All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
July 30, 2019 - Skeptoid
17:25
Skeptoid #686: Your Weirdest Thing, Vol. 2

I give my thoughts trying to solve some of your weirdest experiences. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Unpacking Strange Personal Experiences 00:02:06
This week we're continuing with part two of last week's show, where you, the listeners, send in your strangest personal experiences and put the ball in my court to see if I can help you figure out what really happened.
Maybe you have a ghost experience, or saw a Bigfoot, or witnessed a UFO.
Hopefully, I can help you unpack the tale and find an earthly explanation.
Hopefully.
We'll find out right now on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's HyperFixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Your Weirdest Thing, Volume 2.
Once again, I've visited the bottomless font of wonder by soliciting Skeptoid Premium members for their weirdest stories.
Today, we're going to hear a few of your mysterious experiences for the express purpose of me applying my personal powers of skeptical analysis, which will no doubt, in most cases, enrage you and turn you against me.
But as I've said before, if everyone agreed with my conclusions in every episode, it wouldn't be much of a show.
Anyway, this is an important exercise that we should all go through from time to time.
Follow the three C's, challenge the story as you heard it, consider alternate explanations, and conclude which one best fits the facts and what's known of the natural world.
The Brain's Synaptic Misfire 00:10:16
The Sizzling Bomber.
This comes from listener Ray, whose dad flew a B-25 in World War II.
He told me once that he had been flying around a thunderstorm.
There was a lot of St. Elmo's fire on the wings, and his co-pilot looked over his shoulder and said, Rags!
Rags, look!
And there on the floor behind the pilot and co-pilot seat in a B-25, it's a kind of aluminum sill, was a ball about the size of a softball.
He called it ball lightning.
It was spitting and sparking and rolled slowly from one side of the aluminum sill to the other side before it popped and disappeared in a flash.
That was his encounter with ball lightning.
And I know that science says there is no such thing, but I was wondering if you could give me your take on it.
I think two things are going on here.
First, it's not quite accurate that science says there is no such thing.
As you probably know from episode 192, which was all about ball lightning, the science on this is highly fragmented.
While it's true that no empirical evidence for ball lightning exists, many scientists have proposed hypotheses to explain it.
Here are the four points I make in the episode.
One, ball lightning is not reproducible in the lab.
Microwave oven plasma doesn't count.
All known forms of electrical discharge are.
Two, there's no standard description of what ball lightning looks like or how it behaves.
Reports of its color, its size, its speed, its sound, the conditions under which it appears, its behavior, its shape, and its duration are all over the map.
Three, not a single photograph or video of ball lightning exists that is considered reliable and not otherwise explainable.
And four, electromagnetic theory makes no prediction that anything like ball lightning need exist.
It does predict all known forms of electrical discharge.
And when you read any of the hypotheses proposed, and even presented as definitive on sources like Wikipedia, they clearly don't apply to the vast majority of reports.
All rely on theoretical conditions never actually observed in nature, and they're all usually from scientists working outside their field.
The second thing I think of when I hear your dad's story is that it's the same as the one ball lightning story that's by far the most often repeated and dramatized on television.
The account of radio astronomer Roger Jenison published in 1969.
Virtually any article or film about ball lightning retells Jenison's story, which is essentially identical to your dad's.
For my money, the chances that these recollections of your dad's 75-year-old story have been colored by these pop culture dramatizations are too high to give much credence to the details you think you remember.
Also, Jennison was a big believer in dowsing in addition to ball lightning, so take his stories with a grain of salt, as you should all stories.
The teapot trance.
This creepy case is from Max in England.
One strange thing that happened to me many years ago when I was about 19, I had a dream one night that I was at work making some tea and all of a sudden it became very dark in the office because of the clouds going across the sun, as sometimes happens.
And a colleague, a work colleague who was in the office, leant towards the window and said, oh, it's gone very dark out there.
About three days later, I was at work making tea in the side room, as in the dream.
Suddenly the floor went dark and I thought, this is very familiar.
And my colleague leant forward, looked out the window, and said, oh, it's gone very dark out there.
Exactly as I dreamt it.
It was very, very unusual.
It wasn't deja vu.
I've had deja vu plenty of times.
It's a very curious sensation.
It wasn't anything like that.
I seem to literally dream of the future.
Never been able to explain it.
Possibly, well, all I can really say is coincidence.
Very odd.
For those of you who heard last week's episode, you might be saying to yourself that this sounds very familiar to Kevin's story, in which he saw his dad with a splinted finger and suddenly realized that he'd had a strange thought of a finger and his dad earlier that day.
Seemingly too much of a coincidence.
The reason I wanted to include another example of a story that's substantially identical is to make the point that even with the relatively small sample size of premium skeptoid members whom I invited to contribute stories, we're still likely to receive duplicates because some of these phenomena that seem extraordinary are actually common.
But a quick repeat for those who may not have heard it.
I talked about some of the research done on deja vu, the familiar phenomenon where you suddenly get the feeling that you've experienced something previously.
