All Episodes
Previous Next
April 11, 2023 - Sean Hannity Show
34:44
No Free Lunch - April 10th, Hour 2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is an iHeart Podcast.
At Hour Two, Sean Hannity Show, toll-free.
It's 800 941.
Sean, you want to be a part of the uh uh program.
No, you look at the economy, and then you you have to start asking yourself, well, when does it get better?
I mean, I uh I'm listening to the smartest best people that I know in terms of the economy, two of which will join us in a second.
Uh over the weekend, I was uh reading and very interesting articles that relates to Paul Singer.
Uh the guy knows a thing or two about the economy.
He's the guy that uh saw the economic crisis warning about the subprime mortgage crisis before two thousand and eight and Dodd Frank in twenty ten and inflation in twenty twenty, and after the Silicon Valley Bank, you know, what does he think is going to happen next?
You know, on a on just a practical term, I mean, that this caught my attention.
Uh you ever get a value meal at McDonald's?
You ever see the price of a value meal at McDonald's?
Okay, well, apparently a value meal, big Mac combo meal is sixteen dollars and eighty-nine cents.
Some of the other menu prices exceed eighteen dollars.
Now, this is not in every part of the country.
I believe this part was in somewhere in Connecticut.
Uh, but you get my point, because if you go shopping, well, you can see pretty much every place, everywhere that we've got, you know, massive inflation.
Now we have massive, you know, job cuts now surging.
You see a decline in hiring around the country, and the pace of the job cuts of U.S. employers accelerating in March with numbers of layoffs now climbing 15% from just a month ago.
Uh the Biden labor department is now admitting that it's been underreporting jobless numbers by 20%.
Uh, you know, the one thing good that they're good at is lying about statistics.
Uh, it's gonna be transitory, you know, but you you just you just follow up on every single thing that they say.
Whenever the Bureau of Labor statistics reports, you know, about job growth and unemployment rates, you can bet President Biden is gonna use it as an opportunity to brag about a superb handling of the economy.
Uh and now we see with you know OPEC now cutting back production of oil because we have all but abandoned domestic production here.
It guarantees that your summer gas prices are gonna be through the roof yet again.
Very predictable.
By the way, something that could completely be in our control, and and it's not at all.
I mean, you just can't make it up.
Uh anyway, there's another issue that has uh has come up, and that is the central bank digital currencies are about to control.
You know, so in other words, the Federal Reserve should drop the Fed now on any plan to to launch this central bank digital currency.
In other words, every transaction if you use that would be run through the federal government.
That means they're watching every single move that you make, everything that you buy, everything that you do, and they'll have eighty-seven thousand new IRS agents to track your personal life.
You want to buy something online?
Do you want the rest of the world to know what you're buying online?
Not not I'm not even talking about anything nefarious here.
You know, what happens if hackers or cyber criminals get access to that system?
You know, how's the government gonna track you know money at this point?
Each dollar has a unique serial number, identifies it, and and you can help track track it for a legal activity, but the idea of some system being run through uh crypto in which the Fed has literally digitized now and then holding people's money and watching and observing every single thing that they do at every given time.
You know, we've seen governments freeze bank accounts unnecessarily.
For example, look what happened in Canada with the truckers.
Remember, they froze those guys' bank accounts.
Well, that gives uh the government total control over, you know, over everybody basically in society.
You know, then you have the uh possibility of the Fed, you know, expiring people's money after a certain period of time.
What to encourage spending?
Now they're gonna tell us what to do there?
You know, the the thing that the common theme in all of this is that the economy by every objective measure, in other words, the economy that you're living in, where two-thirds of Americans now live paycheck to paycheck.
That economy, I will tell you right now, is the reality, not the lying, not the spinning, not the distortion, not the propaganda, not the misinformation.
Here's Jim Eckards economists saying that the greatest enemy to the US dollar is the U.S. Treasury.
Listen to this.
The dollar's being attacked from all sides.
People are looking for substitute payment currencies.
A reserve currency is a different thing.
First of all, that's uh the savings account, if you will, the country.
Countries don't actually have the currency.
They it's not as if the People's Bank of China has a stack of hundred dollar bills in the basement.
What they do is they buy securities denominated in a currency, mostly denominated in dollars, mostly U.S. Treasury securities.
So the key to being reserve currency is do you have a bond market big enough, liquid enough with dealers, underwriters, sell them in clearance, derivatives, futures, options, etc., all the things you need, and above all the rule of law, do you have that kind of bond market?
But going back at the uh at the keys, you need a rule of law.
So the greatest enemy of the dollar as a reserve currency is not all those other countries, it's the U.S. Treasury.
Because the U.S. Treasury has weaponized the dollar, frozen the reserves of the central bank of Russia, and other countries looking around saying, Hey, what if they don't like what I did?
You know, what if they don't like one of my policies?
Are they going to freeze my reserves?
There, if you say I want to get out of the dollar as a reserve currency, the only really good alternative is gold.
Now, this taps into exactly what I have been saying about the danger of this new access of evil.
Trust me, China wants the US dollar to be replaced as the world's currency.
And they are working towards that.
And now they've aligned with Russia and Iran and the Saudis and the South, the brokering deals with the Saudis and the Iranians and the Saudis and the Syrians, uh expanding their sphere of influence in Latin America, Africa, and other parts of the world.
And then if you pay a little bit of attention to the things that we were talking about earlier in the program, uh it gets really significant when you look at the the threat that China's making even to this very day.
China now is is showing on state TV their war plan against us and planning their showdown with the U.S. Navy, and that China's ready to fight.
Uh and and of course we know that President Xi said that last week.
Anyway, joining us because it's all interrelated as far as I'm concerned.
Uh Steve Moore, economist, author of the bestseller Trump and Omics, David Bonson, trustee of National Review Institute.
Uh welcome both of you to the program.
Uh Steve, you even see I think you your interpretation that it's even worse than I'm describing.
Yes.
Well, let me start with what's happened in the last two years, because uh, you know, I enjoyed listening to your retrospective on what's happened with the economy.
I believe that a lot of the problems that we're facing with U.S. economy, if not all of them, really circle back to the six trillion dollar spending spree by Biden, uh, which was completely unnecessary, was reckless, and has put the United States, I think, in a financially precarious position.
And when you talked about what's happening globally with respect to China and Taiwan, you know, there's an old saying uh that goes back to Ronald Reagan, the weakness is provocative.
And right now the United States looks weak, not just militarily, but also from an economic perspective.
And until we get, you know, this budget semi-same, Sean, at least, you know, you can't continue to borrow one, two trillion dollars a year, year after year after year, which is what Biden is proposing.
We're headed to I said this on your TV show the other night, we're headed to fifty trillion dollars.
Fifty trillion dollars of debt.
I think that's incredibly dangerous.
And so many of the problems you've been talking about, the higher inflation, the threat to the dollar, the fact that uh you know the economy is growing at such an anemic pace.
I think they all go back to the enormous debt and spending spree that we've never seen the likes of before.
What would the consequences, David Bonson be?
We see China, Malaysia now, and I would argue they're the new ally, Russia, uh Iran, and all these other countries will join in very quickly, reviving this decades-old proposal that would reduce dependence on the U.S. dollar.
In other words, they want the dollar replaced as the world's go-to currency, don't they?
Well, they certainly do, and you're uh the clip you played summed it up perfectly where a lot of people are misunderstanding the difference between a reserve currency and a transactional currency, and it's a vitally important difference because China is not opening up their capital markets for their currency to be able to come in and out of the country.
There is no way that other countries want to uh transact with Chinese currency and then hold it in reserve.
They want to convert it into dollars for the very reason that I think you said it was accurate who said that we are uh we have the bond market, the size, the liquidity.
So what we're talking about is transactions, not reserve.
And I do not believe that our policy should be anything other than strong dollar.
I've believed it as long as I've been studying economics.
And we've had two presidents in my lifetime who were strong dollar presidents, Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton.
Okay, we had a Democrat who is the strong dollar president.
And yet it really started with Bush Jr. who did a lot of things I liked, but this is not one of them.
He advocated for a weaker U.S. dollar.
And now we've gotten to a place where people think it doesn't matter.
And it does matter, and the reality is that our own strengths are based in the DNA of our country that we're so large, so powerful, so profound that therefore there's no other option.
Europe is worse than us.
Japan is worse than us.
That's all true.
But we should not be having a national policy based on being the w the best shirt in the dirty clothes hamper.
Yeah I want to get your thoughts Steve on on what David is saying here, because I think he's dead right.
You know, it's sort of like everybody's you know focused on on what's happening in America and the following abortion rulings and they're following what happened in Tennessee.
But the the real danger to the country is taking place as I I I call it the new axis of evil and the intentions of the communist Chinese and the Russians and the Iranians and the North Koreans, now the Saudis and others in terms of now that ab now now that Joe Biden's abdicated the role of the United States on the world stage as the leader of the free world it seems to me that they are moving it at a rapid pace to take to
fill that void themselves as quickly as possible.
Yeah I look I agree with everything that David Bonson just said.
I'm going to put a little just a little twist on it.
So we had a president in Donald Trump who, you know, I didn't agree with every policy put in place, but I agree with most of them.
And one of the things that Donald Trump did, and I was in the Oval Office with him many times, Sean, is that every decision he made truly was about putting America first.
Everyone.
I'm not so sure this president does that, Sean.
I don't think he makes that determination.
And all of these mistakes that are being made, remember how Trump used to say that the other country, all the.
foreign countries are laughing behind our back that is clearly what has happened with Biden policies.
And just to take one example OPEC Sean we never talked about OPEC when Trump was president because we had a president who put America's energy he made us energy dominant so that the OPEC cartel had no power over the price of oil because we were the leading producer.
So what's happened in the last two years now our production has not cut pace uh kept pace we're about two uh million barrels to two to three million barrels less than we should be if Trump's policies had stayed in in place and who have been the beneficiaries of that show you can add another uh you know million barrels of oil a day if they finish the Keystone XL pipeline except that oil would be coming from even though I don't particularly love or I'm a fan of little Justin but it would have come from Canada they are a real ally.
So the the countries that have benefited from the energy policy and I'm just using this as an example our Saudi Arabia, Russia, China, Venezuela, Iran, all of our enemies so this is a very dangerous time for our country both economically and as a uh in terms of our uh national security.
All right quick break more with Steve Moore David Bonson on the other side than your calls 800 nine four one Sean if you want to be a part of the program as we continue America listens to Sean Hennedy.
And he's on on right now we continue now with our economic gurus uh David Bonson and Steve Moore.
Now we didn't have the the spy balloon shot down uh David Bonson until it was long i it got all the intel back to China in real time we now learn even MBC news is reporting that it we we know Biden didn't lift a finger when the drone was taken out of the sky.
We know that the summit took place with Qi and Putin and these alliances I'm talking about are very very real and very very dangerous.
So you know as as China is now saber rattling and talking about a showdown with our Navy in the in the South China Sea and and showing on state TV their war plans what what's Joe going to do now?
Well look I think that the issue regarding the strategic petroleum reserve is one of the best examples we could discuss that I imagine we're all going to agree on as evidence of this administration's weakness.
Well, they were selling some of the strategic reserves to China.
How stupid are they?
Well, there should be no removal from the strategic petroleum reserves for China or us because they're there for emergencies, and it wasn't an emergency.
We have it there as an asset on our national balance sheet that is a point of leverage, a point of competitive advantage, and having a midterm election and having five dollar gasoline is not an emergency.
That reality is we pulled 180 million barrels out down to 1984 levels, and now they have to refill it, and they can't and they won't.
And that's the only reason OPEC plots did what they did last week.
And I know people get so mad at me when I say this, but they did exactly what they should have done.
If you're operating in Saudi Arabia's best interest, Saudi did what Saudi should have done for themselves.
The point is we should be the ones with the leverage.
We should be the marginal producer.
And all that happened, I know you know this and Steve knows this, but I really want listeners to know.
Saudi knows.
We've we unilaterally surrendered economically on the issue of energy, the lifeblood of the world's economy.
And by the way, the Saudis, their biggest oil producing uh company had the biggest profit margin they've ever had, somewhere near 167 billion dollars last year.
Thank you, Joe Biden.
Only have about 20 seconds, Steve.
The good news is ESG is gonna die because you can you can try to cut off all the capital you want to American oil and gas.
They can self-fund their backs at $85 oil.
They don't need capital markets.
Oh, it's it's sustaining Putin's war against Ukraine.
I mean, he's getting rich uh selling all his his oil and and laughing at the U.S. and and basically owning Western Europe that became so dependent on him.
But I got a roll, guys.
I wish I had more time.
Uh 800-941 Sean, you want to be a part of the program, David Bons and Steve Moore.
Look, uh, have you checked the legal title to your home?
Because what if your home's title, the legal document that proves you own your home is in some criminal's name?
Because uh you have cyber criminals all over the world that are involved in going online, finding finding your title, stealing it, acting like you sold your home to them when you did not.
It's called home title theft.
And they can do it in six minutes or less.
We know because Linda met with our friends at Home Title Lock.com and they showed you personally what uh how quick they could do it.
It was unbelievable.
And what was even more scary is how they could copy my signature.
I mean, they literally took the whole thing over, soup to nuts, and somebody else had my house for like ten bucks.
Ten bucks, and then they can take out loans based on the equity in your home, et cetera, et cetera.
Insane.
Anyway, so how do you know that some criminal locked out comments uh promo code Sean, S-E-A-N at home title lock dot com, and your first thirty days of protection are free.
Remember, a lot of uh homeowners' insurance policies don't pay for this, and a lot of identity theft programs don't pay for this.
Some offer it at a premium.
Anyway, home title lock.com, promo code Sean S-E-A-N.
At nine PM.
Do you know where your president is?
I don't know.
Yep, he's sound asleep in his bed.
With not a care in the world.
Must be nice, Joe.
The rest of us will keep working.
You're on the Sean Anity show.
Twenty-five to the top of the hour.
Thank you for being with us.
800-941 Sean.
If you want to join us, hey, we can never forget what happened 911, 2001.
We lost 2,977 of our fellow Americans that day, and and people are still suffering and dying from 9-11 related illnesses.
You have a whole generation, sadly, that knows next to nothing about 9-11.
My own daughter was born, what, 13 days prior to 9-11?
And anyway, only two states in the country mandate K through 12 learning, and that's why the Tunnel to Towers 911 Institute, they're given educators access to nonfiction resources for K through 12 and full curriculum units built around first-person accounts with scripted social studies lessons and activities and background for teachers.
Plus, they have their Discovering Hero series of books with their accompanying uh curriculum units.
They have a speaker's bureau with access to first responders, survivors, loved ones.
They have their mobile exhibit, their high-tech 83 foot tractor trailer that turns into an eleven hundred square foot interactive museum with 911 artifacts.
They have their Russ Russell F. Siller uh memorial scholarships given to the children of program recipients who are exemplary high school students preparing for college.
Anyway, to never forget the Hannity team is committed to eleven bucks a month, and we hope you'll join us because they were there for us, and now we got to be there for them.
They're asking for eleven dollars a month.
If you can put it possibly make this happen, please join us in this effort.
Their website, the letter T, the number two, the letter T dot org, the letter T, the number two, the letter T dot org.
Uh before we hit the phones here, do you remember Kamala Harris?
Didn't she not know what transitory means?
Or am I just making this up in my own brain?
No, no.
I believe you're one hundred percent accurate.
Let's play it.
You're talking about cost of living.
Was it wrong to consider inflation transitory?
I mean, these price spikes seem like they're gonna be with us for a while.
We have to address the fact that we got to deal with the fact that folks are paying paying for gas, paying for groceries, and our are need solutions to it.
So let's talk about that.
Short-term solution includes what we need to do around the supply chain, right?
So we went to the ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach, Savannah, Georgia, and said, hey guys, no more five days a week, eight hours a day, twenty-four-seven.
Let's move the products because people need their product they need what they need.
We're dealing with it in terms of the long term, and that's about what we need to do to pass bill back better.
It strengthens our economy.
Wrong, wrong, and wrong again, and passing the agenda ended up being disastrous for the economy and hasn't gotten us anywhere.
All right, I'm told we have a liberal.
Now people think that we don't allow liberals on the program.
Occasionally that a false allegation is brought up.
It says on the line that we have Sam the man in Pennsylvania and that he's a liberal.
And anyway, Sam, is that true?
Are you a liberal?
Yes, Sean.
We were uh I was on your show.
Yeah, all right.
Well, by the way, and and we were nice to you, aren't we?
Absolutely.
All right, so and and we're putting you back on again.
I mean, is it a fair accusation that I don't put liberals on?
That's not a hard one.
No, it's not fair.
You're you're a liberal and you're on the air.
So anyway, what's on your mind?
Yeah, I just um I just wanted to ask.
I've been listening to your show, and you've been pretty adamant that President Trump was is innocent of the charges that he's been um charged with.
Do you think anybody besides Donald Trump would be charged with with thirty-four counts the way he's been charged?
Well, I I know that there have been other people who have charged, been charged.
No.
This isn't this this novel newly created legal theory of Alvin Bragg, it has never been tried before.
We've gone over that in specificity and detail.
Never.
Not one time.
Well, the statute of limitations number one has passed.
And when you look at the actual indictment, they don't even mention this this they have this, you know, this open, you know, reference to an underlying crime, which nobody knows what the hell Alvin Bragg is talking about.
Uh per the sixth amendment, you do have a right to know what you're being charged with, and you know, it's a mystery right now to uh anybody and everybody that's ever read that indictment.
Um so if you're asking me, uh, do I think it's the right thing to do?
No.
Do I think what uh the Russia hoax lie, wouldn't you admit that that has been exposed as a nothing but a lie in Donald Trump that that took up three years of his presidency?
Do you deny that Donald Trump was spied on uh thanks to lying to uh a FISA court uh for an entire year, first as a candidate, then later as president?
Are you denying that Hillary's dirty dossier was the basis for that FISA application when it says on the top of the PISA application verified?
Do you deny that if they were really concerned about quid pro quo's in Ukraine and the impeachment that took place there that Donald Trump uh okay if that's their standard that Joe Biden bragging on tape that he leveraged a billion taxpayer dollars to get a a prosecutor in Ukraine fired who turned out to be investigating Barisma Holdings and his son Hunter and his son Hunter who went on TV and admitted he had no experience in energy,
oil, gas, coal, or Ukraine, but was being paid a massive amount of money.
Uh do you think that's a double standard, yes or no?
Uh Sean, uh I believe I asked you a question.
Is that a double standard?
Is that a quit and a pro and a quo by Joe?
If there was a law that was broken, everybody there I didn't ask you that.
I just explained the scenario.
There's no ambiguity into what happened here.
Joe Biden said it himself.
I could play it for you.
Would you you w need me to go that far?
Is it a double standard?
Yes.
It is.
So Donald Trump and and was the three year Russia hoax nothing but a lie we now know in the end?
Sean, I'm I'm agreeing with everything that you're saying.
Okay.
So, you know, name me another president that's ever been treated like this.
But what I'm saying is there is obviously some kind of law that was broken.
If there was a law that was broken when Hillary with the whole thing.
Well, wait a minute.
You just got done admitting to me that a three-year investigation and narrative pushed by Democrats and the media mob about Russia was false.
You just got done admitting to me that there was a double standard about quid pro quos in Ukraine.
So you're just gonna sit here and declare Donald Trump guilty when never before in New York State or any other state that I can think of, uh, have we had a situation where the a DA who ran on the very promise to get one man,
one organization, and one family fulfilling a campaign promise by taking a a a misdemeanor charge with the statute of limitation having long expired and marrying it to some type of federal issue, probably an election issue that the FEC itself passed on and the DOJ passed on and Mueller passed on, and and you're sitting here defending that?
There must be something you said to me.
Why, because Alvin Prague said so?
Well, there must have been something to the Russia thing after all, you know, all the Democrats and uh everybody in the media said so.
Sean, I'd like to have a back and forth conversation with you.
Is that something that we can do?
I'm listening, but there's nothing you're saying that's worthwhile.
But go ahead.
What I am trying to say is if there was a law that was broken, if somebody saw that there was a law that was broken, what do they typically do?
They go through the process of getting somebody indicted.
Okay.
Why didn't anybody go through that process with Hillary Clinton?
Why didn't anybody go through that process?
Because I think we have a dual justice system is my answer.
Now, you told me you're Mr. Liberal.
Tell me what in the what in the indictment, the thirty-four charges by your friend Alvin Bragg against Donald Trump, tell me what the crime is.
What is he being accused of?
Uh uh I'm I'm no friends with anybody, but I would imagine that he's being accused of illegal.
I don't want you to imagine.
I want you to tell me specifically what the charge is.
Sean, I don't know that because I'm not Alvin Bragg, but I would imagine that he's being charged with the original crime is illegal campaign contributions.
Okay, then why didn't he mention that in the indictment?
I don't know.
Because the statute of limitations, if that were true, would have expired also.
I love uh I love educating liberals.
This is a you know, this is a great exercise back and forth.
You just hate Donald Trump, like most people in the media.
And you just sat here and I got you to admit three years of Russia collusion lies.
I got you to admit that there's a double standard when it comes to quid pro quos.
I got you to admit you don't really know anything about what is what what Donald Trump's being indicted for, because it's not specified in the indictment.
I just but you just said there must be something.
Why, because they indicted him?
You do know.
Let me ask you a question.
When Donald Trump's attorneys went before the grand jury and presented their evidence, do you think that was a fair opportunity for them?
Yes.
So you felt he got his fair shot before the grand jury, Donald Trump.
He tried to do that uh in several uh courts, and they were all thrown out.
Okay, it was a trick question.
The defense never gets to say a word in a grand jury proceeding.
Did you not know that?
Sean.
Have you ever heard the phrase you can indict a ham sandwich?
Let's figure this out, okay?
No, only the prosecutor gets to present their side of the story and the defendant gets to say nothing in a grand jury proceeding.
You didn't know that?
Sean, we're trying to figure out why he got indicted.
Sam got indicted.
Sam, I just asked you a question.
Did Donald Trump's lawyers get a fair opportunity before the grand jury on is on the issue of indictments?
You told me yes.
You obviously don't know that the defendant or uh potential defendant has an eye that their lawyers don't have one word.
They don't get one second before the grand jury.
Sean, I'm glad you know as the professional on the phone right now.
I'm glad that you know that.
But you're you want to make the case that well, there must be something.
I gave you a list of examples when they said there was something and then it ended up being nothing.
And then you're just saying, well, there's gotta be something, and then the I'm asking you to cite what's in the indictment, you can't do that.
And then for some bizarre reason you think that Donald Trump's attorneys have been able to go before the grand jury.
You're not you're not representing your liberal side very well.
I will tell you that.
Sean, what I'm trying to say is that if there is a law that was that Joe Biden broke, I don't care if he somebody wants to indict him and they want to impeach him.
Have at it.
He has his day in court.
Everybody has their day in court.
All right, quick uh break more with Sam the Liberal.
We're not gonna rush him off the phone here.
Well uh on the other side, then we'll get uh to your calls also next in the next hour, I promise.
Uh also coming up in the program today at the top of the hour, we will check in with Gordon Chang about these China threats.
It's getting scary out there.
We have Hannity, live audience show.
If you want free tickets, Hannity.com.
Quick break, right back.
We'll continue.
Final hour roundup is next.
You do not want to miss it.
And stay tuned for the final hour free for all on the Sean Hannity Show.
All right, back with Sam the Liberal from Pennsylvania.
You know something?
There comes a point where you're abusing the justice system.
And and they have tried to tie this man up in knots the ent since the moment he's come down that escalator at Trump Tower.
And if there was any sense of fair play in you, I don't care that you don't like him.
I don't care that you don't like his policies, but you should be for equal justice and equal application of our laws.
Because we do know Hillary Clinton deleted thirty-three thousand subpoenaed emails.
We do know that she used something called bleach bit to do so.
We do know that an aide beat up her blackberries and and iPhones with hammers and they remove SIM cards.
Does that sound like obstruction of justice to you?
I would imagine so, and she probably should have been charged.
But I'm asking can I ask you?
That's my problem, is we have a dual justice system.
We don't have equal justice under the law or application of our laws.
Ask your last question.
I'm getting a little bored here.
Sean.
Yes.
Sam.
Hi, Sam.
You really think that I would support somebody who broke a cri who broke the law?
I but you you called and you said the words you used were I'm sure there's gotta be something there, and when I press you to give an answer what might be there, you're just guessing.
And you know what?
You sound a lot like Nancy Pelosi.
He said, Well, he'll have his day in court and he'll have the ability to prove his innocence.
No, under our system of justice, you're supposed to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Did you know that?
That's what the that's what the the prosecution that's what the uh Alvin Bragg's gonna do.
You believe that Alvin Bragg, do you think it's right that you have an A G in New York and uh and a Manhattan prosecutor that run on a promise to go after one man by the name of Donald Trump, one organization, the Trump organization, one family, the Trump family?
How would you feel if somebody was running for those powerful offices mentioned your name, your family, and your business?
How would you feel?
Do you think that's you think such a person should ha w wield so much power?
Or did they have a conflict of interest?
In other words, are they gonna are they going to manipulate the law for their own political advancement?
Sean, do you remember locker up?
I do remember locker up.
You remember locker up?
I do.
But luckily, Trump did not go through with that.
Well, no, it wasn't a matter of Trump going through with that.
Well, you should then you should then at least give Trump credit.
He left it up to his own Justice Department, and and they they decided not to prosecute.
They made the that's called prosecutorial discretion.
This is you know, even liberal lawyers I know see all of this for what it is.
They see what's happening here.
And you want to defend the system like this.
Um anyway, I would urge you the next time you call, we'll invite you on the program anytime you want to call, but I urge you to come in a little bit more informed on what you want to talk about.
Okay.
That'll make you a better liberal caller.
I'm encouraging you to be a better liberal caller.
Good day, Sean.
You have a good day.
God bless you.
Appreciate you being with us.
Now, was that exercise worthwhile?
I think it was.
Because this unfortunately is the mentality of many people that don't know what the hell's going on, and they just hear things and believe things.
I thought the best question that you just asked him, as nice as he was.
He was nice.
Was could you tell me what he was being charged with?
Nobody can tell you.
And nobody can tell you.
No, the answer is Alvin Bragg hasn't been told yet what to charge him with.
And once they tell him what he's allowed to charge him with, then he'll do that.
So I was looking at this article by Paul Springer, and actually he just reaffirmed everything I've known since I started uh saving money, and that is I I diversified more my portfolio.
Every any good financial advisor will tell you that.
Uh, but also he mentioned, you know, gold as being any he hates he hates cryptocurrency.
Um, but anyway, he mentioned gold and silver uh having the ability to withstand inflationary periods and and over a period of time being a strong solid investment and a protection and a hedge uh against other investments that you have.
That's why for years I bought gold and silver.
Uh now we've partnered with a a great company called Go Co Gold Co.
I did my research.
They have they're a great company, great reputation in the precious metals market.
By the way, you can look up how they're gonna give up to ten thousand dollars away in free silver while supplies last.
And for my fans, you could receive also a free Ronald Reagan silver coin.
Look, look at the economy right now.
It scares the hell out of me.
We've had disastrous economic policies, war inflation, a potential recession, now throw in bank failures and bailouts uh into the mix and saber rattling by China against the U.S. These are not these are not fun times.
Anyway, I love my friends at Gold Co.
Give them a call today.
You know, always do your own dil due diligence and and check in with your own financial people.
Uh their number's eight five five eight one five G O L D. That's eight five five eight one five gold, eight five five eight one five G O L D for Gold Co.
▲
Export Selection