Sidney Powell, Attorney and author of "Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice" and Gregg Jarrett, author of the upcoming book, "The Russian Hoax, The Illicit Scheme to Clear Hillary Clinton and Frame Donald Trump" stop by the show to discuss the seemingly never ending barrage of lies from the left. Plus, Robert Mueller’s questions for President Trump are leaked to the press! What impact will this have on alleviating the circus that is becoming the Russia investigation? The Sean Hannity Show is on weekdays from 3 pm to 6 pm ET on iHeartRadio and Hannity.com. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
You are listening to the Sean Hannity Radio Show Podcast.
Graduation season now is around the corner, so let Job Genius power your job search.
Now, Job Genius offers free advice on job searching, resume writing, interviewing, and tips to ace your first A on the job.
Just go to ExpressPros.com slash job genius today and search Job Genius on YouTube.
Now let this educational video series be your guide for entering the workforce.
Now Job Genius is brought to you by our friends at Express Employment Professionals, the leading staffing company that employs more than a half a million people a year.
And when you're ready to start your job search, we'll turn to Express Pros.
Apply now at ExpressPros.com for administrative jobs, including customer service and sales and accounting positions, as well as skilled labor jobs like drivers and forklift operators and welders and CNC programmers.
Now each Express Employment Professional Office is locally owned and operated.
They never charge a job seeker a penny, no fee.
And Express Pros takes pride in connecting the right people with the right company.
Just go to ExpressPros.com.
Glad you're with us, and happy Tuesday and write down our toll-free telephone number if you want to be a part of this extravaganza.
You know, how is it that Clapper, after now we now know he lied to Congress, said he never leaked, leaked twice, committed perjury, and he leaked to CNN, then he gets hired by CNN.
Amazing.
This is CNN.
Uh is CNN.
This is a pretty amazing story that we're fine.
People on the left have been so desperate to take down Donald Trump.
So desperate, and the dossier has been proven, well, pretty much debunked all across the board.
Anyway, since it's been debunked, do you realize 50 million more dollars has been spent trying to prove that the dossier with the hookers urinating in the bed and Moscow was all true?
I mean, you got these op research people.
I think it was uh Glenn Simpson, one of the one of the fusion GPS guys is quoted as saying, give up.
We didn't find anything.
There's nothing there.
Anyway, the team of op researchers behind the dossier embraced by the FBI, apparently is still being paid big bucks and have been paid big bucks to dig up dirt about Russian meddling and American politics well after the 2016 election.
That revelation is buried inside that 243-page report of the House Intel Committee.
Republicans put out last week, and it sparked news speculations about the identities of these secret donors uh who were actually funding the post-election project.
By the way, is that some kind of in-kind donation?
I'm sure the the investigators will be all over that.
It would only be, of course, if they're Republican.
Anyway, that um according to the House Intel report, Daniel Jones, president of the Penn Quarter Group, former staffer for Democrat Senator Diane Feinstein, secured the services of dossier author and former British spy Christopher Steele.
Why?
Why is Diane Feinstein, the president of this group, former staffer of Diane Feinstein?
Well, they hired Christopher Steele to quote, continue exposing, if you will, Russian interference after the election.
They also hired an associate of Steele.
Steele's getting rich off all of this uncorroborated, debunked information that he put out.
Anyway, the report doesn't list all the donors, but Jones told the FBI that the Penn Quarter Group was being funded by seven to ten wealthy donors, primarily in New York and California.
You know, those are people that might have contempt for those of us that have red state values that contradict theirs.
And they don't like the any more than the deep state does the outcome of the election or the will of the American people or a duly elected president.
So they've been spending all 50 million dollars.
50 million.
Report doesn't list the donors, but apparently ten wealthy donors, New York, California provided approximately 50 million to this firm to continue all of this.
And Fusion GPS and Steele originally teamed up during the 2016 campaign to compile the dossier full of unverified, uncorroborated, salacious information about Trump's connections to Russia, paid for by the DNC that Hillary was controlling, and Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, funneling the money through Perkins CUI, a law firm, so they didn't have to identify it for the real expense it was, and I assume they put it down as some type of legal expense.
The dossier was then used by the FBI and the DOJ to obtain the surveillance warrants.
But of course, nobody had bothered to tell the Pfizer court judges that in fact none of the information was verified or corroborated, and in fact, a lot of it had been debunked, and they never told the judges that it was an opposition party candidate research document put together by a foreign national using Russian and Russian government sources.
It's pretty unbelievable.
I mean, the whole thing, it gets more unbelievable by the day.
That's how much they hate Donald Trump.
As if and like they hate everybody that likes Donald Trump.
And really the people they hate the most are the people that voted for Donald Trump.
Now, when you think deeply about this, for these guys to be successful, that means the country has to go through a spectacular failure.
That means they don't want the president to do well on the foreign stage with Kim Jong-un, who just said that he would meet Trump at the DMZ.
It would be pretty darn historic.
That's interesting.
We'll see what that ends up being.
Um, or the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula, or the fact that now we've exposed that the Iranians are a bunch of liars and that they've had a nuclear program the entire time, and that everybody in the Obama administration was bamboozled and lied to.
Wasn't that hard to figure out that they hated us when they chant death to America and death to Israel every single solitary day?
It's pretty unbelievable.
So the big story is uh among liberal media, and I'm told there's a lot of false.
A lot of this New York Times piece that came out late last night, a lot of it's baloney.
A lot of it is just a bunch of crap, and you can actually tell by the questions.
But if you look at it really deeply, it should be very troublesome to everybody because there are what, 49 questions in this whole thing.
What Mueller wants to ask Trump about obstruction and what it means.
And the questions show the special counsel's focus on obstruction of justice, touch on surprising other areas.
Now remember, the whole initiative here was Trump Russia collusion, so that's dead.
Martha Stewart, they never got her on what they wanted to charge her on, which was involved in some type of, you know, what was it?
I guess she had knowledge about a particular trade.
Yeah, insider trading.
They never got her on that.
And the amount of money for Martha Stewart was like nothing.
Now it was insignificant amount of money.
That she had sold the timing wasn't good of the sale, and then she was friends with a guy that might have had information about the sale.
No, they get her on this perjury trap that they set.
And Alan Derschwitz is exactly right.
As I look at all these questions, I see nothing but a perjury trap for the president of the United States.
And Dershowitz said today that the list of questions attributed to Mueller in the New York Times look like they are specifically designed to trip up the president.
They're really designed to let him ramble and talk.
And I suspect that's the strategy of the special counsel because they know that that may be President Trump's weakness.
Do they care about the rule of law?
Do they care about our is this what the law now has become?
You can get them on the what you investigate him for, but you so want to get them that you're gonna, you know, come up with the the slickest lawyers, the people with the worst backgrounds and the biggest political agendas, atrocious track records like Andrew Weisman, and the goal is to trick up, trip up the president of the United States so that you can claim he committed perjury and then you can impeach him that way.
Because you'll put a report to Congress.
He was not forthcoming.
He obstructed justice.
Now, meanwhile, if we have equal justice under the law, you go right to Hillary Clinton.
Where was that same intensity?
That same passion, that same desire when Hillary Clinton was finally interviewed after Strzok and Comey wrote months earlier their exoneration of her when she finally got interviewed by Trump hater Peter Strzok, she wasn't under oath, and two days after the interview, she's exonerated so she can run for president of the United States.
How about Donald Trump gets the same treatment as Hillary Clinton in all of this?
I mean, we do believe, right?
Mr. Muller and all you lawyers with big degrees, I'm sure you believe in equal justice under the law and equal application of our laws and the Constitution of the United States.
You know, so if you're designing questions to trip up the president and let him ramble and talk so you can point the fingers and say he wasn't honest.
You know, he writes if they were to ask him direct, tough questions to which he can answer yes or no, that might not give them the advantage they're seeking.
I didn't know this was a game of gotcha.
We're talking about gotcha with the president of the United States.
Well, we know Andrew Weisman was at Hillary Clinton's celebration party at the Javit Center in New York.
We know that he twice withheld exculpatory evidence, and we know that tens of thousands of people lost their job.
This is this is Robert Muller's pit bull with the Anderson accounting.
We know the Supreme Court overturned the guy nine zip.
He sent four Merrill executives to jail for a year.
They were found not guilty.
That was the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.
And I think Derschwitz is right.
These questions are designed to trip up Donald Trump.
They ask direct questions, they may not get what they're seeking, the advantage they're seeking.
How about the the goal should be to find the truth?
And the truth is there's no Trump Russia collusion.
How about we start there?
Derschwitz also advised the president's personal attorneys to respond to as many queries as possible in writing, if permitted by Mueller, in order to prevent the president from making statements that it could expose him to legal risk, which seems to be the goal.
That's what this is here.
You've heard of a perjury trap.
This is a perjury trap.
Now the House has drafted articles of impeachment against Rod Rosenstein.
I didn't see the big coverage on that front, but uh I can tell you that Rosenstein responded to this today because uh the Freedom Caucus did this, and he said they can't even resist leaking their own draft.
The Department of Justice will not be extorted.
And Ralph Rosenstein accusing Congressman of extortion because these congressmen drafted articles of impeachment for him because there's conflicts of interest in regard to Robert Mueller's Russiagate investigation is so glaring that he should have recused himself months ago.
Word is that in fact, and we've corroborated it from multiple sources, that Rod Rosenstein personally signed off on reauthorization of the Pfizer warrant on at least one occasion.
You mean the one where they use phony Clinton bought and paid for foreign national Russian lies?
The one that was never verified or corroborated, the ones where they never told the judges that Hillary paid for it.
Anyway, the draft impeachment is the latest in an ongoing battle over this.
Why, you know, I think that Meadows is right.
This, you know, there is a massive conflict here.
He says it's a last resort option if the Department of Justice fails to respond to congressional requests for documents pertaining to the Russia investigation and another federal inquiry into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server.
By the way, are we gonna ever ask the questions that I've been asking about that are important about Hillary Clinton and Hillary acid washing, bleach bit, deleting, busting up devices with hammers, putting top secret special access programming, classified information on a server?
Anybody gonna anybody gonna set a perjury trap for that and get those questions answered?
Or the fix was in and rigged by Trump haters, Comey and Strck?
And then the conduct of Loretta Lynch, the conduct of Strzok and Page, the conduct of Andrew McCabe, the conduct of Jim Comey, who purposely Leaked classified information to get the special counsel in the first place.
It was an illegal act that set the whole thing in motion.
And why the Attorney General of the United States ever recused himself here?
He's allowed the country to go through this mess.
And all the signs we're seeing with these leaks to the New York Times is that they want this to go on in perpetuity.
Or until they get their catch.
Until under whatever circumstances, whatever games they've got to play, whatever traps they've got to set, it seems like they want Donald Trump out because they never liked him.
Or they never liked you, the American people, and your choice.
And they don't they certainly don't like Donald Trump to be successful, because then it makes it harder because the people like him more.
And if he brings peace with North Korea, and he and he strikes Iran with their nuclear program, and the economy keeps growing.
14 states, the lowest unemployment levels ever, lowest unemployment level for African Americans, Hispanic Americans, women in the workforce ever.
Of course, why would we want to continue that after eight years of Obama?
All right, we've got that audio of uh Rod Rosenstein.
Remember, we've been reporting that Rosenstein, it looks like signed off on one of the Pfizer Warren applications that had unverified, uncorroborated, uh, foreign national Russian propaganda and lies that were paid for by Hillary.
Listen to him responding to the Freedom Caucus saying, uh, you're you're too conflicted.
You should have recused yourself.
You may have to be impeached.
Any reaction to the news that certain members of the House Freedom Caucus have talked about drafting up articles of impeachment despite your best efforts to comply with their document requests.
They can't even resist leaking their own drafts.
I saw that draft.
I mean, I don't know who wrote it.
It really does illustrate, though, a really important principle about the rule of law and a distinction between the way we operate in the department, and we make mistakes.
Oh, you're you're you're far from uh you're way beyond flawless at the Department of Justice these days, trust me.
Uh, I don't find it funny, though.
I don't find it funny.
Where is the sense of urgency about all of these topics?
You know, was the Pfizer court given information that in all likelihood was false, Mr. Rosenstein?
You know, by the way, we can ask Mueller these questions too.
You know what I'm gonna do when I come back?
We'll start with the questions that maybe the New York Times, that the Hannity questions that they should be asking, versus the New York Times leak questions that I'm told are not accurate.
Some of them, well, obviously some are predictable.
You know, anybody could have written 20 of those questions.
You know, what was in your, you know, some of these questions about what was in your mind?
What do you know about the phone calls with Mr. Flynn and his soon-to-be counterpart?
What was your reaction to the news reports of January 12, 2017 and so on and so forth?
Um, how was the decision made to fire Mr. Flynn?
What is your opinion of Mr. Comey during the transition?
He met him three times.
Who cares?
What is his opinion?
What is that a crime to have an opinion of Comey?
I mean, it's what was your reaction to Comey's briefing that day on the intelligence issues?
You know, what was the purpose of your April 11th statement to Maria Barreta Romo?
I mean, you can't make this up.
This is uh it's if it wasn't so important, it'd be sad and funny.
All right, as we roll along, uh 25 now till the top of the hour.
I find this fascinating that Rod Rosenstein is uh out there saying, oh, they leaked their own first draft on memos, and he actually said the DOJ will not be extorted.
I'm like, extorted.
It's you know, did you follow the rule of law?
Why did you have conflicts that should have led to your recusal in this particular case?
That's what's at stake here.
Then Rod Rosenstein, now we have reported and have corroborated that Rod Rosenstein is one of the people that signed up, signed off on the Pfizer warrants.
Remember the Pfizer Warrants unverified, uncorroborated.
The bulk of information, according to the Grassley Graham memo, was the steel dossier that Hillary bought and paid for with Russian lies.
Rod Rosenstein actually said the four people that did wrong in the DOJ face consequences.
I guess he's talking about McCabe, struck Page and Bruce Orr.
Well, I think there are others there as well, including James Comey leaking information the way he did.
Now the three people he leaked it to, first it was one person, so that was a lie by omission under oath, because they didn't tell us about the other two people, but they're all three now just coincidentally became Jim Comey's lawyer.
Because then he has attorney client privilege, which I guess doesn't mean anything anymore anyway.
I'm just guessing about that.
You know, just stuff I'm reading in the newspapers.
It doesn't mean anything.
Um anyway, Rod Rosenstein then goes on to say four people that did wrong in the DOJ face consequences, and if Pfizer applications are serious, and if they're found they're false, serious consequences.
Let's play that.
The way we operate in the Department of Justice, if we can accuse somebody of wrongdoing, we have to have admissible evidence, incredible witnesses.
We need to prepare to prove our case in court.
And we have to affix our signature to the charging document.
That's something that not everybody appreciates.
And many people that I see talking about it seem not to recognize uh what a FIS application.
A FISA application is actually a warrant, just like a search warrant.
Uh, in order to get a FISA uh search warrant, you need an affidavit signed by a career federal law enforcement officer who swears that the information in the affidavit is true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief.
Uh and that's the way we operate.
And if it's wrong, sometimes it is, if you find out there's anything incorrect in there, that person is going to face consequences.
Okay.
Then where's the consequences?
Because to this day, in the first interview Comey did with Georgi Stephanopoulos, Clinton sycophant, uh, for his new book, he admitted, I still I have no idea to this day if in fact any of that dossier is true.
Was there any choice there?
Uh why if this was salacious and this particular part of the dossier unverified, still unverified, by the way?
Yes.
Still unverified.
Stop right there.
Still unverified.
And let's go to the newness memo and the Crassley Graham memo.
The bulk of information to obtain the FISA warrant was the dossier.
Andrew McCabe, no dossier.
We won't even have an application for a Pfizer warrant.
Okay, well, how does that sync up with what Rod Rosenstein just said?
That in fact there are serious consequences, and FISA applications are serious, and if it's found there are false and serious false, there are serious consequences.
Okay, we suspect Rod Rosenstein signed off on one of the renewal applications.
Did he check if it's verified?
Did he check if their dossier was the bulk of information?
Did he just sign his name to it without looking at it, as serious as he says that it is?
This is unbelievable.
Unbelievable.
All right, so Robert Muller sends his uh, you know, Russia Gate team of liberals in with their questions that they're now leaking to the news meeting.
This is interesting.
Because Hillary, we have precedence here in terms of the treatment of high profile Americans.
Like the FBI took over from the field agents, the rank and file FBI guys that were doing their job.
Remember, there's two instances of that.
They took it over on the email server investigation and they took it over.
Remember, Andrew McCabe had a meltdown.
He was out of town and he he he found out that there was investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
He had a meltdown.
And you know, the Clintons had the special category every time when it came to them.
They had their own special investigators.
It was taken out of the hands of the rank and file, which wouldn't happen to anybody else, because that goes to the whole heart of my argument that the fix was in, it was rigged with Comey, McCabe, and Struck and Page, and and uh, of course, Loretta Lynch played her little part in all of this too.
So if that's if if we're gonna interview high profile people, if a presidential candidate gets treated this way, then I am uh thinking, well, we ought to treat everybody this way.
In other words, the New York Times with their big list of questions, and I had multiple sources telling me some of this is a bunch of crap last night that Mueller wants to ask Trump, which they're pretending are actual questions, but I I agree with the analysis of Alan Dershowitz that these are all designed to create a perjury trap for Donald Trump, and that's why they're so open-ended, and the whole idea here is to trick him.
But anyway, if we're gonna have one standard for Hillary Clinton, that same standard needs to be applied to Donald Trump.
Because it's another failed, you know, special prosecutor, Robert Mueller, trying to entice the president into sitting down for this perjury trap interview.
I don't think any good lawyer would ever let that happen.
New York Times claiming they obtained the list of definitive questions that Mueller wants to ask Trump.
It seems to me who benefits from leaking this, not Trump, but the special counsel.
Anyway, which they're pretending to be are actual questions that Mueller would ask in the interview if it ever took place.
If Trump were ever to sit down for the actual interview, well, we know the phony New York Times script goes out the window.
And in comes, you know, Robert Mueller's pit bull, Andrew Weisman, and they'll start with their perjury trap, or to use the words of Alan Dershowitz, they really designed to let him ramble and talk that the strategy of the special counsel because they know that's Trump's weakness.
And uh if they ask him direct tough questions to which he can answer yes or no, that might not give them the advantage they're seeking.
Why is this an advantage if you're trying to ascertain what the truth is in an investigation?
Is this a game of winners and losers here?
Because the only loser, if you set a perjury trap for the president is the country, the country that elected him, that I know many in the top echelons of the deep state didn't like and still hate and have been trying to undermine from day one.
So uh anyway, if Donald Trump's uh lawyer, the only way I would ever consider letting him sit down, I I would not let I would not let Mueller sit down with his team of partisan Democrats led by Andrew Weissman.
I would not allow it.
I think it's a bad move.
I think I think Dershowitz is right.
Send him in writing, or let's have it out and have a constitutional crisis over this.
You know, but anyway, Mueller, is he gonna give him the Hillary treatment?
If it's the Hillary treatment, the interview is not going to be conducted under oath.
If it's the Hillary treatment, it's not gonna be recorded.
If it's the Hillary treatment, the interview's not gonna be transcribed in any way.
Now, if we have equal justice under the law, well, that's how we applied this to Hillary.
Before the interview, Mueller and his team can agree to prepare a letter of exoneration months in advance of their interview of Trump.
In the case of Hillary, the exoneration letter writing began in May.
They didn't interview her till July.
Two days later, then they exonerated her.
And then Mueller can agree to destroy any incriminating digital evidence, just like they did on the laptops with Cheryl Mills and other Hillary's attorneys there.
Can you imagine the FBI goes into the DNC and says we want to look at your, you know, find out where the where the leak came from, where the where the hacking came from, and they said no, uh no, you can't.
Imagine if Trump did that.
Any pro-Trump witnesses are found to have perjured themselves, Mueller can agree to grant them retroactive immunity agreements, because that's what they did to Cheryl Mills and Uma Abadid and computer techs who lied about the destruction of Hillary's emails.
And let's not forget James Comey is signed as most, you know, rapidly anti-Trump pro-Hillary agent, Peter Strzok, the guy that interviewed General Flynn also interviewed Hillary Clinton.
He's involved in everything.
And since there were no recordings and no transcripts, it was it was Strzok's discretion to determine if Hillary told the truth.
Nah, when she deleted those emails under subpoena, that was not designed to obstruct justice.
And she acidwashed the hard Drive that was not designed to obstruct justice.
When she uh told AIDS to beat up devices with hammers, that was not designed to obstruct justice.
I doubt Comey would have tolerated any agents working under him who were rabidly pro-Trump, as Peter Strzok was pro-Hillary, do the interview.
So Mueller's gonna have to go outside.
Maybe he should get me to conduct the interview.
Because I'm about as pro-Trump as Peter Strzok was pro-Hillary.
And Andrew Weissman, pro-Hillary showing up at the celebration when he thought she was going to win.
So I say put me in charge.
Or maybe they could put the great one, Mark Levin in charge of that one.
Or Rush Limbaugh.
Somebody that would treat Donald Trump with the same deference that Peter Strck treated Hillary Clinton.
Anyway, whoever they pick, trust me, it's not going to be the same conditions, and that is the point, isn't it?
There's no equal justice under the law.
That's the point.
We have a dual, a two-tiered justice system.
That's the point.
They're shredding the Constitution.
They're not applying laws in this country equally.
I have a lot of questions I want to ask.
We have a ton of them.
You know, they used an unverified dossier.
It was funded by Hillary Clinton and Hillary Clinton's money control of the DNC, funneled through a law firm to get a Pfizer warrant against an American citizen, a member of the opposition party candidate weeks before presidential election.
How is it possible an unverified, uncorroborated dossier put together by a foreign national with Russian sources is ever the basis for a warrant?
Rod Rosenstein answered that question today.
You know, you got George Stephanopoulos.
He still doesn't know to this day if it's true.
Well, how is it possible it was ever presented to any Pfizer court judge?
It was presented to one, two, three, four.
The original application, and then the three subsequent applications.
That apparently even Rod Rosenstein, this would be a huge conflict, signed off on himself.
And did James Comey sign off on these?
I believe he might have.
Let's find out the answer to that question.
Amazing, nobody asked him.
As he went on his I'm a great person tour across America.
You know, when did the when did the FBI director know about the FISA application?
Was the FISA court given information that was false?
Do we now know?
Or unverified at the very least?
Was it the bulk of evidence as the Grassley Graham memo suggests?
You know, we were told that there was only a little asterisk saying the dossier may have some political taint to it, but that really wasn't true because we know Hillary paid for it.
When did everybody know Hillary paid for the dossier and the DNC paid for the dossier?
Why wasn't the Pfizer court told directly and unequivocally that Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign in the DNC paid for this Russian propaganda?
These lies.
They have any knowledge that uh could have directly impacted the court's decisions.
Of course it would have impacted the court's decision.
Why in the three subsequent Pfizer renewals applications were judges not told the information was unverified and Hillary paid for it?
You know, are they concerned that the money was funneled through Perkins Couie to hire a foreign national through Fusion GPS, Christopher Steele?
Are they concerned that Steele used Russian sources and apparently Russian government sources?
Is that Russian interference in our election?
Is that a foreign national's interference in our election?
Did they ever double check or verify the sources?
Did the FBI ever pay Christopher Steele?
Why did they fire Christopher Steele?
Then of course we got all the 18 USC 793 mishandling, destroying classified information.
Got all of this evidence out here, all of it.
That never got leaked.
Those are questions that ought to be asked everybody involved in this case.
Well, Hannity, why are you talking about this?
Well, because it's called we have one justice system.
And if we don't apply the rules and the Laws equally, we don't have a justice system.
We have a banana republic.
We have Venezuela.
We don't have a U.S. Constitution.
We've shredded the Constitution.
We don't have equal application of the laws.
We have special treatment under the law.
And then you lose your country.
That's why it matters.
That's why it matters.
All right, we have in studio.
This is pretty interesting.
Paul Manafort's legal team put a memorandum in support of a motion requiring a hearing regarding the improper disclosures related to confidential grand jury information and potentially classified materials.
This, by the way, is not a mere technicality.
This is a real possibility that uh that unethical behavior could have taken place, which could in the end work out good for him.
All right, when we come back in studio, Greg Jarrett, Sidney Powell.
Later we're talking to Sarah Carter, uh, and so much other news we'll get to.
Rod Rosenstein speaks and much more straight ahead.
All right, glad you're with us hour two, Sean Hannity Show, 800-941.
Sean, our toll-free telephone number.
You want to be a part of the program.
Uh all right, a lot happening.
Uh AP has just put out Sean Hannity battles a battle of sourcing with the New York Times.
Sean Hannity urged his viewers to put New York Times article on the special counsel investigation in your fireplace and burn it.
Well, I said last night.
Instead, he offered a tutorial on the importance of reading.
The Time Story was a list of questions.
The special counsel Robert Muller wanted to put to Trump in a potential interview, upended cable newscast Monday night, including Hannity's.
Uh Hannity denigrated the Times use of anonymous sources as he did Trump, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Hannity says he has his own sources.
I do.
I have a I have my own anonymous who we didn't identify.
All we've heard for over a year are unnamed sources that spoke on the condition of anonymity.
So I'm just I'm just holding up the AP and the New York Times and Washington Post and CNN and you know, fake news MSNBC.
Anyway, that's how bad the press is in this country.
They're being fed lies and misinformation.
He said the story was clearly a leak by the special counsel's office.
Yet for uh yet for a story reliant on anonymous sourcing, the Times was unusually forthcoming about where the information came from.
It didn't point towards Muller's office.
This is what they're writing about me.
It's still anonymous.
The Times Story said that the special counsel investigation investigators read a series of questions to Trump lawyers who compiled those questions into a list.
That list was provided to the Times by a person outside of Mr. Trump's legal team, the newspaper said.
Mr. Hannity did not discl discuss the disclosure on his show.
Anyway, here to sort all of this out, all the new developments today.
Sidney Powell is the author of the bestseller licensed to lie exposing corruption in the Department of Justice, Greg Jarrett, Fox News legal analyst.
He's got a brand new book coming out.
It's called The Russian Hoax, and that is the illicit scheme to clear Hillary Clinton and frame Donald Trump.
Isn't that basically what it comes down to?
Isn't that where we are?
That's exactly what it is.
That's exactly what it is.
You have an endorsement for your book.
This is exactly what it is.
I'm glad to get it from Sidney because I've read her great book.
And uh yeah, the the subtitle really tells this story.
There were people at the Department of Justice and the FBI who, for political reasons, decided to clear Hillary Clinton, absolver of what was obvious wrongdoing criminality, and try to destroy Trump, first the candidate and then the president, and they're still trying to do it, Sean.
And they had to do it, Sean, because Obama was writing Hillary under using an alias on that server.
He knew jolly well that she had not was operating off the grid and that it wasn't secure.
What did you think of these questions with the New York Times?
The irony of all the what did you think and do about what did you think?
Is thinking now a crime?
Yeah, the thought police have now decided to take over America.
I I must tell you when I read these questions, I laughed.
These are the most amateur-ish questions that I I find it hard to believe that they actually came from a skilled experienced lawyers.
Looks like they were written by a first-year law student who was about to flunk out.
Questions like, what were you thinking at this point in time?
There's a half a dozen of those.
What was your opinion of Mr. Comey?
Uh, you know, What was your reaction to a news report?
All of that is irrelevant.
You are not allowed to intrude on the the thinking of the president when he's exercising a constitutional power.
And I would say at least half of these questions are covered by executive privilege.
If not all of them.
Why would any lawyer, Sidney, ever allow the president to go before Mueller's partisan team of uh Andrew Weissman's who you have written about extensively?
Yes, uh literally wrote the book on Andrew Weissman.
The only reason would be because Muller ultimately has the power of a grand jury subpoena and could bring the president.
So the president's lawyers say we're not going to let, we're not going to do it this way.
You're not going to have open-ended questions and a perjury trap set for the president of the United States.
Exactly.
Then I think the only real possibilities for Mueller to ask him written questions.
