Democrats STAGE COUP Against Biden To SAVE Democracy, Biden REFUSES To Quit, Trump CRUSHING POLLS
BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO FIGHT BACK - https://castbrew.com/
Become a Member For Uncensored Videos - https://timcast.com/join-us/
Hang Out With Tim Pool & Crew LIVE At - http://Youtube.com/TimcastIRL
Democrats STAGE COUP Against Biden To SAVE Democracy, Biden REFUSES To Quit, Trump CRUSHING POLLS
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Become a member at TimCast.com by clicking Join Us to support the work we're doing and to get access to the uncensored TimCast IRL call-in show Monday through Thursday at 10 p.m.
You don't want to miss it.
Now, let's get into the news.
The Democrats are staging a coup against their duly elected nominee.
I will stress that right now.
The news breaking is that Democrats are not Are not seeing confidence in Joe Biden after this George Stephanopoulos interview.
They want him to step down.
Donors are saying they will not give money to the Democratic Party if Joe Biden is the nominee.
Recently, a phone call was had with top Democrat leadership in the House, and they said, get off the ticket to Joe Biden.
And Joe Biden said, make no mistake, I am the nominee.
I will not step down.
This is interesting.
Joe Biden is the duly elected nominee.
Now, to be fair, the argument they're going to make is, no, no, not until the convention, when the delegates actually cast their votes.
So the will of the people be damned.
This is fascinating.
Because even if they want to make the argument that Joe Biden is only the nominee after the convention, what they're basically saying is, the popular vote don't count.
Let me stress that they had a primary.
Joe Biden won.
And now wealthy elites are trying to boot him from the ticket.
I say Joe Biden is our nominee.
I have been the staunchest Joe Biden supporter.
You know, he's sharp as ever.
He must remain on the ticket.
Alright, well here's what's really going on.
Joe Biden's polling is collapsing.
We got new updates.
It's just getting worse.
The Democrats are right to want someone else on the ticket, but my question then is, what the is going on?
The media lied to cover up for Joe Biden the whole time.
Why do a debate at all?
They didn't have to.
Democrats could have played their game where they said, Donald Trump is a liar and we're not going to do a debate with him and that's it.
Did they think they were going to lose in the polls because they would avoid the debate?
Well, they put Joe Biden on that stage, and he failed miserably.
And now, all of the leadership is basically saying, get him out.
Even his former staffers are like, you're done, Joe.
You watch videos from Joe Biden.
Four years ago, he is a different person.
His decline is rapid, and it's alarming.
We've got a lot to break down coming off this holiday weekend.
I hope you all enjoyed your 4th of July weekend and have put up your American flags in celebration of MAGA month.
Hope that one triggers all the lefty weirdos who hate America.
The New York Post coming in with the editorial report as updated this morning.
Democrats are going to get Biden off the ticket.
Now of course, when you look at the polling, and let's do that first, let's jump right into the polls, because this is going to blow your mind.
538, that normally shows polls favoring Democrats, has Donald Trump up 2.3 points.
So of course, of course the New York Post is correct when they say they've got to get Joe Biden off.
Here we go.
We've got Trump up 5.
Let's just do this.
July, we got Signal.
Two polls, Trump up 5.
When they include Kennedy, West, and Stein, Trump is still up 5.
Daily Mail has Trump up 5.
Against Harris, he goes up 11 points!
Because she's next in line.
I wonder, is she still the frontrunner?
I think she is.
Let's see, let's go to Predict It.
And see, okay, so Kamala Harris is no longer the frontrunner over on Predict It.
Sorry Kamala, you were, but you're not anymore.
So we've got Trump with Kennedy, Weststein, and Oliver.
Oh, that's funny.
And that puts Trump up 6 points.
Reuters has Trump up 8 against Pritzker, Whitmer, Beshear, and Newsom.
He's up 6, 6, and 4 points.
Now here's the interesting one.
When Reuters put Michelle Obama on the poll, Michelle Obama is up 12 points.
And I think that that may be the play.
A lot of people have been saying it.
We've mentioned before a lot of people saying, yeah, but Michelle Obama doesn't want to run.
She doesn't want to do it.
None of that means anything.
None of that means anything.
Whether she does or does not doesn't matter.
You got another Reuters poll.
Michelle Obama up 11 points July 1st and 2nd.
Now, while Trump dominates across the board against everyone, The polls say he won't beat Michelle Obama.
Take a look at this from the 2024 general election RCP, Real Clear Polling Average.
Trump is up 3.3 points.
Now, I will tell you this.
I'm not absolutely convinced Michelle Obama could win against Donald Trump.
These polls say one thing, and a lot of people are pointing out, like, oh, but Michelle Obama, she's an Obama, she's popular, she'll get the diversity vote, like, the leftist, the woke vote.
And I'm like, no, I don't think you understand.
I think it actually doesn't work that way.
You know, a lot of people think that they need Kamala Harris for the diversity vote, for the woke vote.
I don't think so.
I think they did.
I should say sort of, sort of.
But it's not because people voted for Kamala Harris.
The fact is, no one voted for Kamala Harris.
She didn't get a single delegate.
So why is she on the ticket?
So that Joe Biden can say, look at me!
I believe in diversity.
And he gets his brownie points with white liberal women, right?
But the white liberal women wouldn't vote for Kamala on her own.
And as evidence of, they didn't.
I'll stress that again.
Kamala didn't get a single delegate.
She did not get these votes.
She's putting the ticket as a virtue signal.
What do you think happens with Michelle Obama as the head of this ticket?
Now, it may work because Obama-Harris or, you know, something.
May work.
Because people like Obama.
But don't forget what Barack Obama did.
He brought Joe Biden on specifically because they were concerned people would not want to vote for a black man.
Republicans show their true colors.
Oh, that's right, I'm calling you out, Republicans!
You show your true colors when you say Michelle Obama can win.
Because it shows you're not racist.
These Republicans are like, uh-oh, Michelle Obama is a charismatic woman, and she might be able to give Trump a run for his money.
A lot of Republicans are saying that, and I'm like, guys, guys, you gotta understand, Democrats are racist.
They are racist.
I'm not exaggerating.
I'm not being cute.
Let me do this.
I'll pull this one up.
This is from Yale.
Democrats are racist.
White liberals present themselves as less competent in interactions with African Americans.
Now, I'm not saying that not a single Republican is racist or whatever.
My point is, I do believe there is a substantial amount of people on the Democrat side and middle-of-the-road people who aren't super political who are not going to vote for a black woman.
First, you've got racists.
And I'll tell you this, America is not racist.
That's why they voted for Barack Obama twice.
And it's not all about race.
