Sean Hannity Show - The Maine Problem - May 27th, Hour 3

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 28, 2025 - Sean Hannity Show

33:49

The Maine Problem - May 27th, Hour 3

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is an iHeart Podcast.
	You want smart political talk without the meltdowns?
	We got you.
	I'm Carol Markovich.
	And I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
	We've been around the block in media and we're doing things differently.
	Normally is about real conversations.
	Thoughtful, try to be funny, grounded, and no panic.
	We'll keep you informed and entertained without ruining your day.
	Join us every Tuesday and Thursday normally on the iHeartRadio app Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcast.
	I'm Ben Ferguson.
	And I'm Ted Cruz.
	Three times a week we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
	Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
	Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
	And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
	We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
	So Dow, verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
	What I told people, I was making a podcast about Benghazi.
	Nine times out of ten, they called me a masochist, rolled their eyes, or just asked why.
	Benghazi, the truth became a web of lies.
	From Prologue Projects and Pushkin Industries, this is Fiasco Benghazi.
	What difference at this point does it make?
	Listen to Fiasco Benghazi on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
	Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
	All right, news roundup and information overload hour.
	Toll-free, our number is 800-941 Sean.
	If you want to be a part of the uh program, well, the left-wing Democrats, they can't help themselves.
	I guess they really can, but they choose not to, but they are who they are, and I don't think they're going to change too much.
	And anyway, the issue of of trans uh athletes or men playing women's sports, they are now the champions of.
	And if you remember, President Trump got into a little bit of a confrontation with the with the governor of Maine, Governor Mills, over this issue, and here's how that went down.
	Is it Maine here?
	The governor of Maine.
	Are you uh not going to comply with it?
	I'm complying with state and federal laws.
	Well, I'm we are the federal law.
	Well, you better do it.
	You better do it because you're not going to get any federal funding at all if you don't.
	And by the way, your population, even though it's liberal, although I did very well there, uh, your population doesn't want men playing in women's sports.
	So you better comp you better comply because otherwise you're not getting any any federal funding.
	See what every state good, I'll see you in court.
	I look forward to that.
	That should be a real easy one.
	And enjoy your life after governor, because I don't think you'll be in elected politics.
	Ouch.
	And then of course, Gavin Newsom talks to Charlie Kirk.
	Oh, I'm uh not for men uh playing women's sports, but we've got the tape, and here's what he had said at the time.
	Turns out in 2014, years before I was governor, there was a law established that established the legal principles that allow the uh allow trans athletes in women's sports.
	Um, but the issue of fairness is completely judged.
	It is an issue of fairness, and I think Democrats have thank you for what you did on civil rights for students in our schools, transgender rights in this state.
	Oh, of course, you know, Gavin just flips some flops and flails because he wants to live at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
	Now, you might remember the case of a Laurel Libby, state legislator from Maine, won her case by the way, and her role in Maine politics with the help of the Supreme Court ruling in her favor, but she's still struggling to do her job for her constituents because some people in Maine's legislature do not want to hear from her, and she's also had plenty to say about why the Democrats cannot connect with today's generation.
	Um, but anyway, uh we appreciate you being with us, Laurel Libby.
	Thank you.
	And uh, you know, you decided to stand up and protect girls' sports, and and you are ostracized, and I guess remain ostracized, and you reminded your state what Title IX was all about in the first place, and they were supposed to respond by rejecting your right to voice your opinion.
	I mean, this is this is the modern day left today.
	That is modern day left.
	Thankfully, the Supreme Court has ruled that the legislature has to count my vote now while the case is pending.
	And so I am still not able to speak in the main house, but I am allowed to vote on behalf of my constituents at this point.
	I mean, I just can't believe what is their rationale for not letting you speak.
	Well, I I was censured three months ago, and uh their rationale was that I uh shared a picture of a minor.
	Now, of course, this was a picture that had been um shared publicly already.
	And if I had shared the post in celebration of a biological male winning a state championship in the female category, then uh that post would have been celebrated as well.
	But the fact is that uh it highlighted a policy that's not popular with Mainers.
	And so in political retaliation, I was censured, and my ability to vote and speak on the floor on behalf of my constituents was taken.
	So we have two issues that have come out today.
	AB Hernandez a male high school athlete identifying as a female continues to make waves in the track and field world.
	Hernanda is a name you may be familiar with, uh took first place in both the long jump and triple jump at the California Interscholastic Federation Southern Section Masters meet over the weekend.
	And by doing so, Hernandez qualified for both events for next weekend state championships.
	And anyways, this individual's uh uh I guess a junior, and those latest accomplishments could be enough to start netting him college scholarship offers in women's track and field made possible by the fact that the biological male recently amended his birth certificate to reflect his change to the paltry sum of $23.
	And anyway, an organization also that works to protect fairness, safety, and equal opportunity for women and girls' sports is suing various officials in the state of Minnesota for allowing boys to compete against girls in sporting events there, and the Alliance defending freedom,
	female athletes united, uh you know, names the attorney general Keith Ellison and and others, and the official policy of Minnesota High State High School League, which governs high school athletics in the state, is to allow students to compete based on their stated gender identity without regards to sex.
	So this obviously is still continuing, and Democrats continue to champion it.
	What's your reaction to that?
	Yeah, it's absolutely completely unfair and discriminates against our young women who have worked so hard for years trying to excel in in their different fields and to have uh biological male boys swoop in and take their place because that's exactly what is happening.
	They're being pushed aside um so that a boy can uh can swoop in and take their podiums, take their medals, take their scholarships.
	It is completely unfair.
	And we've heard that from Gavin Newsom.
	Unfortunately, he's not backed that up with any action in support of women and girls.
	Uh, but that's what we need to see state by state.
	And thankfully um we are seeing individual school districts uh step up, whether we're talking about Maine or Washington or other states, and uh declare that they're going to go by Title IX rather than allowing this woke policy to persist.
	But uh folks need to stand up and say no more.
	Well, I appreciate your win in the Supreme Court.
	The idea that you cannot speak on behalf of of your constituents and they're silencing you is beyond troubling to me.
	Is there not anybody in in that chamber that you work in in Maine willing to stand up for you and stand with you and support your right to speak?
	You know, I I wish that there were.
	Um I just got my right to speak back last Thursday, and just today uh am having uh the right to to vote on specific bills challenged by even my own party when Republicans wouldn't support a roll call um on a bill that I requested today.
	So now ongoing challenges from both the left and the right in the main house chamber.
	And what is the reaction among your constituents in this case?
	You know, my constituents uh are thankful, as am I, that I am able to vote on their behalf.
	It's been a long three months.
	They have not had representation.
	They've been completely disenfranchised uh by the Democrat majority issuing this censure and declaring that I couldn't speak or vote on their behalf, but they're also eager for me to have my voice back and to be able to speak on their behalf.
	Uh in our case is pending on June 5th.
	We'll have um a hearing before the First Circuit Court of Appeals, and I'm hopeful that they'll uphold the Constitution uh in my constituents' right to representation and my right to the First Amendment uh right to free speech, and that this will be struck down.
	But this is also unprecedented, and as much as you have all four active federal judges in Maine, all four of them recuse themselves from hearing your lawsuit against the main house speaker.
	Why did they recuse themselves?
	Uh the mother of the biological mail, the boy that won the state championship here in Maine that I posted about, uh, that young man's mother apparently works for the court.
	And so uh the judges were accused themselves because of um it's that that close relationship with that employee, and my case was moved to uh Rhode Island where it was heard, and and then when we lost there, we've moved again to the First Circuit Court of Appeals and are looking forward to having our day in court on June 5th.
	It really is unbelievable.
	What did you make of this this news that came out over the weekend?
	Some what, 20 million dollars a plan to study the syntax of young men to win their votes over?
	I mean, what was your reaction to that?
	I mean, it made me laugh.
	I mean, it chuckled.
	I chuckled to myself, or the idea that somehow Tim Walls was chosen as as the as the white guy to you know be able to talk pro talk with people is laughable to me, but it I mean that's that's what happened.
	But Democrats wrote, you know, 20 million dollars plot to win over young male voters, uh doesn't sound very authentic to me.
	No, it it certainly does not sound very authentic.
	And if you're in a position where you have to uh buy the next generation's vote, you may want to consider that perhaps the policies that you're advocating for, um economic to social policies and everything in between.
	Perhaps you should reconsider uh what you stand for if the next generation is saying we don't want that, rather than trying to buy their vote.
	Yeah, the plan was called Sam, which is short for speaking with American men a strategic plan and a promised investment to study the syntax, language, and content that gains attention and and in and uh virality in these spaces, and the plan recommends buying advertisements and video games and noted above all we must shift from a moralizing tone.
