All Episodes
Aug. 9, 2025 - Timcast IRL - Tim Pool
02:04:16
Texas AG Files Suit To Vacate House Seats Of Rogue Democrats Who Fled State | Timcast IRL
Participants
Main voices
a
angela belcamino
14:25
e
elad eliahu
17:53
p
phil labonte
01:02:49
s
sean fracek
21:33
Appearances
r
raymond g stanley-jr
04:58
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
phil labonte
Ken Paxton has filed suit to vacate the seats, the House seats that Democrats who fled Texas.
Putin says he'll be satisfied with half of Ukraine, which is not really a surprise to anybody.
He's also going to be in Alaska next week, which is the first time since the United States acquired Alaska.
So that's interesting news.
Trump says he's authorized the military to take on the cartels.
And so we'll see if that'll work this time because in the past it's had spotty results.
And Virginia says that it's going to help or that it has helped kids get abortions.
And so we'll talk about that.
Right now, we want you guys to head on over to Cassbrew Coffee and buy some coffee.
You've got the 1776 Blend Josie Special Grind is available.
You've got two weeks till Christmas.
Of course, Ian's Graphene Dream is available.
We've got K-Cups available.
So head on over to Casbrew.com and get yourself some coffee.
The Appalachian Knights is probably our biggest seller.
It's either that one or Ian's Graphene Dream, but they're both great.
That's honestly the coffee that I drink in the morning.
So head on over there.
And then we also have a big culture war tomorrow.
Head on over to DCComedyloft.com to get tickets for the Culture War Live.
Tomorrow it's going to be Myron Gaines.
It'll be, I think, Kayla.
I forget what her last name is.
I think her not so Kyla Turner, she's not so erudite on Twitter or ex.
Kat Timp will be there.
So they'll be arguing whether or not feminism has destroyed the West.
And so I think that Myron is going to take the pro-feminism side, and Kat Timf and Kyla are going to argue against it.
So head on over there.
But why don't you guys go ahead and smash the like button, share the show with everyone you know.
Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more is Angela Bell Camino, right?
Did I pronounce the last name right?
angela belcamino
Bel Camino.
phil labonte
El Camino.
Okay, all right.
angela belcamino
Yeah.
phil labonte
Well, who are you?
What do you do?
angela belcamino
Yeah.
Thanks so much for having me, guys.
It's been a long time coming.
Many of you know me as the bold lib.
What a lot of you don't know about me is that I'm actually, you know, my background's in mental health, and I've been doing that full-time for the past many years.
And I recently left my job to start my own podcast coming up in September, which is going to be streaming on Rumble.
So I'm very excited about that.
Thanks to my sponsors at Network Access Group.
They're bringing this podcast on.
So I'm super excited about that.
I'm going to be moving in a week out of New York City back home to Florida.
I've been in cold.
Yeah, I'm from Florida originally.
I've been in New York for 12 years.
So I'm just feeling over it.
Awesome.
But yeah, my main platform right now is X at Angela Belcamino, and I'm going to be bringing some more stuff on TikTok.
phil labonte
Awesome.
Well, thanks for joining us.
We got Raymond G. Stanley.
raymond g stanley-jr
Hey, friends, it's your resident blue-collar devil dog hair.
I'm excited to be here today with the boldest libs of them all.
And we have Sean's here.
sean fracek
Producer Sean.
Hey, guys.
Thanks for having me.
Backed by Popular Demand.
The blue hoodie was a fan favorite last night, so I wore another blue hoodie.
Awesome.
Different color blue.
But glad to be here.
phil labonte
Thanks for joining us.
Elad is here.
Barely.
elad eliahu
Good evening, everybody.
White House correspondent here at Timcast.
Thanks for having me, Phil.
phil labonte
Well, thank you for coming to hang out.
All right.
So we're going to get right into it.
From the prime, from the post-millennial, breaking, Ken Paxton files suit to vacate state house seats held by Dems who fled over redistricting vote.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a lawsuit with the state Supreme Court in order to declare the seats held by 13 Democrat House lawmakers who fled the state amid a vote on a new congressional district map vacant.
The rogue Democrat legislators who fled the state have abandoned their duties, leaving their seats vacant.
These cowards deliberately sabotaged the constitutional process and violated the oaths they swore to uphold.
Their out-of-state rebellion cannot go unchecked, and the business of Texas must go on.
I have asked the Texas Supreme Court to clarify what has been clear from the beginning: that the runaway members have officially vacated their offices in the Texas House, Paxton said in a statement.
This is a bit of a surprise for some people.
I think that it's good.
I know that House members leaving the state in order to prevent quorums and stuff like that.
It's not unprecedented, but it does seem like Ken Paxton wants to put a little oomph behind it.
And I think that probably has something to do with the fact that he's after John Cornyn's seat.
sean fracek
Yeah.
Yeah, we were talking about this yesterday as well.
So like without 100, they can't do business, right?
So that's the issue.
So it's like, you know, the government's already inefficient, and now they can't even like do anything because these Democrats have left.
We were talking about it last night.
The issue is like, okay, if you arrest them, you just martyr them and you give them, you know, all kinds of social credit.
So what do we do?
raymond g stanley-jr
What's social credit going to do for them?
sean fracek
When elections become, you know, like become the face of the Democrat Party.
I mean, everyone's vying for that right now.
phil labonte
Do you think that state legislators leaving really are going to have an impact on national Democrats?
sean fracek
No, what I'm saying is if you arrest them.
phil labonte
I mean, yeah, but I mean, the point that I'm making is as state, most of the time, most Americans don't really pay attention to their own state governments, never mind the state government in Texas.
Now, there are people that are worked up because this is about redistricting and stuff, but redistricting is not, you know, redistricting halfway through the time for the census is not unprecedented.
They've done it before.
It's happened.
I heard someone, I forget who it was that was talking about this being an unprecedented situation, and it's not.
sean fracek
They've had fine, but Chris O'Kane said that.
Yeah, it's rare.
phil labonte
Yeah, rare is fine, but it's still unprecedented is different.
And so I don't think that most Americans really are going to care beyond Democrats are looking for something to talk about.
unidentified
What do you think?
angela belcamino
I mean, I'm not well-versed on gerrymandering, but I mean, my opinion is that they should have stayed.
Like, you know, I don't think it's right that they left.
Like, I'm can say that.
And yeah, my question is the same.
Like, what, like, something needs to be done about it?
I feel like so it, I mean, I think.
sean fracek
Yeah, what do you, I mean, like, what do you do?
You're like, yeah, you pick them up and like force them back into their job.
I mean, it's, it's like, like, what are your options?
And yeah, what I'm saying, as far as like becoming the face of the Democratic Party, like, they're being arrested.
They're getting the photo op.
They're going to be, it's going to be national news.
Like, they want this.
You know what I mean?
With like Mom Donnie, I would argue Mom Donnie's probably like the biggest, most popular face in the Democratic Party right now.
But if these guys are, you know, carded out in the jail and stuff, like all of a sudden everyone's going to know their names, know who they are, know what their positions are.
So it's like, you know.
phil labonte
But does this hurt Democrats?
Because it's my opinion that Democrats are really floundering.
Part of the reason why they're doing this is because, you know, Democrats still, just yesterday, there was a clip of Nancy Pelosi talking about how they want to nationalize gender reassignment surgery for kids.
This is an 80-20 issue.
The American people do not back that.
But Democrats still are on the wrong side of so many issues.
Is this the issue?
that they're trying to get behind because they think that it's an easy win.
Is it an easy win?
Or is this just something to distract from the fact that they still have nothing except for Zorhan Mamdani, who is really unpopular in their own party?
I mean, there are some people that are very pro Mamdani, of course, but the people that are against Mamdani, like this is really going to split the Democrat Party, even though it's only the mayor of one city, not even a national level Democrat.
angela belcamino
Yeah, no, it's a big one, like myself included.
Like I am, you know, not as progressive.
Like I'm not on this extreme.
Like, and a lot of this stuff is really turning me off.
So, you know, being a Democrat, like I, you know, I don't know that this is the issue, but I think you're onto something whereas they're not really changing their tune.
They're sort of doubling down on the scene.
So that's been bothering me.
It's something that's kind of pushed me more towards center, you know?
sean fracek
Yeah, I'm curious a lot, like, what are we hearing at the White House?
phil labonte
What do you mean?
sean fracek
Like, as far as like, what's the administration saying about this?
phil labonte
I haven't really heard.
sean fracek
I've heard a lot.
phil labonte
A lot.
sean fracek
Our White House correspondent who talks to everyone at the White House.
phil labonte
What's the president's, has the president or has the White House made any official statements about what's going on in Texas?
elad eliahu
Not to my knowledge.
I think he's letting this one rock out.
I don't know.
You could Google it.
I haven't been up to date on like.
sean fracek
You've been at the White House, right?
elad eliahu
I have been at the White House.
sean fracek
Oh, okay.
elad eliahu
You're just making sure.
I did ask.
I don't want to get into my scoops here.
I'm not sure, but I think there is this one House rep in Texas.
He just went on the Joe Rogan show.
I forgot what his name is.
He's having a little come up.
I don't know if he's one of these guys.
But yeah, again, this is just posturing.
Like, this is a band-aid fixed for the gerrymandering issue for them in Texas.
They're going to eventually have to come back.
phil labonte
It's a special session right now.
And the special session, I believe, ends at the end of August, I think.
I'm not positive, but it's 30 days is what a special session is.
And then if the governor wants to declare another or call another special session, they can.
So eventually, yes, you're right.
There is going to have to be something that'll happen.
But the Democrats that I've heard talking, the Texas Democrats that I've heard talking, they've kind of alluded to the idea that they're willing to stay on the land as long as it takes.
sean fracek
Because you just said a lot, they're going to have to come back.
What does that mean?
You can't force somebody to come back unless you arrest them, in which case then they're going to stay out of the way.
It's what they want.
elad eliahu
They're going to be strict until the next midterm election.
No, right?
They're going to slowly get fined, and then they're going to look very bad for staying out of their districts and not doing anything and essentially filibustering inevitably to prevent the state house from accomplishing anything that'll be extremely unpopular.
So politically, they're going to have to come back.
phil labonte
It'll be unpopular on the state level.
Do you think that it'll be popular with national Democrats?
elad eliahu
Do I think it'll be unpopular with Nemo?
phil labonte
No, do you think that it will be popular with national Democrats?
Because it will be looked at as, oh, they're taking it to Trump and they're giving it.
elad eliahu
Maybe, but I could still not name one of these.
I don't know.
You said these guys are going to turn popular, Sean.
Can you name one of these House representatives?
sean fracek
Not yet, but as soon as you get the handcuffs on him and he's on television everywhere, it's like Mom Dani.
Could you have named Mom Danny three months ago?
elad eliahu
When he was running, I could have, but that's not.
sean fracek
Right.
raymond g stanley-jr
They did this in 2021 when there were voting laws in Texas.
Over 20 or over 50 Democratic lawmakers fled.
If you guys recall this, they all left in Texas.
But they all came back and the Republicans still passed the law.
So it's just a big theater.
It's not going to have any effect.
They're going to come back.
The gerrymandering is going to work and we're going to move on and no one's going to care about these people down the road.
phil labonte
Well, I mean, I think that I think you're probably right about the long-term consequences unless one of these state legislators actually is exceptionally politically talented.
Because it's like you could take someone.
I mean, no one thought that Barack Obama was going to be the president six months before he got into office as the junior senator in Illinois.
Nobody knew who he was.
But because he's very politically talented, has a lot of charisma, you know, very quickly it became apparent that, wow, this guy's actually going to be a force.
And then, you know, within just, you know, a year or so, he had taken over, basically taken over the whole Democrat Party.
So I do think that as long as there are no, there are none of these people are actually politically talented, I think you're right.
But this is the kind of thing that brings out, you know, that shines the light on politically talented people.
sean fracek
And we are in unprecedented times.
You know, like I understand what you're saying, like, would you say 50 years ago?
raymond g stanley-jr
No, no, just back in 2021.
sean fracek
2021.
unidentified
Okay.
sean fracek
So they all came back.
raymond g stanley-jr
Yeah.
phil labonte
Yeah.
sean fracek
Or 50 left and they came back and they just think on the left, they hate Trump so much that like even like what do the woke call it?
Good trouble.
They get into good trouble.
So it's like this is what they see as their opportunity for that good trouble not coming back.
And plus you can be on broadcast it every day on social media.
phil labonte
Yeah, I mean, that's, I think that that's the kind of what I'm getting at is this is the kind of situation that really does take your nobodies and make them into somebodies.
So it could be that this is an opportunity for them.
Now, I mean, I could be totally wrong about the individuals.
And this really does depend on the individuals in question.
Like if none of them are, if they're just, you know, run-of-the-mill, you know, clowns, then they're not going to be able to capitalize on this.
But this kind of attention could make a star out of them, especially if they're perceived as someone that's taking it to Donald Trump.
Because that's the whole point of this, right?
The whole point of this is: look at us.
We're not letting Donald Trump destroy democracy for the 75,000th time, right?
Like it's always about they're destroying democracy.
They're going to destroy our democracy, et cetera.
But, you know, this is not going to make a mess.
There's going to be, I think I heard them, I think I heard the governor talking that there would be four new districts they're talking about.
One of them would be, they would all be likely predominantly Republican.
One would be predominantly black and one would be predominantly Hispanic, though they would be Republican still.
So it's not like the Democrats really can go with their normal catchphrases or what have you.
Like they're, oh, this is about racism, et cetera.
It's like, well, not really.
If you've got a mostly black and a mostly Hispanic, you know, this isn't about racism.
This is about, you know, representation.
You know, does that make a difference?
sean fracek
I don't, I mean, I don't know.
Like, I think this story is really very much so like for the insiders and the people that are paying attention, the kind of the smaller percentage of people out there.
Like if you ask somebody on the street, do they care about this?
Probably not.
I think once, you know, their absence starts affecting people in Texas, like if there aren't social programs that people are relying on or whatever the case is, you know, if that starts falling through, then I think people would be like, you know, start getting outraged, but I don't know.
Kind of like what Raymond said a lot of theater.
raymond g stanley-jr
And Jasmine Crockett, she's probably going to lose her seat.
sean fracek
Yeah, that's hilarious.
That's good too.
phil labonte
I think that now, Jasmine Crockett, that's someone that I think is politically talented.
Again, there's going to be a lot of people that are going to wig out that I'm saying, but she gets attention.
