The Stone Zone dissects Trump’s State of the Union as a historic comeback, praising his $38M 2000 funding potential and combative style while critiquing Zelensky’s $350B aid role-play and Logan Act violations. Stone demands investigations into Social Security fraud (130K+ records of "over-160-year-olds") and Sanders’ campaign ethics, contrasting Trump’s DOGE with Democratic hypocrisy. The episode ties Ukraine to money laundering, highlights Trump’s $1T investments (SoftBank, Apple, Taiwan chips), and slashes border crossings by 93%. An interview with fraud investigator Sam Antar exposes NY AG Letitia James’ $509K mortgage loans, missing rental disclosures, and ActBlue campaign finance irregularities, linking her to broader Democratic scandals like Adams’ straw donors. [Automatically generated summary]
At Manhattan University, a graduate degree is not out of reach.
You'll gain real-world skills, credentials, employers' value, and connections to New York City's top companies.
Choose from their new Master of Science degrees in healthcare, informatics, digital marketing and analytics, business analytics, or financial analytics.
All built around hands-on learning and industry partnerships.
Graduate ready to lead, not just work.
Take the next step at manhattan.edu/slash graduate.
Manhattan University.
lead the future this is the stone zone with roger stone People love him and respect him.
Roger Stone.
Now, give him a zone.
It's the stone zone.
Here's Roger Stone.
This is Roger Stone, and you're entering the Stone Zone here on the Red Apple Audio Networks.
Donald Trump addressed the Congress last night for the first time since reclaiming the presidency.
Trump is a colossus.
He is a force of nature.
As I watched him speak last night, I couldn't help but marvel about the greatest single political comeback in American history.
But I believe America is back because Donald Trump is back.
I first met Donald Trump in 1979 when I was sent to New York to organize Governor Ronald Reagan's successful campaign for the president, see, where he swept every delegate in New York State, split the Connecticut delegates 50-50 with Connecticut native George H.W. Bush, as well as sweeping the New Jersey delegates in that contest.
I saw almost immediately that Donald Trump had the size, I don't mean the physical size, but the stature, the independence, the courage, the stamina, and the strength to be not just a great presidential candidate, but a truly great president.
In 2000, his fellow billionaire Russ Perot, who had run a relatively strong race as a Reform Party independent candidate in both 1992 and 1996,
and Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura, the former professional wrestler who had been elected as a Reform Party candidate of that state in an upset, both urged Donald Trump to consider a race for the presidency.
Most in the mainstream fake news media of the day thought it was a publicity stunt or just Trump burnishing his brand, but in fact, he spent substantial time thinking about and traveling, exploring an independent Reform Party candidacy for president.
One of the things that attracted him was the fact that back in those days under the campaign finance laws, Trump would have been allowed To get $38 million in general election funding from the public treasury, actually from the checkoff system on the income taxes, which created a fund from which presidential candidates were funded.
$38 million in OPM to run for president, other people's money.
Trump made very successful trips to the Simon Wiesenthal Holocaust Museum in Los Angeles, to the Bay of Pigs Museum in Miami, and made a foray to visit Governor Jesse Ventura in Minnesota before he correctly concluded that one could not be elected president as a third party or minor party candidate,
that one needed to be either a Republican or a Democrat.
Trump actually had been a registered Republican for most of his life, as were both of his parents, both of whom I knew well.
He only became a Democrat for two years, and that was in the wake of the war in Iraq, which he opposed.
That was his way of protesting.
He regretted his support of George W. Bush in that contest.
Little did I know that by 2016, the time and the man met, and he was exactly the right man at the right time, at a time that the American people had very little confidence in all institutions, Republicans, Democrats, Congress, the federal government, state governments, but most importantly, a growing distrust of establishment media, what we call legacy media.
Last night, I think, perhaps was Trump's finest hour.
I will note that he is the first president.
There are a lot of firsts with Donald Trump, but he's the first president to mention his triumphant election.
He is the first president in a state of the union, I should say, to denounce his predecessor, but that is Trump.
He is combative.
He doesn't play by any rulebook but his when it comes to politics.
And, well, he's been incredibly successful.
I think it was in many ways, as I say, his greatest speech.
Trump knew the Democrats wouldn't applaud no matter what during the president's speech.
Democrats refused to stand up and applaud, even for a child who was battling cancer.
President Trump actually predicted this behavior at the beginning of his speech.
