Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 27, 2022 - Viva & Barnes

02:09:54

Elon Musk & Twitter; Hunter Biden Compromised; MSM Thinks WE ARE IDIOTS! Viva Frei Live

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	How do you feel?
	How do you feel when you see something beautiful and prices being apparently destroyed before you rise?
	Do you feel afraid?
	Do you feel afraid?
	It's a little bit.
	It's a little bit.
	Where is that feeling when you see the planet being destroyed by your four very eyes?
	Obscene.
	Oh no.
	Hey, shaman.
	This painting is protected by glass.
	It's justified.
	Shut up!
	Take away from that.
	Vulnerable people in the global south, they are not protected.
	The future of our children is not protected.
	People in view of poverty who need to choose between eating or eating are not protected.
	All right.
	Here's the question.
	How do you deal with that?
	Like, what's the way to deal with that?
	Let me just make sure the lighting is good.
	My insulating mat is in frame.
	Headphones are in frame.
	We're witnessing.
	If we don't consider that to be a form of what is otherwise known as behavioral...
	Mass formation psychosis is just another fancy term for behavioral psychology.
	Mic check.
	We'll get it.
	USB.
	So we got the good camera.
	That's what I had to reboot my freaking computer twice.
	Here we go.
	Is that better?
	A little ASMR viva in the early afternoon.
	Good afternoon, everyone.
	So I'm reading the chat.
	What is the way to do this?
	This phenomenon.
	And it's not...
	Occurring at the same rate, just more people are reporting on it.
	It's occurring more now.
	Why?
	One reason people might immediately accuse me of being a hypocrite is that media is giving it attention.
	Giving it attention, but not necessarily in the right way.
	And so you have copycat vandalizers in as much as you have copycat or other...
	Replicating a behavior for much more sinister acts of violence.
	That might be one reason.
	The other reason?
	The media might be generating this type...
	Well, let's not call it psychosis, mass formation psychosis.
	Let's call it behavioral psychology.
	The media might actually be writing the political permission slip for people to do this.
	Because when the media says...
	The earth has 12 years to live.
	It's a climate crisis.
	We will all be dead if nobody does something, if you don't reduce your carbon footprint while your political elite gallivant across the world in their private jets to attend their meetings in Davos, Switzerland, wherever.
	Behavioral chicanery.
	I like that.
	The political permission slip has been written by the media.
	And you get these people now.
	It's very easy to see how these people view themselves as the heroes in their own story.
	They've been given the political permission slip.
	They've been whipped into a form of frenzy, a form of delusion, a form of hysteria.
	I mean, it's Greta Van Susteren.
	Is it Greta Van Susteren?
	Greta Van Susteren is the other one.
	Greta Van Thunberg.
	Greta Thunberg?
	Whatever.
	You know who I'm talking about.
	It's that level hysteria in young people whose brains are not yet fully developed.
	But now the question is this.
	What's the deterrent?
	Give them a massive fine that they'll never be able to pay?
	Lock them in jail for a year?
	Make martyrs out of them?
	I don't know.
	Physical violence is never the solution.
	It'll only make them more of martyrs in the eyes of themselves and others who are already believing in this.
	What's the deterrent?
	The little velvet rope is not the deterrent anymore.
	Well, Mark Mark makes the point.
	Mother Nature's not that weak, no, but we are.
	And this whole, the climate is changing when someone think of the children.
	It's a very, very, even assuming they're right.
	Let's just assume that they're right.
	It's a very selfish perspective because Mother Earth will heal herself in a generation or two, in a century or two, in a millennia or two, which in the grand scheme of the cosmos...
	It's a sliver of paper.
	It's a slice of paper in the encyclopedias of the universe.
	What they mean is it's going to be hard on humans.
	Pretend it's about the animals.
	Pretend it's about...
	The Earth has had, what, four mass extinctions in its history?
	Animals come in and out of existence all the time?
	We could destroy the Earth with a nuclear war, annihilate all of humankind and animal kind, and within...
	I don't know, a cool million years, the earth will restore herself.
	It's the way it is.
	But it doesn't matter.
	We have created a mass hysteria now where young, influential, not influential, is that the word?
	Influential, no.
	What is the word when you're susceptible of influence?
	That's influential.
	Easily influenced individuals.
	The cool thing now, go pretend to sabotage or go sabotage, go Vandalize a historical work of art.
	You'll be a hero.
	Yeah, we're going to get to the sink, by the way.
	We're going to get to a lot of this, because call me an idiot, and I sometimes am thoroughly convinced that I am, I didn't get the joke for a very, very long time.
	I thought it was a computer, and therefore it made no sense when I was watching it.
	Okay, we are going to move over to Rumble, and just so everybody knows, we've got some fun stuff, some quirky stuff.
	Keith Wilson is coming back on.
	He's going to talk about the dismissal for mootness and maybe give us a little rundown on the Emergencies Act Inquiry Commission that's going on simultaneously to this stream.
	On Viva Clips, on YouTube, and on a separate livestream on Rumble, I'm running, just as the day goes along, the Emergencies Act Inquiry Commission, which is going on for another month, I think.
	I think it goes on until the end of November.
	So I'm running that at the same time.
	So if anybody wants to watch that, go watch it.
	It's boring.
	I pop in and out after the stream.
	It's going to go on.
	Today, what's on our menu?
	First of all, New York Post was hacked, and they started posting some things which are not funny.
	But I guess, you know, the purpose of the hack is to rattle the system.
	You know, nothing really legally is there.
	It's just an interesting story of the day.
	Elon Musk looks like he's finalizing the deal with Twitter.
	And is showing up at his new offices.
	And some people are not too happy because the rumor on the street was that Elon is going to cut the Twitter employee force by up to 75%.
	What else do we have?
	Let me just get my notes.
	That being my Twitter feed.
	We are going to move...
	Oh, we got...
	The impending Bill C-11 is now in its second reading at the Senate.
	And it looks like it might pass, and that might be the end of the free internet in Canada.
	Hunter Biden.
	We're not going to let Hunter Biden get forgotten.
	We're not going to let everything they said about Donald Trump and his family is true of Joe Biden and his family.
	And it's not whether or not foreign interests have blackmail material on Hunter Biden.
	It's a given.
	The only question is, do we know everything?
	That they know at this point.
	Of course, it wouldn't be blackmail material if they didn't have it.
	But there's news.
	There's news.
	That laptop from hell went from Russian disinformation to confirmed information.
	And now it would seem that foreign interests might have the goods on the Bidens.
	And Caitlyn Jenner, a transgender, takes issue with Dylan Mulvaney and normalizing the bulge.
	We'll get there in a bit.
	But before we do any of that...
	And as much as some of you don't like it, hey, I've got sponsors.
	They are courageous people to sponsor the hinged, fringed minority with unacceptable views.
	And today's sponsor, I don't have the picture of it, it's the air purification filter that I have in my own home.
	It's called EnviroCleanse.
	The website is ekpure.com.
	It's about the size of a very small portable fridge.
	Air purification, for those of you who don't know that you might have problems mold, Contaminants, bacteria.
	If you don't have people with asthma in your family, things like this might not be much of an issue or you might not notice them, but they are an issue.
	And we had a filter back in Canada.
	It was a piece of junk.
	I've got a great filter now.
	EKPure is the website.com.
	You can't get into all the technical details.
	Patented technology used by the Department of Defense, and it's in 300,000 classrooms in America.
	And my goal would be to try to get it into 300,000 classrooms in Canada so that Canadian children don't have to open the windows in winter for proper air circulation.
	They can use one of these filters.
	It's got a HEPA filter.
	It's got patented technology in the actual filter section of it.
	I don't know how it works, but it's minerals that nullify, neutralize bacteria up to a half or a quarter the size of the ronavirus.
	They promise it will reduce...
	The spread of viruses during flu season purifies the air.
	Patented technology, amazing stuff.
	You can get 10% off.
	If you need one, you know you need one.
	10% off if you use the promo code VIVA.
	ekpure.com, promo code VIVA.
	And you get an air quality monitor.
	So you can see what it's actually doing and you can see if your air quality in your place is not good.
	It's quiet.
	It's running right now.
	I have one in my home and it's beautiful.
	EKPure.com, promo code VIVA.
	Links are in the description below.
	Thank you, EKPure.
	You can put up with someone like me and you make a damn good, quiet, quality air filtration, air purification system.
	With that said, everybody, what do we want to start with?
	Do we start with the hack?
	I mean, the hack, it reminds me of the time Elon, not Elon Musk.
	But from Twitter, what's his face?
	Jack Dorsey's Twitter handle got hacked.
	When you hack it, when you hack a website, if you're really thinking about it, what you'd want to do is something subtle.
	Don't even let the institution that's been hacked know that they've been hacked.
	Just start putting out truth.
	Truth that would otherwise never get put out but for the hack.
	But when they hacked Jack Dorsey's Twitter account, They put out a bunch of racist crap and just stupid stuff.
	Stupid stuff to not fully exploit what they've done.
	You shouldn't do it, by the way.
	Totally illegal.
	You'll get caught and you'll be really in big trouble.
	But if you're going to go to jail and you hack Jack Dorsey's Twitter feed or you hack the New York Post and what you put up is crap like what they put up, you're wasting an opportunity to actually wake people up to, you know, I could have thought of...
	Non-racist, informative things to put up.
	But, alas, New York Times is reporting on a hack by the New York Post.
	And there was a call for violence against AOC.
	Not funny.
	I mean, it's not even funny as a hack.
	We're living in absolute bizarre times where the masses, people, can get whipped up into a frenzy real easy.
	To the point where they can start vandalizing historical pieces of art and think they're the heroes.
	The New York Post is investigating a hack that led to a series of vulgar and racist tweets and headlines published on its website and social media channel, the publication said on Thursday.
	The posts on Twitter included a reference to Governing Hoshel of New York falsely attributing statements about her to Representative Lee Zeldin.
	This could indicate a little political motivation.
	If we're going to try to find who might have been the likely culprits to this, Lee Zeldin allegedly said...
	I mean, it's totally implausible.
	I'm not pulling them up.
	Totally implausible what the statements were, but it might show some political motivation.
	Or it's a double-fakey false flag.
	The right doing it to make the left look like they're the ones who did it to make them look bad.
	Who knows?
	Her opponent in the coming election, as well as post-vote Mayor Eric Adams of New York and President Biden's son, Hunter.
	The hacker or hackers also appeared to have access to the Post's internal publishing system.
	Republishing an editorial about Representative AOC and changing the byline to Ben Shapiro, the conservative commentator, the headline was changed to say things that I'm not saying even as a joke, even to report on it.
	A spokeswoman confirmed that the Post had been hacked.
	The funny, I mean, I say there's only one funny thing about this.
	I went back to the New York Post's Twitter feed after they seemed to have re-established it, and I wasn't sure if it was still hacked or not.
	I mean, there were no racist or vile tweets calling for violence, but the headlines, unclear if it was still being hacked.
	Oh...
	Thank you.
	So, I mean, it...
	It's a wasted opportunity where you could have used that opportunity to maybe publish things that would have said, holy crap, I never realized that.
	That might be true.
	That might get taken down afterwards.
	Oh, like, I don't know, things related to the jibby jab.
	Things related to the jibby jab, which we're going to talk about here before we go on over to Rumble exclusively when Keith Wilson gets in here so we can talk about...
	The latest.
	Get ready to want to pull your hair out from the stupidity.
	It's not just that MSM, mainstream media, legacy media, the science.
	It's not just that they're corrupt.
	It's not just that they're propagandists.
	It's not just that they tow the narrative stubbornly.
	It's that they think we are absolute I mean, absolute idiots.
	I follow someone who's been on the channel, Clifton Duncan on Twitter, and he shared a link, and I said, no, I couldn't believe that it was a real story.
	I couldn't believe it was a real story, and I had to Google it, and lo and behold, it's a real story published in...
	Where else?
	None other than the Washington Compost.
	Oh, get these things out of here.
	Get this out of here.
	Wait until...
	Get...
	Oh, you sons of the beastings.
	How do I get rid of those so I can actually read the article?
	There we go.
	Okay.
	This is a real article published by an outlet that calls itself news, that wants us to take it seriously, that treats us like we are idiots.