And that's what people are kind of neglecting.
I've had arguments with people around this table before about like AOC's political talent.
And someone's like, oh, she's just dumb and never blah, blah, blah.
And that is a terrible, terrible perspective to take because whether or not she is someone that you politically agree with or someone that you find charismatic, she is charismatic.
And she can definitely get people's attention.
angela belcamino
People rally behind her and feel very strongly.
And she gets people like heated and she gets people to vote and be passionate about these things.
phil labonte
When you were living in New York, were you in her district?
angela belcamino
I was.
unidentified
Okay.
angela belcamino
And I did like her and I did vote for her.
sean fracek
So it's a hot take.
That's a spicy thing.
raymond g stanley-jr
What did you like about her?
angela belcamino
I mean, I feel like she was really well-spoken and, like you said, charismatic.
And like, I just, I think I tend to believe everything that she was saying easily.
And so I think, you know, with My experience and kind of evolving, I'm more willing to really like, you know, do some more research and like, you know, and ask more questions.
But she definitely had that quality or has that quality about her where, you know, where now I'm like, oh, okay, once I see the other side and I'm able to have conversations with people more.
But I think, yeah, she.
phil labonte
Did you feel the same way when the issue with the Amazon warehouse was going down?
She prevented the Amazon warehouse from being built in the district.
Do you remember that?
angela belcamino
I do kind of remember.
Yeah.
And that didn't, did that have, did that color your opinion of her when that happened, or was it something that really I don't remember that specifically being something that I, yeah, I was super involved in at the time.
phil labonte
Okay.
angela belcamino
Yeah.
phil labonte
The reason I wonder is because that's the kind of thing that would turn a lot of people off if they, if it, when it's that type of thing that if it touches their lives, if it's like, you know, this really, I was really hoping for a job or something like that.
I was, you know, I've been looking for work and et cetera.
And the scuttlebutt going around was she's not in her district enough.
She's always on the internet and she's always in DC and she's more concerned with being an influencer.
So that's why I brought it up.
angela belcamino
I was wondering if it affected it wasn't personal to me, but I definitely get that.
I think people would.
sean fracek
Do you still identify as a Democrat?
angela belcamino
I do.
sean fracek
All right, we got one, boy.
angela belcamino
I do, I do.
But I see myself, you know, you were saying like kind of more of like a classic, like old school, modern liberal, a little more like left of center.
sean fracek
Do you see this as like action, like what these Texas Democrats are doing?
Do you see this as like something that the Democrats get behind?
angela belcamino
Or do you think that's, I think what I was saying is like me personally, I don't, I see it as more of like, you know, a bad look.
Like I don't, it's not something I would rally behind personally.
And I, I, I don't know.
I just, I think with the Democratic Party in general, right now people are asking a lot of questions.
And, you know, can you unpack that a little bit?
phil labonte
You said, to your, you know, progressive or Democrat friends, what are the, what are the things that they say to you about the Democrat Party and about like your kind of evolution away from the more progressive side of the Democrats?
angela belcamino
Well, I'm definitely getting pushback from people on the left, like the more progressive.
Like, you know, I'm seeing a difference where it's just getting very extreme, like more woke.
And so by being more woke today still.
Yeah.
sean fracek
Okay, that's what I was saying yesterday.
They view it as punk rock.
angela belcamino
Yeah.
sean fracek
They really do.
phil labonte
But go ahead, please.
angela belcamino
Yeah.
So, you know, I'm getting a lot of pushback.
I'm getting canceled by a lot of people that, you know, I was previously like having, you know, we were working together in the Democratic Party.
And over the past several years, you know, since this most recent election, it's, I'm, you know, getting canceled for asking questions or not just like subscribing to this sort, you know, the bullet points and the, and I just find it super, you know, being called a Nazi and a fascist.
Like vandalizing Teslas is a crime.
Like, you know, and not like just agree.
So by not agreeing and asking those questions, I have a lot of people calling me a Nazi and fascist.
phil labonte
Yeah, I went through, I've gone through four tires because of nails being left around my Tesla in the past in the past month.
angela belcamino
And I don't agree with that.
Like, how are, how are we doing any good by doing?
I don't think that's.
raymond g stanley-jr
I'm sorry, Phil.
I thought you were someone else.
phil labonte
Be careful.
You don't want to do that stuff.
Yeah, you're on camera.
But I appreciate that.
When you said something, though, you said canceled.
When you say canceled, what do you mean?
Because colloquially canceled has meant lose a job, friends stop talking to you, possibly stop talking to you, and you find out about it because they make a big long social media post about how you're a terrible person, which has happened to me.
I mean, it's been a long time since that stuff has happened to me because I've been fairly open about my opinions for a long, long time.
But it was a new thing in 2013, 14, 15.
And that was fairly shocking to me.
People that I thought that I'd been friends with, that I'd grown up with, that I had heard say some of the most offensive, terrible jokes.
And then they come out and say, oh, he's this terrible person for saying something that is night and day from what the things that I'd heard them say.
But what do you mean?
angela belcamino
That's hard, right?
That's hard.
It's hard to wrap your head around a lot of that stuff.
I think, yeah, with a lot of over the past several years, you know, with politics, Facebook, whatever.
So some of it is real, like real life family members and friends coming at you and, you know, being nasty and name-calling and things.
But it's a lot.
I mean, I do a lot on Twitter, a lot on X, and the comments are really ugly and really nasty.
There's a lot of blockings.
There's a lot of, I followed you, and just a lot of name-calling, a lot of nastiness, which I'm not behind.
It's like, if you disagree with me, let's have a conversation.
Tell me why.
It's okay to disagree, but you can't.
You just, I mean, so that's kind of what I mean: blockings and name-calling, nasty comments, just a lot of people who are very vocal about talking to the internet.
sean fracek
Yeah.
It's funny that Democrats are trying to cancel you, but the conservatives think it's all a bit.
They think like what you're doing is fake.
We're talking about that a little bit before.
angela belcamino
Yeah, I'm a conservative psyop.
But there's, but it actually has been really nice.
So I've gotten a lot of like positive responses from conservatives.
Oh, that's on the right too.
Like, they're kind of coming around and being like, oh, I thought I hated you and I thought this narrative, this thing about you.
phil labonte
Your rage baits were absolutely, I mean, and they really were absolutely perfect.
The way that you would post things and stuff, especially and especially when you were really going for it, trying to upset conservatives.
I was like, this chick has, she knows exactly what to do.
And when I remember when I saw you hanging out with, it was Ashley Sinclair, I think it was the first time.
And I was like, is this real?
And then I was like, well, now, has the whole thing been a bit?
Because I knew that it was rage bait.
Like, I knew the point of it was that you were trying to get a reaction out of people.
But I was like, there's no way that she's that good at it.
Has it all been a bit?
So how much of it was a bit like, I mean, obviously you are a Democrat.
angela belcamino
I am.
phil labonte
But you just knew how to get a rise out of people.
angela belcamino
We were talking about this earlier.
Like, I am a Democrat.
I am a liberal.
But I, you know, I think there's extremes on both sides.
And so, you know, sort of trolling, you know, a bit there, but there is an authenticity and genuineness about it too, but just sort of like calling out and trolling extremes and like having fun with it too.
raymond g stanley-jr
Yeah, when you're like walking down the streets of New York, like strolling your stuff and like, I'm 40 and I'm ready for a baby, but I'm not going to have them because I'm free.
Like, you know, that's that's kind of different.
angela belcamino
It's like I was doing 42 child-free.
You were also talking about that because you were talking about kids.
And I feel strongly about like people should be able to do whatever they want to do.
Like, I don't think people should, you know, your life is meaningless if you don't have children.
And I think those videos, people got so angry.
raymond g stanley-jr
Yeah, I bet.
sean fracek
Oh, is the chat lighting up right now?
Is the chat lighting up?
phil labonte
I don't know.
elad eliahu
Like, as a bold lib, what are the issues you care about?
Is it abortion?
I'm guessing is like top of the list.
angela belcamino
For me, like, coming from a mental health background, my stuff is very much like humanity.
Like, you know, things that affect human lives, quality of life, mental health related, like that kind of stuff.
But I do, yeah, but women's rights is also important to me.
phil labonte
What about women's lefts?
angela belcamino
That too.
All of the rights and the lefts.
phil labonte
Okay.
elad eliahu
So what I'm trying to understand, like Democrats, they deal with mental health issues very well, you think?
Or like, is there something in particular?
angela belcamino
I mean, I'm not sure what you mean.
sean fracek
Are you saying that Democrats are mentally challenged?
elad eliahu
Is that what you're saying?
No, like the Democrat issues that you care about.
And you were like, yeah, the mental health stuff.
angela belcamino
Well, it's not necessarily a Democrat issue.
Like, that's why I'm more about bridging, like bringing people together.
Like, right now, you know, I feel like I'm at least now, like, in this phase of like, we have more in common and trying to bring people together and we're all human and finding that sort of common ground is where I'm at right now.
elad eliahu
And does that mean you don't have like a bleeding hatred for the president?
angela belcamino
Right.
No, correct.
And that's, I would say that's different.
Like, I would say that I, that's part of my evolution.
I think that we all should hopefully grow and evolve.
And I can definitely say, like, I have said some bad thing, you know, that I don't take it back.
That's where I was then.
And I feel like who I am today is different.
And I feel like I'm learning.
And that's why I'm here and why I want to like have more conversations and be like open.
phil labonte
So, do you feel like you had a looking back now, right?
To when you were more in the, I guess, liberal bubble.
Do you feel like you were in a first of all?
Do you feel like you were in a liberal bubble?
And second of all, do you feel like you understand conservatives now better now after kind of coming out and making light of some of the more progressive ideas and also spending time with conservatives?
Did you used to think that conservatives were a different kind of person, or is it something that you kind of like always were like, no, we're all kind of actually just having different opinions and come from different places?
angela belcamino
Yeah, I don't, I think that it's, I think that I can see the differences.
Like, I feel like I might have lumped people all, which is not like me.
So I'm able to see that more clearly.
phil labonte
It's very normal and very human.
angela belcamino
Yeah, for sure.
We will, I think we have a tendency to want to put people into boxes, right?
Which I'm actually very, and I say this now, and it's part of my bio.
I'm anti-label and anti-box.
So it's more in line with who I am.
But yeah, I don't think I realized now I have a better understanding.
And I think getting to know people and their stories.
Like, so I do interviews on X where, and I'm interviewing a lot of conservative people, Jay Sixers, et cetera.
And so I would have thought the same thing, right, about that entire group of people.
But like hearing their stories, you hear a whole other perspective, and not everyone's situation and where they were at that day is the same.
So I think that's so important.
And that's something I want to do with my podcast: really the storytelling piece and getting to know people's backgrounds so that we don't lump people and just make assumptions.
sean fracek
But I also think like the 90s liberals are in a tough spot.
Like the Conservative Party today versus the Liberal Party, like go back to the 90s, they're completely inverse.
You know what I mean?
Like the conservatives in the 90s were very much pro-censorship.
Like, you know, like a lot of, you know, very Christian.
phil labonte
Remember, the PMRC was Al Gore's wife.
sean fracek
Who's that?
phil labonte
The PMRC.
sean fracek
PMRC.
phil labonte
Explain.
I forget what the acronym meant, but it was looking to censor music.
sean fracek
Oh, okay.
Oh, at the albums, the explicit album, the label.
Evas and Butthead, though, I think that was the conservatives, right?
Like that's.
raymond g stanley-jr
They went after Eminem.
sean fracek
Yeah, they went.
phil labonte
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
No, this is much further back.
Al Gore's wife.
This is in the 80s.
This is when, because the label on offensive records or whatever, that wasn't in the late 90s.
That was in the early, late 80s, early 90s.
It was when D. Snyder went before Congress and actually was talking to Congress.
And it was Al Gore's wife who was the leader of the PMRC.
So I do agree, you know, Republicans and conservatives have that stigma because of the fact that that's where the Christian conservatives were, but it wasn't just Republicans.
And I, you know, point the Al Gore's wife.
sean fracek
Sure, but the left was seen as the free speech party, the live and let live, the pro, you know, same-sex marriages.
Like it was down with the machine, taking down the government.
Yeah, in the 90s, yeah.
phil labonte
And I think the PMRC is the same thing.
sean fracek
Now that's the right.
Except for the gay marriage part.
phil labonte
I think the PMRC was actually earlier, because Hook and Mouth by Megadeth references the PMRC, and that was on the, I think it was So Far So Good So What album.
Anyways, either way.
sean fracek
I remember it was a big deal when they put those big labels on.
phil labonte
Mid-80s, but it was a big deal.
sean fracek
It was a big deal.
phil labonte
And that was, again, that was...
sean fracek
And Beavis and Byad got censored because they were saying fire because some dumb kid burned down his house.
phil labonte
Yeah.
sean fracek
They were saying fire, so they couldn't say fire anymore.
And then remember when the movie came out, they said fire like a thousand times.
phil labonte
And all the people that were looking to censor video games.
sean fracek
Yeah, video games.
phil labonte
Violent.
sean fracek
Conservatives.
phil labonte
It was.
Yeah, it was largely...
I feel like it was largely accredited to conservatives, but I do feel like it was actually more bipartisan than people remember.
And I think that that's because of the fact that it was oftentimes led by the Christian conservatives.
sean fracek
Yes.
phil labonte
And that's what people remember is the people that were the Bible thumpers that were saying this is against God.
sean fracek
Book burning.
phil labonte
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Going after Marilyn Manson.
Edel.
Going after, you know, heavy metal bands there were there were the people that were going after judas priest because they swore up and down that there were backwards messages in the songs yeah yeah yeah judas Priest had to go to court.
sean fracek
But it's just wild.
Like, that's what I'm saying.
Like, a lot of, I think a lot of 90s liberals are homeless because of that.
phil labonte
Well, I think a lot of 90s liberals are MAGA.
sean fracek
Yeah, and now they are.
That's what I'm saying.
That's what I'm saying.
phil labonte
Your hat's going to be a little bit more.
That's why I'm wearing red.
sean fracek
Turn the new leaf.
angela belcamino
Yeah.
phil labonte
All right.
So I think we're going to jump to this next story now.
From the Wall Street Journal, Putin tells U.S. he'll halt the war in exchange for eastern Ukraine.
Let's see.
Russian President Vladimir Putin presented the Trump administration this week with a sweeping proposal for a ceasefire in Ukraine, demanding major territorial concessions by Kiev and a push for global recognition of its claims in exchange for a halt to the fighting, according to European and Ukrainian officials.
