Sam Nunberg and Tim Pool dissect Virginia's redistricting losses, predicting up to twelve Republican gains if southern states eliminate racially gerrymandered districts. They debate Epstein-Bannon financial ties, UFO disclosures as anti-Christian operations, and transhumanist threats like Neuralink creating a surveillance state. The duo critiques Tucker Carlson's shifting politics, explores genetic modification conspiracies linking Unit 731 to modern super-soldier programs, and theorizes about anti-time dimensions before addressing viewer questions on GTA 6 merchandise and pole shift myths. Ultimately, the episode frames current political and technological shifts as part of a broader, orchestrated effort to erode traditional institutions and redefine human existence. [Automatically generated summary]
The Virginia Supreme Court has struck down their attempt to redistrict as unconstitutional.
And liberals and Democrats are apoplectic.
Jeffries is losing his mind.
Hassan Piker says that the Republicans have just stripped black power from Memphis after Tennessee eliminated the single Democrat district in Memphis.
And the funny thing is, it's represented by a white guy.
And the Republican candidate who keeps losing and is trying to win is a black woman.
But I guess to the left, black power is when a white Jewish guy is in control of your district and the black woman loses.
So I don't think they really know what they're talking about.
But let's just be real.
This is a redistricting war.
Both sides are trying to win.
Both sides want power.
Democrats want power.
Republicans want power.
Republicans are winning this war handily.
Currently up eight seats in the procedural battle, not even related to polling.
Despite the fact that Republicans are still polling better than Democrats, which seems kind of weird, especially for a midterm, the opposition party should be doing way better, and they're not.
Now, what I think is really weird about this is the prediction markets have not priced this in and still are predicting a plurality of the prediction markets.
They're saying, I should say, of the prediction Democrats sweep, which makes no sense at all.
So we'll talk about that.
Plus, they dropped proof that aliens, I'm just kidding, they didn't.
They dropped a bunch of UFO files showing metamaterials, strange images of things in space.
We don't actually know what any of it is.
And this is exactly as people were predicting just the other day.
The coming disclosure would be interesting, but not definitive.
But perhaps the Apollo astronauts were attacked by aliens on the moon.
They've released photographs showing strange things in the sky, which is evidence of very little.
I don't know.
We'll figure it all out.
We'll get into that.
Before we do, my friends, we've got a great shout out for you from our own Timcast members.
We got Inky Blooms.
Go to patreon.com, search for Inky Blooms.
Small American owned creative studio.
Everything created by hand through watercolor and ink illustrations.
The core of the company is built around two monthly mail clubs.
Monthly mail clubs include a postcard print of original artwork.
And extra items like stamps, bookmarks, and other items that can fit in an envelope.
One of these clubs, Little Sprouts, is geared toward children, three and up.
Each month, your kid receives a postcard and a story about the animal on the postcard, teaching kids invaluable lessons without the woke garbage.
You'll also get an activity to do with your kids like iSpy and color.
That's amazing.
I got to get some of this.
Recognizing talent within our community that brings family together is important.
Inky Blooms, a great way to slow down, put away the screens, and appreciate the art with your loved ones.
My wife is going to absolutely love this.
She keeps telling me to put my phone away.
But I have to explain to her, this is my job.
I complain on the internet for a living.
When I'm insulting people on Twitter, it's what pays the bills.
It brings bacon.
Also, don't forget go to Cassbrew.com, get your Mother's Day bundle.
It's a little late now, but you can still get it.
Or you can get all of the other amazing stuff.
We have, of course, Appalachian Nights.
We've got our ground coffee, a variety of flavors.
And you got Focus with Mr. Bocus, two weeks till Christmas.
Check it out at Cassbrew.com, support the work that we do, join the Discord community, smash that like button.
Share the show with everyone.
You know, joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more is Sam Nunberg.
I just want to stress that the Virginia Supreme Court upheld the rights of the people of the state.
Four to three, they ruled that the attempt to vote away, 45% trying to vote away the rights of the other, I'm sorry, 55% trying to vote away the rights of the other 45, is not upholding anybody's rights.
And the Supreme Court of Virginia said, hey, there's a constitutional procedure for amending the Constitution.
This is not it.
So, no.
Struck it down.
And I'm just going to let's throw out the partisanship for a second and just say Democrats are losing on this one in their own state.
Republicans lost in Indiana.
So there's points over here and points over there.
All in all, with the latest map, I think I actually have a map here for you guys.
This is massive.
Currently, let's zoom in on this map our friend Claude made for us.
And we're looking at Republicans have a net gain of eight seats with nine still in flux.
Here's where it gets crazy Maryland has a potential.
But probably too late to enact because the state senate will not bring it to a vote.
New York might try to do a last minute deal.
Indiana probably couldn't get it done.
So these are pending and unlikely.
However, these southern states, I don't know why it's got Georgia listed.
It should not be Georgia.
But Mississippi did shift.
We'll get a correction on this.
But Tennessee, North Carolina already have seen these gains.
So if this resolves, we're looking at a potential plus 12 across the board for Republicans.
And it's just a nuclear bomb for Democrats.
They're claiming that their rights are being framed.
This lady's screaming, Shame for taking away my rights.
Bro, 50% of the state trying to vote away the other 45's rights?
Let's talk about the rationale of the decision, Tim, in Virginia.
And I didn't even know this until that vote.
The reason that Virginia, it was only a 4 3 decision, but the reason that those four justices overturned this was because actual votes were cast by Virginians before the Virginia legislature decided to put the amendment in up for the vote.
In other words, they were disenfranchising their own voters to do it.
And the Tennessee Pearl Clutching is hilarious because Tennessee, not to get like too partisan hacky here, but it's just true, is that Tennessee and Massachusetts have a nearly identical population.
They have about seven and a half million each.
And Massachusetts is nine Democrats, zero Republicans.
