Stay Free - Russel Brand - THE TRUST CRISIS — Vaccines, Obama’s Image & Gates’ Agenda - SF648

Nov. 10, 2025 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

59:57

THE TRUST CRISIS — Vaccines, Obama’s Image & Gates’ Agenda - SF648

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Ladies and gentlemen, Russell Brand and Russell Conspiracy Theorist trying to bring real journalism to the American people.
	Hello there, you awakening wonders.
	Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
	Today we take a deep dive into and unpack a bunch of subjects that you'll be interested in.
	One, Bill Gates's U-turn on climate change.
	How can we ever trust him again?
	Let me know in the comments and chat.
	Two, the legacy of Barack Obama.
	It's weird, isn't it?
	Because we were talking about no kings earlier in the week and now we have to look at the kind of attempt to mint new founding fathers in real time.
	How can we ever believe in Barack Obama again after 2008 and after the period of his presidency in which he got involved in too many wars and frankly didn't deliver?
	Who can get it up for hope and change anymore?
	It was hard to get it up in 2012, wasn't it?
	The second time that he was in.
	So we look at the legacy of Barack Obama and we look at the hegemony that continues to exist in American politics even though you fundamentally want to be an actual democracy with maximal authority at the smallest level of government.
	That's what I'm pitching to you anyway.
	The sovereignty of the individual, democracy in the community, the ultimate power of the state and then minimally nation-state government.
	I don't know, that seems to me like the constitutional intention of America, although I know it's an ongoing argument and there were big, big state founding fathers like Hamilton and small state founding fathers like Jefferson.
	I don't know, like all of the various different, like, you know, I know Patrick Henry, for example, was like, this shit's going too far right after the war for independence.
	So, you know, your country remains a great bastion and a great ongoing, as you always call it, experiment into what democracy could be.
	And that experiment ain't over, but it is at a pretty pivotal and important point as we face a crisis in confidence in government and a crisis in confidence perhaps in everything.
	Now, since Charlie Kirk has died, people are interested again in Christianity and Christ.
	And I wonder how you feel about Christianity being collapsed into, say, republicanism or individual strands within Christianity, e.g., orthodoxy or, I don't know, Lutheranism, anything really.
	Like, what is it to love Christ these days?
	Anyway, amidst this crisis of faith, people won't believe in the orthodoxies that governments across the world are set up, like science and medicine.
	Those things are collapsing everywhere, sometimes with a detrimental cost because science undertaken by men and women of good faith and good favor is obviously one of the greatest tools we've got.
	We'll be looking at the fact that in the UK, people that know the score won't take the shot no more.
	Doctors, nurses, people that work hospitals are going, yeah, you're all right, thanks.
	I won't take that flu vaccine.
	Why is that?
	Because I've just probably seen too many heart attacks, experienced too many lives.
	We'll be getting into that in depth also.
	Hope you've watched our show earlier this week with Cheryl Hines and I hope that you've acquired her book.
	Hope you've watched our video with Gavin DeBecker.
	His book's right there.
	There's our Lord.
	There's Gavin De Becker.
	That's basically the Mount Rushmore that we sit in front of.
	I hope you've acquired that book and seen the interview that we did with him.
	Over the course of this show, you're going to learn a great deal about Barack Obama and the commerciality of politics.
	You're going to learn a lot about the collapse of faith in the orthodoxies of science because orthodoxy without orthopractic is a long Latin way of saying bullshit.
	Absolute bullshit, bullshit, bullshit.
	Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit.
	I don't even say that in the film.
	Oh, oh no, the snow, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit.
	Oh, nor do I say, you sound like you're from London.
	So I'm really losing a lot of blood.
	You sound like you're from London.
	Paul Rudd, Kristen Bell, those are the people that get quoted at me.
	Hey, so we were looking at Bill Ga.
	We'll be looking at Bill Gates' convenient climate change pivot.
	You can't trust that dude.
	No more.
	We'll be looking at Barack Obama's Aussie Mandias mad monuments to self.
	Can't trust that dude no more.
	And we'll be looking at doctors, nurses, and medical professionals not taking the jab.
	Can't trust that no more.
	I know you know all this, but who do you know that don't know all this?
	Share this content with them.
	Make sure that they know the truth.
	It's your obligation and your duty, Lord.
	It's your absolute obligation and duty.
	If you haven't got Rumble Premium yet, get Rumble Premium now.
	You support me there as well as getting additional content from the likes of Crowder and his mug club and Tim Paul, the ever-excellent Glenn Greenwald, our friend Dave Rubin, Kim Iverson, so many great content creators.
	And I directly benefit if you subscribe to Rumble Premium.
	So why don't you go ahead and do that if it's of any use to you.
	Let's have a look at our first video today.
	Strap on.
	No, don't strap on.
	Strap in.
	If you haven't got a penis, you're probably not meant to have.
	No, let's not get into that debate.
	Just strap in and watch this video.
	See you in a second.
	No kings, including Obama.
	Hello there, you awakening wonders.
	As a former liberal myself and a denizen of Hollywood and a person that thought it was fantastic when a Barack Obama become president, I have to say that him building a Kublai Khan style monument to himself at a point where people are talking about the hegemonic symbolism of Trump's early reign seems hypocritical, doesn't it?
	Do you remember the excitement that accompanied the election of Barack Obama?
	Were you happy?
	Did you celebrate that Barack Obama became president of the United States?
	Because this is the kind of political territory that I'm truly trying to operate.
	I want to live in America.
	I love your country.
	Where people are excited that anyone from anywhere can become president, including Kenya.
	That's a joke.
	I mean to say that if the reason you don't think Barack Obama should be president or should have been president or was a bad president or is a pain in the ass even now is because he's black, then that's not the team I'm on.
	That's not the side of the argument I'm on.
	I thought it was fantastic that there was a black family in the White House.
	I thought that meant that America was changing and America was heading in the right direction.
	I felt optimistic.
	Then of course the 2008 crash happened.
	Barack Obama bowed out the banks and it became clear to me, at least and I wonder if you as well, let me know in the comments and chat, that we were being distracted by cultural, ideological and racial issues and in fact hoodwinked into believing that real change was possible and indeed was happening while in fact it was business as usual.
	And as Glenn Greenwald points out in this post that a US president leaves office knowing he wants to raise 1.5 billion from the country's richest people and largest corporations all so he can build a gigantic monument to himself is the incestuous sleaze and noxious self-dealing that people hate about the DC swamp.
	And that's in response to this Obama post.
	When the Obama Presidential Center opens next year, it'll be a hub for change.
	Change.
	Remember that?
	Remember?
	I'm friends with Shepard Ferry.
	I hope I'm still friends.
	I loved Shepard Ferry.
	He made this poster, this famous iconic image.
	But what does that image mean now?
	He's still using that branding.
	A place for people to come from all over the world to come together, get inspired and take what they learn back to their own communities.
	Well, is that what it really is?
	Or is it a kind of icon to self?
	Think about these great and exciting and influential political leaders of the last 20 years.
	Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, Barack Obama.
	What were they about really?
	If you ask me, they were about making liberals feel good about themselves while global imperialism, commercialism and corporatism, materialism itself, the belief that what matters most of all is the material world, not spirit, not unity, not joy, not beauty, not solidarity, and certainly not God.
	All the things that they summon to the forefront of your mind, this is about quality, progress, brotherhood, kindness, all those ideas, they're in the mix, aren't they?
	But where are they when it comes to the way that these people governed and when it comes to their legacy?
	Let's have a look at some of the promo for the Barack Obama Presidential Center.
	Well, do you know what I need?
	A presidential centre.
	I think they showed that shot just so that we could see that person had dreads.
	And they're still playing the same card.
	They're playing the card that this looks like progress because it is progress that people that were bought to America in chains have ascended to positions of power.
	That, if you isolate it, is a good and positive thing.
	But when you look at it in the spectrum of what's actually happening, it's a meaningless thing.
	It's a distraction.
	And wokeism is the arse end of an ideology that attempts to distract you from reality by highlighting one positive idea.
	That's what progressivism itself is.
	Aren't we doing well?
	We are progressing.
	It's women in the workplace.
	Gay people can get married.
	Well, what's happening?
	At the level of the spirit.
	Not forget just the level of the spirit.
	What's happening globally?
	Are there more people in slavery than ever before?
	Yes, there are.
	Are we tumbling face first into limitless and senseless vice?
	Is pornography available at the end of your hand?
	Are we deteriorating?
	Are we losing the spiritual war?
	Of course, any endeavor and piece of engineering, whether it's the L.A. Aqueduct or the Hoover Dam or Space...
	Like engineering feats and building, they are generally positive experiences.
	And I imagine if you're involved in this, like it feels like you're doing something fantastic and worthwhile.
	But are you, though?
	What are you contributing to?
	Is America continuing in ascendancy, fulfilling the ingenuity of the Constitution?
	Or is America in degeneration and deterioration?
	I had a big argument with AI about this recently, where it attempted to say that biblical historical values could now be looked at almost as something we've transcended.
	But in a way, materialists have given us the perfect metaphor.
	Degeneration, deterioration.
	Over time, through entropy, matter appears to decay while the molecules move further apart.
	Is America getting better or is America degenerating?
	We can't make this content without the support of our partners.
	Here's a message from one now.
	Fume.
	Do you need something to fidget with using your hands?
	You sometimes wonder, oh, what should I do with these things, these glorious miracles?
	I'd be better off as Edward Scissor hands with literal nuts and bolts for fingers.
	But what happened when you touch your own face?
	Little cuts.
	What happens when you try and love people?
	You slash them.
	You need fume.
	Unless you're Edward Scissorhands, in which case it'd be very difficult to operate that.
	Fume.
	Have you ever found yourself reaching for a bad habit?
	Where is my bad habit?
	Without even thinking about it, maybe it's stress, boredom, just wanting to fit in.
	Well, that's where fume comes in.
	It ain't about quitting.
	It's about replacing.
	Fume, the sponsor of this very video, offers a simple and enjoyable way to break away from bad habits while still having something satisfying to reach for.
	No vapor, no nicotine, just flavor.
	Fume is an award-winning, flavored air device that delivers great taste without any harmful chemicals.
	Instead of inhaling vapor, you're simply breathing natural, food-grade ingredients, satisfying the craving without addiction.
	It's sleek, it's portable, it's built to last.
	I go for crisp mint because I like to feel freshness when I'm supping upon the sweet air that God gave me.
	Inhale that Holy Spirit, breathe it right in.
	Fume.
	Over 700,000 people have already made the switch to fume as part of their habit change journey.
	If you're ready to try it yourself, now's the time.
	For a limited time, if you order the journey pack using my code Russell Brand, you'll get a free fume topper, an awesome accessory to level up your experience.
	Click the link try fume.com forward slash Russell Brand or scan the QR code on the screen to get yours today.
	Click the link at try fume.com forward slash Russell Brand or just scan that QR code.
	There, that one.
	That just scan that to Trifume today.
	Back to the content.
	Obviously, it's being built in Chicago.
	Barack Obama's from Chicago, Hawaii, Kenya, whatever.
	I don't care.
	I don't care, honestly.
	I was into it.
	I'm into the idea that people can create glorious new monoliths like the Tower of Babel.
	Let's have a look what the people of Chicago think, though.
	Said to be open in April 2026, the Obama Presidential Center has garnered sharp criticism from older woman Jeanette Taylor.
	She has lambasted the project over concerns that it's going to lead to gentrification of the neighborhood, pointing out that Chicago did not sign a community benefits agreement.
	A CBA is a legal contract which developers signed to ensure that a building project will protect affordable housing, the environment, and lead to local hiring.
	It can't even succeed in accordance with the ideology that it purports to be a part of.
	Do you note that?
	Like the success of Obama is meant to be iconic of these types of ideas.
	But it can't even fulfill that.
	We're going to see the rents go higher and we're going to see families displaced, Taylor told the Daily Mail.
	Every time a large development comes to the community, they displace the very people they say they want to improve it for.
	Already, one resident, Kyana Butler, who's involved in at least three groups lobbying for more protections for the area as a result of the Obama Foundation, has said rent prices are already rising.
	But remember, of course, the Daily Mail was generally speaking inclined towards criticizing projects of this nature.
	The Daily Mail's not your friend either, is what I'm basically saying.
	So, what did Barack Obama represent?
	Well, let's have a look.
	Obama prosecuted more journalists using the Espionage Act than all the presidents before him combined.
	He arrested, jailed, and tortured Chelsea Manning for revealing war crimes.
	Do you remember that?
	In the Julian Assange era, he repealed the Smith-Munt Act, which now allows the CIA, FBI, to directly propagandize American citizens and infiltrate unions, NGOs, scoreboards, and organizations of any kind.
	He deported three million Hispanics and built the cages Democrats protested against under Trump.
	Do you see that people that believe in Barack Obama believe in an illusion?
	I know because I was one of them.
	That's what's fascinating: Barack Obama is still out there acting like these facts aren't available anymore.
	And that's the problem.
	People that loathe Trump for the ICE raids and the deportations and see him as an object, an icon of the right.
	And let's have it right.
	Fascism, Nazism are failing to address that their own icons by the metrics they used to damn Trump would be themselves damned.
