Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Mainstream Media Pushes Binary Choice Over Campus Protestors
|
Time
Text
Rainbow Gestapo, the good-stepping gay lobby, all of that stops right now.
People say we need to make America great again.
I completely agree.
We may need to make Gallows great again.
literally so many people that need to have a millstone put around their neck and tossed into the sea all right welcome ladies and gentlemen uh I'm just chuckling here because I'm looking forward to...
This is going to sound crass, but I didn't know.
There's some female pastors or preachers out there or pastors out there that want to actually try to tie the gospel to their menstrual cycles.
We've got that clip for you.
Coming up later on in the show, my name is Paul Harrell.
This is the Millstone Report.
Thank you so much for being with us.
As always, we can't do this program without you.
So the protests against Israel's war in Gaza that have sprung up across the nation are very reminiscent of the last time mass protests swept our country.
In 2020, the Black Lives Matter movement wreaked havoc on this country, on this nation.
The cities were burned and looted, all while the mainstream media gaslit the nation while claiming the protests were mostly peaceful.
Now, a slight difference here from then to now is that in many cases the protesters are actually remaining peaceful for now.
The current protests are potential powder kegs, though, for intel agency-backed false flags.
Just so you're aware.
Also remember that when all this was going on back in 2020, the media was telling normal Americans who were not protesting that we had to mask up and stay in our homes and close our businesses while the protesters were given free reign to break all of the COVID protocols.
Yeah, racism or the fight to stop racism trumped COVID protocols.
The whole thing was orchestrated and funded by deep state actors who wanted the country to descend into chaos.
The lawlessness on display back then was no doubt part of the larger plot to lawlessly steal the 2020 election.
2020 can just really be summed up.
It's one of the most lawless years in American history.
Forced masking, forced lockdowns, forced business closures, burn, loot, murder, no consequence, and then it all culminates with the 2020 election theft.
No one was held accountable, except those who showed up to protest the theft on January 6th, as we all know that was a fed-up, an entrapment scheme to destroy populism as we know it.
But fast forward to today.
And once again, it's an election year and millions of Americans are glued to their TV screens as we hear about the sudden rise in anti-Semitism and these protests taking place on college campuses.
One thing is clear, to me at least, the talking heads are demanding that you pick a side.
You are not allowed to see nuance or you're not allowed to stay neutral on this.
We're told on the one hand that if you don't support the suppression of speech on college campuses currently underway, even if it's speech you may disagree with, then you're a supporter of the terrorist group Hamas.
And on the other hand, we're told that if you don't support the protesters, then you're supporting the ethnic cleansing and the genocide of innocent women and children in Gaza.
So personally, I don't know about you, I feel like I'm on an island, and this is why.
Because I think about who the average lefty protester is on one of these college campuses.
The average lefty protester who is no doubt outraged, just like I am, by the brutality of Israel against women and children in Gaza that they've likely seen on apps like TikTok, which the Uniparty wants to ban.
But I would be ignorant if I didn't recognize that the average woke leftist protester...
Protesting genocide would be no fan of my politics, would be no fan of my family, would be no fan of my Christian convictions on protecting children from the LGBTQ mafia, right?
And does that make sense?
I mean, how many of these leftist protesters right now on college campuses cheered when J6 protesters were thrown in gulags and many of them still rot there to this day without a trial?
How many of these left-wing protesters have perpetuated cultural Marxism and claimed that speech they disagree with should be considered violence?
That's what some of these people think.
Oh, speech can be an act of violence against somebody.
How many of these leftist protesters support thought crime legislation they would call hate crime laws?
I suspect most of them support all of these things.
I stand in opposition to those things.
However, I do not support Israel in their ethnic cleansing campaign, and I have serious questions about how the October 7th attacks were allowed to happen in the first place.
Apparently, I'm not the only one either.
According to Ryan King over at the New York Post, in a recent interview President-in-exile Donald Trump gave to Time magazine, he criticized Bibi Netanyahu over the October 7th attacks.
Quote, former President Donald Trump has slammed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Saying the October 7th Hamas terror attacks, in which around 1,200 people were butchered, should have never happened.
In a wide-ranging interview with Time magazine published Tuesday, the 45th president said he believed the assault on southern Israel has had a profound impact on Netanyahu 74.
They have the most sophisticated equipment, Trump said, 77 of Israeli security forces.
They had everything, they had everything was there, I'm sorry, everything was there to stop that.
