All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 6, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:49
October 6, 2016, Thursday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of The Rush 24-7 podcast.
Okay, testing, testing, one, two, two.
Okay, folks, we're in Los Angeles here as we have uh migrated.
We have moved to the left coast in order to evacuate ground zero for Hurricane Matthew, and as always happens, we got to do some things live on the radio because what we do beforehand never holds.
So this is called mixed minus.
Need to bring the audio up.
Bring it up, bring it up, there we go.
Bring it up a little bit more.
Bring it up at just a little bit.
You're not a hearing the changes I'm hearing.
This is only how I hear things.
If I don't hear myself, folks, it doesn't matter what you hear.
Okay, that sounds good.
So as long as I'm here, it doesn't matter where here is.
We have uh we've come to the left coast, hopefully for just a couple of days.
Great to have you here.
Telephone numbers 80082-2882, the email address L Rushbow at EIB net.com.
It's amazing the number of people who have looked at this hurricane and think that it's aimed right for where I live.
And of course, when these things happen, as I alluded to it yesterday, folks, I have become an amateur hurricane tracker.
By no means do I suggest anything I say should be believed over the National Hurricane Center.
I must actually I think you should, but I can't officially say that.
I can't officially say it.
Uh I have been studying these things as long as I have lived in Florida, because that's the first time they actually began to have any impact on me.
It's the way things work for most people growing up in Missouri, hurricanes happen, yeah, you watch them, but there's no personal attachment to it.
But there has been since 1997, and so that's how long I've been studying these things, and I've comparing the data that I collect independently versus what the government puts out via the National Hurricane Center.
And there are always variations.
For example, I can give you some stats right now that are true.
Hurricane Matthew just went through Nassau.
How many of you have been to Nassau?
It's a beautiful place.
Don't misunderstand, but it's 150 years old.
The buildings downtown are very old.
Um look, the maximum winds, according to people on the ground there that have been tweeting out, and yes, people are still able to tweet out.
They still got electricity.
They still have the internet in Nassau, despite this Hillard hurricane going through.
Top winds, they said were 85 miles an hour.
Now the forecast is for much higher than that.
So somebody like me and those of us who live in Palm Beach will look at that and we will feel optimistic.
We will feel hopeful.
Now, we also look at models, the hurricane models that predict in advance the track the hurricane will take.
They never agree.
They're always all over the place.
But as you get closer to um ground zero, get closer to impact, they do get more accurate and they group together.
And oftentimes the Hurricane Center will not follow what the model guidance is.
So you say, okay, why?
I I do, independently, ask, why do they not?
Now let's look at what's happened here.
Since I don't know, last 24 hours.
If you live in Florida, you know this.
For the last 24 hours, the reports have been get the hell out.
We have a storm that's gonna hit the central coast of Florida that has never hit the central coast of Florida before in terms of this strong and this powerful.
So the evacuation orders have been given.
The local drive-bys are inciting all the panic.
They're doing what they usually do.
You can't go to Publix and find any bottled water, for example.
That's been the case since yesterday.
And you see people are in there staring at an empty shelf of water.
I didn't see it.
I because I can't do these kinds of things anymore.
But I have I have spies who tell me these things.
So Maximum Winds 85 in Nassau, yet we're told to expect a hundred and sixty mile an hour winds.
Well, what if it's not gonna be as bad as they say?
I don't expect them to change.
If the tracks in the models take it further away, and I'm talking about where I live.
I mean, I can't accommodate the entire state.
It's gonna hit somewhere.
It's or it's gonna get closest to somewhere in Florida.
So, given where we live, that's the focal point for us, obviously, being selfish as we are, as anybody would be.
Uh, you look for track information that might say, hey, you know what, it's not gonna get as close here as they think.
And then you think you find it, then you wait for it to be reflected, and it isn't.
Well, here's one of the reasons why.
The east coast of this country, you'd be amazed at the percentage of the population in this country that lives on the East Coast near the water.
It would stun you.
A lot of people live in Florida, and a lot of people in Florida on the East Coast.
A lot of people, therefore, have been tuning in and they have heard every warning, everything said.
Well, if it's not going to be that bad, you wouldn't expect the Hurricane Center to back off of it, because what if at the last moment it strengthens and they're wrong?
So even if it might not be as bad as they forecast, they're not going to say so.
On the other hand, let's say that they did.
Let's say that in the in my case, the track, let's say I want to see it move east.
And let's say in the model runs, I see it moving east.
And I go, yay.
And then I look for the next hurricane forecast, and they're not moving it east.
And I say, why not?
Then I stop and think.
This is where politics comes into it.
Okay, they've already got everybody feverishly pitched.
If they move it further away, and it doesn't go further away, they are going to catch hell, like they caught hell in Katrina.
They didn't do anything wrong in Katrina.
They had the proper warnings, it's just that people didn't hear them enough.
So the Hurricane Center got beat up after Katrina.
So that's really the demarcation point.
Ever since Katrina, I think they do a risk assessment and figure it's much better to forecast really bad and be wrong.
Doesn't end up as bad, everybody's happy, than to forecast, hey, folks, it's going to be that bad, and it turns out to be bad.
They're going to be hated and despised and defunded and all that.
It's a long way around saying that we all look for hope.
We all try to find scenarios where it will not be as bad, like I found the wind speeds in Nassau nowhere near what they were predicted to be.
The damage in NASA, I've been looking for reports of catastrophic damage, structural damage along the path this hurricane can't find any.
Doesn't mean it isn't going to happen in the future.
Doesn't mean it's not going to strengthen.
So for us, where we live, the worst point, according to forecast, 8 p.m. till 2 a.m. tonight.
Now they're forecasting uh, and here's another anomaly.
The Hurricane Center is telling us to be on the lookout for winds of 130 and gusting to 150 or higher.
You get the National Weather Service forecast, the maximum winds are 97 miles an hour.
You say, yay, okay, cool.
But then you wonder, okay, who's right here?
Are they talking to each other?
Who knows what some of the other does?
Why?
So you start imagining all of this.
Now, I know some of you hearing this, saying, what do you mean?
Politics.
I have been, folks, I have been trying to convince everybody who listens, that where the government is concerned, and the hurricane center is part of Commerce Department, so's a National Weather Service.
In fact, it's 80% of what the Commerce Department does is the weather.
You know that every cabinet department in our government has been politicized.
It's undeniable, but some people don't understand it.
They don't get it.
It's they don't think politically, therefore they don't see it.
Let me give you an example of how this has been politicized.
After Katrina, remember Al Gore and all the global warming people where they were happy.
They were beating their chests like Tarzan out there, and they were saying that this is just the beginning.
Because the climate change, because the global warming, we're going to have hurricanes like this every year.
Many of them, it's going to be devastating.
It's going to destroy coastlines.
Miami will be just all of that.
And if in the next 11 years, not a single hurricane.
So global warming became climate change.
There hasn't been a single hurricane that hit Florida, Not a major in 11 years.
Now this one comes along, and they're all excited.
We got crisis, we got doom and gloom, and we have our climate change issue.
And if you think that I'm wrong, let me tell you what happened.
I mentioned this to you yesterday.
There was a rumor, story about an MSNBC reporter.
Turned out to be true.
Ron Allen, a major, major credential drive-by media reporter working for NBC News, had been there for years.
He was on MSNBC The Late Show.
And he was talking about the upcoming United Nations interpanel governmental, whatever it is on climate change.
And he said, he gushed about how Obama believes so deeply in protecting the environment.
And that this UN climate change deal marks one of the most significant aspects of Obama's legacy.
Because deals like this are designed to stop hurricanes like Hurricane Matthew.
So here you have an NBC reporter.
Does he know better?
Is he really this dumb or ignorant to think that a piece of paper signed by a bunch of leftist nerds at the United Nations means the end of hurricanes?
Because somehow that piece of paper signifies action that major governments are going to take to affect climate change.
They have been predicting the end of the world since 1980.
There hasn't been any significant warning and warming in the last 15 years.
The thing I've been asking myself for the last 48 hours, it's two days for those of you in Rio Linda.
We've been tracking the direction of this hurricane.
And it's been changing.
Every six hours, the hurricane track forecast changes, and it's different somewhere along the track.
So I'm saying, why can't we get a consensus of scientists to tell us where this thing's gonna hit in the next 12 hours?
We've got a consensus of scientists to tell us in 50 years there isn't going to be Miami.
In 50 years, the sea levels are going to rise.
In 50 years, we're going to be scorched and roasted because the temperatures, but we can't find a consensus of scientists that can tell us where this hurricane's going to be in two days.
And now we have an NBC reporter actually suggesting to people, and the danger here is how many people believe this.
We have a we have a crisis of stupidity in this country that has borne the defects in our public education system for two generations now.
So here's an NBC reporter lauding Obama and his great, great work on climate change.
By the way, I will not lose my place here.
See, Obama yesterday said that he'd met with the joint chiefs, and the single greatest national security threat this nation faces is climate freaking change.
It's not Saturday Night Live, folks.
It is real life American government.
And Obama's out there saying, and he's got these joint chiefs, they got to go along with it, or they don't continue to rise their career ladder.
And then he went on and said, somebody said it Obama, somebody said, yeah, yeah, yeah.
This war in Syria, climate change.
Climate change has had the number one impact on the war in Syria.
Really?
Climate change is firing the bullets?
Climate change.
Well, no, Mr. Limbaugh, climate change is dictating the movement of the refugees.
Oh, you mean they're trying to escape Syria because it's so hot?
Not because bullets are flying.
Exactly right, Mr. Limbaugh.
Now you're getting it.
Climate change is causing all of these immigrants to leave Syria.
Oh, it's not the war.
It's not the gas attacks.
It's not, no, no, it's climate change.
And we got people telling us this.
Now we got people telling us that if we sign this United Nations climate change deal, and this is going to be like the third one, the aim is to stop hurricanes like Hurricane Matthew.
It's just it boggles my mind.
This is the first hurricane to make landfall in the United States since Hurricane Wilma in 2005.
Hurricane Wilma also went over my house.
That was a category two.
There wasn't any damage.
There were some trees down.
It's obligatory you lose power, use the phone lines for a while, but there wasn't any structural damage.
And that was 2005, so that's what uh 11 years ago.
But gee, if we'd have just signed that climate change deal last week, this hurricane would have quit.
You know what?
The hurricane would have seen that the UN had finally gotten serious, it would have just dissipated.
Or it might not have even formed in the first place.
Don't accuse me of being sarcastic.
I'm telling that's exactly what they want you to believe.
That if the U.N. didn't take an action, hurricanes like this can be stopped.
The aim of the United Nations intercontinental, whatever it is climate change, is designed to stop hurricanes like Matthew from forming.
Now, leftists, liberals, and they can try, they can promote all they want.
They don't care.
But the fact that people believe it is what's scary.
And uh a lot of people do.
NBC's Ron Allen thinks climate deal is designed to stop storms like Hurricane Matthew.
These are acts of God.
Have you ever you have an insurance policy on your home or anything?
You know the force majority, the act of God, which is events that you can't control that man has no say so over.
Hurricane is one of those.
But I guess the intergovernmental panel on climate change is gonna steal the purview of hurricanes away from God.
And next we're gonna go on, we're gonna stop war with with climate.
Look, the long way around telling you that there is politics in everything.
There's politics in the weather, there's politics in the forecasting of the weather.
There's politics in hurricanes, there's politics in the forecasting of hurricanes, because there are votes.
And look, most people already.
What do you think happened?
Do you remember when when um you you may not believe this?
Port St. Lucy, which is one of the target areas.
Remember the some some babe walks into a McDonald's and they're out of McNuggets?
She called 911, wanting to speak to Obama to fix it.
So what if that same woman or somebody like her goes into publics because she's been told to stock up on canned goods and water and all these other things to get ready for the hurricane?
She goes in there and there's no water.
It just stands there.
Well, what do I do?
You ever thought about getting a jug turning on the tap.
So anyway, this is the kind of stuff that goes through my mind as I'm also tracking.
And I'm not going to tell you where I think this is going to go, but that would be irresponsible.
The Hurricane Center, they're they have a monopoly on this.
If they tell us the winds in Nassau were 100 miles an hour, then that's what the official record's going to show.
And I don't work for the Hurricane Center.
I'm not a trained meteorologist, but I am the world's leading expert in dissecting liberals and liberalism.
And it's everywhere.
They are everywhere, and they are corrupting everything because they are infusing their political agenda into everything.
You know what?
Try this.
Hillary Clinton, the campaign, has gone out and made a major media buy on the weather channel.
Now, some people think, whoa, man, that's brilliant.
I don't know.
You're watching the weather channel because you really want to find out where the hell this thing's going or what and all of a sudden here comes a Clinton for president commercial talking about what a reprobate Trump is or whatever.
Could backfire out there.
By the way, we have Ditto Cam here.
It's a strange angle.
I'm not avoiding looking at you.
It's just odd.
I don't like looking to my left anyway, which I have to do here.
Um, but at least we have one.
The makeshift studio, everybody's a great job getting this set up on a moment's notice.
I mean, I didn't make the decision to leave until noon yesterday, right before the program started.
Now I gotta take a break.
We'll do that.
And uh see, folks, even in discussing a hurricane, I got the reasons you listen to this program front and center, right in the middle of it.
Nobody does that.
That's right.
Do not go away.
Out on the left coast.
Near Los Angeles, Rush Limbaugh, the Excellence and Broadcasting Network.
Telephone number 800 282-2882, and uh everything's normal.
You want to send an email, we'll check it.
The new address El Rushbo at EIB net.us.
Now, there's all kinds of other stuff going on in the news today that it's not all hurricane.
Uh and I know most of you are not affected by the hurricane, and so it doesn't have the immediate interest to you that the presidential campaign does.
See, that that's why, even in discussing the hurricane, I was able to infuse politics because the left puts it there.
And he's going to start saying that, well, the UN panel, man, if we just sign that deal, it's designed to stop hurricanes.
It's just it's it's so stupid.
You know, it's the kind of I felt the same way reading that that I felt watching this vice presidential debate theater.
It just insulted me.
It's so beneath the dignity of the people of this country to watch something like that go on.
Um it's painful.
Anyway, Alicia Mochado says she's done giving interviews about Trump.
She's had it.
It's backfired on her.
I think we'll have details and more coming up.
Executing a signed host duties flawlessly zero mistakes.
And as always, half my brain tied behind my back, just to make it fair.
800-282-2882, if you want to be on the program.
Yesterday on this program, we had Mike Pence, the vice presidential running late for Donald Trump.
And we uh talked to him about the fact that one of the points that drive-bys were making about his debate reform.
Remember, everybody raved about it.
It was great.
Oh, it was so good.
He was better than Trump.
He made Trump mad, they said.
Trump was said to be unhappy if it Pence did so well because it meant that Trump had to work harder and that he was outshine and so forth.
And then they started speculating why Pence didn't really fire back on some of the insults that Kane was throwing out about Trump.
And they said we had this media montage yesterday.
All of these people, I'm I'm sure this came from the Hillary campaign.
They put out this this that everybody in the drive-by would say, yeah, well, Pence was setting himself up for his own presidential run in 2020.
That's what Pence was doing.
Pence knows that it's a lost cause.
Pence knows that Trump's already lost this thing.
Trump knows Pence knows that Trump's not going to win this.
He's setting himself up for 2020.
And they all were saying this.
So I said, where does this come from?
Did all of these drive-by reporters just independently come up with that theory?
No way.
I'm telling you, it came from the Hillary campaign.
Hillary campaign issues talking ports because the media is nothing more than the Hillary campaign.
The media is just a bunch of Democrat Party hacks disguised as journalists for the for the most part.
So Hillary Campaign puts out talking points.
Hey, Pence obviously setting himself up for 2020.
We had a montage.
At least 10 of these reporters said it.
Now, why would Hillary put it out?
Well, put it out there that Pence already knows this is over.
