All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 19, 2025 - The Political Cesspool - James Edwards
54:44
Radio Show Hour 1 – 2025/10/18

James Edwards and Keith Alexander discuss the potential implications of the Voting Rights Act’s apparent demise and the rewards that could follow. They also discuss Politico’s “investigation” into a private group chat of Young Republicans and the remarkable takeaways that have followed in its wake.

|

Time Text
You're listening to the Liberty News Radio Network, and this is the political cesspool.
The Political Cesspool, known across the South and worldwide as the South's foremost populist conservative radio program.
And here to guide you through the murky waters of the Political Cesspool is your host, James Edwards.
Another Worldwind Week for yours truly has led us to another Saturday night.
So here we are again together on this October the 18th, a week away from our 21st anniversary here on TPC.
It all started October 26, 2004.
More on that next week.
But tonight, we've got a lot of work to do.
Thank you for joining us.
I'm James Edwards, along with Keith Alexander.
We'll be discussing the potential implications this hour of the Voting Rights Act's apparent demise and the rewards that could follow in its wake.
We will also discuss Politico's so-called investigation into a private group chat of young Republicans and the remarkable takeaways that have followed in its wake.
I've been reading up a lot about this one and talking to a lot of folks, and we'll try to give you some insights and informed opinions on both.
Keith, let's first start with something.
I tell you what, this is a story that's going to butter your bread.
This was one that is tailor-made for you.
The Supreme Court is taking up the case and is going to consider essentially gutting the Voting Rights Act, this horrible piece of anti-white legislation that led to gerrymandered districts across the South to make sure that blacks had safe districts no matter what.
And as Brad Griffin writes at Occidental Descent, Black Belt Liberation Day is coming.
By gutting the Voting Rights Act, you could nuke the filibuster and pack the courts.
That is a political solution.
It will end the gridlock and create a path towards major legislation passing Congress.
The case that is challenging the Voting Rights Act is the big enchilada.
This is the signal amid the noise.
If Trump wins this case, it unlocks all kinds of political doors by changing the political landscape.
I think people forget what kind of a win streak Trump is on at the Supreme Court, Keith.
He has gone 26 in two in his last 28 bouts at the Supreme Court level.
Any boxer would take those statistics, and I think he's won, what, his last 19 in a row, something like that.
NBC News reports the Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on Wednesday in Louisiana versus Calais.
It is the latest in a series of Republican-led attacks on the Voting Rights Act, which is known as one of the crown jewels of the, I will say, so-called civil rights movement.
The case challenges a congressional map that Louisiana adopted in 2024.
And Louisiana is a great example of what we're talking about here because this district, this blue district in Louisiana, stretches from the tip-top northwestern end of the state and runs exactly diagonally throughout the entirety of the state and then ends in New Orleans.
So picture from the upper northwest part of Louisiana stretching across diagonally all the way down to the mouth of the Mississippi River, and it stretches about as wide as the Panama Canal.
I mean, this thing is like a few miles wide of a district.
I mean, how could you even come up with something so unnatural?
And it's ironic because Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act says it is a nationwide ban on voting practices and procedures that discriminate on the basis of race, color, and language minority status.
But it seems as though it does the exact opposite.
It seems as though it guarantees that blacks will have these seats solely because of racial concerns and considerations.
Keith, what is going on here and what is your reaction?
Well, if you look back at the civil rights movement and the legislation that came out of it, all of the legislation originally was based on the assumption that you were going to do away with racial discrimination, period.
That race was no longer to be considered a factor in making decisions about, for example, how you drew congressional districts or who you selected for admission to selective colleges, universities, and professional schools.
But after they passed the law based on colorblindness, the Jewish governmental employees that were hired, for example, to staff the EEOC Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, that was the bureaucratic organization created to enforce the Civil Rights Act of 64.
And likewise, on the Voting Rights Act, they went to work almost seamlessly to turn it into racial discrimination in favor of blacks.
And that's what we've had ever since the late 60s in America.
And it's just the opposite of the so-called principles upon which the original legislation was founded.
Now, there's a part two of the Voting Rights Act.
The Voting Rights Act, for example, all the baloney you heard about, you know, blessed Selma and walking across the Edmund Pettus Bridge.
All of that was done to try to fan the flames of discontent and to get people to support the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
And basically, the purpose of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was to make sure that you could, in effect, proxy vote on behalf of black people because black people, for example, in Memphis had been voting ever since about 1900 under the Boss Crump era.
But they had to be bribed to vote because, quite frankly, voting was not a high priority for them.
It was a high priority for those trying to undermine whites and to promote blacks as a kind of revolutionary class in America.
But the black people themselves were not particularly interested in it, so they had to find a way that they could justify proxy voting on behalf of blacks.
I remember one of the first things they did was called Souls to the Polls, where they bought all these old school buses, had the black preachers do that, and then they would pay the black preachers 25 bucks a head for every person, every black person they brought to the polls.
That didn't work.
They eventually got into mailing ballots.
That was the most effective end run on electoral integrity that they were able to come up with.
They had extended early voting periods.
They had unlimited absentee voting, things like this, basically to allow people to vote on behalf of reluctant black voters at black churches, for example.