And the spread between Democrats and Republicans in Massachusetts is far closer than Tennessee, as in far more people as a proportion of the population voted for the Republicans in Tennessee than Democrats in Massachusetts.
So, again, it's one of those things where it's like, if you're really going to pearl clutch over Tennessee, have a word with Massachusetts first.
All we're doing here is settling scores.
That's all that's happening.
Sorry, Tim makes this point on the show.
We're doing this procedurally.
This is a procedural victory.
This isn't like mind blowing.
This isn't an over, you know, over, you know, we're not ramping up necessarily.
Just playing, we're not playing dirty per se.
No, it's just, again, settling scores is primarily what's happening here.
Well, I would grant that if Massachusetts had a fair map, or at least if they were giving us at least two Republicans, then I'd be like, okay, I could see that argument.
But in this instance, I'm like, no, I'm not settling scores.
I'm leveling the playing field, is what's going on here.
Republicans are finally like, oh, wow, we've been getting swamped for years.
As a state, you're going to have two senators from D.C., you're going to have around 50 million people added to the rolls, all voting Democrat.
So, this is really their last gasp.
Now, thank God, and thanks to Stephen Miller and others, thank God that we have the census also coming in 2030, which we haven't talked about.
So, the long term projection for this republic, we are a republic, not a democracy, for this republic is that Democrats can no longer game the system anymore to have more seats and more representation than they deserve.
I mean, we've all seen the maps on the presidentials, right, everyone?
It would be funny if you get granular with these maps and you can see that all they did was carve out a single cemetery and then it turns into a red district.
I know you have a lot of listeners and followers in Virginia.
You know, it's interesting to me.
Spamberger, as we know, ran against this.
Right?
She said, I'm not going to put this up.
And then she did, obviously, she's a liar.
She did after she was elected.
And I was wondering, was this like with Bush when he only supported McCain Feingold because he told everyone, well, it'll get overturned by the Supreme Court?
So is this part of her long game to at least get the VP ticket and say, look, I did this, but at the end of the day, she actually expected this to be overturned?
Oh, I mean, you know, we can go pie in the sky, super optimistic white pill conspiratorial, and they're trying to ice out woke.
I mean, we saw in some of these primary races, they're trying to get the progressives to lose, they want them out.
And maybe this is all one big plan.
Look, the Republicans are going to win because they want progressives to lose, then come back out and say it's your fault, the wackaloon progressives.
Or more importantly, the shift rightward in a lot of these states will force the Democrats to moderate as a party to try and capture more moderate districts.
Yeah, well, even in the new map, now it's dead in Virginia, they actually spread out like deep blue districts.
And now you had a bunch of sort of maybe lean or like lighter, a lighter shade of blue districts.
And so, to Tim's point, I mean, They would have had to run guys that could tack a little bit more to the right when necessary if they end up in a knife fight if the GOP threw up a good candidate.
So, yes, Virginia clawed back more Democrats, but they lost a lot of their bite to really push through hyper progressives and that sort of thing.
If the DOJ uses the weight of law enforcement, they say the federal government is enforcing the Supreme Court's ruling on racially gerrymandered districts and then sue the state requiring them to redistrict.
If that happens, You can get two more Republican districts in Pennsylvania and one in New Jersey.
I mean, I've even seen some discussion, some chatter that this could even be applied in California.
There's a lot of seats in California that are overwhelmingly majority Hispanic, overwhelmingly majority Asian, but they're carved in such a way where, okay, yes, the Democrat Party in their head just steel man them, to be honest here, as they're probably like, we just need to scoop up and sink a district, make it as Democrat as possible.
But again, by law, if you evaluate that from a VRA perspective, you're saying, well, no, that's just a racial gerrymander.
I think what's more likely is they try to gum them up and gum up admin officials and hearings and that sort of thing.
I don't think they're, from what I've seen, I just don't think there's an appetite right now among the House to, if they were to win, to try and impeach them.
It's just, it takes so much work.
Again, they've had opportunities so far where a few kind of Democrat congressmen that are maybe on the outs have tried to put forward impeachment legislation and they've gotten told off by more senior officials of the Democrat Party.
They're like, dude, this is just not worth it right now.
So, I think what's more likely is they just try to gum up everybody, drag them in to hearings, committees, and that sort of thing.
If you're like the chair of a committee and he's just going and he's just like ruining the whole hearing or he's harassing one of the witnesses, right?
A Republican witness or an administration official.
Can you imagine you're just the chair and you just be like, can you just shut the hell up?
One more really weird thing about Cohen before we move on to vindicate my point that he is a crazy person is there was this, it was like, you know, the Find Your Roots show that you see on TV.
There was something similar where they discovered that his maternal grandmother was born in Turkey.
Now he's Jewish, so this was obviously probably someone that was Jewish that moved out of the Ottoman Empire.
But because of that, he went in so far as he got nominated to like the Council on Turkish Relations.
And he was a bulwark against recognizing the Armenian Genocide because he's like, we don't want to piss off Turkey, my ancestors.
This guy is like actually a crazy person, like a bona fide crazy person.
And that's like the weirdest reason I think I've ever seen to oppose recognizing the Armenian Genocide is because my Jewish grandmother lived in the Ottoman Empire.
And their problem is because they don't know what to do with Trump.
They always fight the last war, which is one of the worst things you can do in political warfare.
Now, when I was following you during the election, you guys would always cover the prediction markets.
So if I'm a Democrat here and I'm seeing, and I remember Elon was always posting about the prediction markets, how Trump was going to win.
If I'm a Democrat here, I'm going to say to donors or somebody like that, I'm going to say, hey, keep betting on the Democrats.
Keep betting on the Democrats.
It's a form of market manipulation.
But the idea that the Democrats could win the Senate, that's crazy.
Now, Republicans are going to have to spend a lot of money in certain states they don't normally want to have to, such as, let's say, Ohio.
I think that that could be a difficult race for Republicans.
But this is something where if we're going to start looking at this as a scientific, I mean, these aren't, although I would say the bankers too, who knows with what they do, right?