	And until people are able to take on that mindset, that purview, that Weltenschung, that perspective, then we'll be trapped in an endless cyclone of hypocrisy and we won't awaken to the deep truth of Christ.
	It doesn't matter if you vote for Democrats.
	It doesn't actually even really matter, particularly if you vote for Republicans.
	Unless you, in your heart, are embracing Christ, unless you, in your heart, are attempting to deal with a deep truth, then you are just one more site of manipulation that they can maneuver around the chessboard of their perennial game of essenceless corruption.
	Obama took us from two wars to seven wars while ramping up the drone bombings, killing innocent people left and right.
	He effectively repealed habeas corpus and gave the government the authority to jail people indefinitely.
	Obama is a myth.
	Pushed by the establishment and their brought media to make you think there was someone fighting for you while he was serving banks, big pharma, the MIC, and the corporate masters.
	Excellent analysis from Jimmy Dore there.
	When Barack Obama spoke at Stanford University talking about the need for more censorship because of misinformation and malinformation, I realized that Barack Obama, like Tony Blair, like Yuval No Harari, is a convenient tool and poll to convey information that's useful to true power.
	In this instance, Barack Obama passionately conveys his belief that we need to be able to censor and control people.
	Who does he mean?
	He means people like me.
	He means people like you.
	Barack Obama here advocates for centralized control of information.
	What we should be advocating for is decentralization when it comes to currency and when it comes to information.
	Of course, there is the possibility that independent media of this type could lead to misinformation.
	If I sort of say, you know, oh, you can treat yourself against COVID by eating dandelions and putting a condom on your head, that's wrong and hopeless and hopefully you won't do it.
	But the fact that independent media voices are sometimes wrong, whether you're referring to David Icke or Alex Jones or Joe Rogan or whatever prominent online voices you might care to list, the idea that those voices should be censored indicates that there is a central authority that you can rely on and Barack Obama is a representative of that central authority that you can rely on.
	What this post from Jimmy Dore points out and what I would like to reiterate is that the very forces and sources and resources that Barack Obama advocates for are more dangerous than MAGA, populism and Trump, even if you detest them.
	They are a worse and more insidious form of authoritarianism and imperialism than the more vivid and lurid and vilified and condemned icons of the right, shall we call them, like Trump.
	Understand, it's not necessary for people to believe this information in order to weaken democratic institutions.
	You just have to flood a country's public square with enough raw sewage.
	You just have to raise enough questions, spread enough dirt, plant enough conspiracy theorizing that citizens no longer know what to believe.
	That's really interesting.
	And I remember commenting at the time that equating independent media with raw sewage is a brilliant piece of rhetoric.
	And the claim that ongoing conversation means that centralized institutions of media can no longer control the debate is true.
	But that's not a problem.
	That's an advantage because you shouldn't trust them when they're perpetuating war.
	You shouldn't trust them when they're telling you to take vaccines.
	Even if you just take the period of the pandemic, which is primarily what he's referring to here, in fact, we now know that they were wrong about social distancing, wrong about masks, wrong about vaccines and their efficacy, wrong about vaccines and their potential side effects.
	Whereas what Barack Obama is saying here is Joe Rogan should have been banned.
	Russell Brown should have been banned.
	All of those voices that were making you cynical and skeptical about social measures during the pandemic and medical measures, for example, what they were referring to as vaccines, those voices were right.
	Now, in the interim, Bobby Kennedy, who was a marginal figure, is now the secretary of the HHS.
	So the world has changed and in some ways improved.
	But my God, you can't be objective about any of the MAGA figures.
	They continue to double down on their condemnation of the evidently and obviously imperfect Donald Trump.
	And I suppose the reason that I'm focusing on Barack Obama in this instance is they continue to celebrate, reify and glorify the name and icon of Barack Obama instead of acknowledging that Barack Obama was not a good president.
	The facts and the figures speak for themselves.
	And even in this, his post-presidential period, he continues to focus not on meaningful social endeavors, although, gosh, I find it hard to identify what that could possibly be, but rather grandiose personal projects like monoliths to celebrate his own personal glory.
	Have you ever heard him come out and say 2008 was a mistake, we shouldn't have bowed out the banks?
	Have you ever heard him say the pandemic period revealed how little we can trust media, how little we can trust big pharma?
	Have you ever heard him say anything like that?
	haven't and you never will because Barack Obama is one of the key poles along with Tony Blair, Bill Gates, George Soros that ensures that liberalism and the left remain in the thrall and capture of global imperial interests.
	Once they lose trust in their leaders, in mainstream media, in political institutions, in each other, in the possibility of truth, the game's won.
	Mark Maron's tenure as popular podcaster defined an early part of online media where it could have gone, I suppose, any number of ways.
	Mark Maron was broadly liberal.
	I went on Mark Moron's show.
	He's a lovely guy, a great comedian, and he had an unusual route to mainstream success.
	Subsequent to his podcast and his extraordinary success, he entered the mainstream, did movies, became a success within the institutions of power that he was previously peripheral to.
	Remember, he's mates with like Louis and stuff and came up with Louie.
	Louie has been kind of cast out because of somewhat unsubstantiated attacks on his sexual conduct and stuff.
	Difficult for me to talk about those kind of things.
	You know what I'm going through legally myself.
	But what I'd like to say is that Mark Maron is an example of a liberal, let's call it sort of an urban figure rather than Joe Rogan, who's become much more representative, say, of the sort of robust UFC commentating, firearm-owning, meat-eating, ivermectin-taking aspect of the online space.
	And it turns out that taking ivermectin is a pretty sensible thing to do if you want to fight off viruses, bacteria, and maybe even cancer.
	Who knows?
	We'll get into that on another occasion.
	But Mark Moron's interviews of Barack Obama kind of tentpoled his tenure and success.
	When he first went on, that was really interesting and impacted me personally.
	Have a look at this clip of me interviewing the then leader of the Labour Party, Ed Miliband, who now works in the government again under our current Prime Minister, Keir Starmer.
	Have a look at this quick clip.
	For me, and for a lot of people that don't vote, that's where that frustration emanates from.
	It certainly isn't apathy, Ed.
	It's a sense of what's the point?
	Progress comes through people demanding change.
	Yes, politics responding, not all the way, and people pushing for that change to carry on.
	But without the politics, without government, the change doesn't happen.
	Ed Miliband did that interview with me because independent media at that time was on the ascent and rise and politicians in the UK were beginning to recognize that they had to collaborate with online media pundits like me and there weren't really many in the UK at that time.
	It wasn't long after that that a spate of headlines began to appear condemning me as a conspiracy theorist, right wing, UK's Joe Rogan.
	And then, of course, in September 23, allegations and accusations generated in media using actors to play people making allegations was broadcast.
