Stay Free - Russel Brand - They’re Running Out of Road — The Scandals, Experiments & Numbers They Can’t Hide - SF654

Nov. 24, 2025 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

01:00:25

They’re Running Out of Road — The Scandals, Experiments & Numbers They Can’t Hide - SF654

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Ladies and gentlemen, Russell Brandon conspiracy theorist trying to bring real journalism to the American people.
	Hello there, you awakening wonders.
	Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
	These unpacked episodes are fantastic.
	We tackle head-on Epstein Island.
	We're going to do that first.
	It's fantastic.
	It's a marvelous look at how occultism almost has to be part of the story at this stage.
	And the bewilderment that's been created here, where does it all lead us to?
	We're also looking at the fact that the British government and British media have withheld information about excess deaths.
	And we look at how the scientific community have always been in mad, giddy cahoots with structures of power, whether that's Mengele, dear old Hitler's right hand, not right-hand man, but one of Hitler's minions, or whether it was that crazy anthrax scandal in your country not so long ago.
	So we'll be looking at that.
	And also, most alarmingly, this peculiar resurrectionist technology two-way in conjunction with genetically engineered babies.
	This is a brilliant show.
	You're going to love it.
	You're going to get proper ammunition to argue with people that think that your outlier views are radical and crazy.
	Also, you'll see how it all connects to the most important reality there is, the sublime reality of Christ Jesus and his sacrifice for you.
	A psychedelic, magnificent new reality available to you right now.
	Here we are then.
	Our first story is about Epstein Island.
	Where will it all lead?
	Let's have a look.
	The Epstein files.
	Is it so confusing because of deep international deception or interdimensional deception?
	Ooh.
	Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
	Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand Unpacked.
	As the Epstein saga mutates into an unsettling fusion of political scandal, cultural rot, and occult overtones, must we ask what deeper forces, spiritual, psychological, and even metaphysical, are revealing themselves through this moment?
	And what does the next phase of the Epstein saga represent and reveal?
	Why do you think he is working so hard not to get them released for so many months?
	What do you think the real reason is?
	These files implicate billionaires and friends of him, of his and political donors that he's trying to protect.
	And Epstein also had close ties to our own intelligence agencies and Israel's intelligence agencies.
	That's why there's so much effort in trying to stop this.
	And I do believe they'll try to stop it somewhere else.
	And that's going to backfire on them too.
	It's brilliant, isn't it?
	This plainly is a window into real power.
	It plainly is a portal that allows us to momentarily glimpse at how real power operates.
	That it's not just ballot boxes and campaigning and rosettes and pendants and brass bands.
	Power is dark and deceptive and hidden.
	Power is radiant and bright, incredible and beautiful.
	On a pretty basic level, I do find it quite difficult to imagine Donald Trump filleting a horse or a human male.
	I imagine that Donald Trump spent a lot of the 80s or 90s or times between marriage having a lot of sex with willing participants.
	I suppose that's what people do.
	Certainly, it's what I used to do when it was an option and I was a single man.
	What I was supposed to be doing was sleeping around.
	Never felt necessary to suck off a pony or anything.
	Just not really my cup of tea, as it were.
	But no doubt, people are using sex as a form of power.
	And sex in scripture, don't have sex outside of the container of marriage because it's a powerful force.
	Huh, almost like if you do what you're told, life will be easier.
	The newest phase of the Jeffrey Epstein saga, marked by Donald Trump's announcement that he has now signed a bill ordering the release of all unclassified government files related to Epstein, has escalated the scandal way beyond politics.
	After months of calling the matter a hoax, Trump reversed course as Congress prepared to pass the release bill with overwhelming bipartisan support.
	His signature forces the Justice Department to publish all unclassified Epstein documents in a searchable format within 30 days.
	Even so, national security caveats remain, and the power struggle between disclosure and concealment persists.
	But to see Epstein and this peculiar, peeling portal purely as a political scandal is to miss its deeper cultural and spiritual dimensions.
	Daniel Pinchbeck, in his substack essay, The Eighth Sphere, draws on Rudolf Steiner and contemporary esoteric teacher Gigi Young to argue that modern crises increasingly reflect the activity of invisible forces shaping consciousness.
	Pinchbeck quotes Steiner's warning that just as physical air surrounds us, so too does the spiritual.
	We have to look for the spiritual within what is actually physical in our environment.
	The Epstein system, its trafficking networks, its hidden patrons, its strange blend of sex, secrecy, money, and influence can be seen as exactly this, a material manifestation of occult forces feeding on human degradation.
	Whilst David Icke and his more contemporary online progeny, not literal, I mean cultural, might speculate in depth about interdimensional beings or the nature of these peculiar institutions that seem to have been captured by evil, as a Christian, I'm fascinated by Ephesians 6:12 that says we fight not against flesh and blood, but against dark authorities and spiritual principalities.
	I'm fascinated that in the temptation of Christ, Satan says, I have authority over the world.
	And Christ doesn't decry that, denounce it, or contradict it.
	He doesn't attempt to gainsay it.
	Christ just accepts that the devil is in charge of the world.
	So if we're just syntactically quarreling about the vocabulary that we use to describe evil, it seems like a bit of a waste of time.
	Because what appears convergent interests from both the left and right are settling on is that the institutional powers themselves seem to house power that isn't controlled within them in any way that can be manipulated, controlled or even influenced by ordinary people or sometimes the denizens of those very institutions.
	For example, even a permanent organization like the CIA, a permanent in the sense of it doesn't change when the government changes, although a new head might be appointed, don't appear to be being controlled in quite the way we previously understood.
	So while I like Daniel Pinchbeck's writing and I admire what I know about Rudolf Steiner and I find David Icke fascinating and definitely ahead of the curve when it comes to incorporating interdimensional realities into the conversation about power, the truth is the real answer lies in Christianity and in Christian doctrine which tells you plainly we were made perfect.
	We fell because we disobeyed and were tempted.
	We must find our way back to God and we now can through Jesus Christ.
	Through our own works we can achieve little unless those works are an expression of our faith that he is the supreme reality.
	Again, St. Francis' phrase, sanctify yourself to sanctify society is helpful because when you approach problems of this magnitude from a social, material or practical perspective, you end up saying to yourself and maybe others, what can I do?
	I'm just one person.
	But actually, you yourself are an individual well.
	You drop down into the deep, powerful, imminent forces that form, create, change reality.