	I mean uh oh, let me uh hi bro.
	How are you?
	What's going on, dude?
	What's up, man?
	How are you?
	What's happening with you?
	I mean, w we have to have a lesson in how to be a person.
	You know, AI can go a long way, but I don't think it can uh help shift the failed Democrat policies to win over the next generation, and certainly not the folks who are um playing video games by bringing in uh any kind of uh fake, you know, they're looking for authenticity.
	The next generation is looking for authenticity, and they can tell uh authenticity from not.
	And that's what's shifting folks away from the Democrat Party.
	Uh buying advertisements in uh video games is not gonna get them anywhere.
	I don't think so.
	Well, we appreciate your fight.
	Sorry you have to live through this, and I am very grateful to hear that your constituents support you because we need more people like you that are willing to get in the fight and engage in the fight, even though you treated so unfairly.
	And I I hope the courts rightly reverse this this travesty, this constitutional travesty in this case.
	And we appreciate you coming on and we wish you the best of luck.
	Thank you so much.
	All right, Laurel Libby, 800 941 Sean is a number if you want to be a part of the program.
	Hey there, I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
	And I'm Carol Markowitz.
	We've been in political media for a long time.
	Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
	That's why we started normally a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
	We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
	We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
	So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional fashion.
	You're our kind of people.
	Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday.
	On the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen.
	I'm Ben Ferguson.
	And I'm Ted Cruz.
	Three times a week, we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
	Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
	Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes, inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
	And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
	We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
	So down a verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
	What I told people, I was making a podcast about Benghazi.
	Nine times out of ten, they called me a masochist, rolled their eyes, or just asked why.
	It's almost a dirty word.
	One that connotes conspiracy theory.
	Will we ever get the truth about the Benghazi massacre?
	Bad faith, political warfare, and frankly, bullshit.
	We kill the ambassador just to cover something up.
	You put two and two together.
	Was it an overblown distraction or a sinister conspiracy?
	Benghazi is a rosetta stone for everything that's been going on for the last 20 years.
	I'm Leon Mayfock from Prologue Projects and Pushkin Industries.
	This is Fiasco Benghazi.
	What difference at this point does it make?
	Yeah, that's right.
	Locker up.
	Listen to Fiasco Benghazi on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
	Uh, we have somebody calling themselves Coach from the great state of Texas.
	God bless Texas.
	What's up, coach?
	How are you?
	Are you a coach?
	Yes, sir.
	Well, not anymore.
	What do you co- what do you coach?
	Well, I coached uh football, basketball.
	I coached both my daughters in sports.
	I played sports forever.
	I'm luckily I'm retired now because if I was in the school district right now, I would be risking my career because I'm first of all I'm pissed off, number one.
	And you have to question the last segment.
	How much is enough?
	I don't know if that was rhetorical, but I have an answer.
	How much is enough?
	I've identified three things that are gonna have to happen to kill this.
	Has nothing to do with legislation or funding.
	One, they need to somebody has to step up and out absurd the absurd.
	Bring me Mike Tyson and women's boxing, bring me Lamarad James in basketball, give me a male famous player and girl.
	And that will end it.
	That's one way.
	Number two, sadly, somebody's probably gonna have to die.
	And I hope it doesn't go that way, but we're getting closer and closer.
	God, I hope I hope not.
	I mean, you had the one volleyball player that was pretty severely injured.
	And it it's just about physicality.
	And I think Caitlin Jetter said it best.
	When she said, I don't care what your hormone levels are when you're 18, 19, 20, what were your hormone levels at puberty?
	And then you have this whole concept of puberty blockers.
	Then you have another concept where where kids can literally get this type of treatment without parental consent, which is a major problem for me because as a parent, you're not a potted plant.
	And I believe in parental rights.
	So I mean it it's a multifaceted issue.
	But it's not to me, it's not about the biology.
	If you look at any game or any sport that's ever been played or ever will be played, it's gotta be fun, it's gotta be fair, it's gotta be three of danger, a three F is what I call it.
	So the the man playing in the women's sport, let's just call it what it is.
	It removes all three.
	It's no fun, it's no fair, and now we're in danger.
	It's gonna take a serious injury or death, sadly, to make this stop.
	I hope it does I hope it doesn't come to that, Coach.
	I really do.
	I'd hate to see that happen.