They liked him better as a better candidate.
But I do believe there is going to be, I believe there's probably way more sexism, especially in minority communities.
So where these, you know, you think it's going to be white people, nah, I think Michelle Obama would actually do a lot worse.
You poll, people are going to say, oh yeah, of course, we'll see what the numbers actually turn out to.
Here's the New York Post has to say.
Biden insisted Friday that he won't drop out of the race unless the Lord Almighty tells him.
Get ready for a lot of Democrats to start publicly praying.
Not so much to God, though, as to Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama, and anyone else with a shot at getting through to Joe, who right now seems to be only listening to Hunter and Dr. Jill.
The party's down-ballot candidates are freaking out, rightly fearing that having a manifestly unfit-for-office guy at the top of the ticket will not only hand Donald Trump the White House, but elect a Republican House and Senate.
I'm here for it.
Obama's top electioneer, David Axelrod, is already telling the party's donors to close their purses to any candidate who won't call for Biden to drop out.
Fat cats like Abigail Disney are on board.
Sticking with Biden will kill the party's turnout in swing states and districts, and outright democratic civil war to oust him at the convention won't help either.
Every day the conversation turns on Biden's condition is a day that Dems lose.
Take a look at this.
We have a running list of Democrats calling for Joe Biden to drop out.
Adam Smith, Jerry Nadler, Mark Takano, Joe Morrell, Angie Craig.
You got—oh, she wrote a big thing.
Mike Quigley.
Here he goes, another interview.
Seth Moulton, Raul Grijalva.
You've got Julian Castro, former Housing and Urban Development Secretary, riding on the X. He's gotta go.
He's gotta go.
Texas Rep.
Lloyd Doggett, Tim Ryan.
Look at this.
And more to come.
More to come.
Right now, we have this from CNBC.
Disney heiress, wealthy Democratic donors say they won't finance the party until Joe Biden drops out.
This is from Thursday, July 4th, just last week.
But we are seeing the revolt, the civil war against Joe Biden.
Now, from this morning, from yesterday morning, several top House Democrats say Biden should step aside during leadership call.
This is what Bhatia Angarsargan calls the anti-Biden coup.
Writing in the opening paragraph, something amazing has happened in the 10 days since Joe Biden and Donald Trump faced off in a presidential debate in Atlanta.
Biden has come in for the kind of coordinated onslaught from the mainstream media and the Democratic power brokers that is usually reserved for Republicans.
Biden's performance allowed the audiences of CNN, MSNBC, The Washington Post, and The New York Times Their first glimpse of something that journalists at those outlets had worked hard to conceal.
That Biden slurs his speech, that his thoughts are erratic, his glassy gaze unfocused, his memory deeply flawed.
unidentified
Hey, it's Kimberly Fletcher here from Moms4America with some very exciting news.
Tucker Carlson is going on a nationwide tour this fall, and Moms4America has the exclusive VIP meet-and-greet experience for you.
Before each show, you can have the opportunity to meet Tucker Carlson in person.
These tickets are fully tax-deductible donations, so go to momsforamerica.us and get one of our very limited VIP meet-and-greet experiences with Tucker at any of the 15 cities on his first ever Coast to Coast tour.
Not only will you be supporting Moms for America in our mission to empower moms, promote liberty, and raise patriots, your tax-deductible donation secures you a full VIP experience with priority entrance and check-in, premium gold seating in the first five rows, access to a pre-show cocktail reception, an individual meet-and-greet, and photo with America's most famous conservative and our friend, Tucker Carlson.
Visit Moms4America.us today for more information and to secure your exclusive VIP meet-and-greet tickets.
Look, man, I am fed up with the Democratic elites and the establishment.
These people are abject evil.
I don't know what to tell you, man.
I don't know what to say.
But these people are evil.
They lie, cheat, and steal every day.
And perhaps that's always been the case.
And perhaps it's only now, because of the internet, as I often say, that we're able to see beyond the veil and understand who the man behind the curtain really is.
What they've been doing this whole time.
We think we know what's true.
We don't know what's true.
The media has always just reported what the establishment machine wants them to report.
It's probably been that way since Kennedy or even earlier.
From Axios, Biden refuses to take cognitive tests, denies he's losing to Trump.
Well, if he's denying that he's losing to Trump, that may be all the cognitive tests you need, because the polls show it plain as day.
The donors are saying it.
But you know what this is?
Joe Biden doesn't care about any of that.
Joe Biden cares about his family.
I can respect that to a certain degree.
And Joe Biden's son, Hunter, doesn't like that he's being convicted of crimes, and he doesn't want his dad to drop out.
Neither does Dr. Jill.
Jill, oh man, she is, she's the first lady.
She doesn't want to give up that power.
She will rip it from whoever she has to, to keep it.
These people are despicable.
They're the worst kind of people.
Joe Biden in his demented state.
And you know, I think it's fair to say demented, right?
And this is important, right?
So there were some news stories where they said, he doesn't have dementia.
He's got age-related cognitive decline.
And I'm like, okay, let me pause you right there.
I understand the difference between age-related cognitive decline and dementia.
Now, if you're saying that he sometimes stumbles over his words and he's a little bit forgetful, that's not dementia.
That's just age-related cognitive decline.
But when he confuses the names of countries and wanders the wrong way off stage, he is showing signs of dementia.
Now, some are speculating maybe he has Parkinson's because a Parkinson's specialist met with the White House doctor or something like that.
I don't know.
I think we know that he's suffering from something upstairs.
I think he may have a moderate, a slight form of dementia when he's on stage.
Donald Trump walks on stage for the debate.
He walks off stage, right?
Joe Biden, at various instances over the past few years, has walked the wrong direction.
There was one where he's on stage and he turns around looking at the screen, the backdrop, and starts talking to it.
That is not age-related mental decline.
That is, Joe Biden doesn't know where he is.
When you see his hands outstretched in front of him with his fingers grasped like this, that is a sign of dementia.
When you see the angry outbursts, these are symptoms typically associated with Alzheimer's and dementia.
And it's sad, really.
The rage, I'll tell you where it comes from.
Read about it, Google it.
They say that The simplest way it's been explained to me by an expert in the field.
You know that feeling you get when something's on the tip of your tongue?
And you're like, I can't think of it.
It's frustrating.
You're like, what's that?
What was that band?
Oh, I can remember the song.
I can't remember the name.
And you're like, how do I search for this?
It's a little frustrating.
Imagine if that was every sentence, every time you tried to speak.
You knew you have something to say, but you can't grasp it.
It gets so frustrating.
You get angry.
And that's what we see with Joe Biden.
When he yells at that union worker a couple of years ago, I don't work for you!
Remember when that reporter was asking him a question and he just started snapping, repeating the same thing over and over again?
A lot of people say that's indicative of dementia.
He's forgetting.
He's getting angry.
His brain's not working.
It could be Alzheimer's.
It could be dementia.
Age-related cognitive decline would be like him going, ah, you know what, what was the name?
I can't remember that.
That's not what he's doing.
When he's wandering offstage with his hands, the worrying thing to me is when his fingers are twisted.
Look at his hands when he's doing the cornholio and walking.
You can see his muscles are contracted in his hands in a strange way.
Axios says President Biden flatly ruled out taking a cognitive test or submitting to an independent medical examination to determine if he has any neurological conditions, insisting he has had the energy and ability to run for president and defeat Trump.
In an interview with ABC News' George Stephanopoulos, the president avoided the verbal flubs and unfinished sentences that defined his disastrous debate performance last week.
Really?
Or maybe it's an edited interview.
However, more importantly, As many on the right have explained it.
They've said, it's actually, it was a really great interview.
Joe Biden didn't do anything to the point where they could justify removing him in this interview, but he certainly didn't do anything to calm people down.
So he does an interview, people are still concerned over his mental state, but it wasn't such a disastrous interview where they could pull him out immediately.
If he did this interview, and it was as bad or worse than the debate, he's gone off the ticket.
But it was okay.
So everyone's like, okay, he's still tired, making excuses, but he didn't lose it.
The funny thing is, in this interview, Biden's like, you know, I was traveling around the world, and you know, they advised me not to do it.
And then Stephanopoulos is like, he's like, you had six whole days of rest before this debate.
And you start to believe, oh man, if they keep Joe Biden on the ticket, we can't lose.
And then what happens?
Then come November, Trump supporters are like, we couldn't possibly lose against this guy, and then they do.
Because there's going to be a shadow campaign, just like there was in 2020.
What does that mean?
I don't know.
Ask Time Magazine.
I don't know what they mean by shadow campaign.
Let me pull that one up.
Because they love to claim there's no conspiracy or whatever.
I don't know, man.
Is Time Magazine conspiracy theory?
The secret history of the shadow campaign that saved the 2020 election, which they refer to as a conspiracy behind the scenes.
Is that American democracy?
the protests, according to the residents of from CEOs to help stop Donald Trump. Time magazine says
there was a conspiracy to stop Donald Trump, and they call it a shadow campaign. Is that American
democracy? These people are gloating that they have burned our institutions to the ground.
You know, I look over at France and Marine Le Pen's party is the largest party in in the country
now, winning every single district except for Paris. But because of a coalition from the left,
they are not the majority power.
Well, that's Parliament.
Parliament is not the same as win or take all elections.
The way it works in France, and actually I should say this, the way parliamentary systems tend to work, I don't know about France specifically, is that If you have an election in your area, and you have, let's say that there are 10 representatives that are going to be sent from certain districts.
If your party gets 60% of the vote and the other party gets 40, six of those people will be your party, four will be the other.
They don't do winner-take-all.
They actually say, okay, here's how many seats we're going to give your party based on how much percentage of vote you got.
And I suppose that makes a lot of sense.
It does.
The problem is, You end up in situations with France where if a corrupt party brings in more and more people who oppose the interests of the country, it's impossible to win.
Now, that's true too for the U.S., but the Founding Fathers knew we needed protection for minority groups in this country, which is why we have the Electoral College.
The Democrats are outraged.
They don't like the idea that the minority party actually gets a chance to rule, but that was the intention.
Two wolves and a lamb deciding on what's for lunch.
The Republic is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
That's America.
The electoral college system ensures that sometimes the minority party has the opportunity to defend itself.
Hey guys, Josh Hammer here, the host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer, a podcast for the First Podcast Network.
Look, there are a lot of shows out there that are explaining the political news cycle, what's happening on the Hill, the this, the that.
There are no other shows that are cutting straight to the point when it comes to the unprecedented lawfare debilitating That statement is basically telling the left to take action.
No.
I'll tell you what I want to see.
All of that every single day right here on America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
Subscribe and download your episodes wherever you get your podcasts.
That statement is basically telling the left to take action.
Now, I'll tell you what I wanna see.
I wanna see as stable as an election as we could possibly have.
I personally would like to see Donald Trump defeat Joe Biden.
There are other people who I think would do a better job than Donald Trump, but Donald Trump is the best we have right now, and I give him a lot of credit for his work in foreign policy and the economy in the United States during his first term, though he's far from perfect.
I think it's very silly that you get many people, especially libertarians, saying things like, we need a president who will do this, that, or otherwise.
And it's like, guys, you'll never get a perfect president.
You go for who can get you the net positives you want to see.
And while there are going to be a lot of people that say, Tim, you're wrong.
Trump was a net negative.
Many libertarians.
I look to foreign policy and domestic economics.
I look to areas where the president has real control, which is foreign policy and diplomacy.
And I say, Trump did a lot of bad things.
But overwhelmingly, it was a net positive.
So I'll take it.
The issue right now is that we are dealing with...
Let's just call it the shadow campaign of the 2024 election.
You've got House Democrats in huge news fighting the GOP plan to require proof of citizenship to vote?
How is that in any way shocking?
Take a look at this.
Axios reporting, House Democratic leadership bringing out the big guns against a Republican bill set to be voted on next week that would require proof of U.S.
citizenship to vote in federal elections, Axios has learned.
I just want to pause real quick and ask, why would Democrats fight this?
There's no logical reason.
I'll give you the excuses.
They'll probably go, oh, it's a citizenship thing, it's an ID requirement, and poor people in this country can't get IDs.
Don't know, don't care.
I don't care.
You don't get an ID, don't vote.
That's just absolutely insane.
Democrats rejecting this, of course, is a lot of people believing they're going to make attempts to get non-citizens to vote.
And then they'll win, and they'll say, oh look, the polling was wrong!
Biden right now claiming the polling underestimated him in 2020, and it's underestimating him again, which is factually not true.
It overestimated him in 2020 and 2022, and I cite CNN as my source.
But to the main story here at hand, Heritage Foundation head referring to the Second American Revolution, Project 2025.
What is this?
Why are Democrats freaking out?
I think Project 2025 is interesting.
It does outline a series of things that Trump has expressed he wants to do.
But I love how the Biden camp is going hardcore on this 2025 thing, which, it's a non-profit.
You know, I'm hanging out with family over the holidays.
And I hear, you know, Project 2025 and here's what they're going to do.
And I'm like, but what does that have to do with Trump?
That's just the Heritage Foundation.
