Sean Hannity Show - Senator Paul - December 5th, Hour 2

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 6, 2022 - Sean Hannity Show

33:26

Senator Paul - December 5th, Hour 2

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is an iHeart Podcast.
	Hour two, Sean Hannity's show toll-free 800-941.
	Sean, if you want to be a part of the uh program.
	So story breaks this weekend.
	Scientists who work closely with the U.S. funded, again, NIH money funneled through the Eco Alliance to this Wuhan Virology Lab, which everybody knew was engaged in gain of function research and coronavirus research.
	Anyway, one of the scientists that worked closely with this Wuhan lab is now claiming that COVID, in fact, as we suspected, was genetically engineered and leaked from the facility.
	Dr. Andrew Huff, former vice president of the Eco Health Alliance, called the pandemic one of the greatest cover-ups in history and the biggest U.S. intelligence failure since 9-11.
	And it is his expert opinion, uh, and he is a whistleblower, that the grant funding provided by Anthony Fauci uh with NIH money to the Eco Health Alliance was linked to the creation of COVID.
	And he claims that the NIH funded this gain of function research.
	U.S. intelligence community was aware of this and appeared to have been involved in the work.
	That's what he's claiming.
	And anyway, this this has been the the stress from the very beginning.
	Now we see through emails in early January of 2020 among high-ranking officials, Fauci included, in the NIH, you know, a panic flurry of emails back and forth, because they're wondering if whether or not it's going to come out that they funded this thing.
	And then ultimately, you know, we have the Intercept.
	They had 900 pages of documents that were pretty damning, along with Project Veritas.
	And then, of course, in I believe it was October, uh certainly the fall of 2020, the NIH's own emails confirmed that they knew what was going on in this virology lab.
	Now, when Anthony Fauci was asked questions about this, well, he for example, he answers no when he was asked if he could do anything over or do anything differently.
	And then he said getting vaccinated, you know denies the COVID opportunity to circulate among us.
	And he also said if you get vaccinated, you don't have to worry about getting infected again.
	Listen.
	So, Dr. Fauci, in our last few minutes, I want to reflect a little bit on your career as a whole and look ahead a little bit.
	So first I want to ask you, is there a moment of your career that you wish you could do over?
	You know, um Yasmin, no.
	But you also have a responsibility to society.
	Because if you really want to make sure we put this vex, this virus, this outbreak in the rear view mirror, we can make a contribution by not giving the virus the opportunity to circulate among us.
	And you do that by getting vaccinated.
	If you get vaccinated after you get infected, your level of protection will go sky high, and then you won't have to worry about getting infected again.
	All of which, you know, we he's been wrong on everything.
	We played last week, all the times he said, oh, if you get vaccinated, you're never gonna get COVID.
	Well, that didn't last very long.
	The Delta variant was the first breakthrough variant.
	Uh, then it was oh, masks don't work, one mask, two masks, no masks, mask and perpetuity.
	And you know, he's been all over the the map on all of this.
	Anyway, Senator Rand Paul has been a longtime warrior in this battle against suppression of information uh from the American people on many topics.
	It should get interesting in terms of Elon Musk, the new owner of Twitter and what he might reveal as it relates to COVID and uh and a cover-up of such uh information.
	Anyway, uh Senator Rampall is with us now.
	How are you, sir?
	Very good.
	And when you start to factor in that there are going to be more whistleblowers, what about whistleblowers from Facebook, from Twitter, from YouTube, all these places where there was big government collusion suppressed speech.
	What about when these people come forward?
	But one thing we do know about Fauci is that in the hearings when I challenged him, he said it repeatedly.
	He said, I unequivocally state that my agency, the NIH, NIAID, did not fund gain of function research in Wuhan.
	That is provably false.
	And he said it repeatedly, and that is lying under oath, and he should be prosecuted for it.
	What's gonna happen now is there's going to be an investigation, and he will come forward before Congress under oath, and he will have to testify under oath.
	He's already had to testify this month under oath when uh the attorney generals of Missouri and Louisiana brought him forward over collusion with big tech.