	And it's preventable.
	And it's just but what is amazing to me is in spite of public offen opinion so strongly against this, the Democrats are clinging to this as their issue, just like they cling to you know, defending the rights of illegals over the safety of Americans, like they cling to the notion that it is a constitutional crisis to cut out waste fraud and abuse in government spending.
	It's like they could they wouldn't even stand for mothers that lost their children.
	This is a party that is really, really gone astray, and they've lost, you know, any moral compass or moral clarity or common sense in their lives.
	Uh maybe it's a good thing if you don't want them to win, but you know what?
	They're not gonna give up fighting.
	They're not.
	They're gonna try and take your stove, take your air conditioner, take your refrigerator, you know, put a car in your driveway that you don't want and not give you freedom.
	And then promise a cradle to grave womb to tomb society that will never materialize.
	Anyway, my friend, 800-941 Sean is our number if you want to be a part of the program.
	All right, quick break, right back.
	We'll get to your calls 800-941 Sean as we continue today.
	Anyway, 800-941 Sean, if you want to be a part of the program.
	I mean, it is clear the left is not going to change.
	I mentioned earlier they want to want you to climate proof your memorial day.
	And electric grills are a climate-friendly option.
	There's nothing cleaner burning than natural gas.
	Nothing cleaner.
	It makes zero sense.
	They don't care.
	But that's that's the left today.
	You know, Mike Rose said something that was very, very interesting, and I like him a lot.
	He did the dirty job series.
	He also uh is on uh uh my favorite show, Deadliest Catch.
	I love that show.
	Just love that show.
	You know, I donated the money.
	He never, he still has never sent me my poster autographed by the captains of that show.
	Can you believe that?
	What's up with Mike?
	Anyway, he's highlighting how there is a lack of consequences that could be leading to a declining work ethic.
	And with all the new high-paying career jobs that will be coming online in the next four years, we there's gonna be a great need for people that have a good work ethic.
	Anyway, so he he went on to point out that a lot of these younger kids, and you know, they they grew up in a world without deadlines and consequences, and that it's fueling a potential crisis, and over the last few years, many people are questioning the work ethic of former members of Gen Z. Those are people born between 97 and 2012, and have expressed concern uh over how this impacts young people entering the workforce.
	And anyway, he went on to explain, he was on with Martha McCallum on Fox that one of the overriding factors contributing to the decline in work ethic in younger generations is they face more lenient deadlines and less consequences.
	And he said that expectations and standards of workers can become fungible quickly.
	He's not wrong, he's not wrong.
	I've noticed this in my own life.
	You know, if you live your life on a high wire with a safety net 15 feet below you all the time, there's no consequence for folly.
	And he went on to explain that the work ethic is gone.
	I I can tell you, one of the best things that ever happened in my life is I worked.
	And I work from, you know, the at age eight with the with uh, you know, doing paper routes, age 12 working Friday, Saturday, Sunday night, washing dishes in a busy restaurant.
	And it's like we've got to now go we gotta get our kids back, and we don't we've got to teach them a work ethic.
	It's like schools today, they just pass you whether you're qualified to pass or not.
	Pretty unbelievable.
	Anyway, 800-941 Sean is our number.
	You want to be a part of the program.
	Uh, let's say hi to Randy in Washington State.
	Randy, how are you?
	Glad you called.
	Hey, I wanted to talk about that great big, beautiful bill.
	I don't understand if we have the house and a slim majority in the Senate.
	Why are we even listening to these Democrats?
	They obviously just want to spend their money needlessly and wastefully.
	And if we have the majority, why don't we just write it down bill the way it's supposed to be written, cutting out all the pork and fight it out in the Senate.
	And honestly, we don't even really have the Senate because we don't have enough votes to pass the bill.
	We we do through the reconciliation process.
	And frankly, you can thank the chairman of the budget committee in this case.
	That happens to be Lindsey Graham.
	Now uh Ron Johnson, Rand Paul, and some others are saying that they don't think the cuts go far enough.
	I'm I'm fine with them adding more cuts to it.
	I really am.
	I have no problem with that at all.
	Um the Trump tariffs, by the way, have foreign car companies scrambling to open factories in New York.
	Consumer confidence jumped by double digits in May.
	That number just came out.
	Uh the stock market went through the roof today.
	And you know, but what you I'll give you an example.
