All Episodes
Previous Next
March 4, 2024 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
56:34
Trump WRONGLY Removed From Colorado Ballot - It’s OVER For Dems! - Stay Free #317
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a walkthrough of this. I'm going to be showing you a little bit of the
So, I'm going to be showing you a little bit of the process of how to do this.
process of how to do this.
In this video, you're going to see the future.
We're getting some breaking news.
We've got a live shot there.
Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand on Rumble.
We've got a fantastic show for you today, so you can really relax and ease your way into it.
I'm talking to you, Amilla1214, Cruisin' Buns, The Real Mix, Vroom Vroom, all of you guys in the Rumble chat.
And it would be remiss of me not to acknowledge the beautiful Awakened Wonders in our locals community, who every week get additional content, like a brilliant COVID video we did last week.
And some additional content where we analyze the life and death of Amy Winehouse like Katharine and Georgie boy.
And I'm going to tell you guys that I'll be raising a mug to you on a variety of important issues which we'll be discussing later.
Of course we're covering the Trump ruling about Colorado.
We're talking about George Galloway.
We've got so much news for you.
All of it true.
It's going to be difficult to squeeze it all in.
We'll be available for the first 15 minutes or so.
On YouTube, then we will be exclusively available in that sweet stream of freedom that we've come to know as Rumble and we'll be telling you how you can take advantage of a fantastic new offer where you can store all of your data in the Rumble Cloud, meaning that Amazon and Google and Microsoft will not have control of all your information.
Let's start off with the days First story before getting into the general hysteria around Trump, because if you want my view, and I'm sure you do, on the macro narrative here, it's seeming increasingly less likely that judicial means will be able to
Let's have a look at the Colorado ruling.
So, Supreme Court ruling allows Trump to stay on primary ballots nationwide.
There's a unanimous ruling overturning a decision by Colorado's top court that barred Donald Trump from the ballot for his involvement in Jan 6, which will resolve the question of the former president's ability to run for office nationwide.
Now I suppose because Nikki Haley is Got a pipsqueak victory over in Washington DC as Vivek said amidst the dwellers of the swamp.
It's no reason to have any renewed enthusiasm that establishment candidates may prevail.
Remember here on this channel we are beyond partisan argument believing that new measures of decentralization are urgently required across the world for us to be able to meaningfully oppose the elites.
Certainly I understand why you see Trump as a representative of that class, because he agitates in extremis
those denizens of the legacy media.
Here are MSNBC blindly panicking about Trump's gaffes.
And isn't it curious that on one hand we're talking about escalating war,
we're talking about a military-industrial complex that appears to be able to puppet global systems through endless
conflict, and yet when it comes to the political discourse there's a
sort of a contretemps based on whether or not the two candidates for the presidency have got...
Good memories!
Let's have a look at MSNBC's reporting on Trump.
What was it?
He did say something wrong, didn't he?
He said, oh Obama is, you know, he mistook Biden for Obama.
But I know what you lot are going to start saying in the chat.
I know what you're going to start saying.
You're going to start saying that Biden was Obama's third term.
Aren't ya?
Aren't ya?
Let's have a look what MSNBC said.
Donald Trump was on the campaign trail this week in North Carolina and Virginia.
And the guy just kept getting confused.
Look at this series of clips.
Look, they're actually really pleased about that, aren't they?
Like, you can see Mike is pleased.
Joe, I've never seen him so elevated.
But what's interesting is they've tried to use January 6th as a weapon.
And now it's been revealed that many of the people incarcerated around Jan 6th, that was incorrect.
They were incarcerated incorrectly and unduly.
They've tried taking him off the ballot box.
They're trying to find various means to impede Trump but the Supreme Court ruling and the deferment of any involvement in the Jan 6th Jan 6th events means that it's unlikely to take place before the election.
So now they're resorting to saying like he's demented or forgetful and they found themselves right in the middle of a Joe Biden glass house wildly throwing stones.
It doesn't seem right to me that this conversation has become about sort of gaffes We've always said when we're pointing out Joe Biden's almost endless errors that...
It's not really the key issue, it's just an odd indication that this guy surely cannot be heading all these institutions.
Not in reality.
In fact, I saw RFK said something similar, didn't he, recently?
He said, someone else has got to be making the decisions inside the White House.
Using what substance?
In the Trump administration, it seemed that it was very popular to use amphetamines.
Under the Biden administration, someone in that family is bringing a lot of the naughty marching powder, the white mischief, right into the corridors of power.
In Venezuela.
Did you just see Maduro?
Venezuela.
It's unbelievable.
This is the greatest movement in the history of our country.
Maybe in the history of any country.
Even Argentina.
They went MAGA.
You know Argentina.
Great guy.
We are a nation that just recently heard that Saudi Arabia and Russia will...
I don't even... What happened there?
Charlie Sykes, we see it more and more.
He gets in the middle of sentences.
He's reading teleprompters and his mind still blanks out.
At this stage, these kind of criticisms merely serve to expose the lack of impartiality at the heart of the legacy media.
If they'd been doing items like this for the last six months to 12 months about Joe Biden's relentless gaffery, Then you'd sense a degree of objectivity.
But what we have here is partisanship and what we're trying to offer you on this channel is respect for your opinion and view, your allegiances and your tribal affiliations, whatever they may be, believing in our individual sovereignty and our right to run our own communities more than any particular ideology, particularly when these ideologies so plainly appear to have been co-opted by globalist interests.
Here's John Kirby rather bashfully defending Joe Biden.
Yeah, that's right, Gaza.
I'm sorry that he got a little bit muddled up there because that's a little bit tricky, isn't it?
Because that's a pretty significant issue which seems to be being exorcised from many of the legacy media's news cycles.
I know it's causing the Biden administration a lot of problems.
Firstly, Touch upon Nikki Haley's victory in Washington.
Let me know in the chat.
Does that mean that her campaign could be salvaged?
Do you think that the establishment will get one of their own in there?
Y or N in the rumble chat.
Let me know.
Hard word to say, says second chair.
Gaza!
I found it pretty easy to say, sometimes difficult to contemplate.
Here's Vivek's response to Nikki Haley prevailing in DC.
He says, the one primary she wins is where the swamp is the electorate.
She'd really like to thank her core constituency of defence contractors,
overpaid consultants and the permanent political class.
You know Trump's going to love having Vivek on team with little posts like that.
Do you think that this is an indication that Nikki Haley could win the Republican nomination?
Or has that ship sailed?
According to this poll, Donald Trump is more successful than ever before, certainly more popular than ever before with the people polled in that instance.
Hey, listen, do you want one of these mugs?
You can get one.
If you like this stay free mug, we're going to post it, you automatically get 25% off all week when you add it to your basket.
And if that ain't enough to make you hysterical, you should sit down and watch the view, because this is fascinating from Whoopi Goldberg.
As they start to realise that the lawfare against Trump is unlikely to succeed, you're beginning to see the revelation of some extraordinary emotion.
There's one thing in particular that Whoopi Goldberg says here, That really fascinates me.
Firstly, she said that, you know, that Biden is the current incumbent and could jail all Republicans if he wanted to.
That's an astonishing thing to say, but she kind of retracts that and backtracks that and makes it clear that she's only using that as a sort of a rhetorical device.
But what she also says is, you know, all debt could be cancelled.
Now, what I think is exposed, even in this little tirade on daytime TV, is the fact that we have narrowed our parameters of what we expect from politics to such a low bandwidth, that the idea that debt cancellation, or the radical transition of society, or greater empowerment, or view your personal sovereignty and localised democracy, is beyond the scope of our thinking.
But debt cancellation Can you guys remember when debt was cancelled on a pretty large scale?
Do you remember as far back as 2008 when having campaigned on hope and change, Barack Obama bailed out the banks on an unprecedented scale when ordinary Americans could have been supported?
And of course what you'll be told is he had to do that.
He had no choice but to do that.
And if he had no choice at all, What democracy is there?
Because if democracy is not about choice, it ain't about much.
Let's have a look at Whoopi Goldberg.
Remember, if you're watching us on YouTube, we'll be available here for another 10 minutes.
Then we've got some amazing content coming up about excess deaths.
We'll be covering George Galloway's victory here in the UK and how it's a threat to the uni party in our country.
And if truly we are living under the auspices of a new global establishment, Figures that buck the trends of national politics are who we have to look to to create new opposition.
Let's have a look at Whoopi Goldberg now.
We'll be covering George Galloway in a moment.
Let me know what you're looking forward to in the chat.
And hello to Ruby C. Kinglet and Firegirl2020 in the Awaken Wonder chat.
Let me know what you guys thought of our Rand Paul conversation.
It's up now on Locals.
And remember, we've got Mike Benz coming up on the show later this week.
He's a person who analyzes the deep state and its ability to censor and control global narratives
in a way that's beautiful.
Russell, let's hear your best American impression.
I have so many American impressions.
What about this little nasal guy?
Now let's get into Whoopi Goldberg on The View.
Well, the Supreme Court won't hear oral arguments until the end of April.
Now I just, you know, just let's look at a scenario where the Supreme Court says, yes, he has that,
he has all those rights.
He is immune from everything.
You know what Joe Biden could do since he is presently president?
What?
Look, she's excited by this idea.
She's excited by the idea.
She's about to say, jailing all Republicans, right?
Have a look at how this vitriol is espoused.
Now, I know Whoopi Goldberg.
I don't know her.
I went on The View a couple of times, and actually, I think she's a lovely human being.
On this subject of politics, though, to encourage people to have such a narrow perspective, given that the show is called The View, to encourage such low horizons, It doesn't seem in the right spirit.
We could change so much.
We could achieve so much.
We can raise our expectations.
Listen to this.
It's extraordinary.
He could throw every Republican in jail.
The audience goes to applause that because they've been coached into applauding that kind of jingoism is the word for it in this country.
Hey, Spazotron, stop posting fart or we're going to mute them.
Remember, we've got a policy on that, I think, for spamming.
You have got free speech, but you don't got free spamming.
Do you want us to spam someone that is repetitive on there?
I think we do that already.
Let me know, guys.
Let me know where we stand on that.
Good. I mean, no, no, no, no. This is not a good thing.
I totally, totally, totally, yeah.
What this means is it's, he can do anything.
Yeah.
He could dismiss everybody's debt.
Yeah.
You know, there's a whole bunch of great stuff that could happen,
but let's, let's really look at what this means.
Yeah.
So that, so they're basically kicking the can.
Just briefly stopped on the idea, paused, alighted on the idea of cancelling all debt,
as if it's like a sort of a ridiculous proposition.
you could radically order civilization.
Politics has real power.
That's the thing we forget while lost, deluged in fake tribalism that still empowers the same interests, it seems to me.
We forget that we do have deep power.
the road though. They're not taking up this case immediately. So what's their motivation then? If
they, if we all know that we can't do what you just said because of the extreme power that a
president would have, what is their motivation for not doing it right away? Well unfortunately
some people are saying the motivation is that there are certain conservative justices that
have been appointed by Trump that want to help him. And because we know the end result is if this
case is not resolved by the time of the election and he, God forbid, becomes the president of the
United States. Poo poo.
That's really odd, isn't it?
In a two-party system where you can say on television, God forbid he become the President of the United States, look how divided That nation is.
Look how clear it is that there is no genuine balance or objectivity within that field.
Remember, you know where we stand on this issue.
And look at where Jamie Raskin stands, offering some extraordinary strategy to Democrats that people have to become aroused, to get really aroused about politics.
Listen to this.
I don't find it at all arousing.
Obviously, we can't put all of our hopes in the Supreme Court.
The people need to be engaged and aroused at this point to... Engaged and aroused?
Look at Anderson Cooper.
Aroused?
I don't know about that.
That seems like going a little too far.
I don't know if we should be getting aroused and pre-empic and turned on by a situation of this nature.
Well, I suppose he means, and what he did also say, is engaged, inspired, connected again.
And rather than reaching out for the low, low energies of rage and fear and hatred, is it possible to have an aspirational politics, a positive vision of America and indeed the world?
Demand that there be justice, but also to be organizing for the election.
Everybody needs to be vigilant.
This is an interesting point from Bhatia Ungasagan.
She says this on Bill Maher.
She says, now I'd love to know what you think about this, she says that to a lot of Trump supporters, and I know a lot of you love Trump, that Trump supporters consider Trump to be liberal.
But what is it that you like about Trump?
Have a listen to her on Bill Maher.
To you and to most Democrats, Trump is an extremist.
But to Trump supporters, he is a liberal, and they like that about him.
Yes.
So, for example, if you look at his position on abortion, 16 weeks, okay?
That used to be, like, the Democrats' position on abortion.
He just got $45,000 from the Teamsters union, who gave to the RNC a week after meeting with Trump.
His position on immigration, That was the Democrats' position in the 90s.
He's pro-gay, and he's courting blacks actively, and all of this is stuff that his supporters love about him.
So we are, on the liberal side, the liberal media is misunderstanding how he comes off to his supporters because of how they see him.
I totally agree with that.
They don't get him.
Fascinating piece of analysis right there that possibly still to this day the legacy media is unable to understand Donald Trump.
I'll be interested to hear what you lot think.
Tell me in the chat what you think about this.
Tell me what you think about if you are in the United States of America.
Let me know what you think on the subject of migration.
Let me know what you feel about the borders.
Let me know what your concerns and fears are.
Let me know what you feel when Trump says this.
Let me know in the Awaken Wonder chat as well guys.
We will begin the largest domestic deportation operation in American history.
Domestic deportation.
Do you think that's necessary?
Do you think that's where things have got to go?
And would you, just tell me yes or no, do you think if you're going to control your borders that means you also have to control your foreign policy?
Would you be willing to control your borders but no more war?
No more involvement in foreign war?
No more military support for wars that don't directly involve the United States of America.
And I don't see how they can directly involve the United States of America unless they happen in America.
Unless America has a bunch of imperialist projects around the world that you're funding, paying for, protecting with your tax dollars.
Hey!
Remember guys, we want you to sign up to locals join our awakened wonders there like fire girl
2020 and sensitive hearts 25. If you become a member you get additional content like yesterday
we posted a vaccine side effects video that's fantastic because across the world in no small part
thanks to Rand Paul people are talking about vaccine side effects in an unprecedented way. We got
some amazing content coming up later this week which we will post widely but we'd love it to
become a supporter of our movement because we're stepping things up right now where we talk about
information that is being suppressed and repressed that may yet establish a definitive connection
between medications in the 2020-2021 period and excess deaths.
You will love it!
Now I want to talk to you a little bit about UK news.
George Galloway who's been An interesting and radical political figure in our country is a Scottish person for a long time now.
He's just won a seat in parliament, that's like becoming a congressman, with a big win in Rochdale, that's a constituency in the north of our country, and he campaigned significantly around the war.
In Gaza, Glenn Greenwald, talking about him.
Can you get 11 up on my thing?
Thanks, guys.
Posted, think what you want about George Galloway.
Well, Glenn Greenwald.
Glenn Greenwald is a person that does permit free thinking.
He was one of the strongest voices against the US and UK's invasion of Iraq.
He opposes US-UK support for wars in Ukraine and by Israel, despised by the UK establishment.
And this is one of the funniest and most revealing interviews you'll see, and I agree with him.
It is pretty funny.
What he is commenting on in this video is a speech given by our Prime Minister, globalist, and Moderna funder, Rishi Sunak.
Now, Rishi Sunak gives an extraordinary speech.
We're just going to show you a little bit of this.
You know he's a globalist.
You know he was one of the first ones to say, we're going to have our own cryptocurrencies.
You can't trust these cryptocurrencies that we're not in charge of.
Have a look at Rishi Sunak, our temporary Prime Minister.
I mean, all things are temporary, but few things are as temporary as Rishi Sunak.
Except perhaps his WhatsApp messages that get deleted before any COVID inquiry can reach right into them.
Rishi Sunak, like your Trudeaus, like your Macrons, like your Dem Party, is one of the establishment voices that you have to hear to believe.
Here he is.
It's an extremist disruption and criminality.
What started as protests on our streets has descended into intimidation, threats, and planned acts of violence.
Jewish children fearful to wear their school uniform lest it reveal their identity.
Muslim women abused in the street for the actions of a terrorist group they have no connection with.
Now I hope you know that on this channel we are against all forms of prejudice that people of all faiths and all colors should be free to express themselves however they wish but as with many of the hate speech laws being proposed across the world this Stated aim to protect vulnerable groups and protected characteristics seems to be frequently used in order to establish more authoritarianism and here Rishi Sunak is about to make the audacious claim that a candidate winning an election is an attack on democracy because as Mike Benn says when they talk about democracy now
They mean a set of institutions or some kind of delicate deity that is in their control.
Democracy can't be attacked by democracy.
In a democracy, you ask people, what do you lot want?
We'll do it.
We are in your employ, at your service.
We will represent you.
What democracy means now is the global establishment has a set of national institutions that have been co-opted and are controlled.
And should that be disrupted by an election, We will attack it!
Now our democracy itself is a target.
Council meetings and local events have been stormed.
MPs do not feel safe in their homes.
Long-standing parliamentary conventions have been upended because of safety concerns.
And it is beyond... Storm?
What did he say?
What did he say about the storm?
Don't you storm our council meeting!
Now you know, do you know that Joe Biden is actually now not announcing where his public events are taking place?
Because of protesters, because of the events in Gaza, the genocide in Gaza or war in Gaza, you call it what you feel it to be, we believe that speech ought be free.
the idea that council meetings are being stormed and that the capital is being stormed and that
whenever people express their opposition to the establishment and to the system that is a form
of terrorism. Note how many... I see Spazza trying to get there, Laura Branstad, will you shoot that
shit down mate? Just because you know we said we would. So what we're noticing now is institutions
and agencies that were established in order to oppose terrorism and by terrorism we mean
organizations like ISIS.
That's what people used to mean by terrorism and God knows some pretty complicated arguments could be made about the establishment of ISIS and the involvement of Western and foreign agencies in the establishment of that little scenario.
Those tools, technologies and techniques are now deployed against domestic populations.
Alarming.
Last night, the Rochdale by-election returned a candidate who dismisses the horror of what happened on October the 7th, who glorifies Hezbollah, and is endorsed by Nick Griffin, the racist former leader of the BNP.
I need to speak to you all this evening because this situation has gone on long enough, and demands a response not just from government, but from all of us.
Someone's won an election that we didn't want to win an election.
That's not how elections are supposed to work.
We're supposed to give you the illusion of choice, and if you take a choice, then, well, we don't like that.
Someone says, fix your lisp with your billions.
Your callous.
You're callous in that rumble chat sometimes.
Hey, Beth in Wonderland, I'm saying, oh, does your wife need help too?
She's of course referring to Rishi Sunak's wife, Who of course works with Infosys, her father's firm, and partners at the WEF.
Here is George Galloway making the speech that Glenn Greenwald was referring to and check out his points about the uniparty system, check out his points about anti-establishmentism, check out his advocacy against war or his advocacy for resisting war and for diplomacy therefore.
I didn't watch it, but I understood the first part of it related to the Rochdale by-election.
The Prime Minister has just said that your election review to Parliament is beyond horrifying.
What do you say to that?
Well, I can understand how disappointed he is about the by-election.
The Conservative Party, which is the government of the country, was crushed, not just by me, but by an independent candidate that no one had ever heard of before outside of Rochdale.
So it was a disastrous night.
Anyone with a fedora is instantly suspicious.
The hat does require some analysis, but I consider it to be the mark of character.
...for the Conservatives and a disastrous night for Labour.
I got more votes than Labour and the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats and the Reform Party put together, which adds up to a pretty crushing rejection of the two-party system.
So I understand why he's alarmed.
I want you to address some of the specifics that the Prime Minister said about you this evening.
He said that you backed Hezbollah.
Is that true?
I don't know what that means, backed Hezbollah.
I oppose Israel's occupation of Lebanon and I respect the right of people in occupied territory to resist their occupier.
And I've done so since Hezbollah was formed.
Some people in the chat saying he wears the hat to hide the results of an attack and some scarring, so there you go guys.
And Israel occupied much of Lebanon, right up to the Litani River, regularly bombing Beirut and so on.
So, I'm not sure what business that is of his.
Because you see, they are a terrorist organisation and they're part of the government of Lebanon, a country with which we have sovereign diplomatic relations.
I had this debate with Sky's Anna Botting in 2006.
It's quite an epic clip, you should watch it.
More than a hundred million people have.
This is the bit I like.
all these things about me in the by-election and in the by-election it
was them that got crushed in the democratic process so I'm not sure why
he would reheat it. Now the Prime Minister is saying that you are...
We're talking about little Rishi Sunak.
This is the bit I like, this bit. You're talking about the Prime Minister as if he's a god.
We're talking about little Rishi Sunak.
This is the attitude and the position that's going to be required if you are serious about doing anything other than moaning and complaining.
We're going to need political figures from across the spectrum.
Some people that are affiliated with the left.
Some people that are affiliated with single issues.
Some people that are considered to be on the right.
Some people... You're going to have to find new allies.
What your main point of alliance is, is their willingness to challenge the establishment.
Check out this for a piece of anti-establishment takedown.
You guys might like Vivek Ramaswamy or maybe you don't like Vivek Ramaswamy when he spoke to CNN and talked about Jan 6th.
To me, it don't matter anymore, that left and right stuff.
Park it.
Let's start thinking about the beast and the serpent and the thing that needs its head took off and what it's going to require to do that.
Unless we're going to keep this thing to, we're talking in chats on Rumble.
Well, on the chat and rumble I've expressed my rage about an issue.
Is that where you want to leave this or do you want to take it further?
The fag end of his prime ministership.
Don't talk to me as if he's come down from the mount with tablets of stone.
The things that he says are somehow meant to awe me.
They may awe you, they don't awe me.
A lot of people have just watched what the Prime Minister said.
This is your opportunity to respond to what he said.
He says that there are forces here at home trying to tear us apart.
He is implying you are a divisive figure.
You have run an election campaign that has tried to appeal particularly, not entirely, to one section of the community.
Who won the election?
Me or Rishi Sunak?
I've got the democratic mandate here.
Not Rishi Sunak.
He didn't even come second.
He was lucky to come third.
So don't put to me.
Rumble chat's a good place to start.
Yeah if we can start agreeing with each other because I see some of you lot have got strong views on Israel, some of you got strong views on Palestine, some of you got strong views on Trump, all sorts of strong views in there and one thing that you've all got in common is you're all the prisoners of the establishment.
They got you right where they want you, in a chat complaining instead of in a chat organizing.
Statements made by Rishi Sunak as if I'm supposed to be impressed by them.
We don't... He don't impress me much.
What?
Because there are people... I mean, is he... Is that Shania Twain that he's quoting there?
Let's get him on the show.
That don't impress-a me much.
Don't impress-a me much.
I impress-a me much when someone... Rumblers assemble!
Yeah!
Awakened wonders of the world unite.
You have nothing to lose but your chains.
Guys, do you know one way we're gonna... This is the last thing I want to say before we get right into it.
We've got some great Jan 6 stuff coming up.
We've got some great stuff on Excess Deaths.
I'm warming up now.
I'm warming up.
This is it.
We're gonna get fiery, baby.
But before we leave you on YouTube, you know who looks after all of your data?
Amazon.
Microsoft.
All of the most powerful big tech companies in the world have got complete power over your data.
If you're someone who uses these services, you're probably tired of getting a surprise, a saucy surprise at that, when you see your cloud services bill every month.
Well, our friends and partners at Rumble have done it again.
The new Rumble cloud services are coming this spring.
Rumble has built a cloud for a parallel economy.
The disruptive Rumble cloud pricing model will allow the big tech company clouds to be blown away without ammunition, offering you big savings and predictable budget.
And according to Statistica, Microsoft, Amazon, Google own 66% They just need one more six man to own our entire internet information situation.
This means these big free giants decide they don't like something that they're hosting, they can shut it down without anyone stopping them.
Do you remember when Parler got taken off the internet after January 6th?
Of course you remember it.
That probably affected you.
How did it happen?
Parler was hosted by Amazon, meaning they could cancel the app from the internet with a simple flick of a switch.
Now, like Rumble video, you don't have to worry about cancellation on RumbleCloud.
Now, this is exclusively for our friends of Rumble.
There's a sign-up today.
If you go to friends.rumble.cloud, you can take a picture now of this QR code, right?
And you'll receive 30% off your first three months.
You can have your own little cloud.
Which will be available for purchase later this quarter.
Rumble cloud services are the essential cloud services you need for any size business to innovate and grow.
Head to friends.rumble.cloud and sign up.
Look, the link's in the description.
That's available for all of you beautiful people.
Let's start owning the tech.
Let's start our own currencies.
Let's start our own communities.
Let's start looking beyond the divisions that they want us to be lost in.
Now, if you're watching us on YouTube, there's a link in your description right now.
We want you to click on it because we're going to be talking about excess deaths.
We can't talk about that on YouTube.
We are going to be talking about Jan 6.
We can't talk about that on YouTube.
We got some magnificent content.
We're talking about the Blaze journalist that got arrested.
That's a pretty good story.
It's not a good situation, but it's a good story.
As well as Elon Musk's media breakdown.
Oh man, you've got to join Locals as well because Locals, we got Mike Benz this week, we had Rand Paul last week, we've got a brilliant COVID story.
Become a supporter!
Get together with our movement!
Should we get that musk thing up now?
Where is that musk thing?
On Oldsmedia.
We are the feet in Oldsmedia.
Click the link in the description.
We're going to see, let's go!
Right, okay guys.
Yeah, where is that Musk thing on?
There's a part two thing, it's not up now.
Listen, all right, should we finish then?
Oh, this is good now.
You know, like you might, maybe you're not feeling scared of COVID anymore because it's like, you know, for a good many reasons.
We'll go back to Galloway in a minute.
We're at 120.
Let's remember that.
We'll do that.
We'll cover that a little bit later.
But check this out.
Look at this.
Check this.
Like now, to try and drum up a bit of dread around COVID, look at this.
Hangovers are worse.
Researchers think COVID could be the cause.
Now, like, just let's look at the trajectory of this.
It started off with Everyone get in your house, you're all gonna die.
Take these injections, otherwise you're killing your nan.
Now it's like, are your hangovers a bit worse?
They're clutching at straws at this point, aren't they?
They've run out of ways to propagandize this thing.
Matt Gatz though, he's taken on the Defense Secretary and former Raytheon director Lloyd Austin on vax mandates in the military, which were proven to be, which were proven to be Actually illegal.
Some people call him Gates.
Let's have a look at it.
Cancer, that you were being treated for cancer, or that the treatment for that cancer had gone wrong, because you saw it as personal and medical.
And I think a lot of us have empathy for you in that regard.
On the chat the other day, someone goes, he looks like a grown-up child actor.
I think that is the perfect definition for Matt Gatsgate.
Call him what you will.
Now, this is good here because he's using Lloyd Austin's personal health issues to leverage an interesting argument.
But now that you see how personal medical decisions are, will you call for the re-recruitment Restoration of full rank and back pay for the 8,600 service members who were vax mandated out of the military.
No, I won't.
I mean, all he really needed to do was briefly lick his lips and he was straight into that, wasn't he?
Hey, maybe it's time for us to put on our video.
I think it is, actually.
Let's have a look at this.
Excess deaths are growing at such an astonishing rate that, in our country, they've had to change the way that they measure them.
Politicians across the world are starting to question vaccine side effects, as government-funded agencies, it seems to me, have manipulated Statistics to downplay the true gravity of excess deaths.
This is an epic investigation.
It's going to make you laugh.
It's going to make you cry.
It may not make you get any vaccines.
Tasty Darl in the Awaken Wonder chat.
What's the situation with Julian Assange?
I hear you, mate, because it was supposed to be announced on March 4th, wasn't it?
And today is March 4th.
If we get any news on that, we will, of course.
Update you and I pray for Julian Assange and I pray that he gets the outcome he deserves which is of course freedom.
Let's have a look at excess deaths, the attempt to manipulate those numbers and later this week we'll be talking about the information that could demonstrate finally a connection between the medications and the excess deaths and of course that information may be held already in the hands of pharmaceutical companies, certainly not being released to the public.
Let's have a look Now, at the attempts to manage excess deaths.
Here's the news.
No, baby.
No, no, no, no, no, no.
Here's the effing news.
With even politicians questioning vaccine side effects in Congress and in parliaments around the world, and with government-funded agencies visibly appearing to manipulate excess death figures, we ask you, will the truth about these supposed medicines ever be allowed to fully emerge?
Government agencies have just out of nowhere decided, you know excess deaths?
Yeah, we know excess deaths.
Do you know excess deaths?
Yeah.
We're going to calculate them in a different way now.
It's complicated statistics, information, numbers, maths.
They're all very subjective concepts.
This new way that you're going to calculate excess deaths.
Is it, this is just a shot in the dark, which is what you've ironically been giving all of us.
Is it going to make the number of excess deaths lower?
Oh, yeah it is.
That's interesting.
Let's have a look at even Dr. Phil, who was once a sort of Oprah Winfrey protégé, is there anything more mainstream than that, announcing to the world that he's got some pretty serious questions.
And the same agencies that knew that are the agencies that shut down the schools for two years.
His eyes are bulging a bit.
I'd like to know how many booster shots he's had.
Who does that?
Who takes away the support system for these children?
Who takes them away and shuts it down?
Remember when you had those questions?
Hold on a minute, isn't shutting down the schools likely to lead to other conditions and problems and potentially complex social issues to do with welfare?
Isn't it possible that if you shut down all of society there'll be economic costs, mental health costs, addiction costs, costs That was to protect people!
people's cancer treatments, heart trips, all those questions that people were quite rightly
discussing at the advent of the pandemic, which were, as we now know, censored and shut
down and controlled for some reason. What was that reason?
Remember the reason we're continually given and still given? That was to protect
people. That was to protect people by making sure they take this medicine. This medicine
though, is it effective?
Does it work in the way that you first claimed?
Are there more side effects than you initially said?
So finally we're having conversations that we could have had three years ago that would save us all a lot of money and heartache and authoritarianism and dispute and protest and all sorts of challenges and problems really but else That's where there's clearly an attempt to control this information, as we'll show you.
There's a brilliant, brilliant British public information film about how numbers don't mean what you thought they meant.
Numbers are different now.
We're changing maths.
Maths is a thing that you can meddle with.
It's sort of, I see maths as subjective, really, just like a musical genre.
We'll be showing you that in a second, as well as looking at why these questions are being asked and how these conversations are being framed now, I think, to minimise the impact of the emerging truth.
But Dr Phil's doing a great job there and he's astonishing the regulars on The View, so there's watch him do yet more of that.
There was also a bit of demagoguery, they were trying to save kids lives.
They were trying to save kids lives.
We don't need to get so deep into the burrows of doubt, do we, where we start to consider
that there was possibly another agenda.
But it seems like the sort of nexus of interest in the end were doing something other than
trying to save kids lives.
It seems to me, at best, like the reflexive assertion of control and the inert accumulation of profits.
Those seem to be two pretty powerful forces.
But let's see if this corroboration for even more malfeasant agenda at work, global control, mass profits, Population, I mean, there's all sorts of things that could be discussed and will be discussed on our other platforms.
That's why we want you to become a supporter of our work so we can speak openly because the space that you're watching this now, unless you're, praise be, watching it on Rumble, could be subject to censorship in the same way that the platform that it's being discussed on now is.
You can see the room alter, bristle, bridle, and prickle when Dr. Phil, nervously but robustly, like an agitated wardrobe, brings up the subject of natural immunity, which again was another censored subject at the height of the pandemic.
No one wanted to believe.
We know a lot of folks who died during this.
So it wasn't people weren't laying around eating pawn, but well, you know what?
We're lucky.
Maybe we're lucky they didn't because we kept them out of the the the places that they could be sick
because no one wanted to believe we had an issue.
No one wanted to believe.
There's an argument.
Some say that people often unconsciously convey their deepest feelings while talking about another subject
and it seems to me that what's being avoided now is we now know that social distancing measures
we just saw came up with six feet.
We shut down football just because my friend in another state shut down football.
It's possible that the adverse events are far more pervasive and severe than was first suggested, even in a new global survey to a part funded by the agencies that told us that we should just get on and take that stuff.
The agitation that Whoopi Goldberg is expressing, and I say this as a fan of Whoopi Goldberg, generally speaking, Are you saying no school children died of Covid?
Wolfie Goldberg, she's a brilliant stand-up comedian, is the unwillingness to relinquish
the perspective that we were kind of forced to have. It's very difficult, isn't it, to unfurl
people's grip on an old, old lie. It's hard to get people to accept that we were lied to.
Are you saying no school children died of COVID?
I'm saying it was the safest group. They were the less vulnerable group and they suffered
and will suffer more from the mismanagement of COVID than they will from the exposure to COVID.
And that's not an opinion.
That's a fact.
The audience applauds there because we, the people, are becoming better informed every day because of independent media.
You can also see how the media environment, the legacy media environment that we were just analysing, automatically provides a hostile and oppositional space when such matters like, oh what, no children died?
Is that what you're saying?
That no children died?
Like, Dr Fields has to be on a tightrope above a pool of sharks.
Where if you go on MSNBC, for example, and say, if you take this vaccine, it stops with you, you won't get it, or this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated, no one's ever going, hey, come here, that thing you said about a pandemic of the unvaccinated, I've got some information for you.
Those conversations never take place, do they?
No wonder excess deaths are high, and no wonder excess deaths are so high that maths has had to be changed to accommodate it.
I'm a mathemagician.
But seven goes into 28 four times.
Uh, this is a magic seven.
Britain suffered just a third of the total excess deaths previously estimated in 2023, it was revealed today.
It wasn't revealed today, it was manufactured by changing the way that maths works.
Even though many charities and universities have reported unusually large upswings in mortality rates for conditions like heart disease, And even though insurance companies have had to amend premiums because people are dying that are not expected to die.
So that means, hold on a minute, we can't insure you, 35-year-old person, because now, for some reason, you're more likely to die than ever before.
Now what they've done is they've just changed the way they do math.
Oh, well, that was a mistake.
Those charities and universities must have been mad, or they must have had some sort of other agenda.
No, no, no.
What's happened is these charities and universities and people using calculators to go, well, that person's dead, that person's dead, that person's dead.
They're all wrong.
We've got this new system now called Make Stuff Look Good.
Fresh analysis of official statistics show 20,000 fewer deaths than expected occurred in the UK last year.
No!
Fresh analysis!
A pack of lies!
Tolls for 2020 and 2021 at the height of the Covid crisis were also revised downwards.
Could we just revise these?
In which direction?
Upwards, because of all the ways we know that from.
From and with COVID.
No, downward.
Let's revise them downwards.
Excess deaths are considered the most accurate way of measuring COVID's true impact because they cover deaths missed by testing and collateral fatalities.
It is also considered the most consistent way to measure pandemic death tolls.
Recording varies massively between countries.
Traditionally, the figures were calculated by comparing the number of deaths in a year with the average number for the previous five years.
Go on!
But now, the Office for National Statistics, ONS, adjusts the rates to capture trends relating to age and population changes.
Oh, trends you're capturing, not propaganda you're relaying.
I think I can smell shite.
Under the new calculations, there were an estimated 10,994 excess deaths in the UK in 2023, around a third of the original 31,442.
Whatever new mathematic categories and switches of perspective they deployed, it had the, you know, happy and coincidental effect of reducing excess deaths, which is, let's face it, the big fly in the ointment, the turd in the swimming pool of why we can't continue to say vaccines were so great.
These vaccines were so great, why are there all these dead people?
in the pool.
These vaccines are so great, why are there all these dead people?
Because you know, we've already established that they didn't stop transmission.
I know, I know, I'm trying to think.
I know they have all these adverse events.
Look, I'm trying to think.
If you keep talking, how am I to get in there and change maths itself in order to make this
look better?
At the time, experts blamed surging rates of cardiovascular disease as one of the leading
causes of excess deaths.
What could have caused that?
Professor Carl Hennigan, the director of Oxford's Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine,
seems like the sort of person we could trust, said, The ONS estimates make excess deaths look more serious in
2020 and less serious in 2023.
It's clear to us that something is not right.
There have been more deaths than expected since the pandemic.
But that's just old Professor Carl Hennigan at the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine,
the crackpot that's concerned there.
Last year, the British Heart Foundation reported that since the onset of the pandemic,
as of June 2023, there have been nearly 100,000 excess deaths in England
involving ischemic heart disease or other cardiovascular diseases.
We can't continue to bring you this potentially paradigm shattering information without the support of our sponsors.
We've got one for you right now.
Stay to the end, please.
Is it me or does the future feel more insecure and uncertain?
Wars.
Pandemics, lies, trickery.
For those of you that are in the United States, there is a way to secure your hard-earned nest egg.
American Heart for Gold makes it easy to protect your savings and retirement accounts with physical gold and silver.
With one phone call, they can have physical gold and silver delivered right to your door or inside a qualifying retirement account like your IRA or 401k.
American Heart for Gold is the highest-rate firm in the United States with an A-plus rating from the BBB, that's the Better Business Bureau, and thousands of satisfied clients right now.
They'll give you up to $10,000 of free silver on your first qualifying order.
This offer, I'm sorry to tell you, is only for customers from the United States of America.
Call 866-505-8315.
That's 866-505-8315.
Or simply text BRAND to 998899.
Then they'll know we sent you.
Get up to $5,000 in silver and protect your future in this crazy, crazy world with some solid, precious metals literally made in stars.
Now let's get back to the content.
The number of premature deaths from heart disease soared to a 40-year high in the wake of the pandemic, yet the government appears to lack any appetite for investigating the root causes.
What could that be?
Why would there be no appetite to investigate the root causes?
Could it be that they made decisions that led to these deaths?
Endorsed products that led to these deaths?
Seems astonishing, but what they've actually done is, what if we were to change maths?
The new changes saw excess deaths in 2023 revised down from 31,442 to 10,994, a drop of 65%.
This is like a film where like prisoners play football against the guards and then at the end the guards go, we've got an extra 25 minutes of extra time!
It's like we're winning because the results are in.
Hey, what are you doing about all these deaths?
What deaths?
I didn't see no deaths.
This is actual, literal corruption.
And the film I'm referencing is Escape to Victory.
A stacked game.
The Third Reich's finest against a ragged bunch of prisoners of war.
But there are claims that it underestimates the true picture today because current death rates are increasing in part because of the excess death problem.
Oh, you bastards.
Professor Kevin McConway, the emeritus professor of applied statistics at the Open University, said there's no such thing as a correct number of excess deaths and urged experts to focus on getting to the bottom of what was causing the increased mortality rates.
That shows you what happens in bureaucratic dictatorships like we essentially live in now.
Instead of going Oh my God, what's causing these deaths?
We've got to help people.
Yes, we have got to help people.
What if we make that number look littler?
But all those people that are dead will still be dead.
I know.
But it's going to look a lot better when you're looking at it from an ivory tower laughing on a bed made out of money.
The ONS method gives a measure of how many excess deaths there were, but tells us nothing directly about what was the cause of any excess, he said.
There should be an investigation.
Well, good luck getting that.
The ONS defended its new methodology, saying it had worked with many academics and organisations for more than a year to make sure the modelling was robust.
These academics, who funds them?
And these organisations, what are they?
They are managing reality in order to achieve a particular outcome.
The reason that there is not more striving to change our corrupt systems is for the people with the most power.
Our corrupt systems are working.
Professor Sheila Bird, former program leader at the MRC Biostatistics Unit of Cambridge University, said getting excess deaths right was highly important for both the public and the COVID inquiry.
Yes.
It does seem to be quite important to know how many people have been killed as a result of recent events.
It seems somewhat concerning that the response to these excess deaths has been to change maths.
You will not see a single legacy media organisation demand a conversation about how they arrived at this new statistical method.
You won't see that.
What you'll see is Albert Baller puff pieces, various politicians brought onto shows and said, Well, does that mean Trump's probably conspiring with Putin?
That's what investigative journalism in the legacy media looks like nowadays.
But you and me know that they're up to something, and it requires the media, and it requires the government, and it requires big corporations, and it requires global organizations.
You know their names.
All of these little groups that work together to manage reality to keep you docile, compliant, and distracted.
And it seems ill.
If you should die as a result of some of their decisions, well, they've got a new mathematical method to conceal that death.
And here it is.
During and since the coronavirus pandemic, we've generally seen more people die than we'd expect.
Yes, we certainly have.
So how are you going to make this seem really, really boring so that we don't pay attention to it?
Someone get Jean!
We call these deaths above average excess deaths.
Different organisations have used different ways to calculate this.
And we've finally found one that makes it look like loads of people didn't suddenly die in 2020, 2021 and 2022 and 2023.
And we've found a way of minimising that and making it seem not that bad.
Each with merit and particular uses.
We've found one with merits and particular uses that are in alignment with our agenda.
For example, for planning health interventions and identifying emerging threats.
The biggest emergent threat is you waking up and becoming non-compliant.
In the spirit of continuous improvement, we've been working with independent experts.
How independent are these experts?
Where's their funding coming from and why are they so willing to go along with your agenda?
Here's some independent experts I'd like to see involved.
Jay Bhattacharya.
Did you give him a call?
No, I didn't think so.
And those across government and the devolved nations to develop a common UK-wide approach.
While you're watching this, you have to expel from your mind your knowledge that Moderna have employees from the FDA, that Moderna take employees from the UK government, that Pfizer spend an enormous amount of money settling lawsuits, that Pfizer spend a lot of money lobbying.
As long as you expel all of that information, then you can cast from your mind the obvious fact that there's been significant excess deaths and the way of solving that problem has been to change maths.
Using our new approach, Today's release estimates 11,000 excess deaths in 2023.
Oh, that's good, because that's lower.
Yes, in other news, this number here, that straight line, that doesn't mean anything anymore.
And that one there that you used to call eight, that we call a snowman, that one we just call squirrel.
Nothing means anything anymore.
While this is lower than our previous estimate, our new method accounts for the growth and ageing of the population.
It's not growing and ageing as much as it was because people are dying.
You can't conceal that.
These are key factors in understanding how many deaths we'd expect to see and whether the number of deaths is below or above this estimate.
Like just ask yourself this quite macro question.
Why have they decided to do this now and put it out in the media?
It's because obviously there's huge concern about excess deaths.
What we're involved in now is a new phase of the pandemic.
It's to put out surveys that minimize and mitigate the obvious adverse events.
And now, mathematics itself is being revised in order to minimise excess deaths.
So the two key problems that have emerged from the pandemic period, or the post-pandemic period, are people died in extraordinary and exceptional numbers.
You better control that figure.
People got sick and ill as a result of the vaccines.
This information can't be concealed anymore, but it can be managed.
Because there's a point, even for us, Even for people as willing to be compliant and as slumbering and sleepy as us, there's a point where we can't take it anymore.
We're obviously reaching that threshold because pieces of propaganda like this are being released.
Looking more closely at the last months of 2023, there were actually negative excess deaths.
Oh that's good so everyone's fine then.
Also you're not poor and your food prices have gone down and everything's all right and the Ukraine war is going very well as well.
Meaning fewer deaths than average being registered.
Further back across the pandemic the trends and peaks in excess deaths are the same using the new method as they were under the old.
That's literal Orwell.
We've always been at war with Oceania.
War is good.
Peace is bad.
Four legs bad, two legs good.
They're just changing information because it's becoming unmanageable.
This is the key problem that independent media presents.
Now we all have access immediately to alternative information and we can decide for ourselves.
So they have to make arguments for why we shouldn't be allowed to decide for ourselves because you look at something like Excess deaths.
You look at something like this piece of propaganda and you realize what's going on and you realize that you were right all along and you realize that the next step is to stop complying.
It's important to note there are estimates of excess deaths.
Just that.
Estimates.
That's all.
Just estimate.
It's just a funeral that you watched on YouTube.
It's just a person just dropping dead on a sports field.
It's just young people getting heart disease at unprecedented levels.
It's just wars all over the place that you're funding.
It's just lies and propaganda.
That's all it is.
Estimates.
They can't be counted individually.
Unless you experience them or you know those people, in which case you've got to live with that forever.
Unlike death registrations, which haven't changed.
The only reliable piece of information is if you look at the web address you'll see the word gov.
That's short for government and that's where that information came from.
Can you trust them?
That's the question I'd like to leave you with.
I would say what we're experiencing is a new propaganda phase.
Because the information is out there, the information has to be managed, manipulated and altered to prevent what would be the subsequent phase.
Disobedience, disillusionment, maybe even opposition and organisation of new systems.
In a way, this is a very positive piece of propaganda because it shows us that they are beginning to understand what they're up against.
But that's just what I think.
Let me know what you think in the chat.
▲
Export Selection