	You have your portion.
	God is in you.
	By surrendering yourself to him, by obeying him, by accepting him, you become part of the solution.
	What is so exciting to me as a relatively new Christian is all my Baroque speculations as a conspiracy theorist and a drug taker and a radical and a peripheral figure and an anti-establishment Marxist champagne socialist cocaine communist are all wrapped up and enshrined.
	As the four winds or the four spirits come together, there are solutions.
	They are our solutions in Christ.
	And how does that become practical?
	Well, what did Jesus do?
	He lived as well as he could, as well as any man ever has, any man God ever has, and he lay down his life for his friends.
	He sacrificed himself for others.
	Are you willing to do the same?
	You may not be able to walk on water, but you may be able to glide upon frequencies that are inaccessible.
	You may not be able to turn water into wine, but you may be able to turn the flow of your consciousness, which might be clear and ordinary, like this delicious water, into an elixir that creates transcendent, like wine.
	Within all of his great miracles, he showed us that he is God.
	Through his sacrifice, he showed us how we might live and die.
	In Steiner's cosmology, the eighth sphere is a false parasitic dimension woven from distorted thoughts, unprocessed shadows, and spiritual corruption.
	Jung, not Carl Jung, that's Gigi Young, describes it as a false cosmos, a complete inversion and mockery of our world, and adds that only when we feel terrified and like the world is ending will we ever accept the religion of the eighth sphere.
	This idea echoes the collective emotional climate surrounding Epstein: fear, fascination, disgust, denial, fantasy, and dread.
	The scandal behaves like a psychic vortex, pulling society into a distorted mirror world where the powerful appear insulated from morality, bound to hidden networks, and animated by forces beyond ordinary comprehension.
	It is here that Tucker Carlson's idea of literal demons becomes unexpectedly relevant.
	Tucker Carlson has argued that certain political and cultural actors behave as if influenced by malevolent spiritual forces, not metaphorical demons, but active, non-physical entities flourishing in moral chaos.
	His intuition mirrors Steiner's Luciferic and Aramaic beings and Jung's description of occult parasitism.
	And that will lead us to UFOs.
	All right.
	Now, I know you're into this topic.
	What we're seeing, these phenomena, are spiritual phenomena.
	They've been here forever.
	There's a lot of evidence of that in the written record going back thousands of years.
	They're angels and demons, of course.
	The way to know what the truth is is by figuring out what they're trying to prevent you from believing.
	And if you look at the U.S. government propaganda, DOD propaganda, on the question of UFOs, UAPs, the one thread that connects all of it is that these are not supernatural.
	These are little green men from Mars.
	They're a weather phenomenon.
	They're experimental aircraft.
	The one thing that they don't want you to believe is that they are spiritual entities.
	Why would that be so threatening to them?
	Well, that's a great question.
	That is the question.
	Consistent with what we know about spiritual forces, which is always a deal.
	You know, bow down before me and all of this will be yours.
	I mean, that's kind of the core story in the New Testament, and it's the template for our own lives.
	And there is a lot of informed speculation that the U.S. government has participated in this, and that defense technology, in particular nuclear technology, is the product of that.
	I will say one extremely interesting thing that no one seems to know is that it's not exactly clear where nuclear technology came from.
	He's good news, isn't he, Tucker Carlson?
	No wonder he's getting so much heat.
	There you have it.
	He ties together rather beautifully New Testament ideas about the battle between good and evil with some of the stories that are playing out now.
	And the idea that intelligence services and good and evil and Hollywood has been one that's played out in the American mythology for some time now and coalesced rather beautifully, destructively and dreadfully around the Manson family era.
	Many people think that Charles Manson was a CIA asset.
	Let's have a look at this.
	My question here, huh?
	Are you saying?
	Shane?
	Yes.
	That's what I'm talking about.
	Van Houten claims she originally lied about Manson's role in the murders to protect him during their first trial.
	They're up to something, those kids are lame.
	Go ride a horse.
	Go ride a horse.
	Feelings towards everything.
	I feel no bad.
	I know no bad.
	Open them.
	I'm not against you.
	Huh?
	Are you bitter?
	Bitter?
	No.
	No.
	I have a question.
	Are you guilty of any murders?
	Are you guilty of plotting any murders?
	I killed a chicken once.
	Any human beings?
	No.
	No.
	You're absolutely innocent of any conspiracy to commit murder or telling anyone to commit murder or planning it.
	I'll plead guilty to the Indian.
	Whoa.
	Sex, power, glamour, Hollywood, and occultism.
	We can't make this content without the support of our partners.
	Here's a brief, funny message from one now.
	Do you want to support me?
	No, I don't.
	Yes, you do.
	Support me and support Rumble Premium.
	You won't only be supporting me, you'll get additional access to Mug Club, that's Crowder's gig, Tim Cast, that's Tim Paul's racket, and Glenn Greenwald's additional content.
	Join us on Rumble Premium.
	We make content every single week through Rumble because Rumble supports free speech.
	When I was under attack from the British government and the British media, Rumble stood firm.
	Yes, of course, there's crazy people on Rumble.
	There's crazy people everywhere.
	There's a crazy person living under this hat.
	That doesn't mean we shouldn't have the right to speak freely together.
	By supporting Rumble Premium, you're supporting me and content creators like me.
	You get additional content, and what I will say even more, drink down deep on the delicious irony in this one.
	You get an ad-free experience.
	If you want an ad-free experience of Rumble, get Rumble Premium.
	In the meantime, stay free.
	The Epstein universe, ritualized exploitation, systemic blackmail, the harvesting of psychic vulnerabilities fits squarely within what Carlson articulates.
	The sense that some human actions are animated by forces that are not merely psychological but spiritual.
	Lately, I've been reading David Icke's new book, and it's fascinating as one might imagine.
	But what I'm struck by again and again is that when David Icke talks about himself being ahead of the curve when identifying demonic entities controlling human institutions and the requirement for us to surrender to a holy power, that that's actually in another book that somewhat precedes Ike's research, The Holy Bible.
	And even here, Rudolf Steiner, I believe, was a Christian and certainly used a Christian framework to some degree.
	And in my own encounters with Christ, what I feel like I'm engaging with is a transcendent yet imminent salve for the problems that has been brilliantly described in this article by Pinch Beck that draws upon Steiner as well as Zhigi Young, who I'm going to be watching some more of.
	Recent news only enforces this impression.
