Skeptoid #685: Your Weirdest Thing, Vol. 1
I take a shot at critical analysis of your weirdest experiences. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
I take a shot at critical analysis of your weirdest experiences. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
|
Weird Things in Our Past
00:07:10
|
|
| Nearly all of us have some weird thing in our past. | |
| Something that we saw or experienced that seemed unbelievable at the time. | |
| Perhaps it's something we clung to and now look back on our own personal ghost experience, UFO sighting, or psychic connection. | |
| In today's episode, you've got a chance to tell me about it and give me an opportunity to point Skeptoid's skeptical eye at it and see if we can unravel what happened. | |
| And we're doing that right now on Skeptoid. | |
| Hi, I'm Alex Goldman. | |
| You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that. | |
| I'm doing something else now. | |
| I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed. | |
| On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them. | |
| Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind. | |
| No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you. | |
| That's HyperFixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia. | |
| Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com. | |
| You're listening to Skeptoid. | |
| I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com. | |
| Your weirdest thing, Volume 1. | |
| Rarely does a day go by that I don't receive an email from a random person describing a strange experience they've had and asking me for my take on it. | |
| This is not limited to woo-wists who believe their experience was unequivocally supernatural and intended to challenge me with it. | |
| Just as often, I hear from skeptics who are lucky enough to have witnessed something without an evident explanation. | |
| So, as I do from time to time, I sent a special invitation out to all of Skeptoid's premium members. | |
| If you are one, you probably read that email. | |
| And asked those of you with such experiences to share them on the show. | |
| Here they are. | |
| I do want to start with a preamble that applies to all of these. | |
| I wasn't there, and I'm therefore a terrible person to presume some kind of superior insight to what you experienced. | |
| And normally, I wouldn't. | |
| However, today's exercise is explicitly for me to offer my particular take on your stories, for what little it may or may not be worth. | |
| The imploding window. | |
| Let's begin with a creepy tale from England. | |
| This comes from premium member Phil, who did ghost hunting in college and was called to a local business. | |
| Having a look around the place, we decided that the most malevolent room was the one at the top floor of this business, and it was just full of personal effects and bric-a-brac and stuff which people had accumulated over years. | |
| And so we put a Hawthorne Cross in the corner and left for the day. | |
| And the next day, something had seriously happened. | |
| Well, the room was utterly and completely destroyed. | |
| This solid brass table smashed in half. | |
| A chair that had been next to it has shoved through the window, and most of the stuff just completely destroyed, really. | |
| But what was interesting, the challenging bit, was that the chair had been shoved through the window, and all the glass, and I mean all of it, had fallen inside the room, which would have been pretty difficult to do because the window only opened outwards. | |
| So, yeah, that one challenged me, and to this day still does. | |
| Maybe it's because I wasn't there because I'm not seeing a mystery. | |
| I can think of at least two ways to break the window like that. | |
| First, just throw something through it from the outside. | |
| Second, pop a small hole through it from inside and pull the rest inward. | |
| Perhaps other options might present if we had a look at the place. | |
| If someone has suggested that a ghost was involved here, I'm not seeing where that suggestion is coming from. | |
| I don't hear anything at all that excludes human intervention. | |
| And I expect that if you'd left a hidden camera inside, instead of just a cross, you'd have caught the culprit. | |
| It's never helpful to note the shopkeeper was a level-headed person and would never make something up. | |
| You and I, and most people, are level-headed, and people make things up all the time for all sorts of reasons, like gaining publicity for your shop. | |
| And on top of that, we know nothing about their friends and neighbors and mischievous little brothers, or what role some laughing unknown rap scallion might have had in this. | |
| The Dying Pope. | |
| Next, we have a common type of story. | |
| Several of you sent me essentially the same one, and I chose this one as a representative sample. | |
| It comes from listener David in Adelaide, who had met the Pope once when he'd been a young boy. | |
| Fast forward 17 years later, by this time I'm living in Australia, and one Sunday morning I woke up at 4 a.m. and just could not get back to sleep. | |