They would have some lady out in the vestibule with a card table, and the preacher would tell the people, we've got a bunch of absentee ballots out here.
go by there and sign one and don't put anything on it, and we'll make sure it gets voted right.
Well, that's obvious electoral fraud, but the Republicans would not challenge it because they live in mortal terror of being called a racist.
Or at least they did.
And of course, some still do.
But we are seeing a lot of movement.
And this is, well, let me just tell you, here's CNN. reporting on this.
Two years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court surprised observers and even some inside the court when it narrowly preserved the 1965 Voting Rights Act and race-based remedies, as CNN puts it, intended to counteract historical discrimination against blacks and other minorities.
But again, what's going on here is gerrymandering districts.
In Louisiana, what they did was they found the black population, drew a circle around it, wherever it may be, and called that a district, no matter how unnatural it was, no matter how ridiculous.
That's how they got the original name gerrymander.
It was a guy named Elbridge Jerry who was drawing, I think, congressional districts in New York.
Massachusetts.
And it looked like a salamander, so they call it gerrymandering a lot of the state.
And that's exactly what this one that you're talking about in Louisiana looks like.
It does.
It does.
And, you know, it's interesting you bring up New England, which is, you know, where this started, and this goes back a couple of hundred years now.
In New England, in the six New England states, 40% of the votes cast there in those six states are Republican.
There are zero Republican members of the House coming out of those six states, even though 40%.
So, I mean, the Democrats are doing it too.
It's time that the Republicans catch up, and it looks like they will.
Now, it says CNN writes the court may be on the brink of forbidding the consideration of race in redistricting and eroding states' ability to consolidate blacks and other racial minorities into majority-minority congressional districts to boost their chance of electing a candidate of their choice.
I mean, see, Keith, I mean, this just reads like, I mean, it's exactly the language of it sounds all well and good, I guess, but then they do the exact opposite.
And then here they explain that they are doing the exact opposite.
But our friend at Occidental Descent writes this, the way that counterrevolutions happen in America is through working within the system and dominating the federal government, especially the courts, for an extended period of time until the old norms have time to dissolve and one or two generations can no longer remember the previous order.
So here's how, here's a glimpse of how it could work out.
So let's just say the Supreme Court guts the Voting Rights Act.
It looks like they will.
It looks like they will.
Okay.
So let's just use that as our forecast.
So then you have the red states, particularly in the South, using their redistricting power to gerrymander their own solid house majority.
Now, this is already happening, and it could be, it's already happening in Texas.
There's no need to gerrymander.
We have a majority.
For example, in Tennessee, we have nine congressional districts.
We have 11 electoral votes.
That's two senators plus the nine congressional districts.
What they could do is just have an American flag motif in half horizontal lines all the way across state, and they would dilute Memphis's voting across the entire southern border.
Well, see, this whole straight line across doesn't make a lot of sense either because, I mean, then you're going from Union City to Johnson City, and that's your district.
But I see what you're saying.
Well, the thing is that that way you would be sure that every congressional district represented all of the people of Tennessee, not just a particular group.
any event.
I mean, we see what's happening here.
They're going to take away that and do away with the one Democratic congressman we have from Tennessee.
And That's what would happen optimally from the Republican standpoint because we will pick up, for example, we pick up one in Tennessee by doing away with Steve Cohen's district in Memphis.
You would probably pick up the public.
I got it right here.
I can tell you exactly what it's going to be.
You're getting to it, and I got it right here for you.
Here's the CNN report.
Let's listen to it.
It's a minute and 26 long, a minute and 26 seconds.
And I'm going to have you, Keith, respond to it.
But this is exactly what will happen if the Republicans basically, let's just say, make logical district boundaries.
If they exercise all the power that they will be invested with under this.
Instead of going out of their way to make black safe districts, which is what has happened since this was passed.
But if all this does happen, I will just say this before I play the clip.
You are going to basically, basically what this would do is, as we said a couple of years ago, which was a possible way this whole thing could work out, you're basically going to relegate the Democratic Party to a coastal minority party.
They're going to lose up to 19 seats in the House if this happens.
There will be a permanent Republican majority, and we won't have to worry about what they think and what they say.
And for all the people who say, no, no, no, no, the Hispanics, well, if the 2030 census excludes illegal aliens and further entrenches a Republican-leaning House map, it's going to make it nearly impossible for the Democrats to ever retake the House.
But let's listen.
What will that bring?
Are the Democrats going to ask for secession at that point?
Interesting question.
This is CNN.
The headline reads, panic worsening amongst Democrats after it sinks in just how many Republican House seats will be picked up through redistricting by 2026 if the Supreme Court overturns Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
This is CNN a couple of days ago.
Take a listen.
represents pretty accurately, mathematically, how the country is divided over the question of the presidency.
But if you look at this, this is what the party pickups would be for congressional districts.
Republicans, five.
Missouri, one.
North Carolina, one.
Ohio, two or three.
Indiana, one or two.
Florida, still discussion down there, but that could be another gold mine for them if they tipped it even further their way.
Kansas, one, New Hampshire, one, and Nebraska.
Democrats, Utah, California, Maryland.
Look at this.
If you offset California and Texas, Missouri and Utah, North Carolina and Maryland, everything left over is an advantage to the Republicans.
And don't forget, the Supreme Court is considering what could really be the end of the Voting Rights Act, which would protect minority groups.
So you don't have a state that's half black, for example, that elects only one congressional member and everybody else goes to the Republicans that would represent that population in some way.
So if that is gutted, Democrats could lose 19 seats.
This would be a huge amount.
But this is also a measure of how much the White House is concerned about this because Donald Trump knows if the Democrats get the House again, there could be new investigations just like last time.
There could be a new impeachment.
There could be a lot of impediment to these plans that right now the Republicans in the House and Senate are letting run like a freight.
All right.
So there you go.
So they are worried about it and they're doing the math and they're figuring it out.
And so that's what we're here to talk to you about.
But even in reporting this, this guy's lying.
There's not one state, not even the blackest state in the South is 50% black, which is what he's alive.
Mississippi comes the nearest.
It's 39% black.
But Mississippi, interestingly, has the strongest white voting bloc of any state.
I wonder why that is.
Out of any states.
Out of all the states in the Union, more whites vote Republican in Mississippi than any other state.
But that's an aside.
But so anyway, I mean, racism is no longer a taboo.
Race realism takes on black crime are increasingly seen on even television, but they're everywhere on social media.
There's a growing movement online to re-stigmatize miscegenation.
Charlie Kirk went to his grave thinking MLK was a con man.
And now the fact that the Voting Rights Act is now on the table illustrates how swiftly the tide is turning.
I will say this, and I will say this with a degree of satisfaction.
We here on this radio program, not only are we the longest-running pro-white radio program in the world or pro-white media broadcast outlet, whatever in the world, we have been right consistently, consistently right.
Not right 100% of the time because nobody is, but on the big things, I can't think of anything we ever really got rid of.
We've really led this type of thinking.
You know, we were the first people to talk about these things out loud, and now you're about to see the Supreme Court falling in line with our viewpoint.
So again, just to reiterate, Democrats in the South face wipeout as the Supreme Court guts Voting Rights Act.
By the way, that's what I voted for.
I didn't even think I could get that, but I voted for it.
That was one of the headlines.
I just mentioned this.
40% of Republicans in New England, the six New England states, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut.
They get about 40%.
They give about 40% of their votes to the Republicans.
They got zero.
Not one.
Not one.
Republican representative out of those six states.
The Democrats have long been doing this.
It's going to be wonderful to see the other side give it back to them.
And so don't talk to us about gerrymandering or anything else.
I don't even care.
I mean, yeah, gerrymander, do whatever it takes.
Just win.
I mean, if it's good for us, I'm for it.
There is a guy, and we're going to read his take on Columbus in the third hour when we get to our annual salute of Christopher Columbus.
Of course, Columbus Day was last Monday.
Senator Eric Schmidt.
He's a Republican senator, United States Senator from Missouri.
And wait till you hear what I read that he wrote about Columbus in the third hour.
It is probably the most succinct, most wonderful testimonial to Columbus that I've ever heard.
He's a sitting United States Senator.
And of course, we're the ones that started that off.
I remember back 10 years ago, we had an article about Columbus Day and why it should be celebrated and what it really does, what Columbus represents.
And again, we've had all sorts of people like Jared Taylor, Eric Schmidt, whatnot, fall in line with our viewpoint on this.
So again, I'm ready to claim credit where credit is due on all these things because we, you know, our show has been groundbreaking and trailblazing on so many of these issues that are basically now becoming the official position of the Republican Party.
Well, I certainly can't say we were the first to ever celebrate Columbus.
However, I mean, you know, Jared, we ran something from Jared this week.
I mean, many, many, many years old.
He had one that I did, what, 10 years ago, at least.
At least, at least.
Well, I mean, you know, people on our side have always celebrated Columbus.
But I will tell you that you would say happy Columbus Day or something, you know, 10 years ago and then put on your helmet and then, you know, wait for the barrage.
Now, there are people, we'll read some of the comments on social media about Columbus, but that's an aside.
That's coming up in the third hour, so let's not get too far ahead of ourselves.
But I will say this.
Senator Eric Schmidt wrote one of the most poignant love letters to Columbus, and we'll read it.
A sitting United States Senator, you love to see that.
But he also wrote this on October the 15th.
And this is sort of related to everything we're talking about this hour with the overturning of the Voting Rights Act.
The radicals of the 1960s failed to overthrow America by force, so they set out to capture it from within.
The left's long march through the institutions was the defining political project of the last 50 years.
Now the right must take back those institutions.
This is a sitting United States Senator, and that sounds like something, you know, certainly you would have said and that you would have heard here or elsewhere in our ranks.
And it's good to hear it because people are getting it.
I'll put an even finer point on it.
Basically, what happened was Jews backed the civil rights movement.
They provided the money, they provided the leadership, they provided the masterminding.
And it was intended to turn blacks into a group of revolutionaries that they could be used to change America into a liberal bastion.
That's what they did.
That's what they've done since the end of the 60s until basically the last five years or 10 years at most.
We've started to make progress on rolling that back finally under Trump.