	Speaker Mike Johnson has warned that releasing Epstein's files unredacted could expose intelligence agency operations.
	Number five, national security concerns, okay?
	The discharge.
	Because it's all sexual and disgusting and puerile and revolting, even the word discharge now carries an additional burden.
	Suddenly I see myself in a barnyard with Bubba grinning at me saying, Hey, sugar cubes and carrots ain't gonna cut it no more.
	Now it's time for me to ride you.
	Get on your knees, boy.
	What a world we're living in where even these conversations are taking place.
	I mean, this escalated so quickly, didn't it?
	Do you see now that nothing short of a life of fidelity, spiritual fidelity, will solve the problem we're in now?
	If we remain devoted to worldiness, we're just going to be shoved around on this checkerboard like priapic ponies.
	Requires the Attorney General to release within 30 days, quote, classified information to the maximum extent possible.
	This ignores the principle that declassification should always rest and always has rested with the agency that originated the intelligence.
	Why?
	So that they can protect their critical sources and methods.
	It is incredibly dangerous to demand that officials or employees of the DOJ declassify materials that originated in other agencies and intelligence agencies.
	We can't put Mossad at risk.
	Like what an extraordinary time we're living in.
	When in the COVID crisis, then Prime Minister of the UK, Boris Johnson, was confronted with the idea that at the height of COVID, when all of us were locked in our homes and not visiting grandmas and not seeing babies be born, you know, to protect one another and all that, and take that vaccine, even though it doesn't impact transmission, we want you to take that.
	And if you don't, you're a bad person, you're not thinking of others.
	All sorts of weird gaslighting moral quandaries.
	Boris Johnson and the Conservative government were attending parties.
	And when he was confronted with that fact, Boris Johnson first of all said, I didn't know there were any parties.
	Then said, I did know there were parties, but I wasn't at them.
	Then said, I was at the parties, but I didn't know they were parties while I was at them.
	That ridiculous deterioration, that degeneration of reason.
	We're going to see again and again as new media means that old power is confronted with sets of facts that it ain't equipped to deal with.
	Because everyone's got a camera, everyone's got a phone, no one can suppress information.
	The Epstein file, whether you're left or right, or black or white or whatever you are, really helps you understand why Barack Obama took the position he did at Stanford University.
	Even if you yourself are able to take the chaff from the wheat and know the conspiracy theories from the conspiracy facts, not everyone does.
	That's why we need these categories of misinformation.
	That's why we, the government, need the ability to center.
	Of course they do.
	Because otherwise, there's just a deluge of information, much of which is going to be ridiculous and fantastical.
	And the Epstein file is a perfect example of that.
	Who knows whether or not the more ridiculous or extreme claims are true?
	And in a way, actually, I would say don't get distracted by that.
	Even though the Epstein files are to some degree about sex and sexual exploitation, and I sometimes forget there are real victims in the middle of this, real women and alarmingly, girls that have been abused and raped as a result of this story and ought to be the center of this story.
	The true center in terms of why is it happening?
	Why did it happening?
	Is power so that powerful people can be compromised and controlled.
	Why are they being compromised and controlled?
	So that some kind of mysterious, difficult to detect, centralized entity can exert its will.
	Now, some people will say that that's Israel.
	Some will say it's deep state power within the US.
	Others will say it's forms of global imperialism.
	And some will say, as the essay by Daniel Pinchbeck illustrated, that it's a darker power even than that.
	Again, I'm a Christian, so I believe it's pure flat-out evil, capturing and exploiting human institutions in order to pursue its end, the capture and destruction of human souls.
	That's what I think.
	Let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
	Linked emails show Epstein maintained a vast network of high status confidants, including Noam Chomsky, who he reportedly called a highly valued friend.
	Meanwhile, the internet circulates surreal rumors that Vladimir Putin possesses a photo of Trump blowing Bubba, sparking speculation about whether Bubba is Ghislaine Maxwell's horse.
	I remember when they were satisfied with a sugar cube or a carrot.
	Or that Candace Owens believes Israel is blackmailing Trump with Epstein-era emails.
	Whether true or not, these rumors operate like symptoms of the collective subconscious, serving in occult terms as symbolic eruptions from the astral plane.
	Candice Owens, my sister, Christian, and fellow pundit in the outer edges of online spaces, has been making some exceptional, extraordinary, and bold claims that perhaps require additional corroboration.
	And I pray for her safety and I pray for peace for everyone.
	Here, she appears to entertain the Trump-Bubba paradox.
	Can you imagine?
	Just the way he acts.
	I just can't imagine he'd be into that.
	Weiner Berlin's decadent nightlife, occult salons, and sexual libertinism preceded the Republic's collapse.
	The late Roman Empire was haunted by accusations that Isalis indulged in depraved rights.
	The Manson family blended sex, power, psychic domination, and hints of intelligence world adjacency into a miniature cosmos of collective possession.
	Epstein's network is their globalized, digitized descendant, more refined, more powerful, more deeply hidden.
	Steiner warned that Luciferic forces amplify glamour and fantasy.
	Aramaic forces enforce mechanization and secrecy.
	Asuric forces aim to dissolve individuality itself.
	Epstein's ecosystem contained all three, the glamour of celebrity and access, Luciferic, the technocratic intelligence adjacent machinery of secrecy, Arimanic.
	The annihilation of the victim's eye, reducing human beings to instruments.
	Asuric.
	Pinchbeck writes that when human thinking, feeling, and willing are pulled into such a construct, we lose the capacity to encounter death, nature, and the soul as free beings.
	In this view, the Epstein system was not just criminal, it was spiritual predation.
	Trump's signing of the release bill marks an opening in the mirror world of the eighth sphere, a forced crack in the psychic membrane.
	Yet release alone cannot transform the culture.
	What is required is the spiritual work Steiner and Young insist upon, illumination, self-knowledge, and the courage to perceive the unseen architecture behind events.
	As St. Francis says, sanctify yourself to sanctify society.
	The Epstein files may reveal the contours of a hidden elite system, but the deeper revelation is that humanity must confront the forces, literal or symbolic, that animate such systems.
	The question now is whether we use this moment as an exorcism, a break from the gravitational pull of the eighth sphere, or whether we recoil, fascinated, and remain trapped in its reflection.
	What I do want to talk about is I've been recently told the reason they're going to be releasing these things and the reason for the flip is that they're sanitizing these files.