President Trump said Friday he would meet with Putin in Alaska on August 15th following Putin's proposal.
He didn't provide additional information about the meeting or the exact location.
The Kremlin didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
European officials expressed serious reservations about Putin's proposals, which would require that Ukraine hand over eastern Ukraine, a region known as the Donbass, without Russia committing to much other than stopping fighting.
The offer which Putin conveyed Wednesday to U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff in Moscow set off a diplomatic scramble to get further clarity on details of the proposal.
This is something that most people that have been watching the war in Ukraine kind of figured was going to happen.
So I don't know that Putin, well, the news isn't really the actual news.
It's Putin saying, you know, making the remark that's actually the news.
But this is something that, you know, there's always been the assumption, or at least since Putin's advance was stopped.
The assumption was he was going to take the Donbass.
He was going to take the places that are predominantly Russian speaking.
And he was going to say, okay, this is where I'll stop.
Because no one at all ever thought that Crimea was going back.
Ever since 200, whatever, 12 or 13, when he actually invaded Crimea into Crimea, everyone has kind of been like, well, I guess Crimea is part of Russia now.
And there are people that are like, no, especially those fellas on X. They love to say, no, we're going to kick Putin out of Crimea.
And it's like, man, that ain't happening.
Like, you're just, you're a clown if you think that.
What are you going to do?
Like, how are you going to get him out?
I mean, is the U.S. going to actually put troops in there?
That's not going to happen.
It was never going to happen.
So this is like, this is probably a best case scenario.
And it's also what kind of people really thought was going to be the end game anyways.
But if I understand correctly, some of the details that Putin wants is like, there will be no UN or Ukraine will not enter into the UN.
There will be no Western forces in Ukraine, which just kind of means that Putin's going to be like, all right, we'll stop fighting now until I feel like it again.
unidentified
Right.
sean fracek
So I mean, is it $80 billion well spent?
I mean, I guess, Angela, from your standpoint as a Democrat, like, I don't understand why the whole pro-Ukraine thing started.
I really have no idea where that came from.
All of a sudden, it was like, you're on one side or the other.
It didn't make a lot of sense.
Like, from your standpoint as a Democrat, like, why do you guys love Ukraine?
angela belcamino
I don't know.
This is not an, like, I'm not versed in this at all.
Okay.
I haven't been heading to the bank.
sean fracek
In your circles, did they have like the flags and their profiles and stuff?
angela belcamino
Some.
unidentified
Why?
angela belcamino
Yeah.
raymond g stanley-jr
It's easy to answer.
angela belcamino
Yeah.
raymond g stanley-jr
It's easy to answer because it's Russia.
It's Trump and Russia, the Russia gate.
Anything against Russia, Russia does, they're going to hate their whole offense.
The Democratic Party side is going to hate, even no matter what, to do something good, do something bad.
That's why day one, they instantly put their flags in their bio because it's Russia and they're told to hate Russia because of Russia Gate.
phil labonte
Because Russia helped.
Yeah, because Russia helped Donald Trump steal the elections.
So if you facts.
If you are against Donald Trump, he's allied with Russia because he's a Putin puppet.
angela belcamino
Right.
phil labonte
Which is, I mean, it's, I mean, it's not based in any kind of reality, but that's the narrative that the left is.
angela belcamino
I think that is the narrative.
Yeah.
phil labonte
Yeah.
So, I mean, a lot, what do you feel is the proper course of action?
Do you think that this is what was always going to be the situation?
Do you think that we, I mean, I don't think we can trust Russia personally, but what do you think?
elad eliahu
So for President Putin, I think the Ukraine war is legacy-defining.
He wants to take a bigger chomp out of Ukraine that he's been able to.
In the initial assault, he almost split Ukraine in half when he sent that long convoy to Kyiv.
I don't know if you guys recall, but they definitely want a lot more territorial gains than this.
And I don't think at the negotiating table is the way that Putin will be able to achieve this.
Ukraine will not give up half their country without a fight, considering how much I think they've already fought for the eastern parts of Ukraine.
And from Putin's strategy, if you guys have been paying attention, President Trump has been giving this guy a ton of different deadlines that he repeatedly just has to push back because Putin doesn't want to negotiate.
He's leading Trump on.
And I think President Trump actually knows that he's leading him on, and he just needs to allow him to do so because Trump needs to bite for more time because there's no serious solution to this that it doesn't take a large amount of political capital that I don't think the president wants to expend right now in Russia.
The administration right now has been trying to pivot to the Pacific.
That's been like that's actually been the government's direction pretty much since Obama's pivot to the Pacific.
And right now, a lot of people pivot to the Pacific, you're talking about China.
China.
So there's a lot of people in the administration who like generally talk about that issue as a top issue.
Eldridge Colby is this one of the top guys in the DOJ or in the military, I believe.
And then there's also Pete Hexeth, who's been known to talk about the Pacific a lot.
And they don't want to get bogged down in Russia and the type of investment that it would require to militarily remove Putin from Ukraine or stop him from advancing would be a lot.
And it would be a kind of sinking of our treasury, our military treasure in Ukraine.
So I think he's trying to balance all of this out.
I do think it's also worth mentioning that president promised, I think it was originally on day one, that he would end the war in Russia and Ukraine.
And he was unable to do so.
He's been very successful in different parts of the world.
Like I believe he's been very successful in the Middle East, despite people freaking out all the time about what he was doing here.
But he campaigned on, I believe, reducing or no way to Ukraine.
And that's where the base seemed.
But otherwise, I don't know why people wouldn't start calling President Trump a neocon once more because he did allow a ton of arms to flow to Ukraine.
Despite NATO paying for it, we're still sending a bunch of arms that Ukraine wouldn't be able to procure otherwise.
I furcy us being much more involved, though, militarily, once there isn't a diplomatic solution to this.
Putin, again, is just leading the president on more and more.
We're seeing secondary sanctions on India that aren't panning out exactly as the way that we planned.
We were trying to sanction Russian oil.
There's so many different elements to what's going on here.
phil labonte
Well, I mean, for sanctions to work, we need good partners, and good and Europe has not been a good partner anymore.
elad eliahu
Nor have the Indians.
They've been really screwing us over on immigration fraud.
They've been screwing us over on global trade.
They've been screwing us over on call centers.
The Twitter.
phil labonte
The fact that, you know, Europe has been buying Russian oil for essentially the entirety of the Russian war in Ukraine.
elad eliahu
I think they've dramatically reduced.
I think the main buyers right now are China, India, and a couple of other small countries.
And look, I do and don't blame India because from their argument, the way they see it is that, hey, we're a bunch of poor Indians and I have over a billion Indians who need cheap access to cheap oil and cheap oil from Russia.
phil labonte
Literally burning dung is the option.
elad eliahu
Exactly.
So like, you know, we're telling them to live in squalor and not buy cheap Russian oil.
But they are, in a sense, also, you know, paying for the Russian economy to run and it's a wartime economy and they're just producing arms to attack Ukraine.
I think we should keep our eyes on China.
phil labonte
So it's your sense.
elad eliahu
I'm a big China guy.
I care about Ukraine.
I think we should send more arms and money to Ukraine, but our real eyes need to be on.
phil labonte
So it's your sense that there will be no meeting with President Putin?
elad eliahu
Well, there will be a meeting, but I don't think anything fruitful will come out of it.
phil labonte
So even if the United States were to say, okay, we've convinced Kiev to your terms, right?
You can't.
elad eliahu
I think it's like a maximalist ask from Putin.
Zelensky can't even come to the table.
This is an insulting offer.
Like, think of it from a Ukrainian perspective.
How many lives you've just lost?
phil labonte
But does Ukraine Ukraine have the ability to say no?
I mean, I know that it's an insulting Offer.
I understand what you're saying.
But if the president says, look, you need to go and talk to him, you need to be here, or whatever the conditions are.
I don't know what the White House thinks that the Ukrainian president is going to do.
But if the White House, hypothetically, if the White House were to say, hey, you need to sit down and talk because you're losing 5,000 people a week or whatever, and we want this to stop, and you don't have the human capital to continue this, and NATO's not coming in.
Can he say no?
Can Zelensky say no, Mr. President?
I'm not going to.
elad eliahu
I think this goes beyond Zelensky.
I think this goes to the Ukrainian people.
Ukraine is still a democracy right now, and Ukrainians feel this way.
And Zelensky is just representing them.
Ukrainians want to fight for their country.
And I think even if we stopped helping them, even with just Europeans' help, they would keep fighting against the Russians.
These guys don't want to let their country fall.
They've been under Soviet rule in the past, and I think their fight back is righteous.
And they've actually been doing an extremely effective job at it.
Also, at this point, I think it's worth noting.
Russia is a much bigger country, but they're losing a lot more men because they're on the offensive.
And when you're on the offensive in war, you have to give up like a three to one ratio.
It's a lot harder to attack and conquer than it is.
Three is correct when it comes to like a position, but still.
Russia doesn't have endless stockpiles of weapons.
sean fracek
They got some pretty big weapons, though.
elad eliahu
I'm like, I don't think that's pretty big.
If I'm a Russian, if I'm putting on my Russian neocon hat, I'm actually not.
I'm like very sad and not impressed at all with my military gains on Ukraine.
We're not able to subjugate Ukraine at all, actually.
If I'm a Russian military man, I'm like, embarrassed by the gains that we've made.
And they should have been able to end this in the first few weeks.
That was Putin's original plan, but that's what he wanted to do.
sean fracek
Do you realize, I mean, Russia's not sending their best stuff.
I mean, just so we're clear.
And that's, I think you are right.
I think Trump is in a position here because this whole thing was no new war.
elad eliahu
They're not sending their best stuff.
Is Russia trying their hardest to take over Ukraine right now?
Yes.
sean fracek
I have no idea.
I'm just telling you, you know, we know for decades what kind of weapons they have, you know, and that's where it gets really scary.
You know, you go back 20, 30 years, a nuclear war was a big fear for a lot of people, even in our country.
I mean, Phil knows, you know, we used to do drills for that stuff.
But the point I'm making is, you know, with Trump, the position he's in, like he, the whole no new wars, and we got to end these wars, like he's in a tough position here, too, you know, because the American people don't want these wars.
We don't support these wars, you know.
phil labonte
I don't think that the U.S., I think the American people don't support sending money.
Well, definitely not Americans.
I do think that if the, I think that to a lot's point earlier about where the money is coming from to pay for the arms, I think if you can sell the American people on Europe is paying American weapons manufacturers to manufacture weapons and those are the weapons that are going to Ukraine, I think you could sell the American people on that.
sean fracek
I don't know.
Trump was brought in under the banner of we got to end these wars, these forever wars.
phil labonte
A lot of that was because of the financial aspect, right?
Because the American people aren't doing the dying.
Yes.
Well, okay, so now that's a whole different context that you're adding to it.
So that's not what I'm talking about.
But the American people aren't doing the dying, right?
The financing has been the problem.
People are like, look, man, I can't even buy a house and we're spending all this money over in Russia or over in Ukraine trying to save Ukraine.
I can't afford groceries, but we're spending all this money over in Ukraine.
It was a financial argument that the American people were most compelled by.
So if you can convince the American people, like, look, not only are we not paying for these weapons, but we have Russia or we have Europe paying for these weapons and they're being made in America.
That means there are American jobs that are being made.
The money's going into American pockets to American people that work at these weapons manufacturers.
And we're also putting a hurt onto our geopolitical enemies because Russia is a geopolitical enemy.
Don't forget, just a couple years back, there were Russians, the Wagner group was fighting with Americans in Syria.
Like there's a couple pretty famous engagements where U.S. special forces were fighting with Russian PMCs.
And Americans, or at least Americans that pay attention, remember that.
And they still look at Russia as an enemy.
So I think that the American people could be sold on that if just so long as it's not Americans that are paying for it.
sean fracek
I mean, maybe.
Like, I understand what you're saying.
Like, it depends on which Americans you're asking, Nancy Pelosi, people that work at Lockheed Martin, sure.
Yeah.
No, I'm talking about people in the industry making money on it.
But I think, you know, the average person on the street, should we be in wars?
Do you support war?
Should we be helping Israel?
Should we be helping Ukraine?
I think, I mean, personally, like, just based on my conversations with people in my relationships, people don't want.
And that was a big thing Trump ran on.
No, end the forever wars, no new wars, end the forever wars.
elad eliahu
So, Sean, I think it's really easy to say.
So, like, what does that look like if we're just ending all the new wars right now?
Like, what does that mean?
Leaving Ukraine, not sending any arms over to Ukraine, and then allowing them to take over as much of Ukraine as they'd like.
sean fracek
I mean, that's a great question.
If it were up to me, yeah.
I really, it's not our war.
It's not our fight.
You know, I get it.
I understand the point you're making, and it sucks.
Don't get me wrong, but like, why are we fighting it?
It was like Desert Storm.
elad eliahu
I don't think we are fighting.
sean fracek
It's like, why did we go into Iraq after 9-11?
That made no sense.
Like, there's a lot of stuff that we get taken advantage of.
People in the military, I've had a lot of people, friends that were in the military, they love going to war because they get paid triple time.
You know what I mean?
So, yeah, there is like the economic standpoint of it, to Phil's point.
But no, I think most people just don't see the benefits of war and like why people need to die.
elad eliahu
Yeah, I think we need to be pretty clear here.
We're not fighting this war.
The Ukrainians are fighting this war.
Ukrainians are dying.
We are not paying.
A death toll.
We are getting paid to send over weapons at this point.
And also, like, I mean, I feel like it's such an easy, basic take.
Like, yeah, war is bad, but war is happening.
And, like, what are you going to do about the war that is happening?
sean fracek
How are you going to respond to that?
Why is it our job?
elad eliahu
Because appeasing war only begets more war.
sean fracek
Why is it our job?
Why is it America's job?
elad eliahu
Well, like, we also have a country that can.
No, because we have a NATO allyship with a bunch of European countries.
So, like, what do you think our relationship with NATO should be?
The president thinks we should increase our defense spending to 5% to make sure that we're the preeminent power.
But you think we should what?
sean fracek
I mean, I'm just saying, like, Trump ran on no, ending the wars, ending forever wars, no new wars.
I mean, are you noticing this in the White House as the message changed?
You know, we have to start wars and we have to be involved in every war forever.
I mean, is that the messaging now?
elad eliahu
No, I think you just read into the president what you want to hear.
