Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 25, 2022 - Viva & Barnes

01:44:30

Taco Tuesday! Hillary an Election Denier (again!); Democrat Double Standards (again!) & MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello, Indivisibles.
	I'm here to highlight something.
	Hello, Indivisibles.
	I'm here to highlight something that is keeping me up at night.
	And I know this group really understands what I'm about to say.
	I know we're all focused on the 2022 midterm elections, and they are incredibly important.
	But we also have to look ahead, because you know what?
	Our opponents certainly are.
	Right-wing extremists already have a plan to literally steal the next presidential election.
	And they're not making a secret of it.
	The right-wing controlled Supreme Court may be poised to rule on giving state legislatures, yes, you heard me that correctly, state legislatures the power to overturn presidential elections.
	Just think, if that happens, the 2024 presidential election could be decided not by the popular vote or even by the anachronistic electoral college, but by state legislatures, many of them Republican-controlled.
	But there's also good news in the face of this very real threat to democracy.
	Let's hear it.
	Indivisible has launched.
	Crush the coup to make sure we're ready to defend democracy in 2024.
	You could say they have a theory about critical races.
	Crush the coup.
	And your dollars could very well decide the winners and the winner of the next presidential election.
	This could not be more important or more urgent.
	Crush the coup.
	Crush the coup.
	Let me just take these headphones off.
	Oh my goodness.
	I can still hear.
	Oh, let's do this like this.
	Let's do it like this.
	Okay.
	Crush the coup.
	Nothing intimidating about that.
	Nothing potentially able to be misunderstood in that.
	When Trump says protest peacefully, that's a call to violence.
	When Hillary Clinton comes up and calls on her indivisibles, you crush the coup, I will crush it.
	Totally, totally normal.
	And by the way, I was told...
	I would love to see if YouTube takes issue with this introductory video.
	With this video of Hillary Clinton coming out and saying how...
	Did she call them Republican extremists?
	Are literally trying to steal the 2024 election.
	And how are they doing it, by the way?
	Through the state legislature.
	Hmm.
	Hmm.
	That kind of sounds like, um, what do we say on this channel?
	Oh.
	Politics ruins everything is one thing we say on this channel.
	Confession through projection is another thing we say on this channel.
	She said Republican extremists, right?
	Okay.
	And by the way, I think she also said that in the context of referring to the SCOTUS.
	Don't crush the cool, you indivisibles.
	You must find the coup and you must crush it.
	It's confession through projection.
	But more important than that, egregious, egregious hypocrisy.
	And I know some of you out there say, and I think you might be right, it's not hypocrisy, Viva.
	It's hierarchy.
	We get to do things that other people don't get to do.
	We get to do things, we the political privileged elite.
	You want to talk about privilege?
	I'll throw this out there.
	The real privilege in this world is not white privilege.
	It's political privilege.
	It's political, economic, financial privilege.
	But more political privilege because that tends to be the precursor to all the other forms of privilege out there.
	It's not hypocrisy.
	It's hierarchy of the privileged political class.
	Anybody who says those lawsuits should have gone to the Supreme Court, anybody who says, I think there was chicanery afoot in 2020, anybody who actually says in a non-flattering way exactly what was said in that Time article magazine,
	how the election was fortified, anybody who says exactly what was said in that Time article magazine about how a secret cabal of powerful, well-funded people controlled information, changed the rules, To fortify the election.
	Anybody who says that, but in a non-flattering tone, election deniers worthy of cancellation.
	But come out and say, literally, they're going to steal the election when, just out of curiosity, if they're anticipating in advance that 2024 is an election that can be stolen, how do they prevent and prohibit in the past from suggesting that there may have been Historical interference in prior elections.
	How then?
	That which is the safest election of all time should remain the safest election of all time.
	Hillary Clinton comes out, and it's not the first time, by the way.
	It's not the first time Hillary Clinton has come out as being an election denier.
	We know this.
	Hillary Clinton, Bush, selected, not elected.
	We all remember this one.
	It's not the first time Hillary would be guilty of election denial.
	She's got a history of election denial.
	More of a history than many of the other people who questioned other elections.
	Ah, good old internet is forever.
	Cancel.
	Hillary Clinton in 2002, George W. Bush was selected, not elected.
	It is completely irresponsible to argue that a president who reaches 270 electoral votes is not elected and legitimate.
	Right, Hillary Clinton?
	Only a shameless partisan with no concern for democracy or our system of government would insist that presidents would insist that president is not elected long after he's taken the oath of office.
	Trump is insanely responsible to suggest that this election may be rigged and the outcome fraudulent.
	Why?
	Who?
	Oh, look at that dog!
	Sorry.
	Anyway, it goes on.
	Where the heck is the article?
	Dude, where's the flippin' article?
	Is it a video or what's the deal here?
	Do I have to click on...
	What is going on there?
	Okay, I did not think...
	I did not think that that was an ear.
	I thought that was another part of the dog's body.
	Oh, that's from October 2002.
	Whatever, you get the point.
	Hillary Clinton in October 2002.
	Election was stolen.
	The president was selected, not elected.
	Then in 2020, it becomes verboten to even suggest that drop boxes, mail-in ballots, absentee voting, maybe might have had an influence.
	And then Hillary Clinton comes out.
	And what?
	Indivisibles?
	I mean, it all seems like...
	Absolute cultish brainwashing.
	Good afternoon, Indivisibles.
	The Republicans are getting ready to steal the election.
	You must crush the coup.
	Crush it!
	I mean, it's like, it's Zoolander-level indoctrination.
	Hypocrisy, double standards, hierarchy, whatever.
	It's par for the course.
	And I hate to say it.
	It's par for the course, but it's not because the GOP or Republicans or conservatives don't engage in similar, you know, finding creative ways to justify what we want to justify for our adversaries, you know, like cancel Ethan Klein for making an anti-Semitic joke, but don't cancel Kanye.
	It's not that the same exercise is not used on both sides.
	It's an exercise of those who have difficulty being intellectually consistent.
	It tends to happen more, from my observation, on one side, if only because that one side, and we're going to get to this in another post, one side, that being the leftist, the Democrat sort of side, to dichotomize it that way, it's only because that side tends to control the media, tends to control the arts, tends to control, and I say control as in have predominant influence.
	Not like necessarily marionette strings.
	They have predominant influence and reach.
	You think of media outlets, other than Fox News, which admittedly, by numbers, kicks the ass of all the other ones, by number of outlets.
	You got Fox News, number one.
	Okay, and then you got...
	I don't know, what would be some of the other ones?
	Gateway Pundit?
	And a few others.
	Flip side.
	CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, CBS, NPR, BBC, CBC, Global Moon.
	The machine.
	They control, if only through the power of the bullhorn, more of it.
	And so when they come up with their utter hypocrisy, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, censoring people, canceling channels, penalizing people for questioning the integrity of the 2020 elections.
	Incorporating it into their terms of service, their community guidelines.
	Cannot question it.
	It's a verboten subject.
	And what year are we now?
	2022?
	Hillary Clinton comes out and says, literally, Republican extremists are literally going to steal the 2024 election.
	I'm sure it's totally okay.
	It's totally okay.
	There's so much of it, though.
	I don't know where it ends.
	Okay, let's make sure that we're on live on the Rumbles, Taco Tuesday.
	Good.
	We are also simultaneously, I know it's confusing and it's diluting a little bit, but it doesn't matter.
	We're also simultaneously live streaming the Emergencies Inquiry, which is running now, and there's a bunch of people watching it, both on YouTube and Rumble.
	I'm going to let that run the whole day.
	I'm going to come in and out whenever I can.
	And someone just said, you know what?
	Maybe I'll just try to make that.
	There we go.
	I just enhanced the window for the Emergencies Act inquiry.
	You all know what's going on, but in Canada, they're having the...
	What's the word that they're calling it?
	The Public Order Emergency Commission is investigating the circumstances surrounding Justin Trudeau invoking the Emergencies Act, and it's going on for six weeks.
	Not everybody is really able to find it all that easily on the public hearing website.
	There's no chat.
	There's no interactive anything about it.
	So I'm running it on the second channel.
	Simultaneously confusing.
	Tough to navigate on my end.
	Maybe a little bit diluting and confusing for all the viewers who don't know what they want to watch.
	This live stream or that live stream, but that's what we're doing now.
	How goes the battle on this beautiful Tuesday?
	This morning I did an interview or a podcast with Ron Coleman, who, as many of you know, is working on a very interesting lawsuit for one Nate Brody, Nate the lawyer, who is drafting proceedings, is going to be suing one Christopher Boozy.
	His name is actually Boozy, I'm not making fun, B-O-U-Z-Y.
	Founder, creator of a website called Bot Sentinel, which rates Twitter handles, Twitter accounts, As acceptable to problematic and is responsible for, and if they're not actually responsible for it, at the very least takes credit for, deplatforming, cancelling, censoring, punishing problematic accounts.
	For those of you who don't know, Christopher Boozy.
	I will not say arguably.
	He's going to have a defense.
	Chris Boozy arguably defamed Nate Brody.
	By taking a video clip of Nate Brody, interpreting it incorrectly, taking it out of context, to make accusations that Nate Brody...
	Some of you may not like his politics.
	Doesn't matter.
	He's a friend, and I consider him to be very intelligent.
	Took a video clip out of context of Nate Brody, and then took it to make the public statements over and over again that Nate Brody admitted to planting evidence on people he arrested, Police corruption.
	Questioning whether or not he was a lawyer.
	And so on.
	And Nate Brody's going to be suing.
	And Ron Coleman at Harmeet Dillon's law firm, where he's a partner, I believe, is...
	He's going to sue.
	And Boozy and Brody, oh my effing G, that jingles.
	We need a beat music.
	Boozy and Brody are going to the courts.