	And, you know, Dr. Oz was on this program last week that we're all pay footing the bill 14 billion dollars, you know, for Medicaid fraud while eligible patients struggle for care.
	There's 1.4 million people that are illegal that are getting Medicaid benefits.
	Now, there was a New York Post article today, and you're right.
	Um, yes, Republicans need to cut federal spending and soaring Medicaid outlays because it's headed towards insolvency.
	You know, and you could see that the outlays have skyrocketed the these last 20 years, and the Fed spent one 160 billion in fiscal year 23 and over three and a half times as much uh state level spending.
	Meanwhile, that rose from 108 to 280 billion dollars.
	But what's basically gone on is Democrats steadily pushing towards universal health care coverage at taxpayer f uh taxpayer expense by doing it this way.
	In the process, Medicaid's grown from covering the poor and covering the near poor and even the not really poor at all in the process, displacing private insurance more than it's actually expanding the share of the population that is covered.
	Any illegal immigrants as well as legal ones who aren't supposed to become, you know, beyond the public dole or on the public dole.
	And they're all benefiting from this.
	That's not how this was designed.
	That's why it's headed towards insolvency, just like Social Security is headed towards insolvency.
	And it's a big problem.
	If the if the Senate can improve it and make it more conservative and cut back more money, I'm all in favor of it.
	And I I think probably Republican House members will support that too.
	The way this is gonna work is the House passed it by you know a slim margin, and the Senate will pass their version of it, working with the uh Senate parliamentarian to make sure it meets the criteria for reconciliation, and then they'll go into conference between the two houses.
	They'll come up with a compromise bill.
	Hopefully it cuts more, because I think the more the better.
	I think it's better for the economy.
	We can't keep robbing from our kids, and then they'll vote again in the House again in the Senate, and then hopefully the president signs the bill.
	As of now, I I don't see problems.
	Uh I think that eventually it will get there, but I don't I think it's a heavy lift, and I think the more that they cut the better.
	Well, and I don't agree with them, you know, like putting Social Security on the chopping block.
	Uh you know, I'm 68.
	I don't make enough on my Social Security to even qualify to rent an apartment.
	And that's uh, you know, a cheap apartment.
	You have to have three times the amount of monthly income to qualify to rent an apartment.
	And I paid my dues, and I'm still paying.
	I'm back to work, and I'm I'm paying every paycheck into Social Security, and I already paid.
	I I I don't think that's just anyway.
	I know there's a lot of injustice, and I know Trump's doing a fantastic job.
	I'm really impressed.
	And I hope that they address the Social Security because every year these politicians vote themselves a raise.
	Well, we uh in Social Security ought to get the same percentage of a raise.
	We don't.
	We get 2.5%.
	Woo-hoo.
	That doesn't even keep up with the times.
	So anyway, that's all I had to say.
	Sean, thanks for taking my call.
	You bet, Randy, appreciate it, man.
	Glad you called Jimmy New York next Sean Hannity show.
	Hi.
	I was just calling the the blatant hypocrisy and uh the lack of ethics that has become the the Democratic Party.
	The fact that they went out of the way to throw everything and the kitchen sink at Trump to try to get uh get him tossed, and they created the 25th Amendment just to go after his mental and cognitive abilities.
	Yet the mainstream media and the party had such a concerted effort that uh playing key parts in covering up Biden's diminishing ability.
	Now they're trying to spin around that they're pointing out Jake Tapper putting out his book.
	They have no shame.
	They're trying to take the part of pointing out this.
	And that now they're pointing out the importance of going after Trump's declining ability again.
	Like people aren't picking up on their games they're playing with their classic uh deflection tactics.
	Listen, uh it was as we pointed out on this radio show and on TV.
	We were pointing out his cognitive decline in it, Frank, over the summer and fall of 2019.
	And it was obvious to us then.
	He was not the same guy that he was as vice president, not the same guy he was as president.
	So the idea that they didn't know just holds no water with me.
	We were showing the American people in real time.
	Somebody on one of these networks said they weren't showing it.
	They weren't highlighting it, they weren't focusing on it.
	They were covering it up, and they didn't make it a big issue.
	Had they done so, Joe Biden probably would have been removed with the 25th Amendment.
	And the people around him that were responsible for this, what did they know?
	When did they know it?
	There needs to be a full-fledged investigation.
	Because that is a real constitutional crisis.
	If you don't know if the president doesn't have control of his faculties.
