All Episodes
Jan. 15, 2023 - Sunday Night Live - Chase Geiser
01:48:48
Elites Convene in Davos To Plot Humanity’s Destruction — Sunday Night Live - FULL SHOW - 01/15/2023
Participants
Main voices
h
harrison smith
01:26:11
k
konstantin kisin
08:40
Appearances
a
alex jones
02:08
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
harrison smith
What, uh, what are you doing over there?
What?
Nothing, nothing.
Where?
In Ukraine.
What are you up to?
Ukraine?
What?
Ukraine?
Nothing's happening in Ukraine.
Ukraine of all places.
Where do you get this stuff?
It looks like there's some sort of NATO expansion and a CIA-backed coup and something about Joe Biden withholding a billion dollars.
You want to get impeached?
Impeached?
You can't impeach me.
In that case, just shut up.
No, no, I'm not kidding.
It looks like Russia is massing on the border.
Well, it's fine.
We're sending Anthony Blinken over there.
Oh, to prevent a war?
No.
Okay, well, what's he doing?
He's going over to protect democracy.
Oh, democracy.
I love that word.
Terrible news.
Oh, no.
Russia invaded Ukraine.
Oh, no.
Why?
Well, because Vladimir Putin is evil, so...
Because Putin is evil.
Putin evil?
Zelensky good.
That about sums it up.
Okay, so the largest country in the world decided to invade a country the size of Texas, and the only reason you're giving me is Putin evil?
Big country, little country, you get it.
I'm confused.
Well, you don't like the fact that a bigger country invaded a smaller country, do you?
No, I mean, I guess not.
Great, you're fully on board.
Here's the Ukrainian flag.
Hey, have you heard about the ghost of Kiev?
He's this lone fighter pilot.
It's protecting the whole city.
He's already downed, like, six Russian airplanes.
It's incredible.
Whoa, really?
No, no.
But there are these guys on Snake Island.
When the Russians demanded they surrender, they responded, go f*** yourself!
It's awesome.
Whoa, really?
No.
No, that didn't happen either.
But did you hear about the Russian atrocities?
They are committing war crimes against children.
Oh my God, really?
Nope!
But it doesn't matter, because we have to defend Ukraine.
They are our military ally.
I don't actually think they are.
Yeah, well, we're gonna do it anyway, because after all, we've got to defend democracy.
Okay, so what are we doing to help?
I mean, can we mediate?
We can call for peace?
How many zeros is in a hundred billion?
You're writing them a hundred billion dollar check?
Yeah, I mean, I was writing checks in the tens of millions, but I was running out of checks, so I'll just do one big one.
How much have you sent them?
You mean, how much have you sent them?
No idea.
Literally impossible to know.
Okay, well, where's it all going?
Again, who knows?
Up in smoke, or whatever bombs do.
Ugh, that's so much money.
Has there even been an official declaration of war yet?
A what?
Never even heard of that.
No, there was a declaration that Putin is evil.
I'm sure you heard me.
Yeah, I don't know if I'm really convinced that Putin is evil.
Well, of course Putin is evil.
I mean, if he's not evil, why would he drive our gas prices up so high?
Putin drove our gas prices up?
Well, gas prices are high because of the sanctions that Putin made us put on him, so... Oh, sanctions.
So this is hurting Russia.
They've never been better, actually.
Okay, well, what about our oil supply?
No, it's awful.
Actually, we're having to sell our strategic reserves.
You mean use?
No, sell.
Sell to who?
China!
You know, our enemy?
Okay, if we're having to sell our strategic reserves, like, why don't we just pump our own oil?
Don't we have domestic production?
Unfortunately, somebody already banned all of the pipelines and drilling permits, so can't use it.
Yeah, that was you.
We're going green!
Gas prices have doubled.
It's a transition.
Transition into what?
Transition for climate change.
I thought we were talking about the war in Ukraine.
Oh, right.
Well, the weapons that we're giving Ukraine are extremely fuel efficient.
We can kill thousands for the same amount of emissions as a small SUV.
So, progress.
And hey, here's some good news.
Somebody just blew up Russia's underwater pipeline.
My God, who?
I don't know.
Who could it be?
No one's gonna believe that.
They're gonna think you did it.
unidentified
Me?
harrison smith
The U.S.
government?
You know Russia has nukes, right?
Like, is this game of brinksmanship really worth it?
I'm in my bunker now!
Pretty nice.
What was that last question?
I said, is it really worth this game of nuclear brinksmanship?
There it is, ladies and gentlemen.
The latest from InfoWars.
The latest skit from InfoWars.
Bandod video.
Ukraine war pitch meeting.
Please share that out to your friends, to your family, to the stupid people in your life that still think that Ukraine is... We're not gonna get into it.
Just, it's InfoWars, isn't it?
Comedy, world-ending...
You know, plots of domination being carried out, the highest levels of power, persistent and increasingly frantic spirituality.
You get everything here at InfoWars.
And of course, it's all brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com.
We have a huge, huge show for you today.
I'm Harrison Smith, by the way.
I normally host the American Journal each and every weekday morning here on InfoWars and Bandai Video.
8 to 11 Central Standard Time.
Boy, we have a lot to talk about.
Just Just insanity.
The World Economic Forum in Davos is going to be sort of our number one topic, and we're going to take a deep dive into what the future plans of the globalists are, since they sort of accidentally told us with the lockstep document.
We'll take a look at that a little bit later.
We'll of course talk about the documents found in Joe Biden's possession.
First, I want to talk a little bit about some cultural issues, I guess you could say.
I hope everybody's having a good Sunday.
I'm having a great one.
I went to church this morning and just, it was just so nice.
So different than everything else in the world right now.
And it was interesting because the preacher's sermon was about the last prayer that Jesus gave that sort of the last, yeah, I guess prayer that Jesus, you know, conducted with his followers just before, you know, knowingly going and And dying.
And it was for unity.
It was a prayer for unity of the people of the church.
And so the sermon was all about unity.
And of course, it gets into a little bit of the political topics.
You know, there's just so much division right now.
We need unity above all else.
And I had to...
I had the feeling the preacher was looking at me a little bit more than everybody else.
I think I might have a guilty conscience about this, which is hilarious because it's entirely unearned, right?
It's so funny to hear the way people talk about InfoWars and then you get self-conscious because you know that that's how people think that you are.
But if you think about it, InfoWars, I mean if there's one thing about InfoWars that separates it from just about every other organization even remotely similar to it, we have to have the most diverse audience of all time.
I mean, the people that we bring together, folks, We got boomers, we got zoomers, we got veterans, we got anti-war activists, we got, you know, hippie mamas that just don't want something toxic in their veins, and we got, like, hardcore right-wing sovereign citizen types.
Who brings people together better than InfoWars?
I don't know who.
And then, I mean, when it comes to race, color, creed, it's like, that's what InfoWars has always been about.
But, you know, it's always the talking point, isn't it?
These right-wing conspiracy theorists thrive on division.
No, we want everybody to get together.
We want everybody to love one another.
And all this is, you know, in church it was, I mean the feeling of being in this church, especially, I don't know what it is about my church, that there's like more children than there are adults.
It's insane.
There's just children everywhere and it's so just like vivacious and just like wild and just very fun and Then we go out to lunch afterwards in downtown Austin, and there on the corner is a shop that's celebrating male birth control.
It's called Be Unproductive.
It says, male birth control is an act of solidarity with every human who owns a uterus.
I just had to take a picture of this sign.
The crew wants to do the document cam on this.
And so, you know, on one side, it's like, yeah, I do want to unify.
On the other hand, I don't want to unify with these people.
These people have nothing in common with me.
And it's not like this is a divide in America, that there's some sort of 50-50 divide.
Half the places you go are full of life and children and wonder and joy.
And the other half is this.
No, it's more like public life is all this.
Public life is all this anti-human, degenerate, perverted weirdness.
And then you have to find little conclaves, little enclaves, little gatherings together where you can actually be around people that believe the same thing that you believe.
So I want unity.
I just want victory first.
Is that a weird thing to say?
I don't know.
Am I going against the teachings of Jesus?
I don't think so.
I don't think Jesus would be okay with what we see going on in the world around us.
And of course, I mean, this week, this weekend, the stories of the LGBT stuff, I mean, it is wildly out of control.
And we'll get into some of that.
But you know, what is that division?
What is the difference between a happy-go-lucky, family-friendly church and just like a normal American street?
And it's just this anti-life, anti-human, death cult that we operate under and it's, well, it's permeating the brains very deeply, I should say.
Let's go to clip number eight here.
Savannah Hernandez actually took to the streets of Austin and this is a little insight into, you know, what the What the outside world is heading towards, what the end point of all of this rhetoric and indoctrination and academic research encouraging people to be the end of their genetic line, to be lifeless husks in some machine.
This is the effect of that on young people.
It's a video from Savannah Hernandez called, Gen Z's Thoughts on Having Their Own Kids One Day.
Let's watch.
unidentified
What is your view on motherhood?
Like, do you want to become a mother one day?
Do you want to have kids one day?
What are your thoughts on that?
I don't know if I want to become a mother one day, right at this point in time.
It's not something I deeply consider, um, just because I'm trying to live in the present moment.
What about kids?
What are your thoughts on kids right now?
Um, a nuisance.
I'm, at this day and age, I'm, like, really focused on myself, and if I were to bring a child into this world, it would really just cause a lot of turmoil for me.
To leave my standpoint on kids, I think they're a beautiful gift to the world.
However, as of right now, I don't think I would have any, or I don't look to have any in the future, just because of where our I do see myself adopting children.
I'm terrified of childbirth.
I would like to adopt and have a family.
I would definitely never, like, create life.
But I would think about adopting, like maybe.
What are your thoughts on kids right now?
I pity them I guess that we're gonna be like living in a dying world.
I get annoyed by kids like I that's my only thing it's not that I think like kids are a burden in any way if I ever did have kids I would want it to be through adoption like I wouldn't want to have my own.
I think that experiencing life before you have to kind of I don't want to say settle, but in terms you do need to settle down to have a family and children and everything.
But I definitely think experiencing all that you can get a hold of while we're young and able to and while we don't have the responsibility is kind of what I see as more important.
I have kids, yeah.
Adopt children.
I will adopt a kid and then I want two of my own and then one adopted.
We're overpopulated and there's a lot of kids without homes and families and stuff.
When you mention overpopulation, is that kind of fear of climate change and having more kids, or what are your thoughts?
Yeah, obviously the more kids people have, the worse the problem is going to get.
Do you want to have a family one day?
Yeah, that's my biggest dream.
