WW3! IT WAS ALWAYS ABOUT THE MONEY - STAY FREE 374
Visit https://www.CHARLIS.beauty/Brand and use code “BRAND” for 20% offWake up everyday and choose freedom, order at https://1775coffee.com/BRANDWar, war and…. More war - 2024 has been full of warmongers thirsty for more war and its profits while pushing us all closer to a nuclear conflict and more death like Ukrainians dead toll! Here’s what you need to knowIn today’s special, we discuss the $95 billion bill for war, Russian TV calling for Nuclear war, US Politician calling to nuke Gaza, war with Iran, and Colonel Douglas MacGregor On Ukrainian deaths.Support this channel directly here: https://bit.ly/RussellBrand-SupportListen as a podcast: https://podfollow.com/1648125917Check out social medias and more: https://linktr.ee/RussellBrand
Hello you Awakening Wonders there on Spotify, Apple, Stink Whistle, Gurgle Dot, or wherever you download your podcasts these days to remain at least peripherally connected to some tendril of truth in a bewildering miasma of lies and propaganda.
We appreciate you, and we love you.
You're part of our community.
So that's why we're very happy to give you an audio version of our live Rumble Show five days a week.
It's on Monday to Friday.
We decipher the latest news stories, we break down current topics that the mainstream media should be covering, and if they aren't, Then we critique why they're not and what they are covering.
Every week as well, right?
We do brilliant conversations with people like Jordan Peterson, RFK, Tucker Carlson, Sam Harris, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate.
These things are already up and you can listen to them now.
So remember, this is an audio version of our daily live show.
To tune in live, go to rumble.com forward slash Russell Brand.
You'll find it easily and I hope that you will love it.
Now please enjoy this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand.
Thanks.
Thanks for joining us for this very special show today.
War, war and more war.
War with Russia by July.
Prepping for war across the UK.
Are we being groomed for war?
Well, there's significant evidence that we are.
When you look at some of the war stories and warmongering that's gone on in 2024, So far.
If you're watching this on YouTube, we'll be there for the first 15 minutes, but then we'll be exclusively on Rumble, our home where we stream freely.
Consider becoming an Awakened Wonder, because if you are, you get an exclusive video every week.
We talk about extraordinary stuff over there.
The CERN Hydra Collider.
Hydra Collider.
Hydra Collider.
We talk about that.
We talk about the Red Heifer Prophecy.
We talk about very unusual stuff, as well as doing our book club and meditating.
It's certainly Worth you joining us.
We've got all sorts of special offers over there.
But for now, let's focus on war.
The first war story that we want to bring you, and here are some of the things we'll be talking about, is the $95 billion war bill that you're footing.
Russian TV saying that nuclear war is an inevitability.
US politicians openly declaring that nuclear war would be a good idea.
The potential for Middle Eastern war to go nuclear and our special guest Colonel Douglas McGregor talking about the tragedy, the needless and senseless tragedy of ongoing Ukrainian death.
We'll be available with you on YouTube for another 50 minutes then, sweet lady freedom.
That breeds and swims freely upon rumble will be with us all.
Okay, let's have a look at the 95 billion dollar war bill that you are being asked to foot.
Do you think there's any possibility that that bill would be passed if it was voted for by the population?
Of America?
Do you think that they'd be able to get it through?
So in a sense, war, more than any issue, tells you that there is a deep disparity between the governing class, those that make the laws, and those that suffer under the yoke of unjust laws.
Let's have a look at this story now.
We know that the business of the establishment is war and business is booming.
The House has passed a $95 billion foreign war aid bill.
They have packed together a number of extremely complex issues.
It doesn't make sense to me, not a bit of sense, that escalate intentions In China, or certainly between the U.S.
and China, the escalating conflicts of the Middle East and the Ukraine-Russia conflict can all be effortlessly bundled together.
Nonetheless, that's what's happening.
The bill is passed.
After months of delays in GOP infighting, the U.S.
House voting Saturday to provide $95 billion to allies abroad, a major win for the White House and Speaker Mike Johnson.
In a rare move, Democrats crossing the aisle to help Republicans clear a series of foreign assistance bills.
The package would provide $61 billion to help Ukraine fight Russia, $26 billion for Israel, just days after Iran attacked the Jewish nation, and $8 billion for the Indo-Pacific, where the rise of China has national security experts worried.
A fourth bill bans TikTok if its Chinese owner doesn't divest.
What?
You've just added TikTok to that?
Yeah, we've added TikTok.
What?
What's that got to do with it?
Well, I'll tell you what it's got to do with it, is that TikTok is a site that is difficult to regulate for the authorities of the war establishment, the pro-war machine.
Remember, the deep state are spending money condemning and smearing dissenting voices, ensuring that they're regarded as pro-Putin
instead of anti-war.
Why is the TikTok ban bill tagged onto this $95 billion aid bill? Let me know, AwakendWonders.
Let's have a look at this extraordinary story and how it's evolving with some fantastic analysis
here. The resulting legislation will give congressional sanction to the Biden administration's
policy of global war.
The very fact that it will combine into a single whole the U.S.
interventions in three widely separated regions, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and the Far East, gives expression to a fundamental change in world politics.
The U.S.
ruling elite views its conflict with Russia, Iran, and China as interconnected theatres in the same struggle, the initial stages of a third world war.
American imperialism, the strongest military power but a declining economic power, is engaged in a last-ditch effort to maintain its global hegemony against any possible challenge.
Wow!
This bill itself could be seen as tacit acknowledgement that we are on the precipice of a world war.
What other connection is there between these three regionally disparate disputes?
Well, you could argue that the military-industrial complex benefits from all free disputes, whether it's by continuing to arm certain nations involved in wars, or whether it's Escalating tensions in other regions, but perhaps the mentality behind it is one of global war whilst acknowledging that as an economic power the United States is in decline, but as a military power they are still supreme.
And as the anti-TikTok bill indicates, by preparing to shut down an app used by 170 million people, in many cases to obtain information censored by the American corporate media, imperialist war is incompatible with democracy and freedom at home.
Stepped up domestic repression is a necessity for the ruling elite, both to silence outright political opposition and to impose on working people the enormous sacrifices, both economically and ultimately in human lives, that such a war will entail.
War against Russia, Iran and China means a war against the American working class.
That's a complex and interesting idea, but the economic implications of this escalating conflict will likely weigh heavy on particular sections of American society.
And you will not be divided by religion or culture or skin tone.
You will be divided by your economic class.
This is once again a crisis For ordinary people.
But an opportunity for the most powerful forces in the world.
Comparable to the pandemic.
Where for them, it's an opportunity.
Comparable to the 2008 crash.
For them, it's an opportunity.
For you, it's foreclosure.
Comparable to the 2001 terrorist attacks.
For you, it means that bills were created then that are still being passed.
Facilitating surveillance.