This is my fifth speech to Congress.
I look at the Democrats in front of me and I realize there's absolutely nothing I can say to make them happy or stand or smile or even applaud.
Nothing I could do.
I could find a cure to the most devastating disease that would wipe out entire nations or announce the answers to the greatest economy in history or the stoppage of crime to the lowest levels ever recorded.
And these people sitting right in front of me will not clap, will not stand, and will not cheer no matter what.
It's very sad.
It should not be that way.
I saw Elon Musk in the crowd last night.
Interestingly enough, Elon Musk was wearing a suit and tie.
I've never seen him in a suit and tie previously.
Last week, I criticized the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, who, despite the fact that we've given him $350 billion, cannot wear a suit and tie when he either addresses a joint session of Congress or when he meets with the president of the United States.
He shows up in a dirty military type sweatshirt.
I guess he's an actor playing a role, but his act is getting very old.
We saw what happened in the Oval Office.
It is very clear that if it is true that Zelensky met prior to his meeting with Trump with former Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, former Assistant Secretary of State for Ukraine Victoria Newland, the former National Security Advisor Susan Rice, Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut, bragged about this on his social media,
as well as Alexander Vindeman, the architect of the fake Ukrainian collusion impeachment hoax, well, then every one of them are in violation of federal law.
The Logan Act specifically says that you cannot, as an American citizen, conduct your own foreign policy.
And urging Zelensky to turn down a peace initiative by President Donald Trump is a textbook example of violation of that law.
Frankly, I think Attorney General Pam Bondi should investigate.
And if she can confirm that these talks took place, and I believe there's video of them, then I think those Democrats should be subjected to a bit of their own medicine.
The president also gave a warm endorsement to Doge last night, giving credit to Elon Musk for creating the department.
And he discussed the billions in waste and fraud that has discovered.
I created the brand new Department of Government Efficiency, Doge.
Perhaps you've heard of it, he said.
Of course, the Democrats in the chamber went crazy.
Discovering the fraud found in Social Security's database, Trump said, over 130,000 people, according to the Social Security database, are aged over 160 years.
We have a healthier country than I thought, Bobby, Trump said, referencing Secretary of HHS Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Now, Bernie Sanders immediately took to social media to say that nobody who's 150 or 200 years old is receiving Social Security.
It's a lie.
Bernie, you don't get it.
Somebody is getting that money.
They're not really 150 or 160 or 200 years old.
It's fraud.
They're using somebody else's social security number.
Bernie Sanders is particularly annoying to me because here's a guy who skimmed millions of his dollars, he and his wife, out of his two presidential campaigns in quote-unquote media commissions.
Now, that is not illegal, but in my opinion, it is unethical unless you disclose it to your donors, which Bernie never did.
Bernie used to criticize billionaires and millionaires.
Now I notice he just criticizes billionaires.
That's because Comrade Bernie has become a millionaire.
Driving a top-of-the-line Mercedes and now with three vacation homes, Bernie favors socialism for thee, but not for Comrade Bernie.
President Trump discussed the benefits last night of cutting billions in government waste.
By slashing all of the fraud, waste, and theft we can find, we will defeat inflation, bring down mortgage rates, lower car payments, and gross report prices, protect our seniors, and put more money in the pockets of the American people.
Trump also spoke out against the radical trans agenda last night.
He pointed out that he had signed an executive order to ban men from playing in women's sports.
Three years ago, Peyton McNabb was an all-star high school athlete, one of the very best, preparing for a future in college sports.
But when her girls' volleyball match was invaded by a male, he smashed the ball so hard in Peyton's face, causing traumatic brain injury that he left her partially paralyzed on her right side and ending her athletic career forever.
It was a shot like no one had ever seen before.
Peyton was in the gallery last night, and she was widely applauded by the Republicans.
The Democrats sat on their hands.
Trump said, I signed an order making the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders, male and female.
Trump then called on Congress to take action.
Now I want Congress to pass a bill permanently banning and criminalizing sex changes on children and forever ending the lie that any child is trapped in the wrong body.
Our message to every child in America is that you are perfect exactly the way God made you.
We're going to talk about that Tsumami of the Law Fair later on in the show when Sam Antar, who is an investigator of white-collar fraud, joins us.
But in the meantime, you're in the Stone Zone.
We've got a lot more.
so whatever you do please please don't touch that dial is the stone zone with roger stone Not just stepping stone.