To have a family, a nice, happy wife, and however many kids that would be.
I put that before My film dreams, my school dreams.
That goes first.
Same.
I've had a girlfriend for close to four years now and the goal is to probably get married after college and to then have a family, so.
harrison smith
Stupid white guys bucking the trend.
But most of those people had more or less the same answer, right?
Climate change, pessimism, pitying children.
My god.
I've never been around children.
They're so happy.
How can you pity them?
But it just goes into a whole pessimism idea, right?
Just the anti-human agenda.
And like, InfoWars has been pushing this idea that there is an anti-human agenda for so long.
For so long, people would all, they were so baffled by this concept.
Well, there it is on full display.
The suicide of a people.
The willing dying out, willingly dying out of entire class of human beings and you know the interesting thing again about seeing this like vasectomy shop on the street corner is just like so many other things just like abortion or you know transgender puberty blocker like any medical intervention it's not i can just see i can just see it right now i'm I can see them pushing vasectomies.
I can see them, you know, every show that you watch has some character that, like, his wife wants him to get a vasectomy, but he's not, and he's played and portrayed to look like a fool, an idiot, you know, some guy clinging on to some old idea, and by the end of the episode, you know, he gets the vasectomy, and everybody celebrates, and he realizes that that was actually the right thing all along.
I can just see the propaganda now.
It's already everywhere, right?
You can already see the posters that we're pulling up and everything.
And then I can see, you know, people on the right going, this is weird.
This is like, what is up with this?
Why is there a big push to get people to willingly castrate themselves?
Why is our entire country seemingly engaged in a program to bring about the existence of a class of eunuchs?
Like, what is this?
And then I can see the left-wingers go, the latest Republican attack on your basic human rights.
And it's like, just like abortion, just like all these other things.
Sure, abort, you know, vasectomies, sure, maybe it's, maybe it's a good thing, maybe, you know, your wife has some condition, she can't get pregnant again, she, her body couldn't handle it, so for her sake, you gotta, you gotta snip it, you gotta snip it out, you know, I get it, you know, everyone wants it, but these people aren't saying this is a valuable medical, you know, intervention that should be used rarely and occasionally, they're making posters that say to be an ally to all beings with a uterus, you should be Not able to reproduce anymore.
You should castrate yourself, not because it's some medical choice you have to make for a medical reason, but as part of an ideological game they're playing.
An ideological, you know, purity contest.
A sacrament, if you will, in their anti-human, uh, cult?
I don't know.
But on that topic, there's been a lot of discussion about this guy Paul Ehrlich recently.
And Wall Street Journal came out with this story, saying opinion, whatever happened to Paul Ehrlich's population bomb?
Whatever, whatever happened with that?
Hey, whatever happened to those, you know, far reaching and thinly sourced claims of destruction and devastation that people in the 70s told us was going to kill all the humans and wanted to force us into not having children?
Whatever happened with that?
In his 1968 book, The Population Bomb, Paul Ehrlich famously declares that unless countries engage in population control, hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death in a, quote, race to oblivion.
He was wrong.
Thank you for letting us know, Wall Street Journal.
He was wrong.
They're here to tell you we are, in fact, still alive.
Sadly, though, the Stanford...
Okay.
I was confused by the sentence at first because he was he was wrong, right?
And then it says, sadly, it's like, wait, were you sad that he was wrong about the mass death?
They are.
Don't don't get confused.
They are sad about that.
But they say, sadly, though, the Stanford University's biologist claims help to drive human rights abuses around the world from forced sterilization in India to forced abortions under China's disastrous one child policy.
So again, we're reminded of a couple things here.
That first of all, the climate change agenda that we'll be getting into a lot deeper in just a little bit when we're talking about Davos and the World Economic Forum meeting right now to use the climate change claim as an excuse to absolutely dominate every aspect of your life.
So we'll get more into that.
But it shows that this has been going on for decades, that their prognostications have been Continuously disproven, never even remotely correct, but the prescriptions that they provide, the solutions to the problems that don't actually exist, cause massive, unrelenting, almost undreamed of damage to psychology, populations, human beings by the millions.
It's really a crime against humanity that not only these people are Out there saying this as if they're experts, but then, you know, convincing or cooperating, conniving with politicians to take this false information and put it into law.
But at the end of this story, where they talk about Mr. Ehrlich, who still is being treated like an expert, his claims, despite decades of being made a complete fool of, They're still relying on him for more predictions into the future.
They're still talking about putting policies into place.
They still are putting policies into place that come from his litany of falsehoods.
But this has been going on for literally decades.
And we have this at the very end of this article.
They have two notes from readers.
And the second note is from somebody named Kenneth Mday.
And he says, I was in college when I read Mr. Ehrlich's The Population Bomb.
I took it to heart and now have no grandchildren.
But 50 years later, the population has increased to 8 billion without dire consequences.
I was gullible and stupid.
Well, you were attacked, right?
You were the victim of a very sophisticated brainwashing program.
And you look at all of those people that you just saw the video of, Savannah walking around, they're in college now.
They likely are physically incapable of having babies, but doesn't matter because they don't want them anyway.
And the other things they have to say, it's because of climate change.
It's because this program has continued.
And I just hope that it doesn't take 50 years and sitting in an old folks home, you know, wondering where your family is for these people to wake up to the lie that they've been sold.
And you notice that in their reasoning for not wanting children, first of all, they all say adoption.
I would put just so much money on the bet that they never even get close to remotely even trying to adopt.
I mean, it's just something they say because they want to feel good about themselves because they, you know, have some misplaced sense of duty to strangers over themselves, which is ironic because the number one thing they say, the number one reason they give for not wanting to have which is ironic because the number one thing they say, the number one reason they give for I mean, you just boil it down.
Well, I'm really focusing on myself right now.
Well, kids are just like kind of annoying and I don't like being annoyed, right?
It's just selfishness.
I'm generally a very selfish person and I'm prioritizing myself right now over my duty or religious imperatives or, you know, biological drive.
I'm just I'm just doing stuff for me wasting time now.
I'm just wasting time just wasting so much so much time and again, it's ironic because in 50 years Their self is going to be suffering enormously for having not done more when they were young for not having actually a You know, put to the side their own selfish desires and actually did something, you know, out of love for once.
They're setting themselves up for, you know, a life of disappointment and loneliness.
But they feel like, so it's like even if, if they really do just want to do what's best for them, They should probably be at least entertaining the idea of having kids, but they never do.
And generally it's just this overwhelming sense of pessimism that these people have, right?
Just the general, like, hopelessness.
And of course that leads to extremism, right?
If you really think that the, like, the Earth is doomed, like, you either think the Earth is totally doomed, And there's nothing anybody can even do at this point.
And that was sort of the sense you got from those kids.
They weren't saying, we have 12 years to do this or else we're going to be beyond the point.
No, they're all like, it's already done.
It's over.
The earth is being destroyed.
It would be mean to bring a kid into this world because of how awful it's going to be moving forward.
So they're convinced that it's, it's over with.
I guess there's two types.
The 12-year type, the AOC type, the Greta Thunberg type.
See, they're prone to extremism because it's like, this is an existential crisis, this is for all of humanity, so any extremism we take, any level of, you know, intervention we pull off is worth it because, you know, we're saving the Earth here, so we have to do stuff, we have to do stuff extreme, we have to do stuff right now and don't think about it and just do it.
So that's one level of extremism, but there's this other level of just It's hopeless, there's no point going forward, it's only going to get worse and worse and worse, in which case, it's like, who cares if they spray aluminum into the stratosphere to try to block out the sun?
Maybe it'll kill everybody, but everybody's gonna die anyway, so at least maybe this gives us a chance, right?
You get what I'm saying?
That it's like, when you just already have this foregone conclusion that...
The Earth is on a downward trajectory and will be absolutely overrun and it'll just be mass starvation and global cataclysm.
Regardless of what anybody does, why not spray things into the atmosphere?
Why not, like, you know, vaccinate the farm animals?
Yeah, why not?
Like, who cares?
It's all over anyway, so everything we do at this point on doesn't really matter.
So regardless, it's like selfishness, pessimism, Just a hatred of humanity in general.
Which is funny, because of course, you know, these are the same people that were just like, everything we do is out of love.
Well, we just love everyone so much.
I think I'll adopt.
I think, I think, actually, I plan on adopting.
unidentified
Yeah, right.
harrison smith
It's literally harder to adopt than it is to have a kid.
The paperwork, my God.
I actually have family members that actually adopt.
Yeah, here's another guy that they celebrate.
Even worse than old Ehrlich.
Earth now has 8 billion humans.
This man wishes there were none.
Yeah, not less.
Not a sustainable amount.
No, none.
He thinks we're a plague.
He thinks we're a cancer.
And then these people are like, we're protecting the Earth.
We're saving the Earth.
I think I'll adopt.
I think I'll adopt two kids, actually.
It's so stupid.
But no, they've just been indoctrinated into a death cult and that's that.
Of course, you know, the reason I bring up the hopelessness and the, you know, who cares if they're poisoning the Earth because we've already poisoned the Earth.
So, you know, screw it.
From raw egg nationalist, thenationalpulse.com, corporates have already begun geoengineering the climate with basically no one's consent.
Well, who cares?
You know, it's like we got to do something.
If we don't do anything, we're all going to die.
So why not release reactive particles into the atmosphere and attempt to alter the climate?
This is the firm Make SunSets.
We covered this on American Journal.
They acknowledged that it had launched weather balloons containing sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere.
The launches took place in April 2022 in Baja, California, Mexico, months before the company was even incorporated.
They're just already doing this.
We know Stanford already had this plan in place.
We know they've already been spraying things into the atmosphere for a very long time.
They call it strategic aerosol injection, and it is a, at this point, open and acknowledged program carried out by the DOD and others.
And of course China just announced they were, you know, hiring another like 55,000 people to change the climate in an area the size of India.
Isn't that amazing?
Isn't that wonderful?
Don't consider the effects this will have on a closed atmospheric system all over the world.
Pay no attention to that.
But why not?
After all, we're all gonna die and we're not having kids anyway, so who cares if the Earth is here after us?
Right?
Right?
That's how it works.
And so the question is, like, when When will this be enough?
And I think, uh, I think the sort of theme of today's show will just be like, it's too much already.
It's too much already.
We've gone too far.
That'll be the theme of today's program.
It's just, we've gone too far.
You can debate whether or not we were too far in one direction before, but we've overcorrected.
And so in the next little segment, after the next commercial break, we're going to get into the, the LGBTQ agenda.