I think the president ran on a lot of different things, like peace through strength, and he ran on Iran never being able to get a nuclear weapon.
I don't know if you were paying attention.
And he's done.
sean fracek
He was paying attention.
elad eliahu
Yeah, so he's abided by a lot of those promises.
sean fracek
I'm still like up in the air as whether or not you're going to the White House.
So we'll sell it.
elad eliahu
What are you talking about?
sean fracek
Let's bring Angela into the.
elad eliahu
I don't know.
You must have not seen my recent scoops because it's a lot of people.
sean fracek
Angela, should we have a lot of wars?
Should we be in forever wars?
As a Democrat, should we be in Forever Wars?
angela belcamino
I mean, I'm also not a war person, so I tend to agree with you, but I hear both of what you're saying.
I think it's complicated.
I don't have the answers, but I tend to not want to be in war.
And I definitely would ask, you know, have questions about why we're involved or, you know, was it the argument that Trump was making when he was campaigning?
phil labonte
Was that an argument based on economics?
Or do you think that it was an argument based on not being involved in war overall?
angela belcamino
I don't know.
I don't know.
What do you guys think?
I'm not sure what his reasoning.
phil labonte
For me, like I said earlier, I think that it was an argument based on economics.
I think the American people got behind it because of the fact that it was an argument based on economics.
Most people were really hurting in the lead up to the election.
People couldn't pay their bills, grocery prices, and they were just like coming off the shock of significant inflation for multiple years.
And so they were just like, why are we giving these people money?
Why are we giving these people money?
Every time I heard an argument, it was a monetary argument.
It was a financial argument.
We shouldn't be spending money on these wars because we can't afford them.
Why are we giving money to Israel?
Why are we giving money to Ukraine?
Those are the two big things.
We shouldn't be spending our money on this, et cetera, et cetera.
So if the argument can be made, look, Europe's paying for this stuff.
Our NATO Allies are paying for this stuff.
They're sending us money.
They're sending money to our weapons manufacturers, and our weapons manufacturers are sending weapons to Ukraine so the Ukrainians can defend themselves.
I feel like that's an argument that the American people will say, all right, fine, I don't care.
Because I understand your perspective, Sean, that, you know, it's not our fight.
It's not a fight the United States wants to be in.
But the United States is not over there doing the dying.
We do not have troops on the ground.
I don't even believe the people that say that there's special forces on the ground.
Maybe there are CIA operatives, you know, human intel and stuff like that, gathering information, but there's not special ops guys.
Like those dudes are not there.
They're legitimately not.
Any Americans that are over there are over there as privateers.
They're volunteers.
They went and they joined up because they actually want to fight because, you know, whatever they like, war.
But that doesn't mean that the American people are doing the actual dying and that matters, right?
If you're not paying for it and Americans aren't dying, most Americans are like, all right, well, I guess I'm going to go to work then.
You know, you're going to be like, I don't care, whatever.
My friend's kid isn't going to lose his legs.
Right.
And I'm not going to have to pay the taxes that are going to this.
So what do I care?
sean fracek
Right.
But I mean, you know, and when 9-11 did happen and we did have boots on the ground in Iraq, a lot of sentiment around the country was, we don't, you know, why are we there?
Like, what's the point?
phil labonte
I feel like that didn't really start until like 2018.
sean fracek
I'm just saying, like, and that became the time.
Yeah.
phil labonte
And it was, it was honestly.
sean fracek
Because it was a ground up movement from the people who were like, we're sick of this.
Why are we in the same war constantly?
You know, like, we've been fighting with Russia for how long now?
Like, it's insane.
phil labonte
It's like gets it.
So wait a minute.
You're conflating topics.
We're not, we haven't.
sean fracek
I'm just saying war in general.
phil labonte
Like, we haven't been fighting with Russia.
Like, we have not been in combat.
sean fracek
But there always uses the boogeyman or whatever.
And it's just like, you know, people get kind of sick of the whole thing.
phil labonte
Russia.
I mean, I get it.
sean fracek
You know what I mean?
Like, all we can do is war.
It's like the Democrats.
It's like all they can do is war.
phil labonte
We're the most, when you're the most powerful military in the world, that's the thing that people are going to come to you and say, hey, we have this problem.
Your allies are going to come to you and say, hey, we have this problem and we want you to help us.
Like that, whether or not the American people get behind it, that is part of being the most powerful military in the world.
Now, world policing, I agree.
We shouldn't be the world police.
But I think that there's a difference between being the world police, right?
Taking the initiative to say that we're going to stop this and stop that, and then selecting which conflicts we're going to involve ourselves in.
That's one thing.
Sure.
As opposed to when someone else says, hey, come help us.
We're your ally, or we have good relations.
Maybe they're not NATO nations or whatever.
They're like, we are an allied nation.
We've had good relations.
We do a lot of economic work together.
We've got this issue, this military issue.
Can you come help us?
That's a different thing.
And I think that whereas most, I would probably say most Americans don't make the distinction, but as far as like Washington goes, there's definitely a distinction in that.
sean fracek
It's a business of war.
phil labonte
I mean, I think that that's, well, I mean, that's what happens when you've got the biggest military on earth.
War is part of the business.
It's part of the business of being the biggest military on earth and also having the reserve currency.
elad eliahu
Bold lib, can I ask you, is war bad?
angela belcamino
I mean, there's, you know, obviously there's reasons why, you know, people are fighting it.
unidentified
Wow.
sean fracek
That's a good poll.
That's a good question for the chat, a poll chat.
Warhawk or...
angela belcamino
Yeah.
It's a good question.
unidentified
I know.
angela belcamino
It's obviously it's complicated.
So there's not as, but I think I see people dying.
I mean, I don't, you know, that's the part I don't like about obviously people, you know, there's very strong reasons why people are doing it and putting their lives on the line.
So yeah, of course, it's a, yeah.
elad eliahu
For a bold lip, I'm surprised you don't love Ukraine.
Bold libs love Ukraine.
So off-brand for you.
No, am I wrong?
No, I'm still pretty certain this is like a 70, 30, 80, 20 issue.
angela belcamino
People are always asking those questions.
So.
phil labonte
All right.
So we're going to jump to the, we're going to at least talk a little bit more about Trump and Putin.
From Fox News, Trump Putin will hold first ever in-person meeting since Ukraine invasion next week in Alaska.
President Donald Trump and President and Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet next Friday, August 15th for the first person in for the first in-person meeting between the leaders of the U.S. and Russia since Moscow launched its deadly 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
The leaders are expected to meet in Alaska, Trump said in a post on Truth Social.
The highly anticipated meeting between myself as President of the United States of America and President Vladimir Putin of Russia will take place next Friday, August 15th, 2025, in the great state of Alaska.
Trump wrote in his Friday evening post.
Further details to follow.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
I love the thank you for the attention to this matter.
It's my favorite Trumpism now.
The location of the meeting was a major point of interest after the summit was first floated following a call between Trump and Putin on Wednesday after White House envoy Steve Witkoff traveled to Moscow to meet with the Kremlin chief.
Hungary, Switzerland, Italy, and the UAE were all under consideration, with Putin originally favoring Hungary, according to sources familiar with the planning.
The Kremlin chief also shot down the idea of meeting in Italy, according to reports on Friday, due to Rome's perceived closeness with the Ukrainian president Vladimir Zelensky.
Following the Wednesday, Trump Putin called the U.S. president, also spoke with Zelensky along with European leaders on the potential for a trilateral meeting.
So I don't know how realistic a trilateral meeting would be, but I mean, again, to your point earlier, a lot, do you think that if Trump says, hey, Zelensky, get on a plane, do you think that he has the ability to say no?
elad eliahu
I don't think Putin wants to meet with Zelensky because it gives him more credibility than I think Putin believes he deserves.
So he doesn't want to give him like a lot of respect to meet with him.
I think Putin and Trump are going to meet in Alaska and nothing's going to get done.
Like a bold lib at a bar, he's being let on.
phil labonte
But what do you think?
But what do you think?
What do you think would happen if Donald Trump were to say no?
Get on a plane, Zelensky.
Do you think Zelensky would?
elad eliahu
I think Zelensky definitely would.
I think it makes Zelensky look like a more potent political figure if he's meeting with Putin.
Putin's never met with Zelensky.
The way Putin talks about Zelensky is like that he's a rogue state, that Ukraine, you know, is a completely rogue actor and he's a leader of an illegitimate state.
So if he meets with him, it's giving him like that credibility.
And so he, Zelensky wants to meet with Putin.
Putin doesn't want to meet with Zelensky.
Putin wants to waste Trump's time in this meeting and lead him on more.
And the war is going to go on because Putin wants definitely a bigger bite of Ukraine because they made baby gains, Russian military, very unimpressive gains in Ukraine.
Not crushing it.
sean fracek
I do think it would be based if Trump got Putin to admit that they wanted Hillary to win.
I think that would go viral.
If Trump gets Putin to admit that they actually wanted Hillary to win and not Trump the first time around.
raymond g stanley-jr
Why would he bring that up when they're talking about warnings?
angela belcamino
Do you think that will happen?
sean fracek
That would be fantastic.
It would just end everyone.
Everyone's brains would melt.
But that is what it kind of looked like: Russia did want Hillary, not Trump, the first time around.
Based on everything that's coming out with Tulsi and everything else.
phil labonte
Maybe.
raymond g stanley-jr
Zelensky is a Trump.
Yes.
phil labonte
Zelensky is a chump?
raymond g stanley-jr
Yes.
phil labonte
Oh, really?
raymond g stanley-jr
I agree with a lot.
So, yeah, Putin's like, you know, he's one of the world leaders.
He might be a terrible person, but Zelensky is some dude who dances and he's for the worst corrupt country in the world.
elad eliahu
Democratically elected.
raymond g stanley-jr
Sure, they say they say.
elad eliahu
You don't think he's kosher?
raymond g stanley-jr
I don't think he's kosher.
elad eliahu
I believe he was Democratic.
raymond g stanley-jr
Zelensky?
phil labonte
Yeah.
elad eliahu
I mean, we could dislike him, but.
raymond g stanley-jr
Oh, fine.
Either way, but I don't think Putin thinks he stands up to him in any certain way.
phil labonte
No, I mean, I think that I think I agree with you guys.
I think that Vladimir Putin doesn't have any respect for Zelensky.
But I don't know that, I don't know, I think that Donald Trump does have the ability to say, look, you know, he's here.
Like, right?
Like, if he were to bring him in and surprise Putin.
Now, Putin might be like, all right, well, I'm leaving.
That might actually happen.
And I think that.
sean fracek
I think, well, yeah, I don't think.
Like Alex Stein, where he brings someone else on the show.
I mean, it's possible beefing.
phil labonte
It's possible.
I think that I honestly, like, if you really think about it, I don't think that Donald Trump would want to risk that because Putin would get up and be like, all right, well, I'm leaving.
sean fracek
It took a lot to get him here.
phil labonte
And so I don't think that he would want to risk it.
I mean, it would be funny, but I don't think that I don't think Donald Trump wants to risk that.
raymond g stanley-jr
Trump's talked a lot of ish about getting this settled, and he's failed violently for the last forever since January.
phil labonte
In my opinion, it was a bad idea to talk about this as something that he could just walk in and make the deal.
Yeah.
Because Putin has all the cards.
Trump talks about who's got the cards and stuff.
There is absolutely no reason for Putin to say, okay, well, I'm going to stop then now.
Now that Trump's back, because I mean, the U.S. could threaten military involvement, but everyone knows where that leads.
And whether or not, you know, whether or not the U.S. would actually start down that road, nobody wants to come to those people.
sean fracek
You lose the favor.
phil labonte
Well, the American people, you know, well, Putin knows that the American people don't support that.
sean fracek
Right.
unidentified
Right.
phil labonte
Like, we were just talking about how the American people are like, okay, well, if Americans aren't doing the dying and we're not paying for it, fine.
But the American people wouldn't be like, oh, you want to risk nuclear war so that way you can protect Ukraine, which I don't give an S about.
The American people just that would not fly.
Now, I do think that the U.S. has, I think that this is this particular engagement or this war has shown that Ukraine, or I'm sorry, Russia is kind of a paper tiger beyond their nuclear weapons, right?
Like if it were U.S. versus Russia without nuclear weapons, there is no question in my mind the United States would stomp an absolute mud hole in them, right?
Just absolutely decimate the Russians.
And I think the Russians know that.
And I think that the only thing that they're relying on their nuclear arsenal to prevent that from happening.
sean fracek
But that, but to Aladd's earlier point, I mean, that's if like China doesn't back them up.
phil labonte
Yeah, I'm only talking about a head-to-head kind of thing.
sean fracek
I know, but all of a sudden you get people teaming up, and all of a sudden we're in World War III.
phil labonte
Well, yeah, I mean, but then World War III would mean nuclear weapons.
Like I said, you're talking about military powers of the U.S., conventional military powers of the U.S. versus Russia.
Russia just doesn't.
unidentified
Right.
phil labonte
Russia doesn't have a chance because Russia can't even, you know, that's not how war is fought anymore.
sean fracek
It's not fought head-to-head.
phil labonte
The point that I'm making is Russia can't steamroll the Ukraine.
They don't have the military might that people assumed before the Ukraine war.
sean fracek
It kind of can, though.
Like, they could turn it into a camp.
phil labonte
Okay.
sean fracek
You know what I mean?
phil labonte
Okay.
So again, not talking about nuclear weapons is the point that I'm trying to make here.
sean fracek
Like, people are playing fair.
What's that?
elad eliahu
Why don't you think they've used these nuclear weapons that you're talking about?
sean fracek
That's a real good question.
That's a real.
And it's scary to think about when Putin's on his deathbed.
phil labonte
I know.
sean fracek
Like what's going to happen.
elad eliahu
Yeah.
Well, he doesn't because he's becoming incredibly isolated as a result of it.
Like Trump is.
sean fracek
But you're on your deathbed.
elad eliahu
I don't know what to say.
Crazy leaders on their deathbed.
What could they do?
Is Putin on his deathbed?
sean fracek
I don't know.
elad eliahu
What are we even talking about?
sean fracek
I mean, there was a rumor in the media that he had cancer.
Was it like a couple months ago or whatever?
He had cancer.
Have you guys heard this?
I mean, it's a story.
phil labonte
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I just saw something in the chat.
sean fracek
Oh, I was like, I don't know why that's funny.
Like, Putin with cancer.