That's like me coming out and being like, did you hear about Planned Parenthood's plan for Joe Biden's next term?
Yeah, I'm sure they have plans and considerations.
They're lobbying all of that stuff.
So what?
They're saying a lot of these people in Project 2025 are associated with Trump's inner circle and things like that.
Yeah, sure.
The same is true for Biden and every other nonprofit.
Okay then.
That's why they're attacking Project 2025 and saying this is the Trump policy blop.
No.
It's what the Heritage Foundation wants Trump to do.
And Trump may do some of it or none of it, but they're acting like this is Trump's plan.
And that's the distinction.
That being said, I don't know that we overwhelmingly disagree with Project 2025 anyway.
Why do Democrats?
Well, let's read the story.
And I'll stress this too.
When I heard that Kevin Roberts said, bloodless if the left allows it to be.
You need to understand what he's saying with that.
Okay?
What he's saying is, and I think what he truly means, if the left doesn't go insane and burn this country to the ground, we are going to win and have this dramatic change.
But you need to understand what you are saying to them, not what you are trying to say.
We had a guest on TimCast IRL who said something, I can't repeat, and he was basically saying, you know, if you're on the left and you really do think Trump is Hitler, well, you know, and I'm like, no, no, no, no, no, listen.
You do not live in a vacuum.
You are not just speaking to the people of your worldview.
Understand what this means when you say Second American Revolution.
Bloodless, if the left allows it to be.
If a leftist said that, if Antifa stood up on a milk crate and yelled to Antifa, they are engaging in a second American revolution only if we allow it.
That's a rallying cry to the far left to take violent action, and I think you can't say stuff like that.
What we want to happen is, we need Republican lawyers, we need Libertarian lawyers, we need lawsuits and challenges on unconstitutional actions to counter the shadow campaign.
We win with the ballots, Trump gets elected, you get a Republican Congress, and then we do things like secure the border and better trade agreements.
You know, these Democrats are saying, like, Trump's gonna be a dictator!
He wants to be one!
He's claiming he's gonna- No, he's not claiming he's gonna be one.
I just can't stand it.
I'm watching the news and they're like, Trump says he wants to be a dictator on day one.
On Fox News with Brett Baier.
Brett, see, that's not true!
That's not true at all!
If someone said to me, yeah, well Trump says he wants to be a dictator on day one, I'm like, to drill oil?
Is that what you're referring to?
No, well he said, yeah, he said he wanted to be a dictator so he could drill oil.
I mean, come on.
It's a turn of phrase.
He's being somewhat facetious.
He's saying he's gonna go in and he's going to bring back Keystone.
He's not talking about rounding people up.
It's lies, okay?
But it's the lies they use to rally their base and it's unchallenged.
What we want, and what we're gonna get, I'll tell you what we're gonna get.
Ladies and gentlemen, if you vote for Donald Trump, the overwhelming likelihood of what you will get...
It's not going to be Project 2025.
Trump will fire some people.
He'll hire some bad people.
There will be some questionable foreign policy.
The economy will generally improve.
Our border security will generally improve.
There will be some degree of deportation.
It will not be this mass militarized campaign or whatever.
Trump will probably not have any strong prosecutions against the far left or Democrats.
You are going to be grumbling half the time And you're going to be saying, well, I guess that's alright.
Your costs are going to go down.
And you're going to say, I appreciate the peace attempts in Ukraine.
That's about it.
What can I say of Trump's first term?
He hired bad people.
He got rid of TPP.
USMCA is pretty good.
Brought manufacturing back to certain states.
Got reinvestment from these big corporations.
It's good.
No new wars.
I like it.
Withdraw time frame for our troops in the Middle East.
Very good.
And he hired people like Bolton.
He commando raids in Yemen at the behest of Saudi Arabia.
Missile strikes on Syria being praised by the corporate press.
Trump hired some bad people.
We all grumble about it.
But it overwhelmed me, you know, overall.
You know, it's like a 55-60% positive.
A lot of bad things, a little bit more good.
And for the first time in my life, I felt like I wasn't voting for the lesser of two evils.
I felt like I was voting for, let's just be honest, what's the appropriate way to say this for a family friend?
We're trying to be family friendly talking about the news.
A crude man.
Certainly a crude man.
He's funny.
He's funny.
But lacking a bit in the decorum.
But overall, you know, net positive.
So I dig it.
I don't care about the mean tweets.
They're funny.
Grow up.
There's this really great restaurant nearby.
It's a crab shack.
And they have a sign on the wall saying, please let us know if anything here offends you.
We could all use a good laugh.
And I'm like, come on, that's exactly what I'm talking about.
That's the attitude we need.
Grow up.
If somebody wants to wave a Biden flag, I don't care.
If somebody wants to wave a Trump flag, I'm not going to cry about it.
If City Hall wants to fly a pride flag, I'm going to say, I'm not a fan of religious symbols in public institutions.
You want to do a rotation in the corner for various religions, fine.
But don't fly a flag for your religion on my City Hall.
Don't do that.
But let's read the story from the New York Times, and then we'll talk about where we're currently at.
Joe Biden has sent a letter to Democrats saying he will not back down.
That's big news.
But considering where we're going in this election, and how Democrats want non-citizens to vote, Second American Revolution sounds pretty worrying.
The New York Times reported last week the president of the Heritage Foundation, a right-wing think tank that has developed a prominent series of policy plans to overhaul the federal government under a Republican president, said on Tuesday that the country was in the process of the Second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.
The group's president, Kevin D. Roberts, made the comments in an interview on The War Room With Bannon.
On Bannon's show, Mr. Bannon himself did not host the show because he was in prison.
Mr. Roberts was discussing the Supreme Court's ruling on Monday that presidents have substantial immunity from prosecution for what they do in office.
Quote, we ought to be really encouraged by what happened yesterday.
And in spite of all the injustice, which of course friends and audience of the show, of our friend Steve know, we are going to prevail, Ms.
Roberts said, he wanted to say that the radical left was apoplectic because our side is winning.
And so I come full circle in this response and just want to encourage you with some substance that we are in the process of the second American revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.
You see how he says that?
Right on, thank you brother, the interviewer, former rep, David Braddiver Jr.
replied.
If the left allows it to be, you need to understand how Antifa will interpret that.
He's saying, we will calmly walk into government, take everything from you, if you let us do it.
This is I understand what he's saying to everyone who's paying attention.
So long as the left doesn't go crazy, this will be a standard political process.
But what he's saying to the left is, gear up, baby!
Don't... I'm not a fan of that.
And I know people who talk that way and I'm like, guys.
Stop.
And what the left tries to do...
Is they try to argue that I'm advocating.
I advocate for Civil War.