An unnecessary war in the Middle East causing millions of death and birthing new terror Not only into that region, but making it a domestic possibility in your homeland, in our homeland and across the world, creating yet more fear, yet more tension, yet more dread, yet more opportunity for the powerful.
The House passage of the war bill brought together the two capitalist parties, uniting them in support of an unlikely hero, House Speaker Mike Johnson.
This unity has been actualised on the central priority of the US financial aristocracy, global war.
War is necessary.
It's necessary.
Without war, they cannot perpetuate their systems of power.
They cannot perpetuate their dominance.
So it's not for humanitarian reasons.
We can't allow Putin's criminal invasion.
We simply have to support our allies in the Middle East.
We can't allow China to get away with this.
Now we begin to understand what this is really about.
The perpetuation of continued control, the subjugation of foreign powers, but significantly, the necessary defeat into constant supine states, the inhabitants of the United States, the American people.
House Democrats waved miniature Ukrainian flags as the roll call vote on the final passage of the funding of the Ukraine bill was carried out.
When it was completed, they began chants of Ukraine!
Ukraine!
And had to be admonished from the chair to quiet down.
The supposedly left Democrats, such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of the Democrat Socialists of America, DSA, and members of the Squad, There were only 21 members of Congress out of 431 that voted no against funding these perpetual wars.
Doesn't that astonish you?
431.
That's Democrats and Republicans combined.
And believe me, the Democrats and Republicans are combined.
Particularly if you tally it, as we have of course done, with unusual wells reporting on how many members of Congress will directly and personally financially benefit from this war.
How staggering, how astonishing.
Let's have a look at that moment of the members of your Congress, whose wages you pay, Chant, clap like braying fools and animals at the expenditure of your money on foreign soil.
They are shipping your tax dollars straight out of America.
Meanwhile, the border to the South remains unregulated, perhaps because cheap migrant labour further destabilises the domestic population.
It's win-win for them and it's lose-lose for everybody else.
[Cheering]
There they are.
That's your leaders.
That's your leaders.
That's the people that you voted for.
Those are the people that you pay for.
And they are very pro-war.
Saturday's votes demonstrate the most important reality about contemporary American politics.
There is no lesser evil in the 2024 electoral contest.
The lesser evil argument pretends to acknowledge the vast discontent with the Biden administration among millions of workers and youth while declaring that Trump would be still worse.
But the House actions over the weekend showed one party, not two, or rather two parties united for war, not only against Russia, but throughout the world.
The Democrats and Republicans agree on far more than they disagree.
They agree on war, on austerity, on bailouts for the rich, and as Chomsky said, Where both parties agree you have no choice at all.
The American working class must come forward to oppose the war on policies of the twin capitalist parties which threaten humanity with nuclear annihilation.
That would surely seem to be the most important subject now.
The potential for those braying maniacs and lunatics who are so happy to facilitate the expenditure of your labour, your work, your toil, your graft, your life, No one is benefiting.
No one.
It's a war for the elites, by the elites, funded by everybody else.
And that same political establishment has signed a bill Extending warrantless spying powers in your country?
It's going to affect all of us because that's the way it's set up.
And indeed, I would not be so reductive as to say all people in Congress, all people in the Senate, all members of Parliament, all politicians everywhere corrupt.
Get rid of them, because there are occasionally voices that resonate with you, aren't there?
You hear people talking in those rooms, in those halls and those chambers of corruption, that make you think, yeah, they for a minute stopped chanting and praying for an unwinnable war that could be solved diplomatically, so less Ukrainian people would die, so less Ukrainian cities would be destroyed, so less Israeli lives would be lost.
Peace!
Advocate for peace!
Oughtn't the power of the United States of America, particularly as it's powered by your lifeblood and your life's work, be advocating for peace?
Or shouldn't you at least be allowed to vote for it?
I'd stay out of it.
I'm English.
If you had a vote, a nationwide referenda, hey guys, we're just about to pass a 95 billion dollar bill, it's your country, it's your money, what do you want?
How do you think it would go?
The fact that there is no referendum tells you all you need to know.
They know what you Luckily occasionally a voice comes to the forefront like the voice of Rand Paul when it comes to the issue of Pfizer section 702 who speaks clearly, compassionately and eloquently on exactly the risks and indeed how the system works.
Delaying this vote until it's too late to do anything but obey and that's what they want you to do.
Obey.
They'll only give you information if that information makes you obey.
If that information is in alignment with their agenda.
Let's listen to Rand Paul.
The idea that we don't have time is a specious one.
The only reason we wouldn't have time is because the supporters of this bill delayed to the last hour.
We have five years to renew this.
We delayed it until we have four hours left, and then we're told we can't amend it because we don't have enough time.
That is a false argument.
The House is still here.
They're going to be voting tomorrow.
We should pass the good amendments today, send them to the House tomorrow.
This is an argument that has been forced upon us by the supporters of FISA, who want no debate, and they want no restrictions, they want no warrants, and they want nothing to protect the Americans.
They want to allow whatever goes, whatever happens, happens, and to hell with the American individual citizen and the Bill of Rights.
I say, don't listen to the people who don't want amendments and don't want debate, and let's pass this amendment.
On this vote, the yeas are 31, the nays are 61.
Under the previous order requiring 60 votes for the adoption of this amendment, the amendment is not agreed to.
These are the kind of truths that we need to discuss and that need to be conveyed.
I am against war.
Now that we're paying for these wars, we might as well enjoy them.
Why don't we take them up a gear?
Certainly there are calls to engage in nuclear war, not from lunatics and fringe figures, but from paid politicians, people in the Senate, people in Congress, actual career politicians are normalising the idea of nuclear conflict.
We won't be talking about that if you're watching this stream anywhere but Rumble.
So if you're watching on YouTube, click the link in the description.
Join us because we're going to be talking about that.
We're talking about Gaza, we're talking about endless escalation of tensions with Iran, and we're talking too about Colonel Douglas MacGregor's view on needless deaths in Ukraine, but elsewhere.
Click the link in the description.
See you over there.
Okay, let's have a look at this story now, where Russian TV is actually openly suggesting that war is a possibility.
Let's get into it.
Here's a significant piece of news for those of you that want to carry on being alive and not be blasted into ashes in an apocalyptic event.
Russia are seriously considering destroying the world because they're sick and tired of the NATO US imperialist threat.
Here they are saying that plainly and clearly and here it is in their own language.
If NATO countries send their troops to Ukraine to defeat Russia strategically,
then the moment will come, which Putin once said, "Why do we need peace if there is no Russia in it?"
Then everything will fly away from us.
I find that phrase rather chilling.
First they list the brand names of some of their artillery and then the news anchor explicitly
says certain American sites are already in our crosshairs.
At which point I start to think, well, at the moment, I don't live in the United States of America, which is doubtless the epicenter of imperial power.
Many of you will believe it's the greatest country in the world yet.
Certainly the Democratic experiment, or the Republican experiment, you know I don't care too much for those taxonomies, but the spirit of independence, the spirit of revolution, the spirit of independent freedom thrives there still, even though the Biden administration is trying to allay and subdue that under a fog of propaganda.
Let's have a look at the continuing and escalating threat from Russian media.
Right, France, you're out of the picture, you're going down.
The British Isles will simply go underwater.
Checks map.
Wait a minute!
I live in the British Isles!
What terrifies me about this is at the advent of this terrifying conflict and this escalation of hostilities, I, and I'm pretty far from an expert on geopolitical and military matters, said, hey, You don't treat Russia the same way as you would treat one of the Middle Eastern nations that there have been military-industrial complex wars in the last 20 years because, you know, Russia are a military superpower with a long successful military history.
If we continue to threaten them and engage them in some purgatorial Afghanistan-style nightmare, using Ukraine as a vassal state to drain the resources of Russia in order to establish a unipolar power on behalf of the United States, but more specifically their globalist, corporatist interests that have clear alliances with NGOs and three-letter, four-letter nightmares like the WHO and NATO, you're We'll ultimately arrive at a point where Putin will say there will be a nuclear war.
Now, remember when Biden some years ago was saying, we can't do that.
Help me.
Third World War, for Christ's sake.
Direct confrontation between NATO and Russia is World War III, something we must strive to prevent.
He was acknowledging it himself.
It was clear in the rhetoric.
Now, you know, too, that when the Nord Stream pipeline happened and he went, Russia aren't going to blow up that pipeline.
That's economically significant.
Their ability to convey shale gas to Germany is pivotal and fundamental to their entire economy.
What's more likely is that Navy SEALs or maybe some deep state Ukrainian or other NATO nation, yet to be, NATO nation, will have enacted this crime.
And remember, the Nord Stream Pipeline insurers won't pay out on that.
Sorry.
We don't cover you for sabotage acts conducted by Jocko Willink.
I'm not saying Jocko Willink did it.
I merely remember Jocko Willink, because when that was going down, Jocko Willink came on our show.
I said, Jocko, could the Navy SEALs have done this?
Sure.
Purely hypothetically, would it be possible for a special forces team to undertake the sabotage of a pipeline?
Yeah.
I mean, absolutely.
Like sort of like the Navy SEALs could have done it while sort of snacking, they could have done that.
We can't continue to make this content without the support of our sponsors.
Here's a message from one of them now.
Now before we get into that I would like to send a message of love to our sponsors at Charlize.
Charlize make this incredible product.
Now have you noticed that I'm looking incredibly young?
It's not just the tiny hat, it's my skin and my skin is looking good because of this range of extraordinary products.
Now I don't know if these products are going to be for you but they might be for someone you love and they make a perfect gift and there's 20% off this pack For the next... I think we can do it for 48 hours.
Is it 48 hours?
Can we do it for 48 hours?
If you use the code BRAND.
Now, there's a number of significant details about these extraordinary products.
First, they're absolutely toxin free, unlike a lot of cosmetics.
You know, like you use things to make you look younger.
It sinks poison, venom into your face, like some sort of oily little cobra, like some sort of Justin Trudeau moisturizer.
Looks good.
Actually toxic.
One of the components of this product that makes it extraordinary is citrus paradisi peel oil.
This is a beautiful organic ingredient and the very kind of thing that you would expect from Charlene, the founder of this company, who is on Joe Biden's hate list because of the stance she took during COVID.
Remember, you can use our code to get a discount on these products.
These products can do all manner of things.
Elevate your skincare routine using the unmatched power of nature.
Toxin free, baby.
So, say yes to natural goodness and show your skin its true potential.
I will say they tend to look better if you use them in conjunction with a tiny, tiny little mouse's hat.
So, take a stand, demand transparency, let beauty shine from the inside out.
Visit charlies.beauty forward slash brand and use the code brand for 20% off.
Discover a new era of personal care, one that's truly toxic free.
Stay radiant, stay conscious, stay beautiful.
There will be someone in your life that will love you For this glorious little concoction.
I'm calling it a basket of wonder.
There's a shower gel in there.
There's a restoring anti-aging serum.
There's all sorts of stuff in there.
I'm recommending it.
I'm endorsing it to you.
And Charlene, the founder of the company, she's a good, strong, damn fine American woman.
So what is most astonishing about the ongoing escalation of hostilities between NATO nations, Ukraine and Russia is that you and me, people that haven't had the privilege of a Harvard education, people that don't have access to Pentagon files, people that aren't on the inside of the deep state military industrial complex machine would say, If you keep provoking Russia, won't that lead to a nuclear war?
Well, guess what?
It looks like it actually might.
Unless there is an intervention.
Now does it astonish you, trouble you even, that you, as a subject or citizen or member of whatever nation you're watching this from, I have literally no say.
you're funding this escalation, you're funding the CIA bases in Ukraine, you're funding the
$95 billion aid package that enables Ukraine to continue what will ultimately, I would
assume, be a futile fight, either futile on the basis that Russia will ultimately win
a conflict if indeed it is between Ukraine and Russia, or if it continues to be supported
by proxy nations like the United Kingdom and the United States, it will escalate to the
point of nuclear war.
So wouldn't it have been a lot better?
Tell me how, tell me what I'm missing here.
Wouldn't it have been a lot better if the deal between Putin and Zelensky that was available
a couple of years ago, before 600,000 Ukrainian lives were lost, before billions of dollars
were spent, before numerous disasters, numerous cities, endless debris were incurred, that
a diplomatic solution was on the table?
No wonder they went into a meltdown and panic attack when Tucker Carlson spoke to Putin and we got to hear the information straight from the horse's mouth.
We're not naive to think that there's no such thing as Russian propaganda.
Of course there's such a thing as Russian propaganda.
There's probably even such a thing as Russian agents.
Lord alone knows there are CIA carve-outs that accuse me of being funded by Russia.
They've made that accusation.
They've made that content.
They've funded Ukrainian media, specifically Ukrainian Vox, to make the exact allegation.
You can check that out for yourself.
But what isn't propaganda is that Russia are a military superpower.
If you do not allow them to have their own trajectory, their own agenda, whether you agree with it or not, you are ultimately provoking a power that can wreak havoc.
This is not Iraq.
This is not Afghanistan.
This is not one of those rollover nations that the military-industrial complex can keep the Czechs coming in by provoking a nation that can't respond on their own terms.
In your nation since the Vietnam War, this whole Modality, this economic modality of the economy of war has been failing.
Even those that have pointed out that this is the economic model under which the United States succeeds or flourishes, and I don't mean American people, I'm talking about Julian Assange of course, who says the purpose of Afghanistan was not to end the conflict, it was to sustain the conflict, that way you can keep funding the war using public money, transferring it into private hands, keeping the whole racket going.
The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the United States, out of the tax bases of European countries, through Afghanistan, and back into the hands of a transnational security alliance.
i.e.
the goal is to have an endless war.
Or who was it?
Which one of your presidents was it that said simply, war is a racket?
Now Russia are capable of propaganda, there's no question of that.
All nations are capable of propaganda, misleading or framed information, narrativisation, call it what you will.
But do you want to take that chance?
Let me know in the comments.
And the very next thing this anchor says after saying the British Isles will be submerged underwater, it's the New Atlantis!
is this is not propaganda.
So whatever you think about that, the man himself there says it's not propaganda.
I believe that we should use the collective might of our nations to bring about diplomatic solutions rather than exacerbate potential armageddon.
So on one hand, you've got Russia normalizing nuclear war.
Well, as long as, like, some lunatic warmonger in the United States doesn't start calling for nuclear war, we could be able to avoid the terrifying Red Heifer prophecy.
Look at that exclusive video, Become an Awakened Wonder.
This is all falling into place.
Thank God we've got Lindsey Graham advocating for Armageddon.
Have a look at this.
Let's have a look at Lindsey Graham, a man who I don't think would do very well in a fight of any description, inviting... Maybe I'm missing some subtlety in the language.
Maybe there is some poetry to Lindsey Graham that I'm missing, but it does sound like he might be saying that Gaza should have a nuclear missile.
Exploded on it.
When we were faced with destruction as a nation after Pearl Harbor, fighting the Germans and the Japanese, we decided to end the war by bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki with nuclear weapons.
What do you think Lindsey Graham masturbates about?
Like, from the look of him.
I don't think it's very nice, do you?
Because he seems to be getting off here, for example, on the very idea of evoking a nuclear apocalypse that would decimate first the lives of the people of Gaza, but then the region more broadly, and given the fact that Tehran have nuclear weapons, would likely lead to the destruction of the entire planet.
Is that what turns you on, Lindsay?
That was the right decision.
I mean, is it like a boy named Sue thing?
Is it that?
Is it like a Johnny Cash thing?
Like if you call your son Lindsay?
Lindsay's a bit of a feminine name, but I'll tell you what's not feminine.
Killing kids.
Nothin' feminine about that.
Nothin' feminine about bringin' about Armageddon.
Nothin' feminine about my gray dead eyes.
Nothin' feminine about me starin' at a screen now.
Pluckin' away at my old banjo hamstring.
Pluckin' away at this dumb old piece of gammon between my thighs.
Lost there between the pudgy mound and my groin.
Nothin' feminine about that.
Nothin' feminine about that at all!
Give Israel the bombs they need to end the war they can't afford to lose.
Can I say this?
Why is it okay for America to drop two nuclear bombs?
Lindsey!
That wasn't all right!
We don't all look back and say, here's a thing that was all right.
It's called Nagasaki in Hiroshima.
That was a grave global error.
It was unnecessary.
There's evidence that it was unnecessary.
I think even at the time that, what was it called, Enola Gray and Little Boy, as those missiles On Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end their existential threat war.
Why was it okay for us to do that?
I think there was a sense then, look we've made this now and we're gonna have to use it,
I'm just too curious, I just gotta know what it's like. It's not necessary, we've got evidence that
it was not necessary. Once you start legitimizing the apocalypse, I figure it's over for our kind.
On Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end their existential threat war,
why was it okay for us to do that? I thought it was okay.
With the tapping of the pen, I think we got a further insight into what I was discussing.
Why was it okay before?
Why was it okay before?
Why was it okay for us to do that?
Why was it?
Why?
Why?
To Israel, do whatever you have to do to survive as a Jewish state.
Senator, again, military officials say technology has changed.
Let's have a look though.
Tehran have got Nuclear bombs.
Let's see what Bobby says.
Bobby Kennedy here says both should make strong condemnatory statements of that.
And here's some evidence that it was not strictly necessary.
Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped.
That's his statements from leadership that are still alive that have the inside scoop on that.
And if you're curious about other propaganda about other wars because, hey, there's a lot of it about seems that Russia are doing incredibly well in that war that they're having with Ukraine that you're paying for.
There's a new border offensive.
They're getting all sorts of territory.
Here's Greenwald on that.
He says Russia is advancing deeper.
It's long been obvious Ukraine can't win.
The only purpose of U.S.
financing is sending unwilling Ukrainian conscripts to the death.
Perhaps he's referring there to the fact that many conscripts are having their bank accounts frozen using new DIA technology, D-I-I-A technology, that you are also paying for, by the way, given that people don't want to fight in that war.
We're talking about Ukrainians.
Kind of looking unpopular.
He's enriching, says Greenwald, US arms dealers and enabling Michael McFaul's and David Frum's to feel tough and purposeful.
And I'm imagining Lindsey Graham's feeling tough, purposeful and possibly replete with a newly glazed belly.
The New York Times he's responding to there.
I'm not even going to read it because I've given enough time to their propaganda over the years.
Here's a fella, Dominic Cummings, he was a propagandist in our country for a previous incarnation of the current administration in our country, but he's sort of a populist figure and he's got some interesting observations on the subject of Zelensky.
This is not a replay of 1940, he says, with Zelensky as the Churchillian underdog.
We're getting **** right now.
That dude has got a way with words.
Anyone that's been following the news for the last, I don't know, couple of thousand years, maybe longer, last 5,000 years, would say that if there is going to be an apocalypse, it will begin in a very particular region of this world that somehow has prophecy and apocalyptic preaching built into its very history.
I'm talking about the Middle East.
That's why it's so disturbing to hear that nuclear war between Israel and Iran seems increasingly likely.
Let's have a look at that.
You'll be aware now that over the weekend there was an escalation of tensions in the Middle East, that Iran attacked Israel with a number of drone strikes.
What I've observed so far is this.
Once Israel attacked the Iranian consulate in Damascus, it was inevitable that there would be retaliatory measures.
It also seems to me to be clear there's been a long-term plan to involve Iran in an escalating conflict.
One person who seems particularly excited at the prospect is, of course, Lindsey Graham, and we'll get to him in a minute.
But remember, when Trump was said to have left office with those boxes that contained confidential presidential data, much of it, and perhaps the most controversial aspect of it, pertained to potential escalating conflict with Iran.
Of course, Iran attacking Israel is wrong.
As you probably know, when it comes to military matters, I admire deeply service personnel.
The tens of thousands of American service personnel situated all over the Middle East right now, who are now, because of this escalating conflict, incredibly vulnerable, have our support and our gratitude and our prayers.
But it seems clear that creating tension and even all-out war with Iran has been on the agenda for a little while.
I mean, when did you first hear about it?
Isn't it your man Donald Trump who claimed that the reason he took those boxes is because they contained information that demonstrated there was a long-term plan to engage Iran in military conflict and he wanted to have that?
In case he got tarnished with accusations.
Let's get into the details as best we can of this story.
And just note this, that while the project of the nation-state continues, whilst nations like France, I think, are calling for de-escalation and possibly the Netherlands, our country, the one I'm from, the United Kingdom, we obedient little snapper dogs that we are, yapping away at the heels of whoever the United States establishment condemned, Participated in the response, the Israeli response to these attacks and of course the United States have now engaged directly in conflict in support of Israel.
So now essentially the United States are in global war on at least two fronts. Of course the Ukraine-Russia
conflict remains a proxy war funded by you, US taxpayers, and us, UK
taxpayers, and now as well as supplying Israel with arms it seems that there is
direct military involvement and that it could yet escalate.
The thing that I find really extraordinary and difficult about this is that these events take place in like Jerusalem and Damascus.
Words that are redolent with spiritual awakening.
It's astonishing for me that this is the scene where all of this trauma takes place.
But those of you, and God knows there are enough of you that know scripture better than me, knew that this would always be the place where the apocalypse, the revelation, Armageddon, the final reckoning, Went down.
And those of you that have studied the origins of the First World War will be aware that extraordinary events that somehow seem disassociated and occasionally insignificant can escalate to the point where millions and millions and millions of lives are lost.
And are you being asked whether or not you want to get involved in an escalating conflict?
Let alone through your taxpayer dollars, potentially through your life or the life of your loved ones.
Let's have a look at this story now.
Biden condemns Iran's strike on Israel.
Case study in imperialist hypocrisy.
This is from a socialist website, guys.
But you'll notice, even if you're of the right, even if you out and out condemn socialism, just notice how many things you agree with.
And every time you do agree with some of this, you can give yourself a real pat on the back.
Because if you're not opposed, remember like I said in the Pfizer story, If you're not opposed to people on the other side of the divide, when it comes to culture or sort of lazy political labels, then you are part of a movement that could save the world.
Because you are potentially part of a decentralised model where people run their own communities.
According to their own values, according to their individual sovereignty and their participation in representative democratic processes at the localist possible level.
Let's get into it.
The imperialist powers have responded to Iran strikes on Israel on Saturday with an outpouring of condemnation.
I condemn these attacks in the strongest possible terms, says Biden.
America's ironclad commitment to the security of Israel has been reaffirmed.
That means that we back Israel.
The G7 group of imperialist powers said in a statement, we unequivocally condemn in the strongest terms Iran's direct unprecedented attack on Israel.
There's a brilliant bit of footage we'll show you in a minute of David Cameron, current British Foreign Secretary and former British Prime Minister, WEF member, globalist dude, straight up and down globalist all over the gaff, stocks and shares, all of that all day long saying, well this is unprecedented and the newscaster on mainstream news to her total credit goes, what would Britain do?
Well, it's almost like he didn't spot the question.
Well, we'd attack them.
We'd attack them hard.
Well, isn't that what Iran are doing?
Yeah, but this is... Yeah, but what they're doing, they're being a... Have you seen what they wear?
And how they talk?
I saw one in a curly slipper!
They wear different clothes than us!
Iran has further stepped towards the destabilisation of the region and risk provoking an uncontrollable regional escalation.
Like, there's a really amazing post from Iran that we saw, a Saga post on Breaking Point, where Iran go, look, you bombed our consular, we've droned you with some half-arsed lazy drones that took ages to get there that are a bit, like, not proper.
Now, let's draw a line under this.
And wouldn't it be sort of amazing if Israel, backed by the United States and the UK and these G7 nations went, all right, well, you know, even in the Old Testament, an eye for an eye, let's look for a diplomatic solution that doesn't lead us all into the jaws of death.
But...
One senses further retaliation might be on the way.
These statements by the imperialist warmongers, repeated by every major NATO power, are the height of hypocrisy.
Let's get the timeline accurate.
Iran's strike was a response to the April 1st attack by Israel and an Iranian embassy in Syria that killed seven top-level Iranian military officers, including two generals.
So that's kind of a military strike in the first instance, isn't it, wouldn't you say?
In response to Israel's flagrantly illegal and murderous attack on what was effectively Iranian soil, the imperialist powers effectively endorsed it.
Now the imperialists are falling over themselves to condemn Iran's response to Israel's action.
This is all the more striking given that Iran's action was largely symbolic.
The Iranian government announced Saturday's strike to countries in the region 72 hours in advance in an effort to limit the impact.
As Reuters reported Sunday, Iran gave wide notice days before Saturday's drone and missile attack on Israel, allowing mass casualties and rampant escalation to be averted.
Isn't it extraordinary that there are revenge attacks and retaliation, but also concurrent diplomacy?
And even as tensions escalate between, for example, the United States and China as part of a presuming escalating Cold War, what continues is trade.
What continues is business.
What continues is the necessary relationship with China for the manufacture of endless commodities in your country and mine.
What reality do we believe in?
The geopolitical military reality or the economic reality?
Because they don't make sense.
They seldom coalesce, at least not in patterns that I'm able to observe.
We can't make this show without our sponsors.
Here's a message from them.
Hey, this is exciting.
We've got a great partner today.
It's Rumble.
But beyond Rumble, it's Rumble's latest venture.
Let me ask you first, are you a Sleepy Joe type character with zero cognitive performance, struggling to muster focus and brain power for basic things like running the United States of America?
You've got to stop drinking woke, liberal coffee that hates you and your way of life and start your day by drinking Rumble's very own 1775 coffee.
This is going to be the best tasting coffee you've ever had.
Seriously good, ethically sourced, from a family farm in the high altitude mountains of Bolivia.
Not in the Bolivian lowlands run not by a family but by a single man still living with a pet.
No!
Instead of waking up and drinking your big corporation-owned woke ideology coffee that's probably making you sick from the pesticides it's sprayed with, try Rumbles.
1775 revolutionary coffee.
Support freedom of speech.
Build a parallel economy that actually values you and loves you.
My favourite?
It's dark, of course.
I've always found the lure of the dark irresistible.
I'm sorry, how can I stay mad at you?
You're just going to have to wait over there for a little while.
Level up your morning routine with a 1775 coffee.
Sleep all night knowing your hard-earned dollary dues are going towards supporting freedom-loving creators, like me, on Rumble.
Visit 1775coffee.com now, pick up your first bag, use the code BRAND to save 10% on your first order.
Oh, come on.
Why choose, you know?
Okay, back to the content.
The imperialist powers are asserting that they and their proxies can kill as many people as they want, carry out targeted assassinations and act in complete violation of anything resembling international law.
But any response, even of the most minimal character, is denounced as a crime.
This is the basic law of colonialism and imperialism.
Now what I like about this kind of language is it shows you that ultimately there are centralised power and then there's the rest of us.
There are extremists and lunatics throughout the world, across all cultures.
And do you not feel that there is the potential for those of us that believe in harmony, that those of us that acknowledge our individual flaws and our collective flaws as a species, but believe in the possibility of change, might possibly subvert the models of those that continue to colonialise and condemn and generate
conflict.
Remember Julian Assange, still in Belmarsh, still without trial, says
the function of government is to transfer public money into private hands.
Remember it was also Assange that told us that the Afghanistan war was not about resolution.
It was about perpetuation.
Are you not beginning to think that the same might be true of the Ukraine-Russia conflict?
If the Russian military is getting ever more powerful, the longer it continues?
If Ukrainian people are being devastated?
If it's making incredible profits for the military-industrial complex?
If it's making people afraid and fearful that we live on the precipice of apocalypse?
What reason is there to bring about a peaceful resolution?
When our aims and intentions are at odds with those that lead us, there is only one sensible solution, and that is revolution.
Peaceful revolution, always.
We've learned that from the great leaders of the past.
But revolution nonetheless.
While Biden condemns the actions of Iran, he does not extend the same language to Israel's onslaught against Gaza, which is being funded, armed and politically supported by the United States and other imperialist powers.
Israel is actively carrying out a genocide against the population of Gaza, already having killed at least 40,000 people.
It's systematically displacing, starving and bombing an entire population of 2.2 million people and methodically and deliberately murdering doctors and aid workers.
The genocide in Gaza is developing into a regional war which can very quickly draw in the entire globe.
It's pretty easy to see how this could escalate, isn't it?
Sections of the US political establishment are openly advocating a full-scale war, asserting that the Biden administration is not going far enough in supporting an Israeli war against Iran.
The Wall Street Journal wrote in an editorial, "The attack should at least cause Mr Biden and
his fellow Democrats to end their cold war with Israel over Gaza and recognize that this really
is a war against Iran." It continued, "Leaders in both parties should also start telling the
truth to Americans about the new world of global threats.
Russia, China, Iran, North Korea are all on the march working together." Now I'd like a little bit
more evidence before we embark on a war that involves Russia, massive nuclear superpower, China,
massive nuclear superpower, Iran, massive nuclear resource rich, not superpower but
significant nation, North Korea, nuclear power with, let's face it, somewhat up
for it.
Leader?
I mean, also, that's quite a lot of countries, isn't it?
So it's war.
The Israeli cabinet has been deliberating over the past day on what actions to take, and there are evidently divisions within the regime itself.
In any event, the Biden administration has reaffirmed that if Israel does take action, it will have full support.
So instead of saying, No, listen, let's chill this right out.
They're saying we'll support you whatever you want to do.
Even if you take the most open-hearted approach to this, people that are aggrieved and in a vengeful state need support and love and guidance.
And the same is true of nations.
Like, listen, this is terrible that there's been these drone strikes, but you did bomb that consulate.
Look, should we take the higher ground here, draw a bit of a line under this?
That would be the kind of counsel that I might be offering but apparently that's a position that France have taken as well so you know that's something.
Appearing on Meet the Press, White House spokesman John Kirby declared, whether and how the Israelis respond is going to be up to them.
Oh good.
Asked if Israel does decide to move forward with retaliatory strikes, will the U.S.
support Israel?
And Kirby said, drumroll please, the U.S.
support for Israel's self-defense will stay ironclad.
Ironclad.
Medieval.
Interesting image there.
The United States responded to the events on October 7 by launching a major military offensive throughout the Middle East.
Yeah, remember that?
When, after those abominable terrorist attacks by Hamas on Israel, the United States did get into some crazy stuff.
And as it says here, within days, the U.S.
surged in a marger of warships, which is a weird move, and hundreds of aircraft to the region, which is used to launch dozens of illegal airstrikes over the past six months.
Now, many people believe that that's an indication That there was always an intention to escalate conflict in that region prior to October the 7th, and that October the 7th was just a useful legitimisation of that agenda.
Remember, it appears that the US military machine, they call it the military-industrial complex, as we generally do, have had sights set on Iran for a significant amount of time.
That's at least how it seems, doesn't it?
The US offensive in the Middle East is a crucial element of an unfolding global war, with Russia and China as the main targets.
The subjugation of Iran, lying at the heart of Eurasia, is a critical component of the United States' drive for global military domination.
And does it benefit you?
Americans?
American taxpayers?
You're funding it!
Your loved ones are out there in the numbering tens of thousands on those warships, in those territories, Jordan, Syria, etc.
And are now especially vulnerable.
And in fact, let's go beyond that.
Because who among you would be surprised if there were terrorist attacks in the United Kingdom right now?
Or if there were retaliatory strikes in US cities right now?
Or further legitimisation of the New York subway being patrolled by the military because there are terrorist threats now?
Or who, that's been through that pandemic, would preclude the possibility that now what we're going to be told is there are going to be terrorist attacks on our... It's likely, isn't it?
Because the truth is, the United States is an unprecedented and still unparalleled global military superpower.
And that's the kind of power that you want only advocating for peace and diplomacy.
When they participate in regional disputes and fail to condemn the actions of their allies, they necessarily escalate tensions.
So wait for it!
Attacks in New York?
Attacks in Texas?
Attacks in the UK?
What do you think?
Let me know in the chat.
Do you think that's likely?
Whatever the immediate developments in coming days, the regional war throughout the Middle East, as part of an expanding global war, is spiraling dangerously out of control.
Yeah, the world stands much closer to nuclear conflict than any time since World War Two.
After the consulate was bombed in Damascus, the permanent mission of IR Iran to the UN in New York offered up this post, which you can see, at the time that we pulled it, had nearly 15 million views and this is interesting because I would say
because of the fusion of diplomatic, military and emotional language. Conducted on the strength
of article 51 of the UN chart pertaining to legitimate defense, Iran's military action was in
response to the Zionist regime's aggression against our diplomatic premises in Damascus. Okay, so that
was the attack that we've talked about already. The matter can be deemed concluded.
They're saying after these drone attacks, which are terrible, but I believe that as yet no one has died as a result of those attacks.
Now, you know, I don't think I would like to be subject to a drone attack.
That's certainly not my position, but it's certainly a good thing that no one has died.
Isn't it interesting?
The matter can be deemed concluded.
That's an attempt at reason, isn't it?
Even though it is an unreasonable act to bomb potentially civilian targets.
However, should the Israeli regime make another mistake, Iran's response will be considerably more severe.
It is a conflict between Iran and the rogue Israeli regime.
Of course, that's, you know, like, I guess that adjective there is a condemnation of
Israel and when we get into the subject of Israel's right to exist as a state from which
the US must stay away.
So almost a provocation there, one might say, of the United States baked into that as well.
But wouldn't it be miraculous, inconceivable almost, for the global military response to be, do you know what, let's calm this right down.
Don't you crave in your heart, somewhere, a global statesperson, some Gandhi, summonsed from some far-flung grave, that would on all our behalf say, we have to end this.
This can't continue.
We all see where this could go.
On behalf of the God in all of us and the God around us all, let us end this.
Let there be a cessation.
Let there be reason.
Let us recognise that so many of you have lost sons and daughters, so many of you are nursing broken hearts, that we must from somewhere find forgiveness within ourselves, not further limitless vendettas.
That is surely what we need as we stand on the brink not only of global Armageddon, of domestic attacks in all of our nations, while the onslaught in Gaza continues.
And it's one of those things that I'll be honest with you, I can't spend too much time thinking about it.
I've got children.
And like, you know, whenever you hear children die in wreckage, all of the... It's just, like, if you've got, like, I have a seven-year-old, a five-year-old, an eight-month-old child that's survived heart surgery, those kind of images are unbearable.
What you want is the voice from within us all, perhaps, if Gandhi ain't coming back, if Christ ain't coming back, even if Damascus and Jerusalem are at the very centre of all this, you need someone But he's going to bring love into the conversation.
But what we're getting is David Cameron.
All these countries that have somehow wondered, well, you know, what is the true nature of Iran?
It's there in black and white.
What would Britain do if a hostile nation flattened one of our consulates?
Well, we would take, you know, we would take the very strong action.
And Iran would say that that's what they did?
Well, what they did, as I said, was a massive attack.
So they were right to respond but they overreacted, is that what you're saying?
What I'm saying is that the attack they carried out was on a very large scale, much bigger than people accepted.
But did they have a right to respond?
No, look, I love a droning as much as the next person.
I've not met a war yet that I don't like and can't profit from in some way or another.
But you do not do that while wearing a turban.
Countries have a right to respond when they feel they've suffered an aggression.
Of course they do.
But look at the scale of that response.
Had those weapons not been shot down, there could have been thousands of casualties, including civilian casualties.
I think that's a really important point to take into account.
He's bringing up civilian casualties with what's going on in Gaza right now.
Whoa, that's heavy.
Our colleague and friend over here on Rumble, Glenn Greenwood, has been posting about this, as you might imagine.
And if you know Glenn's work, you'll be aware of how he has a great ability to summarise and convey these complex issues with journalistic and legal Integrity.
Let's have a look at some of Greenwald's posts on this.
Firstly, the U.S.
stays in endless wars, financing and fighting multiple wars at the same time, because those who wield the greatest power in D.C.
who fund both parties profit greatly from it, as does the permanent U.S.
security state.
The ones who don't benefit are ordinary Americans.
That's you watching this right now, are funding this.
No one is on your behalf saying, hey, hey, this has got to stop.
Like, literally none of them.
Are they?
Are they?
Does Donald Trump want to end it?
Does even Bobby, who I pray for, Bobby Kennedy, Will you end this?
Will you lend your advocacy and your voice to peace?
Will you, the view of the establishment, GOP, the grand old party, and much of the establishment,
Democrat party, say that this is the agenda, this is the global agenda according to Glenn
Greenwald.
Tell me if you agree with this.
Finance the war in Ukraine indefinitely.
Well, that seems to be the case.
Bomb Yemen, is that happening?
You know, I know it is, but is it continually happening?
Finance Israel's war in Gaza.
Okay.
Confront China with at least a Cold War, if not more.
That's what I referenced earlier.
Bomb Iran.
Okay.
So, endless war.
Is that what you want?
That's a couple of posts there from our man Glenn Greenwald.
I don't feel like Lindsey Graham's got the right attitude to global conflict.
I think we should stop asking him, but if you do ask Lindsey Graham what we should do, this is what he'll tell you.
They've been saying for six months now, hit Iran.
They have oil fields out in the open.
They have the Revolutionary Guard headquarters you can see from space.
Blow it off the map.
Yeah, blow it off the map.
What's it doing on a map?
It shouldn't even be on a map.
Wherever you stand on the complex Middle Eastern issues, when you hear the place names of Jerusalem and Damascus, there is a significant clue there.
That this is a time where we need to awaken.
It's extraordinary, isn't it, that some of the world's major faiths, Christianity, Judaism and Islam, have their spiritual homes in this region.
That they are born of this region.
That those words are redolent with peace, enlightenment and rapture.
And the potential for change, for an inborn light to be turned on within each of us, a personal connection with the Messiah available to us all.
What value does that have when we are led in the manner that we are?
When you have no control or purchase?
When you are nothing but a subject in your own nation?
When you're just pulled along by the great gravity of warmongering states that see you and your children, your bodies and your minds as just collateral to be spent in the endless pursuit of centralised power?
Wouldn't it be good if the Western nations, the United States, the G7, advocated on behalf of peace here?
Arrived in that region as bringers of peace and of, if not salvation, then certainly of reconciliation.
Because that is the only alternative to escalating conflict.
And whilst you might feel that what I'm saying sounds ridiculous and idealistic, that perhaps shows us how far we've come from who we're supposed to be, that the idea of peace and diplomacy An non-violent solution sounds ridiculous, while Lindsey Graham stroking himself into an ejaculatory frenzy over the possibility of more war is more likely to be the direction that great nations such as yours and mine and all of ours pursue.
I may wear the garb of a soldier, but do I genuinely think like one?
Have I experienced the horrors and duty that are commonplace to them?
Simple answer is no.
Here's Colonel Douglas MacGregor talking about the needless casualties and extraordinary expectations placed on the Ukrainian people who, when it comes to it, Might ultimately be serving the financial interests of powerful globalist corporations, in particular the military-industrial complex, puppeting the American people and the American government alike.
Let's have a look.
The demoralisation and social engineering are both fascinating aspects of this because it suggests that if there is a kind of entropy and decline within the American armed forces it is part of a deliberate process and it's interesting to speculate as to why an institution would deliberately undertake deleterious action against itself
and of course we will cover the domestic issues that are affecting your
nation I hope over the course of our conversation. I am interested in the escalation
of conflict across the globe and its apparent motivation.
After the Afghanistan conflict, it appears that very little has been achieved by America's involvement other than the two trillion dollars spent and what the eventual destination of much of that expenditure may have been.
Of course, obviously and notably, the military industrial complex companies like Raytheon and Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman who do, it appears, employ top military personnel who frequently appear on legacy media shows to endorse ongoing conflict.
I wonder is it your personal and obviously professional opinion that events in Ukraine are significantly different from the version that is commonly rendered through legacy media.
What is the significance of NATO impeachment on former Soviet territory?
What is the significance of CIA involvement in the 2014 coup?
How important is it that there are 10 or 12 CIA bases in Ukraine?
And indeed, how Involved are the United States military in a variety of ways, whether it's through special forces or military advisers, obviously the provision of armaments, diplomatic advice, and of course, through guiding and indeed sabotaging potential peace talks.
Is it clear that the United States has an agenda or the United States establishment have an agenda when it comes to Russia?
And is it essentially that the United States do not want regional superpowers like Russia or China?
Are the American people and the world at large being sold a kind of unipolar power project as variously humanitarian or in support of democracy or a variety of other smokescreens?
Well, in answer to the three or four hundred questions I would say the following.
You have several things happening on different levels.
On one level, you have a population in the United States That admittedly likes to think of itself as the center of the universe.
We're not very different from the British population before the outbreak of World War I. You know, the attitude was, we've got the men, we've got the guns, we've got the money too.
In other words, we're the richest, we're the strongest, and we can effectively impose our will.
It took Britain 50 years to destroy itself through two world wars.
I would even start earlier with the Boer War, probably.
But 50 years to destroy itself.
We've done this in the space of less than 30.
So we've turned out to be more efficient.
Perhaps that's part of the communications revolution that you mentioned earlier.
So we've got a problem.
Americans have been told repeatedly, we're the greatest.
You know, it's a sort of a terminal case of national narcissism.
That we're the greatest, we're God's gift to mankind, and so forth, and we have to bring liberty, justice, democracy, and the American way to everybody.
Most Americans are not interested in doing that at the point of a bayonet.
And originally, Americans thought of themselves as a people where if we're good, if we're successful, if we're prosperous, others will imitate us.
And that's a good thing.
Very few Americans ever thought in terms of we're going to use our military power to sort of export America.
And that hasn't worked worth a damn, obviously.
So that's one thing.
The second thing is that Americans are waking up to the reality that you mentioned.
In fact, somebody you should bring on and consider talking to is Nassim Taleb.
Nassim Tala wrote a book in which he describes in great detail this concept of the black swan.
The notion that you have black swans swimming around in the financial sector and it's only at some point the black swan shows up and destroys everything and you have a major crisis.
He tries to explain how this happens and how people ignore it.
His point is that the people at the top don't have skin in the game.
And you've got to keep in mind, nobody has skin in the game in Washington.
The only skin they're concerned about is themselves.
In other words, they're not going to be committed to anything overseas to fight for anybody under any circumstances.
Those are other people's children.
And after all, they were dumb enough to volunteer to do this, which is the attitude behind closed doors.
So they make everybody feel good by saying, well, thank you for your service.
And in reality, what they're saying is, thank God I don't have to be bothered doing this nonsense.
It's more like the plumber who comes to fix the toilet that won't flush.
You know, that's what you are.
Thank you so much for your service.
You're flushing the problem down the drain for us.
We appreciate it.
They're not really interested in it.
They don't care as long as the money flows.
And they don't care how the money is spent.
Now, why is this?
Well, part of it is the fact that we haven't faced anybody militarily that we could not easily dominate for a long, long time.
The last time we fought an organized enemy in the field, it was the Iraqi military.
And that military obviously was in no position to withstand us under any circumstances.
But you've got to go all the way back to the Korean War, where you saw an American army almost driven into the sea by a North Korean force.
We ended up in this thing called the Pusan Perimeter.
And then, of course, MacArthur comes out of mothballs and ultimately retrieves our chestnuts from the fire with Inchon and so forth.
But we almost went out of business as an army at that point.
We're very lucky that we survived.
We haven't had that kind of experience for a long time.
Instead, we've had an experience that says, well, here's a PowerPoint briefing, General.
These are the targets for today.
We're going to do X, Y, and Z, and the enemy sits there and waits for you to show up and exterminate him.
And this is not war.
So we are now in a different situation.
We're looking at Ukraine.
Russia, in the last two and a half years, has built up an enormously powerful and successful force.
This is battle-hardened, well-equipped, well-led, well-trained, highly disciplined.
The Ukrainian force has been annihilated.
They've lost over 600,000 dead on the battlefield.
There's nothing left.
The place is falling apart.
And most of the money you were talking about will never get there.
It's simply sent through the washing machine over to defense and then to the defense industries
and then the donations flow back to the Hill.
So it doesn't, you know, it's not a question that we're sending 60 billion and putting
it into Zelensky's hands now.
Now Zelensky and his friends will profit, no doubt about it.
Let's not kid ourselves, they'll get some of it.
How much?
Who knows?
I mean, this is the most corrupt country in the world.
This is a country that has missing children probably at this point in the hundreds of thousands.
Prostitution out of control.
I mean, you're talking about criminality on a scale that we in the West can't even begin to imagine.
It's a tragedy.
It's the worst of all possible outcomes.
The Ukrainian nation has been destroyed.
Why?
Because it's mortgaged to our vanity in the West.
Russia must be taught a lesson.
Russia must be destroyed.
Putin must be removed.
Really?
Why?
Well, because we've decided that we want to strip Russia of its resources.
So we turned Ukraine into a battering ram, designed to stab Russia in the heart.
The Russians woke up, not completely, but at the last minute and decided, well, we probably should intervene here and stop what's happening and signal just how serious this is in our estimation.
So they did, and they found out it's much worse.
Than we thought.
The force is much larger, much better trained.
It has much more equipment.
This is a far more serious problem.
And as a result, they had to step back, establish a defense, build up their forces, and now they're moving.
And they're going to finish the job.
Finish the job means everything from Odessa up to Kharkov is back in Russian hands.
And those areas are originally Russian anyway, as has been pointed out.
Your question is, what happens to the rest of the country that is west of the Dnieper River, this rump Ukraine?
And I think it's going to become a giant demilitarized zone, a DMZ, similar to what we have between North and South Korea.
There will be nothing there.
There won't be any fighting forces of any kind.
And the Ukrainians can live there and they may have some form of administration, but they're not going to be permitted to ever again present a direct threat to Russia.
You pointed to the CIA stations and laboratories inside Ukraine.
The Russians have overrun those.
They know what's there.
They know what we've been trying to do.
They know that we've been experimenting biologically with various weapons that could be used against them.
This is insanity.
And it was never necessary.
No one in the United States supported that.
No one in the United States was consulted.
So what do they do?
They lie.
They create a narrative.
Russia is a rambunctious nation.
Russia is the Soviet Union reborn.
We must stop it and defend democracy.
That's all crap.
That's nothing to do with any of it.
And of course, Kiev is not a democratic state.
Zelensky is not a democratic leader.
He makes Stalin look good.
So he's going to go out of business.
He's going to vanish here over the next 30 to 60 days.
Whether he succumbs to whatever the Ukrainians decide to do with him on the ground, I don't know.
I'm sure that his foreign mercenaries that are surrounding him, special ops types from the United States and Britain and other countries, will do everything they can to keep him alive.
But at some point, even they may abandon him.
But the narrative persists because the media is an arm of the government.
This is very similar to what Noam Chomsky wrote about during Vietnam.
Manufactured consent creates the illusion that this is something we all want.
No, we didn't want it.
We didn't ask anybody to open the borders.
We did not ask for millions of people that we don't know and know nothing about to come into the United States.
And what do we do with millions of people who can't find work, especially if we go into the serious financial crisis that every sane person on the planet is predicting is coming?
Thank you for joining us for our World War 3 World War Forevermore Armageddon special.
Next time we'll be back with Conspiracy Theory to Conspiracy Fact.
Once again we'll be showing you how you were right to question what the legacy media told you and how yesterday's conspiracy theories are today's you best start prepping because this stuff's a happening.
Thanks all of you for joining us.
Remember consider becoming an Awakened Wonder and gaining access to all of our additional content.
We'll be back next time With Conspiracy Theory to Conspiracy Fact.
