All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 15, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:20
September 15, 2016, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Okay, folks, it is up at rushlimbaugh.com, the GIF, we prepared a GIF video of the guy that would not stop chewing during Trump speech, the economic club of New York.
It's about an hour and 15 minutes ago.
I'm watching it, and this guy, camera right, screen right, if you're looking at the screen, lower right hand corner while Trump is speaking.
Guy would not stop chewing.
I never saw him putting anything in his mouth.
He's just kept chomping away to the point of being a distracting.
So I said I'm earlier.
No, so you've got to get video of this, because I'm going to describe it, and I want people to be able to see it.
So it's up there now at Rush Limbaugh.com.
Welcome back, folks.
Great to have you.
800-282-2882.
If you want to be on the program email address, Lrushbo at EIBNet.us.
It's a new email address.
Apparently, ladies and gentlemen, you know, this this doctor that Hillary has, this uh what is her name?
Uh Bardakus Bard Bardson.
Anyway, she has told everybody, she's diagnosed Hillary as uh having back Lisa Bardeck is her name.
She diagnosed Hillary as having bacterial pneumonia.
Now, I must I had never heard of bacterial pneumonia.
This whole diagnosis that this doctor repeated sounded I'd never heard of it before.
Now I'm not a pneumonia expert.
I'm don't sit around studying pneumonia, but I'd never heard of bacteria, noncontagious, limited bacterial pneumonia.
Well, it turns out there's no such thing.
It turns out there is no such diagnosis as non-contagious bacterial pneumonia.
Apparently, Hillary's doctor made it up.
And if that's made up, then practically everything else in this report could be made up.
This report doesn't even deal with the one thing that everybody saw, and that's the seizure.
She had a major seizure.
And they're reporting, oh, yeah, she was dehydrated, and yeah, she tripped, it fell out of her shoe getting off the curb, and uh she stumbled getting into the van and she's just weak for a long time.
Noncontagious bacterial pneumonia.
Well, there is this website called the International Classification of Diseases, and it turns out that this place, the ICD, the International Classification of Diseases, is the Bible for Obamacare.
Medical coding.
This place is what Obamacare uses in coding C-O-D-I-N-G, coding various medical maladies, diseases, and sicknesses in the process of diagnosis and treatment.
And it doesn't exist there.
According to ICD-9 codes and the more current ICD-10 coding, there's no such diagnosis as non-contagious bacterial pneumonia.
But Hillary's doctor said yesterday in a letter that she had diagnosed with mild contagious, mild non-contagious bacterial pneumonia.
Since then, a lot of doctors have pointed out that there isn't any such thing.
Now the drive by's are not finding those doctors.
Other media is fine or finding doctors.
Mild noncontagious, bacterial pneumonia.
There is no mild pneumonia, noncontagious, isn't this convenient?
Hillary has the kind of pneumonia that doesn't affect anybody else, and it can be cured in an hour and a half, and after that you can hug a little girl and not have any fear of spreading the disease.
Why, it's a miracle.
Hillary has a miracle disease, a miracle strain of pneumonia that doesn't hurt her or anybody else.
The problem is nobody's ever heard of it.
And in this classification website, this coding website that the Obamacare plan uses practically exclusively in coding And denoting tracking diagnoses in medicine, it doesn't exist.
Apparently Hillary's doctor just made it up.
And if so, what else in this report is made up?
But if that's made up, it means she doesn't have pneumonia.
Her doctor's report makes no sense.
Her doctor's report raises more questions than it answers.
And her doctor doesn't even address the primary thing everybody saw, and the primary thing everybody's curious about, and that's the seizure.
She had a seizure.
It was patently obvious on this video.
And it's not the first time.
And that wasn't even addressed.
So let me ask you this.
What do you prescribe for a non-existent disease?
What as a doctor would you prescribe for mild non-contagious bacterial pneumonia that many doctors have pointed out there isn't any such thing?
What would you diagnose?
A placebo.
Anyway, we will have more on that.
I want to get back to these Colin Powell emails.
Because folks, let me tell you something.
We we actually learn a lot here.
We learn more than you think.
If you know how to read these things, if you know how to attach the meaning in these emails to the real world lives of the people writing these emails and commenting on them, you can learn a lot more than just what Colin Powell thinks of Bill Clinton.
Let's go through them.
