Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| On May 4, 1970, hundreds of students were protesting the Vietnam War at Kent State University. | ||
| The National Guard tried to disperse the crowd, but were met with resistance. | ||
| Things escalated, and four students were shot and killed. | ||
| This was rightfully memorialized as an overreach of power, but things have since changed in America. | ||
| On January 6th, 2021, during perhaps the biggest peaceful protest of American history, the FBI instigated violence. | ||
| Things escalated and four people died, including Ashley Babbitt, an unarmed Air Force veteran who was executed for climbing through a window. | ||
| There were no rock anthems composed to memorialize her death. | ||
| Instead, her killer was celebrated on TV. | ||
| The almighty, self-righteous liberal now celebrates tyranny. | ||
| And after pretending that violent mobs burning down cities for an entire summer is peaceful, they pretend that the American patriots at the Capitol on January 6th are terrorists. | ||
| And they pretend that the violent masked group Antifa does not exist. | ||
| Antifa has been used regularly to silence, intimidate, and violently attack peaceful protesters, including women, children, and the elderly. | ||
| And because the police have proven to be nothing but tyrants allowing all this to happen, a group of patriotic Americans known as the Proud Boys did the right thing and attempted to protect and defend their fellow man from a criminal government. | ||
| Including Army veteran Joe Biggs. | ||
|
unidentified
|
People always ask why we come. | |
| My question is why don't more people come here? | ||
| There's a lot of bad shit that's been going on. | ||
| It's been 100 plus days of violence and riots, assaulting police officers, killing people, executing people. | ||
| We don't like seeing that, you know? | ||
| I want everyone to learn how to get along. | ||
| And like today, as much as I do not like Antifa, I don't want any of those guys to get hurt. | ||
| I want everyone to be able to go home. | ||
| I disagree with them, but we should be able to disagree and keep our hands to ourselves. | ||
| Because the police have done nothing while innocent lives have been taken by government proxy groups Antifa and Black Lives Matter, the Proud Boys stood up to exercise our God-given right under natural law, self-defense. | ||
| And because the brainwashed masses have fallen into complete submission to the corrupt system, a new precedent is now being set that will forever change this country, strip us of our First Amendment, and further enslave us all. | ||
| Joe Biggs, along with four other members of the Proud Boys, are now being tried for sedition and face up to 20 years in prison. | ||
| Court reporter Alicia Powell was there to witness the lead prosecutor accusing the defense of being racist, and nearly every potential jury member has rallied for Black Lives Matter and supports Antifa. | ||
| A former CIA operative has also been qualified for the jury. | ||
| These political prisoners have been rotting in an American gulag for a year. | ||
| Some are being starved and drugged. | ||
| And our so-called leadership does absolutely nothing. | ||
| The trial is set for next week. | ||
| The current state of justice in America is a complete abomination. | ||
| A system comprised of criminals and whores. | ||
| May God bless America, because we need a miracle. | ||
| Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese. | ||
| Absolutely incredible stuff from the one and only Greg Reese and I was watching the out. | ||
| Oh, but hello, by the way I'm Harrison Smith sitting in today for Owen Schroyer as we take on the globalists on this Sunday night live edition of InfoWars. | ||
| So glad to be here on this Sunday evening. | ||
| Very special show we have for you today and I'll explain what exactly is going on in just a moment. | ||
| But before I do, I was watching the Alex Jones Show, just as you probably were if you're watching this show, and I saw that Greg Reese report, and I immediately had to text him and had to ask, Did you see my tweet? | ||
| Did you see my tweet about this? | ||
| Because literally just yesterday, I tweeted out, I mean, somebody, not me, because I'm not allowed on Twitter, and I would never break the rules like that. | ||
| But somebody, some sort of genius, tweeted out a comparison between Kent State and January 6th. | ||
| Pretty, pretty astonishing parallels that you can draw. | ||
| And it just goes to show like Alex was saying, actually, in the in the last show when he was talking about how he didn't have to tell Owen or I about Kevin McCarthy. | ||
| We're both just on the same page. | ||
| That's just how it happens. | ||
| So I had to text Greg Reese and go, Did you see what I tweeted out? | ||
| Or are we just on the same page here? | ||
| And he said, We're just on the same page. | ||
| Uh, you know, he apparently didn't see my tweet, but it just goes to show you great minds think alike. | ||
| So I thought it was great because I was going to do it. | ||
| I downloaded the Kent State little mini documentary. | ||
| I was going to probably save it for American Journal tomorrow morning, but I was going to do a whole Kent State versus January 6th breakdown. | ||
| And then I see Gregory goes and And does it for me. | ||
| So it really is amazing having all these people at Infowars. | ||
| We don't even have to talk to each other. | ||
| We just get it. | ||
| We all just are on the same page about this sort of stuff as I'm sure so many of you are. | ||
| It's not like the left where they need constant propaganda, constant control, constant censorship to make sure everybody's on the same absurd level. | ||
| Because it turns out that the truth doesn't need any propaganda. | ||
| The truth doesn't need any You know, censorship or control or anything of the sort, it is a lion. | ||
| You can let it free and it will defend itself. | ||
| So again, I just really appreciate Greg Reese making my job a lot easier by doing a Kent State report before I could. | ||
| So incredible stuff. | ||
| Share that report at band.video. | ||
| And of course, it's not just the American Journal, the show that I do each weekday morning, the Alex Jones Show in the War Room that is funded by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| It's the great content creators at Bandai Video, such as Greg Reese and John Bowne and so many others. | ||
| And it's all brought to you by you. | ||
| When you go to InfoWarsStore.com, I know Vitamin Mineral Fusion will be the sale will be ending tomorrow. | ||
| So you're getting 50% off this absolute bombshell product. | ||
| I take a lot of calls in the morning on American Journal and a lot of people, we don't ask them to. | ||
| We don't say, hey, when you get on, make sure to plug our stuff. | ||
| We never say that. | ||
| In fact, it kind of muddles things up sometimes, but I appreciate people. | ||
| They always want to call in and say how much they love our products, and Vitamin Mineral Fusion has to be the product that we get more compliments on, and more people calling in to say, you have no idea, this product changed my life. | ||
| vitamin mineral fusion is the top of that list. | ||
| So make sure you can find out what all the fuss is about. | ||
| Go to InfoWarsStore.com today because tomorrow it will be no longer 50% off. | ||
| Get that massive discount right now at InfoWarsStore.com and we so appreciate it. | ||
| A lot of news to get to today, but we're going to spend the second hour of today's two-hour program exclusively on a very special debate that we're going to have. | ||
| Tyler Nixon and Austin Peterson are going to be debating the topic of JFK. | ||
| the JFK assassination. | ||
| So I'll be playing moderator for the second hour here and I look forward to finally, finally coming to some sort of conclusion about JFK. | ||
| I think What is it 55 years now? | ||
| I think it's been long enough. | ||
| I think we should get to the bottom of this, so that's what we'll try to do in the second hour, and I'm very excited about that. | ||
| And of course. | ||
| You may be thinking, you know, there's so much stuff going on right now from COVID-19 to the border to Brazil exploding into chaos, and we will get into that. | ||
| But why? | ||
| Why spend this valuable time talking about JFK? | ||
| Well, because JFK the assassination of JFK was the. | ||
| Starting gun for the race to control America for the deep state Apparatus to really hit the ground running it That event, the assassination, has had reverberations that we're still experiencing to this day, and there's a lot of comparisons you might say to January 6th as well. | ||
| I really, I think it highlights the importance of what we are doing here on a daily basis to try to get the truth out, to try to spread the reality in the face of the false reality that's constantly being | ||
| Foisted upon us because I would hate to think that 50 years from now People are debating whether January 6 was an insurrection and a seditious coup or whether it was just a big protest Let's just go ahead and finish this whole narrative Right now shall we like things have changed a lot since the 1960s. | ||
| We have more than three TV networks that control everything. | ||
| We have vectors of information undreamed of in the 1960s. | ||
| There's no excuse for people to continue to believe the lies of the mainstream media and yet we've seen the way that the deep state has metamorphosized and altered itself, evolved along with the technology to maintain their grip on the minds of the wider American public. | ||
| Not you, though. | ||
| If you're watching this, you're not one of them. | ||
| You have broken free of the Matrix, you have left Plato's Cave, and we're all just having fun in the sun up here. | ||
| We do have a lot to talk about today, a lot of big stories to get into, a lot of videos to show as well. | ||
| Where should we even begin? | ||
| USDA approves first vaccine for honeybees? | ||
| Oh joy! | ||
| Oh good! | ||
| Oh wonderful! | ||
| I'm sure that will go well. | ||
| Area principals admit to withholding National Merit Awards from students. | ||
| Is it because of racism? | ||
| Is it because of climate change? | ||
| Stay tuned to find out. | ||
| Find out what absurd excuse they're using this time to not help anybody. | ||
| We have a very interesting story here. | ||
| but just steal the rewards that people have deserved for some sort of vague idea of so-called equity. | ||
| We'll get into that. | ||
| We have a very interesting story here. | ||
| A Harvard professor's book asks, what if the January 6th attack had succeeded? | ||
| What if? | ||
| What if it was an insurrection in the first place? | ||
| What if anything you people talked about was real? | ||
| Wouldn't that be crazy? | ||
| Wouldn't it be crazy if it really was an insurrection? | ||
| Wouldn't that be nuts? | ||
| It wasn't though, so what are you talking about? | ||
| We'll get into that a little bit later as well. | ||
| Of course, Brazil is just exploding right now. | ||
| Absolute madness. | ||
| Lula, the President-elect, I guess, although I guess he's been, um, he was sworn in about a week ago. | ||
| Lula vows to punish thousands of Bolsonaro supporters who stormed the Presidential Palace and Congress. | ||
| He declared a federal intervention in a televised statement vowing to punish Bolsonaro supporters for storming the Presidential Palace and National Congress, saying there's no precedent in the history of our country for these protests. | ||
| Well, isn't that interesting? | ||
| There's also no precedent for the wholesale theft of the election that you just carried out. | ||
| So, hey, I guess we're in uncharted waters here. | ||
| Of course, one of the biggest stories that I know Alex covered quite a bit is the new revelations about the true mass murder, genocidal campaign of the so-called vaccines. | ||
| InfoWars has the article, Smoking Gun Covid Infection Rates Higher Amongst Vaccinated, Australian Data Reveals. | ||
| So, I mean, this really is the end point, right? | ||
| This really is the dead end, like cul-de-sac of COVID justification, vaccine justification, you might say, right? | ||
| It's gone from, it's perfectly 100%, it'll stop transmission, you won't get infected, you won't, okay, and then it moved, all right, okay, you might get infected, but, you know, you still won't transmit it. | ||
| Okay, so you can transmit it, you can still get infected, but you'll be better off. | ||
| Okay, you're not gonna actually be better off, but you won't die. | ||
| And now they have nothing. | ||
| And now they have absolutely nothing. | ||
| So we've really have reached the end of the rope when it comes to the vaccine justifications. | ||
| I think people are waking up to a greater extent than is reflected by the mainstream media, just from my personal discussion with people. | ||
| I won't tell you who it is, but I was hanging out with a couple fellas the other day and they're not They're not professionally political, right? | ||
| They all have normal jobs and families. | ||
| And yet I was shocked at the violence with which they discussed Anthony Fauci. | ||
| You know, I think sometimes we push it a little far on the American Journal. | ||
| I use colorful words to explain how I feel people who carry out mass murder should be treated. | ||
| But it was nothing compared to what just a couple regular dudes, you know, hanging out and playing poker were saying about what they wanted. | ||
| In fact, the actual quote was, um, next time I see Anthony Fauci, he better be swinging from a noose. | ||
| That wasn't me. | ||
| I wasn't saying that. | ||
| I'm just telling you what the people are saying. | ||
| So I think the awakening is happening to a pretty, pretty much greater degree than we expect. | ||
| And then again, you know, there's a lot of people out there that are still happy with their Fauci tattoos and all that sort of nonsense. | ||
| So, you know, maybe, maybe my friends aren't the best bellwether for this, but I think it does speak to the, The fact that the Americans are just sort of getting to the end of their rope, sort of just tired of being told the same thing over and over and over again when that thing has, from before it ever was announced, known to be false. | ||
| It was known to be false the entire time. | ||
| There's a story from InfoWars. | ||
| Fauci responds to alleged upcoming Fauci files, says disinformation is the enemy. | ||
| And a quick reminder, he specifically used the word disinformation because misinformation means it's false, but disinformation means it can be true. | ||
| That's their words, not mine. | ||
| Again, those are the authorities telling you that. | ||
| But regardless, it's obvious now with the massive rate of unexplained deaths, with the televised collapse of athletes happening on almost a daily basis at this point, it's becoming a little bit too much to ignore. | ||
| And we know what the mainstream media does. | ||
| If they can ignore it, they'll do that. | ||
| If that's That's plan A, right? | ||
| When something comes out that they don't want to talk about, plan A is bury it, ignore it. | ||
| Now, in the 1960s and the 70s and the 80s, when mainstream media still had a stranglehold on basically all communication in America, it was easy to ignore something that was inconvenient. | ||
| If you didn't talk about it, there was no one else to talk about it, so it just went away quietly. | ||
| That's not the case anymore. | ||
| So the mainstream media, or the powers that be, the authorities, whoever you want to say, they've had to change their tactics since the invention of the internet, since the creation of things like InfoWars.com. | ||
| So they can't just ignore things anymore. | ||
| Now they have to distract, deceive, and actually engage in the conversation in an attempt to distract. | ||
| And so that's what we're seeing across the across the board. | ||
| And it's well, it's getting comical scientists studying temperature at which humans spontaneously die with increasing urgency. | ||
| Now, folks, it it's climate change. | ||
| I mean, I just want to ask, for the Democrats and the Democratic-controlled media, if you guys could just chill for a little while? | ||
| I like to make skits, I like to satirize, I like to parody, and you people have gone farther than I could ever imagine. | ||
| How am I supposed to come up with jokes when you are, in all seriousness, saying that it's climate change that's causing the unexplained deaths? | ||
| I wouldn't even write that joke. | ||
| It would be, it's like, well, that's, yeah, no one would believe it though. | ||
| You know, jokes have to have some sort of grounding in truth. | ||
| The lies of the left and the mainstream media, they are not bounded by, you know, such restrictions. | ||
| They can be as ridiculous as they want. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Oh yeah, we have, okay, let's get into some of these videos now. | ||
| Because we have a lot of COVID COVID videos, let's just say that. | ||
| And of course, we saw one of them there on the screen as B-Roll, but let's go ahead and play this one. | ||
| Another young, healthy athlete falls suddenly while grasping his chest, this time in the middle of a basketball game. | ||
| Let's go ahead and watch what that looked like. | ||
| There he is, laying on the ground. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Horrifying, obviously. - No, Essien, the sophomore guard, 5'11", 170, out of Wiley, Texas. | |
| Plays high school ball out of Bishop Lynch. | ||
| Still being looked at at the trainers, Cameron. | ||
| With a timeout in action, both teams. | ||
| Obviously hoping he's okay. | ||
| We'll get another look at it. | ||
| You see here on the replay, not quite sure what happened, but... Well, he wasn't struck in the chest. | ||
| He wasn't hit in the chest. | ||
| No, he was just standing there when he goes down and grabs his chest. | ||
| Horrifying. | ||
| Literally horrifying. | ||
| I would hate to be that person's friends or family watching this take place. | ||
| But it can only happen so many times. | ||
| It can only... You can only distract from this for so long before people get what's going on. | ||
| They understand that, you know, if all these people are collapsing in exactly the same way, On TV, they've all been vaccinated. | ||
| There's only so long you can go, well, no, that one was because he was hitting the chest. | ||
| And this one was because of climate change. | ||
| And this one was because he was stressed out because you were talking bad about vaxxers. | ||
| I mean, enough, enough. | ||
| It's obvious. | ||
| We all know what's going on. | ||
| So just stop insulting us. | ||
| And that really is, I think that's how people should feel. | ||
| I mean, you should feel insulted that they think you're so stupid that you can't see what's going on. | ||
| I think you know better than that. | ||
| Here's the story from zero hedge .com. | ||
| Old Dominion basketball player clutches chest and collapses mid game. | ||
| Just days after Buffalo Bills player Demar Hamlin had to be administered CPR on the playing field after he collapsed following a play against the Cincinnati Bengals. | ||
| Another athlete has collapsed under what appears to be mysterious circumstances. | ||
| Again. | ||
| Horrifying he did not appear to lose consciousness. | ||
| So not as bad as what happened to Demar Hamlin, but still yet another data point Constructing this constellation that we can all see when we just zoom out long far enough and see what's going on But some pretty amazing videos have come out over this weekend About the facts I have so many I wonder okay, I'm gonna try to get to all of them Let's go to this video. | ||
| Doctor calls unvaccinated son losers. | ||
| So this guy kicked a father and a son out of his building denying them treatment. | ||
| And just listen to the vitriol with which he discusses his patients. | ||
| This is a doctor who's taken a Hippocratic oath to do no harm and to serve whoever it is that comes in for help. | ||
| That is the point of being a doctor, I think. | ||
| But now it's variable. | ||
| It's dependent on whether You are a submissive slave to the New World Order or whether you are a rebel. | ||
| It'll determine whether or not you get healthcare. | ||
| It may determine whether or not you can get on a train or buy a house or buy food soon. | ||
| But they're starting in sort of the most egregious place which is healthcare. | ||
| You would think it would take a while for The culture to shift and the culture to change and people start getting blocked out of things. | ||
| But no, they just went straight to the doctors. | ||
| They just went straight to what would seem like the last profession that would actually allow themselves to be hoodwinked by this and actually allow themselves to be used as political pawns. | ||
| People's health, the matter of life and death in their hands, and yet they are perfectly willing to exert their power in this way. | ||
| That alone should be horrifying to everyone paying attention. | ||
| Let's go now to this video of this doctor insulting this unvaccinated father and son who he has just refused service to. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know what? | |
| I don't want anything inserted inside of my son's body. | ||
| They could have done a rapid test, and you refuse, and you quote SHA being the reason? | ||
| SHA's policies do not require, do not require a PCR test. | ||
| I just don't agree with anything you guys say. | ||
| No, you're calling us names, calling us losers. | ||
| Yeah, but on my face you called me a coward. | ||
| Yeah, exactly. | ||
| That's pretty funny actually. | ||
| Look at that dude, wearing a mask, still, to this day, outside, calling you a loser and a coward for not submitting to this experimental jab, which, at this point, there is absolutely no reason to continue this charade. | ||
| But continue it. | ||
| They are. | ||
| Let's go now to this first video. | ||
| Something is extremely wrong. | ||
| Here's a pediatrician sounding the alarm on the COVID chabs, as if, so, you know, When it comes to COVID jabs, I know we're used to hearing deafening alarms continuously every single day, so let's, you know, let those turn down a little bit as she sounds yet another alarm on the COVID vaccine jabs. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So a few months ago, I looked at the package insert. | |
| I pulled it from the box of mRNA product, and, you know, it was sealed just like I'm showing you here. | ||
| I unsealed the box that the entire thing came in, and then I pulled this out, and this is what it looks like. | ||
| So I'd like to show this to you. | ||
| It is. | ||
| Sorry about that. | ||
| It's, um, it's blank. | ||
| Boom. | ||
| There it is. | ||
| It says intentionally blank on it. | ||
| That's the data that pharmacists and physicians are basing on giving the injections outside of mainstream media recommendations. | ||
| There it is right there. | ||
| Here's a good question. | ||
| Why didn't they just print that on a piece of paper the size of a postage stamp? | ||
| Why all the theater of folding it up? | ||
| Into a great big piece of paper like that. | ||
| Why? | ||
| That's what's passing for informed consent. | ||
| Right, so how am I to get informed consent to parents when I have, this is what I have. | ||
| I have a government that's telling me that I have to stay safe and effective and if I don't my license is a threat. | ||
| How am I to give informed consent to patients? | ||
| We're seeing an uptick in myocarditis. | ||
| We're seeing an uptick in adverse reactions. | ||
| We have trusted these regulatory agencies, I have, for my entire career, up until now. | ||
| Something is extremely wrong. | ||
| How am I supposed to give informed consent? | ||
| Well, you can't. | ||
| You actually can't give informed consent when the side effects, potential or noticed, can't be discussed and aren't talked about. | ||
| And of course, I'm actually not sure where that doctor was located, but we know that California just put into action AB 2098, which says that if you contradict the government's statements on COVID-19, you will have your license revoked. | ||
| In the state of California. | ||
| Absolutely horrifying, as always. | ||
| Let's go ahead and go to this next video. | ||
| The triple vaccinated are the most likely to die of COVID-19. | ||
| So again, this is it. | ||
| They have run out of rope. | ||
| They have run out of space to retreat. | ||
| They're up against a wall at this point. | ||
| Not literally, unfortunately, but at this point, metaphorically, they are up. | ||
| They have their backs up against the wall because As we just explained, they have gone from safe and effective to minor side effects to, well, but at least you won't die if you get it. | ||
| It would have been way worse if I hadn't been vaccinated. | ||
| And now that's gone. | ||
| That's over. | ||
| They have nothing. | ||
| You're more likely to die. | ||
| You're more likely to get it. | ||
| You're more likely to get other stuff. | ||
| You're more likely to get these horrific life altering or at times life ending side effects from the vaccine. | ||
| It's not like there's just not a good reason to do it. | ||
| I mean, if the vaccine was just saline, if everything had played out just as it did, but the vaccine was just some inert liquid, it would be better than whatever it is now. | ||
| It's not just that it doesn't work, that it actually has the inverse effect than they suggested. | ||
| So let's go now to this video. | ||
| The triple vaccinated are the most likely to die of COVID-19. | ||
|
unidentified
|
700,000 people in the study in Israel, just so you know, that showed that the double vax were 27 times more likely to get reinfected. | |
| So it's not the vaccine, even if we just talk about that, it's not stopping infection, it's not stopping transmission. | ||
| If you look at the studies in England, in Scotland, in the northern countries in Europe where they get real data, that they're actually the triple vaccinated, the most likely to die. | ||
| So, bottom line is that as we go forward, The natural immunity is long, broad, and durable. | ||
| And I don't know if he mentioned it, but we have SARS-CoV-1 patients who still had immunity 18 years later. | ||
| Let that sink in. | ||
| 18 years later, we still had immunity from SARS-CoV-1 to SARS-CoV-2. | ||
| This is long, broad, durable immunity. | ||
| So, what I want to say in closing is, natural immunity should be considered legally to be at least equal to vaccinated immunity, and immunity is likely lifelong. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Yeah, significantly better. | ||
| So as we close out this segment, let me just give you some of the headlines. | ||
| Most of these are from InfoWars.com, but there are others around there. | ||
| Bombshell COVID-19 booster causing cancer relapse and sudden death. | ||
| That's a London professor of oncology, Angus Dalgleish. | ||
| He's called for an urgent stop to COVID-19 boosters, stating, as an oncologist, I'm seeing people with stable cancer rapidly relapse after a COVID-19 booster. | ||
| You have this. | ||
| UK government whistleblower reveals massive spike in excess deaths since COVID jab rollout, more than 1,000 a week. | ||
| A UK government whistleblower has come forward to reveal there's been a massive spike of excess deaths since the rollout of the COVID so-called vaccines. | ||
| Harvard medical research on mRNA vax spike protein undermines fact-checkers and COVID censorship. | ||
| Fact-checkers and big tech lost another round of reported COVID-19 misinformation this week when an American Heart Association journal published research suggesting the spike protein used in mRNA vaccines can harm some people. | ||
| What? | ||
| What? | ||
| I'm so surprised. | ||
| Two years ago when we covered this. | ||
| COVID PSYOP exposed. | ||
| Network of doctors who pushed masking lockdowns on Twitter during pandemic don't exist. | ||
| Do I need to read it again? | ||
| Doctors and physicians who were pushing masking, COVID lockdowns, and the experimental vaccines on Twitter during the pandemic were actually part of a network of fake accounts, according to a bombshell report by the San Francisco Standard. | ||
| Probably one of those far-right conspiracy theorist organizations, the San Francisco Standard, if I had to guess. | ||
| Rare COVID-19 vaccine complications linked to circulating spike protein in blood. | ||
| Young adults and adolescents that suffered from rare cases of myocarditis following vaccination had increased levels of viral protein spike in their bloodstream, found a recent study carried out by a team at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Massachusetts General Hospital. | ||
| All these are from today. | ||
| All of these stories are from one single day of headlines as the truth really just comes spilling out like the dam has thoroughly broken. | ||
| A weekly COVID report in Australia shows 1,770 hospitalized and none of them were unvaccinated. | ||
| All of the people being hospitalized in Australia now have been vaccinated. | ||
| And of course, in response to this, they are blaming, let's all say it together, climate change! | ||
| It's climate change, you guys! | ||
| Go back to sleep and die! | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is Sunday Night Live. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| In 30 minutes, we will be joined by Tyler Nixon and Austin Peterson. | ||
| They will be debating the JFK assassination. | ||
| As I understand it, Austin Peterson is on the more or less on the Russia did it side of things. | ||
| And Tyler Nixon is on the side of the CIA. | ||
| Did it we will see if we can get some sort of conclusion of this in the second hour of this program. | ||
| But now I've got just a heck of a lot to cover. | ||
| I forgot to even mention it. | ||
| I'm so stupid. | ||
| I just read through all these amazing headlines. | ||
| Amazing in sort of, you know, the most awful way you can possibly imagine about the ineffectiveness of the vaccine and the true scale of death that's being caused because of it. | ||
| I forgot to mention the biggest story of the day on InfoWars. | ||
| Smoking gun COVID infection rates higher amongst vaccinated Australian data reveals. | ||
| So that really is the the final word, the final linchpin, the just The end of the road for the vaccine pushers. | ||
| They have nothing to rely on but their lies. | ||
| So they will continue to push it. | ||
| Push those as hard as they possibly can. | ||
| Now, what I want to do right now is talk about censorship. | ||
| Because it's happening at an increasingly rapid rate. | ||
| About an increasing number of disseparate topics. | ||
| But there's A key part to understand about this, and it goes into not just censorship, but just force in general. | ||
| See, if the vaccines worked, they wouldn't have to lie about it. | ||
| See how that works? | ||
| See how that works? | ||
| If COVID-19 was really as bad as they said it was, they wouldn't have had to Make a conscious effort to spread fear porn for the first couple months. | ||
| They wouldn't have had to fabricate all of the things they did. | ||
| They could actually tell the truth and people naturally would respond in an appropriate way. | ||
| You actually hardly ever need force to make people do things that just make sense. | ||
| I know that might be an obvious statement, but it's something that the globalists seem to have forgotten or Are actively working against somehow? | ||
| So I was thinking about this when it comes to the so-called 15-minute cities. | ||
| They just rolled out a pilot program in Oxford where if you want to leave an area, there's a 15-minute area, 15-minute radius from your house. | ||
| If you want to leave that area, you have to apply to the council to get permission to go farther than 15 minutes from your home. | ||
| Sounds like prison to me. | ||
| That's exactly what it is, obviously. | ||
| And it begs the question, why? | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because the proposal isn't necessarily bad on its face. | ||
| It actually sounds kind of nice. | ||
| The idea is that you should be able to get everything you need for your life within 15 minutes. | ||
| I'll tell you, if you just went out and bought land and started to build a neighborhood, started to build a little town where this was the idea, people would flock there. | ||
| They would love it. | ||
| If you said it's going to be walkable and within 15 minutes you're going to have a hospital and a school and your grocery store and your doctor and your pharmacy, everything you could ever need is within 15 minutes. | ||
| People would go there. | ||
| They would love that. | ||
| It happened here in Austin. | ||
| There's a neighborhood called Mueller where they sort of had this idea. | ||
| They built these big houses. | ||
| Unfortunately, the houses were made as cheaply as possible, so they're already falling down, and the neighborhood was only built a couple years ago, but that's beside the point. | ||
| The point is that they were building a neighborhood where this was the idea. | ||
| It would be walkable, you wouldn't have yards, but you would have one big shared park that everyone would go into. | ||
| They wanted to create sort of a community, and it became probably the most popular, you know, suburb of Austin for a long time. | ||
| It probably is still, you know, it continues. | ||
| So this idea is not objectionable on its face. | ||
| So why do you need the prison guards? | ||
| Why does this 15-minute city need to have barbed wire around it? | ||
| Why do you need permission to leave? | ||
| Because they don't want to make a nice little 15-minute neighborhood where you can have everything that you need. | ||
| They want you imprisoned in your neighborhood. | ||
| They want you incapable of traveling if they don't give you permission. | ||
| How do you think January 6th would have ever happened if you had to get permission to go? | ||
| Well, what do you, what do you want to leave your neighborhood for? | ||
| I'd like to go protest the government, please. | ||
| No, I'm afraid we're all out of permits for today. | ||
| You're going to have to stay home. | ||
| I mean, how hard would that be? | ||
| And if you don't have a car and you run on, uh, you know, public transport and your public transport ticket is biometrically linked to your physical body, then you're not going anywhere. | ||
| So again, it's like, If any of this was natural or good or what people wanted, there would be no enforcement mechanisms necessary. | ||
| The problem is that everything they're trying to foist on us is horrific and objectionable and nobody wants it. | ||
| So they have to lay the groundwork. | ||
| So they're actually sort of working backwards, right? | ||
| They're actually starting with the control mechanism. | ||
| They're starting with the, you know, laying the groundwork of vaccine passports and You know, whatever, the facial recognition software, they're starting with that. | ||
| So then when they implement the rules, they'll still package it as something good. | ||
| They'll still say, but it's a great idea. | ||
| 15 minutes, you have a grocery store and a hospital right there. | ||
| And it's like, okay, well, that sounds nice. | ||
| Can I leave? | ||
| Oh, no, no, you can't actually. | ||
| You're here forever. | ||
| You know, the truth doesn't need censorship. | ||
| Good things don't need a gun to your back to make you do them. | ||
| Vaccines that work don't need a, you know, to be unquestioned continually. | ||
| Cause just like everything else, you know, if, if you think we're lying, we're not going to shut you up. | ||
| We want to hear what you have to say because we're right. | ||
| And we'll counter, you know, contradict you with the facts and that'll be that. | ||
| And if the vaccine was good, then they wouldn't care about misinformation. | ||
| They would see it as a opportunity to tell the truth about it, but that's not what's happening. | ||
| And of course, the Disinformation Governance Board is still operating. | ||
| It's still going on. | ||
| They're calling it something else, but you know, that's the way tyranny works. | ||
| Again, I don't know what the solution is. | ||
| We need some sort of charge of attempted tyranny, attempted oppression, something like that, right? | ||
| Because the way it operates now is they try something like the Disinformation Board, which is hilarious, right? | ||
| They essentially declared war on disinformation only to be defeated by that disinformation 15 minutes later. | ||
| But all this is just to talk about, you know, one of their main enforcement mechanisms, which is censorship. | ||
| And of course, here in America, thank God, or, you know, thank the Founding Fathers, we have this little thing called the First Amendment. | ||
| And one of the things, just since I'm on a different show here, I say this quite a bit on American Journal, but I want the whole InfoWars audience to understand this, that the time the First Amendment was written, The press was the press. | ||
| It was the thing that you used to print. | ||
| It'd be like saying freedom of the printer. | ||
| They're not saying press as in the media. | ||
| It wasn't freedom of the media or freedom of, you know, the mainstream media or freedom of this nebulous sort of idea of the press being the people that report things. | ||
| It was the physical press. | ||
| It was the technology necessary to spread information to a wide populace. | ||
| Literally in the Revolutionary War and in the lead up to it you have you'd have people with presses being able to distribute leaflets calling for revolution and the British government would send in agents to go smash that press up or burn it or steal it to go print their own you know information to counteract the information war that was taking off there. | ||
| So when it comes to the technology That's what the First Amendment guarantees. | ||
| It guarantees the access to the technology not be monopolized by the government. | ||
| And so when it comes to big tech, that's just a fancy printing press. | ||
| That's just a fancy new technology. | ||
| And it's worth remembering that when they say freedom of the press is one of those five freedoms enshrined in the First Amendment, it means the freedom of the technology to spread information. | ||
| And thank God we have that. | ||
| But other places aren't quite as lucky. | ||
| Unfortunately, there are places like the UK, where they have no such thing as the First Amendment. | ||
| They have a history of being on the forefront of respecting free speech, but that's not the First Amendment. | ||
| That's not a constitutional guarantee of that right. | ||
| It's just sort of a suggestion. | ||
| It's sort of an idea that they like to have, but when it gets in the way of Other things they want to do? | ||
| Well, that freedom takes a backseat. | ||
| Someone in the U.S. | ||
| named... Let me get the exact name here. | ||
| Goddard is his last name. | ||
| I lost my little sheet. | ||
| I think it's John Goddard, but I just... James. | ||
| Okay, James Goddard. | ||
| James Goddard in the U.K. | ||
| has been threatened with arrest. | ||
| He got this letter. | ||
| Dear Mr. Goddard, This is in reference to a crime report. | ||
| On the 4th of August, 2022, you posted a tweet on your Twitter account, at Goddard2066. | ||
| This tweet contained a video of Wimberly Way and commentary from you regarding the rainbow pride flags which represent the LGBT community. | ||
| These comments are targeting specifically the LGBTQ community and would be considered grossly offensive, thus being in contravention to Section 127 of the Malicious Communications Act of 2003. | ||
| I therefore require you to contact me to arrange a voluntary interview. | ||
| Just that sentence alone. | ||
| Did it feel weird to type that? | ||
| I wonder if it felt weird to type that. | ||
| You are required to do this voluntarily. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hmm. | |
| Interesting. | ||
| It's just the way it works now, right? | ||
| I therefore require you to contact me to arrange a voluntary interview I require you to volunteer. | ||
| Okay, good. | ||
| So this matter can be further investigated. | ||
| This interview can be conducted near your home address and I would suggest a mutually convenient date in early 2023. | ||
| Whenever it's convenient for you to come beg for forgiveness for daring to have an idea in contradiction of our religious authority, the gays, you can come meet me. | ||
| Whenever it's convenient for you to come kneel on the ground and beg for forgiveness, as long as it's convenient, we want to make it convenient. | ||
| If I do not hear from you within 10 days of the date of this letter, an evidential case file may be submitted for consideration of prosecution. | ||
| Yours sincerely, P.C. | ||
| see Gordon. | ||
| I just, I mean, how would you react if you got a letter like this from your government? | ||
| You know, There's a reason we still have the First Amendment. | ||
| And it's because we have the Second Amendment. | ||
| I'll just say that. | ||
| I'll just say, if I get a gentle request for a voluntary, necessary, required interview for something I said or a video that I posted, I just don't think I would go quietly. | ||
| That's just me. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| How would you react to this? | ||
| So here's what we're going to do. | ||
| We're not the Redcoats. | ||
| We're not in the UK. | ||
| We do not have to abide by their ridiculous rules. | ||
| We're going to show you the video that he posted. | ||
| We're going to play it. | ||
| We're going to post it on Bandod Video. | ||
| We're going to post it on InfoWars.com. | ||
| We're going to ask you to go out and download this video and re-upload it to your own account. | ||
| Pretend to be from the UK just to send the UK police around chasing their tails looking for these thought criminals. | ||
| Maybe change your IP address through a VPN to make it look like you're posting from the UK just to mess with them. | ||
| That's just a suggestion. | ||
| If you want to do it, you're more than welcome to. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So we're going to play this video. | |
| James Goddard posted this video. | ||
| And here's the other thing. | ||
| It's not even... | ||
| It's not even like we're playing this video and I have to like warn you because it actually is offensive. | ||
| No, no, it's not offensive. | ||
| It's the most milquetoast, reasonable, just common, inoffensive sentiment that this guy is making. | ||
| He's just, it's the equivalent of rolling your eyes at a LGBTQ plus IAP flag and just rolling your eyes. | ||
| That's what's happening here. | ||
| So, Like, it would still be objectionable, it would still be ridiculous, it would still be something to talk about if a guy posted a video where he's, like, filmed the rainbow flag, and he's, like, lighting it on fire, and he's like, oh, gay people need to die! | ||
| I'd be like, alright, well, that's a little far, but it's, it's, you know, your human right to express how you feel, and, you know, frankly, people have crazy ideas all over the place, and, uh, unless you want to censor everybody, you can't censor anybody. | ||
| So, even if it was this crazy video, I'd still play it, and it would still be his right to express his views, Because he's a human being. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| But look at this video. | ||
| Watch this video and realize this is what they're sending police after. | ||
| This is what they're censoring in the UK. | ||
| This is a blasphemy against their state religion and it's being treated with all of the severity. | ||
| of such a thing. | ||
| So let's go now to this video. | ||
| Warning, viewers from the UK, it may be illegal for you to watch this. | ||
| If you're in the UK, turn off, turn in your TV license, close your eyes, shut the door, run away, call the police on me. | ||
| I dare you. | ||
| Here it is. | ||
| James Goddard has been summoned to the police and threatened with prosecution over this video. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome to the home of English football, ladies and gentlemen. | |
| Welcome to the home of English football, where the fly in the nonce is flag. | ||
| They've turned Wembley into nonce-ally. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| He called the rainbow flag a nonce flag. | ||
| I don't even know what that means. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't even know what that means. | |
| I mean, was the inquisition like this? | ||
| Is that what this is? | ||
| Is this a gay inquisition? | ||
| Nobody expects the gay inquisition. | ||
| But honestly, do you think that was the level of severity that was placed on people who lived You know, under the rule of Catholic Spain, do you think if they said something like, Jesus is a nonce, they would have been hauled in front of the authorities to explain themselves? | ||
| Or is this like even beyond any religious persecution that we've seen before? | ||
| And we know UK is frankly not in a great spot as literally praying silently to yourself in your head in certain areas can get you arrested and charged as we saw. | ||
| As even now is working its way through the English courts, a woman praying in her head has been arrested for those very thoughts and is being tried and may potentially face some sort of punishment for the thoughts that she thought in her head. | ||
| Truly incredible. | ||
| And here, if you post a video, simply rolling your eyes at the rainbow flag, the cops come for you. | ||
| So again, Why? | ||
| Why? | ||
| Why do they need you to believe what they believe? | ||
| Why do they require you not just to say whatever, it's your right, you can do whatever you want. | ||
| They actually demand your approval at this point. | ||
| They demand your full capitulation. | ||
| You can't just tolerate it at this point. | ||
| You have to encourage it. | ||
| You can't just say, look, it's a rainbow flag. | ||
| It's a nonce flag. | ||
| You have to be in favor of it. | ||
| You have to be happy about it. | ||
| We've already got thought crime. | ||
| Is face crime next? | ||
| Is face crime the next frontier that the UK will cross in its Orwellian pursuit of total control? | ||
| You remember in 1984, they had that. | ||
| They had face crime. | ||
| If you made a face that revealed, you know, if you look at a rainbow flag and sort of grimace, is that too much? | ||
| Here's the definition. | ||
| British slang for a pedophile. | ||
| Okay, more accurate than I thought. | ||
| The pedophile flag. | ||
| So, just enjoy it while we have it, folks. | ||
| Enjoy the First Amendment while it still exists in some, you know, decrepit, destroyed form that we still have it in now. | ||
| But again, all this You know, relates to one another, right? | ||
| You can't have this control system without the lies that predicate it. | ||
| You can't have the lies that spread without the censorship to silence the truth that destroys your lies. | ||
| You can't have the censorship without folding in both big tech and the media and law enforcement into your deep state control system. | ||
| Like all of these things are being put into place one by one. | ||
| And I don't know if I don't know if people know, like, I don't know. | ||
| I don't know how people, I just, I'm constantly trying to figure out what's going on in the head of Normies and it's a, it's a futile attempt because it seems like they're goldfish. | ||
| It really seems like people, they may hear about something and they may go, oh my gosh, that's bad. | ||
| And then, you know, they forget about it the next day and then something else happens and they go, well, I don't like that either. | ||
| And then they just move on. | ||
| Wow, that's weird. | ||
| Shrug and just move on. | ||
| I don't know why it's so difficult for people to just remember what happened yesterday, remember what happened the day before, remember what happened a year ago, and then draw the connecting line and, you know, look forward and wonder what's happening next. | ||
| Like, pattern recognition is not that difficult. | ||
| And when you can see a pattern of all of these things being put into place, Literally, I mean, it's like people are sitting there, and one by one, the bricks are being built in the jail cell around them, and with each brick, they go, but that's just a brick! | ||
| That's just one brick! | ||
| And it's like, can you not see the wall? | ||
| Yeah, each brick's just one brick, but together, they're trapping you, and you'll never escape! | ||
| Yeah, but you're worried about one brick? | ||
| Who cares? | ||
| This is the 100th brick they've laid today. | ||
| Are you not concerned now? | ||
| People just aren't concerned. | ||
| So these are the bricks that are being laid. | ||
| The censorship, the control, weaponizing police against people who have wrong thoughts, infiltrating and subverting religious institutions so they can't offer you a solace or a force of You know, push back against this. | ||
| Just one by one, all of these pieces are being put into place, and it's really not that hard to zoom out and see where this is going. | ||
| I don't know why people can't do it. | ||
| I don't know why InfoWars stands as this, you know, singular outlet that can connect these dots and see the constellation that they're making. | ||
| And since we're talking about censorship, I thought this tweet from my good friend Ron Filipowski Really highlighted one of the tactics of the lefties. | ||
| I think I'll do it tomorrow. | ||
| If I can do it in time on American Journal, we have a lot going on on American Journal. | ||
| We actually already filmed. | ||
| We may have to refilm, but we did a new pitch meeting skit. | ||
| We did a pitch meeting for the Ukraine war. | ||
| So tune into American Journal tomorrow to perhaps see that maybe no promises, but that'll come out sometime this week, guaranteed. | ||
| But I may also do this thing because. | ||
| I don't I see I haven't I haven't I haven't I haven't fleshed it out yet, but there's this phenomenon that I've seen. | ||
| in multiple aspects of. | ||
| One of them is Jamie Kilstein. | ||
| He's this comedian that was just a rabid leftist troll that would just continually attack people. | ||
| And then it turned on him. | ||
| He got accused of things and suddenly he was like, wow, this is what it's like? | ||
| Wow, this hurts. | ||
| And then he flipped back. | ||
| But he describes, you know, what it was like to be in the leftist mob and to just wake up every morning being like, who are we attacking now? | ||
| Who are we destroying? | ||
| And it's this idea that, like, they think they're fighting against something. | ||
| They think that we are this opposing force that is just as dishonest and just as manipulative and just as conniving and just as exploitative as they are. | ||
| But we're not. | ||
| We're just trying to tell the truth. | ||
| We're just desperately trying to get the truth out there and constantly being, you know, prevented from doing that. | ||
| But they have this idea that they're warriors. | ||
| And they're the only side that has that, which is why they're able to be so dominant. | ||
| At the same time, I saw a headline again, I'll cover it tomorrow, but it's from a Swedish newspaper. | ||
| And it said something like, the angry nerds that make us defend Amazon. | ||
| And it's basically these people getting mad at YouTubers and other commentators who were criticizing things like the new Lord of the Rings series on Amazon. | ||
| And it's all these leftists going to war against them and defending Amazon and then getting mad at the nerds for making them defend Amazon. | ||
| The point is that Like they're in this just like mind cyclone where they just... | ||
| They're convinced that, like, nothing, that the other side can't be honest, they can't just be truthful, they can't just be, you know, in one instance, like, people that just really like Lord of the Rings and really don't like the new Amazon movie. | ||
| In their mind, this is an enemy faction that's full of racists and white supremacists and misogynists and they're attacking this beautiful thing because it has women and black people and we have to defend it. | ||
| It's, they live in a fantasy world. | ||
| Just like, you know, when it comes to Jamie Kilstein or any of these people, You know, they are on a crusade. | ||
| They are on a mission to destroy this force that they've imagined. | ||
| But we're just trying to tell the truth. | ||
| We're just trying to explain what's going on. | ||
| Here's the tweet from Ron Filipowski. | ||
| Actually, it's a retweet. | ||
| So first, I'll read Charlie Kirk. | ||
| So this is what he tweeted. | ||
| This is the image that he tweeted. | ||
| It's Charlie Kirk saying, I've actually learned more about the Democrats this week. | ||
| I knew the Republicans were divided. | ||
| Seeing the uniform, machine, cyborg-like discipline from the Democrats is very telling about the enemy that we're up against. | ||
| And this, of course, everybody knows. | ||
| Everybody knows this is an asset of the Democrats. | ||
| This is one of their primary attributes, is their ability I don't know if it's an ability. | ||
| Their disability to just completely ignore any of their own personal opinions and just fold themselves into the machine willingly. | ||
| It's amazing. | ||
| So Ron Filipowski's response to that was, Maga can't understand how to process unity, harmony, class, decorum, and civility. | ||
| Alien concepts. | ||
| I think this highlights the divide so well. | ||
| What we see as being forced into conformity. | ||
| As being forced into unquestioning submission to the orders from on high. | ||
| They couch. | ||
| They disguise. | ||
| They camouflage in language of civility. | ||
| Being nice to people. | ||
| Just be nice, okay? | ||
| It really reveals. | ||
| They say be nice. | ||
| They say be civil. | ||
| They talk about decorum and class and harmony while their boot is on your neck. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| So just so we understand. | ||
| These are the two sides, right? | ||
| There's one side that just mindlessly conforms. | ||
| There's another side that thinks for itself. | ||
| The problem is that that mindless conforming side is convinced that they're just being polite. | ||
| They're just being decent. | ||
| They're being smart and intelligent. | ||
| No, you're being controlled. | ||
| You've surrendered your human will. | ||
| You are an animal now. | ||
| You are less than that. | ||
| You're a robot. | ||
| And it's sad. | ||
| We'll be back with the debate. | ||
| Don't go anywhere. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Good news and some bad news on multiple fronts. | |
| The good news is Vitamin and Mineral Fusion and DNA Force Plus are still 50% off. | ||
| The bad news is they're very close to selling out. | ||
| And by Monday of next week, and I'm cutting this ad on January 5th, 2023, we're going to have to go back to full price. | ||
| And then about a week after that, they'll be sold out. | ||
| So that's good news. | ||
| You can still get the products. | ||
| It's bad news because they're about to be sold out because they're also some of our best selling products. | ||
| When we don't have them, we can't fund the operation. | ||
| So it is a real conundrum, but that's just where we're at. | ||
| I want to thank all the listeners for your ongoing support. | ||
| But if you want Vitamineral Fusion, it's so incredible for your immune system, your whole body, and DNA Force Plus that helps your telomeres last longer and cleans out your mitochondria and so much more, you can get them both exclusively, top-of-the-line supplements, at infowarstore.com. | ||
| Still 50% off until this coming Monday. | ||
| They're going to be sold out for months and months. | ||
| Thanks for all your support. | ||
| Now please visit infowarstore.com. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| It is Sunday night live here on InfoWars.com and Band.Video. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith, playing moderator today for a very special debate. | ||
| The last hour of this program will be dedicated to this conversation between Austin Peterson and Tyler P. Nixon. | ||
| We will be discussing the JFK assassination. | ||
| And, uh, I'll let these guys introduce themselves and we'll do a little opening statement so they can state their position. | ||
| We'll just do a back and forth two minutes each. | ||
| So we'll start with a 32nd introduction from each one of you just saying who you are and why you are the the person to make the arguments that you'll be making. | ||
| So we'll start with Austin Peterson. | ||
| Let me just, I'll give you a brief intro. | ||
| Austin Peterson is a pro-life, pro-liberty, small business owner, and the founder of the online news source, The Libertarian Republic. | ||
| You can follow him on Twitter at AP4Liberty. | ||
| Thanks for coming on, Austin. | ||
| And just give us your intro as to what your interest is in the JFK assassination. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Harrison, thanks so much for having me here, and I appreciate InfoWars for having the debate. | ||
| Tyler, good to meet you. | ||
| Some of you might know me from my presidential run in 2016. | ||
| I campaigned for President of the United States against Governor Gary Johnson, took second to him in the year that Donald Trump became president. | ||
| But I think probably some people might be familiar with my work as a producer at the Fox Business Network, where I was the writer and producer for Judge Andrew Napolitano. | ||
| So I got to cut my teeth in liberty politics, working and writing for the judge, and he and I still do quite a lot of collaborations these days. | ||
| And I've always been fascinated by conspiracy theories. | ||
| I've gotten a lot of my news over the years from InfoWars. | ||
| And when it comes to the Oswald debate, I guess I started on the info war side of things, but after years of study, I started to see a different point of view on this one, and I look forward to sharing it with you all tonight. | ||
| Okay, brilliant. | ||
| And Tyler P. Nixon, he is an advocate, an activist, an archivist, a technologist, an army infantry vet, a classic car tech, an attorney at law, a student of history, an extremist in the defense of liberty. | ||
| You can follow him on Twitter at Tyler P. Nixon. | ||
| Thanks for coming on, Tyler. | ||
| Give us your bona fides here. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Good to be with you and good to meet you as well, Austin. | ||
| You know, who ought to the libertarian cause? | ||
| I've been on board with that for many years myself. | ||
| I am an attorney and a longtime sort of political junkie. | ||
| And my mother went to school actually in 1960 to 1964 in Washington, D.C. | ||
| at Trinity College. | ||
| And so in the attic of our house, when I was a little kid, I was a very avid reader and liked to explore and find things, were the Life magazines, Look magazines, and all the memorabilia she had. | ||
| She attended his inauguration, John F. Kennedy's inauguration, as well as his funeral. | ||
| And I was just fascinated by just the beautiful color pictures of this presidency and then the horror of the assassination. | ||
| And as I got older, I began studying it and began looking into it. | ||
| The first book I ever got was Best Evidence by David Lifton, who recently passed away and may he rest in peace. | ||
| He did great work bringing out a lot of evidence and exposing a lot of the cover-up. | ||
| That went on and so you know ever since then I've been pretty much just I guess they used to call them buff assassination buffs But then I began also actually attending conferences and getting to know some of many of the researchers You know personally gotten into Cyril Wecht among others Vince Palomar is a good friend of mine He's the Secret Service expert and also I was able to actually speak to firsthand witnesses including Mary Mormon Dennis David an autopsy technician and others and And, you know, when I began, I accepted the warrant. | ||
| And you could see behind me the actual Warren Commission 26 volumes, which I picked up when I was, I think, 13. | ||
| And so I've been through all this and sort of immersed in it for many years. | ||
| And I've gone full circle. | ||
| I'd say I started out, well, I've gone around the circle, let's just say. | ||
| I've started out thinking, all right, the warrant report was right and it had to be him, had to be Oswald, single gunman. | ||
| But since then, I've been turned around on it. | ||
| Interesting. | ||
| I'm looking forward to it. | ||
| So both of you guys sort of started on the opposite side that you're now holding. | ||
| So maybe y'all can switch. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| That's very fascinating. | ||
| So thank you very much. | ||
| The way we're going to do this, we'll just start off with five-minute opening statements. | ||
| If you need all five minutes, take it. | ||
| If not, then take as long as you need. | ||
| And I'll just give you a warning when you have one minute left and then when you have 10 seconds left, and I'll keep the timer going here. | ||
| But we'll start, and we discussed this before the show, with Austin Peterson. | ||
| So go ahead and lay out your argument. | ||
| Five minutes, Austin Peterson. | ||
| Sure, thanks Harrison. | ||
| So I think that the key to the Oswald assassination is really the reason why people ask so many questions, right? | ||
| Why do people believe that it was a conspiracy versus a question of a conspiracy theory? | ||
| And of course we do know that conspiracies to assassinate the president have happened in the past. | ||
| A lot of people already know that Abraham Lincoln was not shot by a lone gunman. | ||
| There was a conspiracy to assassinate Abraham Lincoln. | ||
| So it makes sense that whenever you have an event of this magnitude, that people would ask questions and wanna probe deeper. | ||
| So I don't blame anyone for reading a lot of the literature that's out there and saying, well, you know, there seems to be something deeper. | ||
| But of course there's a difference between asking questions about something and actually stating valid facts about what occurred on the day of the assassination and who was involved. | ||
| I think that the reason that a lot of people have so many questions surrounding the conspiracy is because of all of the intelligence failures that occurred and because the conspiracy, which is quite frequently what occurs, the conspiracy in this case was in the cover-up much like 9-11 and many other things. | ||
| So many intelligence failures had occurred that the Secret Service and the CIA and the FBI, who had a lead on Oswald, are looking to cover their butts for a lot of the mistakes that they had made leading up to the assassination of John F. Kennedy. | ||
| And so, you know, I guess I'm not quite sure where Tyler's going to fall on this one in terms of like, you know, how many shooters or, you know, you know, if Oswald was involved before he was just a patsy and stuff, because, of course, you know, there are dozens and dozens of conspiracy theories about the Oswald assassination. | ||
| So I guess, you know, it'll it'll be interesting for me to find out where Tyler stands on whether or not, you know, Oswald was involved or whether or not he was just a patsy and not involved whatsoever. | ||
| But that I guess we'll suss that out later on in the debate. | ||
| But what's important, I think, is to establish the fact that Oswald was involved and if he had a motive to assassinate John Kennedy, which he certainly did. | ||
| And in building a motive and building a court case against Oswald, there's a mountain of evidence that you can accumulate to determine whether or not Oswald had a motive to assassinate John Kennedy. | ||
| And he certainly did. | ||
| You would look at his past and say, you know, what was his past like? | ||
| Did Oswald just come out of nowhere? | ||
| You know, what did he do? | ||
| What was his family life like? | ||
| And Oswald's family life, his entire family life, was one of chaos and turbulence. | ||
| He spent time in foster homes and adoption agencies before his mother finally decided to raise him. | ||
| And he was quite violent. | ||
| Not only did he punch his mother in the face, his own mother, he also pulled a knife on his sister-in-law while he was living there at home. | ||
| He became a dedicated Marxist at 15 years old and declared his hatred for the United States at an early age, well before he joined the U.S. | ||
| Marines and declared his intent to live in Soviet Russia because he believed that the capitalist system was corrupt and evil and he wanted to see it brought to an end. | ||
| Oswald spent a little over a year, I'm not entirely sure of the time period and how much time he actually spent in Russia, but he did defect to the Soviet Union post-military service because he believed that Soviet Russia was a superior system to the United States. | ||
| He hated capitalism and he wanted to live in what he thought was a Marxist utopia, But like many Marxists, he was lazy and thought that he deserved more than he actually worked for, and because he was not getting the kind of attention that he wanted, because he was very much someone who wanted attention, which is of course what people who try and assassinate public figures do. | ||
| They're attention seekers, people who commit these kinds of crimes. | ||
| And Oswald was an attention seeker. | ||
| He spent his time over in the Soviet Union, found out that he was not going to get the kind of attention for being a defector that he wanted, and he was brought back to the United States. | ||
| Now, he was under surveillance at that period. | ||
| He was under surveillance at that time, not just by American intelligence agencies, but he was under surveillance by the KGB for being a defector. | ||
| He eventually came back to the United States. | ||
| He actually attempted to assassinate an American general, fired at his house once with the same rifle they used to assassinate John F. Kennedy, and tried to murder a man in his house that was an anti-communist here in the United States. | ||
| A mountain of evidence shows that Oswald not only was a violent individual with mental health issues, but that he had a motive to kill John F. Kennedy because he hated his wealth, he hated his family, and of course John F. Kennedy was a dedicated anti-communist I think that after tonight's debate, that a lot of people who were on the other side of this debate are going to come over to my side of things, because I'll be able to present enough evidence to show that Oswald was, in fact, the lone shooter from Dealey Plaza and the third floor book depository. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| OK, thank you. | ||
| And of course, the question of this debate is who killed John F. Kennedy? | ||
| So that was Austin Peterson's answer. | ||
| It was Oswald. | ||
| Look forward to hearing your evidence for that. | ||
| Tyler P. Nixon, your intro statement here. | ||
| Five minutes. | ||
| Time starts now. | ||
| Sure, so I think it's useful to break down the question into whether, first of all, was there a single gunman that did it? | ||
| Was that gunman Oswald? | ||
| And if not, then do you have multiple, you know, was it multiple shots or multiple people involved? | ||
| In other words, you could have a conspiracy with one rifleman. | ||
| And you could have basically, unless you believe that there were two people or more shooting at President Kennedy in Dealey Plaza that day who had totally independent of each other, then the existence of multiple direction shots, meaning if the shots at President Kennedy can be found to have come from different directions than where Lee Oswald was purportedly, allegedly located in the Texas School Book Depository on the sixth floor, Then you have you have a conspiracy. | ||
| You know, it's impossible to say it is not a conspiracy, like I said, unless you believe you have independent riflemen who happen to all converge on Dealey Plaza at the same time. | ||
| So I think we can say that if there were multiple direction shots, there was definitely a conspiracy. | ||
| Now, the question that the evidence at this point indicates and then let's get let's also put this out up front. | ||
| Of all the people involved, whether it be witnesses, whether it be Oswald himself, only one set of people has consistently lied, fabricated evidence, destroyed evidence, and attempted to cover up and conceal facts about the case that have since come out and since been proven beyond reasonable doubt, at least in my opinion. | ||
| And that is the United States government. | ||
| Only one entity was able to strip President Kennedy's Secret Service and protection to the point where it was unprecedented when he rode through Dallas. | ||
| He was the lead car. | ||
| This is never done, except for, excuse me, except for the pilot car driven by Chief Curry and a couple of other people. | ||
| Maybe Bill Decker was in there, the sheriff. | ||
| That was just a little lead car. | ||
| There was no protection at all. | ||
| They were literally in front of it. | ||
| President Kennedy was sent through this crowd. | ||
| of people with no attempt really to have the level of protection you would see from any leader at the time, or even himself in previous motorcades, where you had a phalanx of motorcycles that went ahead and were meant for crowd control, crowd protection. | ||
| In this case, they literally stripped down the security. | ||
| The Secret Service agents were out drinking and carousing in the cellar in Fort Worth the night before, showed up, many of them in a shambolic state. | ||
| And frankly, President Kennedy was sent like a sitting duck out in the middle, literally the first car again. | ||
| Even the – they usually would have a press truck filming in front of the presidential limousine. | ||
| Even that was moved back in the motorcade. | ||
| You have, for example, other – then there's the medical evidence. | ||
| regardless of what you're saying. | ||
| The lone nutters, as we call them, the people who would like to pin it on Oswald, they want to focus on Oswald and how he's disgruntled. | ||
| First of all, Oswald never once spoke a bad word about President Kennedy. | ||
| In fact, everybody who's ever heard him speak to President Kennedy, including Maureen Oswald, said he loved President Kennedy. | ||
| And he was probably one of the few politicians that Oswald did not have any anger for or any animus for. | ||
| Oswald is clearly intelligence connected. | ||
| He was an FBI informant. | ||
| There's no question about that. | ||
| That's been demonstrated since. | ||
| The FBI has attempted to destroy evidence of that. | ||
| They burned notes, you know, and evidence of contacts with him after the fact. | ||
| He was, you know, as they would say, angry. | ||
| He's, you know, he's maybe not so intelligent. | ||
| Look, Oswald, a Marxist Marine, I mean, who's kidding who? | ||
| Oswald was in Atsugi, Japan. | ||
| He was given some of the highest clearances in terms of access to some of the radar information and radar equipment there. | ||
| And when he went to, you know, suddenly decided he wanted to go to Russia, this is in the midst of a program that was being run in the late 1950s by William Harvey at the CIA of fake defectors, which was actually uncovered by someone at the State Department. | ||
| Uh, and who, who was asking questions about this and among the people on the list of people he believed were fake defectors was Lee Oswald. | ||
| Of course, this man was shut down hard. | ||
| Um, and you know, that's, that's basically been sort of, uh, you know, here's the thing about it. | ||
| The problem with people who believe either the Warren Commission or the lone gunman theory is that they're operating from a limited and frankly flawed set of evidence that has been doctored. | ||
| We know, for example, the autopsy photos are complete fabrications. | ||
| And believe it or not, even the Zapruder film, the famous Zapruder film, is pretty much almost a cartoon. | ||
| It's been completely manufactured. | ||
| That being said, there's no question. | ||
| I think there's multiple direction shooters, which means conspiracy. | ||
| And whether or not you believe Oswald was shooting, it's irrelevant. | ||
| There is a conspiracy. | ||
| Okay, so it seems like the opening statements had a lot to do with Oswalt's personality and his involvement. | ||
| We'll just go back and forth now. | ||
| We'll give you each two minutes to respond to what the other had said. | ||
| If I need to step in and, you know, offer a suggestion or help get us back on track, I'll do that. | ||
| But for now, I imagine Austin has some things to say about what Tyler said. | ||
| So we'll just keep this conversation going. | ||
| Austin Peterson, your response. | ||
| Yeah, I think that, you know, in terms of the bigger picture, you have to ask yourself, I mean, are you a believer in government competency, right? | ||
| Are you a believer that the CIA, the FBI, and the Secret Service, and these bureaucracies of the agencies of the government are actually capable of doing what it is that they claim they do? | ||
| Remember, these are the institutions that set out to try and assassinate Fidel Castro, and they tried dozens of times, and they could never pull it off. | ||
| But all of a sudden, for this one conspiracy, they managed to pull it off and do it in such a way as to completely cover their tracks so that average people are not able to make that kind of determination on whether or not it was a conspiracy or not. | ||
| I'm more of a believer that the government is inept rather than capable. | ||
| But in regards to, it is important, Tyler, that we determine whether or not Oswald was involved or not. | ||
| I'd like to have you answer that question here at least in a minute, if you believe it was a conspiracy, if you at least believe that Oswald was one of the shooters. | ||
| But I thought it was fascinating that InfoWars just put up a picture that came from that film JFK, which was this whole Where the magic bullet theory came from, this idea that John F. Kennedy was shot with a bullet that, you know, twisted in the air and then hit Governor Connally, who was sitting in front of him. | ||
| I think it's very important for us to take a look at that and remember that John Kennedy, and I've actually been to Detroit and seen his presidential limousine, John Kennedy was not sitting in a straight line behind Connally. | ||
| He was actually sitting raised above Connally behind him. | ||
| So when it came to that graphic that you had placed up there, InfoWars, just remember it's very important that you know the trajectory with which these shots were fired from that book floor, the third floor of that book depository, where it was done by Oswald. | ||
| We need to talk about the facts and remember that the Warren Commission came out at a time When we didn't even have access to lasers. | ||
| Lay people now have lasers in their pockets. | ||