A lot of people knew about it, Trump said.
You know, thousands and thousands of people knew about it, but Israel didn't know about it, and I think he's being blamed for that very strongly.
Very strongly being blamed.
It goes on.
I will say this, he added, Bibi Netanyahu rightfully has been criticized for what took place on October 7th.
The presumptive Republican nominee has beef with Bibi dating back to 2020.
The post goes on when Trump claims Israel pulled out of the operation that killed Iranian General Qasem Soleimani.
That was going to be a joint attack, he says, and all of a sudden we were told that Israel wasn't doing it, he told Time, and I was not happy about that.
That was something I never forgot about And it showed me something.
End quote.
Okay.
Interesting.
I wonder what that means.
Aside from the fact that Israel didn't want to risk their own lives in that operation, they pulled out and they wanted the US to risk their own lives or resources for that operation.
Huh.
So I wonder what Trump means by all that.
Who knows, because it's very difficult for him to ever take a consistent policy all the time, right?
I mean, Trump will say that, and then he'll turn around and criticize Democrats who don't support Israel.
But anyway, all that.
One thing is clear.
All three of the contenders running for president, just so we're clear, all three of the contenders running for president, Biden, Trump, RFK Jr., they both have affinity for Israel, right?
They're both loyal to Israel.
Back to the protesters, though.
There are reports now that many of the groups who are funded by George Soros are helping organize these college campus protests.
It's another red flag for me.
Against the war in Gaza.
George Soros organizing the protests against the war in Gaza.
Again, remember how I said this is a potential powder keg for an intel agency to come in and perform some false flag?
So it's even more puzzling to me because I'm old enough to remember when you couldn't even mention George Soros' name on Fox News and it was considered anti-Semitic.
Watch.
...broid by this violence.
Yeah, they represent everybody, right?
Speaker Gingrich, I know you have a final thought for us.
Yeah, look, the number one problem in almost all these cities is George Soros elected left-wing Anti-police, pro-criminal district attorneys who refuse to keep people locked up.
Just yesterday, they put somebody back on the street who's wanted for two different murders in New York City.
You cannot solve this problem.
And both Harris and Biden have talked very proudly about what they call progressive district attorneys.
Progressive district attorneys are anti-police, pro-criminal, I'm not sure we need to bring George Soros into this.
I was going to say you get the last word, Speaker.
He paid for it.
I mean, why can't we discuss the fact that millions of dollars he spent?
I agree with Melissa.
George Soros doesn't need to be a part of this conversation.
Okay.
No, it's verboten.
Okay, we're going to move on.
Yeah, not allowed.
It's verboten.
It's forbidden.
You can't do it.
Interesting.
Now, if you've got a question, you know, if the obvious question in your mind after that is, why would a Zionist like George Soros be funding the left-wing protest against Israel's genocide in Gaza?
I mean, that's a great question.
Is this all one giant set up?
One thing's for sure to me.
The binary choice here?
It's a binary choice that's being forced on this nation?
It's a faulty choice.
It's a faulty choice.
And it's quite the sight to see Republicans commit resources to stop progressive leftist protesters from disrupting universities that are leftist progressive institutions.
Like, stalwart leftist progressive institutions that will never be anything else.
Like, they've been completely taken over.
That's interesting.
It's very interesting.
What's the America First take here?
What is it?
What's the America First take here?
Good question.
Let's go to the screen, shall we?
The author of The Case for Christian Nationalism, who we've interviewed on this program before.
So some of the guys I follow in the Christian nationalist movement are starting to talk about this very protester thing, and they're pointing out hypocrisies where It's fascinating to me, and I'm a big fan of it.
Stephen Wolf, we've interviewed on this program before.
I'm a fan of his and his political theory, his book, The Case for Christian Nationalism, by the way.
If you ever read it, it's a political theory on what would be a permissible form of government, not necessarily what would be a correct prescription for certain cultures or what have you, but it's fascinating.
He says, I'm not taking sides in a foreign conflict.
So he's quoting, right?
I'm not, quote, taking sides in a foreign conflict.
But he points out, but we cannot let it slip.
We can't let it slip by that the same Christians, the same Christians who use the rhetoric of the image of God, human dignity, love your neighbor, meekness, and gentle and lowly have suddenly become comfortable with brutal warfare against Israel's enemies.
It's basic neocon liberalism, meekness at home in the name of liberalism, brutality abroad in the name of liberalism.