I mean, maybe it is funny.
phil labonte
Well, I mean, yeah, but even if that, like, we've heard rumors, but you don't see him falling apart the way that you would imagine.
sean fracek
Yeah, right.
But he has the best health care of like anyone.
And, you know, like on earth almost.
phil labonte
Or the point that I'm making is the argument was he was he had cancer and he was, you know, he was degrading and et cetera, et cetera.
sean fracek
It was like rumors that we didn't know.
phil labonte
It was two years ago, and we haven't seen the fruition of this alleged cancer, right?
sean fracek
Well, you can live with cancer for years.
elad eliahu
No, to rewind, what we were actually talking about was Russia's military capacity in Ukraine and their ability to overtake it, which they haven't displayed and haven't done a very good job of, but like they do have nukes.
They can nuke Ukraine.
It wouldn't do much for them.
But conventionally, they are clearly unable and falling very short, probably losing hundreds of thousands of Russians for a lot less than I think they anticipated to get originally.
This looks like, from a Russian perspective, almost like they're Afghanistan.
Well, Afghanistan part two, I guess.
sean fracek
That's a good, that's a good.
phil labonte
No.
No, it's not even close to Afghanistan because like almost every, like, I can't think of a significant engagement the United States lost in Afghanistan.
sean fracek
Oh, that way.
elad eliahu
They have some for being bogged down.
sean fracek
Yeah, and like waste of time and a waste of money.
elad eliahu
Unable to fulfill your ultimate like military to the political ends of it.
sean fracek
Like when we went into Afghanistan, we thought, oh, we're going to change these people.
We're going to turn them into Americans.
They're going to have blue jeans.
phil labonte
That was a rap at the time.
That's what we thought in Afghanistan.
sean fracek
Well, Afghanistan.
Well, yeah, you're right.
We turned Afghanistan in glass.
Then we thought we can go to Iraq and do that.
But yeah, yeah, yeah.
phil labonte
Yeah, like in Iraq, it was like, oh, we're going to set these.
We'll be welcomed as liberators in Iraq, et cetera, et cetera.
Afghanistan, it was just like, you're in the Stone Age and we're going to keep you there for 30 decades if you don't.
sean fracek
There's no nation to go in Afghanistan.
And the funny thing, and after 9-11, you remember this, Phil, like the Americans were all on board for that strike in Afghanistan because it just got hit.
phil labonte
Oh, yeah.
sean fracek
And everyone was out there, rah-rah-rah.
And even I hate war and I was supporting it because it's like you just killed thousands of Americans.
So it's like, of course.
But then when it went to Iraq, that was the bridge too far for a lot of people.
And that's all I'm saying.
Like, this stuff escalates, and you're going to lose the favor of the American people the more we're fighting in these wars.
That's my opinion.
phil labonte
Well, I mean, yeah, I don't think that the American, I think that we've made it fairly clear that the American people don't support having an actual war in Ukraine where the U.S. is actually on the ground and involved in the fight.
But, all right, I think that we've talked enough about military force in Ukraine.
Maybe we should talk about military force in Mexico.
raymond g stanley-jr
Let's go.
phil labonte
From the post-millennial.
Trump authorizes military force against drug cartels.
Report.
President Donald Trump has reportedly ordered the Pentagon to begin using military force against drug cartels that have been deemed terrorist organizations under his administration.
People familiar with the matter revealed to the New York Times.
Anna Kelly, a spokeswoman for the White House, told the outlet when asked about Trump authorizing military force against cartels, President Trump's top priority is to protect the homeland, which is why he took the bold step to designate several cartels and gangs as foreign terrorist organizations.
The sources said that the U.S. military officials have begun preparing options for how to go after the designated cartel groups.
Per the outlet, the directive is focused on U.S. forces directly capturing or killing people involved in the drug trade.
Now, I just saw a tweet from President Scheinbaum, and she straight up said that there is no chance of U.S. military forces in Mexico.
Now, I think she was referring to boots on the ground.
Actually, let me see if I can find that.
sean fracek
While you're looking for that, Phil, a lot, do you support this?
Do you support boots on the ground in Mexico?
elad eliahu
Yeah, but I'm nervous about it.
But yes, I feel like this has to be dealt with militarily.
I just am very nervous of an outlandish cartel response or the killing of Americans visiting in Mexico or even them breaching American territory and trying to send a message to Americans.
But I'm confident President Trump is doing this lightly.
Also, like, I think we have, I wonder what troops she's talking about specifically, because I do believe we already are like deeply ingratiated there with like our DEA agents or have been on and off for some time.
phil labonte
So, yeah, I don't know.
I can't find the action.
elad eliahu
President of Mexico, Sean.
phil labonte
Yeah.
raymond g stanley-jr
Chat GPT says she's sharply rejected.
There's going to be any U.S. troops deployed to Mexico.
There'll be no invasion.
She's saying it's going to violate their sovereignty.
phil labonte
Yeah.
I mean, you hear rumors that there are former U.S. military special forces guys that are actually training some of the cartel members, which is a terrible, terrible development.
And I think that should they actually be, should that actually turn out to be true, the U.S. should deal with these people accordingly.
sean fracek
I mean, I agree.
I agree with a lot, like in principle of maybe having boots on the ground or at least trying to get the situation under control.
But it's like, you know, what happens if we take out the cartels?
They're just going to get replaced by something.
You know what I mean?
It's like same thing that's happening in Gaza.
It's like you go after them.
It's like you can't destroy an ideology and you can't destroy like a society's like it's a drug trade.
We have an idea.
elad eliahu
We don't believe in the cartel.
sean fracek
It's an ideology in Mexico that they are, they are the hammer, right?
If you mess around in Mexico, they're coming after you.
raymond g stanley-jr
And we smash their hammer.
sean fracek
I understand what you're saying.
phil labonte
There is precedent for the U.S. to be involved militarily going after cartel members.
sean fracek
I understand, but I'm just saying in Mexico, the people have accepted the cartels as this iron fist or whatever you want to call it.
Us going in and disrupting it, don't you think something else is just going to pop up in their place?
phil labonte
Allegedly, or ostensibly, what should happen is the U.S., should the U.S. go in and actually directly involve themselves with the cartels, what should happen is the local police forces that are supposed to be, you know, run by the municipalities, they should step in and say, okay, we weren't able to fight the cartels.
Now that the U.S. has either decapitated or significantly degraded their ability to murder people by the dozens.
I know.
They should step in and say, okay, well, we're going to provide for the people of Mexico because that's the whole point, right?
You vote for people.
There is a municipality.
You pay your taxes.
The taxes pay for police.
They're supposed to be able to...
sean fracek
You know what I mean?
Like their whole thing is just shaking down people.
So it's an occurrence.
It's a currency.
phil labonte
The U.S. should not.
Is the argument?
Are you making the argument that the U.S. shouldn't?
Or are you in the soil?
sean fracek
I think, like, you know, I personally think the best offense is a good defense.
And I do believe in a lot of those principles that come out of the American first movement where it's like we need to be focused on home and focused on.
phil labonte
How is a narco country on our southern border not focused at home?
There's a point.
sean fracek
I understand what you're saying.
Now, if they're coming in and trying to attack us, like a lot is saying, like they're doing like attacks on American soil.
I understand.
But if they're like actually attacking us on our soil, like dropping bombs and stuff, then yes, obviously we're in a defensive stance.
But us go, I'm just going to take bombs.
I'm just saying, I'm just whatever.
You know what I mean?
Like they're coming down there on the street.
They're going down.
They're mowing down Americans.
Of course, we're going to have to.
phil labonte
So the death toll isn't high enough?
sean fracek
All I'm saying is when you're the bully and you go in and you're saying, hey, we're going to fundamentally change this, just like Afghanistan, just like Iraq.
You can't go in and tell people, hey, the way you live is wrong.
We're going to kill them and put in what we want.
It just doesn't work.
phil labonte
The point that I'm making, though, is they're already operating in the United States.
unidentified
Sure.
phil labonte
They're killing Americans.
sean fracek
Get them out.
Get them out.
Get them out of the United States.
Then when they start, you know, you get them out and then they're actually attacking us, like doing like bombing buildings or cars or whatever the case is.
You know what I mean?
Like actual, you know, war.
Then yes, open game.
Like destroy them.
Because they, you know, you want to be in the defensive position, especially as the bigger person, the juggernaut.
We don't want to be seen as a person going in and just massacring people and then saying, oh, you guys figure it out.
Oh, the local police are going to take over.
Everything's going to be okay.
You know what I mean?
phil labonte
So what do you say to the idea that the United States has actually been disassembling terrorist organizations for 20 years?
And whereas I understand if you're making the argument that changing a government doesn't work, I can concede that.
But the idea that the United States is not successful or has not been successful dismantling terrorist organizations, that's just flat out wrong.
Right.
So a lot of people love to say, oh, well, you know, the U.S. tries to go in and do all these changes to these countries, et cetera, et cetera.
And it never works.
But what they're saying is you can't change the government and expect to have a Western-style democracy.
That doesn't mean that you can't kill enough of the bad guys where they stop.
And hold on.
And that's what the U.S. has been doing for 20 years.
There has been a sharp decline in terrorist attacks Against the United States in the past 15 years, the last time there was some kind of significant upswing in terrorist attacks was ISIS, and the U.S. completely wiped ISIS out.
sean fracek
Understood.
So you think Obama's drone campaigns were good?
phil labonte
I don't know.
I don't think that I'm not talking about drone campaigns.
sean fracek
Why not?
phil labonte
We're going because I'm not because I'm not talking about drone campaigns.
Let me finish the sentence and stop talking before I'm done.
I'm not talking about just drone campaigns.
I'm talking about dismantling terrorist organizations.
The drone campaigns were one aspect of an overall system, right?
So it was intel, it was actual boots on the ground, like Delta Force going in and killing bad guys.
That's why there was, that's why Bagram Air Force Base in Iraq still has U.S. soldiers there, is because they use that as a Ford operating base, or they did use that as an afford operating base when Syria was being overrun by ISIS.
And then subsequently, when they had the civil war that was going on, right?
So like the U.S. is extremely good at dismantling terrorist organizations, and we've got 20 years of doing it.
And I understand, like, people love to say, oh, well, you know, Afghanistan, blah, blah, blah.
The U.S. didn't lose engagements in Afghanistan.
The U.S. lost the politics.
And the U.S. did there were serious, serious fights in Iraq, but even that, like the U.S. lost the politics of it.
The U.S. didn't lose a lot of engagements.
The U.S. military and U.S. political goals are totally different things.
And the U.S. military is second to none at finding and killing terrorists.
And if the U.S. has actually decided, or if the U.S. were to actually decide, hey, we think that the terrorist organization or the cartels in Mexico are terrorist organizations, and we're going to apply the same pressure to them that we did to ISIS.
I don't think that it's the situation where, oh, you know, we can't do anything about it anymore.
sean fracek
I understand.
I'm just saying we have to understand the position we're in as the biggest military in the world.
And I personally think what Obama did put us way behind in a lot of those relationships.
What about Trump was always anti-war?
phil labonte
Trump came in and took ISIS out.
sean fracek
I know.
phil labonte
And it was a good policy.
sean fracek
I know.
Listen, I'm not saying it's always the bad, the worst decision.
Angela, maybe you want to chime in.
Should we be bombing Iraqi kids?
phil labonte
Yes.
Should we be bombing Iraqi kids?
Could you possibly phrase this in any more disingenuous way?
sean fracek
Should our Iraqi kids have our most popular president be sending drones over to destroy Iraqi kids?
What?
That's a good question.
raymond g stanley-jr
We're talking about the cartels, bro.
elad eliahu
Angela.
sean fracek
No, no, we're talking about some of the things that I've been talking about.
elad eliahu
I watched that one of the big lib issues during this administration that's kind of been an 80-20 issue for them.
And that's kind of President Trump's like reinvigoration of ICE and like the Democrat opposition to that.
I think it was governor from Minnesota, Tim Waltz, said the ICE that they're like the Gestapo.
And it's part and parcel for how many Democrats describe ICE.
What do you think of the president's, I guess, immigration strategy?
angela belcamino
I mean, being in New York City, like I'm, you know, I'm giving Trump props on this one, like from what I see.
So this is, again, I know, but it's, it's, it's a bold lib thing to say this, but I feel like it's a bold statement because a lot of Democrats wouldn't say that, right?
Like, I want to give, like, I'm not rooting against Trump and I'm not rooting against the country.
Like, I'll definitely give him.
I think that's an area that he's been really successful and done well at.
So, I mean, I'm, I'm happy with that.
I have seen, I think he has been successful in doing that.
And yeah, I definitely don't agree with, you know, violence against ICE agents and against ICE.
So, and I do believe that people, you know, should be here legally and go through the right process and steps.
So, again, with the sense of humanity, like I care about people and their families and their situations, but I also, you know, if they're here illegally, like I feel, you know, that that's a concern that needs to be dealt with.
And they should, like, you know, I have, I wouldn't go to another country.
Like, I feel for their situations and why they're fleeing.
But I wouldn't expect to go to another country and just be able to be there.
sean fracek
You just got canceled by the rest of your Democrat friends.
angela belcamino
I mean, it's one by one, right?
No.
But, like, I don't think that that's like unreasonable to say that.
I think that sounds reasonable to me.
phil labonte
I'm so unreasonable when it comes to immigration policy.
I'm the most, and I'm probably the most hardline person that you're going to meet.
So you're not even close to unreasonable, in my opinion.
sean fracek
10 years, right?
10 years?
raymond g stanley-jr
No, but moratorium is going to like 30.
sean fracek
We need to 30 years.
phil labonte
30 years.
I want a 10-year moratorium on all immigration except for 0-1 visas.
I want to see actual punishment for people that hire or rent apartments to illegal immigrants because the best case scenario is a scenario where people deport themselves.
I don't like the idea of ICE having to run people down and going through neighborhoods to pick up illegals and stuff.
So the best possible situation is making it incredibly hard for them to stay.
So if you are renting to someone that's an illegal, that person should possibly lose their property.
Maybe second offense, they lose their property.
Definitely they go to jail in their first offense.
If you are hiring illegals, you should run the risk of losing your business, tax remittances at 90%.
So that way they can't get the money that they make out of the United States.
And of course, anyone that's caught that's illegal, they just go out and they can never come back.
sean fracek
And H-1Bs, because that's corporate slavery.
phil labonte
And H-1Bs, I like H-1, not H-1, the 0-1 visas, but there should be a lot of, what's the word I'm looking for?
Pretext to the situation, right?
Like you can't just be like, oh, well, I have an O-1 visa, so blah, blah, blah.
Like, you have to have the right ideology.
No communists, no leftists.
We have to deal with our own leftists here.
So those kind of things.
You have to love America.
You can't hate America to come to America.
unidentified
Yeah.
sean fracek
I guess to wrap it on this, like, what does the panel think as far as should we go and kill the cartels?
unidentified
Yes.
sean fracek
Okay.
raymond g stanley-jr
We should go to war with them.
sean fracek
I mean, it's essentially effectively.
raymond g stanley-jr
You're very hyperbolic.
Like, no, we should stop them from doing what they're doing.
We can go in them like we did with ISIS, like a lot of other things.
America has capabilities of stopping them.
We don't need to just bomb them and bomb whatever you're saying about bombing the civilians.
sean fracek
I wouldn't say that.
phil labonte
But look, the Ginsu missile is really good, right?
raymond g stanley-jr
There we go.
phil labonte
You're not even, you're really, really targeting an individual.
You're not targeting, blowing up children and stuff.
Yeah, nowadays they've got the hellfire that's literally loaded with swords.
sean fracek
We have stuff from space that we can drop down.
raymond g stanley-jr
Jewish laser.
sean fracek
No, we do.
There's spikes up there that drop down once.
phil labonte
No, rods from God are not real yet.
sean fracek
Okay.
I could have sworn I saw that.
I mean, that would be one of the main menu.
That would be a good thing.
unidentified
That's what they're talking about, Sean.
They're talking about the Ginsu missile.
phil labonte
You mean the blades?
No, he's talking about rods from God.
unidentified
Like a tungsten spike outer space.
phil labonte
Tungsten spike in orbit at like 200 miles and drop it and then it's all kinetic energy.
I understand.
sean fracek
I understand that is.
I think that does exist.
raymond g stanley-jr
We have to stop them, brother.
We have to.
sean fracek
But you have to also consider, again, again, we're the most powerful military.
It's Mexico.
Cool.
We've seen the made in Mexico signs on kinetic energy.
What does politicians have to do?
I'm just saying, like, we have to consider what it looks like to the rest of the world and what the favor of the people.
raymond g stanley-jr
We've never cared about what the world cared about.
sean fracek
I understand, but we've also never went into Mexico and started a war with cartels.
phil labonte
Yes, we have.
unidentified
We did.
phil labonte
We absolutely have.
We've had military.
What's his name?
elad eliahu
The war on drugs.
phil labonte
Yeah, I mean, the world remember?
There have been multiple times where actual Delta guys, actual Delta Force has been used to pick up cartel members.
sean fracek
Sure, but I'm saying we have not gone in and disseminated them to weirdo them.
phil labonte
We're not talking about actual invasion.
sean fracek
Oh, okay.
I thought that's what we were talking about.
phil labonte
No, no, no, no, no, no.
There's not a discussion.
sean fracek
She's saying that there's nothing, but the panel was saying that they were supporting an invasion.
raymond g stanley-jr
No, we talked about going against cartels, not invading Mexico.
Well, I think there's a difference.
elad eliahu
Slow down.
There's a spectrum here, right?
raymond g stanley-jr
Yes.
elad eliahu
Like, we're not going to do regime change in Mexico.
raymond g stanley-jr
Yeah.
elad eliahu
Despite their government being a narco state saying, maybe they got Pablo Escobar.
raymond g stanley-jr
How coach are they?
With a good time.
phil labonte
So Delta's, Delta was, Delta Force was involved in picking up Pablo Escobar in Colombia and El Chapo in Mexico.
unidentified
Yeah, sure.
elad eliahu
I've targeted raids against powerful narco-cartel gangs in like northern Mexico, farther from the centralized government where they're most potent on our northern border.
Those that distribute lethal drugs to American citizens and get rich off of that.
We are coming after you.
The president is coming after you and expect to get raided soon enough if you are on American soil or Mexican soil.
And we need to go after the Chinese too, because the Chinese are involved in the precursor chemicals that arrive in Mexico.
sean fracek
That mushroom story is wild with China that they just got away with that.
You know, I don't want to get too far off, but that was insane.
phil labonte
I'm not sure about it.
raymond g stanley-jr
Parabella mushrooms?
sean fracek
The mushroom that they brought in that was like going to cause like a big disease or pandemic.
phil labonte
Oh, yeah.
sean fracek
That was insane.
That was just like, oh, that's normal.
raymond g stanley-jr
All right.
phil labonte
We're going to jump to this story to close it out tonight.
From the post-millennial again, Virginia high school staff accused of secretly helping students get abortions, including pressuring a girl who was five months along.
All righty.
An investigation is underway in Virginia's largest public school district after allegations came out claiming a staff at a local high school arranged and funded abortions for students without notifying their parents.
The claims involved Centerville High School in Fairfax County, where employees allegedly helped at least one 17-year-old obtain an abortion in 2021.
The story was first reported by the WC Dispatch, which said there were two instances of female minor students saying school officials arranged and bankrolled abortions at Fairfax Health Center without so much as a phone call to their parents.
Under Virginia law, physicians must attest that at least one parent or guardian was contacted before performing the abortion on a minor.
The 17-year-old student was allegedly assisted by a school social worker who scheduled and paid for the appointment and kept the information from the student's parents.
A second female student who was five months pregnant was allegedly told by the same social worker that the student had no other choice, but the student fled from the clinic and did not go through with the procedure.
Per the outlet, school principal Chad Liam allegedly green lit the procedures, which were paid for with school funds.
Well, this is disgusting.
elad eliahu
Any I know they earmark school funds for that.
phil labonte
You know, apparently they do.
Any time the conservatives or the right say things like, oh, the Democrats think their kids are yours.
Democrats sit there and protest, no, no, no, no, no.
And then you hear about stuff like this, like, you know, students five months along, right?
Like, my girlfriend is seven months along, but I just imagine like five months along, you're going to abort a baby.
We were, you know, feel the kick in and stuff.
Like, that was a baby.
I don't care what anyone says.
Five months, it's a baby.
I don't care what you say.
If I understand correctly, at five months, it's possible that the baby could be born and survive under, you know, it has to be in care and stuff, but like it can survive at five months.
So like the idea that thankfully the girl ran away from them, which kind of makes it more horrible, right?
Like the girls like being ushered in, like it just gives you like this concept of like them trying to be like, no, you got to get rid of that thing.
And they're just like, no, no, no.
So yeah, I mean, I can't imagine thinking that this is acceptable.
And I imagine that you don't either, but.
angela belcamino
No, I don't.
Like, it's very icky.
Like, right?
So hearing it is very icky.
I am pro-choice, but also coming from like a health background, mental health, what like this is all shady because there should be there, you know, they, there is, you know, they do need to have parents' permission to do anything as a minor.
So this does not seem like it was gone about, obviously, the right way.
sean fracek
Well, that's, that's kind of the shocking thing.
And like, this, this, a lot of this came out during the critical race theory and the COVID, you know, during COVID when, you know, parents could see what their kids were doing in school.
But like, it's weird.
The Democrats are so creepy and weird on this every time.
Like, I understand what you're saying, the parents' permission.
No, that's actually not the case.
In a lot of states, the schools trump parents' rights.
So the school can say, you know, schools will treat a kid as trans.
If a kid says they're trans, a school will treat them as trans and won't will never tell the parents, you know, abortion like this, never tell the parents.
It's a strange thing.
And to Phil's point, like they do say, you know, like, these are our kids.
We love these kids like they are our kids.
And then you see like this weird weirdness of them including the parents.
And I've talked to a lot of educators, especially that were on the left, and their argument is always their defense is, well, a lot of these kids have troubled homes.
And we know if we tell their parents they're trans or they're this, like they're going to be treated like crap at home and yada yada yada.
But it's at the end of the day, it's not their kid.
angela belcamino
I agree with you.
sean fracek
I mean, if you say that, like you're a Republican, if you say, oh, it's parents' rights, like the parents' rights don't exist on the level.
angela belcamino
Well, everywhere that I've lived and worked, I've always needed permission when working with minors from parents to whatever.
So this is surprising to me to see.
That hasn't been my experience.
sean fracek
Depends on what's going on.
angela belcamino
This is a decision that, yeah, I don't think should have been done without the parents being involved for sure.
phil labonte
Have you heard, you've heard stories of minors going for transition surgery and stuff?
I mean, this to me seems like the mild situation, which is ridiculous.
I mean, the fact that I'm even articulating this idea is mind-blowing to me.
But an abortion paid for and handled by the school is actually significantly less.
I mean, I'm not, I'm actually, I'm not sure about that, but it strikes me as significantly less offensive than a teenager or maybe young teen getting some kind of transition surgery without the parents' involvement.
angela belcamino
I hear you.
I think like those things can like coexist, right?
They can both be, I don't know that one, everyone's situation is different, but I also agree with you in terms of I don't think those surgeries should be done on children either.
I definitely think that children can feel a certain way.
Maybe they feel more like a man or a person.
phil labonte
A woman, right?
angela belcamino
Yeah.
What?
phil labonte
Like when kids are like, I'm a truck.
unidentified
Oh.
phil labonte
You know, you're not going to go and like drain out their blood and stuff and full of motorized.
angela belcamino
Like long-lasting surgeries, et cetera, things like that, like very definitive.
I disagree with those being done on minors as well.
sean fracek
Yeah, Tim brings this up a lot.
It's like you're watching the same movie, but it's two different screens.
It's like the Democrats see this as actually protecting the kid.
They see this as like healthcare.
They see this as like keeping the kids safe from the parents.
So it's like, it's hard to like explain to people that literally think they're doing a good thing for kids, like, hey, this is horrible child abuse and the parents should be involved.
It's, it's a tough one.
phil labonte
I'm not so sure that there are people that really believe that they're helping so much as they really believe that there should be more people that think like them.
Right.
Like, I think that's a little bit of a problem.
I think that when it comes to like the LGBT stuff, especially when you're talking about trans people, I think that they are looking to make more of them.
sean fracek
Oh, for sure.
I think it's both.
But they truly think what they're doing is good for the kids.
And so, yes, of course they want them to follow in there.
raymond g stanley-jr
So they're pushing their ideology up to them for their future gain.
phil labonte
I mean, I'm not so convinced that it's about the child, right?
Like, I don't think that it's, I think at the end of the day, like really down deep, it's not like, oh, we have to help these kids.
It's, I want more.
It's a narcissistic thing for the trans people that are trying to get the trans, get kids to help.
Oh, sure.
It's not like, oh, I want to help these kids.
They really need help.
No, it's, I want these kids to be like me.
It doesn't matter that the kid, if, because if it was really about the kid, they could be like, well, we can wait.
Because there are even, even if you're making arguments that are pro-transitioning, right doing it to children is bad if only because there's not enough material to fabricate the genitals of the opposite sex when they're children because the gen you know their genitals haven't grown so now this is not in any way like some kind of endorsement i think that it's an abomination but if you really care about the kids then you would want to have as much material
sean fracek
work with so you have the best possible outcome but they don't want that they or they don't care about that they want the transition to happen as early as possible because it validates their own mental yeah i agree okay there definitely are the activists and there definitely are the useful idiots but at the end of the day most of them still think they're saving the kid's life from committing suicide because that is i think that that's the end goal if they don't transition the kid they are convinced that
phil labonte
the kid will self-harm i disagree i think i disagree i don't think that it's actually the the like fundamental motivation is not about the kid it's not about saving the kid it's not about having a kid that transitions and has a better happier life it's about get this kid to transition because that validates me i think it's narcissistic and i think that it's not about the child because like i said there are arguments for people that agree like i can make i
angela belcamino
don't agree with this but i i can make the argument that if you think that it's good to transition you should wait until their genitals have fully matured so that way you have the most material but they don't think they're gonna make it that long they truly if you talked i mean angela back me up here i mean i they're lying right it's hard whenever you generalize like i don't think every like you can't generalize across the board i think everything is situational but i would say in my experience i more believe that
they think that they're helping like i think it might be an overreach or a stretch or based on being older and thinking you know you've been had no but i do like i have relative like i have a trans cousin um i my aunt has like i've seen her go through that process like i genuinely don't think that she is pushing anything on her right like i think that she feels like she's trying like he was bullied in school and i think she and you know they're unhappy and
sean fracek
potentially suicidal and i so i do think my experience has been more that people genuinely are trying to help and think that they're doing the best thing but i i agree with you that i that's a it's a young age to be doing like a surgery like that they're activists at the top totally that know exactly what they're doing and are trying to further the ideology like you're saying but i think a lot of the educator uh educators especially like truly believe they're helping the kid like they just spend you know they've
phil labonte
been brainwashed into thinking this is the way so your your argument is not that the educators as in like people that you would teachers regular normal people yeah like regular bought into the line that the trans people that are who run the schools who are at the top of the schools yeah yeah yeah yeah okay i i can understand that i think that i think that that does make sense i think the people that are the activists that are the the most likely to do things like kidnap a kid take them to a place where they can get a
transition yeah i think those people are are the ones that i'm referring to yes i don't think that they're actually motivated to help people i think they're motivated by the fact that they're narcissists and that they want to see more people like them and it validates their own uh what's the word i'm looking for their their own self-image yeah their own yeah their own like motivations and it's like and it's sad too because like the hardest thing on the left these days which is really sad it's like you know everything you're saying is right phil about like why they shouldn't be doing it but
sean fracek
as soon as you have that discussion with an educator uh on that level like they shut down they stop listening they stop talking like you can bring up all these facts hey you should wait till you're 18 all these things hey this you know thing about like self-harm in a video game is not necessarily true whatever they don't they just shut down and so it's really hard to get through to them and they're the ones that are overseeing the education system you know so and like bringing it back to the story that we were on like i think the social work that i do think that they probably want to help
angela belcamino
these children but there are those measures in place for a reason, right?
Like with going through the parents, and you, I mean, that's it, it's just like, yeah, it's crossing a boundary in a line for sure.
phil labonte
I agree.
I think it's most when it comes to teachers that would help a kid get an abortion.
I think that that is them thinking that they're doing the right thing.
Because if you listen to people make arguments for abortion, I think the vast majority of arguments for abortion are bad, but then because they're always like the extreme cases that are like, you know, 0.01%, oh, you know, they'll be poor.
Oh, so it's better to kill a kid as opposed to have a poor kid.
That's insane.
That is absolutely insane.
So they'll make the argument of, what about rape and incest?
And then the, you know, conservatives are constantly like, okay, we'll make a car vote for rape and incest.
How about we, how about we do that?
And then all other abortions are out.
No, no, no, because they know that 99% of abortions are actually just about birth control.
They're not about any of the preconceived or any of the arguments that you hear made, the exceptions and stuff.
It's never that.
sean fracek
Well, you got to be careful on the conservative side because birth control is not necessarily the most popular on the conservative side, too.
So that's where that whole discussion gets really weird.
I think when you get to the abortion discussion, it's too late.
Like there needs to be a whole discussion of what's happening before the abortion discussion.
And, you know, the conservatives will say, okay, abstinence, more responsibility, yada, yada.
The left will say, they used to say, use like protection and condoms and stuff like that.
phil labonte
Oh, the left.
Yeah.
They used to say that.
That's what the right says now.
sean fracek
Well, kind of, really, right?
But it's not all the way there like it used to be.
So it's like.
phil labonte
I mean, well, again, the distinction that you're making here is actually the distinction between the Christian conservatives and the broader MAGA coalition.
So even the broad MAGA coalition would be like the Democrats from the 90s that we were talking about earlier.
sean fracek
But I would still say broad MAGA does not support the Plan B. It does not support things like that.
I mean, a lot, maybe he can chime in.
He's in the MAGA a lot.
elad eliahu
I think MAGA.
sean fracek
What does the White House say about it?
elad eliahu
What's your deal, bro?
I think MAGA writ large is pro-choice.
I think Trump's made this pivot in the Republican Party to now be relatively pro-choice.
And when I say that, I mean that he's moving more in the pro-choice direction.
In effect, what he's actually doing is allowing the states to make their own decisions and leaving it up to the states.
But I don't think that's a fundamentally pro-life position.
And compared to Republicans of the past, it's going in the pro-choice direction.
And I think that's effective politically because it's dispelling, I think, Democrats' most potent attack against Republicans.
I think for many women, the Republican Party was a little bit unappealing because of the abortion issue.
That could get a little bit iffy for them.
I don't know if I'm breaking any news here, but abortion is a little bit more personal for women than it is for men.
So it's a little bit of a touchy subject for them.
So I think politically, it's very potent, but it's also going at one of the traditional three stools, one of the stools of the Republican Party, which is religious conservatives that are completely unaligned with the MAGA, the larger MAGA movement on this issue, because they go as far as to not even believe in IVF.
There are many Christian MAGA people who don't believe in IVF, let alone who are pro-life.
So I think that's something important to consider.
And that could be a core constituency in the future that could turn against the Republican Party if they keep heading in the pro-choice direction.
raymond g stanley-jr
But that's like, you know, what's the terminology?
They're hitting stuff in their own foot.
Like people like Lila Rose or something like that, they're telling people not to vote for Trump because he's not super, you know, pro-life.
Like, what are they going to do?
Vote for a Democrat so they can kill a baby in nine months?
Like, they have no choice in the matter.
Unless you have a third party, if you don't go with someone who's, you know, moderately released, leave it up to the states and move to the state that you want to live in where you can save your baby no matter what.
And they can't, you know, whatever they got going on.
I'm not a big old pro-life person.
I'm okay with it.
unidentified
I love it.
raymond g stanley-jr
Go babies.
But you know what I mean?
Like, what are they going to do?
They have no other choice in this matter.
They can't alienate themselves against Trump and/or Madden Republicans.
elad eliahu
I think it's also important to understand that I believe most abortions now happen via the abortion pill, which is methopristone.
And there's this one other drug.
And this is a drug that during COVID, it required like a meeting.
Before COVID, it required a meeting with the doctor to be able to be prescribed it post-COVID because COVID disallowed people from meeting with one another.
They changed the law such that women were able to be prescribed this and didn't have to be with the doctors.
We're still under those COVID laws or post-COVID laws where women don't have to meet with a doctor to get this drug.
This drug's becoming a lot more accessible.
So when we think about how abortion will look in the future, it will become more medicalized.
Women will have a lot easier access to it through Mephipristone.
If it ever becomes illegal, women can easily, you know, get access to these drugs despite that because it's abortion and a pill.
You don't need to do a crazy coat hanger or something.
phil labonte
Right.
elad eliahu
Which was the stereotype.
raymond g stanley-jr
Is that what killed population worse and worse down the road?
phil labonte
The abortion abortion has been one of the worst things for no, I agree, but like with make it so easy, like in the course of it.
I think that it is all right.
I think it's already one of the reasons why, you know, it's been such a hit to the population.
raymond g stanley-jr
What was 60 million?
elad eliahu
Remember the teen mom show?
Like, oh, geez.
When I was younger, there was like a lot of teen moms.
They wouldn't abort the kids.
raymond g stanley-jr
Yeah.
elad eliahu
And I don't know.
Still.
Oh, really?
angela belcamino
Yeah, it's like it's still on.
I don't watch it, but I do have a little Jersey Shore guilty pleasure.
unidentified
Jersey shows up.
angela belcamino
Sometimes I see it.
I love Jersey Shore so much.
But Teen Mom, like, I don't know.
They're bringing back the teen moms from like before.
elad eliahu
I used to use that as an example.
I'm going to stop using that as an example now.
I always used to say, like, oh, you really abhor all the young women are encouraged to abort, but I guess not because the show is still going on.
Also, on Mefepristo, real quick, the Trump administration actually defended its use in Texas.
They're trying to not have different people and different courts go after women's access to mephapristo.
And I think it really speaks to the pro-choice direction of the at least the administration right now.
And they don't want to touch this issue with a 10-foot pole.
They like that.
Trump loves touching on all the issues, but I think he's noticeably leaving this one alone.
phil labonte
All right, we're going to go to super chats now.
So smash the like button, share the show with all your friends, with everyone you know.
Head on over to DCComedyloft.com.
I think there are still tickets available for tomorrow's show.
It is going to be Myron Gaines, Not So Erudite, and Kat Timph.
And they're going to be debating whether or not feminism has destroyed the West.
And I think that you guys can probably figure out who's going to be on what talking point.
sean fracek
And Angela's going to join as well.
Are you going to be there?
Show me.
phil labonte
Are you going to stick around?
I saw the conversation on X, but I wasn't sure if there was a resolution of that.
So Angela will be there, and she's definitely going to be on the side of the misogynists.
We're going to go to you.
We're going to go to your super chats right now.
Lee Whitaker says, hey, based friends, Discord VIP here.
I've written an anime-inspired fantasy novel available on multiple platforms.
All links at celestiumsaga.com.
Absolutely.
If you are a member of the Discord, which you should be a member of the Discord, actually, before we get any further, head on over to Timcast.com, become a member at Timcast.com so that way you can join the Discord.
And then head on over to rumble.com and become a member there.
So that way you can watch the after-show.
Now, tonight being Friday, we're not going to have the after-show, but it's Monday through Thursday.
You watch the after-show.
We can say things on Rumble and the after-show that we're not allowed to say on YouTube.
And if you're a Discord member, you can call in and you can ask us questions, ask questions of our guests.
You can also possibly find your spouse because we've had like three people get married in the Discord.
You can start a podcast.
There's like three or four different podcasts that were started in the Discord.
So join Timcast.com so that way you can find like-minded people and do things together as friends.
sean fracek
And you get free tickets to the culture events.
phil labonte
Oh, you get free tickets too.
There you go.
sean fracek
Members get free tickets.
raymond g stanley-jr
And afterwards, we have a little get-together for the Discord members after the live event.
So you have an extension after live vet, and you get to meet people In the Discord at the live event.
phil labonte
So I think there's still time to do that too, right?
If they were to sign tonight, tonight, get a free ticket for tomorrow in D.C., and then you'll get free access to the after-show in Washington, D.C. I think we have like 20 tickets, maybe like 18 left.
elad eliahu
That's a sick deal.
You could also buy me unlimited drinks at the after-show.
unidentified
I would love to see you get a lot of thing to buy me a drink.
phil labonte
A lot.
Now I think that I just want to buy you enough drinks to get you absolutely.
unidentified
Hey, man.
raymond g stanley-jr
Imagine that.
elad eliahu
As long as you tip your bartender well.
phil labonte
Do you have a ride home?
Are you driving?
elad eliahu
You could drive me.
You could drive.
phil labonte
I am not driving you anywhere.
raymond g stanley-jr
Absolutely not.
elad eliahu
Bold lib.
angela belcamino
I have a driver.
elad eliahu
I was saying on the other show, young liberal women don't get enough credit.
I was saying libs are kind of hot.
Nobody agreed with me.
And then I said young Hillary Clinton was, you know, a beautiful woman.
What?
angela belcamino
No.
elad eliahu
Okay, you agree, right?
angela belcamino
I don't know if I've seen a young Hillary Clinton.
I don't know.
elad eliahu
Serge, you ready to pull her up?
sean fracek
Oh, no.
phil labonte
Don't tell me.
angela belcamino
You guys aren't ready for young Hillary Clinton.
sean fracek
I mean, a lot has been thinking about her a lot, apparently.
phil labonte
He's been talking about it.
angela belcamino
I like it.
I'm happy for you.
raymond g stanley-jr
She's happy for you.
phil labonte
I'm happy for you and Hill Dog.
elad eliahu
Well, hey, her and Bill got pretty far.
I mean, hey, they had a good run at it.
She was almost president.
sean fracek
She has amazing pantsuits.
Great.
elad eliahu
I'm kidding, by the way.
sean fracek
This is all.
phil labonte
Wyatt Caldenberg says: if they arrest one of these Dems, I think he's talking about the Texas legislators, he or she will become a superstar.
If they arrest 30 or more, they become a faceless mob.
Everyone remembers the first man to step on the moon.
Who remembers the fourth?
That's actually a fair point.
I do think that the talent of the individual still matters.
It will actually matter, though.
If you get someone that can't speak, can't relate to people that just managed to squeak in as a state rep, you know, that'll be a problem.
They need to have that kind of charisma and that political star power.
raymond g stanley-jr
Ellen Bean was his name, by the way, the fourth person to step on the moon, Ellen Bean.
phil labonte
Was it really?
sean fracek
Facts.
phil labonte
There you go.
sean fracek
Well, if you believe anyone to oh, God.
We'll talk about it tomorrow with Alex.
phil labonte
I don't even want to talk.
Plastic Cup Politics says, I will be severely disappointed if not, but a single Tim Cast member tosses a lime green sexual.
Yeah, there you go.
On stage during the feminist debate tomorrow, Peep's going to be showing up with a literal bag of dicks.
raymond g stanley-jr
Now that you've read that, someone's coming with one.
phil labonte
You know, I know.
It was already coming out of my mouth before I realized what it was.
sean fracek
Just aim it at Alex.
He'll love it.
phil labonte
Dane Peterson says, hook and mouth, so far, so good.
So what?
Greatest anti-government song ever.
Great job, Phil, bringing it up.
F. Tipper Gore, absolutely.
I'm a fan of Megadeth.
We just got the privilege.
We had the privilege of touring with them just last summer.
Great guys.
Dave was awesome.
And one of the cool things about Megadeth is they change the set every night.
So it's actually worth going to see multiple shows if you can swing it.
They don't play the same show the same set every night.
They were constantly surprising people.
So yeah, go check out Megadeth.
They're awesome.
Ligma Johnson says Trump's promise to end the war on day one came before Biden Greenlit American missiles to be fired on civilian targets inside Russia.
Biden did everything he could to fan those flames.
Yeah, I agree, but at the same time, like what a cope.
Yeah, I mean, his point isn't well taken, but at the same time, I don't think that Trump could have just stepped in and said, hey, stop.
And I mean, you know, Putin was going to listen because Putin, again, Putin has all the cards.
Putin is in the position of power there.
sean fracek
Well, that's why it's like we are always in the impossible position of like trying to bury beefs, like end beefs.
And it's like, I get we're powerful, but how do you stop people that have hated each other for as long as they hate each other?
Like, that's the toughest thing.
It's like, outside of, you know, doing terrible things.
And even that doesn't necessarily end it.
It just makes it worse.
Again, Obama's campaigns.
Like, that didn't help us.
So.
phil labonte
Shane H. Wilder says a Tarrant County judge granted Paxton's request for a temporary restraining order injunction against Beto O'Rourke's powered bythepeople.org.
That was receiving funds to pay fines of the Dems.
Big W. Hey, look, anytime Beto O'Rourke gets his fanny slapped, I'm happy.
Well, hand slapped, smack in the face.
I don't want to.
Don't get the wrong idea.
Don't get the wrong idea, weirdos.
sean fracek
Lad's talking about hot Hillary.
phil labonte
Shane H. Wilder with another Rumble rant.
Raymond is right about the long term, but in the short term, they are delaying more than the redistricting.
They are delaying votes on protecting groundwater and a flood disaster bill.
So Shane H. Wilder is from Texas, so he actually has a good inside track on it.
Thank you, Shane, for those.
elad eliahu
I wanted to mention one of these guys.
His name is James Tallarico.
He's a Texas state representative.
He's one of the guys who fled, but he's also one of the guys who went on Joe Rogan's podcast like a week or so ago, and he's getting a lot of buzz.
So if there's somebody who's trying to finesse this whole, you know, political stunt into something, it's this guy.
And I mean, this is what he wants for us to keep our eyes on him.
But I guess he's somebody to keep his eyes on.
Your eyes on.
raymond g stanley-jr
I mean, if he made it to JR, that's kind of a thing.
sean fracek
But I agree with Shane.
Like, once critical things start happening as a result, that's the only way people start being like, hey, go get this guy arresting.
raymond g stanley-jr
Yeah, water's a big deal.
sean fracek
Yeah, exactly.
phil labonte
Shane H. Wilder again said, remember Warren's cherry pie album, 1990, had a 55-second track called Ode to Tipper Gore that consisted of clips of every foul word they said in concert as a big middle finger to the warning label.
sean fracek
Look, the warning label.
phil labonte
When the warning label came out, that was a badge of honor, right?
sean fracek
But it hurt your sales bigly.
phil labonte
Did it really hurt the sales?
sean fracek
Yeah, artists were all like, because Walmart wouldn't carry them, like, family-friendly stores wouldn't carry them once they had that label on it and you lost a ton of money.
phil labonte
In the 1990s, was there?
