March 8, 2026 - The Political Cesspool - James Edwards
54:26
Radio Show Hour 1 – 2026/03/07
Nick Griffin and James Edwards dissect UK politics, analyzing Rupert Lowe's "Restore Britain Party" as a threat to Reform UK that could enable a Labour-Green coalition of alleged Marxists and Islamists. They debate Muslim voter turnout versus white apathy, dismiss claims of poll-watcher bias regarding cultural sensitivity, and criticize King Charles for his low academic standing and potential abdication. The conversation further accuses Peter Mandelson of treasonous ties to Jeffrey Epstein while contrasting Farage's immigration rhetoric with Griffin's hardline nationalism, ultimately questioning the British establishment's failure to organize effective resistance against perceived demographic shifts. [Automatically generated summary]
You're listening to the Liberty News Radio Network and this is the political cesspool.
The Political Cesspool, known across the South and worldwide as the South's foremost populist conservative radio program.
And here to guide you through the murky waters of the Political Cesspool is your host, James Edwards.
Well, I hope you have your passports ready, folks, because TPC's annual march around the world commences once again right now, this Saturday evening, March the 7th.
During this month-long special series, as you know, we're going to be showcasing leaders and elected officials from across Europe as we seek to discover how our kinsmen are faring throughout the Western world.
Tonight, we're going to have you, we're going to take you to Australia, to Mexico, to Canada.
But first, our first stop in England, where our good friend Nick Griffin is standing by live to help us assess the situation in our mother country.
And we are going to talk to all guests this month.
All of them will be weighing in on current affairs in their respective ports of call, but also all eyes will be on Iran as well.
So all guests this month will be talking about that situation.
But first, we want to say hello to Nick.
Nick, thank you for being back with us and thank you for once again leading off this special series.
Thanks, James.
It's a pleasure and an honor.
All ours, my friends.
So let's start here with the big news, not just in England, but really on both sides of the Atlantic.
Nationalists, populists, whatever you want to call us, very excited about Rupert Lowe and his brand new Restore Britain Party.
Let's take a quick listen to just about 60 seconds of excerpts from his announcement speech a few days ago.
The first priority is to control who comes to our country and more importantly, who stays in our country.
Restore Britain will not just stop mass immigration.
We will reverse it.
Restore Britain will make our communities safe again for women and children.
That, I promise you.
If that means millions go, then millions go.
It's about who we are as a nation and who we are as a people.
Britain is not just an economy.
Britain is not just an idea.
Britain is not just a passport.
Britain is a nation.
Britain is a people, our people.
And Restore Britain will never allow that to be erased.
This is Britain and we will do things our way.
This political party now exists for one reason, to restore Britain.
to make it a better, safer and more prosperous place for British men and women to raise their families.
It will be difficult and it will be painful.
But I assure you, it is possible.
I hope you will consider joining me on this journey and becoming a member of our party.
It is our country.
It is now our collective responsibility to act.
Together, we will restore Britain.
Okay, so that is the message.
It's on point.
He has the right look.
He has the right sound, the right issues.
But everybody's weighing in on this, but I'm interested to hear the opinion of a man who has been there and has done that and has led a very similar party and has reached the heights of the European Parliament.
Nick, is Rupert Lowe the real deal and can he in fact restore Britain?
I think he's the real deal in his own head.
I think he's genuine.
He's a screaming mad Zionist, of course, but if he was going to say Britain, I could probably just about forgive him that.
But he's got the standard problem of people, especially who are new to politics, which he is.
He's only in the House of Commons because he stood on the reform that's Nigel Farage's ticket.
That's the only reason he's there.
He's new to politics.
He's a banker-turned farmer.
I've got a lot of time for the second, no time at all for the first.
But he's got this typical new politician's problem of confusing the question of what should happen with what can happen.
And yes, what he said there in his launch was wonderful and so on.
When we get to power, we're going to do all these wonderful things.
The problem is that to do any of them, you have indeed to attain and keep power.
And Rupert Lowe and his restore party have absolutely no path to power.
So this is hopeful, waffle.
It's great soundbites.
It's actually disastrous potentially in that if he achieves any sort of public support, anything off of the internet, I'm talking about real public support, all he will do is to split the reform UK vote, which of course is for another screaming Zionist, Nigel Farage, who's making very, very similar noises.
If that vote is split, then the consequences we'll have from 2008, probably when the next election is, or sorry, 2028 or 2029, the next election, we'll then have another five years of a Labour government even worse with coalition Greens who are hardcore Marxists and Islamists running this country until 2034 at the earliest.
And that is all he can possibly achieve if he gets any serious votes, which in fact is very, very unlikely.
To cap it all, I can tell you this, that he's going to, when he actually registers his party, because he still hasn't done so, which is amateurish in its extreme and runs the risk someone else can just steal the name.
But when he gets it registered and he starts having meetings, and the far left and various immigrant groups start turning up outside them and smashing them up, he'll be left with a choice which Mosley had, which the National Front had, which the British National Party had.
Do you resist this violence with physical force to defend your rights and thereby immediately be slammed by the mass media as troublemakers and violent and fascist thugs, etc., etc.?
Or do you run away and hide?
My prediction is that Rupert Lowe will run away and hide.
If he doesn't, then you'll end up slammed with the same smears and slurs that we were in the past.
And Middle England will certainly then run away and vote for Nigel Farage as well.
So it's great sounding stuff, but it's going absolutely nowhere.
And all it's going to do is waste another three or four years while good-hearted nationalists think there's an electoral road out of this mess instead of getting on with the job of organizing our communities to defend for themselves.
Nick, I want to follow up with an observation about the growth thus far of Restore Britain and a little more background on Rupert Lowe and his very interesting relationship with Nigel Farage.
You had an interesting relationship, I guess you could say as well with him and somewhat similar.
But Keith has a question first.
Well, after listening to you, I just have to wonder to myself, is there any path out of this conundrum for England?
Or is it going to have to just evolve into guerrilla war?
Well, all right, but before you answer that, Nick, keep that question in mind, because what Keith just asked, I will sort of add a little more information to it.
So if my facts are correct, you have what would be called the major parties, if you can go ahead and include Restore Britain in that.
You have Reform UK, which is the largest, followed by the Labour, followed by the Green Party, followed by the so-called Conservative Party, then the Liberal Democrats.
And then I think Restore Britain may have passed the Liberal Democrats now, perhaps even the Conservative Party.
No, absolutely not, James.
The only poll which has been showing anything at all was actually a push poll.
A push poll is when voters are given a leading question.
And at that point, they turn up as 10%.
But in actual terms, they're nothing like that.
Nothing like it.
All right, that's a good point.
You were looking at this from differently than I.
I was going by purported membership numbers.
Oh, yeah.
They've had 100,000 members.
Yes, fourth or fifth place.
And growing.
And they have grown at a rate that has certainly been remarkable.
So you still think that there is a hard ceiling, even though they are probably, if the membership numbers are correct, which has them in the low hundreds, thousands now, low six figures, Reform UK is only at about 270,000 members, but you'd think that there is a hard ceiling there.
There's a hard ceiling, which they're not even going to reach.
These are only people who pay £20 a year, £20 a year.
It's not really a very great commitment.
They're not being asked to do anything.
None of them are organised in any way, shape, or form.
This is not a political party.
This is a group of people hanging on every word of Rupert Lowe's.
But the tragedy of this is that if Rupert Lowe were to understand that the next election is not his time, that he has to let reform get in and burn itself out, and that in the meantime, he could take his 100,000 people, he could make it 150,000, it could become 200,000 very easily.
And if he were to direct them and say, instead of wasting probably five or six million pounds, eight million dollars or so, losing the next election and letting the Labour Green coalition back in, instead of doing that, he would knuckle down and start saying, we are going to buy community centres.
We are going to organise and train people.
We're going to bring every single person who wants to fight an election to the one single election we're going to fight in the next general election, his own seat.
If he was to do that, then after the next general election, he would have the biggest and most effective grassroots nationalist type political movement that this country has ever seen.
It'll be a spectacular thing.
Instead of that, he is almost guaranteed to go ahead and, I wrote about this on Substack the other week.
It's the charge of the light brigades.
It's the charge into the electoral valley of death.
The charge of the light brigade was something which the British Army did in the Crimean War back against Russia in the 1850s.
And the French general watching it said, c'est magnifique mes ce la poliguer.
It's magnificent, but it's not war.
And what Rupert Lowe is about to do is magnificently stupid, but it isn't sensible politics.
Well, something needs to be done.
I don't know if you heard it, but Donald Trump supposedly said something this week.
He was being challenged about alienating the Muslim world with the Iran-Iran war.
He said, oh, no, he said, you're wrong.
He said, every Muslim country is behind us except for France and England.
That can't be right.
It would be true, but I don't believe, did he really say that?
It's a very clever line, isn't it?
It's a very good line.
If he was a comedian instead of the leader of the most powerful country in the world, he'd be a wonderful thing.
We're going to get to Iran later this hour, but staying on this for a moment.
So let's go a little more background here.
Some of this is very interesting.
I actually do.
People don't believe me.
I spend more time researching the show than we spend on the air.
And any good host should do that.
But according to, correct me if I'm wrong, this is why I like to go to you, Nick, for all things UK.
You've been there, you've done that, you've led a political party, you have reached high elected office, member of the European Parliament.
Now, if I've got this right, though, Rupert Lowe was once one of Reforms, that's Nigel Farage's party.
He was once an MP for reform, and he also had previously sat alongside Farage as a member of the European Parliament, which is, of course, the governing body where you sat, as an elected MP.
So they had a falling out, and now he is a member of Parliament in the House of Commons.
But Rupert, excuse me, Nigel Farage had expelled him and I think even called the police on him during that particular dismissal.
So all of that having been said, and I'm going to play a clip from Nigel Farage in just a moment that is just astonishing because, of course, he has been packaged as sort of like a Donald Trump-like figure for the UK, populist, oversized personality.
But of course, if you remember the origin, folks, of Nigel Farage, I mean, he basically was meant to stop Nick Griffin, but nevertheless, I digress.
If you were advising Rupert Lowe right now, or let me ask you this.
You already gave the advice, I guess, because you have written an open letter to him.
This has been something on your sub stack that you have written about.
And by the way, Nick mentioned his substack.
If you go to thepoliticals, pool.org and you click on the promo for tonight's broadcast, you'll see Nick Griffin's name highlighted in red.
Click on that link, and it'll take you to his sub-stack.
I am there every day.
Subscribe to it, support it.
But let me ask you this: what would be the differences, do you say, between the BNP of the early and mid-2000s and where Restored Britain may be going in the very near future?
