Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

July 9, 2024 - Tim Pool Daily Show

01:15:12

The Election FIX IS IN, Democrats REFUSE To Bar Illegal Immigrants Voting, Trump DEMANDS GOP Act

BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO FIGHT BACK - https://castbrew.com/ Become a Member For Uncensored Videos - https://timcast.com/join-us/ Hang Out With Tim Pool & Crew LIVE At - http://Youtube.com/TimcastIRL The Election FIX IS IN, Democrats REFUSE To Bar Illegal Immigrants Voting, Trump DEMANDS GOP Act Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Participants

Main voices

tim pool

01:08:25

Appearances

jon stewart

02:47

Clips

josh hammer

00:31

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Become a member at TimCast.com by clicking join us to support the work we're doing and to get access to the uncensored TimCast IRL call-in show Monday through Thursday at 10pm.
		You don't want to miss it.
		Now, let's get into the news.
		We sit.
		We cheer.
		Joe Biden's brain is fried.
		The world knows it.
		Late night comedy hosts are mocking Joe Biden.
		Democrats are demanding he step down.
		Kamala Harris next in line could never defeat Donald Trump.
		Donald Trump is on track to lose in November.
		I'm just going to come out and say it.
		I'm going to come out and say it because it's a bit hyperbolic, but according to the polls, economic data, it suggests a Donald Trump victory.
		That's the truth.
		However, when you look at the more nuanced politics of what's going on in this country, I think it's fair to say that there is a shadow campaign, like there was in 2020, and Donald Trump is on track to lose.
		Why?
		Because Republicans cannot and will not address a very serious problem.
		One that was brought up by Donald Trump back in 2016 when he first won.
		Trump said illegal immigrants are voting in this country to the tune of millions.
		The media, of course, said that's a lie.
		Well, to be fair, Donald Trump just saying that doesn't prove anything.
		But also, just calling it a lie doesn't prove anything either.
		Unless they do a full forensic audit of an election, how do you determine whether or not there is or is not a problem?
		I don't know that Donald Trump is right about millions of illegal immigrants voting.
		What I do know is that, for one, Initially, it doesn't matter if they vote.
		If they are counted on the census, then the states that allow illegal immigrants will get more electoral college votes, and thus, Democrats are cheating.
		But now the fix is in, says the Daily Caller.
		The SAVE Act.
		Republicans want to make it so that if you want to vote, you've got to prove you're a citizen.
		And Democrats say, why?
		Why even bother doing that?
		Now, there's two problems here.
		The first, This bill won't pass.
		Even if Republicans in the House say yes to the SAVE Act, the Senate will not vote on it.
		And even if it gets to Joe Biden, he will veto it and say we don't need it.
		And you're not going to get a veto-proof majority in the House or the Senate.
		So this goes nowhere.
		And that's not the big problem.
		That's just one of them.
		You also have the Help America Vote Verification System, which is showing us outright anomalous voter registration data not being addressed by anyone.
		So I ask you this.
		What is the remedy?
		If illegal immigrants vote, what is the remedy?
		Now, of course, we hear from Joe Biden and the Democrats that they're not.
		It's illegal for them to vote.
		Uh-huh.
		Your theft is illegal.
		People do that every day.
		Murder is illegal.
		People do that every day.
		More importantly, speeding is illegal, and quite literally everyone is speeding.
		So telling me a thing is illegal so it doesn't happen is just utter nonsense.
		But I'm supposed to sit here and be confident that Trump and the Republicans can win when there is no effective system in place to prevent illegal immigrants from voting.
		And they've added, what, 7 to 10 million in the past four years?
		Now, of course, there's also the legal immigration, which is about a million per year, and these people overwhelmingly vote Democrat.
		I do not see how you solve for this.
		Now, of course, Trump is very, very ahead in the polls.
		Joe Biden says he's not backing down.
		Maybe it doesn't matter.
		Maybe none of that matters.
		Maybe it will be Joe Biden.
		He says, I'm going to run this race.
		Maybe the point is, they're going to convince you Trump can't lose, and so you're distracted while the real problem is happening.
		I don't know how many, if any, illegal immigrants vote.
	My point is, the system is insecure, we can't track it properly, and there are many municipalities that allow non-citizens to vote.
	So what happens then?
	Well, you've got to register to vote if you're a non-citizen in these places, right?
	Uh-oh.
	That includes your federal registration.
	You know, when they say, this is what Biden says, he says, it's illegal for non-citizens to vote.
	They would go to jail or get deported.
	I gotta tell ya, I'm not sure Democrats are concerned about the well-being of the individual illegal immigrant who votes.
	In which case, sure, there might be illegal immigrants voting, and if for some reason they get caught, you think Democrats care they're getting deported?
	No, they win power.
	This is it.
	The election fix is in.
	Now, Donald Trump has issued a statement.
	Republicans must pass the SAVE Act, or go home and cry yourself to sleep.
	Non-citizen, illegal migrants are getting the right to vote, being pushed by crooked Democrat politicians who are not being stopped by an equally dishonest Justice Department.
	Our whole voting system is under siege.
	Harmeet and David, go to court and get this stopped now.
	The Dems can't win on their policies.
	The only way they can win is to cheat.
	They do it at every level of government, and they do it well.
	That's how they get an incapacitated moron like Joe Biden elected.
	Get tough, RNC, Michael W., Speaker Johnson, and all state and local Republican politicians.
	The Justice Department is corrupt and won't do a thing to help.
	They have no shame.
	All I can say is that if I'm elected president, we will pursue election fraudsters at levels never seen before, and they will be sent to prison for long periods of time.
	We already know who you are.
	Don't do it.
	Zuckerbucks, be careful.
	Wow.
	Trump posted this this morning.
	What are you going to do, Trump?
	What are you going to do?
	What are you going to do?
	What are any of you going to be able to do about this?
	Here's the important thing.
	Winning at the state level where you can.
	And gaining control of as many state delegations, legislatures, governorships as possible.
	This has to be remedied at the local level.
	California will keep cheating.
	Illinois, New York, Washington, they will cheat to the high heavens.
	You need to be able to shut them down at the state level.
	Let me break it down for you real simply for those who don't know.
	California allows illegal immigrants in to the tune of millions.
	They call themselves a sanctuary state in defiance of the Supreme Court.
	They do not deport illegal immigrants.
	The census then asks people who lives here.
	Congressional seats are then apportioned based on How many people live there?
	Not.
	How many citizens?
	This means Democrat districts are likely around 650,000 to 700,000 U.S.
	citizens and then maybe 50,000 illegal immigrants.
	They give themselves a buffer margin to increase the amount of Electoral College votes they get and seats in Congress.
	So their votes outweigh the votes of the American people.
	But think about what this means.
	It means that one Democrat has a captured constituency of illegal immigrants who cannot vote.
unidentified		Right?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Think about what that means.
		In the average Republican district, you're going to have 775,000 people.
		They all get a say on who their nominee is.
		In the Democrat California districts, our sanctuary state districts, there's a portion that are non-citizens who are represented by the member of Congress who don't have the right to vote.
		I tell you where this is going.
		Democrats of the future will say, You know, you're right, Tim.
		That's wrong.
		We do represent these non-citizens.
		They should have the right to vote, too.
		And that's exactly where we're going.
		Ballotpedia breaks it down.
		Details about non-citizen voting in local elections.
		As of June 2024, the District of Columbia and municipalities in California, Maryland, and Vermont allowed non-citizens to vote in some or all local elections.
		They say, don't worry, it's illegal to vote in the federal elections.
		Meaningless.
		San Francisco says, in 2016, voters in SF passed a charter amendment called Prop N. With 54% support, the amendment read, shall the city allow a non-citizen resident of San Francisco who is a legal voting age and the parent or legal guardian or legally recognized caregiver of a child living in SF, school district, blah blah blah, The vote, the right to vote for members of the Board of Education.
		The law took effect in 2018.
		SF Superior Court Judge Richard B. Ulmer Jr.
		struck down Prop N in July 2022, stating the law violated the state constitution.
		A California Court of Appeal overturned his ruling a few months later, arguing that Prop N was in fact permissible under the state's constitution and the city charter.
		According to the City of San Francisco's website, on August 8th, 2023, the California Court of Appeals upheld their non-citizen voting program.
		D.C.
		allows it.
		In Maryland, Barnesville, Chevrolet, Chevy Chase Section 3, Garrett Park, Glen Echo, Hyattsville, Martin's Additions, Mount Rainier, Riverdale Park, Somerset, and Tacoma Park.
		Allow non-citizens to vote.
		In Vermont, Burlington, Montpelier, Winooski.
		Same deal.
		Now hold on.
		You may be saying, but Tim, these are local elections.
		Yeah, let me break it down for you.
unidentified		Hey, it's Kimberly Fletcher here from Moms 4 America with some very exciting news.
		Tucker Carlson is going on a nationwide tour this fall, and Moms 4 America has the exclusive VIP meet and greet experience for you.
		Before each show, you can have the opportunity to meet Tucker Carlson in person.
		These tickets are fully tax-deductible donations, so go to momsforamerica.us and get one of our very limited VIP meet-and-greet experiences with Tucker at any of the 15 cities on his first ever Coast to Coast tour.
		Not only will you be supporting Moms for America in our mission to empower moms, promote liberty, and raise patriots, your tax-deductible donation secures you a full VIP experience with priority entrance and check-in, premium gold seating in the first five rows, access to a pre-show cocktail reception, an individual meet-and-greet, and photo with America's most famous conservative and our friend, Tucker Carlson.
		Visit momsforamerica.us today for more information and to secure your exclusive VIP meet-and-greet tickets.
		See you on the tour!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Bye!
		Not federal ones.
		But you better show up to register to vote.
		The non-citizen shows up to get their registration paperwork in order, and when they do, whoopsie, it's the same registration for the federal elections.
		Or more importantly, maybe it's not.
		Maybe it's not.
		Maybe they show up for the election.
		School board election happens the same day as any other election.
		And they show up and they say, who are you voting for for president?
		And they go, oh, Biden, I guess.
unidentified		Because they don't know better.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Tucker Carlson warned about this, and I don't see a direct remedy.
		The only way to win is going to be mass, just, like, mass turnout.
		Every single person needs to turn out and vote to shut this down.
		Otherwise, this country is gone.
		Now, they've flooded this country with millions of illegal immigrants in the past couple of years to the point where they've shocked and terrified people in Chicago, New York, LA.
		That could make a difference.
		But the media machine, it goes hard, ladies and gentlemen, and there are people who believe absolute, utter nonsense.
		They believe whatever psychobabble garbage the media tells them to believe.
		And I don't know how you remedy that.
		So what we have now, my friends...
		Those of you who are watching and paying attention, who question and research and try to figure things out for yourselves, we all have differing opinions.
		But we are now trapped, weighed down by the horde, the cultists, the illegal immigrants, all of these working to destroy the fabric of the American system of governance.
		The Daily Caller breaks it down.
		Democrats are against a House Republican-sponsored bill requiring voters to prove they're U.S.
		citizens before casting a ballot.
		Republican Texas Rep.
		Chip Roy introduced the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Save Act to protect U.S.
		elections from the millions of illegal immigrants flooding our border every year under the Biden administration.
		Secure elections are a key cornerstone for any representative government.
		Without them, we won't have a country.
		Not surprisingly, Democrats are firmly against the SAVE Act, claiming that any justification for the bill is built on falsehoods about our election system.
		The White House put out a statement Monday morning, and over the weekend, Axios reported that House Democrats plan on bringing out the big guns against the bill.
		Coming up for a vote this week.
		Why?
		Even if it passes the House, it won't pass the Senate, and Biden will veto it.
		What's the point?
		What will this accomplish?
		Nothing.
		Congress is impotent.
		They can do nothing.
		The administration strongly opposes H.R.
		8281, the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act.
		It is already illegal for non-citizens to vote in federal elections.
		It is a federal crime punishable by prison and fines.
		The alleged justification for this bill is based on easily disproven falsehoods.
		Additionally, making a false claim of citizenship or unlawfully voting in an election is punishable by removal from the United States and a permanent bar to admission.
		Woo!
unidentified		Wow.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		I didn't realize they came around so quickly on the two-way argument.
		Murder is already illegal!
		Why ban guns?
unidentified		Right?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Well then.
		If murder is already illegal, then it's already illegal to go and shoot a bunch of people.
		We don't need to ban guns.
		It's just a waste of time.
		Thank you for the argument, Democrats.
		Now, the reality is that two things are very distinct.
		For one, guns are a right enshrined and protected by the Constitution.
		Your God-given right to defense.
		Voting is not.
		Voting is not a guaranteed right for anybody.
		Voting is a privilege.
		And if we want there to be a limiting factor on voting, I think that's absolutely fine.
		You will have a right to defend yourself.
		You have a right to speak.
		You have a right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness.
		But whether or not you get to change how our system works, not so much I agree with anyone being able to do that.
		The Founding Fathers understood this and, well, we've seen the system erode over time to the point where it's causing us quite a deal, quite a bit of problems.
		House Minority Whip Catherine Clarke told her colleagues they are urged to vote no on the SAVE Act because it would prevent Americans from registering to vote with their driver's license alone and would further intimidate election officials and overburden states' abilities to enroll new voters.
		Illegal immigration and its effects on American citizens have become one of the top issues in the 2024 election.
		Well, it's number one.
		It was for a while.
		It was number one for a while, but now Biden's failed mental state is number one.
		Biden's border policies turned every state into a border state.
		This is a serious problem that needs fixing.
		This is putting vulnerable Democrats in a position where they have to choose to either tow the party line by supporting illegal immigrants with the right to vote, which is undeniably what is and will happen, or vote to block non-citizen voting to save their campaigns.
		Now that's interesting.
		How many Democrats have constituents who are Democrats but are concerned about the illegal immigration problem?
		Many of these cultists will do whatever the Democratic Party tells them to do.
		It's racist, you're a bigot.
		Many of them will say, it's good that illegal immigrants vote.
		We're all people.
		But some of them, maybe enough, are going to say, if you block this bill, we will vote you out.
		We'll see. The SAVE Act has a good chance of passing the House now that Speaker Mike Johnson
		has signed on to support the bill. The Speaker's office released a 22-page report outlining the
		loopholes in current federal laws under the National Voter Registration Act and the Welfare
		Reform Act of 96 that paved the way for non-citizen voters.
		The Biden administration, through the US, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, allows
		illegal immigrants to be eligible to apply for work authorization and simultaneously apply for a
		social security number within 180 days of applying for asylum, whether or not their application is
		fraudulent.
		And what we're seeing now with Help America Vote verification is that millions of people are trying to register to vote who don't appear in the social security network database.
		So who are they?
		Furthermore, why are some of them dead?
		dead?
		It's an interesting question.
		The Biden administration's efforts to dismantle border security and related policies have
		enabled millions of aliens to enter the country, violate our immigration laws, and exploit
		a system to obtain an SSN.
		President Biden recently referred to the flood of aliens crossing the border as voters.
		One state Democratic official is promoting the idea that individuals are eligible to
		vote in federal elections, even if they're not a citizen, unable to prove citizenship,
		and in fact, ineligible to vote under federal law.
		Johnson stated in his report.
		The biggest hurdle for Republicans will be getting the Democrat-controlled Senate to pass the bill, which it won't.
		Republican Utah Senator Mike Lee is sponsoring the bill on the Senate side.
		Illegal immigrants and non-citizens across the nation are being improperly registered to vote, allowing them to cast illegitimate ballots in federal elections, Lee said in a statement with Roy.
		At a time when trust in voting is more important than ever, we must stop foreign election interference and pass the SAVE Act.