Secretary of State, former Secretary of State Colin Powell, ripped into Hillary Clinton in several personal emails over the years, while the drive-by media is trying to say that Powell really ripped into Trump.
They're doing that to try and not report what Powell said and wrote about Hillary.
This is according to a document dump of hacked emails on the website DC Leaks.com.
CBS News, no less, waited through the documents, and they picked out some of the most interesting emails blasting Hillary.
In one blunt, I mentioned this to you before the break at the top of the hour.
In one blunt 2014 email with Democrat megadonor Jeffrey Leeds, Colin Powell had this to say of Hillary.
Quote, I would rather not have to vote for her.
Although she's a friend I respect.
A 70-year-old person with a long track record, unbridled ambition, greedy, not transformational, with a husband still dicking bimbos at home, according to the New York Post.
So that's one email that Colin Powell sent describing Hillary.
That is quite an accusation, especially at Bill's advanced age.
It's no wonder the drive-byers are trying to concentrate on what Powell said about Trump, because these are devastating.
And this is Colin Powell.
He's as close.
He's as close, he's as close to uh untouchable Mr. Pure Mr. Clean as Washington, D.C. has to offer.
Or he was.
In another email to the same guy, Megadonor Jeffrey Leeds, this is August of 2015.
Colin Powell weighed in on his own use of private emails for State Department Business.
Quote, agree, press has started asking Peggy and me about our use.
We've answered three IG questionnaire.
That's inspector's general.
We've we've answered three IG questions, and we're clean, he told this guy.
We're clean.
Now a newsie asked today to interview me on my use.
I told him to read my book, chapter on brainware.
So he calls journalist news.
Yeah, newsy asked today to interview me on my use of private email service.
I told her read my book, Chapter on Brainware.
You ready for what?
I'm look at folks.
I'm just reading what what the hacked emails reveal.
They are going.
I don't want to say the word.
Okay, let me just he didn't say screw it up.
But it's close.
He said they are gonna screw up the legitimate and necessary use of emails with these friggin' record rules.
I saw email more like a telephone than a cable machine.
As long as the stuff is unclassified.
I had some secure state.gov machine.
Everything Hillary Rodham Clinton touches, she kind of screws up with hubris.
Hey, yeah, I did it, but not the way she's doing it.
I didn't use State Department email on my private server.
No way, no how.
I never went there.
My personal stuff, yeah.
But she's gonna screw it all up.
These rules, she screwed it up for everybody.
Everything she touches, she screws up with hubris.
That email continues.
I told you about the gig I lost at a university because she so overcharged them, they came under heat and they couldn't pay any fees for a while.
I should send her a bill.
Folks, that is, I can't tell you how telling that is.
Let me translate this for you.
Powell is complaining about Hillary in this email to a mega donor of the Democrat Party.
He said, I told you about the gig, meaning the speech opportunity.
Speech gig.
I told you about the speech gig I lost at a university because she so overcharged them, they came under heat and they couldn't pay any fees for a while.
The ruling class, this crowd is obsessed with speaking gigs.
Hillary, 20 million dollars in two years making 20-minute speeches to banks.
Bill and Hillary Clinton's net worth, 80% of what they have earned since leaving the White House is from speech income.
And apparently, same thing with Colin Powell.
Apparently, speech income is hugely important to these people.
And he's ticked off here because Hillary went and gave a speech at some university and also asked him.
She charged them so much when it was learned how much they paid her, they got all kind of heat and they had to cancel subsequent speeches or ask people to give them for nothing because they had run out of money.
And there was so much heat on they couldn't keep up the facade.
It's made to look like that the money is not a factor.
The people who get paid try to downplay it.
No, no, I care about these issues on my heart.
I uh I care about the country.
I am devoted to uh the education of young minds.
I I thoroughly enjoy the trip to campus.
Uh spending time there at the academy and academia.
It's a great opportunity to uh share with the students that show up the breadth of knowledge I've acquired over the course of the years.
It's the least I can do to pay people.
Yeah, the least you can do, you're getting paid six figures to show up and mumble this stuff.
I think this is a big discovery.
I think it's a big find.
That that's how these people grease their skids.
Well, no.
No, no, not you can make money however you want as far as I'm concerned.
I just think there's a lot of phoniness attached to this.
And how much value is it in truth when colleges and universities don't invite conservatives to come make speeches and certainly don't pay.
But I just, besides all that, look at what he's angry about.
Hillary's so overcharged, hubris, that there wasn't any money left for him.
So he didn't get his speaking gig.
Ruling class, very, very obsessed with these speech gigs, folks.
I've never charged for one.
Never ever.
I even pay my own expenses to get to them.
It's never felt right charging people to make a sp.
I can't.
I don't know why.
I can't tell you why.
I just felt like I've never, and I've been offered a lot of money and I've never accepted it.
In a recent email, August 23rd this year, Colin Powell called Hillary's excuse for using an email server a dumb one.
Dumb.
She should have done a full Monty at the beginning.
She was using email when she took over.
They put the personal system in the basement a few months later.
The dinner was June 16th.
She didn't need any advice or okay from me.
She was already doing it.
I gave her written guidance on why and how I'd been doing it.
I warned her staff three times over the past two years not to try to connect it to me.
I'm not sure Hillary Rodham Clinton even knew or understood what was going on in the basement.
Now you might think that's exculpatory.
That's not what that is.
He's saying I don't know how much she knows about any of this stuff.
I don't know how much she knows.
I know she's not even aware.
Smartest woman in the world.
And look at all the things that she admits she doesn't understand or doesn't know.
And in an August 21st email bashing Donald Trump, Powell talked about his frustration with Clinton as well.
You know, it it it could have been so easy for her just to tell what she did, just do the full money.
You know, last night people came up to me, they said she threw you under the bus.
I said, Don't be silly, she's under the bus.
The FBI guys loved me, and so did the inspector general guys.
The conversation turned to Clinton's always trying to use you.
That's Colin Powell.
Clinton is always trying to use you.
Most folks up here detest Trump and they won't vote for him, but they dislike her intensely at the same time.
Oh well, the country will decide.
That's his e that's his reference to Trump.
And that's what the media wants everybody to think is all he said in these emails.
They didn't say anything else about Hillary or anything of the sort.
But it's it's a it's a halfway decent treasure trove here of uh indications in the minds of these ruling class types about what's important to them.
And notice, notice how front and center money.
These are the people that try to convey they're above that.
Uh money, no, no, no.
That's that's a that's a that's a hoy polloy concern.
I I am above that.
I I don't need money for what I I'm not concerned with the uh the money.
I'm in this uh for the good of the students and the uh audience, and I'm I'm in this for the good of the money, I couldn't care.
They care totally about the money, just like everybody else does.
Back in a sec.
We're gonna start Rockford, Illinois.
Scott, I'm glad you're up your first today, and welcome to the program, sir.
Rush, thank you very much.
Third generation U.S. Navy ditto you as a student of the EIB uh network working on my continuing degree.
I understand from my teacher that conservatism wins every time it's tried.
And we know socialism fails every time it's implemented.
I'm confused with what you said yesterday when you said we've had decades and generations, if you will, of us paying for everyone else's stuff.
Isn't that the point of all this rush?
When is it gonna stop?
Yeah, but let me ask you a question.
And I'm I I don't mean to be picking a fight with you because I you're you're not doing that with me.
I really need to ask you a question.
Sure.
You also know I'm the mayor of Realville.
You've heard me say, okay, that means that I deal with with what is, not with what I wish was, or not with what was or used to be, deal with what is.
Let me ask you point blank, is conservatism on the ballot in this presidential election?
No, sir, it is not.
Okay.
Given that it's not on the ballot, what?
What then becomes the criterion for your vote?
You personally, what I've go ahead.
No wrong answer here.
I'm I'm basically interviewing you.
If conservatism's not on the ballot, then on what basis are you choosing to vote?
Well, um, if you give me just a second here, what I my base is on the Constitution of the United States, which is being violated everywhere by all parties involved.
But given that, the way I look at this election rush, there's no way I can ever vote for Hillary Clinton.
I have extreme difficulty voting for Donald Trump because of the history that I know this man has.
I look at it this way.
If Hillary wins, we know exactly where she's going.
If Trump wins, he has a very, very small window to squeeze through to become a good president.
Or if he's allowed to be disjust distracted by everything else, it can be just as much of a disaster.
So the only play truly is Trump.
My question is, as a student talking to the doctor, how do I rationalize what we've learned from you and what I believe by knowing my history and the Constitution?
What she came up with yesterday is nothing but more of the same, and that's what's killing this country.
I live in Illinois, Rush.
The the state that has mastered unfunded liabilities.
You put that on a national level with our unfunded liabilities.
I guess we can just add more to it.
But I'm not sure.
We already are.
Look, look, I've got a break here.
Hang on, if you can, Scott.
We will continue this on the other side of our obscene profit timeout.
Don't go away.
And back we are with Scott in Rockford, Illinois.
Okay, so you you're you're basically asking me how in the world we can support anybody can support what Ivanka Trump came up with, because it's just more the same.
It's just another expansion of government, it's just another entitlement.
Why are we getting all excited about it?
Is that essentially your question?
That's yes, it's essentially where my confusion comes from.
Okay.
Are you confused because you think I endorsed it?
No, sir.
No, I understand exactly why you said what you said in the world.
I was just I was describing it.
You know what I have learned in the course of this program uh over the years is people I'm a very highly opinionated person, and so people assume I'm opining on everything.
When I open my mouth and say something, it's an opinion.
Yesterday I was explaining, and I said a couple of things that probably could have, I don't know that they did, but I bet they might have really enraged some conservatives.
Let me repeat those two things, and then we'll get into the even greater substance.
And don't worry about time here, Scott.
You're here for as long as time as you have.
Now the uh one of the aspects of Ivanka Trump's plan was the equivalent of savings accounts, child care savings accounts.
And I made the point that when those have been proposed by conservative think tank uh members in the form of school vouchers or health care savings accounts or other similar proposals to give people control of the money that's being spent for them, say on health care or education, those proposals have been greeted unanimously with support and applause on the basis that they are conservative.
Because conservative think tanks created these ideas.
The health care savings account school vouchers uh any any number of other similar proposals.
So here comes Ivanka Trump proposing it, and all of a sudden it's an entitlement, they say, and it's expansion of government.
I just asked the question why when conservative think tanks propose these things, is it great conservatism and a great example of small government or or trying to make smaller government the reality, and when she proposed it, proposes that it becomes an automatic entitlement and expansion of government.
Seems to me to be a little hypocritical.
Now there were parts of this proposal that do reek of entitlements, like the Democrats come up with them.
But George W. Bush did one too, Medicare Part B. We've we've we've had to live through this for I don't know how many years.
But at for for me, Scott, it doesn't do any good to sit here and wring my hands and talk about what could have been, or if somebody else had Won the Republican primary, for example, or what has been, I deal with what is.
And here's how I see things.
Hillary Clinton has promised to expand the number of illegal immigrants and refugees pouring into this country in the hundreds of thousands.
It is my belief that immigration of all the issues that are destroying or raking great damage in this country, immigration is number one, not because of who, not because of anything to do with race, simply because we're flouting the law, we are flooding the country with people who are not educated, who are not able to speak the language, and who are not capable of providing for themselves, and that's exactly what the Democrat Party wants.
They are not becoming Americans, they're not assimilating, there's no effort to assimilate them.
Look at California.
If you want to find out what the future of the Republican Party is, if Hillary Clinton wins, take a look at California.
California is, as we speak, preparing to pass a law to grant national Obamacare or whatever replaces it to illegal aliens just by showing up.
The price for settling a refugee that enters the country under Obama or Hillary is $67,000.
This stuff has to stop.
And in this election, there is a candidate saying that he's going to stop it.
We don't know if he really will.
But we do know that Hillary won't.
We do know the Democrat Party won't.
Thank you.
For me, Scott, we're beyond ideology at this point because it isn't on the ballot.
I regret that.
I wish it weren't the case, but that doesn't accomplish anything by wishing something was that isn't.
I just can agree with you, sir 100% on what you just said, although I I will take a uh a side step from one thing, and that is I'm more worried about the future of the Republic instead of the Republican Party.
And I understand exactly what you're saying, and it makes all the sense in the world.
We know what Hillary is going to do.
Donald Trump, you just said it, he has a small window.
He can actually be a good president, but he has a tendency to be distracted in the subterfuge.
And what concerns me the most is like almost like what Chuck Schumer said the other day, the man openly just said, I'm going to, if I become the Senate majority leader, we're going to put people on the court that won't follow the Constitution.
This thing's going to self-destruct if we don't correct it.
Wait a second now.
I uh d don't misunderstand something.
This is a classic example.
I wasn't advocating for the Republican Party.
That's not my motivation here.
I'm simply telling you, there think of the Republican Party as the opposition to the Democrats.
It doesn't exist in California.
I'm not whatever I believe here, and whatever I whatever you think I'm advocating, it's not because I care what happens to the Republican Party.
I care about what happens to America.
And I know that any more of what we've had the last eight years, it's going to be America, but it's not going to be the America you and I know.
It isn't going to be the America that was founded, and Chuck Schumer has just admitted that that's their objective.
But they don't have to admit it.
All we have to do is watch what they're doing.
So whether the Trump proposal, whether it's an expansion of government, whether it's another entitlement, and how conservatives have been snookered again.
If if you if you if if you really don't want Hillary, I I don't know what to tell you to do.
I I um the theory.
Once again, uh catchphrase, I'm gonna follow my conscience, and it's probably gonna lead me as hard as it is to the polls for Donald Trump.
Well, but Lou, I want to circle circle back to something you said.
You called me under the premise that I am Mr. Conservative, and you want to know you're at you're attending the Limboy Institute.
You think you're close to getting a degree, even though there aren't any here.
You you want to know what the professor really thinks about this in terms of whether this proposal that Ivanka put forth is actually conservative or not, and are we making a mistake by not opposing it?
That's what you're really for the sake of conservatism, you want to know if we keep biting the bullet and supporting and and electing these things that we disagree with, what's it gonna do to us as a movement, or what it's it gonna do to conservatism is is that close to one of the questions that you had.
True, but I think I think the hardest part about that, if you expand on that, Rush, is the fact that even if we even if we went through what you were say explaining about uh the vouchers and things of that nature, every single program that has been put out there immediately gets expanded and the doors are open and all of a sudden it's it's accumulating and everybody from everywhere instead of the intended target.
And that's where all of these things go off the rails.
Okay, so just make sure I understand.
So if if we if if this proposal as written and submitted ends up being enacted then in your view it's a it's the creation, the establishment of a new entitlement and it's only going to expand every other entitlement because it's going to continue the premise that government will pay people for their behavior.
And it's going to be another electron and the magnet of drawing people here illegally, period this proposal give give me this how how does this act as a magnet to illegal immigrants?
Well we already have this fictitious number of eleven million in the shadows.
How they come up with that when they're in the shadows I don't know I think that's the thing that's the that figures that figure is also a bunch of years old.
It's got to be more than eleven million by now.
Right, right.
It's got to be way over that but i we just saw that they're they're allowing them to come in now whether regardless of whether from it's not even a a nation or an origin or a race or anything.
It's just people that aren't supposed to be here are coming across in drones.
Once they're in the plan to find them and stop them.
But wait a second now look look it's it's not quite as uh what's the word the number if we can trust anything that's reported the the numbers are actually somewhat down because the status of the U.S. economy is not that strong.
There aren't the people that are coming here to find work aren't coming and and some people are leaving because of that and so you combine these two numbers and there's some question over you know if the rate of illegal immigration is down or is the same or or is up but the point is you know we're getting off track again.
The point is that there is a political party that wants to expand it and in fact there may be two political parties that want to expand.
You know what a big danger for let's say Trump wins let's just say Trump wins and let's say that he's being honest about everything he's proposing let's say he's serious about building a wall he's serious about deporting these people he's serious about trying to keep corporate manufacturer here.
Let's say all of this is true.
Do you know what the Democrats in Congress are going to do?
Oh yeah I do.
Well you're going to probably cave to it.
Ex cave try join.
Because even if Trump wins the establishment's not going to go down a hole the establishment's not going to slink away in defeat.
The establishment is going to look at this as one inexperienced buffoon who happened to get elected versus all of them who know the ropes inside and out of Washington and they're going to make it their objective to deny this guy anything and everything that represents anything he campaigned on.
Well I agree with that completely and then here comes the executive orders things I'll leave the professor with just one thing Rush and that is this.
If you can sometime after this is all over with how do we re forget liberal conservatism Republican Democrat how do we save the Constitution and the Republic?
Because if we lose that there's nowhere to go.
Our U.S. Constitution is the stumbling block to anyone that wants to take over control of the I mean the answer to this requires the correct starting point and by that I mean well how did we get to this point where so few Americans have been taught about the Constitution?
Oh I agree with that 100%.
Okay, so well follow me on this now so few Americans have been taught the miracle that is the founding of this country that it's literal miracle after miracle after miracle that came together for this country to be founded as it was first and only time in human history this has ever happened.
And that special exceptionalism Is not taught any longer.
