All Episodes
Previous Next
June 13, 2023 - Sean Hannity Show
33:50
Joe Tacopina on Trump Case - June 12th, Hour 3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This isn't iHeart Podcast.
Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
All right, news roundup information overload hour.
Glad you're with us, 800-941 Sean, if you want to be a part of the program.
So, you know, we've been spending a lot of time today talking about unequal justice under the law, uh how we don't have equal application of our laws.
Uh and, you know, at the bottom of this half hour, I think I'll play the entire exchange because Lindsay just nailed it with Stephanopoulos over the weekend uh about why this is so relevant.
Because if if one person is treated one way, well, why would another American be treated entirely differently?
You know, and then we have the whole issue of the entire Biden family syndicate, and there's no interest in the media at all whatsoever.
Uh, or Joe Biden's four locations for top secret and classified documents.
I'm telling you right now, this is so fundamental and so basic to this democratic republic of ours.
It is the heart and soul of our constitution.
Every law is based on that document.
And we might as well be shredding it if Hillary Clinton can get away with all of the top secret, all the classified documents, and uh uh a little admonition from James Comey that no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute, and then on the obstruction side, the deletion of thirty-three thousand subpoenaed emails,
uh, and then of course devices that might have had those emails destroyed with with hammers, blackberries, and iPhones, and some SIM cards removed, uh some of them later showing up on on Anthony Wiener's laptop.
But no, there was no rate at Hillary Clinton's house, just like there was no raid of Joe Biden's house where the the Corvette was stored ever so safely with more open pictures of the garage that one can shake a stick at, or the Penn Biden Center in it at the University of Penn, U Penn, uh or Delaware, you know, where he had in that office, you know, thousands of documents apparently, or at least eighteen hundred total, and we've not gotten a a breakdown of how many were top secret classified.
I'm not sure if I'd believe it at this point what they told us.
And then, of course, that is Beach House.
Whoops, more documents there too.
None of those locations were raided.
I don't see the special counsel in the case against Biden doing a thing.
I don't see grand juries being formed.
I don't see witnesses being called in, left, right, and sideways.
I see none of that.
Anyway, joining us now is Donald Trump's uh attorney, uh Joe Tacopina is back with us.
Uh sir, how are you?
I'm good, Sean.
Um I'm agitated, but I'm good.
And you know, the way you just said it is is exactly it.
There is such a double standard in the administration of justice in this country that it is actually frightening.
It's frightening because the Justice Department is now being used as a political weapon for the the the whoever happens to be in power.
And it's Gestapo liked it, and it really shouldn't be.
I mean, it's a dark day for the country, it really is.
But you know what?
Half the country, I mean, if you're in the mainstream media, you love this.
If you're a Democrat, you love this.
You love the double standard.
Do they not see the double standard, or is it they just have convinced themselves that Donald Trump is the personification of all things evil on earth today?
That's what it is.
They've convinced themselves he's a personication of all things evil.
But what what we're absolutely really riles me up is the hypocrisy of the far left and the woke and all that.
Look, and I and Sean, I'm not, you know, I I I at times I'm socially the well, I'm a defense attorney.
I mean, there were certain things I I'm really, you know, feel strongly about when it comes to the rights of citizens accused and whatnot.
But but I will tell you this.
What I've seen now is is beyond pale.
I mean, you know, the whole thing about the the far left, the woke party or whatever they are, is inclusion and tolerance.
Inclusion and tolerance.
You, you know, include people, all people, people of all sorts of walks of life, change and everything.
Include everyone.
Be tolerant of everyone.
That supplies unless you have a different opinion than them.
Because if you have a different opinion than them, there is no tolerance.
It's your canceled, you're a white supremacist, you're an animal, whatever it is.
And it's it's gone too far.
It has absolutely gone too far.
And and to to put down the rule of law the way we've put it down here, to really stretch the rule of law to the point where it's never coming back to its original form and proper form, is what people don't seem to understand.
Yeah, the haters of Donald Trump think this is a great thing.
It's not a great thing because the next time, this is now going to be the new norm for this country.
The next time you have a a- No, it's only is it really gonna be the new norm?