We're gonna get we're gonna really get into it folks and we're gonna point out That it's just too far.
It's too far now.
It's that's enough.
It's actually too much and we need to go back Not all the way, you know, nobody's calling for We're not trying to I'm trying to be Saudi Arabia over here.
But uh Yeah, it's too far.
It's too far.
So, you know again we can We can have the argument of, well, in the 70s, men would be beating up for, okay, well, we don't have to go all the way back that far, but where we are now, it's too far.
So we got to go back, we got to turn this boat around, head back the opposite direction, find some sort of comfortable middle ground where we can all enjoy each other's company without, you know, surrendering our children to pedophiles or having to participate in some absurd charade where we pretend not to know what men and women are.
How about that?
How about we have some nice middle where we aren't biased and we don't discriminate but also we don't have to lie about the basic functions of reality in order to keep our job or participate in society.
I think there's a middle ground here and I think where we are now is too far.
Just too far.
We'll get into all of that here in the other side.
I don't want to remind you, please do go to Infowarsstore.com to support us.
In the next segment, I'll be getting into the LGBT stuff and we'll be laying out how all of this intertwines very deeply at a very fundamental level.
And again, it's one of the things that you're just not going to get from anywhere else because there are other places I will talk about transgenderism.
I don't think I put the video in here.
There's a congressman who's like, we're going to have an anti-woke caucus.
Just like, great, that'll go.
That'll go super well.
Infowars is like the only place that's like, how about we move forward with a positive message rather than a constantly reactionary one?
And how about just, instead of reacting to every new inch of ground that the globalists claim for their own, yeah, anti-woke caucus representative Jim Banks,
You know, instead of constantly reacting, why don't we point out that all of these little actions that you're constantly responding to, one by one, piecemeal, are actually just puzzle pieces in a much larger plan, and if you want to stop that larger plan, the solution is not to one by one try to patch up the little holes in the dam, because you'll eventually be flooded.
It's an impossible task.
The trick is to drain the whole lake, and then rebuild the dam, and then let the water come back in.
So you gotta, you gotta not constantly be reacting.
We actually have to be proactive in all of this.
And the way that you get that movement going is by, again, explaining that all of these little instances that we're talking about, and that we'll talk about in the next segment, are all just part, they're all just stars, all just pinpoints in a wider constellation that you have to zoom out, see the whole thing, see where it's taking us, realize we don't want to go there, turn the boat around.
It's really as simple as that, folks.
You support everything we do here by going to infowarestore.com.
I really do hope you support us.
We will not be here.
If you don't, it's just a matter of fact.
If you want this type of coverage, you need to support us at InfoWarsTore.com.
Alright, welcome back ladies and gentlemen.
Sunday night live here at InfoWars.
We have the key to the secret plans of the globalists to enslave humanity and we will be explaining it all to you here with the documents and everything.
Of course, they're meeting in Davos this week.
The actual government is meeting in Davos this week.
I should say the already functioning already in place world government is gathering in Congress this week to set policy for the future and decide the course of human history and they're doing so in Utterly secret and unaccountable fashion.
It's really incredible.
And of course there are Schemes are not really all that complicated.
They're extremely sophisticated, they're extremely organized and well-run, and I mean, they're good at what they do, trust me, but it's not, you know, all that complicated or hard to understand.
It's an anti-human agenda.
It's an agenda of control.
It's an agenda of depopulation.
The normal human population is too wild to Handle.
So they've got their reprogramming us forcibly.
It's really not that hard to figure out.
And of course, once you realize that it's just anti-human in general, looking forward to the end of humanity, you know, everything else makes sense, right?
Why are they, which is why are they doing all the things they do?
They literally hate humanity.
And so they celebrate all the things that make us either weaker or distracted or just easier to control in whatever fashion.
And they figured out a long, long time ago, a hundred years ago or more, much more actually, that the best way to control people was through their desires.
By fulfilling their desires, you control somebody.
By deciding for other people what their desires are, then you can make sure that you're always the one that fulfills them.
So it really is a satanic agenda.
It really is an agenda of selfishness.
And that's why the, again, mind control program of transgenderism has come about.
It's all just on its way to transhumanism.
And I'm not kidding.
kidding that's i'm no but it actually is and so i want to talk about this and again you know i feel like i need to lay the groundwork just because when we talk about any of this stuff it's not it's not that we are just like living our lives and and gay or transgender people are living their lives and we just like here they're getting we're just like what There's gay people having a good time over there?
Let's go ruin it!
I hate gay people, right?
It's like, I got no issues with gay people.
I got no issues with transgender people.
I got, my whole life I've interacted with people of indeterminate gender.
You just treat them however they want to be treated.
Like it doesn't matter.
None of that matters.
I couldn't care less about what people do in their private lives.
Couldn't care less.
I don't know how to lay the groundwork better than that.
Just to set the stage here, I literally don't care.
Couldn't care less.
Doesn't bother me at all.
Here's the problem though.
It's all part of a lot bigger plan and the transgender thing is less about transgenderism as it is about Forcing people to accept absurdities as if it's true.
Again, if you want to dress up like a lady, I'll treat you like a lady.
It doesn't bother me.
I don't care.
I'm not gonna look under the hood.
I don't know any better.
Just however you want to be, however you present yourself, that's how I'll treat you.
It's literally as simple as that.
But if you demand that I Fully believe, not just say, but actually believe that you are not a man, you are a woman, because you're wearing a dress.
That's going a step too far.
That's demanding my participation in a delusion.
And it's not good for me, it's not good for you, and it's not good for our society to be engaged in this.
And hopefully I can explain why exactly here as we move forward.
But it is as absurd as you could possibly imagine.
This is a big story today.
Very, very amazing stuff.
Owner of Miss Universe says it will be run by women, owned by a trans woman.
So if you just, if you just take away the words that are lies, what you're left with is, this is a new world, this is a new stage of the Miss Universe pageant.
It will be run by women and owned by a man.
That's what that means.
I hope everyone's aware.
There's them making the announcement.
Yes, folks, it's Miss... They've changed the name.
It is Miss Alternative Universe.
And it's she.
He is the prettiest woman in the universe where he exists.
Just incredible stuff.
Amazing, really.
And again, it just reminds me of this headline or this tweet from a little while ago.
Oh, no.
Well, I love the InfoWars headline about this.
Internet slams dystopian nightmare of trans-owned Miss Universe.
And again, you know, there was the, I don't know if it was Miss Universe or Miss America pageant where this trans guy entered and he's just, he just looks like an ogre.
I mean, it's not even, it's not that he's dressed up like a lady.
It's just, he's not even a particularly attractive man.
And yet he wins.
Like, there's all these, like, beautiful women next to him, like, clapping, like, yeah, he's the most beautiful out of all of us.
That's, I agree.
And it's just like, this is absurd.
It'd be one thing, you know, it's too far.
It's just too far.
It's just, we've gone too far.
And that's that.
So the story at InfoWars is Internet Slam's dystopian nightmare of a trans-owned Miss Universe.
Which again, you know.
Who cares?
But it's like, you're acting like it's empowering to have a man who dresses like a woman own your company.
You're saying this is a, we're breaking new ground, this is a major achievement, a woman now owns Miss Universe pageant, but it's a trans woman.
Like, you get that that's absurd, right?
You get that that's insane?
Everybody understands that?
It's true.
Everybody understands that.
But it reminds me of this headline here, right?
From the Daily Mirror.
This is like a week or so ago.
Transgender man gives birth to non-binary partner's baby with female sperm donor.
People were posting this headline going, what the hell does this mean?
Transgender man gives birth to non-binary partner's baby with female sperm donor.
Is this a headline?
Is this an important news headline?
Cause I can fix it for you.
I can take out all of the words that don't make any sense.
And I can tell you what this headline actually says is man impregnates woman.
That's what this headline says.
I mean, that's it.
That's the headline that we're dealing with here.
And again, it's not... So I was thinking about this, right?
Why is this important?
Who cares what they're saying?
Well...
Because it's weird.
Because it's weird.
It would be weird if you opened up the newspaper one day and it was like, breaking news, a woman has been impregnated by a man.
You'd be like, well, that is not news.
That happens all the time everywhere.
But it's like, no, no, you don't understand.
One of them dresses up and acts like and demands that people say that he is a woman and the other one doesn't believe in gender.
It's just like, no, none of that.
It's okay.
A man gave birth.
They've impregnated a woman and everything else is illusion.
Obfuscation.
Just costume.
That's all it is.
And I do think this is important.
I think it's... It's important to notice.
It's important to... To understand the reasons why it's important, I guess.
It's weird, right?
Again, I could care less.
Dress up however you want.
Doesn't bother me.
None the slightest.
But, but there's a very, very, very strange thing going on in the world right now.
It's not just happening with the activists.
It's not just happening with the far left ideologues.
It's permeating everywhere and it's horribly troubling.
So to illustrate this, I want to go to a silly cartoon from decades ago that was set decades or centuries in the future.
We're gonna watch a little clip from Futurama.
See if you can pick out the joke in this little clip that wouldn't make any sense anymore, and then I'll explain why I'm showing this clip on the other side.
But here is just a little taste of one of my favorite shows of all time, Futurama.
Let's watch clip number two here.
unidentified
Now, Fry, before you go into space, you'll need to see our staff doctor.
I should warn you, though, he's a little unusual.
He wears sandals.
Dr. Zoidberg, this is Fry, the new delivery boy.
He needs a physical.
Excellent, excellent.
You'll be fine.
Now open your mouth and let's have a look at that brain.
No, no, no, no, not that mouth.
I only have one.
Really?
Uh, is there a human doctor around?
Young lady, I'm an expert on humans.
Now take a mouth, open it and say... What?
My mother was a saint!
Get out!
harrison smith
Did you hear it?
Did you hear the line that just... isn't a joke anymore?
Right?
When he calls Fry a young woman.
So that's why, that's why I was thinking about that clip.
Because at one point today I was just, for some reason I was thinking about that clip, thinking about...
Basically I was thinking about it this way.
I was thinking, if we were in some Futurama world, if we were in some Star Trek world, and you had some serious illness that you were worried was progressing and was going to kill you, but the only doctor you had available was an alien doctor, and you walked in, and they said to you, I don't worry.
I'm an expert on humans.
You're in good hands.
You know, this disease is very dangerous and it could be a lot of trouble if you don't have somebody who knows what they're doing, but I'm an expert on human anatomy.
So you're in good hands.
Tell me first, are you a man or a woman?
You would be like, all right, I need a new doctor.
I need a new doctor, because this doctor doesn't actually know humans.