And don't ever imagine that we would have made as much headway as we have had it not been for Trump.
Trump has been able to, for example, pack the Supreme Court.
That was, you know, all sorts of people, Reagan and others had talked about it, but they didn't, you know, it was, as Elvis said, too much talk, too much conversation, not enough action.
It's true.
It is just an absolute matter of fact that these advances would have never happened without Donald Trump.
That is a full stop period.
I mean, there's nothing up for debate about that.
And Keith, you mark the ominous anniversary, that dark day in the history of Western civilization, the day that Brown versus Board of Education sailed through the Supreme Court.
May the 17th, 1954.
You recognize that even perhaps even more quickly than your own birthday.
So I know that this is something that is near and dear to your heart.
Did you ever think that, let's see, what was it?
2015, when Trump came down the escalator, did you think that the Voting Rights Act would be up for total?
And you know if the left had used any amount of restraint in their reaction against Trump, it would never have happened.
But on the other hand, they came after him hammering tongs.
And because of that, they basically radicalized Donald Trump.
And that's why he is, for example, that's why he's sending the National Guard to these blue cities, you know, and like Memphis.
He needs to send them to places like Jackson, Mississippi, as well.
All the red states would have governors that would support him.
And I think that when all the dust settles, most black people, the law-abiding black people, will be very happy with the results and will probably gain more of them as Republican voters.
Well, I mean, you know, that's always been, you know, I wrote a chapter about that in racism-schmazism back in 2010.
There's a pot of black Republicans at the end of the rainbow.
I'm not depending on it.
I just think that basically, you know, there is a large group of criminally minded blacks in every majority black city, but I still think there is a majority, maybe a narrow majority of blacks that do not live on crime and are the primary victims of black crime.
And, you know, if I don't care whether they change or not, but I think they will change because they are the victims.
You know, they don't come into the white neighborhoods as much as you would expect them to do.
Instead, most of their depredations are directed at their own kind.
Well, again.
Most of the crime is in the black neighborhoods of these blue cities.
We'll give Brad Griffin the last word on this.
He has been documenting it dutifully at occidentaldescent.com.
We're going to transition into the next segment.
We're going to be talking about these young Republicans, this chat.
Oh, this is an interesting story for sure.
And we're going to peel the layers of this onion after this.
But, Brad, as he writes, if the Supreme Court strikes down Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, you're going to take the Congressional Black Caucus will be out of existence.
Well, there is going to be a total drop-off in Democratic Party power in the federal government.
All right, when we come back, what are we talking about?
Let me check my notes.
Well, I just told you, but how did I put it in my notes?
Oh, the investigation.
I got to tell you something about investigations when we come back, and then we'll set up the story of the young Republicans.
Protecting your liberties.
You're listening to Liberty News Radio.
News this hour from Town Hall.
I'm Mary Rose.
Support for President Trump's handling of the Israel-Palestinian conflict is on the rise.
An AP Nork poll shows 47% of U.S. adults approve of his approach, up from 37% in September after he helped secure a Gaza ceasefire.
Republican strategist Aaron McGuire reports.
This does cement Donald Trump as the most geopolitically significant leader in American history for the good of global peace.
Yes, there have been world wars that have been ended by America and American greatness, but these were wars that have been started by other nations that without having to put an ounce of American bloodshed on the ground has radicalized the world and ended wars and conflicts.
The poll indicates the bump in the president's approval comes mainly from Democrats.
A U.S. military strike on a cartel boat left survivors a first, according to U.S. officials.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio offered few details when he spoke to reporters.
It's well known there's an ongoing narco-terrorist operation the United States has been conducting.
As far as details of any recent strikes, we're not prepared here to announce all those details, but you'll get that information here very shortly.
The Australian government has begun a public education campaign with tips on how to wean children off its social media.
It's all ahead of a world first national 16-year age limit taking effect.
Australian E-Safety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant says information on her agency's website explained the new laws.
It also offered checklists and conversation starters about ways to make the transition.
Facebook, YouTube, and other platforms could be fined millions starting in December if they don't take steps to prevent young Australians from holding accounts.
Australia's age restriction is being watched closely.
Keith Peters, Washington.
More on these stories at townhall.com.
Dinesh D'Souza went into a war zone to make his new film, revealing never-before-seen footage of October 7th.
The film offers a new way to understand Israel, radical Islam, anti-Semitism, and biblical prophecy.
Could the fate of the world be tied to this place?
The Dragon's Prophecy, based on Jonathan Kahn's international bestseller.
Watch it now or buy the DVD at SatemNow.com.
That's SatemNow.com.
I'm not going to tell you what to do with your money, but gold has increased over 80% in the past two years.
So, if you think stuffing money under your mattress is your retirement plan, well, good luck with that.
When you call AdvantageGold at 800-741-Gold, we'll send you a free gold kit that explains how rolling over your IRA into gold could not only supercharge your retirement, but maybe even help preserve your sanity.
When's the last time you ever heard someone say, Hey, sell all your gold?
Always consult with your financial advisor before investing.
Call 800-741-GOLD.
Hey, friends, it's James.
Did you know that every issue of the American Free Press now features my own published QA interviews with one of your favorite guests from the radio program?
That's right, the American Free Press has officially partnered with TPC to expand our audience into the realm of print media.
I encourage you to read it for yourself by subscribing today at AmericanFreePress.net.
Did you know that regular TPC contributors like Nick Griffin and Jose Nino also have their own exclusive, insightful, and hard-hitting columns published in every issue of the American Free Press?
I love this paper and read it as soon as it lands in my mailbox.
Whether you prefer to receive the print edition or a digital subscription, the choice is yours when you subscribe at AmericanFreePress.net.
We are advancing, but we need to be wise and well-informed.
Enhance your intellectual ammunition today by subscribing to America's last real newspaper.
If you enjoy listening to this broadcast, you'll love reading the American Free Press.
Subscribe today by calling 1-888-699 News or by visiting AmericanFreePress.net.
God tells us in Hebrews 10:25 that we should gather together to worship Him.
This isn't a request, it is a command.
Going to church isn't an option, it is your Christian duty.
With the hellish apostasy of mainstream churches, attending church these days can be difficult.
That is why your King James Only, traditional services in the ancient Church of St. Mary Magdalene, alive, online.
And I invite you to gather with our congregation to study God's Holy Word.
Join us every Sunday at the TemplarChurch.com and especially on the first Sunday of the month for Holy Communion.
This do in remembrance of me is also a command that all Christians must obey.
I'm Reverend Jim Dowson, ordained Puritan minister, nationalist, and a veteran pro-life campaigner.
Tune in to my weekly sermons at the TemplarChurch.com.
Based in Ireland, this old-time religion is the faith that built America.
God bless you.
And we're back.
We're going to switch gears now for the remainder of the hour.
Let me again remind you that still coming up tonight, I called Mark Weber this week.
Mark and I had an appointment to have him back on the program right around this time.
And I called him on my way out to my parents' house a few days ago and we talked.
And he told me, and I didn't know this, but he had just gotten back from an 11-day trip to Vietnam of all places.
And I had called him for something totally different to talk to him about something entirely separate.
But as he told me a little bit about his trip, it's like I do with you, Keith.
You and I sit and have lunch or we pregame something.
And I said, you know, I just wish we could have bottled up the entire conversation and put this on the radio.
And we were batting around some ideas of what he could talk about tonight.
And, you know, it just came up.
Well, what about your trip to Vietnam?
It's interesting.
I hope you'll enjoy it.
It's going to be a little bit of a change of pace.
So he's going to be back with us in the second hour to share observations from his recent trip to Vietnam.
Third hour, we're going to honor Christopher Columbus and his unparalleled, his matchless contributions to the age of exploration and the expansion of Western civilization.
But first, right now, we're going to be talking about Politico's, this left-wing rag web zine, their investigation into a private group chat of young Republicans.
I say investigation, you know, that's a funny word.
The SPLC, back now, 21 years ago next week, it'll be 21 years.
We've been celebrating 20 years for two years now because we celebrated it a year in advance.
I mean, 20 years is a big milestone in this movement, let me tell you.
But it'll be 21 years next week.
And so in those early years, Keith, the SBLC was on us like white on rice because there was nobody else doing this.
Nobody else even started doing this until about 10 years after we first went on the air.
And the SBLC was constantly writing about us, and they would do what they would call these investigative reports, investigative journalism.
You've heard that term.
And every time they would do one of these investigative pieces, these intrepid journalists, you know, there was no digging deep and finding things behind the scenes because there's nothing behind the scenes to find.
We are who we are.
And like Popeye said, I am what I am.
And that's all what I am.
But every time they would do one of these pieces of investigative journalism, it would be Winston Smith used to always laugh about it when he was still on the show.
You remember Winston?
Absolutely.
And he would say, you know, where's the investigation?
You know, everything that they would report, they either heard on the show or read on our website.
It was no dirt.
There was no digging.
They either heard it on the show or they read it on our website because it was all public.
It was all public information.
And that's sort of what happened here with this young Republican thing.
What happened was the Jewish leader, chairman of the Young Republican Club of New York, which is a pretty prestigious group.
I mean, they've really done some decent work and advanced some of our issues.
But the chairman, or now the former chairman, Gavin Wax, was feeding them this information.
And they call this an exclusive investigative report.
You know, what did you investigate?
They can't investigate anything.
They couldn't investigate their children's report cards.
Well, I mean, what's the investigation?
You had a rat that gave you all the goods.
I mean, that's not an investigation.
What did you do?
You just sat there and reported what he fed you.
And it was a Jewish chairman of this young Republican club feeding it to a Jewish journalist of this left-wing rag.
And that's something that is often said.
I mean, that's a stereotype.
They will say they're conservative.
Conservative.
It's a stereotype because it's true.
They are conservatives.
They are liberals.
They are Republicans and Democrats.
But at the end of the day, they are just what?
Jews.
And they basically are behind all of the left-wing drift of America over the past 70 years.
They did it on purpose, and they've done it not to help black people or to help homosexuals, but to harm white heterosexual Gentiles in America.
And so just like all of those old pieces back when we were the only target to be shot at, now there's like thousands of people.
Anybody that has a microphone now is a commentator.
But, you know, with a computer, I should say.
But back in those days, they would breathlessly, and almost orgasmically, if I should say that, I mean, it almost reads like that, you know, report these things.
I mean, breathlessly.
And so the headline reads at Politico, I love Hitler.
Leaked messages exposed young Republicans' racist chat.
And it's in modern day parlance in the online community, T-L-D-R, too long, didn't read.
It is a screed.
If you ever want to know what a screed is, type in the Politico Young Republicans article on Google, and it is so long.
And they document 251 naughty phrases or opinions or words.
Words and phrases they consider naughty, but what other people consider to be truthful reporting on the situation in the world.
Well, what it is, is you have young people.
They're called the young Republicans for a reason.
They're young.
So when you're young, you're intemperate.
You engage in locker room talk.
Now, when I was 20, I was...
And you're fearless in going after taboo subjects, like, for example, Hitler.
I'm glad to hear people not buying this, you know, typical celebratory tripe about what an evil man Hitler was and what a righteous man Churchill was.
All that's well and good, but they are intemperate and they are immature.
But they were engaging.
Now, I will tell you, because I can contrast that.
What was I doing when I was 20?
When I was 20, I was doing radio, TV, and newspaper interviews as a spokesman for Pat Buchanan and his third campaign for the presidency.
And I tell you this, every day that I live, every day as I get older, I am more proud that my entry into this whole thing was that campaign because, boy, that was one of a kind.
But, you know, so, you know, this is what they say, and everything's recorded now.
I mean, you didn't have social media and the internet back in 1999 and 2000 as you do today.
And so these people, well, this is just an example of some of the things they said.
They said that, well, they called blacks watermelon people.
They said, if I want to watch monkeys play with the ball, I'll go to a zoo in reference to, are you watching an NBA game?
They said that Indian people stink.
And by the way, that is entirely true.
I'm not trying to be funny.
I'm not trying.
It is true.
There is a theater here in Bartlett, the Hollywood Cinema.
It's owned by Indians.
And once a week, I've told this story before, and I think I've told it recently.
Once a week when I was growing up as a teenager, they would have Indian Movie Night.
Hollywood.
And if you went there that night to see any of the other movies that were playing, you know, it would be packed with Indians and the whole place stunk.
Just last week, I was out of town for a meeting and also in the hotel that we were meeting at was a group of Indians.
And they stunk.
They absolutely do stink.
I mean, all of that's true.
And so, I mean, there was just some other things they said.
You know, they called somebody retarded.
I mean, it was just things like that.
And it's this exhaustive screed of, if you find it and you try to read it, I mean, I hope you have two or three hours to spare to read the whole thing because they document like everything these kids said and, you know, just presented it because back in the day, you could do that and it would, you know, heads would roll.
There's no doubt about it.
But that day is changing.
That day is changing.
Punishing individuals isn't working anymore and it's not going to change the culture of young conservatives.
What is happening is that the snakes and the rats that ran to the media are having their reputations destroyed.
And as I said on my own Twitter account this week, the day of weak and apologetic conservatism is ending.
And the time has come for those of us who have never apologized to simply take over everything with the black flag in hand.
I stand in complete solidarity with all of these young Republicans who posted the messages that the left is pretending to be outraged about.
I'm not saying that it wasn't in poor taste or that they're not immature or whatever, but it doesn't bother me.
I mean, their hearts are in the right place.
I probably agree with them on everything and vice versa.
But this thing is, you know, they'll know these are these are fine people.
I don't have a problem with it.
But the left does all of that and then some.
And then some.
I mean, even their primary candidate for attorney general, their nominee for attorney general just said he wants to see white kids die.
He wants to murder the white kids of his Republican opponent.
Lauren Witsky said this week on Twitter, leftist transgender lovers are murdering conservatives like Charlie Kirk while their allies celebrate it, and these hacks want to be offended over conservative men having some gamer locker room talk.
Sorry, we're not playing the denouncing game.
We're done with that.
Paul Kersey, our friend Keith, we have one objective, the total erosion of what's acceptable discourse.
Pour it on, warriors.
We are the deluge.
And that's where we're at right now.
There are some Republicans that are wringing their hands and reflexively prostrating themselves as conservatives have always been wont to do.
But I tell you where it stopped was at the White House.
Trump has been noticeably silent on this.
And JD Vance came out multiple times and defended these people.
He has an Indian wife.
Well, let me tell you what the thing is, the left is not doing this to be mismanners or to try to enforce decorum and propriety.
They're doing it to try to destroy people's future, to destroy their, to let them lose their jobs and stuff.
We need to understand what they're doing and why they're doing it.
And because of that, we are 100% opposed to them.
We think that freedom of speech is real and freedom of speech lets you say what you want to say as long as you're not threatening somebody's life.
And because of that, you know, we're never going to apologize.
We're never going to join forces with these lily-livered Republicans that are so, you know, upset about what is being said by the young Republicans.
Basically, what we need to do, those Republicans that are identifying themselves as being these weak hitters, we need to identify them and get them out.
Some of that is happening now.
I mean, again, you would have had a unanimous consent in the George Bush and John McCain era of Republicanism of people denouncing these people.