	We'll get into that on another occasion.
	But certainly it became clear that independent media was in the ascendancy, was significant and was powerful.
	Here's Mark Maron interviewing Barack Obama towards the end of his time.
	And in a way, let's look at how media has changed and how Barack Obama has changed and how our trust in independent media, mainstream media, and figures like Barack Obama has altered in that timeframe.
	That's not who we are.
	That's not our idea of America.
	We don't want masked folks with rifles and machine guns patrolling our streets.
	We want cops on the beat who know the remote neighborhood and the kids around.
	And that's how we keep the peace around here.
	We don't want kangaroo courts and trumped up charges.
	That's what happens in other places that we used to scold for doing that.
	We want our court system and our Justice Department and our prosecutors to be and our FBI to be just playing things straight and looking at the facts and not meddling in politics the way we've seen later lately.
	Now, just remember, see if you can hold in your mind that confidence, although the body language ain't great, he's doing jiu-jitsu on himself there.
	Look at him.
	But have a look at that confidence and certainty.
	Now hold that in your mind with a Jimmy Door post.
	Prosecuted more journalists using the Espionage Act, arrested, jail, tortured Chelsea Manning, repealed the Smith-Munt Act, deployed 3 million Hispanics, built the cages, took the US from two wars to seven wars, effectively repealed habeas corpus.
	Obama is a myth.
	I would like to believe in the Barack Obama that Barack Obama himself still appears to believe in.
	I did believe in it.
	During the inaugurations and celebrations and ascendancy of America's first black president, I was excited as well.
	But the difference is, is that I've now seen what Barack Obama represents.
	Even if Barack Obama himself doesn't know that, he must be aware that he took the US from two to seven wars.
	He must be aware that they used the Espionage Act against Julian Assange.
	He must be aware that when he talks about misinformation and malinformation, he's talking about control.
	The myth of Barack Obama includes the idea that if America has a black president, that equates to an improvement of the social conditions of African Americans or Americans with less money or females or gay Americans or a whole host of minority Americans.
	Why Barack Obama is important and interesting, even if you don't like him, is because the ideology and mentality still prevails.
	He's still being celebrated and like Tony Blair is still in a position of significant power and influence.
	And that power and influence is being used to control discourse, control media, censor and ensure that global imperialism continues to advance.
	That figures like Trump, the MAGA movement and nationalists everywhere are overtly, explicitly and aggressively vilified.
	If the metrics and measures that you would use to condemn nationalists like Trump and MAGA and nationalist movements elsewhere, if those metrics were reliable and true, then you would have to use them to condemn Barack Obama too.
	So Barack Obama as a president and as an elder statesman is a pivotal figure in ensuring that America can continue to believe lies about neoliberalism and can continue to deceive itself and the world about what the Democrat Party and neoliberalism more broadly means.
	Well that's just what I think.
	Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat?
	Whether you're watching this on YouTube as a one-off or as part of our Rumble show, remember to join us three times a week on Rumble at this time for our live participatory show and at these times for our other shows every single week.
	More important than that, if you can, please stay free.
	Hey, if we're supposed to trust the science, why are scientists and people that work in medicine refusing to take vaccines?
	Hello there, you awakening wonders.
	Did you know that nine in ten hospital staff that are mandated or at least you know encouraged, coerced, pushed, pressurized into taking vaccines no longer take them?
	I'm talking about a story out of the UK but that affects everyone everywhere because people are beginning to recognize and learn that we were lied to significantly throughout the pandemic period and in ways that have not been addressed, apologized for, let alone remunerated.
	And in the cases where they are remunerated, guess who's protected from the payouts?
	Yeah, it's the pharmaceutical industry.
	So you take the vaccines, you get the injuries, and you pay when people are successful in proving that they are vaccine injured.
	What a fantastic racket.
	Nice work if you can get it.
	Let's unpack it.
	That's all we've got time for on YouTube.
	If you want to see the next video and I recommend that you see it because it's a belter, then click the link in the description.
	Get on over to Rumble and Rumble Premium.
	Hey, that's all we're able to give you on X. Click the link in the description.
	Get over to Rumble where you can see all of this content in full as God intended.
	The NHS, that's the National Health Service, the state healthcare that's provided in the UK, for now, almost 90% of employees at One Health Trust rejected the offer of a flu vaccination.
	Why would that be?
	Well, our fantastic guest, friend of the show, Gavin DeBecker, writer of the book Forbidden Facts, when he came on our show, was kind enough to explain many of these problems.
	Here he is elsewhere talking about the polio vaccine, the presumed efficacy of the polio vaccine, and the true, often untold story of polio vaccines.
	There's no doubt we're in a reckoning when it comes to the pharmaceutical industry, although really that reckoning is long underway.
	We've had the opioid crisis that revealed to us the true nature of the incentives and morality of, for example, Purdue Pharma and the Sackler family that runs them that greenwash their product by sponsoring galleries and paying for a bunch of advertising on TV, meaning that TV won't report accurately on it.
	Have you seen this before?
	Brian Stelter, have you seen this before?
	Yellow Joe Rogan, have you seen this before?
	Trust the science.
	Have you seen this before?
	Stephen Colbert and a bunch of syringes dancing across your screen.
	What the pandemic period is brilliant at demonstrating is the level to which various systems will co-align and lie to you and control you.
	What we are attempting to do for independent media and independent faith is equip you with some facts so that you can avoid participating in the systems or avoid joining up with some other cartel or tribe that will similarly betray you one day down the line inevitably.
	Why?
	Because they're human.
	Let's have a quick look at what Gavin DeBecker had to say about polio vaccines and the way that we've been lied to, even in one of the areas where vaccines are regarded as a tremendous success.
	You have a crazy example.
	Polio.
	Polio is the worst disease in world history.
	Not actually, but that's the spin.
	Polio was completely eliminated by mass vaccination.
	Not actually, but that's the spin.
	But if we look today at polio on Earth, entire planet, 8 million people, how many people died last year from polio?
	Zero.
	How many had paralysis from polio?
	560.
	And 97% of them was vaccine strain or vaccine-induced poliomyelitis.
	So, our opponents say, well, that's because of vaccination.
	But how does that account for the more than a billion people on Earth who never had the polio vaccine?
	They have the exact same death rate.
	Same thing for measles.
	The same death rate if you had vaccine and the same death rate if you didn't have the vaccine.
	Further insights are provided by Tom Renz on X. Have a look at this.
	Breaking, get the flu shot and you're 27% more likely to get the flu.
	Just like the COVID jabs and pretty much any other vaccine, it appears that the flu shot is an abject failure.
	In a reprint study from the Cleveland Clinic, employees that got the flu shot had 27% higher chance of contracting the flu.