		Voting is both a sacred right and responsibility of American citizenship, and allowing the people of other nations access to our elections is a grave blow to our security and governance.
		I wonder if I have the HAVV pulled up.
		I think I pulled it up the other day, but I don't know if I have it right now.
		Is that?
		That's not it?
		No, that's the Gazette.
		Let me just... We're going to keep visiting this story, Help America Vote Verification, so that you can understand.
	This is the Social Security Administration's website.
	I'm going to choose the latest week, June 22, 2024, and I will show you how about Missouri.
	17,096 individuals registered to vote without an ID.
	1,889 came back with no match.
	167 were dead.
	I'm gonna ask you this, as I've asked every time we've covered this story.
	How do 167 applications get filled out matching the name and social security number of a dead person?
	Now, you might come to me and say, maybe they applied to register to vote and then died on the spot.
	SSA got their information before the paperwork went in.
	Sure.
	I mean, maybe.
	Highly unlikely.
	The person registered to vote when they're alive.
	So, you'd have to have me believe that, you know, we're talking about one, a little bit more than, around 1% of these applications.
	Someone, for some reason, fills it out, submits it to the DMV, and what, the DMV just holds it for a little while?
	They hold it for a little while?
	This person then, I don't know, drops dead.
	The family immediately says, oh no, they're dead, and then files the paperwork with the Social Security Administration, who instantly upload it before the DMV.
	No, sorry, I don't buy it.
	Maybe in some instances, something like that could happen, but 167 times in a week?
	No thank you.
	And you might say, but maybe it's not a week, maybe they're holding onto these.
	No, I gotta tell you, they update this every week.
	We get numbers every single week.
	Here's the previous week.
	22,000 with 215 dead.
unidentified		2,480.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		10%!
		10% of the people who registered to vote and the week ending June 15th came back, no social security number name match.
		Okay, maybe some of them wrote the name wrong.
		Maybe they got a number wrong.
		John Smith, my social security number is 123456789 or whatever.
		Or I think it's 8 numbers, right?
		Oh no, it's 9.
		Yeah.
		Let's say that's what they put.
		But oops!
		They put 1, 3, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.
		They mixed them up.
		Yeah, that would come back no match.
		Well, I don't know what to tell you.
		This does not add up.
		Texas, earlier in the year, was seeing millions, hundreds of thousands, 100,000 plus every week.
		Signing up.
		In one week, Missouri had 20-something thousand dead people.
		Let me see.
		Let me try and find what, uh... When was this?
		I think it was, like, April 20th.
		Let me see if I can find when Missouri had all these dead people trying to vote.
		Okay, well, here's Missouri.
		And I chose randomly the week of April 20th, which was not the right one.
		97,000 people tried to vote, or to register to vote, without an ID.
		That's very strange.
		7,000 came back with no match.
		3,766 were dead.
		Texas had 249,770.
		44,000, no match.
		4,659, dead.
		I'm telling you, it's staring you in the face.
		They can scream SAVE ACT all they want.
		had 249,770, 44,000 no match.
		Four thousand six hundred fifty nine dead.
		I'm telling you it's staring in the face.
		They can scream Save Act all they want.
		Trump can scream Save Act all they want.
		This is likely the shadow campaign right now.
		And we only found it on accident.
		Someone noticed this weird voter verification thing.
		And I tell you, no one's addressing it.
		The Republicans aren't addressing it.
		Why isn't anyone filing subpoenas to the SSA to determine what is going on with this ridiculous amount of people trying to register to vote who don't have IDs?
		And who are coming back as dead.
		Or non-matching.
		44,000 people in one week?
		Let's make sure we get that number right.
		Where do we see that?
		44,000 in Texas.
		44,000 people in one week had no match.
		How does that make sense?
		You mean to tell me that around a fifth, 20% of people who registered to vote in Texas who don't have IDs put their name in wrong?
		B.S.
		The likely answer is, illegal immigrants coming through Eagle Pass are being given work permits when they file for asylum by people at CBP, these human trafficker scumbags, and then they're saying, okay, I got my info, now I'm going to register to vote.
		What are you going to do about it?
		There will be no large-scale investigation.
josh hammer ▲ ● ▼		Hey guys, Josh Hammer here, the host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer, a podcast for the First Podcast Network.
		Look, there are a lot of shows out there that are explaining the political news cycle, what's happening on the Hill, the this, the that.
		There are no other shows that are cutting straight to the point when it comes to the unprecedented lawfare debilitating It's this simple.
		affecting the 2024 presidential election.
		We do all of that every single day right here on America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
		Subscribe and download your episodes wherever you get your podcasts.
		It's America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		It's this simple.
		If illegal immigrants vote and Donald Trump loses, the Democrats controlling the DOJ
		will never investigate any of this.
		The states will never investigate any of this, because they're cheating to steal power.
		And I don't know how big of an impact this will be.
		I'm just saying, we've been covering the story over and over and over again, and we've gotten no solid answers.
		Texas said, certainly you're mistaken.
		We've not registered that many people.
		That's wrong.
		We don't know why their number says that.
		Missouri said, we're doing some voter roll cleanup, which doesn't make sense based on how the HAVV works.
		They may be doing voter roll cleanup, but that would mean they're holding onto their registration forms years later?
		Decades later?
		That doesn't seem right to me, but maybe?
		Maybe?
		I'm not saying I know for sure.
		I'll put it this way.
		When you have 500,000 People.
		Let's do this, because that was the week of April 20th.
		June 22nd.
		We have 211,419 people trying to register to vote, and they don't have IDs.
unidentified		35,000.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		No match.
		And 1,000 are dead.
		Okay.
		I don't know how those 1,000 died and how that happened.
		But 35,000 people who don't have IDs tried to register and came back with no match.
		How did that happen?
		And let's make sure we break this down so you really understand what all of this means.
		HAVA is the Help America Vote Act of 2002, and HAVV requires that people submit a voter registration, and when they don't have a license, the state can request a four-digit SSN verification from the SSA.
		The state must submit the applicant's name, date of birth, and last four of their SSN.
		The HAVV system provides one of the following responses.
		That's all it's for.
		I don't see how Republicans fix this one.
		I think that was it.
		If this is the way it's gonna be, 2020 may have really been the last election.
		Now, the average moron in this country will still think elections are happening.
		They won't be able to tell the difference.
		They'll say, oh, you know, I guess we lost again.
		And they will just live under the boot that they're told to live under.
		I suppose we'll just have to wait and see.
		Next segment's coming up at 1pm on this channel.
		Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
		Last night, several late-night comedians stepped up to slam Joe Biden for being mentally deficient, incapable of running for the presidency, and calling on him to step aside.
		Jon Stewart went into a long tirade, saying they should replace him at the convention.
		Effectively, that's what he's saying.
		It seems like the marching orders have gone out.
		The official narrative now is Biden must go.
		But Biden says he don't want to go.
		Now, I wonder this.
		You know, this morning, when I wake up, I have breakfast.
		I put on Fox & Friends.
		That's what I put on because, you know, I want to see what is actually happening.
		I know Steve Bannon says watch MSNBC, but I'm not trying to see in the morning when I wake up the lies from MSNBC.
		I'm trying to know what's actually happening in this world.
		Not that I trust Fox News completely, but they're more likely to give us a breakdown.
		And what I saw was interesting.
		The Fox & Friends hosts are saying Biden should step down.
		Because Fox ain't no different from any of these other outlets.
		I thought, as I saw these segments, has anyone stopped to ask why it is that despite the fact we all knew Joe Biden was deficient, now, like, finger snap, the entirety of the media has come out against Joe Biden.
		The other night, a story went viral from the New York Times.
		A Parkinson's expert met at the White House eight times in eight months.
		Shocking!
		Could this be that Joe Biden is suffering Parkinson's disease?
		Maybe.
		There's a possibility that because he has exhibited symptoms, they brought in an expert to track this to see if he may be developing Parkinson's.
		But when you actually read the story, once again you rip through the garbage and you see something else.
		This doctor that they've been meeting with?