Their careers would be over.
They would never again be engaged in politics and they would probably be ruined for life.
Now you have the vice president standing up for them.
You do have other Republicans that are doing the white wimp shuffle as to being and be sure to note very carefully who these people are because they're the people whose careers need to be.
That's it.
That's it.
Well, I received this comment, and it's a good point.
And it looks at both sides of this.
He said, I know the young Republicans are good people.
They're just joking around.
And it's obvious that they know nothing about the Holocaust, so they wouldn't have mentioned gassing Jews.
But I have to tell you, anyone with that bad of judgment to not understand that these kinds of comments are always dug up by somebody and used, even when made in jest, might disqualify them from getting my vote of confidence.
Such bad judgment makes me wonder if I would want them in any position to make decisions that could affect my life.
P.S. I'm in Virginia, and Jay Jones's comments were much worse and much more malicious and violent.
This is the black candidate for attorney general in Virginia who said he wants to murder white kids.
Not only his enemies, but the children of his enemies.
And he said, that being said, all of these people should know better than to put these things up in any kind of form that can be used against you.
All of that's true.
Okay, so you can't get a total absolution.
You got to have tact.
But at the same time, that's not the same as throwing them under the bus.
I will close ranks with them.
And as you said, Keith, I believe that the people that should be drummed out of the Republican Party are the people that are prostrating themselves before their absolute mortal life and death enemy to disavow them for being imprudent at 20 years old.
Well, the thing is, I'm tired of having Jews and Israelis thrown up to us as sacred cows that are beyond reproach, like Caesar's wife.
They're not.
In fact, if I see one more ad showing some aged Jewish person living in a chicken coop, crying about not having enough food and whatnot, this is the richest subgroup of ethnic group in the world, but they can't take care of their aged.
They want the rest, they want these credulous, white, fundamentalist Christians to provide all the money for taking care of their old people.
And it is, you know, it is beyond ridiculous.
And it is really, those commercials are so over the top that the Jewish community ought to be ashamed of themselves.
Really?
You talk about the 3 a.m. Fox News commercials?
Oh, yes, absolutely.
You know, we've got.
If you send 19 cents to Israel, you'll save a starving Holocaust survivor.
Yeah.
How many of those people are going to be able to do?
Well, you know, of course, they've got to be around 100 years old.
Well, they can keep it.
Well, but it's a hereditary thing.
I mean, it could be passed on.
That trauma.
That trauma is here.
They've already said that.
When are the German people going to stop being taken to the cleaners?
What are you talking about?
Fox News isn't reaching the German.
No, I'm telling you what they do.
The German government sends a billion dollars or millions of dollars every year to Israel, supposedly to assuage them and be atoned from their guilt, supposedly, of doing the Holocaust.
In the Holocaust, I think there's plenty of reason to question the validity of the numbers or what happened during this.
Things like the Nuremberg trials, for example, that was a disgrace.
That was a disgrace to Anglo-Saxon justice.
Not that I don't want to talk about that, but I want to stay on this topic.
So listen, we have a couple of people in our ranks who are my contemporaries in terms of age.
You know, all of my friends are your age, Keith.
You know that.
So I don't keep a pulse on what's going on with the 20-year-olds, but a couple of people my age do, specifically named Kevin Deanna and Paul Kersey.
And so for my next QA in American Free Press, I reached out to Paul yesterday and he got back with me immediately within a couple of hours.
He had the entire QA typed up and done.
And so I'll read a few of his responses just to inform you folks and to give you some further insight.
He has followed this very closely.
He knows some of these people.
And I asked him, who is Gavin Wax and what was his role in this?
And this was Paul Kersey's response.
Gavin Wax has been a significant force within the young right, and I have appreciated his work up until now.
Now, this is the Jewish head of the Young Republican Clubs who has done good of New York, that has done good work, if you follow it at all.
By New York standards.
Well, no, but I mean, no, they really have.
Well, Paul gives us some details.
He encouraged the Young Republican Club of New York to advocate for ideas that have long been silenced in both traditional Republican circles, such as the Great Replacement, the consequences of both legal and illegal immigration, and the troubling reality of disproportionate crime rates among black individuals in major cities.
He became a target of Antifa himself.
However, he eventually secured a position in the Trump administration in 2025.
He is in the State Department right now, which I viewed as a major development, Paul writes, given his connections with hardcore individuals that leftists consider beyond the pale those who have the most interesting ideas.
But it now appears as though he leaked private Telegram chat messages to Antifa PR representatives posing as journalists at Politico.
It's proving that you can't trust a Jew.
Well, you know, what Paul is saying there is a little bit tongue-in-cheek.
It was a journalist at a so-called journalist at Politico, but also an Antifa, most likely.
But it was the Jewish Gavin Wax giving it to the Jewish Bieferman as his last name at Politico.
Biefman, please.
Which is a severe betrayal of the most important virtue in life, loyalty.
He should be removed from his position in the Trump administration as he's betrayed his comrades without gaining anything in return.
So that's what set all of this off.
Basically, he acquired the chat logs of people under his organization and fed it to another Jewish, an antifa Jewish reporter at Politico.
He said for what reason?