It's kind of wild.
Because I'm probably like the staunchest anti-Civil War individual.
And that's the lie they push.
They are evil people.
It's crazy to me.
Dude, when I was younger, I didn't really believe in evil.
I really didn't.
I thought we had competing interests and everyone was trying to just get by.
That's not true, man.
I have encountered such evil in these past several years.
It is unimaginable.
No question.
But this is where we're currently at.
The left is gearing up to be as insane as possible.
They are apoplectic.
We should not be using language that tells them, basically, it's war.
What we want, as I mentioned, is as stable an election as we can have.
Mr. Roberts' remarks were publicized by the liberal media watchdog group Media Matters, which basically means garbled nonsense garbage.
I want to mention this.
Why is Steve Bannon in jail?
And Merrick Garland is not in jail.
I don't understand how there could be any sane person who can listen to a segment like this, or pay attention to the news, and they don't question this.
We had a guy on Tim Cast IRL, we argued.
He said, yeah, well, Ben's tied to mobsters, so he deserves it.
I'm like, so you're an authoritarian.
You're a fascist.
The idea that the government can simply say, we know you're a criminal, so we'll use any law we can to arrest you.
Yeah, that's authoritarianism.
That's not good.
That's where we are.
Merrick Garland defied a congressional subpoena, refused to turn over evidence on Joe Biden's conversation with a special prosecutor as to why he will not be prosecuted for crimes we know he committed.
Merrick Garland was referred for criminal prosecution, the DOJ refused, and now they're pushing inherent contempt.
But of course, we had the holiday over the weekend, so we'll see where we're at in just a little bit.
We'll go over that in the next segment, probably.
But ask yourself why Bannon goes to prison, why Navarro goes to prison.
Because it... I don't know if Second American Revolution is the right way to describe it.
We're in a civil war.
Some kind of civil war.
Cold civil war, or just civil strife, perhaps.
Cold civil war is probably better.
But you know what I've said to everybody, because these leftists try to put clips of me and they lie, I'm like, when we have people come on this show, on Tim Castellaw, I should say, and they're advocating for national divorce, I'm saying, NO!
That's what the communists want!
They want the country to break apart, they want to seize control of institutions, and they want you to encourage it!
If this country fractures in a national divorce, it will be torn to shreds.
China will come in.
Iran will come in.
Russia will come in.
Varying interests, allying with various factions, and you will get international conflict.
A civil war in the United States begets World War III internationally.
Can't handle that.
Don't want that.
I want to be able to sit down in my $600 reclining massage chair.
Believe it or not, yeah, they're actually not that expensive.
I want to sit in my massage chair, put on the World Series of Poker, order some chicken wings, and dip them in ranch dressing.
Doesn't that sound fun?
But we are only able to have such comforts and luxuries for two big reasons.
First, the men and women in uniform who are holding up the country.
Don't get me wrong, the political establishment abuses these people every day.
I don't agree with the foreign policy plans of most of these individuals, but it is true.
It is the men and women in uniform who make our luxury possible with the petrodollar and our military base overseas, whether you like it or not, that's true.
And I respect the people who have decided to serve this country tremendously.
Next up is those on the front lines of the domestic policy disputes.
These are the individuals like you who are paying attention to what's going on, to know how to vote, when to rally, how to get people to sign up, register to vote.
We are secondary.
To the people who actually support and sustain this nation.
But it is the core of the informed population that protects all of the stupidest people, and I mean no disrespect, and then the laziest people, and the smart people who don't want to be involved because they're scared or, I don't know, interested in other things, that's fine.
But it is the informed political citizenry that make it possible for us to sit around dipping our chicken wings in ranch dressing and watching sports.
Doesn't that sound nice?
Relaxing?
At the end of the day, that's all you could ask for, right?
That means we gotta do the work.
That means we gotta pay attention to what's going on.
That means we gotta tell our friends and family they have to go and vote.
From the AP, Biden assails Project 2025, a plan to transform government, and Trump's claim to be unaware of it.
Trump says, I know nothing about Project 2025.
I have no idea who's behind it.
I disagree with some of the things they're saying, and some of the things they're saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal.
Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them.
This is the weirdest thing about Democrats, about the left, the establishment.
Tucker Carlson is speaking in, where was he?
Australia.
And a journalist asks, you've said that white people are being replaced.
And he goes, did I say white people?
I don't think I've said that.
I challenge you to quote me on that because I've not said that.
And she goes, well, it's been reported you have.
I was like, I never said it.
And he said the interests of black Americans are just as important as the interests of white Americans.
And there are black families in America whose families have been here for 400 years.
I don't believe that.
I reject that.
They matter just as much as white Americans. And he said, I said, native born Americans are being
replaced. And the journalist goes, No, you didn't. You're lying. You think white people hold on.
Here is the man standing in front of you telling you outright. I don't believe that. I reject that.
They think there's some secret plot behind the scenes where Tucker's like, I better espouse
views I don't agree with to rally people to some what? What is this ridiculous world?
These people live in where anyone is going to rally for? Ah.
Ah, now I understand.
It's the world they live in.
Democrats go on stage every day and advocate for things they don't actually want, so they assume everyone else does the same.
So when Tucker Carlson says, I don't think white people are being replaced, I think Americans are being replaced, they go, no, you mean white people.
I think the appropriate response is, do you think it's white people?
You projecting here?
Because the idea that I would espouse a belief I don't actually hold, but you think I would, says a lot about your character and less about mine.
This is the strangest thing, but I think I understand it.
The capacity of Democrats to advocate for things they don't actually want, they project that onto Republicans and then tell everyone just that.
When they commit crimes, they say Trump committed the crimes.
When Joe Biden engaged in a quid pro quo with the President of Ukraine, they said Trump engaged in a quid pro quo!
Well, at the very least, you both did, but Joe Biden did for sure, right?
Now, there's that big debate over Donald Trump and the call to Ukraine, and I put it this way.
The left says Donald Trump was trying to dig up dirt on a political opponent.
And I'm kind of like, why would he need Ukraine to do that?
Why wouldn't he just instruct his political assets, like his American domestic assets, his private... He did this hush-hush deal with Cohen to cover up Stormy Daniels, but then he gets on an official phone call to dig up... Are you kidding me?
Come on, man!
And then Joe Biden says, if you don't fire the prosecutor, you're not getting a billion dollars.
He publicly admitted that.
And the prosecutor was investigating Burisma, where his son worked.
At the very least, we call that a conflict of interest.
Fact.
Biden engaged in conflict of interest.
You can argue that you don't think he was doing it to protect his son.
I don't care.
That's fine.
Conflict of interest.