	Anyway, appreciate the call, Jimmy.
	Glad you're with us.
	Dave, Illinois, next, Sean Hannity Show.
	Hi.
	Hello.
	An honor to speak to you, Mr. Hannity.
	It's an honor.
	The honor is all mine, sir.
	Glad you checked in.
	What's going on?
	Well, living here in the fine communist state of Illinois.
	But anyway, um, I was diagnosed, I got my diagnosis the exact same day that our former president did on prostate cancer.
	I'm 62 years old, have been monitoring it for four to five years.
	Saw a spike.
	Uh we did an MRI, the MRI led to a biopsy, biopsy led to the diagnosis.
	It is not that hard to you know be diagnosed with prostate cancer.
	Again, if they're doing just a simple blood test, literally a 10-minute test, um, two times a year, pointing them to where I've been diagnosed with um prostate cancer.
	Now, do I like the now what what stage of cancer do you have?
	Do you know?
	Well, the uh on the the Gleason scale, I've gotten real smart on this.
	I'm a seven.
	That's a pretty high score.
	That's not that's not that that's not something you can ignore.
	No, no, they said, you know, I could probably go this summer without dealing with it.
	Uh I could probably push it up to a year without really going after it, but no more than that.
	And it's like, no, I'm I'm gonna get on top of this.
	So uh I have a 23 treatment radiation, followed by they will insert radioactive seeds into me.
	And I the week after 4th of July, I'm done.
	Let me tell you something.
	I know Rudy Giuliani, he was public about it.
	Ollie North, he was public about it.
	They used the radio ra radiological seeds like you were using, and they had great results.
	I know people that used other treatments uh that have had great results.
	Uh I applaud you for jumping on it early, not waiting that year because you run the risk.
	The longer you wait, the the greater the odds it can spread beyond the prostate.
	What most people don't know is most men will die with prostate cancer, but not from prostate cancer.
	And it's it's very, very common.
	Yours got you know aggressive fast, but you stayed on top of it.
	And I'm gonna tell you how this is likely gonna end for you.
	I'd say the odds are very, very high you're gonna be fine, and you're not gonna die of prostate cancer.
	And the fact that he didn't have a simple PSA test, as you rightly point out, a blood test, is unconscionable to me.
	It's unfathomable to me.
	And having been around President Trump and been with him in the Middle East, I I saw upfront and and close and personal.
	The close proximity at all times doctors are with the president.
	Anytime you see a presidential motorcade, there is an emergency vehicle with medical doctors prepared to do surgery on the president at the ready.
	It's with him at all times.
	He has access to a doctor 24-7.
	And as as it should be for any president, Democrat or Republican.
	Anyway, um, I'm I'm glad you're gonna be uh through this by the fourth of July.
	I think that's awesome.
	You're being proactive.
	I can could not encourage any more to do so, and I think you made the right call.
	I really do.
	Well, I think that every guy needs to have a check because again, it is not uh a huge ordeal.
	God bless you in your treatment.
	Keep us up to speed, let us know you're okay, right?
	We'll do.
	Thanks, sir.
	800 941 Sean.
	You want to be a part of the program.
	All right, that's gonna wrap things up for today.
	Hannity tonight, 9 Eastern on the Fox News Channel, Caroline Levitt, Rhines Previs, Joe Conshaw on a corrupt media, Senator Mark Wayne Mullen, Alan Derschwitz, Greg Jarrett, and also we will check in with Clay Travis, say you DVR tonight, Hannity, 9 Eastern on Fox.
	We'll see you tonight, back here tomorrow.
	Thank you for making this show possible.
	You want smart political talk without the meltdowns?
	We got you.
	We've been around the block in media, and we're doing things differently.
	Normally is about real conversations.
	Thoughtful, try to be funny, grounded, and no panic.
	We'll keep you informed and entertained without ruining your day.
	Join us every Tuesday and Thursday, normally on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
	I'm Ben Ferguson.
	And I'm Ted Cruz.
	Three times a week, we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
	Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
	Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
	And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
	We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
	So down a verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
	What I told people I was making a podcast about Benghazi.
	Nine times out of ten, they called me a masochist, rolled their eyes, or just asked why.
	Benghazi, the truth became a web of lies.
	From Prologue Projects and Pushkin Industries, this is Fiasco Benghazi.
	What difference at this point does it make?
	Listen to Fiasco Benghazi on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

▲