| When I turned on the morning news that day, it was reported that John Paul II had died at 7.30 the day before. | |
| Anyway, I worked out the time difference and that calculated to be 4 a.m. on the day that that day that I woke up and couldn't get back to sleep the exact same time the Holy Father ended his eternal sleep. | |
| So while this seems like a coincidence, so radically improbable that only some supernatural intervention could be behind it, mathematically, it's actually quite common. | |
| Let's estimate the average person wakes up early for no good reason about once a month. | |
| That gives a 1 in 30 chance that your one special famous person will die on a day you wake up early. | |
| With 7.7 billion people in the world, this will happen to about 256 million people. | |
| But let's narrow it down to the exact same time of day. | |
| Let's make that a five-minute margin of error. | |
| There are 288 five-minute blocks in a day. | |
| This means that about 891,000 people alive today will wake up on the same night and at the same time that their one special famous person dies. | |
| If you remove the restriction to just the one specific famous person you've met and include your own friends and family, this number multiplies enormously by the hundreds. | |
| We call this the law of large numbers in the same way that casinos will always make money, even giving out many jackpots. | |
| We require no supernatural explanation, even with so many people waking up at the exact same moment as their one particular famous person dies. | |
| So apologies to you, David, but your experience is not unusual. | |
|
Beyond Swamp Gas Theories
00:10:13
|
|
| Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure. | |
| Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship. | |
| This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit. | |
| We set sail from Málaga, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finish the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th. | |
| You'll enjoy a fascinating, skeptical mini-conference at sea. | |
| You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts. | |
| And Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop. | |
| We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port. | |
| This is a true sailing ship. | |
| You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails. | |
| You can even take the helm and steer. | |
| This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss. | |
| But cabins are selling fast, and this ship does always sell out. | |
| Act now, or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. | |
| Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com slash adventures. | |
| Hope to see you on board. | |
| That's skeptoid.com slash adventures. | |
| The splinted finger. | |
| Our next mystery comes from Kevin in Arcata, California. | |
| One day in fifth grade, I was sitting there, bored, as usual, and nothing better to do, so I looked at my hands and I looked at my middle finger on my right hand and I thought, my dad. | |
| And it wasn't because I wanted to flip him off or anything. | |
| I just thought, I don't know why, but I'm thinking of my dad and looking at my finger. | |
| When I went home that day, I walked in the kitchen and there was my dad. | |
| That finger on his right hand was in a splint. | |
| He had sprained it. | |
| That's all I know. | |
| Of course, this may have no relevance to your experience, but what you've just described has all the characteristics of the classic case of deja vu, which has been studied a lot, and we now have a pretty decent handle on what's going on. | |
| When a moment of deja vu is triggered, for example, when you came in and saw your dad with the splint, brain scans have shown that the decision-making centers of your brain are activated. | |
| The theory is that these moments are attention-grabbing because a tiny seizure or synaptic misfiring happens when the brain is attempting to correlate what it sees with relevant memories, resulting in a sort of perceptual double-take and force-feeding you a reconstructed memory. | |
| Innocuous and insignificant events like looking at your hand or thinking of your dad happen countless times a day to all of us, so we rarely form specific memories of them happening. | |
| In many of the cases studied, that moment of seeing the finger and thinking of dad turns out to be a distorted memory formed after the fact, possibly even completely false, which is 100% indistinguishable to you from an actual memory. | |
| And it makes no difference how certain you are that it happened. | |
| In fact, often researchers find that the memories we are most certain of turn out to be the least reliable. | |
| Now, obviously, there's no way to say that this is what happened in your case, so I'm not saying that. | |
| But without compelling evidence that this is not what happened, I'm afraid a skeptical memory researcher would not find your story to be especially compelling. | |
| The popular aliens. | |
| Here's a story from listener John. | |
