4 Star Retired General Robert Oaks and Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah join Sean to talk about the all-important vote in Utah, and the ridiculous 3rd party candidate, Evan McMillan, spreading lies and untruths about this election and Donald Trump. The Sean Hannity Show is live Monday through Friday from 3pm - 6pm ET on iHeart Radio and Hannity.com. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
You are listening to the Sean Hannity Radio Show Podcast.
All right, glad you're with us.
Six days till Election Day.
This time, next week, when we come on the air, we will be discussing who the president-elect of the United States of America is.
Will it be Donald J. Trump or Hillary Rodham?
I'm getting really pissed off along with my husband, Bill Clinton.
I want to first start and send our thoughts and prayers.
I know it's not going to get the coverage it deserves because we are in the midst of this election season, but we had two cops shot and ambushed in Iowa late last night, and our thoughts and prayers go out to them and their family.
I also want to, you know, unlike the media, you ever notice when they make a correction, it's, you know, the story's on A1.
The corrections on page A38, paragraph 4, right-hand column, and buried.
But we made a mistake on the program.
Usually, by the way, I'm not at all upset with Jim Hoft over a gateway pundit, and he sent a nice note to us.
But he had seen a story and he put it up on his website.
I reported it on the air that, in fact, that Michelle Obama and then later it came out that maybe Barack and Elizabeth Warren had actually wiped references to Hillary off their Twitter feeds.
They did not.
I was wrong.
I humbly apologize.
And why are you shaking your head?
Don't even put your microphone on.
I don't want to hear it.
Because you're going to try and take the blame, just like every time they screw up, you take the blame for them.
You don't take the blame.
It's my show with my name on it.
As your producer who gave you the information incorrectly.
Live on the air.
Live on the air.
Okay.
You are one of my best employees.
Shut up.
And I say that respectfully.
But I said it on the air, not you.
It was my fault.
All right.
You shush up.
I said, I'm sorry.
I went with it.
It's my mistake.
So if people want to pick a fight, now turn off your microphone.
Turn it off.
I don't want to hear it.
Shush.
Shush.
I told you this morning.
I want to put on the website.
I want to do this.
I want to do that.
You're getting blamed.
No, stop.
It's not a big deal.
I humbly apologize.
This audience understands live radio.
This audience knows that we get it right most of the time, 98% of the time.
Rush is at 99.
We'll let him be 99.9%.
We're at 98%.
That's all right, Rush.
And when we make a mistake, we want to be upfront about it.
One added bonus if Donald Trump wins the election is that this was an Investor's Business Daily.
Investors Business Daily, you want to know which poll I'm paying the most attention to?
It's that one.
Why?
Because they have been right the last three presidential election cycles.
By the way, I didn't mean shut up.
I meant just shush about this issue.
You know that.
Okay.
Anyway, so thousands of government workers, according to Investors Business Daily, are threatening to quit their jobs if Donald Trump wins the White House.
I have an answer to all of them.
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
And I don't believe for a second these people are going to quit their cushy government jobs, which pay more than the private sector.
Anyway, new survey finds more than a third of federal workers threatening to quit.
That's never going to happen.
There's so much at stake in this election.
I have the latest polling information.
One of the things that I'm looking at every day and not sharing with you, not because I don't want to share with you, because I don't want you to read too much into it.
It's all going to come down to Election Day turnout, like it always comes down to Election Day turnout.
And I want to, you know, I want to give you the best possible information.
I am telling you on this day, six days out of this election, I do not know who is going to be the next president of the United States.
I don't know who's going to get elected.
I don't want to be Pollyannish.
I don't want to give you false hope.
I don't want, look, every scenario under every scenario, by the way, flag this tape.
Hannity was pushing the online poll.
No, I'm not.
I'm a big believer in polls.
I dealt with that months ago with that idiot Nate Silver, who's been more wrong than right this entire election, more than me.
Anyway, I don't know.
I wish I could tell you because it's the question I get asked the most.
I'm walking on the streets of New York.
Who's going to win?
Who's going to win?
I go out to eat.
Who's going to win?
Who's going to win?
If I knew, I would take all of my money and put it down on Donald Trump if I knew he was definitely going to win.
It's really in your hands.
It's in the hands of the American people.
And I'm hoping that by pointing out not only lately all of the corruption and the lying and the misinformation, I mean, you talk about draining a swamp.
If WikiLeaks has not awakened you to just how deeply corrupt the system is, if what happened with the Uranium One deal doesn't wake you up to how corrupt the Clintons are, if the Clinton women didn't wake you up, if the Saudi money, the Kuwaiti money, the UAE money, the Qatar money, you know, where marital rape is legal, beating your wife is legal.
Hillary's taking money from them.
Saudis, women can't drive, told how to dress, can't leave the country without a man's permission, can't go to work or school without a man's permission.
Gays and lesbians are killed just for being gay and lesbian.
Christians and Jews persecuted.
That's all right.
$25 million of the Clinton Foundation up to $25 million, $10 million more for the Clinton Library.
I wish I knew.
You know, there are, I'll give you these indicators, and this is happening all around the country.
There is in a lot of the key battleground states, and I'm seeing this in the poll numbers that I see or the early voting numbers I see and the absentee voting numbers that I see, there is a trend that has emerged.
And the trend is Republican enthusiasm is up from 2012, and that the number of Republicans voting early is up from 2012.
And generally speaking, Democrats are down from 2012.
That is a sign of hope, but it still doesn't get us to the magic number 270.
Several key battleground states that were thought to be in the bag for Hillary Clinton are now in play for Trump, thanks to the collapse of Hillary's support among African-American voters.
Even CNN is recognizing this new phenomenon.
A dip in African-American turnout has knocked Democratic early voting numbers off their 2012 pace in key battleground states.
Well, that's pretty much happening in all of them.
We got a bunch of new state polls that have come out that I think are worth sharing with you.
Florida, you know, it's dead even.
North Carolina, you have one poll, Trump up by seven, another poll, Clinton up by three.
You've got Ohio, Trump up by five.
You got Pennsylvania, one poll has it a three-point race, another poll has it a five-point race in Hillary's favor.
I don't know what to tell you.
I can't give you an answer.
I can tell you the path to 270.
I know that even the Washington Post laid out four paths to Trump being president.
Two of them had him at 269 votes.
If you want Donald Trump to be elected president, this is what he needs.
He needs Missouri, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, South Dakota, Tennessee, Alaska, Kansas, Nebraska, Congressional District 2.
All right, now leaning Trump.
Thank God Georgia broke towards Trump.
If we have to defend Georgia, we're in trouble.
Texas broke towards Trump.
Indiana's now Trump.
South Carolina's Trump.
And even with Admiral Mullen, McMullen, Utah is back, Evan McMullen.
Even Utah now is back in the lean Trump column.
But for Donald Trump to win, he's got to get Ohio.
He's got to hold North Carolina.
He's got to get Florida.
You can't win without them.
He's got to get Iowa.
That's flipping three of four.
Then he needs Arizona.
He needs Nevada.
And then we still are short.
And that leaves a combination of Pennsylvania's in a toss-up category.
Now, according to Real Clear Politics, Real Clear Politics says Clinton Kaine at 226.
They have Trump at 180 electoral votes, 132 electoral votes up for grabs.
Ohio, 18.
Trump has to have it to win.
Florida is a must-win 29, and it's neck and neck down in Florida.
North Carolina, it seems neck and neck.
You know, all of these states seem neck and neck.
Pennsylvania, I can't believe Pennsylvania has gone.
Are you really doing better?
Are you better off than you were eight years ago under Obama and Hillary Clinton?
Colorado, seriously?
You know, Colorado, Nevada, well, Nevada, Iowa have to go Trump.
Maine Congressional District 2 has to go Trump.
Arizona has to go Trump.
Then Trump's got to grab either Virginia, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Colorado, Pennsylvania, and now we've got those are in the toss-up category, or he's got to pull out Wisconsin, Minnesota, or Connecticut.
I'm sorry, this is not easy.
And I don't know what other people are telling you, but I am just looking at raw numbers.
Now, I can tell you all the arguments that the numbers don't count.
But I heard all that crap back in 2012, too, and it didn't turn out to be true.
Now, the first argument I'd make is that probably the same model that the pollsters are using, which is the 2012-2008 models, are not going to apply here.
I actually agree with that to a small extent.
How big an impact?
I'm not going with that.
I'm not counting on that.
The fact that there could be a Brexit effect, I'm not going with that either.
The fact that things are now breaking, it seems like all the break is towards Trump.
Okay, but we're six days out, and I don't trust the Clintons, and I think the Clintons are going to drop whatever bombs they can, even if they have to make them up.
And that then slows momentum for Donald Trump.
It's a very, very difficult path for any Republican.
And I hate to say it, no one's going to believe me.
Any of the other 16 Republicans, if they were nominee, the nominee of the party, they would be racist.
They would be sexist.