	But that's just the first of many to come.
	This is a man with unlimited arrogance, unlimited ability to tell falsehoods, and ultimately we need to know the truth because a million Americans died.
	And if this came from the lab, which I think all the evidence points to, is that it is the greatest errand judgment ever of a political or government official to fund this research that was so dangerous that ultimately led to the deaths of millions of people worldwide.
	I mean, that was mistake number one.
	Mistake number two is they they were wrong on their advice the entire time, and anybody that dare take uh a different opinion, uh you know, even if if if you listen to Dr. Daniel Wallace, you know, the foremost expert in the country that has been dispensing HCQ,
	for example, uh, for over 40 years and has the largest lupus practice in the entire country, and he said the risk of taking such is nil, and anyone that ever dared suggest that it might work, uh, you know, was excoriated publicly, and then studies have since come out saying, hey, if you took it early, it could mitigate a lot of sym symptoms with no risk to the patient.
	Well, uh, you know, I can't say for certain that it works, but what I can tell you this is I'm an ophthalmologist, I practice for 20 years.
	The most common treatment for uh rheumatory arthritis is called plaquinil, but that's the name brand for hydroxychloroquine.
	And so I would see people throughout over 20 years because there's a possible ocular side effect.
	Over years I saw thousands of patients and never saw one of them with the ocular side effects, but also as I saw them and talked to the patients, never heard of really any of the patients being taken off of hydroxychloroquine because of cardiac problems.
	So when they came out and said that, this was Trump derangement syndrome.
	They didn't like it because Trump was for it.
	And I'm still not telling you today that I conclude that it worked.
	I would conclude this.
	Patients and doctors deserve the code.
	Well, there have been studies.
	I'll give the Henry Port Hospital study is one of them.
	There have been a number of other studies.
	They're not saying it cured people.
	They're not saying it worked for everybody, but they're saying if you took it early, it did mitigate some of the symptoms that people had.
	That's all.
	That's all.
	That's the only conclusion I saw.
	Without question that that information be out there and we should study it.
	And we could have gotten more to the truth.
	But the CDC and Fauci and all of these bureaucrats, they come to these studies with pre-existing biases and conclusions, and because Trump had suggested it might work, they believed it didn't work.
	It was as simple as sort of childhood reverse psychology.
	They thought, oh, Trump's for it, we're against it, and so let's make sure that none of the studies come out and are honestly treating this.
	Because you're right, there were international studies on ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine that were showing some benefits.
	Both of them have anti-inflammatory properties.
	In fact, the NIH was actually studying whether ivermectin worked.
	It was in actually uh in a in a in one of their phases with their studies, but then they dropped it because of lack of enrollment.
	But why do you think you don't get enrollment if everybody in government is saying it doesn't work?
	I've never seen this study on ivermectin.
	I have not seen one that showed that it was working.
	It seemed like the gold standard therapeutic was monoclonal antibodies, and they're not even producing those to anywhere near the level you would think they'd produce them today, knowing that it is the therapeutic a choice, isn't it?
	The thing we don't really know today, there's a real simple question that they have the data for, but they probably won't reveal to us because they hide the data because they're trying to reflect the conclusions.
	So the one simple question we should ask is how lethal is the virus now?
	Less people are dying, and is it because they have immunity?
	Some people say, I've been vaccinated five times, that's why I didn't die.
	Maybe.
	Or the other countervailing argument is maybe you didn't die because the virus is now much less deadly.
	So you could sort all of this out by putting into a large database, people have had the virus previously, people have been vaccinated previously, and then people have not had either, and then look at the death rate and compare that to the death rate back in 2020.
	I think what you'd find is that the death rate is greatly reduced because the current virus, even if you have no immunity, no vaccine and no previous exposure, I believe the current virus is much less deadly.
	But instead you have these morons and you have to call them for what they are from government, heads of different agencies.
	Well, I've had five vaccines, and thank God I didn't die when I got COVID.
	Well, maybe, or maybe you got the version that's not very deadly now.
	And but by telling people five vaccines it was good, but next year I'm gonna have five more, and thank God if I get COVID next year, I'll be vaccinated ten times.
	We don't know if the vaccine is actually having additive effect on that because we're not studying what is the value of previous infection.
	We're also not comparing it to people that have had neither previous infection nor vaccine to see how well they're doing currently with this version of the virus.
	So we need honesty.
	We need we need more data, we need more honesty, but uh they have so much.
	Well, they never talk about natural immunity, which was an issue you brought up from the beginning, or herd immunity and whether or not we've actually reached that point or that level in the country.
	You actually get to a point, it may not be actual herd immunity, but you do get to a point where the most vulnerable have either had it and survived or died.
	And that's not something anybody wants to have happen, but that's kind of what happened.
	If you look at the statistics in New York, they're actually very, very intriguing.
	They did a terrible job in the beginning, and they had massive death rate in New York, particularly among the vulnerable.
	But it's interesting, as you look at the next waves, you had less and less and less each time.
	Even before the vaccine, the death rate was going down dramatically in New York.
	So no subsequent wave did very well because you did reach a level of immunity, particularly among those at risk, but it did slow the death rate down quite a bit.
	And you saw the death rate going up in some of the other places that didn't have the big first wave.
	So as bad as the first wave was, in some ways that did allow enough immunity to be circulating in New York that the subsequent waves were not nearly as bad.
	What do you make of Elon Musk and the Twitter files that he released on Friday and talked about on Saturday?
	And what do you make of the fact that the FBI was warning all of these big tech companies, including Twitter and Facebook and others, uh during weekly meetings?
	Um, you you gotta watch out for these hack and leak operations and Russian interference.
	They they had weekly meetings with all of those companies, which by the way, became the excuse mechanism used by Twitter and Facebook uh not to publish the Hunter Biden story.
	I've told my staff I wanted to know where those meetings take place, and I want to ask to be invited to those meetings.
	I want my staff represented if they're having meetings to collude with big tech to censor speech, I want someone in the meetings, I want a record of those meetings.
	Because this is terrible to have uh you know the FBI and government proactively getting involved in speech.
	And you know, you watch CNN and it's nonstop of this crap about Russians have manipulated the elections.
	Well, guess what?
	It turns out the FBI has been very involved with it, not only in ginning up sort of the the Russian hoax and saying Trump was somehow associated with Russia, which turned out not to be true, they also did it to senators.
	You know, Senator Ron Johnson, they came and leaked to the media that somehow he was talking Russian disinformation when he was talking about Hunter Biden's laptop.
	So they leaked that into his race.
	He only wins by a couple thousand votes.
	But his opponents were then using what the FBI did, which was leak a private meeting where he asked honest questions about the Hunter Biden uh laptop.
	And so that's that's FBI getting involved as well.
	So, you know, what did they do right before this last election?
	They hold back the the uh Hunter uh Biden laptop.
	So that's also getting involved in our elections as well.
	So yeah, I mean, then they come to us and they say, Oh, we're gonna be in charge of disinformation, we're already doing it already.
	And I was like, really?
	You are you are the chief uh promoter of disinformation in our country.
	So we've got to get the FBI out of politics, and we've got to get them out of our elections, and we gotta get them back to catching bad guys with guns, dealing drugs or whatever else.
	But we got to get them out of our elections and out of our speech.
	That's two presidential elections in a row where they put their thumb on the scale in favor of a democratic candidate uh rightly that they did it for Hillary Clinton in in 2016, not rightly, but they did it in 2016.
	Uh they used the dirty dossier.
	We now know the FBI offered a million dollars to Christopher Steele in early October 2016.
	If he could corroborate it, he couldn't, but they still used it for the bulk of information in their FISA applications.
	It was unverifiable information.
	You would think you'd get in trouble for that.
	Uh And meanwhile, they had the Hunter Biden laptop themselves for nearly a year, and they're they're basically communicating with big tech corporations saying you want to be on the lookout for this fake Russian information.
	Uh and then 51 intelligence, former intelligence people, including Clapper and Brennan come out with this letter saying, Oh, it looks like Russian disinformation to me, and it all turned out to be true.
	We're working on legislation that would absolutely prohibit the government from colluding with big tech to censor speech.
	It's harder to work on the other half.
	It's harder to regulate big tech and tell them what speech they can produce, because I think there are First Amendment problems, but there's no first amendment problem with regulating government.
	So I want to regulate government in a significant and severe way, prohibit it from colluding.
	What we're basing this legislation on is basically the First Amendment protected speech.
	So it's a long history of First Amendment cases that have been before the Supreme Court.
	And there is some division.
	There's some speech that you cannot use that directly incites violence, and there are different doctrines and cases.
	We're going to try to incorporate that into the law and say that the speech that is protected that doesn't involve violence, it doesn't involve this, cannot be censored, and the government cannot participate.
	So going to big tech and saying that because I've been telling everybody that will listen that cloth masks don't work.
	If the government thinks that's disinformation, that's protected speech, because that's my opinion.
	But it's also my opinion based on dozens and dozens of randomly controlled trials and scientific studies.
	That is protected speech.
	That is not speech inciting a mob to violence.
	I'm not asking for war to overthrow a country.
	What I'm saying is something that people can dispute and they can put facts up on the other side, but that should not be in the bailiwick of anything uh that the government can be involved with suppressing.
	Senator Rampall, Kentucky, thank you, sir.
	Appreciate you being with us.
	When we come back, we'll hit the phones.
	I see a lot of you want to talk about Twitter.
	Hey there, I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
	And I'm Carol Markowitz.
	We've been in political media for a long time.
	Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
	That's why we started normally a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
	We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
	We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
	So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional sass.
	You're our kind of people.
	Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen.
	Hey there, I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
	And I'm Carol Markowitz.
	We've been in political media for a long time.
	Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
	That's why we started normally a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
	We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
	We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
	So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional SAS.
	You're our kind of people.
	Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen.
	Didn't the IRS scandal and the NSA atrocities convince you?
	You need a watchdog on Washington with insider sources.
	You need Hannity every day.
	All right, 25 now to the top of the hour.
	The new leader in the U.S. House of Representatives for the Democrats, Akeem Jeffries, was on ABC this weekend and got challenged on his calling.
	He's an election denier.
	Donald Trump, an illegitimate president.
	Listen.
	You did say the history will never accept Donald Trump as a legitimate president, and the Republicans are making quite a big issue out of that.
	What is your response?
	Well, here's the Republican playbook.
	Facts don't matter.
	And in many cases, they believe that shamelessness is a superpower.
	My view of the situation has been pretty clear.
	I supported the certification of Donald Trump's election.
	I attended his inauguration, even though there were many constituents and others across the country pushing me and others to do otherwise, and found ways to work With the Trump administration being the lead Democrat in negotiating historic criminal justice reform.
	That track record speaks for itself.
	At the same time, I will never hesitate in criticizing the former president.
	I think I'm in good company there throughout the world.
	Okay.
	Still didn't answer the question why he was an election denier for years after Donald Trump was elected.
	Only matters to the mob of the media if you're a Republican and you you criticize uh the election system that we currently have, which can be improved in terms of integrity greatly.
	Uh all right, let's go to uh Teddy is in Louisiana.
	Teddy, hi, how are you?
	Glad you called.
	Hello, uh Sean.
	You know, it occurs to me that Elon Musk spent 44 billion dollars just to get the truth out of what happened at Twitter.
	There's a lot of people that work at Facebook, at Google, at YouTube, and places like that that are doing the same things that they were doing at Twitter.
	And every deplorable, every boomer, every uh pick your your negative pronoun out, and uh we all know what they've been doing to us.
	Just as uh, for instance, I mean, if you put a uh American flag on something, they'd take your post down.
	If you uh said something about God, they take it down.
	But you know, there's uh, you know, all this stuff with the uh the government inter interference uh is happening at all the other places just as well.
	And when we put political things up on their uh their post on their social media sites, uh they get taken down.