You said he didn't get anything from it.
He did.
His standing in the Jewish community, I'm sure, rose considerably because of his, I guess you would call it betrayal of his Republican cause.
I want to read this very quickly.
And I said, while weak and apologetic conservatives have reflexively prostrated themselves, many have not, and that includes the vice president, JD Vance.
Is this further evidence that the right is entering into a new era?
Paul Kersey responded unquestionably, and this will be in the next issue of American Free Press.
The entire situation would have been undoubtedly dominated by the news cycle, blogosphere, and social media platforms in 2018, resulting in mass firings and weak apologies from those involved in the deliberate data breach aimed at undermining effective right-wingers.
What we are witnessing now is a desire from the right to win and reject the naive conservative mentality that allows those willing, only those willing to accept the most premises of the left a seat at the table of respectability.
This atmosphere was governed by individuals who espouse rhetoric reminiscent of the Bolsheviks.
There is no discussion of race or racial differences, no criticism of our one-sided relationship with Israel, and absolutely no advocacy for the interests of white Americans.
Everything is changing now.
And I commented to him: if you look on Twitter, you look on X, it is inundated with commenters pointing to the hypocrisy of the left, which openly engages in and fantasizes about violence against whites, attempting to ruin the lives of these young men and women who are privately engaging in humor.
And most of these people that are doing it are, guess what?
They're not Anglo-white, Anglo-Saxon primitives.
Well, you definitely have some weak.
You got some weak whites that are doing it too.
But by far, the majority of this type of activity is a Jewish occupation, just like political assassinations are especially of the Messiah.
The comment, I don't care about leaked DMs, direct messages, is ubiquitous on X right now with illustrations of Charlie Kirk and Irina Zaruska being murdered as a couple of examples to illustrate this and to provide emphasis.
And so, you know, are journalists losing, so-called journalists losing the ability to act as the enforcers of political correctness.
Paul Kersey wrote to me in what will be published in American Free Press next week.
Yes, they have lost their control largely due to Elon Musk's decision to purchase Twitter in 2022.
He goes on to a more informed answer, but that's the most I'm going to give you now.
If you want to read the rest, get a subscription to American Free Press if you don't have it already.
I do go on and ask him: is it possible that the persecution of these thought criminals can backfire and only add more fuel to the fire that is raging on the right?
And he writes this, this is very insightful.
You learn a lot about yourself when you face persecution from Antifa and those who are determined to ensure that the egalitarian left dominates the cultural narrative.
This perspective attributes all the problems non-whites experience to the pervasive threat of white privilege, implicit bias, and systematic inequalities.
We have witnessed a significant moment with this story from Politico in which the vice president of the United States dismissed it in less than 140 characters on Twitter and never looked back.
That is damn important.
And the only thing that I would say to improve it is that rather than talking about the egalitarian left, it's the anti-white Gentile left.
That's what they really are.
I asked him to recap key takeaways from this story.
Paul Kersey, our friend, writes, and this is to go back to our commenter from a few minutes ago: be careful what you say in group chats with friends, and in fact, try to avoid them altogether.
Even those who appear to be right-wing, like Gavin Wax, throughout his public career, particularly if they're Jewish, may betray you if it means gaining temporary approval from the left.
Many conservatives have already ceded moral authority to the left.
I suggest removing the term conservative, he writes, from your vocabulary altogether and not identifying with this defeatist mentality.
By every measure, Paul Kersey says to me in this exclusive QA for American Free Press, conservatives have failed in their endeavors, often exploiting Americans who wish to restore traditional values.
Got to go quick here.
Many have donated to nonprofits in Washington, D.C., but hey, for $1,000, tax-deductible, of course, you can get your pocket Constitution.
I asked him this in closing.
With this issue fresh on our minds, if current trends persist and advance, what does the near future look like on our side?
And he wrote this: We are not far from a time when an elected official or a public servant openly declares not only is it okay to be white, but it is moral and just to advocate for America to remain predominantly white.
There is nothing wrong with standing up for your own demographic, and for too long, Americans have been told that it is amoral to recognize the greatness of our past and honor the sacrifices of our ancestors made for future generations.
Keith, you see that damn breaking now in that it is not unanimous, this condemnation of these people who engaged in locker room talk.
There are very significant conservative or Republican figures, including the vice president, that are defending them.
And it is in many circles the people who are trying to hang them out to dry on the Republican rights.
Let me just say, let me cut to the chase.
You need to become Jew-wise and you do not confide in Jews.
A Jew will never be your best friend.
The Jew's best friend will always be another Jew, even if he's someone on the other side of the political spectrum.
Great article also.
Now, that'll be in American Free Press, and I only read you a bit of it tonight.
My exclusive QA with Paul Kersey about this story.
Another good article, The Young Republican Chats, this posted at Countercurrents by Greg Johnson.
He has a great take on it.
We're going to repost that at thepolitical cesspool.org on Monday.
Didn't have a chance to get into it, but good takes there if you want to read more about this story.
Mark Weber up next.
He just got home from Vietnam.
Good morning, Vietnam.
You remember that movie?
Robin Williams?
And in the third hour, Christopher Columbus.
▲
Export Selection