		He's a neurologist.
		He's not a Parkinson's doctor.
		He's a neurologist.
		And the White House is denying that he was meeting with the President.
		The President's just been meeting with his normal physician.
		No, we don't know for sure.
		But the New York Times reports that this guy, this doctor, has actually met at the White House many times, several times, over the years for many other Presidents.
		Why, then, is the New York Times playing this up?
		Look, my friends, I'm not going to sit here and act like Joe Biden is with it.
		He certainly ain't.
		That dude is busted.
		But my criticism is always the media and understanding how something like this happens.
		I do not believe that it is likely a coincidence that all of a sudden everyone from Democrat Party leadership to major Democrat aligned media all of a sudden is like Biden's got to go.
		In Jon Stewart's rant, he says, new information the voters have received.
		New?
		You called it cheap fakes, not you Jon, but the media called it cheap fakes when we pointed out Joe Biden was ailing.
		Well, look.
		I'm not saying, definitively, that there is a coordinated media effort.
	It is entirely possible, nay probable, that these people just march in lockstep with each other.
	And when they see something is popular, they try to jump on that bandwagon.
	That's a possibility, too.
	But I wonder why, all of a sudden, at once... Well, I'll tell you what I think.
	I think it's actually substantially more likely.
	The reason why they did not call for Joe Biden to be removed earlier in this campaign is because RFK Jr.
	would have won the Democrat nomination.
	But they played this game.
	Biden is the incumbent.
	Biden will be the nominee.
	No RFK Jr.
	And so they had this primary, they ousted R.F.K.
	Jr., Joe Biden wins, and now that it's functionally too late for R.F.K.
	Jr.
	to run as a Democrat, at the last minute, they had this debate where they can play this narrative.
	No, no, hold on, hold on.
	Play the narrative, right?
	They didn't need for Joe Biden to have this debate outside of the Commission on Presidential Debates.
	They did not need to do it in such a way that benefited Donald Trump.
	Many people pointed this out.
	By having no audience, by muting mics, it made Trump look better.
	He wasn't interrupting.
	He wasn't cheering or trying to goad the crowd or anything.
	He played it straight.
	And Joe Biden stumbled, fumbled, and bumbled.
	Why would they do all of this?
	Now, look, don't get me wrong.
	Occam's razor suggests that in the absence of evidence, the solution that makes the least amount of assumptions tends to be correct.
	In this case, I would assume these people are just really bad at what they do.
	And, you know, I don't like to assume, but that's probably the simplest choice to make.
	They really just fumbled and bumbled.
	But I gotta pause there for a second, because what is true is, yeah, everybody and their mother knew Joe Biden was broken, and we know the media lied about it.
	I can prove it simply by showing you one of my favorite articles of all time.
	Stay alive, Joe Biden!
	Democrats need little from the frontrunner beyond his corporeal presence.
	This, from March of 2020.
	They knew, and they wrote back then, that Joe Biden was not all with it.
	They feared he would die.
	And they actually published an article in The Atlantic.
	I say they, these journalists, some of these journalists.
	In this instance, eight journalists.
	But don't tell me that the collective media did not understand this.
	Now they play the narrative that it's new information, a conspiracy.
	We had no idea Joe Biden was this bad.
	You knew four years ago, before he got elected, he was this bad.
	So, in the absence of evidence, the solution that makes the least amount of assumptions tends to be correct.
	Well, fortunately for us, we have evidence.
	Evidence to suggest that Democrats and the media knew full well Biden was unwell, and now all of a sudden are acting like they're surprised.
	Which is to say, perhaps, The solution here is, the least amount of assumptions here would be, this is a coordinated effort for some reason we don't yet know.
	Why?
	To keep RFK Jr.
	out, it would seem.
	Well, let's do this.
	Let me play for you this clip from Jon Stewart reacting to what's going on, and wow!
	You know what I gotta say is, I like Jon Stewart.
	I've liked him for a long time.
	The work he did for 9-11 first responders, I shall commend till the end of my days.
	I really do mean it, Jon.
	Those of you who don't know what he did when he fought for the 9-11 first responders, it is one of the most honorable and dignified things a man can do, outside of what the 9-11 first responders did.
	But Jon Stewart, using his weight to defend those people, to fight for their funding, heroic.
	Not as heroic as the actual first responders, but to stand up for them, I tremendously respect, and I will give him that credit.
	I believe, and as an aside, we should be...
	9-11 first responders, the $100-200 billion we give to Ukraine, here's my proposal.
	We divvy it up among the 9-11 first responders who are alive and struggling today.
	And for those that have passed, we give their families a cut.
	I don't understand, just as an aside, because again, shout out to Jon Stewart, how we as a society would not just put these men up on the pedestal they deserve to be on and grant them their every desire.
	I'm not even kidding.
	The firefighters who ran in that building, and the building's collapsed on them, their families should want for nothing.
	I digress.
	I just, you know, this one really grinds my gears, and again, I shout out to Jon Stewart.
	Why can't we?
	Just take one Mega Millions.
	One Mega Millions.
	We all decide, you know what we're going to do?
	The lottery ticket winning the 500 million today?
	We're going to just give that to the 9-11 first responders.
	How about we do this?
	How about the next three we give to 9-11 first?
	We can cover their bills.
	We can take care of these families.
	I just wanted to say.
	You know, I get into that because again, shout out to John Stewart.
	But let me play.
	Let's go back to criticizing him and talking about this election.
	Here's the clip from Jon Stewart.
	Let's play it so you can hear it, and we'll talk about it.
jon stewart ▲ ● ▼		Authoritarianism and Donald Trump aren't the only threats our democracy faces.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Our democracy.
		I gotta pause right away.
		Just so you understand, when they say our democracy, they are not including you, average American with concerns about your border, immigration, security, etc.
		Our democracy.
		He's not talking about you.
		You're a fascist to him.
		Wait till you hear it.
jon stewart ▲ ● ▼		An arthritic status quo, unable or unwilling to respond in any way to the concerns of voters who just received new and urgent information about their candidate, also erodes confidence and faith in the system of government.
unidentified		Get on board or shut the f**k up!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		New information, he said, about their candidate.
		Why is that new information?
		I already showed you that four years ago, they were concerned Biden was going to die.
		Now there's new information to their voters?
		It is because they attempted to conceal this to the average person.
		Because the average person doesn't pay attention, doesn't watch the news, and doesn't know better.
		That's unfortunate.
		When people like I, or Crowder, or Viva Frye, or Styx, or any of these great personalities who are reading the news attempt to inform the public, they censor, they shadow ban, they silence.
		Because they don't want the American people to know.
		Now hold on!
		Who are these people?
		Well, it's Democrat interests in large corporations.
		It is YouTube deciding.
		Let's play more.
unidentified		It's not...
		It's not...
		Yeah!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		I think, uh, I think John tore that paper.
		He just ripped a piece of paper, because the last time he was doing a bit, he crumpled it and couldn't rip it, and then people made fun of him for it.
		So he just grabbed a single sheet and then tore it and then pushed it aside.
unidentified		Weird dude.
jon stewart ▲ ● ▼		Honestly though, get on board or shut the f**k up is not a particularly compelling pro-democracy bumper sticker.
jon stewart ▲ ● ▼		Nor is, what are you gonna do?
unidentified		I've gotten a lot of text today from folks who watched a lot of West Wing episodes and imagine a very complex path through which we might have a robust primary process.
		But Wolf, you know the reality.
		There's four months left to the presidential election.
		Four months is for f**k's sake.
jon stewart ▲ ● ▼		So let's pause real quick and ask this question.
		in two months. France had two in one month, defeated fascism, and still had time to have
		an affair with Denmark.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		So let's pause real quick and ask this question. What does it mean that France defeated fascism?
		Well, the single largest party is now Marine Le Pen's party.
		She won basically every district except for Paris.
		What does that mean, defeated fascism?
		Okay, well, I'm not going to play games.
		Jon Stewart views pro-nationalist ideas as fascism, so when he says, our democracy, he ain't talking about people who are concerned about illegal immigration, who are concerned about manufacturing.