	There are people that are working in YouTube and Facebook and places like that that just similar to the what the ones that were working at Twitter that are not coming forward yet and telling us what was going on.
	So we need them.
	We need those people that are sitting in their office right now to listen and say, hey, you know, I have some values.
	I'm going to uh um you know let the the world know what's been going on and uh come forward and and actually give us the information like uh Elon had to spend 44 billion to spit we shouldn't have to spend that to get the truth on what's going on with our social media.
	I'm not sure if that's why he bought Twitter.
	However, him being this transparent, I think is revealing the fact that he's gonna reveal more uh censorship, I think is going to be critical.
	I think we're learning a lot, and I think he's doing the country a good service by doing so and and probably taking a financial and and personal risk in doing it because Democrats they don't they don't want anything to do with any of this.
	Um and I think it's it's enlightening.
	It's actually scary too.
	And that is you know, for the what's that?
	Uh there are people sitting in their offices right now not knowing whether they should uh make a move or not, though.
	And they uh there was people in Twitter that knew he didn't have to spend that 44 billion dollars, and uh as a matter of fact, he probably could have uh uh paid the salaries of a couple of them and and and uh put them on his his own payroll and found out what was going on.
	But uh uh, you know, there's they're the fact that the FBI was having weekly meetings um in the in the weeks and months before the 2020 election, uh telling them about you gotta expect these hack and leak operations by state actors, meaning foreign countries, and they had had Hunter Biden's laptop for over a year, I think is pretty revealing also.
	And that was why didn't they do anything with the laptop for a year?
	Knowing that there was low-hanging fruit, and then we get to the deeper issue of Hunter's father, Joe Biden, your president, and his involvement in pay to play in this this you know, family syndicate of making money from foreign countries and Joe lying to the entire country about it.
	You know, what how this how this plays out, I don't know.
	I've gotten very cynical now.
	I just I don't feel we have equal justice or application of our laws, but the American people absolutely know deserve the truth, and that's you know, hopefully the direction that the Republican Congress will take us now.
	Uh time will tell, though.
	Anyway, appreciate the call.
	Gary in the great state of Georgia.
	What's up, Gary?
	How are you?
	Hey, Sean Hannity.
	I met you many years ago at Butler with Ann Coulter.
	Uh moved down here to Georgia about eleven years ago.
	But I heard you talk last Friday, uh, talking about voting in Georgia.
	You know, my concern, and I I voice this when I go to Herschel's uh fundraisers, etc.
	You know, we've got a problem with the the uh Republican Party down here.
	You got Jeff Duncan, you probably saw that, former lieutenant governor, you know, claims he can't vote for for Herschel because he's a bad person.
	Uh, you know, I sent him a note and asked him if he wanted his.
	He doesn't he doesn't care.
	Let me tell you what the biggest problem and Florida has Florida Republicans have solved this.
	And we need to follow what Florida is doing.
	Republicans, conservatives in Florida are not resistant, reluctant in terms of voting early and voting by mail.
	And they do it and they do it with great confidence that there's integrity in the system and that their votes are going to be counted.
	And I I'm telling you, I've studied now all the early voting numbers in Georgia.
	Yes, Herschel has a shot.
	Herschel can win.
	It's gonna but he's starting from behind.
	There's no way uh every way I've analyzed those numbers and every person that I think is intelligent and understands their voting numbers and the the democra uh graphic breakdowns of them thinks is as the same as I do, and that is he can win, but we're starting, you know, with a deficit on election day.
	And the biggest deficit demographically that I see are men, suburban men are have not come out in sufficient numbers to support Herschel, but they're also the people more likely to vote day of.
	I just don't like the fact that you you know, tomorrow it's supposed to be raining in Georgia.
	Is that gonna, you know, ha uh result in some people staying home?
	I don't know.
	But Republicans have got to get over this reluctance resistance.
	It's not the system we want, but it's the one we've got, and you gotta work the system the way the Democrats do.
	Unless Republicans get in that game and play the game the way they're playing it until they have a chance to fix it, then uh you know, some of these outcomes are gonna be disappointing for some time.
