SUPER TUESDAY Build-Up + Dems MELTDOWN At Trump Supreme Court Ruling - Stay Free #318
|
Time
Text
Ben.
Hey, Ben.
In this video, you're going to see the future.
Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand on this finest of Super Tuesdays.
Ah, it's probably my finest and most favourite Super Tuesday ever.
Don't you look forward to Super Tuesday every year?
Do the old Super Tuesday traditions and Super Tuesday dances.
Will you be doing them?
Which she go?
Will you be doing them?
The real mix.
I'm chatting to all of our friends now.
In the rumble chat, a place where free speech is liberally deployed.
If you want diversity of opinion, get yourself into the rumble chat where you'll hear some pretty ferociously opposing views expressed in real time, as well as that most valid and important component of contemporary life, love.
And I'm talking to you, A Miller 1214, and you, Chip Henson, all of you guys, because I tell you what, it's going to be a beautiful day as well for you, the Awakened Wonders in our locals chat, like Heel, Love, Light, and Ashella, and Fearless Jay, because there's so much to talk about today, isn't there?
Not only Super Tuesday, and we'll be keeping you abreast of developments, although we're expecting them to be a little later.
I'm here in the UK, wide awake, ahead of it all.
People in Alabama, they'll still be sleeping.
Will they ever stir?
One might ask.
Later we'll be talking about Canada's Liberal government advancing online harm censorship bills that's extraordinarily authoritarian.
We're going to be asking you just how Nancy Pelosi will be profiting further from her astonishing and incredible investments.
We'll be talking about the Supreme Court verdict and also the way that the legacy media is responding to this and their willingness To attack institutions in a way that seems at odds with their position, for example, when it comes to an event like January 6th, when the Capitol is sacred.
It's like the Taj Mahal of democracy.
It's like the Basilica of democracy.
But the Supreme Court, the minute they're not compliant, compliant?
Look at them old duffers dressed in black robes, them idiots.
Poor, they're farting in there!
They're too old!
If you're watching us on YouTube for about 15 minutes or so, we will be with you streaming, but eventually we will have to slip into that free stream that we know as Rumble, our home that have got their own cloud these days.
What an incredible advantage that's going to be for all of you.
We'll post a link for that as a matter of fact, because it's got to be beneficial, hasn't it?
To break out of the Google grip that is currently around your throat in the form of censorship.
Hey!
Guess how long it's taken U.S.
health authorities to get to where you were three years ago.
Check this out.
If you get COVID, simply treat it like a cold.
They're up!
They nerded it!
Now, Jake Tapper seems to be very excited about something.
He's talking about the Supreme Court's decision with Nikki Haley.
I don't know if it's the Supreme Court or Nikki Haley that's got him excited.
Why don't you let me know in the rumble chat, you guys?
Explanation was not they didn't like Donald Trump.
They said he participated in an erection.
What?
Jake, what do you mean by that?
Is that a slip of the tongue?
Is that Freudian?
Let's go back.
Let's watch that again.
Erection.
And I have erection.
Erection.
And I have to... Jake, you're out of control, man.
Explanation was not.
They didn't like Donald Trump.
They said he participated.
Well, I guess how Nikki Haley's just like, oh, no, he's said erection.
Even he likes Donald Trump.
I'm just going to have to sit here while CNN Show me undue credit and credibility because I'm their preferred candidate.
Let's let Jack- Jake Tapper run himself out.
Climax.
take this erection to its natural conclusion.
...in an erection, and I have to...
an insurrection, sorry, an insurrection...
Do you know why I think he did that?
It's because on some level he knows it wasn't really an insurrection, because in an insurrection, people are fully armed,
there are armed battles, revolutions...
You've had a revolution in your company.
It's not like people in baseball caps wandering around like minding the velvet ropes and being perfectly, broadly speaking, well behaved.
Although I acknowledge there were some very sad events on that day, not least the death of that woman who was I think shot by the capital police.
Come on Jake.
And I have to say, I got up at 5 this morning to do Casey Hunt's show, and I'm exhausted.
Well, that could have gone a lot worse, given that she was called, or he's called, Casey Hunt.
Good job you didn't make a similar error there, or you'd be in a lot of trouble, Jake!
Okay, RFK though, interesting.
Tell me how you feel about this.
RFK is coming on our show soon, so get your questions ready for Bobby Kennedy, because I know a lot of you are concerned about his position on Israel, but many of you think that RFK is the best chance any of us have.
Let's see what he had to say about the Supreme Court ruling.
Let's have a look at what he says.
This is the correct outcome.
I want to win a fair election, not one in which my competitors are removed through legal maneuvers.
Pretty impressive perspective on that, I would say.
I suppose it's interesting to note that generally speaking there's been a lot of panic and even perhaps hysteria around the Supreme Court verdict.
Let's have a look at various legacy media Outlets panicking before for the rest of you because I know most of you are American and you're politically well informed you know exactly what Super Tuesday means but we're gonna look at Al Jazeera's coverage of Super Tuesday the importance of Super Tuesday and like you'll see figures like Al Gore and George W Bush and in the sort of current
In the current condition that American democracy is in, a lot of these people look like matinee idols and democratic icons.
Let's have a look now at the left media panicking about the Supreme Court.
Note again that when an institution doesn't do what they want it to do, they really don't like it.
We've learned that it was a nine to nothing decision ruling that Donald Trump can be on the ballot in Colorado.
Unanimous, unanimous decision.
That's like the judiciary doing what it ought to do.
It ought be objective.
Elections ought to be solved electorally.
Democracy should mean the will of the people expressed through the ballot box, hopefully with a variety of options, a variety of diverse opinions, the ability to challenge these institutions.
Isn't that what In other states, I'm not confident that that will produce a result that's good for American democracy.
This is actually what I had been concerned about.
I had been concerned that should it go to the Supreme Court, they would rule this way.
I'd laugh if it weren't so sad.
Panicking, they're flapping, they're hysterical.
Even my dogs are finding the entire situation hysterical.
But we demand democracy.
We demand it now.
We demand that either these institutions are revered or they are attacked.
You can't have it that when January 6th is subject to a little bit of protest, it's hysterical, it's ridiculous, it's utilised to create yet more draconian measures.
And when some judges, you know, do their job, it's regarded as somehow anti-democratic.
What do you think?
Do you think that these institutions have been When I see that Supreme Court, I think they're absolutely adorable.
Bunch of lovely grandparents.
It's like a grandparent graduation, isn't it?
Still an oath-breaking insurrectionist.
Do you have confidence in the Supreme Court?
Do you think this court is partisan?
The court itself may have overstepped.
When I see that Supreme Court, I think they're an absolutely adorable bunch of lovely
grandparents.
It's like a grandparent graduation, isn't it?
