All Episodes
July 10, 2024 - Tim Pool Daily Show
01:25:33
Trump WINNING NEW YORK, Democrats PANIC As Biden NY Polls COLLPASE, Dems CRY Over Biden NOT Quitting

BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO FIGHT BACK - https://castbrew.com/ Become a Member For Uncensored Videos - https://timcast.com/join-us/ Hang Out With Tim Pool & Crew LIVE At - http://Youtube.com/TimcastIRL Trump WINNING NEW YORK, Democrats PANIC As Biden NY Polls COLLPASE, Dems CRY Over Biden NOT Quitting Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Participants
Main voices
t
tim pool
01:20:26
Appearances
j
jake tapper
01:41
Clips
j
joe biden
00:21
j
josh hammer
00:31
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
tim pool
Become a member at Timcast dot com by clicking join us to support the work we're doing and to get access to the uncensored Timcast IRL call in show Monday through Thursday at 10 p.m.
You don't want to miss it.
Now, let's get into the news.
Joe Biden will not be the nominee.
I don't see how you can look at everything that's been going on over the past year.
To be honest, past several years.
And conclude, this man will be the Democratic nominee.
With Jon Stewart coming on his show and saying, screw the primaries, have a convention, we pick someone else.
I think it's clear where the media machine is going.
I think you take a look at even Fox News, and the narrative machine is a-churning.
Biden is out.
Now, there is a little old problem with Kamala Harris, and Trump has this funny quote from his rally the other day where he was like, you know, if Biden did anything right, it's picking Kamala, the greatest insurance policy, to make sure they don't replace him.
But they're going to.
And I think it's plain to see.
Now, look, okay, fine, maybe I'm wrong, but with this story right here, okay, in the latest news on polling, there is no world, in my opinion, where the Democrats will allow Joe Biden to continue.
Why?
Well, you clicked this video, you likely know Donald Trump is beginning to win in New York State.
When you look at the polling, the predictions, New York is always deep blue Democrat.
Yet, right now, Democrats are extremely worried because in New York swing districts, places where Joe Biden won by 23 points, Donald Trump is now winning.
We have the story from Politico.
Take a look at that.
Donald Trump said he was going to win New York.
I don't know that he will.
He's down by 8 points.
now. Democrats are worried the president is taking New York for granted as the state becomes
surprisingly competitive. Take a look at that. Donald Trump said he was going to win New York.
I don't know that he will. He's down by eight points. But this is like a D plus 30.
Joe Biden has a new problem, Politico says.
A competitive race in deep blue New York.
Elected officials, union leaders, and political consultants are panicking over polls showing a steady erosion of Biden's support in a state he won by 23 points four years ago.
They're so worried.
They've been trying to convince the Biden team to pour resources into New York and shore up his campaign and boost Democrats running in a half-dozen swing districts that could determine control of the House.
Biden aides have not focused on New York, committing no significant resources to a state where they expect the president to easily win all 28 electoral college votes in November.
Perhaps.
unidentified
But it's going to be close.
tim pool
And I think what these Democrats aren't realizing, I think many of them are, but I think, you know, a lot of people around Biden, a lot of the lower IQ personalities, you go to these guys online, you say, Trump's going to come close in New York, and they say, so what?
Biden will win.
And you say, this means that Trump will win Congress.
Congress is not winner-take-all by state.
It's by district.
And while New York may be blue in terms of electoral college vote count, they have Republicans.
And these swing districts, districts that weren't normally swing districts, they're now going Trump!
So don't be surprised if Republicans end up winning here.
Now, that being said, Republicans are the worst!
Look, man, at least the Democrats will spit on you and then tell you why they did it.
Republicans will spit on you and then say, I don't know what you're talking about.
We're trying our best.
It was an accident.
Democrats will beat you over the head with a club and then say it's for your own good.
Republicans will stand there and watch and say, well, if only we could do something about this while they smile and pat the Democrat on the back.
I can't stand the Republican Party.
They're just so awful.
You know, I'm going to break this down for you.
The Democrats are awful.
The Republicans are awful.
The Libertarians are awful.
The Green Party's awful.
They're all awful.
I'm the black sheep.
Don't listen to me.
I clearly don't like any of these people.
I suppose if I came out as like a staunch, hardcore Republican, party, party, hoorah, hoorah, you know, maybe I'd have a bigger audience or whatever, but let me just pause real quick and say, Democrats are evil.
They lie, they cheat, they steal.
They launched the J6 committee, they put people in prison, they abused the system to go after their political opponents.
They are lying half the time, and the other half, they're probably just not saying anything at all.
The Republicans are spineless and do nothing.
The GOP won't even hold Merrick Garland in contempt because he defied a congressional subpoena.
While Bannon and Navarro are in prison for this.
I'm not asking for revenge.
I'm not asking for retribution.
I'm asking for equality under the law.
Show me the system exists!
Show me government exists!
Oh, okay.
Democrats can put two guys in prison and Republicans sit on their hands.
Republicans are garbage.
Libertarians, you say?
The Libertarians are pie-in-the-sky people who believe in wackadoo politics.
Let's be real.
There's a reason why they got 1.2 or like 0.8% last time around.
Now that I've sufficiently insulted everybody, the Green Party doesn't even register and I don't know who else is left.
The Green Party's wackadoo as well.
Now, I like the Libertarians quite a bit.
The Ron Paul Libertarians, the Mises Caucus guys, they seem to hit the nail on the head pretty well.
And then, what happens?
Well, look, for a variety of reasons, you get Chase as their nominee.
Not like they were going to win anyway.
But my understanding is that when they were voting on their nominee at the Libertarian Convention, a bunch of the Mises Caucus delegates left.
And they let this guy win.
I just, I have, you know what, man?
I have very little confidence in anybody.
They're all just so awful.
So it is funny to go back to the news that we're looking at New York shifting Republican.
Alright, so the warning signs are impossible to ignore and have been building over the past year.
Two private polls conducted in a swing New York House district and reviewed by Politico, one in September, one in March, found former President Trump leading Biden by one point, a virtual tie.
And public polls over the last four months found Biden's lead had winnowed to just eight points across New York.
An unusually narrow gap in a state where Democrats outnumber Republicans two to one.
Quote, we're still acting like this is a one-party state, which for pretty much 20-25 years it has been, said Democratic Manhattan Borough President Mark Levine.
I truly believe we're in a battleground state now.
Biden, whose campaign is in free fall after a shambling debate performance last month, is yet to pay much attention to the state beyond high-dollar fundraisers.
He was most recently in New York on June 29th to raise money in the Hamptons.
An attended dedication ceremony for the Stonewall Inn Visitor Center in Manhattan a day earlier.
He has been appearing in traditional battleground states, including Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, over the weekend as the 81-year-old tries to silence doubts over his age and mental acuity.
Now, Democrats want Biden to get serious about the Empire State as they warn of the existential crisis to democracy posed by Trump's potential return to the White House, according to interviews with 10 Democratic Party officials, consultants, and political leaders.
A contested race in New York exacerbates Biden's re-election troubles as members of his party continue to call for him to step aside or question his fitness for office, including two members of the state's House delegation.
And it would cost him time and money he'd rather be spending on the country's six swing states siphoning millions of dollars to play in the costliest media market in the country.
The money that needs to be spent here will be subtracted from other areas he's going to lose.
Former Democratic New York Governor David Paterson said top statewide Dems, including Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, have signaled shared public support for Biden.
Schumer, though, has been sparing in his public comments about Biden since the president's debate performance nearly two weeks ago.
Here's FiveThirtyEight, ladies and gentlemen.
Take a look at this.
The latest polls out of Emerson.
You pull out Joe Biden, Trump landslide.
I mean, look.
If Joe Biden is not the nominee, Shapiro, Trump up 8.
Warren, Trump up 10.
Gore, Trump up 5.
Gore, are you kidding me?
Clinton, Trump is up 7!
Sanders, Trump is up 6.
Buttigieg, Trump 10.
Whitmer, Trump 10.
Newsom, Trump 8.
Harris, Trump 6.
Biden, Trump 4.
I hate to say it, but Biden really is the best bet Democrats have.
I don't know who they're going to pull in.
Michelle Obama.
That's really it.
She polls really well.
We'll see.
Emerson has Trump and Biden tied.
How?
This country, man, I tell you what.
July 7th morning consult has Trump beating Biden by two.
Now, here's one that I really love.
Ben Dixon and Amandi International Polls.
Has Hillary Clinton beating Trump by two points?
Sorry if I don't believe it.
Y'all look, I can't stand the Republican Party.
I, I absolutely just, I like, oh I like, I hate them so much.
I try not to say it, but I do.
I hate the Republican Party so much!
Ugh.
Libertarians are like your goofy neighbor kid where you'll like have weird conversations about the goofy things you did.
He's like, you know, it's like 16 year old kid next door and he's kind of doofy and goofy, but he just discovered like, I don't know, in excess for the first time.
And you're like, oh man, you know, and you talk about it, but it's really, it doesn't matter.
That's like the Libertarian Party.
You hang out with them and you reminisce of the good old Ron Paul love revolution days and how the Federal Reserve is garbage and taxation is theft, you say, and you know it's going nowhere.
And then, the people who actually live in the House, Democrat dad, Republican mom, or the other way around, whatever, they're bickering and fighting and complaining the whole time.
unidentified
The Republicans do nothing Hey it's Kimberly Fletcher here from Moms4America with some very exciting news.
Tucker Carlson is going on a nationwide tour this fall and Moms4America has the exclusive VIP meet and greet experience for you.
Before each show, you can have the opportunity to meet Tucker Carlson in person.
These tickets are fully tax-deductible donations, so go to momsforamerica.us and get one of our very limited VIP meet-and-greet experiences with Tucker at any of the 15 cities on his first ever Coast to Coast tour.
Not only will you be supporting Moms for America in our mission to empower moms, promote liberty, and raise patriots, your tax-deductible donation secures you a full VIP experience with priority entrance and check-in, premium gold seating in the first five rows, access to a pre-show cocktail reception, an individual meet-and-greet, and photo with America's most famous conservative and our friend, Tucker Carlson.
Visit momsforamerica.us today for more information and to secure your exclusive VIP meet-and-greet tickets.
See you on the tour.
tim pool
And it's like, it's like watching this family mercilessly beat their child.
And we'll call it the Libertarians, too.
They're in the backyard getting yelled at and screamed at.
Democrat dad is just whipping these kids with a belt, and you're like, you guys need to stop doing this!
And they're like, they like it!
It's for their own good!
And Republican mom is like, well, I would do something if I could, but I mean, I really can't.
He's hurting himself, really.
I mean, people can see what he's doing.
That's how I feel about all this.
Because Republicans right now, You got Merrick Garland in contempt, and Speaker Johnson's like, oh, but they're in freefall.
Why would we do anything about the crimes they commit?
What does that have to do with anything, dude?
Stop letting them get away with crimes!
In fact, in this analogy, I guess Democrats are mercilessly beating your kid.
Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro are in jail.
Nullify that.
At the very least, get them out!
Man, I tell you.
I just, I hate all the political parties.
They're all absolute garbage.
We need a new political party called the Fire Everyone, Nothing Else Matters, I Don't Care Party.
Here's my party platform.
When elected president, I'm only going to go in and just fire everyone.
And then I'm going to leave.
Give me one week.
I don't want to be involved in any of this.
One week, and I'm going to fire everybody.
Bye!
That's all we need.
No, nobody wants that.
I mean, actually, maybe a lot of people want that, but nobody will run on that.
Can we get someone to run on that?
Can we get someone to run on the Republican ticket where it's just like, look, I don't know what he's talking.
They're going to be at the debate.
It's going to be like, when I'm elected, we're going to focus on healthcare, and I'm going to be like, I won't.
I will not focus on healthcare.
I'm just going to fire everybody, and then I'm going to resign.
So, you guys, think about your VP, because that's going to matter.
And then whenever the debate happens, they're like, so you're saying you'd do nothing?
Uh, well, mostly, yeah, I would do nothing.
I'd fire everybody.
I would dedicate 100% of my resources to firing everyone.
Just gone.
Call it whatever you want, okay?
And then the next person could come in and hire whatever.
I ain't saying it's gonna solve your problems, but oh boy, it would feel good.
We need We need people to vote en masse to get the incumbents out.
That's what we need.
Lord help us.
I'm so sick of the Republicans, dude.
Here we go, baby!
Cook Political Report moves three swing states to lean Republican.
This one's massive.
They also moved three Democrat states from likely dem to lean dem.
Former President Trump now has an edge over Biden in three key swing states of Arizona, Georgia, and Nevada.
The new ratings underscore that even if Biden survives the calls for him to step down, the Democratic Party still faces a bigger challenge ahead, winning in November.
Look, man, can you believe there are people actually predicting a Trump landslide?
Yeah, for real, look, I'll say this, much to the chagrin of people like Sam Seder who cry all the time about, like, Why do you care about my opinions?
I never talk about you.
But here I am, talking about him talking about me, because I said I was right about 2020 insofar as I could not predict Democrat electoral strategy.
That is, Trump's economic numbers were good, the predictors were in line with historical trends, but universal mail-in voting dramatically changed everything, and the strategy employed by Democrats resulted in a Biden victory.
I think that is an accurate assessment.
Like, Trump won the bellwethers.
Trump won key swing states.
Moody's Analytics predicted Trump victory based on economic factors.
I'm looking at these things being like, wow, look at the historical trends that indicated Trump victory.
I'm not wrong because I'm not actually asserting a particular opinion outside of I thought the media analytics were correct.
Nobody knew the quote-unquote shadow campaign was happening.
Now, based on everything we're seeing, they're predicting a Trump victory.
But yo, we have no idea who Trump's even running against.
We don't even know who Trump's VP is.
Dude, we are four months out from election.
This is all wacky, wacky bonkers BS.
I'll tell you where I'm at right now.
I am so pissed off at the Republican Party.
Part of me really wants them to lose.
But I wouldn't cut off my nose to spite my face.
So I get it.
I get it.
And I'll show you why in a second.
Maybe we'll do a bigger segment on it at 1 p.m.
We got this from 270 to Win.
The Presidential Election Interactive Map.
This is where we're currently at.
This is the current forecast.
Republican 268.
Nevada, Arizona, and Georgia are now lean Republican after Biden's failed performance.
They must swap him out.
They have no choice.
Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, well, let's do this.
If Democrats win these states, let's just put them at lean Democrat.
Let's just say this is what happens.
270 electoral votes for Democrats, Republicans 268.
Now, that being said, Republicans would need only contest one of these states, maybe Wisconsin, in order for this to be a disputed election.
It would go into a contingent election where the House would then decide who the President is.
The thing is, it's a slim majority in the House.
We're really looking at House delegations.
And there's way more Republican House delegations Trump would likely win.
Democrats will claim it's illegitimate, blah blah blah.
So we'll see.
We'll see.
My bigger concern right now is that Republicans have done nothing to address the Help America Vote verification scandal.
That is, of course, something we've covered extensively, where we are seeing hundreds of thousands of people every week register to vote without IDs, and tens of thousands every week come back as having no match in the Social Security Administration database.
Meaning, there are people who are trying to register to vote with bad information.
Now, someone brought up really—this is a TimCast.com member, so shout out.
Y'all should become members at TimCast.com.
Maybe we do, you know, it'd be a fun thing to do is a Friday bonus segment with one, you know, this is a really good idea.
Maybe I should do this.
Y'all submit questions early in the week and then we do a special segment where I just talk with a couple of the TimCast.com members about projections and predictions.
I'll tell you why.
Someone called in yesterday.
We often get great callers.
So here's how, you go to TimCast.com, you click join as become a member.
If you're a member for at least six months, you get upgraded to the next, you get an upgrade.
If you sign up at $25 per month at TimCast.com, you instantly are upgraded.
We're gatekeeping because we don't want Antifa and other far-left weirdos trying to come in and disrupt things.
Once you do, you can submit questions.
People have on the questions, then you call in your on TimCast IRL.
The reason I bring this up is, We often get really, really great questions.
Yesterday, someone brought up that a lot of the anomalous voter data from the Help America Vote Verification System is coming from college districts, or districts that are near universities.
And he was wondering if it was that young people were registering young people en masse, and Rep.
Burchett, who is here, said, no, they don't vote.
And I said, well, hold on.
That's just it.
If they go and start pulling names and social security numbers from college databases, this all starts to line up.
Let's break down a potentiality.
You go to a college or university district.
You look through their records.
You see social security numbers and names.
You start writing them down for voter registration without these people knowing.
Submit them because you can't go through the DMVs, you have no ID.
Because they're not the people, right?
So these are fraudulent registrations.
I'm not saying it's true, I'm saying hypothetically.
You go to the universities, you register students, but you don't have their ID, so it needs to be registered through the Social Security Administration's verification database.
Why are we seeing so many coming back with no match?
Non-citizens going to college in this country.
Bad SSNs or incomplete or incorrect numbers or non-existent numbers.
And so someone may be going to these areas, pulling transcripts and lists and student records, registering them to vote.
Why?
Because the universal mail-in votes will land at their doorstep.
And that's really it.
It's not going to be illegal immigrants.
It's going to be a 22-year-old who gets a mail-in ballot and goes, ah, I didn't know I was registered.
Knock on the door.
Hey, why don't you fill that out?
They are being automatically registered, I'm saying.
And it may actually just be much simpler than that.
Not that anyone's doing anything fraudulently, but the university is just saying, would you like us to submit your information for voter registration?
And they go, okay, sure.
So they're automatically registering young people because they know young people lean Dem.
That really could be an answer.
And this is not outside the rules.
Understand this.