And, of course, we see a hospital bed with a child that's clearly a child, a dead child from the Middle East.
And then Stephen says, this rhetoric is designed to reconcile you to post-war liberalism, and it's discarded when bombing the enemies of liberalism.
Wow.
Wow.
And these comments here are great.
If you guys don't follow Stephen Wolf, you'll learn a lot by following him on X. You'll learn a lot.
Another tweet from him.
Quote, Israel killing two women or children for every Hamas fighter is okay because of the Christian just war tradition, but we can't have a Christian nation because post-Constantine Christendom dishonored Christ and discredits the gospel.
He is obviously parroting some of the criticisms of his work.
And he says this basically captures the ethical thinking of ethicists at your typical evangelical seminary.
You know, it does raise an interesting point.
We've talked before about how many people, many Christians in America, they believe in eschatology that believes that the modern nation, secular...
I mean, they're not a religious...
They're an ethno-state, but they're not religious.
They're secular, that they are somehow the fulfillment of biblical prophecy, that they're the same Israel from the Israel of the Old Testament and how this colors all of their thinking, right?
But it contradicts, right?
Just giving Israel carte blanche to just do whatever...
Because of this thought, it really contradicts the suffering of Christians, of everybody.
But there are Christians in the Middle East suffering because of this bloodshed.
But it's interesting to me that there seems to be a blind eye turned to that.
We don't care.
All of a sudden, yeah, we want peace at home.
We want this evolved piety, ivory tower sensibilities at home.
We can't possibly, you know, there are some evangelicals, there are some Christian leaders who are perfectly fine with the barbarism that's going on over there, but at the same time, they don't want Christians to ruin their witness by confronting the cultural evils right here at home because that's making an idol of politics.
There's a glaring inconsistency here with what's going on over there versus what's acceptable over here.
And Stephen Wolf's not the only Christian nationalist, you know, in that reformed Christian nationalist Twitter sphere that I'm a part of.
You can follow me on X, by the way, at RealPaulHarrell, H-A-R-R-E-L-L. Joel Webin over at Right Response Ministries says, He had this tweet.
Over the past few weeks, we have seen protests against Israel erupting all over college campuses.
The left is determined to destroy the left.
So this is a rare instance.
I've mentioned this before.
This is a rare instance where we have the Democrat Party, or the leftist construct, or whatever you want to call it.
There's a schism here.
And again, I think it's all orchestrated and fake, based on what I just said.
But We don't see this very often.
The Democrats are normally lockstep, and when they get power, they use it.
And they use it swiftly, right?
But this is a rare instance where much of their voting base has turned against them.
Has turned against the Uniparty and the, you know, support our greatest ally Israel at all costs, and It's fascinating because you don't see it.
Most of the time, the real political debates are within the Republican Party.
And again, we lose all the time.
I'm not saying we ever win, but I'm saying that's where at least there's these arguments that can happen, right?
That's actually where the real...
Because the Democrats just seem to be monolithic.
Republicans are a coalition of a bunch of people, right?
Pro-lifers who are becoming pro-choice, abolitionists who want to end abortion, people like me that want to ban the transgender lifestyle, especially for kids, versus there's some Republicans that are trying to reach out to the LGBTQ and the log cabin Republicans, and they're trying to make the big tent versus there's some Republicans that are trying to reach out to the LGBTQ and the log cabin Republicans, and they're trying to make the big tent party, and they want You know what I mean?
It's a party of a – it's much more of a spectrum, if you will.
Democrats aren't supposed to be doing this.
So that is certainly interesting when Joe Webbin says the left is determined to destroy the left, but not if the right has anything to say about it, right?
Well, what are we really talking about here?
The Uniparty.
The Uniparty.
He says, rest assured, conservatives will do everything they can to save the progressive universities from the progressive protesters.
This, I couldn't believe he wrote this, but this was really, I think, an astute observation.
Rest assured, conservatives, we're talking like Greg Abbott, we're talking, you know, Brian Kemp, It's not lost on any of us out there that the BLM movement, you had cities that were just allowed to burn, you had looters that were allowed to loot, and there was no crackdown.
I mean, there was a police presence there, but they were told to stand down.
And Netanyahu says these protests on college campuses in America, Netanyahu says they have to end.
And all of a sudden, the police are going in and breaking up the protesters and are saying, look, you know, free speech has its limits.
