Skeptoid #684: Starlite, the Magical Mystery Material
The real reasons for the disappearance of this amateur material said to be able to withstand even a nuclear blast. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
The real reasons for the disappearance of this amateur material said to be able to withstand even a nuclear blast. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
|
Starlight: The Suppressed Miracle
00:07:15
|
|
| I don't want to shock anyone here, but believe it or not, on the internet are claims that somebody made an amazing discovery, which was then suppressed by the government, or by corporations, or by the man, or something. | |
| One of these was an amazing material called Starlight, history's greatest fire retardant, suppressed into obscurity. | |
| Today we're going to find out what Starlight actually was and what it could actually do. | |
| Or not do. | |
| And we're going to do that right now on Skeptoid. | |
| Hi, I'm Alex Goldman. | |
| You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that. | |
| I'm doing something else now. | |
| I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed. | |
| On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them. | |
| Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind. | |
| No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you. | |
| That's HyperFixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia. | |
| Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com. | |
| You're listening to Skeptoid. | |
| I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com. | |
| Starlight, the magical mystery material. | |
| It was said to resist nuclear explosions, the most powerful laser beams, and any amount of heat. | |
| It was cheap and easy to make, with countless applications throughout both safety and industry, and could have earned billions for its inventor. | |
| Yet this incredible material called Starlight is nowhere to be found today, and internet pundits charge that it was suppressed or stolen by the biggest corporations. | |
| What is the true history of Starlight, and why is its humble inventor not renowned as one of our greatest? | |
| Morris Ward was a hairdresser in North Yorkshire, England. | |
| Although he had no training or education in chemistry or material science, he used to like to experiment with new formulations for hair coloring, which he did quite successfully by all accounts. | |
| He was also intensely interested in fire protection and mixed up various compounds until he came upon one that seemed to meet all his goals. | |
| Named Starlight by Ward's granddaughter, the compound was a white powder to which PVA glue is added to create a desired consistency. | |
| PVA is polyvinyl acetate glue, a common and relatively safe glue similar to familiar Elmers or wood glue. | |
| Ward had a few fits and starts showing it off to people he knew, always with the same demonstration. | |
| He took a raw egg, plastered it over with starlight, and pointed a blowtorch at it for several minutes. | |
| Then he'd ask someone to pick it up, who found it perfectly cool to the touch, and crack it open, showing that the egg was still raw. | |
| It hadn't been cooked at all, being perfectly protected by that thin coating of starlight. | |
| Finally, Ward's big break came. | |
| In 1990, the BBC television show Tomorrow's World did a segment on Starlight, performing the exact same egg trick and promising that the material would revolutionize everything from the military to commercial and space travel. | |
| Sir Ronald Mason, a retired former chief scientific advisor to the Ministry of Defense, saw the show and decided to join Ward in the Starlight project. | |
| Through his connections, Mason was able to arrange some tests by the UK's Defense Research Agency. | |
| These included hitting it with high-powered lasers at the Atomic Weapons Establishment in Falness and at the Royal Signals and Radar Establishment in Malvern, plus a trip under NATO auspices to the White Sands Missile Range in the United States, where it was subjected to extreme heat simulating that from a nuclear explosion. | |
| Ward and Mason reported that Starlight withstood all of these. | |
| Glowing reports in hand, they set out to commercialize it as the newest miracle product. | |
| A barrage of press releases in 1993 resulted in articles in respected publications such as Business Week and Jane's International Defense Review, which trumpeted these positive results. | |
| They soon found another champion, a man named Rudy Naranho, an engineering manager at NASA. | |
| In 1997, Naranho directed their major subcontractor, Boeing, to perform a series of tests on Starlight to see if it might be useful to NASA. | |
| These tests, the results of which are detailed in a 33-page report, were conducted in December 1997 at two Boeing facilities and considered three potential applications using about 15 various formulations of Starlight. | |
| The first test was resistance to lasers, and it was found that most Starlight variants performed as well as existing materials. | |
| The conclusion from this phase of testing is that Starlight has successfully demonstrated proof of concept for resisting high-energy lasers. | |
| The second was as a fire and thermal barrier, and again, most Starlight formulations performed as well as existing materials. | |
| The conclusion from this phase of testing is that Starlight has successfully demonstrated proof of concept as a fire and thermal barrier. | |
| The third application was as a flame-proof liner for airliner cargo bays, and here it stumbled a bit. | |