| We've been able to go back now and make the kinds of determinations using lasers to be able to determine the trajectory of those shots and whether or not they were able to be fired from that position, as it was said. | ||
| And we have been able to determine now, using the kind of computer techniques that were not available to the Warren Commission, that there was a shooter, one shooter, who fired three shots Now, the first and the second shot are a little bit hazy still, but we know for a fact that three shots were fired and that two of them hit Kennedy, and that at least one of those shots hit Kennedy and Connolly. | ||
| But it is important, I think, Tyler, and I'd like to nail you down on this one. | ||
| Do you believe Oswald was involved, at least was one of the shooters? | ||
| All right. | ||
| Was Oswald involved? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'd love to answer your questions, Austin, but you're going from false premise. | |
| First of all, this bullet right here, this is the 6.5 Carcano round. | ||
| I've owned a Carcano. | ||
| In fact, I've got one right here, in fact, made in the same exact, made in the same timeframe, the same plant where the supposed Oswald weapon was made. | ||
| Look, here's the bottom line. | ||
| The medical evidence is the best evidence. | ||
| Number one, This was supposedly the stretcher bullet that was the so-called magic bullet. | ||
| There's no magic bullet, okay? | ||
| Let's just face it, there is none. | ||
| There were bullets that were entered into evidence, multiple bullets claiming to be the magic bullet. | ||
| The chain of custody is completely dubious at best. | ||
| And the fact is that Governor Connally's, the fragments taken out of Governor Connally's body were greater than the amount of missing fragments from the so-called magic bullet. | ||
| The trajectory rounds, and here's the key piece of evidence. | ||
| Every single surgeon, just about. | ||
| I mean, pretty much, there's a book here called Parkland to Bethesda by my friend Vince Palomera. | ||
| It is the witness statements of pretty much everyone from the scene, including Clint Hill, all the way to the morgue, excuse me, the funeral technicians who prepared Kennedy's body said that President Kennedy had an anywhere from orange size to grapefruit size blowout in the back of his head. | ||
| Blown out, right? | ||
| And so much so that the actual cerebellum, which is the base of the brain, dripped out and part of it oozed out or extruded out onto the table. | ||
| That's the statement of Dr. Robert McClelland. | ||
| So, and what you have in that scenario, including the initial shot in the throat, which was cut open and jagged in the pictures, in the autopsy pictures, which by the way, you know, I don't know how Lee Oswald had a bunch of angels on his own who decided they wanted to cover up the fact of shots from multiple directions. | ||
| But I mean, the autopsy and the medical evidence has clearly been doctored to the point it's really grotesque. | ||
| In fact, every person who's looked at it, all the autopsy technicians looked at was the medical record in Bethesda, or excuse me, at the National Archives and said, I don't know what that is. | ||
| That looks nothing like it. | ||
| In addition to the contemporaneous testimony, blowout in the back of the head, as well as an entrance throat wound from the actual surgeons, Dr. Kemp Clark and others. | ||
| And the key thing of this, there are multiple witnesses, including someone who worked at Ford and was one of the top guys who literally ran the energy for the plant, the Rouge plant, who said there was a through and through bullet hole through the windshield. | ||
| Which would have been lined up, if you want to talk about trajectories, with an inner throat shot. | ||
| Now we have Gerald Ford moving the wound. | ||
| I've got to cut you off there. | ||
| That's your two minutes. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Austin, you want to pick that up there, questioning the medical evidence and the chain of custody. | ||
| Is this just more government incompetence, in your opinion? | ||
| Yeah, we'll never attribute to malice what can easily be ascribed to incompetence, especially when it comes to government. | ||
| But I mean, still, Tyler hasn't answered my question whether or not he believes Oswald was at least one of the shooters. | ||
| Even if he thinks that there were two or three shooters, I'd like him to answer the question of whether or not he believes that Oswald was involved. | ||
| And let's not forget- I'll answer it right now. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| No, I do not believe Oswald. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Let's not let this break down. | ||
| I'll do it in 10 seconds. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Lee Oswald was given a paraffin test. | ||
| If you fired that rifle even once, you would have nitrates on your face and your hands. | ||
| He came up negative for having fired a rifle that day. | ||
| Period. | ||
| End of story. | ||
| I don't believe he fired any. | ||
| And he said it himself, I didn't shoot anybody, sir. | ||
| So that's your answer, Austin? | ||
| He does not think Oswald was involved? | ||
| He shot two people. | ||
| Let's not forget, he shot two people that day. | ||
| Oswald murdered two people on the day of the assassination. | ||
| We're all forgetting of course the officer. | ||
| Well, here's the thing. | ||
| If you have a paraffin test on you, it's going to show that there's going to be some blowback. | ||
| Do you deny that he shot the police officer later that day? | ||
| Well, let's see. | ||
| Oswald's pistol was a .38 caliber Smith & Wesson revolver. | ||
| They found automatic shells at the location that said they were from an automatic. | ||
| Do you admit that Oliver Stone made a mistake in the movie JFK when he showed that John F. Kennedy was sitting directly behind Connolly? | ||
| The multiple witnesses could not identify Oswald and gave different descriptions. | ||
| Do you agree or at least do you admit that Oliver Stone made a mistake in the movie JFK when he showed that John F. Kennedy was sitting directly behind Connolly? | ||
| Do you at least admit that John Kennedy was sitting higher than Connolly, which of course impacts the whole question of the trajectory of the bullet? | ||
| Well, I'm not here to defend JFK or speak for Oliver Stone, so I don't know. - But I mean, you do it. - Determine that yourself. | ||
| You do admit that John Kennedy was sitting higher than Connolly in the limousine, correct? | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Okay, well that's very important because when you're talking about the trajectory of the shot, in terms of where these bullets came from, the simple fact that John Kennedy was sitting higher than Connolly in the limousine shows that the trajectory of these three bullets came from one location. | ||
| There was a singular cone of where these shots would have came from. | ||
| And you can use lasers to be able to make these determinations to show where these shots came from. | ||
| All three of these shots came from one location, which we're able to determine. | ||
| And we have been able to determine, but only really in the last 30 years. | ||
| Of course, this technology wasn't available to people, again, back in the 1970s or 80s. | ||
| And when you brought up the whole Carcano bullet, that 6.5 bullet, I actually also own that rifle. | ||
| And I'm able to make those shots quite clearly. | ||
| It's a very easy shot to make. | ||
| It's been recreated many times. | ||
| As a matter of fact, many libertarian YouTubers went out there, like Brandon Herrera and others, to show how easy it was. | ||
| Even the most untrained shooter, especially with that 4X magnification Hollywood scope that was placed on top of it, it was one of the easiest shots that anybody could make. | ||
| I make those shots from a deer stand here in Missouri, no problem. | ||
| It was very easy for one person to be able to make that kind of a shot in that distinct period of time. | ||
| So I think the important part is that you have to determine whether or not Oswald was a shooter, which clearly Tyler does not believe. | ||
| So I'd like to know if he knows who these shooters are, because we're talking about one, two, three people. | ||
| But I mean, you know, we're kind of on... | ||
| on different planets by saying, you know, not only are we saying, not only is there more than one shooter, you know, on your side of things, but you're even saying that Oswald was not involved at all. | ||
| I mean, you know, I could go back and debunk all the things you said about Oswald's security clearance while he spent time in Japan. | ||
| He obviously did not have that anywhere near a high security clearance as you claim that he did. | ||
| You know, he was not considered to be an important individual. | ||
| That's why he was. | ||
| Is there timing here? | ||
| I know things are broke down right there, but I do want to give Tyler an opportunity to respond to. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| So as you notice, Austin did not answer the paraffin test questions. | ||
| There's no question, if anyone fired a rifle, especially that rifle, if Austin owns one, he knows, that is a loose bolt action. | ||
| Even firing it once, you have a blowout of nitrates. | ||
| Unless Oswald was firing from the hip, and let's talk about the telescopic sight, which the FBI and the people who were handed the rifle, which by the way was collected with evidence along with President Kennedy's body and illegally taken out of Texas, Out of the hands of the competent people trying to investigate on the ground there. | ||
| But, oh, it's just incompetence, right? | ||
| They were pretty competent in covering it up, let me say. | ||
| And let's just, you know, the idea that the CIA were a bunch of bunglers or the Secret Service and the protection stripping. | ||
| Or, for example, was it incompetence that the Secret Service willfully destroyed their entire record of 1963 when the ARRB said, turn this over. | ||
| This is under law. | ||
| You have to do this. | ||
| They instead destroyed it. | ||
| So, you know, you're looking at a malicious, frankly, an intentional cover-up. | ||
| Now, getting back to what I was saying, you know, look, bottom line is this, the rifle scope was so offline, they could not zero it. | ||
| They had to keep adding shims, and even then, because of the way the rifle was balanced and the drill holes were apparently, I guess, not lined up, they could never actually zero the rifle. | ||
| So, Oswald was looking, they said it was something like, I don't know, off to the right by at least two or three feet. | ||
| So, even if he was looking directly through it, He would have had to adjust if anybody was looking through it. | ||
| He would have had to adjust his fire according to the scope being like two to three feet off that could never be zeroed. | ||
| So this is the evidence. | ||
| You know, General Walker, you talk about all these things. | ||
| You know, look, I mean, this this, you know, Oswald was working with intelligence agencies. | ||
| Uh, you know, there's no question of those ties at this point. | ||
| And this is why the CIA and why they refuse to release certain documents. | ||
| We still have 60 years later, practically, documents being withheld because there is a cover up at the highest levels because you have the president's body being altered. | ||
| You have it arriving in a shipping casket, you know, in a body bag at Bethesda Naval Hospital, while on TV you see it being unloaded or loaded into a bronze ornamental casket. | ||
| I mean, there was a lot of hijinks that went on. | ||
| It's way too much to cover in this, you know, in this short period of time. | ||
| But look, we can, you know, they want to focus on Oswald, they want to focus on the trajectory of the bullets. | ||
| Again, no answer to the through and through. | ||
| Hold on, no answer to the through and through bullet hole in the windshield. | ||
| No answer to the throat entrance. | ||
| No answer to the pressure on the doctors to change their story. | ||
| We'll let Austin see if he has answers to some of these questions in just a second. | ||
| I'm sorry to cut you off. | ||
| And I'm happy to let this just be a free-for-all. | ||
| You guys can ask each other questions as long as you're both respectful of each other's times. | ||
| We can do that. | ||
| We'll talk a little bit during the break. | ||
| But again, folks, we are debating the JFK assassination. | ||
| Austin Peterson and Tyler P. Nixon. | ||
| You can follow Austin on Twitter at AP4, the number for Liberty. | ||
| And you can follow Tyler at Tyler P. Nixon. | ||
| And we'll be back on the other side. | ||
| It's actually Real Tyler Nixon. | ||
| Oh, at Real Tyler Nixon. | ||
| Sorry about that. | ||
| At Real Tyler Nixon on Twitter. | ||
| So we'll be back to continue this discussion. | ||
| The second half continues on the other side. | ||
| In the meantime, let me remind you, let me beg you, let me beseech you, go to InfoWarsStore.com to help us stay on the air. | ||
| As we said, folks, this wouldn't even be an issue if InfoWars was on the air in the 1960s. | ||
| But let's let's form a future where we don't have to have these type of types of debates where we can have the free flow of information from anybody and everybody. | ||
| That's what InfoWars is trying to build here and has done a very good job, I should say. | ||
| Please support us by going to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Vitamin Mineral Fusion is 50% off and it will no longer be on sale starting tomorrow. | ||
| So don't waste any time. | ||
| Go now to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Help us stay on the air. | ||
| Help us have great debates like this, fantastic guests like this, and just a platform where we can actually discuss things that the mainstream media have told us was settled years ago. | ||
| Shut up. | ||
| You're not allowed to question that. | ||
| Well, we will question it and we'll try to come to a conclusion on the other side with Austin Peterson and Tyler P. Nixon. | ||
| We'll be right back, folks. | ||
| Don't go anywhere. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is InfoWars Sunday Night Live, Bandai Video, InfoWars.com. | ||
| Please do share those links. | ||
| It is so helpful when you do, since, as you know, we are banned from social media. | ||
| We rely on our audience to help us get this information out there. | ||
| We are hosting a debate between Austin Peterson and Tyler P. Nixon. | ||
| You can follow Austin on Twitter at AP4, the number for Liberty, and you can follow Tyler at Real Tyler Nixon. | ||
| We're going to sort of change things up. | ||
| This is a casual debate. | ||
| This is no, you know, Something highfalutin like the presidential debate. | ||
| I'm not about to cut your mics off or anything. | ||
| So we're going to change it up a little bit. | ||
| We discussed it during the commercial break. | ||
| We're just going to sort of go back and forth. | ||