The Stone Zone Zone.
Not just Stepping Stone.
If you're looking to create, grow, and sustain your wealth, download and subscribe to the Pain Points of Wealth podcast at bebullish.com with Bob, Ryan, and Chris Payne.
It's your podcast for market insights, money tips, and real talk on the economy.
Download and subscribe at BeBullish.com.
This is the Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
They went after a guy named Roger Stone who's sitting in the office.
And I'll say this in Trevor Rogers.
He's no baby.
And right now, he's cleaner than anybody in this place.
Now they treated him very unfairly.
Now, get in the zone.
The stone zone.
Here's Roger Stone.
And we're back.
Congressman Brandon Gill of Tech introduced a bill to put President Donald Trump on the $100 bill.
I love this.
He's calling it the golden age president on the bill, saying, let's make history.
For some years, Democrats pushed to replace one of our greatest presidents, the president most often, by the way, compared to populist Donald Trump, and replace him on the $20 bill with Harriet Tubman.
Not taking against anything away from Tubman, but I think Andrew Jackson should stay on the $20 bill.
I'd like to see President Eisenhower used to be on a silver coin on a dollar bill.
He was one of the greatest presidents in my lifetime.
We had unprecedented peace and prosperity under Ike, and he tried to warn us about the deep state, except for he called it the military-industrial complex and pointed out that we should be careful about the accumulated power of unelected bureaucrats who were in government, as well as in the defense contractors, in the think tanks, and in the media.
Eisenhower was exactly right.
Today we call it the deep state.
It is noted by Congressman Gill when he said President Trump is far more a crucial character in American history than any other person being considered to be put on our currency.
This sounds like a great idea to me.
I love the idea of Donald Trump on the $100 bill.
President's Border Announcement00:02:51
President Trump also announced in his speech that illegal border crossings are now at a record low, down 93% from the day he took office.
Within hours of taking office, he said, I declared a national emergency on our southern border, and I deployed the U.S. military and border patrol to repel the invasion of our country.
And what a job they've done, the president said.
As a result, illegal border crossings last month are down by the lowest level ever recorded.
President Trump also honored the memory of Lake and Riley.
You remember her?
She's the woman tragically killed by an illegal.
He noted the very first bill he signed into law as our 47th president mandated the detention of all dangerous criminal aliens who threaten public safety.
This was correctly called a very strong and powerful act by President Trump, and he paid homage to Lake and Hope Riley.
The Democrats didn't cheer for that either.
President Donald Trump has also announced that he secured new investments into America.
The president announced that since his election, he has secured over $1 trillion in new investments.
Thanks to the president's First America policies, he said that we're putting $1.7 trillion in new investments into America in just the last few weeks.
The combination of Trump's election and his new economic policies that are going over extremely well with the American people, according to the polling.
SoftBank, one of the largest banks in the world, announced a $200 billion investment.
Apple announced a $500 billion investment.
It is also interesting that a Taiwan semiconductor said that they were doing a $165 billion investment to begin building powerful chips on the most powerful chips on earth right here in the USA.
So to further boost the economy, Trump announced his plans for slashing bureaucratic red tape.
He said he would unshackle our economy.
And he has directed, said this in last night's speech, that for every new regulation, 10 old regulations must be repealed and eliminated.
This is the Donald Trump I Know and Love.
The president spoke about Ukraine last night.
We talked about it earlier in the show.
The president is committed to peace.
His enemies who revel in the money laundering, the skim, and the child sex trafficking of which Ukraine has been a centerpiece have vowed to oppose him.
Sam Antar Joins Us00:02:49
This is going to be something we cover a lot here on the Stone Zone.
But coming up, Sam Antar joins us.
He is a white-collar crime and fraud investigator, and he's learned some shocking things about New York Attorney General Letitia James.
It's all coming up here in the Stone Zone.
So please, whatever you do, don't touch that dial.
The Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
Stepping Stone.
This is the stone zone.
Now, give us own.
It's the stone zone.
Here's Roger Stone.
You are back in the Stone Zone, and joining me now is Sam Antar.
Sam is a former certified public accountant whose career trajectory took a remarkable turn from perpetrator to investigator of financial fraud.
As the former chief financial officer of Crazy Eddy, you remember them, a major consumer electronics chain in the northeastern United States in the 1980s, Antar was a key figure in one of the decade's largest security fraud schemes.
Following his criminal conviction and after he paid his debt to society, Sam redirected his expertise towards forensic accounting, leveraging his firsthand knowledge of financial fraud to help combat white-collar crime, particularly by government.
His unique perspective and technical expertise have made him an expert advisor to various clients, including government agencies, law enforcement organizations, law firms, independent investment research firms, hedge funds, and others.
I urge you to check out his terrific blog, whitecollarfraud.com.
Sam Antar has been studying the public filings and financial disclosures of New York Attorney General Letitia James, and he joins us now.
Thank you for having me on, Roger.
Sam, you're back as you are every week with more shocking revelations.
Financial Disclosures Debacle00:14:58
And I see that the real deal, a real estate publication, tried to mix it up with you, tried to question your conclusions.
We'll get to that a little bit later, but you call New York Attorney General Letitia James a repeat offender, saying over the last past decade, she's failed to report and disclose critical financial information, including hidden mortgages, rental income, and so on.
So walk us through your latest revelations.
Well, the problem with Tish James is every time I think I got to the bottom of it, I find a new bottom.
To recap, she has two properties, one in Norfolk, Virginia, and another property in Brooklyn.
In the Norfolk, Virginia property, which she purchased in August 2020 for approximately $138,000 or so, she took a $109,000 mortgage.
Initially, it was supposed to be a second home, but on all of her financial disclosures, she listed it as an investment property.
That $109,000 mortgage was never disclosed in the financial disclosures to New York State.
Then all of a sudden in 2023, two new mortgages appear totaling between $250,000 to $400,000, making the total mortgages on that property in Norfolk, West Virginia, to be approximately $350,000 to $509,000.
However, the valuation that she placed on the property in her own disclosures and loan words was still $100,000 to $150,000.
So the question is, how does she get leverage $350,000 to $510,000 on the property that's worth at most, according to her own words, $150,000.
Even if you go to the tax assessors role, which values a property slightly higher at $180,000, that still doesn't make up for the lopsided loan to equity ratio, which is approximately two or more times the valuation of the property.
The other item is those two mortgages that she made on her Virginia property show up in her financial disclosures, unlike the $109,000 loan when she purchased the home, but they don't show up on her property records.
So you have one loan when she bought the property for $109,000 to OVM Financial, that shows up on, that shows up on her property records.
It doesn't show up on her financial disclosures.
Then you have two other loans totaling $250,000 to $400,000 that show up on our financial disclosures, but don't show up on her property records.
Okay, on top of that, the property showed $5,000 in income, between $1,000 and $5,000 in income in the first year of ownership in 2020.
All of a sudden, there's no income during all of those years, and she's still listed as an investment property, which gives me segue into the next topic.
When I did further research, I discovered in 2013 a Cranes article that said that on her Brooklyn property, which we haven't discussed yet, but this will transition us, on her Brooklyn property, she had failed to disclose rental income for many years.
So you see an interesting parallel.
That's why I call her a repeat offender.
Now, it could be that there was no income on the Virginia property after the first year.
But the other issues remain.
She has one mortgage that's on the property records, not on her financial disclosures.
She has two mortgages on her financial disclosures that are not on her property records.
And she has a large amount of total loans against the value of the property, two to three times the value of the property, which in this world is insane, to use the crazy Eddie model.
So that is the Virginia property.
The New York property, the problem with that property was all of a sudden, between 2021 and 2022, she increased the valuation of the property by approximately 42%.
Now, I remember that year very vividly.
It was the year of COVID, okay?
It was the year of COVID.
At that time, values of properties in Brooklyn were going down or slightly higher.
In other words, there was no big spike in the valuation of the property.
That same year, she took an additional approximately $400,000 in mortgages when she spiked the value.
Now, the amount of mortgages on the Brooklyn property, okay, are far less than the total valuation.
But what got me was, if you look at the pattern of the assessed valuations on the property, in that one year, the assessed valuation of the property declined about 7% while her own valuation of the property increased 40%.
I wanted to know why the spike in the valuation of the property was because she took two new loans, but she seemed to have had adequate equity even without the valuation spike to take two additional loans.
So this thing doesn't make sense.
And, you know, listen, I don't have subpoena power.
You don't have subpoena power.
At the end of the day, all we can do is look at the financials from public information, scrutinize them, and point out the inconsistencies.
And that's what I've done.
Well, we do know that under state law, public officials must disclose all mortgages and encumbrances on reportable real estate.
Under Section 73A of the New York Public Officers Law, elected officials must file sworn annual statements disclosing all real estate holdings except personal residences that don't generate income, all sources of income exceeding $1,000 and all debts exceeding $10,000.
These, by the way, are not, as you point out, optional formalities, but legal statements signed under penalty of perjury.
False statements can constitute a Class A misdemeanor under New York state law, punishable by up to a year in jail.
It's interesting.
The other day, there was almost no reporting.
A woman by the name of Sophia Quintara, I think I've pronounced that right, filed a lawsuit in 2022 against Attorney General Letitia James and her chief of staff, claiming that she had been sexually assaulted by the chief of staff and that James had covered it up.
James moved to have the suit dismissed.
That was roughly two years ago.
Then last late last week, it appears that although the suit itself was not dismissed, the charges or the claims against Letitia James herself were dismissed.
When I reported on this, your comment was that is the least of her problems.
Sam, you looked into Letitia James' campaign finance filings.
You found other questionable things.
Talk to us about that.
$5,000.
I'm sorry, I spoke over you.
I apologize.
$5,000 in change last summer she spent on cab bribes in Martha Vineyard.
I mean, why not just rent the goddamn car, for that matter?
You only need $5,000 for car rights for cab rights.
I don't spend that in a year, and I live in New York, and I don't even own a car.
I mean, that was irregularity, number one.
In prior years, she spent a lot of time in Martha's Vineyard, and she even invited a staff there for a retreat.
Now, that was on campaign money, not taxpayer money.
But it just shows you the pattern of lavish spending and irresponsible spending that she's doing.
Technically speaking, you're not allowed to use campaign funds for personal purposes.
That creates a taxable event that requires income to be reported.
Okay, again, I don't have access to her tax returns, but those better be on our tax because anything that's deemed to be a personal expense that she spent the campaign money on is a taxable event.
And of course, there's the campaign financing laws that she may have violated.
There's all kinds of stuff.
But the big point is, is her whole financial history is one big muck.
It's just a pile of SHIP, to put it bluntly, in New Yorker language.
Well, remember her own words.
She said, no one is above the law and the rule of law must apply equally to everyone.
I think it's time, as you say, to ask, does it really apply to her?
The investigator, Chris Gleason, has done an excellent job investigating the contributions that flowed to her campaign for Attorney General through the Democrat payment processing company, Act Blue.
Now, it's interesting that on Act Blue, during this period of fundraising, they turned off the function where an individual can make a contribution without matching the credit card number with the billing address.
What Gleason and his team of investigators have done is to visit individual donors working off the campaign finance records to confirm that they gave to Letitia James not once, not twice, but in some cases as many as 10, 12, 15 times in a pattern of donations.
About 60% of those who have been willing to submit to interviews say that they never heard of Letitia James and they made no campaign contribution to her campaign.
There are 19 attorney generals already investigating this because it not only affected her campaign, but those of Senator Raphael Warnock of Georgia, Congresswoman Val Demings of Florida, who raised $37 million for her race against incumbent Marco Rubio, now your Secretary of State.
There's a troubling pattern of fraud here.
This is money laundering, money laundering into the campaign of Democrat candidates, including Letitia James.
Ultimately, there will be a full report of this.
We'll see if the New York Post, who did not cover the story last week about the dismissal of charges against James in the sexual assault matter, covers this matter.
Folks, you're listening to Roger Stone here in the Stone Zone on the Red Apple Audio Networks.
We're talking to Sam Antar, a white-collar crime and fraud investigator, and we'll be right back.
It's the Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
Not just Stepping Stone.
The Stone Zone Zone.
This is the Stone Zone.
Roger Stone.
They went after a guy named Roger Stone who's sitting in the office.
And I'll say this in front of Roger.
He's no baby.
And right now, he's cleaner than anybody in this place.
No, they treated him very unfairly.
Now, get him a zone.
It's the stone zone.
Here's Roger Stone.
And we're back.
Our guest is Sam Antar, the former crazy Eddie CFO, turned forensic accountant.
After his metamorphosis from Wall Street criminal to fraud investigator, he runs a website, whitecollarfraud.com.
I commend it to you.
It is meticulously researched and most illuminating.
Sam, you had a comment regarding the lawsuit regarding sexual assault that was dismissed in some cases last week.
Yes, with my limited knowledge of jailhouse law, because I was a jailhouse police, so to speak.
Just kidding.
When the case is brought, the defendants generally file what's known as a motion to dismiss, saying that even if I did everything that you said I did, right, it still doesn't violate the law.
So it's basically the case was dismissed on the technicality of the law.
That doesn't mean that the allegations against her are untrue.
Okay, that would come out in discovery, okay, as she has to testify in depositions or a trial.
And the case can always be amended to bring it back into the case based upon that subsequent information.
So she is not out of the woods, and that does not exonerate her.
It just means that that case against her on the technicalities of the law doesn't apply.
It's so amazing to me when this lawsuit was first filed.
There's very scant coverage of it in the New York media.
Now, such coverage should certainly have included the Attorney General's denials or any statement she wants to make, but the media blackout about this is really quite extraordinary.
It's a case I'm going to be watching very carefully.
Sam, when you came out with your most recent revelations regarding Attorney General Letitia James, a real estate publication, The Real Deal, really published an attack on you, which seemed to me they were just running cover for Tish.
A piece by Eric Enquist really went after you, but because you are who you are, you pushed back.
Tell us about this.
Attacking the Accuser00:03:26
Well, my policy is to push back because I don't take a f ⁇ from no one, excuse the language.
They wrote an article that totally mischaracterized what I was saying in my reporting.
They didn't contact me beforehand.
They didn't let me know that an article was coming.
They didn't give me a chance to explain.
All they did was they claimed that what the research that I've done was that Tish James evaded real estate taxes, which is not the case.
They also complain that I didn't know the law of real estate taxes in New York, that assessments don't always follow market values and that the market values attributed to properties by the property tax department doesn't follow market values in the general market.
All kinds of stuff.
But the matter of the thing is, my research was about Tish James violating laws pertaining to her, it was a section 73A, laws pertaining to her personal finances and the proper disclosures, okay?
Whether I referenced the assessed value has no bearing on the total argument that I'm making.
So what they basically did is they made this straw man argument, claiming that I was talking about real estate taxes, where that was just a small part of an overall equation relating to the entire story.
And then they call me a fraudster.
Yes, I was a fraudster, but I'm not a fraudster now.
And attacks like that don't go unpunished.
So I went back and I went back after them.
And I went line by line in my blog and I detailed what they said that was wrong and I rebutted every single word that they had to say.
If they want to run interference with Tish James, shame on them.
It shows that they're not a media outlet.
It shows they're just a bunch of cronies who only care about access to power rather than challenging power with the media supposed to do.
Yeah, I must say you posted a very, very line-by-line detailed rebuttal to this piece.
This piece is what is known in politics as a contract.
was a contract uh leticia james i think is yeah she leticia james i think the ag is she's running scared She's being sued by the federal government, she and Governor Okel, for their unwillingness to cooperate in federal law when it comes to the deportation of illegal immigrants.
She finds people digging into not only her city campaign financing, where I suspect she may, may have done the same thing Mayor Eric Adams is accused of, which is to say, taking straw donors whose money is really not theirs and running it through the city's eight-to-one campaign finance matching fund.
We shall see.
Also, we're digging in deep, investigators, on her financing of her campaign for Attorney General.
Let me thank our guest, Sam Antar.
He has a great blog at, let me get this exactly right.
It is whitecollarfraud.com, whitecollarfraud.com.
Folks, check it out.
Sam Antar is the real deal, and he backs up everything he says.
We're happy to have had him today in the Stone Zone.
24/7 Healthcare Lifelines00:01:15
Until tomorrow, God bless you and Godspeed.
Rural Americans deserve access to the best our nation has to offer, especially when it comes to health care.
Across every state and every community, America's rural hospitals are the first line of defense, protecting our families, neighbors, and loved ones.
No matter where you live, hospital care doesn't clock out.
They're there 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year.
Each year, America's over 5,000 hospitals care for millions of patients, providing 24-7 emergency care, delivering babies, cancer treatments, and other life-saving care that patients rely on.
Behind every one of those patients are doctors, nurses, and caregivers working tirelessly to keep people healthy and safe.
Hospitals are our community's lifelines.
They employ our neighbors and keep our families health.
But now, some in Congress are threatening access to care.
Tell Congress, protect patient care to keep America strong.