In terms of the policy on immigration, really not very different.
In terms of Lowe has done some really good work with the anti-grooming gangs campaign.
He crowdfunded about $800,000 to set up an independent inquiry into the grooming gangs to counter the government's rigged one.
It wasn't that independent because he made a point of not having me on and not having former members of the British National Party on who were the ones that led the exposure of all this in the first place.
So it's a self-serving thing, not that independent.
But as I say, in terms of rhetoric and even policy, on immigration, not that different.
On everything else, enormously different because the man is not a proper nationalist.
He's an Israel firster, the same as Trump has now turned out to be.
He's a rampant free trader.
His problem with Europe was that not that it was protecting Europe, which it was to an extent actually, but that it's not in favor of free trade.
Now, free trade is the thing which has gutted British industry, which has gutted American industry.
You've got to have a government which says we're prepared to interfere with the financial system in order to serve our nation, our people, our industries.
And he's just a free trader.
Nigel Farage's Capitalist Class Take00:12:08
He's just a 19th century conservative.
And actually saying what he says about immigration and Islam and so on, it's exactly the same as Winston Churchill used to do.
And he's out of that sort of category, which you might think, well, fair enough.
But it's not nationalist.
That's the thing.
One other thing on this, Durton James, I must say on the absolute crux of it, Farage's take on immigration now, and so the official reform position is that we should have net zero immigration.
And the stupid people think that sounds good.
It's going to stop immigration.
What that means, actually, and he's quite open about it, is that he's going to, he would allow in as many immigrants as Brits emigrate or die off.
So under Nigel Farage, he'd be happy to have at least half a million immigrants a year.
But what he wants is not Muslims, no, he wants Hindus.
He wants huge numbers of Indians.
He's made that very, very clear.
Now, Lowe's position is rather more fudged, but he put out a tweet the other day which is very interesting.
He complained about how the current immigration rules under the Labour Party favour people from the European Union, but they discriminate against, and he put, he made a short list of the dominions.
So this is Australia and Canada and so on.
And he added in as a dominion, it's a former part of the British Empire settled by white people.
He added India in as a dominion, saying it's not fair that we've got an immigration policy which discriminates against Australians and Indians.
So I don't think he's that different to Farage.
How can he be?
He's a merchant banker.
He comes from the capitalist class.
And if he didn't have mass immigration, the capitalist class in Britain are going to squeal and lose money.
It's just the same as in the United States, where big business is one of the key drawers and supporters of mass immigration.
That's where he comes from.
Demographically and economically, Britain would be in terrible trouble without mass immigration.
As a nationalist, I say I don't care because the existence of my people and our long-term survival is more important than short-term economics.
But restore like Farage is there for the system and not for us.
Okay, Nick, now here is Nigel Farage, the aforementioned Nigel Farage.
And we just heard that clip of Rupert Lowe.
Now we can understand rhetoric and what the rhetoric and promises you make can very oftentimes differ from the policy you implement into when you get elected.
We've learned that all too well far too many times.
But this is Nigel Farage speaking now.
And again, by his own admission, he was put into play to stop the BNP, to stop Nick Griffin, as he has put it specifically.
But he is sort of presented as the implicitly pro-white guy in the implicitly pro-white party, and at least the one that is interested with immigration control.
That is how he has presented.
This is some recent comments from Nigel Farage.
Political impossibility to deport hundreds of thousands of people.
We simply can't do it.
At the moment, it's a political impossibility.
But is it your ambition?
No.
Listen, I'm not going to start drawing ethnic lines on what being English is.
Otherwise, maybe back to DNA tests of whether you're Anglo-Saxon.
I'm not going down that road.
It's about how you feel and it's about what your priorities are.
That's what I'd say.
In the last 20 years, the white British population has declined from 87% to 74%.
Is that a concern of yours?
No.
Okay, so with the friends, scrap that guy.
With friends like that, who needs enemies?
So, I mean, again, comparing the two, would you say that there is a tangible difference, or at least one worth investing in one or the other?
Yep, there's two differences.
The first is that Lowe's rhetoric is far, far better.
And Farage, at most, like Maloney in Italy, would keep out some of the illegals and some of the Muslims, unless in vast numbers of Hindus instead.
So that's the first key difference.
So Lowe's better in that regard.
The second is that Nigel Farage has a serious minority chance of forming the next government.
And Rupert Lowe is not going to win a single seat in the next election.
so he can say whatever he likes uh he's no different to the you know the national front still exists with about 200 elderly skinhead members They can say when we get to power, we're going to do this.
But they're not going to come to power.
So it's a nonsense.
Both of them, both Farage and Lowe, are guilty more than anything else of wasting the time of good people who could be getting on doing really serious things, preparing for the time when we become a minority, or if push comes to shove, preparing for the time when it becomes a civil war.
And there's no way that losing an election is going in any way to prepare you for some sort of civil war.
Sounds like you've got a problem in leadership in England.
It sounds like everybody that is supposedly on the right is weak as grandma's tea.
And, you know, we just get down to the, you said that the business class is against cutting off immigration or remigrating people.
What is the problem?
We've got the same problem over here.
The unions, you know, if they had it just for native people, I mean, they would use all their power to, you know, make labor as expensive as possible.
How do we deal with that?
Well, first of all, Keith, before that, come back for a moment.
You said it seems like we've got a particular problem in Britain with leadership.
We have, but it's not just Britain.
There's a problem all over Western Europe.
Yeah, and for a very simple reason.
They don't even lie good in England.
But you've got the same thing in Italy, the same thing in Germany.
In all of our countries, until, say, 15 years ago, nationalism and resistance to mass immigration was represented by genuine nationalists, myself and other comrades.
And a huge and systematic attempt, successful in the end, was made to destroy or utterly marginalize that sort of nationalism and put fakes and time wasters in place instead.
And that is what we've got with all these parties, whether they talk a good fight or not.
If they're not working to organize our people properly, then they are wasting people's time and money.
And I'm absolutely sure it's not just accidental, it's quite deliberate.
This is controlled opposition at its worst.
All right, Nick, when we come back from our bottom-of-the-hour break, we have about two or three minutes before we hit that.
We're going to come back with Nick and we're going to do a segment on Iran.
And then we have a lot of questions that have come in from the audience.
I don't know if we can get to them all, but we will do a rapid-fire segment in our fourth and final segment this hour with Nick to try to take as many of those questions as we can that have come in for him.
And then we will depart in the second hour to Australia with Drew Fraser, then down to Mexico, and then over to Canada or neighbor to the north with Paul Fromm in the third hour.
So stay tuned for all of it tonight.
But Nick, one thing that I found interesting from your no-nonsense assessment tonight of Rupert Lowe, and again, folks, go to Nick's substack if you want to read a lot of this for yourself, his open letter to Lowe, a lot of his takes on this and so many other things.
I could give you the URL, but the easiest way to know it is to just go to thepoliticalaccessible.org.
You go to our promo for tonight's broadcast, and Nick Griffin's name will be highlighted in red on that entry.
You click it and you're at a substack.
Bookmark it, support it, read it.
I am there every day.
But Nick, you were saying, in spite of the astronomical growth, which has been, again, as I say, remarkable in terms of reported membership, that they will not be able to parlay that into any elected seats in the next year or two?
Not in the.
If there's no one standing for reform, then they can turn it into local council seats quite easily.
But in the parliamentary election, remember it's first past the post exclusively.
Lowe was elected for reform and Nigel Farage in the European Parliament initially on a mixed representation basis.
But in Parliament, British Parliament, you have to be number one.
And they will not win any seat.
The only seat he could possibly win, he could hold his own seat in Great Yarmouth if he threw every single thing into it.
But instead of that, he's talking about fighting three, four, five hundred seats out of 650.
If he does that, he will certainly not win a single one.
I reiterate, all he can do, unless he gets in a four-way seat, a four-way fight, you have to get 25% plus of the entire vote.
And there is no earthly possibility of them doing that.
At the very, very top, they might get 10%.
I think it's more likely they'll get 1%.
If they got 10%, all they will do is ensure that the Labour Party and their future Green and Islamist allies take virtually every seat in the House of Commons in the next general election.
And at the end of that would then be a total of eight more years of hard-left Labour government, with at least half a million Brits leaving every single year and more open doors coming in.
At the end of that, there's no way back.
That's how serious it is.
That sure is encouraging, Nick.
Well, I mean, we want it no nuts as we want it.
We want it clear-eyed, but plane is a billy goat's ass on a stump, as they say out of the country.
We'll be right back.
Stay tuned.
How would you like to help this program reach more people and earn silver at the same time?
Call or text 801-669-2211 for complete details.
News this hour from Town Hall.
I'm Mary Rose.
President Trump joins grieving families for the return of soldiers killed in war in the Middle East.
President Trump is attending the dignified transfer for the six U.S. soldiers killed in the Middle East at Delaware's Dover Air Force Base.
Very sad situation.
He joins family members and most of his cabinet as the soldiers' remains return to the U.S.
They died last week in a drone strike on a command center in Kuwait.
Trump spoke earlier Saturday at an event in Florida.
They're great heroes in our country.
He's pledging to keep American war death down.
At the same time, he said he will keep the pressure on Iran.
The six members of the Army Reserve are all from the 103rd Sustainment Command based in Des Moines, Iowa.
I'm Julie Walker.
The UK military is rejecting criticism of its response after last week's strikes by Israel and the US.
Britain's Chief of Defence, Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Knighton, reject criticism that they were ill-prepared for the conflict in Iran.
Well, what the Prime Minister and the Defence Secretary have made clear and what's very clear to me is that this is probably the most dangerous time of the last 30-odd years that I've been in uniform.
And it's very clear that the demands on defence are rising.
And that's why I think the Prime Minister said in his Munich Security Conference speech that we need to spend more on defence and do it faster.
And you won't be surprised that I agree wholeheartedly with what the Prime Minister said.
Also said that the UK could join more proactive strikes in the future, while the focus remains on protecting British interests and personnel.
Rika and Garcia, London.
And stranded Americans across the Middle East say they've been left to navigate flight cancellations and confusing government guidance on their own.
They expressed frustration with the State Department's directions to depart now on commercial flights, even though the airspace remains closed or heavily restricted.
More on these stories at townhall.com.
Diabetes, high blood pressure, anxiety meds, everyone's on them.
If you're a 50-year-old male, maybe a bit quirky, and you may even have type 2 diabetes, a million dollars of term insurance may only cost you about 200 bucks a month.
Call Term Provider.
Big Lou's Term Life Solutions00:03:02
Speak with Big Lou at 800-555-2085.
Big Lou will find a term life policy for you, even if you have type 2 diabetes, are overweight, or have high blood pressure.
Term providers help thousands of people like you who think they can't afford term life insurance to buy a million dollars of affordable term life for you.
All you need to do is call Big Lou at 800-555-2085.
Lou will make sure the scales are tipped in your favor.
Call 800-555-2085.
Big Lou will answer your call and work to fit you into a term life policy that you can afford.
Remember, Big Lou's like you.
He's on meds too.
Call 800-555-2085.
800-555-2085.
Hey, friends, it's James.
Did you know that every issue of the American Free Press now features my own published QA interviews with one of your favorite guests from the radio program?
That's right.
The American Free Press has officially partnered with TPC to expand our audience into the realm of print media.
I encourage you to read it for yourself by subscribing today at AmericanFreePress.net.
Did you know that regular TPC contributors like Nick Griffin and Jose Niño also have their own exclusive, insightful, and hard-hitting columns published in every issue of the American Free Press?
I love this paper and read it as soon as it lands in my mailbox.
Whether you prefer to receive the print edition or a digital subscription, the choice is yours when you subscribe at AmericanFreePress.net.
We are advancing, but we need to be wise and well-informed.
Enhance your intellectual ammunition today by subscribing to America's last real newspaper.
If you enjoy listening to this broadcast, you'll love reading the American Free Press.
Subscribe today by calling 1-888-699 News or by visiting AmericanFreePress.net.
Hey, y'all!
Do you enjoy great tasting coffee but are tired of supporting companies that hate you?
If so, let me tell you about Above Time Coffee.
Above Time Coffee is a privately owned and operated small business.
They hand roast coffee and ship it to customers throughout the United States and abroad.
Above Time Coffee was launched because they saw a need for more pro-white businesses serving our people.
The time has come to take our own side.
And did I mention their coffee tastes great?
It's the best coffee I've ever tasted.
When James brought home a sample from a conference, I was hooked and threw out all the other brands.
I think you will too after you make an order at abovetimecoffee.com.
Living a healthy and active lifestyle is important to us.
And I appreciate the effort Above Time Coffee invests in keeping its products organic.
And there are so many flavors to choose from.
Check it out for yourself by visiting abovetimecoffee.com.
It's the only coffee we drink at the Edwards Home.
Delicious Coffee, a company that serves the interests of our people.
Check out their selection today at abovetimecoffee.com.
Next Plane to London00:10:34
Told him I was gonna be a star.
But to do it, I would have to go far away.
But I'd come back Sunday and take him away.
I'm on the next plane to London, leaving on runway number five.
Next plane to London that I'm missing him.
That baby of mine.
Once again, our first stop on our March Around the World 2026 edition is in the UK, a little bit told the west of London, if I'm looking at my map correctly.
But nevertheless, we thank Nick Griffin for being with us here in the early morning hour of Sunday where we're live here at 6.36 Memphis time.
And Nick, before we move on to Iran, you wanted to say that it is not all gloom and doom.
And in fact, in some ways, you are more optimistic than ever.
Yeah, in every way, James, in every way.
I was on a, strangely enough, one of Britain's main hardline Muslim podcast a few weeks ago.
And we discuss all sorts of things and we disagree on many things, but we agree on some, particularly foreign policy and the fact that if it wasn't for the way that the West in general and the Zionists and neocons in particular have wrecked their countries, most of those people wouldn't be in our countries.
So anyway, I was on this show and I said to them, you do realize that the British people that you're now dealing with are nothing like the ones you grew up with.
That the British, something has clicked in the British psyche and we're utterly different to the people that you think you live among.
So be very careful of these people.
And I felt I think they understood that.
You can see it everywhere.
Britain, the white areas are festooned with our flags now.
Just thousands upon thousands of them on lampposts and telegraph poles.
It's a stunning thing.
The electoral support for reform, you know bear in mind that you said James at one point, reform are ahead.
They've got the largest membership.
They're also ahead of the official governing parties.
They've been the governing parties for more than 100 years.
They're consistently ahead of them in the opinion polls.
There's this enormous electoral support change.
The membership surge for Restore.
It's an astounding thing.
It could go further.
So there's this enormous change going on.
I was with your friend and mine, Jim Dowson, a week or so ago.
And we took from the Templars a donation.
We went up to a suburb of Manchester and we went up to a neighbourhood patrol been set up with good local fellas and we took them several thousand dollars worth of ballistic vests, radios and GoPros and things, things they need to be more effective at their community patrols.
And I was talking with people, we went around with them through the shopping centre and the estates and so on, talking with local people there.
Now I campaigned there in 2009.
And again, the level of political awareness, sophistication and resilience and willingness to resist everything that's going on amongst people, it's transformed.
It's absolutely enormous.
So someone the other day was criticising my criticism of Rupert Lowe and said, but it's either Rupert Lowe and Restore or it's war.
Well yeah, okay.
So admit that Rupert Lowe's not going anywhere.
So yes we are facing in this country a sort of at the very least low level if not higher civil war.
But there are two sorts of war.
There's cold war, there's always hot war and there's very often a cold war.
And as long as our community is strong and resilient enough, then the others aren't going to have a go at us.
It's not going to become a hot war.
It could become a cold war in a society which balkanizes itself, which divides up so their communities live in their bit and ours live in ours.
And to me, that's one hell of a lot better than integration, which is basically when you're 8% of the world's population, integration is a death sentence.
So that's where we are.
We are going to become for a while a minority in our own country, just as white Americans are going to become a minority in your own country.
It doesn't mean you're doomed and they're going to come and cut your throats, all the rest of it.
We can be, and all the signs are that we're going to be, we're going to be a well-organised, confident and the dominant minority.
And people say, of all the Browns, they're going to outnumber you.
There's no such thing as Brown, certainly in this country.
There's Muslims and there's Hindus and there's Sikhs and they hate each other far more than any of them hate us.
So as long as we're a well-organised minority, we will dominate this country for the entire foreseeable future, well beyond the life of my children and grandchildren.
And during that time, things will happen in the world and especially the West clearly is losing its economic dominance.
When we lose our economic dominance and we become unable to live off the fat of the rest of the world, our countries will be less attractive and most of these people will simply go home.
One last thing on this.
I've spoken to two very well-placed Muslims recently and to a couple of Hindus.
They all say the same thing.
All their educated young people, which is more and more of them, more of them go to universities now than our kids, they all can't wait to emigrate and get out of Britain because they think it's a cold, wet, dreary backwater with no economic future and they're not really wanted here.
So long term, we will not lose this country.
We will hold what we have and one day we'll take it all back.
Let me make a modest proposal, like Jonathan Swift said.
Is electoral fraud a problem over there like it is here?
You know, we have gotten so used to the fact that we're going to lose elections, but what we had in America is a reluctance of black voters to go to the poll.
And the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was basically intended to allow for proxy voting on behalf of reluctant black voters.
You know, mail-in ballots, unlimited absentee balloting, extended early voting periods.
Is there voter fraud going on in England like there is in America?
Call us on that, Nick, and we'll go to Iran.
On a staggering scale, Keith, on a staggering scale.
And Naja Farage has just started complaining about it.
It was part of the tricks he used to stop the BNP back in the day.
The other fascinating factor is there are more Brits, not even registered to vote, and I mean British Brits, there's more Brits not even registered to vote than elected our last Labour government.
And if people were serious about doing electoral politics, the damn first thing they should do is start getting our people to register.
But no, these people are rank amateurs, hell-based on wasting time, and they're not going to be able to do it.
But you need a save act over there like we have here.
You need to have a, you know, all the voting on election day from eight in the morning till seven in the evening with picture ID and a specified.
You need that.
But the Labour Party is not going to bring it in because they designed the system to encourage the minorities to vote.
They rely on them and they are not going to change that.
All right.
So we have, I really want to get to these questions because it's important to get to audience questions.
And we did a big show last week on Iran.
We're going to continue to cover it with every guest that appears from whatever country they may be reporting in from this month.
And we want to get Nick to chime in on this as well.
We could have done a full hour with you, Nick, on Iran.
But I did feel like it was important to have you touch on Rupert Lowe because that is such a big talking point right now amongst our people throughout the West.
But so one of the things on your sub stack, by the way, your sub stack is permanently affixed to our daily reads on our blog.
So you can link over there as well, folks.
But one of the most recent posts was Betrayal.
It's what populists do.
And that would certainly apply to this most recent conflict in Iran, led by the Trump administration.
And by the way, we've got a big feature coming up in the American Free Press.
Nick Griffin has contributed to that.
He's in every issue of the American Free Press as it is.
But a big panel discussion on this.
Nick, your take on Iran and Trump's involvement and the U.S.'s involvement on behalf of Israel in that conflict.
Yeah, well, I'm sure that my basic take on it is the same as all your other people and so on and the vast majority of your listeners.
It is a scandalous betrayal to turn from MAGA to MIGA, which is what you've now got, a make Israel great again administration at enormous expense.
I saw a figure of $100 million the U.S. has already spent shooting down Iran, some of Iran's cheap drones, $100 billion.
It's a staggering figure.
So it's costing America money.
There's the first six-year-old.
Nothing's too good for the Israelis.
Sorry, say again.
I said nothing's too good for our Israeli friends.
Nothing's too good for them, of course.
No, indeed not.
Not when Mr. Epstein's people have got the photos.
So, no, it's obviously it's a disgrace and a scandal.
The question is, is it also a ghastly geopolitical error?
And we don't yet know.
It depends.
Not just, clearly Iran's got enough missiles and drones.
The question is whether enough of the launch systems of the missiles have been destroyed so they can't actually launch them.
Because if, it's not a question of if, when the very expensive air defense missiles run out, which they're going to, and the figures I've seen are between four days from the start to four weeks.
After that, they run out, basically.
If the Iranians are still able to fire their drones and their ballistics after that, then it'll be very, very clear that the only possible way forward for the coalition of Satan in this would actually be some kind of insane ground war, which America, for all its military might and all the bravery of your soldiers, you will lose a ground war in Iran.
They're not going to even try that.
What they may do, they're not going to try the ground war.
I think what they're going to do is...
I don't know about that.
Well, let me just say my, put in my two cents.
I think they're going to bomb them back into the Stone Age and leave them there.
Well, to bomb them back into the Stone Age doesn't win the war.
Sensitive Data Exposed00:02:42
That's right.
That's it.
And if you look at the United States.
Well, it certainly takes them away from having any power to affect.
We've got to take a break.
We'll continue this discussion.
It is common for politicians, major media outlets, and nonprofits to hype white on black murders aggressively.
or even claim that blacks are living in fear of white people.
Lynch for simply being black.
Hard to believe, but that's what was done.
And some people still want to do that.
This is why National Conservative launched the Interracial Homicide Tracking Project.
We have now documented well over 2,000 confirmed interracial homicides since January 2023 and created the most comprehensive overview of these killings anyone has ever made.
We plugged the gaping holes in data left by other homicide trackers and government crime stats.
Rather than engaging in hyperbole and vitriolic rhetoric like everyone else, we are simply creating a massive sample size of empirical evidence so people can form rational and informed opinions about a sensitive and politically charged issue.
Visit natcon.life, n-a-t-c-o-n.l-i-f-e.
As you are aware, America is divided over every fault line possible.
This is intentionally fostered by those who do not love God, family, or country.
We believe a peaceful future as a free people absolutely depends on civility.
Clarion Call for Civility is looking for funding and volunteers at every level to make our hopes and efforts a reality.
Please donate.
Sign our pledge and help us in our sacred cause.
Please visit CallForCivility.com for more details.
Callforcivility.com.
Introducing Managed IT services from NPI.
We offer top-notch data backup and recovery, email spam protection, and network security tailored to your needs and budget.
With 20 plus years of experience in the medical field, our HIPAA certified consultants know what it takes to protect sensitive information.
Don't settle for less.
Give us a call at 801-706-6980 and experience the difference with managed IT services.
Remember, your IT support should be fast, efficient, and reliable.
You know, when I come into the studio on nights like this with guests like Nick Griffin, I say to myself, I don't have to do this.
I get to do this.
And this is why we are still doing this after 22 years here on your AM Airwaves AM 1600, WMQM in Memphis, and live all over the world.
Thanks to the Liberty News Radio Network and the godsend that the internet has been.
Iranian War Panel Insights00:10:06
Just a quick thing on the Iranian War Panel discussion.
In your next issue of the American Free Press, there is a collection of 10 participants that I gathered.
And I asked them just to share their reaction to the escalating conflict in the Middle East, focusing on what stands out to them.
And as a result, it was a wide variety of diverse perspectives, covering topics such as military tactics, the potential impact on Trump's legacy, the U.S. midterm elections, and possible global geopolitical shifts and realignments, Israel's role, likely outcomes, and much more.
Nick is one of those 10 participants, and you don't want to miss it.
After a brief embargo with exclusivity by AFP, we'll have it posted on the internet at our website and elsewhere.
But, Nick, now we are going to transition to questions from the audience, and we are going to have to make haste.
So, I will serve these up as quickly as I can.
If you can put a stopwatch at about 90 seconds, it'll be a brief response, but that will allow us to work through as many of these as we can, and we want to do that.
So, here we go with the first one.
In the recent UK election near Manchester, the Green Party, which is led by a blankety blank blank that defeated Nigel Farage's supposedly surging Reform Party, the Labour Party came in a distant third.
The Green Party candidate was a silly woke cat lady who rails against the wealthy while making millions as a property magnate.
It was the Muslim bloc vote that elected the Greens.
And the question is from this listener: is that a sign of things to come?
And has Farage shot himself in the foot by putting Muslims, Sikhs, and Hindus in leadership positions in his implicitly pro-white party?
It is and isn't a sign of things to come.
It's a sign of things to come in areas with a significant Muslim population.
The Muslim population in that seat is about 30%.
But given that they're all registered to vote, and at least 20% of the white population is not registered to vote, and given that all the Muslims turn out and vote, while well under half of the whites turned out to vote, that's what makes the difference.
So, in areas where there's a big Muslim population, the Greens are going to win, and they'll win because people will vote for them rather than the Labour Party, because they've got more chance of keeping reform out.
All over the rest of Britain, which is still a vast majority of it, actually, where the Muslim bloc vote simply isn't there, then Farage and Reform are the ones who are going to win in the next general election rather than the Greens.
So, that's where the danger comes in at Rupert Lowe.
If he splits that vote, the Greens and the Labour Party will become the next government.
Well, you know, that's strange.
It's a difference from what we have in America.
We have reluctant black voters, and the white voters all get out.
And in England, the white voters don't go out, but the Muslims show up 100%, huh?
Yep.
It's that way around, and the irony of it, and I know this from the campaigns years ago, is that the people who, if you meet them in the street or they see you in the street and they lean out of the houses and they wave to you and so on, the ones who are your firmest supporters are almost inevitably not even on the electoral roll because they're the people who years ago have decided all politicians are the same, they're all scum, and it's too late to do anything about it through the ballot box, so I'm not going to bother.
So, the people who actually should be there voting for people like Rupert Lowe simply are not going to be there on the ballot and on the ballot papers.
Sorry, on the ballot roll.
To Keith's point about Muslims and yours as well, Nick, and I have not independently verified all of these facts that are being asserted here in these questions and statements, but I do know that we have such a well-informed audience, I don't even need to.
So we will roll with this one.
Nick, this one comes in from a listener, and it reads, It is a jellable offense in the UK for anyone to go in a voting booth with another.
Yet, many Muslim men were seen doing this with their wives in the most recent election.
The poll watchers were told to ignore this in the name of cultural sensitivity.
Is this a widespread practice in the UK?
It is widespread.
And actually, it's really, it's a so what.
They actually, and Naja Faraj was trying to imply that those women might have voted for his candidate if they hadn't been forced to by their husbands.
Nonsense.
