Exclusive: Roger Stone Responds to New Jan. 6 Charges Against Trump
|
Time
Text
But attorneys that I have talked to about these charges tell me that they believe that they are fatally flawed, that they're a stretch.
That doesn't mean, unfortunately, that even if they put on the greatest defense in the world, and that's questionable at this point, and even if they relitigate whether the election was or was not stolen, which would take both a huge amount of time and a huge amount of money, The goal here is to stop Donald Trump from becoming president.
If in the end, some unjust conviction in the District of Columbia were to be overturned by the U.S.
Supreme Court, but in the meantime, because of the timing of the trial and the dynamics of the election season, they were able to deny him returning to the White House, they will have achieved their goal.
Now, if they can send him to prison for 600 years, To serve as a lesson to anyone who might seek of challenging the broken two-party duopoly that is busy destroying our constitutional republic, then that would be good for them too.
To have a conversation with Roger Stone right here on the InfoWars War Rays now, Airwaves.
Now, Roger, last time we spoke, the latest indictment for Trump has not been filed, so it's a totally different world now, you might say.
Now, have you heard, I'm just curious, did you hear President Trump's statement that he released last night, the video message that he released last night?
Have you heard this yet?
I read a transcript of his remarks.
I haven't seen a video.
But actually, Owen, I think if you go back to the show we did last night, I predicted that we would be at this exact moment.
In other words, we're, duh.
In an information war, and therefore it became essential for the cabal, for the deep state Democrat media cabal, to block out coverage of the epic corruption of the Biden crime family, and the fact that we now have hard evidence of extortion, bribery, money laundering, influence peddling,
Illegal lobbying, and let's just say it, treason by Joe Biden and Hunter Biden and Jim Biden and other august members of the Biden crime family.
So they must immediately cue the indictments.
I actually think it's possible, Owen, that the special counsel here has moved a little more quickly than he had planned.
But that's because the House Republicans were able to expose as much as they have been able to expose.
And God forbid that story lead the news.
So what is the answer?
The answer is to move very quickly on Donald Trump.
Why?
Because he's leading Joe Biden in the polls, because he's going to lengthen his lead against him in the polls.
They have hit the panic button, and now they've completely weaponized the system, and they have triggered that weaponization.
Let me put it another way.
Questioning the outcome of an election, questioning the integrity of an election is a crime for which you should actually go to prison, unless of course you're Hillary Clinton, or Nancy Pelosi, or Jerry Nadler, or Stacey Abrams, or Jamie Raskin, in which case it's perfectly alright.
And you could go on for days with that list.
Barbara Boxer.
Kamala Harris.
I mean, we could play this game all day long.
But, you know, the judge in this case from Kingston, Jamaica, Tanya Chutkin, appointed by Barack Obama.
I think we can all be confident, though, that this is not an affirmative action hire.
I think we can all be confident here that this woman is not going to take into that courtroom any anti-white bigotry that she might have to get Get justice for her ancestors with that rich white man in her courtroom.
I think we can all rest easy, Roger, knowing that's certainly not a potential here.
Well, she's a major donor to Barack Obama.
She and her husband, both major donors, and her mother-in-law, all major donors to Barack Obama.
Must be nice, must be nice, Roger!
Oh, make some donations, get the judge position, huh?
She and her husband, her husband's also appointed a federal judge by President Barack Obama.
And of course she worked in the same law firm as that Hunter Biden was associated with.
But there's no political bias here.
Look, I don't think it really mattered in DC.
I can't think of any member a member of the judiciary there that would be insulated from politics.
But this judge has been particularly harsh on January 6th victims, has been particularly harsh on those charged with crimes in connection with January 6th, actually handing out sentences that were over and above those requested by prosecutors.
- Which is almost never the case. - Very, very rarely the case.
Look, this is a kill zone.
I think we understand that.
I don't think any Republican, put it another way, any non-Democrat, any non-liberal can get a fair trial in the District of Columbia.
I think, and I'm not an attorney, and I say that right up front, but attorneys that I have talked to about these charges tell me that they believe that they are fatally flawed, that they're a stretch.
That doesn't mean, unfortunately, that even if they put on the greatest defense in the world, and that's questionable at this point, and even if they relitigate whether the election was or was not stolen, Which would take both a huge amount of time and a huge amount of money.
The goal here is to stop Donald Trump from becoming president.
If in the end some unjust conviction in the District of Columbia were to be overturned by the US Supreme Court, But in the meantime, because of the timing of the trial and the dynamics of the election season, they were able to deny him returning to the White House, they will have achieved their goal.
Now, if they can send him to prison for 600 years to serve as a lesson to anyone who might seek of challenging the broken two-party duopoly that is busy destroying our constitutional republic, then that would be good for them too.
I mean, they must be really scared of him.
600 years, Roger.
For 600 years, this is like some sort of a mythical dragon that they have to use a spell to put away because they're so scared of this man.