| I saw a UFO on May 24th, 1966 in Hayward, Wisconsin. | |
| At a quarter of 10 at night, I was near my little fishing boat on the lake, and I got that feeling we all get where something is watching you. | |
| I looked up and saw a flying saucer above the treetops. | |
| It was silver and white with red lights near the center, and it made no sound. | |
| The lights were blinking, illuminating everything around me like a flashbulb camera. | |
| It wasn't swamp gas, I've seen that before. | |
| The object slowly rose up out of the trees and then accelerated into the stars and out of sight in a matter of seconds. | |
| I rushed in to tell my mother what I'd seen and the news was on. | |
| There were sights of similar things all over Minnesota, Wisconsin, and the Midwest. | |
| Later that year, on November 18, 1966, a military plane mysteriously crashed nearby. | |
| Is that what I saw? | |
| Experimental aircraft? | |
| Or just maybe, was it little green aliens on a joyride through space? | |
| The first thing I did when I heard this was to turn to the lists of mass UFO reports, and I didn't find anything from May 1966 in Wisconsin. | |
| I did find, however, that the month before, there was a popularly reported news item in which a pair of Ohio police officers pursued a probable weather balloon across two states. | |
| It's possible your mother was referring to that case because it had just been the talk of the town, or that memories conflated the two over the decades. | |
| You do bring up a pair of other points I'd like to address. | |
| First, your mention of swamp gas. | |
| Although UFologist J. Alan Hynek proposed this as an explanation for some UFO sightings, it was never an acceptable one. | |
| Under no naturally occurring conditions can swamp gas, basically methane, spontaneously ignite. | |
| And when swamp gas is burned in a lab, it flashes with a sudden green pop. | |
| It cannot, as Hynek suggested, form a glowing orb that produces a sustained light drifting through the sky. | |
| So I'm curious to know more about what you mean when you've seen it. | |
| Second, I'd like to address your proposed explanation of a military aircraft. | |
| Although this is one of the first solutions many people reach for when they hear of any strange-looking aircraft, it's just as bad as the swamp gas. | |
| From the entire 20th century history of experimental military aircraft, all of which are long since declassified, well known to the public, and now sitting in museums, not a single successful example differs substantially from a conventional aircraft's configuration and performance characteristics. | |
| But if you insist on going on to claim, without evidence, that there must have been a super-secret design consistent with a flying saucer that was so successful it remains classified today, then you're really just committing the logical fallacy of a special pleading. | |
| Your claim can't be disproven because it requires special knowledge not available to investigators. | |
| But even if this was true, which it's not, super-secret military aircraft are tested in secret at places like the National Classified Test Facility. | |
| They are never, ever, presented to the public by flying them in plain view outside of controlled airspace. | |
| In summary, a secret military aircraft is among the worst possible explanations for most UFO reports, as they share no common characteristics. | |
| What's missing from all of these stories, of course, is the actual explanation for what might have happened. | |
| In many cases, it's lost to memory and to history, and will likely never be known. | |
| Nevertheless, the exercise does have a valid purpose. | |
| It keeps our critical analysis skills limber and prepares us to more readily and effectively question the next weird thing. | |
| An inquisitive analytical shout-out to Skeptoid financial supporters Simon Matthews from Gosford, Australia, David Bullman, Michael Bigelow, and Michael Maris. | |
| Make sure you are representing in your cool Skeptoid t-shirts. | |
| Visit the store at skeptoid.com slash store. | |
| We've got all the colors, styles, and designs, all intended to call you out on the street as the skeptical person. | |
| And just wait to see the admiring gazes you'll draw. | |
| Get your skeptoid gear now at skeptoid.com slash store. | |
| You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program. | |
| I'm Brian Dunning from skeptoid.com. | |
| Hello, everyone. | |
| This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse. | |
| And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month. | |
| And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles. | |
| And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar. | |
| Why support Skeptoid? | |
| If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, premium is for you. | |
| If you want to support a worthwhile non-profit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today. | |
| Remember that skepticism is the best medicine. | |
| Next to giggling, of course. | |
| Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill. | |
| From PRX | |