	The COVID shots have also shown negative efficacy in numerous studies.
	We said it in the summer of 21 and no one listened, but we will keep saying it to try and get people safe.
	Get the shot, get the disease.
	Now you know that and I know that, but think about your mother or your grandmother or other people that are outside of the independent media space.
	They're queuing up and lining up outside of pharmacies and chemists across Europe and the United States of America like obedient little prisoners of the state, jabbing themselves up with medicines that don't work and might actually make things worse.
	Please help us by sharing this content with them so that they are able to arm themselves with the facts and therefore face reality a little more robustly.
	Just two years ago, Moderna and Pfizer were selling their products to us with such incredible confidence, gravitas, glibness, flippancy, whatever was required to make us believe in their deceptive and unaffective products.
	Have a look at this.
	it's like a sort of historical document when it comes to your health you do you you ping and pong that body you plunge that body you green that body you brain power that body you practice and practice that body it's not trying to appeal to people that are particularly interested in their health like a maha type of audience you might say that would drink green juice that would have ice box
	Kind of things that I'd do, as a matter of fact.
	I'll tell you something that I wouldn't do, that I never did and will never do.
	Trust the government when it comes to medications.
	I didn't take that COVID shot.
	I've never taken a flu shot.
	And I recommend pretty strongly that you never do anything like that either.
	And the reason for these recommendations is not, you know, trusting the science.
	Well, except for the science of experience and empiricism and what I've learned from observing the conduct and behavior of big pharma, the number of times that they've lied, the number of times they've exploited us, whether it's Johnson ⁇ Johnson through Talcum Powder, whether it's Pfizer through the vaccine for which they're still granted indemnity, whether it's the numerous times that they've had to sell, as Cheryl Hines said, on The View, to the tune of billions of dollars for various injuries received through vaccines.
	And note how quickly beloved dear Whoopi Goldberg goes to the mat and goes to bat to say, well, hold on, that's all vaccines.
	Like, that makes it all right.
	You make it rain that bite.
	Note the nefariousness of the marketing and advertising industry.
	Throughout the pandemic period, what were the modalities and techniques that they deployed in order to coerce you near enough into taking those vaccines?
	Certainly 30,000 New York nurses and doctors lost their jobs.
	It was, get that vaccine.
	You're going to kill your grandmother.
	You're a pervert.
	What are you doing, you sicko?
	Why won't you get a vaccine?
	Is it because you're a paedophile?
	You're killing people.
	You Nazi, you sick Nazi.
	Even friendly people like the Jimmies, Fallon and Kimmel.
	Like, hey, listen, let them die.
	Let them die in the wards.
	I say if they haven't a shot, Piers Morgan, all of them.
	Shame, attack, shame.
	Now, when it's convenient because it's not being mandated or coerced to the same degree, hey, it's a lifestyle choice.
	Let's all boogie undown and get our vaccines together.
	It's just like doing the Samba.
	You know, like how sometimes during a Samba, you might have a terrible heart attack because of myocarditis.
	Yeah, it is kind of like it.
	You flu shot that body and now you spike vax that body.
	Let's hope that that spike remains in the deltoid and doesn't migrate to the skin around your heart, that buddy.
	You have a spasm in your face, that buddy.
	You collapse while playing basketball.
	Do you remember how many athletes just sort of dropped dead on sports fields and in sports arenas during that period?
	Oh, there's this new thing now where young people just die of nothing.
	Get used to it, kids.
	It's the craze that's sweeping the nation.
	Dropping dead from nothing, even though you're a fit young athlete.
	Because even though the pandemic is over, COVID-19 isn't.
	Spike vaccs by Moderna is a vaccine to help protect you against COVID-19.
	Look, it isn't over.
	We still have something to sell you.
	We still have reserves and various shots.
	Why don't you take the shots?
	Gavin DeBecker in our interview pointed out that there may come a time in accompaniment with social credit scoring where you, if you don't take the shots mandated by your government, because I've tested now how coercive they can be and how compliant people will be in general, that you, well, and that's me actually, I live in this guy, that I might get a beep on my phone saying, hey, Russell, get down to the pharmacy and take your shot.
	And if I don't take the shot, I might not be able to use trains or my bank account might get frozen.
	My shot might be, hey, that guy's got a lot of pep in his step.
	Let's bring him down a peg or two.
	Other people might be a little lethargic.
	Yeah, why don't we give them a little jolt so they can work a little harder on the production line or be a bit more compliant when they're sat dying in the metaverse or whatever universal credit concocts for the unneeded and unwanted members of our society that can't even participate in a surf cast no more.
	Note what's being piloted at us here and pay attention to the central fact of the video.
	People that know the score because they work on the hospital floor, doctors, nurses, hospital staff are not taking flu shots anymore.
	What do they know that we don't know?
	What have they proved that we can't prove?
	What are they experiencing that no clinical trials are being undertaken to demonstrate?
	Maybe because it's not profitable to undertake clinical trials that show you that if you're healthy, if you exercise, if you eat well, you don't need to take any vaccines.
	That doesn't seem very profitable.
	Aha, what a coincidence.
	You shouldn't get Spike Vax if you had an allergic reaction to Spike Vax or its ingredients.
	Note the banalizing tone of this advert.
	They're speaking to you like a child they want to encourage.
	Hey, all the cool kids are getting myocarditis.
	Why don't you get yourself some myocarditis shots?
	And note that during the pandemic, they spoke to you like you're a malign and malevolent, disobedient child.
	You're a naughty boy.
	Take the vaccine.
	Take the vaccine.
	In both instances, they talk to you like a child because they want your total fealty.
	Where else do you hear come to me innocently?
	Come to me like little children.
	You hear it in the actual Bible.
	God needs you to approach him with an open heart and the government wants to be your God.
	How I want the government and commercial interests around vaccines to talk to me is informationally.
	Hi, are you worried about vaccines?
	Because, you know, you might have heard loads of stuff online and you might have seen people dropping dead at sports matches.
	Well, if you're like obese or have a bunch of comorbidities and you're prone to colds and flus, this product might be beneficial to you.
	In fact, what we need is an age of authenticity and integrity where people sell their wares on the basis of utility.
	Do you have feet?
	Yes, you might want these shoes.
	Do you get colds?
	You might want this vaccine.
	Not to be manipulated and bribed and emotionally stimulated and shamed and lied to.
	The reason they deploy these methods is why?
	Why?
	Because if they were honest with you, you wouldn't comply.
	Not just in the area of commerce and trade, but when it comes to civil disobedience and governance more broadly and in general.
	If they told you the truth, you would become unworkable, disobedient, revolutionary.
	Rare cases of inflammation of the heart muscle and outer lining have been reported.
	Sometimes you might shed blood, but everyone else is doing it.
	Why don't you shed blood in a cup and sip it down?
	Put your cup of ass blood under a soldier stream.
	Carbonate your ice blood.
	Drink down your own shitty ass blood.
	What?
	Why not?
	They'd do it if they could.
	The most common side effects are injection side pain, redness and swelling, tiredness, headache, muscle pain, chills, joint pain, and fever.
	I like it if that guy just peeled off that fucking bike like, ah!
	And died and fell out of the virtual reality of that advertising world in his headset and into the reality that many people are occupying now because of vaccine injury.
	People that obediently queued up, sometimes lined up, obediently lined up, sometimes for good reasons, believing like, oh my god, I'm going to see my grandmother in an old folks home.
	Maybe I should get the vaccine.
	I don't think the people that took vaccines were idiots.
	I don't.
	I think they're generally quite kind.
	Some people are conformists, aren't they?
	They just like to obey.
	Other people are kind of kind.
	You could probably get me to take one if you found the right stimulant.
	Like, you know, if you do this, I'll, I don't know, compliment you for a couple of hours.
	But they just didn't find the right way of manipulating me.
	But they will eventually with AI.
	Make vaccination against COVID-19.
	I mean, I think that lady in the lab coat who's not even facing the table has had some sort of neurological damage, probably from a vaccine.
	A part of your health routine.
	Spike vax that body.
	Part of your health routine.
	Part of my health routine is I take medication to cause heart disease.
	I'm crazy like that.
	With Spike Vax.
	You're gonna regret that name Spike Vax.
	That's not gonna work.
	That's actually bad branding.
	Bye, Moderna.
	Maybe you need your propaganda to have had its penis inside a pop star.
	Hey?
	When you get your flu shot?
	Oh, two things at once.
	Two things at once!
	I'll give you two things at once.
	Actually, be careful with that kind of lifestyle.
	two things at once i'll have the two things at once please now Now, back to two things at once.
	Two things at once.
	That's not two things at once.
	Come.
	Travis, ask about getting this season's COVID-19 shot when getting your flu shot.
	What I would say is that the subtext suggests that he's in a delirious fantasy realm, possibly as a side effect of unnecessarily taking vaccines simultaneously.
	Look, I've got nothing against that guy.
	He's famous and powerful, and I'm assuming probably pretty good at fighting.
	But my point is that you shouldn't participate in these things.
	It's not good.
	I'm sure people feel like they're doing it for the right reason.
	The worst thing I ever done was a Hewlett-Packard commercial.
	That's the worst thing I've ever done.
	That I feel bad about it.
	They launched a tablet.
	Luckily, the product was so bad that they didn't even run the advert.
	So thank you, Lord.
	Got the money, though.
	When she was on the Joe Rogan show, Dr. Susan Humphreys talked about how doctors are financially incentivized to push vaccines, including free COVID shots for babies.
	And the idea that doctors are financially incentivized is one that goes back to the opioid crisis in your country, right?
	That's why doctors were willing to push.
	Well, not only the fentanyl, but when they knew that it was not good for you.
	And so I suppose the financial incentives, whether it's me selling Hewlett-Packard or Travis there selling the Pfizer shots or doctors recommending products that are not good for you, show you that in a way that is how sort of Satan works.
	The insidious fingers of demonism can be laying upon you financially, probably easier than any other way.
	Maybe sex is a powerful one.
	I'm speaking, I suppose, from personal experience.
	It's very easy to get corrupted and distracted and to forget what life is and who God is.
	Very easy.
	And there are examples just, I mean, everywhere.
	I was fired for reporting COVID vaccine adverse events under the emergency use authorization to the VERE system, which is the vaccine adverse event reporting system.
	I was required to do this by law and I whistleblue on my organization.
	I hate the phrase whistleblow.
	Like, I will whistleblow you so hard.
	I will whistleblow you in your spy hug.
	Just seems nerdy.
	Sorry.
	I should never have imagined blowing into that anus.
	Why would you ever do that?
	It's not even cocaine.
	On the HighWire show with Del Bigtree, I also did a little piece for the New York Times.
	This was when the man gates were coming down and they asked me why I wasn't getting the COVID vaccine.
	And I talked about all the side effects and the suppression of the reporting that was going on two weeks after without warning.
	Imagine that backtrack over there.
	You know, it doesn't seem so good anymore, does it?
	Dun dun dun dun.
	Yeah, look at some of those adverse events.
	I was surrounded in the middle of my shift.
	I had been actively seeing patients on the floor.
	They surrounded me and then literally threw me out of the hospital.
	Patients were abandoned that day because I was supposed to go back and see them for discharge and they don't know what happened to me.
	For years we were told to trust the science.
	Yet today, even doctors and nurses, the very people who make up the front line of that science, are quietly opting out of vaccines.
	After years of coercive public health messaging, is the question not whether the public has lost faith in science, but whether science has lost faith in us.
	A report in The Times reveals an extraordinary statistic.
	Nearly nine in 10 NHS staff at one of England's largest hospital trusts refused the flu vaccine last winter.
	These are not anti-vaxes, whatever that means.
	They are doctors, nurses and frontline workers.
	The very people who lived through the chaos of COVID are now turning their backs on official vaccine campaigns.
	It's a revolt not of ignorance, but of disillusionment.
	How did we get here?
	The answer lies in how governments, corporations and global health authorities handled the pandemic and in the authoritarian habits they cultivated along the way.
	In the rush to save lives, Western democracies borrowed the lockdown playbook from China, turning once-free societies into laboratories of control.
	The science became a slogan, not a method.
	Dissent was vilified and uncertainty was censored.
	Now the backlash has arrived inside hospitals no less.
	At the heart of this mistrust is a collapse in confidence over vaccines themselves.
	The flu jab, long taken for granted, is now being quietly questioned.
	Some studies suggest last year's shot may have had negative efficacy, meaning those who got it were 27% more likely to catch the flu.
	Add to that the confusion over COVID vaccines whose promises shifted from stopping infection to reducing symptoms and a pattern emerges.
	A scientific establishment that overpromised, under delivered and never apologised.
	Worse still, the moral hypocrisy of the mandates left scars that haven't healed.
	Tens of thousands of healthcare workers, the same people who were once hailed as heroes, lost their jobs for refusing a shot they didn't trust.
	In New York alone, 30,000 doctors, nurses and hospital staff were fired for refusing the COVID vaccine, despite many having natural immunity after working through the pandemic's worst days.
	Their livelihoods were destroyed in the name of public health while political leaders and pharmaceutical executives congratulated themselves for their compassion.
	What message does that send to those still inside the system?
	And who benefited from this confusion?
	Not the public.
	The pharmaceutical giants did.
	Pfizer Moderna and their investors made tens of billions while governments used their authority to compel citizens to comply.
	Even as efficacy dropped and side effects surfaced, the contracts and the profits kept rolling.
	Meanwhile, these same companies were legally protected from liability, indemnified by governments against vaccine injuries.
	When mistakes were made, it wasn't corporate money that paid for them, it was yours.
	The public has seen this movie before.
	Purdue Pharma and the Sacklers flooded America with opioids while claiming they were safe.
	Johnson ⁇ Johnson sold tout products later linked to cancer.
	Volkswagen faked data emissions data.
	Monsanto poisoned farmland.
	And yet we are told to trust the next miracle shot without question.
	This time under legal immunity.
	Is it any wonder that faith has evaporated?
	Then came the propaganda.
	The phrase, the pandemic of the unvaccinated, will live on as one of the most divisive and dishonest soundbites in modern history.
	It wasn't science, it was social engineering, a way to stigmatize dissent and enforce conformity.
	It turned neighbor against neighbor, colleague against colleague.
	If you want to read these articles in full, subscribe to our sub stack.
	Those essays are up there and you can support me there.
	That mindset hasn't disappeared, it's just evolved.
	Now anyone who questions mandates, masks or pharmaceutical influence is smeared as a crank.
	But after years of deceit and coercion, who exactly deserves our trust?
	Even the very concept of a health emergency now deserves scrutiny.
	Who defines what an emergency is and who benefits when one is declared?
	The same global health bodies and political elites that presided over censorship mandates and mass fear campaigns now want more power.
	The proposed WHO treaty would grant unelected international institutions the authority to decide whether a health crisis exists and to impose vaccines, lockdowns and restrictions across nations.
	They say it's about safety.
	But after the past four years, many see it for what it is.
	Centralization of control dressed as compassion.
	The NHS vaccine rebellion is not a quirk of statistics.
	It's a verdict.
	The people inside the system no longer believe in it.
	Their message is the same one millions of ordinary citizens feel but rarely voice.
	We were lied to, coerced and exploited.
	And now you ask us to trust you again?
	Science is supposed to question everything.
	Governments and corporations demanded the opposite.
	They demanded obedience.
	And now as the institutions that broke our trust try to rebuild it with fear, slogans and treaties, we must finally ask the only question that matters.
	Why should we trust them at all?
	Well at least hospitals aren't vaccinating people while they're unconscious.
	That would be a dreadful news the Affordable Care Act came out.
	We are now as nurses required to ask every single patient when they come to the hospital if you've had your flu vaccine or your pneumococcal vaccine.
	If you say no to either one of those, in the computer an order, we'll generate that says we need to give you this vaccine.
	We don't need to speak to a doctor.
	It's hospital policy.
	It's now health department policy that we now have to give you the vaccine.
	Even if you came to the hospital with a stubbed toe, you will be offered both vaccines if you meet requirements, which just about everybody meets requirements for flu vaccine.
	And most people over the age of 65 will need the pneumococcal vaccine.
	Even if you come to a hospital with a stubbed toe, you are going to be given this vaccine.
	You have the right to say no.
	If you say no, they just check it off as refused.
	This was never like this years ago.
	This is a new thing.
	And tell me what we were discussing before about surgery and your admission that you hadn't had these recent vaccines.
	Tell me about this protocol because I don't think that people, matter of fact, I know that there are many people that are not aware of this.
	When you go to the hospital, if you need surgery, you need a knee replacement surgery.
	First, they're going to ask you if you had the vaccine.
	You're going to say no.
	Then they're going to say, well, you need to sign this consent.
	If you're going to have vaccine, if you're going to have surgery, you need to sign a consent.
	In the consent, there's a word called biogenics.
	If you sign the consent saying, I consent for you to give me biogenics, that basically means that they can give you anything that they deem necessary, including vaccines.
	So if you say you didn't get a flu shot, it's flu season, and you sign the consent that says, I agree to biogenics, they will give you a vaccine even when you're under anesthesia because you already signed the consent.
	So you might not even know you received the vaccine.
	Correct.
	Unless you go and get your medical records, you will not know that you got a flu vaccine.
	They may tell you at the end, oh, by the way, you're now covered.
	You got the flu vaccine, but you got the pneumococcal vaccine.
	But two people now have reported to me last week saying that they got the vaccine, they did not want the vaccine.
	They didn't know that word biogenics meant that they're going to get a vaccine because vaccine falls under the title of biogenics.
	It's a new terminology that I myself just realized.
	In total, what this points to is a total crisis of faith, an understandable crisis of faith because we were told science was one thing, experimentation, clinical trials, conversation, deduction, honest debate, often polarizing, certainly opposing opinions and eventually through this process, truths, reliable truths.
	You only have to take a glance at the commercial products around those vaccines to see that you're not dealing with science.
	You're dealing with commodity.
	You only have to cast your mind back to the pandemic period to observe that you are not dealing with science.
	You're dealing with authoritarianism and the construction of a new orthodoxy.
	Orthodoxy may not be bad if it's aligned to orthopraxy, if it's aligned to the practice of principles that are undergirded deeply in the Holy One.
	But if God is the government now treating you like little children, then you're in a lot of trouble.
	The Catholic British writer GK Chesterton said, When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing.
	They then become capable of believing in anything.
	That is the point of crisis that we are living within now.
	We know we can't trust the government.
	We know we can't trust the media.
	We suspect we can't trust the judiciary, except thankfully there are jurors and they're human beings and they may be okay.
	Let me know, Lord.
	Let me know.
	What we have is a crisis of meaning, precisely because we have lost our connection to the Lord.
	And until that connection is reachieved and realigned, and until God is in his position of primacy, this kind of chaos will continue to ensue.
	But that's just what I think.
	Let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
	If you want to read the articles that we make this content from, we create them here in-house at Stayfree.
	You can support us on Substack and you can read them there whenever you want to.
	Check it out.
	Bill Gates is no doubt one of the great entrepreneurs and innovators of the modern age.
	But with him changing his mind about climate change, saying it's not that bad and we don't have to worry about it.
	Is it possible that Bill Gates is just another one in a long line of American billionaires that use philanthropy to control reality?
	When I think about Bill Gates outside of Microsoft and his brilliant entrepreneurialism, innovation and radical change of the way that people used software, I think about the following.
	He got involved in agriculture a bunch, didn't he?
	Did you know that?
	He got involved in African agriculture, Indian agriculture, seed patenting and the technologization of agriculture.
	He also cares a great deal about vaccines and getting people vaccinated.
	He also acquired an awful lot of farmland and he talks a great deal too about the environment and in particular climate change and carbon footprint.