When Republicans are like, we got it in the bag, we're tracking the legal strategies, blah, blah, blah.
I don't believe it.
I don't believe they are.
Democrats are likely saying, let's do maximum voter registration at universities.
When people are signing up for school, let's ask them if we can submit for registration.
When they say yes and sign it, we send it in.
They could be sitting there saying, okay, and do you want to fill out this registration form to vote?
Totally allowed.
They say, oh, okay, sure.
Universal mail-in ballot will land at their doorstep.
Next thing you know, Pennsylvania goes blue.
Michigan goes blue.
Wisconsin goes blue.
270 Democrat to 268 Republican.
And that's all within the rules.
Ain't nothing illegal about that, registering young people.
And Bridget says, yeah, but college-age people don't vote.
He's right.
They don't.
Until a Democrat shows up at their doorstep, knocks on the door, and says, uh, can you fill that out for me?
And then they do.
So there are some people predicting a Trump landslide.
We'll see.
But I'll tell you what.
I'm going to go into, for our next segment at 1pm, exactly why I just despise the GOP.
I've always, I've never been a fan.
I will never be a fan.
I don't, there's no political party for me, right?
If I had to choose, it's Ron Paul.
You know what I mean?
And I don't even agree with the guy on everything.
I remember back in the day, and this is a quote, the Libertarian Party quoted me on this because, it's a good quote.
Or at least they liked it.
I said something like, you know, I don't agree with Ron Paul on everything.
In fact, I agree with him on relatively little.
But the things we agree on are the important ones.
When Ron Paul says he's in favor of some policy or plan or whatever that I don't like, I say, I don't know about that.
But then he says, I just want the government to leave you alone.
They shouldn't be involved.
And I go, sir, agreed.
We shake hands.
Because if I believe in, you know, we should run our programs this way, and Ron Paul says, oh, you can't do that because you gotta run it this way.
And then he goes, but don't worry, my vote will be that the government doesn't bother you.
I'm like, hey, there we go.
You leave me alone.
Let me do my thing.
I'll leave you alone.
You do your thing.
I love that.
josh hammer
Hey, guys, Josh Hammer here, the host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer, a podcast for the First Podcast Network.
Look, there are a lot of shows out there that are explaining the political news cycle, what's happening on the Hill to this, to that.
There are no other shows that are cutting straight to the point when it comes to the unprecedented lawfare debilitating While we view the world differently, we agree not to interfere where we can.
And then there are certain issues like abortion, which are really tough.
And I do think we need a Supreme Court ruling on that.
Upload your episodes wherever you get your podcasts.
It's America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
tim pool
While we view the world differently, we agree not to interfere where we can.
And then there are certain issues like abortion, which are really tough.
And I do think we need a Supreme Court ruling on that.
We'll see.
That's why I like Ron Paul.
I don't see a political party for me anywhere.
Mises Caucus gets pretty close.
I like those guys.
Libertarian Party, Mises Caucus.
Libertarian Party is a... Look, I'll tell you what the Libertarian Party is.
It's people who are mad a thing is illegal.
And they're voting Libertarian so that hopefully it will not be illegal anymore.
That's it.
Democrats are the party of the cult.
Republicans are the party of the... For the most part, the uppity do-gooders who think they're better men.
Fortunately, Donald Trump kicked the door in, and now we have something slightly different.
A populist, pro-America, moderate position.
And they won't admit it.
They say Trump's far-right.
He ain't far-right.
Trump's a moderate.
You take a look at Trump's social policy.
Moderate.
Yeah, we don't want any of the weird woke stuff, but he certainly isn't coming out saying, shut down gay marriage.
In fact, Trump said, guys, that one's over.
Okay?
That's been ruled.
That's been decided.
Trump's a moderate.
I like it.
That's why I'll vote for Trump.
No new wars.
Fantastic.
But the GOP is the vessel by which Trump is seeking to win the presidency, and they are a bunch of crackpot, crony, garbage morons who get nothing done, save a small handful.
Like I mentioned, Ron Paul, legend.
Rand Paul, the best.
And then you've got, you know, Burchette's cool.
He's made some mistakes, we can agree with that.
Matt Gaetz, absolutely fantastic.
Rep Luna, you are awesome.
Who else?
Massey, he's fantastic.
I disagree with Thomas Massey on a lot, but he is a good dude and I have tremendous respect for him.
There's a very, uh, Marjorie Taylor Greene, I like.
Boebert, I like.
And I don't know if they like each other, but I think there are fighters in Congress.
It's just there's too few.
There's too few.
And if I missed you, I miss you.
I'm sorry.
And also, shout out to Riley Moore, who's gonna be entering Congress.
Well, to be honest, Riley won the primary in like a deep Republican area, so he hasn't actually won election yet, but there's nobody who's gonna beat Riley.
Like, we're really excited for that.
And so, we gotta make sure we get out there and just, everybody's gotta register, everybody that can to vote, everyone's gotta vote.
Republicans, please.
Please vote.
I hate the Republican Party so much, but you gotta vote!
You got Charlestown, West Virginia.
It's got a Latin mass, thousands of people marching down the streets in a Catholic Latin mass, and they elected a woke city council.
Why?
I asked one of the city councilmen, he goes, Conservatives won't vote!
Democrats show and bash their faces on the wall to vote!
Man, Republicans, go vote!
Lord, help me!
Alright, next segment's coming up at 1 p.m.
on this channel.
I'll talk more about why I'm so sick of the Republican Party.
Ugh.
Thanks for hanging out.
You can follow me on AXAT, Tim Cass, and I'll see you all then.
We are advancing on from the stage in Saving Democracy, where Democrats try to remove their duly elected nominee, and advancing towards Democrats panicking and reduced to hoping for another public misstep by Biden, according to the New York Times.
Democrats are now at the point where they know they are powerless to stage a coup against Joe Biden, so they're hoping he screws up.
Well, fear not, my good friends, Democrats.
CNN has come out with possibly the biggest takedown of Joe Biden.
And to be fair, ain't nobody actually watching CNN, so I don't know who's watching that.
But fear not, for I, Tim Pool, will play to you, a much larger audience, the clip, so that you can see what Jake Tapper has to say about Joe Biden.
And I must add, It is not that I am trying to be smug and cocky over this tremendous audience that we have here.
It's that I'm trying to insult CNN to the best of my ability, so forgive me if I sound immodest.
But let us all bask together and comment below about why you hate CNN, but will appreciate this segment.
This is Jake Tapper taking down Joe Biden, and it's great.
jake tapper
In reality, 72% of voters say that they believe President Biden is too old.
That's according to CNN's most recent polling.
Voters have been saying this for quite a long time.
The reality is that the Democratic elites are mostly late to acknowledge these age and ability issues compared to the rest of the public.
The elites have been forced to reckon with it after the debate just 11 days ago.
joe biden
Look at my career.
I've not had many of those nights.
It was a terrible night, and I really regret it happened.
But the fact of the matter is, how can you assure you're going to be on, you know, faith that I can intervene on your way to go to, you know, work tomorrow?
Age wasn't, you know, the idea.
Get him, Jake!
jake tapper
The fact of the matter is, how can you assure you're going to be out on, you know, on your way to go, you know, work tomorrow, age, age wasn't, you know, the idea that I'm too old.
Keep in mind, that sounds like it's reassuring to those Democratic supporters who have gone wobbly.
tim pool
Did you ever watch the debate afterwards?
unidentified
I don't think I did, no.
jake tapper
He doesn't think he did.
He called in to a couple of black radio stations.
tim pool
Oh, it's so good.
jake tapper
And he said, among other things, this.
unidentified
By the way, I'm proud to be, as I said, the first vice president, first black woman to serve with a black president.
I'm proud to be the first black woman in the Supreme Court.
There's just so much that we can do because together we, there's nothing, look, this is the United States of America.
jake tapper
He's proud to be the first black woman?
Not coherent.
And even then, we later found out, later from the radio host, that the Biden campaign had given her a list of questions to ask President Biden.
tim pool
She resigned.
jake tapper
That is a huge no-no in journalism, and the host was fired for it.
tim pool
Oh, you would know, Jake, wouldn't you?
jake tapper
Remains quite telling that in the Biden campaign's efforts to show that the president has not missed a step, his campaign felt the need to feed questions to the hosts for a call-in radio interview.
And the president still, even then, failed to deliver in many of his answers.
Now, many elected Democrats are expressing concern about this answer, too, although it was quite coherent.
George Stephanopoulos asking him how he would feel if he ultimately loses to Donald Trump, which polls have suggested he will.
unidentified
I feel as long as I gave it my all and I did the goodest job as I know I can do, that's what this is about.
jake tapper
As long as he gave it his all and did the goodest job he could do.
That's what it's all about, isn't it?
tim pool
The goodest.
The goodest job.
Look, ladies and gentlemen, you've seen all of those, most likely all those gaffes, all those slurs, all that incoherent nonsense.
And now CNN is dropping the hammer on Joe Biden.
You hate to see it, Joe.
But I do have to ask all of you to consider one thing.
And I'll give a shout-out to our good friend Alex Jones.
He liked to say, uh, kibono.
Let me make sure I get that right.
But who benefits?
To whom is it a benefit?
Key Bono.
C-U-I-B-O-N-O.
It's a classic Latin.
Key Bono.
Who benefits?
To whom is it a benefit that this is all happening?
CNN, who we do not trust.
The New York Times, who we do not trust.
All of a sudden now, aligning perfectly with Biden's gotta go!
Now, I'm not actually a big fan of defending Joe Biden.
So I do think it's rather interesting.
I do think Joe Biden should probably go.
There's a lot of people.
We've made the joke on Tim Kast IRL.
We've said, no, Joe Biden is good and we support him.
Ha ha.
Like, you know, it's like it's in a tone where if Media Matters took the transcript, it sounds like we're Biden supporters, but you get it.
We're jokingly saying Biden will lose against Trump.
We don't want him swapped out.
That being said, Kamala Harris next in line loses, just loses.
And then you've got this big list of all these other Democrats they tried to field.
They all lose.
Now, you've got, uh, who is it?
Jimmy?
Is it Jimmy Kimmel?
Coming out saying Hillary Clinton actually wins in one poll.
And then she wants to run.
No.
There's like one poll that showed Hillary Clinton up a couple points.
But there's like several others that show she's still behind.
She can't win.
What is achieved by replacing Joe Biden?
Nothing.
So I don't, for me, flip a coin, I don't know if it matters one way or the other whether it's Biden or anybody else.
What matters is, the only thing that matters, is that Republicans today, right now, I call upon you, good friends, and I don't necessarily mean Republican Party, I don't like the Republican Party, oh boy, I said I was going to rag on them earlier, we're going to save that one for the next segment because this one's fun.
But here's what I say of you, my friends.
You must, you must take action in a positive and meaningful way that translates into two big parent trees.
The first tree is outside of your community.
The next is within your home.
I shouldn't say outside of your community.
I should say within the broader outreaches of your neighborhood and your community.
And the other is internally.
Externally, internally.
There we go.
Externally, what do I mean?
Register people to vote.
I mean, Scott Pressler is a hero, okay?
He's knocking on doors.
He's talking with people every day.
He's doing the most important work.
He's sending up tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of people to vote.
People who are not registered are leaning for Donald Trump.
Donald Trump is not a savior.
He is not a god-emperor.
He is not going to do everything you want.
He's going to give you a marginally okay presidency.
That's really it.
He's going to turn the ship around in a slightly positive direction.
All this Project 2025 nonsense, it's not going to happen.
Trump is not going to be the iron fist the Democrats claim he is, nor the savior many of his followers think he is.
He's going to marginally improve the economy.
He's going to have marginally better foreign policy.
We're all going to groan and grumble about many of the things that he does.
But I believe that it is the direction towards righting this ship.
And then hopefully in the next four or eight years, we will see improvements in our political structuring.
Whatever that could be.
But that's what I say.
So that means, externally, register people to vote.
Be involved in your community politically.
Internally, you all need to be exercising, eating healthy, and doing the best you can.
That's the rallying cry right there.
Find the heaviest thing that you can carry and carry it.
You will feel more fulfilled.
This message is to all of the hikikomori, the people who don't have jobs and sit at home all day and don't know what to do.
The people who find themselves overweight and feeling like garbage.
Start exercising.
Find a plan.
Find a professional.
There are apps that'll tell you this stuff for free.
You can get MyFitnessPal for a couple bucks.
Be a better person.
If today, just right now today, because you got four months.
If today, every single person who is in favor of saving this country, protecting its borders, bringing back the manufacturing base, strengthening the manufacturing base, ending foreign wars, if all of these people started exercising and eating healthy food, you would have a guaranteed end result.
It's simple math.
All of these people who want something better for this country are stronger, more fit, they're thinking better, they're living longer.
They will exert more influence politically and economically.
And all the people over here who are fat, lazy, and will do nothing but groan, they will eventually, unfortunately for them, cease to exist.
They will not be thinking as clearly.
They will not be as mobile and motivated and energetic.
They will have less influence in the economy and politics.
And that is why I say, be a better version of you every day.
This is the goal, and this is the game.
Every day, you must be a better version of yourself.
In skateboarding, it's just my sport of choice.
You can have any sport of choice you so desire.
I ask you, what is the metric by which you are better today than you were yesterday?
For me?
You know, it actually does get a little bit more difficult.
I'm 38 years old.
We get it.
You're getting older.
And I look back at the things I did when I was younger and I'm like, what tricks left are there for me?
You know, I've 360 inward heel flip.
I've never done one of those.
I suppose I could try and learn that one.
But really it comes down to, is there something I haven't done in a long time that I could add to my, add back to my repertoire?
I just, I want to make sure that I'm doing something new every day.
And that's the goal.
For you, it could be simple.
Yesterday, how many push-ups did you do?
Add one more, and I'm not even saying, I'm not even saying, you know, maybe you got down, you did ten push-ups.
I'm not saying do eleven.
I'm saying three hours later, do one.
And then, the journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
Before you know it, if every day you mark down, you scratch into your wall, or you mark on your calendar, Within a month, you're like, I actually did 30 push-ups today.
And you might do none today.
And then by November, you're doing 100.
Think about that.
And that really will make you better off.
But let's talk about where the Democrats are currently on the verge of implosion.
I want to give a shout-out to our friend Jimmy Kimmel.
Oh no, it's not Kimmel, it's Fallon.
I don't even know who these guys are!
Spare me.
People are like, Tim, what's your favorite podcast or show?
I'm like, I just read the news.
But this was actually pretty good.
This one was pretty good.
I have to say, I laughed.
Jimmy Fallon says, Trump says he's going to be choosing his VP nominee sometime soon.
He goes, quote, Trump needs someone who is going to help him win, so right now the frontrunner is Joe Biden.
I gotta admit, that one got me.
That one made me laugh.
You know, they're now getting honest about how Joe Biden is broken.
His brain don't work.
We've known this for a long time.
I think there's something else afoot.
There's a reason why they waited this long.
But so long as they're being honest, I gotta say, that joke worked.
Joe Biden is so disheveled and incapable, he certainly is helping Donald Trump win.
For Jimmy Fallon to say that on his show, Trump needs someone who's going to help him win?
So right now the frontrunner is Joe Biden, and the audience laughs!
Granted, there's a big sign saying applause or whatever, not that I think these people actually understand what they're laughing at.
That one was pretty good!
It was pretty good.
I gotta say, I know for many of you, it feels good right now to sit here and just say, The recognition of so much that we knew was true happening right before our eyes.
It feels fantastic that Joe Biden's brain is fried, and now everyone finally agrees.
But this is the funny thing.
It's almost like we don't matter, right?
We scream to the high heavens, there's a boulder rolling down the hill, and they go, shut up!
And the boulder slams into their house, and they go, a boulder rolling down the hill!
And it's like, I told you that years ago that that thing was coming.
And they act like, well, we were caught off guard, it was covered up by the press, and it's like, ugh.
Pay attention, dude.
I say this.
There is one opportunity for all of us right now.
Though we may ask Kibono to whom it benefits that they're doing all of this.
That's the question, right?
Who is benefiting from this play the media's making that Joe Biden's gotta go?
I tell you this.
There is benefit for us in now's the opportunity for the political whiplash.
Go to your liberal aunt or uncle or mom or dad or cousin, brother, sister, whatever, and say, remember how I was telling you Biden was messed up for years?
Do you think I'm lying about everything else?
And they may not believe you, but you know, you try.
The argument is simple.
The media claims it was a cover up, but I told you this six months ago, OK?
Will you please listen to what I have to say?
I'm not trying to hurt you.
Biden is clearly not with it.
Let's go, Mediaite!
What did they say?
President Joe Biden may have been able to nudge his fellow Democrats to publicly line up beside him in the past few days, but behind the scenes, the grumbling and panic continues.
Biden has been facing increasing scrutiny since his verbal stumbles during his debate against former President Donald Trump.
Recent polling showed 72% of Americans do not believe he has the mental and cognitive health to be president.
The days following the debate continued to bring more tough headlines for the president, as rumors swirled about internal discontent among Democrats, including several public calls for him to step aside, and worries about him remaining behind in the polls.
Nonetheless, Biden remains adamant that he intends to stay in the race, and said so during a rally Wisconsin.
The Times has been an especially scathing voice amidst the media frenzy, swirling around the president, expressly calling for Biden to drop out of the race in two columns from the editorial board thus far.
Tuesday's article by congressional correspondent Annie Carney did not buck the trend, headlined, On Capitol Hill Democrats Panic About Biden But Do Nothing.
Carney detailed how multiple Democrats had publicly called for the president to swiftly take action.
So far, Mr. Biden has done none of that, wrote Carney.
candidacy raised by a disastrous debate performance, including more unscripted events, town halls
and media interviews.
So far, Mr. Biden has done none of that, wrote Carney.
And yet Democrats on Capitol Hill are stifling their doubts and falling in line behind him
anyway.
Doing nothing was a strategy many of them conceded could be disastrous, she continued.
But the defiant letter Biden sent to Congressional Democrats, along with his support from Congressional Black Caucus members, vociferously rallying to his side, seems to have successfully paralyzed the entire party into a state of uncertainty and inaction.
Democrats in vulnerable districts were panicking, wrote Carney, as they were now left with few options besides hoping for Biden to get himself into more trouble.
Kibono!
The swing district Democrats, that's who it benefits.
That's why they're split.
The voters want Joe Biden.
That's the reality.
And this is funny.
There was a primary.
People voted for Joe.
They don't want anybody else.
Swing district Democrats know they're going to lose.
Perhaps the reality is this.
Maybe there really is no coordinated effort in the grand scheme.
A small one, perhaps.
Perhaps Democrats have just made their bed.
You know, I think of it like we're all navigating this big maze.
And there are clues as to which path will bring us to the exit.
And at a certain point, the Democrats veered off in a direction we warned them would lead to a dead end.
But they were adamant.
We will not align ourselves with you nor listen to your liars.
And so here we go.
The Democrats have reached that impasse.
Joe Biden was the only guy they thought could beat Trump, so they went for it.
Kamala Harris was the diversity pick they thought she'd be the right move.
But now, several years later, lacking foresight, they end up with a president who is too old to run again.
Next in line is a deeply, deeply unpopular woman who cannot win, and polls the worst against Trump out of all the Democrats, and no logical path towards replacing them.
I think what we're going to see is an open convention.
The Democrats are going to say, the will of the voter is spoken, blah, blah, blah.
We're going to have an open convention.
The polls show we should.
They're going to say, well, the Democratic voter is divided as to whether Joe Biden should be the nominee at this point.
Perhaps it's fair to, as Jon Stewart said, stress test and present alternatives, which we can all vote on.
Biden then graciously steps down.
Kamala Harris with a smile on her face.
You know, people have said, how did they get past Kamala?
It's really easy.
It's not as complicated as you think.
She speaks to the convention and says, these past four years have been the honor of my lifetime to be your vice president.
But the will of the people of democracy matters.
And I see that there are many people who believe we have a better chance of defeating Donald Trump with a new ticket.
And you know what?
I will not stand in the way of democracy.
I wish I could be that candidate for you.
But I respect democracy, unlike Donald Trump.
It's easy.
It's easy.
You throw her some right now.
The big challenge is going to be whether or not she's willing to make that statement.
Maybe.
I don't know, man.
I don't trust any of these people.
Does Joe Biden really not want to step down or is it all part of some game?
Is it political strategy?
You know behind the scenes, they're talking about which tie he should wear and what color shoes he should wear and the certain level of scuff.
What's that movie with Matt Damon, The Adjustment Bureau?
The story is Matt Damon's running for office.
He's about to win, but then he ends up losing.
And he meets this woman.
She kind of changes him a little bit.
He's standing there at his concession speech, and he says this line, you know, we had a saying back where I grew up in Red Bank, when you fall down, you get back up.
And then he goes, We never had that saying.
A consultant thought it played well.
And then he goes on to explain, you know, they told me this tie pulled better, so that's why I wore it.
They said they wanted to make sure my shoes were scuffed just enough to where I looked like I could be working class, but I didn't defend the lawyers.
The idea was, he came out and he was honest.
He broke script.
And he said, behind the scenes, they're telling me to do all these things.
We all know it.
That's the trope in the movie.
That this guy finally said what everybody knew and then he ends up winning next time around or something like that.
The movie is actually about like angels that control fate or something.
It's an okay movie.
They could have done it better.
But the idea is there in the minds of every single person.
We know behind the scenes that Joe Biden is not just making decisions willy-nilly.
We know that political consultants are guiding most of his moves.
And that if they're telling him to stay in the race, there's a reason for it.
I don't believe it is so cut-and-dry that Democrats are panicking.
I'm sure swing district Democrats are panicking and crying because they don't know what's going on.
I think the higher echelons of the political party know exactly what they're doing and why they're doing it.
They have a general idea.
Not that it means they'll be successful, but they have an idea as to why they're doing it.
That being said, maybe this time around we're wrong, I don't know.
It feels like the system itself is in disarray and is collapsing.
Okay?
Contempt of Congress, the loss of decorum, it doesn't seem to be confidence building.
It doesn't seem like there's good reason to believe that this country is actually functioning the way we thought it would.
In which case, perhaps, Biden really is just fried.
The consultants can't reach him because his brain don't work.
Jill Biden doesn't want to step down from power, and Hunter Biden's worried about going to prison and needs his dad to pardon him.
Maybe that's all it.
Maybe.
I couldn't know.
I can only know what we can see on the surface.
The one thing I can say, though, which is just to wrap things back up, while I respect and appreciate the takedown from CNN, you can really tell that Jake Tapper is reading a teleprompter.
It's fascinating.
Guys, this is a weird thing to me.
The Cornering does not use a teleprompter.
Viva Frye does not use a teleprompter.
Luke Rutkowski does not use a teleprompter.
Steven Crowder does not use a teleprompter.
Like, there's a general idea of what we're going to talk about.
I pull up stories that I know about, and then I just talk.
Times, they are a-changin'.
Jake Tapper may take down Joe Biden in this segment, but you know he has no idea what he's talking about.
He's just reading from a prompter in front of him, and saying what his producers tell him to say.
For which I ask, key bono.
Why are the producers at CNN now asking Jake Tapper to do this, when he didn't for so long?
Perhaps because CNN's ratings are in the gutter and they need to turn it around and they know that, hey, this stuff kind of works.
Perhaps they've realized, at a certain point, you can only lie so much.
And regular people are like, dude, we know you're lying.
And this is our time to turn things around.
Maybe.
Or maybe it's politically advantageous for some reason.
I don't have answers for you.
Just questions.
But I can tell you this, Joe Biden ain't all with it.
Donald Trump is a better choice.
There are certainly much, much better choices across the board.
And I think we need to start looking forward as to who is going to take the reins of this country when we save it, someone younger, and what that means.
Next segment's coming up at 4 p.m.
on the channel.
Thanks for hanging out.
We'll see you all then.
The challenge we face today in this country is good versus evil.
When I was younger, I really didn't think so.
I actually thought that there were just competing interests for ways of life.
You know, and I looked to my friends as a kid who were Republican, and they said, we want policies that do this thing.
My Democrat friends said, we want policies that do that thing.
I said, you know, they're all arguing for similar things, right?
They all want health care that can be affordable for everybody.
Republicans want health care, but they think you get there through a different system.
Non-governmental, more privatization.
They're not arguing for taking away people's Medicare or medical treatment.
They're arguing for making it cheaper and easier to access through the free market.
The Democrats are arguing that doesn't work and that you need a social safety net.
And so I really felt, you know, They're all just trying to come to a good place in different ways.
But the polarization is astounding.
And what we see today, well, have mostly changed my mind.
What I see now is actual evil individuals who attempt to burn this country down, and
for what reason I really don't know.
But I look at it in a few different ways.
You have what's referred to as the banality of evil, that is, commonplace actions that
are evil and destructive.
They seem to just be everywhere and everyone doesn't.
You have the zombie horde of evil.
Is the zombie truly evil?
It doesn't know what it's doing, it just marches and does these things and eats and consumes and converts.
You have the overtly evil actions and you have the abject or epitome of evil.
Genocide, murder, killing children, abusing children.
I look to many of these liberal pundits and I suppose I can give them a good shout out.
Sam Seder, for instance, I believe is an evil man.
I think Kyle Kalinske is a good person.
I don't think he's evil.
Liberal pundit.
I think he's just wrong about some things, but I think he does try and I respect him.
The Krasensteins.
They're evil.
And I'm going to use Brian Krasenstein as an example so you can understand the difference between good and evil in this fight.
Perhaps there are some people who would disagree on what it truly means to be good or evil, but I'll break down my worldview and what I think, and I'm not the arbiter of truth and morality, certainly you may disagree.
Here's how I see the world.
I see that we are, as humans, we are balls of potential.
We are simple beings in many ways, but we have so much potential and opportunity.
So what is good?
Well, first let me start with an overly simplified view of my spiritual and religious beliefs.
For one, I do believe in God, but I don't follow these theistic religions.
What I think is that life is a form of negative entropy.
It is a function of resisting chaos.
Life seeks to collect free energy, organizing it into a complex system.
It's rather rudimentary and doesn't get to the bigger picture of things, because I'm simplifying it for you, but You look at the functions of physics in the universe and you see energy coming together in different patterns, and life ultimately organizing free energy into higher levels of complex systems.
Those that would seek to destroy those systems, that would result in an end in which there is more chaos and more entropy, that is what I see to be evil.
Because it defies life.
It is anti-life.
And we as life have an interest in pursuing things that life pursue.
Which brings me to Brian Krasenstein, so you can understand my political views and what I think to be evil and, you know, good.
Brian Krasenstein tweeted, What has American politics come to?
78-year-old convicted felon found liable of fraud and sexual assault uses his campaign-funded rally to promote his own golf course and challenge an 81-year-old opponent to a round of golf.
Call me crazy, but I really miss the days of Bush v. Gore and Obama v. Romney.
I just can't wait until 2028.
Hopefully there's some young, normal non-felons running for the president of the most powerful nation on the planet.
Brian Krasenstein is an evil person.
And I'll tell you why.
His end goals are for the destruction.
They would result in chaos, entropy, and destruction of our organized systems.
Now, there certainly are circumstances in which an organized effort can destroy something.
For instance, if a person is suffering from cancer, you can take action to destroy the cancer in the human body to save the larger.
However, this brings me to the zombie evil, the banality of evil, an abject evil, the epitome of evil, etc.
I do not believe that Brian Krasenstein's goals, as well as, and I'm singling him out, but many liberal pundits, I do not see as individuals who are always intently trying to burn everything down.
Some are just marching in lockstep.
Now, the actions here in this tweet that I just displayed, it's evidence of Brian Krasenstein willfully, knowingly seeking to cause harm and to create destruction.
This is a man who is intentionally lying to people for personal gain, extracting from a system for which he gives nothing back, which will result in damage to that system.
Thus, it is an evil action.
Here's what I see.
The best path forward, based on what we think we know, and especially what I think I know, is decentralization to a varying degree.
You certainly do need some kind of central functioning system, a nucleus, but decentralization really does work.
Meritocracy in a decentralized system rapidly, exponentially, improves things.
So if we take humans and we say, you are, to yourselves, free market with some guidelines and some form of central nucleus, meaning it's not absolute wanton chaos.
I'm not an anarcho-capitalist or a big L libertarian.
But for the most part, we want meritocracy to drive.
When humans encountered a serious problem in New York City back in the turn of the century, 1800s to 1900s, horse manure piling the streets The problem presented by the Central Authority, by the thinkers, was within 20 or 30 years, there will be so much horse manure in the streets, you'll be unable to live and work.
How will we deal with this problem?
Do we ban horses?
unidentified
Well, no.
tim pool
Humans invented the automobile.
And then, all of a sudden, there was zero horse manure.
Now, of course, this led to carbon emissions, general pollution, etc.
And it doesn't mean that we are not without problems, but humans advanced.
When we are presented with a problem, the decentralized process of human governance in the free market tends to solve these problems and create solutions.
You then have people who believe, no, government and central authorities should dictate.
The problem is, no one person can clearly see the whole picture.
Hence, the Soviet Union's failures.
Now let's isolate this whole narrative down to a single point.
The actions of Brian Krasistein, why he is evil, his brother is evil too, and I think this is important.
My response to the man is, you're evil.
That's really it.
He's evil.
Why?
Well, let's start from the very beginning.
It's easier to articulate all these thoughts in a long-form video as opposed to Twitter, but then I'll read the rest of what I said.
Donald Trump, a 78-year-old convicted felon.
Sure.
But that really ignores the context of the modern political condition in the United States.
That is, the third-highest-ranking member of the DOJ stepping down in an unprecedented move to join a local office in the United States, for which Donald Trump The former president, and who has the honorific title President, was criminally charged under a statute that was beyond its statute of limitations, falsifying business records.
Well, they upgraded it to a felony, citing that it is exaggerated, or what's the right word?
It is a felony, an advancement, whatever you call it in law, I'm not a lawyer.
It is an aggravation when you are falsifying business records in furtherance of another crime.
Now, in order for the state to actually accuse you of a crime, you must be convicted in a court of law.
That's in our Constitution.
We have due process rights.
Well, in this instance, Donald Trump was never convicted or proven to have committed a secondary offense.
The state of New York, a local jurisdiction, cited an unknown secondary crime, and the judge told the jury, You do not need to be unanimous on what that secondary crime was so long as you believe Trump committed the first crime.
The problem here is the state does not have the authority under the Constitution to assert a crime was committed definitively unless due process occurs.
Trump did not have due process to any secondary crime thus to claim he committed a felony in this regard is it's nonsensical.
Well, that context matters.
But why, then, is Brian Krasenstein calling him a convicted felon?
Why is he then saying he was found liable to fraud and sexual assault?
Also, removing the context from the greater conversation.
The greater context is simple.
The United States is undergoing a very serious period of tumult, and fraud and sexual assault and the felonies are in wide dispute.
One state has filed a lawsuit against New York, Missouri, citing original jurisdiction, bringing it to the Supreme Court, arguing that this case is a violation Let's talk about the fraud.
The bank in question that Trump apparently defrauded said Trump did not defraud them and they want to keep working with him.
What does this mean that he was found liable of fraud?
Honestly, I don't know.
It seems nonsensical.
moment that is not so easily defined as to just say convicted felon or otherwise.
Let's talk about the fraud.
The bank in question that Trump apparently defrauded said Trump did not defraud them
and they want to keep working with him.
What does this mean?
Then he was found liable of fraud.
Honestly, I don't know.
It seems nonsensical.
The argument from the state and the prosecution was that once again, local jurisdiction, Donald
Trump misrepresented the square footage of his buildings and the value of those properties
to get favorable loans.
However, Donald Trump also in in his in the court case, his defense pointed out that when
they presented these documents and their estimates on square footage, which, yes, were wrong,
They said, the information may be incorrect, and it requires the due diligence of the lender to assess the property values.
For which, Deutsche Bank and other lenders said, we have assessed your documents and we have concluded they are incorrect, so we will give you a lesser valuation.
To which Trump said, agreed.
Never was anyone misinformed as to the actual property size or values.
They were given adequate information and warning.
That with such a large business empire, you can get things wrong.
That's context that matters.
Sexual assault?
A woman who can't remember when it happened, sometime 30 years ago, in a crowded department store, claims that Donald Trump walked into a dressing room with her.
None of the story makes sense.
They changed the law in New York to allow these lawsuits to happen 30 years later.
For only one year, certainly that context matters.
Brian Krasenstein is aware of all this, because he himself has been victim to such narratives.
He's aware of the context around these cases, as are many of these liberal pundits.
I mentioned Sam Seder, who I believe is also evil.
They're aware of the context.
So why do they ignore the context when presenting that information to the average person?
Because in their minds, they seek to benefit by restricting access to information thus.
In a society that is deeply benefited by meritocracy, and harmed by centralized authority, Well, these individuals seek to restrict information to individuals.
Thus, the merit can never be truly met.
In order for the American population to do its best and to be its best, it needs to be well-informed.
This is the general idea of journalism as a main pillar of society.
or the fourth estate.
The idea is inform the people to the best of your abilities so they can make the best
decisions possible and your society grows strong.
Individuals like the Krasnsteins and people like Sam Seder seek to do the inverse.
They restrict information and they lie to you.
They remove context so you are ill-informed and confused.
The evidence today?
Joe Biden's mental health.
These liberal personalities, these Democrats, acted like Joe Biden was fine.
Corrine Jean-Pierre called it cheap fakes.
But now, now they're acting like it's new information that we were made, that we are unaware of what was really going on.
No, honest individuals like me and many others were telling you from the get go, Biden is suffering some kind of problem.
And they lied to you because it was financially and politically advantageous.
Those actions have damaged the democratic process, harmed the Democratic Party, and have caused harm to our system of governance as a result.
The destructive nature serves no greater good in the end.
It is just chaos.
It is anti-life.
Thus, I say, in my view, it is evil to withhold vital information as to how a system functions if it would result in the destruction of that system.
There are certain instances where lying does actually do good.
I certainly believe that's true.
We withhold military secrets to prevent evil from destroying us.
I'd like to show you this example.
Store from the Daily Beast.
Feds seized a fortune from resistance icons accused of boosting online Ponzi schemes.
The Krasinski brothers are relatively well-known on X. You may not have heard of them, but I'm just using this as an example of what evil is.
These men are evil individuals.
They seek to cause harm and damage to our system to extract value to benefit themselves.
Thus, in the past, they've been accused of taking... Let me read this for you.
In late 2016, federal agents showed up at the Fort Myers, Florida, homes of brothers Brian and Ed Krasenstein, seizing computers and financial records, hauling off at least 20 to 30 bundles of stuff.
At the time, the story was a notable blip in local media's crime blotter.
But in the two years since, the Krasensteins have become more than a pair of local businessmen.
They are online anti-Trump resistance.
This is a story from 2018, mind you.
According to the Feds, the Brothers, until recently, ran websites that propped up fraudulent online financial scams.
Law enforcement officials last year seized nearly half a million dollars from the Brothers, money that prosecutors say was derived from wire fraud.