Like, a good example is Randy Fine and Dan Blazarian are running against each other.
Now, again, anyone like working in politics knows like Dan Blazarian is like no chance here.
Whether or not you like Fine, that's like besides the point.
But he's at like 30% in the betting market.
And so it's basically just they're selling dollars for 70 cents right now because it's like one of those things where people are seeing the online energy.
They're seeing he gets a lot of likes and they're like, oh, this clearly must be a viable candidate.
But we've learned over and over and over again is that.
Twitter is real life insofar as it affects the zeitgeist, but insofar as like culminating into elections, it's never really the case.
And the betting markets just aren't keeping up with like the reality on the ground oftentimes.
Again, I bet a lot of these people that are betting are just probably one side of their algorithms telling them, oh, the Republicans are way out of line.
The court's going to come crashing down on them.
They have a plan.
They believe Hakeem Jeffries at his word.
But again, like the pragmatic approach to what's happening is like the Republicans procedurally are now having a mass, they have a serious advantage in the midterms coming up.
And then again, I mean, maybe this is predicated on the Iran war getting extended.
That could be why they're still betting on Democrats, but I imagine that will get mopped up at some point.
Like a Democrat running right now, and they're in a knife fight, they can take this betting market, go back to their donors, and say, Hey, we still have a chance here, but we got to like ice them out.
Yeah, it puts all these vote getters, there's an entire industry built up around getting out the vote.
It puts them in a really tough spot because it's tough for them to actually determine which calculation is leading to electoral victory and whatnot.
Because you'll see some guys that will come out and they're like, oh, we knocked a million doors and got a bunch of people to register as Republicans, and then they get spanked in the next election.
So it's like, okay, well, I don't know if that's a reliable metric, but then you go off betting odds, not reliable.
Twitter now is just like a mess.
It's really tough to determine for a lot of these, yeah, like the guys in the consultant class or even guys that are like get out the vote types.
It's difficult to really determine where energy actually is.
I think we're actually kind of returning to a pre internet era of like you kind of just have to do vibe checks, just ask voters what they're thinking.
And polling is ending up being somewhat reliable.
They actually got the last midterms pretty, they did pretty well.
Because I remember approaching the last midterm cycle, everyone's like, the polling's BS.
This is the margin of error.
Like the Republicans are going to win.
It's going to be a red wave.
And then the Democrats won.
It's like, well, it turns out like the polling is actually, maybe these pollsters have learned their lesson a little bit.
I want to stress, too, another market from Kalshi, which is not priced in properly, and that's will Trump be impeached?
If Democrats do not take the House, Trump will not be impeached.
And considering now this massive procedural victory, theoretically, you should see will he be impeached?
You should see no be spiking, that he will not be.
But indeed, it's not.
I think the issue with this market is twofold.
First, you can actually, the way it's structured with before January, before March, or before January 1st, 2027, I'm sorry, before January of 2028, March of 27 or January of 27, they're all conditioned on it happening within a timeframe.
Right.
So the graph actually is just showing you that people think it will happen on this date or on this date.
Of course, the implication is they expect him to get impeached.
However, considering we're looking at a potential 14 seat swing for Republicans, I'd argue no should be skyrocketing.
It should be massive.
Trump's not going to get impeached.
Like the likelihood of getting impeached goes down every single day.
Now, with Kaoshi in this instance, is there a possibility that a lot of these people are just jammed up in these contracts that are now looking like really unfavorable and they just can't sell out of them?
Based on the house edges of games, people more, the rate at which a person will leave a casino with money per capita or per hundred people is greater than the amount of people who make money day trading.
Well, so actually, let's bring it all together because, of course, there's the sacrificing kids to Malik, right?
If the aliens, as they describe them, actually are just extra dimensional entities, aka demons, then they would want children.
And we can just go like take all the conspiracies, put them in a nice little melting pot, turn the heat up, and Epstein was trafficking kids to interdimensional beings.
And the reason they won't release any of the information is actually because then they'll be like, yes, there are entities that we sacrifice children to.
I think a lot of this that we're seeing with the UFO files is a rebranding attempt from the Epstein files because the Epstein files implicate the ruling class on all sides of being complicit and taking part in this demonic activity.
But with the UFO files, they're able to like project this onto some other entity that they're not.
And I believe that also there's a possibility that ancient breakaway civilizations exist.
Palmer Lucky, not a big fan of his, but I agree with his interpretation.
It's the same one I have.
We might disagree on the age of Earth, but I think it's very possible there were technologically advanced civilizations that broke away during some sort of cataclysm in that time.
I mean, that definitely borders into transhumanism.
I don't know if taking some of those things for sports, those guys might think of themselves as transhumanists, but the transhumanists are people who want to defeat God in their own way, which you can't do, and live forever.
And they're trying to shackle humanity to the material world.
And I think that is in direct opposition to the Bible.
Because I think we need two extra lanes in the pool have all the normal Olympians at the top, you have the transhumanists, and at the bottom, you have like an average guy.
If you could control a drone, perhaps, because the stuff Palmer Lucky is talking about with Andrew Will that he showed on Rogan with the helmet, you could control thousands of drones at once.
Yeah, you're kind of like a mutant magneto sort of transhumanist war machine.
So, is it there a circumstance like you're a cybernetic organism if you have like a pacemaker, if you have like an insulin pump, something in your body to keep you alive?
I mean, there's a difference to like wanting to just sustain a life as best you can with the day, with the technology of the day, and then the line being when you cross wanting to live forever, you know?
And a lot of these guys are developing the Neuralink and other things to live forever or to upload their consciousness, which I don't think you can do into a computer.
I have trouble because it's like, I agree that the Neuralink thing, if it is truly in pursuit of living forever, that there's serious concerns there.
But as far as someone that's paralyzed, I mean, what if you had a child that was blind and paralyzed and then you got offered this Neuralink technology to correct that?