And if you criticize Israel, then that is now anti-Semitic.
Even if you criticize a war, even if you want peace, like we're to the point now where if you just want peace and you advocate for peace without any descriptors, really, like without any...
Really without even categorizing any of them.
If you want peace, they're going to tell you that you're an anti-Semite now because Israel doesn't want peace right now.
So you're an anti-Semite.
If you interfere with, if you advocate against what they want, what politicians who are Zionists want, then congratulations, now you're going to somehow be a racist or a bigot.
That's where we are right now.
Joel Webbin ends.
He says, when you were locked in your home and half the country was in flames with BLM riots, we were told to just let our American heritage burn.
But that was merely the selfish interest of blue-collar Americans.
He says, this is different.
Targeting leftist universities and Israel will not be tolerated.
And then the next, we've got the first comment here, never interrupt your enemy when he's making a mistake.
A guy named Andrew saying, really shows you who's in control.
Then we have this repurposing of a Rick James quote, Zionism.
Zionism, not cocaine, is a heck of a drug.
Oh, man.
I really, sometimes, man, the internet's great.
I like it.
But then you have this take.
So, clandestine.
And, you know, I follow clandestine because this is the guy, one of the guys, that when Russia invaded Ukraine said, hey, are there any biolabs in Ukraine?
And he, you know, pinpointed on the map.
And he showed you where all the bioweapons labs were and related it to COVID. And really the idea, the insinuation was...
That they were going to do another pandemic and release it in Russia this time instead of China, right?
And so many people were thinking that might have been one of the reasons, maybe two birds with one stone, maybe there were multiple birds, but certainly one of the reasons that Putin wanted to go into Ukraine was to take out these facilities that are right on his doorstep that are basically doing gain-of-function research and things like that.
Anyway, that clandestine is the guy who broke all that.
I believe he was banned for it for a time before Musk took over.
But he says Trump criticizing Netanyahu for October 7th might be the funniest thing to ever happen.
He says now the pro-Israel crowd are upset because Trump is calling out Israel and the pro-Palestinian crowd are upset because now they're forced to agree with Trump.
It's beautiful.
I don't know if I agree with that.
I mean, yeah, I see it.
I mean, I get it.
I read you the quote in the monologue, right?
Trump is criticizing Bibi Netanyahu, there's the New York Post headline, saying that he should have stopped October 7th, that thousands of people knew it was going to happen, and yet he's essentially saying everything but it was allowed to happen.
But at the same time, if you Google, if you go and you Google Trump and Israel, you find so many headlines that just completely contradict each other right now, right?
You'll find this headline, you know, you'll find the New York Post headline about this, you know, Trump rips Netanyahu over October 7th, but then you have these other headlines where it's like, you know, Trump is, you know, Trump wants the protests stopped, just like Bibi Netanyahu wants it.
You know, Trump criticizes Democrats for abandoning Israel.
I mean, it's literally all over the place.
At this point, it's just difficult.
It's extremely difficult.
There's just so much inconsistency from Donald Trump.
There just is.
It is what it is.
So, you let me know.
Tell me in the comments what you think.
Do you believe that the binary choice is real?
I mean, some people, I'm sure, believe, hey, yeah, I know those lefty protesters are pro-LGBT. I know those lefty protesters in the past have said that hate speech is real and speech can be violent.
I know those lefty protesters probably did cheer when J6ers were thrown in gulags, and again, they're still there to this day.
I support what they're doing because they're drawing attention to what's going on in Gaza and Israel's genocide in Gaza and that sort of thing.
Okay, I mean, I guess I can see that, right?
That wouldn't be the first time the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
But I just...
It's just tough.
Again, I don't support the genocide in Gaza, but these protesters, they fundamentally hate somebody like me.
And so it's just like, I'm sorry.
I would like a third way.
Can I get a third option here?
That's my take on it anyway, but let me know what you think.
I would love to hear it.
There's other news, so Bitcoin.
Hey, back in the day, Bitcoin was worthless, right?
Bitcoin started in what, like 2012, something like that?
It wasn't a pretty worthless product.
Well, there's a guy named Roger Ver.
And he gave up his U.S. citizenship.
And he went to Spain.
Well, he was recently arrested because the IRS is now coming after him.
They say he undervalued his Bitcoin purchase.
Again, in 2014, you see, now Bitcoin's worth a lot.
The guy gave up his citizenship.