	A little while ago in a puff piece softball interview with Anderson Cooper, he said that it was a bit rich him talking about carbon footprints when he flies around the world on a jet trying to help people to reduce their carbon footprint.
	But he mitigates it and reduces it with a number of measures including the plant in a trees.
	But now Bill Gates has changed his tune, which leaves us with a question, was he ever serious about climate change?
	Was climate change and the climate change agenda always about control?
	And how does Bill Gates compare to other American billionaires that had incredible influence socially, not just through the use of their wealth, but also through a concommittant political power that they use to change the shape and face of America?
	We'll be talking about the Rothschilds, Carnegie and Rockefeller.
	What is Bill Gates?
	What does he want?
	How does he vacillate between climate change and vaccines as if they're just interchangeable subjects rather than really quite vastly different ideas?
	Climate change is an ecological argument about the impact of human behavior on overall climate.
	And vaccines is about how we might intervene, intercede and improve human health through medicines, in particular vaccines.
	But one medicine for which there is legal indemnity for the manufacturers.
	Interesting choice.
	And has Bill Gates dropped his climate change language and rhetoric because there's a lot of competition in that marketplace?
	Because people are now starting to question the climate change narrative or because he's telling the truth.
	Let's have a look at Bill Gates, past and present, see how he fits into the lineage of the Rockefellers, the Carnegies and the Rothschilds and such, and see if by the end of it, we believe his position on climate change, vaccines, agriculture, or anything.
	Here are a series of headlines that explain how Bill Gates has changed his position.
	Bill Gates makes a stunning claim about climate change.
	It's not that bad.
	Bill Gates now says climate change won't be as serious as he fears and calls for more spending on vaccines instead.
	Funny in it, like the second one, is he now says climate change won't be as bad as he fears.
	But I've got this other idea that I want you to back.
	Another position could be, I was wrong about that.
	I'll shut up and leave you alone.
	No, it's like, I still want to be in charge with what happens with everything, but I want to direct your attention over here.
	Other headlines include, Bill Gates says climate change will not lead to humanity's demise.
	Bill Gates says climate change is not the end of the world.
	You know, when you see Trump say, like, you know, people talk about it's going to raise by a millimeter in a hundred years.
	Who cares?
	You know that the liberal media would say, oh, Trump's being glib and flippant.
	And maybe if you're talking about something as significant as we were told climate change was, that would be a flippant attitude.
	But how do you assess Trump's earlier glibness when Bill Gates now, the front man, the mick jagger of climate change, seems to be climbing down on his previous position?
	So here is Bill Gates on your television set saying that climate change is not as bad as he'd previously said it was and trying not to offend Greta Funberg or her name's of noise, isn't it?
	I can't remember how to say it.
	Climate is a super important problem.
	There's enough innovation here to avoid super bad outcomes.
	Small childish note.
	It says B.O. behind his head.
	And I bet he has it.
	won't achieve our best goal uh the 1.5 or even the two degrees and as we go about trying to minimize that i'm not interested in hearing him opine on the minutiae of climate change and the various degrees of fahrenheit and celsius which i still don't understand that are required for the planet to be stable in the way that bill gates wants when he's actually changing his position fundamentally That's the real story.
	Someone's gone on and on and on about climate change now saying, yeah, I'm not bothered about climate change anymore.
	It's not a big deal.
	We have to frame it in terms of overall human wealth.
	Unconscious use of the term frame there because when Bill Gates has meetings about how to talk on television and how to carry his message, they use words like frame there and overteen window and prioritizing and people's perception.
	And he's allowed it to enter his ordinary vocabulary.
	That's his backstage vocabulary, terms like frame.
	That shouldn't be front of house vocabulary.
	They're not just everything should be solely for climate.
	When the climate activists who have been very supportive of what you've done and you've been very supportive of what they've done read this, and if Greta Thunberg is reading this and saying to herself, He can't say it either.
	That's the problem.
	If you make your name a noise, then people won't be able to say it on the television or probably when you're in jail in Tel Aviv.
	My goodness, he seems like he is reversing himself.
	What would you tell her?
	I like that question.
	What he's saying is, Nep, Bill, what do you say to people that actually care about climate change?
	Like, Gweta Funberg, who, whatever you think of her, is a sincere and authentic person.
	Well, I tell them, you know, like, I have to make choices.
	I have to fly around in a jet while pretending to care about climate change.
	I have to tell other people to take vaccines, even when there's mounting evidence these vaccines are ineffective and maybe even injurious.
	Greta, you just focus on what you do really well, piercing from childhood into young womanhood in the public eye and yet staying peculiarly neutral as an individual.
	I'd say, wasn't the goal here to improve human lives?
	And shouldn't we, in our awareness of how little generosity there is to help measure, you know, should we get them a measles vaccine or should we do some climate-related activity?
	It's interesting because what you see when you watch Bill Gates is that he's a person who, in spite of his kind of nerdish, nebbish persona, is a megalomaniac who wants nothing short of the ability to absolutely control reality within the terms that he describes.
	Should we give him a measles vaccine or should we try and make it so that the ocean is this high rather than this high?
	Like a literal king canoe.
	You know, though, that Bill Gates could radically review his entire empire if he wanted to.
	Do you remember when he said he was going to give away his whole fortune?
	Do you remember that?
	They're always saying stuff like that.
	I'm not going to be rich anymore.
	I'm going to give everything away.
	Then you find out that what they're doing is putting their money into philanthropic causes in order to avoid taxation.
	Do you see that Bill Gates wants to totally control the manner in which he and we live and help others?
	Never inviting into the conversation things like, well, what if you just gave away all of your wealth?
	What if we decentralized government absolutely?
	What if we decentralized and deregulated media?
	What if we had local assemblies to determine everything?
	How about instead of you buying up farmland everywhere, as much as possible, food ought be resourced within the communities that it's determined to feed.
	If you're going to get into let's radically reorganize the world, let's start also considering options that aren't achingly convenient to Bill Gates.
	Bill Gates only ever proposes solutions that are beneficial to Bill Gates.
	That's the continuum.
	That's why something as seemingly grand as I don't care about climate change no more isn't a big deal because the actual rubric within which his discourse exists is what things can I do that allow and afford me more control.
	So one minute is vaccines, next minute is climate change.
	And if we could take, if we stop funding all vaccines and that saved you 0.1 degree, would that be a smart trade-off?
	That's the kind of question we have to ask.
	Why doesn't he think he's the only person that decides what the trade-offs are and what the options are and what the possibilities are?
	That's literal megalomania and narcissism.
	His reality is the only reality.
	Bill Gates could be consulting with experts like Vandana Shiva in India when it comes to agriculture and a variety of scientists when it comes to a subject like ecology and climate change.
	And some scientists might come up with solutions that are not beneficial to Bill Gates.

▲