Fact.
Donald Trump called the president of Ukraine, had a conversation.
He said he wanted to know what that whole thing was about.
Joe Biden's quid pro quo!
Trump was like, what was that quid pro quo thing?
Trump did a quid pro quo!
Trump did it!
Trump was investigating your quid pro quo.
You see the game they play.
Well, Trump's denying it.
Here we go.
Newsweek says Project 2025 ties cannot be denied by Trump, says Democrats.
I don't care about any of that.
It's just a weird thing they're latching onto.
I'll tell you what I care about.
House Democrats have rallied and are calling for Joe Biden to step down.
Joe Biden wrote a letter to the Democrats saying he won't drop out.
And we're all sitting here saying, how are they going to win?
Uh, how about this?
Let's not use it.
Let's jump to, uh, do we have Fox News?
House Democrats launch united effort against election bill requiring voters prove citizenship.
Democrats are urged to vote no on HRH281.
Recently in France, Marine Le Pen's party won, the largest party in France.
However, the left formed a coalition and together they have more seats in French Parliament, meaning the actual French nationalists will not have the ability to control their own country.
Democrats want non-citizens to vote because then your country is gone.
They can open the door and say, you want to come to America?
We're going to let you vote.
You got to vote for us.
They go, deal.
The Republicans are going to say, no, we want to kick you out.
And they're going to say, we'll just vote for Democrats.
You can't vote.
You're not a citizen.
Democrats made sure you ain't going to check.
Once that happens, the United States is gone.
It's gone.
It'll be some passive idea.
Passive idea.
Well, my friends, I don't think it's fair to say it's the Second American Revolution.
I think it's more fair to say we are in civil strife.
Best way to describe it?
You can call it a cold civil war.
Civil strife is the official definition of the period that we're in according to academics on the left and the right, as well as journalists, historians, etc.
It's a period of turmoil and struggle that doesn't always result in civil war.
It is entirely possible things remain calm.
It's entirely possible that we don't get civil war for 40 years.
There was talk of civil war in the 1820s because of slavery.
Nothing happened.
It bubbled up into 1861 when there was already a period of seven years of blood and violence in bleeding Kansas.
So they called it.
Then civil war happened.
We are in civil strife, but for all we know, You might get Trump to finish out his term.
The country continues to polarize.
It could be 10 years before everything actually breaks down.
But I'll warn you of this.
Recent news that Saudi Arabia has dumped the petrodollar deal after 50 years.
Russia and Iran will no longer use dollars.
The petrodollar is dying.
Prices are going to spike dramatically.
And when people get hungry, things break down.
I'll leave it there.
Next segment's coming up at 4 p.m.
on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
Last week, news broke that Missouri AG Andrew Bailey would be suing New York, filing to the Supreme Court under what's called Original Jurisdiction, claiming that they're interfering in the election by going after Donald Trump in the way that they are.
We now have an update from last night.
Attorney General Andrew Bailey has announced he will be suing Joe Biden's corrupt Department of Justice for stonewalling his demand for transparency and accountability into the illicit prosecutions of President Trump.
He has a thread here that I will get for you in just a minute, but this is absolutely amazing news, and I applaud Missouri's AG Andrew Bailey.
I keep saying, where are the state-level guys to file these claims, to file charges, to investigate?
Now, one thing many people have said to me is, Tim, we do not want tit-for-tat.
Is that really how we want to govern?
We don't want to do that.
Matt Gaetz said it.
We had him on SimCast IRL, and I said, where is this happening?
Is that really what we want?
We want state-level guys to be just filing?
No, no, no, no, no, no.
We want accountability.
We want justice.
And that's what AG Andrew Bailey is working towards.
This is not.
These are not lawsuits that are seeking to target Joe Biden over Burisma or other political dealings.
They're specifically in reference to the actions being taken against President Donald Trump.
I do think it's funny that the media always calls him former President Trump.
It's like, you retain the title afterwards.
He's a former president, but we call him President Trump.
Soon to be, hopefully.
But this is Andrew Bailey saying, I want to know what they're doing with these prosecutions.
I want communications.
I want the evidence.
They're stonewalling him.
They're blocking him from doing so.
Now some people have said, when this news broke last week about the New York lawsuit, they said, so what?
The Supreme Court's term is over.
Now they're not going to be able to hear it.
He should have filed it earlier so they could have taken it up.
Well, Andrew Bailey had responded to that.
This was filed on the emergency docket, and as it is a lawsuit under originals jurisdiction, state v. state, the Supreme Court will likely pick this up relatively soon.
So this could be huge.
Now, I do want to get into the corruption of the DOJ and Andrew Bailey's threat about his lawsuit.
But first, let's briefly go over his lawsuit against New York, which happened... This was news from last week.
Just to give you an update of where we're at, and then we'll break down where he's currently going after the DOJ and why.
Fox News reports... Oh, and they're always doing this.
Don't block me from this, Fox News.
Let's see if we can get Fox News to respect news.
I'll have to pull up something else.
We'll come back to this later, but you get the title.
I'll give you the quick gist.
Fox News will load the article and then a little while later delete it and be like, nope, you gotta give us your email.
Missouri AG sues New York over reprehensible lawfare against Trump, poisonous to American democracy.
Now you've got a whole bunch of outlets arguing that he can't actually do it, there's problems there.
Well, we'll see.
In the meantime, we'll pull up a different news source, which can give you the rundown on this, and I'll stop trying to pull up Fox News, because they always do this, you know, So we have NewsNation, I believe.
Looks like NewsNation will allow us to actually show you guys the context.
Reporting...
Here we go.
Missouri's Attorney General is alleging the state of New York violated the First Amendment rights of Missouri residents... Oh, come on.
Stop blocking us.
Everybody's always trying to play games.
...of Missouri residents by imposing a gag order on former President Trump during his hush money trial.
Andrew Bailey filed a lawsuit Wednesday saying New York's illicit prosecution, gag order, and sentencing of Trump undermine the former president's ability to campaign for president.
In addition, the lawsuit says that New York's overt meddling sabotages Missourians' ability to hear from and cast a fully informed vote for president.
100% right.
100% right.
Donald Trump's the frontrunner.
He's in court.
They're saying he can't say certain things.
He's been gagged.
Now hold on.
The people of this country want to know what the frontrunner has to say about these criminal charges.
We want to know what he's thinking, why they're happening.
New York, a single state, trying to shut him down so no one else can hear.
Supreme Court's gotta act.
Right now, Missouri has a huge problem with New York, Bailey said in a statement.
Instead of letting presidential candidates campaign on their own merits, radical progressives in New York are trying to rig the 2024 election by waging a direct attack on our democratic process.
