Sean Hannity Show - Truth about Pfizer - June 20th, Hour 3

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 21, 2024 - Sean Hannity Show

33:58

Truth about Pfizer - June 20th, Hour 3

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is an iHeart podcast.
	You want smart political talk without the meltdowns?
	We got you.
	I'm Carol Markowitz and I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
	We've been around the block in media and we're doing things differently.
	Normally is about real conversations.
	Thoughtful, try to be funny, grounded, and no panic.
	We'll keep you informed and entertained without ruining your day.
	Join us every Tuesday and Thursday, normally, on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
	Your city!
	Hitting 1994 crime bill, talking about super predators, that was Biden.
	Like, if we don't acknowledge that there are some things, some real pocketbook issues that are still front of mind for people, we've missed the mark.
	It pisses people off.
	It's Hispanic.
	We're going to lose Hispanic males.
	Yeah.
	We're going to lose.
	The clock is ticking.
	37 days until America votes.
	Yeah, we're coming today.
	From coast to coast.
	From sea to shining sea.
	Sean Kennedy is on.
	Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
	All right, news roundup and information overload.
	Our toll-free.
	Our number is 800-941-Sean.
	If you want to be a part of the program, if you've noticed, we've been doing a lot of segments on the follow-up as it relates to COVID-19 and all of the lies that we have been told.
	You know, if you get the vaccine, you're never going to get COVID.
	Lie.
	If you get the vaccine, you're never going to infect others.
	Lie.
	I mean, all of these things.
	Even though it was emergency authorization use, what did we learn from the doctor that created the technology that actually allowed for the creation of these all-new mRNA vaccinations?
	And that's Dr. Robert Malone, who said that the technology was never perfected.
	Well, we have a case out of Kansas, thankfully, thanks to Chris Kobach, the Kansas Attorney General, who will join us in a second about Pfizer and how they made multiple misleading statements to deceive the public about their vaccine at a time when Americans needed to know the truth.
	And he is now suing Pfizer for misleading the people of Kansas on the COVID vaccine.
	Now, look what they did in Great Britain, AstraZeneca, their version, I guess, of Pfizer and the Moderna shot, which was different than the Johnson ⁇ Johnson shot, which was one shot, not two.
	And it was a vaccination made the more natural way.
	People began mocking it because it didn't have the new technology.
	For those that took vaccinations, I guess in retrospect, maybe it wasn't so dumb after all.
	Anyway, he said on Monday, Chris Kohlbach did, announcing that he's suing Pfizer for what he said were misleading claims that it made related to the COVID-19 vaccine.
	And he joins us now.
	Mr. Attorney General, great to have you back.
	How are you?
	Great to be with you.
	Doing fine, Sean.
	Yeah, we filed a suit on Monday under our Kansas Consumer Protection Act and are seeking civil monetary penalties, damages, and injunctive relief for the misleading statements that Pfizer made in marketing its vaccine.
	You know, the federal government gave the vaccine manufacturers immunity from torque lawsuits where somebody sues and says, you know, I was injured in some way and I want damages to compensate me.
	But they did not give them immunity for making deceptive claims to the public.
	And I think everybody remembers at the time the vaccines first came out, everybody had to make a decision or two decisions.
	First, am I going to take the vaccine?
	And second, which one am I going to take?
	And in that kind of environment, especially with all of the anxiety and the duress with some employers forcing their employees to take vaccines, people needed information.
	And it was imperative that the information be truthful.
	And that was not the case, as we lay out in our lawsuit.
	You know, I'll just bring you back in my own personal experience.
	The amount of pressure that was brought to bear on me to push my audience into taking a vaccination was inordinate.
	It was not something I had experienced before.
	I've experienced a lot of political pressure in my life.
	The other thing was, you know, for me to give everybody my status, what is my status?
	Are you vaccinated or have you gotten COVID?
	Everybody wanted to know my personal business.
	And by the way, Mr. Attorney General, I probably would have gladly shared it at the time.
	However, once they were demanding I share it, I was like, screw you.
	It's none of your business.
	I have my own personal, you know, I believe in medical privacy with all due respect to all of you.
	And so I didn't tell anybody.
	But what I said to people on the air, and I'm so glad that I didn't give in to their pressure, not that there was any threat that I would, but I said to people, I don't know anything about your health.
	I don't know anything if you have pre-existing conditions.
	I don't know.
	I have no idea if you have comorbidities.
	I have no idea.
	I'm not a doctor.
	I don't know anything about this shot.
	I was not qualified to tell people what to do.
	I didn't know.
	But what you're telling me is they didn't know either or they just flat out lied about it.
	What do you think it is and what do they lie about?
	Well, it's pretty clear that they did flat out lie about it, at least at Pfizer in several respects.
	They made misleading and deceptive statements.
	And, you know, let me give you two examples.
	One is pregnant women.
	They marketed the vaccine as safe for pregnant women.
	You know, that's an example of, as you're describing, you know, each person needs to make a decision for themselves.
	But pregnant women needed to know that there was a risk for them.
	And Pfizer had two studies.
	They also possessed information from their October 2020 pregnancy study on rats indicating that the COVID-19 vaccine was linked to likely infertility, loss of litters, and stillborn offspring.
	That should have been a major signal, forcing them to put the brakes on things.
	But they proceeded.
	And in February 2021, Pfizer had reports for 458 pregnant women who received Pfizer's vaccine during pregnancy.
	And more than half of those women reported an adverse event.
	And more than 10% reported a miscarriage, many within days of vaccination.
	Sean, let's just pause.
	A miscarriage means that a human being dies.
	A baby dies in the womb.
	That's extraordinary.
	And over 10%.
	For Pfizer to continue to market its vaccine as safe to pregnant women in light of that and with the knowledge of that, I just think that's not only deceptive, it's just wrong on multiple levels.
	And then the other example we lay out in detail in our complaint is myocarditis.
	Pfizer denied any evidence of a safety signal between its COVID-19 vaccine and myocarditis.
	The safety signal is just a risk signal.
	And the CEO in January of 2023 was asked whether the vaccine, Pfizer vaccine, caused strokes for myocarditis.
	And he said, quote, we've not seen a single signal, although we have distributed billions of doses, end quote.
	but Pfizer knew and the United States government knew and the U S military knew and others had found that the Pfizer vaccine caused, uh, what was linked to myocarditis and pericarditis.
	So these statements is it's myocarditis.
	And I can't tell you how many doctors I've spoken to that say post COVID that the incidents, especially among young athletes, believe it or not, young people is so much higher than they ever have seen before.
	And the other issue I keep hearing a lot about is blood clotting.
	Is that what you're learning as well?
	You know, we don't make specific allegations about blood clotting outside of the myocarditis and pericarditis context.
	And they may involve clotting.
	I'm not a medical doctor, so I'm not sure.
	But, you know, I have a friend, Sean, who took the Pfizer vaccine.
	And shortly after he took the vaccine, he had heart conditions that he never had before, had to have two surgeries, and he also suffered a stroke.
	And his doctor said it's the vaccine.
	There's no other explanation.
	I mean, you know, people had anecdotal information like that, but this lawsuit is just about what Pfizer knew and what they said.
	And Pfizer knew certain things, and those things contradicted what they were saying to the public.
	Did Moderna treat this differently?
	Because I find it interesting that you're suing Pfizer, but not Moderna.
	You know, we have the information with respect to Pfizer.
	There's one other difference regarding Pfizer.
	So Pfizer did not accept the Operation Warp Speed money from the federal government.
	And as a result, they were not subject to all of the same reporting requirements that recipients of the Operation Warp Speed money were.
	They made a decision not to take that money in order to free themselves of certain obligations.
	And I have a quote here from the CEO of Pfizer.
	He said, they want reports.
	I don't want to have any of that, end quote.
	And that's referring to the federal government wanting reports.
	So I think that may be one of the important distinctions between the vaccine manufacturers that's relevant here.
	What do you make of AstraZeneca taking their shot off the market?
	And that was used more widely in Great Britain and elsewhere.
	You know, I don't have enough evidence to say, you know, people are listening to my comments very carefully because we're in litigation.
	So I don't have enough information about AstraZeneca to speculate about why they took it off the market.
	But, you know, focusing on Pfizer, we have clear evidence here that they were making statements to the public in advertisement.
	You just can't do it.
	I mean, you know, think about it, Sean, you're on your show.
	You know, in the advertisement, there may be some pharmaceuticals that are advertised.
	And we all know that in that ad, they point out all of the potential side effects or issues that can result if you take that pharmaceutical.
	That's part of what we're accustomed to in America.
	But here, Pfizer not only didn't tell us about it, they said the opposite.
	They said there is no connection.
	And so it's, you know, it's behavior like that that triggers a Consumer Protection Act violation.
	And I should note that although Kansas is the lead state here, we're part of a coalition of a growing coalition of half a dozen states now who are standing together and they're either going to be bringing their suits in their respective states or they will be taking steps for doing so, depending on what Pfizer does.
	I'm just trying to anticipate what their main argument will be.
	Are they going to say, well, all of this was done under the guise of emergency authorization that allowed them to bypass The usual process to getting a vaccination to get legal vaccination or FDA approval?
	You know, I'm waiting with bated breath too, Sean, to see what they're going to say because I just, you know, the public statements they've made since we filed the suit have simply been rather general.
	You know, the vaccine saved lives and we made accurate statements.
	We'll see when push comes to shove when they are forced to explain exactly what they said and why they said it and what they were aware of.
	And how soon will these people be deposed?
	Yeah, that's what I was going to next.
	There'll be depositions and there will be discovery where they have to provide documents in addition to what we already have from various FOIA requests.
	The schedule will be set by the judge and he has not yet laid out a schedule for what the stages of discovery will be, including depositions.
	All right, quick break.
	We'll come back more with Kansas Attorney General Chris Kolbach on the other side.
	Then your call's coming up, 800-941-Sean as we continue.
	Hey there, I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
	And I'm Carol Markowitz.
	We've been in political media for a long time.
	Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
	That's why we started Normally, a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
	We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
	We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
	So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional sass.
	You're our kind of people.
	Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday.
	On the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you listen.
	Hey there, I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
	And I'm Carol Markowitz.
	We've been in political media for a long time.
	Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
	That's why we started Normally, a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
	We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
	We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
	So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional sass.
	You're our kind of people.
	Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday.
	On the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you listen.
	All right, we continue now with Chris Kolbach.
	He's the Attorney General of the great state of Kansas, and he's now suing Pfizer over the COVID vaccination that they gave out.
	I think this is very key.
	And one of the things that's been really alarming, and we've had a lot of people, I don't know if you know Dr. Kway, he testified before Congress this week about the origins of COVID.
	I don't know if you've had a chance to read Rand Paul's book, Deception.
	I mean, you've got emails going back and forth, and it was very obvious that people at the NIH in the earliest days of COVID knew and understood that the at that NA NIH money going through and funneled through the EcoHealth Alliance was going to the Wuhan virology lab where they knew coronavirus research took place and they knew gain of function research took place.
	And they were panicked almost from day one that the American taxpayers actually.
	funded the creation of this virus, which turns out to look pretty true to me at this point.
	And yet people have not been held accountable for that either.
	Yeah, it's interesting how long, you know, here we are in the middle of 2024 and we're looking back and finally this information is coming out.
	I think we're going to continue looking back in these lawsuits and as more people testify in front of Congress or in other ways, you know, disclose information.
	It's not looking good.
	And certainly in the case of the decisions, Americans were presented in the manner in which certainly Pfizer presented them, but looking at what the government did, forcing, one of the things that I think was the worst in terms of government actions, Sean, was the military vaccine mandate.
	I represented some pilots at the time who wanted to avoid the vaccine on religious grounds, and the Department of Defense was proceeding to fire them at a time when the Air Force had a shortage of over 1,500 pilots.
	They're firing pilots over this.
	It's just unreal, the kind of decision-making that was occurring during this period.
	No, you really can't make up how bad it was.
	You know, back to the pressure that I felt.
	I mean, could you imagine?
	I'm a radio and television talk show host.
	Now, I try to be as informed as possible.
	You've known me for a long time, and we've known each other for a long time.
	And I do a lot of reading and a lot of research, but I'm not equipped to give my audience advice, medical advice on something as serious as to taking a vaccine or not taking a vaccine.
	It's just not my role.
	Now, I think I gave good advice telling people to take it seriously.
	I think I gave good advice telling people to talk to their doctor and to do their own research.
	I think I gave people good advice that they have to look at their own specific medical history and pre-existing conditions and comorbidities, and they've got to look at their age.
	And then it's a decision that only they and the doctor can make.
	It's not a decision that a radio talk show and a TV talk show host can make.
	Well, I think that's exactly right.
	And the key word in my mind that you just said was do your own research.
	And that's where this lawsuit comes into play.
	Well, how are you going to do research if the company is making statements that are contrary to the research the company has, but you don't have?
	And it should be noted that many of the studies and facts presented in this lawsuit only came out because of a FOIA Freedom of Information Act request.
	And that request was resisted.
	And finally, the information came out.
	So that's why this lawsuit didn't happen last year or the year before.
	This only happens after we get the information that has been very hard to get.
	All right, Kansas Attorney General Chris Kobach will follow this suit very, very closely.
	We appreciate your time.
	My pleasure.
	800-941 Sean, if you want to be a part of the program.
	All right, 25 to the top of the hour.
	800-941 Sean is our number if you want to be a part of the program.
	Well, the cuckoo brigade, the conspiracy theory brigade is out in full force.
	This all started when you had conspiracy theorist extraordinaire Rachel Maddow thinking that if Donald Trump is elected, he will be putting her in a camp.
	I didn't get any clarification on is it a day camp?
	Is it a sleepaway camp?
	Obviously, that's not what she's referring to, but you get my point.
	Followed up Chrissy Teigen.
	Trump will come after her.
	Followed by AOC thinking that she's going to be thrown in jail.
	Followed up by Joyless Behar and Rachel Maddow, talking in depth about this, thinking that shows like the hard-hitting news show The View will be taken off the air.
	Now Nicole Wallace has joined the brigade suggesting that if Trump wins re-election, she'll be taken off the air.
	Listen to her.
	I've seen that toast a bunch of times, but it landed very differently this year because depending on what happens in November, seven months from right now, this time next year, I might not be sitting here.
	It might not be a White House correspondent's dinner or a free press.
	Okay.
	So, Nicole, you're still going to be on the air if you want to be on the air, and your employer wants to keep you on the air.
	I can promise you that, number one.
	But here's all the mob media Democrats worried that Donald Trump is either going to throw them in jail or put them in a camp.
	Listen.
	You said recently that you thought that you, as an outspoken critic, could be a target yourself.
	Some people think that sounds overdramatic, but I'm right there with you.
	I think that he is so venicted that he will go after however he has to, through the IRS, maybe, or even, you know, through sponsors to get us off the air, maybe.
	Who are you?
	I think it's bad to have somebody saying, give me as much power as you can in this country so I can use it to go after other Americans.
	And I don't think anybody's safe if that's the sort of basis on which he wants to get if Donald Trump wins.
	We are looking at the potential dissolution of democracy in the United States of America.
	It sounds nuts, but like I wouldn't be surprised if this guy threw me in jail.
	It sounds nuts.
	That's the only thing she said in that statement that was true.
	You have the co-founder of LinkedIn, a guy by the name of Reed Hoffman.
	I don't even know who he is, saying he's worried that Trump will retaliate against him.
	I don't even think Trump knows half these people.
	I'll ask him, but I don't think he knows half these people.
	Listen.
	I literally talked to business leaders who are fearful about speaking out against this because they're fearful of retaliation.
	Are you concerned that Trump could retaliate against you?
	Of course I'm concerned.
	Of course I'm concerned.
	What do you think he's going to do to the co-founder of LinkedIn?
	I don't think he's going to do anything.
	I don't think he even knows who he is.
	But I guess this is now the fear tactic.
	You know what this is?
	A cheap, fake paranoia, feigned phony outrage.
	And it's just a way to scare people that Donald Trump is this scary, scary figure, et cetera, et cetera.
	Maybe what they really do fear is because they all have one thing in common.
	They have supported the weaponization of our justice system and their silence has been deafening.
	They're part of the group that had no problem with that sham trial in New York, no problem with the valuation of Mar-a-Lago at $18 million.
	No problem that Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro, unlike so many others held in contempt of Congress, are going to jail, Peter Navarro in jail.
	Maybe it all related to that.
	I don't know.
	All right, we're going to get to your calls in a minute here.
	Look, if you own a gun, you believe in the Second Amendment.
	That's not enough in today's America.
	It is essential you be insured, trained, educated.
	As a USCCA member, you can defend yourself and your family against people that want to bring you and your family harm and also protect yourself against the legal system that maybe doesn't protect the rights of gun owners.
	You may now want to end up like a guy like Craig.
	Who's Craig?
	He's an American veteran, no criminal history.
	Returned home.
	He finds an intruder wearing a mask and gloves in his own house.
	Anyway, the criminal ignores Craig's yells to leave and reaches into his pocket.
	Craig shoots, calls 911.
	Law enforcement labels it a justified homicide, but they charge him anyway because the gun wasn't registered with the government.
	And because he's not a USCCA member, he's going to spend a fortune to get a lawyer that's even willing to take the case and then hope and pray that he doesn't go to prison for defending himself on his own property.
	Now, I share this story with you because the truth is that simply owning a gun for family protection can get you in trouble in our new America.
	Now, I've been a proud member of the USCCA for nine years because they have the best training, best safety training, best education, best access to insurance made specifically for self-defense incidents.
	And you get all of that for less than a dollar a day.
	Now, go to their website, defendfamily.com.
	Right now, you can learn more about USCCA and their membership.
	You'll get entered to win a gun of your choice and up to $155 worth of free bonuses.
	But if you believe in the Second Amendment, please, you've got to go to defendfamily.com today.
	All right, let's get to our busy phones: 800-941-Sean, if you want to be a part of the program.
	Ben is in New York.
	Ben, how are you?
	Glad you called, sir.
	Hey, Sean, thank you for taking my call.
	Shout out from Long Island.
	Where in Long Island are you from?
	My old stomping ground where I was born and raised.
	What's going on?
	That's right.
	Valley Stream.
	Valley Stream.
	Well, first of all, tell me.
	By the way, you were raised in Valley Stream?
	Yep.
	Do you remember the old Carl Hoppels?
	No.
	Okay.
	How old are you?
	50.
	Yeah, might have been a little before your time because my dad was a waiter at Carl Hoppels in Baldwin.
	But I grew up in Franklin Square right next door to you.
	Very close.
	Anyway, what's on your mind today?
	Well, you know, like most Americans are watching the, you know, watch the trial in New York, the Sham trial, as you call it.
	And we know that the gag order hasn't been lifted.
	And it's very strange.
	And I have a theory on it, and I'm wondering what you think about it.
	You know, the debate is next week, and I think they're trying to box Trump in.
	And what's going to happen if they bring up the trial and the president cannot respond to anything because he's under a gag order?