	Abject, juvenile idiots.
	But I think even a child would understand this is absolute stupidity.
	But it's so in your face.
	I'm not going to make any historical analogies.
	It's so in your face.
	You have to say, how could anyone lie like this to me?
	How can anyone treat me like I'm so stupid that I wouldn't know that this is the stupidest, most insulting thing that will cause me not only to lose faith in the Washington compost, Of which I have none left.
	But in science and medical experts themselves.
	Listen to this.
	The Washington Post.
	Regular exercise may improve the effectiveness of coronavirus vaccines.
	I say everybody should practice law for a bit.
	Long enough to build character.
	Long enough to build certain reflexes.
	But not long enough to crush your soul.
	I say 13 years is on the verge of too long to crush your soul.
	Everybody should take a philosophy course and it's called basic logic.
	Everybody should take basic logic.
	You don't have to get into like the Heidegger type philosophy.
	You just need to know how arguments work, how logic works, so you can dissect and analyze the abject stupidity of what we are being tried to be led to believe right now.
	Regular exercise not may increase your ability to fight.
	Viruses and might increase your ability to fight the coronavirus in particular.
	Something which many people have been noticing and commenting on and concluding since the beginning, since before vaccines all get there.
	No, regular exercise doesn't help your body.
	It helps the vaccine help your body.
	Exercisers who are vaccinated...
	We're about 25% less likely to be hospitalized with COVID than sedentary people who received the same vaccine, a study found.
	Oh, really?
	How about you just run that exact same study on people who were not vaccinated?
	Oh, what's that?
	There's nobody left?
	Oh, isn't that convenient?
	By Gretchen Reynolds.
	Gretchen Reynolds.
	Okay, never heard of her.
	Regular exercise could amplify the benefits of your next coronavirus vaccination or booster.
	Not your natural immune system.
	As we have always known, vitamin C, vitamin D, exercise, sunlight, active...
	No.
	It'll help the booster.
	Even if you schedule your shot weeks or months from now, according to a new study...
	Of the effects of regular physical activity and vaccines.
	We're going to get to the study in a second.
	Unbelievable.
	The study which involved almost 200,000...
	That's a lot of people.
	200,000 men and women in South Africa.
	South Africa!
	The same country, by the way, where Albert Bourla claimed the vaccine was 100% effective at avoiding COVID cases.
	Oh, that's an interesting way of reiterating the disputed claim now.
	We never told you that the vaccine would prevent transmission like Albert Bourla did in his April 1, 2021 tweet.
	We never told you that.
	So let's flood the market now with articles reiterating the claim that no one said was made that it was...
	Oh, it effectively prevented severe illness, not transmission, severe illness.
	Notice, by the way, all of the articles are going to flood the market now with this statement, so that anytime you Google effectiveness of the coronavirus vaccine, it's always, as of now, the results are going to be as relates to severe illness and not as relates to transmission, as though they never said it.
	There's like...
	There's compelled memory holing, there's algorithmic memory holing, and then there's flooding the market with search results that are going to effectively memory hole what actually happened.
	Hold on.
	I've actually, I've got to see what's going on in the chat.
	I want to see what people's reactions are to this in the chat.
	TimeBandit66 says, Viva, do you have a PO box?
	I have a signed CD to send you.
	I DMed you through your merch site, but you will never see it.
	I have a PO box.
	It's in the about on YouTube.
	Check it out.
	And let me see what other...
	Looks of incredulity that we're going to see in the chat.
	They want you to believe, first of all, just repeat it again, even though no one asked, that the vaccine was virtually, what did they say?
	Virtually.
	It effectively prevented severe illness in most of them.
	But it worked best in people who exercised regularly.
	I mean, how do you even contradict such serious levels of stupidity?
	How do you even contradict the levels?
	It's like saying, I couldn't even think of an analogy and I don't think we need to.
	The vaccine, the effectiveness was increased by exercise and not natural immunity, not your natural body system strength.
	They wound up 25% less likely to be hospitalized with COVID than sedentary people, although everyone received the same vaccine.
	Oh, it's almost like being sedentary is less healthy in general.
	No, no, it wasn't the less sedentary.
	It was the less sedentary caused the vaccine not to work as well.
	I think this study adds to the growing evidence that along with vaccination, daily physical activity is the most important thing you can do to prevent severe COVID-19, said Robert Salas.
	We knew that from before vaccines.
	We knew who was being hospitalized with COVID before vaccines.
	Obesity, underlying physical conditions, underlying illness.
	We knew that before vaccines.
	And by the way, they're burying the lead in there.
	Now they're going to say, well, we never said it was, you know, it was only exercise that helped the vaccine.
	We also said, you know, what everyone knew.
	He has researched COVID and exercise, but was not involved in the new study.
	Oh, okay.
	That's probably why he knew that exercise was good for the immune system in general.
	The study's findings raised questions, though, about how much or how little exercise might best magnify vaccine benefits and whether it is too late to benefit if you already have been fully vaccinated or will be soon.
	That's not the question anybody with half a brain is asking.
	How long does this absolute trash go on for?
	Is that it?
	Trash.
	It's dishonest, disingenuous trash.
	But even among the fully vaccinated, exercise made a significant difference in COVID outcomes, said John Patricios, a professor of clinical medicine and health sciences at University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg.
	Vaccinated people who walked or otherwise exercised moderately for at least 150 minutes a week were almost three times less likely to be hospitalized if they developed COVID than were those who were sedentary.
	In more concrete terms, their vaccines protected them about 25%.
	This is so stupid.
	This is idiocracy.
	I'm sorry.
	My blood pressure is actually rising.
	This is Brando-level idiocracy.
	In more concrete terms, the vaccines protected the healthy.
	Those who exercise.
	About 25% better.
	You have to be stupid.
	To believe this, and you have to be stupid and or dishonest to say this and expect anyone to say, oh, oh, crap.
	I'm going to go exercise to increase the benefits of my vaccine.
	The study was associated, though.
	The study was associational, though, meaning it shows links between activity and COVID outcomes.
	While it does not prove that being active causes vaccines to be more effective, the links were consistent and the effects large.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	Did you just, in the end of the article, admit that you're actual liars?
	And that the Washington Post, for about however long this crappy piece of rubbish has been drafted for, was misleading everybody?
	He also believes the relationship would be similar for exercise and other coronavirus vaccines, such as Moderna.
	How about exercise and COVID?
	Let's just see this.
	Exercise COVID hospitalizations.
	Exercise COVID hospitalizations.
	Thank you.
	Regular exercise can help shield you from severe COVID.
	When was this from?
	August 23rd.
	Let's go back.
	Physical inactivity is associated with higher risk for severe illness.
	When was this from?
	COVID outcomes.
	When was this from?
	This was from 2021.
	Where's the date?
	I saw it somewhere.
	I saw 2021 somewhere.
	There you go.
	2021.
	What else?
	Let's see here.
	Regular exercises.
	This is April 2021.
	Regular exercise shielded COVID-19 patients from hospitalization death.
	Let's go back even earlier.
	2020.
	Did I do something wrong in the search?
	Exercise COVID hospitalization 2020.
	It is so pathologically disingenuous.
	But they have to continue selling the vaccine right now.
	Smoking was an added risk factor.
	Diabetes, obesity, underlying medical condition.
	2021 April, this is even before, it's not before the vaccines, but before it was known.
	Lack of physical activity, not being healthy, diabetes, obesity, increased your likelihood radically of being hospitalized with COVID.
	But now they've got to sell the vaccines.
	They've got to keep pushing them.
	Because as Joe Biden said, not enough people have been boosted.
	And so what do they have the disingenuous dishonesty?
	The audacity to think we are stupid.
	Exercise increases the vaccine efficacy, the vaccine efficiency.
	Even though the purchase orders for the vaccine force member states to acknowledge that the efficacy and safety of the vaccine is not yet known.
	It's not known.
	It causes an erosion of trust in every institution that we have been brought up to trust.
	Media, politicians, and most importantly now, the medical field.
	Science, the experts.
	It's an insult.
	All right.
	What else do we got here?
	I didn't do the standard intro.
	No medical advice, no election fornication advice, no legal advice, yada, yada.
	Did you see MSNBC says we need foreign allies to monitor our elections?
	I didn't see that.
	I didn't see that, but I mean, I have no doubt.
	No doubt that it's the case.
	Thank you very much.
	Ehef for the Super Chat.
	Everybody, you should know, YouTube takes 30% of all Super Chats if you choose to support the channel that way.
	The better way...
	Go follow us on Rumble.
	There's a $50 Rumble rant from John Meese, who says, have you seen the case of the West Virginia judge in divorce court that goes straight to a man's house in the middle of the hearing and forcibly searches his house herself?
	I did not, John Mayese.
	$50 Rumble rant.
	Thank you very much.
	Rumble takes 20% of Rumble rants versus YouTube 30% of Super Chats.
	I'm going to go find that video.
	Maybe afterwards when I have a pause.
	I'm going to crack my back.
	Oh yeah, that was good.
	No, I saw the live stream.
	There was a court hearing where a man who was accused of domestic abuse, I think, and had a restraining order against his wife was in his wife's house during the very same hearing.
	And that was intense to watch.
	TimeBandit66, a $5 rumble rant, says, Viva, I think the most important question not being asked is why...
	Why did they do it?
	George Carlin, it's a big club and you're not in it.
	They are so far into this lie right now.
	They're so far into culpability.
	I mean, look, here's the why.
	It's corruption, and then it's the old, when you tell one lie, it leads to another, and you tell two lies to cover for the other.
	You tell three lies, and then boy brother, You're in the deep SHIT.
	Whether or not it started off as malice, I think in retrospect now, it could not but have started off as malice.
	We said it at the time, you cannot rush certain things.
	You cannot rush things which require nothing but the mere passage of time.
	It's like the...
	The matzah story from leaving Egypt.
	You can't make bread rise faster than it can rise when it just requires time.
	It's even a bad analogy because you could, in theory, come up with some technology that causes bread to rise real quick, like without yeast or whatever.
	You know what I mean?
	As far as safety goes, as far as efficacy goes, it needs time.
	Because here's the issue, and people smarter than me were calling it earlier.
	The jibby jab could be, let's just say it could be, Totally effective at preventing COVID infection for a certain period of time.
	Could be 100% effective, as Albert Bula now wrongly asserted in his April 1, 2021 tweet.
	It could be.
	Okay.
	But you need time to know, is it going to be 100% effective, or are there going to be adverse consequences once...
	Immunity wanes once the vaccine wears off.
	Will it make you more susceptible to COVID infection in a year?
	You can't know that until that happens.
	You can't know that until it happens.
	You can't know what the effect of the jibby jab are going to be on pregnant women until women start getting pregnant after having been vaccinated, start delivering after having been vaccinated.
	So it's going to take, I don't know, just at the very least six months.
	Maybe nine months.
	Maybe more.
	You can't say that in advance.
	So they were saying things in advance that they could not have been saying in advance.
	And then it goes fucking sour.
	I mean, if you don't think it's gone sour, if you don't think it's gone south, we're living in different realms of reality.
	It's gone south.
	And then they have to start covering up for it.
	And they need the media that's been in their pocket, that's been working hand-in-hand selling this product to now cover up.
	Because it went from being negligent, arguably, to being potentially culpable.
	And they can't admit it now because it would open up a can of worms.
	I just got a notification from Timcast that Elon, the deal, went through.
	They're too far gone now.
	And now they have to cover it up and they have to keep covering it up and they have to just get everybody to get it.
	And that way, there's no test group, although there will be, and I see them taking pride in being purebloods.
	Get everybody to take it, double down, triple down, and try to make people actually stupider.
	Brandon, Brando.
	What is it called?
	Brondo.
	It's got what plants needs.
	Oh, the vaccine is so good that if you exercise and get healthy, it helps the vaccine.
	Okay, I see Keith in the backdrop.
	What we're going to do now, everybody, because I want this...
	We're going to reward...
	A platform that actually respects freedom of speech.
	We're going to bring everybody over there now to the Rumbles.
	So I can bring in Keith.
	It'll be exclusive on Rumble and it'll be on YouTube tomorrow.