Bailey also accused Soros-backed prosecutors of holding Missouri voters hostage in the election.
I completely agree.
Now, the funny thing is, I wonder how many Democrat voters in Missouri are saying, no, it's fine that we don't get to hear what Trump has to say.
Sure.
Here's his latest thread.
He says, I'm filing suit against Joe Biden's corrupt Department of Justice for stonewalling my demand for transparency and accountability into the illicit prosecutions of President Trump.
He says, after evidence came to light, the DOJ is the breeding ground of all the unconstitutional lawfare aimed at President Trump.
I demanded all communications between the DOJ and Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, New York AG Letitia James, and Fulton County DA Fannie Willis, but they refused to comply.
Missourians and all Americans deserve to know to what extent the prosecutions of a prominent
presidential candidate are being coordinated by the federal government, which is currently run
by President Trump's principal political opponent. Biden's DOJ owes it to the American people to
produce the documents we have demanded, so we're taking action. He says more on our investigation
here. In this post from the AG's website, today, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey demanded
the Biden Department of Justice turn over any communications relating to the investigation
or prosecutions of President Trump.
Thanks to the evidence that has come to light, my office has reason to believe Biden's corrupt Department of Justice is the headquarters of the illicit prosecutions.
In the latest request for documents, Attorney General Bailey noted He says former?
You shouldn't say that.
He's President Trump.
He says have been conducted in coordination with the U.S.
DOJ.
This is demonstrated only in part by the move of the third-highest-ranking member of the DOJ, Matthew Colangelo, to the Manhattan DA's office in order to prosecute former President Trump in the so-called hush money trial in December 2022.
In addition, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg worked alongside New York Attorney General Letitia James in pursuing civil litigation against former President Trump, using that experience as a springboard from which to campaign for his current position.
During that campaign, Bragg promised if elected, he would go after Trump once he won the election.
He pledged to personally focus on the high-profile probe into President Donald Trump's business practices.
Given the timing, Bragg charged Trump only after Trump declared his candidacy for president, the transparent weakness of the charges, and the effect of the charges having in keeping Trump off the campaign trail, there is substantial reason to suspect the Biden administration has coordinated with Bragg and others to bring prosecutions against Trump.
In order to protect the rights of all Missouri voters who plan to participate in the 2024 presidential election, the state of Missouri has the right to know to what extent the prosecutions of a prominent presidential candidate are being coordinated by the federal government, which is currently run by President Trump's principal political opponent.
The request for documents can be read here.
Well, of course, they didn't turn it over.
Right now, Republicans in Congress... Let's see if we can get any updates on this one, actually.
Republicans in Congress demanded that Merrick Garland turn over the communications between Biden and Robert Herr, a special prosecutor, communications where a transcript has been released, but we want to hear because we're wondering if there's anything said that they didn't transcribe.
Biden has classified documents, same as Trump.
Illegal.
No charges against Biden.
Why?
He's a doddering old man with a bad memory, so we wouldn't be able to get him.
Okay, we want those communications, right?
Well, Merrick Garland refused to turn them over.
He was held in contempt, referred for criminal prosecution, and the DOJ is refusing to take action.
Steve Bannon, for the same reason, is in jail.
So, I haven't checked the latest on the Inherent Contempt Ruling because it was the weekend.
I don't think we have any updates yet as to what's going to happen.
But Congress, this is... Who's filing this?
Ah man, it's been a long weekend.
Ana Paulina Luna filing for Inherent Contempt.
We'll see where we go with it.
But this would mean the Sergeant-at-Arms of Congress would be arresting Merrick Garland.
Heck of a way for things to go.
The lawsuits have already begun.
I was having a conversation with family about this.
Actually, you know, usually conversations over the poker table.
This past weekend, while I was visiting family, I had to check out the World Series of Poker.
Had a great time.
Did not play in it, but I did play the 5-10 game in the World Series of Poker King's Lounge, which was pretty fun.
Nice chairs, nice tables.
Expensive game.
Won, as I often win at poker.
You know it.
And I had a good time.
I had a good time.
I talked to some of the people there.
They were familiar with the show.
They'd asked me about, you know, who's going to be president.
I said, I didn't know.
I don't know what's going to happen.
What I can tell you is the lawsuits have begun.
Missouri is suing New York for election interference.
The Supreme Court's already ruled that Trump has immunity.
When it comes to official duties, presumptive official duties, constitutional duties, and presumptive immunity as it pertains to official acts.
No immunity for unofficial acts.
They did not answer as to whether or not what Trump did on January 6 was official.
Lower courts have to decide first.
Missouri suing New York.
The Supreme Court may now actually intervene and say, this case did cite actions Trump took in his official capacity.
Can't do that, so their answer may be, we hereby decide.
And that New York is interfering in a federal election.
But there's a challenge there.
A challenge for all the justices.
States are allowed to bring criminal charges against people they think commit crimes.
So we have a constitutional crisis on our hands.
New York will argue, just because you're running for president doesn't mean you can't be prosecuted.
Then what?
Well, the Supreme Court could say, yes, but you did cite its official duties, so this is out.
Maybe.
The lawsuits have already started, and that's what matters most.
Come November, There will be some kind of election.
I think we're going to have lawsuits piling up in the coming months.
We are less than four months away, ladies and gentlemen.
Four more months.
The lawsuits will be piling up.
We are going to get states suing states.
We are going to get Republican legislatures suing their own states, suing their governors.
What will happen in Congress?
Will the Republican members of Congress Will they be able to actually push back?
It's a thin majority.
Very thin.
I don't think so.
What happens if, with all these predictions, all the predictions are based on the results coming in clean?
Wisconsin.
The results come in.
The state legislature contests the results, saying, these counties acted outside of the accordance of our laws, and so we will not, as the constitutional bearers, the state legislatures decide how the elections are run.
We reject this.
The governor says, nope, it's fine, I'm going to certify.
The state says, no, you can't.
They send up dual electors.
The state legislature sends their electors.
The governor sends his electors.
The governor says, I'm the one who certifies them.
The state legislature says, Constitution says, we're in charge.
Lawsuits get filed in the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court now has to answer.
I think it's simple.
Supreme Court has to side with the Constitution.
Legislature has the final say.
It's only recently we decided the governors get to certify anyway.
The legislature decides.
What happens if the Supreme Court says, not interested?
And so when it comes to Congress, they go, Which ones do we count?
Democrats say, count the Democrat ones.
Republicans say, count the Republican ones.
And Congress just goes, we're counting none of them.
What happens if neither candidate makes it to 270?
A contingent election.
Delegations then vote for Trump.
The lawsuits are beginning.