	There's a facility in Winchester, Virginia, where they're scrubbing the files to take Republican names out of it.
	That's what I was told by a pretty good source.
	Gosh, imagine being Jeffrey Epstein's brother, like some kid you grew up with and went to school with and slept in the bunk above, being the center of such an extraordinary story.
	Let me know in the comments and chat whether you think he's really alive.
	Did he even ever exist?
	I mean, what is Epstein now?
	He's a synecdoche for global corruption and the way that sexual blackmail is used to leverage power against the apparently most powerful forces in the world.
	An old photograph of the current US President Donald J. Trump and the former president Bill Clinton has gone viral alongside one of Jeffrey Epstein's emails that has attracted scrutiny on social media.
	Explain what this is all about.
	Well, Mark, we can see the photo being shared on Reddit and TikTok, amongst others.
	Here it is on TikTok.
	And it claims to show Donald Trump groping then President Bill Clinton.
	It's gone viral after the US House Oversight Committee released a trove of Jeffrey Epstein's emails last week, including emails pertaining to Trump.
	And this photo is being shared alongside those rumours.
	So let's look at one claim at a time.
	The photo is, in fact, a real photo of the two.
	Dear old Emerald there, grappling with the cutting edge of technology.
	Like, okay, if we could just move this here, sort of scrabbling about in minority report in a constant war with too many windows left open in that weird honeycomb of scandalous news.
	Look, I reckon Bill Clinton and Trump are womanizers.
	And I say that as a former womaniser myself that would take advantage of sexual opportunity and probably wouldn't require coercion because of the amount of availability.
	I don't know whether things get pretty depraved when you get ridiculous access when you're in the upper echelons of power or if part of this whole Epstein deal is people doing crazy drugs and getting put in positions that are plainly in the edgelands.
	Who knows, man, what people are capable of.
	But if this does involve, as Pinchbeck speculates, interdimensional entities, then who knows what people get up to.
	But what I would say is much of the Old Testament seems to be dedicated to God's outrage that people in positions of power are sacrificing babies and are sexually licentious, interdimensional beings have to go down to, for example, Sodom and say, would you mind not dragging people out to the public squares and raping them?
	Like the Bible dedicates a lot of time to sexual impropriety and that seems pretty relevant now, doesn't it?
	Let me know if you agree in the comments and chat.
	And you can see it here on Reuters and also on Wikimedia.
	And we know from Wikimedia that it was taken in 2000 at the US Open by photographer William Vasta.
	He was the White House photographer at the time.
	So fact checkers at Snopes got in touch with him about the photo and he told them that he didn't see any inappropriate contact.
	Trump was simply signaling to others in the room to gather for a group photo that included him, his guests and Clinton.
	What you're seeing in the still photo is just an outtake between handshakes and gestures.
	And indeed, other photos from that day show the two shaking hands or standing with other people as well as with Trump's wife Melania and apparently sharing a joke.
	So these photos were released in 2016 when Trump was running against Hillary Clinton in a very acrimonious race for the White House.
	But the batch of photos show an earlier time around 2000 when Trump and Bill Clinton were friendly.
	So who knows what that was?
	It turns out they were just a golf tournament.
	Hey, I can tell you of two quite high-profile people that grabbed my crotch in a kind of playful way and I didn't like it.
	As a matter of fact, two.
	Want me to name them?
	Let me know in the comments and the chat.
	It was out of order, but it's also just, I think, forgive the pun, horseplay.
	So in short, it is a real photo, but no, Trump is not groping Clinton in it, Mark.
	We are living in a peculiar vortex.
	This is a moment where time itself appears to be speeding up.
	The paradigm cannot contain anymore the amount of power that's rushing through it.
	The serpent coils and turns and eats its own tail.
	It seems that we don't even have the language to adequately describe what's happening.
	For the first time, certainly that I can recall, certainly in the modern, rational post-Enlightenment age, people are open to the idea that spiritual forces are what control reality.
	And I suppose the reason is this.
	Even when you see footage of Elon Musk eating with Albert Baller at some black pie event, doesn't it seem to you that the game can't just be about power and money?
	Doesn't it feel to you that it's about more than that?
	I know if you're poor, could I remember it?
	But when you're poor and you don't have anything, it seems that resources and material are everything somehow.
	That if I could just go here and go there and do this and get that, it feels like this is the plane where things matter.
	It is a tremendous relief, as Jim Carey famously said, to experience this level of power and excitement.
	Not that I'm suggesting I know what it's like to be Jim Carrey, what a genius, what a great guy.
	But I do know the difference between being real poor and being a drug addict and then being affluent and having money and having access to stuff.
	And I do know what it's like to not be a Christian and then to become a Christian.
	And this is what I've learned and this is what I've been shown.
	We are in a spiritual war.
	We're in a holy war.
	If you don't know that you're in a holy war, you're on the wrong side in the holy war.
	This is an important time for urgent and immediate awakening.
	And the Epstein file and the confusion and the contradiction and the backsliding and the contradiction and the we're going to release it.
	No, we're not going to release it is the beginning of a kind of implosion of power that I imagine is going to lead to radical reevaluation.
	Either that re-evaluation will be the assertion of centralized power in a way that we've never seen before or something approaching bliss, something approaching a return to what we were designed for and what we were made for.
	But that's just what I think.
	Let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
	Remember, we make these unpacked three times a week.
	You can see them first on Rumble.
	Support me on Rumble Prime.
	And if you've not, and if you haven't yet, and if you haven't yet taken the opportunity to win this glorious Jeep, then enter now.
	For every dollar you spend, you get 25 entries.
	Click the link in the description.
	You could be driving around in a Jeep.
	Then all your problems would be solved.
	That's as much as we're willing to give you over on YouTube.
	Join us on Rumble.
	If you haven't got Rumble Premium yet, get Rumble Premium Now.
	And if you want to support my new venture, Reborn, click the link in the description.
	Get yourself entered into a draw to win a magnificent Jeep.
	Yeah, that'll solve all your problems.
	Get off YouTube.
	Get onto Rumble and get Rumble Premium.
	Is it possible that the government and taxpayer-funded media are withholding information about excess deaths during a pandemic?
	Because it's possible.
	It's definitely true.
	In an era when official narratives repeatedly collapse under the weight of suppressed evidence and shifting truths, how much trust can we really place in the institutions now asking us to accept their latest assurances?
	Let me know in the comments and chat.
	For much of modern history, moments of institutional failure have followed a familiar pattern.
	Early warnings dismissed, dissenters smeared, information withheld for the public good.
	And only years later does the truth emerge, usually in the form of grudging admissions or declassified documents.
	Today's controversies surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, the origins of the virus and the suppression of vaccine-related data fit comfortably into this lineage.
	What is most striking, however, is how the same public institutions that once championed transparency now appear increasingly hostile towards scrutiny.
	The UK HSA's refusal to release anonymised vaccine mortality data is merely the latest example.
	Officials justified the secrecy by claiming that publishing it might distress bereaved families or fuel misinformation by revealing correlations the public was supposedly not capable of interpreting.
	Yeah, we're still protecting you.
	Like how we were protecting you during the pandemic.
	We're still protecting you and we're protecting the bereaved families.
	How long can we keep up these claims that they're protecting us?
	How long can we enter into this faith-based relationship with these systems that demand our fealty in return for what?
	Corruption and an endless carousel of deception.
	It mirrors the logic used during the infected blood scandal.
	Another instance of authorities insisting that hiding the truth was necessary to protect the public.
	All you have to do is for a moment just think, how do they react internally when this happens?
	Oh no, look, the data is available now.
	The vaccine caused excess deaths.
	Hmm.
	If we admit that, then it's going to show that all the people that were suspicious, cynical, and almost on the point of revolution were correct.
	And it shows that we were lying.
	Yeah, we can't reveal that then.
	Well, how can we justify withholding this information?
	Can we still say that we're protecting them?
	I suppose we could.
	I mean, you couldn't blame them if they didn't believe us.
	Let's just keep the lie going.
	Just keep the racket going.
	These systems now are like Judy Garland, some propped-up Hollywood star, held together by pills and injections.
	They're just trying to keep the show on the road.
	The gig is up.
	The game is over.
	This is what it means when it says in Christianity, it is finished.
	It is done.
	We are playing offense.
	We are storming the gates of hell.
	This is it unfolding.
	They're just desperately trying to prop up more counterfeits, more lies, more deception as their ruse falls apart.
	Campaigners at us for them observed that this paternalistic mindset defined the COVID years.
	Do what we say.
	Don't ask questions.
	We know what's best for you, which once again is the pose you're meant to adopt before God.
	He's the father.
	He's the principle.
	Remember, in this sort of post-patriarchal age, people are like, we don't want to bow down before God.
	Well, you're bowing down before the state.
	You're bowing down before progressivism that can't even make its mind up about simple biological principles from one day to the next.
	Those who challenged this mindset faced professional and personal consequences.
	In the UK, Andrew Bridge and MP was suspended from the Conservative Party after raising concerns about vaccine harms.
	Concerns dismissed at the time as misinformation, but which in the light of persistent excess mortality and growing calls for transparency now appear far more reasonable.
	Dr. Claire Craig, co-chair of the Heart Group, has been doggedly pursuing the UK Health Security Agency for their record-level data on dosage, dates and deaths for a year.
	There's some real darlings there that I happen to know.
	There's a Seamohotrasat there.
	I see, actually.
	I just wanted to say.
	Oh, look, there's a C. Mohotra.
	Just like when you see a photo of his school and go, no him, no him, he's dead.
	No him, no him, drug overdose.
	No him, no him, he's dead.
	This is the data that could sort out this issue once and for all.
	No him, no him.
	Government killed him.
	No him, no him.
	Government accused him of rape.
	No him, no him.
	Government accused him of being a racist.
	They admit they've got it.
	The MHRA admit that all this data has been released to Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna.
	I like Andrew Bridgen.
	He's so British, isn't it?
	They ad they got it now.
	Come on, look at that.
	I mean, what is that massive paper clip that he's wearing on his suit?
	If he needed anything to make him more nerdy, that absolute darling hero of a man, willing to sacrifice himself for what he believed in, definition of a hero.
	Yet they claim they cannot anonymise it for public release to the public.
	A failure to release this data makes it look like there is definitely something to hide.
	A recent poll in the USA shows that more than half of the public think the vaccines are responsible for a significant number of deaths.
	If there was nothing to hide, they would certainly release this data for analysis, anonymized, to stop the upswell of legitimate concern.
	The latest response from the Information Commissioner's office is that Dr. Claire Cray's got to wait another six months at least before a case officer will be assigned to this issue.
	This is not acceptable, Sir Gary.
	They've released our health data to big pharma, but they won't release it to us.
	The record data-level data must be released.
	It is really too much to ask.
	Is it really too much to ask that the British public be given the same level of access to the relevant data given to big pharma companies, those actually responsible for this debacle?
	Corporations that carefully secured immunity from all legal liability, or in this country, indemnity from the government before dangerously and negligently experimenting on the health of our nation and the world.
	We're witnesses to the greatest medical scandal in living memory.
	The consequential fallout in trust, public opinion, and public confidence is only just beginning.
	Continued attempts to shut down debate, flatten dissent, and obstruct independent analysis can only delay the eventual collective shame.
	It's going to be a reckoning.
	And we're going to have to try and rebuild trust in our health services, in our media, and in our politics.
	And we haven't even started on that journey.
	That data was a surprise for your birthday, and you ruined it.
	Meanwhile, in the United States, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was branded an anti-vaxxer and treated as a conspiracy theorist by legacy media for questioning the official narrative about the origins of COVID, for discussing potential links between U.S. intelligence agencies and Wuhan research, and for highlighting conflicts of interest within the public health bureaucracy.
	Yet, many of the issues he raised, especially around the plausibility of a lab leak, have since become mainstream and are now openly debated by intelligence agencies, Congress, and the scientific establishment.
	In a function study is the kind of science that is designed to make microbes and pathogens more virulent, more transmissible, and more deadly.
	It was in this country, they started doing it in 1947, the military and the intelligence agencies, in order to develop bioweapons.
	In 1969, President Nixon banned it all, shut down Fort Dietrich, shut down all the labs.
	And then signed the Bioweapons Convention.
	That ban lasted until 2001.
	And after the anthrax attacks, Anthony Fauci began, essentially, restarted the arms race and the bioweapons arms race and did it under the pretension of developing vaccines because of the same science that you developed bioweapons and vaccines.
	In 2014, three of his bugs escaped.
	And 300 scientists wrote letters to President Obama asking him to shut down Anthony Fauci.