They're a fraud.
I don't want this person treating me.
This is my health.
I might die from this, so I need an expert.
And if this dude doesn't know the difference between men and women, he clearly is completely incapable of dealing with human beings.
He doesn't know the difference between humans.
And with an alien, it would be reasonable to understand that maybe they couldn't recognize male and female.
Why doesn't that happen nowadays when you have doctors asking people if they're men or women?
If you have doctors actually having to participate In this absurdity of we don't know what gender is because if you went to a doctor because this happens now I mean it's like a regular thing now as a doctor will say and what gender are you right as if they don't know if again if that was an alien you would go oh you don't know what human beings how they operate so I need a new doctor now but you don't do that with a with a human doctor because you both know that you're both engaged
In a charade, in a game that you're playing.
You go to the doctor, the doctor asks you, are you a male or female?
You know perfectly well that they know perfectly well which one you are.
And they're just asking because they're pretending not to know.
They're pretending to be ignorant.
They're playing this game.
They're participating in this little show where you both pretend not to know basic human anatomy.
To me, that's, that's very weird.
It's... I don't know which one's better.
I don't know if I'd rather have my doctor actually know so little about human anatomy that he can't tell the difference between men and women, or if I'd rather have a doctor who knows perfectly well what the difference between men and women is, but is so easily persuaded into a cult of nonsense that he actually participates in this ridiculous show of pretending not to know which gender you are.
I don't know.
I don't know which one I would rather have.
They both seem incredibly dangerous to me.
They both seem horrifying.
So again, this is, you know, your doctor is not, well, maybe they are, but most doctors aren't, you know, left-wing transgender activists.
However, they are rule followers.
They are licensed.
They are told what to say most of the time through organizations that have been for a very long time infested with people who have a vested interest in forcing this absurdity on everyone.
So again, I don't know if it's I don't know if it's coming across clearly, but it's like it's not about being mean to transgender people.
It's not about just like you're doing a woman usually wearing a dress like no, no, it's It's that you have our doctors and our healthcare professionals and our bankers and our police all engaged in this absurdity, all willingly subjugating their own common sense and logic and basic observation and knowledge of human anatomy to the whims of some faceless mob that demands that you reject the evidence of your eyes.
And that's not a good precedent to set.
It's not a good place for us to be as human beings.
And of course this is being purposefully indoctrinated everywhere.
This Daily Mail article, pretty incredible.
Penn State professor challenges straight students in his sociology class to quote, watch gay porn.
What do you even say about this?
An American college professor has come under fire for telling straight students to watch gay porn to understand new sides to their sexuality.
Penn State professor Sam Richards aired the challenge to students during a lecture for his entry-level sociology class in December and was reportedly met with silence in response.
Yeah, I bet.
Yes, yes, I bet he was.
And you know, it's not one of those Equal and opposite sort of things.
Could you ever imagine?
Could you imagine a professor just being like, you know, to all of my gay students out there, you ever tried straight porn?
Just give it a try.
It's like, no, you know, you're insane.
You're an insane person, actually.
Footage of the lesson, which was recorded.
Oh, I didn't know there was footage.
We'll have to get that for the show tomorrow.
It stirred up sentiments of outrage from onlookers online.
The stream has since been made private.
Oh, we'll find it.
We'll get it.
It's out there somewhere.
The school, meanwhile, is, of course, what else would you expect?
Standing by its staffers' statements.
Telling DailyMail.com Thursday that academic freedom for faculty is necessary to achieve critical thinking and discussion within its student body.
Okay, but he told his straight students to watch gay porn because it might make them gay.
That's what he did.
That's called conversion therapy if it's the other way around.
unidentified
Right?
harrison smith
The best part is like why he says You know, to do this.
He says, if you're straight, watch gay or lesbian porn and see how quickly you feel aroused.
And you can't control that, Richards reportedly asked in the clip, which was viewed by Fox News.
I mean, it's a great reason.
It's a great reason to do something, right?
I just, I don't even want to like, like to make fun of it.
I have to say the grossest stuff.
I just, I don't even want to.
Because you could replace, you know, gay with, like, any sexual fetish.
You get that, right?
It's just like, just try—or any sin, really, right?
Not aroused, but, you know.
It's just like, you know, if you're a peaceful person, just try, you know.
Buying a mouse from the pet store and crushing it in your hand, you'll feel a rush.
I mean, you're a human being, so you're going to feel like a rush of adrenaline and power when you do this.
It's just like, well, no, no, I don't care if I feel a rush from it.
I don't care if, like, physiologically, I'm programmed to do something like that.
It's like, no, what are you talking about?
unidentified
right?
harrison smith
Just try, you know, violent stuff.
It's, you know, you'll see, you might like it.
You might be into it.
And that's, and that's what determines whether something good or bad is if you have a physiological reaction to it.
And they're just, it's just animalistic, right?
It's just down to the very bottom.
He's won several awards over the course of his 32 year career, shamed students for white privilege, sparked outrage by asking them to watch porn.
Again, just imagine it's the other Just imagine he's just like, everybody's a little bit gay.
Just like, hey, gay guys, just cut it out.
Just watch some straight porn.
Everybody's pretty much straight.
So, you know, you can fix yourself with this.
Who knows?
Maybe you'll get it.
But we're all, you know, in a way, in a way, I kind of agree.
I kind of think all human beings have the capacity to indulge in all sorts of Desires.
I think all human beings have innate desires or, you know, impulses that are not good for us, but are still very powerful.
Right?
Violence is definitely one.
Sex is definitely one.
Perversion, definitely one.
I mean, everybody has the capacity to do that.
And apparently, and it's like natural, right?
We're like fallen.
We like are animals at the end of the day.
You know, we, we just have this programming into our head.
That's pretty unavoidable and it shouldn't really be avoided in a lot of cases, but.
Tact like that means it's good or that.
Yeah, it's just.
It's not something that has to be fostered.
It's not something that has to be encouraged.
It's the opposite of that, right?
It's not hard to make a human being like if you were raising a kid, would it be harder to make that kid?
A degenerate sex addicted drug addict weirdo who's mean to everybody or would it be easier or would it be harder to turn a child into somebody who is accomplished and is able to sublimate their own animalistic desires because they are human beings and recognize something higher?
Like is it easier to raise a kid to indulge in their base desires Or to supersede them and overcome them and, you know, know what they're good for.
So, you know, this professor is just like, just go down to the bottom lowest common denominator.
Just if you're physically wired to be aroused to something, that means it's good and you should do it.
Completely insane.
And again, it's weird.
The weirdest part about this.
Is that this is something that, again, if you were to put it in any other context, nobody would make this, nobody would suggest this, nobody would make this statement, nobody would say this, but for some reason these people feel, like, empowered to do things they would never do otherwise, would never suggest, would recognize immediately how absurd all this is, but for some reason when it's in this cloak of, you know, the rainbow religion,
They feel like not only are they going to do it, their right to do it, even if people criticize it, it's because those people are ignorant and the school will back them up and the media will write stories about how actually it's a good thing.
It's like, it's a cult and it's very bizarre.
We got time.
I'm going to go to this video here.
I'm going to come back from the other side and continue on this with a little bit and tie it into, you know, the World Economic Forum's wider anti-human goals.
But when I say we've gone too far, this is a wonderful example of it.
It's clip number four.
Santee YMCA allows naked men to use the women's locker room with underage girls.
Here's an underage girl saying what her experience was trying to bring this to the attention of people who run the operation.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Good evening, council members and residents of Santee, behind me.
My name is Rebecca Phillips and I'm 17 years old.
I am not a resident of Santee, but I am employed at a local restaurant, The Omelette Factory, and I work out regularly at the Santee YMCA.
Just two weeks ago, after finishing my shift at my job, I went to the gym to swim laps.
As I was showering after my workout, I saw a naked male in the women's locker room.
I immediately went back into the shower, terrified, and hid behind their flimsy excuse for a curtain until he was gone.
I ran into a bathroom stall to change as quickly as I could, organizing my thoughts to share with the people at the front desk.
As I did so, I could only think of my five-year-old sister, who I bring to this gym during the summer to enjoy their water slides.
This is the YMCA, where hundreds of children spend their summer afternoons in childcare camps.
This is the YMCA where my little sister took gymnastics lessons.
The locker room was supposed to be her safe haven to gossip with her friends and shower and change.
When I asked the YMCA management what their policy was regarding transgenders, they confirmed that the man that I saw was indeed allowed to shower wherever he pleased.
As long as you are not a red flag on Megan's Law, the California Sex Offender Registry, a grown male can shower alongside a teenage girl at your YMCA location here in Santee.
I was made to feel as though I had done something wrong when I talked to people at the YMCA.
Somehow, the indecent exposure of a male to a female minor was an inconvenience to them.
When my dad spoke to the Sheriff's Office, they told him that he should never allow me to shower there ever again.
The YMCA wouldn't let my father speak to the manager of the Santee branch.
After waiting several days, he finally received a call from Terry Moss, who is the Director of Membership for San Diego County.
She informed my dad that I was not in any danger at the time of the incident, that I was safe.
But I ask you this.
I'm assuming all of you either have a wife, a sister, daughters or granddaughters, or are a woman yourself.
Could you knowingly send an underage girl into a room where there was a naked male and say that she was not in danger, that she was safe, or more importantly, that this was right?
The fact that we are now tailoring our privacy policies and bathroom laws around transgenders, ignoring the blatant threat to safety that this poses, is obscene.
The safety of children, girls, is on the chopping block.
And this issue is not unique to one political party.
Both Democrats and Republicans, whom I have shared this story with, have all been equally disgusted.
So I implore you all to take action.
With great privilege comes great responsibility.
Whether it's requiring transgenders to use the single cell family restrooms or making them use the bathroom which aligns with their biological trans... Thank you.
Thank you.
harrison smith
So we're going to explain this a little bit more on the other side.
Suffice to say, yeah, it's too far.
That's enough of that.
That's enough of that.
We got to go back.
I don't know how far, but not one step farther.
We'll go back.
Jones on the other side.
We'll break down the World Economic Forum and we'll talk about, you know, where this goes from here.
Because this is just the beginning, folks.
Just getting started.
alex jones
InfoWars has made history.
You have made history by supporting InfoWars.
The globalists are being defeated on every front, and now is the time to not just sit on our laurels because we're winning battles.
Let's win the war, the information war.
There's nothing you can do more important than keeping InfoWars on air and the fight for liberty.
I don't think anybody denies that fact, and I thank you for your past support, but I'm encouraging you now to get one of the very last coins in a four-coin series, the Teddy Roosevelt Man of the Arena coin exclusively at 1776coin.com.
And you can get $30 off this historic pure silver coin with promo code 1776 at 1776coin.com.
No more of these will be made.
If you want the coin, it's exclusively available right now for a limited time at 1776coin.com.
$30 off when you use promo code 1776.
dot com $30 off use promo code 1776 thank you for your support all right This is Sunday Night Live.
harrison smith
Second hour has begun.
We'll be getting deeply into the World Economic Forum as they convene in Geneva, Switzerland.
I'm sorry, Davos, Switzerland, obviously.
Later this week, they'll be convening later this week.
We'll talk about that.
We'll break down.
We'll break down what they're going to be talking about.
We know it all now.
And we'll get into that.
Let's sort of continue with this LGBT topic.
So we're gonna we're gonna keep going, keep breaking it down, keep, you know, let it expand out to the wider, the wider world of woke.
But that video again, just just illustrates the sheer, sheer level of insanity we're dealing with these days.
It really does.
It really is beyond words.
Like, there are no words to describe it.
You just saw it for yourself.
There's nothing I can add.
A California teenager sobbed before city council as she told of her trauma at seeing a naked man she says was a transgender woman inside the women's changing room of her local YMCA.
17-year-old, you know, right?
Underage.
Thinking about her five-year-old little sister who goes in there by herself while she's at camp or whatever.
Just thinking there's going to be a fully naked, full-grown man.
What, just leering at my little sister?
Exposing himself to my little sister?
Exposing himself to all these little kids?
That would be insane, right?
But then when she complains about it, when she brings this up, and, you know, the other thing is, they claim this person is a transgender woman, right?
You can debate whether even, like, it doesn't even matter if he really is or not, right?
It doesn't, it really doesn't matter.
But the other thing is, there is literally nothing that he has to prove to show he's a transgender.
He can just, he can just be dressed like a man, acting like a man, all the things, he's just a man, and he just walks in the locker room and goes, no, I'm a woman, actually.
And they gotta go, oh, okay, actually, oh, I'm sorry, I didn't know.
Like, there's no, so all they've done, You can say it's for transgender but you can see you know maybe a transgender person like feels better because they get to go in the restroom they want you know that's the that's the only potential benefit here but the negative that what you've actually set up is just a situation where if a man was so inclined they could go into the women's locker room take all of their clothes off expose themselves to children and watch the children while they shower Without the children even knowing that it's happening, right?
This girl was in the shower when the guy came into the locker room.
She steps out expecting it to be a women's locker room, and there's a man saying, right, it's horrifying.
Well, there's no proof that he's anything, he's just a man.
So you've just set up a situation where now legally, apparently, a man can walk into a women's locker room for whatever purposes he wants.
So, again, it's not even about Transgender or not transgender, it's about do you set up a situation where you are giving free reign to perverts and pedophiles to practice their trade?
And what is the benefit for that?
Oh, it's that, you know, they can use the locker rooms of the family stall where they could use it otherwise.
Like, there is no benefit.
There's only negatives.
Just so we're clear.
So, they say it's a trans woman.
It could just be a man.
There's no way of knowing.
There's no... There's nothing they have to do to prove they're a woman.
They just... That's just the rule now, is men can go into women's locker rooms.
And the woman says, the young woman, the 17-year-old, who was exposed to this, said, I was made to feel as if I had done something wrong.
The indecent exposure of a male to a female minor was an inconvenience to them.
Very inconvenient when people are traumatized by your actions.
So inconvenient.
And when they asked the YMCA about this, she says that they informed the dad that I was not in any danger.
I was safe.
So, okay.
I didn't realize that was a... Do pedophiles know about that excuse?
Do they know?
I mean, a lot of pedophiles, they don't hurt the kids.
So, I mean, do they, can they, can they use this?
Is that, I didn't, I don't think they, you know, I mean, that's a great excuse, right?
Like she was never in any danger.
I had her tied down so, so tight she couldn't even get up.
She was perfectly safe in my basement.
She was perfectly safe being exposed to my genitalia against her will.
There was nothing unsafe about that.
Completely insane, right?
Just literally, utterly, totally insane.
She was safe.
These are the people that will tell you it's unsafe to criticize transgender people because that'll lead to violence.
But if a man whips his junk out in front of your underage daughter in a locker room, traumatizing her, You know, shattering her sense of safety and etc.
That's totally fine because it's her that needs to get over it.
She's the inconvenient one.
She is the one who is causing all the trouble.
And then it gets even crazier, right?
It's crazy that it happens.
It's crazy that the response is what it is.
And then just to top off the craziness, the Sheriff's response is to say, don't let your daughter go to that locker room anymore.
Because there's a naked man wandering around exposing himself to children, you can't use your YMCA anymore.
You can't use your community resource anymore because you're offended by having to see some grown man's junk in your face in the locker room.
You have to suffer.
You can't use your public places anymore.
You know, if you just, if the whole thing is that, like, transgender people feel excluded, their solution is to literally exclude a much, much bigger portion of the population than the transgenders.
The people who don't want to be in a locker room with a person of the opposite sex.
The women.
It's just wild.
It is just utterly and totally wild.
I think I want to play clip 10 here.
We're gonna play a longer clip in just a second of Constantine Kissin, his bombshell speech at the Oxford Union.
I'm going to play another clip that I think was from the same debate, but it's Toby Young is the guy speaking in that.
We'll play that in just a second because I think that explains what's really going on here.
And it's important to notice that, again, if you can You know, these people go, you know, it's, uh, it's very traumatizing for me to have to use a bathroom that corresponds with my gender.
It makes me feel bad to remember that I am, in fact, the gender that I am, so we have to change all of the laws.
And they say, you, you know, if you don't have empathy for me and my mental illness, if you don't have, you know, if you aren't willing to, you know, do what I say and, and, you know, feel so bad for me that you change your laws, I mean, you're a bad person, but if this traumatizes somebody or if there is some sort of rape, like in Loudoun County, they couldn't care less.
You think the empathy goes both ways?
No, they demand empathy from you.
They demand sympathy from you.
But if you say, you know, this has traumatized me or my daughter was raped in a bathroom because a so-called transgender man was allowed to go in there and Corner her in a stall, which happened multiple times in Loudoun County because they covered it up, right?
It's happened multiple times.
I mean, it's not like a... Well, it's an increasingly not rare thing, I guess you could say.
And so, you know, you think they have any sympathy for a girl that was raped by a man?
No.
It's the only thing they care about is the...
The political win, the victory, the permanent change to our society that they're trying to achieve.
If your rape gets in the way of that, you're a nuisance.
You're in the way.
You think they have sympathy for you?
Not for a single second.
Traumatize you, you know, shatter your illusion of safety, just, you know, drive you out of a place that you are, you know, gone for your whole life.
And, you know, this happened last year with the 80-year-old woman who saw a man in California naked in the locker room, like, leering and watching little girls get undressed.
She went and told the YMCA.
The YMCA kicked her out, banned her for life, said, you're not allowed to come back here anymore.
She'd been going there for literally decades.
And you know, this all just goes, you know, when the first debate was happening, like, well, should we let transgender people in?
unidentified
Right?
harrison smith
It was always just like, that's, it's a ridiculous thing to claim that this would happen.
If that was really their belief, then when it did happen, they would say, this is horrible, this is wrong, this should have never happened, we opened up these bathrooms for transgender people out of an act of love, and you're taking advantage of that, you pervert, you're not, you, we will not accept it, but they don't do that, do they?
No, they shout you down, they call you a bad person, even though Ostensibly, they would have agreed with you when they were demanding this happen.
They would have said, yeah, if that happens, then we'll definitely deal with it.
But no, this is all part and parcel with what their designs are.
And that guy that, you know, exposed himself to the children and then got the 80-year-old woman kicked out of her YMCA she'd been going to her whole life, he was then showered with hundreds of thousands of dollars from left-wing activists.
So, expose yourself to a child, be rewarded by the freaks that you associate with.
And I really think this clip that we're about to play does such an incredible job of illustrating all of these points.
The lack of empathy, the lack of humanity when it comes to anyone that opposes your worldview.
They don't, they really don't care and you'll see it here.
You'll see the reaction.
It is as legitimate as you can get when they're told that their policies have destroyed innocent lives.
They, it's like telling them that they accidentally stepped on a doodle bug on their way out.
They accidentally crushed a, you know, a roach as they walked out the door.
I'll scrape my shoe off.
You think I care?
You think I care that I did that?
You think I care that the, you know, innocent bystanders of our policies are having their lives destroyed?
They don't.
They really could not care less.
So it illustrates that.
And it also illustrates that there is no end to this.
There is no achievement that they can get that they will then say this is enough.
And this is sort of the issue with all this stuff, right?
If it was all just about equality, it would have been over in the 90s.
If it was about acceptance, it would have been over in the 2000s.
If it was about any of these ideas of just, we just live and let live, it would have been over a long time ago.
They keep pushing because that's how they get their power.
They have to keep finding new frontiers to cross because once they cross one and achieve it, their existence is purposeless from then on.
All these groups advocating for gay rights or whatever, it's like you have all of the rights, so what are you advocating for now?
Gay privilege, gay exclusivity, it's absurd.
So I think this clip really highlights all of this.
And we'll show more of this debate on the other side.
But first, Toby Young exposes the lack of humanity in the SJWs of the Cultural Revolution.
Clip number 10.
unidentified
But you know what?
You get people that would say, you know, J.K.
Rowling has been cancelled just because she doesn't satisfy the arguments of the transgender lobby and that it's the reason the West is coming down.
Sorry, that sounds a lot like what Konstantin said, but actually that was Vladimir Putin who made that argument.
So at least you have strong supporters on the side of your argument.
People that made basically exactly the point that you did tonight.
I know I would never want to be on the side of Vladimir Putin in a debate.
harrison smith
I think you're slightly mischaracterizing what's happened with J.K.
Rowling.
So the Free Speech Union is currently representing someone called Gillian Phillips, or Jillian Phillip, and she lost her job at HarperCollins.
She was an adult, young fiction writer.
She was fired after a revolt by this company, HarperCollins, when she tweeted, Hashtag I stand with J.K.
Rowling.
It's not the J.K.
Rowlings of this world that get counseled, it's the people who express any support for them who don't have her power and her money.
She's had to retrain as a heavy goods driver, a truck driver.
And the week after she lost her job at HarperCollins, her husband got cancer.