And now he's going to get extradited to the United States in all likelihood.
And so somebody named Kurt Wuckert says, if you don't like it, leave, right?
So that's what a lot of people say.
If you don't like America, well then just get out!
Leave!
Roger Ver was arrested in Spain for failing to pay the IRS capital gains taxes in 2018 for bitcoins he sold in 2017.
Notably, Roger ceased to be a U.S. citizen in 2014, but the IRS has determined that coins Roger held in corporate entities cost them nearly $50 million that should have been declared as an exit tax in the way more richly benefited the U.S. government.
This is wild.
Kim.com, who I'm pretty sure the U.S. government's coming after Kim.com as well.
He writes that Roger Ver was one of the earliest Bitcoin investors and was arrested in Spain for alleged tax invasion and the U.S. government is seeking his extradition.
The U.S. DOJ claims that Roger underreported the value of his Bitcoin holdings when he gave up his citizenship in 2014.
Now think about how stupid this is.
Talk about FOMO. Well, this is like some sort of retroactive FOMO. This is like, now that Bitcoin is insanely expensive.
And $50 million is nothing.
This is just weaponized government.
They want access.
They want this Roger Ver guy for something else.
But it ain't tax evasion.
I can promise you that.
Right?
This is just a trumped-up charge to get this guy.
At that time in 2014, Bitcoin was the Wild West of investing.
There were no rules and regulations governing Bitcoin.
It wasn't clear what the legal status of Bitcoin was.
Bitcoin value would vary substantially with any large transaction crashing the price of Bitcoin.
How do you assess the value of such an illiquid asset in 2014 to now claim a decade later that Roger owes $50 million in taxes to the U.S. government is ludicrous?
He said, So how does the U.S. government calculate what Bitcoin was worth in those days of total uncertainty?
If Roger would have tried to sell his Bitcoin holdings in 2014, the market would have crashed by 80% or more.
How do you fairly assess the value of something that was so new and fragile?
The U.S. government doesn't even make an attempt to be fair and balanced.
Make no mistake, this indictment has nothing to do with tax invasion.
It's a witch hunt against a man who turned his back on U.S. wars and malicious foreign and domestic policy.
Roger is a supporter of Julian Assange and press freedom, not just with words but with actions.
He's a popular speaker at crypto events around the world where he educates people about the injustices used by the U.S. government.
Roger spoke, I'm surprised this guy hasn't been drone-striked yet.
Roger spoke out against mass surveillance.
He spoke out against endless wars and the murder of innocent people for profit.
He funded many good causes against U.S. imperialism, and that's why they target him.
At every opportunity, Roger spoke about why he left the U.S. citizenship behind in a wave of successful Americans have followed by example.
You've got to know that that makes him mad.
The U.S. government has lost hundreds of billions because Roger was leading the way for many successful entrepreneurs who followed his example.
This is malicious.
It's an attempt to vilify Roger, to punish him for exposing and opposing the crimes of the U.S. Empire.
Roger Ver is...
Now you can know why they're going after Kim.com, by the way.
I think he's in New Zealand, and they're trying to make a move on him in New Zealand.
Roger Ver is one of my closest friends, and I vouch for his integrity and exemplary leadership, his empathy for humanity, and his efforts to make the world...
On a path of peace, through technology, are laudable.
He always stood against evil.
And now I would like to ask the crypto community to stand up for Roger Ver.
He has done so much good for the crypto community with his advocacy and investments.
Let's leave a difference.
Okay, anyway, you can...
Look, here's the deal.
And I don't really know what I think about crypto.
I really don't.
Some people think the whole, especially Bitcoin, they think it's backed by the Intel agencies.
I don't know.
I really don't.
But I will tell you this.
Every now and then you kind of get a glimpse of these, essentially like these mini-conflicts, these mini-battles.
And almost always it comes out that it's about the U.S. financial system and they're trying to stop people that are threats to the U.S. financial system, right?
I mean...
You look at the main threat to the U.S. financial system right now is BRICS, right?
You've got this SWIFT system that they locked Putin out of, and he's in BRICS, right?
Brazil, Russia, India, South Africa, China, and others are joining.
And cryptocurrency, there's a lot of them, you know?
You don't think that that's a way to get around any of these swift rules and regulations?
I would say it probably is.
So, anyway, let me know what you think about this story with the U.S. government.
They'll do anything they can to come get you if you oppose them.