	Yeah, it's going to be amazing.
	So I did a podcast with Ron Coleman this morning, and I don't know when they're going to publish it, but sooner than later.
	Viva, thank you for being one of our great warriors in this political mess.
	It gives me hope that we'll win at some point.
	Elections are coming next November in the States.
	Next November.
	In two weeks in the United States.
	And for anybody who didn't watch the...
	Governor DeSantis versus Satan himself.
	I shouldn't say that.
	DeSantis versus Crist yesterday.
	The debate.
	We're going to go through some of that today as well.
	On the menu today.
	Hypocrisy.
	Double standards.
	We might pop in and out of the inquiry in Canada.
	Chat, questions, so on and so forth.
	And that's what we're going to do.
	We've got some good stuff here.
	But first, this is not just a question of, as they say, paying the bills.
	This is a question of thanking and being grateful to a sponsor that I actually have that is bold, audacious, courageous enough to sponsor the wrong thing.
	Fringe minority holding unacceptable views.
	Viva Frye.
	And no, it's not the maker of those shoes.
	Those are shoes that Murph's Kicks sent me, and they're glorious.
	EnviroClean's air purification filter system that you see right in front of your face right there.
	I really like to vet companies that I work with as sponsors, make sure they're good companies, good products, and in as much as possible, work with sponsors for products that I actually use.
	Some of you may or may not know, but we have asthma in the family.
	It doesn't come from my side of the genes, as my father would say.
	We have asthma in the family.
	Air quality in the house is a very big issue.
	It's a very big concern.
	Back in Canada, we had a filter.
	It was a piece of junk.
	I came across this filter.
	It's amazing.
	EnviroCleanse with a Z. The website is ekpure.com.
	If you use promo code VIVA, you get 10% off the unit and a free air quality monitor.
	Used by the Department of Defense.
	HEPA filters.
	It's got a patented purification technology in the air purifier filter section that neutralizes bacteria to half or a quarter the size of the ronavirus bacteria.
	It's quiet.
	It's amazing.
	For those of you who know that you need it, don't waste your money on something that sucks.
	The HEPA filter is a thick, beautiful HEPA filter.
	It's got patented technology for the neutralizing filter.
	Which has like minerals that neutralize particles as they go through them.
	If you need it, you know you need it.
	Get it.
	It's expensive.
	$6.99.
	EKPure.com.
	Promo code VIVA.
	You'll get 10% off the unit and an air quality monitor.
	A third-party monitor, but lets you know what your air quality is and lets you see that or if, but that the air purifier is working.
	Links are in the comments on both of the Rumble and YouTube.
	Air purification, it's important.
	And it's used by the Department of Defense.
	It's in 300,000 classrooms in America.
	And I would love to see it in 300,000 classrooms in Canada so that Canadian children don't have to have their windows open in winter to have proper or even adequate air circulation.
	But that's another discussion for another day.
	Okay.
	Are they easy to replace the filters?
	Yes, they are.
	The filters last, I think it's six months for the...
	For the purifier and two years for the HEPA filter.
	Easy to replace.
	Order them online.
	And it's whisper quiet.
	I feel like Nick Riviera.
	It's whisper to quiet, but it's actually whisper quiet.
	And it's amazing.
	And thank you, EnviroCleanse, for having the courage and making a quality product.
	EKpure.com, promo code VIVA.
	Okay, no, it's not $6.99.
	It's $699.
	There is 0% financing for people who...
	Who qualify.
	Okay, okay.
	That's the business end of this.
	And now let's get into the bidness end of this.
	Bidness.
	We're going to move over to a rumble in a second.
	Let's just cover the flagrant, egregious.
	No, you know what?
	Forget it.
	Alex Stein, 99. Before we get back into the hypocrisy, if you haven't seen this video, you go watch this video.
	You go watch this video.
	You see...
	The cojones.
	And you know what?
	I'm going to take that back.
	It's not cojones.
	It's not courage.
	It's stupidity.
	Alex Stein, I know you're probably watching this.
	You are crazy and you are stupid.
	But my goodness, my goodness, do you capture the craziness and the stupidity yourself?
	The world needs all types of people.
	It needs people who will literally strip naked and run into the proverbial fire.
	In fact, I should say, who will proverbially strip naked and run into the proverbial fire.
	That is...
	Alex Stein, 99, the number one pimp on a blimp, something along those lines.
	So he goes to Penn State.
	He goes to Penn State.
	I won't show the whole video because you got to go watch it.
	He goes to Penn State and has a wonderful experience.
	Imagine, I mean, these are the tolerant, non-misogynist, non-judgmental people who are out there fighting fascism.
	Imagine your Richard is so small, you become a proud boy.
	Oh, that's very funny.
	Okay, so this is the glorious part.
	And it's glorious for highlighting the insanity, but we're also going to draw a little law lesson from this.
	Let it roll.
	Alright, I'm on the key.
	That is a lot of spit.
	That's a lot of spit.
	That's assault, brother.
	That's assault, brother.
	People don't really appreciate this, but I think most people by this day and age know.
	Spitting on someone is assault.
	How do I get this out of here?
	What did I just close?
	Oh, I hope I didn't close the wrong window.
	Spitting on someone is assault.
	It's assault of the most disgusting order.
	But under certain circumstances, you should all appreciate this, it could be beyond assault.
	It could be borderline terroristic.
	One can recall, if one remembers these things...
	Make some noise.
	If one remembers these things...
	No, sorry, I'm not bringing that up.
	I'm not bringing that up.
	Viva, does it count as provocation when it comes to getting your teeth punched out for doing it?
	If whether or not he punched her in the face, would he be charged with assault?
	He would.
	I mean, I think.
	That would be my limited, uneducated opinion.
	Provocation?
	Maybe.
	Good luck.
	Good luck with politics playing that.
	But by the way, spitting is not just assault.
	Spitting on someone is not just assault.
	It could be a terroristic charge.
	Y 'all remember that crazy thing called the Rona?
	When people going around coughing on faces, spitting on stuff, there was an incident where someone spat all over the produce at a shopping center.
	Let's read this article.
	This is from March 31, 2020, when the world was absolutely out of its mind, and still is.
	Because of the coronavirus.
	Top line.
	As many people take precautionary measures to prevent the spread of coronavirus, a bizarre spate of reports are emerging nationwide of others allegedly spitting and coughing in public, perhaps to infect others, leading officials to issue warnings that perpetrators will be prosecuted, possibly even for terrorism.
	Early Sunday morning.
	Let me get my golfer's voice on.
	Early Sunday morning, a Colorado woman pulled over for a suspected drunken driver.
	Drunk driving, drunken driving, spat in a police officer's face saying, there's some corona for you.
	Now all you need is a lime.
	She clearly meant alcohol and not the virus, you dumb bums.
	Reports of similar incidents have taken off since last week, including an Amazon delivery driver who was fired after appearing to spit on a package.
	He was dropping off in a video captured by an Amazon ring device.
	Why would anyone do that?
	A British man was sentenced to a year in jail last week, a year in jail after he pleaded guilty to spitting on police officers while saying he had the coronavirus.
	One of the first sentencings since the UK government announced that coronavirus coughs at public servants and essential workers will be charged as assaults.
	Supermarket in Pennsylvania.
	This is the one I remember.
	Complained to police Wednesday after a customer claiming to be sick spat on produce and meat seeming to intentionally contaminate a reported $35,000 of goods.
	They were forced to throw it away, yada, yada, yada.
	While also trying to steal a 12-pack of beer.
	Then there was the video of a viral video of somebody licking the ice cream.
	Yep.
	A man in Harlington, Texas, was arrested and charged with terroristic threat after spitting on a park bench, according to police.
	The man said he had contracted contagious diseases and was attempting to infect everyone.
	So, not just assault.
	Not just assault.
	Could be terroristic threats.
	I'm not seriously suggesting that that deranged, unhinged individual at Penn State should be charged with terroristic threats.
	I think disciplinary actions and legal action would be normal.
	That was a luge.
	If it contained phlegm, that will make me barf.
	So I guess story time or the TMI of the day, I am not capable of doing those loogie things like going and coughing up phlegm or snot.
	Because it makes me want to vomit, and I have the fear of the vomiting.
	So whenever I have a cold, I just have to snort it back, and it's even grosser, although my doctor said it's better than blowing your nose.
	Even grosser.
	But I cannot cough up phlegm.
	When it happens, it makes me want to gag and retch.
	If that were phlegm, like beyond saliva, that's like the green, thick, mucousy boogers that's in the deep part of your head.
	But can you imagine?
	They're fighting fascism.
	These brave, stunning and brave, courageous students are fighting fascism by...
	Oh, demonetized.
	Doesn't matter.
	They're fighting fascism by physically assaulting, even if you consider them to be obnoxious, in-your-face jack-and-innies, physically assaulting them.
	You got to go watch the whole video, guys.
	It is glorious.
	Did I share the link?
	Anyways, everyone should be following Alex Stein.
	99. Even if you don't like all of his stuff.
	The dude is out there pushing the envelope and, you know, my goodness.
	Because the rest of that video is madness.
	Mayhem.
	They're out there fighting fascism seemingly by being fascists.
	They're out there fighting Yahtzees seemingly by acting like Yahtzees.
	Let it rip.
	You're missing out.
	Heck no.
	Law.
	And we're going to have some more double standard hypocrisy coming your way very soon.
	But before we do it, everyone, let's move the party on over.
	Oh, good.
	Okay, the hearings are on pause.
	Oh, yeah.
	Now I can put my headphones back on.
	I feel so naked without my headphones.
	Let us go and mosey on over to the rumbles and carry on this conversation there, shall we?
	I don't care.
	It's not about the monetization.
	It's about the exposure and the Promoting on the platform that it does not get after YouTube decides to demonetize.