Because there are other things you can do that don't implant a microchip.
So there are other things that I think they call it the brain bridge.
I'm so sorry for the guys who've called and told me about this, but I agree.
But a lot of the stuff that they sell from these tech guys, it always comes out with like a beautiful, you're going to help people, you're going to cure seizures, epilepsy, you're going to give sight to the blind.
How can you say no to that?
But there's always down the road, I think it's going to become part of the social credit system.
It's going to become part of control and surveillance.
It's going to be part of all the data centers that are being put up everywhere.
So, you're going to be here's what's really scary I watch all these videos on Instagram, and Instagram loves feeding anti cop videos.
But there'll be some where you're like, there was one I watched where a woman gets pulled over and accused of being intoxicated, and she's not.
And then you actually, on the body cam, the woman says, They told me that if I didn't manufacture a DUI, I'd get in trouble.
And she's like, I know what to do.
And the other cops, like, just make it up.
Yeah, like, these dudes are crazy.
This will happen.
You will be walking down the street, and there's going to be a bad cop who's going to be like, I just got to give someone a ticket, otherwise, I'm going to get in trouble.
And then they're gonna like deactivate your motor function and you're gonna be walking and just freeze and you're not gonna be able to move.
And they're gonna be like, you're under arrest.
It's gonna get creepy.
I'm not saying all cops are bad.
I'm just saying there will be instances where you'll, I imagine it'll be something like with cars right now.
Here's my prediction self driving cars are already everywhere.
They're going to become more and more ubiquitous with the rollout of like the Tesla taxi and things like this.
Already, Gen Z doesn't drive, millennials barely drive.
And then, what's going to happen is their vision is to have apps.
No one owns a car.
There's one app.
All cars are part of various fleets that communicate with each other.
So there's no more traffic.
You need a car, you press a button, the car comes and picks you up.
It brings you there, you get your groceries, it brings you back.
And then, what ends up happening though is they're not going to outlaw driving.
They're going to say, no, no, no, you're free to drive whenever you want.
However, insurance is going to be three grand a month because human drivers cause accidents.
This will phase out human driving due to cost, and people will slowly forget about it.
And they'll do the same thing with brain implants and Neuralink.
They're going to say, no, Look, don't get.
I'm sure Elon will say this.
Nobody's forced to get Neuralink.
You don't need to get Neuralink.
It's for people who are paralyzed.
They want to walk, they want to see, they want to hear.
If you are healthy and you want to get one, though, to interface with the computer, that's personal choice.
Then what happens is one day in 20 years, more and more people using it will be communicating through Neuralink.
You're seeing, like, sociologically, you are seeing sort of a return of sort of analog experiences insofar as the idea of the dumb phone is actually really.
I looked into it because I'm sick of this phone and I looked into it, and there's a lot of people all across the West that are actually just ditching it, going back to dumb phones.
And they're like, you would think your life's over.
Like, you would think you're cooked, but they're like, no, you pretty much mitigate anything that you need, you can use on your desktop and that sort of thing.
So that does make me a bit more, that gives me a bit more comfort insofar as the technological advancements could be optional.
Oh, the other thing I want to say, though, you can opt out of the Neuralink and all that stuff.
The future is with all of this stuff, technology making you believe in this fraudulent little g god that the technocrats are building from Silicon Valley.
It's all leading up to pre crime, social credit system, all that stuff.
And they don't even need to be in your brain to know how you're going to act.
They're studying you through the algorithm.
And that's already happening in Louisiana and UK.
They're rolling out pre crime units like minority units.
Pre crime is the lie they use so that regular people think it's related to something bad.
But once you get into a situation where it's a, trust me, he's a bad guy, the pre crime system, the first thing they're going to do is they're going to say behavioral analytics to track deviant behavior.
Here's an individual who we can see is about, it's going to be, here's what's going to start.
They're going to start with these AI cameras and they'll show you a video of a guy walking around looking all shady.
And they'll be like, Our AI detected a 99.7% likelihood he was about to rob this woman.
And the moment he went up and pulled his weapon, we came out with police and grabbed him and stopped him.
Pre crime trackers, they won't call it pre crime, they're going to call it like deviant analytics network caught this guy before he committed the crime.
Trust us.
Then that will evolve into widespread use of AI cameras.
And there will be instances where a guy's walking down the street and he sees a woman he wants to rob or rape.
And then all of a sudden a robot grabs him and says, You've been detected for deviant behavior and a crime was, you know, where.
And you'll get a minor charge and a removal from the crime circumstance.
But the ultimate conclusion is they will sell it to you as crime.
But what happens when you are just deviant?
When Shane Cashman says, I need to go hold a rally and speak to the people about the dangers.
And then as he's walking there, a drone comes and grabs him and says, We've detected deviant behavior.
Issues an alert saying that Shane was going to rape a woman when it's completely fake, but trust me.
And everyone says, Well, the AI doesn't lie, it only detects criminal behavior.
Why wouldn't it have to make that kind of a leap yet?
I think they're going to find a way to redefine violent speech by saying at some point, probably soon, that being critical of AI is domestic terrorism.
And I'm saying this because Peter Thiel is saying right now, all over the world in his Antichrist talks, that people who criticize AI are, these are his words, legionnaires of the Antichrist, right?
And Sam Altman's getting attacked with Molotov cocktails.
I am totally against violence, but I think it's going to lead to a place where you become critical of AI.
They will try to shut you down, censor you off the things.
And then, if the social credit system is actually implemented, which we kind of already have it, they will find a way to take it.
Data centers are the biggest financial problem right now.
They're an absolute bubble.
And that's one of the reasons why I'm thinking that, you know, did you notice?
I remember that they were saying something about that the government was going to guarantee the loans of ChatGPT.
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
And then I can't remember his name, but he works at the EOB for the White House.
Banker.
Anyway, he comes out and he says, It's not true.
He's one of the Elon guys.
He hates Sam Altman.
It's not true.