The reason their husbands are going in there is because they're completely, these women, it's cousin marriages and so on from the subcontinent, and they are absolutely illiterate or they can't read English at all.
So they're in there so that they vote the way that they actually want to vote, because the whole community is voting that way.
So it doesn't actually make a difference.
It's always been the excuse for the black voting through black preachers and everything.
They say, well, we're just voting in your best interest.
We know that if you were smart enough to actually be a voter, this is why you would vote.
The irony of it, by the way, is that the only way that the Muslims could actually really get sort of what they want would be if there was a proper hardline nationalist like me standing.
And I get stopped by Muslims in the street all the time now saying, well, you know, used to disagree with you, but everything you say, you know, thank you for what you say about Gaza.
Thank you for being anti-Zionist.
And also, these people, because they're basically religious-type traditionalists, they're not all craze fanatics, but they are religious, genuine religious people.
So the stuff which Christians should be appalled by, the LGBT things and so on, it really bothers them.
But they still turn out and vote green, who are committed to legalizing all drugs, absolutely committed to the LGBT nonsense in its worst possible forms.
And they simply don't belong voting for them.
But in the end, they're scared that they vote for reform or anyone like that.
You know, their cousins will be stopped coming in, et cetera, et cetera.
The hijab might be banned.
So, of course, they all turn out and vote against them.
You know, Nick, we're on to something now.
This is an epiphany we've had here just here tonight.
Nick Griffin runs for office again and is swept in by popular solution.
On the Muslim vote.
God's will be done.
Handwritten balance.
God's will be done.
No, Nick.
Well, Dale's vault.
It's the same thing.
All right.
This is a question about the royal family, which is always interesting to us here at Stateside.
The listener writes, in light of the former Prince Andrew being accused of treason, will the establishment, and he's talking about the families that go back to 1066 and the Magna Carta, demand that King Charles step down to be replaced by the more popular William and Kate.
Could Charles use his cancer as an excuse for abdicating?
He could use it as an excuse to abdicate if he wants to.
It was always apparent when his mother just went on and on and on, and you're living far longer than expected.
He was rather frustrated by that.
He wanted to be king.
I don't expect that's changed.
He's a far more active king than William is a Prince of Wales.
But he's so stupid.
Oh, Keith is staggeringly stupid.
You don't know how stupid he is.
I'll explain it.
He went to one of the most expensive schools in England with all the best possible tuition, and he only managed to get two O levels, which is the basic level of competence at the age of 16.
And one of those was in art.
Now, by comparison, I got nine O levels, and that's fairly standard.
He comes by his liberalism.
He comes by his liberalism authentically then, doesn't he?
Yes, absolutely.
But the idea that the establishment would force him to stand down, why on earth would they?
And in any case, William is no better than his father.
They're utterly liberal, utterly anti-our people.
They're of no use to us whatsoever.
Why don't we get rid of the people who are going to be able to get rid of the monarchy altogether then?
Oh, because then we'd end up with a president.
Look what they do.
We do have fun every time Nick Griffin is on.
I mean, it may not always be what we want to hear.
We're going to do everything a Hindu can do.
Here's one more, Nick.
And by the way, if you're not reading Nick Griffin's Substack, what are you doing?
You should be there.
If what's going on in the UK is of any interest to you, depoliticalaccessible.org, click over to it.
It's in our daily reads on the blog, permanently affixed.
It is in the show promo for tonight's live broadcast.
His name is highlighted.
Click over there, join it, subscribe to it, read it, as I do every day.
And here's one last one with two minutes remaining.
And stay tuned for Nick Griffin also on every issue of the American Free Press, including my most, well, not most recent, but forthcoming feature on the war in Iran.
But once again, another blankety blank blank blank at the heart of British government is Peter Mendelssohn, who was accused of treasonous behavior to the advantage of Jeffrey Epstein.
The Labour leaders John Smith and Jeremy Cornyn kept Mendelssohn at arm's length.
Tony Blair and Kier Stormer embraced Mendelssohn.
Why?
Were they implicit in his treason or blackmailed?
That's the question.
Well, he was always known as the dark prince, basically.
They respected his dark arts, and of course he had all the right connections.
Yeah, your questioner, I'm sure, knows, and Keith indicated he knows.
He's there because whereas Corbyn in particular was, for all his many, many faults, he was genuinely up to a certain point.
He was anti-Zionist.
He hasn't got a clue or never prepared to confront the deeper Talmudic problem, which is the origin of the Zionist horror, his deep racism.
But he was a genuine anti-Zionist, and so he wouldn't touch Mandelson.
He's an arch Zionist, and that's why they got rid of him.
Whereas Blair and Starmer are rampant Zionists, so Mandelson was their man.
It suited them to have someone who was close to Epstein.
And now it doesn't, so they try and run away, but nothing unusual there.
Those people stick together.
Weighing In On Important Topics00:00:46
All right, Nick Griffin, it has been an honor, as always, and so especially special to have you kick off this annual series, which is such a delight to us, where we spend the entire month of March speaking with exclusively international guests or at the very least expats who are living abroad.
And to have you from England tonight weighing in on all of these important topics.
Sorry for all the questions that came in that we could not get to.
We do the best we can with the time we've got.
Follow his sub stack.
Nick, we'll talk to you again soon.
Not soon enough, of course, but we will talk to you again soon.
Thank you, James.
Good night, and God bless.
God bless you.
Indeed.
Indeed.
Professor Drew Fraser, what's going on down under?