	I have a sneaking suspicion that this video was demonetized because YouTube heard certain words but didn't know that Hillary Clinton was saying them.
	The words are verboten words when it's not Hillary.
	It's different.
	When it's capital D different, the words will be interpreted differently.
	Guaranteed that that stream, the first 30 minutes of this stream, will get re-monetized on YouTube.
	But for the time being...
	It's demonetized and being reviewed.
	Because they heard words, but they didn't know who was saying them.
	So they didn't know that it's acceptable.
	We've got a Rumble rant here.
	How did I miss that almost?
	RF Latstone or R Flatstone.
	You should switch to Rumble exclusive immediately upon YouTube demonetization.
	You know, I'd go for half an hour because, you know, for continuity, fluidity, whatever.
	But I have not been getting demonetized all that often.
	But it's soft censorship.
	It's not hard censorship.
	Because I know in all of my pushing the envelope for monetization, I don't really push the envelope for much more.
	So it happens, it happens.
	But I'm going to end this on Rumble.
	Can you interview Ye?
	Oh my goodness, would I interview Ye in a heartbeat?
	I don't know how it works.
	Can you get out there and everybody tweet Ye?
	Do a live stream interview with Viva.
	It would be...
	I'm not an arrogant, pompous man.
	I know my strengths and my weaknesses.
	One of my strengths would be the ability to conduct a phenomenal interview with EA.
	But I'm probably not important enough to even come close to the realm of having that happen.
	Okay, so that's it.
	Let's move it on over.
	Dan Bongino should be the one accredited for first saying, it's not hypocrisy, it's hierarchy.
	He is another great Rumble channel to watch.
	Dan Bongino should get credited for a lot of things.
	I don't know if he created the parallel economy concept.
	I suspect he didn't, but he certainly promoted it.
	And if it was an original idea to him at the time, he's a very, very smart man.
	Everybody should be watching Dan Bongino.
	Even if you don't agree with everything he says, go do it.
	All right, man.
	Let's go.
	I don't know what that's about, but okay.
	We're moving it on over.
	We're going to end it on Rumble.
	We're ending it on YouTube.
	Moving over to Rumble.
	We're moving in 3, 2, 1. Oh!
	I'm such an idiot.
	I was 13 seconds from doing it on 30 Minutes on the Nose.
	Not that anybody pays attention to those things.
	You'd have to be a totally deranged, obsessive-compulsive disorder individual to have noticed that you were 13 seconds from ending it on a perfect 30 minutes.
	Now, okay.
	Hierarchy.
	Hypocrisy.
	Endless.
	It's endless and it's in your face.
	You can't say what they can say.
	You get cancelled for saying what they get lauded for.
	It's so over the top.
	It's so ridiculous that you feel like you're taking crazy pills for noticing it.
	I can't find my link.
	Hold on one second.
	Y 'all remember when Gina Carano, who's...
	Twitter account seems to be suspended again, from what I can see.
	Do you remember when Gina Carano posted that tweet or that Instagram message?
	Here, hold on.
	We're going to do this.
	Okay, ignore it.
	You know what we're going to do?
	No, never mind.
	We're going to do this.
	We're going to close this here.
	We're going to go to...
	I want to pull up Gina Carano's original post.
	Okay, Google.
	Gina Carano, World War II Instagram post.
	Y 'all remember this?
	Y 'all ready for this?
	Let's backtrack to the past.
	Back in a day when I naively thought there was the ability to discuss and have a coherent discourse with people who were intellectually honest.
	This is what Gina Carano posted once upon a time.
	Now, I think we can see it.
	No, we can't see it because I'm on...
	For goodness sake.
	By the way, everybody, I tried to run with a second computer today.
	It's a seven-year-old Mac and it's a piece of junk.
	Here.
	This was Gina Carano's post from way back in the day that got her cancelled, lost contracts with Disney, whatever.
	Gina Carano, Jews were beaten in the streets, not by Nazi soldiers, but by their neighbors, even by children.
	Sad emoji, which is probably the understatement emoji of the millennium.
	Quote, because history is edited, most people today don't realize that to get to the point where Nazi soldiers could easily round up thousands of Jews, the government first made their own neighbors hate them.
	How is that any different from hating someone for their political views?
	And then this historical picture.
	Now, of note, despite knowing Gina Carano's, I guess, political leanings, there's no mention of political party in that.
	There's no pointing fingers of anyone in particular in that post, rather just highlighting the political divide that leads To neighbors hating neighbors, family members hating family members, communities turning on community members.
	And it doesn't happen overnight.
	It so doesn't happen overnight that if someone said to you in 2019, would you ever think of calling the police if you saw your neighbor not socially distancing with someone outside?
	You'd say, there are so many things wrong with that question.
	I think you're crazy.
	You would say...
	Why would that ever be?
	And you're crazy.
	Thank you.
	Go away from me and go back to screaming at trees in the park.
	Flash forward a year.
	It happened quickly, but it didn't happen overnight.
	Gina Carano put out that post.
	She lost a contract with Disney.
	I believe it led to her suspension.
	I could go back to that article.
	And let's just...
	Hold on.
	Let's just...
	You don't know who said it.
	This is another tweet on Twitter.
	Today.
	It didn't start with gas chambers.
	It started with one party controlling the media.
	Other than the fact that this is totally applied the wrong way, but we'll get to that.
	It started with one party controlling the media.
	One party controlling the message.
	One party deciding what is truth.
	One party of censoring speech and silencing opposition.
	One party dividing citizens into us and them and calling She's quoting Quentin Tarantino.
	Susan Sarandon.
	Susan Sarandon, mother activist, actress.
	Now, I swear to you, I made the joke earlier that it might be in there somewhere, you might be able to see it, that Susan Sarandon has gone full MAGA, like ultra MAGA, because you read that.
	You read that.
	And if anybody thinks that that applies to the GOP, to the political rights in America, I'm just going to say this, you're an idiot.
	Like, you have to be a brain-dead, eyes-wide-shut idiot to read this and then say, that totally applies to conservatives.
	That totally applies to...
	You have to be an idiot, or you just have to be willfully blind.
	Let's just go through them one by one.
	It started with one party controlling the media.
	Other than Fox News, which does not control the media but has a product that people like, who controls the media?
	And I don't mean in the Kanye West sense.
	I mean in the actual tactical control.
	Who controls the media?
	You got YouTube.
	You got Google.
	You got Facebook.
	You got Twitter.
	Then you got, in the actual media, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, 60 Minutes, and now I'm going into entities.
	BBC, NPR, in the media.
	Who controls the media?
	Republicans?
	Not even an idiot.
	You just have to be absolutely ignorant and ill-informed to even plausibly say Republicans and conservatives control the media.
	Hollywood.
	Politics is downstream from culture.
	Who controls cultural discourse?
	It's sure as hell not conservatives.
	If it were, you wouldn't see the filth that you see coming out of Hollywood by way of movies.
	You might see other stuff that you don't like.
	You wouldn't see the moral degeneracy and depravity that you see coming out of Hollywood if conservative Republicans controlled the media.
	Controlled the media.
	One party controlling the message.
	Oh yeah, no, no.
	Which party is it that has fact-checkers that deplatforms people for wrong think?
	One party deciding what is truth.
	You literally have Facebook fact-checkers deciding what's truth.
	Literally.
	Not Rachel Maddow literally, not literally, literally.
	Literally, literally, literally.
	Fact-checkers.
	Reuters.
	PolitiFact.
	Snopes.
	What are some of the other ones?
	PolitiFact?
	Reuters?
	AP?
	USA Today?
	Are those right wing?
	Are those controlled by conservatives?
	By the Republicans?
	You have to be an idiot.
	You'd have to be an idiot because to say it and expect someone to believe it, you have to be a double fakey idiot.
	You've got to be like next level.
	Not just an idiot to believe it.
	An idiot to think other people are so stupid they would believe it.
	One party deciding what is truth is exactly what Facebook does.
	It's exactly what...
	YouTube does.
	By way of example?
	Just because I happen to have it here?
	Where is it?
	Where is it?
	Oh, come on.
	Salty Cracker put out a video referring to the Katy Perry eye glitch as climate change induced.
	Here, hold on.
	Let's just...
	So, obviously, tongue-in-cheek.
	Hold on, so we gotta go.
	Stop, scream.
	Salty Cracker put out a video referring to Katy Perry's eye thing.
	If you haven't seen it, I still believe my theory that it's...
	Now, I believe it's a gluey, fake eyelash getting stuck.
	I agree, it looks totally weird.
	But that's my theory, and I'm sticking to it until proof to the contrary.
	But he put out a video talking about it.
	He says, the video's called...
	Katy Perry suffers climate change-induced facial spasm during concert.
	YouTube puts a warning.
	Climate change on his video.
	His video, just for those of you who don't have any lingering doubts, doesn't have to do with climate change.
	Climate change refers to long-term shifts in temperature and weather patterns, mainly caused by human activities, especially the burning of fossil fuels.
	This is a fact-check warning label.
	Unilaterally slapped on a salty cracker video with a humorous, ironic title by the people controlling the truth.
	And there are still idiots out there who are going to say, Republicans, conservatives, determine what is truth?
	You've got to be stupid to believe it and stupider to think other people are stupid enough to believe it.
	Let's go on.
	One party censoring speech and silencing opposition.
	Censoring speech.
	I will steel man it.
	I do know that people say DeSantis, with his don't say gay bill, although it's totally misnomered as don't say gay, but even if he says don't talk about gender or sexuality, well, they're censoring speech.
	I can concede that what they are doing is limiting speech.
	Up to you to decide if limiting speech of sexuality and gender issues to kindergartners is an illegitimate form of controlling speech.
	As relates to other people.
	But I'll concede to Steelman that some people say the Texas law governing social media censors speech.