	President Obama declared a moratorium, but instead of shutting down his experiments, he moved them offshore mainly to the Wuhan lab.
	And then Wuhan was never heard of again.
	History is full of examples showing why dissenting voices are not a threat to democracy.
	They are necessary for it.
	During the Watergate scandal, institutions tried to hide politically damaging information, but investigative journalists, remember them, pursued the truth relentlessly.
	The mainstream press acted as a counterweight to government power.
	And I want to say this to the television audience.
	I made my mistakes, but in all of my years of public life, I have never profited, never profited from public service.
	I've earned every cent.
	And in all of my years of public life, I have never obstructed justice.
	And I think too that I could say that in my years of public life that I welcome this kind of examination because people have got to know whether or not their president's a crook.
	Well, I'm not a crook.
	I've earned everything I've got.
	By contrast, during the pandemic, those same institutions largely became amplifiers of government messaging, generously funded by pharmaceutical advertising and public health sponsorships.
	Figures like Anthony Fauci were treated as unimpeachable authorities.
	I am the science.
	You am in a lot of trouble, you little fucking liar.
	Despite shifting positions and documented conflicts of interest, rather than questioning power, the press helped shield it.
	Why is that?
	The parallels grow darker when viewed through the lens of covert biological and psychological operations.
	The CIA's MKUltra program, once derided as a fringe conspiracy theory, was ultimately exposed as a decades-long illegal experiment involving drugging and manipulating unwitting subjects.
	Chernobyl similarly demonstrated how governments will suppress alarming evidence to maintain political stability, even at the cost of public safety.
	And the 2001 anthrax attacks, first blamed on foreign terrorists, but eventually traced to a US biodefense researcher, revealed just how easily a government insider can become the source of a biological threat.
	But I want you to bear this idea in mind.
	It's not a bug, it's a feature.
	They'll try to use even transparency, belated transparency about Chernobyl or Watergate or the murder of JFK or whatever things they've ultimately been forced to tell the truth about to defend ideas that they're currently still lying about.
	Don't allow that to happen.
	I use this paradigm.
	Is it possible they would do it?
	Yes.
	If they did do it, would you know about it?
	No.
	Did they probably do it?
	Yes.
	Just operate from a position of not trusting authority, basically no matter what, unless it's this authority, the authority of Christ Jesus.
	And it's all pretty straightforward in there.
	Love one another, be cool.
	Recent disclosures about the office of the director of national intelligence add yet another layer to this pattern.
	Documents show that the ODNI worked closely with coronavirus engineer Ralph, including facilitating meetings with the CIA, while later suppressing intelligence pointing to a research-related origin of COVID.
	In early 2020, Barrick even warned US intelligence agencies that a lab leak was plausible given the Wuhan Institute of Virology's low biosafety standards.
	Despite this, ODNI officials dismissed lab origin intelligence as, you guessed it, misinformation, amid genomic analysis from public reports and resisted declassification efforts until public pressure forced a shift years later.
	Figures like RFK Jr., Andrew Bridgen, and independent researchers who raised these contradictions early on were treated not as whistleblowers, but as heretics.
	Yet if history teaches us anything from Watergate to MKUltra, from Chernobyl to the anthrax case, it's that institutions often attack those who expose uncomfortable truths long before they admit those truths themselves.
	And indeed, in today's environment, it's not just the researchers that reveal the information, it's the people that publish them.
	Note that Edward Snowden is exiled, Chelsea Manning is jailed, Julian Assange is held without trial.
	Two of those people were whistleblowers.
	Julian Assange is essentially a journalist reporting on the information.
	So bear that in mind, just in case there are any other people in independent media space that were reporting on these topics at the time that have subsequently, for example, been accused of heinous sex crimes.
	I can't think of any examples off the top of my head, but I know they must exist.
	This matters profoundly today because society is being asked to embrace new global frameworks, from pandemic preparedness treaties to carbon-scored food labels on the premise that institutions are trustworthy, competent and transparent.
	But recent history repeatedly shows the opposite.
	Transparency is granted only when politically convenient and withheld when elites fear the public might draw conclusions that they cannot manage.
	It was not governments or legacy media who warned the public about the WHO treaty or early excess deaths or intelligence links to Wuhan.
	It was online journalists, independent researchers and so-called conspiracy theorists.
	Had we remained silent, most of what we now know would still be hidden.
	This is why raising concerns early, whether about data secrecy or carbon track consumer surveillance, is crucial.
	Public debate is not dangerous.
	Silence is.
	And once the truth finally emerges from behind layers of institutional denial, it is always, always too late to undo the consequences.
	Here, Andrew Bridgen, who I mentioned earlier, friend of the show, friend in general, says, Health chiefs accused of a cover-up after failing to reveal data that may link COVID jabs to excess deaths.
	I asked in the House of Commons for the record-level data of doses, dates, and deaths to be released in 2023.
	They refused.
	Why are they hiding?
	I think we know.
	Do you notice that a lot of times online, and I guess I do it as well, people are like, I told you this.
	I told you this already.
	I told you this.
	Why didn't you listen to me?
	Of course, the courts and the UK HSA are involved in a cover-up of post-vaccination death data.
	This is the record-level data we've been asking to be released for over three years.
	The only reason this is not being released is because it's damning and will confirm the link between excess deaths and the COVID-19 vaccines.
	This release would result in a lot of very powerful people facing the consequences to their actions and inactions.
	Let me know what you think in the comments and chat about that post.
	Good evening.
	This is Friday, August 1st, 95 days until the 2008 presidential election.
	To that topic, presently.
	I don't think newscasters would even use the word presently anymore.
	There's a deterioration in the quality of language in broadcast.
	Except for me.
	I'm polysyllabic till the end.
	First, if reporting by the Los Angeles Times today is even remotely accurate, the questions about the anthrax attacks, which terrified this nation late in 2001, would seem tonight to have boiled down to three.
	First, was the anthrax sent by just one employee of boiled down to three.
	First, was the anthrax sent by just one employee of our own government or more than one employee of our own government.
	Second, when the FBI missed an easy clue, the unreported spilling of anthrax in the federal repository of anthrax.
	Why is there a federal repository of anthrax?
	Why are they doing gain of function research?
	Why are they doing all these things that are so diabolical and demonic?
	Unless, of course, all these institutions have been somehow captured by evil.
	How long can we ignore that the dollar bill's got a pyramid with an eye on it?
	How long can we ignore the weird sigils of dark power that seem to adorn all of their citadels of darkness?
	Why would you need a federal reserve of anthrax?
	May I ask, where do you expect us to get our anthrax from?
	And where do you expect our rogue employees to get a bit of anthrax to go on a rampage, if not from our most treasured Federal Anthrax Reserve?
	One of our proudest traditions.
	That the suspect did not report, was it incompetence or a cover-up?
	And third, how, if there was evidence of something askew at our biological warfare lab in Maryland as early as December 2001.
	Like another era.
	They said, like, even, you know, we're in a period of mass degeneration.
	Because even this guy is on the MSNBC, so it can't be that long ago.
	He seems like a sort of a thoroughly decent, upstanding man.
	Now, when I see people on the news, how?
	Here is the news.
	You're a racist.
	Fuck you.
	Look at him.
	He's like in a pinstripe suit.
	He's trying his best.
	When did things start falling apart so radically?
	Why did national news organizations in this country receive supposedly reliable leaks from the Bush administration that the anthrax had originated in Iraq?
	Our fifth story in the countdown: there is finally a suspect in the anthrax attacks.
	He worked for the government's anthrax lab.
	Stop saying anthrax.
	And unfortunately, he's dead as of this past Tuesday.
	Keith Oberman, he's a much beloved broadcaster, used to cover sports in the early days and made his way all the way to the top.
	Then, probably, because of, I don't know, integrity, he had to be beheaded.
	Lord alone knows where he is now.
	I'm going to guess, somewhere in an anthrax lab.
	His name was Dr. Bruce E. Ivans.
	The Los Angeles Times reporting this morning, NBC News confirming tonight.
	Grab to Bruce E. Ivans.
	Good game, good game.
	That's for the British.
	That the Justice Department was preparing to file criminal charges against him for the 2001 anthrax attacks.
	Dr. Ivans dying Tuesday at Frederick Memorial Hospital in Maryland, reportedly after taking a massive dose of prescription Tylenol with codeine.
	Come on, mate.
	At least take anthrax.
	His lawyer today asserting his client's innocence in a statement, quote, for six years, Dr. Ivans fully cooperated with the investigation, assisting the government in every way that was asked of him.
	We assert his innocence in these killings and would have established that at trial.
	The relentless pressure of accusation and innuendo takes its toll in different ways on different people, as has already been seen in this investigation.
	No, it's fine.
	You can take it.
	You can take the innuendo.
	You can take the attacks.
	You can take the fake accusations.
	You can handle it.
	Top it up.
	The CIA's secret mind control experiments are back in the spotlight.
	Newly released documents reveal details about MKUltra.
	Sidney Gottlieb, why is he cropping up signs of a project that would evaluate the effects of large doses of LSD?
	I wonder if he's related to that Gottlieb that ran the FDA till pretty recently.
	Volunteers in federal prisons.
	I mean, it's so extraordinary.
	How many times have you encountered mentally ill people that say things like, there's a machine, there's a machine following me?
	And you think, come on, you nutcase.
	Then you read this and you realize, oh no, they probably, what they've got is some acid flashback of an MRI they were forced to undertake under observation during an MKUltra experiment.
	And that's why when someone like Candice Owens openly talks about not trusting the official narrative around the murder of Charlie Kirk and the potential that the alleged killer is working in cahoots or coordination with other forces, you can't just go, that'd be ridiculous, because look!
	A 1950s program using LSD and hypnosis to study behavior control.
	We've got great MKUltra watch-along.
	Check out the link in the description.
	It's pretty good, actually.
	And I seem to remember there's a bit too much saxophone music, but other than that, it's pretty good.
	Pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly reportedly supplied large amounts of LSD for that project.
	These are actual companies, Eli Lilly, that you might get baby formula and stuff from.
	They're providing LSD for MKUltra experiments.
	Some tests were done on unsuspecting Americans, including prison inmates.
	If you didn't want MKUltra experimentations on your consciousness using powerful hallucinogens, then you should learn to pay your parking fines on time.
	But what is time?
	I'm not answering that question.
	National Security Archive, marking 50 years since the program's exposure, compared the research.
	Next time someone accuses you of being a conspiracy theorist, you might point them in the direction of this video and the evidence within it that the government, big pharma, and the military cooperated to exploit mentally ill people and prisoners with LSD without their consent.
	That's basically all of the components of the worst conspiracy theory imaginable.
	Not imaginable and probably not the worst one that's happened.
	But what it demonstrates is that everyone, big businesses, the government, vulnerable people, are involved in factual, demonstrable, empirically true conspiracy theories.
	MKUltra, still when I say I think that probably didn't happen, well, it fucking did.
	To Nazi experiments and criticize the lack of accountability.
	Could we have a bit more accountability?
	I mean, at least Dr. Mengley, when he sold a dick onto a twin's forehead, would, you know, often take them out afterwards for maybe a drink and a dance.
	And a giddy time in Berlin's burlesque nightlife.
	Life is a cab, a ray old chum.
	So there you go.
	Conspiracies are real.
	Conspiracies are true.
	We were lied to during the pandemic period.
	Many people were talking about that at the time.
	You knew at the time it was a lie.
	So when will we get the information that's warranted?
	Probably when that information's not so supercharged that it will bring down the institutions of power that continue to exploit us in myriad ways.
	Whether it's the Epstein files or the revelations of the pandemic, we are in a new era of power.
	And I don't think that the current institutions have the integrity or authority to withstand it.
	This is something glorious and extraordinary.
	It's moving at a pace that I can't keep up with.
	I don't know about you when you watch the online spaces, the sort of extraordinary speed with which these stories are spinning out of control.
	But there is one place where you can find alpha, Amiga, before time, outside of time, beyond time, comfort, through the cross, through the vertical plane and horizontal plane.
	Truth and purity is there.
	It doesn't mean an end to suffering, but it does mean an end to constant deception of yourself and the constant deception and counterfeits of the world.
	But that's just what I think.
	Let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
	Are you sick of your baby?
	The answer is yes.
	Would you like a genetically engineered one?
	The answer is yes.
	Are you glad that people are already genetically engineering babies?
	The answer is yes.
	As Silicon Valley pushes into the most intimate realms of human existence, reshaping how we are born and how we grieve, what happens to a civilization that allows its technology to redefine life and death themselves?
	Well, it collapses is the simple answer, but let's get into that now.
	While the race for AI captures all of the headlines, there's another one quietly brewing between Silicon Valley executives.
	The race to create a bioengineered human being, a child.
	The Wall Street Journal has some extraordinary reporting out that a small company backed by none other than Open AI chief Sam Altman has spent months pursuing a secret project for a genetically engineered baby.
	They're working toward creating a child born from an embryo edited to prevent a hereditary disease.
	Editing genes in embryos in order to create babies is banned in the United States of America.
	So the company called Preventive.
	Same as when gain of function research got banned in America.
	They outsourced it to, I don't remember where they outsourced it to, but I know there was, I think it was Wuhan, but I don't think it ever led to any problems.
	So they're just going to outsource genetically engineering babies to a territory or terrain that's outside of US jurisdiction, but ultimately within US dominion.
	Has been searching for places to experiment where embryo editing is allowed, including the United Arab Emirates.
	All you need now is to genetically engineer the perfect babies for Epstein Island.
	You can have the perfect kind of Disneyland for Jeffrey Epstein and his chums, dicks, like roller coaster rides made of sexy babies that can't speak except to say, yes, please, I'd like another one, Jeffrey.
	I mean, the problem is, is these technologies ultimately end up being exploited by the most powerful forces in the world.
	And we know what their hobbies are now.
	And, you know, it's not swingball.
	Sam Altman's family office and Coinbase co-founder Brian Armstrong are backing this company, Preventive.
	How about genetically engineering people's sexuality or their identity or their race?
	You can see that human morality, human reason, divorced from divine surrender or submission to the divine could head in literally any direction.
	Hitler would justify going in one direction and Bill Gates in another.
	The best thing is to surrender to God and accept divine principles, which are, by and large, written down.
	Which, as you mentioned, is conducting preclinical research to attempt to create a baby from a genetically engineered embryo to prevent a hereditary disease.
	Hmm.
	I don't know why I wouldn't trust his own genes.
	He's got a lovely little face.
	Look, I sense the demonic in all this.
	Do you?
	Behind the scenes, the company has told people that a couple had already been identified who was interested in participating in the research.
	Can you imagine the amount of controversy caused by the pun around the word genes when Sidney Sweeney was advertising their meagle genes?
	It's in your genes.
	Do you think it's a bit racist, hmm, you know, for a white person to use a pun about genes?
	Well, look, puns, we can have a discussion about puns around genes.
	It's probably not a good idea.
	It's bad.
	But here, there are actual stories about the inconceivably wealthy conducting gene experimentation.
	And to what end?
	They always dress it up, like, you know, all of these things, Neuralink.
	It's there to help, but, you know, they'll always, the outlier ideology will always be, it's there to help you.
	Like the pandemic.
	We're just locking you in your house to help people.
	We're just genetically modified babies to repeat after me, help people.
	But we've seen where this stuff ends up.
	In the same week that Silicon Valley elites, including open AI chief Sam Altman and his husband, were revealed to be bankrolling preventative, a company whose goal is nothing less than genetically engineering babies, former Disney actor Callum Worthy unveiled Two-Way, an AI app that lets users speak with digital recreations of their deceased loved ones for a monthly fee.
	So on one hand, we're genetically engineering babies, and on the other hand, we're resurrecting the ghosts of our loved ones.
	Now, have you read Mary Shelley's Frankenstein?
	No?
	Okay.
	How about the Bible?
	No, not the Bible either.
	Okay, right.
	We're in serious, serious trouble.
	These two stories might appear separate, but together they signal a profound and accelerating shift.
	The tech industry is no longer content with reshaping our economies, our media, or our politics.
	It's now reaching for something far more intimate and far more dangerous.
	The power to manipulate the beginning and end of human life itself.
	And unlike past moral crises, this one is emerging quietly, disguised as compassion, convenience, and progress, which is the new masquerade that we're invited to engage in.
	Remember, power is protecting you.
	These tools are for your convenience.
	The dream of designing improved children may be marketed as a humanitarian breakthrough.
	And believe me, as a parent, I would like to improve my children.
	I love those guys.
	But history teaches us exactly where such dreams lead.
	A century ago, eugenics movements across the West claimed they were simply promoting healthier populations.
	That rhetoric paved the way for sterilization campaigns in the United States and Britain, and later for the monstrous Nazi vision of a biologically engineered master race.
	Right, let's have a look at what the Nazis were up to.
	They were a lovely bunch.
	It was an almost unbelievable project.
	I liked them.
	Mac Hitler, what a guy.
	Don't be so enthusiastic, mate.
	They aren't the Nazis.
	The most secret one of the Nazi regime, the Liebensborn programme, meaning spring or source of life, to give birth to children who were seen as perfect in the eyes of the Nazis.
	Tall, blonde, blue-eyed.
	The Hemsworths.
	Creating a master race.
	The dream of Adolf Hitler.
	But they're still Australian, aren't they?
	The dream of Adolf Hitler.
	In 1935, Heinrich Himmler, the head of the SS, launched the program, setting up a network of nurseries.
	What's that reporting babies together?
	That's like when my Gerbel had babies.
	Germany, Austria, and France.
	Women who were pregnant by a member of the SS invited to go to the centers towards the end of their pregnancies to give birth.
	All had to pass pseudo-scientific tests to prove that they met the racial purity criteria defined by the regime.
	The Liebensborn project was brought to a halt with the liberation and the fall of the Third Reich.
	Stop putting them babies that close.
	They can't like that.
	It's not hygienic.
	But in 10 years, around 20,000 babies were born in the Nazi maternity hospitals.
	In March 1948, at the end of the eighth Nuremberg trial, the four leaders of the Liebensborn project were charged with crimes against humanity.
	We were just trying our hardest.
	We were just trying to stop the spread.
	We were just trying to help people.
	5000 followers of science.
	They pleaded not guilty.
	They claimed that they ran a charitable organization that helped mothers in difficulty to give birth.
	That's so much like the Nazis, isn't it?
	We actually are running a charitable organization that helps mothers, but that kind of Nazi mindset that's in institutions of power everywhere.
	Just check it out.
	Check out these days.
	We're just trying to help people.
	That's what they'll say about that AI generation of your grandma.
	That's what they'll say about genetically engineered neuralink, all of it.
	We're here to help you.
	Digitalize the help, We're going to help you into total, total incarceration.
	They were convicted, but only for their membership of the SS.

▲