	So, Keith, I'm going to bring you in a second.
	Everybody, mosey on over to Rumble.
	The link is there.
	I'm going to end the stream here and I will see you all on Rumble.
	Tabarnouche, I don't want to make a mistake.
	Removing from YouTube, head on over to Rumble.
	I'll see you there in 3, 2, 1. And now I go over to Rumble and I see the numbers.
	Oh yes, go up.
	26, 24, 5. Okay, bringing in Keith now.
	And I'm going to clip this portion of the interview and post it to Viva Clips tomorrow so that we can have everybody see it.
	Keith doesn't have some explaining to do.
	The government has some explaining to do and we're going to need Keith to do it for us.
	Keith, get ready.
	You're on.
	Hello, can you hear me?
	I can hear you.
	And now the inquiry, I think, is on break.
	Yes.
	So I'm not going to be hearing the inquiry and you at the same time.
	Let me bring you in a little closer here.
	There we go.
	Keith, let me ask the question that I think everybody's asking.
	What does it feel like to have your heart ripped out of your chest and then have a judge stomp it on the ground?
	Well, disappointing.
	Very disappointing.
	And the reason I find it so disappointing...
	Viva, I think you know that I have been criticized by others in our profession, other lawyers, and they're in a pessimist class.
	They've criticized me for, like, why are you doing this?
	Why are you trying to uphold charter rights in Canada right now?
	And the reason is, is that...
	First of all, I think our charter rights are fundamentally important.
	Basic human rights and freedoms are critically important to live a successful and a good life.
	So it's critically important.
	But the way I look at it is this.
	Either the institution is real or it's corrupt.
	And in my view, the best way to reach the proper conclusion about that...
	Is to bring carefully crafted, properly founded, procedurally accurate charter challenges before the court.
	So that's what we did.
	Premier Peckford, the last living signatory to our constitution and our charter, remarkable, is my client, along with a number of other applicants.
	And he fundamentally believed that his right to mobility was obviously violated by the federal government's travel mandates.
	So, what I believe is that we need to give the court a chance to prove itself as a worthy institution and or we need to allow the court to expose itself as a corrupt institution because it's only through that exposure that reform can occur.
	So, you know, that's why...
	This case is so important.
	It's just one of the reasons it's so important.
	There are many.
	So when the court, at a point in the process, where, as you know, and your viewers will know, the government put forward 16 witnesses, 5 external experts, 11 internal of the highest officials, that...
	The Prime Minister and the ministers kept claiming they were relying on for the advice of experts to justify restricting millions and millions of Canadians' rights.
	You know, that was an exhaustive process, as you and I have talked about, and it's amazing.
	I mean, the motion record, the compendium of evidence, is approximately just under 15,000 pages.
	And so here we have this full case ready to go.
	We had our factums completed.
	The only thing that needed to occur that hadn't occurred is next Monday, the 31st of October, we were supposed to appear before the court for oral argument.
	All the evidence was filed.
	All the factums are done.
	So, instead, the federal government, their lawyers, brought an application seeking to strike out our claim and prevent the court from hearing and finishing it on the grounds that it was moot.
	We had an oral hearing before the court here in Ottawa, where I am now, but for the inquiry, on the 21st of September, and we made the case as to why this case wasn't moot.
	And as you know, the court issued a quick ruling last week in the sense, or a brief ruling without reasons, late on a Thursday afternoon, advising us that the case was being thrown out and struck.
	Let me stop you there for just one second, because it's the curse of knowledge.
	For anybody who doesn't really know the absolute 30,000-foot overview, Brian Peckford, Maxime Bernier, other petitioners challenged, asked for judicial review on the basis of charter violations for the Trudeau mandate that unvaccinated Canadians could not board planes and trains.
	Charter violation, it goes through the courts for about nine months, 16 witnesses, the whole process, the whole shebang.
	In the interim, at some point, when it becomes politically unpopular, Trudeau suspends the impugned order and then says, well, now that we've suspended it, your case no longer has an object, no case in controversy.
	They made a motion to strike for mootness.
	That was argued, and it was granted.
	And that's where we are right now.
	And Keith, it was a very short, succinct judgment that came virtually a month after the hearing.
	No motivation or what it's called, no reasoning whatsoever.
	How did it take a month for the judge to allow you guys to know not to prepare for the upcoming hearing which started 10 days later?
	Well, and we had already started preparing.
	I mean, as I was coordinating with the other lawyers, both my team and the teams of lawyers for the other applicants, because it's a consolidated application, so we all work together as required.
	I remember sending an email to the team, the broadest team of our lawyers, on the Monday that we did, finally, of that last week, saying, okay, now they're jerking us around.
	Like, there's just no way that...
	This should take this long.
	The court knows full well that we're locked into preparations.
	We're burning through our clients legal money and limited money it is.
	And so I'm just very disappointed.
	I think it was bad form.
	I'm part of the court.
	If that was their decision, why did it take so long to make it, especially without reasons?
	I could possibly see a decision taking that long if there was a comprehensive set of reasons that went with it, but there wasn't.
	So I'm very disappointed in the court.
	And it's part of a trend.
	It's part of a trend that we've seen, although, as you know, as you and I both know, there was an aberration in the trend, fortunately, yesterday, or was it the day before, in Nova Scotia, where a court went, what I think, the right way.
	But the courts have just been so reluctant to touch anything related to COVID.
	To touch anything related to the charter and COVID, anything related to these outrageous government overreach actions, whether it's the Quebec government's bizarre curfews, to forcing businesses to close, to shutting down playgrounds and swimming pools, to preventing us from gathering at Christmas and at funerals and at weddings.
	All of these things.
	The court has to deal with this stuff, and whether it's awkward and difficult is not an excuse, and it just really feels like the court's become politicized.
	Keith, before we even get there, just so people appreciate this, because the hearing was on September 21st, and we did an interview on the 22nd, and I agreed.
	I don't know who said it, but it was common sort of assessment.
	The longer the court took to issue a decision, the less likely it would be to dismiss it, because It was a five-day hearing.
	Oral arguments that you had scheduled.
	Was it five or ten days?
	How many days?
	Five days starting next Monday, October 31st.
	So five days.
	Arguments.
	You don't prepare for that the day before, the week before.
	You have 15,000 pages of evidence.
	You prepare for that.
	You were probably preparing for that before the motion to strike on mootness.
	How the judge then waits nearly a month for an unmotivated decision where the judge presumably knew that's exactly what...
	It's a male judge, he was going to say?
	Well, no, the judge, it was the deputy chief justice of the federal court that heard our case.
	So it was not a judge of insignificance.
	No, so the judge hears it.
	The judge knows that he knows where he's going.
	It doesn't take a month to let you know no trial and ha-ha, you've been preparing for three weeks.
	I mean, I don't know if it's a question you can answer.
	To me, that feels deliberate.
	That feels like a needle.
	Above and beyond everything else to make you burn through your clients' money.
	Peckford is burning through actual money.
	The government, probably preparing as well, burning through our money.
	Is it deliberate?
	Is there any rational explanation for it?
	Well, I mean, I can only speculate and base it on my experience.
	I've been a litigator for 28 years and done many cases and lots of judicial reviews against governments.
	I just thought it was highly unusual to verging in on improper, that the court would wait that long, knowing full well the magnitude of evidence and complexity of evidence that we were working to distill for a cogent argument in a coordinated manner between four different applicant groups.
	So I'm very disappointed in what the court has done.
	Now, another thing I've heard, and I'm not sure what the applicable rule is, that you have 30 days to appeal, but is the 30 days from the unmotivated judgment, or is it 30 days from when you get the actual reason so you know what you're appealing?
	It's 30 days from the short decision that says your case is dismissed, reasons to follow.
	However, fortunately, unlike other forums and jurisdictions, the federal court And just to be clear, because you know the answer, but for all of your viewers, we are appealing.
	I phoned Premier Peckford immediately upon receiving the decision.
	I said, sir, my recommendation is that we appeal, and what is your instruction?
	He said, absolutely.
	You are appealing.
	No expletive.
	Not that I think Peckford swears, but if there's a time to swear, that's the time a polite person would swear.
	If I may ask you...
	He gets this incredible resolve in his voice.
	It's just he's such a leader.
	We're so gifted as a country to have had him as a premier, and you look at his accomplishments.
	Have him as a founding father of our charter and now have him, having taken such a strong stance in support of Canadians' rights and critiquing government overreach, we're very fortunate.
	Fortunate.
	And then, I mean, you compare a leader like Peckford to current administration, who I will not even call a leader for the sake of it.
	But I won't ask you.
	That's my opinion, Keith.
	You're not guilty by association.
	So, I mean, obviously going to appeal.
	Are you going to need or have issues raising funds?
	I mean, how is that going?
	We need help.
	So first of all, you know I've asked to keep our discussion focused on Peckford right now.
	You know that I've just come out of the hearing room and the public inquiry.
	So the Justice Centre is supporting two legal teams here at the public inquiry.
	And also is funding the appeal for Peckford.
	And so our burn rate is very high.
	I have offered a further reduction in my hourly rate to help with the staying power.
	But yeah, if people want to help, they could go to the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms.
	The nice thing about donating through the Justice Center is it's safe.
	You won't get your bank account frozen.
	Not yet.
	Who knows?
	Well, you know who's going to defend you.
	We're ready.
	And you get a charitable receipt because they're a full legal charity.
	So you can actually get a...
	It can be a wash for you.
	For what you donate, you actually get...
	The same discount on your income taxes.
	So don't forget that.
	I'm going to give more as of the time we end this, but I'm trying to find the...
	Is there a specific link?
	I'm on the website now for...
	There'll be a dropdown and you can either pick...
	It'll be the Travel Mandate Challenge or Peckford Travel Mandate Challenge, it'll say.
	And then there'll be another one that'll talk about Freedom Trucker ones for those who are interested in supporting what's going on at the public inquiry and all the other, the criminal defense for Chris Barber and others.
	So, yeah, that would be very, very much appreciated.
	I haven't been bringing that up much lately, but we could sure use some help.
	I'll put the link there and then I'll put the specific sublink afterwards when I can find it.
	So you're going to appeal.
	Now, I talked about it yesterday because I think it just came out yesterday.
	Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, provincial court of appeal, not federal, overturned their prior restraint, injunction on outdoor protests because of security.
	I mean, pretty scathing judicially.
	Court ruling said, obviously, ex parte.
	Hearing on an injunction totally improper.
	Their expert witness probably should not have been recognized as such.
	And they way overstepped the bounds of science and law.
	And they said we agreed to hear it despite the argument for mootness.
	Is that going to help you in any meaningful way?
	It's a provincial appellate court, but will that have any sway, any influence on a federal court of appeal?
	I think so.
	For two reasons.
	You know, one is legal.
	As you know, the principle of stare decisis and other precedents influence, but there's a hierarchy.
	And so a provincial level court, even a superior court, is not binding against the federal court.
	However, I think it's helpful.
	It informs the court and it's something that they should consider and they're required to consider.
	But it's also helpful at a more practical level because...
	You know, it always takes that one person in the crowd to stand up when the others are sitting nervously and perhaps too afraid or too complacent or just drank the Kool-Aid to say, no, this is wrong.
	And when one stands, another can stand and more and more can rise.
	So I hope that's what we see happening here.
	We've had our federal court, or sorry, our Court of Appeal in Alberta issue a very strong ruling in the Pastor Paslowski case with some very strong and proper judicial condemnation of the flakiness of the lower court decisions and their rush to be cheerleaders.
	For government policy without critiquing it and making their decision based on the evidence.
	So I'm hoping this is part of a pattern.
	And it doesn't matter because I've been on your program a few times and I think one of the things you've learned about me is I'm a little bit on the stubborn side.
	So we're going to keep going, man.
	They think they're discouraging me.
	They're wrong.
	Well, I mean, I guess that's a good segue into what's going on now with the Emergency Act inquiry.
	That's all the news for Peckford?
	Let me just do a map out for everyone because Peckford was even wanting me, needed help on, wanted certainty around what I'm about to say.
	So here's the road ahead.
	So, we filed the appeal against the mootness motion, or the mootness ruling, to strike our claim, so our claim struck.
	That gets heard by the Federal Court of Appeal, because we're currently in the Federal Court, so we go to the Federal Court of Appeal.
	If the Federal Court of Appeal agrees with the Federal Court and says, no, that was the right decision and your claim struck, we will then appeal that decision to the Supreme Court of Canada, okay?
	And to go to the Supreme Court of Canada, you need leave, so you'll seek leave, and then you either say, no, we're not hearing it, in which case you're done, or they say, yeah, we'll hear it.
	If we go to the federal court of, when we get to the federal court of appeal, and the federal court of appeal says, you're right, Mr. Wilson and all the other lawyers, that the court got it wrong and should not have struck down your case and should have held that hearing, five-day hearing, On the 31st of October, we then go back to the federal court to run that five-day hearing.
	Of course, that'll be at some point in the future.
	And if after hearing the five-day hearing in the federal court, they rule against us and say that it was demonstrably justified for the federal government to restrict 6 million Canadians' fundamental right to travel by train and plane.
	Preventing millions of Canadians from being at the side of dying loved ones, attending funerals, going to weddings, the birth of first grandchildren, caring for loved ones, discharged from hospital, or being at important social events, whether it's 50th anniversaries or graduation ceremonies.
	If the court says, no, that was okay, then we'll appeal that as well.
	So we're just going to keep going because, as I've said before...
	I've said it many times, and you're going to keep hearing me say it, which is Canadians need to know, does the charter mean anything?
	Like, were we all duped?
	I think I joked on your program that I was going to sue Osgood Hall for...
	For my constitutional law class because my professors told me that it actually was a real substantive document that conveyed real rights to Canadians and limited government overreach.
	So we need to know and we're going to keep pursuing it.
	So that's the road ahead.
	If there's a university that at this point deserves to be sued, it might be Western specifically for their booster mandate.
	I don't know if they took that back.
	Ridiculous.
	So just so everybody also appreciates Americans, if you're watching, we've got state courts.
	We've got provincial courts.
	And federal court system, much like states and the federal in the United States, if the mootness gets appealed, if it gets upheld on the mootness, it goes to the Supreme Court.
	I mean, I guess the federal government could appeal the reinstatement of the lawsuit, but probably wouldn't.
	That would have minimal chances of being heard by the SCOTUS.
	Supreme Court of Canada, SEC.
	Then it goes back for the merits, and if you win on the merits, they probably take it to the Supreme Court.
	If you lose on the merits, you take it to the Supreme Court.
	One way or the other, In two to three years, we'll have a resolution.
	That might not make people very happy or very encouraged, but we'll see what happens to the world between now and then.
	The Emergencies Act Inquiry.
	You're there now watching this and you're attending with your team all day long, every day, right?
	Yeah, they're long days.
	As you can maybe hear in my voice, I'm recovering from a cold.
	I ran myself down too much.
	And I got knocked out of action for a few days just as the hearing inquiry was starting a week and a half ago or two weeks ago.
	But it's been fascinating.
	I represent Tamara Leach and Chris Barber and Danny Bulford and Tom Marazzo and many of the other original volunteers that came together to make this freedom convoy what it became.
	And as you know as well, myself and Eva Chipiuk arrived on the ground on February 2nd with the support of the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms funding us and we provided on the ground legal help To the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa.
	We did the negotiations with the city manager and then later with the mayor and got that deal.
	So this is a little strange to be back in Ottawa for me.
	But this inquiry is a very serious process and they're very long days.
	We're up to over 20,000 records and a record can be as short as one page and up to many hundreds or thousands.
	So we're up to about 50,000 documents and we get new documents every day.
	And we have to identify the witnesses that we intend to cross.
	Three days in advance.
	We have to disclose the documents that we're going to put to the police and the government witnesses three days in advance.
	And then we get to ask for how much time we want to cross-examine, you know, whether it's Interim Police Chief Bell who unleashed the goons or whether it's the commissioner of the OPP or whoever who's testifying right as we speak right now.
	And so let's say we say we want an hour and a half to cross-examine them, and then we get our allocations the next day, and it's like you've got 20 minutes.
	So a lot of people, we're getting a lot of emails from people, why aren't you asking this, and why aren't you asking that?
	Well, actually, those questions were on our list when we were planning for an hour and a half, so then we have to triage.
	And watching the judge, the judge is consistently reminding witnesses to go slow, so it's not like you could even have them talk at the speed.
	Which some people talk.
	They've got to go slow.
	That's just limitations.
	Well, one of the things you might have, may not picked up on, but you might have, and if you reflect, it'll become clear, is in the early days, we were putting up lots of documents.
	But then we realized, you'd say, okay, bring up OPP5017362.
	And then you're waiting.
	And you're waiting.
	And you're waiting.
	And then finally the document comes up and then they got it crooked.
	So then they got to rotate it.
	And then they got to scroll up and they got to scroll down.
	And some of the legal teams only get five minutes to cross.
	And then you just chewed through two and a half minutes.
	You just chewed through two and a half minutes of your time trying to get a document up.
	So now you might have noticed that most of the lawyers, they put propositions to the witness.
	We shifted our posture very quickly once we saw this.
	And what you do is you say, there is this document, it exists, and it has these words on it.
	Then you put the question to the witness as opposed to waiting for it to come up as you normally would.
	So we've had to adopt.
	We've also held off showing videos.
	But yesterday we transitioned and it was planned.
	And we showed a video of a Canadian being pulled in their snatch and grab technique, as you know, when they...
	The police line would come up, and they would wait, and then they'd open the line, and they'd pull the Canadian, and then the line would close.
	And then you can see him thrown to the ground as they're fighting with him.
	And then you can see a police officer with his anti-riot gun just smashing this thing, muzzle end first, not even butt end, not that it would have felt that much better being the butt, or, you know, so the stock end of the gun.
	The room got very quiet when that video was played, and we're going to be trying to do a lot more of that in the coming days.
	Well, forget, I mean, I'm no gun aficionado, but forget comfort.
	Muzzle end really increases the likelihood of a fatal mishap if someone pulls a trigger.
	Absolutely.
	What time of day was that at?
	I might just go back and snip and clip so that we can...
	It got played twice in the hearing yesterday, so if you go back and just power through it, you'll see the video pop up.
	It actually got played three times because one of the other legal teams brought it up in cross.
	We put it in in our cross, our cross-examination of the police officials.
	But at a high level, Viva, you know, I warned Chris and Tamara and Danny and Tom and others.
	I said, you know...
	Get ready, because this hearing is just about two months long.
	We're not even close to the halfway point.
	I've never had to be away from my family on a case for this long.
	I warned the whole team.
	I said, we're not going to Ottawa for a case.
	We're being deployed.
	We've really had to adopt a military kind of mindset that we're on a deployment, because we just work day and night, seven days a week.
	But anyway, I had to warn.
	Tamera and others that, you know, be ready for one of the most difficult experiences of your life, of witness after witness coming forward with complete fabrications, recharacterizing what happened in Ottawa in the most negative light imaginable.
	Well, I was wrong, thank goodness, because every day, it hasn't happened yet today, but it might still yet, we sit there and we go, Why aren't we at home already?
	The evidence that has come out against the government has been absolutely spectacular.
	Like, even when they first brought up the Ottawa residents to complain, like, we found out, you know, the horror of hot tubs.
	Horrific.
	That was how the mayor described it.
	And then the protesters had hot tubs, and it was horrific.
	You usually don't get the word hot tub and horrific in the same paragraph.
	There's a video of a woman who allegedly had diarrhea in a hot tub.
	That's horrific.
	Yes, that would be horrific, but there's been no evidence or nor allegation of that.
	They could have thrown that in.
	But what we did find out is that some people felt That Uber Eats was not as available as it was prior to the protest.
	I mean, I was watching it, and people are watching it saying, well, yeah, why isn't it over?
	The evidence is not just scant, but damning against the government.
	That's part and parcel of the reason of this commission, is get that evidence out there so that, in theory, there could be a harshly worded conclusion against Justin Trudeau.
	That he had no basis to invoke it.
	It was pure abuse of power.
	But listening to the highlight for me thus far, above and beyond Zexy Lee talking about how some residents might have gotten their hands on some eggs and might have had their little reprisal.
	It's like, oh, so there actually was violence there and it came at the hands of residents of that high rise.
	What's your name?
	Catherine McKinney?
	Catherine McKinney and Mathieu Fleury.
	When they were testifying.
	First of all, when Mathieu Fleury was talking about the microaggressions, people getting stink-eye for wearing a mask, A, it's a lie, but B, even if it's true, that's the best they got.
	But I mean, were people laughing?
	Were people saying, my goodness, Catherine McKinney is an absolute joke when she told him, whispered to him on a hot mic to answer in French to frustrate Brendan's ability to conduct his cross?
	Were people gasping at the...
	Bad faith gesture that that was.
	Well, the audience does react from time to time, and there's a number of supporters of the Freedom Rights Movement that are in the gallery each day, and I have spoken to them time to time, and I have explained to them that given the nature of this proceeding, the best thing you can do to be helpful is be silent at all times.
	Because if they react in a way, it actually distracts the commissioner.
	And his legal team, his helpers, from focusing on what just happened.
	So, as you know, it's just not helpful.
	This is not the place to do those sorts of things.
	And most of the audience has been very respectful.
	And the other thing, too, that, you know, we're in a completely different world now.
	And systems and processes of institutions haven't adopted.
	What am I talking about?
	The best example is the hot mic.
	And what do I mean by that?
	Well, it actually wasn't that obvious in the room because she whispered.
	But what do your viewers and others do when they watch that and they clip that and they go, wait a minute, did she just whisper to him?
	So they stop it and they play it back and they know how to adjust the sound settings and they crank up the audio and they go.
	And you can hear it clear as day.
	And then when the guy goes to speak, they bring the audio right back down.
	Otherwise, your ears are going to blow out, right?
	And then they clip that.
	And then they put it up on social media.
	And all of a sudden, everybody sees the hot mic moment.
	And so we're in a different time.
	We adopted a very deliberate communication strategy.
	That's partly why I'm not in the hearing room right now because communicating with you is very important in getting accurate information out and it's part of our communication strategy.
	We have no confidence.
	I've been scrummed a few times by Global and CTV and CBC and I'm like...
	I can guarantee 100% this clip won't get on the news because I'll say something bad about the government.
	It's like they're not going to play it.
	It's a joke, and I'm watching Rachel Gilmore.
	She's live tweeting from Global News, and they repeat, like gospel, Jim Watson.
	Was it Jim Watson who said somebody came down from New Brunswick with guns in his trunk threatening to kill him?
	I just asked the question, and maybe there's a police report that shows it.
	Was anybody arrested for issuing threats?
	Oh, no.
	So, you know, you've noticed that I don't take the podium, right?
	Yep.
	And that was a very conscious decision I made to step back as lead counsel.
	Well, you are going to be...
	Are you going to be a witness at some point?
	I think I saw...
	Yeah, that was just confirmed publicly this morning, and I'll be testifying next Wednesday.
	Okay.
	And that's why I've stepped back as barrister.
	So we brought in...
	I searched far and wide.
	And I was really happy to find Brendan Miller and Bathsheba and very pleased that they were willing on short notice to, hey, can you get rid of all your existing cases and come to Ottawa for two months?
	People who don't practice law might not truly appreciate.
	If you're not at a big firm where there are other lawyers to take your files, and even that takes a lot of work, I mean, people won't appreciate.
	It's not like going on vacation.
	Well, and not only that.
	Be involved in one of the most controversial, historic cases of our lifetimes.
	So, you know, most lawyers, too many lawyers are afraid at the career risk of doing the type of work that I and my legal team do.
	Anyway, what's been remarkable is the damning evidence that's come out.
	You know, like the best they got is...
	So we have a social media team.
	And as soon as...
	As soon as they started talking about Uber Eats, we had everybody start posting all their Uber Eats receipts from the protest, right?
	And so everybody's like, well, I got Uber Eats every day.
	I don't know why you didn't get Uber Eats in downtown Ottawa.
	So we're trying to counter them in real time, counter their misinformation.
	And we're going to keep doing that.
	The other thing that was remarkable is the level of...
	The complimentary nature of the evidence from so many police officials about the extent to which the protest organizers were always seeking to stop lone wolf crazy people from doing silly stuff.