	It doesn't allow...
	It doesn't allow...
	The hearing just came back on.
	It doesn't allow big tech companies to censor speech.
	Thus, it censors the speech censorship of the big companies.
	Okay, fine.
	Silencing opposition.
	That can go both ways.
	One party dividing citizens into us and them.
	Did they not listen to Biden's presidential red, what do they call it?
	The red speech?
	What did Barnes call it?
	Dividing us and them.
	MAGA Republicans.
	Extremists.
	Nazis.
	Fascists.
	The President of the United States.
	Crimson.
	The Crimson.
	The Crimson Speech.
	Susan Sarandon tweets exactly, exactly, not verbatim, but in essence, exactly what Gina Carano tweeted.
	Gina Carano gets cancelled.
	Susan Sarandon gets praised, hailed, lauded as a hero.
	The Crimson, what did Barnes call it?
	The Crimson?
	The Charlie Crist, don't vote for me speech, buckle brush.
	No, we're going to get to that.
	I got the highlights from the debate yesterday.
	It's that...
	Susan Sarandon, I believe, unironically in her own mind, tweeted that thinking that she was talking about conservatives and Republicans when every single aspect of that speech applies, if not exclusively, one of them applies potentially shared to both sides of the political aisle.
	Controlling media, controlling speech, dividing.
	Oh, yeah.
	That's the crimson speech.
	What was it?
	Anyhow, that's hypocrisy number one of the day.
	Oh, let's see what's going on here.
	Indenture Serpent says, test, test.
	It works.
	No chatters, says Robbity Bob.
	Robbity Bob.
	The Red Sermon.
	Thank you very much.
	Meme 521.
	The Red Sermon.
	People are saying test in the chat on Rumble.
	What's the dealio?
	Is there a problem?
	Mega Maggle trickle down.
	But I made the joke.
	Susan Sarandon, she's full Magga.
	And if she's not actually full Magga, and she made that as a tweet to criticize the right, the left could easily be turned on Susan Sarandon.
	Because if the left and the ADL and whatever else fell for that white power hand gesture meme, Joke that started on 4chan?
	They can certainly fall for the gag that Susan Sarandon has gone full MAGA and she is now anti-Biden.
	They certainly could because that's actually not just more plausible.
	On an ordinary reading, substitute the poster of that tweet, you would think it was a right-wing conservative or I'll just say centrist making political observations.
	Now, I'm not all that good at memeing and I'm not all that good at starting...
	4chan gags, but that could be a good one.
	Okay, let's see what we got in the chat.
	Prestitute says, David Fry, talk about Hu Jintao and China's new dictatorship.
	Can't really talk about things I don't really have an adequate understanding about.
	And I try not to...
	No, I try not to.
	I make sure not to overstep my own understanding of things.
	But I can tell you one thing that you did bring up in my mind with the talk about China.
	Speaking of hypocrisy.
	Speaking of...
	Speaking of hypocrisy.
	Speaking of double standards.
	Y 'all heard this?
	Adidas has seen the light.
	Adidas has seen the error in their ways of partnering.
	With anti-Semites.
	Of doing business with anti-Semites.
	By the way, some people might say, cutting off business relationships with a black American is very racist, Adidas.
	I mean, penalizing a black man?
	For things he said?
	Why would that not prima facie be racist until Adidas can show us that it was not racially motivated?
	No, it wasn't racially motivated.
	Adidas is not a racist organization that sanctions Free-thinking black Americans.
	Adidas is a morally virtuous company that cannot have anything to do with anti-Semitism or anti-Semitic remarks.
	They're virtuous.
	Potential genocide of the Uyghurs in China, that's a different thing.
	Why is it a different thing?
	It's like science with the dollar sign, except this is business with the dollar sign.
	That's business, and there's business.
	You know, there's...
	What was that from?
	There's the truth.
	And the truth.
	Well, there's business.
	Like, you know, Kanye.
	However much they were making off of Kanye's, you know, whatever they were doing with him.
	There's business.
	And then there's business.
	Asia is by...
	You can pull up the article.
	This is just, you know, straight up Google search.
	Asia is by far where most Adidas shoes are made.
	There are at least 371 factories in the continent making Adidas shoes, which is more than half of the total number of contractors listed by Adidas Group.
	China leads the pack with 103 factories.
	We'll do the Uyghur.
	Wait, where's the third?
	No, that's not what I wanted to show you.
	Because there are allegations of potential genocide, potential internment camps of Uyghur Muslims in China.
	There's potential.
	Hawley moves to personally sanction Xi top CCP officials over complicity in Uyghur genocide.
	It's coming from Fox News.
	Maybe they have a vested political interest to, I will say, exaggerate, to hyperbolize what's going on in these camps, rehabilitation camps, re-education camps.
	President Xi Jinping is expected to be re-elected to a third term power by the end of it.
	When is this from?
	October 20th, 2022.
	Minor potential genocide of Uyghur Muslims in China, internment camps, human rights violations.
	But no, Kanye West's ill-advised and easy-to-misunderstand social media posts, that's where Adidas draws the line.
	It's the Parkinson's law of virtue signaling.
	I've talked about Parkinson's law many, many, many times.
	It's a beautiful concept.
	A company can spend...
	Basically, the more complicated the question, the less time people are going to spend trying to find an answer because it's actually too complicated to understand.
	But the more simple the problem, the more everybody has an opinion on it because it's easy to fix, easy to understand, and therefore everybody will opine and express their opinion and think that they're smart.
	When it's something that's very complicated that there's no obvious solution to and it's not even obvious people actually understand the intricacies of the problem, then everyone gets silent.
	Ask where to put the water...
	What the hell am I talking about?
	The water...
	The water dispenser.
	Ask where to put the water dispenser at a law firm.
	Everybody's going to have an opinion.
	Ask how to deal with conflict of interest and China walls to ensure that people can bring their clients over from other firms if you want to attract new lawyers.
	The discussion on that is, oddly enough, going to be shorter.
	Adidas cannot possibly ever hope to solve the problem.
	Or to think of an adequate solution that wouldn't hurt it too much in dealing with China's human rights abuses, alleged Uyghur genocide.
	And they make way too much money with them.
	But, you know, look virtuous by canceling Kanye.
	Doesn't cost him much.
	Easy to do, easy to understand, and easy to...
	What's the word?
	Signal boost.
	On the social medias.
	It might even make them more sales, in which case they can manufacture more shoes through slave labor in China.
	Might even make them more money.
	Might make more business for those kids stitching those shoes together in China.
	That's fine with Adidas.
	Stupid social media posts, you canceled.
	Let's see this.
	Someone says it's...
	Imagine Matt says play and pause, then refresh and piss off out and rejoin.
	Nothing but his avatar.
	Hold on.
	Let me see what's going on on Rumble here.
	Hold on.
	See an ad.
	Should Hillary Clinton be investigated?
	That's the...
	Okay.
	I'm not clicking on it because it brings me to another window.
	No, I see myself.
	Is that me?
	I see myself paused looking at the computer.
	Is that me?
	Okay, good.
	No, it's working.
	It's working.
	Some people within Adidas probably agree with Ye.
	Well, it is...
	Look, there is a very big irony in what Kanye said.
	Even if one is inclined to interpret it in the most anti-Semitic, offensive way possible...
	The response has not been one that's going to convince Kanye that he was wrong, if that's truly what he thought.
	And the really grotesque thing about the response, which is what people don't really seem to understand, there might have been people not even in the middle, there might have been indifferent people or people with an opposite opinion that are now seeing what's being done to Kanye, and they might have never had this thought until the media said Kanye was anti-Semitic.
	And now let's go cancel Kanye.
	They might have never had the thought until now.
	And so you see that these knee-jerk cancel culture responses, other than actually not doing anything, they actually only risk doing the exact opposite.
	There are going to be people now who are going to say, my goodness, Kanye's right.
	They might even think that Kanye meant something he didn't mean and agree with what Kanye didn't mean in the first place.
	As a result of how the media framed it and how social media responded.
	Oh, but remember Susan Sarandon's post.
	Conservatives and Republican control the message.
	They control the media.
	That's why Kanye's getting cancelled.
	Having banking relations terminated.
	Having business contracts terminated.
	Because conservatives and Republicans control all of that.
	Shea, boss.
	All right.
	That's the Kanye hypocrisy.
	What was the other hypocrisy that I have on the back burner here?
	Adidas.
	Oh, anyways, I made a good meme.
	I think this is actually a good meme.
	And I'm not a meme master.
	I'm not a joke master, but this is good.
	This is the Drake.
	Adidas is like, no, no, no, no Kanye.
	You all get that meme here if anybody wants to partake in my creative genius.
	So that's it.
	That's for the fun stuff of the day.
	Here's the link.
	How's everybody else doing?
	Do you feel like you're going crazy?
	And do you feel like the world is going crazy?
	You have to and you should because everybody has to feel that way.
	The question is, what do you do with that thought?
	What do you do with that energy?
	What do you do with that anxiety?
	Someone once explained to me that anxiety is a code hook looking for a jacket.
	And it will find a jacket.
	And if you don't have a jacket to hang on that code hook, it'll find a shirt.
	It'll find a towel.
	It'll find...
	I can't think of it.
	It'll find earbuds.
	Put it to good use.
	Kanye doesn't understand himself.
	The other thing is, Kanye might just be...
	I'm not into the writing him off for bipolar mental illness.
	It's unfair, and it's exactly why people who suffer from mental illness are reluctant to come out and divulge it, because then any behavior that anybody disagrees with, anything that would be eccentric in someone who's not known to be mentally ill...
	All of a sudden becomes a symptom of mental illness when someone who has admitted or known to have mental illness displays those characteristics.
	It's a deterrent from open discourse and treatment, and it's just fundamentally unfair.