Is that what you mean by holding people to account?
unidentified
"There's a tragedy in that person's experience." "I'm afraid that, you know, on other points you made in your speech earlier, where you talked about conservatives fearing losing their job, well, if they happen to be people that have racist or bigoted views, then I'm afraid that's not the same as people who don't have those if they happen to be people that have racist or bigoted views, then I'm afraid that's not the same So to accept the premise of the motion that woke culture has gone too far,
is to determine that the clock of progress should stop ticking.
I think that would be ridiculous.
Maybe it should tick off Toby Young, but I don't think that's any problem.
And so there is no finish line to the pursuit of progress.
harrison smith
There is no finish line to the pursuit of progress.
The number of things that guy said right there that are just horrifying.
Just horrifying that people feel confident enough to express these beliefs in public is just something else, right?
So his answer was no, he didn't care.
He pretends he acts like he's standing up against powerful people like J.K.
Rowling, who, again, I don't want to get into that, but he predicates his argument on, these are the type of people, these billionaires, these powerful people, and who cares if they get cancelled, they have a little trouble.
This guy points out, well, it's not just them.
What about some random nonfiction writer who just tweets out, actually, I like J.K. Rowling, and then gets fired and has her life destroyed.
And this person's like, well, if they're racist, then they deserve it.
And it's just like, right, no sympathy, no empathy, no care.
They will destroy you.
They will burn you.
They have already been programmed to treat their fellow human beings like nuisances, to be discarded if they do not comply completely to a program, to an ideology that self-professed, as you heard right there, has no end point, has no culmination, has no goal they're trying to reach. has no end point, has no culmination, has no goal It's just deconstruction.
It's just destruction.
It's just domination.
That's all they have.
That's all they're going for.
Progress, he says, has no end goal.
No end goal.
So what does that even mean?
Once the family's destroyed, you're not done?
Once the nation-state's destroyed, you're not done?
Once gender's destroyed, you're not done?
Once human beings willfully commit suicide as a race, you're done?
You're not done?
I mean, where does it end?
Nowhere.
They don't think it ends anywhere.
Take it from them, it doesn't end anywhere, which is the best argument you can possibly make for stopping them right now.
There's no reason why it needs to go any farther.
There's no point that you can appease them to at which they will Shake hands with us and say, okay, great, we agree, we can stop here.
There is no end.
To their madness.
So we can stop it right now and we can roll it back.
And since, you know, since their timeline is infinite, what matters?
What does it matter if we're going that far or this far?
You have forever to go and you'll always have forever to go.
So if we're here or if we're back in the 1980s, you still have forever to go because you are going nowhere.
You have nothing.
You are going for nothing.
You have no goals in mind.
You have nothing that you're trying to achieve.
You have no point at which you will be happy.
You are just Weaponized ants, you know, carrying out the actions of a queen who despises you.
I really believe that.
Very thoroughly.
So let's go now to this video.
It is extremely excellent.
Oh, before we do, this will be from Constantine Kissin.
It's clip number three.
But let me just, another series of headlines I thought was hilarious from this weekend.
You've got this.
Canadian publisher pulls Catholic textbooks after LGBT criticism.
Textbook publisher Pearson Canada's dropped the Ontario Catholic education curriculum fully alive from its offerings after LGBT advocates claim the Catholic content is homophobic.
Yes.
One religion demanding another's be censored.
Amazing.
Groomers with guns greet child protection activists at Dallas All Ages Drag Event, a Taylor Hansen report.
That was here in Texas.
I'm missing one.
There was another one that I had too.
Oh, well, I think it was just this one as well.
All right.
Girl 17 weeps as she recalls seeing naked trans women with penis in women's changing room.
And then you have The Economist saying America's far right is increasingly protesting against LGBT people.
First of all...
Just try to be more subtle in your headlines, right?
We get it.
You want to portray it as if right-wingers just hate LGBT people because they're gay.
We hate the people.
Literally nothing to do with it, right?
Like the group Gays Against Groomers.
It's not homophobic.
It's gay people who don't want children being groomed by pedophiles, but they take issue with that.
So again, the headline's not subtle.
They're trying to portray it as right-wingers are protesting against LGBT people.
LGBT people.
There's normal people.
There's going about their business.
Just like some lawyer going to get his latte at Starbucks.
Just like, morning Jim.
Hey, how you doing, Bob?
And then there's just like right-wingers just like, stop being gay!
unidentified
Stop being gay!
We hate you being gay!
harrison smith
No, no, no, no, no.
No, no, no.
See, what's really happening is all this stuff I just read, it's all this stuff I just read, is the book publishers censoring the word of God to appease LGBT psychopaths who have nothing to offer and only want to criticize and destroy.
It's about the drag queen story times where strippers are taking money from little children and outside of it are mass clad communists holding AR-15s threatening to shoot anybody that stops the pedophilic entertainment.
And the law enforcement's on the pedophile side and the law enforcement's on the drag queen sides.
And it's girls, underage girls, being exposed to male genitalia in locker rooms at YMCA and being told by all the authorities she's the one in the wrong.
She's the one that needs to shut up.
She's the one that should never go to that locker room again.
And if she dares speak up about it again, they'll ruin her life and get her fired from her job.
And they'll laugh in her face because she thinks wrong.
And then they wonder why people are starting to protest these actions.
It has nothing to do with about gay people or bisexual people.
It has to do with These groups, these activist groups, relentless drive for unquestioning control.
And it's ridiculous.
And we're gonna reverse it.
It's gonna go back the other way.
I guess it's up to you fine folks to determine the speed at which we travel.
We'll get more into this on the other side, but I do want to play this full video.
Constantine Kissin, here's his speech at the Oxford Union.
It's available on Twitter.
The debate was, this house believes woke culture has gone too far.
Let's watch.
konstantin kisin
Well, first of all, Mr. President, I'd like to thank you for that preview of the 2024 American election we witnessed earlier.
And if you're not persuaded to vote for the proposition tonight by that speech by James, I don't know what will persuade you.
You will not know this, but I was supposed to be the first non-student speaker for the proposition.
I've now been the fourth, which means that I now have to thank all the previous speakers for making my best points for me.
And I find that the reason, the main reason now that I have left to be in support of the motion is that I am so tired of talking about woke culture.
That's why it's gone too far, more than anything else.
And I thank the other speakers for making the points for me, because it means I don't have to reiterate the point that no, no, free speech is not some right-wing reframing of whatever, it's the foundation of Western civilization, upon this civilization is built, and the Enlightenment values that led to it.
I don't have to make the point that has been made by far better people in the past, that the only way to deal with the problem of racism is to treat people on the content of their character.
And nothing else.
And the fact that woke culture seeks to overturn that is a new form of racism that we must all oppose.
It means, also, I will not use this opportunity to say I told you so, as someone who spent the last five years warning people in the West that if we continue to erode our culture, if we continue to undermine our confidence in Western values, that our enemies, enemies like Vladimir Putin, will seek to capitalize on it.
I will not make any of those points tonight.
At all.
Instead, I'm not going to talk to those of you who already agree with me, which I imagine is most of you.
I'm not going to talk to you because I imagine after everything you've heard tonight, you're going to vote for the proposition.
I'm going to confess, I will take your vote for granted.
Tonight, I am the Labour Party and you are the Red Wall.
Now, I want to talk to those of you who are woke and who are open to rational argument.
A small minority, I accept.
Because one of the tenets of wokeness is, of course, that your feelings matter more than the truth.
But I believe in you.
I believe there are those of you here who are woke, who are open to rational arguments, so let me make one.
We are told that your generation cares more than any other about one issue in particular, and that issue is climate change.
We're told that many of you suffer from climate anxiety.
You wish to save the planet.
And for tonight, and tonight only, I will join you.
I will join you in worshipping at the feet of St.
Greta of climate change.
Let us all accept right here, right now, that we are living through a climate emergency and our stocks of polar bears are running extremely low.
I join you in this view.
I truly do.
Now, what are we to do about this huge problem facing humanity?
What can we in Britain do?
We can only do one thing.
You know why?
This country is responsible for 2% of global carbon emissions.
Which means that if Britain was to sink into the sea right now, it would make absolutely no difference to the issue of climate change.
You know why?
Because the future of the climate is going to be decided in Asia and in Latin America.
By poor people, who couldn't give a shit about saving the planet.
No thank you.
No thank you.
It's going to be decided by poor people in Asia and Latin America, who don't care about saving the planet.
You know why?
Because they're poor.
Because they're poor.
I come from Russia, which is not a poor country, it's a middle-income country.
20% of households in Russia do not have an indoor toilet.
What they have is an outdoor toilet.
And I don't mean one of those nice port-a-loos that we get here.
I don't even mean a Glastonbury port-a-loo.
I mean a wooden shack with a hole in the ground that holds a collected fermented memory of the last 10,000 visits.
How many of you are going to go home tonight and say, let's rip out our bathroom and erect a Siberian shithouse in the back garden?
And if you're not, why should they?
120 million people in China do not have enough food.
I don't mean that they don't get dessert.
I mean they suffer from malnutrition.
That means that their immune system is breaking down because they don't have enough food.
You're not going to get them to stay poor.
Imagine you're Xi Jinping, the leader of China.
When you were 10 years old, there was a revolution, a cultural revolution in your country.
And people came and they put your father in prison.
Your mother had to denounce him.
Your sister killed herself.
And you, no longer enjoying the protection of your formerly powerful father, were sent to a village where you lived in a cave house.
And here you are, decades later, you have clawed your way up the bloody and greasy pole of Chinese politics to be the undisputed supreme leader of the very Communist Party that destroyed your family.
And you know that the main thing you have to do to survive and to stay in power is to deliver the one thing that the people of China want.
Prosperity.
Economic growth.
Where do you think climate change ranks on Xi Jinping's list of priorities?
A third of all children who live in extreme poverty in the world live in India.
That means they are starving and dying of preventable disease.
Now, about 15 months ago, my wife got pregnant.
Not me, because we're old school.
And for nine months, we talked about what our boy would look like.
What he might do when he grows up.
We looked at baby scans and videos on YouTube about what the fetus looks like at 9 months and 12 months and 20 months.
And eventually he was born.
And he is this cute little bundle of joy.
He's cuter than about 80% of puppies.
unidentified
Right.
konstantin kisin
Now if you said to me that I had a choice.
Either my son had a serious risk of starving or dying from a preventable disease in the next year.
Or I could press a button and he would live.
He would go to school.
He would bring his first girlfriend home.
You'd go to university and graduate and become a woke idiot.
And then he'd get a job and get married and have children and become a man.
unidentified
Amen.
Thank you.
konstantin kisin
But all I have to do is press this button, and for every day of my son's life, a giant plume of CO2 is going to get released into the atmosphere.