And I don't mean interrupt you.
Or is it gonna be the new norm if you're a Republican or conservative and the new norm that Democrats get away with the same offenses, or worse?
Well, I yes, that's true, clearly, because you know the media is so I and I experienced look in this last seven months representing the president.
I can't tell you how real that has all become to me.
Look, I thought there was a little bit of an overstatement regarding the bias of the media and whatnot.
My God, Sean, you were right all along.
I mean, the stuff I've seen is so one-sided.
It's it's that they create facts at times that don't exist just to carry an agenda in the media.
And you know, the media now is a very I I put you know, air air bunnies around that, air quotes around the word media, because the media now is so many people who aren't even journalists, don't have editors, can write what they want to write.
But it's becoming to the point now where they're all talk show hosts like me, except I'm honest about it.
And unfortunately, they're double standard that they see this all with glee.
They think this is good for America.
They think this is gonna stop Donald Trump uh from ever being president again.
That's what their ultimate goal here is.
Republican becomes president.
The next Republican becomes president, right?
And all of a sudden, they've seen the playbook now.
The playbook is hey, use the Justice Department, which used to be separate apart from from any any sort of political bent.
Now use the Justice Department to go after the Democrats you don't like.
That's the new norm.
I'm telling you, that's what's gonna happen.
It's bad on both sides, but we've only seen that on one side.
And to me, it's unconscionable for a president to indict his leading candidate opposing him.
Okay?
Joe Biden also kept classified documents for decades.
And and and you know, if you believe in the rule of law, you have to stand with President Trump against this this this force.
It's a grave injustice, it really is.
I'm not sure ultimately how it plays out.
I know he's got a very aggressive uh special counsel, the prosecutor, you know, trying to run this case against him.
The only benefit I see for him is that that that finally it seems that the special counsel realized the jurisdiction would have been South Florida, uh, where the president lives and where the Mar-a-Lago raid took place, and not Washington, D.C. The odd thing was apparently a lot of the uh grand jury testimony took place in DC and then was read back to the grand jury in Florida.
That to me was a little odd, especially when you consider the grand jurors, correct me if I'm wrong, have a right to ask uh witnesses questions.
Correct.
It is everything.
Look, this we are there's a new norm every single day.
There's a new new new you know, fact, new process that comes out when you're dealing with President Trump in the legal system every single day.
And it's gets to the it's gotten to the point now where it's you don't know what what what's gonna happen next.
Look, I am happy that this case is gonna be tried in the jurisdiction.
At least there are some people who love who you know who who support and love him.
Um you know, Carnegie case in New York, if you're representing President Trump, you know, nine out of ten potential.
Listen, Joe, you did the Egene Carroll lawsuit.
And and in that case, remember they they weighed in, they would not say the word rape in that case.
The verdict came back.
That was an incredible by the way, I uh in New York, I was shocked.
I thought it was a slam dunk guilty, guilty guilty.
Yep.
And and we beat them on the one thing that matters to them, rape.
They said rape a hundred and thirty-three times on that transcript for that trial.
The first words that are from out was why are you here?
Donald Trump rape me.
It was a rape case, and all they wanted was the next day's headline showed there'd be red ink ends of the world headlines, rapist.
Well, that didn't happen.
And it was just more of the same access Hollywood tape and all the stuff that was led into that trial that I don't think should have been let in.
And and that's all the jury smised and found, but they didn't believe her claim that Donald Trump raped her, and he didn't.
And and that was let me ask you this, because you've got Alvin Bragg and his case moving forward.
Uh both Alvin Bragg and the attorney general of New York, Letitia James, actually ran campaigns to go after one person, one man, Donald Trump, one organization, the Trump organization, one family, the Trump family.
Um is is is that the right thing for somebody that's supposed to be impartial and and follow the law to be running on in a campaign?
Boy, you teed that one up.
That was a beautiful softball you just threw me.
I mean, that is so outrageous, not even funny.
It's to me it's what I'm trying to sell to hit you with a softball.
I'm just trying to understand how do you campaign against going against one family and one guy?
I I I know you're not, but think about what you just asked me.
How ridiculous is that, right?
Before Alvin Bragg is the prosecutor, before he has has his hands on evidence, before he has subpoena power, he's a citizen running for an office.
He determined that priority number one is with Donald Trump in jail, not just convicted, put him in jail.
That's on an interview he did.
Okay.
How do you know that before you become the prosecutor?
You don't know the evidence.
You don't have access to evidence that's sealed by grand jury information.
How can you make a ridiculous statement like that?
With Tisa James, the same thing.
She's running, she's a private citizen, running for the office of attorney general, said her priority will be to go after Trump and his family.
Really?
Based on what evidence?
Which goes to show you it was find the target and then we'll get the evidence later.
Let's deal with who we want to go after, and then we'll back into that's what they used to do in the days of Stalin and the days of Hitler and any, you know, communist China, you know, dictator who didn't like his opponents, they'd find the target, and then they try and back in evidence to support that claim.
But it is outrageous that those two, and it shows you a little bit of a serious lack of judgment and/or intelligence, that they would actually spoke the state that my they're running on a campaign to go after Trump.
Easy to do in New York, really courageous to do in New York when you know nine out of the ten voters vote against him.
But how can you say that if you're going to hold a law enforcement office where law enforcement has such enormous power, and you have to use prosecutorial discretion before going after anyone, you've already made a claim and a promise.
It's not just a claim, it was a promise to the constituents that you're going to prosecute Trump without knowing a stitch of evidence.
That's why we are where we are.
That's why this case in Manhattan is going to be full, in my opinion, um, based on a host of things, including selective prosecution.
Quick break more with Joe Tacopina, President Trump's attorney on the other side.
Uh, don't forget Gavin Newsom on Hannity tonight, nine Eastern 800-941 Sean.
If you want to be a part of the program, inflation's on the rise.
Stock market's so volatile more than ever.
Protecting your retirement savings is a challenge for everybody.
Now, to weather today's economic uncertainty, our friends of the Phoenix Capital Group, they are highly recommending that you diversify your investments right now.
Now, their recommendation is high value U.S. oil and gas investments.
Uh their current yields are ranging from 8% to 12% APY paid monthly.
Uh obviously a better rate of return from than a bank or a CD, no middlemen involved.
Uh and these corporate bonds are uh offer or variable terms starting at you know only nine months for accredited investors with a monthly or compounding interest option.
Now to find out more, just download the Phoenix Capitol's free investment packet.
It's at PHX on Hannity.com.
Uh PHX on Hannity.com.
And now keep in mind that an investment in bonds has a certain amount of risk, and you should only invest if you can afford to bear that risk of loss.
It's just that simple.
And before making any investment decision, you gotta carefully consider and review every risk involved.
Anyway, learn how what the Phoenix Capital Group is offering uh in terms of diversification for your portfolio.
Download the Phoenix Capital Group's free investor guide.
It's at PHX on Hannity.com.
PHX on Hannity.com casting coast to coast.
And all over America.
This is the Sean Hennedy show.
Hey, I've shared the importance of every school having a Knox entry access system that quickly gets law enforcement into locked doors when needed.
Now, tragically, the importance continues.
18 U.S. school shootings have occurred from January through March.
Now many schools have a Knox entry system, but the statistics illustrate the need and importance for all schools to provide law enforcement with quick access to locked doors.
Now you can learn more about Knox entry when you go to schoolentry.com.
Do it today, schoolentry.com.
All right, we continue now with Joe Tacopina, President Trump's attorney.
Let me go to the idea that they're trying on the left to get this judge that was Trump appointed, recused from this case.
Will they be successful?
I don't see why they should be successful.
I mean, a judge is a judge, right?
I mean, we had a judge in Manhattan in the Egene Carroll rape trial, which I wasn't a rape, that was appointed by by uh Bill Clinton and very close with Clinton.
So I don't know.
That didn't seem to have an effect.
It didn't bother anyone then.
Why would it bother anyone that he appointed judge?
He's got social friends with the judge.
He didn't, you know, work with the judge, wasn't business partners with the judge appointed based on recommendations and qualifications.
This judge is a very qualified judge, and federal judges are supposed to be fair and read the law properly.
There's no evidence that this judge, and and and shame on anyone who suggests that she's not going to be fair and impartial, because there's absolutely no evidence that she couldn't be fair and partial.
She's a United States district.
Well, they tried to point out that in the the case she had put forward a special master, and the 11th Circuit, you know, uh push back on that, uh, and she eventually just could you know gave into what the 11th Circuit said.
So I mean, I would imagine that you know this is going to be one of those moments.
Um I will say, do you do you think that this is such a slam dunk case that that clearly the special counsel believes it is?
You have you know charge stacking in this case, you basically have the same charge 31 times.
Thirty-one separate incidents.
Uh what is your take?
It's not a slam dunk case.
It's a case, first of all, it's a case that had had they entitled the grand jury on the Biden's for the same exact you know, conduct or the Clintons and Hillary Clinton in particular for her steel dossier thing or or the But is that gonna be allowed?
Will that be admissible if it was in New York like the case you just tried, it would be admissible.
Of course not.
So that that can't be you.
But but when you say slam dumb case, there's no such thing as a slam dumb case when it you're basing your your entire theory on assumptions maybe made by others or that you're making.
The assumptions being that that Donald Trump, you know, knew he was doing something wrong.
In criminal law, you have to have the mentor, as they call it, or the criminal intent to do something wrong.
And and for him to declassify documents, take home, most of which were personal mementos, obviously, and and some documents that he believes he declassified when he left the office.
I mean, it's not a slam dumb case.
And don't forget, what a jury can do, what a jury can do is simply this.
They can feel that if someone's being treated unfairly.
Now we as lawyers can't argue this, of course, but but a jury, and I've seen it happen before, if they believe someone's being treated unfairly, there's no one that could tell them they have to vote a certain way.
If they believe that there's a selective prosecution going on against Donald Trump, where others who did the same exact things were never even investigated, a jury could say, hey, a judge would have to let those comparisons in, wouldn't they?
Yeah, well, the judge is not going to let those comparisons in, but we all live in this this planet Earth where people are going to understand that look, if you think you're gonna get a jury who's never heard of any of the the Biden classified document stuff or the Hillary Clinton Steel dossier or the Hillary Clinton private email server, you know, we're not living in reality.
There could be people who are going to say it's not fair what happened here.
And I think there is a way for the defense in this case to bring out the fact that no one else has been prosecuted for these documents, uh classified documents where they were recovered in other people's homes, like you know, Vice President Pence, like uh Joe Biden, like others.
Uh it is and Hillary was the worst defender of them all.
Yep, but unfortunately, unfortunately, you know, there is uh double standard, and that's the way of putting that.
And look, I still think with a Florida jury, which means he's gonna get some people on there who don't off the bat hear the name of the defendant and vote guilty, right?
Because had this case been in New York or in DC, there are people who would have heard the name of the defendant and said, good, he's guilty.
I don't really care what the evidence is.
I think in Florida, you're gonna at least have a balance.
This judge Well, you have the best shot at a balance, and it looks like the they're gonna do everything they can do to get uh to do their judge shopping and get a more favorable judge uh on their part, even though it's a random system.
Uh Joe Takapina, uh Trump's attorney, thank you so much for being with us.
Okay, Sean, any time.
Thanks.
Sean's got more behind the scenes information, more contacts than anybody.
More friends behind the curtain.
Sean Hannity is on.
All right, 25 to the top of the hour.
Thank you for being with us.
We'll get to your calls here in this final half hour and a minute.
800-941 Sean, our number.
Reminder, Gavin Newsom, my interview with him.
Uh, very spirited, and and I think you'll find it very interesting.
You know, we have you know two Americas here.
You got one America that, you know, how do we reconcile uh open borders, closed borders?
How do you reconcile law and order versus defunded no bail and and and dismantling police?
How do you reconcile energy independence with climate alarmism and no domestic production, but we're gonna make Venezuela rich?
And we get into all of this, you know, and I I confront the governor about all the people leaving his state.
Why are they leaving his state that never happened in the history of the state before?
Anyway, so I think a spirited debate.
Hope you'll watch uh nine Eastern.
Uh obviously tomorrow is going to be all Trump news because tomorrow will be his arraignment.
Um, you know, it's so it's so funny.
This audience is not shy when we do something that you don't like.
And any time it's it's as predictable as the day is long.
If we have Lindsey Graham on, so many of you get so mad at us for putting him on.
And by the way, just so you know, there are times Lindsay drives me up a wall, and I and I call him out on it.
I'm like, what are you doing?
I I called them over Christmas screaming about this idiotic omnibus bill that the Senate, you know, allowed to go through, for example, that was the latest time.
And but then there are moments, and and I say this about him to other people, where if you think of the Kavanaugh hearings, I mean, the entire momentum of those hearings shifted when he just lost it, and he went hardcore uh defending Justice Kavanaugh and condemning this sick process that Democrats often use to smear slander besmirch.
And and I think that was a turning point in the Cavanaugh hearings, in my view.
Um, well, equally, this weekend he had an exchange with George Stephanopoulos.
I played a little part of it earlier, but let me let me play the whole exchange here.
I think it's worth listening to.
Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina who's endorsed Donald Trump for president in 2024.
Senator Graham, thank you for joining us this morning.
Donald Trump has said repeatedly that he did nothing wrong.
Well, here's what I believe.
We live in an America where if you're the Democratic candidate for president, Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State, you can set up a private server in your basement to conduct government business, and when an investigation is had about your activity.
No, let me finish.
But you didn't answer that.
That was ridiculous.
Well, yeah, I I'm trying to answer the question from a Republican point of view.
That may not be acceptable on this show.
Yes, I don't like what President Trump did in certain aspects.
I don't like that Joe Biden had classified information on the garage.
I don't like that Mike Pence carelessly took classified information.
I don't like any of that.
But what I don't like is a system in America where the Secretary of uh State, who's a democratic uh candidate for president, has people take a hammer to social media devices and break them apart, apply beach uh bleach bit to a hard drive to erase emails, allow classified information to get on a felon's computer, Anthony Wiener.
You haven't even mentioned that.
Most Republicans believe we live in a country where Hillary Clinton did very similar things and nothing happened to her.
President Trump will have his day in court, but espionage charges are absolutely ridiculous.
Whether you like Trump or not, he did not commit espionage.
He did not disseminate leak or provide information to a foreign power or to a news organization to damage this country.
He is not a spy.
He's overcharged.
Did he do things wrong?
Yes, he may have.
He will be tried about that, but Hillary Clinton wasn't.
Your old boss committed perjury in a civil lawsuit, lost his law license, obstructed justice in a dozen ways, and he didn't get prosecuted.
Well, look at who's been charged under espionage act.
Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning.
People who turn over classified information to news organizations to hurt the country or provide it to a foreign power.
That did not happen here.
Donald Trump, you may hate his guts, but he is not a spy.
He did not commit commit Espionage.
What he did is very similar in my view to what Hillary Clinton did.
People in the Clinton case took a hammer to a Blackberry and destroyed it.
They wiped clean with bleach bit emails.
They said they were all personal, but some of them actually were classified, and it wound up on Anthony Wiener's computer, and not a damn thing happened to her.
I mean, that was a great segment.
That's how Republicans need to fight.
Now granted, I know Lindsay will frustrate many of you, you know, 20, 25, 30, 40% of the time, whatever it is.
He frustrates me.
But when he's when he's good, he could be really good.
And I thought this was maybe right up there with his commodile moment.
Uh all right, let's get to our phones.
Casey in Florida.
Casey, how are you?
What's going on?
Hey, Sean, it's been a long time.
I haven't talked to you since the Obama days.
I hope everything's well with you and the family.
Well, as long as you're listening, I don't care.
Long as you're out there, how you been?
I'm I'm doing okay, buddy.
I'm a little worried about you, though, man.
It seems like uh You're not really worried about me.
Cut the crap.
You don't care how I'm doing.
Admit it.
So, Sean, let me ask you a question.
He didn't disagree, but go ahead.
You go ahead.
Ask me the question.
You be the host.
You know, you always talk about you know, equal side to justice, all the law and stuff like that.
Right.
You know, the the bottom line is though, all right.
Trump Trump brought this on himself.
There's no there's nothing you can say.
They got him on video.
They got it recording.
He is a criminal and a traitor to this country.
And I know Okay, he's not a traitor to his country.
He wasn't involved, as Lindsay said in any espionage here.
The question was whether or not he felt in his mind, based on the Presidential Records Act, and whether or not these documents were legal to have in his possession.
My advice is if they want them, if they're gonna threaten to raid your place, hand them over.
Do you really care?
And but but he's not a traitor to his country, so you know, let's get rid of the hyperbole.
He was subpoenaed seven times.
Okay, I don't know about seven subpoenas, but I know do know he was subpoenaed in the case.
And and hang on.
And if you go back, you can't not acknowledge a simple truth.
The FBI had unfettered access to that room where they found the majority of those documents.
And they were there.
And nothing stopped them that day from saying, Hey, can we take these with us?
They didn't take anything with them.
They just called back and said, Can you put another lock on the door?
So the FBI was in there in the very room where the you know, where all those documents remember the FBI sent out pictures showing everybody, see the documents, see the documents.
Uh, they didn't do that with Joe Biden.
I haven't even chronicled how many documents Joe Biden had at this point.
And I've always wanted to ask you this, okay?
I've always always wanted to All right.
Well, now I get to fulfill your lifelong wish.
What?
You talk about the dossier all the time, but you fail to tell your your followers and your and your whoever listens to you that the dossier was originally purchased by the Republican Party and Marco Rubio.
Why do you never tell your party or your your followers the truth?
They have I had read that a lot that that some of this information, which would be normal, typical op research on another candidate, uh that was going on with other Republican candidates.
However, the specific series was a it was not a big dossier to start.
It was a series of memos and op research that collectively became known as the dossier.
That's the one that Hillary Clinton bought and paid for.
That's the one that she funneled money through a law firm, Perkins Cuey.
They hired Fusion GPS that hired Christopher Steele to do the op research.
And when Christopher Steele was offered a million dollars by the FBI to corroborate any part of that dossier, he couldn't do it.
And then they still used it as the bulk of information and not one but four Pfizer warrants, even after the final two uh they used after his source, subsource Danchenko, who they then hired, said that none of it was true.
They kept using something that was false.
Now, if I went before a judge and I said something that I'm giving the court is verified when it's unverifiable, what do you think would happen to me, Casey?
Where would I be?
Uh I don't know.
Probably uh probably doing your judicial karate stuff, I guess.
I don't know.
Yeah, no, I'd probably be in jail, maybe doing some you know, prison workouts.
That's what I'd be doing.
But Andy, respectfully, the Republicans Respectfully, you're not answering my point.
Hillary bought and paid for this dossier.
And that dossier then was leaked to the media.
And the media ran, you know, hog wild with it.
The FBI couldn't corroborate it, and they used it to get a Pfizer warrant.
Now, what where is your outrage at lying to to you know Pfizer court judges?
Where is it?
I don't hear the outrage.
I hear outrage about only Trump.
Where's the outrage about Hillary and and Jim Comey and company?
Where's that outrage?
Targeted Hillary.
You guys investigated Hillary 13 times and came up with egg on your No, no, we have a uh this is my whole point.
We have a dual justice system.
Now, do you think any Republican would get away with deleting thirty three thousand subpoenaed emails and destroying blackberries and iPhones with hammers and removing SIM cards?
You tell me, do you really believe a Republican would get away with that?
Would Donald Trump get away with that or only Hillary?
Yes, Trump did.
Trump Trump did not.
He didn't delete thirty-three thousand emails.
Wrong.
You're wrong.
And this is where you are lacking intellectual honesty, Casey.
If if Donald Trump deleted thirty three thousand subpoenaed emails, what would happen to him?
Well hopefully what would happen to him.
Answer.
It's not a it's yes or no.
Would he get arrested?
Yes or no?
Yes.
Okay.
Why didn't Hillary get arrested then?