		He's saying, you're the fascists who must be defeated, and our democracy is going to defeat you.
		He's saying us versus you understand that.
jon stewart ▲ ● ▼		Are you telling me you sons of bitches?
		Are you coming to my house and say to my face that the United States of Bruce Springsteen's America can't hold an election better than a French?
		Is that what you're telling me?
unidentified		It's four months.
unidentified		Four months!
jon stewart ▲ ● ▼		It's a hundred and nineteen...
unidentified		It's 119 days!
jon stewart ▲ ● ▼		There are contestants on The Bachelor, who haven't even met yet, that will get married and divorced between now and the election.
unidentified		We have nothing but time!
jon stewart ▲ ● ▼		And by the way, I am in no way saying Biden's got to drop out, but can't we stress test this candidacy?
		Can't we open up the conversation?
		Do you understand the opportunity here?
		Do you have any idea how thirsty Americans are for any hint of inspiration or leadership and a release from this choice of a megalomaniac and a suffocating gerontocracy?
unidentified		Do you have any idea what could be ahead of you?
jon stewart ▲ ● ▼		All we want is for someone to keep it 100.
jon stewart ▲ ● ▼		The percentage, not the age.
unidentified		That's all we want!
unidentified		Here's an idea.
jon stewart ▲ ● ▼		I'll spitball it.
		It's last minute.
		But why don't we try and get all the Democrats together in, I don't know, six weeks' time?
		We could get everybody to fly into some Midwestern town, maybe like one adjacent to important swing states.
		Let's call it Chicago.
		And they could spend, I don't know, four days there, because nobody works Fridays anymore.
		And on Monday, anybody who wants to gives their sales pitch of how they can make democracy more responsive to the people it is supposed to serve.
		You could bang it out.
		On Tuesday, the winners could move on to the next round and then face Biden.
		They could face Biden.
		Biden had a bye.
		Wednesday would be an off-day bus tour to find the restaurant from the bear.
		Thursday, the party emerges, energized, unified, sanctified.
		You could televise the entire proceeding for four days.
		You could call it, I don't know, The Apprentice.
		I'm just workshopping here.
		Feel free to ignore any obvious weaknesses in your team's existential fight for freedom and democracy.
		And then just white-knuckle this thing till November.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		This is the actual dissent into fascism.
		I thought this segment was particularly important to highlight.
		Jon Stewart is saying the primary process be damned.
		An elite group of Democrat politicians should be the ones who ultimately decide who their nominee will be.
		And perhaps the plan with Joe Biden was not to bar RFK Jr.
		or because they just found out Joe Biden is ill.
		Perhaps it was because the entire time they were concerned.
		Ten years ago, Bernie Sanders stormed the gates.
		An upset, a grassroots populist campaign nearly upset the established order.
		Democrats likely said, we can't allow the people to pick because Bernie Sanders, using the internet, is going to win.
		So what do they do?
		Exactly this.
		Now, Jon Stewart's frantically begging you ignore the primary process.
		Voters be damned!
		Democrat elites should be the ones who go into that room for four days and make the choice for you.
		Really?
		Well, I can't say I'm surprised.
		That's what I expect the Democratic Party to be.
		Now, they make the argument that Donald Trump is a dictator and his party is a cult and all that stuff because that's what they are.
		It's projection.
		It's what they do.
		Donald Trump's far from perfect, but I don't see what they claim to see.
		And as the meme goes, Lord give me the Donald Trump that exists in the delusional minds of these leftists, because we certainly don't get that.
		Trump will hire some bad people, some uniparty establishment shills, he'll give us a moderately good presidency, and we'll all roll our eyes when he does bad things.
		That's the truth.
		You like Donald Trump?
		Yeah, I guess.
		Foreign policy was fairly good.
		Not perfect.
		A lot of bad foreign policy.
		I can't stand these libertarians who are like, oh yeah, Tim, well what about when he fired Tomahawk missiles on Syria?
		And I'm like, yes, that's bad.
		Next question.
		You're going to come to me and say that Barack Obama murdering two Americans, and it was more than two, but I know for sure, Anwar al-Awlaki and Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, you want to make all the arguments about Anwar, fine, he was a jihadi, so what?
		We have a constitution that protects American citizens from extrajudicial assassinations, but fine, he was an enemy combatant, make your arguments in court.
		Now Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, the 16-year-old who was not a combatant, you blew him up?
		Spare me your lies.
		Now, back to the libertarians who are saying, but Donald Trump, you know, commando raids in Yemen, drone strikes.
		He increased the drone strikes.
		He removed the transparency.
		I'm like, bad, bad, bad.
		Next question, dude.
		He set timelines for withdrawal of our troops in the Middle East.
		He wanted our troops out of Syria.
		They lied to him and they lied to us.
		The military did, by the way.
		They lied to Trump and lied to us to keep troops in Syria.
		Trump said, I want our troops out of Afghanistan.
		I'm going to set a deadline.
		I'm going to meet with the Taliban.
		And we're going to negotiate our retreat.
		Or I shouldn't say our retreat, but our exodus from this country.
		Donald Trump worked peace deals in the Middle East and in Europe.
		And in North Korea.
		So by all means, tell me the bad things.
		But I say it was marginally better.
		Slight net positive.
		Donald Trump is responsible for many bad things.
		Massive spending.
		A lot of the deficit he contributed to.
		All of this is true.
		And that's my point.
		Donald Trump will be a marginally good president.
		He will not be the greatest president ever.
	He's the greatest president of my lifetime.
	I told him that.
	But what does that mean?
	It means that what does the president do?
	Well, foreign policy and diplomacy is principal to the presidency.
	He's the commander-in-chief of the armed forces.
	He's the executive of law enforcement at the federal level.
	Mostly what he can do is executive orders, executive actions pertaining to how law enforcement is handled in the United States, but principally foreign policy.
	And Donald Trump's foreign policy was net positive.
	I look at all the past presidents.
	Garbage!
	War, war, war, war, war, that we never asked for, that we never voted on!
	And Donald Trump, for the first time in my life, says, no more.
	That makes him the best president of my lifetime.
	But he's not going to be the greatest president ever.
	He may be a really great president, and he may be one of the best presidents for a variety of reasons.
	We'll see.
	But I really do believe that we're going to get a marginally good second term from Trump.
	I think everybody who's begging for this Agenda 47, or even the people who think he's going to enact Project 2025, which I'm not even convinced, it's just a Heritage Foundation, Trump's not going to do all that.
	People say he's going to fire everybody.
	We hope he fires some people.
	Now, Joe Biden, I don't know, right?
	But this idea that we would basically delete the primaries, it has already been a point of contention in the United States that two private organizations essentially determine who the nominees will be.
	And if you don't play ball with the Democrats and the Republicans, you ain't getting in.
	Going back 10, 20 years, you know, when I'm looking at Bush, Gore, all that stuff.
	I'm a kid.
	I don't really pay too much attention.
	I'm watching this somewhat marginally.
	And then Barack Obama comes around.
	And I believe that was my first election.
	I don't think I voted in 2004, which I would have been able to for the first time, I think.
	Barack Obama was the first.
	And a lot of promises were made, not kept.
	But you know what?
	The problem that I saw back then, and I asked about, is so if I want to vote for somebody, they've got to go through the private organization of the DNC or the RNC.
	That's how it works.
	They're private.
	They choose how they want to do things.
	They exclude third parties, all that jazz.
	They control the machine.
	One of the big issues we took was the use of superdelegates.
	When it came to Bernie Sanders, he should have won in 2016, but they iced him out.
	Superdelegates, political elites who can vote however they want.
	Primary, be damned.
	The Republicans don't have superdelegates.
	At least, I'm pretty sure they don't.
	I'm pretty sure the RNC does not have superdelegates the way the Democrats do.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, superdelegates are a Democratic convention thing.
	Republicans, uh, let's see.
	In Republican conventions, three Republican party leaders of each state are automatically seated as delegates, but they are pledged to vote according to the results of their party's primaries.
	Democrats just have political elites who can be like, no, I don't care.
	I'm voting for who I want.
	Jon Stewart came out and he says, primary be damned.
	Joe Biden was their choice, but new information emerged.
	That's a lie.
	That is a lie.
	This story was written four years ago.
	Four years and four months.
	Stay alive, Joe Biden.