The Krasensteins, who have not been charged with any crimes, maintain they did nothing wrong or illegal.
The Brothers remain extremely popular, etc., etc.
They go on later to explain.
that the scams were taking money from innocent individuals.
They say, our website was filled with warnings and notices about sending money to any website
which anyone saw advertised on their website. The entire purpose was to help people find out
which online business opportunities were legitimate and which were not.
Federal prosecutors did not see it that way.
In a civil asset forfeiture complaint filed in last August, Homeland Security Special Agent Michael Adams wrote that the brothers were paid huge sums by online scammers engaged in illegal activities.
According to prosecutors, the services the Krasinskys promoted on their website duped thousands of investors into funding Ponzi scheme type scams and even resulted in some downloading a virus that emptied their accounts on an anonymous online payment platform used by the Krasinskys themselves before it was shut down as part of a major federal money laundering investigation.
Let me give you the facts.
The Krasinstein brothers were never accused of any crimes.
They ran websites which included advertisements which led people, according to federal prosecutors, towards downloading viruses and giving money to scams.
The Krasinsteins themselves were just running websites with ads.
But let's talk about what's evil.
I think it is good that I inform you about who these guys are, and I point out they're not accused of crimes.
Money was seized because it was derived from wire fraud, according to the feds.
The important thing to understand here is, we don't know that they did anything wrong.
They could just be really stupid.
I think that's fair.
unidentified
I don't know.
tim pool
You decide.
Now let's talk about how to be evil.
I could certainly do this.
I can say, in my report, the Krasenstein Brothers, comma, who were accused of serious wire fraud, enriching themselves to the tune of half a million dollars from money derived through wire fraud, ran a website that resulted in innocent people losing lots of money, their savings, and being the victims of scams.
Does that give you the real context as to what they did and who they are?
It certainly does not.
All it does is taint the well.
It poisons the well.
So that you don't actually understand.
Now, let me give you a breakdown of how the post I see here from the Kresen scenes, it's evil.
Let me break this down for you.
He says, call me crazy, but I miss the old days.
I said, you're evil.
That's it.
I think these guys are evil.
Brian's response.
Evil.
No, I called him evil.
It didn't have anything to do with him saying he was voting for this guy.
I'm calling him evil for the reasons I've laid out already.
I call him evil all the time.
Apparently it really bothers these guys.
But you see what he's doing here.
I said, in my response, that's not what I said.
I think you're evil because you intentionally lie to people.
To which he continues the line, what did I lie about in the post you are replying to?
I'll wait.
Let me guess.
Trump isn't really a convicted felon despite being convicted on 34 felony counts because you say so.
I never said that.
I never said Trump wasn't convicted of anything.
But you see how he injects that.
What Bryan Cranston is doing, I go on to break down, I should just read my posts, but this is an anchoring technique in social engineering manipulation.
He's doing it on purpose.
He admitted he's doing it on purpose.
Alex Soros tweeted May 31st, Democrats should refer to Trump as a convicted felon at every opportunity.
Repetition is the key to a successful message, and we want people to wrestle with the notion of hiring a convicted felon for the most important job in the country.
To which Brian Krasenstein tweeted, I've been tweeting the exact thing.
Hammer it home over and over 100%.
Brian has publicly stated he's doing this as a messaging technique.
It's social engineering 101.
I never said anything about Trump's conviction in the post.
Just pointed out that he's an evil guy.
Why?
Well, he posted in the past he's doing this to manipulate people.
Hence, he's evil.
In my response, he then once again performs what's called a social engineering anchoring technique.
Let me read for you my thread, so I think I tried to make it succinct when I was responding.
I said this response chain is actually a good example.
You're manipulative.
You exploit ignorance using assumptive language and reasoning for political ends.
You're what's wrong with humanity.
You're a plague.
You omit context to drive your political ends, exploiting ignorance for personal gain.
You exist in the mindset of autocrats and authoritarians who believe that the use of manipulative tactics are warranted because you're better than others.
You think you are.
Your constant convicted line is a good example.
Of course we could debate legal merits, legal definitions, politics, etc.
But you're using a common manipulation tactic seen in social engineering instead.
You insert a conclusion outside of the conversation anchoring.
The tactic aims to drive an idea to anchor it by having it rest as a footnote outside the context of the conversation.
I could add to every tweet something like this too, needlessly adding that you're a scammer accused of fraud.
It's irrelevant, but it anchors an idea.
The goal, of course, is that no matter what you say, I will shift the argument into a different area.
Quote, the Krasensteins committed fraud and are scammers?
Question mark?
I never accused them of it.
It's a question, right?
It's Social Engineering 101, and you guys do it all the time.
You're evil.
So does Sam Seder, for instance.
Oh, I know the context.
You were never arrested or charged.
Your website ran bad ads.
But that's social engineering.
Ignore context, anchor, and pressure.
You're evil, and you know it.
We see this routinely in media.
The Krasensteins, comma, who are accused of defrauding and scamming innocent people, comma, expressed outrage over Trump's conviction.
The paragraph is factually correct, but completely dishonest.
And it misframes who and what you are actually mad at, and why you're mad at Donald Trump.
You're evil.
I believe that was the last one.
Well, someone said, I love when two podcasters do this while we're fixing to do an interview, blah, blah, blah.
The Krasnistins have been on Tim Kast's IRL.
But I'll go into a little bit more detail and depth on this.
Let's say Brian Krasenstein says, why should I vote for a convicted felon?
And I respond with something like, are you saying that your accusations of committing fraud and scamming innocent people are irrelevant?
Wait, hold on.
We're not talking about that.
The question is, why should I vote for a convicted felon?
Okay, well, I think there's certainly questions to ask about someone who is a convicted felon.
You know, notably, you, the Krasnistins, were accused of serious fraud and destroyed the lives of so many innocent people.
I do think it's important that we bring up this conversation about who we're listening to.
unidentified
Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
tim pool
But you get the point.
The idea of anchoring something can be actually relatively simple.
The idea being that We want to make sure there's an idea attached to everything we say.
So if you ask me, is the sky blue?
I would say something like, it's really funny that you're questioning the sky being blue considering you're a felon, blah blah.
You get it.
Does it argue politics?
No.
There's better ways to do it.
The point is, you want the conclusion to be assumed to be true without context by asserting it as an afterthought.
That's what they do.
And again, I will stress, the dude said outright, that's what he's doing.
Now, the people need to understand what's happening in this country.
That will help them make better decisions.
Brian Krasenstein doesn't care if they make better or worse decisions.
What he cares about is that he wins politically.
For whatever reason, fine.
You make the assumption.
But that is the challenge we face in this country right now with evil individuals.
You know, Sam Seder is a good example of this.
Famously, two years ago we released a song and Sam Seder's crew played the song with some kind of distortion and then claimed it sounded bad.
The intention is to lie to people so that they believe you.
And if they can stay in your cult and you can isolate them from outside messaging, it's cult tactics 101.
This is what these people do.
Another example is recently I stated that I was correct in my assessment in 2020 based on Moody's Analytics when we saw the bellwether districts and the votes that Trump got, but what I did not get correct was the strategy employed by Democrats related to ballot harvesting and the quote-unquote shadow campaign as Time Magazine called it.
I'm not wrong.
What Sam Seder then puts out is a video where he says Tim Pool thinks he was right about the 2020 election or something, completely omitting the full context.
They're evil people.
They don't give you the full information.
They don't give you the full argument because they want you to be tricked into giving up what power you have to them so they can live better lives exploiting you.
It's the authoritarian mindset.
We are better than you.
That's what they argue.
And thus, you see it here.
The Krasensteins are just one example.
But, this is what we navigate in media every single day.
You've seen it in my videos, when the media says, Donald Trump, comma, a convicted felon, comma, said today that he would do... Okay, wait, what?
But I'll give you one really, really easy example.
I will end this with the nail in the coffin, proving, very easily, this man's evil.
He says, A 78-year-old convicted felon filed libel, blah, blah, blah.
Right?
Framing and anchoring.
Putting that in as an assertion of fact.
Now, I will stress, you want to get a little nuanced, a person is not a convicted felon until after sentencing is rendered.
Meaning, the judge reads the verdict, like the verdict is read out, the judge says, for this, you will be sentenced.
As of right now, sentencing is postponed due to a question of immunity.
So, Trump is not legally a convicted felon.
They're just saying that.
That was the point the whole time.
They argue, semantically he is.
Okay, okay, fine.
I don't care.
Make that argument.
Literally, I don't care.
But he says this.
Use the campaign-funded rally to promote his own golf course and challenge an 81-year-old opponent to a round of golf.
Call me crazy, but I miss the days of... Here's a story from the Washington Times, June 27th.
Biden challenges Trump to golf contest to prove fitness for president.
So, at a major political debate, and not even the first time, Biden challenged Trump to a golf—to a round of golf.
Trump then says the same thing, and of course, this is my point.
Brian Krasenstein is omitting the context.
Biden already challenged Trump twice.
Trump responded saying he'd challenge him for charity.
Now they're acting outraged.
This is what they do.
They're evil.
Their intention is to make sure you cannot live a good life.
That you succumb to their tactics and give up your freedom, your choice, your right.
Your resources.
Brian, you are an evil man.
You are evil.
And I hope I've laid it out as eloquently as possible.
I'll leave it there.
Next segment's coming up at 6pm on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out.
And I'll see you all then.
The possibility of Merrick Garland actually being held in contempt is, in my opinion, kind of good.
Seriously.
So, Ana Paulina Luna has been trying to hold Garland in contempt.
Well, they did hold him in contempt, because he won't turn over the HER tapes.
That's what they're called.
Joe Biden gave an interview as to the crimes he committed with classified documents.
The special prosecutor said, guys, he's a bumbling old man with a bad memory.
We can't prosecute him.
Republicans said, we want to hear the tapes.
Well, the DOJ said, no.
Garland, AG, was subpoenaed to turn over the records.
He said no.
He was held in contempt.
He said no.
The DOJ is refusing to prosecute.
So, Luna wants to hold him in inherent contempt, which will fine him $10,000 per day for not turning over the information.
Now, the Republicans are resisting this.
It's very, very frustrating because we want to see equality under the law.
Bannon and Navarro are in prison for contempt of Congress right now.
Why is Merrick Garland allowed to flout the law?
Yeah, we'd like to know.
But something interesting happened.
Now that swing Democrats are desperate to remove Biden, they may actually side with Rep Luna.
Luna has reached out to Democrats saying, we all want to know what's on that tape and whether or not Joe Biden can actually do the job.
These Democrats in swing districts are so worried they cried in a meeting.
So, as Fox News reports, Rep.
Luna planning to force vote to hold Garland in inherent contempt for refusal to hand over Biden her tapes.
Speaker Johnson and Republican leadership don't want to do it.
They're of the mindset that, no, no, let them flounder.
The debate stuff's hurt them so tremendously that we don't want to get in the way.
Wrong.
Something else is going on.
Republicans are just in on the game.
I guess, I don't know.
The leadership is.
What we want is to hear those tapes to understand what was going on.
Well, now it may not matter.
Johnson and other Republican leaders don't want to do this too bad.
Because Luna will likely get some swing Democrats to make a statement like, we all saw the performance and we want to know.
And this is how they knock Joe Biden out of the race.
Fox News reports, Florida GOP Rep Anna Paulina Luna is preparing to force a House vote to
fine Attorney General Merrick Garland $10,000 a day for not complying with the congressional
subpoena to turn over audio tapes on President Biden's handling of classified documents.
The move to invoke the rarely used inherent contempt power could impose a fine for every
day Garland does not hand over the tapes.
She's got some tweets on the matter.
She tweeted this.
We'll zoom in a little bit.
Why?
Inherent contempt power.
Congress has the inherent authority to enforce compliance with its mandates as recognized historically.
Anderson v. Dunn established the foundation for broader interpretations of Congress's contempt powers.
Effective Enforcement Mechanisms.
The Debt Collection Improvement Act allows for garnishing the salaries of non-compliant officials.
Section 713 of the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act provides authority, authority to, authority to, did I miss a note there?
These measures are essential to compel compliance and uphold the rule of law.
Without such enforcement, congressional oversight would be ineffective, compromising its constitutional duties.
If Congress does not hold Garland in contempt, they are not a co-equal branch of government.
They are a subsidiary completely powerless to do anything.
In the meantime, I'd like to just point out that Congress should have already nullified the subpoenas against Navarro and Bannon and gotten them released from prison.
I despise the Republican Party.
Johnson and all the rest, they are not doing anything to help these people.
If you're going to come out and say, no contempt for Garland, then I want to see Bannon and Navarro out of jail now.
Prove to me the government exists.
Prove it!
They can't.
It doesn't.
All that exists is sycophantic morons suckling at the teat of the establishment authority and crackpot tyrants who abuse people they don't like.
Because if there was a system by which we could map the logic of law, Bannon and Navarro would either be free or Garland would be in jail.
But so long as we exist right now as we are, with Johnson and the rest refusing to uphold the law, and the DOJ refusing to uphold the law, it shows you there is no system.
There's none.
GOP's tug-of-war over Merrick Garland.
Speaker Johnson argued for letting Democrats Uh, implode without any interference from Republicans.
What do you mean?
Releasing the audio would actually cause them more damage for the same reason.
Multiple sources at Johnson expressed concerns about Luna's proposal, which would fine Garland $10,000 a day for flouting a congressional subpoena.
unidentified
Rep.
tim pool
Kelly Armstrong I also don't know why you'd make Garland the bookie man right now.
Biden is doing a pretty good job on his own, Armstrong said.
Vote these people out!
Man.
This country is in for a reckoning, I tell you this.
We're in for a reckoning.
The system cannot be sustained in this way.
There is going to be a mass incumbent purge when people go to the ballots.
Something's coming this year.
Because these people are pathetic!
unidentified
I don't know why you'd make Garland the bogeyman.
tim pool
Maybe it's because he broke the law, he should go to jail.
That's it.
That's it.
You, you guys, you're the reason why there are criminals running the streets, smashing up stores, and abusing people.
Because you don't believe in equality under the law.
All you care about is politics!
But they're hurting- I don't care if the polls are going up and down.
What I care about is equality under the law.
And if holding Garland in contempt hurts Donald Trump's polling, I don't care!
Prove to me the system exists!
They can't.
Because it doesn't.
Luna appeared undeterred.
In a Tuesday afternoon tweet, she indicated she still planned to force a vote.
Take a look at this from yesterday morning.
Rep Ana Paulina Luna is leaning into Democratic concerns.
In a letter to Democratic colleagues being sent Tuesday in Share with the Hill, Luna said the Democratic anxiety over Biden in the wake of his poor debate performance should also fuel their desire to support her resolution.
What America saw at the first presidential debate leaves no question that Congress needs to hear special counsel Hearst's tapes from his interview with Joe Biden.
Biden's performance was so concerning to all of us who watched that even before the debate had ended, people were questioning his ability to continue as president.
Even many of you had to make the difficult decision to call for Biden to drop out of the race.
The urgency of the situation cannot be overstated, and we must act swiftly.
It is now evident that Congress must hear these tapes.
After repeated attempts by the House to gain access to the H.E.R.
tapes, the White House has made it clear that the only way for us to listen to them is to hold Merrick Garland in inherent contempt, to compel him to release the tapes.
This action is not a matter of partisanship, but of national security.
Our duty as members of Congress, regardless of who is in the White House, is to demand accountability and transparency for the American people.
That is why I am asking that we unite in this cause for the greater good of the nation.
That's fascinating.
Democrats actually cried, as I mentioned.
This is a big story.
They had a meeting over Biden refusing to drop out.
Biden is underwater to such a degree that several swing states are now listed as lean Republican, according to Cook Political Report.
Swing district Democrats are going to lose.
In New York, in one district where the Democrats have won, it's leaning Donald Trump.
When the voters go in, they're going to see Joe Biden, and they're going to say, Republican, across the board.
In fact, some of these states have the down-ballot voting system, where you go in, and you say, give me the Democrats, and you walk out.
Doesn't even matter who you vote for.
If Joe Biden's the guy, and people don't want him, you are going to see a red wave, and they know this.
The only opportunity now for these swing district Democrats is to join with Luna, get these tapes released.
We saw this reporting earlier.
That Democrats are hoping that Biden has another misstep.
Well, it's right here, right in front of you.
Allow the law to exist.
Contempt of Congress for Merrick Garland.
Release the tapes.
If Bannon and Navarro go to jail, Garland goes to jail.
And the fine is a compromise.
Fine.
Let's at least have there be penalty.
Now, I'll end by saying this.
In the event this is how it goes down, it doesn't prove the system exists.
It just proves that when the power interests align, you'll get something like this.
unidentified
It sickens me.
tim pool
I'll end by saying this.
In the event this is how it goes down, it doesn't prove the system exists.
It just proves that when the power interests align, you'll get something like this.
It sickens me.
Sickens me.
To see that people like Steve Bannon, who had the exact same reason as Merrick Garland,
executive privilege, and he did.
But they don't care.
Because the system is broken, and we all know it.
And if this will not get done, then part of me wants to see Republicans lose everything.
I'll put it this way.
Why should I care if Republicans win?
If they prove to be ineffective anyway, if they won't hold people accountable, if they can't pass laws, then I don't care.
Then when the Democrats burn the country to the ground, perhaps then Antifa gets what they want.
They get the fight they've been asking for.
If Republicans are unwilling to actually do their jobs, why should I or anyone else advocate for you to go vote for them?
They're pathetic, and they can't do their jobs.
Sad.
Next segment's coming up tonight at 8 p.m.
over at youtube.com slash timcast IRL.
Export Selection