	Setting aside absolutely over-the-top, like running around naked because you think you're on fire, which Ricky Bobby did in Talladega Nights.
	And Nature Freedom says, no excuses, he's just a jerk.
	No, but the other thing is...
	He might know what he's doing, and he might be a performer through and through 24-7.
	Any publicity is good publicity for some.
	I prefer rather just to have good publicity being good publicity, or at least not have publicity of, you know, bad publicity, legit bad publicity.
	So he might just be doing it because it's good for business, it's good for branding, and he wants to be provocative.
	Or he might have said something.
	Awkwardly.
	Absolutely did not mean what the media said he meant with it, but the media's response to it might actually confirm in Kanye's mind that maybe he didn't mean that in the first place, but maybe he might mean it the next time he says it.
	Bill Brown's in the house.
	Templeton pig guarding the dooryard.
	I fear nothing.
	For those of you who don't know, Bill Brown is in our locals community, one of many wonderful community members.
	One day I'm going to meet Templeton.
	Bill, do we call it a pig or a hog?
	If I could show a picture of it, let me do this.
	Let me see if I can get it.
	Bill, I'm going to see if I can get a picture of your hog.
	I have to save it because I don't want to...
	Let me see.
	We've got a live chat running in Rumble.
	For those of you who don't know, Rumble is probably the coolest place to be these days.
	Not Rumble.
	Well, Rumble is as well, but locals.
	VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com, where Viva Barnes, Barnes and me, have a magnificent community.
	Now, I'm scrolling up in the messages.
	We have a live chat going now.
	You don't have to be a paying member.
	You could be a member of the community.
	There's over 100,000 non-supporting members of a community.
	You get tons of free content, but tons of stuff that is exclusive to locals.
	And then there's some stuff behind a paywall for the supporting members, which is normal and to be expected.
	Bill, the one time I can't find a picture of your pig...
	I gotta get it.
	I gotta get it.
	A pic of your hog.
	Okay, so it's a hog.
	Let me go to...
	Come on, man.
	Okay, Bill, go put another picture of the hog in, and I'm gonna go back down to the bottom of the comments here.
	It's a picture of Katy Perry with the wink.
	Okay, Bill, get a picture there.
	And while you do that, who saw the debate yesterday?
	The debate between...
	Governor DeSantis and Ron DeSantis and Charlie Crist.
	Everybody should watch it.
	It was an hour.
	It was kind of quick-paced.
	But it was like an Arsenio Hall show.
	It was an Arsenio Hall hooting and hollering, regardless of what was said, regardless of the substance of what was said.
	I am biased.
	Not biased, but I like DeSantis.
	I think he has some quirks.
	Not all of his questions were home runs, and some of them were deflectors.
	But I like him.
	I think he's by far the best political leader out there right now.
	Didn't hit home runs on all of his questions, but I like him.
	So you think I'm biased.
	I don't think I'm biased.
	I think I've come to the right conclusion.
	Charlie Crist is an awful, hateful man.
	It exudes from his skin.
	He's a mean-spirited individual in as much as I can surmise anything about him, having never met him and seeing him only from the interwebs.
	And they had the debate last night.
	And Charlie Crist came off exactly the way mean-spirited, angry curmudgeons come off.
	Uh, Angry.
	And by goodness, Charlie Crist had an agenda last night.
	It was to support abortion.
	You know, he himself didn't answer the question that he faulted DeSantis for not answering up until when?
	Or when does DeSantis want to prevent abortion?
	As of what date?
	Faulted DeSantis for not answering the question, although DeSantis, in my view, did answer the question, if only implicitly, if not explicitly.
	But he comes off as just an awful, awful, angry, bitter man.
	But don't trust me.
	Trust Charlie Crist.
	I put together four highlights, and maybe we'll walk through it after.
	Listen to this.
	Bring the state back together and not have a divider as a governor.
	Doesn't want to have a divider as a governor.
	I want a uniter.
	I want to bring the state back together and not have a divider as a governor.
	Okay, now, by the way, just so we can appreciate something.
	Back together.
	Look at how he's raising his eyebrows.
	Because when you raise your eyebrows, you obviously look more sympathetic than when you frown.
	I've got the frown wrinkle here.
	Here, when he wants to lie about being a uniter, he's got to look like a nice, sympathetic old man.
	Look at his eyebrows.
	Bring the state back together and not have a divider as a governor.
	By the way, now watch what happens when he...
	When he speaks honestly.
	Those who support the governor should stay with him and vote for him and I don't want your vote.
	If you have that hate in your heart, keep it there.
	Notice the eyebrows.
	I don't want your vote.
	I want them united.
	I'm a nice old man because I'm in front of a camera now and I really understand that I have to be performing.
	I want to bring this state back together and not have a divider as a governor.
	And I don't want your vote.
	So I'm not biased to DeSantis.
	DeSantis has proven to be better than Chris.
	But it doesn't end there.
	So listen to this.
	DeSantis looks...
	He's got a funny delivery.
	But okay, listen to this.
	The question was, basically, until when?
	As of when should a woman not be allowed to have an abortion?
	He also supports sex-selective abortions, which is used to discriminate against little girls.
	He supports dismemberment abortions, where they literally will tear the baby limb from limb, and he supports taxpayer funding of abortion all the way up until the moment of birth, and that is wrong.
	Congressman, you have 60 seconds.
	Ron, that's just not the truth, and you know it.
	You know it.
	He wouldn't answer your question.
	Do you want to ban abortion completely?
	He never got to it.
	He talked about Jamaica.
	I don't want to ban abortion.
	I want to make sure we keep a woman's right to choose available to the women of the state of Florida.
	And I want to make sure that we don't have a governor in the future who wouldn't even allow exceptions for rape or incest.
	We just found out recently about a case of a middle school girl near Jacksonville who was a victim of incest, became impregnated.
	Because of the bill you signed, Governor, she had to go two to three states in order to take care of this issue.
	Take care of this issue.
	That's not compassionate leadership.
	That's not doing the right thing.
	That's not even having a heart.
	That's callous, it's barbaric, and it's wrong, and Florida deserves better.
	And if you want better, I hope you vote no matter.
	I didn't notice that I got a notification during that screen grab.
	Appreciate that, by the way.
	And we can talk about policy issues on that in a second.
	The question was to Charlie, you know, when does he support abortion up until?
	In DeSantis' answer, he said, I think 15 weeks is reasonable.
	That was his answer in the substantive part of his answer.
	Notice, acutely absent from Christ, other than criticizing what he believes DeSantis believes, doesn't answer the question, when does he believe it should be permitted and as of when should it be forbidden?
	On the substantive issue, people might not like my personal view, but there should be or have to be exceptions for rape and incest.
	People have to appreciate the policy issue with that.
	And it's a very, very legitimate, and actually it's a very thorny problem to find a solution to.
	If you make the exception for rape and incest, it might incentivize women.
	Who have gotten pregnant, not through rape or incest, but who might be beyond what would otherwise be the statutory restrictions, barring the exception for rape or incest, from getting an abortion.
	And so then what you might end up having, let's just say it's 15 weeks.
	Woman doesn't know she's pregnant, finds out 16 weeks, 17 weeks.
	Wants to have an abortion.
	Can't.
	In that state.
	Maybe she'll have to go to California, which is going to be the sanctuary state for a number of things.
	Can't.
	Well, if there's a rape and incest exception that goes beyond the statutory ceiling, you might incentivize people to then say, well, it was rape, so allow me an exception.
	Well, if it's rape, then you got to press charges against somebody.
	If you go to a doctor and say it was rape, I don't want to press charges, I don't want to go to the police, you might have an issue.
	If the requirement is, okay, there will be a rape and incest exception, but it has to be coupled with a police report, then you might get a lot of people filing a lot of false rape claims so they can get an abortion that would otherwise be precluded from them because of time passage.
	So I don't know exactly what DeSantis' position on it is.
	I would be, in as much as I'd ever be a politician or a policymaker, would admit of that exception, in as much as some people won't like it, and I can appreciate that.
	We'll have to agree to disagree, and that would be what would be on the ballot.
	But even if you agree with that exception, it poses serious problems, and it poses serious risks that you can't just brush off.
	You can't just ignore and say, oh, because it's a real policy issue.
	But it doesn't end there.
	There were a couple more highlights from that debate.
	Who watched it, by the way?
	Let's just see if we got...
	Did I watch the real Anthony Fauci movie coming from Candace?
	No, but I read the book.
	I don't think I want visuals to that.
	His position is the 15-week law he just signed.
	Duh.
	I think it's a good compromise.
	Oh, there's Templeton.
	Save image as Templeton.
	Templeton is going to get so much exposure right now.
	People, you're going to love this hog, pig, whatever.
	I think it's...
	Okay, hold on.
	Here we go.
	We got that.
	Oh, I just want to kiss it on the face, but I know that those things are not the type of animal you want to kiss on the face.
	This is Templeton.
	Everybody watching this now.
	This is Templeton the pig, Templeton the hog, whatever you want to call it.
	Bill.
	From our locals community, if I ever can get an animal like this, I will.
	Look.
	Look at this thing.
	Don't you...
	Do you not just want to...
	I'm conflicted.
	On the one hand, I want to kiss it and hug it.
	And on the other hand, I want to eat it.
	Okay, I'm sorry though.
	I once had an equestrian client, a horse.
	They owned a horse thingy thing, an equestrian as a law client.
	And I made a joke about...
	Whether or not they eat their beloved pets after they're done with them.
	Apparently, horse owners don't find those jokes funny.
	Look at this fat little pig and that mouth.
	I mean, they can destroy you.
	Anyway, everybody, that's Templeton.
	I love him.
	I love him.
	Okay.
	Bacon.
	I see food.
	Bill might not be.
	It's a pet.
	I mean, it's a dual-purpose pet.
	I always make the joke about Pudge, but if Pudge were to ever kick the bucket, there's also no protein on her.
	She has no muscle anymore.
	Horse meat is good and good for you, though.
	Yes, but I can appreciate people thinking horses are too smart to be food.
	I mean, I know I feel that way about dogs.
	And I do not, you know, protein is protein, and I can understand under certain circumstances, but I wouldn't get offended at jokes about eating dogs, my dogs, or like, you know, someone's pets, but yeah, no.
	Viva, you are nuts.
	Pigs want to eat you too, says Sheep Droppings.
	No, I know, I know.
	And the thing is, they're not soft.
	They're not mushy, cushy pillows.
	Their hair is not, you know, like soft and flowing, like it just has argan oil put into it after it was brushed.
	They're hard animals, and their hair is coarse, like bristle pads.
	And they're kind of vicious.
	Yes, S. Bovino says, I'm not kosher.
	I'm off the bandwagon, people.
	Okay, but hold on.
	We've got to get to two more highlights from the debate yesterday.
	So all of you don't have to watch it.
	I watched it.
	I almost had tickets to go.
	But it didn't come through.
	Okay, hold on.
	Because we got Charlie Crist.
	We got that one.
	Okay, he's an evil man.
	Okay, we got one, two.
	Listen to this.
	Listen to this.
	You want to talk about someone incapable of answering a question.
	Someone incapable of providing a response because they're just politicians who can't answer a bloody question.
	I think it's here.
	I think it's here.
	It is.
	Listen to this.
	All of American history, including slavery, Florida statutes require teaching all of American history, including slavery, civil rights, segregation.
	It's important that that's taught.
	But what I think is not good is to scapegoat students based on skin color.
	It's not good to distort American history by saying that...
	American Revolution was fought to defend slavery, which is not true.
	I think we should have a history like Abraham Lincoln believed in our founding, like Frederick Douglas.
	These are great eternal principles.
	We've got a great constitution and people have used those principles to make great progress over the course of our country's history.
	I'm proud of our history.
	I don't want to teach kids to hate our country.
	I don't want to teach kids to hate each other.
	And the way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
	I mean, other than someone could say he's got a bit of a goofy delivery.
	Setting that aside, forget delivery, substance over form, how can anybody listen to that and not say, how can anyone disagree with that?
	How can anyone disagree with that?
	People are going to say, you have to discriminate based on race because some people have been so underprivileged from day one that they need to be overprivileged and you need to reverse discriminate.
	That's not how you rectify a historical injustice.
	That's how you create a present-day injustice.
	Thank you.
	You know, he talks about not teaching about the history of our country that might offend some people in our schools.
	We ought to teach facts in our schools.
	Who's hooting and hollering?
	We ought to teach facts.
	Who?
	What the hell are you saying, Chris?
	We got to teach.
	No, no, you don't.
	We should teach fiction in school.
	Unless it's, you know, fiction writing.
	But no.
	And people hooting and hollering.
	We ought to teach the truth.
	You want to teach facts and you want to teach the truth?
	There are biological differences between biological males and biological females.
	Biological males have more muscle mass, on average are taller, and therefore should not be allowed to compete in sports for biological females, even if they've transitioned, even if they're taking hormone blockers.
	Let's talk facts.
	Is that a controversial fact?
	There's an old expression, Ron.
	Those who don't know history may be condemned to repeat it.
	And those who do know history may be condemned to watch jackasses like you repeat it.
	That's the other part of the sentence, Chris.
	Usually people use that in reference to the Holocaust.
	It could just as easily be referenced to slavery in our country.
	It happened.
	It's a fact.
	We shouldn't have a whitewash approach to educating our children.
	That's not right.
	How are they going to do well in life if they don't even know our own history?
	How are they going to do well in their life if they don't even know our own history?
	How are they going to know their own history when you've taken down monuments?
	When you've taken down...
	History itself.
	Teach people to hate each other in our schools.
	I don't know where you get that idea.
	I don't have hate in my heart.
	And I don't think we need to be doing that in our schools.
	Why you think that's happening right now is beyond me.
	We need to get back on track.
	We need to apply common sense.
	We need to do what's right.
	And you're taking away from all these other issues because you don't want to talk about taking away a woman's right to choose.
	And that's on the ballot in this election.
	That's time, folks.
	And you've even signed a bill that would take away their right in cases of rape and incest.
	It's on Congress.
	Congressman, that's time.
	We're going to have to leave it right there.
	Every question led to abortion last night.
	It was actually pathological, but you know how it works.
	They've got their talking points.
	Every question led to abortion.
	Everybody should be following Chef Andrew Grew, by the way.
	Oh, yeah.
	One day.
	Okay, but then there was one more highlight.
	There was one more highlight.
	As we do this, I'm hearing the Ottawa Convoy thingy thing in the back.
	Look for the first one.
	I think it was this one.
	Here we go.
	This is the last of the highlights that I got.
	And Congressman, do you believe it's important to educate students in kindergarten through third grade about sexual orientation and gender identity?
	Congressman, you have...
	Yes or no?
	Let's hear the question.
	Was the question confusing?
	And Congressman...
	Do you believe it's important to educate students in kindergarten through third grade about sexual orientation and gender identity?
	Congressman, you have 60 seconds.
	What I think is important is to educate children on science, math, and history.
	And true history.
	And facts.
	That's not an answer.
	You know what that is?
	That's what Kent Brockman refers to as avoision.
	That is a disingenuous, dishonest copo, Mr. Christ.
	And you know it.
	I mean, you don't need me to tell you that you know it.
	What do I think?
	No.
	If you start a question with avoiding the actual question, so I was going to think it's like Tom McLean, not Tom McLean, John McLean in Die Hard, where his wife says, you always answer a question with a question.
	He says, do I?
	It's sort of like that.
	Do you think that kindergartners to grade three should be taught about sexual orientation and gender identity?
	What I think is something totally unrelated to the question you just asked.
	Liar, dishonest, disingenuous, coward.
	Period.
	Hold on, what am I looking at here?
	Okay, that's me.
	So yeah, those are the highlights.
	Where there was some...
	DeSantis could have some answering to do on insurance issues.
	Some of the financial, economic stuff that seems to be unique or disproportionate to Florida, there's work to be done.
	But my goodness, just so people can appreciate this, Charlie Crist accused...
	It was so illogical.
	He's destroyed the state, and yet that's why tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of people are moving to Florida.
	He's anti-business, and yet that's why...
	Tons of businesses are moving to Florida.
	I mean, it was the question of sucking and blowing, because you can't deny certain facts, but you want to make it look like DeSantis has destroyed Florida, and yet it's the focal point to which people are flocking, people and businesses.
	There are issues about real estate value.
	There are issues about insurance costs that are real issues.
	Chris tried to fault him for his response to the hurricane.
	I mean, it's so, so dishonest and so disingenuous, but par for the course for the thing.
	So my takeaway is that DeSantis probably could have answered a few questions better, but Charlie Chris looks like an angry old man.
	He looks like, you know, he looks like an angry Joe Biden.
	And his policy has just been absolute crap.
	I mean, his policy.
	His positions.
	Inability to answer very basic questions which people want answers to.
	All right.
	What else do we got here?
	I'll bring up one story here.
	Greiner.
	I wanted to talk about Greiner.
	Basketball player in Russia.
	Brittany Greiner, Appeal Russia.
	Her appeal was heard, and she's got nine years.
	Part of you feels bad, because I think nine years for a non-violent drug offense, it's different only in the extent of 13 years hard labor for stealing government Paraphernalia from a North Korean hotel.
	But don't go to countries that you don't trust.
	Don't go to fascist dictatorships that you don't trust that are run by what you believe to be genocidal maniacs.
	Russia court denies Brittany Griner's appeal of her nine-year sentence.
	National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan.
	Said Tuesday's decision was the product of another sham judicial proceeding.
	It's a sham judicial proceeding when she pleaded guilty to act.
	I mean, I don't think the actus reus, the act of the crime here, is at issue.
	There might be an issue of mens rea, whether or not she knew that it was illegal to smuggle or bring in what she was bringing into the country.
	Maybe.
	But I don't think...
	Any elements of the crime are actually in controversy.
	The process, maybe.
	The sentence, definitely.
	But you have the audacity.
	Jake Sullivan has the audacity of calling what happened in Russia a sham of a judicial proceeding where someone actually had a trial for a crime that they admitted to, pleaded guilty to, sentenced harshly, and confirmed on appeal.
	I hate to equivocate and bring it back over because I'll call both of them injustices.
	What about January 6th?
	And it's not a whataboutism.
	It's why criticize Russia and then maybe people think twice about going to a country that they think is an authoritarian regime run by a Hitlerian genocidal maniac.
	Maybe you think twice about going there.
	Maybe if that's who's running the country.
	It doesn't exactly have the type of judicial system you even want to expose yourself to.
	That being said, some people are looking at America, Putin being one of them, and saying, pot, meat, kettle.
	A person living in a glass house, don't throw stones because I've got a few in my back pocket as well.
	What happened in Russia was a sham of a judicial proceeding.
	In America, in Washington, D.C., some people held in two years pre-trial detention in horrendous conditions, denied medical treatment, abused pre-trial detention.
	They didn't even get their sham trial.
	Silence.
	A Russian court on Tuesday denied WNBA star Brittany Griner's appeal and upheld her nine-year prison sentence on drug charges.
	Not charges anymore.
	Drug convictions.
	I hate to play semantics, but framing is important, but so is honesty.
	She looked despondent as she appeared at the hearing, yada, yada.
	Griner's conviction in August was decried by the United States, which has said the athlete is being wrongfully detained.
	The denial of her appeal will see her hopes for Griner's release shift to the potential for a high-profile prisoner swap.
	Why is she being unlawfully detained?
	It's a serious...
	She might be being excessively detained.
	Does anybody deny that she did what she pleaded guilty to doing?
	Funny thing is, when Otto Warmbier...
	Does anybody remember Otto Warmbier?
	Let me see.
	In the chat, does everybody remember Otto Warmbier?
	When he was found guilty and he pleaded guilty and he was sobbing and throwing himself at the mercy of the court, I thought that it was an extorted confession, a coerced confession.
	I didn't think he did it.
	I didn't think he did anything.
	I thought it was just, I thought it was, everything was, all the charges themselves were fabricated.
	Some other people have said, no, you know, he actually did steal the paraphernalia.
	That would change virtually nothing.
	But it, you know, and it's not to say play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
	Go to North Korea dictatorship and do something which would otherwise be a prank slap on the wrist in a free and democratic society, purportedly free and democratic.
	Hold on now.
	I see here, someone says, I did not know that PSYOP.
	So what did PSYOP say?
	Says that does make the harsh sentence understandable.
	Hold on a second.
	What did PSYOP say in the chat?
	She knew, and it was more than personal use.
	The Russians understood she brought extra to hand out to Russian athletes.
	This is tantamount to attempted murder in Russia.
	Okay.
	The bottom line, she confessed to it.
	And whereas nothing is going to explain or justify away the atrocity that was committed against Otto Warmbier in North Korea, all that to say is...
	I did not know that apparently the rumoring or the theory is that he actually did steal something to bring it back as a memento.
	To bring it back as a memento is like, look what I was able to sneak out of communist or whatever they call it.
	Dictatorial.
	Dictatorship North Korea.
	I didn't know that.
	That seems to be the theory.
	Doesn't change the injustice.
	Brittany Greiner, and I don't know if she actually brought more than was for personal use and was planning to have parties in Russia, she broke the law in Russia.
	And if you think what people seem to think about Russia, Putin, the system there, don't go there.
	Don't give them your money.
	Don't take your chances with a system that you think is run by a genocidal maniac.
	Take your chances.
	You're taking your chances.
	I lost the article.
	I forgot the article was still out there.
	Hold on.
	Anyway, so she got her sentence.
	Her appeal was denied.
	And now they're going to have to trade her out, and the question's going to be, who are they going to trade her for?
	President Joe Biden has been very clear that Britney should be released immediately.
	Oh, she should be released from Russia for smuggling drugs, but January 6th defendants should be locked up indefinitely.
	And Putin is the autocrat.
	Adding that the Biden administration has in recent weeks continued to engage with Russia through every available channel and make every effort to bring home Britney, as well as to support and advocate for other Americans detained in Russia, including fellow wrongful detainee Paul You threw that word in there again.
	She might be excessively detained.
	I think most people do.
	She's been quite optimistic, yada, yada, yada.
	Okay, well, that's the end of the article.
	But, you know, while we're at it, January 6th, detainees.
	Let's just see what the latest news is there.
	Yeah, let's just read an article from NPR.
	Take it for what it's worth.
	January 6th, detainees say a D.C. jail is so awful that they'd like to transfer to Guantanamo.
	Oh, but these guys, they stormed the Capitol.
	They tried to uproot democracy.
	They tried to destroy the American experiment.
	Brittany Griner all she did was smuggle drugs into Russia.
	Dozens of individuals held in Washington, D.C.'s jail on charges related to the January 6, 2021 insurrection.
	They submitted a handwritten letter to a federal court demanding to be moved to Guantanamo Bay.
	The detainees say they are living in inhumane conditions.
	No, but let's look at Russia.
	Let's complain about Russia.
	The seven-page letter reviewed by NPR is signed by 34 defendants and was submitted as part of a response to the government for its denial of alleged Capitol rioter Ryan Nichols' pretrial release.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	He's being detained before trial?
	Nichols is facing multiple charges related to his alleged participated in the insurrection.
	The individuals who signed off on the letter include a bunch of people.
	Who allegedly used chemical spray as well as a crutch and a metal pole to attack police officers guarding the building.
	He's accused of assaulting.
	The detainees list several issues.
	The conditions allegedly include no religious services or visitations, black mold, which is very bad for you for anybody who's ever dealt with mold issues, worms, on the jail's walls and in food, abuse by guards, And vaccine requirements for visits and other services.
	They also say their clothing sent to laundry is returned covered in brown stains, pubic hair, and or reeking of ripe urine.
	Don't forget that, guys.
	That's America.
	Let's focus on Russia.
	And if anybody thinks that Putin is not looking at this and saying, pulling a little Drake, Oh, what's that?
	You tolerate your injustices, but you don't want to tolerate mine?
	They say they've lost eyesight and hair because of malnourishment.
	In contrast, the letter says that Guantanamo Bay actually provides nutritional meals, routine sunlight exposure, top-notch medical care, is respectful of religious requirements, has centers for exercise entertainment, and for its detainees, despite the fact that those residents are malicious terrorists.
	The Department of Questions for Washington didn't immediately respond to NPR's request for comments on the allegations.
	No, they were too busy complaining about Russia and Brittany Griner.
	But let's just see, what was...
	Brian Nichols.
	I think we covered this before, but has he not gone to trial?
	He hasn't gone to trial yet.
	March 24. March?
	So that's six months ago.
	March, April, May, June, July, August, September.
	Seven months ago.
	Judge, federal judge grants trial continuance for two Capitol riot suspects.
	Are these them?
	Ryan Nichols left.
	And who's on the right?
	Alex Harkiger.
	What happened here?
	Continuance is a postponement.
	A federal judge has agreed to postpone a trial for two former Texas Marines charged with multiple crimes.
	The trial was originally scheduled for July 25th.
	Ryan Nichols and Alexander Harkrider are former Marines that allegedly traveled together to Washington, D.C. to protest the elections.
	Prosecutors say they have evidence showing the pair committed multiple crimes during the January 6th insurrection, including footage of Nichols allegedly using pepper spray on federal law enforcement officers.
	Prosecutors paint Nichols as the leader of the pair.
	Nichols remains in Washington, D.C. jail while Harkreiter is in Texas on bond.
	So he's in a jail.
	It's March 24th.
	This occurred on January 6th.
	January to January.
	That's a year.
	January, February, March.
	Pre-trial detention still there.
	Nearly two years.
	And yes, let's take for granted he pepper-sprayed a police officer.
	Y 'all are okay with that?
	Where's...
	The tennis player.
	What's her name?
	Billie Jean.
	Where's Billie Jean?
	Both defendants were present at the status conference via Zoom.
	As it was ending, you could hear one say to the other, I love you, brother.
	An official date has yet to be set, but the judge said he wants to begin the trial by November 1st.
	January to January is one year.
	January to February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November.
	That is two years less two months.
	Pre-trial detention for someone accused of allegedly pepper spraying a police officer.
	And people want to lecture Russia on abuse of the judicial process.
	People want to lecture Russia on inhumane detention, on unlawful detention.
	They haven't even stood trial yet, that guy, Nichols.
	Two years pre-trial detention.
	Hasn't had his trial yet, hasn't been released pending his trial.
	OK.
	You try to make sense of it, and you can't.
	The only thing you can do...
	Hold on.
	The only thing you can do...
	Give me a second.
	I'm not going to screw it up today.
	This is what you can do.
	Dude, one day I want to remember it.
	God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and wisdom to know the difference.
	Now, that is requiring the.
	It has to say, God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.
	It has to have the the for flow.
	I don't believe in necessarily Agob, but I will ask whoever is in control of internal emotions and plight, please do that to me.
	I'm good at identifying the things that I can't change.
	I'm bad at not obsessing over them and stressing over them.
	But there are very few things that we can't, if not directly change, at the very least, attempt to change.
	I will stop engaging with trolls on Twitter once I had become thoroughly convinced that they are in fact...
	Disingenuous trolls.
	Sometimes I'm a weak man and I still either try to think that I'm going to be able to change them, talk some sense into them, prove that their initial statements were wrong, but I won't be able to change that.
	So I need the wisdom to know when.
	Let's see.
	New York Supreme Court reinstated all fired employees with back pay.
	Well, I don't know.
	I don't know that.
	But Lazy Bugs Nanyo Business, NYB, says, I believe in God with every fiber of my being.
	There is no lasting hope without that.
	I was thinking about that, that the value of believing in God, and the funny thing is belief doesn't make a difference if God exists or God doesn't, but the value of believing itself, I think, is the value.
	It will give someone confidence.
	It might give someone...
	It might release the proper chemicals in their own body to make them stronger, to make them deal better with the environment around them.
	God loves a working man.
	Goodness is its own reward.
	Belief itself might be its own strength.
	But not when it comes to the point of apathy.
	I believe in God, so therefore I don't have to do anything myself.
	Because God helps those who help themselves.
	What else do we got?
	What do you got?
	Let's see here.
	I think we're almost...
	Oh, has the hearing...
	The hearing is on break.
	Oh, here it is.
	It's right here, the news article.
	Okay.
	Look at this.
	And this is...
	I remember now, we've been involved in this for long enough, people.
	Barnes and I have been talking about it for long enough.
	At some point...
	Well, the only problem...
	At some point, justice does find a way.
	Justice is life.
	It will find a way.
	New York's Supreme Court reinstates all employees fired for being unvaccinated.
	Orders back pay.
	The Supreme Court found that being vaccinated does not stop the spread of COVID.
	Oh, the court found that?
	By the way, it's so undeniable, they're now telling us that we were never told that being vaccinated would stop the spread.
	It's so undeniable now that they have to lie about what they initially said.
	Gosh darn it.
	Look at that face.
	Carrie Lake.
	Aw, yeah.
	Let's bring this out of here.
	I'd like to have Carrie Lake on the channel also.
	Maybe I'm going to do a random tweet.
	To see if I can make that happen.
	The New York State Supreme Court reinstated all...
	Are these state employees?
	All employees who were fired for not being vaccinated on Monday ordering back pay and saying their rights have been violated.
	The court found that being vaccinated...
	Hey, YouTube overlords, when I put this out there, I'm just reading an article and what the court said.
	But now I guess now if the court said it, maybe you're going to go change your community guidelines so that people can actually repeat it.
	The court found that, quote, YouTube overlords...
	Being vaccinated does not prevent an individual from contracting or transmitting COVID-19, end quote.
	Then what the hell were the purposes of the mandates?
	Oh, what's that?
	Now we're finding out that the mandates were unlawful, were unscientific.
	New York City Mayor Eric Adams claimed earlier this year that his administration would not rehire employees who had been fired over their vaccination status.
	My goodness, how we come to accept discrimination.
	How we've come to normalize discrimination.
	So I guess it's state employees.
	New York City alone fired 1,400 employees for being unvaccinated earlier this year after the city adopted a vaccine mandate under former mayor, the king of discrimination, Mayor de Blasio, the man who would go around looking in synagogues to see if people were praying.
	Many of those fired were police officers and firefighters.
	Sweet, merciful goodness.
	Let me just leave that up there so I can tweet it out.
	Oh, you see the tweet?
	No, that's in the article.
	I'm going to go tweet that out.
	FDNY, yada, yada.
	We're here to say that we support the revocation of the vaccine mandate, yada, yada.
	Okay, whatever.
	That's great.
	But you know what?
	It's the government.
	So you know who pays for that mistake?
	You.
	They abuse you and they pay for the wrongs of their abuse of you with your taxpayer dollars.
	So enjoy it.
	These people have violated the Nuremberg Code, in my opinion.
	Lonesome Crow.
	So that's the latest.
	What else?
	Anyone got any questions?
	Yes.
	Thank you.
	Got to go, folks.
	Life calls.
	God bless you all.
	Ladybugs.
	None of your business.
	Thank you.
	See you soon.
	I think we're going to call it here anyhow because the afternoon is coming.
	Have we been going?
	How much time?
	We've been going for an hour and 35 minutes.
	It's amazing how time flies when you try to make sense of the insane world in which we live.
	So the public hearing is probably going to resume.
	At 2 o 'clock, I would imagine.
	I'll be bouncing in and out of that.
	Let me give you the...
	Let me give you...
	I forget it.
	I'll share the links around for that afterwards.
	Let's just see if there's any questions or chats in there.
	Viva, emergency act hearing.
	Did you see this hot mic?
	It's sickening.
	Was it the part where he said...
	Hold on.
	Let's just see if I can...
	Here, dude.
	Let's do this right now in real time.
	I'm going to go here.
	I'm going to go here.
	Taco Tuesday.
	Okay, fine.
	We can do that.
	Let's see if I clipped it properly.
	Okay, hot mic.
	Oh, the hot mic obstructing justice.
	All right, let's do this.
	It's classic.
	I don't think it's obstructing justice, and I don't think...
	It's not really a hot mic, because she knew that she was doing it, and she knew that the mics were on.
	But look at this.
	This is when...
	What's her name?
	McKinney?
	Is telling a man who's quite clearly, perfectly bilingual.
	Fleury on the left.
	Mathieu Fleury.
	His French, no, sorry, his English is better than my French.
	Listen to this, though.
	How long has this been?
	In your evidence, you made use of a term you referred to as microaggression.
	Is that right?
	I believe so.
	Multiple times.
	Okay.
	is microaggression, is your understanding of that, that it means verbal and environmental slights?
	Je suis francophone.
	Donc, si vous voulez être spécifique sur les mots, il va falloir que vous me demandiez en français parce que vous me demandez une théorie de définition et malheureusement, je ne suis pas assez...
	He's French.
	You're asking him a very specific question on terminology.
	Wow.
	This is...
	It's not obstruction of justice.
	I would not say obstruction of justice.
	It's just petty...
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	It's pettiness.
	It's petty, angry, bitter people.
	This is what they do.
	They're not obstructing justice.
	They're just being pains in the asses.
	And by the way, exploiting of linguistic minorities to do it.
	Keep going.
	Well...
	Catherine McKinney, Ottawa City Councillor, is running for Ottawa Mayor.
	The election is going to be held on Monday, October 24th.
	This might be why...
	People just don't care about Canadian politics.
	It's so petty and it's so juvenile.
	Yeah, so that's it.
	All right, I'm looking for something good to play us out because we don't necessarily want to just leave every day with a bad feeling.
	Oh, yeah.
	Okay, I got a good one, guys.
	Let's get through the ad.
	And so what's going to happen?
	I'm going to pop in and out on the second channel, second stream of the inquiry when they resume, I guess, at 2 o 'clock.
	And we're going to see this here.
	Check this out.
	Okay.
	Ice fishing.
	I miss it.
	I'll get to do it again one day.
	So with that said, everybody, do you have any new footage from your new GoPro?
	Where is my GoPro?
	But somewhere in here, I've got some good footage on it, but I have to put it on my computer.
	So that is VickyLin1974.
	I've got some good footage, but I need to get more.
	I need to use the kayak that I bought.
	I got a kayak.
	It was on sale.
	It's a beautiful kayak.
	A kayak on sale?
	So...
	Viva, Danielle Smith is worthy of a mention.
	Calls out WEF.
	I talked about that yesterday.
	I'm going to try to get Danielle Smith on it.
	Bill Brown says, always leave him wanting more Viva.
	Okay, good.
	Let's do it.
	Thank you.
	I could stay here 24 hours a day.
	My wife would kill me.
	My kids would disown me.
	My dogs would piss and crap all over the house.
	But you're right, Bill.
	Got to leave something to talk about for tomorrow.
	Got to see who we can get for sidebar.
	Everything is good with Barnes, everybody.
	If you notice, he's incommunicado.
	He's in transit at events and from what I understand will be freer or free as of Thursday.
	So nothing bad, all good, and that's it.
	But look, let's end today on a fishing video.
	I caught the same fish twice.
	I'll play the last two minutes of the video.
	It is very rare to catch a pike ice fishing.
	And I was hand lining with no leader and I was not expecting to hook a pike and watch what happens.
	Everybody, let me just actually, the white pill.
	Not to be inspirational, period.
	To be realistic.
	Life, justice is life.
	It will find a way.
	We're seeing the pendulum swinging back now in terms of truth, in terms of facts, in terms of knowledge, and in terms of justice.
	Do not succumb to your inner desires, your debased, not the word debased, your primitive desires to lash out.
	At those who sit there and laugh at your face.
	I'm just thinking Hillary Clinton right now.
	Do not lash out and do not do that which the people who are rightly, I think we cannot deny, are abusing us, are abusing our rights, what they want you to do.
	This public inquiry out of Canada, it's going to yield something.
	It takes time and it's frustrating to have to sit there and get suffocated as it goes on.
	Things are going to change for the better.
	And I don't know.
	Not that I can feel it.
	I can see it.
	And we're seeing little bits of it.
	And it's going to pick up momentum.
	Every avalanche starts with a single snowflake.
	Every rainstorm starts with a single drop.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	All that to say, do not succumb to your inner desires to compromise your own integrity.
	Continue to Conduct yourself in a manner that would make your parents, your children, and your pets proud, and truth will prevail.
	Now, with that said, let's watch a little happy fishing video.
	To close us out, to play us out, enjoy, everybody.
	I'll be popping in on the other stream afterwards, and thank you all for everything.
	Snip, clip, share around.
	You want to support?
	Merch, vivafry.com.
	Again, thanks to the sponsor.
	ekpeer.com is the website.
	Pure, as in EnviroCleanse.
	EKPure.com.
	If you need an air filtration unit, it's the one.
	Promo code VIVA.
	And thank them for sponsoring my content.
	It's courageous and brave.
	And what else?
	Keep on fighting.
	Stay the course.
	And now, enjoy a fishing video.
	Oh my gosh!
	Oh my god!
	Well, hold on.
	That was the climax part of it.
	That's not what we want to do.
	Oh!
	You okay?
	You're recording.
	Okay.
	Here's a big fish here.
	He caught me in the worst possible time.
	I was in the middle of untying my skates.
	Hold on.
	This fish is actually pulling.
	This fish is actually pulling.
	Running.
	I mean, I don't have enough.
	Whoa.
	Okay.
	I think it might be tired now.
	I'm scared.
	There's nothing to be scared about.
	I just don't have enough line to play with.
	I was hand lining for perch.
	Where is it?
	Oh my gosh.
	Woo!
	Holy cow!
	This fish has a hook in its mouth!
	This fish has a hook in its mouth!
	What?
	This fish, I bet you is the one that got off before.
	This fish has a hook in its mouth right here.
	Does it have a second hook?
	Yeah, it's got the one that I just caught it with here.
	Oh my gosh.
	Let's get this hook out.
	Okay, we got it out.
	This is the fish.
	Just watch it.
	This is a bit- We got to get a picture.
	Hurry up!
	Okay, we're gonna put it back.
	Okay.
	This is the fish that got away.
	This is the fish, literally.
	Okay, here we go.
	Yeah.
	This is a big fish.
	This is a big fish.
	You ready?
	He's off.
	He's off.
	Okay, I'm stopping to record.
	Yes!
	Chill!
	Go what?
	Come here, come here.
	Can I just finish untying my skeet?
	This was the fish that got away.
	This was the hook that was in his mouth.
	You in focus?
	This was the hook.
	And just to make sure, look, these are the hooks I was using.
	I caught the fish that got away.
	High five.
	Oh, mamacita.
	I'm not touching you.

▲