| Only some formulations worked, and then only when applied much more thickly than conventional materials. | |
| The conclusion from this phase of testing is that Starlight has only partially demonstrated proof of concept as a cargo bay liner protectant, and that further testing is required to achieve full demonstration. | |
| Nevertheless, following the Boeing tests, there appeared a four-page memo on NASA Stationery, purportedly written by Naranjo, that gives Starlight the highest praise imaginable. | |
| This memo is widely available online and is waived by Starlight's advocates at every turn. | |
| However, the NASA memo is where the Starlight story ended. | |
| Ward never managed to sell Starlight to Boeing or NASA or anyone else. | |
| He never gave away the formula, and when he died in 2011, it's said the secret died with him. | |
| Today, that secret is with StarlightTechnologies.org, a guy who says Ward shared the formula with him before he died, and he now wants Ward's daughters to, quote, realize the dream of Starlight. | |
| His website is a collage of Bible verses, random music videos from YouTube, a completely empty crowdfunding campaign, and ranting conspiracy theories. | |
|
Ward's Secret and the Ship Adventure
00:02:54
|
|
| Starlight is the most important invention of all time that you have never heard of. | |
| Stolen by the Boeing company, NASA, and the FAA. | |
| Media organizations have refused to investigate and tell the story for over 10 years. | |
| Another company, Thermoshield, also makes similar claims about having obtained the formula from Ward's family. | |
| Their website's a bit cleaner. | |
| In fact, throughout YouTube and the rest of the internet, you can find similar conspiratorial claims. | |
| Ward is often afforded a sort of mystical superhero status, like that given to Nikola Tesla by alternative science believers. | |
| The starlighttechnologies.org guy calls Ward's failed attempts to sell Starlight the biggest David vs. Goliath story of all time. | |
| Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure. | |
| Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship. | |
| This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit. | |
| We set sail from Málaga, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finished the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th. | |
| You'll enjoy a fascinating skeptical mini-conference at sea. | |
| You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts and Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop. | |
| We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port. | |
| This is a true sailing ship. | |
| You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails. | |
| You can even take the helm and steer. | |
| This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss. | |
| But cabins are selling fast and this ship does always sell out. | |
| Act now or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. | |
| Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com slash adventures. | |
| Hope to see you on board. | |
| That's skeptoid.com slash adventures. | |
| I'll let you in on where my head was when I began to research the Starlight story. | |
| After reading everything, I found Ward's to be a familiar story. | |
| A lone amateur inventor, working in isolation with no collaboration from relevant experts, claims an incredible discovery beyond the abilities of all the world's top scientists. | |
|
Why Starlight Is Fake
00:07:07
|
|
| But some conspiracy of powerful corporations suppresses it and prevents him from realizing any profit. | |
| Most specifically, I was thinking of the old hemp conspiracy theory. | |
| The claim here, promoted mainly by marijuana enthusiasts, was that industrial hemp was a superior raw material from which to manufacture virtually any kind of product. | |
| So all the big chemical companies conspired to have it banned. | |
| The truth, however, as discussed in Skeptoid number 401, is that the tiny amount of industrial hemp grown is due not to any conspiracy, but simply to the fact that it isn't all that useful of a product. | |
| There are better alternatives for every potential application. | |
| This guided my expectation of where I thought the Starlight story might lead, if every big chemical company in the world turned down Ward's invention. | |
| I expected to find out early on that Starlight simply wasn't very exceptional. | |
| That is, of course, exactly what came out in the Boeing report. | |
| A few formulations occasionally performed better than conventional materials. | |
| Most at best matched their performance, and others failed. | |
| It's noteworthy that in the version of the Boeing report available online at starlighttechnologies.org, only 23 of its 33 numbered pages are included. | |
| What's missing and why? | |
| There are other reasons we shouldn't be surprised that Boeing did not recommend Starlight to NASA for anything, besides its failure to outperform existing materials. | |
| Ward was apparently perversely paranoid about Starlight. | |
| He never discussed its ingredients. | |
| He refused to patent it due to the requirement to list its ingredients. | |
| He refused to leave samples with Boeing, which would have allowed the required more comprehensive testing. | |
| He also insisted on maintaining at least 51% ownership and refused to consider licensing, and is frequently on record saying Starlight was worth multiple billions of dollars. | |
| If he was demanding billions of dollars while refusing to let anyone know what it was, it's little surprise his sales went nowhere. | |