Now, you're all very young, and most of you are not parents.
Let me tell you something.
There is not a parent in the world who would not smash that button so hard their hand bled.
You are not going to get these people to stay poor.
You're not even going to get them to not want to be richer.
And so, I put it to you, ladies and gentlemen, there is only one thing we can do in this country to stop climate change.
And that is to make scientific and technological breakthroughs that will create the clean energy that is not only clean, but also cheap.
No, thank you.
I want everyone to get home on time today, which is not going to happen.
And the only thing that wokeness has to offer in exchange is to brainwash bright young minds like you to believe that you are victims, to believe that you have no agency, to believe that what you must do to improve the world is to complain, is to protest, is to throw soup on paintings,
And we on this side of the house are not on this side of the house because we do not wish to improve the world.
We sit on this side of the house because we know that the way to improve the world is to work, is to create, it is to build.
And the problem with woke culture is that it's trained too many young minds like yours to forget about that.
unidentified
Thank you very much.
harrison smith
Ladies and gentlemen, this is Sunday Night Live coming to you live from the InfoWars studios.
I'm Harrison Smith, your host tonight.
Please do go to InfoWarsStore.com to support us.
I haven't plugged it nearly enough right now.
And actually, we have, you know, there's a lot of stuff I'm not even going to get to right now.
I'll get to it tomorrow morning on American Journal, but There's a lot of really good stuff happening, and I think the Civil War has played a very large part in the development of the political culture here in the United States.
I talked about it when I got back from the TPUSA event.
TPUSA, I heard a hell of a lot more about the Great Reset than I did about tax cuts.
It ain't your dad's conservative party anymore.
People recognize and realize what we're up against.
So it really is, it's amazing, sort of bittersweet in a lot of ways.
That Fox News and Charlie Kirk and TPUSA and they all sound like InfoWars now.
They all talk about things that InfoWars was talking about 10 years ago, which is nice.
It's nice to see them talk about it.
It would be really nice if they could advance another 10 years and realize what this is really all about.
and understand the lengths it's going to take to get back on track.
But it's fine.
They're catching up, and it's good to see.
But you really can't overestimate the impact that InfoWars has had on the world, really.
I mean, it's not just America either.
It's really around the world.
And things like the World Economic Forum are a great point.
I mean, there was a time in my lifetime when things like the Davos meeting and the Bilderberg group were considered lies.
They were called conspiracy theories and people said that they didn't exist.
And now we're going to see that they can't take that tack anymore.
They can't take that line.
It's absurd on its face.
Everybody knows they do this.
So now they've rebranded and they say, yes, we do do this, but it's because we love you.
It's because we're Because we love you so much and we're doing things that are good for you.
Completely insane but the good news is that it means that they have to sort of show their hand and we get a inside look where we'd otherwise would have been completely blocked out.
And that again is a lot to do with InfoWars actually just getting this information out there and letting people know it's not a conspiracy theory it's just a fact that the most powerful people in the world get together in secret conclaves where there are no reporters allowed and they set the policy for the world And everybody just knows that now.
Everybody just gets it now.
Now it's time for how to fight back and how to reclaim our sovereignty from these people.
Because make no mistake, the global government is not coming.
It is here.
The global government is meeting in two days in Davos, Switzerland.
Just like any Congress or Parliament, any gathering of those with authority, they're going to get together.
They're going to set policy.
They're going to set an agenda.
They're going to plot the path forward and then they'll all redistribute out to their particular nations and enforce these measures through the national governments.
So it'll look like the national governments are doing it, but they're not.
They're all being told what to do.
They're all being openly directed by people who are not elected, have no accountability, and are unknown most of the time.
So that's a real, that's what the government does.
It's what a government does.
It is in all purposes.
It is a government.
It just doesn't call itself that.
It calls itself a forum.
But we know better.
And again, InfoWars has exposed this and has opened people's eyes about this more than any other organization.
And for that alone, I think it's worth giving us just a little bit of your support, right?
Just letting you know about the enemies who are trying to kill you.
Isn't that enough?
But just know that the fight goes on and there's a reason why InfoWars is targeted the way that it is.
And it's because we've been right the entire time.
Here's the crew spoiling my presentation here.
unidentified
I'm kidding.
harrison smith
But please do go to InfoWarsStore.com.
And let's just break it down because...
Again, this is gonna be like a old school InfoWars deep dive.
We're gonna look into all this stuff, play some videos, and let you know what's really going on.
So yes, that is the headline from New York Times.
World Economic Forum in Davos confronts a new order.
And you gotta think the conversation happened in the press room.
They're like, confronts a new world order?
Do we keep world in there?
I mean, it's a little too on the nose, isn't it?
A little too on the nose.
So is that the site that's live now?
They changed the headline.
So that's the one that was like, that was the one I first saw.
Davos confronts a new world order.
But then when I looked at it again to print it out before the show, they changed it to World Economic Forum in Davos confronts a new order.
So that conversation really did go on.
I was joking, but that conversation really must have gone on.
They went, it's a little too, a little too Alex Jones-y when we write new world orders.
Just write new order.
unidentified
Just leave the world part out.
harrison smith
The COVID-19 pandemic, invasion of Ukraine, trend towards autocracy and economic inequalities.
Okay, this is how they start the article.
Hilarious, right?
Because the way they finish that sentence is, challenge the World Economic Forum's relevance.
What it should say is, the COVID-19 pandemic, invasion of Ukraine, trend towards autocracy and economic inequalities, brought to you by the World Economic Forum.
In all of their glory.
Bloomberg has a headline.
Billionaire heading back, heading to Davos.
Reflect a changed world order.
Yeah, nothing says we're just a bunch of, you know, innocent do-gooders like having all of the biggest mainstream media outlets all use exactly the same verbiage in their coverage as if they were given a talking point from your group.
Pretty amazing stuff.
Pretty amazing how blatant in your face they are.
Literally just Bloomberg, New York Times, Wall Street, they all just have like the same headlines.
World Economic Forum confronting a new world order.
But not that one, not that world order, not the one that they talk about, just a very similar one.
And so this article has the same kind of idea that you'll see in the Bloomberg article, right?
You kind of see this idea of Chaos.
Economic inequalities.
They're challenging the World Economic Forum's relevance.
They're navigating through troubled waters.
The World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland finds itself navigating troubled waters.
Not the way I would put it.
But I do like how they are Telling you who is navigating the ship of the world right now.
Long the affluent symbol of a globalizing world where the assumption was that more trade would bring more freedom.
Right.
Yeah, totally.
That was your assumption, right?
It now confronts international fracture, ascendant nationalism, and growing protectionism under the shadow of war in Europe and sharp tensions between the United States and China.
Oh my gosh!
Oh my gosh, they're experiencing so much trouble, you guys, and that's the idea that you get from all of these.
It's so troubled now.
The world is so uncertain now.
Billionaires heading to Davos reflect changed world order.
It wasn't so long ago that Russian billionaires were a fixture at Davos, as commonplace as Moncler puffercoats.
This year, they're zero.
The war in Ukraine and Russia's ostracization by the West have effectively banished the oligarchs from the annual confab of capitalist elites.
I bet they feel bad.
Yeah, they aren't welcome in the old psychopath with liver spots club.
Yeah, you can't hang out with us anymore.
unidentified
But how are we still going to get the Russian prostitutes?
harrison smith
We must solve this issue before all this festivities.
unidentified
But it's the same type of idea, right?
harrison smith
Things are changing, we're in flux here, nobody knows quite what's going on, it's very scary, it's very uncertain, and in fact the This sentiment that's coming out of the New York Times and Bloomberg and BBVA and all these other, you know, mainstream accounts and outlets, they all have this same kind of mood to them.
They all have the same through line.
It's like they're all being told what to say from some central organization almost.
But, you know, that would mean there's some sort of cooperation by elites in the media to bring them.
No, no, we won't even go there.
That's crazy.
So the craziest part is that this sentiment from all these mainstream media outlets is verbatim exactly 100% what the World Economic Forum says.
Like it's just, it's so blatant.
The World Economic Forum is just, they just set the agenda.
They set the tone.
They literally are telling everybody what to think.
So you look around the world right now, I don't see any increasing division more than anything else we've experienced over the last several years.
These aren't trends that they're actually recognizing and then reporting on.
These are the talking points that they've been handed by the World Economic Forum themselves.
The Davos meeting this year, the theme of it, the title of this year's meeting in Davos is cooperation in a fragmented world.
They say the world is at a tipping point.
The COVID crisis and the war in Ukraine have combined to shake up global economic and social system and increasing uncertainty, bringing lower growth and triggering higher inflation.
The magnitude of the challenge calls for bold collective action, as stated in the theme of the 54th, uh, 53rd Forum.
Right?
It's a crisis and they're having to deal with this, these global issues that are critical now.
And we know that using these terms like critical and, you know, desperate and all these things, they make you feel like things are uncertain, like you need an authority, like you would like to have somebody, you know, steering the ship and keeping things under control.
Of course, as soon as you realize that it's the very people meeting in Davos that are directly responsible for every single issue they bring up as being a symptom of collapse and chaos, it becomes a little bit hard to take them so seriously.
So they use collapse, they use disasters, they use uncertainty as their primary weapon, as their primary psychological attack.
Almost their initial attack, their primary attack You know, it's the enslavement, but in order to open up your defenses to strike the blow, it's the fear, it's the uncertainty, it's the chaos, it's the, you know, disaster, it's the emergency, right?
Everything's an emergency, it's always, you know, well, we would never do this normally, but it's an emergency, so we have to, we have to do it right now.
We can't ask questions about it.
Mail-in ballots, go quick, quick, mail-in ballots, we have to do it.
Right, everything, everything, everything, everything.
So how does this work?
It goes like this.
Here you have an article from very, very, very early on in the COVID pandemic.
Early 2020, I believe this article was.
And it says, to build back better, we will have to reinvent capitalism.
They say thanks to the ongoing pandemic, the world is off balance and will remain so for years to come.
Far from setting into a new normal, we should expect a COVID-19 domino effect, triggering further disruptions, positive as well as negative, over the decade ahead.
Possible COVID-induced discontinuities ahead range from full-blown financial crisis to a step change in the rate of global energy transition.
Some analysts now reckon that fossil fuel demand may have peaked in 2019 for good.
They say true recovery from COVID-19 will not be about putting things back together the way they were.
We need to build back better, to reset.
If we are to address the deep systemic vulnerabilities the pandemic has exposed, we have to build back better.
Not the same way they are, but by quote, reinventing capitalism itself.
So even aside from the World Health Organization and their being central in the World Economic Forum, being central to the creation of all of the disasters, COVID didn't wipe out our economy.
The lockdowns did.
The lockdowns came from the World Economic Forum, came from the World Health Organization, came from these very people.
That's what destroyed our economy.
Then they say, because it collapsed, we need to remake it completely in a completely different style, even though they were the ones that caused the collapse with their intervention for the disease that they created in a lab that they released on purpose.
Just so we understand, how this all works.
It's not that complicated.
ABC, cause disaster, offer the solution.
The solution makes everything worse.
Rinse and repeat.
Do it forever until you're in hell.
unidentified
Yeah.
harrison smith
But this is how it goes.
Beginning of the COVID pandemic, they already know, they already recognize, they go, we're going to use this pandemic to destroy things, and then we will rebuild those things, and this is how we'll use the pandemic.
That was very early on that they knew that would happen.
About halfway through the pandemic, around the end of 2020, beginning of 2021, they have This article.
The time to reinstate food systems among economic policies is now.
They call for a great food transformation.
Again, what does this have to do with COVID?
Absolutely nothing.
What does this have to do with the disaster of a global pandemic?
Again, just literally nothing.
But it doesn't matter.
This is what they do.
So first they talk about, hey, this, this whole COVID thing is going to make a great opportunity for us to reorganize things, reinvent things, reset things, build back better.
Then about halfway through the pandemic, they're saying, you know, we can even use this to go after the food supply.
We can recreate the entire farming and distribution infrastructure to serve our needs through COVID.
And of course, then we see them doing it.
So World Economic Forum has this meeting, the global government decides to, you know, shut down farmers and You know, repurpose the entire nation of the Netherlands into a tri-city state where they can just, you know, flood it with immigrants.
And anyway, that's what they do.
That's what they announce, and then it goes out and gets done.
And it's always, you know, against your will.
If the World Economic Forum had any good ideas, no force would be necessary.
No secrecy would be necessary, in fact.
Take the 15-minute city that they talk about so much.
If it was such a good idea, why do you need checkpoints?
Why do you need permission slips to leave the 15 minute zone?
If you thought it was such a great idea, go make a suburb and say, it's a 15 minute suburb and everything you need will be within 15 minutes and watch people flock to you.
If it's such a good idea, you don't need the force that you're employing, but they do employ the force.
They are using the force that they have taken for themselves to impose this on people, whether they like it or not.
And that's sort of the theme.
In fact, that was a direct quote from one of the city councilors imposing the 15 minute zone.
He literally said, this is going to happen whether you like it or not.
In other words, the people at the World Economic Forum who are sending us to war in Ukraine over demands for so-called democracy also simultaneously impose things against your will and say it's happening whether you like it or not.
And if you try to protest, they send the national or state police to shoot at you as they did with the Dutch In the Netherlands about the farming thing that they planned on using COVID-19 as an excuse to do.
But we continue to the end of the COVID pandemic, the winding down the lessons that they learned.
This article is called My Carbon, an approach for inclusive and sustainable cities.
While transport and building are the major drivers of emissions in cities, the share of individual emissions is significant.
Personal carbon allowance programs have had limited success due to a lack of awareness and fair mechanism for tracking emissions.
So we know this.
You are the carbon they want to eliminate.
And they're working to impose so-called carbon trackers off of the lie of climate change.
It's a lie upon lie upon lie.
Prison built upon deception.
That's all this is.
But this is the important part from it.
They say COVID-19 was a test of social responsibility.
A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens across the globe.
There were numerous examples of Globally of maintaining social distancing, wearing masks, mass vaccination and acceptance of contact tracing applications for public health, which demonstrated the core of individual social responsibility.
And we can of course go through these measures and point out that not a single of them was scientifically valid or effective or useful or actually had any positive.
We can also point out how they've all had massive negatives.
So these are again, this is what these people get up to, right?
And so in this, you know, these three stories, they paint a little picture for you, don't they?
How at the beginning of the pandemic, they say, we can use this to remake the world in our designs.
Midway through the pandemic, they say, you know, we can use this even more than we thought before.
We can really expand this out and take over food systems and currency systems and everything using this.
Fear that we've inspired.
And by the end, they have a little retrospective and they say, you know, this was all a big test to see if we could get people to conform.
And humanity failed.
In my view, they failed.
For the World Economic Forum, they passed with flying colors.
They showed that they were more than willing to do things of the most absurd nature, without question.
And they would actually not just follow your rules, they would enforce your rules.
They would go out and get in fights with their fellow citizens over what you told them to do.
And they would think they're virtuous for doing that.
They really were just by the end of it, they were like, we have just had incredible success.
We had no idea people were this easy to manipulate.
It's going really well.
Now it's time to smash the foot on the accelerator.
But let's tie it all in together, shall we?
Let's say let's put a whole let's put a bow on the whole sorted conflagration.
We go to the lockstep documents published by The Rockefeller Foundation.
Now just on a quick note, since it's worth bringing up every time we bring up the lockstep document.
The lockstep document is a great chance, little opportunity for you to play a game of Wikipedia Hopscotch.
I just came up with that, but I love it.
I'm going to start using that from now on.
I always talk about this idea, but I never had a term for it.
It's Wikipedia hopscotch.
That's what it is.
So, you know, go to the lockstep document, find out who it was written by, go type that name into Wikipedia, just start clicking around.
I was able to get from the lockstep document to, you know, weapons of mass destruction, the war in Iraq and, you know, September 11th in like two jumps.
Peter Schwartz, Global Business Network, CNAC, it's, Once you look into who these people are and who their associates are, it's unbelievable.
But this was written in about 2010.
It goes up to about 2015.
I don't need to give you the whole rundown of it, but it is important to understand what this document really is.
What this document really is...
was a playbook for Plan A, B, C, and D. And they list these out, and they list them as four scenarios.
We've covered this on my show quite a bit, but here are the four scenarios.
Lockstep, Clever Together, Hack Attack, and Smart Scramble.
The three most important ones are Clever Together, Lockstep, and Hack Attack.
See, Clever Together was their fantasy.
It was the world willingly enters into the New World Order without having to be forced into it.
That would have been if Hillary Clinton had been elected president.
The collapse of America, which had really been blasted into hyperdrive under Obama, would have continued at a pace.
You wouldn't have had that break of Donald Trump being in office, where there were no new wars, and they had to postpone all the stuff that they were going to do.
So we missed Clever Together because America woke up, because humanity woke up, because people like Alex Jones, because people speaking out about this, because we still have the system that was made by our founding fathers that still, in all of its, you know, brokenness, can still, you know, get us a president that's not approved of by the deep state.
But anyway, Lockstep was Plan B, right?
So that was where they force you into it through COVID, and that's the one that it's famous for, because it just predicted COVID 100%.
But what about Hack Attack?
What is HackAttack?
Well, HackAttack is Plan C and that's what we are now entering into.
That is the new phase that the World Economic Forum and its media outlets and its political cronies are signaling to each other.
We are now entering into this new phase.
So, HackAttack reads just like that New York Times article, just like the Davos meeting notes, Just like speeches that we've shown on American Journal.
Maybe I'll do a collection of them for tomorrow's show.
Justin Trudeau and others giving speeches where they're saying the world is becoming increasingly unstable, increasingly uncertain.
We are entering into a phase of when you have all of a sudden, within a week, Justin Trudeau and other world leaders who belong to the World Economic Forum and the New York Times and the World Economic Forum themselves all coming out with exactly the same verbiage and exactly the same words.
That's evidence of a conspiracy.
But it's not just that, it's also the conspiracy itself.
It's the conspiracy in action.
When they make these speeches, when they write these articles, they are sending signals out to their NPCs, signals out to their devotees, saying, here's what we're doing.
Here is, you know, little code words that say, now you recognize, now we're in a new phase.
So go, you know, reference your material, reference the white papers we've given you.
Now that you've received the signal that we're entering into the hack attack phase, plan C, You know, comport yourself in the way that we've told you to beforehand.
So hack attack, an economically unstable and shock-prone world in which governments weaken, criminals thrive, and dangerous innovations emerge.
And again, we've gone through this quite a bit, but you know, they say things like, the US reallocates a large share of its defense spending to domestic concerns, pulling out of Afghanistan, where the resurgent Taliban has seized power once again.
In Europe, Asia, South America, and Africa, more and more nation-states lost control of their public finances.
Resource scarcity, severe economic and climate stresses, just it's...
It's all bad, folks.
It's all coming down.
Government power weakened.
Order rapidly disintegrating as safety nets evaporating.
Violence and crime grew more rampant.
Countries with ethnic, religious, or class divisions saw especially sharp spikes in hostility.
It just, it goes on and on.
Of course, it's all the result of the policies they pursue, but ignore that part because they're telling you that they are now in hack attack mode.
They are now moving on to that.
And I love the quote that they have in Hack Attack.
They have these little quotes from people.
This is from Aiden Ayukuzi, the Society for International Development in Tanzania.
He says, quote, we have this love affair with strong central states, but that's not the only possibility.
Technology is going to make this even more real for Africa.
Their same cell phone penetration rate in Somalia and Rwanda.
In that respect, Somalia works.
So in other words, they're telling you what they believe.
They love central states, and the fact that people are rebelling against them, they are seeing as a existential crisis for their cabal.
And so they have now gotten together and decided they're moving on to the next phase, which is likely going to be some sort of massive cyber attack on American infrastructure.
Klaus Schwab has talked about doing it, and the hack attack document lays out exactly how it will happen.
They're telling you this, and then they're signaling to each other through the words that they use, telling everybody, this is the phase we're now moving into.
Prepare to operate under a hack attack game plan.
I will see you tomorrow at 8 a.m.
alex jones
for American Journal folks. - The second American Revolution is happening right now against the New World Order.
And the answer to their 1984 tyranny is the 1776 mindset and InfoWars embodies that fight for human liberty against globalist tyranny.
Now in the last year we've done a very successful fundraiser of silver coins.
When you buy the coin you know that you are supporting the transmission and you get a historical memento so you can remember the great contribution you made to freedom.
Now, despite the fact that the coins are selling out, the last of the four coin series, Teddy Roosevelt, Man of the Arena, we're offering it for $30 off right now while supplies last at 1776coin.com.
And just like an NPR pledge drive where they mark up a coffee cup or a t-shirt or a DVD, 300%.
That's what we've done with this because it's a fundraiser.
But despite that, we're offering $30 off exclusively at $17.76 on WhatCoinsRemain.
Export Selection