That would be the more appropriate thing to do, and there's certainly precedent for doing that.
Okay, and then Mueller says no, because if you believe Alan Dershowitz, the reason that these are not yes or no questions is because they think and they assume that there's an advantage for them setting a perjury trap for the president if they give uh him an opening to go on and answer long uh questions and and the president likes to talk.
Exactly.
That's their whole goal with interviewing him at all.
I mean, that's what they did with Flynn and Papadopoulos.
It's not about finding the truth.
No.
Yeah, it's not about finding uh about real justice or collusion.
It's about anything they can possibly get him on or get anybody he cares about on.
This is a perjury trap.
Uh I'm just looking at page three, and here's one perjury trap question.
What was the purpose of your February 14, 2017 meeting with Mr. Comey and what was said?
Now, that's the infamous meeting in which uh Trump allegedly said, you know, I hope you you can see your way clear to letting it go in reference to Flynn.
If Trump says anything that deviates one word from what Comey wrote in his presidential memo, even though Comey may have been exaggerating or making it up, then Muller will charge Trump with perjury.
Uh he will take anybody's side over the president's word.
That's a perjury trap.
Here's what most Americans are asking, and um as I watch Comey go on his I'm a I'm a great American book tour.
You know, we we have, for example, wasn't the FISA court lied to?
Yes, completely.
And Rod Rosenstein.
Didn't he sign off on one of them?
He signed off on one of them, Sally Yates signed one or two of them, and Dana Buente, who's now general counsel at the FBI signed off.
And the bulk of evidence was the Was the Steel dossier that we now know as absolute garbage.
Garbage.
So all of those people that signed off on it, they signed off on evidence that was never verified or corroborated?
Exactly.
And and don't they have to And they knew it wasn't verified or corroborated?
Well, James Comey to this day doesn't says it's still uncorroborated.
And months after they used it for the first FISA warrant against Carter Page, who by the way had left the Trump campaign by that time, he wasn't even on it.
But they still had access to the Steel had already spilled things to the press and been invalidated as an FBI informant because of it?
Doesn't the FISA law require verification?
It does.
DOJ was supposed to independently verify it.
And and and doesn't it mean that if they didn't verify it, they didn't corroborate it, then they also have an obligation to tell the judge that Hillary and the DNC paid for it?
They did.
And unbelievably, Comey, uh, when he was interviewed last week on special report on Fox said, you know, to this day he's not sure who paid for it.
How in the world could he have been FBI director sign off on a warrant to spy on an American citizen without knowing the source and authenticity of that key document?
And then he tried to tell uh Brett Bear, well, it was it was uh insignificant part of the FISA warrant.
Well, that's news to everybody on the FISA court.
Including McCabe, who testified in front of Congress that it Was essential to it.
Well, he said there would be no dossier.
There's no application.
Right.
He said it was the bulk of the FISA warrant.
That was in the in the Grassley Graham memo.
Um all right, so that means that it was like in all likelihood, lies took place to the why don't we ever hear from the FISA judges?
If I was a judge and I signed off on a warrant to spy on an American citizen, an opposition party uh campaign associate, uh, and I think I was lied to and and there was purposeful omissions of of key information, I think I'd want to know.
Where are those judges?
Well, who who knows?
Because it's a secret court.
You see, that's the problem with these star chambers in which nobody is accountable when there is no opposition there, just one side, and it's all held in deep dark secret.
Who knows?
Maybe the judges have held a hearing.
Well, I'm betting one of them was Rudy Contreras because he recused from the Flynn case all of a sudden, and it went to Judge Sullivan.
So I'm betting he signed up.
That was an amazing development, too.
Who's pals with Peter Strzok?
Right.
By coincidence.
So I keep bringing up to this audience.
I mean, we know that Andrew McCabe is in trouble.
We all is Hillary Clinton ever going to be in trouble for the things that she did, and that is the 18 USC 793 or or the leading subpoena documents, 33,000 acid washing, beating up drug.
Destruction of justice.
Yeah, I've got an article out from two years ago called The Countless Crimes of Hillary Clinton that got a drudge hit and went viral.
Yeah.
So I mean I listed them.
Is she ever going to be?
She certainly should be.
She should be, but the trouble is some of the statute of limitations have run already.
I mean, on Hillary Clinton.
She showed the hook.
Yeah, not completely.
Some of them haven't run, some have, on mishandling of classified documents.
Um, and you know, obstruction of justice in destroying 30,000 plus emails that were under subpoena.
I mean, i if you or I or anybody in this room, any American did this, we'd already be behind bars.
Oh, we'd be under the jail.
And you know, Hillary Clinton would be a good idea.
No.
Would not be able to get you out.
Look at the poor young sailor that's an off a picture of the case.
Christopher Saucier.
So as I go through that, then we have so where do we go from here?
I mean, Andrew McCabe, we know is we have all these other criminal referrals, some of them congressional, some of them from the IG.
Uh we've now talked about about James Comey's being investigated.
We still don't hear a lot about Clapper and Brennan and Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes and and uh Samantha Powers a masking a person a day.
I mean, though that seems to me that those are the type of things that we're now we are now weaponizing these powerful tools of intelligence that we give to people to protect our country, not turn those weapons on the American people.
That's right.
Where's Jeff Sessions in all of this?
He promised to go after the leakers vigorously.
And you know, here we are.
It's been more than a year since Sessions has been attorney general.
Uh and what?
There's been one leak prosecution and that's it.
Did he ever get to the bottom of the who leaked Michael Flynn's name?
Was it Susan Powers?
Was it uh, you know, John Brennan, Clapper?
Who was it?
Um and we you know, we Susan Rice.
Uh we still don't have an answer to that because I don't think that Jeff Sessions is actually in control of the Department of Justice.
How come it's so obvious to us and they are not they're seemingly not doing their job?
They seemingly are protecting the upper echelon, just like they protected Hillary Clinton.
Do either one of you have an any doubt that Hillary committed crimes with the email server, and then they put the fix in and rigged her investigation.
There's enough information in the public record to draw those conclusions, and any decent prosecutor could prove a case.
And they prove that they wanted Hillary to continue.
Exactly.
And the whole thing was a cover-up because they not only had to cover for Hillary, they had to cover for President Obama.
It never made any sense that she skated on this.
Look at John Deutsch, Sandy Berger, David Petraeus, Harold T. Martin.
Uh, not to mention all of the sailors who did a whole lot less than Hillary Clinton did, yet she walks.
All right, we're gonna continue.
Sidney Powell, attorney, author of the bestseller, licensed to lie, exposing corruption at The Department of Justice.
Greg Jarrett, we're how many weeks away from your book coming out?
We're a couple of months away.
You know, it takes time with the publisher.
They're going to be able to do that.
The title is amazing.
The Russian hoax, the illicit scheme to clear Hillary Clinton and frame Donald Trump.
That is soon to be a bestseller.
You can get it by the way, early copies on Amazon.com.
Rare in studio appearance.
Sidney Powell, author of the best-selling book, licensed to lie.
Greg Jarrett's upcoming book, by the way, The Russian hoax, the illicit scheme to clear Hillary Clinton and frame Donald Trump.
Now that we know about these deep state actors, now that it's being exposed, it's taking a lot of work.
Who's in trouble, Greg Jarrett?
Well, James Cummie, I think is is in trouble beyond Andrew McCabe, who we already know lied four times.
Uh and should be prosecuted.
But Comey, it'll be interesting what the inspector general says.
You know, Comey is still in complete denial and lying every time he opens his mouth.
For example, he insists that the documents he leaked doesn't make him a leaker.
Uh just because he says so, we're supposed to believe him.
Absurd.
Of course.
He says that uh the information that he leaked contained no classified information.
Oh, really?
Then why did the FBI say it contains classified information?
And they had to go to the offices of the recipient of the leak to contain the leak.
So, you know, every time Comey opens his mouth.
Here's an interesting developer.
Here, here's an interesting development from today.
Rod Rosenstein said four people that did wrong in the DOJ face consequences.
Pfizer applications are serious, and if found there are false serious consequences.
And he signed one of them.
Thank you very much.
That's that's what I was thinking.
He should there are 50 reasons why he should be recused from having anything to do with the Rush investigation.
He should never have been able to appoint Mauler for a lot of reasons.
Is that is this all come down to they hated Trump?
They helped Hillary, even covering up for her.
They got caught, even lying to Pfizer judges, and now they're in trouble, or now they're taking their revenge.
What's what's the likely scenario?
A combination of all the above.
So they so when Brennan actually says, stay tuned, Mr. Trump, in a tweet.
Oh, that's a that's a clear threat.
I mean, you know, they're going on the attack now because they want to lay cover for any prosecution being brought against them and say it's oh, it's just politically motivated because we've been on such a tear about all this.
You know what bugs clapper and Brennan and all of the others who uh were part of the Obama Clinton administration, is that they hate to lose power.
Uh, you know, it's like even Comey said yes.
Okay.
Comey said yesterday, I if Hillary won, I'd still be the FBI direct.
They had so much invested in Hillary winning that they went into septic shock from which they're still suffering when she lost.
I think it's a deep psychosis, and it happened at 10 o'clock on election night, 2016.
Uh, great to see you in studio.
Sydney Powell, great to see you.
Greg Jarrett, great to see you both.
800-941 Sean.
Your calls coming up next on the Sean Hannity show.
Can you feel we're going back on the same?
Yeah, it was like we all felt like it uh no time had passed at all, like that maybe we had a month off and it was 21 years.
But it just all clicked and it was just like being home.
Yeah.