It's being lied about and distorted.
So when you say, when are we going to get back to constitutionalism?
Well, do you start with education at kindergarten level?
Do you start in an elementary school?
And if you do, you're talking, okay, we're going to take 25 years to stop the direction we're going and reverse the ship.
If you think we don't have 25 years, how do we get back to constitutionalism?
Well, when's the last time, honestly now, Scott, when's the last time you think we had for president, a genuine conservative on the ballot?
Um I would have to say everyone goes to Ronald Reagan, but he was the last one that was even close to conservatism, and he had to go through a personally.
That would be 1984.
Yes, sir.
So what is that alone tell you?
That tells me that the education system at all levels has been infiltrated and trust me, sir.
I ran into a newly accredited teacher that didn't even understand or couldn't even list the Bill of Rights, and she's a teacher.
I'm not surprised.
But if you maintain that the last genuine conservative candidate for president we had was 1984 Ronaldus Magnus, what does that tell you about the Republican Party?
It tells me that they don't want a conservative.
They don't want that's why they didn't they didn't want Ted Cruz.
You know, people blame media for Ted Cruz bombing out.
Uh Republican Party didn't want Ted Cruz.
The Republican Party I it it it's all of this we've we've discussed ever since this whole primary season began.
At what point do you how do we get back to constitutionalism?
How do we get how do we get back to conservatism?
I mean, conservatism better exist outside talk radio and Fox News.
How does conservatism find its way into the body of politics?
I think most people actually live their lives that way, but they have been poisoned into not voting that way because the brand, conservatism brand, Republican brand has been summarily destroyed over the years.
These are very tough questions and really, really difficult answers to deal with.
Honestly.
And just espousing theory, conservative theory, and and try to have it take settle in uh with people is well, it's not working.
And so how do we if you if you accept that conservatism equals constitutionalism, and I do, well then where do we start?
Where do we start reinstituting all of these values?
The morality in the culture, in our society, the respect for rule of law.
And then you look at what we're up against, an entire Democrat.
This is not even Bill Clinton's Democrat Party anymore.
This party, the Democrat Party of today, is so off the rails and so radical.
We had a poll yesterday that whites and Christians are leaving, and Catholic leaving the Democrat Party.
Now, I thought that should have been happening for 20 years, but they're finally waking up.
I don't have any more detail on that than that at this moment.
But and now I've got to go to another break.
Uh I'm sorry, Scott, but I'm I'm out of time here because I'm really upping up.
The next segment's gonna be so short that people are gonna be mad at me for it.
Okay, let me get back to the phones here.
That one went quite a while, and so we'll stick with it.
This is uh Jamie in Kansas City, Kansas.
Great to have you on the program.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Uh, I just wanted to say that I felt like you when you speak about the movement behind Trump and what everyday Americans feel and what they're tired of.
I just haven't found one error with what you say.
Everything that you say personifies exactly how I how I and many of my conservative friends feel.
Well, um thank you for that.
I I appreciate you're referring to the uh the way I explained this in the first hour of the program today.
Yeah, I mean, you've done it, you know, several times over um the last several months with the election, but certainly in that that first hour he nailed it.
Yeah, well, tell me the i i the the point that I made in the first hour for those of you who missed it, that there are a lot of anti-Trumpers and never Trumpers who are conservative and Republicans who who Who don't like people supporting Trump because they don't understand anybody can like Trump.
Trump is such a bombastic slob.
He's just a mean, rough around the edges kind of guy.
He doesn't have presidential character.
How can anybody support?
And my explanation is that's not even a factor in why people are supporting.
They don't care.
Don't get jealous that people are choosing the ne'er do well over the fine character of your average conservative.
It's not about that.
It's what Trump represents.
The people supporting Trump think this is it.
That if we lose this election, more specifically, if Hillary Clinton and the Democrats win this election, then they believe that's the end of America as they know it for themselves and their kids.
Now, some of the never Trumpers laugh at that.
That's absolutely absurd.
When they must think that, that's why they can vote for Hillary.
But the Trump supporters, it's not about the fact they think Trump's a great guy, has nothing to do with it.
It's not that they like his hair, it's not they're jealous of his airplane, it's what he is opposing.
Get this, folks.
I didn't tell you this yesterday after the Trump uh proposal on child care was made, CNN.
They were livid, they were angry as they could be.
And you know why?
▲
Export Selection