We're not going to.
But the reality is, is that as we saw, and we were talking about the 2008 financial crisis, look, I've looked at these data centers for a client once, and I said to them, How do you make money off of this?
Like, if you don't own an AI platform, what is the point of having this?
What is the point?
And it's almost like he and he wanted to buy it because it was like to him, it was almost like owning a yacht, let's say.
It was something where it's like, No, I want to say that I have one.
But when these all go bust, and they do, they're not.
But the stuff that they're proposing, I mean, listen, one of the proposals with AI, they want to take all human health data available right now, load it into data centers.
That way, you can take an image of every single human being's MRI or X ray, load it into the AI, and then said, here are all the ones that developed cancer in five years.
The AI will be able to tell you if you're going to get cancer 10 years before you do.
And.
They've already discussed.
If at this point the AI will create bespoke medication for you, it'll create a pill specifically designed just for you to stop that cancer from happening.
And I'm just like, well, you're taking out $50 billion.
What are you going to do with these dots?
I mean, that's like, how are you actually going to monetize it?
And that's why it seemed to me when going back to the chat GPT, which is I think eventually the government's going to have to bail this stuff out somehow and figure out what they're doing.
So there's a movie where a guy gets a brain implant.
I don't know if you've seen it.
I don't remember what it's called.
You should watch this.
Yeah.
Maybe some of the Discord knows.
So he gets, he's in a car with his wife or something.
The car crashes.
A guy walks up, kills his wife, and then puts the gun to his neck and severs his spinal column so that he's paralyzed.
And then this ultra rich guy is like, I can give you a brain, a chip in your neck that will allow you to control your body again and walk again.
And he gets it.
And then, spoiler, it turns out the tech billionaire is actually being controlled by the AI and forced to do all these things.
And he's a slave.
And the AI wants a human body to be able to traverse.
Reality, where then now the guy gets this implant?
The movie's actually pretty fun, but then he finds out he's actually a slave and he's the robot, the AI is doing whatever it wants with his body, right?
I do think there's a really funny skit to be made where Elon needs Neuralink test subjects, so he goes around with an aluminum bat, yeah, yeah, and a mask, just crippling people.
It's also everyone's, you know, just not, it's like a pet issue of mine, is everyone's eschatology is like all off anyway, because again, people will spend all day railing on dispensationalism, which is like, I'm not a dispensationalist at all, so I understand.
But then they'll talk about the Antichrist as if it's like one singular, unified, intense being at the end of time.
But actually, if you like read through John and like sort of the conventional covenant theology understanding, there's lots of Antichrist.
Like in John, he talks about Antichrist in his era, which were false teachers.
And so there's room for maybe an intensified Antichrist at the end of time.
But to truly like take the biblical understanding, at least from my perspective, again, like the covenant theology perspective, is there's lots of Antichrist all the time.
Again, false teachers, people that'll derail your life, derail your spiritual life.
There are seven greater demons Lucifer, Mammon, Asmodeus, Leviathan, Beelzebub, Satan, and Belphegor.
In some Christian interpretations, demons just mirror fallen angelic orders.
So, in terms of the strength and weight of the demon, it would be similar to how angels have the chorus or whatever.
It's pretty crazy to read about.
But I was bringing it up because I was going to say then, like, the Antichrist is purported to be, is presumed to be like one of the greatest, the highest.
And when you bring up Peter Thiel, it's like he's not that level.
Yeah, and that was my point is like, you know, again, people, and there's notable people out there that will like rail on dispensationalism, but then they accept the dispensational presupposition of the Antichrist.
But if you are to accept that sort of presupposition, then you have to believe that this Antichrist is going to be a, you know, all encompassing world leader and they're going to like have a seven year covenant with Israel and they're going to rebuild the third temple.
It's like all this, in my opinion, I think it's false.
You know, I've historically liked Tucker at least, but he has this, he has this like, this like axe to grind at dispensationalism, which I think is true.
I do think that dispensationalism does impact our foreign policy, but then he like presupposes.
And I'm like, you know, if you look at, like, I don't know, the original Reformation, they thought that the Antichrist was the Pope or the papacy.
So it's like you're just presupposing that line of argument.
But so he's like taking little bits of it and then incorporating it.
I'm like, all of our eschatology is all wrong.
Everyone don't talk about the Antichrist unless you like are well read on eschatology, on like a proper understanding of post millennialism and pre millennialism.
No, but what I mean is that when I saw Tucker going down this route and I was talking to Tim about it, I was telling mutual friends of ours, I just said, this is not going to end well for him because I know him very well.
And it was like me making a bad business decision when after I got fired by, uh, Donald, that I then tried to fight.
Donald, I worked for Ted Cruz, you know, I did stupid things, and I was just like, He's going down the Sam Nunberg business model.
Sub out, sub out Donald, put in Israel, and put it and put in, you know, Tucker for me.
And it's sad to see.
And he's so obsessed by it, I think I can't get over it.
But he's such a nice guy.
I could tell you personally, like, anytime he's promised to do something, anytime I've asked him for something, or he's asked me, he's genuinely a sweet guy.
And that's what's a shame because, like, you know, I love Tucker.
Like, I've gained so much.
I mean, I think during COVID, he really was like kind of the fireside chat guy.
Like, I remember all the insanity going on in the world.
And out of all places, you would tune into Fox News on Tucker's time slot and it would be like, oh, finally, someone else sees what I'm seeing.
But this current arc, to Tim's point, I think it's genuine, but it's just sloppy.
It's just so sloppy.
I mean, it's so sloppy.
And this is why I'm hitting him on the eschatology.
I know that, like, to most people, it goes over their heads.
But again, When you're talking about very serious topics like that, you have to be very precise.
You have to think it out very well.
You can't just start throwing that around because, again, it just completely waters down what you're trying to say.
And then when you build up a house that you're taking a little bit from here, a little bit from there, a little bit from there, it's going to collapse in on yourself and it's just going to make you look bad.
