Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 16, 2023 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

01:19:55

“SHOULD I EAT MEAT?!” Paul Saladino Recommends Russell Converts To Carnivore Diet! - Stay Free #191

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	birds chirping distorted music
	outro music In this video, you're going to see the future.
	Hello there you awakening wonders.
	I couldn't be more honoured that you have joined us for conversation, connection and love.
	A time when it feels sometimes that we're on the precipice of real disaster.
	When the people in Maui are suffering because of these fires.
	When there are conspiracies everywhere that it was in all good with ill intent and will benefit the elites and establishment that we're coming to detest.
	I want to offer out to you the spirit of love and friendship.
	I welcome you with an open heart and an open mind to whoever you are and wherever you're from and tell you now with clarity that you belong in this movement.
	You deserve to be who you are.
	You can express yourself freely here.
	For the first 15 minutes we're going to be on YouTube.
	Then we will slide, glide and glide to the other place where free speech flows like abundant wine down from Mount Sinai,
	not like the tablets of Moses, no, but like a liquor, like an ambrosia that will
	light us up and change our consciousness.
	Let's partake in this ceremony together. We're going to be talking about when RFK, friend
	of the show, my pull-up opponent, went on Tucker and he talked about Ukrainian biolabs.
	Now, I know those of you that are a little bit more in the conspiracy world, you knew about this stuff ages ago.
	Let us know in the comments and chats, actually, if you were aware of that biolab story already.
	Let us know if you were dismissed, called a crackpot on a tinfoil hat-wearing nut job as a result of espousing those theories.
	Well, it seems that there's more credibility to them than we first thought.
	In our item, here's the news.
	We're gonna be looking at the investigation by special counsel.
	Is this the story, Gal, my on-screen assistant and dear friend, that the person that's conducting this investigation is the person that gave the plea deal?
	They negotiated the plea deal, yes.
	He negotiated the plea deal and now he's gonna investigate?
	Yeah, he's got special powers now though, Russ.
	That's special powers.
	Special powers now.
	When he was doing the play, he had no powers.
	No, there were just normal powers.
	I've got normal powers here.
	That's not going to be enough to learn.
	Anything more than your name might be Robert.
	Did you know that Hunter Biden's name was Robert?
	Let us know in the chat.
	If you're watching us on Rumble right now, why don't you join us in the locals chat there, like Ash Ella, and Tamara Spencer, and True Chimera, and Art by Wendy.
	They're talking about conspiracy theories around Hawaii.
	That's what they're chatting about now.
	You'll love it.
	I've got a great guest coming on.
	He was recommended to me by none other than former SAS hero and TV superstar Bear Grylls.
	He said to me, you've got to talk to Dr. Paul Saladino on your show.
	You've got to.
	He goes, Russell, You're a vegan, right?
	I said, Bear, you know from our time together when we went on that adventure, did you take a glance at my kill?
	And he said, of course I did.
	I took that opportunity when he was there.
	He goes, I'll go, so do you think I'm vegan?
	He goes, I saw that you're a vegan.
	And now I know that Bear's a carnivore from what I saw up there.
	There's a barbecue on that grill!
	There's a veena on the barbecue!
	Lovely stuff.
	Yeah?
	There's a steak grilling up there!
	Well, Paul Saladino, and this might sound crazy to you, and let me know if it does, because I don't want you feeling like you're listening to crazy talk here, because this is a movement, this is a revolution, this is where the pilgrims come, this is the place where we come to taste the sweet wine of freedom, I've told you that.
	Dr. Paul Saladino says we shall be tanning our ball bags to within an inch of our life.
	Now, I don't know if that contravenes WHO guidelines, so let me be careful, because on YouTube they've just updated their laws, Gareth, They're guidelines.
	They call them guidelines, but let's face it, they're laws.
	Because, you know, if you don't obey these guidelines, you're not just being guided down a line, you're being financially penalised if you don't listen.
	And for all I know, the WHO don't like us tanning our nutsacks till they're a brighter shade of pale.
	I'm surprised that's not something you and Bear Grylls did together.
	Well we did actually, but it was an inadvertent side effect rather than the intention of our trip up to the Hedbradys.
	Right, that wasn't the name of the show.
	Weren't Russell Brand and Bear Grylls tanning their nutbags together?
	No.
	Bear Grylls told me some pretty exceptional... Bear Grylls sent me a photograph of me own father like a secret agent.
	Like you know when like sort of in a... Say if you're watching a Tom Cruise film and like you're talking to the baddie and he's maybe played by Philip Seymour Hoffman, God rest his eternal soul.
	Sure.
	And like, he'll send you, like, you'll be like, listen, I got you, you son of a bitch.
	And then, like, Philip Seymour Hoffman will send a picture of, like, your kids going to school or your wife at the supermarket.
	That's what Philip Seymour Hoffman's terrorists would do in a film.
	Sure, of course he would.
	Classic move.
	Classic!
	That's classic Hoffman.
	Like, well, like, this is, uh, Bear Grylls sent me a picture of my own dad on the front of a magazine from the 1980s.
	Why's he, is he trying to intimidate you?
	He did intimidate me and I was already intimidated from glaring up his kilt while I was running wild.
	There was nothing wilder.
	We're talking to Paul Saladino about carnivore diets.
	Would you consider the carnivore diet?
	Am I crazy being a vegan?
	Let me know.
	Is it the vegan way or is it the carnivore way?
	Because tell you what, things are changing fast.
	Which story do you want to hear first?
	I'm going to consult our locals community on this.
	Do you want to hear about Cornel West, who is as liberal and left as they come, slamming AOC and Bernie Sanders?
	Do you want to start there?
	Or do you want to start with rats in New York City that are the size of a slipper?
	The size of a man's fist?
	The size of a dog's elbow.
	The size of the length of a pig's tail.
	What's it gonna be?
	Rats or Cornell?
	Tell us, tell us.
	We're doing Maui a little bit later.
	Rats, rats, rats, rats.
	People want rats.
	Right.
	Okay, let's have a look at these rats in New York City.
	It's really weirdly reported on story.
	We'll do Cornel West slamming Bernie Sanders after.
	You'll love this because what it shows is that independent political figures are coming together like RFK and Cornel West and even the great avatar of the anti-establishment, Donald Trump, in alliance, at least in alliance in terms of the discourse, in terms of the critiques
	they're offering of the establishment.
	You're going to love this, but first, there's a rat in this city. What am I going to do?
	Let's have a look.
	The first anti-rat day of action was held in Harlem.
	We've had rats the size of crocs.
	Just running up and down the street.
	Like a croc shoe.
	Average size 8.
	Like that, because it's a rat that's the size of a croc.
	Not a crocodile, but a croc shoe.
	She then offers some further guidance.
	It's a size 8.
	That's an average size 8.
	So that's that big, is it?
	Yeah, that's about right.
	About that big?
	That's kind of what I'd imagine a... That's what I'd expect for a rat.
	A rat, yeah.
	Also, the bit where she said, rather than running up and down the street... What, it goes up it, then down it?
	Well, that's another thing that I would expect from a rat.
	Rats, they're just up to their usual... They're not doing something... It's not like flying or something.
	They're not doing something really odd.
	Right.
	It's that standard rat behaviour.
	They're not wearing little straw boaters and singing barbershop quartet songs.
	No.
	I'd like to draw your attention to that elegant rivulet of sweat running down that lady's mid-chest.
	But they're not becoming chefs.
	Well, they are in the film Ratatouille, which I believe is an accurate portrayal of Parisian rat life.
	Let's see what else these rats are up to.
	Rats need food, water and shelter to survive.
	For the rats?
	Are we against the rats?
	Is this a rat telephone?
	For just one dollar, you can buy a rat a little chef hat and an apron so it can make it as a chef in Gastron or whatever it is in that restaurant in France.
	She sounds like she's on the wrong side.
	One team hates the rats.
	They think they're too big like a shoe.
	Other team love the rats.
	Why don't they just try and work together?
	Are you guys so different after all?
	Today we're going to cut off their food source and reduce their habitat.
	Take away the places they can live.
	There you go.
	So rats in New York City, normal size, normal measures being undertaken.
	If you don't want to live in a rat infested city, don't give rats all of their delicious rat requirements really.
	There's going to have to be a lot of work done on things like sanitation, but also the whole restaurant system, the food system, big food, corporations.
	I mean, there's a lot of work.
	You're going to have to start again from the beginning, because you know where there's a real infestation?
	Washington!
	Cronyism!
	Capitalism!
	Corruption!
	Everywhere you look, but a friend of the show, Cornel West, He's getting stuck into the real problem by moving beyond partisan politics and into exactly the type of independent politics that we're advocating for.
	Independent media.
	Independent politics.
	New voices in politics making new pledges.
	That's precisely why Cornel West is interesting.
	On a podcast, The Breakfast Club, he had this to say about Bernie and AOC.
	Let's check him.
	At the core of the Democratic Party is a rot.
	And that rottenness is corporate greed.
	So when I hear AOC, I say, okay, she's part of that progressive small slice of the Democratic Party, but she's given in to the perceptions of the corporate wing of that party.
	And the corporate wing says over and over again, all we have is two parties.
	It's freak and frack.
	is Tweedledee and Tweedledum. Ha ha ha ha, Tweedledee and Tweedledum.
	Cornel West offering us an accurate diagnosis. Both parties have been co-opted
	by corporate and financial interests, are unable to offer us reasonable change. Isn't this
	exactly the problem? Isn't that the reason why every indictment Trump receives simply amplifies
	his popularity? Because it's the system itself that you have recognised is no longer
	capable of serving you.
	And isn't part of the problem crazy crackpot ideas like this?
	Now Joe Biden's offering $700 to each household affected by the Hawaii fires.
	Some are saying too little, too late.
	It's at least an improvement from his no comment moment, where even as the president of a nation, he's unable to offer a few words of comfort.
	to those suffering. Many of you saying, and let me know if you think this in the chat and the comments,
	this is his Katrina. This is the moment where we finally see, where it's finally revealed,
	even to his ardent fans. And God, it's impossible to imagine such a thing. But what we got there is
	a figurehead for naught but ineptitude. Just the stooge, just the figure from the establishment,
	incapable of offering anything but platitudes and bumbling, mumbled, half-arsed comments. Now,
	$700 for each household affected by the fires. Check it. He also authorized one-time payments
	of $700 per household to folks who've been displaced so they can do the immediate things
	of just taking care of medications and prescription that they so badly need.
	That's all well and good, but you know the $900 of your tax money is being paid already each year to continue to sustain this unwinnable war between Ukraine and Russia.
	I don't think either side can win, but it seems that Russia are benefiting.
	Do you know that the United States has spent more money on this conflict than Russia and yet claim not to be involved?
	That's why we offered you this poll.
	What do you think your tax dollars should be spent on?
	Hawaiian aid or funding wars?
	And of course, 97% of you want your tax dollars to build US infrastructure.
	I'm sure you are compassionate and loving people.
	I'm sure all of you share in our compassion for the people in Ukraine that are affected by this negative conflict that was criminally begun.
	But it was of course provoked.
	We all know that now.
	We've been through The various reasons that NATO's behaviour and ignoring treaties, or if not treaties, deals has exacerbated this condition.
	But how is sustaining this war beneficial to anyone but the military-industrial complex?
	We need a radical review of this rather than what's happening right now.
	Biden is going to Congress asking for $25 billion more of your money to sustain a war.
	Yeah.
	There simply cannot be one.
	So that $900 is growing.
	You know, that's in terms of, that $900 represents the $113 billion that I think has been spent so far.
	But $25 billion now is going to be spent every quarter on the Ukraine war, on this ongoing war.
	$900 already?
	That is going up.
	Not a dollar more on this war.
	That's something that one of your presidential candidates could stand on.
	RFK thinks the war should end.
	Trump thinks the war should end.
	Cornel West thinks that the war should end.
	Who doesn't want the war to end?
	The Biden administration.
	Democrats, I think, used to frame themselves as the anti-war party.
	They were disgusted by the Iraq war.
	It's an easy mistake to make, but then I didn't start either of those wars, neither did I profit from either of them.
	It's extraordinary, isn't it?
	It's like there is no moral centre, there are no guiding principles other than the relentless pursuit of profit and propagandising a population to the point where we can't even ask reasonable and legitimate questions.
	Yeah, and I think to go back to Cornel West and his criticism of AOC, you know, she's received criticism from Democrats themselves or Democratic supporters for endorsing Biden on the very same day that he said he was going to send cluster bombs to Ukraine to be used in that war.
	Honestly?
	Yeah.
	The cluster bomb day?
	That's right, on that day.
	Clusterbomb Christmas!
	Yeah, so when he says, you know, she's being co-opted or she now represents the same things, it feels like he's onto something there.
	What do you guys think?
	Let us know in the chat and the comments.
	Listen, if you're watching us on YouTube right now, where your content is regulated by the WHO,
	don't get me wrong, we love every single one of you, 6.5 million awakening wonders.
	And that's why we are dedicated to bringing you the truth, including you in this conversation,
	because we value your perspectives and your opinions.
	We don't think we're smarter than you.
	We don't think they're smarter than you.
	We wanna know what you feel, what you think.
	We think it's absolutely vital for this movement that we have your attention,
	that we have as much dedication and devotion as you can offer us.
	And you better believe me, I'm gonna give you everything I've got.
	We're gonna be talking about Tukka and RFK and their recent discussion around Ukrainian biolabs.
	Yet another of the extraordinary coincidences around this conflict.
	Yet another trail where Ukraine leads to institutional, potentially corrupt figures.
	Allegedly!
	In this case Fauci, and in the case of Burisma, Robert Hunter Biden, who will be bringing you more on later when we look at the various tendrils that wrap around that peculiar tale.
	So if you're watching this on YouTube, click the link in the description, join us over in the other place where free speech is truly free, where freedom and speech coalesce beautifully, Well, we can dance together around the totem pole of free speech in glorious and unselfconscious worship.
	I see you over there.
	We're going to be talking about biolabs in Ukraine.
	You ain't going to want to miss out on that, baby.
	Let's have a look at the conversation.
	If you're watching us on Rumble, give us a Rumble.
	There ain't no algorithm on Rumble.
	If you're watching us on Rumble, become a member of our locals community.
	We do bespoke meditations.
	We're going to send the first 1,500 new members A free gift that is literally going to protect you right where it matters most.
	Remember, we're talking to Dr. Paul Saladino a little later.
	He may have salad in his name, he don't have it in his diet, I'll tell you that.
	Because all he wants to do is bite into the side of an elk.
	That's all he wants to do is drag an elk down by its antler and bite a hole in its chest.
	That's right.
	All he wants to do is flap out his ghoulies in the hot sun and warm them up like toast.
	Apparently Tucker does this.
	Have you heard this rumour?
	Like that Tucker Carlson's already vitamin D'ing himself in the ball bag using Sweet Lady Sunshine as a natural salve.
	He looks great.
	He does look well.
	I know we can't see them, but I've never dared even glance.
	But I tell you, you know, of course, as you know, when I was in Tucker's garden with you, actually, I took the liberty of passing water on his property.
	It was a risk.
	His wife endorsed it.
	She did.
	When he came around our house, he went for a wee in our garden as well.
	That's the kind of treaty we need.
	Americans and English people putting aside their differences and piddling in each other's garden in the sweet spirit of love.
	Did you know that about us?
	Yeah, I do like talking about it, Nodaganoku.
	Nodaganoku goes, do you like talking about it this way?
	And I love it!
	I love it, baby!
	Kelly Page laughing, just laughing.
	Okay, should we, oh yeah, so we'll talk about the nutbags a little bit later.
	I can't believe I drove my car into a hedge this morning.
	No, no.
	I spilled coffee all over my legs.
	Which came first?
	The coffee legs.
	Coffee legs.
	First coffee legs, then hedge.
	Right.
	And I felt delirious.
	It's a tale as old as time, isn't it?
	A tale as old as time.
	Coffee on your legs.
	Driving to the hedge.
	You broke your reg plate.
	Beauty and the Beast.
	Yeah, I feel bad about it because it made me feel that reality was breaking apart.
	I'm always having that, like a little thing goes wrong, like you spill a coffee, and while I was going, oh no, I was really angry that I'd spilled the coffee and I couldn't have it no more, and I was looking at you, I was on the seat of the car, we were in it and that.
	Did you think about licking it up a little bit?
	Some of it went in this shoe.
	Now, as you know, my favourite shoe is a Vivo Barefoot.
	Those are the best shoes Sweet Lady Money can buy.
	Oh, he loves those.
	I love them.
	He loves them.
	But some coffee went in my shoe and I felt it pooling around my heel.
	Oh dear.
	Yesterday I stood on a slug and I felt it resist.
	I felt it push back.
	You shouldn't have to go through this.
	It's disgusting the way I live.
	And anyway, while I was thinking about all that, I drove into a hedge.
	I didn't feel good about it.
	Not one bit.
	Not one bit.
	There's a metaphor in there somewhere, isn't there?
	Somewhere, I think, the universe is talking to us.
	Ulterior forces are telling us the truth.
	Let's have a look at Tucker and RFK now, talking about Ukrainian biolabs.
	Let us know if you think there's a connection between these issues and this ongoing conflict.
	And if you're watching us on Rumble, get over to Locals, where the conversation runs free.
	Have a look at Tucker.
	Toria Nuland kind of blithely announced during congressional testimony last year that, oh, by the way, we have these biolabs in Ukraine.
	Yeah.
	And that was kind of ignored, and the people who covered it got attacked for covering it, but the fact remains there are U.S.
	biolabs in Ukraine.
	Why would we have biolabs in Ukraine?
	We have bio-weapons because we're developing bio-weapons and those bio-weapons are using all kinds of new synthetic biology and CRISPR technology and genetic engineering techniques that were not available to previous generation and they can make frightening, frightening stuff.
	What happened was in You know, when we walked away from, when the Patriot Act reopened the bioepsis armories in 2001, the Pentagon began putting a lot of money into bioweapons, but they were nervous at that time.
	Because if you violate Geneva, the Geneva Convention, it's a hanging offense.
	And they weren't sure that that Provision in the Patriot Act would actually hold up as a loophole to treaties that had been ratified by Congress.
	So they were nervous about actually going full force into bioweapons development.
	So they transferred the authority for biosecurity to one agency in the HHS called the National Institute for Infectious and Allergic Diseases run by Anthony Fauci.
	So, Anthony Fauci got all the responsibility for bioweapons development.
	He got, at that time, a 68% raise from the Pentagon in order to do that work.
	So, and that's why he was the highest paid official in American, in the American government of, you know, four, four million people in the American, he's the highest, he has more money, he got more money, $450,000 a year than the President.
	Extraordinary figure, Anthony Fauci.
	Certainly there are numerous accusations now accumulating, peculiar means of profiting, public declarations that have proven to be untrue, and to think that he was initially presented to us as a saviour during the early pandemic.
	This is what authority should be like. Not this clown President
	Donald Trump. This guy, Antony Fauci, a man who, when the moment came, was able to offer us the
	scientific advice, the medical expertise that this pandemic required. Well, as time has
	gone on, it seems that he's precisely the kind of profiteering bureaucratic figure that we should
	be extremely cautious of. Unelected officials with incredible power, with extraordinary ways of
	making money, not accountable to an electorate, not accountable in any of the ways that
	democracy pledges that any official with that amount of power ought be.
	Now we have these revelations around the biolabs.
	Victoria Newland, Victoria Newland, One of those names, one of those figures that's not a politician but is always in and about various administrations.
	Wasn't she in Ukraine around the time of the 2014 coup?
	Correct.
	How does she intersect with this story, mate?
	So yeah, she's a State Department official.
	She confirmed the existence of biological research laboratories in 2022.
	Man, this was like, I thought this was spoken about as a conspiracy.
	I remember when Ukraine Biolabs, at the beginning of this war, was a conspiracy theory territory.
	Yeah it was and even this is being disputed but what people have spoken about with this clip in particular is the fact that she says we don't want them getting into Russian hands and so what they've kind of walked this back and said no it's just biological research it's not dangerous we're not developing weapons but then obviously the point that people were making was why are you worried about it getting into Russian hands if this isn't dangerous?
	Yeah, that's right.
	That doesn't make sense.
	Both those things can't be true and there's just so little trust, isn't there?
	I mean, it seems generally speaking that my automatic response is to resist authority.
	Can you tell us in the chat where you lot stand?
	Like, if someone tells me what to do, my sort of impulse, my visceral impulse in my gut is, I'm not doing that.
	I don't like that you're telling me that.
	I like to be consulted as an adult and as an equal.
	This is what we suggest is best for you.
	What do you want to do?
	That's what I would say should be the premise and the framing for our relationship with the state.
	Authority derived from consensus.
	Authority that is governing along lateral lines.
	Not hierarchies of power and dominion.
	Because when you have Figures like Victoria Nuland do keep cropping up like some negative zealot all over history.
	2014, during the coup, she's there.
	She's worked for the Bush administration, I think.
	I think she worked under the Clinton administration.
	She's still at work now.
	She has some interesting marital relationships.
	I think she's married to figures that operate within the same field.
	It seems, doesn't it, increasingly, that there's a cadre of political apparatchiks that are not put there by us, but are paid for by us.
	Yeah, exactly.
	And Glenn Greenwald writes about the ways, obviously, the connection that the RFK is making there is Fauci and COVID, obviously, in terms of the gain of function research, which is done in the name of being defensive.
	You know, that's the whole point.
	But Glenn talks about the way in which defensive research can easily be converted into extremely destructive biological weapons.
	Anthrax being the example.
	That's a great example.
	It's the prime example.
	And this is what RFK wrote about in his book, The Real Antony Fauci.
	And at that point, I was looking at that book with its tiny print and its difficult premise and its difficult content as well, thinking, I never imagined that RFK would become a presidential candidate and a prominent figure in the international discourse.
	But he was saying exactly that.
	that as a result of the Patriot Act it became possible to do good kind of
	experiments that previously been adjudged to be dangerous and that they
	had somehow conflated bioweapons with vaccines and there were some
	extraordinary liberties being taken again with taxpayer money. What's
	Greenwald saying Gal? Yeah I mean in terms of the anthrax what he says is
	according to the FBI the 2001 anthrax attacks that terrorized the nation came
	Army research scientist, Dr. Bruce Ivins, working at the U.S.
	Army's Infectious Disease Research Lab in Fort Detrick, Maryland.
	The claim was that the Army was merely conducting defensive research to find vaccines and other protections against weaponized anthrax, but to do so, the Army had to create highly weaponized anthrax strains, which Ivins then unleashed as a weapon.
	Brilliant.
	How extraordinary.
	I mean, isn't that the entire mRNA research mentality?
	That we have to create these entities and these pathogens, pathogens, in order to cure and heal them.
	I can't help but think we need a radical revision of all of our systems of research and the way that science is funded and conducted.
	Nobody asked me!
	Nobody asked me if I wanted that done.
	I find it astonishing that you have to develop lethal anthrax in order to solve the problem of lethal anthrax, and that'll all be okay if the story was then, and that's how we solved that lethal anthrax attack, rather than, this is how we created a perpetual war economy, and how we don't, I don't feel safer than I felt at the start of the Patriot Act era.
	No, and also, you know, when you've got headlines that we know about from the Telegraph at the moment about the next pandemic, we're always reading about the next pandemic and how many people it's going to kill and what are the kind of measures that the WHO are going to have to bring in.
	When we know that the potential that through this kind of research for things like COVID being created, you think, well, that...
	Well, they're priming us for a pandemic that's much worse.
	They're doing experimentation that is, by its nature and by intent, dangerous.
	And of course, I'm not suggesting that they would deliberately release things from laboratories.
	I don't think anyone's claiming that.
	Is anyone claiming that?
	Anyone claiming that?
	Remember, you can speak freely in the locals chat.
	Press the red button and talk there.
	Remember, we've love to each other, with pure love.
	What's the point?
	There's enough hate in this crazy world.
	So yeah, you're right.
	It feels like it's like almost like we've been prepared for another Mission Impossible movie.
	Coming soon, another pandemic.
	Bigger, better.
	Tom Cruise is gonna jump out of a lab with pathogens and spray them into your eyes in a burning train.
	I mean, like, they're sort of selling us the next pandemic.
	I'm very cynical.
	Do you know just a mate of mine who's a person who's not involved in politics, doesn't even watch my content, we were chatting about the pandemic, and he goes, you know, at the beginning of it, we all just thought we was doing what was right.
	It was lockdown, we all had to do what we were told.
	He goes, I won't be doing that again.
	This is a person that's not inside the political establishment or media establishment or any of those establishments.
	I think most of us have had enough of being told what to do.
	I don't think anyone trusts the establishment anymore.
	I don't think any of us want mainstream media to prevail while independent media is censored and surveilled.
	I think that the tide is turning.
	Things are changing.
	I think people believe in freedom of speech.
	They believe in free speech.
	Of course they do.
	And where freedom meets speech, you get free speech.
	And where free means speech, you get freech.
	Let's have a look at some of this free speech.
	They're chatting pretty freely over there.
	The boss says, I would like ten cases of Russell's Kombucha flavoured vile slops, please.
	Where do I sign up?
	We are experimenting even now.
	If you take a look at Gallery Cam, you'll see the team.
	Yes, ostensibly what they're working on is our online show here on Rumble.
	Stay free of Russell Brand.
	But in their hearts, they are making vile slops.
	In their abdomens, they're making vile slops.
	Under the desk, I think.
	They're making vile slops with their loins.
	Yes.
	We're brewing it up.
	We're brewing it up in our cellars, even now.
	So if you want Vileslops, and if you can pitch a better name than Vileslops, could there be... Do you actually... Can you... Nodaganoku says, can you actually call your kombucha Vileslops?
	Yeah, we can.
	Make a dark fruits version, says PrimalColin2.
	It's the only flavour.
	The dark fruits of Vileslops.
	The lids of vile slops will be nips, says jimurfc137.
	I like you.
	That's a good suggestion.
	Nip lids?
	Flip the nip.
	Drink the slops.
	That's our slogan.
	Wow.
	We haven't made the drink yet, but we've got the slogans and the flavours slotted.
	The dark fruits.
	Do you want... fart juice?
	I'm not calling that pride farts.
	Not cum butch.
	Oh God.
	Grow up!
	Don't use your free speech!
	Don't use your free speech to make spunk jokes!
	BFG says, talking about the world coin.
	You know, you see that dirty little orb?
	We did a great video on this.
	That dirty little eye sucker orb sucking out your eye juice and telling you what's what.
	World coin sounds sinister as fuck.
	Thanks for the heads up!
	Nice one, mate.
	Sinister as fuck.
	Knocked it on the bonce, didn't we?
	Here's some PBD comments.
	We had on the show Patrick David.
	There he is.
	I like him.
	I'm not criticising him.
	He's a very successful man and he shares our space and we're all friends together in this space.
	But he kept going hypothetical situations to me.
	There's nothing you hate less than a hypothetical situation.
	I don't like it.
	Right, okay.
	1947, and you had nine mouseticks lined up on a wall.
	Which one of them mouseticks is gonna fall first, east or west?
	Oh, I don't know.
	Because when someone makes you do a hypothetical thing, it's like you're in a sort of little game now, aren't you?
	You're in the car.
	You've got a coffee on your lap.
	Wait, hold on.
	You spill the coffee.
	Oh, shit.
	You look down.
	Oh, no!
	What happens next?
	My ball bag!
	I mean, no, I've crashed into a hedge!
	It's the hedge.
	Yeah, that's what happened.
	How did you know that, PPD?
	I know a lot.
	Should I put my ball bag out of the window?
	Should I stretch it long?
	Should I suck my own ball like a lozenge?
	Would it cure the common cold?
	Could it fight off COVID-19, BBD?
	Anyway, someone here says, uh, Chief411, never ever give Russell a hypothetical.
	Because what I started to do, someone goes, who is this guy, Robert De Niro?
	That's Dawny Girl's idea.
	No, he's good.
	He's really good.
	He's had, like, you know, Tate on there and Vivek Ramaswamy.
	He's really good on economics.
	But I disagree with him on some stuff he said about single mums.
	We're allowed to disagree.
	That's good.
	Healthy debate.
	Free speech, healthy debate.
	That's what we're doing here.
	That's what we're doing now.
	Swipe me up!
	Swipe me up!
	And anyway, when he started giving me help for hypothetical situations, I started to really make them weirder.
	Yeah, of course you did.
	In my hypothetical situation, I made a tit milk dairy and talked about incest and stuff like that.
	But it's alright.
	It's all good fun.
	Good.
	None but some pals living life to the full, I say.
	Hunter Biden.
	Ian Drummer goes, his name is Hunter Biden, but maybe Russell should be called the Biden Hunter.
	Yeah, well, hunt him down.
	Oh, I see.
	But I'd hunt down Joe Biden more.
	It wouldn't be difficult, you'd have thought, because he can't move that quickly.
	Even when he was doing that speech a bit earlier, it's like he had to summons up every bit of it.
	It's like he's pulling the words up from his sphincter and they've got a long way to go, you know, because his sphincter, it might have been externalised now, like a duck egg.
	Got it.
	Like a boy penguin's looking after the duck egg to get it.
	Okay.
	Hey, listen guys, do you want to know the truth?
	Should we be slinging our ball bags onto an aluminium foil tray, baking them in the hot, hot sun?
	And what about you ladies out there?
	You've got to cook up them labia till they're golden brown, textured like sun.
	What have we got to do to be free?
	Paul Saladino, him be on the show now.
	How's it going, Doctor?
	Good to see you, Russell.
	Thanks for having me on.
	I'm so happy that you're here.
	You were recommended to me by our mutual friend, Bear Grylls.
	He just simply texted me, you've got to have Paul Saladino on the show.
	And for that reason alone, and now I love you more than ever, because you're a hero, George, white toothed wonder man.
	And I want to talk to you about carnivore diets.
	And I want to talk to you about Gorgeous brown ball bags.
	What if your ball bags are already brown, Paul?
	How do you even know the bloody difference?
	And what's the point of all this ball bag bakery and carnivorism?
	Did you know that your testicle sac, the scrotum, contains some of the highest concentration of melanin in your body?
	So you can get a tan on your body, but your balls can get even more tan than the rest of your body.
	So like the melanin in your ball sac is more than everywhere else.
	Paul, is that why the ball bag is, generally speaking, and I'm talking in the Caucasian skin tones here, because I'm... Well, let me think about that.
	I'm thinking I'm talking universally.
	The ball bag is browner than the rest of the skin tone.
	Is that right?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, because it has melanin.
	And the idea here is just that real sunlight... I mean, you experience this with Bear when you guys are out sunning your ball sacks in the wilderness.
	Real sunlight is valuable for humans.
	Real ultraviolet light does a lot of things in the human body that vitamin D capsules can't do.
	We know that vitamin D is valuable for humans.
	We saw this during the COVID pandemic when the majority of people admitted to the hospitals were vitamin D deficient.
	I mean, how many thousands, tens of thousands of lives could be saved with attention to simple supplementation of vitamin D?
	But even sunlight is better than vitamin D supplementation.
	And you can get it wherever you want, on your skin, On your chest, or you can get it on your coffee-soaked balls now.
	That's the antidote to coffee on your balls.
	Marinate them in caffeine and bake them in the sun.
	Paul, I'm so glad.
	I'm actually going to need you as an expert witness because during the pandemic, at the height of it, I did march into the emergency room and I said, while yous lots are coughing and spluttering on ventilators, These guys are the solution and I'm not afraid to admit I presented my ball bags to some of the senior consultants and medical officials there.
	They asked me to leave and would you believe it I'm facing prosecution and even trial.
	So the point of this is it brings about natural vitamin D. Your ball bags are the route to health.
	Now you know Paul that I'm a Very committed vegan, by God.
	I live and I die for sweet lady veganism.
	But you're saying that the carnivore diet might have some method to its madness.
	And what about veganism?
	Is it some sort of fad?
	Should we put aside our compassion for the cow and down a bit of their leg?
	Not at all.
	I think that anyone who makes an intentional choice with regard to their diet, anyone who's not just walking as a zombie and eating whatever foods fall in front of them or they can pick up in an airport or at a fast food joint, deserves to be appreciated.
	And though you and I make different intentional decisions with regard to our diets, the first step for people finding health, and I think Being good citizens in the community of the earth is making intentional choices and understanding how we're choosing to eat.
	With regard to meat versus plants, I have found and I have concerns that when humans don't eat meat and organs, so we're talking about like muscle meat, steaks, hamburgers, or organs like heart and liver, which come with the whole package of the animal, There are a lot of nutrient deficiencies that can develop unless we're very, very intentional about supplementation.
	And this is where things get really interesting and you go really far down the rabbit hole.
	But I've just seen so many people improve their health when they include more meat in their diet and organs especially, like liver.
	And I think that for the last Decades, last two to three, maybe five decades, we've been told that meat is bad for us.
	But when I look at the science, I think meat is good for humans nutritionally.
	You and I can talk about the ethics and how we navigate that in the world if you want.
	But I think nutritionally, meat is so valuable for kids, for adults, for elderly.
	There's so many things to argue for including these animal foods in our diet from a nutritional standpoint.
	From a nutritional standpoint?
	Yeah, thank you, Paul, for that distinction.
	Is it primarily because of protein or particular types of protein?
	Because I'll say this, I'm actually looking to put on functional muscle mass as a result of a forthcoming contest against RFK.
	I've got to do a pull-up competition.
	I'm willing to ingest almost anything.
	Are you saying it's impossible to get strong enough to win a pull-up competition
	without a little bit of meat in your diet?
	And what is it in particular that, where are the benefits derived from, mate?
	There's the protein in animal foods is more bioavailable than the protein in plant foods.
	But there are examples of people who eat a vegan diet who have lots of muscles.
	And some of those people are probably supplementing with some steroids or some exogenous hormones.
	But I know people in the vegan community that I've had respectful conversations with
	who are probably just taking a lot of protein powder.
	But if you just want to eat foods that you could get from the earth that you could hunt and gather and not a synthetic hemp protein or a synthetic pea protein made in the lab, you're going to be able to gain muscle and all of the other benefits that come with the meat.
	We can talk about the other nutrients much more easily by including animal foods in your diet than you would by eating things like peas and lentils and things like this.
	So if you think about this, This gets a little technical, but there's this one amino acid, leucine, in meat that's associated with muscle growth.
	And you can get enough leucine to trigger optimal muscle growth in eight ounces of meat, like a burger patty, maybe even six ounces of meat.
	But to get that amount of leucine, to get Russell Brand jacked to beat RFK in this pull-up contest, you're going to have to eat pounds of rice and lentils.
	I mean, pounds a day.
	That's going to cause problems for your septic system in your house, and maybe nobody will want to be around you because of the flatulence.
	So I'm telling you, Like, it's a better, and then we can talk about the other things too.
	That's just the protein, but there are many other nutrients that are valuable in animal foods and meat that you can't get in plant foods at all.
	True Nature's Child says, I've got no gallbladder, so I have to watch the fat or it gets runny.
	And I, like, I feel like, you know, like, I do take a lot of protein powders.
	Like, I drink a nice protein shake.
	It's delicious most days, but you're saying that it's not just protein we need to, like, In your ideal world, Dr. Paul Saladino, you've got salad in your name, but not in your game.
	The ball bag is out the window, baking in the sun.
	You're noshing down on elk meat.
	Is that what it's going to take?
	Tell us a little bit about your diet, oh wise and handsome man.
	Yeah, elk meat and elk liver and grass-fed cattle.
	We can talk about regenerative agriculture, but beyond the protein, when people think about meat and steaks, they just think about protein.
	But Russell, it's so interesting when you go down the rabbit hole and you think about the other nutrients that are in meat that are difficult to find in plant foods or impossible to find in plant foods.
	There's been a lot of research recently about this.
	This compound called taurine, and of course the name is there, it's bull.
	And taurine has been found in worm models, in mice models, and in primate models to extend longevity in those models.
	So we haven't done controlled experiments in humans, but taurine looks to be beneficial for humans in other sorts of experiments in terms of cognitive benefits and as an antioxidant.
	And the only place you get taurine, so clearly shows benefit across multiple species in longevity, And overall quality of life.
	The only place you get this is animal meat.
	And I don't know many vegans that are supplementing with taurine, and that's just the tip of the iceberg.
	What about creatine?
	What about carnitine?
	What about carnosine?
	What about anserine?
	What about vitamin K2?
	What about riboflavin?
	It's just that we've evolved eating meat, and there are so many of these key nutrients that allow us to thrive as humans that are predominantly or exclusively found in meat and organs that don't occur in hemp protein or pea protein or Brussels sprouts.
	What about Tina Turner?
	What about Flavor Flav?
	You can't just hit me with a list of magical strings of nutrients and expect me to sit there and take it like a baking ball bag.
	Dr. Paul Saladino, what are the ethnographic and anthropological undergirdings of this because as surely
	as we are hunters we are gatherers and I suppose really the only reason I'm not eating animals is
	not for is not for nutritional reasons in my case I've seen game changers I've seen them
	documentaries for me it's just I think animals they're all right I don't want like as Morrissey
	once said I don't think something's life should end just so I can have a snack like and I know
	so that's the only reason.
	And I agree with you as well, by the way.
	I don't think everything should get so politicised that you can't let people be different from you.
	That's crazy.
	My wife ain't vegan.
	It's not a political thing for me.
	It's just a personal choice.
	Like, I believe all spiritual choices should fundamentally be personal and if people are Inspired by your sacrifices or endeavors?
	Although I don't know how they would be when they hear how I live my life.
	Coffee sloshing about in my groin while I displace my neighbor's shrubbery.
	You know, then that's that.
	But like, do you think that human beings... Is there not a way, mate, that it could be healthier to live on plants?
	Or would that involve the degree of supplementation you've described?
	And if it does, what of it?
	Why not supplement yourself up to the hilt?
	I don't believe there's any evidence in the medical literature that meat is bad for humans.
	I mean, you sort of asked, is it healthier to be on plants?
	And I would say, no, it's not.
	It's healthier to include meat in your diet, especially for children, but even for adults, and then for elderly who become frail, who need the muscle mass to avoid sarcopenia, which is when we get kind of skinny fat, lose our peripheral muscle mass, and get kind of like fat on the inside.
	So we know that what Kills elderly people.
	What causes us to die is frailty.
	And the way that you avoid frailty is by having enough quality food in your diet, especially micronutrient-rich meat and organs.
	And then for children's development, for proper development of the brain and all of the organs and all of these tendons and muscles as kids are developing and growing so they're strong and resilient, the animal foods provide so many unique nutrients that are so hard to get elsewhere.
	You asked about the anthropology, and I think this is an incredibly important point.
	So I went to Tanzania last year and got to hang out with this tribe of hunter-gatherers called the Hadza.
	They're some of the last hunter-gatherers left on the planet.
	There's only a few thousand true hunter-gatherers left on the planet.
	And I'll tell you what.
	We hunted, and then we ate the animal.
	We ate the organs first.
	We ate the animal from nose to tail.
	I shared the brain of this animal with the hunter that killed the animal the next day.
	I ate the brain with him.
	I'm sure they ate the testicles, but I didn't get a chance to see them because they were so prized.
	Then we ate honey.
	They found a beehive, and they ate the honey.
	We found some berries.
	These hunter-gatherers, they don't care about vegetables at all.
	They don't want to eat vegetables.
	They just want to eat meat.
	They want to eat fruit.
	They want to eat honey.
	And they want to eat this baobab fruit.
	And occasionally, they'll eat a tuber, but that's the last thing they care about.
	If you look at hunter-gatherers, I think that, from what we can tell with our ethnographic and anthropologic time machines, humans, we don't give a shit about vegetables if we can get other stuff that tastes better.
	Title.
	Good title.
	Paul, when you was living with them indigenous people, how did you get on?
	Was the vibe good?
	Did they include you?
	Did you get on their nerves?
	Did you start cosying up to them too tight in the living quarters?
	Was it a bit like dances with wolves?
	Also, was there a good ceremonial atmosphere?
	People living a lifestyle where they were connected to meaning and purpose because survival acquired a kind of mythic quality because it took so much endeavour and focus after a day's hunting.
	Did it feel beautiful to sit around a campfire?
	Was there a sense of community, connection?
	Were there other aspects beyond diet, you diet-obsessed lunatic, that were inspiring?
	Yeah, it was really cool to be with them.
	I mean, I think of them as, like, the best time machine we've got.
	It's not a perfect DeLorean.
	This isn't perfectly Back to the Future, but it's about 50,000 years ago, I imagine, that you go back in time when you see these people.
	Now, they're influenced by the Western world, for sure, but it was really moving to sit around the fire with them.
	They were very welcoming.
	They were happy, Russell.
	They were fundamentally happy and peaceful people.
	They welcomed us.
	I think they were more welcoming because we wanted to go on hunts.
	We said, let's take us on the longest hike Yeah, we got to see a lot of them.
	And very few people go visit them and even fewer people that go visit them will go on an eight or nine hour hike slash run slash hunt with them.
	So we got to see as much as we possibly could embedded with them, and it was.
	It was just fundamental.
	Happiness was what they were sharing with us.
	Just they didn't have cell phones.
	They don't use money.
	They were just happy having what they had.
	They had community and they celebrated the food when they could get it and they shared it.
	And especially when we had very successful hunts, there was music and dancing and they were happy to share
	that with us.
	So, not a perfect time machine, but it was pretty idyllic.
	It was really pretty remarkable, the experience with them.
	Also, the DeLorean was not a very good time machine.
	As I recall, there were problems with the flux capacitor, and it broke down in that barn, and Marty McFly had to stay there.
	And we all know what he did when he met his mum, Paul.
	And I'm sure you're not endorsing that, Paul, because that's called incest.
	And that, it don't matter how much elk meat you consume, if you're eating it from your mother's lap, that is a problem in the sweet name of Jesus!
	Mate, what do they hunt, and what do they hunt with?
	They make all of their own hunting implements.
	So they have bows and arrows they make from wood.
	Their arrows are made from wood.
	They have a neighboring tribe called the Datoga that will make them steel or metal arrowheads.
	And they will sometimes take a local plant called an elephant foot plant and put poison on the tip of an arrow.
	And so they hunt with bows made from wood, sinew, and then Barrows they've made by themselves, and they are predominantly hunting local animals around Lake Iasi in Tanzania, and their hunting grounds have been constricted because of encroachment from other pastoralist tribes, so they don't have as much access to game as they once did.
	But their prized thing is an elan, which is a large sort of impala-type ruminant animal.
	When I was with them, we hunted baboons, and along the way they would hunt small monkeys and birds.
	Did you feel, did you have a go in the bow and arrow and wouldn't you feel a bit guilty shooting a baboon down because it's so, uh, sort of the Simeon's beings are so human.
	Like I imagine him tumbling out of a tree sort of going, ah!
	And almost maybe going, bloody hell!
	I've got a date tonight!
	Don't you feel a bit... I mean, at least if you shoot an undulate, it's got that slit up it's hoof, I think.
	Ah well, you're asking for it.
	But a monkey that looks like it... I put aside the one that betrayed Indiana Jones in the marketplace.
	Fuck that little guy.
	But normally, monkeys are our friends.
	Didn't you feel a bit bad about it, and did you have a go?
	It's so when we were actually at the key part of the hunt for the baboons, this tribe of Hadza, this maybe eight or nine Hadza males hunters, they just scattered everywhere.
	They were running and I was just sort of watching and like trying not to get in their way, but they were hurting the monkeys in certain ways.
	They had dogs.
	And so they were the ones that were actually trying to get the monkeys out of the tree, or the baboons, excuse me.
	So I wasn't directly involved in the baboon hunt.
	I was like right there with them, but it was so frenetic.
	And I'm, you know, I'm a westerner, right?
	I've never hunted a baboon in my life.
	I've never been in their tribe.
	I have no business doing this with them.
	The fact that it's like a human and has a thumb and opposable fingers, it is kind of Stirring and disturbing, but you also realize that this is life for them.
	And this kind of goes back to your point earlier, and I'll just add this as humbly and as respectfully as possible.
	When I think about food choices that we make as humans, I'm reminded of a book that I read when I was younger.
	It's called The Tracker by Tom Brown.
	And he tells a story in the book of being apprenticed to this Apache Indian elder who was teaching him sort of these Native American ways.
	And he tells a story of killing his first animal when he was 9 or 10 years old.
	And it's a lame deer that he's killed by himself with a knife.
	He brings it back to camp, and he's weeping.
	And this Apache Indian, this Apache Native American says, why are you crying?
	And he says, because I killed this animal.
	And I'm paraphrasing from the book.
	But this has stuck with me.
	So the response from this elder was, in order for something to live, something else must die.
	This is the way of life.
	When you understand that the life in a blade of grass is the same, and it's all kind of this life force, you'll understand this.
	And the goal is to be respectful of the things that you're using to fuel your life.
	So even when people want to eat plants and they believe that the plants are resulting in less death, I think that it's interesting and important to really look into that and understand all of the ecosystems that are disrupted by the plants that we eat, all of the by-kills, all the moles, the voles, the beavers, the snakes, the rabbits.
	There are literally tens of thousands of lives that are disrupted, that are displaced, that are killed when we're Plowing a field to grow plants.
	And so I think that if we want to live on this earth as humans, and I feel like you especially illustrate this, we have the ability to do a lot of good in the world as humans.
	We have to accept that in order for something to live, something else must die.
	And when I think about the choices we make, In terms of food quality, I believe, and this is just my belief, that by eating meat and organs, we're giving our bodies such unique nutrients that allows us to do the best work in the world, allows us our brains to function well, allows us to be strong and protect our families.
	And so I believe that we have this purpose on Earth to do good in the world, and that none of us should be, I think, ignorant to the way that we affect the world.
	We're all responsible for ending life.
	And it's just how we choose to use that that gift that we're given as we get the chance to live and do things in the world.
	Those are excellent points, Paul.
	And it's just a degree exposes that sometimes we adopt the pose of morality when what we are in fact Discussing his sentimentality rather than rather than true morality that the consequences of the food systems and how they're economically undergirded is not free from a negative impact exactly as you've described and this
	Ideology of non-separateness, acknowledging a continuum of life beyond materialistic, individualistic, solipsistic obsession with the role of humans and our sort of supremist kind of position in hierarchies even beyond the food chain and in sort of ultra-civilised social systems, It protects us.
	It protects us in sort of a kingdom of folly from the consequences of our actions.
	And yeah, you present some really interesting arguments.
	But what I also got from listening to that hunt is when it came to the crunch of shooting a baboon, you floundered and you scampered and you got in the way.
	You dropped the bow and arrow, you squealed, you tripped up, you probably distracted them from an important and nourishing meal.
	But it's time now to put your testicles back in your pants.
	The sun has got its hat on and your balls should have their pants on.
	because this is an important moment in our show and it's as indigenously wonderful
	as any native ceremony you might have experienced.
	Oh well that was a shock.
	That's when Gareth asks the question that that happens, Paul, and here it comes, look.
	Paul, no, I was really interested, I mean, you've raised some amazing points, and I've recently started eating meat again myself, due to a lot of the things... When were you going to tell us?
	Well, I was hiding it from you.
	You bastard!
	What have you been having?
	For these very reasons.
	No, you've just heard that!
	What's next?
	You've been out kicking a baboon?
	I went down London Zoo yesterday and kicked a baboon up the bollocks.
	It's the only way that I could ensure myself a full head of hair.
	This is outrageous!
	I've started to reintroduce some meat into my diet for the reasons that you... You didn't know them reasons!
	Well, who do you think I work with all day long?
	Young Putin.
	What's young Putin been saying?
	He's obsessed with this information.
	If you're not necking a raccoon kidney... He loves Paul.
	Dane's Paul's a god to him.
	Is he?
	Young Putin's in there, Paul.
	He loves you.
	He looks like Putin, the Russian leader, when he was a young man.
	Like he's a dead ringer for him.
	He's well into your gear.
	He loves it.
	He's sat there now sucking on a baboon's butt, simply to impress you.
	That's before he knew it was nutritious!
	Go on then, ask your question.
	So I wondered what, in terms of, you mentioned grass-fed meat is, you know, kind of the best that you can get and it's important.
	When it comes to people, because obviously that comes with a certain expense to it, you know, grass-fed meat, the high quality meat that you ideally want to buy.
	What if you can't afford that?
	What about people who wanna, you know, get the same kind of quality, uh, meat, but they have to, like, go to the shops to buy it?
	Like, what's your- Can you get- What are you gonna do about that, Paul?
	What you gonna do about that now, Paul Saladino?
	What they gotta do?
	Stick their bum out the window and see if they can get some vitamin D up the rectum?
	You think you've got an answer for everything, don't you, Saladino?
	Well, he's got you, hasn't he?
	The lad from Hull, he's Flummoxed you!
	It's privileged elitism!
	We can't all go off and live with a tribe!
	Annoying them by ballsing up an important hunt.
	Can we?
	Some of us is down Lidl, down the middle aisles eating brains faggots!
	So this is a really interesting point.
	So let's just make sure people understand what grass-fed meat means.
	So I want to be clear that I stand with you guys shoulder to shoulder and not being a fan of industrialized agriculture for animals, whether it's chickens or pigs or cows.
	I think clustered animal feeding is not the way that we create healthy ecosystems for those animals, not the way that we create the healthiest animals.
	And it certainly isn't good for those animals' welfare and life in their lifespan.
	But when you've seen a grass-fed and grass-finished cow, that's a cow that's basically on a pasture its whole life.
	And I've been to a lot of farms.
	I've been fortunate to be with a lot of really cool farmers that I've learned a lot from, because I grew up in the suburbs of northern Virginia.
	I'm not a farmer.
	I'm not a Hadza hunter, as Russell has clearly outed me for.
	But when you're with these farmers on these farms and you see these cows, they're eating grass.
	They're healthy cows.
	They eat grass for their whole life, which is what they're meant to eat evolutionarily.
	Like all other species on the planet, I think that cows have a species-appropriate diet, and I think humans in some ways have a species-appropriate diet.
	So I think that it's clear that grass-feeding, grass-finishing of cattle is good in so many ways.
	Good for the cattle, Good for their being while they're alive.
	They have this happy, healthy life.
	And all animals die eventually, right?
	If they're in the wild, they're killed by a predator.
	These cows are just safe and they get to eat grass and they're healthy their whole lives.
	It creates healthier meat free from pesticides and other things that come with grain feeding at the end of a cow's lifespan when it's in a clustered animal feeding operation.
	And from an environmental perspective, if you look at the The carbon emissions, if you want to get that granular, we know that this way of raising animals, especially regenerative raising where they do rotational grazing of these animals, is actually carbon negative or carbon neutral.
	So there's so many reasons to eat grass-fed meat.
	It's nutritionally better.
	It's free from pesticides and mold toxins that come with the grains.
	And from an environmental perspective, if that's something you get wrapped around the axle about, if you're worried about carbon emissions and these kind of things, it's clearly beneficial.
	Now, for some people, the grass-fed meat is more difficult financially.
	I'd say it's probably 20 to 40, maybe 50 percent more expensive.
	I want people to not let perfect get in the way of benefits, and so if someone can't afford grass-fed meat, Get the meat that you can afford, because I do think that even though we know that a grain-fed animal is not ideal from a lifespan perspective, from a lifecycle perspective, it's still going to have lots of good nutrients.
	It's still going to have the taurine and the flavor flave and the Tina Turner that we talked about earlier, Russell.
	And You know, it's going to have these unique nutrients that are hard to get other places.
	And then I think that people can start to make these calculations in their mind.
	For me personally, I can't think of anything that's a better investment than quality of food for you and for your family.
	But I'm going to let everyone else listening to this make their own decisions in terms of how they use their finances.
	Maybe they want to spend it on...
	Gonna get a bow and arrow.
	You're not gonna get a bow and arrow and go around their house and spangle it off in the wrong direction, telling them that it's Paul Saladino's way or it's the highway.
	Oh, we're allowed to make our own choices.
	You're not gonna march us into McDonald's and make us sup down a pint of cow fat with a straw.
	No, no.
	You know what's interesting about McDonald's though, and a lot of these fast food places, is that even at McDonald's, and I've done some content about McDonald's and how bad their french fries are, how many ingredients and how bad their food is, but you can go to McDonald's in terms of like getting food availability.
	Their quarter pounder is 100% beef.
	They don't have any additives in their quarter pounder and they don't use seed oils to cook it.
	So, It was interesting, you know, when we were in Austin, I wanted to talk to some of the homeless people and ask them like, how much money do you get asking people per day?
	You know, you can get a four quarter pounders at McDonald's for six to seven dollars.
	And that's for someone who has no stove and no way to cook, you can get 100% beef.
	Now, is that the ideal way to get beef?
	No.
	Is that the ideal beef?
	No.
	But the accessibility is there.
	And even in like, The fast food joint that is the epitome of probably many causes of our health problems today, there is an ability to make a less bad, potentially even reasonable health choice in terms of high quality meat.
	Dr. Paul Saladino, Thomas Beard in our local chat says, have you ever tried any plant-based food or do you think it's beneath you, you heartless monster?
	No, I added the last bit.
	He just said, have you tried any plant-based food?
	You know, I was a vegan once, Russell.
	I was a raw vegan for seven months, probably about 14 or 15 years ago.
	And I would go to my local grocery store and buy two heads of kale per day.
	So I'd walk out with six heads of kale.
	And this cute girl at the grocery store says, what is that for?
	And I said, well, it's for my smoothies.
	And I made these huge green smoothies.
	So I've been down the vegan path myself.
	Like I said, I respect people's autonomy and their ability to make these choices.
	I just believe as a physician and from a scientific perspective that there are better choices for human health that can be made ethically and morally as well.
	So I've been there.
	I haven't tried any of the vegan burgers.
	Every time we do content on any of this stuff, my whole team is trying to like just eat some Beyond Burger and I just won't do it.
	Why Paul?
	Because I know what's in the ingredients, Russell, and I worry.
	A lot of these plant-based foods contain seed oils, which are something that I have a major problem with.
	I don't think it's healthy for humans.
	Things like corn, canola, sunflower, safflower, soybean oils.
	I'm not convinced that I want to get leg hemoglobin, so like fake hemoglobin in my diet.
	A lot of the plant-based burgers contain cellulose, which can be problematic for the human gut.
	So I look at this food and I think it's not healthy for humans.
	And if someone is really feeling a pull from the deeper regions of their brain to eat meat, that's probably an evolutionary signal that you need those nutrients.
	I have a study here from Johns Hopkins University, and it says that when Paul Saladino says the vegan pathway, he's referring to his own anus.
	Is that true, Paul?
	Of course it's true.
	It's Johns Hopkins.
	How can I debate that?
	Can't debate Johns Hopkins.
	Paul, thank you so much.
	What an amazing conversation.
	What a fantastic perspective.
	So much to think about.
	Let's stay in touch.
	I think we've already got each other's emails and we will communicate more.
	Or I'll get it off bear or something.
	I so appreciate what you're doing.
	Thank you so much for having me on.
	I hope it's valuable for you guys.
	Oh, you're just lovely to talk to.
	You're lovely to talk to.
	You're a delight.
	Thank you so much.
	You can find out more about Paul at heartandsoil.co.co or dragonace.com and download the Paul Saladino podcast, which I reckon is brilliant because he's pretty... He's so lovely, isn't he?
	So knowledgeable.
	And he's nearly killed a baboon.
	He's nearly killed a baboon.
	He was trying to march the homeless into McDonald's.
	He's telling us there's nothing better we can do with our lives than go in there and start eating Big Macs.
	Quarter Pounders.
	He's out of control, that geezer.
	Quarter Pounders.
	Very specific about that.
	Quarter Pounders says there's beef patties.
	He's sort of got a very open, kind face.
	He's so nice.
	I really liked him.
	The murderer.
	He's a monkey murderer.
	He'll murder a monkey as soon as look at it, wouldn't he?
	He'll shoot it out of trees.
	Any monkey he sees.
	Oh, look at that cute little cup of tea.
	Sir, this is Whipsnade Safari Park.
	Do you know that you've got to eat giraffe tongues?
	They may look like velvety and prickly, but they're actually delicious.
	You can't actually survive unless you snatch a giraffe's tongue, wrap it around your fist, and yank it out of the giraffe's head.
	It's the only thing you can do for your children.
	Otherwise, it's irresponsible.
	I like Pooh Saladino.
	That was a good guess, man.
	It's funny, isn't it?
	Because obviously, you'd like...
	Well, I'm not going to say that.
	No, same here.
	Right, so hey, listen, we've got some fantastic people coming up this week.
	We've got Dr. Peter Atiyah talking about longevity, testosterone, and as fucking usual on this show, nuts and testicles and bollocks.
	Wow.
	It's all that we're talking about.
	What's going on?
	Click the red button to join our locals community.
	First of all, you get access to interviews per head of everybody else.
	And you can join us and ask questions if you can get in a word in edgeways around Gareth here.
	We do regular meditations that are bespoke and guided.
	What's the matter?
	What's the matter, mate?
	Someone in the chat says you look like Liam Hemsworth.
	Well, that's a lovely thing to say.
	So what's the problem?
	You look like Liam Hemsworth.
	You've got to take the rough with the smooth, don't you?
	Take the rough with the smooth, you look like Liam Hemsworth.
	Leave Gal alone, says jimurphc137.
	Paffodlipalian and a bloody happy medium.
	What a load of rubbish.
	All right, anyway, listen.
	Listen, you might be wondering...
	Oh, kerosene, testosterone, taurine.
	It's all made up.
	Well, Codswallop.
	Hunter, you know Hunter Biden, do you, Gal?
	Yes, I do, yeah.
	Talking of Hunter and Gatherer.
	Hang on.
	Cut that bit out.
	Don't say that he said it.
	Right, check this out.
	You may think they're nothing more nobler than being a hunter, but I'll show you one hunter, or gatherer, who contracts with Burisma what ain't right.
	And what, then he wouldn't even have gotten them if it weren't for his dad helping him out and everything, behind the scenes, shouting down a speakerphone.
	If Devon Tropelop, testimony archer, if his words are to be believed, then shit dog, Something came rotten in the state of Denmark.
	That's right, it bloody well will.
	How can a special counsel that bargained him a plea deal be in charge of the investigation with new powers?
	Shit off, you pigs.
	That's right.
	Here's the news.
	No, here's the effing news.
	Someone got his pills.
	That's how you do a link, my friend.
	like that.
	I'm gonna do. No. He's the fucking news. Rogan says the Bidens are definitely corrupt.
	The investigation is ongoing.
	But the investigation's being done by the people that are doing it anyway and haven't found anything so far.
	Hmm.
	On board with us we have Joe Rogan claiming that the Biden family are definitely corrupt, that there's sufficient and significant evidence.
	The investigation is ongoing but it's being done by the person that did that plea deal that seemed a bit dubious anyway.
	What are they telling him?
	Could you investigate properly this time?
	Just investigate harder!
	Why won't you?
	Let's have a look at Rogan's claims and see if we can work out together whether or not the Biden's business dealings will ever be investigated with the same vigour and forensic tenacity that Trump's business endeavours and indeed other escapades are being investigated.
	Joe Biden's been a goof his whole fucking career.
	He's always been a goof.
	He's been caught lying so many times.
	He's so full of shit.
	Do you sometimes think that actually media has changed now, and the way that things are
	investigated has changed now, because of channels like Joe Rogan, but the plethora of channels
	ranging from hardline investigative channels, and the fact that investigative career journalists
	can expose stuff if they want to.
	And you, me, anyone with a phone can report on stories.
	Now a career politician who's been around Congress their whole life, been through all
	of those institutions, like, they're gonna be exposed if they've done anything wrong
	ever.
	But one thing's for sure, these kind of institutions and these kind of political figures can't
	survive in this kind of media environment.
	That's why this media environment, I believe, is being manipulated, managed and changed so that you simply can't discuss this stuff.
	The mainstream media, you'll notice, don't talk about Hunter Biden in the same way that independent media like Joe Rogan does.
	That's because they are still managed in the traditional way.
	Presumably, if social media sites like Twitter We're infiltrated by the FBI and CIA?
	Presumably.
	Mainstream media, legacy media organizations have relationships.
	You saw how they towed the line during COVID.
	We've got to do what's best for the country.
	Well, you know what they think's best for the country.
	Democrat government, Biden is president.
	That's what they think's best.
	You don't have to assume these people are evil.
	You just have to assume they have biases and institutional relationships that don't permit honest and authentic reporting.
	Fortunately now, there are people outside of the space that are willing to say, hold on a minute, this looks like corruption.
	There's so much evidence that he's corrupt.
	Just undeniable evidence of corruption.
	And the stuff with him and his son, and then the guy who just testified that was business partners with Hunter, who talked about all the different things that Joe was involved with.
	Evan Archer.
	Yeah.
	It's fucking undeniable.
	The fact that mainstream news is ignoring this except for right-wing media, it's fucking crazy.
	Wouldn't you prefer a media that had biases and allegiances with a particular wing of institutional politics
	but still reported on matters in an open and transparent way?
	then wouldn't you trust them and the party more?
	If you saw CNN, Morning Joe, whatever saying, listen this Hunter Biden business stuff,
	we didn't talk about it enough at the beginning and it was obviously kept off Twitter,
	that Daily Post story should never have been repressed about the laptop,
	but now it looks like there are dubious business dealings that have been ongoing.
	Wouldn't that make you feel more trust?
	Things have become so divided, so separatist and sectarian, that it's almost like that aspect of the media consider it to be their duty to display ongoing fealty to an aspect of the administration.
	That just, I think, continues to diminish trust.
	Let's have a look at this in more detail.
	Joe Biden's son Hunter will now be investigated by special counsel with additional powers, the US Attorney General has been announced.
	What was the first investigation then?
	Look, investigate Hunter Biden, but don't try very hard.
	Don't use all of your powers.
	Just use a little bit of power.
	Let's see now how professional the mainstream media are, how they're better than us, and see how the representatives of the government speak in a clear and candid way that definitely isn't obfuscating, confusing, hypocritical, and sometimes just untrue.
	This is a CBS News special report.
	I'm Margaret Brennan in Washington.
	We are coming to you on the air to bring you an announcement.
	Everything about it, actually, is just grandiosity.
	This is my name.
	I'm in Washington, CNN.
	We are coming to you.
	From the Department of Justice, Attorney General Merrick Garland is making a statement.
	Ooh!
	A statement!
	Let's pull down our pants!
	It's a statement!
	And is making some detailed remarks that we will bring you in a moment.
	Are you just filling now?
	What we know is that it has to do with President Biden's son, Hunter Biden.
	Let's listen in.
	Let's listen in.
	Put a glass up against your TV now.
	This is goodness.
	Put a string in a paper cup, then your friend has another paper cup at the end.
	What is this?
	Is that children's television?
	Good afternoon.
	I'm here today to announce the appointment of David Weiss as a special counsel.
	And now he's doing it.
	Everything's paraphernalia and empty ceremony.
	Like, everyone's behaving like what they're doing is really important and significant.
	But I think you guys are ready for the news done by a man in a leopard print dressing gown, right?
	Let me know in the comments.
	I have today notified the designated members of each House of Congress of the appointment.
	Push in with the camera.
	Ooh, it's more important now.
	Beginning in 2019, Mr. Weiss, in his capacity as U.S.
	attorney and along with federal law enforcement partners, began investigating allegations of certain criminal conduct by, among others, Robert Hunter Biden.
	They've been doing this investigation for six years.
	They've got video evidence of criminal behavior.
	They've got a paper trial that leads them to Burisma.
	They've got Joe Biden letters saying, oh, I hope it goes well, Devon, to his business partner.
	And they actually are only just learning that his name's not even Hunter Biden.
	We've been working on this six years on the Hunter Biden case.
	This just in, that isn't his name.
	That's the end of the investigation.
	Thank you.
	Found his spoon, sir.
	That investigation remains ongoing.
	I'm gonna need another six years.
	I was looking into someone called Hunter Biden.
	He's called Robert Biden.
	All of this was about someone else.
	He actually owns a laptop company and sel- Oh no, that could be him.
	This appointment confirms my commitment to provide Mr. Weiss all the resources he requests.
	It also reaffirms that Mr. Weiss has the authority he needs to conduct a thorough investigation This is a really weird bit of news, isn't it?
	About Mr. Weiss.
	Like, Mr. Weiss, this time, we are going to let him have proper powers to investigate.
	Last time, we told him, investigate very, very slowly.
	Doesn't it make you feel that the machinery of government is about providing the appearance of authenticity and transparency, rather than authenticity and transparency itself?
	And aren't you now learning how to spot the difference?
	Isn't part of the success of figures like Joe Rogan, based on the fact that whether you like him or agree with him, you kind of trust that he's telling you the truth.
	And indeed, political figures like Trump, who plainly says things that are not true sometimes, but so overtly that compared to other political figures that obfuscate and engage in such sophistry, while actually the investigations being ongoing, well at the time I believed it to be true, well that's Not actually, you know, we're so used to a kind of odd, bureaucratic, boring, tedious, ongoing, linguistically complex set of lies.
	But when people just are playing with us, we go, oh God, all right, you then, you then.
	And to continue to take the steps he deems appropriate independently.
	Based only on the facts and the law.
	The men and women undertaking this investigation.
	See, I said men and women.
	Do you see how far we've come?
	Who have dedicated their careers to protecting the citizens of this country.
	The appointment of Mr. Weiss reinforces for the American people the department's commitment.
	Committedment?
	They can't even say words like commitment because they don't mean anything.
	They don't believe in anything.
	They're just bureaucrats.
	Remember at the beginning of the pandemic.
	This is Anthony Fauci.
	This guy, as long as you don't look at any of his past, is super reliable and we should trust everything he says, even though he doesn't trust it himself.
	This is the way that we understand Washington and indeed all centralized government to work now.
	My belief is that they are not especially corrupt.
	My belief is they've always been this corrupt, but now the means for investigation and communication is so profligate that they can't maintain power and control in the way that they used to.
	There's, I believe, a global panic about the miracle of modern communication that requires the legitimisation of censorship in particular, and what we're watching here is just these old institutions desperately scrabbling to hold on to their authority, when all of us can see that the Emperor is nude, and it's not very impressive.
	Last week, the New York Post reported that President Biden's family and their allies bought in at least $20 million from foreign sources, including first son Hunter Biden's business associates in Russia, Kazakhstan and Ukraine, some of whom dined with the current commander in chief.
	So, as you know, nepotism exists in politics.
	People grant access for money in politics.
	Joe Biden, of course, like any of us would, helps his children to get on in life.
	The problem is, is it's with a bunch of Kazakhstani, Russian and Ukrainian energy firms as his There's this weird war going on at the moment.
	There's the receipt of extraordinary sums of money.
	It doesn't look good when the whole of the media is in a frenzy about the apparent corruption of Donald Trump, a possibility that I remain entirely open to as long as that is investigated with the same veracity and tenacity as all other potential incidences of corruption.
	Democrats who for years accused Trump of corruption and of breaking the law have turned a blind eye to the dishonesty of President Joe Biden, his administration and his family.
	For years, politicians such as Nancy Pelosi, Congressional Democrats and left-wing political pundits all touted in a cultish, well-rehearsed, creepy sort of unison that no one was above the law, not even a president.
	Yet, as time has passed, that affirmation has been anything but true.
	In fact, the only time Democrats seem to care about upholding the law is when the person involved has the last name Trump.
	The law is a tool and a weapon to ensure that their agenda can be pursued, their objectives met.
	The law is not an independent entity that is revered and honoured in the same way a god might have been in an earlier incarnation of civilisation or pre-civilisation.
	The law is a weapon and you might argue that gods are similarly weapons to enshrine a set of values and to create in-groups and out-groups and to other communities that you have enmity towards.
	Well, has that much changed?
	They just use bureaucracy and apparent rationalism to underwrite their own preferences and their own agenda.
	At this point, I think it's pretty safe to say that Hunter Biden's businesses benefited from the fact that his surname is Biden and that Joe Biden gave him favorable opportunities and favorable access.
	To deny that, like, this guy would have done all of these business deals even if his dad had been Ron Brand.
	That's my dad!
	It simply wouldn't have happened, although Ron Brand does have assets.
	When it comes to Biden and his family, there have been a completely different set of standards held compared to former President Donald Trump.
	Everything surrounding the investigation of Hunter Biden has been suspect since the beginning.
	Say what you want about Trump's legal issues and multiple indictments, there is a miscarriage of justice here that reeks of corruption.
	Democrats are not applying the same standards to Biden that they did for Trump.
	That's the fundamental argument.
	You can't trust people who do not apply the same standards across a whole gamut of moral or judicial issues, because otherwise we're not talking about moral and judicial issues.
	We're talking about favouritism, political expedience, managing elections, bringing down opponents.
	All of those things start to become more relevant when you see that they don't apply the same scrutiny across the board of issues, I think.
	What do you think?
	think? Let me know in the comments.
	When Trump was in office, Democrats were determined to investigate and hold anyone accountable
	for their illegal acts and corruption. Since Biden has been in office, Democrats' efforts
	at accountability have been much less vigorous. It's almost as if they created two separate
	realms of justice. That's not justice at all. Justice has to be evenly applied, or it is
	no longer justice. It's just a tool of the state. Look no further than last Friday's
	appointment by the Department of Justice of a special council to investigate Hunter Biden.
	The person assigned to investigate Hunter Biden, David Weiss, is the same person who negotiated the President's son's plea deal earlier this year.
	So the person that gave him the favourable plea deal is doing the investigation.
	If he gave him a favourable plea deal, what kind of investigation is likely to be conducted?
	Probably a favourable one, I would imagine, or at least one that takes so bloody long that by the time the results are in, think still, we don't know the full facts around JFK.
	What is this process likely to look like.
	A thorough, fierce and prompt investigation or a laborious task that distracts us from the facts.
	We all of us sort of know, don't we, that presidents do favours for their family.
	That a career politician like Joe Biden's gonna have blood on his hands because of the way he's voted in previous wars, because of the way he's supported various globalist corporations, energy companies, big tech, financial industry.
	We know he's gonna have accepted money from them.
	We know he stood in front of a room full of donors and said nothing's gonna change.
	When what they were offering the population after Trump was massive change, so plainly there, that's hypocrisy and lying.
	And that same intuition tells us that this investigation is theatre, spectacle.
	Look at what it looked like on the news.
	Now something important's gonna happen, an important man's gonna, this is CNN, I'm the news, this is gonna be great, and then he comes out.
	David Weiss is a special counsellor.
	That guy could come and go, look, I know it might look a bit weird, like David Weiss is the person that negotiated the special plea deal that most people now recognise is the fundamental problem, that that demonstrates that this hasn't been done thoroughly or properly, so to bring the same person in looks like a horrible misstep.
	The only way you can get round that issue is by ignoring that issue, because if you address that issue, it tells you all you need to know.
	We've been schooled to think we don't understand politics properly, we must be idiots.
	Oh, it's ever so complicated what they're doing over there.
	They make it sound complicated, and indeed it Probably on some degree is complicated because of the degree of hypocrisy, corruption, lying, obfuscation, concealment of facts.
	It probably has complexity as a result of all those competing factors.
	But when it comes to how do you run a community?
	How do you deal with competing ideas?
	How do you create republics and democracies and manageable systems of government?
	It clearly isn't like this.
	What these systems do is they advantage elites and prevent us from seeing how those advantages
	are undertaken and kept in place.
	That's why they're so fiercely protective of it and that's why they have to create villains
	like Trump and place them centre stage.
	So we're all caught up in this garish, vivid, lurid, grotesque spectacle when in fact what
	we should be deducing is all government is corrupt.
	That's why this doesn't feel like a big deal when it comes to the Trump indictments.
	We know Trump's probably corrupt.
	He exists in a world of corruption.
	He tells us that he does corrupt stuff.
	I take advantage of the very tax loops the cheap, Clinton.
	This would signify a massive conflict of interest in any regular, objective, fair and non-corrupt person.
	Yet this was the duplicitous act de jure by Attorney General Merrick Garland and the Biden administration.
	If the situation were reversed and Trump was in office and did something like this, Democrats would demand it not stand.
	And given their history, they would probably file articles of impeachment, launch a criminal investigation and bring an indictment.
	Simply put, this is why much of the country claims Trump's indictment, no matter the legal basis for any of them, are nothing more than political persecution.
	The Biden administration and Democrats have demonstrated they cannot be trusted when it comes to matters of justice.
	If Trump broke the law, then hold him accountable.
	If not, leave him alone.
	But there shouldn't be one set of rules for people named Trump, and another set entirely for those named Biden.
	And based on all available evidence, that's exactly how it seems to any objective person paying attention.
	So there you are!
	Seems like the reason that there cannot be a thorough investigation of the Biden business affairs is because a thorough investigation would reveal corruption.
	I think many of us intuit that.
	Presumably, even people that have strong fealty to the Democratic Party on some level recognize that there is corruption within the system, that there is corruption within the Biden family, and what they would probably say is, yeah, but it ain't as bad as the Trumps.
	What I would say is there shouldn't be corruption of this degree in any of the institutions of government that we, the people, What I'm saying is that this is evidence that when you take the temperature of the system, you find that it is corrupt through and through, that it is overbaked, undercooked, that it's full of salmonella, that this is a diseased feast that we're being invited to eat.
	And the only way that they can obscure that is through the language of politics, bureaucratic nomenclature that's confusing, obfuscating and distracting.
	If we spoke plainly to one another about politics, it would sound like this.
	Both parties are corrupt.
	Both parties are funded in ways that means that it's impossible for them to do their job.
	The Biden administration's primary function is to create the perception of difference between them and the Republicans, and in particular Trump.
	Plainly, they want to elevate the Trump issue to a degree that it's the only thing in the political conversation.
	In part, it would seem, because they've got a lot of corruption and hypocrisy to deal with within their own party and their own family.
	But that's just what I think.

▲