If you oppose, I mean, look what we're seeing right now.
This really kind of dovetails.
It's all related, all together.
Can't believe I'm saying this, but as promised, when we come back from break, we're going to get into the gospel.
And I'd never seen this clip before, but...
Excuse me.
Yeah, there's a lady pastor, a lady preacher, who thinks that women can learn a thing or two about the gospel and related to your 28-day, or a woman's 28-day cycle.
Yeah, I know, right?
Gross.
We've got to go to break.
My name is Paul Harrell.
As we go to break, we will be listening to Stu Peters yesterday.
Sorry.
Yesterday, Stu had a guy by the name of Dave Martell on to give a movie review about the Civil War movie that's predictive programming.
The Civil War movie, you know, about the Division of America.
It's an interesting interview about what it could be.
Is it a PSYOP?
And it almost assuredly is a PSYOP.
We're going to take a break.
Don't go anywhere.
This is the Millstone Report.
Back in just a moment.
Dave Martell is a filmmaker himself.
He's already watched this film, the Civil War movie.
He joins us now to give us his thoughts on this.
Dave, thank you so much for coming.
We appreciate you being here.
Hey, my pleasure.
Thank you for having me.
So what do you think is really going on here?
Do you agree that this is inspiring Americans who are already polarized to take the next steps and do something similar to what we're viewing here?
Well, I... So...
The Civil War film is interesting to me in a few ways and probably in a way that might not be apparent to a lot of your viewers here.
So let's look at some of the rumblings that are going on among some folks that are in our sphere of thought when it comes to reception of this film.
Now, let's look at it from the point of view of...
So, when I first saw the trailer, I thought, man, this thing is going to flop.
This is just another piece like we've been seeing out of Hollywood.
Everybody's going to hate it.
But, to my surprise, it seems that the general population is receiving it very well.
They love it.
You can go into the comments section you see over and over and over again on YouTube.
It's time to bring America together.
It's time to have a conversation.
This is...
This is terrifying, X, Y, Z. And that surprised me.
So what is interesting to me...
First, let's put on our conspiracy hats for a second.
And this is not really that big of a conspiracy.
So most of the rumblings in our sphere are folks that are kind of accusing this film of being a PSYOP or perhaps operative conditioning or predictive programming kind of thing.
Some of the commentators are saying things like they believe that this film is a strategy to get the American population to kind of come back together.
They're trying to put woke away a little bit and they want to bring the folk back together so they can send us to a war.
Now, I'm not a geopolitical strategist.
I don't think you need to be a geopolitical strategist to see that that is not very far-fetched.
It's not very far-fetched to think that the American system, the machine, is gearing up to launch a war somewhere.
The heat in the Middle East, the heat in the Slavic world, the heat elsewhere, bricks, growing bricks.
There's lots of different factors.
Like I said, I'm not a geopolitical strategist, so I'm not going to get into that kind of stuff.
But to me, as just a guy that likes music and movies and stuff like that, it sort of looks like that.
So what they would really want to do if they are gearing up for a war is kind of put woke away because it seems like a lot of these new demographics of folks that they're bringing in don't really make good soldiers.
And they need to appeal once again to good old Johnny Haystacks in Nowheresville, Indiana, because Johnny Haystacks can win a war for them.
So they want to kind of go back, in my opinion, if we have our conspiracy hats on, they want to go back to a time sort of 9-11 Bush-era patriotism so they can have participation in the system once again so they can launch this war.
So, you know, that's the conspiracy hat on there.
To me, what is very interesting, let's say that is true.
Let's say it is a PSYOP. Let's say it is a form of operative conditioning.
And this isn't far-fetched either.
Let's be real here.
The CIA intelligence agencies all over the world, global powers, have had a vested interest in entertainment, music, movies for a very, very long time.
It's one of their biggest things.
They've admitted it in leaked documents.
It's not a secret.
So it's not far-fetched to think that this is at play here.
It's very, very common for the CIA to be involved with entertainment.
They've admitted it, as I said.
But what's very interesting to me, and this kind of takes it in a completely different direction here...
Is that why did they go with A24? So the production, the studio that made Civil War, A24, is not...
That was surprising to me.
I'll tell you why.
So A24 is...
We started out as a very indie, small fry sort of production company.
They started out very humble beginnings.
They were very indie, very underground, very low budget.
And now they've blossomed into a multi-million dollar studio.
But compared to the big six or the big five, your universals, your 20th Century Fox, your Warner Brothers, they're still very small fries compared to them.
So what is very interesting to me is that if this is indeed the case...
That this is indeed a PSYOP. This is indeed operative conditioning by the intelligence agencies or the government or so forth.
Why didn't they call their good old boys in Hollyweird that have unfathomable budgets and why did they go with A24? Do you have a theory of why they did that?
Now, this is what's interesting to me in my domain of things, is that there is no real logical reason for them to do that outside of Hollywood is incompetent and they stink at making movies.
So, A24, I'm not a big fan of A24. You know, it's not really my flavor of things.
But one thing that I can't levy against them is that they make bad movies.
Their movies are very beautiful.
They have great color palettes.
Their cinematography is wonderful.
They are big.
Alright, welcome back.
Thank you so much for being with us.
Appreciate it, Milstone Report.
You want to check out the rest of that segment there.
It's here on the Stu Peters Network with Dave Martell.
More on that, you know, Civil War movie.
I haven't seen it yet, you know.
I don't get out much.
I'm going to be real.
I'm not really a fan of crowds anymore.
But it was kind of one of the ones on my list to go see just because I was curious about the PSYOP. But anyway, I don't know.
I mean, you tell me.
Is it predictive programming?
I mean, look what's going on.
Look what's going on at the border.
Look what's going on at these college campuses that we spent all that time talking about in the first segment.
Yesterday on the program, we told you about the United Methodist Church and how the United Methodist Church, they're having their annual conference.
And there's a lot of clips that have been circulating around.
One of those clips, they passed some provisions for the LGBTQRSTLNE. Would you like to buy a vowel?
And after that, a few people decided to celebrate, sing Hallelujah, and open up Rainbow Umbrellas, presumably to protect them from the lightning strikes from heaven.
Still can't get over the guy in the white shirt here.
Yeah!
Woo!
I know we did this yesterday, but I'm sorry.
Just refreshing your...
Yeah!
My best friend!
We got the gay stuff in the Methodist church!
Woo!
Woo!
Yeah.
That's just ridiculous.
Well, anyway, we've got another clip.
Apparently, the Methodist Church, at their conference there, they also have a Methodist Women Report.
That's some sort of committee on women.
So, they've got to have a report.
And they decided, because that's natural, I mean, they are women, so obviously there should be a musical number.
There should be a musical number as a part of their report about whatever they've been up to over the last year.
We are united.
A powerful network of women putting love into action.
We are women.
A supportive sisterhood inspiring, influencing, and impacting communities.
We act in faith, bringing women's voices to the table and moving the church towards the kingdom.
We are United Women in Faith.
Did you know United Women in Faith is life-changing?
We support nearly 90 community centers across the U.S. and give millions to women's projects around the world.
We train women leaders and transform through education.
Did you know United Women in Faith is bold?
With United Methodist Communications, we surveyed many, many women.
We listened, we learned, and we acted.
We have a new online digital community, new national membership model, new podcasts and webinars.
You know, in the words of Johnny Garson, I did not know that.
And we changed our name.
Did you know United Women in Faith is nurturing?
All right, that's enough of that.
But you kind of get the gist, right?
Women, clearly women in leadership of the United Methodist Church, which has been the standard for a while there, and I just want to remind everybody that when you allow women to be leaders and they go outside the scope of Scripture, When they become church officers and have authority over men, you will inevitably, because all the other denominations that have done that, they inevitably okay same-sex marriage.
They inevitably, and from there they're going to okay transgenderism, and from there they're going to end up okaying pedophilia.
You wait and see.
That's going to be the interesting crux with some of these people.
Some of these people that have bought into post-World War II liberalism, live and let live, the God of the Old Testament, it's not the God of the New Testament, that's a lie.
But the people that have bought into that and they've tried to say, well, we just can't separate...
The ones that want to separate the miracles of Jesus from the historical Jesus, and they refuse to admit that if you separate the miracles of Jesus from historical Jesus, you eliminate historical Jesus.
But, you know, they still go to church, and they don't want to discriminate against anybody, and many of these people have kids that have been brainwashed by the culture.
They were given over to, in many cases, the demonic public schools, and now many of their kids are gay, and so they don't want to judge them.
They find these denominations that are not going to tell them.
They're not going to hear about the abomination that is sodomy.
They're not going to hear about exchanging relations from normal male and female to male and male, or female and female, and how that's wrong.
They're not going to hear it in those congregations, right?
Instead, they're going to drape their communion table with a rainbow and...
And this is all leading towards, you know, just there's really literally anything goes.
But the kicker to me will be, because all of this is about normalizing sex between adults and little kids and children and making them sexual beings, assigning them sexual identities, these old mainline denominations What are they going to do?
Seriously, what are they going to do when that is the next step?
I'm just curious, will it wake up any of them, or are they already that far gone?
I mean, a lot of times, the Lord can wake somebody up.
For all you people that say, I'm too black-pilled sometimes, which is probably none of you out there.
I'm probably too optimistic.
But I won't discount it.
A lot of times the Lord can wake people up by using the evil that is on display, right?
What Satan means for evil, God can mean for good.
A lot of times something that is really, really, truly evil.
Like I know of somebody who became a Christian.
I know of two people who became Christians, repented, realized they were sinners.
They believed in this New Age stuff, you know, where basically everything is relative.
You do you.
You have your truth.
But the reality of human trafficking and it being a giant open secret, and, you know, there's plenty of rabbit trails to go down about sex trafficking and the elites and everything else, and they realized that that was real, number one, that that was happening, that it is a multi-billion number one, that that was happening, that it is a multi-billion dollar a year industry, that human slavery is still one of the most profitable endeavors out They realized that, and then they were faced with something.
They were faced with evil, and they had to recognize, no, that's a truth.
My philosophy, my New Age philosophy of truth is relative.
Is wrong because I know that I know that I know that this is evil.
That little kids, sex trafficking little kids is evil.
I know this to be a fact.
And so that leads to something, you know, well if evil exists then good exists.
It's got to, right?
So I just wonder, as we careen down the slippery slope where they're going to try to normalize pedophilia, and they already are trying to, but, you know, they'll try to get the churches to embrace it.
The churches to fall first will be the ones that allowed women to have authority over men and have church offices when the scripture says that, you know, church officers are male.
And then the next thing was the gays and they just want to get married and we'll affirm you and blah, blah, blah.
And And now it's the trans.
There are churches now that are supporting the trans thing.
But will they support blatant, open pedophilia and minor attracted persons?
Will that level of evil serve to wake people up?
I don't know.
That's a good question.
But I mean...
Back to this just briefly.
This is the United Methodists.
We built colleges.
We still support HBCU's Clark Atlanta University and Bennett College.
And joining us...
Yeah, so that's Women in Ministry for you.
Here's a woman by the name of Jen Wilkin.
Jen Wilkin is a Bible teacher.
She's a woman.
She's a Bible teacher.
She's an author.
I mean, she's got a lot of books out there.
A lot of people like Jen Wilkin.
But if you needed any convincing, like, I'm already against...
I'm already against public, you know, women Bible teachers.
I guess everybody in this room could be a woman, but I certainly doubt that.
Anyway, here you go.
Women's bodies, every 28 days, tell them a parable about the shedding of blood for the renewing of life.
You don't think that changes the way that we encounter the scriptures?
Men only bleed when something is wrong.
Ha ha ha!
Hang on one second.
We gotta listen to that one more time.
Women's bodies, every 28 days, tell them a parable about the shedding of blood for the renewing of life.
You don't think that changes the way that we encounter the scriptures?
Men only bleed when something is wrong.
Oh, my goodness.
Podcaster Eric Kahn, who's the CEO and founder of New Christendom, says, Now, this is an old tweet.
You know, this is not something that happened recently.
Um...
Well, Eric Kahn's tweet is recent.
This is a Smash Bells tweet from back last year in May.
Apparently women have a better understanding of the gospel since they have a menstrual cycle.
You talk about letting the culture inform, letting the culture totally shift, totally influence, totally captivate your understanding of God's Word.
We've got to figure out, right?
Because we worship women in our society, so everything is about women, women, women.
So why not make a comparison to the Gospel and what that means to us and new life and our menstrual cycles in 28 days, every 28 days?
Ugh.
This is pretty sad to me.
That's all the time that we have for this edition on, what is it, Wednesday?
Wednesday, my goodness.
Wednesday of the Millstone Report.
Follow me on x at RealPaulHarrell.
That's at RealPaulHarrell.
Really appreciate you guys watching.
We can't do the show without you watching every single day.
And we'll be back here tomorrow, Thursday, with a brand new edition.