What seems clear is that, according to the research, what probably happened to you is that your brain, in the normal course of processing your colleague making tea, experienced some type of synaptic misfire when it was seeking out similar memories to compare against the current perception, as it's always doing.
Your brain likely constructed a false memory using similar, but not necessarily identical, actual memories.
Your memory of that dream may not have existed until the moment of deja vu in the office.
And once it did, it became as real to you as all your other memories.
And probably no one could convince you that you didn't actually have that dream, at least not the way you remember it now.
Brains are awesome and also freaky.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding together.
Get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
The Flaming Tree.
Here is a mystical tale from Premium Member Dave Lucas.
A few years ago, my sister and brother-in-law were on a jungle safari during a holiday in Borneo.
Suddenly, the animal chatter from the trees fell strangely silent.
They then spotted a curious light in the treetops in the little distance.
They describe it as resembling a football-sized ball of burning rubber on a high bough, with small flaming drips drawing from it.
My brother-in-law tried to capture it through the viewfinder of his video camera, but although he got a fix on the tree, the object itself was not visible through the viewfinder.
When they asked the guide what it was, he told them to change the subject and that he would tell them tomorrow.
The following morning, he explained that they had seen the Mondal, the spirit of the forest.
The spirit would grow angry if anyone were to talk about it the same day they saw it and cursed them with bad luck.
Skeptoid has dealt with strange lights, which, as I recall, were manifestations of a mirage effect.
Might this be something similar?
And is a silence of the animals connected?
It's true that in Borneo, such beliefs in forest spirits are commonplace.
And it's not just the one you named.
There are many such spirits, or hantu.
When in the forest, behave as a respectful guest in someone else's home.
Don't be loud, obnoxious, irreverent.
Don't take anything or talk about them.
Go with someone the spirits are likely to recognize.
If you trouble the spirits, they'll follow you and you may have an accident or get lost.
The guide's warning was consistent with a common and deep-rooted tradition.
So really, your friends could have said or done just about anything, and they would have received this admonition from the guide.
His remarks say nothing about whatever they may have seen in the tree.
He just said the same thing whether they'd tripped over a log, called out loudly to one another, or just rudely pointed their camera around the forest.
So, what did they see?
I've no idea at all, and wouldn't presume to speculate from a single third-hand anecdote, which, by the time it's gotten to me and my interpretation, is sufficiently distorted from their original perception that I know it's pointless to hypothesize.
Sorry if that's anticlimactic, but it's the only honest answer I can give.
Why You Can't See Your Keys 00:02:20
The invisible keys.
This next one comes from listener Kent Neal.
I always place my car keys in the same location when I come in, on the counter next to the phone.
Not too long ago, I went to get my keys and they weren't there.
This was puzzling, and I proceeded to look at any and all other places I might have put them, including in the car.
They weren't there after a fruitless search where I looked many times at the spot where they always were placed.
I wasn't ready to give up, and I went back one last time, and there they were, on the counter, next to the phone.
They had obviously been there the entire time.
Even though I had looked directly at that spot at least six or eight times, I didn't see them.
That's my unusual occurrence.
If I might contradict you, it's a very common occurrence.
There are many different types of agnosias, which are inabilities to identify objects we see.
Most types of agnosia are associated with neurological problems, but some aren't and can happen to anyone.
Looking for needed items, like keys or glasses, but not seeing them, are among the most frequently reported.
Such agnosias are related to inattentional blindness, which is when we don't notice something obvious in our field of vision because our attention is distracted toward other things.
The famous invisible gorilla experiment is a familiar example of this.
There are basically two throttles controlling your likelihood to notice the keys when you're looking right at them.
First is your attention level.
If you're running around stressed because you're late to an appointment, part of your attention is diverted to thinking about that appointment.
Second is a key area of study in this phenomenon, and that's at what point in the brain's processing of a visual scene items will be consciously perceived.
Some evidence suggests early on.
Some evidence suggests later after all the processing is complete.
Thus, the inability to see your keys when you're looking right at them may be due to how much you're distracted by the reason you need them, or by what point in your brain's processing of the scene it tells you keys, and probably by some combination of the two.
Remember Skepticism Is Best Medicine 00:02:38
Next time it happens, realize what just happened and take a moment to appreciate how totally awesome science is.
Now, obviously, I probably didn't solve anyone's mysteries today, but that's okay because the solution is not as important as the process.
So long as we keep our minds open to the possibility that science may offer a solution to life's mysteries, and we embrace the process of accepting and evaluating evidence, no weird story will ever remain ultimately out of our grasp.
A great big Skeptoid shout out to premium financial supporters, the John A. Wasser and Robin B. Humes Foundation, PPR Masked, James Owen, and an entity designated Arthwallopot.
And remember, not everyone listens to podcasts, so to share Skeptoid with some people, you're going to need to get them the books.
You can find the Skeptoid book series either online wherever books are sold, or get autographed copies at skeptoid.com slash store, where you can also find t-shirts and whatever swag you're looking for.
Skeptoid.com slash store.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrienne Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double-doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection