All Episodes
Previous Next
June 13, 2023 - Sean Hannity Show
33:48
Joe Tacopina on Trump Case - June 12th, Hour 3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is an iHeart podcast here for our final news roundup and information overload.
All right.
News roundup, information overload hour.
Glad you're with us.
Eight hundred nine for one.
Sean, if you want to be a part of the program.
So, you know, we've been spending a lot of time today talking about unequal justice under the law, how we don't have equal application of our laws.
And, you know, at the bottom of this half hour, I think I'll play the entire exchange because Lindsay just nailed it with Stephanopoulos over the weekend.
About why this is so relevant.
Because if one person is treated one way, well, why would another American be treated entirely differently?
You know, and then we have the whole issue of the entire Biden family syndicate and there's no interest in the media at all whatsoever, or Joe Biden's four locations for top secret and classified documents.
I'm telling you right now, this is so fundamental and so basic to this democratic republic of ours.
It is the heart and soul of our Constitution.
Every law is based on that document.
And we might as well be shredding it if Hillary Clinton can get away with all of the top secret, all the classified documents, and a little admonition from James Comey that no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute.
And then on the obstruction side, the deletion of 33,000 subpoenaed emails.
And then, of course, devices that might have had those emails destroyed with hammers, BlackBerries, and iPhones, and some SIM cards removed, some of them later showing up on Anthony Weiner's laptop.
But there was no raid at Hillary Clinton's house, just like there was no raid of Joe Biden's house where the Corvette was stored ever so safely with more open pictures of the garage that one can shake a stick at, or the Penn Biden Center at the University of Penn, UPenn, or Delaware, you know, where he at in that office, you know, thousands of documents, apparently, or at least 1,800 total.
And we've not gotten a breakdown of how many were top secret classified.
I'm not sure if I'd believe it at this point, what they told us.
And then, of course, that is Beach House.
Oops, more documents there, too.
None of those locations were raided.
I don't see the special counsel in the case against Biden doing a thing.
I don't see grand juries being formed.
I don't see witnesses being called in left, right, and sideways.
I see none of that.
Anyway, joining us now is Donald Trump's attorney, Joe Takapina, is back with us.
Sir, how are you?
I'm good, Sean.
I'm agitated, but I'm good.
And, you know, the way you just said it is exactly it.
There is such a double standard in the administration of justice in this country that it is actually frightening.
It's frightening because the Justice Department is now being used as a political weapon for whoever happens to be in power.
And it's Gestapo-like it, and it really shouldn't be.
I mean, it's a dark day for the country.
It really is.
But you know what?
Half the country, I mean, if you're in the mainstream media, you love this.
If you're a Democrat, you love this.
You love the double standard.
Do they not see the double standard, or is it they just have convinced themselves that Donald Trump is the personification of all things evil on earth today?
That's what it is.
They've convinced themselves he's a personification of all things evil.
But what absolutely really riles me up is the hypocrisy of the far left and the woke and all that.
Look, and Sean, I'm not, you know, at times I'm socially liberal.
I'm a defense attorney.
I mean, there are certain things that I really, you know, feel strongly about when it comes to the rights of citizens accused and whatnot.
But I will tell you this.
What I've seen now is beyond pale.
I mean, you know, the whole thing about the far left, the woke party or whatever they are, is inclusion and tolerance, inclusion and tolerance.
You know, include people, all people, people of all sorts of walks of life, transgender, everything, include everyone.
Be tolerant of everyone.
That applies unless you have a different opinion than them.
Because if you have a different opinion than them, there is no tolerance.
It's you're canceled.
You're a white supremacist.
You're an animal, whatever it is.
And it's gone too far.
It has absolutely gone too far.
And to put down the rule of law, the way we've put it down here, to really stretch the rule of law to the point where it's never coming back to its original form and proper form, is what people don't seem to understand.
Yeah, the haters of Donald Trump think this is a great thing.
It's not a great thing because the next time, this is now going to be the new norm for this country.
The next time you have a different is it really going to be the new norm?
And I don't mean to interrupt you.
Or is it going to be the new norm if you're a Republican or conservative and the new norm that Democrats get away with the same offenses or worse?
Well, yes, that's true, clearly, because, you know, the media is, and I experienced, look, in this last seven months representing the president, I can't tell you how real that has all become to me.
Look, I thought there was a little bit of an overstatement regarding the bias of the media and whatnot.
My God, Sean, you were right all along.
I mean, the stuff I've seen is so one-sided.
It's that they create facts at times that don't exist just to carry an agenda in the media.
And then, you know, the media now is a very, I put, you know, air bunnies around that, air quotes around the word media, because the media now is so many people who aren't even journalists, don't have editors, can write what they want to write.
But it's becoming to the point now.
Well, they're all talk show hosts like me, except I'm honest about it.
And unfortunately, they're double standard.
They see this all with glee.
They think this is good for America.
They think this is going to stop Donald Trump from ever being president again.
That's what their ultimate goal here is.
The next Republican becomes president.
The next Republican becomes president, right?
And all of a sudden, they've seen the playbook now.
The playbook is, hey, use the Justice Department, which used to be separate apart from any sort of political benefit.
Use the Justice Department to go after the Democrats you don't like.
That's the new norm.
I'm telling you, that's what's going to happen.
It's bad on both sides, but we've only seen that on one side.
And to me, it's unconscionable for a president to indict his leading candidate opposing him.
Okay.
Joe Biden also kept fat-by documents for decades.
And, you know, if you believe in the rule of law, you have to stand with President Trump against this force.
It's a grave injustice.
It really is.
I'm not sure ultimately how it plays out.
I know he's got a very, very aggressive special counsel, a prosecutor, you know, trying to run this case against him.
The only benefit I see for him is that finally it seems that the special counsel realized the jurisdiction would have been South Florida, where the president lives and where the Mar-a-Lago raid took place, and not Washington, D.C.
The odd thing was, apparently a lot of the grand jury testimony took place in D.C. and then was read back to the grand jury in Florida.
That to me was a little odd, especially when you consider the grand jurors, correct me if I'm wrong, have a right to ask witnesses questions.
Correct.
It is everything.
Look, there's a new norm every single day.
There's a new fact, new process that comes out when you're dealing with President Trump in the legal system every single day.
And it's gotten to the point now where you don't know what's going to happen next.
Look, I am happy that this case is going to be tried in the jurisdiction.
At least there are some people who support and love him.
Crony case in New York, if you're representing President Trump, nine out of 10 potential.
Listen, Joe, you did the Eugene Carroll lawsuit.
And in that case, remember, they weighed in.
They would not say the word rape in that case.
The verdict came back.
Incredible.
That was an incredible.
By the way, in New York, I was shocked.
I thought it was a slam-dunk guilty, guilty, guilty.
Yep.
And we beat them on the one thing that matters to them, rape.
They said rape 133 times on that transcript, that trial.
The first words out of her mouth were, why are you here?
Donald Trump raped me.
It was a rape case, and all they wanted was the next day's headlines on it to be red ink ends of the world headlines.
Rapist.
Well, that didn't happen.
And it was just more of the same than Access Hollywood tape and all the stuff that was led into that trial that I don't think should have been let in.
And that's all the jury surmised and found.
But they didn't believe her claim that Donald Trump raped her.
And he didn't.
And that was.
And let me ask you this, because you've got Alvin Bragg and his case moving forward.
Both Alvin Bragg and the Attorney General of New York, Letitia James, actually ran campaigns to go after one person, one man, Donald Trump, one organization, the Trump organization, one family, the Trump family.
Is that the right thing for somebody that's supposed to be impartial and follow the law to be running on in a campaign?
Boy, you teed that one up.
That was a beautiful softball you just threw me.
I mean, that is so outrageous.
It's not even funny.
To me, it's what I'm saying.
I'm trying to hit you with a softball.
I'm just trying to understand how do you campaign against going against one family and one guy?
I know you're not, but think about what you just asked me.
How ridiculous is that, right?
Before Alvin Bragg is the prosecutor, before he has his hands on evidence, before he has subpoena power, he's a citizen running for an office.
He determined that priority number one is to put Donald Trump in jail, not just convict him, put him in jail.
That's on an interview he did, okay?
How do you know that before you become the prosecutor?
You don't know the evidence.
You don't have access to evidence that's sealed by grand jury information.
How can you make a ridiculous statement like that?
Letitia James, the same thing.
She's running.
She's a private citizen running for the office of attorney general.
Said her priority will be to go after Trump and his family.
Really?
Based on what evidence?
Which goes to show you it was find the target and then we'll get the evidence later.
Let's deal with who we want to go after and then we'll back into it.
That's what they used to do in the days of Stalin and the days of Hitler and any communist China dictator who didn't like his opponents.
They'd find the target and then they try and back in evidence to support that claim.
But it is outrageous that those two, and it shows here a little bit of a serious lack of judgment and or intelligence, that they would actually spoke to the state that they're running on a campaign to go after Trump.
Easy to do in New York, really courageous to do in New York when you know nine out of the 10 voters vote against him.
But how can you say that if you're going to hold a law enforcement office where law enforcement has such enormous power and you have to use prosecutorial discretion before going after anyone, you've already made a claim and a promise.
It's not just a claim, it was a promise to the constituents that you're going to prosecute Trump without knowing a stitch of evidence.
That's why we are where we are.
That's why this case in Manhattan is going to be fall, in my opinion, based on a host of things, including selective prosecution.
Quick break more with Joe Takapina, President Trump's attorney on the other side.
Don't forget Gavin Newsome on Hannity tonight, 9 Eastern, 800-941.
Sean, if you want to be a part of the program, inflation's on the rise.
Stock market's so volatile more than ever.
Protecting your retirement savings is a challenge for everybody.
Now, to weather today's economic uncertainty, our friends at the Phoenix Capital Group, they are highly recommending that you diversify your investments right now.
Now, their recommendation is high-value U.S. oil and gas investments.
Their current yields are ranging from 8% to 12% APY paid monthly.
Obviously, a better rate of return than a bank or a CD, no middlemen involved.
And these corporate bonds are off for variable terms starting at only nine months for accredited investors with a monthly or compounding interest option.
Now, to find out more, just download the Phoenix Capitals free investment packet.
It's at phxonhannity.com, phx on Hannity.com.
And now, keep in mind that an investment in bonds has a certain amount of risk, and you should only invest if you can afford to bear that risk of loss.
It's just that simple.
And before making any investment decision, you've got to carefully consider and review every risk involved.
Anyway, learn how the Phoenix Capital Group is offering in terms of diversification for your portfolio.
Download the Phoenix Capital Group's Free Investor Guide.
It's at phx on Hannity.com.
E-H-X on Hannity.com.
Broadcasting coast to coast, border to border, and all America.
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
Hey, I've shared the importance of every school having a Knox entry access system that quickly gets law enforcement into locked doors when needed.
Now, tragically, the importance continues.
18 U.S. school shootings have occurred from January through March.
Now, many schools have a Knox entry system, but the statistics illustrate the need and importance for all schools to provide law enforcement with quick access to locked doors.
Now, you can learn more about Knox entry when you go to schoolentry.com.
Do it today, schoolentry.com.
All right, we continue now with Joe Takapina, President Trump's attorney.
Let me go to the idea that they're trying on the left to get this judge that was Trump appointed recused from this case.
Will they be successful?
I don't see why they should be successful.
I mean, a judge is a judge, right?
I mean, we had a judge in Manhattan in the Eugene Carroll rape trial, which during time wasn't a rape, that was appointed by Bill Clinton and very close with the Clinton.
So, I don't know, that didn't seem to have an effect.
That didn't seem to bother anyone then.
Why would it bother anyone that he appointed Judge?
He's got social friends with the judge.
He didn't, you know, work with the judge, wasn't business partners with the judge, appointed based on recommendations and qualifications.
This judge is a very qualified judge, and federal judges are supposed to be fair and read the law properly.
There's no evidence that this judge, and shame on anyone who suggests that she's not going to be fair and impartial, because there's absolutely no evidence that she couldn't be fair and impartial.
She's a United States District.
Well, they tried to point out that in the case, she had put forward a special master, and the 11th Circuit pushed back on that, and she eventually just gave in to what the 11th Circuit said.
So, I mean, I would imagine that this is going to be one of those moments.
I will say, do you think that this is such a slam-dunk case that clearly the special counsel believes it is?
You have charge stacking in this case.
You basically have the same charge 31 times, 31 separate incidents.
What is your take?
It's not a slam-dunk case.
It's a case, first of all, it's a case that had they entailed the grand jury on the Bidens for the same exact conduct or the Clintons and Hillary Clinton in particular for her steel dossier thing or the.
But is that going to be allowed?
Will that be admissible?
If it was in New York, like the case you just tried, it would be admissible.
Of course not.
So that can't be used.
But when you say slam dunk case, there's no such thing as a slam-dunk case when you're basing your entire theory on assumptions maybe made by others or that you're making.
The assumption being that Donald Trump knew he was doing something wrong.
In criminal law, you have to have the mentoring, as they call it, or the criminal intent to do something wrong.
And for him to declassify documents, take home most of which were personal mementos, obviously, and some documents that he believes he declassified when he left the office.
I mean, it's not a slam-dunk case.
And don't forget, what a jury can do, what a jury can do, is simply this.
They can feel that if someone's being treated unfairly.
Now, we as lawyers can't argue this, of course, but a jury, and I've seen it happen before, if they believe someone's being treated unfairly, there's no one that could tell them they have to vote a certain way.
If they believe that there's a selective prosecution going on against Donald Trump, where others who did the same exact things were never even investigated, a jury could say, hey, the judge would have to let those comparisons in, wouldn't they?
Yeah, well, the judge is not going to let those comparisons in, but we all live in this planet, Earth, where people are going to understand that, look, if you think you're going to have jury who's never heard of any of the Biden classified document stuff or the Hillary Clinton steel dossier or the Hillary Clinton private email server, you know, we're not living in reality.
There could be people who are going to say it's not fair what happened here.
And I think there is a way for the defense in this case to bring out the fact that no one else has been prosecuted for these documents, classified documents, where they were recovered in other people's homes, like, you know, Vice President Pence, like Joe Biden, like others.
And Hillary was the worst offender of them all.
Yep, but unfortunately, unfortunately, you know, there is double standards.
And that's the way for that.
I was going to say something a little more aggressive, but it's a double standard.
And look, I still think with a Florida jury, which means he's going to get some people on there who don't off the bat hear the name of the defendant and vote guilty, right?
Because had this case been in New York or D.C., there are people who would have heard the name of the defendant and said, good, he's guilty.
I don't really care what the evidence is.
I think in Florida, you're going to at least have a balance.
Oh, you have the best shot at a balance.
And it looks like they're going to do everything they can do to get to do their judge shopping and get a more favorable judge on their part, even though it's a random system.
Joe Takapina, Trump's attorney, thank you so much for being with us.
Okay, Sean, anytime.
Thanks.
Sean's got more behind-the-scenes information.
More contacts than anybody.
More friends behind the curtain.
Sean Hannity is on.
All right, 25 to the top of the hour.
Thank you for being with us.
We'll get to your calls here in this final half hour in a minute.
800-941-Sean, our number.
Reminder Gavin Newsom, my interview with him.
Very spirited, and I think you'll find it very interesting.
You know, we have, you know, two Americas here.
You got one America that, you know, how do we reconcile open borders, closed borders?
How do you reconcile law and order versus defund and no bail and dismantling police?
How do you reconcile energy independence with climate alarmism and no domestic production, but we're going to make Venezuela rich?
And we get into all of this, you know, and I confront the governor about all the people leaving his state.
Why are they leaving his state?
That never happened in the history of the state before.
Anyway, so I think a spirited debate.
Hope you'll watch 9 Eastern.
Obviously, tomorrow is going to be all Trump news because tomorrow will be his arraignment.
You know, it's so funny.
This audience is not shy when we do something that you don't like.
And anytime, it's as predictable as the day is long.
If we have Lindsey Graham on, so many of you get so mad at us for putting him on.
And by the way, just so you know, there are times Lindsey drives me up a wall and I call him out on it.
I'm like, what are you doing?
I called him over Christmas screaming about this idiotic omnibus bill that the Senate allowed to go through, for example.
That was the latest time.
But then there are moments, and I say this about him to other people, where if you think of the Kavanaugh hearings, I mean, the entire momentum of those hearings shifted when he just lost it.
And he went hardcore defending Justice Kavanaugh and condemning this sick process that Democrats often use to smear, slander, besmirch.
And I think that was a turning point in the Kavanaugh hearings, in my view.
Well, equally, this weekend, he had an exchange with George Stephanopoulos.
I played a little part of it earlier, but let me play the whole exchange here.
I think it's worth listening to.
There, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who's endorsed Donald Trump for president in 2024.
Senator Graham, thank you for joining us this morning.
Donald Trump has said repeatedly that he did nothing wrong.
Do you believe that?
Well, here's what I believe.
We live in an America where if you're the Democratic candidate for president, Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State, you can set up a private server in your basement to conduct government business.
And when an investigation is had about your activity.
No, let me finish.
That was ridiculous.
Well, yeah, I'm trying to answer the question from a Republican point of view.
That may not be acceptable on this show.
Yes, I don't like what President Trump did in certain aspects.
I don't like that Joe Biden had classified information on the garage.
I don't like that Mike Pence carelessly took classified information.
I don't like any of that.
But what I don't like is a system in America where the Secretary of State, who's a Democratic candidate for president, has people take a hammer to social media devices and break them apart, apply bleach bit to a hard drive to erase emails, allow classified information to get on a felon's computer, Anthony Weiner.
You haven't even mentioned that.
Most Republicans believe we live in a country where Hillary Clinton did very similar things and nothing happened to her.
President Trump will have his day in court, but espionage charges are absolutely ridiculous.
Whether you like Trump or not, he did not commit espionage.
He did not disseminate, leak, or provide information to a foreign power or to a news organization to damage this country.
He is not a spy.
He's overcharged.
Did he do things wrong?
Yes, he may have.
He will be tried about that, but Hillary Clinton wasn't.
Your old boss committed perjury in a civil lawsuit, lost his law license, obstructed justice in a dozen ways, and he didn't get prosecuted.
Well, look at who's been charged under Espionage Act.
Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning.
People who turn over classified information to news organizations to hurt the country or provide it to a foreign power.
That did not happen here.
Donald Trump, you may hate his guts, but he is not a spy.
He did not commit espionage.
What he did is very similar in my view to what Hillary Clinton did.
People in the Clinton case took a hammer to a BlackBerry and destroyed it.
They wiped clean with bleach bit emails.
They said they were all personal, but some of them actually were classified, and it wound up on Anthony Weiner's computer, and not a damn thing happened to her.
I mean, that was a great segment.
That's how Republicans need to fight.
Now, granted, I know Lindsey will frustrate many of you, you know, 20, 25, 30, 40% of the time, whatever it is.
He frustrates me.
But when he's good, he could be really good.
And I thought this would maybe right up there with this Kavanaugh moment.
All right, let's get to our phones.
Casey in Florida.
Casey, how are you?
What's going on?
Hey, Sean, it's been a long time.
I haven't talked to you since the Obama days.
I hope everything's well with you and the family.
Well, as long as you're listening, I don't care.
As long as you're out there, how you been?
I'm doing okay, buddy.
I'm a little worried about you, though, man.
It seems like you're not really worried about me.
Cut the crap.
You don't care how I'm doing.
Admit it.
So, Sean, let me ask you a question.
He didn't disagree, but go ahead.
Go ahead.
Ask me the question.
You be the host.
You know, you always talk about equal side to justice, all the law and stuff like that.
You know, the bottom line is, though, all right, Trump, Trump brought this on himself.
There's nothing you can say.
They got him on video.
They got it recordings.
He is a criminal and a traitor to this country.
Okay, he's not a traitor to his country.
He wasn't involved, as Lindsay said, in any espionage here.
The question was whether or not he felt in his mind based on the Presidential Records Act and whether or not these documents were legal to have in his possession.
My advice is if they want them, if they're going to threaten to raid your place, hand them over.
Do you really care?
But he's not a traitor to his country.
So, you know, let's get rid of the hyperbole.
He was subpoenaed seven times.
Okay, I don't know about seven subpoenas, but I do know he was subpoenaed in the case.
Seven times.
And hang on.
And if you go back, you can't not acknowledge a simple truth.
The FBI had unfettered access to that room where they found the majority of those documents.
And they were there.
And nothing stopped them that day from saying, hey, can we take these with us?
They didn't take anything with them.
They just called back and said, can you put another lock on the door?
So the FBI was in there in the very room where the, you know, where all those documents, remember the FBI sent out pictures showing everybody, see the documents, see the documents?
They didn't do that with Joe Biden.
I haven't even chronicled how many documents Joe Biden had at this point.
And I've always wanted to ask you this, okay?
I've always, always wanted to ask.
All right.
Well, now I get to fulfill your lifelong wish.
What?
You talk about the dossier all the time, but you fail to tell your followers and whoever listens to you that the dossier was originally purchased by the Republican Party and Marco Rubio.
Why do you never tell your party or your followers the truth?
I had read that a lot that some of this information, which would be normal, typical op research on another candidate, that was going on with other Republican candidates.
However, the specific series, it was not a big dossier to start.
It was a series of memos and op research that collectively became known as the dossier.
That's the one that Hillary Clinton bought and paid for.
That's the one that she funneled money through a law firm, Perkins Cooey.
They hired Fusion GPS that hired Christopher Steele to do the op research.
And when Christopher Steele was offered a million dollars by the FBI to corroborate any part of that dossier, he couldn't do it.
And then they still used it as the bulk of information and not one, but four FISA warrants, even after the final two, they used after his source, sub-source, Danchenko, who they then hired, said that none of it was true.
They kept using something that was false.
Now, if I went before a judge and I said something that I'm giving the court is verified when it's unverifiable, what do you think would happen to me, Casey?
Where would I be?
I don't know.
Probably doing your jiu-jitsu karate stuff, I guess.
I don't know.
No, I'd probably be in jail, maybe doing some prison workouts.
That's what I'd be doing.
But, Andy, respectfully, the Republican.
Respectfully, you're not answering my point.
Hillary bought and paid for this dossier.
And that dossier then was leaked to the media.
And the media ran hog wild with it.
The FBI couldn't corroborate it, and they used it to get a FISA warrant.
Now, where is your outrage at lying to FISA court judges?
Listen, listen, where is it?
I don't hear the outrage.
I hear outrage about only Trump.
Where's the outrage about Hillary and Jim Comey and company?
Where's that outrage?
You guys investigated Hillary 13 times and came up with egg on your phone.
No, no, we have this.
This is my whole point.
We have a dual justice system.
Now, do you think any Republican would get away with deleting 33,000 subpoenaed emails and destroying BlackBerries and iPhones with hammers and removing SIM cards?
You tell me, do you really believe a Republican would get away with that?
Would Donald Trump get away with that or only Hillary?
Yes, Trump did.
Trump did not.
He didn't delete 33,000 emails.
Wrong.
You're wrong.
And this is where you are lacking intellectual honesty, Casey.
If Donald Trump deleted 33,000 subpoenaed emails, what would happen to him?
What would happen to him?
Answer.
It's yes or no.
Would he get arrested?
Yes or no?
Yes.
Okay.
Why didn't Hillary get arrested then?
Why wasn't she charged?
Why wasn't her home raided?
Why wasn't any one of the four locations Biden had top secret classified information raided?
Why is that?
Same thing if you ask, why did Jared, Ivanka, and the boys?
No, I'm asking, why are you talking about the same apples to apples here?
Why didn't Hillary's home, why didn't Joe's home get raided?
Tell me.
Because they both cooperated with no, because there's a double standard in our justice system.
There's your real answer.
And you don't want to admit it because it favors your side.
You like it that it favors your side.
Admit it.
Disagree, but the one thing you've done your whole career, and Ted Couples was totally, is you are very good at what you do.
You are very good.
You're very good at threading the needle.
And you like to keep your base engaged.
I cannot say.
It's not keeping my base.
It's giving news and information that you won't get from the regular media mob.
And I'm sorry that these facts are inconvenient truths for you to coin a phrase because the facts are Hillary Clinton deleted 33,000 subpoenaed emails.
She destroyed those devices with hammers or had them destroyed.
Some of them popped up on later to be a convict Anthony Weiner's laptop.
And even though James Comey acknowledged she had top secret classified information on her servers, no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute.
Does that sound fair in light of the Trump raid and now indictment?
Does that sound fair to you?
Does that sound fair to you?
It's a yes or no question.
It has nothing to do with being fair.
Is that equal justice under the law to you?
Is it?
I'm going to say no, but the thing is, though, again, you.
There you go.
Then we don't have equal justice.
See, I've hannotized you.
You've come around.
I had to put all that pressure on you to get you to get to the truth.
And you know what?
If I'm treated one way because I'm a conservative and you're Casey, a liberal, one of the few in Florida that gets treated another way, that is not equal justice.
And I would support you and I getting the same treatment.
I don't believe in unequal justice.
I don't believe in unequal application.
You just like it because it works for your behavior.
Well, listen, man, it's going to be a long time.
Well, we're losing him here.
We're not hanging up on him.
You're going to hear the phones breaking up.
Anyway, 800-941-Sean, toll-free telephone number, if you want to be a part of the program.
All right, I want to remind you about the Tunnel to Towers Foundation, amazing group that they are.
And anyway, 9-11-2001, 2,977 people lost their lives that day.
Now we have 9-11 related illnesses.
They still continue to take lives.
We have a whole generation that know little to nothing about our nation's darkest day.
Now, the Tunnel to Towers has a 9-11 Institute.
They are righting that wrong by educating kids K through 12th grade.
Their nonfiction first-person accounts are told through videos and their Discovering Heroes book series.
These accounts are moving.
They're on parallel.
Kids won't forget the true stories.
The Institute has a full curriculum unit, scripted social studies, lessons, activities, background for teachers.
They have a speakers bureau with access to 9-11 first responders, survivors, loved ones.
They have their mobile exhibit, the Tractor Trailer Interactive Museum with 9-11 artifacts, the Russell F. Siller Memorial Scholarships for kids recipients who are exemplary high school students preparing for college.
Please join us here at Team Hannity.
They can only do this because of your generosity.
Go to their website, the letter T, the number 2, the letter T.org.
The letter T, the number 2, the letter T.org for the Tunnelton Towers Foundation.
Immigration, jobs, health care.
The news you care about is right here.
Hannity Watch is on.
That's going to wrap things up for today.
Hannity tonight, 9 Eastern on Fox News, Sety DVR.
Me and Gavin Newsome, that's why we were out in California last week paying homage to Linda.
But anyway, it actually went longer than a full hour.
We're going to air the full hour tonight.
Obviously, there'll be a huge big breaking news tomorrow, which we will follow, and then we'll probably run it sometime later in the week, depending on news about Hunter.
Anyway, Gavin Newsome, Hannity, one-on-one tonight on the Fox News channel.
I think you'll like it.
Very entertaining, spirited, and fun, but also making a lot of good points.
See you tonight back here tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection