All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 15, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:37
September 15, 2016, Thursday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24 7 Podcast.
So I said, is the clock still three seconds fast?
I mean, it matters.
And they said, yeah, I'm gonna fix that tomorrow.
So that makes a lot of sense.
We're gonna fix it tomorrow, or we're not gonna be here.
Oops!
I shouldn't have let that out of the bag.
Oh no!
I didn't mean to announce that till a third hour.
Oh.
No, no, no, no, no, no.
Don't don't hit the delay button.
Greetings, greetings, my friends.
It's great to have you here and off and running we are.
Another three hours.
Broadcast excellence, telephone number 800-2882.
I have just been watching Trump do his speech to the economic club of New York, and there's a guy sitting to his left.
He's he's at the podium, and there's obviously a dais behind him, and there's the two people that you can see.
And it looks like Cudlow is to Trump's right.
That would be screen left.
And there's another guy, I don't know who it is.
Screen right on Trump's left, this guy would not stop chewing.
It was driving me crazy.
In fact, it was so distracting and so bad, I ordered Coco to run some videotape on it so that you could see what I'm talking about.
Just a little, if we could make a gif out of it, it'd be a great way to do it.
The guy wouldn't stop chewing.
And I never saw him put any food in his mouth.
He just kept chomping.
And I said, somebody's got to get hold of this because this guy is distracting everybody.
Then it became funny.
Then the guy took a sip of water and still kept chewing.
And I never saw a fork.
So I don't know if he was chewing his cud or what in the world was going on, but I felt like trying to get hold of somebody and saying, look, you know, at the event, wherever it is, you gotta get this guy, you gotta get a message this guy to stop chewing because it's distracting everybody.
But when you see it, you'll see what I'm talking about.
I don't know how much we're gonna put up.
I mean, I don't want to put 10 seconds ten minutes of video up there.
This went on for five minutes.
And we're gonna put enough of it up.
I wouldn't, I wouldn't dare mention things like this and tease you with your inability to see it.
So Coco will let me uh will let me know.
Trump said a couple interesting things here.
It's a good economic speech.
One of the things he said was this.
It used to be you couldn't drink the water in Mexico, and cars were built in Flint.
Now cars are made in Mexico and you can't drink the water in Flint.
And it got a round of applause.
He also had an interesting economic stat.
I think this is a great way of illustrating uh differences in economic uh belief, policy, philosophy.
You know, we always try to tell people about the Reagan economics, the period of economics of Reagan presidency, it's been maligned as a supply set trickle down.
And of course, all economic activity is triple trickle down.
But the left has done their best to malign it and to say that all it was was tax cuts for the rich.
And since the rich didn't give their money away, since the rich weren't sharing it, there wasn't any trickle down, and therefore trickle down doesn't work.
It's one of the greatest distortions in the history of ideology, the history of the news, and the history of politics.
Trump said, our economic growth under Barack Obama has been pathetic.
Had economic growth under Obama been as fast as it was under Reagan, we would have created 10 million jobs in the last eight years.
Now that's the way to explain the difference.
If we had economic growth like we can have, and like we have had, and we had economic growth specifically due to specific policies.
Supply side trickle down, whatever you want to call it.
It was basically get the government out of everybody's life and get the government out of everybody's way or as much as you can.
We had job growth creation out the wazoo.
Interest rates were coming down, inflation was coming down, a bunch of things economic gurus said were not possible.
But I thought that was a great way of illustrating Obama's quarterly growth rates.
We haven't had anything over a point and a half.
We haven't had any more than one and a half percent, two percent growth in any quarter for eight years now, or seven and a half.
So it's uh it was a great way to put it, and I I was unable to gauge the response that Trump was getting.
Remember, it's the economic club of New York.
But I wanted to mention those two things, plus the guy chewing there.
It ended up being funny.
But I'm not kidding, I was getting I was getting mad, it was distracting.
You couldn't miss the guy.
Plus, it didn't look like he was listening to anything.
You ever known these people?
Have you ever known people that when they're eating, they're out of it?
They're just they're not even connected.
It's like they're totally so absorbed in it.
You ask them something, yeah.
Yep.
Yeah, of course.
I mean, they're just not there.
So in it's what this guy looked like.
He wasn't even listening, just kept chewing.
I have warned everybody, when you're on television, there are two things you don't eat.
You do not eat on TV.
You just particularly if you are a candidate.
The next thing you don't do, you do not smack your lips.
They do this on purpose in television shows and movies because it does attract your attention.
But you don't do it.
Remember Caroline Kennedy?
She was running for what?
The Senate.
She was going to be the senator before Hillary was, right?
Or was she maybe when Hillary is going to quit, she was going to become Senator.
Yes, you're running.
Anyway, she's she's running around and meeting all the people you have to meet and then paying homage to all the people you have to pay homage to.
When it came time for Caroline Kennedy to do a sit-down with Reverend Sharpton, they went to Sylvia's soul food in Harlem, and she actually ate.
Sharpton knows enough not to.
They had a big spread on the table, and she was eating with her mouth wide open and talking at the same time.
And I said, that's it.
She her campaign is over.
You just don't do it.
You don't eat in public.
You don't eat when the cameras are rolling.
And the least of the reasons why something might drop and stain your shirt or your clothes or what have you, it just nobody looks good eating.
And the only time it's scripted is when it's intended to be a distraction.
Anyway, folks, happy to have you here as always.
Telephone numbers 800 282-2882 and the uh the email address, Lrushbo at EIBNet.com.
The polling data today continues to roll in.
We have audio sound bites coming up.
We have some people who think that the race is over.
It's essentially over.
Let's start here with um grab 20 and 21.
We'll start with with Frank Luntz.
Normally what I would do is tell you that I've got these, and then I would wait until they come up naturally, but I'm not going to make you wait.
This is Lunz.
Last night with uh with O'Reilly on the O'Reilly factor.
Question, what do you think about the CNN poll just released about Florida?
Trump 47, Hillary 44.
By the way, speaking of which, I have to correct myself on something.
We had a call within the last couple of weeks, and somebody asking me about third parties, and I said, No, no, no, third-party candidates are always going to hurt the Republican.
It's not the case.
Gary Johnson is taking major votes away from Hillary.
The libertarian candidate, because he sounds more like a lib, he sounds more like Bernie Sanders than he sounds like a libertarian, is actually, according to polling data, taking votes away from Hillary.
There are a lot of things lining up here that are shocking.
Surprising and stunning to the political scientists and analysts that we've all become accustomed to and familiar with over the last 20 years.
Anyway, here's Luntz.
O'Reilly says, CNN poll, Trump in Florida 47, Hillary 44.
Seems like the trend is everywhere.
Trump's gaining, Hillary losing, and by the way, she was losing before Sunday.
The drive-bys are trying to say it's just a temporary blip.
It's all based on the video of Hillary having the seizure.
another thing, you know, it could well be that she hasn't seen that, and some of the comments that she and Bill have made, maybe they haven't seen that video that everybody else has seen it.
Maybe that's why there's such a disconnect with what they're saying versus what people think is wrong with her.
So anyway, then Lunch cites the Monmouth poll.
Sixty-six percent of Trump supporters are appalled by Hillary.
They're so appalled by Hillary, they're going to support Trump until the end.
Frank Lunz, what's going on here?
I believe that the polling is going to move even further in Trump's direction over the next seventy-two hours because of what happened this weekend.
They don't like her insults.
They don't think she told the truth about her health.
We see this trend everywhere.
If Donald Trump can continue his discipline and continue his focus on policy without the traditional insults, you're going to see him go ahead in states like Iowa.
You're going to see him catch up in New Hampshire, and the state that I'm watching in particular, Pennsylvania.
I am convinced that he's going to start to close the gap there as well.
Let's not forget Colorado.
We had this news yesterday.
Back on August 4th, Hillary was up 12 to 15 in Colorado.
And they were saying it's over.
And Hillary pulled her pulled her people out of there.
They stopped their ad buys.
They they stopped spending any money whatsoever in Colorado, and they were running around proclaiming Colorado's finished, we're done there, and we've won it, and we don't need to pay any more attention to it, spend any more money, and Trump is up.
And like Lunt says, making moves in all these other states, particularly Pennsylvania, that a lot of people thought was impossible.
Here's Alex Castellanos next, a uh sometime Republican uh establishment strategist.
And he was on Bloomberg TV, all due respect last night, and during a discussion of polling data and the race, this is what he said.
When you look at the real numbers in these states, though, you know, we've seen numbers with Trump up in North Carolina, he's up in Ohio, Pennsylvania, tight.
We have numbers that say that.
So, yeah, I wonder if this race is not already over, and maybe Trump has won this thing.
You know, both these candidates have huge negatives.
If you're trying to burn down the same house twice, I'm not sure it'll change anything, but there's an element underneath all that, a desire for change.
It's not underneath.
There is a desire for change, and not underneath anything, it's front and center.
Now, don't, folks, don't go off the deep end here.
This is just his opinion, Castellanos.
He's okay, he's a nice guy.
He gets upset when I don't talk about him, gets upset when I do talk about him, mispronounce his name, gets upset when I say things.
I don't know, it gets upset.
He used to call Kit all the time.
Every time we talked to him, he'd call Kit with something.
This guy's okay.
He's fine.
It's establishment guy.
Uh watch, you'll probably disagree with that.
I don't know who he can call now.
Anyway, he says it may be over.
Now don't let all this change your attitude.
You Trump people need to continue to act as though you're a startup.
Uh psychologically, mentally, attituding.
You're a startup.
You still, it's you against the world.
You don't want to get cocky, you don't want to get thinking this is over.
Because you really don't know what to trust and who to trust in the media.
So trust yourselves.
Trust your instincts.
Ladies and gentlemen, I'm here to tell you that the brand new t-shirts that we put up for sale.
Do you know there's even a story in the Biz Pack review about how we here at the L. Rushbow Show were the first to get up and running with a product that feeds off of Mrs. Clinton's basket of deplorables comment.
We are selling these t-shirts.
They're they're flying off the shelves at iPhone 7 rates.
It's it's incredible.
It's a t-shirt that says on the front, I am a Hillary deplorable, and on the back it says never Hillary.
It's part of our never Hillary collection at the EIB store at rushlimbaug.com.
As of this morning, you heard did you know that Hillary and Tim Tim Kane had a book?
They have they have a book out, and the New York Times has already proclaimed it a flop.
The New York Times.
Do you know how many copies this book has sold?
As of close of business last night, 2,100, I'm 2,912, almost 3,000.
That's it for a book by the Democrat president and vice presidential candidates.
We have moved so many more never Hillary and I am a Hillary deplorable t-shirts, then they have sold books.
It's not even funny.
In less than 48 hours, we are thumping them.
Now it's not it's it's not a big surprise that Hillary can't sell books.
You know, she got $14 million advance for her memoir.
Memoirs, and I don't think she drew a crowd at a book signing.
I can't imagine they made the made the advance back.
But the Times is, they're calling it a flop.
Do you think that's sexist?
It implies Hillary Clinton is weak.
An old saw about women.
The word flop and women, is that sexist?
I'm just asking.
In the modern era in our modern culture.
I mean, because she flopped into a van on Sunday.
You know, so we all saw her flop in the van.
Now the New York Times calling her new book with Tim Kane a flop.
Fewer than 3,000 copies in its first week and in 48 hours we have moved more.
I am a Hillary deplorable t-shirt.
LA Times, such a great.
By the way, in the LA Times poll, this is the poll that the LA Times does with USC.
And it's a poll of 3,000 people every day.
400 of the people, I think, never change.
It's the same 400 people.
And then there are 2600 people that are new, either every week or every couple of days.
It's 3,000 people that report the results and publish them at midnight Pacific Time, the Western Time Zone.
And I think in this poll, Trump's up six or seven.
What is it?
Trump's up six or seven in this poll.
And the LA Times has a story stunned by the diversity of volunteers at Trump headquarters.
The LA Times paid a visit to Trump's Southern California headquarters, down to Long Beach is where the headquarter office is.
And they have a story in the Times how shocked the reporter was by the diversity of the volunteers who were working in his office.
Steve Lopez wrote the piece for the Times, said it was it was as if the whole thing had been staged in Cambodia town, no less, to belie the notion that Trump's appeal is largely limited to older white males.
See, this is what they attempt to put out there that the Trump support is nothing but a bunch of bedraggled, angry, worn-out, relic white guys who are racist and sexist and they don't like any kind of change and they hate modernity and any of this.
And this guy went out and he found that the people working in this office are Hispanic.
They are female, they're male, they're African American, Jewish, Filipino, Mexican-American.
He literally was shocked.
The New York Times did the same thing back in March.
And they had the same result.
They were shocked and stunned.
We told you about that when I take a break now, but I'll remind you when we get back.
Welcome back.
Great to have you, Rushlin Ball behind the golden EIB microphone back on March the 17th.
The New York Times ran a story.
They went to a Trump headquarters in Tampa, I believe, and they were stunned.
They were shocked at what they saw.
The New York Times sent a reporter to Trump's campaign office in Tampa, expecting to find a bunch of Mussolini debutes and Klan members working in there.
They really did.
That's what they wanted to report.
They were shocked and they were stunned.
They found very few white people, in fact.
It was mostly Hispanic.
There were some African Americans and many other minorities, and they were happy and they were supporting Trump.
The New York Times was bamboozled and flabbergasted.
They couldn't believe it, and they speculated that somebody in the Trump office knew they were coming, and they went out and hired a bunch of people to act like Trump supporters, and this is similar to what the LA Times.
I mean, they're not accusing, they're they're they're Raising the possibility, which you know, this kind of projection, I believe if you conceive of something like that, it must be it's something that you would do yourself.
It's the Democrats that parade people in front of us like this.
It's the Democrats that make all of these kinds of for show illustrations.
Nobody knew at the Trump campaign these people were going to show up in Long Beach, this from the LA Times, in Long Beach, one of America's most diverse cities.
That same diversity was reflected in Trump's supporters.
Lopez, that's the writer for the time, spoke with a woman and millennials of Filipino descent, a Mexican American, a Jewish guy.
And they saw the names of volunteers from the African American, Hispanic, and Asian communities written on blackboards, adorning the names of volunteers.
He noted two middle-aged white people joined the party.
The white people were the minority of all the volunteers working at the Trump office in Long Beach.
I tell you, um, this whole Trump campaign is sneaking up on the people that do not understand it.
Meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day.
Rushlin boy, premier radio guy, doing radio guy stuff consistently and all the time.
Great to have you here.
It's 800 282-2882 if you want to be on the program.
Let's delve into some of the polling data here.
It's I think important to remember, folks, that Hillary was trending down in the vast majority of these polls before she uttered her comments about Trump supporters being deplorable, and before having that seizure in public on Sunday, you know, where she she flopped down there and they had to throw her in the van and take her off to her daughter's emergency room.
Yeah, it's amazing.
Her daughter, Chelsea, her apartment in New York or condo, and it may as well be an emergency room.
Apparently it's where Hillary was revived, and whatever they did in there.
She's been trending down for two weeks prior to this horrendous week she is having.
And I think it's worth remembering that, because people are blaming her decline on one bad week, the drive-by's and everybody trying to protect her.
It's just temporary.
It's all due to her deplorable comment and the seizure and the medical episode on Sunday.
And I think her problems are much bigger than those two things.
Those two things are just symptomatic of the larger problems she has.
Look, our eyes do not light us.
We know the appalling data that everybody treats as gospel, that her negatives are sky high, that she is not considered trustworthy by anywhere near half of the people of the country.
She is not respected, she's not revered, she is considered to be dishonest and untrustworthy by a much higher margin than presidential candidates who win ever report.
She also cannot attract a crowd.
There isn't any excitement about her campaign outside the official channels of the Democrat Party and the official supporters, like the labor unions and the feminist groups and whoever else.
But among voters, there isn't any excitement.
There isn't any eagerness.
She does not have a charismatic personality.
Her appearances are not things that you just have to see.
Trump's are.
Whether you like it or not, a Trump rally is going to sell out.
And there are going to be people who want to get in who can't.
And the people that get in have a great time.
Hillary can't draw flies.
She can't draw crowds, even to these in the in the tank Democrat groups.
I most recent example, she appeared before a Baptist convention in Kansas City at the convention center there, which is a huge, huge building.
And they had to get partitions up because the crowd was so small, they had to they had to shrink artificially the size of the room in order to cover the fact that there was nobody there.
And look at her book with Kane.
Not even 3,000 sales in the first week.
And if you don't move the meter in the first week, it's over.
So this is this probably not a second book that she has had.
It's a flop.
She's never had the connection with people that her husband has or that Trump has.
She's never generated this kind of excitement.
So this notion that Hillary is a feta complet, that it's it's her turn, that this is a coronation.
That's all manufactured media stuff.
The reality behind it, and there is reality behind it.
Whatever reality and substance there is is due to the fact that there's a capital D next to her name on the ballot.
In other words, party loyalty.
But personal excitement, and like I say, I was wrong, I have to admit an error.
The third party candidacy of Gary Johnson, the quasi so-called libertarian, is really harming her and Cain.
Rule of thumb is that any third-party candidate's going to take away from the Republican, but it isn't happening here because Gary Johnson guy, uh, while supposedly a libertarian, sounds a lot like Bernie Sanders.
And there just isn't a lot of excitement.
And you can say of both candidates, that Trump, when you compare Trump to Hillary, there, the people that support him are off the wall, off the charts excited and into it and deeply invested in it.
But the thing nobody gets.
This is this is why the never Trumpers are tripping up.
And this is why so many people who are spitting mad don't get it.
It isn't about Trump.
I think, if I may be so bold, I think there are some people on the conservative side of the aisle, and on the Republican side of the aisle, who are not for Trump, and they are terribly offended that so many people are.
They are beside themselves that Trump won the nomination.
Remember, these people think that the Republican field, those other 16, 15 candidates, was the best Republican field in 20 years.
I think I remember Dr. Crowdhammer even opining that he thought, you know, early on when Trump was pulling ahead, there were a lot of people wringing their hands and very unhappy because they thought, oh my God, this is the greatest Republican field.
We got Jeb, we got Kasich, we have Rubio, we got Cruz, we've got Christie, we got any number of these guys would be absolutely great compared to the Republican field in previous elections.
They were all excited about it.
Trump's come along and just dwarfed everybody.
And the mistake that's being made here, that I think a lot of the never Trumpers that are conservatives and that are Republicans are taking it a little personally, mistakenly so.
It's not primarily people investing in celebrity.
Everybody thinks that this is a celebrity.
A lot of people think that it's Trump's celebrity that is causing people to support him, or his recognizable factor, his recognition factor, or that they're just personally enthralled or whatever.
And that, and look at it, I'm not trying to ruffle any feathers here, but that could make some people unhappy, let's say.
I don't want to go so far as to say jealous or envious, but if that's the case, if they are jealous and envious, they're wasting their time and missing the point, because the Trump support is not rooted in just the fact that people like Trump more than they like Cruz, or that they like Trump more than they like Jeb, or that they like Trump more than they like Rubio or pick a name.
It's what Trump represents.
It is who Trump is in terms of being an outsider.
And I think a lot of people are wasting a lot of energy feeling rejected, either ideologically or personally, because they just they I mean, they think Trump's a boob.
They think Trump's a coarse, mean, rough around the edges.
This He's not at all of the character that we think we should have in the president.
And that's not why people are lining up behind.
That's not why they are staying loyal to Trump.
And it's not that they don't like him.
It's that Trump, the movement that Trump leads now existed before Trump came along.
This penchant, this demand, this desire for somebody outside the entire political system.
This has been percolating in our culture and our society for years.
And all these politicians ran for office, promising that they were the outsider, claiming to be the outsiders.
Some of them even elected.
They were the outsider.
Trump is the first one who really is.
And if Trump loses, their movement's not going away.
Because the people voting for Trump are not going to pack it in just because Trump lost.
This is not intended to be a put down of Trump either.
Don't misunderstand me here.
There's no rejection.
There's no personal rejection going on.
In other words, people aren't choosing Trump because they don't like candidate A, B, C, or D. And it's not, you know, some people are wringing their hands and how can a guy like Trump be more popular than what I think?
How can a guy like Trump be more popular than Cruz?
How can a guy like Trump be more popular than a clean living great guy like Jim?
How can a it's not what it's about?
It really is about a whole bunch of people in this country thinking that they have been forgotten, taken advantage of, taken for granted.
Let's go back to this Trump proposal that was announced by his daughter in the Wall Street Journal op-ed yesterday, the child care and elderly proposal that Trump had.
I fully expected, when we went to the phones, to get a bunch of people just outraged.
Because, see, I I what I expected to hear was, Rush, see what happened here.
This is what happens when you don't nominate a conservative.
Here we got a guy, we told you everybody knew it, this guy's not conservative.
We got a guy proposing big government, an expansion of government, and that's not what I got.
And I asked Snerdley when the program was over, did you get anybody like that that you just didn't feel would be good to put on the air?
I mean, some people don't make it on the air just because they can't talk, folks, or because they get nervous or whatever.
So there's a lot of things going to call screening.
But he told me there wasn't one call yesterday from a person claiming to be conservative who wanted to do a CI told you so.
See, Trump's not conservative.
We told you, we told everybody this is no different than electing him.
You know what we got?
We got people who were all in favor of it because they have figured out the government's giving away money.
And it's about time, if the government's going to pass around benefits, it's about time they got their share.
I saw a story.
Do you know what it's what it costs to settle and take care of and whatever else is involved, a new refugee.
I don't care where they're from, Syria, you name it.
$67,000 per refugee is what it costs the federal government to get them here to settle them, whatever it happens.
$67,000.
Now, the point is that there are a lot of Americans who do not like big government, who are conservative through and through in their hearts, but they're fed up.
That the big government that exists today seems to be aimed at providing benefits and creating dependency for people who are not citizens, who are not Americans, and they feel sold out.
They feel lied to, and they feel like they're being mocked and laughed at and made fun of, which of course they are.
They're called racists if they object to this, they're called bigots, they're called homophobes.
Hillary calls them deplorable.
But to these people, they're the people who get up every day and try to go to work or do go to work.
These are the people getting up, following the rules, paying taxes, doing all the things good citizenship requires.
And they get laughed at and insulted.
And there's one guy who is speaking for them in their minds, and that's Trump.
It's not that Trump is George Clooney or popular like an actor would be popular.
It's not that.
It is issue related.
It's issue-oriented, and it's it's made up of people who just don't trust that the government cares about them.
And I don't mean cares about them in this from the standpoint of giving them money.
They think the government's lined up against them to harm them while benefiting others at the same time.
For reasons that they don't understand.
Just because they've been here a long time, it's it's not fair they've had all these benefits, and now we're gonna spread them around and deny them to these people, and they don't think they've gotten them in the first place.
Anyway, let me take a brief time out.
We'll come back and continue after this.
Don't go away.
You know what's funny to watch?
What's funny to watch is the drive-by's trying to portray Colin Powell and his hacked emails as devastating to Trump.
It's, folks, this is hilarious.
They're doing everything they can to ignore the negative things Colin Powell said about.
And by the way, this is gonna change the day for Colin Powell.
This, Colin Powell is not thought to speak this way.
People don't think that Colin Powell even thinks this way.
Colin Powell is not a partisan.
He doesn't say mean things about people except the people who deserve to have mean things said about them, like me.
But other than he does, he doesn't criticize establishment types.
And look what's in these emails.
My God, we we we've got we could make at least two t-shirts with nothing but Colin Powell quotes on the front.
In fact, that may be an idea.
They've been trying to push the idea that Powell won't be voting for Trump because Powell called Trump a national disgrace.
Ha!
Who saw that coming?
No, the news is...
Bill Clinton is still...
Well, I know he said it, but we you know, we have standards.
We have standards uh on this on this program.
Um but the the thing is, if you look at these emails, it's a safe bet that Colin Powell is not going to be endorsing Hillary Clinton.
I mean, that's that's the message here.
There's a guy named Jeff Leeds, is a huge donor.
He emailed Colin Powell on July 24th, 2014, to tell him he'd gotten Rudy Giuliani to admit that President Obama is a decent guy and that Hillary is not stoppable in the 2016 election.
That's what this Jeff Jeff Leeds guy told Powell that he got Juliani to admit.
Powell said, you know, I'd rather not have to vote for her, although she is a friend I respect.
She's a 70-year-old person, long track record.
She's hampered by being greedy, not transformational, with a husband still dicking bimbos at home.
But he got out of that one by crediting that to the New York Post.
This is I I know what he's talking about, but the New York Post ran a story about some babe that Clinton knows and visits Chappaqua when Hillary's not around.
This the energizer, right, right, the energizer money, whatever her name is.
But there's a whole slew of these women, and everybody knows it.
And here's Colin Powell referring to how many how can you vote for Hillary?
How can you respect her?
Her husband's still dicking bimbos up in Chappaqua at home.
Still dicking bim buzz at home.
Colin Powell!
Colin Powell saying this in an email.
Do you ever think your email's gonna be hacked?
You know what you ought to start?
Everybody, you ought to, every email you write, you better write it with the thought in mind, what if the world saw this someday?
Another email, Colin Powell, describes Hillary as hubris.
I gotta think of it.
I just saw the clock.
Oh, I gotta go.
Be back here in just a second.
Yeah, that's it.
Uh King Bimbo's there's one other great line he had.
▲
Export Selection