Why wasn't she charged?
Why wasn't her home raided?
Why wasn't any one of the four locations Biden had top secret classified information uh rated?
Why is that?
So same thing if you asked, why did Jared Ivanka and the boys now?
I'm asking, why talking about the same apples to apples here?
Why didn't Hillary's home, why didn't Joe's home get raided?
Tell me.
Because they both can cooperated with No, because there's a double standard in our justice system.
There's your real answer.
And you don't want to admit it because it favors your side.
You like it that it favors your side, admit it.
Disagree, but the one thing you've done your whole career, and and Ted Couples was totally, is you are very good at what you do.
You were you are very good.
You're very good at threading the needle.
And you you you like to keep your base engaged.
I cannot keep it my base.
It's giving news and information that you won't get from the regular media mob.
And I'm sorry that these facts are inconvenient truths for you to c coin a phrase.
Because the facts are Hillary Clinton deleted thirty-three thousand subpoenaed emails.
She destroyed those devices with hammers or had them destroyed.
Uh some of them popped up on later to be a convict, Anthony Wiener's laptop.
And even though the James Comey acknowledged she had top secret classified information on her servers, no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute.
Does that sound fair in light of the Trump raid and now indictment?
Does that sound fair to you?
Trump trials.
Does that sound fair to you?
It's a yes or no question.
Is that equal justice under the law to you?
Yes.
Is it?
You're I I'm gonna say no.
But the thing is though, again, you there you go, then we don't have equal justice.
See, I've hanitized you.
You've come around.
I had to put all that pressure on you to get you to get to the truth.
And you know what?
If I'm treated one way, because I'm a conservative in your case, a liberal, one of the few in Florida, uh, that get treated another way.
That is not equal justice.
And I would support you and I getting the same treatment.
I don't believe in unequal justice.
I don't believe in unequal application.
You just like it because it's work works for your behavior.
Well, listen, man.
It's been a long here.
We're not hanging up on 'em.
You can hear the phones breaking up.
Anyway, eight hundred nine four one Sean toll free telephone number, if you want to be a part of the program.
All right, want to remind you about the Tunnel to Towers Foundation.
Uh amazing group that they are.
And uh anyway, nine eleven two thousand and one, two thousand nine hundred seventy seven people lost their lives that day.
Uh now we have nine eleven related illnesses.
They still continue to take lives.
We have a whole generation that know little to nothing about our nation's darkest day.
Now the Tunnel to Towers has a 9-11 institute.
They are writing that wrong by educating kids K through 12th grade.
Their nonfiction first person accounts are told through videos and their Discovering Heroes book series.
These accounts are moving.
They're on parallel.
Kids won't forget the true stories.
The institute has a full curriculum units, scripted social studies lessons, activities, background for teachers.
They have a speaker's bureau with access to 9-11 first responders, survivors, loved ones.
They have their mobile uh uh exhibit, the tractor uh trailer interactive museum with 9-11 artifacts, the Russell F. Siller Memorial Scholarships for kids uh recipients or exemplary high school students preparing for college.
Please join us here at Team Hannity.
They can only do that do this because of your generosity.
Go to their website, the letter T, the number 2, the letter T.org.
The letter T, the number 2, the letter T.org for the Tunnel to Towers Foundation.
Music.
Immigration, jobs, health care.
The news you care about is right here.
Hannity Watch is on.
That's gonna wrap things up for today.
Uh Hannity Tonight, 9 Eastern on Fox News, CE DVR.
Uh, me and Gavin Newsom.
Uh that's why we were out in California last week, uh paying homage to uh Linda.
But anyway, the uh it actually went longer than a full hour.
We're gonna air the full hour tonight.
Obviously, there'll be huge big breaking news tomorrow, uh, which we will follow, and then we'll probably run it sometime later in the week, depending on news about Hunter.
Anyway, Gavin Newsom Hannity one-on-one tonight on the Fox News channel.
I think you'll like it.
Very entertaining, spirited, and fun, uh, but also making a lot of good points.
See you tonight, back here tomorrow.
Thank you for making this show possible.
▲
Export Selection