Have you ever seen anything more lovely than those sort of lovely nine elderly folks
sat there in schmocks presiding over a judicial international scenario?
Stopped.
The court went way further than it needed to go.
Our colleague Melissa Murray has called this Supreme Court the YOLO Court.
What does that mean again, YOLO?
You only live once.
You live for a bloody long time looking at them.
Let's have a look at a breakdown of a Super Tuesday.
Remember, we've got a lot to bring you over the course of the day.
We're going to be talking about Nancy Pelosi's trades.
Can I have a look at that question just briefly?
Can someone pull that up for me?
Can you guys do it?
We asked you earlier about how much Nancy Pelosi has been earning.
How much has she earned?
How much more times her actual salary did Nancy Pelosi make in the last 103 days?
Was it 3 times?
10 times?
Or what's C?
Nothing, don't be silly.
Politicians don't exploit their insights for personal financial gain.
If you can get the correct answer right now in the Rumble Chat or the Awaken Wonder Chat, we'll give away a couple of mugs to you guys in the Rumble Chat, a couple of mugs to you guys in the Awaken Wonder Chat over there on Locals, because let's face it, we're all regarded as mugs by these institutions.
Let's see how we'll be revealing the answer, by the way, once we're exclusively in the stream on Rumble.
So we'll, yeah, we'll capture that stuff a hundred times.
Oh, you think that Nancy and Paul Pelosi can gamble that succinctly and successfully, huh?
Let's have a look at how Al Jazeera describe Super Tuesday before getting into precisely What Rachel Maddow thinks should be the sensible course for anyone interested in true democracy.
This is going to astonish you.
But first of all, just so we understand what's happening today in, for example, well, Virginia, North Carolina, and Iowa, Massachusetts and Minnesota where people have
begun polling, people have begun voting. Before all of that, yeah nice one Steve
McGraw, nice, good, some good answers coming up in the Rumble chat right now.
This first, let's get a little bit of a breakdown on Super Tuesday with a
little bit of nostalgia in there as well. In polling places across the US,
Super Tuesday is the great decider. The biggest date on the presidential
primary calendar with 15 states awarding a third of all delegates often clears a
path to the White House.
Super Tuesday has sealed the party's nomination for Democrats Bill Clinton, Al Gore... I will fight for you.
Al Gore's pretty handsome, I would say.
I don't remember Al Gore being that handsome.
...and John Kerry.
Is that Jet Boy John Kerry?
Is it John Kerry there?
I don't have... Listen, I think it's pretty silly that at this environmental conference you're bringing up the subject of jets.
Do you have a jet?
No.
I don't have a jet, actually.
No.
Does your wife have a jet?
My wife?
Yeah, that lady I'm married to, she's got a jet.
And Nancy Pelosi, what does your husband do?
He might invest in stocks and shares occasionally, but I'm telling you now, I do not use the information that I get from working inside Congress to inform Paul.
Most of the time he's distracted.
He's too busy being burgled or drunk driving.
And it's made standard-bearers of Republicans George H.W.
Bush and his son, George W. Bush.
I've had a proud record of working with both Republicans and Democrats, which is what our nation needs.
This time, the results are expected to help President Joe Biden emerge as the Democrat.
In them days, politicians, that gorgeous bunch of sort of like matinee idols, movie stars, they all say, look at them, they come tottering out, don't they?
Dear old Joe Biden, poor sod.
That's presumptive nominee and former President Donald Trump to surge ahead with an unsurmountable lead for the Republicans.
For the losers, the polling booths of Super Tuesday states are often where hope goes to die.
Right, so by the end of this, this could be the end of Nikki Haley.
She could be just left looking at Jake Tapper and, well, you know what he's got to offer.
Like a Waterloo for losing candidates.
If you don't do well on Super Tuesday in both parties' processes, you have a really steep hill to climb.
Despite what she said...
I'm not giving up this fight.
For Republican Nikki Haley, analysts say a big loss on Super Tuesday could mark the end of the trail.
Some voters say they're focusing on personalities.
I'm voting for anyone whose name isn't Donald Trump.
Why?
Because I believe in humanism, fairness, compassion.
None of those traits I believe he possesses.
Others on issues.
I think there's a lot of our infrastructure that needs to be dealt with.
We need to spend money at home as well.
But I think if Ukraine falls, then Russia is in a very good position to come against us.
There you go, the old propaganda is working.
So listen, let's have a look at Rachel Maddow's MSNBC legacy media perspective on the Supreme Court events.
Now what's, I think, fascinating here Ultimately what she does is demand that you pick one.
And she does mean pick one as well because she means vote for Joe Biden.
Don't worry about the global wars.
Don't worry that in many instances there is not a significant point of difference between Biden's policies and the policies of Trump that they vehemently condemn.
Don't worry that many people have deep concerns.
The 100,000 uncommitted in that recent primary.
Where was that recent primary?
Was that Michigan that one?
Clearly even their own voter base is losing faith in Joe Biden and the only card they have left is a loathing of Trump.
That's why I think it's very significant what Joe Rogan said recently that we have to consider some new perspectives.
I'm talking of course of the moment where Joe Rogan said We need a resurrected Christ to return to American political life.
Rachel Maddow, though, is pretty certain that there will be no magic.
That there will be no magic beans.
She actually lists every conceivable magic entity and tells us that magic is not coming.
Let's have a look.
But I will just leave you with this.
There's no magic spell.
There's no solution that is going to come, say, from the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court did the favor of reminding us all of that today when they ruled that Trump will stay on the ballot all over the country.
They gave us that reminder today after last week they made sure we knew it in the first place.
There's no substantial difference between Biden and Trump.
They both support your release.
That's a pretty amazing post to read there in the rumble chat.
Someone inexplicably took action to delay all the Trump criminal trials.
The word Trump and crime has been compressed in the mind of Rachel Maddow till it becomes a kind of portmanteau, the condemnation almost automatic at this point.
It's not magic that people are demanding.
It's meaningful policies.
It's meaningful change.
It's an end to global war.
It's a port for a significant infrastructure.
Except the one they couldn't stop.
Until after the election.
There's no magic wand coming to stop this thing.
There's no... All of the magic things get listed now.
You know, magic beans that you can grow here.
Magical mouse.
Like a mouse with a magical hat.
Magic mouse.
That makes some beanstalk.
Take us away from all of this.
There's only one way out of this.
Pick one.
The Democratic Party has picked its nominee.
Yes, it's an old guy who is doing practical, normal, and popular things as president and who has a lot to show for it, particularly in terms of how well things are going economically since he has been at the helm.
Is that how you see things?
Let me know in the chat.
Do you think things are going well under Joe Biden?
Are you thrilled right now?
Are you just longing to get out there and endorse this presidency and the forever wars and the ineptitude and the broken promises and the distraction and the pandemic era and the evident and obvious wealth transfer that ...was perpetuated and continued under this administration.
Is this what you think the solution is?
Do you not think that there could be a greater vision presented?
Is there not something calling to you deeply?
Is there not a solution that seems beyond the reach of this institution?
The Republican Party is pretty obviously picking their guy as well.
Also an old guy who, for example, cannot say the word Venezuela.
It's pretty disappointing when they resort to condemning and criticizing mispronunciation when they've been so remiss in pointing out the evident ineptitude and limitations of the current incumbent because it makes it seem so much like propaganda.
And in their willingness to criticize the Supreme Court, you recognize that they don't even support the institutions that they claim are sacred when it's convenient to them.
You can't invade the Capitol.
That's where we do our corruption.
You can't just say fake news about legacy media.
We wear ties.
Joe Rogan, what the hell are you talking about?
They're just as willing to be glib and critical of institutions when those institutions cannot be weaponized in order to serve their agenda.
It seems, at least to me.
Do you agree?
...and who has no idea who is the current president of the United States.
Currently riding high on his party's abortion bans and measles-curious, virological denialist free associating, he's... Dear, I don't know if MSNBC and in particular the figure of Rachel Maddow have been particularly reliable on the subject of medications.
In fact, I can remember some medications being pretty vociferously endorsed that turned out to be not as reliable as we were first told.
Told!
We'll get into that in more detail.
I want to remind you that the question we're asking you in order to win this most glorious of trophies is how much did Nancy Pelosi make from trading in the last 10 months?
Was it three times?
Ten times more than her salary?
Let's have a little look at that question again if we could.
And while you ponder that question and come up with answers in the rumble chat, we'll tell you the answer on the other side.
Now I've got a few things to tell you.
Are you worried about white lung syndrome?
Are you?
Are you worried about them little things that are appearing?
Them little blood clots?
Do you know that 90% of pharmaceuticals in your country, the United States of America, are produced outside of your country?
What happens if there's another global crisis?
And you know they love a global crisis these days!
People will stockpile drugs, there will be empty shelves in your pharmaceutical and convenience stores.
Well, that's why our partners, The Wellness Company's Medical Emergency Kit, has got you covered for such times.
The Wellness Company is home to Dr. Peter McCullough, you know that dude, and Dr. Drew Pinsky.
They've both been on the show.
They're both legit dudes.
That's an endorsement I'm offering.
40% of Americans say they would avoid A doctor or hospital, unless it was a catastrophic situation, the wellness company's medical emergency kit provides a solution.
Eight potentially life-saving medications, emergency antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, that can be useful against white lung or indeed COVID.
So if you want to get this medical emergency kit, simply go to TWChealth forward slash brand and grab your medical emergency kit Right now, that's twc.health forward slash brand.
Use that code because then they'll know it was us that sent you, makes us look good.
Plus you get 10% off.
Don't wait till it's too late.
Take control of your health with the Wellness Company's Medical Emergency Kit.
Now remember, I'm asking you how many more times than our actual salary, in order to get this glorious mug, did Nancy Pelosi make this call?
And how did she do it?
And how did that... Was it called the chips bill?
What was it called?
The...
The CHIPS Act.
Oh, wait till you learn about this CHIPS Act.
Also, we've got some fantastic insights coming your way on Canada's new online censorship laws and how it affects January 6th.
Are you doing the countdown now, guys?
This countdown should be started by now.
I can't see it.
Thank you very much.
Yeah.
Like, we've got so much more.
We'll be answering that question.
We'll be telling you about the online harms bill in Canada, how it relates to January 6th, and a raft of global censorship laws.
In addition to that, we're going to look at some of Gavin Newsom's astonishing donations.
That's what we're going to look at.
And indeed, continuing the theme, That it appears that the Democrat Party hysteria does not relate to reality.
If you're watching this YouTube now, click the link in the description.
Get over to Rumble because we're going to talk more freely about this stuff.
See you in a second.
Okay, you lot.
Let's carry on.
Let's carry on.
I think we've finished with the... We've made our point about Rachel Maddow, I would say, haven't we?
This is pretty interesting.
Another point of difference that We cannot really freely inhabit is the fact that Joe Biden's administration are advocating for ongoing war in several territories.
This is an interesting tweet from Max Blumenthal.
In fact, guys, set up my stream deck for that.
Cheers.
Check it out.
Nothing brings hope to Gaza like another US shipment of 2000 pound bombs to Israel.
Now, this, I suppose, is a response to the U.S.
Embassy reveling in pride around humanitarian aid that has been issued in Gaza, they claim.
Although some have observed that the issue of this aid has been somewhat clumsy and many might point out that to offer aid while simultaneously sending Significant artillery.
It says here in Blumenthal's post, 2,000 pound bombs have been sent there.
Let's have a look at the airdrop to Gaza and see if it's the kind of humanitarian aid that
we think will be beneficial.
It's a pretty dystopic image, I would say, the descent of these parachutes of aid,
some falling into the sea while simultaneously the arming and killing continues.
It's an indication of a kind of moral blur, I might suggest, and certainly not the kind of policy that inspires enthusiasm and optimism in the American administration and current president that's in a position of significant power
and could be advocating for peace there as well as in the other global
Conflicts that are being facilitated and funded only by your tax dollars
Shame in 7-eleven. Yeah, I feel you shame in 7-eleven and you space cat
Thanks guys for supporting us there in the awakened wonder chat. I'm seeing a lot of answers to the inquiries
We've been offering Regarding dear Nancy Pelosi, we'll announce the people that
have won The answer is, of course, Nancy Pelosi has earned 10 times.
Nancy Pelosi's NVDA Nvidia calls have made over 100%, clicking 103% currently.
It's an unusual Wales post.
She's made Now, over $2 million from her position in 103 days.
She's made nearly 10 times her salary in 103 days.
That's, I would say, perhaps the most interesting thing about her.
The winners are on the screen now, are they?
Yeah, on Locals, Zypher2000, we're sending you one of these mugs.
On Rumble, Pontus Larsson, you can have one of these mugs.
It is, of course, ten times her actual salary.
That's the democracy, and indeed the party, that Rachel Maddow wants you to be giddily enthusiastic about.
Here's some information on how Nancy Pelosi may have been able to invest so prudently. Nancy Pelosi's husband, $1 million
richer thanks to NVIDIA options, but missed out on earlier $12.5 million profit. The Speaker
Emerita insists that she does not share information on government contracts and initiatives
with her husband before making stock and options trades. And yet Pelosi disclosed buying NVIDIA
shares before the government passed the CHIPS Act in July.
The CHIPS Act saw $52 billion in grants for semiconductor manufacturing and research in the US.
Pelosi also travelled to Taiwan in support of semiconductor spending by the US government.
But all of these things you are invited to consider as a kind of giddy coincidence.
Now we're going to be talking in a minute about Gavin Newsom's mysterious... It seems that he's been getting donations from an old high school friend and it's led to there being in California's minimum wage laws this odd clause where if you make bread at home you're exempted from the minimum wage.
We'll be talking about that in a minute but first we're going to be taking another one of those great utopias of liberalism, Canada.
Now, Canada's government has just advanced an online harms censorship bill that appears to be, at first glance, somewhat authoritarian.
Indeed, it says that online harms could be punishable with life imprisonment.
Just consider that for a moment.
You could go to prison for that.
I mean, there's people saying stuff, I imagine, in the rumble chat right now, that if you were Canadian, would have you... Ah!
Well, be careful what you say in the rumble chat, because you could be looking at life imprisonment.
Of course, what Trudeau claims, as always, is that this is about protecting children.
But is it about protecting children, or is it about the ongoing assertion of endless, seemingly endless, authority?
If you want a mug, you can buy the mugs.
The mugs are for sale.
We'll give away one more, but that's it.
Just choose one more, Lara.
These people are absolutely mug crazy.
I want you to note, by the way, Justin Trudeau's black leather gloves that he's wearing while making some of his
liberalism announcements. So let's have a look at this and when we come back we'll talk about Gavin
Newsom, we've got a few things actually, Joe Rogan and Jesus, we've got a lot more to discuss. So
yeah, we'll see you in a few moments.
Before that though, here's the news... no no no no, here's the effing news, see you in a second.
Justin Trudeau's new C63 bill will allow the Canadian government to imprison people for
life in order to protect children or to imprison political opponents.
What do you think Justin Trudeau and the globalists are more interested in?
Support our movement, otherwise you will end up belonging to a movement run by Justin Trudeau and The Globalist which proposes that in order to, you know, protect children.
And this mainstream media news broadcast seems to suggest the elderly, I don't know what they need to be protected from, is there a movement?
Are there geriatric rings now?
Although also in weird crazy cuckoo project Canada there are new ideas to euthanize people for being sad, poor or old.
So really the elderly need protecting mostly from Justin Trudeau.
What's going on in the world?
Who is Justin Trudeau protecting us from except bloody Justin Trudeau?
That's who I want to be protected from.
Let's get into this story because whether it's us Let's have a look.
Is it?
Tell you what, I'm talking about my household.
What's going on with these weird new laws to censor people and shut down dissent?
reading free speech. Let's have a look.
Internet safety is a subject talked about in most household.
Is it?
Especially with vulnerable family members.
Tell you what, I'm talking about my household.
What's going on with these weird new laws to censor people and shut down dissent?
Is there anyone worth voting for anywhere in the world?
Especially with vulnerable family members, young kids or seniors.
Seniors, don't worry about the elderly, don't worry about my dad.
Dad, what you're doing, actually, he should be in control of what he puts on the internet, he's a pain in the arse.
But generally speaking, the elderly aren't the issue, are they?
What they're doing, and what they generally do, is present a situation where they are our protectors in order to take our power and security.
It's such an obvious scheme now.
They're such grifters.
It's so plain, I can't believe we continue to believe it.
The Liberal government is hoping its long-promised online harms bill will help protect people.
The latest version is set to be introduced tomorrow.
The Liberals' long-awaited online harms bill will be introduced Monday.
Why do they keep saying it's long-awaited and long-promised?
Like, where's that online harms bill?
Quick, my children!
Won't somebody please think of the children?
That's not the actual issue.
issue. You're a person, trust yourself a bit more. Trust your own instinct and evaluation
of your own life. What are your problems? Is it resources?
Is it expenses? Is it a crisis of meaning? Is it sort of despair? Is it total distrust and
breakdown of society and culture?
Is it a kind of weariness from dealing with the deluge of information from people that
are telling you that they're protecting you from misinformation that appears to be oddly
untrue like this.
The latest in a series of sweeping and controversial internet regulations.
shouldn't be sweeping and controversial at the same time.
If you're going to sweep some ink, make sure everyone bloody well agrees with it.
We need to make sure, and I think we can all agree, we need to protect our kids online.
Justin Trudeau, with his various image issues, should not be wearing black leather gloves.
I suppose it's good that it's on the hand rather than the face, given that it's Justin Trudeau, but it's a bit too Gestapo for someone who literally awards Nazis in Parliament.
And evokes unnecessary emergency acts, isn't it?
The proposed bill is aimed at online companies.
They've put a hooded figure that looks like them people at Nick C3PO and RTD2 in the first Star Wars film.
I bet some of those things there are already laws for.
Like, firstly, aren't there?
Like, terrorism, I think, is already illegal.
both real and AI generated.
I bet some of those things there are already laws for, like firstly, aren't there?
Like terrorism I think is already illegal.
I think it's already not supposed to be a paedophile.
There aren't real required laws.
This is what we're going to do is legitimise censorship by offering you things that you'll agree with, like you want your children safe, you don't agree with hatred and you don't agree with terrorism.
Yep, that's everyone in the world thinks that, except for small marginal lunatics.
And then they're going to use that to go, that was critical of, for example, the trucker protest.
Look at their actions and look at what they actually care about.
They care about being able to freeze people's bank accounts, care about being able to unperson and shut down dissenting voices and seize control of the media.
Obvious what the agenda is.
This is absolute bunk.
All with a significant focus on child safety.
The Conservatives say it's an attempt to censor Canadians, while others hope for even stronger digital protections than those expected in the bill.
Do you know that one of the penalties is life imprisonment?
How much stronger can you go than life imprisonment?
Justin Trudeau will come around your house and strangle you to death in those black gloves of his while singing SWANNY!
Legislation like this already exists in several other countries like the UK, Australia and the EU.
What a coincidence!
Almost as if these bills are being passed everywhere as if it's some sort of coordinated global effort.
Now look, you could say more materially and more skeptically Basically, if you want to be reasonable about it, the pandemic was a global problem, and so having a global response to a global problem is one interpretation, and the internet is a global phenomenon, so having a global response is, in some ways, sensible.
As long as that response is absolutely derived from referenda, as long as it's the response that people want.
I mean, as a parent at the moment, when I think, who do I want in charge of protecting my children when it comes to online safety, and basically actually all forms of safety, Me!
That's who's in charge of it.
Me, my wife and people I trust.
It's not like Justin Trudeau, get your gloves on, the kids are playing up, I don't want them lot involved in any way.
Obviously the reason that we're concerned about this raft of legislative measures across the world, Ireland, our country, the UK, Canada, The EU, as it was listed in the news report, is because of the potential to misuse these laws to impose control on the population of the country.