| Moreover, the basic ingredients were never hard for knowledgeable people to divine. | |
| Besides the PVA glue, lots of guys on YouTube have replicated the egg demonstration with ingredients as simple as cornstarch and baking soda, or even just powdered sugar. | |
| Mick West, on his website Metabunk, showed video of a number of such tests he did himself and concluded, The egg thing is absolutely a party trick. | |
| Pretty much any white paste you apply to an egg will protect it from cooking for three minutes. | |
| In 2018, Ward's daughters brought a sample to material scientist Mark Miyadovnik at University College London for a BBC video. | |
| He put their starlight to the torch and explained how such materials work. | |
| Starlight is a paint, like a white viscous liquid. | |
| Once it's set hard, you apply a heat and we applied a blowtorch to it. | |
| The material itself chars and becomes carbon, and that then becomes this expanding foam of carbon. | |
| Now, carbon is a very high melting point material. | |
| It's incredibly thermally resistant. | |
| And so you have this very low-density foam made of a very high temperature-resistant material. | |
| Such paints are called intumescent paint, and they've been around and been used for fire protection for a long time. | |
| The first one was patented in 1948. | |
| Morris Ward may have developed a fine one, but by no means was it revolutionary. | |
| However, we do have cause for concern that Ward's Starlight may have been even less than that. | |
| Recall that NASA memo, the four pages on NASA stationery, addressed to nobody, signed by nobody, but giving the most grandiloquent sales pitch in history, stating that Starlight has, quote, the potential to revolutionize contemporary warfare, modern industry, commercial transportation, even the space program. | |
| Well, it turns out that memo is fake. | |
| We know this because actual NASA memos do spell National Aeronautics and Space Administration correctly on their letterhead. | |
| This one's missing an S. | |
| And they use the actual NASA logo called the meatball insignia, not a slightly off, mocked-up version with a font that's not even close. | |
| The actual meatball insignia is so widely available online that it's hard to grasp how someone could have faked this so badly. | |
| But the main point is, it's fake. | |
| This letter did not come from NASA, and whoever created it tried to deceive us into thinking that it did. | |
| This gives us cause for grave skepticism about all the other documents used to support the Starlight story, including the Boeing report. | |
| Excluding documents that come from the various Starlight websites, I found only a single reference to anyone from Boeing mentioning it. | |
| It was a 2002 interview with Alan Atkins, then a vice president at Boeing Phantomworks, published in the Tennessee Tech quarterly Visions, and even it does not mention Starlight by name. | |
| Discussing a variety of fireproofing technologies Boeing had looked at, Atkins said, We coated an egg with a layer of material about the thickness of peanut butter you'd put on a sandwich. | |
| Then we put a blowtorch to it for a couple of minutes until it glowed red. | |
| Immediately after the flame was removed, you could hold the egg in your hand, and when we broke the egg open, it was still raw. | |
| No lasers, no simulated nuclear blasts, no cargo bay liner tests. | |
| Just the party trick with the egg. | |
| I'm sad that the Starlight story ended in such disappointment. | |
| Now, I don't doubt that Ward created a capable intumescent coating. | |
| And I don't doubt that at least some of the tests described actually did take place. | |
| Maybe all of them did. | |
| However, after so many red flags, I have grave concerns about the reported results of all the tests. | |
| And it seems all such reports trace back to the Starlight people themselves. | |
| There's every reason to believe Ward was absolutely sincere in his desire to protect people from fire, and every reason to believe he had a natural gift for chemistry and materials science. | |
| But as for the Starlight product itself, it probably deserves no special mention in the history of fire protection, so much as it does in the annals of urban legendary. | |
|
Premium Support for Skeptics
00:01:54
|
|
| And a great big legendary shout out to Skeptoid Premium supporters Chuck Villa, Peter Graham, Ray in Redlands, and Pete Wilson. | |
| If you're not a premium member but you still want to help, please take two minutes to give us a review on iTunes or the podcast portal of your choice. | |
| People don't do this often enough, but it actually is an important part of the fragile podcasting ecosystem. | |
| So if you can't write a check, write a review instead. | |
| It truly will help bring new listeners to the show. | |
| You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program. | |
| I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com. | |
| Hello, everyone. | |
| This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and moose. | |
| And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month. | |
| And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles. | |
| And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar. | |
| Why support Skeptoid? | |
| If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you. | |
| If you want to support a worthwhile non-profit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the teacher's toolkit, then sign up today. | |
| Remember that skepticism is the best medicine. | |
| Next to giggling, of course. | |
| Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill. | |
| From PRX. | |