I guess there was, wasn't there?
sean fracek
Oh, yeah, yeah, absolutely.
phil labonte
They weren't the big, gigantic.
sean fracek
Oh, they were still huge for like artists because people used to buy CDs back then.
Remember, you used to go buy the singles.
We used to go to the bottom.
raymond g stanley-jr
Yeah, I did this all the time.
phil labonte
I'm making a joke.
sean fracek
Okay, okay.
raymond g stanley-jr
Okay.
phil labonte
I myself was buying CDs.
Remember, I'm probably the oldest person at the table.
sean fracek
Right, right, right.
And a musicians.
It really hurt your industry when they put those labels on it, really.
phil labonte
Not as much as streaming, homie.
sean fracek
Oh, for sure.
phil labonte
So let's see.
sean fracek
Lime wire.
elad eliahu
You look good for your age, though.
raymond g stanley-jr
Yeah, very good.
sean fracek
I mean, it's not a hard word because the apps are.
elad eliahu
You're shredded real nicely, even though you're closer to my dad's age than mine.
phil labonte
I probably am closer to you.
elad eliahu
No, I did the math.
sean fracek
What?
elad eliahu
No, not in a bet.
He's good for his age.
Are you kidding me?
raymond g stanley-jr
Yeah.
We understand you're.
phil labonte
Not a fan.
elad eliahu
But he still tours.
phil labonte
Yeah.
raymond g stanley-jr
Oh, freaking Phil Rocks Divine.
Have you heard of that?
elad eliahu
He's a rock star.
phil labonte
Still going to the gym.
Yeah.
I mean, most of the guys my age are not in the shape that I am.
elad eliahu
You probably bench a lot more than me.
phil labonte
Yeah, my chest has never been great.
raymond g stanley-jr
Have you seen this?
elad eliahu
I'm maxed out at 185.
phil labonte
Okay, I can bench more than you.
But my deadlift and my squats are actually much better than Monte Bench.
raymond g stanley-jr
At the White House.
phil labonte
Eb Jones says it's our job because we are the world's most powerful military by a massive margin.
It's not even close.
And we have every interest in staying that way.
The West, communism, or Islam, take your pick.
There is an argument for that, right?
So like everybody that says, hey, the United States shouldn't be the world police.
Like, I like that concept, but I also like the idea of the United States making sure that the oceans are safe for everybody.
Like, so there are trade.
The military makes sure that every nation is allowed to use the seas in a way that is not particularly preferential to other, you know, to other countries or to one country.
And I think that that has been an actual benefit to the whole world for the entire time that the United States has been doing that.
So the post-World War II order, with the United States being the, at least making sure that everyone can trade on the open sea, I think that that's been a benefit for the whole world.
And I would like to keep it that way because I don't know that I think that it would be a significantly worse situation if Russia were in charge of part of the oceans and China were in part of the in charge of the South China Sea and we didn't have at least the ability to fend off a significant increase in piracy out from Somalia and stuff.
Like the United States really does do a lot to keep that kind of stuff under control.
So I think that's a that's a net good net positive for the whole world.
raymond g stanley-jr
Phil, real quick question for you, sir.
phil labonte
would that be like all of the oceans but also like the seas like the black sea the red sea the u.s can't go into the black sea like the the just talking about the example talking just oceans straight up yeah yeah because the like the u.s isn't gonna if if you've like the black sea you know it's surrounded territorially by the gulfs do you think no because the because the thing is it's it's it's multiple countries that are are actually you know yeah when it comes like the gulf of oman or
whatever there there are multiple countries that are are that border the gulf so if it's an international seaway then the u.s is going to make sure that it stays open and i think that's a a generally positive thing for the rest of the world don't get caught up on the on the black sea i was just uh throwing examples off the top of my head no hate let's see ian kenny says i know i'm late on this topic but i was busy in regards to the texas gerrymandering convo here's a wisconsin pbs headline democrats flipped 14
in the Wisconsin legislature in 2024 after redistricting.
It's true, man.
Look, there are something like 40% of the population of Massachusetts are Republicans, maybe 35%.
And there are zero Republican seats from Massachusetts.
New York City is definitely something along the lines of like 30, 70, or in the greater New York metro area, all Democrats, if I understand correctly.
So Illinois is largely controlled by Democrats.
There are like at least 75% of the seats out of California are Democrats.
The representation for conservatives in blue states is almost non-existent or actually non-existent in many of the blue states.
So the idea that Democrats are, you know, the idea that Democrats are being somehow shut down and they don't have political power because of gerrymandering, like that's just a BS line intended to get Democrats worked up.
It's not the case at all.
And they'll tell you that it's unprecedented.
They'll tell you that it's something that the Republicans are doing in order to suppress democracy.
It's all BS.
It's not unprecedented.
It's happened before.
And considering the massive shift of population after COVID from states like California to states like Texas and the influx of people from illegal, the four years of essentially open borders because of the Biden administration, there's a really strong argument to do redistricting now.
So this idea or the argument that the left makes, it doesn't hold water.
It's just absolutely garbage.
elad eliahu
The issue with redistricting is that Democrats can do it too.
I'm reading some new news out of California about how Governor Newsom plans to, or is hosting some of these Texas legislators.
And they have some juice to squeeze out in California too.
So I think we're going to see a tit for tat battle here.
We'll see how it plays out.
phil labonte
Friend of the show, James Klug says, the first time I met a lot, we were debating abortion in a crowded bar and he started yelling at me.
Never seen a grown man lose a debate so bad.
Human life is worth protecting.
sean fracek
Ow, ow, ow.
phil labonte
James Klug is throwing you under the bus.
elad eliahu
And James Klug chilling at the bar yelling about abortion.
Trust me, James Klug got very emotional about, you know, his love for...
raymond g stanley-jr
Babies?
elad eliahu
Life.
raymond g stanley-jr
Yeah, yeah.
phil labonte
Oh, okay.
sean fracek
Oh, did you take the inverse?
raymond g stanley-jr
You took the opposite?
elad eliahu
Maybe he should get one of his own, James.
unidentified
Hey.
sean fracek
You took the opposite a lot?
You're pro-choice?
elad eliahu
I don't believe in the government.
I don't believe the government should be restricting women's access to abortion beyond 14 weeks.
sean fracek
Okay.
Okay.
elad eliahu
Before 14 weeks.
raymond g stanley-jr
I do love your advice for James.
Yeah, right?
elad eliahu
I think dude's almost 30.
No kids.
Damn.
Oof.
That's a bold lip.
phil labonte
I'm almost 50.
I am 50, and I don't have any kids yet.
elad eliahu
Well, she's pregnant.
She's on the way.
phil labonte
right down the road brother yeah right i mean it's like you know they say it's already alive in the womb you know in korea they start from when you get pregnant they start counting you don't have to put a super chat in even if you're on the show well i mean i i'll i'll i'll send the super chat as the uh tesla's driving us to the uh yeah there you go or maybe i'll just wait till it happens like surprising You're on the show.
sean fracek
Put the super chat in before you run to the hospital.
phil labonte
I mean, rumor has it the first one takes a while.
sean fracek
Yeah.
phil labonte
So I assume that maybe.
raymond g stanley-jr
And then the second one just slides right out.
phil labonte
Look, man, I'm the second, and I was born in the hallway.
So they didn't even get my mom into the room.
And my sister, it took some time.
So we'll see.
raymond g stanley-jr
I like it.
phil labonte
I mean, for my girlfriend's, for her sake, I hope that it doesn't take too, too long.
raymond g stanley-jr
Sure.
Sure.
sean fracek
Everybody doing a good job explaining a woman's body and biology or anything.
unidentified
Exactly.
angela belcamino
I mean, you know, the logistics, yeah.
sean fracek
Just slide right out the second one.
angela belcamino
Yeah.
I also hope for her that it's not long and it slides right.
phil labonte
How's the baby fever?
You still got it?
You still got that?
You still sweating?
Hey.
I mean, you tweet about it a lot.
You know, it's what I'm saying.
angela belcamino
So I'm wondering if that's like, if that's real or if that's you just putting on like I said, evolving, growing, open.
phil labonte
All right.
Our sergeant says, our sergeant 31 says, let's reverse some thinking.
What if America allowed its people to cross into Mexico unchecked?
How long do you think it would be before American gangs were running the Mexican?
What American gangs?
sean fracek
Before American gangs were running.
raymond g stanley-jr
Like the Crips, they couldn't make any money down there.
sean fracek
Actually, we get to go in unchecked.
They don't get to come here unchecked, right?
We can go just go to Mexico, right?
raymond g stanley-jr
Yeah, and they hate us.
phil labonte
They hate us.
He's talking about gangs.
sean fracek
Oh.
phil labonte
And also, yeah, like if you are an expat or not even an expat, there are people that are just that just went to Mexico City to work, right?
Because it's cheaper.
They work remotely and it's cheaper to live down there.
And there are Mexicans down there telling them to get out.
They are hating on them because they're like, there's something like 10,000 Americans that live in Mexico City.
And the city has something like five, 10 million.
It's like a big, big, big city.
So the amount of people, the amount of Americans that are there are not affecting housing prices, but they're still blaming the Americans.
They're like, get out of here, Gringo.
sean fracek
They want out the 10,000.
We have like, you know, 400 million or whatever it is.
raymond g stanley-jr
Signs posted, like 4 million.
sean fracek
5 million.
phil labonte
Oh, yeah.
raymond g stanley-jr
Yeah, they don't want American.
phil labonte
They don't like it at all.
They don't like it at all.
raymond g stanley-jr
We're the nice world.
We're the best people.
phil labonte
And again, the Americans are bringing, you know, they're bringing American dollars in.
They're spending dollars that they made when they're working remotely.
sean fracek
To be fair, they probably are driving up the property value and the prices in that area.
raymond g stanley-jr
To be fair to them, the problem area, I guess.
Sure.
phil labonte
The problem is that there are Mexicans that can't find apartments and stuff like that.
Which is, I guarantee, just like in the United States, the cost is because of things like zoning and because of the governments of the municipalities and then the state and country more broadly.
But they're still blaming the Americans.
Like, hey, get out of here, Gringo.
raymond g stanley-jr
So I blame the Whitey somehow.
sean fracek
So ironic.
phil labonte
It's funny.
All right, let's see.
Webhead Mike says, first day done in the hospital with our first baby.
So super chatting in the tradition.
Congratulations.
Thank you very much.
raymond g stanley-jr
Hey, buddy.
sean fracek
Congrats.
I just don't understand how we're having an issue with population when literally every night there's two or kids in the super chats that are born.
phil labonte
You really don't understand?
sean fracek
Mathematically, it seems like we're doing pretty good.
We're definitely at least in our audience.
phil labonte
Our audience, yes, but we're doing great.
As a country, I think that I'm going to trust the people that say that we are having a problem getting people to have kids.
sean fracek
Not in our audience.
Whatever that Discord's doing.
phil labonte
Ligma Johnson says Trump bloviates.
Take him seriously, not literally.
He might not have ended the war on day one, but if Biden didn't fan the flame, it might have been over by now.
I mean, look, man, I don't know, but I really don't think that Trump had the ability to.
And the reason is because Vladimir Putin has all of the cards.
Like, the United States, the American people, were not going to support actual military action against the Russians in Ukraine.
And that's the stick that the United States has, right?
The U.S. can do things like try and sanction.
The U.S. can do things like send weapons to Ukraine.
But the real, you know, when the rubber hits the road, it's the United States military actually taking decisive action.
And the U.S. isn't going to do it against Russia because of all the possibility of all those nuclear weapons.
So, you know, it may sound nice and Trump can talk a good game, but it was never really in the cards of Trump coming in and saying, hey, get out of here, Putin.
And Putin say, oh, I'm sorry, Donald.
You know, that wasn't going to happen.
raymond g stanley-jr
Yeah, on that, Phil, just as much as I like to think America is how badass we are, and we can tell people what to do and how to live their lives in other countries.
Russia's, when you think about it, Russia is stronger than I would think than I want them to be because they're another world power.
They're China.
They're as strong as we can just kind of say, hey, dude, just stop what you're doing.
sean fracek
They're not as strong as they used to be, but to your point, they are still deadly.
raymond g stanley-jr
There's only how many world powers are in there?
phil labonte
There's not.
raymond g stanley-jr
I love you.
phil labonte
No, the United States.
raymond g stanley-jr
But still, I know, I understand.
But these guys are still pretty strong themselves.
elad eliahu
They could take what two small regions of Ukraine, frankly.
Very unimpressive.
raymond g stanley-jr
Well, because of us, we gave them all the weapons.
phil labonte
Corey Stalling says, look at Trump's legacy.
It's amazing to me how much people claim Trump isn't a peace president.
He just ended a 35-year war with Armenia versus Azerbaijan.
Look, man, that's a big one.
Trump's ended that one, and there was one in Africa that he ended.
I mean, he does try to end wars.
It's true.
But listen, smash the like button.
Share the show with everyone you know.
Don't forget to go to what is it, DC Comedy Loft to buy your tickets for the Culture War Live tomorrow.
There are still tickets left.
And if you show up and you're a member of the Discord, you can come to the after party.
It's going to be a great time.
Angela, thank you for coming.
Would you tell people where they can find you?
angela belcamino
Yes.
Thank you guys so much.
Please follow me on X at Angela Bell Camino, also on TikTok at Angela Bell Camino.
And look for the podcast coming in September.
Thanks to NAG, Network Access Group.
Love you guys.
It'll be on Rumble.
So thank you guys so much for having me.
Appreciate you.
raymond g stanley-jr
Nice.
Thank you.
My name is Ray Minji Sandley Jr.
I am here.
Follow me on X at Ray Minji Stanley.
And I appreciated you being here and I had a good conversation with everyone here today.
sean fracek
We love Rumble.
Angela, good luck with the podcast.
We'll check it out.
Support Rumble.
We'll see you guys at DC Comedy Loft tomorrow.
Follow me at Timcast News, producer Sean.
elad eliahu
Thanks for tuning in, everybody.
I am Alad Eliyahu, the White House correspondent here at Timcast.
I actually got a pretty sick scoop yesterday at the White House.
I was able to ask the Secretary of Defense, Pete Hexeth, if he believes the Muslim Brotherhood should be designated as a terrorist organization.
He gave me a thumbs up.
So hopefully we get some more progress on that in the upcoming weeks.
Check us out at the Comedy Loft tomorrow.
And thanks for tuning in.
phil labonte
We will see you all this weekend at the DC Comedy Loft.
There will be clips on YouTube and Rumble this weekend.
Export Selection