They would be anti-gay.
They would want to throw your grandmother over the cliff.
The same crap minus maybe the Axis Hollywood tape.
So you've got a decision to make, and the decision should be: okay, we have 20 Supreme Court justices that Donald Trump's telling you he'll put on the court versus the liberal activist justices that Hillary would put on the court that would cite foreign constitutions and foreign law as a justification for their judicial activism on the court and that they don't respect separation of powers, co-equal branches of government.
That's the biggest to me.
You know, what if the next president appoints five Supreme Court justices?
It's game over for the country if Hillary makes those appointments.
Game over.
Hannah, you're going over the edge.
No, I'm not.
I am not.
The power of the court is in play here.
Then, do you want a president that can say radical Islam or not?
Do you really want a 650% increase in refugees that we can't possibly vet that come from countries who grew up under a belief system that totally contradicts our constitutional system of law and order?
Because that's what we're doing rather than safe zones that we could create with other countries, et cetera.
Then, of course, you got the economy.
Trump's going to cut taxes.
He's going to give us one of the lowest tax rates in the industrialized world.
Why is that important for some guy that lives in Wisconsin or Michigan or Minnesota or Pennsylvania or Ohio or any other state in North Carolina?
Because then there'll be trillions of dollars flooding into America by multinational corporations on top of the money that they've already parked overseas because of the confiscatory business corporate tax rates in this country.
Well, then we'll incentivize them to build factories in Michigan and Wisconsin and Ohio and Pennsylvania.
That's why it's Hillary, $1.2 trillion in new taxes, redistribution.
Hillary, you know, $1.4 trillion in new spending.
Hillary will keep Obamacare.
Trump has promised health savings accounts.
Hillary will put coal miners out of work.
Whole business is out of business.
Trump will expand coal, expand fracking, expand drilling, expand nuclear, and expand all the above.
Well, that's millions of high-paying jobs and careers for the 95 million Americans out of work.
Education will be sent back to the states versus Hillary's top-down Common Core.
You know, we've got then immigration securing our borders.
Well, that means that Americans won't have to compete for jobs and it'll be good for our national security.
That's what's at stake.
You really, the 95 million of you out of the labor force, are you better off under Obama?
The lowest labor participation rate since the 70s, lowest home ownership rate since, what, 51 years, the worst recovery since the 40s, 13 million more Americans on food stamps, 8 million more Americans in poverty.
Geez, what is wrong with you people?
They're not even talking about the Iranian deal, supporting the Muslim Brotherhood the way Hillary and Obama did.
I'm not talking about China's territorial ambition, the disaster that is Iraq and Syria, which created the vacuum for ISIS and Afghanistan.
I'm not talking about Benghazi in Libya and North Africa, Vladimir Putin, Ukraine, Crimea.
You know, I'm frustrated.
I wish I knew more.
I wish I could tell you the way this is going to turn out.
I have no idea.
So if it ends up being a landslide for either one of them, I could see that as a possibility because everything's so close.
If it breaks towards one candidate, not the other, it could be a landslide.
If it's close, if it turned out 269, 269, I wouldn't be surprised.
If it turned out one candidate just barely edges the other candidate, I wouldn't be surprised.
I don't know, but it's in your hands.
It's your destiny.
It's your country.
It's your future.
And how seriously you take this is going to be up to you.
I will tell you, I don't know if America survives the constitutional crisis.
That will be a Hillary presidency.
That I can assure you.
She did break the law.
She did violate laws.
She will either be impeached, indicted, or pardoned.
One of those is going to happen.
Just inevitable.
Anyway, that's my prediction.
I wish I could do more.
I can't.
I don't have the ability to vote for everybody.
So I'm telling you the truth as I see it.
No scenario will surprise me.
Dan Abrams.
I told you there's going to be some bomb this week.
Didn't I say he's either going to be a drug dealer or a rapist or a child molester or a murderer?
Well, if you're wondering why she seems to have suddenly pivoted back to play the gender card, and Alicia Machado was on stage yesterday introducing Hillary at a rally, there's this woman that had claimed that Donald Trump raped her when she was 13 years old and is going to break her silence on Wednesday afternoon.
So that's the one they've been holding back on.
By the way, I'm predicting right now, this is going nowhere.
You know, all these years, Juanita Broderick, Kathleen Willie, Paula Jones, you know, have been out there telling their stories.
And of course, you know, Hillary, part of the effort to smear and slander and besmirch.
It's pretty pathetic.
But you know what?
I don't think any of these things go anywhere.
They had, what, 12 women come out against Trump?
None of them?
Absolutely none.
Nobody knows their names.
One was the porn star.
The other one was the woman on the plane that didn't say anything.
You have a packed plane, and she says he's groping and fondling and doing all these horrible things.
Then the media got embarrassed, and they reported the false story, especially on CNN, reported the false story.
You wouldn't know it from Brian Stelter, but they've reported a false story because they didn't bring on the eyewitness that said the story wasn't true after a 45-minute Anderson Cooper interview.
And they didn't tell this.
Well, I didn't mind the first 15 minutes of groping, and I didn't mind being groped here, but I would have minded being groped there.
And when he started groping me there, I didn't say anything, even though the plane was packed.
And you had somebody sitting next to them that said it never happened.
Now, everybody's asking me about this pen I've been using on the TV show at night, this one.
I will be the greatest president that God ever created.
And it's the Trump pen.
Look, I'm really rich.
And it is.
I'm going to build a great, great wall on our southern border, and I will have Mexico pay for that wall.
Hang on.
You don't wear a toupee.
I don't wear a toupee.
It's my hair.
It's my hair.
I swear.
I swear.
Yep, hang on.
I love China.
I just sold an apartment for $15 million to somebody from China.
Our leaders are stupid.
Our politicians are stupid.
That's true.
We will have so much winning if I get elected that you may get bored with winning.
I don't think I get bored.
All right, we're now getting back.
Anyway, I ordered a thousand of them, and we'll figure out how to give them away, and I just haven't figured it out yet.
That's going to be a nightmare for my staff.
Maybe we'll have people send like a self-address stamped envelope after we pick them, and then this way we'll just pop it in and say, no, you don't like that idea?
You want to write out every envelope for a thousand people?
It's going to be a nightmare.
Hillary's niece talks about a campaign implosion.
Her own family starting to desert her.
Oh, and by the way, this lawsuit, last month, Jane Doe filed a lawsuit.
This goes back to, let's see, woman claims, makes these claims against Donald Trump, break her silence.
She used the pseudonym Jane Doe.
She's expected to appear with, oh, Gloria Allred's daughter to discuss the allegations.
Bloom is also representing this other woman, Jill Harth.
That's the one that claims that Trump assaulted her while the two did business together in the mid-90s.
Anyway, she sent this out Wednesday afternoon.
Last month, last month, she filed a lawsuit when she was 13 in the 90s it happened.
Never spoke to anyone before.
But here we are six days before an election.
She's going to speak now.
And anyway, and it supposedly happened in 1994.
I was told by the plaintiff that Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, by the way, that's the Lolita Express that Bill was on all the time, was subjected to sexual contact by the defendants.
Okay.
That's going nowhere, I promise you.
And that's what they've got.
I tweeted this out over the weekend.
I said, they're going to come up with the worst thing imaginable because that's who the Clintons are.
They're just dirty in everything they do.
Anyway, so Hillary's niece has blasted her as a selfish aunt.
I support Donald Trump 100%.
Macy Smith is her name, the daughter of Bill Clinton's half-brother, Roger Clinton.
That's the guy that was caught in that sting operation using the N-word.
I've been a Democrat my entire life, but Trump is what we need now, somebody who's going to stand up for us.
I think at this point, Hillary just wants this for the history books, to be the first woman president for selfish reasons.
And she admitted that she's never met Hillary Clinton and said that side of her family doesn't think much of her.
And something tells me the Clinton side looks at me and my mother is not good enough, but we're hardworking, she told this particular interviewer.
I want you to pay close attention, issues.
I just went through the Supreme Court vetting refugees, saying radical Islam, cutting taxes, raising taxes, health care, keeping Obamacare, health savings accounts, energy independence or total dependency, the lifeblood of our economy, and building a wall and securing the border and education and all these other issues.
Now we got Obamacare.
You know, there's so many people, unfortunately, that still put their faith, hope, trust in government.
You know, the same government that raided the Social Security lockbox and stole your money, the same government in the last eight years that now accumulated more debt than 43 presidents before Obama combined.
The same government that said, if you like your doctor, you keep your doctor, like your plan, you keep your plan, on average, save $2,500 per family per year.
Well, since that went into effect, the average family increase on health insurance is $4,100.
Now, if you're in the state of Arizona, your 2017 premium will now go to $422.
Yeah, it's going to go up 116%.
By the way, Minnesota, you're going up 59%.
Pennsylvania, swing state, you're going up 53%.
North Carolina, you're going to see a nice 40% increase.
You're going to be paying $446 for your 2017 premium.
Let's see.
New Mexico, you're going to see a 29% increase.
South Carolina, you're going to be paying $319 a month now.
Iowa, you're up to $308 a month.
Let's see.
Utah, you're up to $300 a month.
Let's see.
Missouri, $305 a month.
Connecticut, $340 a month.
Wisconsin, $304 a month.
All increases pretty dramatic by any standard.
Florida, up to $270 a month.
That's really going to help a lot of poor people and retired people on fixed incomes in Florida.
New Hampshire, $219 a month.
Good luck with that because that's what you get.
Because pretty much Obamacare premiums are now rising in all 50 states.
Another broken government promise.
And some of you still trust your government.
Pretty pathetic, but you do.
You know, Hillary, I said last night on TV, she should be in jail.
We know she broke laws.
She shouldn't be on the campaign trail.
She should be in jail.
And you got all these emails released by WikiLeaks.
And, you know, for example, how she deliberately gave the order to delete the emails two days before we now know she was warned that she was getting a congressional subpoena.
Well, that's called obstruction of justice.
And then March 2nd, 2015, the very same day the world first found out about Clinton's use of a private email server.
Well, that day, Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and the campaign manager Robbie Mook, well, they sent emails back and forth how they were completely caught off guard.
30 minutes later, Podesta says, we're going to have to dump all those emails.
Now, Jennifer Griffin, who works at Fox, asked the Clinton campaign about it, and what did you mean by dump?
You know, oh, we meant to release.
Okay, here's where they're wrong in lying, which shouldn't surprise you, the Clintons are lying.
Because why didn't Podesta say release instead of dump?
And who's going to trust the Clintons anyway?
Remember, she's changed the story.
I won't play it here a million times about the use of her private server.
Never sent, received.
She's caught in a million lies.
We played it 100 times on this program.
And if the Clinton campaign really wants you to believe that by saying dump, they meant release, then why did they delete 33,000 emails?
Does that make sense?
And if they were really emailing about transparency and making the emails public, why on March 4th, the same day the Benghazi Select Committee served Hillary Clinton a subpoena to preserve all emails related to the terror attack, did Podesta write, oh man, you think we should hold on to the emails to and from the president?
That would be obstruction of justice.
And then why three days after that, when the president said, oh, I learned about this from the news, why did Cheryl Mills send out the memo?
We need to clean this mess up.
In other words, these emails that he's writing Hillary on don't say state.gov.
And then after being blindsided by the discovery of the email server, well, they were quickly realizing how big a problem they had on their hands.
And the FBI's report on the Clinton server weeks later, March 25th, Bill Clinton's staff, including Cheryl Mills, held a conference call with Platte Rivers Network.
They're the IT company that helped manage the private server.
That's the one that put it in a closet in a bathroom.
And on the same day that call took place, through March 31st, an employee of the company, well, that's when BleachBit was used to permanently delete the 33,000 emails.
And according to the FBI, the Platte Rivers Network employee says, you know, he was told to destroy the emails in December 2014, but he told investigators the reason he didn't, well, he just forgot to do it.
Whoops.
And the timing of this seems all questionable, especially given the fact on March 9th, three weeks before the emails were permanently erased, Platte River Networks was notified of a congressional order to preserve all of Clinton's records.
The employee at the center of this admitted to the FBI he knew of the order, but he did it anyway.
Why isn't that guy in jail?
That's a crime.
By the way, Amazon fixed reviews for Hillary Clinton's book.
Remember the book Stronger Together?
You can get it for like 50 cents on an old book.
You know, they have those old books that they sell that never sold, and they printed way too much of them.
Anyway, the book co-authored by Tim Kaine sold only 2,912 copies their first week, according to Nielsen Book Scan.
And the online ratings were abysmal, 81% one star, average of only 1.7 Amazon stars.
Anyway, according to WorldNetDaily.com, been tracking the number of reviews.
Ah, who cares?
I don't care about this.
Let's move on.
Obama now has joined in the Ken Star strategy two days after he said that Comey was a man of integrity who didn't think he was doing this for political reasons.
Now the president is criticizing Comey and his alert to Congress about the discovery.
We don't operate on incomplete information, he said in an interview.
We don't operate on leaks.
We operate based on concrete decisions that are made.
When this was investigated thoroughly the last time, the conclusion of the FBI, the conclusion of the Justice Department, the conclusion of repeat.
No, that's all lies.
Because remember, James Comey was grilled by Trey Gowdy.
Trey Gowdy got Comey to admit Hillary lied and committed lies.
In a congressional hearing on July 7th, Director Comey directly contradicted what you had told the public.
I had not sent classified material nor received anything marked classified.
Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her private email.
Was that true?
Our investigation found that there was classified information sent.
So it was not true.
But I am confident that I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received.
Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails, either sent or received.
Was that true?
That's not true.
There were a small number of portion markings on, I think, three of the documents.
I never sent classified material on my email, and I never received any that was marked classified.
Secretary Clinton said I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email.
There is no classified material.
Was that true?
There was classified material emailed.
People across the government knew that I used one device.
Maybe it was because I am not the most technically capable person and wanted to make it as easy as possible.
Secretary Clinton said she used just one device.
Was that true?
She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as Secretary of State.
But we turned over everything that was work-related.
Every single thing.
Personal stuff, we didn't have to.
All right, I don't have time to go through all of this now, but I wish I did.
Well, what we don't do know is even though the FBI did not have a complete record of her emails, we do know there were 2,093 emails the State Department currently classifies as confidential or secret.
193, 81 separate email conversations that were classified at the time, ranging from confidential to top secret special access program, which is the highest level of classification.
We know that 68 of the 81 email chains remain classified today.
Eight were top secret, 37 were secret, 36 were confidential.
Seven were special access program.
Three were sensitive, compartmentalized information.
36 were not releasing to foreign governments.
Two were releasable only to five allied partners.
And 12 of these suspect email chains were not provided by Hillary's attorney.
And then the email chains contained classified information from five other agencies, the CIA, the FBI, NGA, NSA.
You know, I don't know what else to tell you.
And now that Team Clinton has got the president to try and can star James Comey.
How does it feel, James?
Aren't you glad you gave it the benefit of the doubt now?
Former DNC chair Ed Rendell, the Clinton campaign is making a mistake.
He's the only one that gets it here.
By the way, there's other things happening with the FBI.
I don't have time to get into it all today, but the FBI releasing closed case files that we'll get into when we have time.
And the Clinton emails, of course, are critical to the Clinton Foundation investigation because that's where the quid pro quo and the self-enriching comes in, like with the Uranium One deal and the list of special donors that were going to be given priority on contracts for Haiti and the Moroccan Quid Pro quo deal.
Anyway, we've got Newt Gingrich at the top of the hour.
Yes.
Jewish guards in effect help murder Jews in the camp so they don't get a lot of people.
Same thing.
So blacks who are sort of helping the other side, they're even helping the enemy who want to destroy them.
Maybe thinking that if I help them it'll be different.
Maybe I'm going to get off okay or somehow I'll save my race by reaching for this movie.
All right, so that, what you're hearing is the latest, now the fifth installment of Project Veritas and exposing the Democratic Party.
This one happens to be out of North Carolina.
And what your late this latest release goes back to a local level and frankly, the core of the Democratic Party.
Now, remember, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, remember why she was removed from her position as DNC chairwoman on the eve of the convention because of WikiLeaks revelations that Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the emails that were racist, misogynistic, sexist, and anti-Semitic.
And then who hires her?
Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Just like Hillary, the champion of women's rights, you know, and gay and lesbian rights, takes money from Qatar and Kuwait and UAE and Saudi Arabia.
Well, many of those countries kill gays and lesbians, and women are treated like third-class citizens and can't drive and are told how to dress and told whether they can go to work or school.
And to add insult to injury, Jews and Christians are persecuted.
Anyway, so that is the latest example with Project Veritas and basically sourcing what they think of black people.
Pretty scary.
Newt Gingrich is with us.
How are you, sir?
I'm doing well.
And, you know, the stuff just keeps coming, doesn't it?
I mean, from every direction now, there's more stuff being revealed.
And virtually all of it is negative.
The Clinton campaign is turning out to be far worse than we thought it could be.
And Project Veritas is just one more sector in which what we're learning is destructive, negative, and harmful to America.
Let me ask you this because there's so much more out there today.
I mean, we've got a WikiLeaks report.
We've now got John Podesta, this guy, Kadzik, Peter Kadzuk, a top official.
He's the one that is now dealing with Congress and writing Congress on the revelations that, you know, as it relates to the new email investigation.
Anyway, now we find out a lot about him.
That Podesta, literally, he was Podesta's guy.
Podesta, through WikiLeaks, we find out praised him as the guy that kept him from going into jail.
And now we also discover through WikiLeaks that in May of 2015, Kadzik sent a heads up.
This is our Department of Justice, you know, giving a heads up to Podesta.
I don't see how they can avoid firing him.
I mean, earlier I thought he had to recuse himself, but that latest smoking gun.
I mean, for a federal official to send a political campaign a heads up about a federal action like that, I mean, this kind of stuff just smells of the worst kind of corruption.
And I don't see how they can avoid firing him or getting him to resign.
What do you make of every election year?
Let's go back to the Project Veritas thing.
I agree with you.
But we also knew about collusion with the White House and the Clinton campaign as it relates to a lot of these issues.
The State Department, they gave heads up to the Clinton campaign.
The Department of Justice gave heads up to the Clinton campaign, as it all relates to the email server scandal.
So they're all working in cahoots.
And if you've got collusion on that level with every department that's involved, don't you have to have an independent investigator come in at some point?
And who would make that appointment?
I think clearly this is going to lead to one or more, and it may well be more, independent counsels.
I pointed out on your show last night that there were 43 officials who were either indicted, tried, or convicted during Watergate.
Because these things become circles in which the one person leads to the next person who leads to the next person.
And that's what we're seeing begin to build now is just potential case after potential case.
Let me go back to the race issue and the sexist card.
And every election year this is used against Republicans.
Remember, if you can turn Mitt Romney into the devil, into Satan, and he had women's resumes, and that's an attack on women and a war on women because he had women's resumes, the people that he wanted to hire.
And you've got these guys on tape, you know, comparing black Americans, say, Jewish guards who helped murder Jews in the camps.
So there are even Jews helping Nazis murder Jews.
And so blacks helping the other side are seriously blanked in the head.
And that came out in this new project, Veritas.
Now, Hillary Clinton once said that her mentor was Robert Byrd.
He's a former Klansman.
Bill Clinton said that J. William Fulbright was his mentor, a known segregationist.
You know, why does it never work in reverse?
Why do these arguments only resonate when it's a charge made against a Republican, whether accurate or not?
Well, because the echo chamber is the news media.
The news media is totally left-wing, and the news media refuses to echo any of these charges.
The news media takes the position that liberal Democrats, by definition, are good of heart, and even if they say occasional bad things, they mustn't really mean it because, after all, they're liberal Democrats.
I mean, it's an amazing double standard, but it's real.
And I think one of the things we've gotten out of WikiLeaks is a much deeper understanding of just how badly the news media has sold out, how deeply it is committed to the victory of Hillary Clinton.
And by the way, the Justice Department, I think I just saw a number this morning that among political donations at the Justice Department, it is 36 to 1 in favor of Clinton.
That means the Justice Department is even more biased than the news media, which is about 24 to 1.
Now, think about that.
That means you have all of those donors who are supposedly handling the investigation of Hillary Clinton, and yet they're people who are donating to our campaign.
The Washington, well, I mean, it's unbelievable.
I think this is a story that I'm going to deal with in real detail come November 9th.
There's just not enough time to go over it all.
But, I mean, if you look at it's NBC, it's ABC, it's CBS.
I mean, it's MSNBC.
CNN is probably the worst.
I mean, they're feeding questions to Hillary.
Here's my question about Hillary's character, though.
I mean, she could ask for Donna Brazil to step aside if she had no knowledge that Donna Brazil was feeding her questions and cheating Bernie Sanders voters.
She could have not hired Debbie Wasserman Schultz after she got fired from the DNC for those racist, misogynistic, sexist, anti-Semitic emails that were being sent back and forth within the DNC.
But Hillary doesn't seem to take a stand.
But I do suspect that if it was Donald Trump, that she would be demanding people's head on a platter by now.
Well, look, if it was Donald Trump, she'd be horrified.
She couldn't imagine a person saying these things.
But I think it's equally fascinating that Bernie Sanders hasn't said anything.
I mean, here we have absolute proof that the fix was in, that they were going to make sure he didn't get to be the nominee.
And where is his demand that Donna Brazil step down?
Where is his complaint about what happened with Debbie Wasserman Schultz?
You know, Sanders is very important to Hillary right now.
And if Sanders were to say to her, you know, if you don't fire Donna Brazil, I'm going to actively oppose you, they would have to cave immediately and fire her because they need Sanders' support, the vote of Sanders' supporters.
So a part of this burden has to be laid down on on left wing Democrats who are supposedly pro-reform until you get down to the tough.
But, you know, this is all now being this is all now being revealed in these John Podesta emails.
There was an elaborate plan that was put in place.
place that actually worked from the very beginning to rig the DNC in Hillary's favor.
And Podesta's emails show how this plot was in the works long before a single vote was ever cast to control the DNC and that John Podesta and the Clinton campaign were establishing themselves as the main decision makers within the DNC well before the primaries.
And a Clinton campaign memo shows that in order to establish the firmest grip over the DNC, that it was to take away power from Debbie Wasserman Schultz and transfer it to an ally that Team Clinton would choose.
Then they also, the emails prove allegations that the Clinton campaign and DNC worked to limit the debate schedule to Clinton's preference, despite the assertions made by Clinton at the time and Wasserman Schultz that there was no coordination.
And months later, the fallout from leaked DNC emails that showed that the party had stacked a deck in favor of Clinton, which forced her out and forced her to resign, you know, before the Clinton campaign had to take action, and she got hired to shut her up.
And then Donna Brazil went even further by feeding questions vis-a-vis CNN.
Well, I mean, the whole thing, every time you turn around, somebody will someday put together a chart that'll be the size of an entire wall and show how each of these different pieces feeds into the system.
I was just remembering last night that one of the real turning points in Watergate was when Watercronkite and CBS began to run charts in the evening news that showed how different people fit in to what was going on.
And we now have so much evidence about so many people, including people who are still currently in the government, that you almost need a chart to be able to figure out how all these different people relate to each other and how the entire web of corruption operates.
And of course, that's exactly what the FBI does and what prosecutors do when they're engaged in RICO cases with organized crime.
They have to put together some kind of chart for the jury that shows how different members of the crime family relate to each other.
You know, you have with Podesta, for example, this newest allegation that his brother was, in fact, bringing in foreign money in a way that is illegal.
You have a Chinese national who was showing up at Hillary's house for a fundraiser, which may well have been illegal.
I mean, every time you, if you were to simply list every allegation that has grown up so far, you don't have a long enough show in the evening.
You might get it done on radio, but you literally don't have a long enough show to list every single one of these things in London.
Listen, I have a list so long, it takes 10 minutes to roll through all the WikiLeaks revelations every night.
That's why I keep rolling it every night.
Let me go over the path to victory for Donald Trump.
Interestingly, the Washington Post outlined four specific paths.
You know, one would show that Donald Trump could win all of Mitt Romney's states that he won in 2012 and Colorado and Florida, Iowa, Ohio, and New Hampshire.
Now, Iowa, Ohio, Florida, I think, you know, are probably the easiest.
Colorado, he's down three.
New Hampshire, he's down four or five.
And, you know, then there's a couple of scenarios that we get to 269, 269 each.
That wouldn't be good.
Or, you know, he can get Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, and Wisconsin to do it.
And I think those are all hard.
You keep telling me that I'm wrong looking state by state and I'm looking at the historical way that they do it.
Well, I don't know if you noticed today, but the LA Times came out today, and I think he's now up 5.6%.
Yeah, he's up six today.
Okay, well, let me tell you something.
If he's up 6%, remember we talked about this yesterday.
If she's getting a 21-point lead in California, which was what she had this morning, that means in the rest of the country, he's up seven or eight.
Well, if he's up seven or eight, every state you're thinking of is in play.
Then why are the state polls not showing it?
Because they're lagging indicators.
They always are.
Okay.
The state polls catch up with the national poll.
Maybe it's just because I'm more of a nervous Nellie than you.
No, look, I mean, if I thought being nervous would help, I'd be nervous.
You know, I love when you punch a little brother in the head.
You slap me in the head.
No, you just slap me around.
I mean, listen, I've watched you do this in presidential debates.
Why wouldn't you do it to your, you know, to basically somebody is your adopted brother?
Now, I don't think you should take personally my effort to educate you on national radio.
I mean, I'm trying to do it.
It's only 15 minutes of people listening to you slap me down.
No problem.
I'm not slapping you down.
I'm offering you a hand up to a more enlightened understanding of the American political system.
You know, I just really want to win this, and I don't see yet looking at numbers, and I'm looking.
Look, I'm looking at early voting numbers.
I'm looking at absentee ballots.
Yeah, we're doing better than we did in 2012 in every state that matters, but not better enough that I go to sleep at night thinking Donald Trump is going to win.
Look, let me remind you: when you were a mere child, Ronald Reagan.
And mommy used to, you know, take my side.
Go ahead.
No, no.
Ronald Reagan begins to roll on the Thursday night before the election.
I mean, all of his great victory occurs between Thursday night and Tuesday.
Now, it's only Wednesday.
So as of tomorrow, I can really wake up and start feeling better every day.
Well, Trump right now is ahead of the Reagan 1980 pattern.
I mean, Reagan was not up six points the Wednesday before the election.
Reagan literally breaks loose.
And what happens is exactly what I see happening everywhere.
I'm talking to you now from Colorado, where I'm going to be at Colorado College tonight giving a talk.
And I can just, I'm going to do two Trump events here.
And I just tell you that the people I see who have not yet voted, so many of whom can't quite decide what they're going to do yet, all those folks are weighing all this new stuff.
And with every passing day, it gets harder for them to pick Hillary.
And Trump is doing a great job.
Greg Gansky, a former congressman, a great doctor in Des Moines, just sent me a note this morning and said he had been listening to one of Trump's speeches this morning.
He said he was as good as he's ever been.
There's no doubt about it.
He's gotten so good on the stump.
And by the way, an incredible trajectory.
If he does win, the learning curve for any one individual who's never been in politics will be studied for the next 300 years.
Absolutely.
So he's performing exactly the way he needs to.
He is positive.
He is firm.
He does a lot about positive things he wants to do.
And then he reminds us of how corrupt the other side is.
But he does it in a way that he gives you much more likable.
Meanwhile, Hillary just gets less likable with every week.
I mean, she's more shrill.
Can you imagine how intense she is?
I mean, you think you're nervous.
How would you like to be somebody who has spent 46 years trying to get to be president?
And all of a sudden, once again, you see it starting to slide away.
I agree.
All right.
I've got to run.
Mr. Speaker, we'll see you tonight.
You have been amazing this entire election season, and you have been making yourself available to us every day.
You offer a unique and special historical insight that very few could ever offer, and we always appreciate it.
Thank you.
It's a great chance to chat.
Thanks.
All right.
I want to welcome to the show.
We brought up the issue of what's going on out in Utah.
I think it also impacts a little bit Nevada and impacts a little bit Arizona, but certainly Utah more than anything else, and that is the candidacy, third-party candidacy of Evan McMillan, who is running out there.
And for whatever reason, the Never Trumper people have decided they want to play spoiler.
And if it means taking away the six electoral votes of Utah to prevent Donald Trump from being president, knowing it's literally threading a needle for any Republican to ever win the White House, it's kind of pretty sad that some people would go to these lengths to do that.
Anyway, here to talk about this specific issue in Utah's four-star general, retired Robert Oaks, is with us.
And Senator Orrin Hatch, welcome both of you back to the program.
Well, glad to be with you.
Senator Hatch, I'm pretty disappointed that so many people, they're not doing this in any hope that Evan McMullen is going to win.
They're only doing this to help Hillary and prevent Trump from winning.
Why?
Well, we all know that a vote for Evan is a vote for Hillary.
There's no other way that would come around because he's not going to win.
There's no chance of winning.
And frankly, it's just a way of some people expressing an antagonistic vote.
But we had a huge rally yesterday up at the state capitol, and we had strong leadership there.
It was a time for Republicans to come home.
And of course, we are.
We even had a former member of the member of the House of Representatives in the state legislature who had come out in favor of Evan.
And he said he knew, well, he reversed his role right there and said, look, we can't do that because that would be a vote for Hillary Clinton.
I might add that at that particular rally, we had Congressman Bishop, Congressman Stewart.
We had the Attorney General Sean Reyes spoke there, and many strong business and community leaders were there.
And I think people are starting to catch on that, my gosh, we can't afford to allow these votes to go to Hillary.
And a vote for Evan McMullen would be a vote for Hillary.
And even though Evans appears to be a very nice man, you know, I have no problems with that.
Still, there's no way that's going to be helpful.
Well, he's being a spoiler here.
And you know what that would mean?
You know, Senator Hatch, you know better than anybody because you were even there when Clarence Thomas was being confirmed 25 years ago.
That's right.
But we now may have, what, as many as three open Supreme Court seats, maybe more?
We could have up to five if the next president is there for eight years.
And if it's Hillary Clinton, I guarantee you we'll never get this country back on track.
Never, because this will then impact this country for two into three generations.
That is the single most important issue in this whole campaign.
Who's going to appoint the judges?
Not just the Supreme Court judges.
But you saw what they did.
Harry Reid and the president, Obama, broke the rules to change the rules so they could add three more additional avant-garde liberals to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, where all of the administrative law cases are heard and most regulatory cases are heard.
It's an extremely powerful court.
Some think it's every bit as powerful as the Supreme Court because they hear thousands of cases the Supreme Court will never hear.
But that's what they do.
They know how important these judges are.
And I guarantee you that if Hillary gets there, we're going to have one heck of a time ever getting our freedoms back and our country back the way we should.
General Robert Oakes, what are your thoughts on this?
Well, I think spoiler is the right term, only I think it's spoiling our country.
The words of Senator Hatch, he just talked about the Supreme Court, but there's just across the board.
And if you talk about defense, if you talk about strong economy, whatever major issue you talk about, an election of Hillary Clinton would spoil our country in those particular dimensions.
And so the role of spoiler is a foolish idea.
We have a Constitution that has provided Electoral College.
That's the system that we elect under, and we ought not to play games with it.
Oh, I agree with that, too.
Why do you think this particular state, Utah, has been targeted, and why has he done well in the polls in Utah?
Now, I know Mitt Romney has been very vocal in not supporting Donald Trump.
What are your thoughts, Senator Hatch?
Well, I'm a great friend of Mitt Romney's, and I don't fully understand why he has taken the position that he has.
By the way, I think Mitt Romney would have been a great president.
I went all in for Mitt Romney, but I think he is ⁇ I have no idea what he's doing or why he's doing it, but I think the effort of the Never Trumpers has been extremely harmful.
Well, it has been.
I love Mitt Romney.
I think he's a patriot.
He's a wonderful person, no question about that.
And I don't fully understand why he has taken such a dislike to Donald Trump.
Look, I think the general yesterday said that when somebody said, well, Donald Trump has had some unsavory past, he said, yeah, and so did Paul.
On the way to Damascus, though, he saw the light.
And I have to say that Donald Trump, I've seen nothing but a very serious candidate here who is running at a tremendous expense to himself and who has gotten much more serious, much more accurate in his comments, and is doing really a very, very upfront good job in the last number of months.
And on top of that, his agenda is conservative, Senator.
Well, it is.
There's no question about it.
I know him personally.
I've had personal conversations with him and his family.
If you want to know how kind of a guy Trump is, look at the kids.
Those kids are really fine people.
I'm going to go out and campaign with Don Jr. here in just a day or so.
And I have to say, it's hard to find any young people who are any better than those young people.
And Donald Trump's their father and has had a tremendous influence on them.
And they love their father and a good reason for it.
And I think, look, we all have to overcome our problems, but I think I've seen in Trump a resurgence in doing what's right, doing it for the right reasons, doing it because he wants to save this country.
And he knows that if we don't do it right, we could be decades trying to get this country back.
He actually said to me, you know, he was explaining to me how this whole process has changed him pretty profoundly.
In other words, getting out, meeting people, seeing how great the country is.
And, you know, it sort of is.
Look, he always knew that the country was on the wrong track and that we needed to do better.
And that's why he got in.
But now he feels even stronger than he ever did before because he actually sees the people that are out there suffering as badly as they are.
Look, I wasn't with him at first.
But when he called me and the people I had supported lost, I said, you don't want me, you know, on the kiss of death.
I said, I was for Bush first and then Marco Rubio.
But he did want me, and I signed on and I've been very happy that I did because I've seen a sea change in this country because of Trump, and I've seen Trump change very much, too.
And frankly, I'm pretty impressed with the guy, and I'm surely impressed with his family.
You know, I do know that, and Utah is a very special place, and both of you know that Utah, especially Salt Lake City, has a special place in my heart.
And I understand Donald Trump, New York, businessman.
You know, he ⁇ look, he doesn't talk like the average person in Utah.
Let's put it ⁇ am I putting it in a nice way? Yeah, you are, but that's what we need. We need somebody to come in and break some chairs and cause people to have to straighten up and that's how I feel. I mean, I get it. I have nothing but the deepest respect. You know, I felt like I, every time I go back to Salt Lake, I feel like I'm going back to America circa 1950. It's that beautiful. But, I mean,
it's also not the reality. This is a dangerous world with ISIS and radical Islamists. And, you know, now we're taking in more refugees that we can't vet. We have open borders. You know, I think the world has no respect for this country at this particular point in time because of the President Hillary Clinton. And anyway, what's your last word, Colonel? If I might just address. I'm sorry, General. I said Colonel. He's a real four-star general, and Rand NATO is one of the best CIFA we've ever had in the military. I humbly apologize, General,
and thank you so much for your service. I was a Colonel a lot longer than I was a general. If I might just add, several weeks ago, in fact, probably three months ago, I had a chance for my wife and I to sit, just the three of us, and converse with Mr. Trump. And I was very impressed with his willingness to listen to what I had to say, ask cogent questions,
and just was very impressed with his character that emanated. And his children were there, and I was equally impressed with them. Like you say, those children didn't just happen with the character they've got. They were raised up on strong principles. They reflect them. And those are the principles I think of Donald Trump. Well,
I want to thank you all. I just hope our friends in Utah understand that this is not an opportunity for Evan McBone to become president. This is only designed as an effort to be a spoiler. And it would really be a horrible,
horrible outcome if Donald Trump would win the presidency but for Utah, which has been a reliable, conservative state for all of these years for all of the right reasons. And I'm just hoping people understand what is at play here. And I appreciate both of you being with us,
Senator Hatch. It's been a while. Appreciate you being with us. Well, thank you, Sean. Utah's going to come through. You wait and see. I think they're starting to realize that this really is much more important than what some people have made it. All right, General. Thank you, sir. God bless you. And thanks. Yes, sir. I spent 35 years in the military, active duty, around the world. And so I served under a lot of commanders-in-chief. There's been a lot of commanders-in-chief talk,
commander-in-chief talk in the election campaign recently. And I just, having looked at it just from that point of view, Donald Trump is prepared by his character, by the strength of his leadership, and to be the commander-in-chief. Hillary Clinton is not prepared. She's had experience, but she doesn't seem to have learned much from that experience. So as a military veteran,
and I've got four sons that have all military veterans, and we all agree that Donald Trump is prepared to be our commander-in-chief if elected. And he's the only one on the near horizon that can make that claim. All right. Thank you both so much for being with us. We appreciate it. Senator Ern Hatch and retired General Robert Oakes,
a four-star general. Thank you, sir. 800-941, Sean, you want to be a part of the program? Marty is in Ohio. Marty, hi, how are you? Glad you called. Thank you. I am here in Kettering, Ohio, near Dayton. I'm a homeschool mom of five,
also a licensed teacher. And I'm here to talk about, or calling to talk about my governor, John Kasich, who is really ticking me off right now to say the least. I have supported him in the past. He's done some wonderful things for homeschool families. He passed the HB 64,
the Diploma Fairness Act, for homeschoolers, which means that their diploma, once they've completed their work, is equivalent to a high school diploma. He's done some other things that have been great, but his decision to write in John McCain is just disgusting. I don't know what else to say. I mean,
he's putting at risk our security, our educational choices, religious freedoms, unborn babies, Constitution. I honestly, it is beyond, it's inexplicable. It is incomprehensible to me. The actions. I was watching George Will earlier today, reading, or should say, reading the comments of George Will and George Will praying for a Hillary landslide, saying it's in the best interest of the Republican Party. Then you got this other group of people out there that are suggesting, oh,
the Republican Party needs to get rid of these talk, radio, and Fox News guys. They're missing the whole point. I'm not responsible. Rush isn't responsible. Levin isn't responsible. Fox isn't responsible for the fact that 65%,
every exit primary poll showed of Republicans felt betrayed by their party. They're the ones that made the promises. They're the ones that failed to follow through on the promises. They're the ones that were timid and wouldn't use their enumerated constitutional powers. They're the ones that helped Obama wring up the debt. They're the ones that were afraid to stop and actually fight the Obama agenda for fear of them being hurt politically. They're the ones that said 2014 was stopping illegal,
Unconstitutional executive, amnesty.
You know, it's not my fault.
They created Donald Trump, and Donald Trump has done something that's pretty amazing.
He's reaching out to blue-collar Americans that have been screwed over by their government and bad trade deals and bad governance and record high health care bills and record high taxes.
And he's saying, we can do a lot better and we can be energy independent and we'll recognize radical Islam and we'll keep you safe and we'll actually vet these people that come from countries that have values that are the antithesis of ours, and we'll build a border wall and we'll get rid of Obamacare and we'll send education back to the states.
Good grief.
It frustrates me.
Because any issue you care about, anything is at stake. I get sometimes a little overwhelmed by the fact that I love this country right in your army. And you know,
I am sick and tired of the negative, dark, divisive, dangerous vision and behavior of people who support Donald Trump. It is time for us to say no. We are not going backwards. We're going forward into a brighter future. I made this case and then we had to go forward. We had no choice anymore but to go for a special counsel. And man,
she has jumped down my throat. It was fierce and chilling. She kind of belittled him in front of everybody. And anybody that stood up and tried to say this was a bad idea who's, you know, smashed down and belittled. Me personally. Did you ever throw a lamp at your husband? No, I didn't. Did you ever throw a Bible at your husband? No, I didn't. Do you have a terrible temper? No, But I do get angry about things.
I'm not going to deny that.
Go to the end of the line.
Why don't you go to the end of the line?
The fact is, we had four dead Americans.
Was it because of a protest, or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they'd go kill some Americans?
What difference at this point does it make?
You want me to tell you what my husband thinks?
My husband is not the Secretary of State.
I am.
So you ask my opinion, I will tell you my opinion.
I'm not going to be channeling my husband.
This woman, this little, little soft-spoken, pardon me for the phrase, dowdy woman, that seemed very unassertive, took a hold of my hand and squeezed it and said, do you understand everything that you do?
I could have passed out at that moment.
And she held on to my hand and she said, do you understand everything that you do?
cold chills went up my spine. That's the first time I became afraid of that woman. I'm so sick. I am so sick of the Sanders campaign lying about me. And I also think we'd be a lot better off when we actually talked to each other instead of yelling at each other. I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration,
somehow you're not patriotic and we should stand up and say, we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration. Such a nasty trust. There is the real Hillary Clinton. Now, you can hear the combativeness that has now emerged on the campaign trail as clearly desperation is beginning to sit in. And it was George Stephanopoulos. She jumped down my throat fiercely, chilling,
she said. And it was amazing. You know, he stood up, he smashed down and belittled Dee Dee Meyerson. Now, those are allies and friends. And I wonder why probably George Stephanopoulos gave all that money to the Clinton Foundation because, well, George Stephanopoulos didn't want to be belittled again. Anyway, news roundup, information overload, six days to go to election day, our election eve, our election edition here, final hour. Ed Kleins joins us, and he has a little inside information on the FBI's investigation into the email server. His book is out,
Guilty as Sin. And also with us is Ron Hosco. He's a former assistant director of the FBI, president of the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund. Welcome both of you. And Ed, let me start with you. You've been reporting on the dissent and disgust within the FBI and even their highest officials and rank and file saying they're quitting. Not only are they piling up their resignations on Comey's desk,
but when he walks down the hallways of the FBI and says good morning and greets, some of these guys and women don't even return his greeting. They don't talk to him. They've shunned him because they think he's brought disgrace upon the institution. Unbelievable. And tell us more. What have you found out? Why did they reopen this in reality? Why did this,
is it because of Wiener and Uma Abedeen, or was he looking for an excuse? He was definitely looking for an excuse, Sean. I mean, his own wife was on his case saying, why did you do what? This comes from a friend of the family, by the way, who knows his wife, Patrice, very, very well. Why in the world did you do what you did? It was so stupid. It was so self-destructive. And he's been going around in a deep depression. One of his friends told me he's gained,
he looks like he's 10 years older in the last four months. I think he realized he had really screwed up. And then his guys from New York came to him and said, hey, what? Look, you wouldn't believe this, but we've just been looking at Anthony Weiner's laptop. And there are emails there from Huma Abedeen, who is the closest person to Hillary Clinton, to Hillary, and back and forth. And for all we know,
there are top secret confidential memos in the laptop of this pervert who doesn't have any security clearance. He jumped at the chance and he reopened the investigation. Ron Hosco, what's your take on Comey's actions? I mean, when he gave that 15-minute speech back in July, I remember coming on the air. I was thinking, wow, for 13 of the 15 minutes, I said he's going to pull the trigger. He's going to at least put forward a criminal referral in the case,
which I thought would have been obvious. And then at the last second, he pulls back and says, well, it doesn't reach the threshold. Meanwhile, we all know what the law says. Even the mishandling of classified information is a crime. Destruction of classified information is a crime. Clearly, obstruction of justice has taken place in this case. WikiLeaks now has revealed a whole series of details that are relevant in this case. Anyway, what's your point? Well, Sean, I, like you,
was on the edge of my seat in July when the director was talking and thought he was going to go in the same direction. And he kind of took us on an interesting turn. So I think a couple of things. One, there is,
I know a number of people in the organization that were involved in the decision-making and the investigation, to include Jim Comey. I trust them, several of them I work very closely with in my time in the Bureau. And I believe they ran a productive,
straight-up investigation. And I don't believe for a second any of those would take a dive for Hillary Clinton or for someone on the right if that happened to be the subject of the investigation. Why are all of these people coming out and saying Comey did the wrong thing? The only one that defended him, interestingly, was Obama. And I have my suspicions as to why, because he was dragged into this email server scandal, caught in a lie because he had said he originally heard it from the press, and now we know in reality and in truth,
he was emailing her back and forth on that email server. Yeah, so on that point, Mr. Klein and I would have very different sources within the FBI. You know,
I don't know Mr. Klein's sources. I'm not asking them. I retired two and a half years ago. I still maintain a lot of close friendships with folks in the organization. I think I have a pretty good pulse of the place. Is there some dissent? Has there been vigorous discussion about how to proceed in this case and in other matters and in pieces of the case to include last Friday's release? Yes, There has been.
And I think that's a reflection of having an open and healthy administration within the FBI by Jim Comey.
But I'll tell you this: I have heard not one word of stacked up resignations or retirements.
I know there is some bad reporting out there.
I actually tried to help correct some of that record the other day of a former assistant and executive assistant director in charge of the investigation.
And it was reported that he disagreed with how the case was going.
He fought it and was so frustrated that he left in frustration.
And that is absolutely untrue.
That person is a friend of mine.
He left because he was retirement eligible, He had kids going into expensive college environments and he had a great job opportunity.
And he left for those specific reasons, not because of the case.
In fact, he concurred with how the case was going at that time. So I think. Are you denying that there is strife within the FBI? Because I've heard it from agents, special agents that I know myself. I think there is some dissent and some strife, but I don't think it is on anything near the scale that is being represented. And really, the same is true of the retirement. But isn't it illegal? Let's go through this, though. Isn't it illegal to mishandle top secret information,
special access program information? Absolutely. And didn't Hillary lie to us when she said she never sent or received emails or sent or received classified materials or sent or received? No, I didn't lie lie, but lie to the American public and lie to the FBI in a face-to-face interview is two different things. So we have to sort those things out. And I believe that in good faith, now, reasonable prosecutors may disagree. In fact, reasonable prosecutors, I believe,
have disagreed with this result and with this director, to include Andy McCarthy up there in New York. Those are trusted, respected voices. So I think there's room for reasonable disagreement,
which the director kind of excluded in his comment. And I know there's a lot of frustration about the result because it's Hillary Clinton, and she did lie to us all. And she didn't just lie once. She's lied repeatedly. It's built into the fabric. So it's very frustrating to a lot of folks. They're frustrated because there were no agency mechanisms to sanction because she's already left the disaster she created her. Okay,
so then when you take, for example, and you take these emails off-site and you put it on an unsecure server and then you delete emails and they happen to be have classified information, tell me what part of that's not a crime. Well,
the part that's not, listen, I believe, like you, that on the face of that statute that they were looking at, the espionage statute, that it absolutely appears as though she violated that. Now, isn't there appears or did? Well, so you're Jim Comey. I'm not asking Jim Comey. I'm asking you, because this goes to the heart of it. If I remove classified materials as a, if I worked in the White House or in the State Department and I remove them and put them on my home server,
will I have violated the law? I believe factually she was in violation of the statute. Absolutely. Okay, so and then if I deleted them, would I have violated the law? Well, I think you would be doing more of the same in violation of the same statute. Okay. It would be an additional violation if you deleted them in the face of a subpoena from Congress or from some other organization that could subpoena you. And if I lied about it,
wouldn't that be a violation of law? If you lied about it to the proper authorities, yes. And if I destroyed devices that had this information on it, would that be a violation of law? I think that would be, and particularly if you're not. I don't think there's a think here. I think there's a definite. That's if I destroyed that, it is illegal to destroy the device with classified information on it. Oh, I believe so. I believe so. So the real question is, if I may interject here, why,
number one, why didn't Comey recommend an indictment? I think from what I've been told by my sources, and I must tell you that my sources are actually pro-Jim Comey. They like him. They are friends with him. I mean, they hang out with him. Their families go out to dinner together. So these are not negative people who are trying to do him in. This source that I'm referring to now says he did not want at that time, Comey,
to interject the FBI into the presidential campaign. He thought he would be accused, and the FBI as an institution would be accused of interfering in politics. So he held back. Now, according to this same source, by the way, the stack of resignations that I was referring to have not been signed by Comey because he does not want to face the fact that he does have all this dissension within his organization. Now,
I can't tell you how many people it is, but it's certainly not just one or two people, according to this very positive source. What about what we've now learned about collusion? Now, by that, I broke the story yesterday. It was in WikiLeaks, and John Podesta is bragging about, oh, this is a top Department of Justice official involved in the probe. He's the guy that is now talking to Congress about the newly reopened investigation. Oh,
he's the guy that kept me out of jail. On top of that, with all the scrutiny, his name is Peter Kadzik, top official at the Justice Department. Well, we now learn that in May of 2015, Kadzik, he sent a heads up to John Podesta about how there's about to be a congressional hearing where a justice official will get questions about the Clinton email server scandal. Now, is that the appropriate way that our Justice Department works with political campaigns,
Ron? Well, first, Sean, since Eric Holder was there, make no mistake, and you know this, politics has been woven into this Justice Department. You can look at it on the policing cases. You can look at it on a lot of other political cases, too. It's woven into the fabric. I didn't ask you that. If the Justice Department, for example, they met on the tarmac in an airplane before a decision was made on the email server scandal. Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch for 40 minutes. Now we see,
because of WikiLeaks, that heads up were given by the Justice Department, by the State Department, and by the Obama White House. They were colluding with the Clinton campaign and giving and passing along information. Are you saying any of this is appropriate? It's not. It's absolutely inappropriate. It smells. It has the appearance of impropriety. Now,
listen, I want to put it in balance, though, in perspective. Kadzik, from what I understand, was a head of legislative affairs. It doesn't matter. He's still giving Podesta a heads up on an investigation that is ongoing. I do not disagree with that point. So he should be either fired or at the very least or accusal on a special prosecutor. Last word,
Ed. Okay. Well, I think from everything we know, it's clear as a bell that Hillary Clinton is, as I say, guilty of sin. And I think the reopening of this investigation, which I'm very much in favor of, I know a lot of people think he shouldn't have done it,
but I think he should have. I think we're going to find a lot of stuff on this laptop computer that was used by this pervert, Anthony Weiner, that, in fact, contains classified information and maybe even a lot of these destroyed 33,000 emails. All right,
guys, we've got to leave it there. Thank you so much for being with us. Ed Klein and Ron Hosco. Thank you. 800-941-Sean, toll-free telephone number. And we'll get to your calls here in just a couple of minutes. Colonel Rob Manus is with us. He is running for the Senate in Louisiana. Louisiana election is an open, what they call crazy primary in Election Day in November. And the top two vote-getters, regardless of party, advanced to the December runoff. And during his military service, Colonel Manus led numerous combat operations,
including as a bomb squadron commander in Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom. I just wanted to give you a minute, Colonel. I've been reading your bio and looking at the campaign. How are the polls looking for you? Well, the polls have been being suppressed just like they have suppressed them on Mr. Trump. They're showing him at 49% in the state-level polls, and we're projecting he's going to get about 65% of the votes. So we think we're right in the hunt to get second place in the runoff,
somewhere between 10 and 15 percent. And that matches up what our voter base was from 2014 when I ran against Marylandrew. And we are expanding our base and growing every day and have a great support behind us and have been on television, digital ads, Radio ads.
What's your take on the Donald Trump phenomenon?
I think he's going to win in a landslide, definitely here in Louisiana.
We think that around the country he's going to win in a landslide because folks are just fed up.
They're fed up with the cronies and the contracts going to big companies and the buddies of the different congressmen and people in the government and those kind of things.
I'm the only candidate in this race that stayed with Donald Trump when the audio tape came out in early October.
The other three top Republicans all left him immediately and have been backtracking ever since.
You know, we've got the Never Trump forces, the Jed Bush establishment, and the liberal establishment wing that backs John McCain that's been trying to take out folks like Tim Huleskamp and conservatives like that around the country that have all coalesced to try to keep me out of the Senate seat because they know that I can't be bought, just like Donald Trump.
And that's why we're getting such a great response in our early voting.
We've had over a half a million people vote in early voting, and that's 44% higher than in 2012.
Yeah.
Well, listen, stay in touch with us.
Let us know how it's going.
And this is going to be, this may actually be the defining Senate seat by the time all is said and done.
And we want to appreciate you for taking time out of your busy day to be with us.
Thank you.
Well, absolutely. I really appreciate it. And you can go to www.robmanus.com to learn more about us and help us in the race. All right, 800-941-Sean, toll-free telephone number. You want to be a part of the program. All right, Dawn is in California. Dawn, hi, how are you? Glad you called. Hi. I just wanted to let you know that we just adore and love you. We're a California-based company. We're rooting for Trump. You're doing a great job. And I really want to know where to get those pens. Oh, well,
I boarded a thousand. You mean this one? I will be the greatest president that God ever created. I've been playing this on TV every night. We watch it every night. Yeah, well, here's another one. We'll build a great, great wall on our southern border, and I will have Mexico pay for that one. Hang on, one more. I don't wear it to pay. I love China. I just sold an apartment for $15 million to somebody from China. Yeah, you know what? Everybody started writing me,
bombarding me. So what I decided to do is I bought a thousand of them. I got to figure out how to give them away. Probably we'll do it on our website, Hannity.com, okay? Okay. And we'll figure out how to do it. Then we'll also put up there a way people can get their own if they don't win one, all right? Okay, that sounds great. All right, the guy gave me a good deal on buying a thousand. I bought them in bulk. You did? Yeah, I bought, well, I bought a thousand. I don't know. He said they do have a Hillary Clinton pen. He says not selling at all. No, no, no. Of course not, right? Who would want one? All right, Dawn,
thank you. San Francisco, KSFO, Frank Neck, Sean Hannity Show. What's up, Frank? How are you? Hey, Sean. How are you doing? I just wanted to find out where I could get a Hannity pen, actually. Oh, you want a pen, too? A Hannity pen, yeah. I mean, a Hannity, but oh, man, let not your heart be troubled. Let me see. What else can I put on the pen? Yeah, yeah, exactly. All right, busy, busy Newsday. Yeah. I just wanted to share with you a quick little story. I was listening to KGO,
and a caller called in. He was the lead of the Hillary Callbank Center, and he said that they need as many volunteers as possible to help out because ever since Friday, things have been, they've been getting hang-ups. They've been getting people in valve ground states saying, I'm never going to vote for a crook. And so that was a little bit of clarity in a moment of this left-wing fog we have out here in San Francisco. Look,
I keep telling everybody that I'm not going to lie to you, and I'm going to tell you the truth. And we're, what, how many days? Six days out of this election, and I don't see Trump yet at 270. And when people say, well, Hannity, I mean, look at the polls. He's up six in the LA Times poll. The poll that was most accurate, the one I think I'm counting on the most because of their track record the last three presidential election cycles has been IDP, investors, I'm sorry, IBD, and that's Investors Business Daily, the tip poll,
and they have it today as dead even. Now, all right, now Newt Gingrich does make a good point when you count that as dead even and you factor in that California and New York are overwhelmingly going for Clinton. And then you add in states, you know, like New Jersey or whatever. Yeah,
there's a possibility, but we have an electoral map system, and I keep going over those numbers because those are the ones that matter. And at the end of the day, there's no national poll that's going to mean enough in this race. Donald Trump needs to win every state that Mitt Romney won. Then he needs to win Nevada. Then he needs to win Florida. Then he needs to win Ohio. And then he needs to pick and Iowa. Those are three. And hold North Carolina,
which has been showing to be a little bit rough. Texas and Georgia now seemingly solidly back in Trump's corner, thank God. And then now you have, you know, you're still ending up five electoral votes short. So it's a combination. Can he also go out and win if he wins all of those states? That's threading a needle. Then he has to win either New Hampshire. If he wins New Hampshire,
he's at 269. He's not a 270. Then that means he has to put in play Colorado or New Mexico or Wisconsin or Michigan or Minnesota or Virginia or Pennsylvania. I'm sure I'm forgetting some state somewhere. But, you know, that's a big task here. That's not easy. It's not. I definitely believe it's doable. I definitely believe in the possibility of all of this. The Democrats,
I think Newt made a good point. Newt's been more optimistic than I have been, and as much as I refuse to be Pollyanna. I just do. And I remember, you know, Dick Morris in 2012, and everybody's hopes got up there, And Mitt Romney's going to win.
The polls show that Mitt Romney's going to win.
Well, I'm telling you now, and some of you are going to call Hannity.
Why do you believe these stupid polls?
I don't.
But it's the only thing we've got.
And I throw out the high and I throw out the low, and I look in the middle and I look at the ones that I know have particular credibility or at least a history of being fairly credible.
And I honestly cannot tell you with any certainty that next Tuesday night that FOX NEWS projects who they're going to project.
And I can't tell you, this is today, one week from now, we will be discussing who the president-elect is, and we'll be talking about how we got to that point.
We might be talking about a story.
Nobody saw the overwhelming landslide of Trump.
Nobody thought Trump would get wiped out, Nobody thought it would be tied at 269.
Nobody thought Trump would just barely squeak it out 270 or Hillary would squeak it out 273.
You know, so I just think you can't discount the Bradley effect out here in California and probably a lot of other states because you can't. Listen, I'm not discounting anything. Believe me, I have talked about, well, the polls are using 2012 models. I've talked about the possibility of Brexit. You know, I see that, by the way, the ACLJ, that's Jay Seculo's group, is now suing the Department of Justice, which is a good thing over, I assume,
the conflicts of interest. But my point to you is I factor all of that in. It gives me some optimism and some hope. Donald Trump, I think, has gotten so good on the campaign trail. Hillary is in huge trouble. I also am cautious enough to understand that we're six days out. The Clintons play dirty, are dirty. We've learned all of it through WikiLeaks. I also have another understanding that half the population,
frankly, wants free stuff and redistribution that believes government lies on health care and Social Security and thinks that the government's going to take care of them. They ignore the failed educational system, ignore that the Social Security lockbox has been raided, forgot the promise of keeping your doctor plan and saving money, and they still put their faith, hope, and trust in government. And that's probably 50% of the population. So I don't know what. Look,
I will tell you this: that if Hillary does win, your government is going to be paralyzed. The legality that is in play here is so significant. There's definitely 100% certainty that she will live under a cloud in that White House. And if she's not impeached,
she may. There could be a pardon in the future. There could be impeachment in the future. There could be indictments in the future. Anybody that's willing to vote for her is willing to risk a constitutional crisis. And I'm not. I think that's insane. Anyway,
Jeff New York next on the Sean Hannity Show. What's up, Jeff? How are you? Glad you called, sir. Hey, how are you doing, Sean? Before I actually give you any of my viewpoints about this, but my question is for you. Do you think if Donald Trump was to do a tri-state rally in City Field,
he could fill up a stadium? Yeah, I mean, you can fill up Giants' Stadium in five minutes. Well, here's my point is there is a lot of unheard votes in New York, and I know that for a fact. I mean, I have a lot of friends in New York. Outside of Manhattan,
you'll see lots of Trump signs. Anything in the suburbs, there's nothing because people are fear for their various reasons why they're not advertising promoting Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton for that matter. But I have actually three signs of mine. I'm like, you know, I wanted like the last of the north of the Pancos. There's no one around my area that even has a sign. I could count them all on one hand. So my whole point is we're really missing a lot of the votes here. And I feel really frustrated,
and my voice is silent because we're not really counted. And I understand what the electoral votes and all that, but I think he has the potential to win a landslide in one or three of those states. And I think November 17th. Probably the state that could be most in play would be Connecticut at this point. New Jersey,
unfortunately, it's probably because of the lack of, you know, there's been so much negative news day in and day out about this trial going on over the shutdown of the bridge and Bridgegate. I'm not sure that Trump can take New Jersey. I think probably a lot of angry people at Republicans in New Jersey. So I don't listen to Trump. Listen,
if anybody was smart in New York, you know, this is the thing. You know, really, liberals are just dumb. I mean, sort of redundant, isn't it? But they just, I don't think they understand. But if you care about people, if you care about the economy, care about your country,
you can't vote for the single most corrupt, single most dishonest, single most self-enriching candidate in the history of mankind. Anyway, appreciate it. 800-941 Sean Jack is in Melbourne, Florida. What's up, Jack? How are you? Glad you called, sir. Hey,
Sean, how are you doing? I'm good, man. How are you? I'm doing great, man. And I'm telling you right now, I'm fired up about Trump. Everywhere I'm a truck driver here in Florida, I see so many Trump signs. I never see Hillary's sign. But my point is,
I want to reach out to my political brothers and sisters. They're the Never Trumpers. They're conservatives. They're independents. They're Christians. I know this. And I always hear them talking about voting their conscience based on their principles. But I would like to challenge them a little bit here because when you make a big decision,
you base your decision on a lot more than that. Now, if I was to just vote for my, you know, based on my conscience, based on principles, honestly, I would have to write my pastor's name in. And if I'm going to be true to myself. But when I consider using logic, reason, and common sense,
I realize I'm throwing my vote away and helping Hillary get elected, which would not sit well with my conscience at all. But when I use reason, logic, and common sense with my conscience and my principles, I go, okay, it's Donald Trump or it's Hillary Clinton, and the choice is right there in front of me. It's Donald Trump. If I do anything,
if I don't vote, if I do anything to help Hillary get elected, that would be terrible on my conscience. I can tell you that it would be ⁇ it's almost to me it's bordering on just an absolute insanity to vote for her. And I don't know what else to tell people. I tell you what the profound significant differences are,
tell you how corrupt she is. We're informing you about how the whole political system is rotted to the core. And the Clintons, through WikiLeaks, have been exposed as the most singularly disgusting politicians,