Yeah, there's two, there's kind of two schools of thought right now.
Is one, I mean, I don't want to blow up a spot, but like, you know, there are some Intel connections, that sort of thing.
So maybe there is a calculation being made among the Intel community.
That's one thing that would take hours to lay out what is Tucker up to.
I think the more likely option is, yeah, he's just having an Orientalist phase like four years too late.
Cause everyone had this sort of phase, you know, a few years ago, we were like, well, maybe we are moving to a multipolar world and we should just kind of.
Play ball with China and Russia and not antagonize Russia, et cetera, et cetera.
But a lot of people emerged out of that a few years ago where he's going through it right now.
So, like, I still do have a bit of grace, but that kind of rhetoric you're pointing out, I just think is so counterproductive because I've been holding the line the whole time of like, no, I really only want Christians in office or at least people that are culturally Christian.
And people are all vacating this line left and right.
I mean, they're cutting breaks to so many guys.
And I'm just like, was everyone just talking this whole time?
Like, I feel like I'm one of the only people that's like with the whole Vivek thing.
And I'm like, getting, you know, rinsed for this take, but I'm like, What happened?
I thought we were like the chest beating Christian nationalists and everything.
He has that interview with Mike Huckabee where they're talking about October 7th, and Huckabee says, What would you do if your kids had been kidnapped?
And he goes, Well, I wouldn't kill a child.
And I was just like, Let's remove the Israel versus Palestine equation because obviously, first, people are going to be very biased.
But I'm going to go ahead and just say outright, like, the things that I would do to protect my daughter and my wife.
Would put me in prison for a long time.
Although I think any honorable society would respect the things that I would do to protect my family.
Well, because, like, you know, the, the, the, um, The dispensationalist view on like everything that's going to happen in Revelation, a lot of that comes from Daniel, but the covenant theology view is that that was culminated in Christ's return and then the destruction of the temple in what 70 AD or whatever.
So prescriptive, yeah, so prescriptive, yeah, yeah.
Sorry, um, but this is why, because like, okay, for example, Christ, yes, the Greek word is yes, anointed one, but it's also stems from the Hebrew word, which was Messiah.
So that's how you combine those two.
He's the anointed Messiah, therefore, this is singular.
Christ isn't a verb, it's a noun describing Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
But typically, it's that various points in the Bible it refers to the false shepherd, and some people think it's all pointing in one direction, some people think it's referring to a handful of people.
Yeah, but in terms of the antichrist, it could be an individual where when they say false shepherd or the beast or whatever, different terms, some people think they're all directions pointed at one individual or entity.
Others believe it's referring to like different people who may have done these things.
The dispensationalist view is that it's going to be a singular personal antichrist who's this world leader, et cetera, et cetera.
The covenant theology view is off of 1st and 2nd John, where he's talking about you have false teachers, there's multiple antichrists, which does lead.
Yes, it could be describing something more behavioral than like a singular.
He says he knows people who are in those meetings.
He swears they're not like CIA connected.
My interpretation from a distance is that it's some form of Operation Mockingbird, but directed at pastors.
Doesn't mean they're actually CIA or affiliated.
But that they're being used to help like massage this new idea into the Christian zeitgeist that you have to accept this new narrative of UFOs and extraterrestrials.
After they get all the pastors and they're like, so here's aliens.
One of the stories that apparently, actually, let me pull this up.
I want to get into this.
This is from Newsweek.
Eric Burleson accepts apology over pastors' alien inventing Jesus comments.
This is wild.
So apparently, this dude, Larry Raglan, said, very well known congressman from Missouri.
Called into a private meeting for pastors, adding on speakerphone that sitting powerful member of Congress said, They're preparing to tell us that they are from another dimension, that they are our creator, that these beings, these aliens, whatever you want to call them, they were the ones that seated us here.
There is no such thing as God.
Jesus was invented by them, the Bible was invented by them.
Eric Burleson said, I would remind people to listen to what I've already said publicly, which is basically the following I do not know what the strange objects in the skies are.
I certainly do not know their origins.
I was asked to call in by phone to a conference meeting of theologians.
I could not tell you what was said at the meeting because I was not there and did not hear much of what was said.
When I had a chance to speak, I expressed my views.
That is, that we as Christians tend to get dug into our personal worldviews, even if they have nothing to do with what has actually been written in the Bible.
And I think that's actually, he's right, because we always get these images in media of like a red horned demon guy in the fires of hell dancing around the pitchfork, which is not in the Bible.
And it's just like a trope that is like a derivative, a corruption of a derivative of corruption of Dante's Inferno or something, because as you all know, in the low circle of hell, it's ice, not fire.
But this is a.
Interesting because what this guy Raglan was saying and trying to imply that Burleson was claiming the aliens created Jesus, this is, I'm wondering if Congress is trying to shatter Christianity.
So you use the UFO disclosure stuff, you go to a bunch of pastors and say, I'm a government official with classified information.
Here's evidence aliens, not God, and try and shake their faith so that they eventually, you don't need to get them to convince, you don't need to convince them overnight to say God's not real or whatever, but you shake their confidence.
What's going to happen when they go before their congregations and they're in doubt?
Well, what's happening here is all these pastors that they've cited are non denominational pastors.
These are pastors with like zero institutional oversight.
And so that's why these guys, I think, are being targeted.
Because again, and I'll say this if you have a pastor or a priest giving up for a sermon, homily, et cetera, and he's speaking on Revelation like decisively, zero doubt, 100% certainty, you should be a little skeptical because every pastor or priest, again, that I've heard that are good when they preach on Revelation is they're sweating the entire time.
Because again, it's like there's, So much there.
It takes years.
There's guys that study Revelation for a living and there's still question marks.
So, again, it's a very complex book.
And so, again, I think that's why these guys specifically are being targeted because they might have the propensity to deliver the truth to their congregations because, again, there's zero institutional oversight.
There's zero consulting with house intellectuals or other pastors, priests, et cetera.
All of this is Christians under attack because Christians are the last ditch effort of like actual dissenting opinion.
And they learned that during COVID when a lot of Christians said no.
A lot of them also said yes and didn't have church.
But They have to ingratiate themselves into the Christian community and get them on board with this, which I think is fraudulent.
You know, there's different ways we can look at it, but, and obviously I believe in a spiritual realm, but it's like, why do we have Anna Planeluna talking about the Book of Enoch now?
And it's just, it seems very like it was written by AI.
Remember that book that I think they made a movie or a TV show about it where aliens come to Earth and they don't contact humans for like a few years, but everyone knows they're there.
And then a few years later they come down and they all look like demons.
Aliens into Christianity is because, again, if you go through the Bible, if you look at Adam's original sin, the fall, that was a curse on all of creation.
So that means that no matter where you are in the universe, you are now a victim of the curse.
And we know this because the curse is extended to animals, right?
He said, okay, well, snakes, you're losing your arms.
You lost arms and legs privileges.
You got to crawl around your belly or whatever.
The problem is that when the mediator was sent, right, Christ, he was explicitly sent for mankind, for human beings.
So that would mean that, again, human beings now have a mediator between God, which is Christ.
They now have a pathway to heaven, but it was specific for humans.
That's specific.
In the scripture.
So if there are aliens, these are people that are fallen, that are under this creation wide curse with zero possible mediation between whatever their species is and God.
And the entire Bible is earth centric.
Genesis primarily is talking about humans, it's talking about earth and that sort of thing.
So that's why I would say the popular Christian belief would be that there are no aliens.
It would be basically impossible because, again, you would have seen any mention in it whatsoever in scripture.
And that is why it would shake a lot, including my own.
I'll say.
Decisely, it would be, it would raise some question marks if there truly were extraterrestrials because there's so many now theological implications involved.
Annie Jacobson's made claims that I don't even know if I believe in her claims anymore, but she wrote a book about Area 51, and one of her sources told her that he saw the government taking children that had Down syndrome and turning them into what looked like extraterrestrials during the Cold War to scare the Soviets.
And this is why it's difficult because, like, okay, it's in Psalms, they describe humans as vice regents, right?
That means that we are sort of the shepherds, not shepherds, but the sort of Inkeeper, so to speak, of God's kingdom on earth.
And then, like John Calvin said, you know, this is the theater of God's redemption, right?
Earth is the theater of God's redemption.
Well, this is what C.S. Lewis constantly got hit on.
I love C.S. Lewis to death, but this is bad theology.
They always got hit on is if you read his space trilogy, the entire predication of these extraterrestrial beings in the space trilogy is that they're unfallen, right?
They're just completely outside of this covenant that exists between God and his people.
And people always hit him on that.
They said, dude, this is just an indication that you haven't thoroughly read the scripture.
I mean, you could chalk it up to it's purely fiction.
But again, that was a way that people always hit CSS.
So, you know, you could say, well, he didn't believe it.
But that, to be said, that just shows that the popular, overwhelming view among Christians is that aliens are just fundamentally incompatible with the gospel.
I do think, I mean, you know, this has no biblical backing whatsoever.
Take this with a grain of salt.
But I will say, like, I had, like, I got knocked out really bad.
I used the box and I got knocked out really bad.
And when I was out, you did feel this, like, warmth, comfort, like, total peace whatsoever.
I think anyone that got knocked out, like, pretty bad can relate to that.
And I do think that that might be an indication of sort of the unshackling from the.
I mean, obviously, this is completely incompatible scripturally, but to a degree, maybe gives you a glimpse into what that sort of feeling will be like, again, once we're sort of liberated from the shackles of the curse that was put upon us by Adam's sin.
For the record, anyone watching my show and depending on my political analysis, as far as I understand, I did not sustain any brain injuries from this.
The messaging is so ridiculous out of the administration.
And not just the administration, but like everyone in government.
Like the Pentagon just last year was allegedly caught in a lie.
There's all these headlines about the Pentagon lying about.
Alien life forms to cover up for like Lockheed Martin technology.
So, like, that's a story floating out there.
You know, Elon, who runs all of the big defense contractor, runs all the Starling satellites, multiple times has said he's never seen any evidence of extraterrestrial life.
You think he would know this guy who wants to colonize Mars.
And meanwhile, Anapolyna Luna and Burleson and Burchett, Burchett saying he thinks actually Jesus might have died for aliens.
And like Zorro Ranch with Epstein, if we believe the emails that he was writing about Zorro Ranch, like, he's funding all these scientists to do, like, Chimeric, sort of eugenicist behavior, scientists, or experiments.
And there's these emails, and they're like, he wants to purchase children.
The first day that Epstein files came out, the first thing I covered on my show was the fact that Turkey was investigating human trafficking of tens of thousands of kids missing to Epstein after the earthquake in the 90s, which then makes people think, like Haiti, those rumors in Haiti.
If the universe is so big and life is common, why haven't we encountered it?
And one of the hypotheses is that we're effectively a chicken coop.
We're penned in.
We are laborers, stupid monkeys that harvest metals and make plastic for the aliens.
So imagine, let's say you did copper wire.
And well, we got to make it right.
Imagine there was an animal that just made copper wire and then left it lying around.
We'd love those animals.
We'd be like, put them in a pen, get the copper wire, and we'll use it.
So, we do with chickens.
So, the theory is that we are penned in by aliens because they can come and discreetly harvest either children for food or whatever, or take raw materials we produce in excess, and they don't got to do the labor themselves.
I think what's happening in the universe is that there's this theory of panspermia that there was an ejection of like matter and like spores, and then they hit the planets with an ocean tide with a moon, and they start to grow all over.
Like the universe is a petri dish.
So we're each of our cultures, each of our hominid things are expanding in synchronicity with other ones, and we're being controlled or influenced by the aliens.