Well, I was kind of intrigued by the comments last night from the president's lawyer, John Lauro, who is correct when he said that, look, when we tried to litigate The last election, when we tried to present evidence of election fraud, when we tried to make our case, the fundamental problem was that no court would ever hear it.
Now, the left-wing mainstream jackals in the fake news media would try to imply, well, the judges, you know, the courts rejected your arguments.
No, that's actually not true.
It's not that they rejected the arguments, it's that they never would agree to hear the There's a case going on right now in Pennsylvania where, frankly, the Pennsylvania establishment, which I think did preside over a deeply flawed and I think corrupted election,
is actually in retreat because Greg Stenstrom and Leah Hoops, is actually in retreat because Greg Stenstrom and Leah Hoops, two patriots there, who are representing themselves, by the way, really are exposing the enormous fraud and, in fact, corruption of the entire system.
So using that example, that case in Pennsylvania as a template, I do think it's possible here that the president and his lawyers and his supporters may have a chance, a canvas, as it were, to lay out the whole broader question of election fraud, something they to lay out the whole broader question of election fraud, something they never really had an opportunity to
I agree that window is there, but I, and this comes from experience watching what they did to Alex Jones, I believe they'll shut that window, they'll lock that door, they'll make sure that nobody gets access to it.
Trump can play the video clips of the Democrats denying elections, he can play the vote viagra for Biden, 300,000 votes in the middle of the night, and they'll just say, nope, nope, reject, nope, you can't show that, nope, reject, nope, jury can't see that.
That's what I think is going to happen, Roger.
Well, that's entirely possible.
Remember, prior to my trial, the judge ruled, based on a motion by the prosecutors, that we don't have to prove that there was any Russian collusion.
Well then, what was it that I theoretically lied about?
In other words, in order to violate the False Statements Act, your false statement has to be both willful and material.
If I had no motive to lie, because there is no Russian collusion or WikiLeaks collaboration to lie about... That's Roger Stone.
We'll be right back.
The country is in a very dark place right now.
But even after everything the deep state has done to me, I will never give up on America.
Mark my words.
In 2024, we will win back the White House.
We will make America great again.
I have no doubt about it.
They come at me from left.
They come at me from right.
The rhinos, the communists, the Marxists, the fascists.
We will not only survive, we will be stronger than ever before.
We're fighting a fight like nobody ever thought possible, and we're winning.
We won in 2016, we had a rigged election in 2020, but got more votes than any sitting president.
We're going to win like never before, and we're going to make America great again.
I can truly say I believe Better than ever before.
Thank you for all of your support and for all of your prayers.
Now, I want to tell you why that short message from Donald Trump was so inspirational for me.
Because...
I've personally seen what Alex Jones has gone through and kept fighting.
I've personally seen what Roger Stone has gone through and kept fighting.
And I'm seeing what Roger, what Donald Trump is now going through and keep fighting.
So it motivates me.
And we're all going through it together, folks.
We're all gonna go through this.
Freedom is worth fighting for.
That's why people fought and died for it and still do every day.
So, Roger, I wanted to replay that for you just because Not to, uh, not to, you know, give you a little ego boost here, but I mean, really, I've seen, I've seen men go through it and keep fighting every day, and it inspires me.
And to see that response from Donald Trump, Roger, just like, just charged my batteries, man.
Well, Owen, remember the famous statement by President Richard Nixon, who said, The greatness comes not when things go always good for you, but when you take some knocks, you suffer some defeats, some setbacks, when sadness comes.
Because Until one has been in the deepest valley, one cannot appreciate the majesty of the highest mountaintop.
A man is not finished when he is defeated.
He's only finished when he quits.
I think this is true of Alex Jones, who is, above all, a warrior and a winner.
It is true of you and everything they have put you through.
Yes, I think it's true of me, I have been sustained by my faith in Jesus Christ and the support of tens of thousands of Americans, including many, many info warriors in the two and a half years of hell that my family and I went through.
Jones has been subjected to the same kind of persecution and abuse.
But you may be, at the end of the day, You're materially poorer, but you are spiritually much richer.
You're experiencing this now yourself, but I guarantee you, the Lord will lift you up, the Lord will preserve you, the Lord will save you.
And this past Sunday in church, we focused on Psalm 110.
110 tells you essentially that although things look very, very dark right now, God never loses.
Good never loses to evil in the end.
And you just have to keep that faith.
And now we also have Dr. Mercola had his bank accounts taken down a couple weeks ago after going on the Alex Jones Show.
I'm talking to Dr. Ben Marble, who does My Free Doctor, and now his bank accounts are under assault.
So, I mean, this is happening to everybody.
I mean, Clay Clark, the Reawaken America tour.
I mean, I can go on and on, but you just said it.
It's about not giving up.
It's about never quitting and it's about understanding what the prize is.
The prize is freedom, the prize is prosperity, the prize is all the stuff that we know is good from the past that we can improve upon in the future.
Instead of this, I mean, Roger, here's what I'm going through too.