	Democrats need little from the frontrunner beyond his corporeal presence.
	It was then.
	It was then.
	You should realize it's a cult.
	It is a cult.
	They don't care.
	It is adhere to the machine, to the hive mind.
	It's the Borg.
	Now what Jon Stewart is saying is, Heavens me, we just found this thing out that everyone knew for four years.
	Therefore, the primary should be nullified, Democrats should hold their own convention, and political elites will decide who your nominee will be, because you can't be trusted to vote properly.
	Welcome to the dawn of a new America, my friends.
	This, the Rubicon's been crossed.
	And some people have argued that it's the American Empire, and like the Roman Empire, it will collapse.
	Others have argued, no, in fact, this is the end of the Roman Republic, as we now emerge into the Roman Empire, which will beget 200 years of prosperity.
	Perhaps it's Trump.
	Could he be our Caesar-like figure?
	I don't know, it's hard to think, right?
	Maybe the Democrats are playing that game.
	This is where they've decided democracy be damned.
	Your primary doesn't matter.
	We're going to run it the way we want.
	And I believe Jon Stewart is predicting what likely will happen.
	Joe Biden will refuse to bow out.
	The Democrats will say that instead of arguing, we will have democracy.
	And we will vote at our convention.
	And they'll all clap and cheer as the primary is nullified.
	Because the vote of the people doesn't matter.
	And then they'll say, this is probably how we should do it in the future.
	We should have the delegates from each state come to the convention and then we do an open audition.
	And then never again.
	Never.
	Never again will you get a Bernie Sanders.
	Or an RFK Jr.
	And that's what Jon Stewart is advocating for.
	The death of what little semblance of democratic representation left in this country.
	The death of that.
	It will be gone.
	Thanks, John!
	Wow.
	I'll wrap it up by saying this.
	I don't know if the man is just stupid or evil, but fine.
	My criticisms here, I think, stand.
	But I will give him credit for his work on the 9-11 first responder stuff, and I will stress this on my way out for this segment.
	The 9-11 first responders and their families should basically have an unlimited fund bank account.
	I don't care.
	I mean, not literally, you couldn't do anything, you know, people might buy stupid things.
	But I believe they should want for no medical bills.
	Their homes should, their house should be covered indefinitely, tax-free.
	Repairs covered, when need be.
	Medical bills covered, for all the immediate family members.
	Vehicle covered.
	And I'll throw in free airfare.
	Fly around, see your family and friends.
	There's a limit, of course.
	I wish I could just give them infinite money or a billion dollars cash.
	It's probably not responsible.
	But I think they deserve everything.
	And we as a society could give it to them.
	And we don't, and that's disgusting.
	So I'll shout out John for that again.
	I really do mean it.
	But I'll wrap it up there.
	Next segment's coming up at 4 p.m.
	on this channel.
	Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
	Truth matters, and that's why, my friends, I must come out and defend Joe Biden.
	Man, this story's flying up everywhere, and we talked a bit about it last night on Tim Cast IRL, but it deserves a standalone segment that all of you should share with your Democrat friends, and all of your Democrat friends should share with your other Democrat friends.
	Parkinson's specialist met with Biden's physician at the White House earlier this year, records show.
	I am going to defend Joe Biden in this segment, and it's important, because I do not believe Joe Biden is suffering from Parkinson's disease.
	I believe that Joe Biden is suffering age-related mental decline and physical decline.
	I believe there's reason to suspect Parkinson's is possible, but the way the media is framing this is suspect.
	When Jon Stewart, in a previous segment, I talked about how Jon Stewart says, we should just have an open primary contest and whoever we pick can then go up against Biden and we'll stress test this.
	That would mean negating the votes of Democratic voters who voted in their primaries for Joe Biden.
	It's anti-Democratic.
	Now, of course, I don't know who they would swap out Joe Biden with.
	We constantly make the joke, oh no, we love Joe Biden, don't remove him.
	But the reality is if Joe Biden's removed, Kamala Harris is next in line.
	And Trump does way better against Kamala Harris.
	So in reality, there is an interest Republicans would have in seeing Joe Biden ousted under the 25th Amendment or otherwise.
	But I find the whole thing strange.
	The story is actually simple.
	I'll give you the quick gist before I read into all this.
	A neurologist has met at the White House for like 15 years with various presidents.
	One of his areas of research is Parkinson's.
	Why is the media framing this as though Joe Biden himself is undergoing some kind of treatment for Parkinson's?
	At the same time, Jon Stewart, Colbert, Seth Meyers, all of these people are coming out saying Biden's gotta go.
	He's too old.
	The New York Times runs this story.
	I'm sorry.
	I think Joe Biden is an old man.
	I believe there is a possibility he pooped his pants.
	Whoopi Goldberg said, so what if he did?
	She has poopy days, too.
	I think these are fair and reasonable assessments.
	An 81-year-old man, likelihood of fecal incontinence, I'm sorry if that's crude and you don't want to hear it, you don't want to believe it, but it's reasonable to say it's a possibility.
	Now, age-related physical and mental decline are one thing.
	Biden being confused is one thing.
	But suffering from Parkinson's, that's disqualifying.
	Now, don't get me wrong.
	I think his age is disqualifying to a certain degree.
	Well, not so much his age.
	I think it's fair to say.
	Age is not so much a disqualifier.
	It's decline in capability.
	If Joe Biden is too old for the job, he's too old for the job.
	I think he is.
	I think Trump's pushing it.
	Trump is fairly spry, though, and I'll give him that.
	Trump could probably handle one more term, and, you know, he's a few years younger than Joe Biden.
	But I don't think Joe Biden can handle it, and I'd prefer if it was neither of them, to be completely honest.
	I like Donald Trump, but younger guy would be better.
	Or lady.
	Just really depends.
	But I'll say this.
	Many have made the argument that Biden's not too old, he may be tired, age shouldn't matter, blah blah blah.
	But if someone's got Parkinson's disease, they are not going to win an election.
	The media bringing this up, I think, is a play to force Biden out because he won't step down.
	The Democratic Party split.
	Many, like I mentioned, Jon Stewart are saying, we need somebody else.
	But then you're getting other Democrat Party loyalists who are saying, no, Joe Biden is fine.
	So I can't tell you what they want.
	What I can tell you is, I think this is a lie.
	I think they are lying.
	It's very strange to me because I can come out and I can say, Joe Biden's not all with it.
	I can say he's too old.
	He's tired.
	He should be retiring.
	But it's a big leak to come out and say he's suffering from Parkinson's disease.
	Let me read a story for you from CNN, and we'll talk about it.
	CNN reports a top Parkinson's disease specialist held a meeting with President Joe Biden's physician at the White House earlier this year, according to records.
	But the circumstances of the meeting are unclear.
	Dr. Kevin Kennard, a neurologist at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, met with White House physician Dr. Kevin O'Connor at the White House in mid-January, according to White House visitor logs.
	They say, Canard has visited the White House three times this year, according to visitor logs.
	A January 17th meeting with O'Connor, and another with a staffer on January 26th and March 28th.
	Canard has visited the White House at least eight times over the past year, according to logs, beginning last August and ending with the March 28th meeting.
	On January 17th, meeting lists O'Connor as the person who was visited.
	O'Connor took the unusual step Monday night of releasing a letter offering some details about Kennard's visit to the White House, following days of speculation about the President's health, writing that President Biden has not seen a neurologist outside of his annual physical.
	Okay, here's... I'm just going to throw this out there.
	I just Googled this real quick, just because.
	Definition, a deliberately misleading fabrication.
	A fable, a fabrication, a fiction.
	Deliberately false or improbable account.
	So when I'm reading this story and they're like, Dr. Kinnard is a Parkinson's expert, I'm like, that's a heck of a name, considering the circumstances.
	Because Kinnard means falsehood.
	It means a misdirection, misleading.
	And then I see this story and I'm like, Okay.
	Alright.
	So, I want to point this out, right?
	They mention how we met at the White House this time, three times, blah blah blah.
	Who's he meeting?
	The doctor.
	O'Connor took the unusual step Monday night of releasing a letter offering some details about Kennard's visit to the White House.
	President Biden has not seen a neurologist outside of his annual physical.
	He wrote of Kennard, Prior to the pandemic and following its end, he has held
	regular neurology clinics at the White House Medical Clinic in support of thousands of