So people ask me, Tim, who's going to be president next year?
I don't know.
I think there's a strong possibility the states will dispute themselves.
These key swing states, where you have mixed government, Democrat in some area, Republican in some area, they're going to be fighting each other.
Because they're the key holders this time.
Republicans need to stop being whiny babies.
That's the problem.
Democrats are going to demand, we don't care what the rules are, we are putting these electors through and we'll arrest anybody who dares challenge us.
Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
It's happening, everybody.
We are on track for the meme news cycle.
It's gonna happen.
Okay, we gotta go slow here because I'm very excited.
Y'all know that Joe Biden on D-Day had that weird squat thing that happened, right?
Well, we don't know exactly if he pooped his pants or not, right?
But...
As an 81-year-old man with a high probability of suffering from fecal incontinence, it is possible that the man has had some accidents.
It has been rumored and suggested on numerous occasions that Joe Biden has, let's just call it, made a boom boom on accident.
I don't mean to be mean to him for being old, but I think it's a real possibility this man is, you know, he's suffering from this age-related decline, which sometimes involves accidents.
Now, in this video, Biden is squatting down a couple times, and when I wake up in the morning, I see this video, and I'm immediately thinking, like, he's crapping his pants.
Now, everybody said, no, no, he didn't.
You've got people on the right being like, he was trying to put papers on the ground or something, and I'm like, sure, whatever.
He was trying to sit down in the chair behind him.
I'm like, okay, hold on, hold on.
Maybe, maybe to all of it, maybe to all of it.
Some have said, Tim, who cares about this issue?
No, no, no, hold on.
There is more evidence that Joe Biden defecated in his own pants than there is evidence that the Hunter Biden laptop is part of a Russian disinformation scheme.
Let that one simmer for a little bit.
That's my point.
It may be 6% chance that Biden made a boom boom, OK?
But they come out, 51 intelligence agents, oh, the Biden laptop is a Russian disinformation scheme, blah, blah, blah.
There's no evidence.
None.
None.
We got a video of Biden doing this weird squat thing.
Now, okay, putting papers on the ground.
You're saying the old man couldn't put papers on the ground?
That's bad, too.
I'll take it.
He was trying to sit down, but he couldn't.
I'll take that one, too.
He forgot he was supposed to be standing for the ceremony with everybody else.
I'll take it.
Shortly after, he does sit down.
Yeah, I don't care.
My point is, this was a weird video, and there's probabilities of various things that have happened.
Now, what's the meme?
What's the meme news cycle?
The meme news cycle is when You know, let's just, we'll go light with it.
They will say, such a thing never happened.
You'll say Joe Biden slurred.
Joe Biden never slurred, the media will deny it!
Then they'll get into the, so what, even if he did?
Does it even matter?
Then they're going to get into, you know, if he did, it would be a good thing.
It would be a good thing if he did.
And then later they accept that, of course it happened!
And it was great that it did.
That's the meme news cycle.
They deny it, they downplay it, they say it would be a good thing, and then they accept it.
Ladies and gentlemen, Whoopi Goldberg says she would still vote for Biden even if he poops his pants and can't put a sentence together because she also has poopy days.
Show me he can't do the job, and then I'll say, OK, maybe it's time to go.
Now, he had a bad night the first time that he went out and debated with Kamala Harris.
And everybody wanted him to quit there and say, you can't talk to women like this.
You're doing this wrong.
You're doing that wrong.
He came back, said, you know what, I got it, and gave four years.
So yeah, I have poopy days all the time.
I step in so much poo you can't even imagine.
Now I'm not running the world.
But, I don't know anybody who doesn't step in stuff at some point.
So I'm just simply saying, there are two debates.
And if he can't do what he needs to do for the second debate, I'll join any crew that says get rid of him.
But loyalty to me?
If you are doing the job, I might not like everything you're doing.
I don't like it all, but I'm going to stand behind you like those guys stand behind the guy who should have been the person people were talking about saying, yeah, Biden had a bad day, but this guy couldn't tell the truth if it split his lip.
This story was updated September 2nd to note that Biden checked his watch multiple times at the dignified transfer event, including during the ceremony itself.
The rating on this claim has been changed from partly false to missing context.
And Biden says at the debate, Oh, not a single person died.
Let's pull that fact check up.
Biden says no service members died.
Let's pull that fact check up.
Stunning omission.
That's what Fox News called it.
Oh, this just popped up right now.
Breaking news.
White House to deliver remarks following Biden's letter to Dems refusing to drop reelection bid.
The news article from June 27th.
Biden makes stunning omission while claiming no troops died anywhere in the world on his watch.
13 U.S.
service members were killed by an ISIS-K suicide bomber during the Biden administration's botched Afghanistan withdrawal.
And he lied about it.
And then Whoopi Goldberg goes on TV and she's like, Trump couldn't tell the truth if it split his lip.
What?
I mean, that'd be painful to do, but that's a deterrent for telling the truth.
Hey, like, imagine you told someone, if you tell me what time, you know, how many lights are there?
And if you say it, your lip will split open, like, they wouldn't want to do it.
Like, that's a deterrent.
You gotta say something like, Trump couldn't tell the truth if you offered him a million bucks to do it, right?
That's incentive!
I digress.
They never tell you what Trump lied about.
They just say, he lied every time!
He lied about everything!
It's like, okay, well, what?
Like, an honest question, like, tell me what he lied about.
We fact-checked him on a variety of things.
He said that Joe Biden called black men super-predators.
Fact-check?
False.
Trump is wrong.
I don't know that he's lying, because that story is wrongly attributed to Biden.
It was Hillary Clinton who said it.
Biden did refer, in a different speech, to predators on our streets with something different.
Not super-predators.
So, is that a mistake?
A lie?
You can decide for yourself.
I don't care.
I would say this, Biden was wrong about a lot.
Now, to claim no troops died during your administration, when you were at the ceremony, either shows your brain is jello, it is fried, or you're a liar.
Because you can't be wrong about that.
Trump misremembering facts from 1993, and who said what?
I call that being wrong.
Trump lies about stuff he does, but tell me what in the debate he lied about, Whoopi.
Meanwhile, you're sitting here saying, I don't care if he pooped his pants.
Whoopi Goldberg says that she has poopy days, too.
And that's why it doesn't matter.
I tell you, the next thing coming out is Biden did poop his pants, and so what?
And then they're going to say it was a good thing that he did.
It's actually a good thing.
It shows he's got a working system, that his body is producing waste, and he's alive.
It's a good thing if it's happening.
I'm sure that's the angle they'll take.
But shout out to The View for beginning the process of accepting Biden and his bowel errors.