And I wonder what the people you talk to think, because when I see people, the kind of mainstream conservative going on Fox News saying, oh, this is going to be great.
They're going to have discovery.
And now Trump can get behind all the election fraud that they wouldn't look at before.
And I think, I'm sorry, but you're naive.
They're going to reject all of it.
But this is a good thing because now they're going to understand how corrupt it is.
Now they're going to see that all the stuff that they believe still existed was still pure and clean in America is not there, including the elections.
I mean, this is going to be a major awakening process.
I mean, 2024 The next 16 months, Roger.
I mean, this is going to be a major awakening process.
And I think the hurdle people are going to realize is like, this is beyond politics.
Somebody like Jack Smith doesn't go up there looking like chicken spit just because of politics.
There's something much dark, much more dark and twisted behind this.
I just think watch over the next couple of days because this is what you say will be borne out.
Trump is going to lengthen his lead over Biden in the polls.
He's actually going to go up despite this vile attack on him.
And he's going to take in tens of millions of new contributions from small and medium-sized donors.
Just mom and pop America just average citizens who see through this entire fraud.
So that which does not kill him actually ends up making him stronger.
If anyone has any illusions about the injustice, about the two-tier justice, then they think that will very shortly be erased.
It is absolutely clear that if you're Hunter Biden, you can pocket millions of dollars.
You can lobby without registering as required by law.
You can lie about all of it.
You can own a firearm while you're on drugs.
Sell drugs in the White House.
Oh, wait, I'm sorry.
We don't know that.
No, but it only took us three days to open and close the investigation.
A case called.
It's just like the death of the Obama's chef.
I mean, I've been investigating this very carefully.
They say, well, he drowned in 100 feet.
He was 100 feet offshore in eight feet of water.
Well, I've done all the barometric charts.
I'm sorry, 100 feet off the water, off the shore.
It's three feet deep of water.
Who drowns in water that you can stand up and would be not even up to your chest?
This is an absurdity.
But that probe has been closed.
By the Massachusetts State Police.
Done, done.
We can't disclose who was with this poor chef when he drowned.
We can't disclose who phoned in the distress call to the Edgar Town Police.
We can't tell you where that phone call came from.
But there's nothing to see here.
Look over there, Donald Trump.
He disputed an election.
He must be put in prison immediately.
It's extraordinary.
Well, and now you were the one, I believe, saying at first, Michelle Obama is going to be the Democrat nominee.
It wasn't my opinion, but I'm a smart better.
I go where the good leads lead me, and if Roger Stone is leading me somewhere, that's where I'm placing my money.
But interestingly enough, the response from the public was kind of, oh, look, this is Obama, if you're being conspiratorial, closing up some loose ends.
What did the chef know?
Whatever.
They are thinking that is a sign Michelle Obama is running, And so, since this news and your investigation continues, where are you at with the Michelle Obama is running meter?
Well, it depends on whether this cover up of what actually happened in Martha's Vineyard holds.
I mean, it seems to me the media is off of this.
They have done their cover up.
Everybody's just kind of accepting their narrative.
I still think that when it comes to the end of the year and the actual filing deadlines for the various Democratic primaries and caucuses, that Joe Biden is not going to be electable, that the Democratic power structure that is led by Barack Obama recognizes that and I still believe that they will switch him out for the strongest possible potential candidate that they could name.
That would be Michelle Obama.
They cannot go to Kamala Harris.
They know that even though she doesn't have dementia, she makes even less sense than Joe Biden if such a thing is possible.
So she's not electable.
And Gavin Newsom, we can't nominate some white guy, some middle-aged white guy, not within the modern Democratic Party.
So I'm sticking with my prediction that at the end of the day, the Democratic candidate will be Michelle Obama.
Now, I need to confer with my good friend Joel Gilbert, the documentary filmmaker who's written both a book and made a documentary on this subject, but I doubt that he's changed his mind either.
Roger, in the last 90 seconds here, do you believe the Republican Party, the RNC, Ronald McDaniel, Donald Trump's team, do you believe they've done enough to push back, equalize all the ballot harvesting, early voting measures that the Democrats usually use to their advantage?
Do you think the proper response has been made there?
You're grinning.
Not even remotely.
Ballot harvesting is one tiny element of a robust effort to ensure that we have a free, fair, and honest election.
This is not something you can do in one minute and ten seconds, but we need a much more aggressive legal and technical approach to the entire question.
There is technology out there.
There are some legal reforms that can still be made.
There's a lot that has to be done.
But I do know this.
If we have a free, fair, honest election, Donald Trump will win, literally, by a landslide.
Yeah, at this point, 80 million votes, but you know, it'll be nice, whoever the Democrat Party is.
Trump will get 80 million votes, the Democrat candidate will get 80 million and one votes, Roger.
That's probably, and then there's nothing to see here, it's totally normal, it's all good.
Roger Stone, about as cool as they come, stonezone.com is where you can find his show.