| One of you is going to make a point that the other one can respond to. | ||
| That way we don't get lost in the weeds or going down any trails for too long. | ||
| So I'll keep an eye on the clock and I'll step in if I have to, but I'm leaving it up to you guys to just make this conversation a good debate. | ||
| And we'll start this time with Tyler Nixon. | ||
| You'll make a point, Austin. | ||
| You can respond to it and make your own point. | ||
| I'll keep an eye on the clock, but hopefully I won't have to interject too much. | ||
| So again, Tyler Nixon and Austin Peterson are here to answer the question, who killed JFK? | ||
| And the floor now goes to Tyler Nixon. | ||
| Okay, so let's look at basically, everybody who wants this story to be a lone shooter wants to focus on Oswald, who would be the first assassin probably in history of anywhere, who had the target come to him, who happened to drive by a building where Oswald had just gotten a job six weeks before, coincidentally. | ||
| They talk about conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists. | ||
| I mean, obviously, that was a term created In the 1960s, and at least perpetuated by the CIA, and as we've seen it ever since, in order to discredit people, in order to do ad hominem attacks on the people who are trying to bring out the truth, which has been the case with many of the people who have brought out the truth about this have been very courageous. | ||
| And let's put it this way. | ||
| There's been nothing that's come out in the last 50 years, probably, that has in any way buttressed or reinforced anything in the Warren Commission. | ||
| Warren Commission report or in the lone shooter theory, whereas we have had multiple, many pieces of evidence come out, including witnesses that continue to reinforce the idea and the hypothesis that this was a multiple shooter conspiracy. | ||
| You know, there were shots from multiple directions, which I said there's physical evidence of, and that the fact that after the fact, the highest level people in the United States government, including especially Lyndon Johnson, directed a medical cover-up and an evidentiary cover-up, you know, least of which was the manipulation of the Warren Commission's you know, least of which was the manipulation of the Warren Commission's evidence, the suppression of testimony, such as, for A two witnesses who worked on the I believe the fourth floor of the Texas School Book Depository immediately went to the stairs. | ||
| The only way you could get down from the sixth floor to the second floor where Oswald was found 90 seconds after the shooting, Victoria Adams and the other lady's name escapes me, went immediately went straight to the steps and began descending them. | ||
| Oswald would have had to have passed them On his way down from the sixth floor. | ||
| He did not. | ||
| He was found calmly drinking a soda in the second floor lunchroom by Marion Baker, the police officer who immediately entered and he said no more than 90 seconds after the shooting. | ||
| So these two witnesses were suppressed. | ||
| Their witness testimony was suppressed and they were never, in fact it was destroyed, one of them. | ||
| And to this day they said it's impossible. | ||
| So Oswald had to levitate somehow down to the second floor. | ||
| - So Austin, the Warren Commission, reliable? - I wouldn't say so. | ||
| I mean, the computers didn't really exist in the 1960s to the degree that they do today. | ||
| We didn't have the kind of spectral imaging that could be done to be able to make the kind of determinations that we do today. | ||
| I mean, you can watch CSI to see what kind of forensic availability of technology we have today that they didn't have anywhere near access to in the 1960s or 70s. | ||
| I also looked into, during the break, Tyler's accusations about a paraffin test that was done on Oswald. | ||
| And I found a little bit of conflicting information on that. | ||
| Some people say that the paraffin test did show that Oswald had fired a rifle, and others say that he didn't. | ||
| But one of the key important things about that is that in between the time where Oswald had fired his shots that killed John F. Kennedy, and when he had had that paraffin test done on him, he had actually already went home and changed his clothes. | ||
| He took a taxi cab home and changed his clothes before he went to the movie theater where he was eventually arrested. | ||
| If you'll remember, of course, Oswald also shot a police officer between the time that he killed John F. Kennedy and when he went home and then went to the movie theater and was apprehended and tried to kill the people who were arresting him too. | ||
| That's really important because, again, if we're trying to establish a motive, You have to ask yourself something, you know, because there are so many unanswered questions. | ||
| Why would an innocent man who's being approached by police officers in a movie theater have a gun on him that he tries to use against police officers who are trying to arrest him if he didn't have such a guilty conscience? | ||
| But again, I think we're showing here the motives That Oswald had to commit murder, which he again, you know, the general that he tried to assassinate weeks before John Kennedy the same year, you know, ought to show that what we're talking about here is dealing with a lunatic and a psychopath. | ||
| And he had plenty of time to be able to wash his face when he changed his clothes between the time that he shot John Kennedy, shot the police officer, and then was eventually apprehended at the movie theater later. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Well, first of all, paraffin tests are done the way they are because why would they use them if anybody could wash their face? | ||
| The nitrates are embedded in the skin. | ||
| They use wax, and it's the only way to extract it. | ||
| You literally, it takes days for it to naturally, and you can't scrub it off your skin. | ||
| So, you know, Austin needs to bring himself up to speed on how paraffin tests work, and there's not conflicting evidence. | ||
| The FBI's report says he tested negative for nitrates on his face. | ||
| There was some evidence of some of it on his hands, but he did work in a place where the actual boxes and the books and the processes used to make those books could have put, you know, Now I'm having to step in here. | ||
| I do want to hear Austin's response to this and then we'll toss back to Tyler. | ||
| used the available technology at the time, Oswald did not fire a rifle, period. | ||
| I mean, that's the FBI. | ||
| Why would you use—but stop, Tyler. | ||
| Why would you use the available— Hold on a second. | ||
| Hold on a second, Austin. | ||
| All right, all right. | ||
| All right, see, now I'm having to step in here. | ||
| I do want to hear Austin's response to this, and then we'll toss back to Tyler. | ||
| But go ahead, Austin. | ||
| Why would—I mean, a simple question. | ||
| Why would you use the available technology of the time to try and make a determination Why wouldn't you use the technology that we have today? | ||
| We are using the technology that we have today. | ||
| There have been multiple examinations using modern technology, using modern forensics to be able to make the determinations about who the shooter was. | ||
| And I wouldn't rely on information that came from the 1960s or 70s. | ||
| I mean, again, even if you look at the Warren Report, You're talking about a report that was done in the 1970s and one that doesn't even have anywhere near the access to modern technology we have today. | ||
| So, I mean, I think that what you really need to do is to look at a lot of the updated information that's been coming out and not try and rely on some wax test that was done in the 1960s. | ||
| I don't think that that makes any sense. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Right. | ||
| So, okay, well then I guess we could exclude all the evidence and just invent our own theories today because, you know, they're talking about laser and that's the trajectory of the bullets. | ||
| First of all, again, do you admit the evidence was doctored? | ||
| Do you admit that the evidence was altered, has been destroyed, has been manipulated, has been withheld, has been suppressed? | ||
| I just gave you an instance which you failed to respond to. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wait, how do you divide by six? | |
| You can't disprove him. | ||
| Alright, alright, alright. | ||
| I gotta step in again. | ||
| It did seem like you asked him a question there, Tyler. | ||
| Let's talk about evidence, how we evaluate it, and answer the question. | ||
| These are absolutely conclusive. | ||
| Oswald would have had to have passed two, three actually, total witnesses. | ||
| Who were on the stairs in order to get to the second floor where he was found. | ||
| So did he levitate? | ||
| Do we have new technology that can show us how that happened? | ||
| Well, you can't disprove a negative, right? | ||
| You can't say, you know, if there's evidence of absence, it's not absence of evidence, right? | ||
| So the problem is, is you're saying, well, then why would they doctor all this evidence? | ||
| Well, why would they doctor? | ||
| Why would the government try and cover their tracks and making a mistake in allowing the President of the United States to be murdered while they were there on their watch? | ||
| And here's the thing. | ||
| I think it's important. | ||
| Let's go back to square one here. | ||
| Why are we even having this debate tonight? | ||
| Why are we talking about something that happened 50, 60 years ago? | ||
| The reason why we're having this discussion tonight is because of the release of documents by President Biden, not the full trove of documents of the government investigations into these assassinations. | ||
| The reason why we're having this debate tonight It's because people have been making these claims on the internet, saying things like, well, the CIA was involved in the assassination, and they've been saying that because of these documents that have come out. | ||
| So I guess I will be curious to find out what Tyler thought about these documents, but I think the fascinating thing about these documents that came out is that they didn't connect the CIA to John F. Kennedy. | ||
| They didn't connect John Kennedy to the assassination, but I do have evidence of a causal link between the KGB and this assassination that I think you all will find very fascinating. | ||
| But before I reveal that evidence and discuss that, the KGB connection in this one, I'd like to know Tyler's answer to that. | ||
| I'd like to know what Tyler thinks about the latest document dump that caused that started this debate tonight. | ||
| The files that were just released by the Biden administration, Tyler, I'd love to get your thoughts on those files and what they claim to say about the assassination. | ||
| Okay, well, I guess I'll answer your questions, Austin, when you answer what I presented as a conclusive evidentiary piece of evidence that Oswald could not have been on the sixth floor. | ||
| So anyway, getting back to here we go, folks. | ||
| Russia, Russia, Russia. | ||
| It's oh, it's the lone, not Oswald, but now it's the KGB. | ||
| OK, great. | ||
| You know, the bottom line is the motives to assassinate the president existed and resided within his vice president. | ||
| And everybody involved in the cover-up were all people who had motivation, frankly. | ||
| Lyndon Johnson was not going to be on the 64 ticket, and he was being chased, frankly, to a prison cell by Robert Kennedy and John Jay Williams, the senator from my home state of Delaware, great man, conscious of the Senate. | ||
| You have Alan Dulles appointed to the Warren Commission as one of the sort of, you know, the conduit to the CIA. | ||
| Alan Dulles was fired by President Kennedy for his Bay of Pigs debacle that he tried to foist on President Kennedy. | ||
| In addition, here's an interesting one. | ||
| Charles Cabell was the deputy director under Alan Dulles, also fired at the same time. | ||
| The mayor of Dallas was Earl Cabell, his brother. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| You have, for example, the Civil Air Patrol, in which Oswald was a young member at a teenage years in which he came across and became friends with David Ferry, who was a murky sort of mafia-connected, intelligence-connected pilot who was in New Orleans and was very kind of a strange, strange guy. | ||
| He was connected directly to him in the Civil Air Patrol. | ||
| The Civil Air Patrol was headed up by, in the incarnation which Oswald joined it, by D.H. | ||
| Bird. | ||
|
unidentified
|
D.H. | |
| Byrd owned the Texas School Book Depository, okay? | ||
| So, you know, you have this confluence of people who, it's just all convenient that it all came together. | ||
| You have to, a real coincidence here, it's like Oswald really has everything on his side, and somehow they wanted to cover it up for him. | ||
| If they were incompetent, they would have, you know, there's just too much evidence of a desire to kill President Kennedy and people who had the motives, the means, the opportunity, and they aren't Lee Harvey Oswald. | ||
| Alright, your response to that, Austin? | ||
| All right, so the KGB connection. | ||
| I think that a lot of our listeners are going to find this one fascinating because here's a real conspiracy that occurred surrounding the assassination. | ||
| In the early 90s, I think it was 1994, a defecting KGB general by the name of Vasily Mitrochkin had brought with him archives from the Soviet Union about how the KGB was involved with the Kennedy assassination. | ||
| After the assassination was over, the KGB, which had been studying American culture, of course, the height of the Cold War when Kennedy was assassinated, The KGB had determined that these conspiracy theories were starting to go around in the United States, that people were suspect that Oswald was not the lone shooter. | ||
| And so in order to take advantage of America's willingness to believe these conspiracy theories to do people like Oliver Stone and other American communists, Oh, shoot. | ||
| All right. | ||
| That's a technical glitch, which unfortunately is there. | ||
| Well, depending on where you stand, unfortunately going to give Tyler Nixon another second to respond, although I don't want to continue if Austin can't hear us. | ||
| But we will. | ||
| We'll try to reconnect in a second here. | ||
| Again, I don't want to just give the floor over to Tyler Nixon just because of a technical glitch here, but maybe what I want to end up having to do, we'll spend a minute trying to reconnect here with Austin. | ||
| Tyler, keep your response in mind. | ||
| I do want to remind people, since we've been forced to take a little break here, I do want to remind people to go to InfoWarsTore.com to help us stay on the air, to help us debate these types of topics, which are as pertinent and as relevant to the government today as it was back in the 1960s. | ||
| And again, folks, you know, today's fake news is tomorrow's unquestionable history. | ||
| So if only we had alternative news in the 1960s to suss some of this stuff out, either the cover-up wouldn't have happened or at least would have been made that much more difficult. | ||
| If there was a cover-up, I don't want to take sides here. | ||
| So please do go to Infowarsstore.com to keep us on the air and keep us in these debates. | ||
| Austin, you're back. | ||
| You got cut off there, unfortunately. | ||
| KGB. | ||
| KGB. | ||
| Yes, KGB. | ||
| So KGB releases files. | ||
| So the conspiracy theory about the conspiracy theory, creating conspiracy theories to discredit conspiracy theories. | ||
| Very tangled web that we weave, I guess. | ||
| But finish up here, 10-15 seconds, and then we'll get Tyler's response to this information that is definitely new to me. | ||
| Sure, I would love to hear what Tyler thinks about the Matryoshkin Archives. | ||
| And so essentially what occurred was that the KGB, when he was, when Oswald was in Russia, they got a copy of his signature and they were able to forge his signature on a note that tied Oswald to a known CIA agent who operated out of Dallas. | ||
| And it was that information that started to sow the seeds of doubt to make people wonder, was the CIA involved? | ||
| Because Oswald had ostensibly had contact. | ||
| The reason why people believed it was real was because they showed it to his wife, who verified that it was a real signature. | ||
| But it wasn't a real signature, as Vasily Matrochkin and his archives had shown this KGB general that eventually defected to the United States, showed that the KGB was involved in propagating conspiracy theories. | ||
| And they used American communists who they knew hated the United States and who distrusted American intelligence agencies to spread those conspiracy theories here in the United States. | ||
| We have to remember, you know, our government isn't the only evil government in the world. | ||
| You know, the Chinese government, the Russian government... It's a good point. | ||
| It's a good point, Austin. | ||
| I do want to give Tyler time to respond. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead. | |
| You've got two minutes before, and now you've got two minutes after. | ||
| I've got to advance. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, go ahead. | |
| You've got time. | ||
| First of all, as I understand it, the Nisenko, that was like the mid-1970s that that emerged. | ||
| And, you know, these archives sat, I guess, They came out after the Soviet Union fell, which would have been like the 1990s, I believe. | ||
| But, you know, look, I mean... | ||
| I don't think the KGB—the notion that the seeds of doubt and the CIA having their finger pointed at them began with some Soviet document forgery is ludicrous. | ||
| I mean, you had Mark Lane, you had, frankly, Jim Garrison directly in the late 1960s pointing the finger at the intelligence community. | ||
| so-called, and the CIA. | ||
| And there were people who knew their fingerprints were all over. | ||
| I mean, you know, the cover-up was ongoing, frankly. | ||
| You know, the FBI was mainly involved in the cover-up. | ||
| But you had, you know, James Jesus Angleton. | ||
| Here's another connection. | ||
| You have Howard Hunt, who was, you know, one of the Watergate burglars, as well as, you know, deep in the agency in the 50s and 60s, in the early 60s especially. | ||
| He called it the big event on his deathbed. | ||
| His son, St. | ||
| John, who was a good friend of mine, interviewed him and said, you know, can you want to come clean? | ||
| You're dying now. | ||
| He said, yeah. | ||
| He said it was absolutely an agency operation. | ||
| He said they called the big, I forget, the big something. | ||
| He said he was a benchwarmer and that, you know, he put his finger on a gentleman. | ||
| Well, he said, you know, the top people, Angleton, as well as David Atlee Phillips. | ||
| You had people who hated Kennedy for what he was going to be. | ||
| He said he was going to break the CIA up into a thousand pieces and cast it to the wind. | ||
| So you had Cord Meyer is who, in addition to Lyndon Johnson, who Hunt, who again, Hunt had no reason to give up his agency. | ||
| He loved the CIA. | ||
| He was a CIA company. | ||
| He was a company man to the very end. | ||
| And he fingered his own agency, said Cord Meyer, whose wife, Mary Hinshaw Meyer, was having an affair with President Kennedy. | ||
| And he believes that he was one of the top people who sort of facilitated. | ||
| Now, interesting, in 1964, Mary Pinchot Myers mysteriously murdered on the towpath in Georgetown. | ||
| And as soon as she was murdered, Ben Bradley from the Washington Post, who was good friends with her and President Kennedy, they went to her house to try to, you know, I guess they were going to just go and, I guess, basically open up and see what they could figure out or let the police in. | ||
| James Jesus Angleton was already there, and he had Mary Pinchot Myers' diary, and he took it. | ||
| And he destroyed it. | ||
| Now, we don't know what's in that diary, but we know that she did have a very close relationship with President Kennedy. | ||
| She apparently did, say, smoke marijuana. | ||
| There was, you know, she was one of the people who came to the White House that he had liaisons with. | ||
| And who knows? | ||
| She was very in fear for her life, frankly. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're coming up on a deadline here, Tyler. | |
| Sorry, I gotta interrupt you. | ||
| Austin, I want a one-minute response to that, and then we'll go and do closing statements, two minutes each. | ||
| But, Austin, your response to what Tyler just said. | ||
| Sure, I got a lot of great respect for Tyler. | ||
| I've earned it throughout this debate. | ||
| It sounds like he's absolutely done his homework. | ||
| And I'd be curious to hear what he thinks about the physics of the question of back and to the left, right? | ||
| It's more than just a Jerry Seinfeld skit, right? | ||
| One of the most important questions about why people believe that there were more than one shooter in the assassination of John Kennedy is because of the physics of the direction that John Kennedy's head went after it was shot. | ||
| He was shot in the skull. | ||
| And our good friends Penn and Teller actually did a really good physics example of this that you can download on the internet from their show BS that was on Showtime from years ago. | ||
| And you can actually do this test at home with a rifle. | ||
| If you put a melon on a pedestal and you fire at it with a rifle, you would think that if you shot something from behind that it would actually go forward off of the pedestal. | ||
| But what the fascinating thing is about John's head, as well as a melon, is that because the exit wound was in the front, right, he was shot from behind the book depository, and there was a minimal exit hole in the back and a maximum exit hole out the front, is that Kennedy's head actually went back and to the left rather than forward, which is what you would think would happen, right? | ||
| But this is why people believe that there were more than one shooter, because of the physics of that question. | ||
| But you can actually recreate it at home. | ||
| I've done it myself. | ||
| And if you were to shoot at a watermelon, that would go back towards you. | ||
| And the reason why is because the explosion of gases, of escaping gases out the front, actually drive the head or the melon back. | ||
| Which is why people have for years said, oh, there must have been a shooter who was in front of him. | ||
| I'm sorry, I got to cut you off because I want to give you both equal time for the end here. | ||
| I had a feeling we weren't going to come to a final conclusion here, but I've learned a bunch of new stuff in this conversation alone. | ||
| I just want to give you each two minutes. | ||
| I'm going to be very harsh on the time, so I'll cut you off. | ||
| I'll give you a 10-second warning, but we'll go two minutes first to Austin. | ||
| We'll let Tyler have the final word, but Austin, go ahead. | ||
| I don't know if I can get a minute to respond to that last Okay. | ||
| Two minutes. | ||
| I'd love to do this for hours, but we just don't have time. | ||
| Go ahead, Austin Peterson. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Yeah, don't believe me tonight. | ||
| Check my sources. | ||
| I write some of the best sources that you'll be able to find out there. | ||
| Brandon Herrera, for example, he's also known as the AK guy online. | ||
| He's a big guy in libertarian circles. | ||
| He actually did a physics test to show that a 6.5 Carcano will do the kind of damage that was done not only to John F. Kennedy, but also to Governor John Connolly, who was sitting in front of him. | ||
| Check out the AK guys analysis of this as well. | ||
| There have also been spectral analysis and laser analysis that have been done to be able to prove that there was a lone shooter. | ||
| Even if you don't think it was Oswald Wright, you know, let's just determine one fact and that there was a single lone gunman. | ||
| And also, I think that the most important thing that we can do and when we're thinking about things like this is to ask ourselves whether or not we really truly believe that the government is capable and competent enough. | ||
| Not that they're evil enough, because we know that they're evil enough to do some evil things, right? | ||
| As we've seen with Ukraine and spending and what they've done to us, you know, with our money and the trillion dollar spending bill and Joe Biden, Barack Obama. | ||
| But just ask yourself truly if you believe that the government is actually competent enough. | ||
| To be able to pull off something of this magnitude and to be able to do it in such a way as to be able to cover their tracks. | ||
| And if they did, do you think that they would ever release the documents that they have already released related to this assassination? | ||
| I think that the answer there is no. | ||
| It's important to be skeptical. | ||
| It's been an absolute pleasure for me as well. | ||
| I wish we had multiple hours to do this. | ||
| I'm really having a good time, so we'll have to do it again. | ||
| Tyler Nixon, your final thoughts. | ||
| Two minutes. | ||
| kinds of debates and have somebody like me on. | ||
| And I also want to say thank you to Tyler and Harrison for conducting this tonight. | ||
| You guys did a great job, and it's been a pleasure to meet you. | ||
| Hopefully, we can do it again sometime. | ||
| Well, it's been an absolute pleasure for me as well. | ||
| I wish we had multiple hours to do this. | ||
| I'm really having a good time, so we'll have to do it again. | ||
| Tyler Nixon, your final thoughts. | ||
| Two minutes. | ||
| Go. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| And it's good to be with you guys. | ||
| And Austin, I appreciate your coming on. | ||
| And certainly, I think you've studied it well enough. | ||
| I think you should look into the alternative. | ||
| You know, there's about a thousand more books than there are about, you know, uncovering the conspiracy and covering the cover-up than there are on the Warren Commission side, which sort of stands alone other than Bugliosi and Posner, who have major, major problems with their... But look, I mean, | ||
| Anybody who thinks that a watermelon on a pedestal is going to give you an equivalent bit of data concerning the intricate neuromuscular and skeletal structure of the human spine and brain and the base and the multiple, it's just, that's ludicrous. | ||
| I mean, it's just, but if you want to talk about that type of evidence, they fired bullets from the 6.5 into cadaver, into the wrists of cadavers, just the wrist. | ||
| And they all came out deformed. | ||
| None were unscathed like the so-called magic bullet, which, again, I said was impossible because more grains were taken out of Connelly's body than were missing from the bullet. | ||
| That being said, look, I mean, the evidence has been severely doctored. | ||
| Even the clock of the assassination of Zapruder film has been altered. | ||
| It's 130 percent enlargement in the background, and that's a photometric actuality. | ||
| You can measure it for yourself. | ||
| In other words, what they did was they cut frames out, and they had to put and superimpose it, so they brought the background forward along the curb line. | ||
| So the people in the background, if you've ever seen it, look larger than they're supposed to be. | ||
| And that's because it's been altered terribly. | ||
| So incompetence, well, look, I mean, these guys, this is the people who won the Second World War against the Japanese and the Germans, very cunning, and enemies and I don't think that saying they're incompetent maybe the government's incompetent maybe agencies of it But these were very skilled and crafty men who fought the Soviets at the time and frankly they You know also brought in contract killers as well I mean the mafia was involved they were doing business | ||
| They were hand in hand with the CIA at the time and only only one agency could have stripped the protection That's of course the Secret Service I wish we had hours to talk about this I I have found this incredibly fascinating. | ||
| This hour has flown by, but thank you so much to our guests, Austin Peterson and Tyler Nixon. | ||
| You can follow Austin at AP4, the number 4 Liberty, on Twitter. | ||
| Also on Twitter, Tyler Nixon at Real Tyler Nixon. | ||
| Thank you both so much for coming on. | ||
| Very lively debate. | ||
| It's my first debate. | ||
| I don't know how I did, but I enjoyed it. | ||
| So hopefully you did too, Austin Peterson and Tyler Penix. | ||
| And thank you so much for coming on. | ||
| Thank you to everybody for tuning in. | ||
| Please do share these links. | ||
| links, please go to Infowarsstore.com and I'll see you tomorrow morning. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| And that means you've only got four days to act if you want to get a Vitamin Mineral Fusion and DNA Force Plus, both at 50% off. | ||
| Next Monday, the products are going back to full price because they're close to selling out. | ||
| We won't have more back in stock for months. | ||
| Everybody should be on Vitamineral Infusion and DNA Force Plus. | ||
| Just look at DNA Force Plus with the PQQ and the CoQ10 and so much more. | ||
| Documented to clean out your cells, your mitochondria, take your immune system to the next level, and even have your telomeres, that's your DNA, last longer. | ||
| This is the opposite of what the globalists are doing with their poison shots. | ||
| This is actually giving your body the tools it needs to regenerate. | ||
| Get DNA Force Plus and Vitaminal Fusion for a limited time for 50% off. | ||
| You've got until next Monday and your purchase supports the broadcast and keeps us on air. | ||
| Please take action now for your own wellness and your own health and to keep us on air. |
Export Selection