	The extent to which they were always advocating that it be peaceful.
	The complete absence of serious criminality that they found.
	the absence of any evidence of, of a terroristic activity, the evidence, the absence of any evidence of all of the criteria, any one of the criteria that are required to invoke the emergency's I mean, the most spectacular one where we literally joked where we were going to call our wives and say, well, it looks like we're coming home, honey, was when the head of the OPP commissioner or superintendent testified, who's the head of their intelligence unit.
	And he's the one who is initiated or heavily involved in what we now know is called Operation Hendon.
	They had the code word for us.
	And he's confirmed that they found no evidence of attempted insurrection.
	They found no evidence of terroristic activity.
	They found no evidence of foreign influence.
	They found no evidence of ideologically motivated extremists.
	They have found no evidence of serious threats of...
	Of political or other violence, etc.
	All of these different permutations of things that the government could cobble together.
	And then, of course, we ask every official after that, do you agree that this inspector is the one that would have the most intelligence and information and evidence regarding these things, right?
	Yeah.
	Do you agree with his testimony?
	Yeah.
	Or they'll say, I don't know.
	And we say, right, you don't know, do you?
	And what's also been fascinating is the only legal teams that have been actually asking questions and drilling down on the evidence as to what this inquiry is about, which is, was the invocation justified?
	Was Prime Minister Trudeau and his cabinet actually facing An existential threat for our country.
	Remember, this is the successor to the War Measures Act.
	So in previous instances, it was invoked in World War I and World War II and the FLQ crisis.
	Did this really come to meet the standard?
	Whereas what the other legal teams are doing is like, you know, the legal team for the Ottawa police is like...
	Oh, it was the RCMP's fault.
	And then the legal counsel for the OPP is like, oh, it was the Ottawa City Police's fault.
	And then the legal counsel for former Chief Slowly, who resigned in the middle of all this, is it wasn't his fault.
	It was the police board's fault.
	And so we've all watched in horror the dysfunction, the egos.
	The blame game going on behind the scenes, and it's all being aired publicly.
	You get the sense the commissioner, Justice Rouleau, is just sitting there going like, really?
	This is what I'm having to deal with here?
	In fighting of a high school nature, Justice Rouleau, he asked a question which really put me in the thinking that he's got this understood properly when...
	He asked a question of one of the police officers after had been examined, cross-examined, and said, look, when you were getting everyone out of the footprint, and Keith, I've got to say, the fact that they refer to the protesters as, you know, a footprint as though they're pollution.
	You know, it's a carbon footprint.
	It's a footprint like they're pollutants on Ottawa.
	I think the wording is interesting.
	But he was asking the police officer, he said, after you start pushing everyone out...
	Did you give them an option as to where they could go to peacefully protest?
	Did you give them an option where they could go legally to continue this but just not in Wellington or on Wellington?
	And he said no.
	Do you think the judge is getting how absurd this is or do you not have any indication one way or the other?
	You know, I can only speculate and I know that's what you're asking me to do.
	He has asked that question at least six or seven witnesses now.
	And I think what he's realizing is the government and the police were overplaying their hand and forcing, not taking opportunities to de-escalate and create dialogue and find a Canadian way out of this protest and this situation by just...
	You're all going to wave the right flag and, you know, hang your heads in shame and leave here humiliated now or we're going to beat you up.
	And, you know, they literally, there was some testimony yesterday about how they cleared the streets of vehicles.
	And I've had several firsthand reports of people reporting this to me.
	It wasn't a truck, you know, a transport truck that they were necessarily smashing the windows out of.
	They did that.
	But if you happen to have your SUV or your rental car or your pickup truck that was clean and had no flags and no markings on it and had an Ontario license plate or a Quebec license plate on it, and you happen to be parked downtown, they came up and smashed out all your windows.
	Like, why even all of them?
	You know, like, why not just one?
	Unlock the door.
	Yeah, there's a power lock.
	You know, you don't even have to go around inside and like old school, you know, and pull the button up.
	So, and then they would turn the key on to accessory mode and then they hauled it out to the storage yard and they left it like that.
	So all these vehicles are full of snow.
	You know, with all the electronics in a modern vehicle.
	Like, why did they have to do that?
	There were so many things.
	Oh, the real one that's been interesting that we're getting out and we're going to have witness testify to it is this practice they had of after they process someone, they do a snatch and grab, pull them through the line, take them to an arrest lineup.
	You know, they're zip-tied behind their back.
	Their gloves have come off.
	I met one person who actually started bleeding because of the zip-tie on his wrist.
	No glove.
	He was showing me he still doesn't have feeling in three of his fingers because of the frostbite.
	And then finally, they would get their primary processing and they'd say, all right, we're not going to charge you.
	We're going to release you.
	But they didn't release them.
	They sent them over to another lineup where they stood up outside and minus 25 with...
	Not including the windchill.
	Then they put them in a paddy wagon.
	Then the paddy wagon sat there for two or three hours.
	And then, remember, they've been told they're not under arrest and they're going to be released.
	So at that moment, the moment they didn't let them go, it's called kidnapping.
	Alright?
	That's illegal detainment.
	So the paddy wagon would then drive them to remote locations outside of the downtown.
	Rural areas.
	They'd release all these people.
	Could you imagine their bewilderment?
	You know, they're dehydrated.
	They haven't been able to use a bathroom.
	They're frostbite.
	Many of them beat up.
	They cut the zip ties off and they drive away.
	And here they are.
	There was no building for shelter.
	There was...
	All of their phones were dead.
	If they still had their phone, because a lot of them lost it in the melee, they were all dead from being in their pocket in that amount of time in the cold.
	And there was no payphone or business or anything else.
	And to do that to hundreds of Canadians, does that sound like Canada to you?
	I can't say what it sounds like to me because I'll get in trouble.
	It's egregious.
	And people don't know about...
	I knew the details about this from some people.
	I mean, when we were down there, people would come back.
	They hauled us off.
	I was outside, you know, beaten up, handcuffed, and hauled off.
	But I actually didn't know about the extent of the injuries.
	I didn't know the extent of, you know, the inhumanity.
	Let's leave it at that.
	Yeah.
	And some of these people they did this to were war veterans that went to Afghanistan.
	To help fight the people of Afghanistan, get human rights.
	People in the chat want me to say it.
	I'm not saying it.
	I think it's criminal.
	I think it's criminal.
	And I don't know how many of them are suing for damages.
	I don't know how many of them can press charges against the authorities.
	I don't know how it works.
	Well, I don't know if you saw the testimony because we put that to the witnesses, the police witnesses yesterday and the day before.
	And so their answer was...
	Because we want to know who came up with this idea.
	Like, there's no way all of these different police officers that were doing this were doing this on their own, right?
	This is not one instance of one paddy wagon getting lost and kicking out 30 Canadians.
	It was happening on scale and at a process level.
	So someone, and it's not in any of their operational plans because we've reviewed all those and it's not in there.
	So whose idea was this and who gave the order for it to be?
	And each of the senior officials with the Ottawa police that we've asked about have completely dodged the question.
	And so we don't know who actually gave that order.
	But it's just one of the examples of things that have come out each day.
	We've had a significant instance.
	Well, even the inspector with the OPP, if you get a chance to watch this clip, when Brendan Miller closes his cross.
	And watch the facial expression of this Inspector Baudouin with the OPP, who is the head for the liaison teams, the whole liaison program of police liaisons.
	And the documents that we're putting up on the screen show that this inspector had come up with a plan, a de-escalation and negotiation plan, that turned out to be parallel to what...
	Myself and others did in our deal with the city to de-escalate.
	But it was going to be at the federal level and they were going to mimic it.
	And it got approved by Lucky, the commissioner of the RCMP and everyone else.
	And unbeknownst to this inspector, his de-escalation and negotiation plan for the federal government to interface with the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa was actually presented to the emergency security meeting of the cabinet.
	On the Sunday night.
	And so our lead counsel, Barrister Brendan Miller, puts it to him.
	He said, you know, he got him to be proud of his plan.
	And then he informed him, did you know, sir, that your plan was presented to the Prime Minister and Cabinet at 7.30 on this day?
	And he was like, wow, really?
	And do you also know that they rejected it?
	And they instead decided to invoke the Emergencies Act.
	And Brendan folds up his computer and walks away.
	Because it doesn't matter what the guy's answer is right there, right?
	And you look at his face, this OPP inspector in his dress uniform, and he's just like...
	That was the first he knew that his plan made it all the way to the Prime Minister and his Cabinet.
	And rather than build on the success that we'd already achieved that day, or...
	We were achieving with the implementation of the mayor's deal.
	They said no.
	Send in the goons.
	It's amazing because it came out today as well where there's correspondence and it says, you know, the GOC, Government of Canada, is losing faith in the OPP or OPS, whatever.
	It was like Trudeau and his regime had one plan and one plan only.
	It was bend the knee, apologize, go home.
	Or else we're doing this.
	And I talk about corruption and how it's insidious, it's subtle.
	It's not Trudeau saying, do it or else.
	It's the government of Canada is losing faith in the OPP because this protest is still going on.
	It's embarrassing us.
	And it hasn't been put to an end yet.
	And if you don't do it, we're going to do it.
	And we did it despite the fact that there were venues, active venues of legitimate, meaningful de-escalation.
	The only problem is, Keith, it's so bloody long.
	I mean, the days are long, 9.30 to 6.30, and the judges...
	6.30?
	That's an early day.
	There was one Friday night, we went till 9.00.
	It's not uncommon for us to go to 7.00 or 8.00, although lately it hasn't been too bad.
	And we're all under notice that at some point, if we start to lose traction on the schedule, we're going to be sitting on Saturdays.
	And each day, we have to...
	Review all the new documents that have been filed.
	Get our head around those.
	We have to identify the documents by 5 o 'clock that we want to cross on the witness who's coming up three days from now.
	In addition to that, we continue to interview our clients.
	We continue to expand our witness list.
	We're in constant negotiations on an ongoing and daily basis with various witnesses that we would like to have added.
	And we're doing that every day.
	And then once we know we have a witness that's being added, doing witness prep.
	So it's absolutely like everything I've been doing since I signed up for this mission.
	It's full on.
	Is there anything enjoyable about it?
	I mean, the idea of being away from your family for two months, is the fulfillment of what you're doing enough to get you through this?
	Oh, there's two things I'd say on that.
	One is...
	I have met the most amazing Canadians, you know, Tamara, Tom, Chris, and on it goes, Danny.
	I could keep going.
	And the legal team that I'm working with is wonderful.
	So that's a reward.
	And the other is, we got to do this.
	There's not an option here.
	This is not an option.
	Too many bad things.
	And they'll tell me about...
	What happened?
	They'll tell me about their seven-year-old daughter, or they'll tell me about how they had to say goodbye through a window to their mother who died, you know, and not be at their side.
	And there's a lot of hurt out there.
	And this government, these governments, have engaged in egregious activity.
	And this is not sustainable.
	It's not a society or country.
	That believes in that kind of overreach and nanny state and government.
	Oh, we'll keep you safe.
	No, I want a little bit of risk in my life.
	Thank you very much.
	And I'll worry about being safe.
	I don't need you to do that.
	You're pretty damn incompetent about everything you do.
	I hardly think you can keep me safe, even if I wanted you to.
	So what we're doing is very important.
	And I appreciate that.
	I sleep well because...
	I know the importance of the work, and I really think we're on the right side of history.
	Okay, fantastic.
	Now, I know the judge is very punctual, and it's 153, so you probably have to go back.
	Just before I forget, the visually impaired witness who was testifying for Ottawa, who alluded to the fact that she might have gotten COVID from the protesters on the street when they came up to her.
	This is the evidence that's supposed to support the invocation.
	Preposterous.
	One more.
	The police chief, Bell, talked about violence.
	So Brendan pushed him on it.
	Brendan Miller, who's just...
	If the only thing you get a chance to watch is watch Brendan's crosses.
	They're just spectacular.
	Spectacular.
	And he pushed him on it and got Bell to admit that he wasn't talking about actual violence.
	It was...
	Felt violence.
	In other words, a perception.
	So now we know we've got potential decline in service levels of Uber Eats.