	active duty members assigned in support of White House operations.
	Many military personnel experience neurological issues related to their service.
	And Dr. Kennard regularly visits the WHMU as part of this general neurology practice.
	Okay.
	O'Connor described Kennard as the neurologist specialist that examined President Biden for each of his annual physicals, and noted the specialist's findings were included each time he publicly released the results of the president's physical.
	Asked earlier Monday about the visit between Kennard and O'Connor, White House spokesperson
	Andrew Bates said, a wide variety of specialists from the Walter Reed system visit the White
	House complex to treat the thousands of military personnel who work on the grounds.
	Those visits include one from a neurologist each year for Biden's physical, Bates said.
	Biden is not seen by a neurologist during this time as present outside this context
	of his annual physical, he added.
	Press Secretary Corinne Jean-Pierre later repeated Biden had been seen by a neurologist three times during his presidency, once during each of his physicals, but declined to name them or why.
	Explain why Kennard had visited the White House eight times over the past year.
	She said she wouldn't name the specialist due to security reasons.
	Publicly available profiles named Kennard as a neurology specialist supporting the White House Medical Unit.
	I am not sharing confirming names from here.
	She said during the news briefing, which quickly quickly became contentious as Jean-Pierre deflected questions about the president's health.
	It doesn't matter how hard you push me.
	It doesn't matter how angry you get with me.
	I'm not going to confirm a name.
	It doesn't matter if it's even in the log.
	I am not going to do that from here.
	Jean-Pierre added Biden has never been treated for or taken any medicine to treat Parkinson's.
	No, no, no.
	I got to hold on here.
	What is this story?
	Honest question, what is this story?
	I'm going to ask again, and I mean this in all seriousness.
	There are concerns about Biden's health, but Parkinson's is out of the blue for CNN, the New York Times, and other outlets to plaster in a headline.
	Honest question.
	There's a lot of things we can talk about with Joe Biden.
	Fine.
	He does have rigidity with the way his hands are curled.
	There's a possibility he is suffering symptoms of Parkinson's, and so they brought in a guy maybe to check on him and see if that's the case.
	Maybe.
	I find it very odd that the corporate press immediately runs this narrative despite knowing this guy has been meeting at the White House eight times in eight months and had met at the White House several times in the past ten years.
	So this is not secret information.
	This is not new information.
	All of a sudden the media has taken this interest in reporting a Parkinson's expert.
	Now hold on.
	He sort of is, but he's just a neurologist.
	This, to me, reeks of framing.
	This is what the media does when they take a story and they align it so that you view it through a certain lens.
	Example, when they said Donald Trump was trying to dig up dirt on his political opponent.
	That's called framing.
	I'm not saying it's right or wrong.
	Believe whatever you want to believe, Democrats.
	What I'm saying is it's framing.
	The facts are Donald Trump called the president of Ukraine.
	Donald Trump asked about the circumstances related to Joe Biden stating he would not give a loan guarantee unless a prosecutor was fired.
	Donald Trump says he wanted this investigated and threatened to withhold aid unless it did.
	That's the reporting.
	The framing from Democrats is, this was Trump digging up dirt on a political opponent.
	You can believe that's the case if you want, but that is framing.
	Just like this story.
	When they say Biden meets with Parkinson's expert, you could say he met with a doctor.
	You could say long-standing White House doctor has meeting with President.
	Uneventful.
	But that's not what they're doing.
	They're making sure Parkinson's is in the headline.
	They're making sure that this serious disease is the headline, is the story.
	Okay.
	I don't know why or for what for, but they don't need to frame it that way.
	They really don't.
	And that's what gives me pause.
	I'm always trying to understand the framing.
	When the Covington Catholic Kids, the Lincoln Memorial, when that video came out, I see a video of a kid and a guy banging a drum in his face and people are like, Tim, did you see what this kid did?
	Seriously.
	And I was like, what's he doing?
	And they're like, well, look what he's doing.
	And I was like, I don't know what he's doing.
	I see two people standing in front of each other.
	For some reason, the narrative had to be that this kid walked up to the Native American guy, got in his face, and smirked at him.
	I don't see any.
	I just see two people standing in front of each other.
	Then the real video came out.
	The Native American guy walked up to the kid, got in his face, banging the drum.
	The kid was the victim.
	Remarkable.
	Framing is everything.
	And people just want to jump on the bandwagon and just believe it.
	Prominent personalities rushing to issue a statement condemning these kids.
	Framing is everything.
	So what is this story?
	The six-page letter from O'Connor released that the president underwent his last physical
	in February had said several specialists consulted on the physical, including a neurological
	specialist.
	Here's what I think.
	I'll tell you what I think of Joe Biden.
	I think he's suffering from early-onset dementia.
	I believe he's got a general age-related decline, which includes frailty, muscle soreness, difficulty walking.
	And I say early-onset dementia because we have seen numerous instances where he's turned the wrong way on stage.
	In one instance, walking backwards towards the screen and talking in the wrong direction.
	Now, we've seen before the debate, people were saying, this is not dementia, this is age-related decline, and it's fine.
	Dementia would be confusion, and not understanding what's going on, or mixing up names, and I'm like, he does all of those things.
	I believe that's disqualifying.
	Personally, I really do.
	It is strange to me, however, that Parkinson's has become the narrative in the corporate press at the same time, all at the same time, all this is happening.
	Ask yourself why.
	Now, I'll be honest with you, I don't think Joe Biden should be the nominee.
	We'll lay it straight.
	Joe Biden should not be the nominee.
	His age-related decline is much too intense.
	He wasn't capable in 2020.
	They should have someone else.
	However, they held a primary, and this is what the people have chosen, and I believe it would be wrong at this point to remove him.
	If he steps down, fine.
	I still think it's kind of dirty.
	But Kamala Harris would be next in line, unless she decides to step down knowing she can't beat Donald Trump.
	I don't like how old Donald Trump is, to be completely honest.
	I believe he's too old.
	But, I like this foreign policy.
	I'm not a big fan of his attitude.
	He's a funny guy.
	He spent a bit too much.
	The drone strikes were bad.
	The commando raids were bad.
	I get all of that.
	But setting a timeline for withdrawing our troops, crossing the demilitarized zone into North Korea with no security detail, in a sign of peace, is one of the most significant historical moves a president in my lifetime has made, and Trump deserves credit for that.
	Trump is bad for a lot of reasons, and I welcome your criticism of him, and it should be.
	He should be criticized.
	But he's certainly better than Joe Biden.
	Now, you present to me someone who does a better job than Trump, I'd be willing to accept it.
	But I don't see it.
	I like Vivek Ramaswamy.
	Don't know that he'd do a better job than Trump.
	I think Vivek actually would do a tremendous job.
	I do.
	But maybe, maybe the next term or next four or eight years, the Democrats don't seem to offer up anybody.
	Tulsi Gabbard, the moderates that they had, they've left.
	Andrew Yang seemed pretty good, but they're all basically abandoning the Democratic Party.
	You tell me what our options are.
	I think Donald Trump is the first time in my lifetime that I've seen a slight net positive.
	So I'll take it.
	Now, does Joe Biden have Parkinson's?
	This seems like a dirty play to force him out of the race.
	We'll see.
	Next segment's coming up at 6 p.m.
	on this channel.
	Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
	The apocalypse will begin in only a few months' time, says Baba Vanga, who has predicted the end will commence in 2025.
	All right, it's a fun story, ladies and gentlemen.
	It's kind of a scary story, considering that we're actually facing World War III.
	But Baba Vanga is dead.
	She's been dead for a long time, but she did make a series of predictions, most of which did not come true, but because some are lining up with current events, well, a broken clock is right twice a day, they say.
	People are actually suggesting that Baba Vaga may be correct, and, you know, I kind of hope she's wrong, but some of her predictions are so fun, like, we're going to explore Venus, and then in the year 3000, we go to war with Mars, and these are certainly fun and exciting prospects for humanity.
	Let's entertain Baba Vanga's prediction.
	So here's the story from the New York Post.
	It's the end of the world as we know it, or is it?
	Baba Vanga, also known as Vangelia Pendeva Gustarova, was a blind Bulgarian clairvoyant widely known for her alleged powers of precognition.
	The so-called Nostradamus of the Balkans, a reference to the famed French astrologer, is said to have predicted 9-11 and the war in Ukraine per the sun.
	The Mystic Healer died in 1996, but the Psychic's followers still await some of the predictions she made before her death.
	In fact, some reports have claimed that Vanga warned the world would end in 2023 due to nuclear bioweapons.
	Nuclear bioweapons?
	Like, viruses that have radiation?
unidentified		Okay, well, that didn't happen.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Here we are.
		Now, these are her followers.
		according to her premonitions and their veracity.
		However, the latest of Vanga's eerie predictions that have resurfaced this is her claim
		that the end of the world will start in 2025, according to various reports.
		Now, these are her followers, my understanding is basically saying,
		like, you know, she said this thing was gonna happen and it's like, okay, here we go.
		But it's fun anyway, right?
		Humanity won't be wiped out until 5079.
		But the beginning of the apocalypse will begin in 2025, allegedly, according to Vanga.
		So what does that really mean?
		That the world won't end until 5079, but the apocalypse starts some 3,000 years before that?
unidentified		Aw, come on.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		We're not gonna be in a 3,000 year apocalypse period.
		Unless, like, everyone's just burning in hellfire or something.
		Yeah, no, people are gonna get by and they're gonna live their lives.
		The average lifespan won't come anywhere near this.
		So for most people, why would they think they were in an apocalyptic period?
		Well, here's Baba Vanga's timeline of the end of humanity.
		Yeah, I guess that's one that people are actually really concerned about.
		will devastate the continent's population.
		Yeah, I guess that's one that people are actually really concerned about.
		British Army Chief warns five years to prepare for World War III with world
		facing a new Axis power. While there are fears that World War III may already
		have begun or may be beginning, it's certainly not going to be 2025 according
		to all these assessments, but hey, maybe, maybe. If NATO gets involved in Ukraine
		and Russia pushes back, China aligns with Russia, we could be looking at World War
		focused on the Eastern European front in 2025.
		That's why this story exists, because people are like, you know, that's kind of a possibility.
unidentified		2028.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Okay, so three years after Europe's population is devastated, humans will begin to explore Venus as an energy source.
unidentified		Okay, what does that mean?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Let's do a quick Google search.
		Potential energy source on Venus?
		Is that?
		Venus atmospheric pressure is 92 times that of Earth's.
		97% carbon dioxide.
		Thick clouds prevent much sunlight from reaching the surface.
		So any life would have to depend on chemical energy.
		Venus has many potential energy sources including solar, electric field, ionosphere, sulfuric acid clouds.
		The electric field.
		Here we go.
		Ionosphere of Venus is a rich source for hot photoelectrons that escape down the plasma tail.
		How are we going to source energy from Venus and bring it to Earth?
		Don't look at me.
unidentified		I'm sure there's some physicists being like, actually, Tim, it's quite simple.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Okay, whatever you think, fine.
		2033, the polar ice caps will melt, rising sea levels to drastic heights worldwide.
		Well, I'll pause that real quick and just point out The concern is not necessarily the ice cap.
		It is, in the North, it's Greenland.
		Much of the ice is sitting on land.
		And in Antarctica, much of the ice is sitting on land as well.
		And so, in the North Pole, it's mostly ice over water, which the ice expands and displaces water.
unidentified		But, you know, maybe, I guess?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Drastic heights by 2033?
		We're like a few years away from the ocean levels rising that much?
		Sorry, I don't believe that.
		2076, communism will spread to countries across the world.
		Agreed.
		2130, humans will make alien contact.
		Okay, that sounds fun.
		2170, a drought will devastate much of the world.
		You know, what?
		I'm just gonna pause here.
		Ocean levels are going to rise dramatically.
		But then, 140 years later, a drought will devastate the world.
		140 years of technological advancement and desalination and, like, irrigation and all this technology, I am not convinced that would be the case.
		Now, to be fair, there will still be underdeveloped portions of the world, so maybe that's what they mean.
		3005, Earth will go to war with civilization on Mars.
		Yeah, I don't know about that one.
		In 1,000 years, maybe.
		If Elon Musk actually makes it to Mars, we send a bunch of people and we start colonizing, and then this civilization grows, it's the... what does that show?
		The expanse?
		They actually have a good idea.
		It's a good thought experiment, I guess, in what would happen.
		Any civilization on Mars would be militaristic.
		Because the strong must survive.
		You're going to be living on a red planet with a weak atmosphere, so you're mostly going to be living indoors in biodomes and things like this.
		You must follow rigid instructions or die.
		Whereas on Earth, it's abundance.
		We grow, we expand, we evolve to live in this place or we replace it intentionally, whatever it is you believe.
		And there's fruit and animals for which we can eat many.
		On Mars, no.
		It's only what you can bring and grow yourself and contain in these biodomes or underground in large facilities that maybe they'll build.
		So any civilization on Mars is going to be fiercely strong and independent.
		That being said, Mars has weaker gravity than the Earth and so that will play a massive role on bone density and development.
		Martian, you know, humans that go to Mars over a long enough period of time, I mean within a generation, you're talking about much lower bone density, much less muscle mass.
		These people would struggle to live on Earth.
		People from Earth who go to Mars are going to be able to jump and they're going to be much stronger.
		It's actually fairly crazy.
		But we'll see.
		By 3797, humans will have to vacate the Earth because it's become uninhabitable, and by 5079, the world will end.
		Okay, now hold on.
		Will the world end?
		Because it sounds like 3797, Earth already ended.
		Perhaps what they mean is, humans will leave, whatever animals are left behind will struggle, and the world ends, meaning Earth becomes a barren rock devoid of life.
		But humanity won't be gone.
		If humanity still exists on other planets and travels the stars, humanity will exist.
		It's an interesting prospect to think about.
		Imagine this idea.
		Earth is destroyed in several thousand years, but humanity has developed technology to such a point where we have large ships and space stations that we are able to travel around in.
		How strange would it be for human life to become dependent upon a construct Let's imagine a gigantic space vessel in constant need of repairs.
		The ship, with advanced AI technology, can maintain itself.
		It travels around seeking out the elements required for its own repairs, and conducts most of its own repairs.
		Humans simply live in this vessel, much like Wall-E, I guess.
		I don't believe they would all be morbidly obese in the same way.
		Because of the fight for survival.
		But this massive floating human container, what would it do?
		Well, I can only imagine.
		This massive vessel would probably deposit human life, and other life, on various Class M planets.
		That's what we call it.
		I don't know if that's an actual term or just a Star Trek thing, but Class M is a planet that could host human life.
		So imagine this.
		By the year 4000, humans have rapidly advanced massive technologies, genetic engineering, etc.
		AI at that point would be so rapidly advanced, probably would be completely integrated with people, and we would have large intergalactic vessels.
		And just, what do we do?
		I suppose what would make the most sense is depositing human life on various planets where it can grow and expand to make sure humanity never dies.
		You'd have this one big ship of massive technology.
	Makes you wonder.
	A movie I recommend is Moonfall, and it's basically the gist of the story.
	Spoiler alert!
	The moon is falling.
	But the moon turns out to be a space station where ancient, ancient, ancient humans from another planet crafted a bunch of vessels that would terraform It would actually create planets with their massive technology and that's why Earth and the Moon and everything is seemingly so perfect because humans designed it to be that way and then something happened where humans lost access to the technology, came to Earth, couldn't get back up to the space station.
	It's a fun movie.
	They go to the Moon and they get inside and there's like spaceships and it's like things humans built a long time ago.
	It's kind of sad to see, you know, the fall of civilization like that.
	Now, anyway, I digress.
	As to whether Baba Vanga is correct, probably not.
	It's probably just shot content, but it's fun.
	I'll leave it there.
	Next segment's coming up at 8 p.m.
	over at youtube.com slash TimCastIRL.

▲