I mean, well, well, it's it couldn't be a bigger thing.
Uh uh, but then also with the big hit comes people that aren't so happy as well.
If you say that you're a supporter of Donald Trump or yeah, people are mad about that.
Yeah.
You know, I don't give a Roseanne Barr on with uh Jimmy Fallon last night, and that is the great.
That is how people should live their lives.
Do you really care that much what other people think of you?
If you do, you can't be yourself ever.
If you spend in your whole, uh, I don't want to offend, uh uh uh just be who you are.
And your friends, your true friends, will come to respect that you are your own person, and the other people the hell with them because they're never gonna like you anyway.
And you're gonna be like sucking up to a dictator and having to always say what you think they want them to say, and you can't be who you are.
Just be yourself.
That was a great answer.
That was really that was the answer of the day.
We give a gold star, Roseanne Barr.
And oh, Fallon at one point goes, Yeah, you had like what, 20 million people?
27.
It was a great moment.
Uh all right, let's get to our phones here.
800 941 Sean, if you want to be a part of the program.
Uh Sandra is in Michigan.
Sandra, hi, how are you?
Um welcome to the Sean Hannity Show.
Well, thank you very much.
It's an honor to have to finally talk to you.
I have one of your footballs that sits on my uh bookcase and it's been there for two years.
Well, I'm sorry.
I hope I hope you throw it around once in a while.
I do.
My dog likes it, but I don't let him chew it.
Oh, wow.
Yeah.
Dogs.
My dog picks up everything.
I get it.
I know.
I got a puppy and he's still a puppy.
Well, I sent my dog.
So there's this place, Majestic Manor in Indiana, where I got my dog.
Full disclosure.
Full disclosure.
Oh, yeah, full disclosure.
What?
That's where you got your dog.
Okay, that's where I got I was saying that.
That's where I got my.
I just wanted to make a very strong announcement about it.
Full disclosure.
Okay.
So I paid for the dog.
Uh I didn't get it for free.
And actually it was kind of cool because it was the last one in the litter, and they were putting it, it was the pick of the litter, Marley was, and they were putting it up for a charity, and it happened to be a health issue that someone in my family was struggling with.
So I ended up paying a lot for one little dog, but it was worth every bit of it.
And so anyway, I got to know the people at Majestic Manners, and now that Marley went into her most recent heat, uh, we sent Marley to Indiana to get pregnant.
We're gonna find out if Marley's gonna have a puppy soon.
So we're looking forward to that.
But this is my first endeavor into puppy production.
And this woman Connie is like rolling my her eyes.
Yeah, I'm not gonna let you do this on your own.
I will fly in for the delivery.
I'm like, wow.
Is it I guess it's that complicated?
I'm gonna Facebook live it because I don't think.
Well, you're the one that actually said, Don't touch the puppy, because if you Well, that's what they told me, because we got a dog.
I told Connie this, and Connie was like dying laughing at the myth you bought into.
It's like fake dog news.
You bought into fake doggy news.
Oh my god.
All right, we don't want to ignore Sandra here.
Sandra, we're sorry.
Okay, I'm loving it.
I was at the uh rally in the other Washington Saturday.
Oh, the real fun rally.
Yeah.
Oh, it was incredible.
I was the one that started the Nobel Peace Prize.
I've actually lost my voice because I said it so loud.
Really?
Right behind him, and everyone looked, and we started doing like the famous wave.
It went around the room, and when you played that, um I had to tell you that I was the one that started it.
Well, let's see if we can hear you starting it.
Let's hear it.
But you know what?
He's been a great help on the border with North Korea, and a lot of good things are happening there.
A lot of good things.
I'm not gonna give you what's going to actually happen because we don't really know.
but i'll tell you one thing we're not playing games and i remember you know it was very rough three four months ago That's very nice, thank you.
That's very nice.
And then he says, I just want to get the job that you started that.
I started that.
I also started Trump Gate because the other media will tell you that there was like a handful of people.
We had thousands of thousands of people, and instead of having a tailgate, we had Trump gate, and I was the one that started the Nobel, and I was in the back, like behind him in the the VIP section, and it went viral.
It totally went viral.
It was such I still get goosebumps when I hear that everyone said that right after I said it.
You know what?
It I mean the crowd picked it up really quickly.
Um I look no, it's it w it's interesting.
Imagine oh the Obama gets a Nobel Prize for doing absolutely nothing.
The world is less safe after Obama's president, the Iranian deal among the dumbest things I've ever seen done in my life.
And here, you know, the president taking on little rocket man and showing a military presence.
Well, it looks like we we have a good shot.
I can't say for sure it's gonna happen, like the president said, we got a good shot at the possible denuclearization of the Korean peninsula.
How good would that be for the world?
Yeah, six decades later.
Come on, that's definitely worth it.
But it was it was such an awesome experience, Sean.
We had so many people, and by the way, we had 20 protesters.
That's it.
Out of 24,000 people, and we did not do anything.
It was very peaceful.
The police department and the sheriff said it was the most peaceful rally, had not one incident or arrest.
Isn't that amazing?
Did anyone chant CNN sucks.
I that's like my favorite when I go when I've been at these rallies.
It's funny because the crowd will look at me and they'll just start laughing because I'm cracking up.
And you see all these CNN reporters uh squirming.
Uh oh, what was the Hannity football moment?
Linda's asking me to ask you.
Well, when you came to America's for Prosperity at the San Marino Club, and I had a boot on a cast, and I was coming out of the ladies' room, and I walked right at you and I smacked you in the face, and I went, Oh my God, you're Sean Handy.
And he goes, Oh my God.
And I was trying to grab a camera trying to get a picture, and you were in the audience and you threw out the footballs, and I happened to catch one.
Oh, you did.
Okay.
Uh huh.
You know, I I try to bring them to every event.
I buy them in bulk, and uh, you know, they seem to be a big hit, so I keep buying them.
And I love it.
I love it.
You know, everybody wants me to sell them on the website.
I don't like to ba ask people for my eye stuff.
I just, you know what, I give them away.
And yeah, it was it was truly a moment.
I actually had a fight with another lady, but I won because I'm I'm five foot ten.
No, I we've seen some real battle royales break out in the crowd sometime fighting over a football.
And I'll even look like the garter and the flower at the wedding.
I like I've seen like I throw the ball, and then that this it's it's say going into the arms of an o older woman or a young girl, and then you see some brute, you know, reach his hands down over them and like steal the ball from the child.
And I'm like, I'll look at the guy and I'm like, Really?
Really?
I'll give you both a ball.
Yeah.
So anyway.
That was Sandra, good for you.
France was attacked, and you came on and and spoke just before they were attacked in Nice.
That was a very, very tough day.
But yeah, I was I just wanted to share that that rally was once in a lifetime.
We were very honored.
I worked in Macomb County, Macomb County put him to the wind, Michigan.
Right.
I made over three thousand phone calls in two thousand and sixteen for Trump.
Good for you.
It was such an honor to have him.
Well, I'm gonna tell you, twenty twenty eighteen is going to be the year.
It's gonna be Democrats want to do over year because they think if they win and take control of the house that for them it's a mandate to impeach the president.
So this is as important, if not more important if we want to continue the progress we're making, that in fact everybody get out and vote.
And as we get closer, we'll be covering it very, very, you know, pretty much every day.
Uh thank you so much, Sandra.
Appreciate it.
800 941 Sean, if you want to be a part of the program.
Michelle in North Carolina.
Hey, Michelle, how are you?
And welcome to the program.
Hey, thank you so much, Sean.
Um, I agree that the the vote in November is going to be super important and as a way to drain the swamp.
We gotta get people out of there that um have a progressive agenda.
But I think the other way that we have got to drain this swamp is we have got to go after the kingpin.
I think that Hillary Clinton is the clincher in all of this.
She and her husband have been in politics for 30 years, and I believe that their tentacles run really deep.
And I think if Lee will go after them, you will have all the people that are their minions scattering like roaches when you turn the light on.
And I think that that's going to be one of the fastest ways um that we can drain this swamp.
And the other thing I think is important is we have got to start making people pay for their actions, and we've got to start promoting lawfulness because um, you know, the progressives, they they are completely misguided in what they are upset about and what they're angry about.
And we have an entire generation of kids who do not believe that um there's black and white and there's right and wrong, and that they should pay consequences for their actions.
And I think it has to start at the top.
I think that we have got to take them down, and um and if we can take them down, I think so many.
I mean, I think hundreds of people are gonna go with them because let me tell you what, you you see you're so smart.
I hate when I have to give away what I'm doing tonight.
With all of this, what are the questions for the president?
Half of which are asinine, to be honest.
What did you think?
Thinking is not a crime.
Collusion is not a crime.
Uh there's no evidence of any collusion.
There's never been evidence of any collusion.
Anyway, and and my sources are telling me that this is, you know, half of this is baloney anyway.
But putting that aside is we'll put up the questions that everyone else needs to answer.
You know, are we gonna have equal justice under the law?
Does Hillary get a pass?
We'll talk about the specific crime she committed.
We'll look at the legal jeopardy that James Comey is in, and Andrew McCabe is in, and struck and page are in, and all those people involved in surveillance, unmasking, and leaking intelligence, and all those people that lied to Pfizer judges and who signed off on unverified, uncorroborated Russian lies before the Pfizer judge and Pfizer courts, and who never told the judge om of lying by omission that Hillary paid for it all.
We're gonna go through all the listen, if it can't be one way.
We have equal justice under the law, or we don't have a country.
So I'm gonna do exactly what you said tonight.
You like my idea?
I love your idea.
And you know what I think?
I think that they actually believe that thinking is against the law.
They don't want people to think critically.
That's why they're so busy just conjuring up everybody's emotions and creating chaos and creating fear and creating violence and and you know in people because they don't want them to think.
They don't want them to look at the facts because the facts are on the side of Trump and this administration, and they're on the side of the American people.
And what people don't see either is our country was founded on a principle of right and wrong and moral law.
And we need to see that that is what has made America great.
That it is a c that has it has been a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.
And we have got to get the people out that are there only for themselves and to actually destroy our nation and our constitution.
And I think that's the progressive and the left agenda completely.
They want to control it.
I can tell you more and more people like yourself, Michelle.
Wherever I go, whoever I talk to, they're getting it.
They're beginning to understand it.
And they're saying, Wow, you were right from the beginning.
And the other people that know it are the deep state actors, because they've been following us too, hoping that people wouldn't catch on to it.
Now even the mainstream media, it sounds like some of their questions came directly from the Hannity program.
It's hilarious sometimes.
Keep up the good work, Michelle.
We need your voice out there.
And as we continue, Sean Hannity Show, news Roundup Information Overload Hour coming up at the top of the next hour, and you don't want to miss it.
Sarah Carter is going to stop by.
She had two blockbuster articles.
We're going to go through it point by point in the next hour.
Uh first, we say hi to Nick is in New Orleans.
Nick, hi, how are you?
Glad you called, sir.
Hey, Sean.
Uh I first I want to thank you so much for talking about doing what you what you think instead of what people want you to do.
You put your life on the line by your opinions by backing Trump.
Uh I get upset when my neighbor looks at me funny because the lawns too uh has grown too much.
But uh, I mean, you uh I mean you're you're so brave backing Trump and going with what you believe, and I I love that about you.
But uh and and that goes to my point about Korea, North Korea and South Korea.
Now uh he they're talking about peace uh prize for Donald Trump, and he's doing the same.
And the reason for this is because of his pronouncing moral judgment and and uh and for the things he said that the media attacked as crazy about calling him a little rocket man and calling him short.
That's actually what caused the peace process to occur.
And the the media is so confused they don't even understand that why they are completely wrong.
Listen, there are a few of us, you know, listen, any time anyone says to me that, you know, you're being courageous, exposing the truth and and the deep state and all these uh actors uh at the top or top echelon of power that abuse their power involved in corruption, you know, there's nothing that any of us are doing that is that is anywhere near the level of bravery that you know f that our troops, first responders, police, firemen put on our every day.
But it's but I'll tell you what's sad about your commentary, because there's a lot of people saying it.
What's sad is is that people do recognize that there is a massive abuse of power that's gone on in this country.
You know, there has been an attempt at a soft coup to undermine a duly elected president to to literally exonerate somebody that we know was guilty so that that person would become the next president.
That all happened.
You know, what happened spying on an opposition party in a campaign year, that all happened based on lies to a Pfizer court.
So people are sensing and feeling the the deep abuse of power and corruption here by these these are top people.
These are not the rank and file intelligence people.
This is not rank and file CIA FBI guys.
They're the guys that do their work every day and and keep us safe.
And so there is a a re a reality now that has set in.
Wow, they really did abuse their power.
What they did is really wrong here.
And we're only at the tip of the iceberg.
You know, we're maybe a week away from this IG report coming out on how they rigged the Clinton email investigation and who the players were.
And they're going to be, not if there will be many people charged here.
And I've got to believe without our team that We put together and the support of all of you listening and watching that a lot of this may not have occurred had we not been pounding this every day.
And then the brave people within the FBI and intelligence that helped us to get to the truth.
These are people that you may never hear of that became heroes in all of this.
And of course, the media is their they're missing in action the whole time.
News Roundup, information overload, Sarah Carter blockbuster new developments on a couple of fronts that she's gonna break wide open.
That's next as we continue.
Coming up next, our final news roundup and information overload hour.
I've been in contact with media until after I left the government on the 20th of January.
So I don't quite understand uh at least what I've read, uh that somehow I leaked uh about uh the dossier.
So let me let me get so you didn't leak anything about the dossier to any media.
No, not I mean I talked about it after I left the government, but uh not during that period, uh not and certainly not between uh the 6th of January and the and the 10th when the president elect himself talked about it.
All right, so Clapper lied again, committed perjury again, and the media ignores it again because they are the great protectors of the deep state.
Sarah Carter is with us, Fox News contributor, investigative reporter.
Uh, she's putting all her material up on her website.
We always link it to our website, Sarah Carter.com.
All right, let's talk first about Clapper and then your explosive uh column from last night.
But Clapper, you know, saying what he's saying here, he's lying again.
He's caught lying again because he leaked to CNN, where he's now getting a paycheck.
Well, this is what happens, Sean, when you keep having to change your story when you first start telling lies and they get all tangled up.
I mean, what we know now is that and and remember we reported this in early March that Congress was actually looking at Clapper, that there were inconsistencies with his testimony to them, particularly about the dossier and when that dossier, the information in that dossier was leaked to CNN to Jake Tapper and the other reporters, and which by the way won a very prestigious, what was known as a very prestigious award um at the White House Correspondents Dinner for that story.
And uh so part of the problem here is that right after the president was briefed, and this was in January 2017, early January, he was briefed by Comey, he's already admitted that, um, on the most salacious parts of the dossier in that meeting with Trump in in Trump Tower, and Comey himself said that Clapper was the one who directed him to give that briefing to the president.
And shortly after those briefings took place, CNN reports on the briefing, reports on the contents of the dossier, and breaks the story.
Shortly after CNN reports, BuzzFeed posts the entire dossier on their website.
Now we got I I gotta stop you for one thing.
Nobody's corroborated a thing.
Fusion GPS never corroborated a thing.
Clapper never corroborated a thing.
CNN never corroborated a thing.
Same with BuzzFeed.
So what you have here is the director of national intelligence testifying that he did not leak this information when in fact we now discovered he did.
That's right.
And r and you said it exactly correctly.
They never corroborated anything.
So here you have the heads of our intelligence agencies, right?
The FBI, the DNI, the director of national intelligence, the head of the CIA then, John Brennan, going over to Trump Tower.
And basically, right before they leave, Comey goes over, pushes, you know, takes uh President Trump aside, everybody else leaves the room, and he begins to tell him about this dossier, which by the way, none of them have corroborated, but they did use months earlier, now we know in a FISA warrant against Carter Page, who was a short-time volunteer for the Trump campaign, which is very interesting in and of itself.
Now we have the memos, and Comey specifically points out Clapper saying Clapper wanted me to give the president this private briefing, right?
On this dossier.
He also says in the memos that CNN, BuzzFeed, uh, other news agencies have this dossier, but they don't have a news hook to run them.
But surely, right after that meeting with President Trump, then President elect Trump, there was the news hook.
And a day later, you have CNN running with the story.
It's like you've got you've got a nexus here where, you know, aga again, what was this all about?
This was about undermining.
Look, it there's many levels of this.
One was keeping Hillary Clinton who had committed felonies and putting the fix in and rigging the investigation.
That's a big component in all of this.
Hillary definitely it's irrefutable.
It's incontrovertible.
The evidence is overwhelming.
She mishandled classified top secret special access programming information.
She destroyed it.
She obstructed justice.
But it was struck, it was Paige, it was Comey, it was McCabe, and it looks like Loretta Lynch, all involved in some level of putting the fix in, riding an exoneration before investigation, letting strut the anti-Trump person that he is interview Hillary.
You know, with all this talk about the New York Times and questions for Trump, Trump should get the Hillary treatment.
What's the Hillary treatment?
Not under oath and meaningless with an exoneration two days later.
Get the Hillary treatment.
Well, well, even worse, Sean, even worse, if you think about this, they were taking information, salacious lies, lies because they haven't proved any of it yet.
And they were taking it from the Russians, paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC, and they were running basically an operation against the president, right?
Because they just needed to get the information out there, the lies out there.
I call it the disinformation campaign.
Believe me, this is something that intelligence agencies are experts at.
The Russians are experts at it.
The United States is experts at it.
There are experts all over the world that run these type of disinformation campaigns against people that they want to target.
And all you need to do is get that false information out there, solidify it in the mainstream media or in a news article, and let it burn like wildfire.
And that's exactly what it is.
This is what the former Soviet Union was known for.
In other words, I read a book years ago, the synthesis of Russian mind control techniques.
And when you use the that that phrase last night on TV, misinformation, disinformation, you know, you can replace it with any of the accompanying adjectives, propaganda, lies, distortions, you know, purposely manipulating people before an election.
Remember, neither Fusion GPS nor the FBI, nor anybody involved in the Department of Justice corroborated that dossier, which a lot of which has been debunked, but they also got the Pfizer warrant on it.
And again, Fusion GPS, they admitted that they were disseminating this information, not corroborated to reporters.
So you got high-ranking members in the intelligence committee working with, you know, gullible sheep in the news media, but so too was Fusion GPS, you know, selling lies to the American people in the lead up to an election.
And so too was former British spy Christopher Steele, who was hired by Fusion GPS, who then the FBI found out was actually briefing reporters when he was told by those handlers that he shouldn't be talking to reporters about this.
Think about this.
This is highly, at that point in time, highly classified information.
It was information that was being investigated by the FBI.
Even though there was no evidence that any of this had happened, even though the people who were purporting this to happen were Russian ex-Russian spies who were probably paid for by Christopher Steele with the money that he got from the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC, um, and and Christopher Steele himself.
Now, these are all foreign agents.
It wasn't like someone from the United States within the CIA had uncovered some kind of evidence, or somebody within the FBI's counterintelligence division discovered some kind of evidence.
There was absolutely no evidence other than now we know that Christopher Steele was trying to shop this thing around, and now we know that Christopher Steele was also in connection with some of Hillary Clinton's closest allies at the State Department that were also funneling information back and forth at this time.
This is incredible because all of this, the last over 15 months that the president, this new administration has had to endure all of this pain, all of this pain and alienation over lies.
And Americans have to get this through their head.
This was not based on any factual information.
If it was, if it was, we would have already seen it.
We've never had a leak on the facts, right?
It's something that I always say when John Brennan puts out his tweets, uh, you know, going after the president.
And this is why this is so important, Sean, and I brought it up in my story.
There's an ethical issue at play here too.
Not only did Clapper, um, and and a lot of people that I've talked to, a lot of my sources believe that Clapper was the one that leaked this to CNN, and I think it spells it out very clearly in that Russia report.
But then months later he goes on to get a job at CNN as a paid analyst.
So you have to ask yourself, was this quid pro quote?
What about doesn't C display?
But CNN had to know that he perjured themselves.
CNN knew.
Well, of course they knew.
I mean, uh which speaks volumes.
I want because we have so much ground to cover.
What did you think of Brennan's tree uh tweet about the House Intel committee?
Oh, it means nothing, it's partisan, et cetera, et cetera.
And then he says kind of cryptically, stay tuned, Mr. Trump.
Now, here is the former CIA director.
I'm reading a deep state threat into that.
He, you know, did he get does he know something or is he just you know, because this is what they do.
I mean, in a good way, the CIA is supposed to be good at lying.
They're supposed to be good at disinformation, but not against their own citizens.
Not that that's what's the president of the United States.
Exactly.
Here is a man, John Brennan, who I have interviewed in the past and I've met in the past, who led probably one of the most and the most prominent agency, spy agency in the entire world, and he is targeting his own president.
Sean, this is something out of countries.
You see in like in Pakistan, and I've said this over and over again, and in other countries throughout the world, uh banana republics, as some of uh the congressional members would like to call it.
He is literally threatening and targeting the president of the United States, acting as if he has some kind of information that is going to take this president down.
Let me tell you, the only thing Mr. Brennan is doing is damaging the integrity of our country because he is not supposed to be partisan.
He can be partisan at home.
He can say whatever he wants about Trump in his house and the privacy of his home with his wife, with his children, whoever he wants to, with his friends.
But you do not, unless you have proof that somebody has done something egregious or committed a criminal act, you do not go after the president of the United States when you were the sitting director of the CIA.
Say right there, Sarah Carter, investigative reporter, uh her report blockbuster on Ronnie Jackson, who is responsible for giving Senator Tester that information that ultimately turned out to be false in a smear effort of the president's doctor.
We'll get to that next.
Right.
As we continue with investigative reporter, Fox News contributor, Sarah Carter is with us.
Sarah A. Carter.com is her website.
Um, but you broke a story how vice president Mike Pence's physician was behind these Ronnie Jackson attacks and these leaks to Senator Tester, uh, a smear job on the president's doctor.
Tell us what you know.
Well, it's just incredible that we live in a time where somebody can just throw allegations onto a wall to see if they stick, and even if they don't stick, people continue to run with them.
You know, after speaking to people uh four separate administration officials, I was able to confirm that um Vice President Mike Pence uh doctor, Jennifer Pena, you know, she's assigned to the vice president um through the White House Medical Unit, um, was the one that initially brought all those charges uh regarding uh Admiral Jackson to Congress.
Now, this has been a longtime grudge, according to numerous sources, Sean, that I've spoken with, between Pena and Dr. Jackson inside the White House, since they were both uh Penya came on board during the Obama administration.
Um Ronnie Jackson had been there since the Bush administration, uh, but she did have other people with her, according to some sources that I spoke with.
There were some other people from the vice president's office that went with her and some other people that were there from before and from the the Army Medical Unit.
Now, they accused Dr. Jackson of horrific things of driving a government vehicle while inebriated and crashing that vehicle of overprescribing medication.
Um even I think the Montana Senator called him uh uh John Tester called him the candy man on television.
I mean, throwing these incredible allegations at a man at a man who served for three presidents.
Now the Secret Service comes out and says we have no records that he ever crashed any car.
Um they go through all of the medical records at the hospital making sure that there hasn't been any missing uh prescription medication.
Everything is up to date.
They find none of that.
And then you have last night, CNN who also broke his story um shortly after my story ran that now uh Penya is accusing him of uh basically breaking HIPAA laws because he treated the vice president's wife, uh Karen Pence.
Um now what I have been told from my sources uh is that and this is coming from the other side.
So there's always two sides to one story, but was that uh, you know, during this time uh when when Dr. Jackson treated Karen Pence, Dr. Pena was over three hours away.
They had to use assets, they were at Camp David, which meant that they had to get a helicopter.
Um and and take Karen Pence to wherever sh they needed to take her to a hospital, whatever for treatment.
And that is the reason why, you know, Dr. Jackson made the phone calls to say we're using this asset, which is at Camp David, the helicopter.
This is the reason why.
Um, and we're taking her to the hospital, and he had to contact the hospital and let them know that she was moving that way.
Now, according to the sources that I spoke with, Kenya was irate.
She didn't want Dr. Jackson treating um the second lady, uh, but she was three hours away, and um he felt that it was the only thing he could do.
Uh so now you have Dr. Jackson, who's in the middle of this, uh somebody described it as Madam's secretary or House of Cards type of situation.
You know, really uh he lost his nomination, right?
He had to withdraw his name um from going to the Veterans Affairs administration.
The president wanted to nominate him.
Of course, there were people that didn't want him there.
And I think it would be fair to say that you can argue whether or not he should have been there.
I it's an unbelievable story.
I can't even believe that this is it has happened.
Sarah Carter, you're gonna stay with us here.
Uh we're gonna update everybody when we get back on the story of the caravan.
Mexico has allowed all these people from Central America to literally make it all across Mexico to the US border, and they've done nothing.
Meanwhile, if it it's about Mexico, that we know what they do and how they treat illegal immigrants there.
And Sarah will stay with with us and we'll be joined by Chris Cabrera, who is the spokesman for the National Border Patrol Council.
That's next as we continue.
We are a nation of laws.
We have to have borders.
We don't have borders, we don't have a country.
And I've been watching for weeks as the caravan came up.
And you know the Mexican laws are very tough on immigration, extremely tough.
And it started out with way over a thousand people.
I guess now it's down to about a hundred.
You gotta have a wall.
And we need border security.
And we will have border security.
As you know, we're sending many, many National Guardsmen down to the border.
Most of them are already there.
And that's having a big impact.
But uh we need a change in the law.
It's an attack on the sovereignty of this nation.
Look, do I think some of these people have a uh a credible fear case that do do some of these folks are are they escaping fear and persecution?
Yes, some are.
But I also know that many aren't.
Many are taking advantage of a system with with loopholes in it.
Uh, and it's just it's just not my thought after 34 years.
If you look at how many get a a positive credible fear finding during the initial interview, which they're cult what to say.
Well, when they show up in immigration court, if they show up in immigration court, the judges find very few.
I think the last numbers I looked at between thirty and forty percent actually would have a credible fear fine, which means every all the rest are you know made up.
Yeah.
We don't have tens of thousands of citizens of Mexico asking for asylum in the United States.
These people have been in Mexico for several weeks now, right?
So apparently it isn't that bad.
They didn't try to come to the United States right away, try to enter illegally because they're in fear for their lives.
Again, I want to be clear.
I think some may have a good case, but many don't.
If they're really escaping Guala, Mala Honduras and they're in Mexico, is it about escaping fear and persecution or is it about getting to the United States?
You know, one thing we gotta remember is this president hasn't changed an awful lot.
This president is simply saying you will enforce the laws on the books, which we haven't been allowed to do in a long, long time.
You know, I I often say that, you know, people ask me all the time about this president and and the way he's attacking immigration enforcement.
And I've said it look, I've worked for six presidents.
I I was hard under uh Ronald Reagan.
I worked for six different presidents.
None of them has done more than Donald Trump has for border security and law enforcement.
This this president done more for us than any president.
And I've worked for six of them.
I respect all of them.
But no one's done more for border security and public safety and law enforcement than this president.
All right, as we look at the situation now that has been unfolding at the border, glad you're with us 24 now till the top of the hour.
Uh I don't think besides myself, there's been any one other person in the news media that's been down to the border uh as much as me, uh, besides Sarah Carter, and she stays with us now in this particular segment.
We're also joined by Chris Cabrera, he's a spokesman for the National Uh Border Patrol Council.
Sarah Carter, how many times have you been down there?
Oh gosh, I spent my almost my the whole beginning of my career um up and down the U.S. Mexico border and spent so much time in Mexico I can't even count.
Uh so it's well maybe were you down there with Linda because Linda bought bought a timeshare down in Mexico when she was twenty.
Thank God we're getting her out of her timeshare because she only went back once and uh thank God for Lone Star Transfer because they get our sponsor of ours.
Uh but in all seriousness, I've been down there like you, and you see, you know, uh on the one hand I can see Sarah, uh I remember one time being in a particular area in San Diego, and they did have a fence in this area, and I'm looking across to Mexico, and uh yeah, you see these kids playing with, you know, in what we would describe as a dump with old tires and garbage and not you know, horrible poverty.
On the other side, you got half million dollar, million dollar homes.
And if I'm living on the one side, I'd want to be on the other side.
But the real fear is the opioids, the drugs that are targeting America's kids that are coming across that border every day.
Just watch the showtime uh show trade and and you'll see it all happening.
And the second issue is well, somebody crosses the border because they want a job, so too can somebody that has uh Islamic extremist views that or some other bizarre uh ideology and they want to commit harm on American citizens.
That's a problem too.
All kinds of contraband.
Anything can move across that border.
I've been down there so many times um uh, you know, that I I can tell you, Sean, even going into Mexico, what I do is I'd go through the actual uh checkpoints.
I'd go into Mexico, I spent time in Agua Prieta, I spent time in Tijuana, I spent time in uh Nueva Laredo, even during the biggest uh battles in Nueva Laredo when I remember uh Vincente Fox had to send uh the Federales uh the f uh down into the border and send their army down there to just try to protect the citizens and and their own Mexican army fled the area within a week because the fighting intensified so much between the drug cartels that they were terrified.
They could they couldn't even control their own cities, you know.
Um and you talk about the squalor, I've seen the squalor on the other side, sure, and and then the million dollar homes on our side.
But Sean, let me tell you this.
I've also seen the million-dollar homes on their side that the drug cartels were using, building tunnels through there to move their drugs into Arizona.
So, you know, into the warehouses in Arizona, and I would go into Mexico and I would see these guys with, you know, these machine guns on the roof, uh, rooftops, protecting these houses that were really just places where they could store the narcotics before and people remember that, before moving them into the United States.
This is a very serious national security issue.
Not only are we dealing with contraband and human trafficking um and all kinds of issues and human suffering, but we really don't know what comes across that border because our resources are very limited.
And you can see that right now.
Look at what they're doing right now um in in California.
I mean, the resources are limited there, but there's areas of our border, just like the president has said, and and I director has said this, and many other people in the DEA, that's wide open where people can move back and forth, and we just don't have enough people out on patrol to do the jobs that they need to do.
And and for eight years, their hands were tied behind their backs.
Let me go to Chris uh Cabrera who's with us.
Uh Chris, let's talk about Your experience and how dangerous this job is for the men and women that do patrol the border and how Mexico is very duplicitous because uh the government of Mexico treats immigrants from El Salvador, Nicaragua, and and Central America horribly.
They throw them in jail, they deport them immediately.
Uh they don't that they're demanding America accept all of this illegal immigration that they themselves won't accept, and they let this caravan, you know, walk right through their entire country and did nothing to stop them, knowing that their goal was to get to the American border.
Yeah, exactly.
You know, it's a shame that that Mexico turns a blind eye towards enforcement when it comes to helping the United States out.
However, when they want something from us, they're they're there with their handout.
And with these 1,500 that came up, I mean, I I think what a lot of folks are forgetting is in in our area in the Rio Gran Valley, we're seeing fifteen hundred just at one station alone of of Central Americans coming in.
Um we're getting, you know, a few hundred every single day.
Um, and you know, just because only a couple hundred showed up in California, that doesn't mean they disbanded and went back to their home country.
Yeah.
Well, uh d is it true that what does Mexico do when they when people are illegal in their country from uh El Salvador, Nicaragua?
Are they not put in jail?
Are they not immediately deported?
They are.
So why didn't Mexico why didn't Mexico stop this caravan if they want to be partners with the United States on trade and other issues?
You know, the way Mexico handles deportations is they tell these folks that they have X amount of days to leave the country, they don't send them back to their country of of origin, so most of them just continue on their on their journey north, and Mexico's not too concerned about it because they know they're leaving anyway, so they don't have to spend the money to get them back home, and uh and they just pass the book on to us.
So I guess they're not too concerned about what the relationship is like with the United States.
Well, you know, and that's the thing is uh oh, you know, when there's trade involved, when there's money involved for them, they're very concerned.
But when it's helping us out and then being a good neighbor to the South, it's just not the case.
Yeah.
And Sarah, as you know, as I look at I remember walking around the drug warehouse in particular, it had a a pretty profound impact on me.
And you look at you look at the opioid epidemic, and it is an epidemic in this country, and all these drugs, and you see that a lot of them are coming across that border, a lot of them.
And these are drugs that are killing American kids.
Uh we're talking about we don't know nobody knows what they're buying in the streets of Cleveland, a big town, a small city, or anywhere else in a in the country that has, you know, serious opioid problems, which is basically every small town and big city in America, and this is big, big money, and we have the ability to protect ourselves.
I'm having a hard time understanding why, why people are resistant to just enforcing the law, uh respecting our sovereignty, and asking people to come here legally.
I know your parents, my grandparents came here legally.
Exactly.
And I mean, uh let's just go back to your point about the amount of drugs that are coming across the border, and it's killing our children.
And particularly if you think about fentanyl.
You know, fentanyl, which is very similar, it's an opioid, it's very similar to morphine.
Um, it is fifty to a hundred times more potent than morphine.
And that is what they're bringing across the border.
And so a lot of these kids, you know, they're cutting it, they're they're utilizing this, they don't even know what they're taking.
They die sometimes the first time they try it.
We have an epidemic across our nation.
Our children are being taken hostage by these drugs and by these drug cartels and these organized crimes.
And Chris and I, we spent a lot of time at the border together years ago.
Um, and Chris can tell you how dangerous this is and how these drug cartels battle.
I mean, I've been on the border in Laredo, Texas, and have literally watched gun battles in Nueva Laredo because these drug cartels are fighting over our highway systems.
They're fighting over our highway systems.
We need to protect our border.
We need to be able to say, look, this is a national security issue.
More than anything else, we can deal with the immigration issues because we've got to deal with Mexico, Honduras, the governments in Guatemala.
We've got to deal with those governments in order to slow the flow of all these people.
And I don't know what that's going to require.
If that's going to require the president to have a stronger hand with these nations to say, look, if you want us to assist you, You've got to do more to assist your people.
But as far as our border is concerned, Sean, our border is a national security issue for our country.
We have people attempting to bring narcotics into our country that is literally killing our children.
And someone needs to stand up for this.
And like you said earlier, we don't know who's crossing that border.
That's a whole other thing.
Rod Rosenstein was answering a question about the House Freedom Caucus members and the draft to impeach him.
They can't even resist leaking their own draft, he says.
The Department of Justice will not be extorted.
What are you how's your what's your reaction to that?
It's incredible.
I mean, look.
Rod Rosenstein has stonewalled, has stymied Congress, has refused to give up information that is necessary for oversight.
And in some ways, it appears that Rod Rosenstein is the one in charge of uh, you know, the Justice Department.
And now he has the gall to come out and say that, you know, we're not going to be threatened by Congress.
Well, then work with Congress.
Help Congress have oversight over what's been going on.
Because what happened during the Clinton investigation, which was a travesty, and what happened with President Trump in this administration and the campaign between the FBI and the DOJ absolutely needs to be thoroughly investigated, and people need to be held accountable.
But it seems like in our government right now, Sean, there is a battle between those that want to do the right thing and get the information out to the American public and those that want to cover it up.
So I think go for it, Congress.
Keep putting out these letters.
Keep threatening with contempt because we deserve to see those documents.
We deserve to know the truth.
Chris, we'll give you the last word on this immigration issue, and you talk to these guys every day uh in your position as the spokesperson for the National Border Patrol Council.
Uh how are they feeling?
Well, you know, the agents um yeah, they're they're optimistic, get frustrated.
Um I I know the president's doing everything in his power to to get things done.
It's just that there's so much bureaucratic red tape.
We've had this loophole since 2014.
Unfortunately, it has yet to be closed.
And and I think what the American people need to understand is we're down here on the border.
We're seeing these folks come in, but we're also on the sideline of in in a sense of parade.
And these people are just continuing north.
They're not staying down here.
Um they're going to the Virginias, the Marylands, the DCs.
They're going to the rest of America.
They're not staying here.
And so whatever they bring with them, whatever baggage they bring, whatever, uh, and we see a lot of diseases come through, whatever they bring through, it goes to your cities.
They don't stay in ours.
And I I think that's what people are missing, and it is a problem for the rest of the country, not just what's going on down here.
All right, tell us about the third party agreement with Canada that they have an obligation to step in themselves when they see this type of law breaking at the border, that they there is a responsibility, and they can't get into the United States because they should have done something themselves.
Yeah, exactly.
And and we have that we're s we should have that with with both ends of this uh debate.
With we have it with Canada.
We don't we don't we don't get any cooperation out of Mexico.
And I've actually had issues where we're actually in in the thick of things down there with an assault or or or shots fired on on the river, and we call Mexican authorities, and they if they show up, they do nothing.
A lot of times we if they show up.
We even had it one time where we saw them coming down hot and heavy with the red and blue lights on, and they just opened uh the gates up for the cartel guys and move on by and leave and they locked up for them.
So I mean that's just what we deal with on a daily basis.
Well, stay safe and thank you for what you do every day, Sarah.
We'll see you on Hannity tonight.
A lot of breaking news.
Nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel, nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel.
Sarah Carter with new breaking developments on Deep State Gate.
We're gonna compare and contrast the questions Robert Muller wants to ask with the questions that should be asked.
The media, of course, will ignore all that.
Uh Greg Jarrett, Sarah Carter, David Schoen, Dan Bongino, Ron DeSantis tonight.
All happening tonight on Hannity.
Thanks for being with us.
We'll see you tonight at nine, back here tomorrow.