	Yeah, I agree, but the the other problem, Sean, is is this whole Republican uh party is I mean, you got you got Gary Black, the guy that ran against Herschel, you know, saying he's a bad person.
	He won't retract it.
	I mean, I've been around the people that know him and listen, what he says to me is irrelevant.
	It doesn't really matter.
	Well, it really is what what matters I'm telling you right now, the only thing that matters is we have a big audience in Georgia, is you gotta turn out in big numbers tomorrow if you want Herschel to have a shot at winning.
	That's it.
	We're starting from behind.
	It's the same story in a lot of these elections now is Democrats, they go all in on early voting and getting the ballots and getting those ballots handed back way before we do.
	You can't keep starting down, you know, by a hundred, two hundred thousand votes in every election and then expect to win every time.
	You can't.
	But the that's the Republican Party.
	You you you come down here and you go I mean Herschel's getting out spent six to one.
	It's not two to one, as you said, it's six to one.
	And when you've got Gary Black on TV, Jeff Duncan on TV talking that they can't vote for Herschel.
	We got a problem.
	You mentioned in the third time in a row.
	I don't care.
	He's irrelevant.
	Well, what matters are the people of Georgia.
	But but every con if you don't want this radical Raphael Warnock, there's your chance tomorrow.
	And you know, I don't like the fact that Republicans have not gotten in the ballot game the way the Democrats have.
	And you better start waking up and they better start learning.
	Anyway, appreciate it.
	We'll be watching.
	Uh 800 nine four one Sean, our number if you want to be a part of the program.
	Marina is in Indiana.
	Marina Hi, how are you?
	Glad you called.
	Um, I just wanted to put my two cents in on the um the education uh loan thing.
	You know Student loan forgiveness, yes.
	Yeah.
	I could have taken that, and I didn't.
	Um I had uh a lot of concerns about it.
	Number one, whether it was a legal thing that the president was doing.
	Um but number two Well, so far it's been stopped by the courts.
	So so far it's and I don't think it's gonna pass muster legally, and I think he actually knew it wouldn't.
	But that's my own take.
	But um my concern is that we're sitting here, and I'm 50 years old.
	I've still got a student loan from 1990.
	And a lot of stuff has happened between 1990 and now that people say, well, you should go ahead and try for it.
	You deserve it.
	You've gone through a lot of stuff.
	Well, no, I don't deserve it, because even though as a 17 year old I didn't understand everything that I was signing, that doesn't mean that my name on that paper Is not my guarantee that I'm going to do something about it.
	And we're teaching all of these younger children that, you know, hey, you don't have to worry about it.
	Your name can be mud for however long you want it to be.
	We're not teaching them that a handshake is your bond.
	We're not teaching them that we need to get out there and do things for other people, not just for ourselves.
	And that's what's concerning to me.
	The only thing I don't like in what you're saying is that, well, first of all, it's not going to pass constitutional muster.
	So this is just an intellectual exercise.
	But I would advise people to avail themselves to whatever tax breaks or whatever you're eligible for from the government, only because I believe every American's over taxed to begin with.
	So that's that's a side note.
	But the idea that we have a party in this country that wants to empower their government to take from one group of people and distribute that money to their groups of people that they think are going to vote for them has got to end.
	And whatever manifestation or form this socialism is taking on, and in this country they're calling it green new dealism, climate alarmism, whatever you want to call it.
	It always results in the same thing, and that is unfulfilled promises, number one, then more poverty in the end, number two, and number three, a loss of freedom.
	It's the same result every time.
	And it's not gonna work.
	So it's a matter of how much pain the American people will go through before they have to wake up and realize that.
	Yeah.
	Our kids need to understand that, though.
	I mean, we haven't taught them well enough.
	I mean, even some of us older generational people, we don't know everything.
	Because I mean, until President Trump got into office, I never knew anything about politics.
	I never knew anything about my constitution.
	I never knew anything about the Bill of Rights.
	I wasn't taught that.
	But we as US citizens, as patriots, as you know, Americans, we need to teach our youth what has happened in the past so we don't go through all of this stuff again.
	We can't forget our past.
	We can't forget that.
	Marina, I agree, but look look at what they're trying to teach your kids today.
	It's about gender identity, it's about CRT.
	I know.
	You know, we pay more money per capita per child with the worst results of any industrialized country.
	It can't get any worse.
	And unless you go back to the fundamentals, reading, writing, math, science, history, and computers, our kids are never going to be competitive in a world marketplace.
	And we will over time, we we will be, you know, outperformed by a lot of other countries because they are putting the emphasis on things that where we should be putting our emphasis.
	You know, we uh we can't let our educational institutions become institutions of indoctrination and social engineering, and that's what they've now become.
	And that's a that's that's pretty scary.
	Uh anyway, pretty appreciate the call.
	Quick break right back to the phone, say 800, 941 Sean, our number, you want to be a part of the program.
	Anyway, Christmas uh season is here, it's upon us, time for giving gifts and parties and friends and family, and you want to look your best.
	That's where our friends at Shamoni and Genucel come in.
	And right now, until Christmas, their most popular package at Genusell is 70% off when you go to genucell.com slash Sean, the biggest advocate in the world for all things Shamonee and Genusel or Linda, you love these products.
	You know, I really do.
	And I was just thinking the other day, I was like, you know, I always talk about my favorites, but I've used everything they have, like the jawline person, friends, family, it's just great.
	And you do have really good skin.
	And you're not gonna be able to do that.
	I do, and I thank Genu Cell for that.
	Uh anyways, right now you visit genusell.com slash Sean, and in the special promo code Sean also, S-E-A-N, and you'll get an additional ten percent off your order.
	Do it now before the holidays.
	This is the best deal of the year, the most popular package, 70% off, genucel.com slash Sean from our friends at Genucel and Chamonix.
	Music Final hour roundup is next.
	You do not want to miss it.
	And stay tuned for the final hour free for all on the Sean Hannity Show.
	All right, we get back to our busy phones, 800-941 Sean.
	If you want to join us, we have uh one minute, we'll give it to John in Texas.
	John, you have the full minute.
	Go ahead, sir.
	Yes, sir.
	Thank you, Sean, for taking my call.
	Good afternoon.
	How are you?
	I'm good, sir.
	Good.
	So the reason I want to call Sean, I've I just want to let you know I've lived in uh Texas for over 10 years now, and uh worked uh work in the oil and gas industry, and I'm I'm proud to do it.
	And I wanted to call you and uh just put my two cents in really quick on some of the comments we got from the press, uh the press corps and the White House Secretary to hear her laugh the other day about some of the things that are going on at the border.
	And um Peter Dissi had asked her the question about is President Biden gonna come down to visit to see her laugh is really a slap in the face of all Americans.
	Just personally, uh Sean, on a daily basis, we see illegal immigrants running around back and forth every single day.
	They steal vehicles on our ranches, they run their vehicles through the fences, they have no regard for people of the state of Texas or the people that are in their way.
	We see it every day.
	It's like seeing uh seeing a p uh an animal on the road.
	You see just as many illegals as you see deer animals running across the highway.
	It's a problem, and I can tell you for sure, Sean, that during President Trump's uh term, it was never this bad.
	And what we've seen in the last two years are just horrible.
	It's uh it's hard to see, and I feel like the numbers speak for itself.
	Four and a half million illegal immigrants, they're being processed into the country, illegally aided and abetted by Joe.
	Uh they get preferential treatment, they don't have a vaccine mandate, they get a free phone, they get free transportation, and you the taxpayers pay for all of it.
	Um something really wrong with that.
	I don't know why people aren't more outraged by by it.
	I really don't.
	I think pe I just I I think we've just come to accept that our government is just fundamentally so corrupt and flawed, you know, we roll our eyes and and we put on a football game because we don't want to pay we just can't deal with it.
	Um it's beginning to you know, but at some point there's gotta be a tipping point.
	Country can't continue like this and survive as a great republic.
	It just can't.

▲