Jan. 13, 2025 - Freedomain Radio - Stefan Molyneux
04:20
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| Men! | |
| Men! | |
| We are programmed to cock so that we can fuck. | |
| Right? | |
| Programmed to cock so that we can fuck. | |
| There are times in human history when eight females reproduced for every one man. | |
| Which is why women find 80% of men unattractive. | |
| There will never be enough super attractive men to go around for women, which is why women in general We're willing to share men, right? | |
| And they're doing that now, right? | |
| They're doing that now. | |
| Twice as many women are in relationships as men. | |
| The math is not complicated. | |
| Situationships is just, you speak for harem. | |
| Women are sharing men. | |
| Women are sharing men. | |
| So, men, are programmed to not disagree with women. | |
| Because if we disagree with women, they'll freeze you out and your genes die with you. | |
| And not only do you freeze her, will she freeze you out, but she'll say you're crazy, you're creepy, right? | |
| You're a weirdo. | |
| There's something off about him, something weird. | |
| He gives me the ick. | |
| Doesn't he give you the ick? | |
| She'll just program other women to reject you, which is why women plus state power is gynocentric tyranny. | |
| Men plus state power is fascistic tyranny, so I get it. | |
| But if you want to vet someone, I don't agree. | |
| Here's why. | |
| in any mean way, not in a hostile way or an aggressive way. | |
| So you just disagree. | |
| That's the only way to vet. | |
| Does that make sense? | |
| Just disagree. | |
| Just disagree. | |
| She will be very attracted to you if you disagree, unless she's a complete bully. | |
| Bye. | |
| Thank you. | |
| Yeah, and if she doesn't disagree with you on anything, that's also a red flag. | |
| Yes, for sure. | |
| Yes, for sure. | |
| When I confronted my former friend about abusing her husband, she gaslit me so hard, so that was fine because it was a clear sign to drop her entirely. | |
| Yes, but what you're not saying, you said she was a shapeshifter, so she usually gravitated around my opinions, I guess. | |
| I didn't see that side of her before, right? | |
| So I'm very glad you did this, and I'm really glad that you as a female brought this up, and I really appreciate you bringing this up. | |
| So what's missing is any sympathy for her husband. | |
| You're just like, oh my God, my friend was so crazy. | |
| I got away. | |
| I was really glad to get away. | |
| It was a good thing. | |
| I didn't see that, right? | |
| But what's missing is sympathy for her husband because, I don't know, did you circle back and give sympathy to the husband? | |
| Nope. | |
| Probably not, right? | |
| And again, I'm not criticizing. | |
| It's just that empathy for men is very hard for a lot of women, right? | |
| Empathy for men is very hard for a lot of women. | |
| Male suffering is suck it up and be a real man, right? | |
| Like, for women to have preferences is having standards. | |
| For men to have standards is being controlling and abusive, right? | |
| For a lot of times, right? | |
| Situationships where women don't know who else is in the harem. | |
| Yes, but they suspect, right? | |
| A woman says, that's something I love about my husband. | |
| He will actually disagree with me. | |
| It absolutely drives me up the wall sometimes, though. | |
| Otherwise, though, you eventually feel like you're in a relationship with yourself. | |
| Yeah, for sure. | |
| And you're being manipulated, right? | |
| Being overly agreeable. | |
| It's one of the most insidious forms of manipulation. | |
| What if she passes this vetting process, yet her family doesn't? | |
| Well, you talk to her about the contradiction between her values and her family's values, right? | |
| Is it good to be able to disagree with people and have rational conversations? | |
| Yes. | |
| Well, it doesn't seem to be the case with your family, so help me understand that, right? |
Export Selection