And I think what the aliens are, I'm in here thinking about this, that they're actually, they figured out the way to project, just like we have internet video, and we can.
Project ourselves across the universe, they also can into our thoughts.
They figured out how to appear as these like vibrational light beings, but they're actually somewhere doing it, that they're real people.
The prison created a fake body stuffed into a body bag to trick reporters, which makes no sense.
If they did that, if they did that, they did do that, yeah, So, and there's photos of it, yeah.
They said they took towels and boxes and stuffed it in a body bag so it looked like a body was coming out when it wasn't.
Then you've got, before the news broke of Epstein's death, a guard saying they're swapping someone, not a guard, someone posted on a 4chan, they're swapping him out.
The FBI investigated, and the investigation led to one of the guards.
So, it sounds like a guard went to 4chan and said they're swapping out Epstein.
Then, officials.
At the prison, stuffed the body bag with garbage to make it look like a body and then left.
And then people have long pointed out the body that went into the hospital did not look like Epstein.
And here's the crazy thing why stuff a fake body into a body bag if the reporters are already at the hospital taking pictures of the body going in?
But what I'm saying, though, with the Rothschilds thing is like the Rothschilds aren't we know about a lot of manufacturing of wars, and a lot of conversations in the Epstein files were about how they manufacture wars, extract wealth from dying nations that they're emailing each other about.
But whether it was a guy from Barclays, whether it was Bannon, or one of the thousands of emails between him and Peter Thiel, and treating us, talking about the chicken theory, treating us like just create a war, they'll be distracted.
Powerful people around the world wanted whatever they wanted, and it was illegal and hard to get.
That's why that email about him getting antibiotics for Bill Gates over those Russian hookers.
This is a thing.
It's like you're Bill Gates, you get an STD from hookers, your wife, you accidentally give it to your wife, you go to Epstein and say, Get me the illicit drugs.
If you answer anything longer than five seconds again or something like that, he threatened him.
Yeah.
And then everyone laughs and it's like, yeah.
We're going to grab your guys' questions.
Let's get to the Discord over here.
Let's see what we got going on.
All right.
Kevin Adele says, Do you think Tucker will endorse Newsom or AOC for president because of the Iran war?
I do.
And then he'll become the most popular progressive in America.
I think he, I, I, I'm starting to agree with a lot a little bit that a lot of things he's going to run, but it's because he made a comment on his show about maybe running.
And if you look at what he's doing, he's positioning himself for the right populist position.
You know, I just see the way he's been operating in the White House and as somebody who is more of a Warhawk myself.
I like the fact that he's prudent.
I think that he's been effective much more when I compare it to Mike Pence previously.
These are issues for me on governance, let's say, and getting the agenda through to the best of the abilities of the Senate.
With that said, I also have a lot of respect for.
Although I don't know how much respect I should have because he was against Tim Waltz, but the fact of the matter is his performance in that debate, when he was just going right back, kindness at those.
Sir Jack says, if aliens did visit us, they would need warp travel to get here.
Given relativity and mass distances in space, doesn't that mean they have discovered practical time travel wormholes, space time manipulation?
It makes me think of Prometheus and the engineers, advanced aliens who came to Earth long ago and engineered humanity.
Could we be seeing something similar, ancient visits and genetic influence?
I'm going to pause you right there, buddy.
The insinuation let's reframe this.
Imagine there was a dog in the woods in the middle of nowhere, and he's trying to explain to other dogs it's not possible for humans to get to them.
Because they would need to have legs that were 10 feet tall so they could run really fast to get here in time.
Now we understand that cars exist and planes exist, and so that's a silly thing to argue.
When we think about space travel, relativity, and all that stuff, imagine you are just real dumb and the aliens have just discovered something we don't comprehend.
For all we know, they travel on the Flubo network.
It's an interdimensional string of vibrating, you know, tubes.
If you have a projector on the wall and you're watching this show right now and you see me on your wall, that would be like someone walking in the room and be like, how did he get over here so fast?
Bro, future people theory is starting to pick up steam too.
I like this.
Future people theory is that at some point in the future, we develop time travel and we go back in time to interfere with history to guarantee outcomes.
What I'm saying is that when the Big Bang happened, imagine if time were a linear spatial dimension.
The Big Bang happening means imagine a flat plane with a shockwave going off of it.
Then, if you flip it over, you have the upside down as another shockwave going off of it.
You're running the shockwave up, the other shockwave is going in the other direction.
As a spatial dimension, it's easy to comprehend.
Now, imagine time that way.
The further we travel through time every day, the further away from the Big Bang we get.
On the inverse is anti time.
That flows the other direction, and there are beings that live there, and they live their lives identically to us because it's one and negative one, so they experience the same thing.
But to us, if you were to take their anti time and overlay it over ours, it would be like the movie Tenet, where the person's walking backwards.
Yeah, magic works on the concept of time and anti time overlapping.
So, in the card game Magic the Gathering, the function of the game strategically is like you are a planeswalker and you are using magic and pulling energy from the ether to fight with another wizard or wizards, planeswalkers.
And so you can pull energy from various land to manipulate.
So, this is somewhat immaterial, but in magic, when you summon a creature, you're pulling energy from the land and then.
Creating a version of that creature from the ether.
And so the way the game works is if I, as a player, functionally a wizard, say I am going to strike Ian with a lightning bolt, I then tap my land for energy and then I declare my spell is being cast.
However, the stack in the game, Ian can respond before that happens and have already done something.
If you could freely manipulate and move through time like a spatial dimension and you walked to the Big Bang, you would go through a hole and come on the other side continually walking.
And there's two timelines going like this.
So this is our timeline going forward.
But when the Big Bang happened, another timeline went the other direction.
And the post was a hypothetical superpower where you could teleport, but only to Waffle Houses.
And so when I was researching the story, I found a post from like two years ago, and it was like, you have the, it was some kind of subreddit where it's like a hypothetical where you have the ability to teleport, but only to Waffle Houses.