[PREVIEW] Episode 199 kicks off with hosts feigning a fake "sealed" trial episode—mocking a nonexistent Hillary Clinton (not Gillene) case involving her cousin’s shotgun execution and bizarre witnesses like Mordecai Goldstein and "the dank rabbi"—before revealing it’s just Episode 199. They pivot to real juror Scotty David’s Independent interview about the Gillian Maxwell trial, exposing how jurors’ post-verdict statements (legally allowed but rarely detailed) clash with pre-trial secrecy. The segment underscores how lawyer-led questioning whittles down hundreds of jurors via questionnaires, hinting at hidden biases in selection. [Automatically generated summary]
Yeah, you've actually missed 20 episodes that are under seal.
Yes.
They'll be coming out because there was an extra super secret a couple weeks ago.
Yeah, yeah, that Guatanimo.
We were just down there for this trial.
And actually, it wasn't Gillene on trial, but Hillary Clinton herself.
It was insane.
They, first of all, executed her cousin like a lame horse in front of her with a shotgun.
It was horrifying.
Horrifying.
After that, she started squealing like a stuck pig.
She named everybody Mordecai Goldstein, Moyal Psychobilly, which is the Venetian Jewish name.
And a character she would only refer to as the dank rabbi.
The dank rabbi?
That's the...
That's me panicking now.
I can't think.
That's a good fun.
That's the dank rabbi.
That was terrible.
That sucks.
I almost said the glove.
The glove?
Which sounded very mysterious.
Yeah, that does sound mysterious.
I don't know what it could mean, but I don't want to meet a dude who's nicknamed the glove.
I could say something really rude right now, not about you, but about a subject that we'll be talking about very shortly.
And I've known a couple guys that could be pretty safely called the glove.
Okay, I don't know what that means.
Well, I can tell you, you stick a hand in.
You can see where I'm going with this.
My name is Bryce.
The Glove Mystery00:03:03
I'm Liz.
I'm confused.
I don't get it.
I'll text it to you.
We are joined, of course, by Young Chomsky, aka not the glove, Mr. Loverman, who's producing this episode.
And, well, ladies and gentlemen, we're back.
Yeah, we're back.
This isn't an episode of the trial.
This is actually episode 199, which I know because our next episode is 200.
And Liz actually just lied to you right then.
Because this isn't an episode about the trial that just happened.
Oh, yes.
This is an episode about the trial that just happened that we're about to have to go to again.
No, dude.
Okay.
If this gets a fucking mistrial, I legit will KMS.
Just leave it at that.
I don't want to say it out loud.
I cannot do that again.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Who's A?
Who's who are you going to kiss?
Oh, my God.
KMS?
No, we're saying that because, guys, a juror squealed.
Uh-huh.
He not only listen.
Let's, yes, he squealed and he squealed in the wrong way.
Well, okay.
So news broke when?
A day or two ago?
Yes.
I think yesterday.
Yesterday.
Was it yesterday?
Who knows?
Oh my gosh, so much has happened.
That it was at the Independent that a juror who identified himself by his first and middle name, and so we will as well.
His name is Scotty David.
All right.
Scotty David spoke to a reporter at The Independent about his experience on the Gillian Maxwell jury.
Now, to be clear, that is his right.
Totally.
Jurors can obviously talk to reporters.
Many of you guys probably remember like famously like OJ jurors, like every single one of them got a book deal or whatever.
Yeah, yeah.
Most OJ jurors to this day still on cameo.
Yeah, yeah, totally.
But like, that's totally their right.
Although, you know, my understanding is that usually they want to be a little careful about what exactly they say, considering there's pretty narrow scope.
Like jurors are given kind of a narrow scope on how they're supposed to kind of be a juror, if that makes sense.
Yeah, I mean, I think we talked about this in maybe a pre-trial episode is, you know, they give them a pretty long.
Yeah, we did.
We talked about the questionnaire.
They give them a pretty, they give potential jurors, of which there's a pool of like hundreds.
I can't remember the exact number, but multiple hundreds.
They give them these questionnaires and they fill them out and are narrowed down through a process.
You know, obviously, some, there's some that they just reject out of hand.
And then there's like a winnowing down process where they're asked questions by lawyers and then, you know, some are rejected.