	What do you think is going to happen?
	I think he's not going to respond to it because I think he's been pretty smart in not responding to it, knowing that this judge is crazy enough to want to put him in jail.
	But I think there are other ways around it.
	I don't think it's insurmountable.
	I mean, Joe Biden is going to want to call him a convicted felon as many times as he can.
	And I have a good answer for it.
	And it's, frankly, Joe, be careful.
	Now that we know the laptop is real, remember your son implicates you as benefiting financially from all of his foreign business deals at times when you are the vice president taking actions to help his business companies.
	And you might want to be careful about this convicted felon mantra of yours because if there is equal justice under the law, there seems to be a prima facie case against you.
	That's what I would say.
	You know what?
	I think he should just speak up and say whatever he wants to say and let you know, let the judge do what he wants to do.
	But he needs to, you know, I know it's.
	Listen, the judge may end up, you know, sentencing him to jail anyway.
	The judge, I think, is just chomping at the bit to put him in a jail cell.
	And if they do, I think the country will see it for what it is.
	I'm not worried about it.
	I don't want that for our country.
	I don't want that for the president.
	However, I think at the end of the day, they're going to have a very hard time for a first offender with multiple appeals.
	Now, I think my guess is he's going to be sentenced to jail with pending appeal.
	That's my guess.
	First-time offender, he's not a flight risk with the Secret Service around him at all times.
	He is a person, you know, again, we're talking about a classy felony.
	It's not even a major felony.
	And I just, but again, you have an abusively biased judge in this case and a judge that I think is chomping at the bit to be loved in New York social circles.
	And by the way, he will be.
	And so will Alvin Bragg.
	They're going to be loved in New York social circles.
	Listen, New York for me became almost inhabitable, especially New York City.
	Not Long Island, where I lived, where people knew me and people were always really nice to me.
	They were great.
	However, it just got to the point.
	It just wasn't worth it for me anymore.
	And that's one of the reasons.
	I mean, when you're in New York City and I have to think twice, three, four, five times about what restaurant I can go to with my staff or with friends, It's not the place for me.
	And I don't have that experience down in Florida.
	It's very different.
	And look, it's not like I was so married to New York anyway, because I lived in Rhode Island five years, California five years, Alabama, two years, Georgia, four years.
	And I've had a home in Florida for close to 30 years.
	I've had a place.
	So for me, it was a natural transition.
	Anyway, I think, yeah, I think Trump will abide by the gag order.
	I think it's unconstitutional, but I think he'll abide by it.
	And I think there's a number of ways around it for him.
	Anyway, I appreciate the call.
	800-941-Sean is on number if you want to be a part of the program.
	Gary is in New Joise.
	What's up, Gary, in New Joise?
	What's going on to the Joysey Shore?
	How much?
	Hot.
	Hey, I was listening to you.
	How are you doing, Sean?
	Good, man.
	How are you?
	Good.
	I was listening to you yesterday with Bill talking about terrorism.
	That's been going on here for three years now, you know, with the fentanyl and everything coming across the border.
	Killed my son.
	You lost your son to fentanyl?
	Yep.
	How old was your son?
	35.
	Stop to talk.
	Oh, man.
	Gary, Gary, you don't have to apologize for being upset over losing your son.
	I know I speak for everybody hearing your voice right now.
	Our prayers, our deepest condolences to you and your family.
	I can't imagine the pain you lived through.
	yet uh... cares that it was an overdose was it uh...
	get something mixed mixed into something Not exactly, but it was the fentanyl.
	Yeah, it's in everything now.
	By the way, they're putting fentanyl in weed now.
	Did you know that?
	Yep.
	And these kids are dying.
	We're losing a generation of kids, opioids and fentanyl.
	You know, this is all being manufactured in China, and our wide open borders are allowing all of it in.
	And we're losing people like your son, you know, hundreds and hundreds every week, and they don't do a thing to stop it.
	And as far as I'm concerned, the government has blood on their hands.
	Yeah, Joe Biden.
	How long ago did this happen?
	A year and almost a year and a half.
	It was St. Patty's Day.
	Let me guess.
	You've never been the same, and you probably will never be the same again.
	Yeah, I got it.
	I got it.
	I understand.
	You lose your breath about it.
	Of course you do.
	It takes your breath away.
	I get it.
	I really do.
	I've had friends that have experienced the exact same thing.
	You know, one thing a dear friend of mine, I'll do the talking through you, a dear friend of mine that lost their son, like you did, a little younger than your son, to fentanyl.
	He said, and he goes around the country and he gives talks.
	He doesn't care if the crowd's 10 people or 100 people or 1,000 people.
	And he says the same thing.
	If you are foolish enough to think this cannot happen to you, you are dead wrong.
	I will tell you, every article I read every day, every day I run across these articles.
	I copy, I paste it, I text it to my kids.
	I'm like, guys, pay attention to this.
	And, you know, I'm sure they're probably at some point rolling their eyes.
	But by now, they've got the message from their dad.
	This is real and it's dangerous and it's everywhere.
	And they're targeting our children.
	They're targeting them.
	You know, a couple of what is the equivalent of a grain of salt or two grains of salt can take out a 250-pound man and not, I mean, kill them.
	I mean, that's how insidious this is.
	And they put it in, they mix it into pretty much everything.
	Anyway, I'm really sorry, Gary.
	I really am.
	Please know our love and our prayers with you and your family.
	And the only hope I have, and it's not cliché to me because I believe it with all my heart.
	I do believe that there is a heaven and a God.
	And, you know, when I say, let not your heart be troubled, the rest of that verse goes on, you know, that Jesus talks about, let not your heart be troubled in my father's house of many mansions.
	And I go to prepare a place for you so that where I am, you shall also be.
	And I just believe you'll be reunited with your son one day.
	I believe that with all my heart.
	And in the meantime, it doesn't take your pain away, but just know that there are a lot of people that understand the pain you and your family have been through.
	It's terrible, and it needs to stop.
	And we have the ability to stop it, and we're not doing it.
	This can all be prevented, all of it.
	Secure the damn border and prevent this poison from coming into our country.
	Yeah, I don't think we have to worry about any terrorism happening here because any bullets being shot because it's all being done by the Sentinel, you know.
	I never thought about that before.
	Isn't that a form of an attack on our country?
	Flooding our country with poison like that.
	New York and Biden should be brought up on treason.
	You ask me.
	They're not safe.
	They're not.
	Nope.
	Nope.
	And Joe, this week, the border is secure.
	I secured it myself.
	I'm like, okay.
	God bless you, my friend.
	And I mean that.
	All right, that's going to wrap things up for today.
	We are loaded up tonight on Hannity on the Fox News channels.
	Please set your DVR so you never, ever, ever, ever miss an episode.
	Anyway, 9 to 10 Eastern, 9 to 10 p.m. Eastern, Monday through Friday on Fox News.
	Anyway, we're loaded up tonight.
	Mary Catherine Hamm, Tommy Laron, Vivek Ramaswamy, Alina Haba.
	We have new information about Judge Ngoron.
	He's the guy that, you know, still swears by the valuation of Mar-a-Lago at $18 million, which is insane.
	Jason Chaffetz, Jimmy Phela, Newt Gingrich.
	Anyway, it's all happening tonight.
	I promise news you won't get from the media mob.
	Set your DVR, Hannity, 9 Eastern.
	We'll see you tonight.
	Back here tomorrow.
	And thank you for making this show possible.
	You want smart political talk without the meltdowns?
	We got you.
	I'm Carol Markowitz, and I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
	We've been around the block in media, and we're doing things differently.
	Normally is about real conversations.
	Thoughtful, try to be funny, grounded, and no panic.
	We'll keep you informed and entertained without ruining your day.

▲