The people that are really regarded as terrorists, we know this because they use techniques, personnel, agencies, technology that have previously been used on terrorists on domestic populations now.
It's common, it's global, it's ubiquitous.
A good example of a domestic population being treated as terrorists is January 6th.
Was that a protest or was it an insurrection?
Certainly people have done pretty lengthy jail sentences in some cases for simply practicing their right to protest and maybe going a bit over the edge.
Well a decision from a federal appeals court could potentially affect the sentences of dozens of January 6th rioters.
Now the court ordered a new sentence for a man from Grapevine who stormed the Capitol saying a judge wrongly applied an enhancement that made his sentence longer. The US Attorney's Office
says that same enhancement has been applied in more than 100 other January 6 cases. What this story
essentially is is that the law even as written has been misused in this instance and people have
served undue sentences.
Because they wanted to make an example of people, didn't they?
They've realised, hold on a minute, if this demographic, like working class, blue collar people, significant portion of the population, becomes disobedient, we've got a serious problem, because guess what?
We need those people to be in our police force, we need those people to be in our army, we need those people to control...
Themselves.
So we better really make an example of them.
I'm minded of like about 10 years ago in this country there were riots and there was a load of looting and stuff like that.
And what was weird is they started in London as a response to the death of a man in police custody in Tottenham North London.
But then they sort of spread and they were happening all over the country.
So it's almost like this discontent had a kind of contagion or meme appeal.
And I think part of the function of these systems that we're currently losing our faith in, institutions of democracy and media, are about ensuring that we don't all spontaneously just go, None of this is working, is it?
Should we start really playing up?
So whenever something a bit off-colour happens, like January the 6th, or the riots in my country, the institutions fire up.
Suddenly, they work really quickly.
Have you ever tried to get a permit to, I don't know, cut a tree, or mend something, or get some tax that you owed?
We'll be back to you in 6 to 12 to 18 months, if you could write to this person, if you could fill in a form.
Try filing a Freedom of Information Act request, see how long it takes for the government to tell you how much they've been spying on you, as I've been doing lately.
It ain't like...
Right, here you go, there's your information, let's go rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr If the ruling stands, defendants who have not completed their prison terms may push for new sentences.
He's not doing himself any favors, is he?
He's dressed up a little bit paramilitary.
But hey, if dressing up was a crime, I'll tell you he would be in prison.
Justin Trudeau.
As you know, we're very careful to select partners that we know you're going to love.
And today, I couldn't be more excited to tell you that this This episode is sponsored by Hallo, the number one prayer app in the world.
I know this because I use this app every single day to pray the rosary.
But there are 10,000 other prayers, meditations and musical choices often voiced by Christian speakers and actors.
For example, one of the main voices on there is Jonathan Rumi.
He plays Jesus Christ, our Lord and Saviour in The Chosen, which is pretty amazing.
And he was my body double when I was in Ballers, which is a good show that I loved being in.
This is brilliant!
Halo has been downloaded over 4 million times in 150 countries.
Halo helps you to pray, meditate and sleep better.
It helps you build a daily routine and a habit of prayer.
I mean, it's literally on my phone, even before I was doing this advert.
I'm listening to it every day because of Jonathan and because I'm interested in learning more about Christ and Christianity and how Christian values Align with my challenges, my personal challenges and my deep faith.
It's such an amazing app, you're going to love it.
Now check this, it's about to be the start of Lent, the 40 days that lead up to Easter in the Christian church, where we're called to give more intense prayer, fasting and almsgiving.
I'm going to learn about this with Halo.
This Lent, Halo's doing a special prayer challenge called Pray 40, meditating on this incredibly powerful book called He Leadeth Me, with the theme of surrender, trust, and hope.
Who doesn't need those things?
The challenge is being led by Mark Wahlberg.
Yeah, that's right.
That Mark Wahlberg.
Jonathan Rumi, Jesus is my body double, and Father Mike Schmitz, and several other faith leaders and actors and stuff.
It's going to be really powerful, so I invite you to download Halo for free months for free at Halo.com forward slash brand and join me in joining the pray for you challenge.
I've already bought the app myself.
I'm not going to be able to take advantage of that offer, but you should.
God bless you.
Let's get back to the video.
Canada's Justice Minister Arif Virani has advanced a highly controversial bill named Bill C-63 proposing comprehensive new legislation aimed at addressing online hate speech.
The bill covers seven types of harmful material, from content sexually exploiting or re-victimizing children and survivors, to content promoting violence and extremism.
But it also outlaws online hatred, so-called hate speech, and forms of deepfakes.
Also, they're doing the classic bureaucratic bunch together, where they take something that anyone would agree with.
For example, if there is a requirement for new legislation to protect children, I'm sure everyone, except for some real, let's call them out there characters, will be totally down with Yeah, laws to protect children from predators and menace.
Get those laws done.
But notice how they bunch it together with, like, hate speech.
So while you're looking at this, we all agree with, they just push through on the slight.
Also, we don't want anyone criticizing Justin Trudeau or the Let's separate the issues at the front of this, like child safety, from some of the issues like free speech.
In an attempt to decrease the prevalence of harmful content, this legislation puts the owners on online platforms to be accountable and transparent about how they handle such content.
Platforms like social media and live streaming services are included under the legislation's online services umbrella.
Oh, live streaming.
You've noticed that, have you?
This is an emergence of a new phenomenon.
They're like, oh no, there's whole new markets.
This is probably related to the total collapse in trust and use of legacy media outlets.
They're realising, oh no, it's moving quicker than we can.
Quick, trap it, stomp it down, censor it, control it.
Surely.
The bill would also create a new stand-alone hate crime offence that would apply to every offence in the criminal code and in any other act of parliament allowing penalties of up to life imprisonment to denounce and deter this hateful conduct as a crime in itself, the briefing explained.
Well that's actually confusing.
Stand-alone hate crime offence that would apply to every offence in the criminal code.
So it seems to me like they're creating a bit of legislation that's That seems quite diffuse, oddly amorphous, and could be applied, it sounds like here, to any other law.
Also, you did that hate crime, it sounds like they're trying to find ways to shut down dissent and control information, which is obviously something we're seeing a lot of.
The proposed law would also raise the maximum punishments for the four hate offences from five years to life imprisonment for advocating genocide, and from two years to five years for the others when persecuted by way of indictment.
It's interesting that there's a new law being introduced.
Like, people might say stuff or type stuff about a genocide, but that isn't the same as doing a genocide.
And given that we are living through what many people regard to be a genocide right now, why the hell are Canada more interested in people advocating for genocide than people actually committing them?
If you're doing a genocide, get your missiles!
Get your missiles!
You don't even have to pay, actually, because we'll make money by replenishing our previous stocks.
And if people are saying, saying, oh, those people should be stamped out, like, so, which isn't the kind of thing that's very nice to say, but it's something that gets said and I don't think should carry a life sentence.
The Liberal government states that the bill's proposed regulations centre on the platforms most frequented by Canadians.
However, the specifics will depend on whether these platforms meet the eventual user thresholds.
Over time, the government may hold other platforms accountable if these platforms end up posing a significant risk of harm.
So they've built into it the possibility that people would just go, stop using that platform, it's over-regulated, start using this one.
We're on a platform that is free speech absolute and that platform, therefore, That's why you should support us on that platform.
That's where we make our daily content.
That's where you can support us to become a member.
Additionally, Bill C-63 proposes establishing a censorship organization which will oversee digital safety issues.
Oh, I bet they will.
Where are they going to draw those people from?
How is it going to be funded?
What will their tastes be?
What their inclinations and political affiliations be?
We just know that we've lived through the two most censored events in history.
The COVID-19 pandemic, heavily censored incorrectly.
It has been retrospectively admitted.
And the current ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia and its mysterious origins, not to suggest again, as I always say, that the Ukrainian people dying in a war is a terrible thing.
But the fact is, is information is already being heavily controlled.
If you facilitate that further, you're playing into the hands of a system that's already heading in that direction.
Highlighting the Trudeau government's actions during the pandemic, Polyev remarked, just in Trudeau, that anyone who criticised him during the pandemic was engaging in hate speech.
This statement underscores a fear that the government might use the proposed legislation to silence dissent in various scenarios.
I think that's almost inevitable.
What Trudeau's doing in Canada should terrify everyone in the Western world who cares about being free from government tyranny, censorship and disinformation.
That's because Trudeau is pioneering a new way for governments to take control over the information environment, spreading disinformation and demanding censorship that is similar but different to efforts we are seeing in places like California, Australia and New Zealand.
It's truly a global issue.
It appears to be built around a pre-agreed global structure.
No doubt when they have these conferences, WEF for example, agreements like this are People across the western world were rightly alarmed when Trudeau invoked, for the first time in Canadian history, the Emergency Measures Act and froze bank accounts of people who had simply donated to the truckers cause.
Trudeau's crackdown on the Freedom Convoy protesters was followed by efforts to regulate and control the internet.
His Online Streaming Act and Online News Act gave the government expansive new powers to regulate what happens and what you see online.
The atmosphere created by Trudeau and his party is completely upending Canadian society, leading to the persecution of his detractors and limiting speech and expression.
If we see more laws like this, we will see more problems like this.
And as we keep illustrating and reiterating, it's happening everywhere.
Have you not noticed that our politicians seem similar, seem to have a similar agenda, seem to be funded in similar ways, seem to have comparable interests, even right down to their hobbies, haircuts, dress sense, and global conferences that they attend?
In looking to defend minorities and promote culture, Trudeau's Liberals are everything they once feared.
They are authoritarian, anti-democratic and illiberal.
And what's happening in Canada is not separate from what's happening in the US, the UK, Europe and Brazil, but intimately connected to those nations.
Trudeau isn't so different from President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, Governor Gavin Newsom and most other Democrats in the US.
The difference is, is that he's ahead of them.
Yes, and if you consider, say, the truckers' protests, and then consider the events of January 6th, and even something like the burgeoning support among truckers in New York, these, I imagine, are actually the issues that they would like to address with new legislation.
I actually don't think they care that much about protecting your children.
Certainly, there are many rumours that there are many in the political class that have the exact opposite view.
According to Justin Trudeau and his Liberal Party supporters, he and their party are the party of compassion for vulnerable people, freedom, and Canadian culture.
Liberals care, in their view, while Conservatives don't care.
Trudeau has proclaimed his loyalty to the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
And when the Liberals introduced their social media reforms legislation, they said the goal was to promote Canadian culture, ensure the sustainability of the news industry, and guarantee we heard from marginalised voices.
But a government cannot claim to care about the vulnerable or about freedom while freezing the bank account of a single mother working on a minimum wage job, as Trudeau's government Did.
Nor can the government claim to care about the vulnerable or freedom while trying to regulate the internet to prevent further protests and challenges to Trudeau's government.
Trudeau constantly splits the population into liberal angels and conservative devils.
You either believe in liberal climate policy or are a climate denier, according to Trudeau.
You either mask up and vax up or are putting lives at risk.
You either support the radical demands of trans activists or you hate sexual minorities.
Trudeau's actions aren't about social progress.
They're about power and control.
Trudeau embodies many of the traits of left-wing authoritarians.
All authoritarians support censorship and submission.
They tend to believe this is necessary because in their minds the population is naive and cannot be trusted.
Perhaps this focus on children is an unconscious declaration of the more deep intent at play that we are all regarded as children in so much as we are denied the right to true autonomy in the way that a child has to be protected, in the way that any parent would take personal responsibility if they can.
for the welfare of their children, rather than deferring that to the state, particularly when it seems that the state do not truly understand the power that they're playing with, and in whose hands they are truly placing this power, when they create diffuse laws that bundle together the safety of children online, the elderly online, when they're not euthanizing them at the first sign of sniffles, and the control and removal of hate speech, which impedes on rights which are necessary in democracy, when they say that democracy is the thing they prize above all else.
So, do these new laws in Canada protect you, or do they prevent you from being autonomous and free, having free speech and your rights as an adult citizen?
Do these laws that are being passed across the world, that bear very similar inflections and contain very similar clauses, that are similarly diffuse and could be similarly exploited, Indicate that whether you are in the United States of America or Brazil or the UK or Ireland, you are now being subject to new measures of control precisely because in these online technologies we have the ability for new true diversity and true representation.
I think that's what they fear most of all.
But that's just what I think.
Let me know what you think in the chat.
See you in a second!
Thanks for refusing Fox 4's new video!
No!
Here's the fucking news!
There may be cyber attacks all around the world, but we are staying connected to you!
They may have brought down Meta, they may have brought down Insta, they may even be attacking Google, but we remain connected to you right now.
Let us know if you're having any struggles as a result of these cyber-attacks.
I'm seeing some amazing comments in this Rumble chat.
For every Formash saying, Russell, you make some good points, there's someone saying stuff like, Kickery Dickery Dock, and just weird stuff that doesn't...
Some of it doesn't even make sense.
You're an extraordinary bunch and I absolutely love you.
Mel Gibson is live right now.
Astonishing stuff.
Some of the comments that I really enjoyed, for example, are Masked Crusader, 1-1-1.
How does one determine what's hate?
Yes, I suppose so.
It's certainly at risk of being exploited, isn't it, in order to shut down open-domain democracy.
What do you think, Ruby C. Kinglet and USA Now and all my friend there in the away?
Oh, that's a spam bot comment, is it?
What?
Hickory dickory dock is a spam bot comment.
I was quite taken with that bot.
I love this bot.
Isn't that like a Joaquin Phoenix film?
When he falls in love with a bot.
Did that happen or did I dream it?
No one you know 81.
They're criminalizing protesting.
Here's the news.
Trudeau is retarded.
It's the super rich versus everyone else.
McSpicy hate speech equals speech that the government hate.
On three of many.
It's too late y'all, we live in Orwellian times.
Rose S85, I love how they just squeeze hate speech in with terrorism.
Deke Bell, Dr. Strangelove, yeah, why don't you read this book about the return of the prodigal son?
It'll cheer you right up.
Or this book, this book that I wrote using my own mind.
Hey, remember we got a We got Mark for you who correctly answered the Nancy Pelosi question.
She earned 10 times her salary in 10 months, right?
Russell, do you hate me?
No, I love you, Jarden68.
I love you.
I absolutely love you, and I believe in your freedom, and I believe in your spirit, and your soul, and your ability to become the person you were intended to be.
Listen, Pontus Larson, you won this, but you're going to have to email your address to hello at russellbrown.com.
Don't anyone else do it in an attempt to trick us out of a lovely mug?
Especially this one, the magical grail, I do declare.
On, I think I told you already, we're giving another one away to AtSpeed50.
We've already got your details because you're a member of our AwakendWonder community, where we're gonna do an additional 10 minutes of the show because we're enjoying ourselves so much.
We'll probably talk about Joe Rogan and Jesus.
I'll probably quote a little bit of C.S.
Lewis, the problem of pain.
We'll talk about the nature of suffering.
We'll awaken together.
You know that there are Outages on YouTube, Facebook and Instagram.
It comes after a global meta crash sends the company's stock prices tumbling.
I wonder if Nancy Pelosi could be connected.
Here is a Fox local news station covering it.
Let's have a look.
I think there is a button number one guys.
If so, I need that up on my deck over here.
Thanks guys.
Okay, so if you're pulling out your phone this morning and trying to log into Instagram or Facebook, it may have already logged you out and then you can't get back in.
There's a nationwide shortage, I mean nationwide outage, I should say right now with Meta, which oversees both Instagram and Facebook.
Yes, so people are rushing to X to find out what's going on and it seems like everybody is in the same boat where all of a sudden everybody was kicked off of their Facebook account.
So I know a lot of you like to do the dual screen at home, maybe you're on your phone What's going on?
There's an outage.
You're watching us and you're wondering what's happening.
Well, it's happening to us too.
There you have it.
It's a solar flare, do you, Rabid69?
I wonder what's going on.
I like how they're covering this over on Houston's morning show.
I'd like to be on that.
And I think the fear is across the board for probably everybody.
Did I get hacked?
No, everything's okay with that.
We don't know why this is happening or what caused the problem, but when we find out, you know, we'll let you know.
Just not through our Fox26houston.com Facebook page.
I love how they're doing the news in Houston.
So friendly, isn't it?
Warm and jolly.
That's the type of legacy media I can handle.
Just talking about simple solar flares or cyber attacks in quite a folksy, homespun and accessible way.
Gavin Newsom, presumed presidential candidate for the future, appears to have been taking donations in order to carve out minimum wage advantages for his preferred donor class chums and school friends.
Have a look at this story about California and Gavin Newsom, which is an extraordinary state.
Will it secede?
Will there be many more secessions to come?
And why on earth would you create a kind of exclusion for companies that make their own bread in-house when imposing a minimum wage law?
Have a look at this weird story.
Governor Gavin Newsom coming under fire tonight over the new $20 an hour minimum wage for fast food chains.
Top California Republicans accusing him of carving out an exemption for one of his campaign contributors, a Panera Bread franchise owner.
Eyewitness News reporter Rob Hayes has the details.
It was a camera-friendly event.
California Governor Gavin Newsom signing legislation last September to boost the minimum wage for the state's estimated half a million fast food workers to $20 an hour.
It doesn't kick in until April, but Republicans say it doesn't kick in until April, and it doesn't include everyone.
In fact, you can buy your way out of it.
Republicans say the law already smells spoiled.
That's crony capitalism.
It's corrupt, and it's unacceptable.
That's California State Senator Brian Jones this morning accusing Newsom of taking campaign donations from the owner of several Panera Bread outlets in the state and then exempting restaurants that make their own bread from the new minimum wage.
It's a weird exemption, isn't it?
Like, you obviously don't have to pay people minimum wage if you're making your own bread.
Well, that's sort of a weird law.
What is that, like, jinx?
Jinx!
I don't have to pay minimum wage to jinx, jinx, double jinx, no returns.
Panera makes its own bread.
That owner made a huge campaign contribution to Governor Newsom, over $160,000.
Also, campaign donations in themselves are a type of exploitation and manipulation, wouldn't you agree?
The only thing that's positive about this entire story is the idea that we should bake our own bread.
Rather a wholesome idea, wouldn't it be glorious to grow our own food, to make our own bread, to unhook ourselves from these systems of tyranny?
Here's the person he's referring to, San Francisco-based restauranteur Greg Flynn.
His Flynn Restaurant Group website says it controls more than 2,300 restaurants in 44 states.
Flynn, you got too many restaurants!
Look at all them restaurants, all them Applebees, all them Taco Bells, all them Arby's, all them Pizza Huts, all them bread-baking Paneras.
Including 24 Panera outlets in California alone.
This bill has become a pay-to-play for some billionaire friends of Gavin Newsom, We reached out to Flynn's company this afternoon but did not hear back before deadline.
Meanwhile, the governor's office is denying there is any carve-out for Panera.
A spokesman for Newsom writing, the governor never met with Flynn about this bill and this
story is absurd.
Our legal team has reviewed and it appears Panera is not exempt from the law.
Pick one. Pick one.
Vote Biden.
Vote Biden, Newsom, Pelosi.
It appears, it appears, what was it, it appears Bernier is not exempt from the law.
Hey, bloody well, the stomach's gone on.
Man cannot live on bread alone.
They also need donations. Now a rather more serious story before we get to Joe Rogan and
our Lord and Saviour and he's calling for a resurrection and a second coming. You know
like how people have said that the attack by Russia on Ukraine was entirely provoked and
then people have said well I don't know you know if you think about sort of NATO
impeding former Soviet Union territories and Ukraine being kind of invited to join NATO.
Seems that happened in around 2008 and it's sort of generally accepted that there's a plan to do that and CIA having bases in Ukraine for the last 10 years.
Seems there's a lot of provocation, but now Like our country, Britain, has got actual military fighting forces, soldiers in Ukraine.
Let's have a look at this.
If this is true, this is another stop provoking Vladimir Putin.
It's not like I'm an apologist or a fan of Vladimir Putin.
I'm just a fan of not having nuclear wars.
I'm planning to go to Panerai here.
They've got a wonderful deal with their staff over there.
British soldiers are on the ground in Ukraine helping Kiev's forces fire long-range storm shadow missiles.
This is sort of a war then, isn't it?
According to a leak in Russian media of a top-secret call involving German Air Force officers, the Kremlin said the leak demonstrated the direct involvement of the collective West in the war in Ukraine, while former British defence ministers expressed frustration with the German military in response to revelations.
Bloody Germans!
What the hell's wrong with you?
Keep your mouth shut!
It's bad enough you were buying all that bloody gas in the middle of the war.
What an extraordinary conflict this is that we're funding over there.
When I say we, I mean you, you know, the American taxpayer, and I mean me, the British taxpayer.
If we're sending all of this money, we're sending military, we're providing deep state services, the CIA have been bedded for 10 years, that coup in 2014 definitely involved the CIA, then seems like we're sort of involved in a war.
Doesn't it?
Seems like a war to me.
Over there in Ukraine, they're training people how to operate drones.
And I suppose really it's just, I don't know, some sort of a part of modern warfare and perhaps even modern life.
But to watch it does seem a little startling.
Have a look at it with your own eyes as we slide into Armageddon, which I suppose perhaps is one of the precipitants of the... of the...
Of the coming of the Christ.
And just think back to the glory of childhood for a moment there.
You know, perhaps playing jacks in the streets, or in latter days, Pokemon.
And now, why don't you learn to operate a drone?
That would be rather nice.
A future of war!
Look at that little girl!
She's not happy about it, and why would she be?
Is this war winnable?
I'm ethnically Russian!
I'd like to see peace!
The war is ongoing whether we wish it or not, and we must be prepared.
We must stay abreast of current events.
While new technologies may emerge, the fundamentals remain the same, so we provide students with foundational knowledge.
The Defense of Ukraine program has been added to the school curriculum at the Centers of National and Patriotic Education.
No, they're making like a computer game, bombing children.
That's not fun.
This class focused on how to operate drones, which have been crucial to Ukraine's defense on the battlefield.
This is useful in principle because it is possible that someone wants to become a soldier in the future.
The reality is that the war persists, so this knowledge is indispensable for everyone.
The program also includes medical training, combat and tactical training, firearms and civil protection.
Grammy Annan, it looks fun!
All of this as the conflict with Russia enters its third year with no end in sight.
It's not fun to be in a war all the time and to perpetuate yet more war.
I like it.
I like war.
Uh, was that Burisma approves this message?
Right.
For Inside Edition Digital, I'm Mara Montalbano.
All right, you maniacs, you absolute lunatics.
I'm glad you are still with us after the solar flares and cyber attacks and oncoming Armageddon.
I'm glad you've remained with us on this Super Tuesday.
Remember, tomorrow we'll be giving you some definitive coverage on those events and indeed discussing the theatre that likely surrounds it.
Hey, Mike Benz is coming on the show.
Mike Benz is the person that says when people talk about democracy now, when the establishment talks about democracy, they don't mean the process of elections by which the people express their will.
They mean a set of institutions that are actually impenetrable and in some cases global and, I would argue, tyrannical.
You can put your questions to Mike Benz if you become an awakened wonder.
Over on Locals.
Also, we're doing a video this week.
You know, you're gonna love the video this week.
We're doing over on Locals exclusively.
Displacement theory.
Is it real or is it false?
Let me know in the chat if you think displacement theory is real.
We're gonna do a video on that.
We're gonna look into how this theory has come about and how it is said to work.
Is it a creation of the alt-right or is it a real thing?
We'll be getting into it.
Remember, if you want to become an Awake and Wonder, you can stay with us for another 10 minutes now.
While we continue to do this show, we'll be giving away mugs, we'll be talking about our Lord and Saviour Jesus and Joe Rogan, we'll be talking about revolution together.
We get fantastic guests on, as you've heard.
Last week we had Rand Paul on, coming up soon.
There's Bobby Kennedy.
We talk about Bobby Kennedy all the time.
We're talking about Bobby Kennedy right now.
We're going to train some children to drone bomb far away strangers.
We're not doing that, that's not part of it.
But you can join us over there, monthly for about $6, or yearly for a little less than that.
Let's get a week's free trial.
Would you like a week's free trial?
Would you do a week's free trial?
The people want Gareth Russell.
Democracy is spoken.
And that comes from Recovering Wanker, which I think is about all you need to know, who earlier we saw has given up wanking for Lent.
If you think that Jesus and all of the saints care about... Well, I think they're probably actually quite impressed.
Well done.
Well done.
Listen, we're going to do another 10 minutes.
Why don't you join the likes of Jay Britt Jones and get exclusive episodes of Here's the News, as well as other stuff.
Scroll up, doll.
And Just Jimbo and Southsider61 and Beatraskfree and Brookie419.
Look at their names across the screen being celebrated.
And at the end of every Awake and Wonder episode, we put up the names of everyone in our community.
Trudeau is retired and says you should wank every day.
Look, I don't like where this is heading.
I don't like where you're going with this.
You're being a bit childish.
Carl Reiner has simply written the word wank.
Now, look!
No, it's got to have control.
Right, sit down.
That belt's for me, not for you.
Now, pack it up.
I used to wank, now I don't, one day at a time.
Well done, recovering wanker.
He's actually quite serious about this.
All right, Jesus loves mugs.
Get over now to the live stream.
Tomorrow, no, Thursday, we'll be talking to Mike Benz.
Tomorrow, we'll be covering Super Tuesday.
You know, we've got a lot going on.
So get over there, will ya?
Right?
We're popping over there now.
I don't know where to press.
Are you?
Is that Recovering Wanker?
Listen, post the link in the description, would you Lara?
So that you can come over there now.
It's not hard.
You have to press it.
You get over there.
You don't even have to pay for the first bit.
You know, but for our paid community, we make fantastic content.
Gareth will not be freed until peace comes.
The day we have peace in the Middle East, Across Europe, we will free Gareth.
Until then, he must remain incarcerated.
Okay, guys, we're going to go over onto locals now.
Are you going to post the link in the description, Brandstatter?
Have you done it?
Oh, yes, she keeps doing it.
There it is.
Look, press on that link from me where it says Russell Brand.
Then get over there.
So wanks a lot.
Come on, guys.
Let's get our shit together, shall we?
This isn't right.
This isn't right.
No.
No!
All right, see you over on Locals, or we'll see you tomorrow in the stream.
It's not hard, get over there, you win yourself a mug, you'll be talking to Mike Benz, you get an additional video on replacement theory, you're the wanky doodoo dandy.
Oh, not on Super Tuesday!
See you tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.