All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 8, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:47
January 8, 2016, Friday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Hey folks, did you see that CNN Obama, whatever it was on gun control last night?
It was kind of surprising.
It was shocking, in fact.
Anderson Cooper did not roll over for Obama.
They had Chris Kyle's wife in there, made mincemeat out of Obama on this.
And Obama even addressed this silly conspiracy he talks about that people think he wants to get guns out of everybody's hands so he can declare martial law.
But if you watched that thing last night, how in the world can you conclude anything but Obama wants to take as many guns away from people as he possibly can.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
I'm not commenting on that martial law business.
This is the point, but the whole idea here is for Obama to get guns taken away from people.
It's what he wants to do.
And he sits up there and denies it.
Starts talking about Australia, denies it.
Then a rape victim for whom he did not have a tear, by the way.
A rape victim.
She wants a gun in her home to protect her and her two kids, and Obama says, well, you know, guns in homes lead to tragic accidents.
And then he wants in the next breath to have us believe that he's not interested in taking people's guns away from them.
Anyway, here we are, folks, scrapping up.
Busy broadcast week, first busy broadcast week of the brand new busy broadcast year.
L. Rushbow on open line Friday.
And what it means is that when we go to the phones, you pretty much can talk about whatever you want to talk about.
That's not the way it works Monday through Thursday.
You have to talk about things that I'm interested in or have already discussed, but on Friday it could be anything, questions, comments.
Go for it.
It's a great career risk.
Turning over that portion of program to people who have not had any specific big media broadcast training.
That makes it fun.
Again, 800 282-2882.
Donald Trump goes to Vermont.
The drive-bys are shocked.
You know what?
It's amazing.
How many how many times, you can't even count them anymore?
Has Trump gone out and done a personal appearance and there are lines.
There are thousands of people inside whatever arena Trump is using.
There are lines outside.
And it's loaded the drive-by's have never seen it before.
Because what they saw in Vermont last night, they can't believe it.
Jonathan Carl, ABC News cannot believe what he saw.
He can't believe for people actually standing in line to get into a Trump event.
He can't believe that there were more people outside wanting to get in than there was room for inside.
Did a whole special report on it.
We have the audio soundbites coming up.
And in the drive-by's are fit to be tied over the way Trump dealt with hecklers last night.
And they're only reporting half the story.
You know, they're focused on the fact that Trump made everybody show up last night swear a loyalty oath.
Meaning he's not going to let them in unless they promise to vote for him.
And Drive by said, You can't do that.
That's absurd.
Forgetting the fact that Hillary Clinton did the exact same thing in Cleveland, Ohio not long ago.
This is a little aside.
I remember Hillary Clinton demanding people showing up at one of her events in Cleveland.
It was back in September, actually, demanding they actually sign a pledge to vote for her.
And the drive-by's didn't think anything of it.
But they can't abide Trump doing it.
And then of course there were some hecklers.
And Trump dealt with the hecklers in a way that the drive-bys disapprove of.
Trump said, kick them out.
Kick us 10 degrees outside.
Don't give them their coats.
Just keep their coats and send them out there.
Kick them out of there.
What the drive-by's are not telling you is, and you probably know it by now.
Is that Bernie Sanders and his campaigns planned all of these hecklers and disruptors?
There was a strategic plan to disrupt Trump's attempt and his uh rather his appearance last night by the Bernie Sanders campaign, and who knows, maybe old Byrne himself is involved in it.
And so Trump gets wind of it, not gonna let it happen.
The protesters start protesting, start heckling, and Trump kicks them out.
Which is standard operating procedure.
Look, it's just like the Constitution's on a suicide pact.
Neither is the First Amendment.
Just because people have a right speak doesn't mean you have to turn over your event to them and have them destroy it.
Kick them out of there.
Now they're really mad that Trump had no compassion.
He wanted them thrown out of there without their coats because it's 10 degrees outside.
But wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute.
These are all Bernie Sanders supporters.
That means they're big socialists.
And it's clear that there are people in Vermont that don't even have a coat.
So send those people out there, hold their coats, give their coats to the poor in Burlington or wherever else in Vermont you want to, and spread the wealth around that way.
I don't think it would have gone over, which would have been a great illustration.
Mrs. Clinton, Mrs. Clinton, uh you know what, folks.
Exactly as I predicted.
And I went back, I looked at the, we went to the grooveyard of forgotten uh sound bites uh and found one back in 2014 in which I predicted what is happening now.
And what is happening now is that young millennial reporters and reporterettes, young millennial infobabes, who do not know Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, well, they may know, but they are not mesmerized by them like drive-by's today are.
You know, the people that were adult reporters back in the 90s and just swooned when the Clintons came around and just thought they were the cats meow, the end of the world.
Well, these youngsters, they weren't old enough, paying attention.
The Clintons hold nothing special for them, and they're now learning that Bill Clinton was a serial abuser and that Hillary joined him in impugning the women who came forward, so they're out there asking Clinton about it.
This has never happened.
The drive-by media won't touch it.
The drive-by media since the 90s will not touch that aspect of Clinton.
Lewinsky, Kathleen Willie, Wannie de Broderick, the entire cadre of women that James Carville referred to as trailer trash, and the bimbo eruptions with these young millennial reporterettes.
They don't care.
They're not mesmerized.
They don't think the sun rises and sets on Bill Clinton, so they're out there asking.
Clinton has never had to deal with it, and he's not doing it well.
And I predicted back in 2014.
Yeah, a lot of people have been predicting it the last two or three weeks, but I, El Rushbo, predicted it all the way back in the fall of 2014.
I said, wait till these millennial reporters get hold of this.
They're not going to find any of this funny or lovable or uh attractive.
They're not going to marvel that Clinton got away.
So the drive-bys that were covering Clinton back in the 90s, and they're still around, people like Andrew and Mitchell, NBC News or Washington, or Howard Feynman, or you take your pick of any of them.
Uh back in the 90s when Clinton was doing all this stuff, they marveled at how well Clinton lied.
They wish they could do it as well as Clinton did.
They marveled at how he just ran circles around the Republicans and conservatives.
They loved him for it.
Whatever he did, he could get away with as long as he continued to make mincemeat out of the Republicans and conservatives.
And they marveled at how he did it.
Well, these youngsters couldn't care less about any of that.
They come from the rape campus college culture and all that.
Um, regardless whether what they believe is accurate or not, they believe that there is a serious abuse of women problem in America.
Now they're finding out that Bill Clinton was the leader of the club.
And so they're asking him.
And and Mrs. Clinton, it's, you know, she's out there.
This is actually a good example, neither Clinton has actually ever had to face.
They would disagree with this, by the way.
But they've never had to deal with an adversarial press.
Now, they have in their moments commented on how unfair and mean-spirited say I was, and this program was to them.
And it they did have me on the brain.
I was living rent-free in Bill Clinton's head, probably still am.
You know, blaming me for the Oklahoma City bombing in a speech, blaming me, accusing me of being a racist at the White House Correspondents Center, uh, openly complaining to the morning team at Camo X in St. Louis about me.
So they had opposition and they know it, but they never had mainstream media opposition.
They have never had to deal with adversity from places like the New York Times, the Washington Post, ABC News, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, you name it.
All they got there was idolatry.
They're not accustomed to it, and they're not dealing with it well.
Uh Joe DeGenova in the past couple of days have been making media appearances talking about the voluminous evidence that the FBI's collecting on Hillary regarding her email servers and the uh classified data she was trafficking in.
And he said it's so much evidence, it's so overwhelming that she's going to be indicted in 60 days.
And if she's not, there's going to be a revolt in the FBI.
If the regime, if the Attorney General, Loretta Lynch and Obama, if they don't bring charges, the Geneva says that there's going to be a revolt.
It's that bad.
Well, Bob Tierrell in The American Spectator has a piece today on that very subject and that very investigation.
And he adds even more via his sources to what DeGenova has been saying.
And when you read this piece, you ask him, how can this woman even be a candidate?
And by the way, uh you should know that uh plugs Biden and John Kerry, who served in Vietnam, they're both waiting in the wings for uh whatever, if anything might happen to Mrs. Clinton.
Now, the odds are that nothing will.
I mean, the safest place to be if you are a criminal in this country is to be a Democrat ranking member of the administration.
That's the safest place for if you're a criminal.
I mean, it's a tough, it's a toss-up being in Chicago or Washington.
But probably if you have engaged in criminal behavior and you are a ranking Democrat, the safest place to be is in Washington right now, where the Democrats are running the show because they probably will not do anything about it.
And that's the prevailing opinion.
Even with the Geneva out there saying it's gonna be 60 days, they've got no choice, they have to indict because of the evidence.
A lot of it's not gonna happen.
It's not gonna happen.
Uh one of the reasons speculated that it isn't gonna happen.
I talked to a uh very powerful, influential member of the uh Republican establishment this morning, who is convinced that Obama wants Hillary to succeed him, so that his agenda will continue and will be even tacked further to the left.
Uh we were not talking about the investigation.
We're not talking about uh the Geneva or the FBI.
I'm just relating it.
If if uh the guy was talking to us right, uh, then there will not be any indictment of uh Mrs. Clinton.
Back to the CNN gun control, well, uh, what do you call this thing last town hall?
I don't know what I mean.
Obama thought he was gonna have uh a slam dunk here, much like he had when ABC News telecasts his health care town hall.
But this was not smooth sailing last night.
We got audio sound bites coming from this, some unique analysis provided by me, and of course, uh more detailed descruption discussion discussion and description of what went on in uh Vermont with Trump and the whole thing with Cruz and how he's can hit by the he's brilliantly dealing with these silly allegations that he's not eligible on citizenship grounds, is really, really dealing with it smartly.
Uh brilliantly, I might say.
The whole thing is just it's cockyed, it's crazy, it's silly, it's a distraction, but it is illustrative of who is aligned where and with whom.
So you hang in there, plus your phone calls, and who knows where that takes us.
It's open line Friday, Rush Limboy, here the EIB network, and back right to it after this.
A man, a legend, a way of life.
Learn it, love it, live it.
Rush Limbaugh behind the golden EIB microphone.
And here we are, folks.
Okay.
Uh Barack Hussein O and his free propaganda opportunity for gun control last night on CNN.
I'm sure that's what he thought it was going to be.
Now, Anderson Cooper, follow this is interesting.
Anderson Cooper explained that the idea for the town hall.
See, everybody's thinking Obama called CNN or CNN called Obama, and they coordinated because Obama had his big to-do big pep rally for this in the White House on Tuesday or Wednesday, and it's this natural thing to do to get together with CNN, do a joint grand slam blanket the country with this,
but Anderson Cooper said that the idea for the town hall came up way, way back when the radical jihadists, the San Bernardino II, killed 14 Americans and wounded 11 others.
Now stop and think about that.
That turned out that that was a Muslim, a militant Islamic terrorist attack.
And CNN looked at it and said, hey, you know what?
This is a great opportunity for a gun control town hall.
Really?
Not a town hall on terrorism?
Not a town hall on how we're dealing with domestic terrorism.
You got a terrorist event, the San Bernardino II, they've got far more than guns in their in their arsenal.
They've got IEDs, they've got rockets, uh RPGs, they had all kinds of weapons that go way, way beyond what you can get.
And your average ordinary hated and despised gun show.
And despite all that, CNN says, wow, we got an opportunity here to do a gun control town hall.
I'm sorry, I'm not buying it.
That's a, I mean, I know some leftists went there looking at an opportunity here for us once again to promote our ideas of gun control, but that was a militant Islamic terrorist event.
So that's just that's just one thing.
Now, I have folks have to tell you here, I was surprised quite often because this thing was fairly balanced.
It was a fairly balanced question and answer session with Obama.
Now the NRA wasn't there, and Obama kept hooting and hollering and making a big deal about their cowards and why didn't they show up?
We invited them.
You know what?
The NRA was invited.
You know what they were told?
They would be allowed to ask one question, and then they could sit there and just watch the rest of the thing.
And they said, why should we sit there being only allowed to ask one question while we know we're going to be the target for derision all night long?
So they said to hell with it.
You guys are not serious, which they weren't, and they didn't go.
I think the NRA would be very happy to invite Obama for another debate.
Just them, just Obama and the NRA, you know, with no audience, no crowd, just do it.
It'll never happen.
But they're not afraid of it at the NRA.
Now, Obama did succeed in distracting the country from actual problems, which is always what he is trying to do.
Whatever he claims to be focused on, he is, but it's usually also serving as a distraction.
Now, his executive action on guns, and he admits this, he admitted it solves no problems.
And he agreed and admitted with everybody who pointed out that every executive action he's talking about implementing would not have stopped any of these recent incidents.
And he admits that too.
He admits that his executive actions on guns would not stop terrorism, that they wouldn't stop the shootings in Chicago, that they wouldn't deal with what's going on in gun-free zones.
He admits all that, but what does he get away with?
He gets away being portrayed as the guy who cares.
And it was the Limbaugh theorem on full display last night.
Barack Hussein O was portrayed and seen as the guy fighting the entrenched power in Washington that he's not part of.
If you just landed from Mars and turned on CNN last night, you would leave thinking the NRA is the president, the Supreme Court, the Congress, and runs all the lobbying shops.
and You would think the NRA and the Republican Party run Washington.
And Obama's a lone outsider, terribly distressed over all the unnecessary violence and killing it is just up against these insurmountable odds trying to solve it, portrayed as the man who cares.
Do you remember how Paul Ryan at a at a it was not a town hall, it was a meeting of congressional leaders at the White House with Obama during the pre-Obamacare days.
Remember how Paul Ryan took Obama to school and inform everybody what Obama's objective really was.
This this uh this town hall was somewhat like that in many ways.
It did not go well for him unless his claims to care more than anyone else is all that ends up mattering to people who watched.
But there's more.
Sit tight.
No, no, no, no, no.
What I what I mean is Paul Ryan schooled Obama on Obama.
Actually, not the right way to.
I mean, nobody can take Obama to school because in Obama's mind only he knows anything.
But what I mean is that it, you know, Paul Ryan told everybody what Obama's real game plan was and how it was gonna bomb and it was not gonna succeed in any way, and now it couldn't.
Ryan ran the numbers, told everybody at that panel how Obamacare just simply can't work the way Obama, and he was steaming, and he was well, this is much of what happened last night.
Obama thinks he's gonna be on a little bit of a, you know, a smooth sailing effort, and he had a lot of stuff thrown right back at him, and of course he's not accustomed to this.
Most of the Democrats are not.
Obama usually gets away with controlling the narrative.
Uh, gets away with inventing his own facts and strawmen.
And when he can do that, he comes off as a pretty reasonable guy, and everybody else seems like they're the bogey men.
But that didn't happen last night.
Obama didn't get away with that last night.
Chris Kyle's wife just handed Obama his lunch and did it, making it look like she was one of his biggest supporters.
It was really well done, really classic.
But Obama set the debate in the country on the second amendment.
He said those who are concerned about violence and those who are not.
That's how he defined this debate.
That is typical Obama.
So he he's got a problem with the guns.
So the way he sets it up, his side, him and his side are loving, understanding, tolerant, compassionate.
The other side's much murderers.
And that's how he frames every debate when he's in charge of the narrative.
Those who are concerned, it's a quote, those who are concerned about violence and those who are not.
So the pro-Second Amendment people don't care about violence.
That's how this thing started off.
And he didn't get away with it last night.
But here's the deal, folks.
Obama's tears don't make his argument any better than supporters of the second amendment who also cry over murders.
Obama's always resorting to emotional plays, such as he cares more.
He cries more, he sleeps less.
And that's how people talk who don't have the facts on their side, don't have the facts of the law on their side.
They try to triumph on emotion and caring and compassion and all that.
President says that we can't eliminate all gun violence, we can do better.
Things like that.
He admits, yeah, we can't eliminate all violence.
That's not what his objective is.
The violence is not what he's worried about.
The violence is simply the tool that he uses to get where he wants to go.
And where he wants to go is guns out of the hands of the law-abiding.
Obama even admitted last night again that none of what he's proposing will keep criminals from getting guns.
Well, isn't that the singular objective?
By definition, the law abiding are not breaking laws with their guns.
They're not a problem, but not in Obama's world.
They are the problem because that's where most of the guns are.
And since he does indeed want guns taken away from people, much as he says he doesn't, if you add up every proposal that he makes, every objective he claims to have, it can only be accomplished by getting guns away from people.
And then he talked about this conspiracy that exists among people out there who think he wants to take guns away and then uh declare martial law.
And Anderson Cooper said, What do you mean conspiracy?
It's not a conspiracy.
We know about it.
Every, you know, it most certainly is.
Got an argument.
Here, let's go to the audio soundbite to see what I'm talking about.
Number one, this is Obama insisting that uh conspiracy kooks think that he wants to take guns away.
He says paranoia led to the American revolution.
The way it is described is that we're trying to take away everybody's guns.
People's concern that that becomes a prelude to taking people's guns away.
The notion that anything we do to try to make them safer is somehow a plot to take away guns, you know, imaginary fiction in which Obama's trying to take away your guns.
You know, there are conspiracy theories floating around the internet these days all the time.
The NRA is convinced, many of its members, that somebody's gonna come grab your guns.
This notion of a conspiracy out there.
You know, he talked, that's a montage.
He talked about it so much while denying it.
Everybody that's involved in this, everybody that has something at stake at this, everybody that's paying it knows full well what his objective is.
Otherwise, why bean bring it up?
When you admit that whatever you're proposing will not stop any of the events that have happened, will not make schools any safer, then what the hell is the objective?
If you admit that what you're doing will not make things any safer, why?
Because none of what he's proposing would have prevented a bad guys from getting their guns.
Which to me ought to be the singular focus.
He talks about this so much and then mentions this conspiracy of people who believe that he wants to take their guns away.
It's not a conspiracy belief, it's common, ordinary common sense.
This is who liberals are.
Liberals have wanted guns taken away.
I don't care the reason.
There are many reasons for it.
In many cases, folks, it's it's just it's a it's uh, I guess an axiomatic automatic thing that doesn't even have any thought behind it.
Let me repeat a story for you that I've told a couple of times, not in a while, however.
This is back in the 1990s, the early 1990s in New York, and I'm still relatively new and therefore a huge item of curiosity to people.
And even the Republicans of New York, which are rhinos and liberals and so forth, they were curious.
Who is this guy?
Nobody ever heard of me.
I came out of nowhere.
I'm not a net worker.
I didn't get anywhere because I knew anybody, so I I came out of literal nowhere.
And there were so many prejudices that people had simply because I was a conservative.
I give before I tell you this story, one illustration of this.
I love illustrating what I'm talking about so that nobody has any misunderstanding.
After my first book was out, the editor, Judith Regan, invited me to go to a party with her.
It was an Oscar night party, and it was at the apartment down in Greenwich Village of the CEO of HBO.
And I said, You sure you want me going?
Oh, yeah, this will be fun.
This will be absolutely great.
I said, You this is gonna get you in trouble.
No, no, no, no, let's go, let's go.
I said, you check with the host.
I I look it.
Just I said, she did, and said, he says, fine, love to have you.
Okay.
His name was Michael Fuchs.
He's a nice guy.
So anyway, we show up at the thing.
And the first thing he says to me, I said, Mr. Fuchs, nice to meet you.
How are you?
I'm a Jew.
I'm a Jew.
Really?
As though that was going to make me get mad and run out of the room.
He was honestly of the opinion that because I was a conservative, I was an anti-Semite.
I'm a proud Jew.
That's how I'm doing.
Jeez.
This is the event where I told you Ron Silver came in, the actor before he had seen the light.
And he made some similar type comment.
And during this thing, I'm sitting there near the front door with Judith and other people.
Carly Simon walks in, sees me, says, Oh my God, Michael, what do you've done?
And she almost left.
Just having seen me.
Bryant Gumbel was in the living room holy court.
He couldn't believe it.
There's all kinds of people traipsing into this place, literally shocked that I was there.
And it was amazing how many of them, just because I'm a conservative, thought that I was an anti-Semite.
Well, it's the same thing at a Republican gathering.
This is this is New York.
So this is a dinner party at a highly fashionable.
I'll tell you who it was.
It's a former Ray Nixon administration guy, Treasury Department official or whatever, big powerful big wig.
Dinner party with a whole bunch of people, and uh somehow, predictably, gun control came up.
And it's on Fifth Avenue on about the fourth floor.
You could look out the window and see Central Park across the street.
And all of a sudden, this guy gets on his gun control kick.
And he's a Republican, a rhino republican.
And he started talking to me like I'm the problem because I am standing in the way of it.
And if I would simply see the light, and this is the first time these people are meeting me, but they think I'm on their side as a conservative Republican.
So this guy starts telling me, and I said, you know, I don't understand you guys.
Could you tell me why?
What why does this matter to you so much?
We've just got to get guns off the street.
Why?
What could you could you give me the intellectual reason why the policy, why you support this?
You're a Republican, you're siding with Democrat.
Could you tell me why?
And he couldn't.
It was just the right position to have in that group.
It was just, you had to believe this if you wanted to be in that click.
So I said to him, I dragged him over to one of the windows.
I said, see, over there, Central Park, if you can tell me, if you can convince me that getting rid of guns, this is why I know that this is what Obama wants.
Everybody I've talked to about this that's anti-second, wants to get rid of guns.
They want to take guns away from people.
Obama can deny it all he wants.
So I dragged this guy over, look out the window, says, over there, see, that's that's the Central Park.
If you can guarantee me that your gun control plan is going to get rid of every gun that's walking around in that park tonight, that I might be inclined to agree with.
And not a word.
He hadn't even, the thought hadn't even occurred to him.
Because in his crowd, being against guns was a requirement, just like being pro-choice was a requirement.
The minute you start talking to these people about it in a substantive policy or personal, you lose them.
They haven't even thought about it.
All they think of in terms of these people at this Republican bash was well, pro-lifers are killing us at the polls.
The pro-lifers are killing our chances to win the presidents.
That's as far as it went.
Or their wives are nagging them or what have you.
This is why I say I don't when Obama, any of these people tell me that they're not trying to get guns out of people.
They most certainly are.
That's all that they care about.
Now, Obama, if he were being honest, would be able to tell me why if I asked him.
He'd be able to tell me why.
And he'd never be honest with me.
But I'll tell you where the answer lurks.
The answer lurks in an undeniable truth of life, and that is the left, liberalism, Democrat Party, number one objective, eliminate opposition.
Pure and simple.
They don't even want to have to be bothered debating the opposition.
They don't want to have to lower themselves to some contemptible level to have to even debate people, disagree with them, because those people are so Neanderthal.
Like, not a waste of my time debating in idiots like that.
They just don't want you around.
And since they universally hate guns, many of them couldn't tell you why, by the way.
It's just required.
Now, Obama could tell you why.
But he never would.
But he gives himself away here by being obsessed with the whole idea last night.
He was obsessed with this a montage we just.
He's obsessed with.
I don't want to get people's guns away.
Oh, I wonder why people think that there's nothing one thing I've ever done.
Big conspiracy out there, and everybody's wrong.
He's consumed with it.
You take guns away from people you have really disempowered people who oppose you.
And that's what it's all about to these people.
This is why I've been so hellbent trying to inform as many people as possible over the years about liberalism and what it really is.
Because it's not good for anybody.
I gotta take a break.
We'll be back and continue after this.
Open line Friday, Rushland Boy executing a signed host duties flawlessly, zero mistake.
She heard the president last night, a rape victim, said that she wanted guns in her house to protect herself.
Guns in her house protect herself and her children, and Obama told her that it is debatable that guns in her house would make her safer.
That she might need extensive training.
What he didn't say was she could go to the NRA for that if he was serious.
I mean, this is close to the worst moment of the night.
Here's this woman with an impassioned explanation.
Mr. President, I am a rape victim.
I gun in my house for safety.
Well, you know what?
Uh it's debatable.
It's debatable.
That gun keep you, you know, those kids can get your gun.
Uh anybody could guns in homes, really problematic.
So his argument is that guns aren't all that effective for self-defense.
That didn't fly.
It didn't fly.
This might have flown in 2009, his first year.
But he's telling this crowd last night in 2016 that guns for self-defense in your home, nah.
Don't think that.
Don't buy it.
Not effective.
And saying it to a rape victim.
Yeah, it's like it's almost, it's exactly right.
It's almost like when this woman stood up at the health care town hall and said, Mr. President, my woman, or my mother is a hundred years old, she needs a pacemaker.
Will you let her have one?
Well, no.
Uh because the woman says, What if she's got a really strong will to live and she's a fighter?
Well, we can't take that into account.
Uh somebody's will to live.
Uh, we have to make judgments uh otherwise.
You never know.
It might just be more compassionate to give her pill.
Hex, he said this.
This was in his first year.
Healthcare town hall.
I'm I'm I'm freaking out.
We've got a citizen on TV actually asking the president if he will allow a woman, a citizen, to get a pacemaker.
And Obama said, probably not.
She's too old.
Give her a pain pill.
I mean, I have been sitting here in in shock and stunned disbelief for all these years.
This would have that alone.
Now I have time, but I don't have time.
I'm gonna run too close to it.
The next sound bite is Obama and Anderson Cooper debating whether or not this conspiracy exists.
This conspiracy trying to tell people Obama wants to take their guns away and impose martial law.
And Anderson Cooper did not let Obama get away with this.
It was really kind of one of the elements of last night that surprised me.
But we'll save that uh and all the other stuff that's yet to come.
The latest with Hillary, the latest with Trump in Vermont.
Uh We're loaded here, folks.
You hang in there, be tough.
We'll be right back and roll right on.
We went back to the grooveyard of forgotten sound bites and uh resurrected these two Paul Ryan sound bites.
They are from February 25th, 2010.
At Blair House, which is the White House guest house, essentially, and it's it's where Obama's health care reform summit was, uh, featuring congressional leaders, including of the opposite party.
And Ryan just took Obama to school on this.
So we went back and got the uh the sound bites.
So that we'll add to the mix here.
And at some point, we're gonna worm and squeeze your phone calls in there.
▲
Export Selection