That Hillary's a lock for 2016, that he's already looking for his own fortunes in the year 2020.
And that's what they did.
So on this program, we interviewed Pence.
We laughed about it.
We joked about it.
You heard it if you were listening here.
In fact, grab summit number two.
We'll play this first because this is the portion of the interview yesterday conducted with Pence, and I want you to hear what they do with this.
So here is the relevant portion of the interview.
Here's the third thing they're saying.
The third thing they're saying is you actually weren't trying to help Trump last night.
You already know Hillary's gonna win.
So you were doing everything you did for 2020, Governor.
Your 2020 campaign began last night.
That's what they're saying in the drive-by media, Governor.
It's what we're used to.
I mean, look, I I said in Virginia today at a rally, you know.
Most mornings I have to turn on the television with a stick.
Wait a little bit.
You know, you just never know what's going on.
That's right.
With a stick.
It's two-on-one everyone.
Wearing latex gloves, exactly.
So, as you clearly heard, I was joking with him about it.
We were laughing about it.
He refuted It, neither one of us believes it or take it seriously.
But last night on CNN's Anderson Cooper 75, a portion of the CNN correspondent Jim Acosta's report about the vice presidential nominee Governor Pence and his strong debate performance.
Throughout the day, Anderson, we've been hearing from uh political pundits all the way up to Rush Limbaugh asking Mike Pence uh whether or not uh this performance last night was generating some buzz about Mike Pence in 2020.
That is not the effect uh that the Trump campaign intended uh when Mike Pence was out there debating Tim Kane last night.
So uh perhaps not exactly what they wanted uh in picking Mike Pence, it's never a good upstage the boss.
It didn't happen.
It's made up, it's entirely made up.
It is a made-up narrative by the drive-by meeting, and I damn well am certain they got it from the Hillary campaign.
You heard Pence and I are joking about it.
I'm running it by him as look at some of the other outrageous things they're saying about it.
And then they report this, and it's not wrong.
I mean, I did ask Pence about it, but they reported as though I think it too, that I have all decided to throw Trump under the bus.
That even Rush Limbaugh has concluded it Trump's toast.
That's what they tried to convey here throughout the day, Anderson.
We've been hearing from political pundits all the way up, putting me at the top of the poll, or should be, asking Pence whether or not it's now.
If you're one of these people that doesn't know what to do when McDonald's is out of McNuggets and you're watching CNN, what are you gonna think?
You're gonna think, my God, even Limbaugh, oh geez, it must be cool, and it must be.
So all we can do is is take this literal trash and garbage that they call the news every day and do our best to refute it.
I want to go back, I want to the montage that started all of this.
This was Tuesday night after the debate and Wednesday morning, played this for you yesterday.
This is a montage of all he's done.
How many are one, two, three, four, five, six, there's ten of them here.
Ten drive-by's, and they all say the same thing.
Tim Kane was running for vice president in 2016.
Mike Pence was running for president in 2020.
Mike Pence defended his term for 2020.
Mike Pence just won the first presidential debate for 2020.
Mike Pence, he's running in 2020.
He threw Trump under the bus.
But Mike Pence certainly did himself well if he decides to run in 2020.
Mike Pence came in and made Mike Pence look good for 2020.
I think Mike Pence may have been looking a little bit at 2020.
He's made himself probably the front runner for the Republican nomination in 2020.
How silly is that?
That's that's Chris Matthews.
How silly is that anyway?
The front runner for 2020, and we haven't had this election yet.
But still, where did all of these people hear, where did they think they independently concluded that Pence was setting himself up for 2020?
There's no way this had to come from the Clinton campaign or some Democrat organization somewhere, and they ran with it.
So I asked Pence about it, and then CNN reports, yeah, even Limbaugh.
Uh and then, of course, you're the Trump campaign when you're minding your own business, and you hear CNN and they think I'm not part of the crowd throwing you overboard.
So I gotta send a flash note here to Hope Hicks and tell her what's going on.
This is how they do it, and how they try to do it and so forth.
And they say, yeah, this put more pressure on Trump.
He didn't really want to do this debate Sunday night.
You know that too.
That's what he didn't really want to do this.
Now Pence has forced him to not only do it, but actually have to work hard doing it, which Trump didn't want to do.
I mean, just the narratives they come up with.
Trump doesn't want to work hard.
Now there's a story, by the way, in the stack that I'm gonna be getting to, let me preview it here.
Trump hired an Albanian immigrant to actually be the property manager for Trump Tower, the jewel in his empire.
Is Trump getting any credit for hiring an immigrant?
An Albanian immigrant?
No way!
You know what the story is?
About how this immigrant property manager has been running side deals with all the vendors.
In other words, they're saying that you had to pay to play to get work at Trump Tower, that you had to give this guy A little bump if you wanted to get the contract to say put in a water pipe or vacuum, whatever the heck it is.
And so they're trying to say Trump runs a dishonest operation and has this sleaze ball immigrant from Albania in there doing it.
If Hillary hired an Albanian to do whatever, and I can't imagine what, but you can imagine the accolades and how it'd be really representative of her open-mindedness toward immigration.
I don't think, as a property owner, I don't think there's a property manager alive that doesn't bird dog it on the side.
It's part of the cost of doing business.
It can get frustrating too.
But uh anyway, let me take a brief time out here.
We will uh continue and strive here to get a couple of calls in in the first hour.
Sit tight back with more here, Rushland bought in Los Angeles today and tomorrow, and possibly for the next couple of weeks.
I mean, you just never know.
Okay, let's grab a phone call here.
It looks like Marie.
If I get your name wrong, folks, the things here are compressed.
I mean, the screen is squeeze zoomed into a narrow top to bottom, and these everything's it looks like Marty to me, but it can't be Marty M-R-I-T-E.
It's gotta be Maurice.
I'm guessing.
Is it Marie in uh in whatever it is?
Are you in Minnesota?
Yep, exactly, Rush.
This is Marie, you got it right.
Great to have you.
Great to have you.
What's up?
Well, ditto's rush on the climate thing, you've got it exactly right.
Um we we're in South and Eastern Minnesota, and I'm a dairy farmer's wife, and we've been highly impacted by this uh narrative about climate change.
And I I know I have friends that think it's a big deal, but um I think that it's being it it's highly used uh to rape our treasury of subsidy money.
Uh we were highly impacted here in southeastern Minnesota by a wind project that was going to kill up to 15 eagles, nearly 15 eagles a year, and it was highly inappropriately cited.
And I was just talking also to a guy down in Missouri, he sold his dairy herd, half his dairy herd and moved because Next Era was coming in with wind.
And this is all under this big umbrella, you know, climate horror is gonna take us over, but little do people know that it's ruining rural communities, uh, the way this is being promoted.
And uh and I think it's all UN-based, and it's it it's all uh issue more of greed and power, if you want to know the truth of that.
Oh, that's exactly what it's about.
Yeah, yeah.
That is but in fact uh people uh and thank you, Marie, I appreciate it very much.
I'm glad you called.
Um by the way, little tech note, I heard that call better than I've ever heard a call on Palm Beach.
I mean, that call sounded like it was right in my ear rather than in a barrel 15 feet away.
Anyway, that's just for inside baseball stuff, folks.
Don't let it affect the way you listen to the program.
But the only way I can pass the information on is when it actually happens, that's they get people to listen.
Otherwise they think you're making it up.
So, climate change.
What is the big deal?
I have uh people that don't necessarily understand the point I'm making, saying, Well, Rush, what what could possibly be wrong with with trying to save the planet?
And I do you really think I I mean I ask people, do you really think, because this is what they want you to believe, that the way you are living your life is going to destroy the climate.
Do you think let's say that President Obama wanted to do the exact opposite.
Let's say that pre any president wanted to destroy the climate.
So he calls in his cabinet.
What would they do?
How would they do it?
Have you ever heard anybody explain how they would destroy because they claim we're doing it.
We're destroying the climate, and it's so bad millennials actually believe a number of them that the planet is not going to be habitable by the time they're 65.
They're being lied to.
It it it's it's near criminal.
And all of it is being done to turn people to government, to accept more government, big government, and tax increases.
All of this climate change is being blamed on us.
The way you live, the car you drive, the amount of electricity you use, all of the fossil fuels.
You are being guilted into believing you are causing the end of the planet.
But then they come along and they tell you you can redeem yourself.
Come along and tell you that you can save the planet despite how out of whack you have been.
And how do you do that?
Well, you agree with everything the government says that you must do.
You go out and buy chinty little cars that you don't want to buy, and you really and by the way, most people are desperately searching for meaning in their lives.
And if you tell them that they can save the planet, why you can own them.
You can have them the palm of your hand.
So you tell them support the government, you bring tax increase, carbon tax, uh, punish big oil punish corporate interests.
It's all of this.
Climate change, global warming is nothing more than a vehicle.
There's nothing scientific about it.
When you hear consensus of scientists, if there's a consensus, it isn't science.
Science is not to a vote.
Science is not democratic.
We don't think that the moon is where it is because a consensus of scientists is decided, and some disagree.
We don't think that the any other scientific discovery we've made has been up to a vote.
It either is or it isn't.
But climate change, it's all a consensus.
Consensus if scientists agree.
And it's all done to turn you to government.
It's all done to get you to hate the same people the left hates, and to suspect the same people the left hates, and to make you distrust uh big pharmaceutical, big oil, big box retail, big what whoever the Democrat Party enemies list, that's who's to blame for this.
And it's all about turning you into a ward of the state, and they make it personal.
They tell you you can save the planet.
And I read, I read blogs written by young people, 20, 25, 30 years old, stunning how they bought into this.
It's it's frightening how they've bought into it.
And it's frightening how many of them think that it's all science when none of it is science.
Do you realize the only thing there is only one thing that points to global warming, and that is computer models.
We don't have a bit of data.
We don't have one shred of scientific data.
All of it is computer models forecasting 20 years from now, 30.
You'll note they never say climate change in the next two years.
They never say climate change in the next 10.
You know why?
Because at some point we would easily be able to prove that they're wrong.
They make the prediction 30 years out, 50 years out, when many people are going to be dead and won't be around to know.
And if you're young enough, if you're 20, and they tell you 50 years, well, that's your still 70s.
You're gonna buy into it to try to save the climate so that there's some place to live.
And all this talk about going to Mars is rooted in the same thing that the planet is not going to be habitable.
And all of this is nothing but total political BS.
We don't know how to destroy the climate.
Look at the ozone layer.
Let's say Obama wanted to destroy the ozone layer because he wanted all conservatives to get skin cancer.
So he calls a cabinet in, and he says to the joint chiefs, destroy the ozone layer.
What would they do?
How would anybody go out to set out and destroy the ozone layer?
Well, you know what did it?
Hairspray cans.
Yes.
So I guess we can get massive hairspray cans and start spraying the air with it, and eventually the ozone would die.
So how do we destroy the climate?
Do we give everybody an SUV?
Do we ramp up the coal industry?
Do we what what they're what they're claiming that we do that destroys the climate that they're trying to stop us from doing, which is progress, they wouldn't know what to do.
They wouldn't know to whom to give the order, and they wouldn't know how to execute the order to destroy the climate.
And yet, we're being told every day that we're doing it simply by virtue of being alive and exhaling CO2.
What we exhale, it's creating the greenhouse effect.
So you see, we can't even avoid it.
It's a total political ruse, and it's sad how it's captivated so many people.
But I know how they do it.
People want meaning in their lives, think they can save the planet for their own adult years and so forth.
It's just silly.
The Earth's climate's constantly changing.
We have no control over it.
It's been much warmer than it is even now.
It's been much colder.
I gotta take a break, folks.
We will be back.
Don't go away.
Okay, a couple of quick things.
Hillary has pulled her spots from the weather channel.
Backlash.
I knew it.
And try this.
The weather isn't the weather anymore.
The Environmental Protection Agency, not the National Weather Service, the EPA has just issued a 50 state climate warning.
Flood, drought, and insect outbreaks.
This is how they do it.
50 state climate warning.
It's bogus.
▲
Export Selection