	We've got microaggressions.
	And we've got felt violence.
	And we're really expecting someone soon to be testifying.
	About how they experienced the felt violence different than someone else.
	That clip was going around.
	I'm watching and I'm like, what violence?
	And then Brendan comes in.
	Here is a list of people who were arrested.
	They were not arrested for this, not arrested for that.
	Where was the violence?
	It was the perceived violence from the community.
	They didn't feel safe.
	Outrageous.
	Your team is doing amazing stuff.
	And I suspect it's going to be fun to watch you testify.
	I will livestream that on the main channel.
	That'll be very interesting.
	I asked Brendan if he wanted to prep me for Cross, and he said, no, it's okay.
	There are some witnesses who are useless to prep for one of two reasons.
	You could train them for three weeks.
	It won't change anything.
	And they're going to be so good, they don't need training.
	Keith, we know which one you're going to be on that.
	You changed the QC to the KC.
	King's Council now.
	Keith, thank you very much, as always.
	I mean, if you can bounce in whenever you can, because I'm running the stream live on my other channel and on a separate live stream so people can watch the hearings, rewind, comment with each other.
	But anytime you want to come back on, please let us know what the latest is, and we'll do it.
	Thank you, and please, if you can...
	Spare a little bit.
	Don't forget to donate to the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms as you can.
	We need the juice to keep going.
	I'm going to make sure everybody knows that.
	I'm going to do it myself after this stream.
	I'm going to put the link there, blast it around.
	You'll notice an uptick if our audience is very active.
	They'll do something.
	Keith, thank you, and we'll talk soon?
	Yes, absolutely.
	Thanks for your attention on this, and you're helping people understand what's really going on around them, so I appreciate it.
	My pleasure.
	My pleasure.
	I'll talk to you soon.
	Thank you very much.
	We're still going to go on, people, but when I hear the hearings resume, I'm going to take the headphones off.
	I've grown accustomed now to the headphones.
	It's like a blankie.
	It's like my...
	What's the word?
	Security blanket.
	So that's Keith Wilson working with the Convoy team with Brendan Miller, who...
	Man, he's good.
	Keith, keep up the good fight.
	Nature, lover, freedom.
	Vicky Lynn, nature.
	Let's see, I'm just going to get some.
	Thanks, Mr. Wilson.
	Cheers from Nerac Zero.
	Viva, post the link to donate.
	I did.
	So here's the link to donate.
	And then when you go to the donate, there's a drop-down box for which it says support us, donate now.
	And then when you go, it says click here to donate today.
	Okay, hold on.
	And then it says donate now.
	And in the donate now, it says select a campaign.
	You can pick the campaign you want.
	And by the way, don't anybody go anywhere.
	We've still got some stories to cover.
	And I got nowhere to go this afternoon.
	So the link is there, everybody.
	Voting is just theater.
	Failure Toronto.
	Say what I said yesterday.
	Oh, did I say it?
	I said it on a Locals livestream exclusive.
	VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com That's Defeatist.
	And I tend to think that people who say don't vote might want to get people not to vote for political purposes.
	Vote.
	No one's going to do it for you.
	Unless, you know, I was going to make a political joke.
	I won't make it.
	The hearing should resume sooner than later, so you all know where that link is.
	Viva Clips live on YouTube and on a separate Rumble link on Rumble.
	But we still got more stories in the bank.
	We've got more stories in the bank of the Twitter diary.
	What one do we go to now?
	Well, so people are saying Bill C-11 has passed the Senate, has passed the second reading.
	The way it works, Bill C-11 is the online, what is it, the streaming act?
	What do they call it?
	Why can't I see the name of the act?
	Yeah, the Online Broadcasting Act.
	Bill C-11 coming out of Canada, because what do tyrants do?
	After abusing their citizenry, well, they want to control the flow of information.
	So the Online Broadcasting Act, Bill C-11, which is the baby brother, the follow-up to Bill C-10, looks to regulate online content the way the Canadian government regulates television and radio.
	No.
	Submit it, not submit it, require it to be a Canadian content compliant.
	I don't know where else it's going to go.
	Disinformation.
	It is going to change the way people access the internet in Canada and the way content creators in Canada get exposure or get suppression.
	Or just get regulated out of existence if they have to have a certain amount of Canadian content requirements.
	If they have to have a certain amount of bilingual requirements.
	It will just...
	It will stifle independent content creation.
	And Lord knows, despite what they say, they're not doing it to protect the Canadian music industry.
	They're doing it to protect the free flow of information for the benefit of the government.
	If this bill passes, it will be the end of a great many YouTube channels coming out of Canada.
	It will be the end of the way Canadians experience a free, democratized YouTube in as much as YouTube is democratized.
	People are saying that it's gotten past the second reading.
	It got past the House of Commons.
	They voted on it, the elected members of Parliament.
	Now it's before the Senate.
	And from what I can tell, and I hope I'm not wrong, it has not yet passed.
	So I don't know what the trumpet is.
	I've never heard of the outlet before, but I can tell if I'm reading something that's garbage.
	Oh, they're back.
	The judge is back, people.
	The inquiry has resumed.
	So I'm going to take the headphones off because I don't want to hear it.
	As we go forward.
	I've never heard of the trumpet, but I can tell if I'm reading garbage, this seems to be relatively accurate, at least.
	Canada's internet landscape is set to be fundamentally changed, receiving little attention from the mainstream media.
	It's receiving attention from me.
	Bill C-11 passed the House of Commons in June and will shortly be passed through the Senate and await royal assent.
	So it hasn't happened yet, unless people are anticipating that it's just going to go through.
	If it goes through...
	The Senate.
	The sober afterthought, which is the Senate.
	They're unelected.
	They're appointed.
	And yeah, a lot of them are appointed by certain politicians.
	If it gets through the Senate and becomes law, then we await royal assent.
	It becomes law.
	Get your VPNs ready.
	Get your VPNs ready and independent content creators in Canada, get ready to have to leave.
	Because no doubt...
	I think this is going after the big players who the government doesn't like, Rebel News, True North, Postmillennial.
	But not to toot my own horn, pat myself on the back, I think I'd be big enough that the government would want to shut me up on Canadian airwaves, or at the very least, shut Canadians out from viewing my content.
	It will impact videos available on YouTube social media posts, how you access Canadian news and information, and can even affect the very website you are currently reading.
	Widespread internet censorship mandated by the Liberal government.
	You can tell this is a partisan, but it doesn't mean it's inaccurate.
	It will have a huge impact on the lives of Canadians.
	The trend of internet censorship in our Western nations aligns with what the Bible says will happen in the last days.
	You can take that for what it's worth.
	Thus far, the factual stuff of this article.
	Is on point.
	Bill C-11 is called the Online Broadcasting Act.
	In short, the bill is a list of amendments that will expand on the regulatory authority of the CRTC, Canadian Radio, Television, and Telecommunications Commission.
	What does that say?
	From over phones, radio, television, to include the internet.
	You're going to have government bureaucrats determining what you're entitled to see and read on the interweb.
	P. Moyer says, this is a $2 rumble rant.
	What is your confidence that the government won't find a way around the use of VPNs?
	None.
	It's why I don't use Telegram.
	It's why I don't use, what's the other one?
	Encrypted.
	First of all, whether or not the use of it will become criminalized.
	I mean, they don't have to know what you're using in Telegram.
	Just by virtue of having it can become a sanctionable offense.
	I have no faith that the government will not find a way to outlaw VPNs altogether, to criminalize them.
	Good luck.
	DVR downmark says, are you allowed to vote in the US?
	No, I'm not.
	I am not a Canadian citizen.
	I'm not a US citizen or a permanent resident.
	I'm not allowed to vote.
	But I'm allowed to cover what's going on.
	Okay.
	So that's Bill C-11.
	It has not yet passed, but people seem to think it's just going to...
	Cruise through the Senate, and then it's going to be law.
	And good luck to Canada when that happens.
	Elon Musk.
	This is fantastic.
	So let's just see here.
	Elon Musk claims he's buying Twitter to help humanity.
	And because the BBC is nonpartisan, they use...
	I don't know.
	Did they use that picture to be flattering or to mock Elon Musk?
	Coupled with the headline...
	I think this is not a flattering picture, and they're trying to make him look like a fool.
	Elon Musk claims that he's buying Twitter to help humanity as the billionaire set out his aims for taking over the social media platform.
	He didn't make money, the entrepreneur.
	He has until Friday to complete a $44 billion takeover, and it looks like he's doing it because he's showing up to the office in a video that I'm going to show you.
	He's showing up, and it looks like it's done.
	Here, I think, is this it?
	Yeah, good.
	Okay, good.
	Now I don't have to actually...
	You want to know what an idiot I am?
	I'm not dense, but sometimes I just miss jokes.
	So here, entering Twitter headquarters, let that sink in.
	And I realize, like, oh, okay.
	And I see the video.
	The pun does not work.
	If you think he's carrying in a desktop or a computer tower or like one of those Macs, I thought he was carrying a computer.
	It's like, oh, that's cool.
	Showing off at work.
	Let that sink in.
	Elon Musk pulling out the dad jokes.
	But it's caused something of a meltdown in the interwebs because there was a rumor that Elon planned to slash...
	75% of the workforce?
	75% of the employees of Twitter?
	I mean, that raises its own questions of loyalty, employment, etc., etc.
	But there was a rumor that he was going to fire up to 75% of the workforce.
	Now, apparently it was just a rumor.
	But that didn't stop people from melting down on Twitter.
	And let's just see if I can get one such tweet.
	Where the heck is it?
	Is this it?
	No, that's a tweet from someone who blocked me after I challenged him.
	Hold on a second.
	I'm going to get the tweet.
	An employee...
	Taking issue.
	Asking Elon Musk rhetorically.
	How does it feel?
	Okay, cripe almighty.
	Hold on one second.
	Got a problem here.
	Okay, I'm just going to go to the Twitter here.
	Employee displaying what some people might describe as the millennial sense of entitlement.
	I hear someone coming into the office.
	It's my wife.
	I believe she's found me.
	Or maybe we got more of those Perrier caffeinated, carbonated Yerba Mate drinks.
	Where's the flipping thing?
	Come on.
	We're going to get to the person who blocked me.
	Doesn't matter.
	It was last night.
	It wasn't last night.
	It was this morning.
	Here we go.
	Listen to this.
	This is what we would call, oh no, I can't see it anymore because I've been blocked.
	What is the sensitivity?
	The person said, okay, well, add it to the list.
	The person said, I guess it was an employee of Twitter.
	I'm on a block list.
	I'm on a block list.
	People are just blocking me.
	Basically said, hey Elon, tell us how it feels.
	Do you get pleasure out of looking in the faces of the people that you're going to fire when you walk into your first day in the office?
	And it's such a, I think a millennial might be the way to describe it, sense of entitlement.
	I have a sense of loyalty, sense of duty.
	The idea that you are entitled to retain a position because you got the position, irrespective of performance and irrespective of quality of work, Is entitlement.
	I think, generally speaking, you have to have a good reason to fire an employee.
	That could be performance-based.
	It could be financial-based.
	If a company is not making money, if someone is not value-added to the company, there's only one institution where financial bloat is a good thing, and that's in the government.
	You get people dependent on the government.
	You get people voting for the very same government that promises not to cut down the government bloat.
	That's the government's business model.
	It's not a business model because they're not in business because they don't make money.
	They take money from citizens.
	When it comes to a company, bloat is not a sustainable model.
	Not doing your jobs properly is not a sustainable model.
	A lot of people were responding to that tweet.
	I don't know if she blocked all of them.
	If Twitter weren't involved in the game of censorship, suppression of voices, unpersoning of accounts, Trump, Jones, and others, you might not be in a position where people might have to get laid off.
	But that's one sense of it.
	But then the other sense of entitlement, that making these hard decisions as a business owner, someone who's put, I don't know, Elon's worth a lot, but put $44 billion of his own dollars or $27 billion plus financing, whatever, billions of his own dollars into a company, and to say that Oh, to make the hard decisions gives pleasure to the person?
	I would argue, I would suggest that that might be a little bit of projection.
	The idea to presume that someone takes pleasure in making hard decisions that affect people negatively, that might be a reflection more of the individual making the accusation than the individual making the decision.
	I have never run a business that had more than six employees, maybe eight.
	It's not easy.
	To hire people, and it sure as heck is not easy to fire them.
	And it's not easy to tell them that you're winding up and, you know, what can we do to help you in life?
	It's not easy, and nobody takes pleasure in it unless you're a jerk.
	And most people don't presume that people take pleasure in doing hard things.
	Unless you might happen to be that very same jerk.
	And then she blocked me because I said, have you ever run a business?
	In my response.
	Oh, yes, whatever.
	So that's it.
	So the deal's going through.
	And, you know, Elon is committed to not having Twitter turn into the Wild West.
	I won't compare it to any noteworthy platforms where it might be the Wild West and it might not be, you know, it might not be a marketable platform.
	And I would suggest, you know, maybe Elon think of adopting something along the lines of the community guidelines, terms of service that Barnes and I drafted for Rumble.
	It doesn't have to be the Wild West of platforms which are just not fun to be on to be a controlled environment in which there are clear rules that are applied without political bias.
	That's it.
	Holy Brian or Holm Brian.
	Viva, if you use voice meter, banana or potato, you can use the outputs so you don't have to listen to it.
	I don't know what that means, but I'll look into it.
	Let me see.
	That interview with Keith Wilson was kick-ass.
	Anyway, so that's it.
	So the deal's going through.
	Twitter's melting down.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	Okay.
	Bill C-11.
	We've already covered that.
	What else?
	What else was it?
	There were a couple things of interest that we haven't yet to cover today.
	Oh, here's another one that's making the rounds.
	This is Disclosed TV.
	Disclosed.tv.
	In case you missed it, PayPal has reinstated its $2,500 fine for misinformation.
	This is not exactly accurate.
	They have not reinstated the drafting of the terms that they said they had released by accident.
	And people are going to the terms of service, as I'm going to show you right here, saying, look, it's there again.
	It's not there again.
	People didn't really appreciate that a provision to this effect had already been in the terms of service.
	People didn't appreciate that there was already something of a liquidated damages penalty clause in the existing agreement that many people have agreed to and didn't read, myself included, because nobody can be expected to read all of the terms of use that you agreed to.
	So Disclosed TV says, in case you missed it, they've reinstated that policy that they said was accidentally disclosed in public.
	No.
	No.
	Something to that effect, a variation of that liquidated damages penalty clause had already been there.
	This is last updated September 2021.
	This is when I first saw the story.
	And I'm like, what is everybody talking about?
	That says, you know, last updated November 2022.
	That date hadn't occurred yet by the time everybody was saying that it's already in the terms of service.
	That was a draft.
	This is the currently applicable acceptable use policy.
	And I'll read it.
	But it was updated a year ago, over a year ago.
	But most people just never knew that it was in there in the first place.
	You are independently responsible for complying with all applicable laws in all of your actions related to your use of PayPal services, regardless of the purpose of use.
	Okay, fine.
	That's fair enough.
	In addition, following the law is not a big deal.
	That's the guiding principle for...
	The terms of service that Robert and I have drafted for Rumble.
	Let's get to the in addition for acceptable use.
	You must adhere to the terms of this acceptable use policy.
	Violation of this acceptable use policy constitutes a violation of the PayPal user agreement and may subject you to damages.
	Including liquidated damages.
	That is an amount that's contractually determined because it would be impractical to actually determine the actual damages or because there would be no monetary value to the actual damages.
	So you establish a contractually acceptable amount, a contractually agreed upon amount.
	So you don't litigate it.
	You don't have to prove the amount of the damages.
	It's deemed accepted between the parties.
	Liquidated damages.
	$2,500 per violation, which may be debited directly from your PayPal accounts as outlined under The agreement.
	That's in there.
	That's been in there for a year despite the fact that most people didn't know about it.
	It's not new just because it's new to a lot of us.
	Prohibited activities.
	Let me just expand this so I can read it.
	Prohibited activities.
	You may not use the PayPal service for activities that violate law.
	Fine.
	Relate to transactions involving drugs.
	Fine.
	Whatever.
	Yada yada.
	False hit.
	Well, maybe we should read these.
	Relate to transactions.
	Transactions.
	So, this is going to be the big defense.
	If you say something on Twitter, PayPal doesn't get to debit $2,500 from your account because of acceptable use policy.
	We'll see.
	Relate to transactions.
	So, you're using PayPal for the purpose of the transaction.
	Narcotics, steroids, etc.
	Drug paraphernalia.
	Cigarettes.
	Items that encourage, promote, facilitate, or instruct others to engage in illegal activity.
	Stolen goods.
	Yeah.
	The promotion of hatred.
	racial or other forms of intolerance that is discriminatory or the financial exploitation of a crime.
	So, presumably, this would refer to selling posters that say X, Y, and Z. But if you go on Twitter and say what the poster says without linking it to PayPal or using PayPal to sell it, then we're entering the gray zone as to whether or not PayPal can say...
	You're violating our acceptable use policies by what you're saying and doing on another platform, even if it does not directly involve PayPal as a platform, as a service.
	Items that are considered obscene.
	I guess you can't sell porno through PayPal.
	Items that infringe or violate on copyright, yada, yada.
	Relate to the transactions that show personal information of third parties.
	In violation of applicable law, support pyramid of Ponzi schemes.
	Matrix programs, other get-rich-quick schemes, or certain multi-level marketing programs.
	Yada, yada.
	Contracts.
	Okay, fine.
	And that's it.
	Involve the sale of products identified as being fraudulent.
	Relate to transaction involving any activity that requires pre-approval.
	Okay, fine.
	Activities requiring approval, and we've got all this crap.
	Go down, go down, go down.
	Violations of acceptable use.
	So that's what it means for now.
	If you use PayPal, I hope we're seeing the same thing.
	Have we been seeing the same thing?
	We have.
	If you're using PayPal as the platform for any of those, what was the word they termed?
	Unauthorized use or whatever.
	You know what it is.
	You know what I mean?
	Then you can have a problem.
	That's been there for a while.
	I don't know how long it's been there for.
	It was updated over a year ago.
	I don't know if that's the first time it was added to the service agreement, but it's been there.
	It's not exactly true that they've reinstated the policy that they said was disclosed by accident of the draft because they haven't.
	Crafting with bits, $5 rumble rent.
	What are the best worst outcomes of the inquiry?
	Will there be accountability?
	My understanding, subject to being the right to be wrong, it will have recommendations and it will have conclusions.
	There will be no monetary sanctions.
	It's not a court.
	It's not a court, and the findings are not going to be a court order.
	So there will be no injunctive relief.
	There will be no compensatory damages.
	There will be findings, conclusions, recommendations.
	And so there might be sternly worded reprimands or judgmental recommendations that it was never lawful, it was never justified under the law.
	And this is what must be done on a going-forward basis to ensure that such abuse of the regulation, the law, never occurs in the future.
	It's going to be recommendations and conclusions.
	There will be no actual sanctions.
	Not that there will not because they're going to be cowards.
	There cannot be.
	It's not the purpose of the inquiry.
	It's to come to conclusions, findings, recommendations.
	It does not have the power to impose monetary sanctions or other sanctions.
	My understanding.
	What else?
	What else?
	Given Trudeau's track record, he'll throw a minister under the bus and force him or her to resign.
	Now, too much exposure on it at this point.
	Trudeau's not going to be able to weasel out by throwing...
	Everyone knows what Trudeau did.
	Everybody knows what Trudeau did.
	Okay.
	My goodness, we almost forgot.
	Everyone knows what Trudeau did.
	Everybody now knows what Hunter Biden did.
	From Russian disinformation, heads of intelligence signing a letter.
	50 of them.
	Russian disinfo.
	They were the Russian disinfo.
	It's info.
	It's accurate.
	And it's bad.
	Former Acting Attorney General Whitaker, oh, we got a Whitaker, says Hunter Biden was targeted in Chinese intelligence mission.
	Well, it's interesting timing-wise, right?
	You know, they just announced the indictment of some Chinese spies trying to interfere with, I don't know, investigations.
	It's interesting timing.
	Is the color coordination behind the Fox counter Ukraine-related?
	I'm asking without judgment.
	Is that like a Ukrainian-inspired backdrop on Fox News?
	I haven't watched Fox in a long time, so I don't know.
	Okay.
	Former Hunter Biden secretary reportedly employed by CCP before working for a Biden family.
	Hmm.
	What better way to get a good jibe with Joe than to have videos of his son doing bad things to people?
	Potential unlock.
	Can you imagine?
	What else is on that laptop?
	We called it at the time.
	When the FBI got involved, when the computer technician guy went public with it, when the FBI got involved, when the computer guy disclosed it to the authorities, there's probably bad stuff on that laptop.
	The Ashley Biden diary, that was also passed off as disinformation, yada yada, which we now know is an authentic diary.
	To be determined whether or not the stories in that diary are themselves accurate and historically true.
	We know what those are as well.
	Involved elderly men showering with their younger daughters who it left such an indelible memory in that they are putting those stories into a diary decades later.
	It's all disinformation.
	And then it all becomes confirmed information.
	But they filtered through a whole tier of people who will not ever Treat it as real information.
	That's the beauty of the scheme.
	Former Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker said the new developments out of the investigation into Hunter Biden's business dealings are very damaging for the president.
	Don't worry.
	The president's time might be politically limited.
	Whitaker argued the shocking evidence being sent to the U.S. attorney shows that China was trying to gather information on the Hunter Biden family.
	No S-H-I-T.
	Do we have to watch the video?
	I don't want to watch the video.
	I'll take things that we all knew last year.
	You imagine they're going to have dirt on Trump.
	Russia has the PP.
	If they have the PP dossier, imagine what else Trump did.
	Trump used to go to Russia and do nasty things with hookers in the hotels.
	They've got the dirt on Trump and they've got the dirt on his kids.
	Everything they said about Trump and his kids is true about Biden and his kids.
	Everything they said they feared as the end of democracy in America for politicians being compromised and being owned by foreign interests.
	Everything they said about that as relates to Trump and his kids is true of Biden and his kids.
	They knew it at the time.
	And you could have telegraphed it.
	You could have telegraphed reality based on their accusations at the time.
	Okay.
	We're going to end on...
	We're going to end on...
	Well, let's just end on the revolution devouring itself.
	I've got to say, Caitlyn Jenner might be the prime example of people doing their own thing and being adults about it and not trying to impose the consequences of their decisions on other people.
	Caitlyn Jenner, trans individual, comes out and says, A former athlete comes out and says, of course you can't have biological males who transition competing with biological females.
	Of course you can't.
	But immediately castigated as a bigot for stating the obvious.
	Well, we saw Dylan Mulvaney talking about normalizing the bulge, which is now a trans euphemism for women should normalize having a penis as being a man.
	Caitlyn Jenner...
	Has Caitlyn Jenner gone through the ultimate step yet?
	I should have double-checked that.
	Chat, you're smarter than me.
	Aggregate.
	Has Caitlyn Jenner gone through the ultimate step of the transition?
	Let me just see if it's a yes or a no.
	TimeBandit66 says guilt through projection.
	Vicky Lynn says no, but I don't know if that's in response to the question.
	Did Caitlyn Jenner...
	Remove the schmeckle.
	The ultimate step has not occurred.
	Okay.
	So, I mean, wait for Caitlyn Jenner to be not trans enough.
	And so, you know, still trans with a penis?
	No opinion.
	That's what it's going to turn into.
	If you're a trans male to female and you still have a penis?
	No opinion.
	Even if you're saying that other trans males to female who also still have that body part get to have an opinion if it's the right opinion.
	But let's just see.
	Caitlyn Jenner lambasted a TikTok trans rights activist who recently visited the White House after a past video of her advocating to normalize women having bulges, women having penises resurfaced online.
	Resurfaced?
	It's not like Dylan's not trying to hide it.
	I'm convinced Dylan is trolling the world right now, but that's just me.
	Dylan Mulvaney, a transgender TikTok content creator who garnered millions of followers for sharing her male-to-female transition.
	We're actually at a point in the world where a biological male, born biological male, who is trying to normalize having a penis.
	The New York Post.
	Are we on the right article here?
	Yeah, we are.
	We have to refer to a biological male, born a biological male, still with biological male DNA, genetics, chromosomes, and a biological male penis.
	The New York Post is referring to this individual as a her.
	I will just refer to Dylan Mulvaney as Dylan Mulvaney.
	Recently spoke with President Biden at a youth summit, by the way, that aired on Sunday.
	They're not just going after trans adults.
	They're going after trans kids.
	And Dylan Mulvaney asked Joe Biden if Joe Biden supports...
	Gender-affirming healthcare, which means double mastectomies for children, lobbing off the genitalia, the male genitalia for children.
	And Joe Biden said, yes, I don't think the state or anybody else should be denying gender-affirming healthcare in the broader context of to children, because Dylan Mulvaney was there promoting trans rights, trans activism for children.
	Of the appearance generated media attention and caused a months-old video about normalizing bulges for women.
	Penises!
	Normalizing penises for women to resurface.
	In the video, we saw it yesterday.
	We don't need to go over it.
	Normalize the bulge.
	We are normalizing the bulge.
	No, you're not.
	You are erasing women, is what you're doing, Dylan.
	If it's not a troll, you are erasing women.
	Now, Dylan Mulvaney...
	Gets to do interviews on the joys of girlhood.
	You don't even need a girl.
	You don't even need a biological girl at this point in time to explain the joys of girlhood.
	You got biological men who can do it better than they can.
	Oh, here we go.
	Many states have lawmakers that feel they can involve themselves in the very personal process, Mulvaney told Biden.
	Do you think states have a right to ban gender-affirming health care?
	That's a euphemism for genital mutilation, among other things.
	I don't think any state or anybody should have the right to do that.
	As a moral question and as a legal question, I just think it's wrong.
	Being seen with people like you, Biden said.
	I mean, I genuinely mean it.
	People fear what they don't know.
	Nobody fears transgender people.
	Nobody fears them.
	And I would dare say, by and large, nobody has any issue.
	With a trans individual any more than they have any issue with a hetero individual.
	Where they have issues is when they start promoting legislation that would result in...
	Where's the punchline of the story of Caitlyn Jenner?
	Whatever, I must have...
	Where they have issue is when trans activists get the president to normalize gender-affirming healthcare, which, as we've seen from my interview with Chloe Cole...
	involves double mastectomies on 15-year-old girls.
	The top surgery, as the euphemism goes, is horrific for anybody who doesn't know what goes into it.
	It's not overnight surgery.
	The bottom surgery, as the euphemism goes, I would recommend not even looking it up if you have a sensitive heart and a sensitive stomach.
	Nobody is scared of transgender individuals.
	They might take issue with trans activists promoting gender-affirming health care on children.
	They might take issue with Leah Thompson trans individuals, biological males through development, competing in and dominating sports that were categories that were intended for biological females and all of that which goes into the biology of being a female.
	Don't mistake in material objection to substantive issues with fear.
	Adults or adults make your own decisions, and to the extent they don't interfere with anybody else's rights, very few people are going to have issue, legitimate issue, with the decisions of others.
	That's not quite the same thing for the debate that we're seeing right now, which is doing none other, nothing else than normalizing what has always been diagnosed in the DSM-5 as a form of dysmorphia or dysphoria.
	I always get mixed up.
	Gender dysmorphia or gender dysphoria.
	It has become an industry, cultivating it and not normalizing it, but normalizing a treatment which itself, although very lucrative for all of the doctors and all of the Boston hospitals and whatever, promoting it, irreparable and should not be normalized for the people suffering, going through, experiencing gender dysmorphia or gender dysphoria.
	I keep forgetting which.
	So I think that's it, by the way, people.
	Let me see here.
	I think I got all the stories that kept me up last night.
	Actually, nothing kept me up last night except for the hassle with our vehicle that we're going through right now.
	No, that's it.
	We've done everything.
	Although I do have to remember to get a video to play us out.
	What video do I want to play today?
	To end the stream.
	Let's go into the chat on Rumbles and see.
	Who has a video?
	Does everyone like the format?
	Do I play the entire video like an oldie but goodie so we can all cringe at what I was or cringe at what I've become?
	Oh, Viva, dvdownmark is Mark Mark from YouTube.
	Okay, cool.
	It's so cool to see the same people with different usernames here.
	Let me just go to YouTube for one second.
	We're going to do an oldie.
	Viva.
	Oh, you know what we'll do right now?
	No!
	Everybody watching now is going to get a sneak peek at an unlisted video that is currently on YouTube that I've given as a sneak peek to members of YouTube and to the community on Locals.
	And I'll play the whole thing, and then I'm going to publish it afterwards.
	It is our trip to Gumbo Limbo in Florida.
	If anybody's in Florida and you haven't done Gumbo Limbo, it's great.
	I've got to go to Viva Family.
	Unlisted videos.
	All y 'all are getting a sneak peek of something special right now.
	When my computer decides to think, here we go.
	Let's get the video up.
	And now we'll watch this.
	I will leave.
	Go see if my wife was able to find the Perrier Yerba Mate.
	Get something to energize me and then go for a jog and go fishing with the kids.
	Possibly.
	Gumbo Limbo, here we go.
	But before I do that, everybody, did I share it already?
	Before I hit play, thank you all for spending the afternoon with me.
	Go check out the inquiry.
	It's going to be on the Viva Clips channel, where I also post clips on the main channel.
	This is on Viva Family, which is also a third channel that we have.
	Thank you for spending time with me.
	Thank you for letting me get all of this off my chest.
	This is therapeutic and educational.
	It's educational and therapeutic.
	We're having some silver linings.
	We're having some white pills now.
	We have people like Keith Wilson, Tamara Lich, Chris.
	We have good people who are fighting hard.
	And like everybody says, you don't need to reach everybody.
	You just need to reach 15%, 10 to 15, but I'll say, let's go for a little more, 20% of the people to actually right the ship.
	The others, God bless them.
	You only need to reach...
	10, 15, 20%.
	You don't need to reach everybody.
	We're reaching people, and we're seeing some silver linings.
	So, don't give up.
	Keep the faith, but not in a passive sense.
	But do not become the monster that you are battling.
	Conduct yourselves in a manner that makes your parents, children, and pets proud, and you can do no wrong.
	And with that said, we shall skip the ad and get to the video.
	Enjoy the afternoon, everyone.
	Peace.
	You've never seen the big turtle?
	No!
	There's a big turtle right there.
	Okay.
	Gumballimbo.
	It's a great place.
	See y 'all later.
	What's on your shirt, please?
	Do you have ketchup on your shoulder?
	Yeah.
	We just had a good burger.
	Okay, let's go to Gumballimbo.
	Okay.
	He's going to freak out when he sees the aquarium.
	And the turtles.
	It's the best place.
	Go, go, go, go, go, go, go.
	And there's big spiders in this video.
	Big ass spiders.
	Now I'm gonna go.
	Thank you.
	I'm going to go to the next one.
	Wow, that's real!
	Oh, hi, fish.
	And then they got some lettuce there.
	They're eating a little twice.
	They're soggy lettuce, right?
	I bet they don't mind the soggy lettuce.
	I bet they don't mind the soggy lettuce.
	The time has come to refuse.
	This week's old green turtle could have fit in the palm of your hand.
	It died after eating one of the 35 pieces of plastic.
	Look at this one.
	Oh, wow.
	Hold on.
	It's coming.
	It's coming.
	Look at this.
	Very slowly.
	Very slowly.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Oh, oh.
	look look look if there there is oh that's a pumpkin chunk Look at that face!
	That beat could rip your face off.
	What's going on there?
	What's going on there?
	Okay, go up on the stairs, go up on the stairs, go up on the stairs, go up on the stairs guys, you gotta see it.
	Go, go, go, go, go!
	Oh, there, there.
	Whoa, what is his head doing?
	That's like nature's bobblehead.
	We're about to see some sexy time.
	Or attacking.
	You want some of this?
	Oh yeah.
	children close your eyes Isn't nature beautiful?
	No.
	It's perfect.
	It's very cold.
	We leave Harry alone.
	We see.
	Yes, sir.
	And that's how the honeymoon began.
	I'm trying to tell you about these.
	That's a tarpon, by the way.
	Those are tarpon.
	Okay, coming through is...
	That's a barracuda.
	Oh my goodness.
	Oh, there's a stingray coming.
	Look at this.
	Oh my, there's a turtle in the bottom, guys.
	Did you not see that?
	That's not dead.
	No, that's a mole.
	Oh my gosh.
	I will eat your soul.
	I need children's souls.
	What is he eating?
	He's breathing.
	He's just breathing.
	How do you breathe water?
	Look into my eyes.
	Daddy, I found the fish.
	Look at the fish in back of him.
	Daddy, look at the fish in back of him.
	I'm fine.
	It was on the walk through the boardwalk that Marion feels most at peace.
	The children exploring nature.
	The children screaming in the distance.
	Who gets to go first?
	Me or you?
	The sounds of nature.
	So beautiful and wonderful and relaxing.
	I haven't been in this video yet.
	This is cool.
	Yeah.
	I don't know anything to me.
	This is beautiful.
	I've never actually seen this before.
	Look at me.
	Don't look at what I'm about to tell you to look at.
	Look at that beautiful tree right there with that vine wrapping around it as it coils up the tree and grows up to the sun.
	It does look like a snake.
	It looks like a snake is hugging the tree.
	Oh, man.
	That's a big, big spider.
	Another one like this?
	Get in focus.
	Look at this butterfly.
	That butterfly is the size of a bird.
	Wait.
	Right there.
	Right there.
	No, I lost it.
	It's right there.
	Can you stop moving for a second?
	It just stopped all the way.
	There you go.
	Wow.
	What kind of spider is this called again?
	Okay.
	There it is right there.
	The golden silk spider.
	The golden silk spider.
	Someone touch it.
	Someone touch it.
	Oh, no.
	It's touching.
	It's touching.
	Okay.
	Careful, careful.
	That was an accident.
	Oh, here we go.
	Golden silk spider.
	Golden silk spider.
	Largest web in North America.
	And it absolutely looks like a bike!
	Costume from Cinco de Mayo.
	That's it.
	It's beautiful.
	Okay, let's just get one more and focus again.
	There.
	Amazing, amazing, amazing.
	Is it alive?
	Yes, it moved.
	Hold on one second.
	Why would this be here?
	How did it get here?
	Where's it going?
	What's its name?
	What are you doing?
	Is it happy?
	Is it sad?
	You need to move it off because I wouldn't do that by pinching it.
	Put on this.
	It's a baby.
	You can't do that for my time.
	Okay, get it on the paper.
	Okay, push it back, push it back.
	Eat this.
	Eat this.
	He was clenching it.
	Here you go.
	Okay, okay.
	Don't drop him.
	Wow, it will absolutely be fine.
	Oh my god, there's a spider right there!
	Alright, it's not a trip anywhere until we go to the gift shop.
	Okay, let's go.
	Let's go.
	Out, out, out.
	Coffee and Red Bulls.
	Okay, here we go.
	Show the cards we got.
	What's the guy's name?
	What's the artist's name?
	What's the artist's name?
	I got this one.
	Dude, what's the photographer's name?
	Oh my god, wait!
	Ben Hicks.
	Ben Hicks.
	Ben Hicks photography.
	This is one?
	Yep.
	Yup.
	Amazing.
	Amazing.
	That one's beautiful.
	And the sticker.
	And the sticker for the car.
	It's in the bag.
	Okay, that's it.
	This video's over.
	Goodbye.
	Oh, there you go.
	It's still on me jumping off the stairs.
	Okay, go.
	These are replicas of the actual largest.
	Can you go jump on his back so we can get a...
	The largest one apparently weighed 2,000 pounds.
	The largest leatherback.
	There you go.
	That's how big it was.
	Yeah, it's hot.
	There's a big one.
	That's beautiful.
	GoPro for size.
	The GoPro is the size of its eyeball.
	Oh my goodness.
	Look at this.
	Okay, now the video is officially over.
	You want to jump off the turtle and then we'll end it?
	Okay, go.
	Go.
	Three, two.
	Okay, we have to take two because both kids wanted to jump.

▲