All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 16, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:37
September 16, 2015, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I I wouldn't be surprised if that happens.
Snerdley just asked me a question here during the uh opening theme, which by the way is my city is gone by the pretenders, which essentially Chrissy Hind, who has a new autobiography out, which has just got the Feminazis in a tizzy.
The Feminazis got of all the women in the world to come out and not be what the Feminazis think she should be, it's Chrissy Hind.
She describes in her book how when she was young, she was always rebellious.
She was from Akron, Ohio, I think Akron near Cuyahoga Falls.
Can't maybe Akron can't in that area.
And early on in her life, she uh found herself hooked up with a biker gang and uh got raped, and writes about it as her fault because of the way she was dressed and the things that she was doing in terms of her behavior.
And she says in the book, I mean, hey, look, you you young tarts out there, you can't run around looking the way you do, and uh, and when something happens, think you're blameless.
And the feminazis are having a cow, figuratively, uh, having a cow over this.
And she's also, she says that these new young female singers today, they're sex porn.
They're not singers, they're not, they're just a bunch of sex porn stars that can sing, is basically what she says there.
They're not really rock, they're not pop.
I mean, just blows it up in this uh book.
You know, we use her song here, My City Was Gone as the uh theme song.
We've had some snafus with that over the years.
And eventually it was Chrissy that did what happened was very early.
This was uh we're still doing the show out of uh uh two pen plaza, right.
And she was a guest on the uh other side of the Oliver, WPLJ, and at the time we had heard from the licensing company, the publisher, the owner of the uh song, that we couldn't use it anymore, that Chrissy Hind didn't want to have anything to do with this program.
And it made big news, of course.
I mean, the media couldn't wait it in big news, Limbaugh can't use theme song anymore.
Chrissy Hind of the Pretenders forbids it or something.
Well, she happened to be a guest over there, and I think it was uh Scott Shannon or Jim Kerr wanted to ask her.
Understand, by the way, you don't you don't think Limbaugh should be using.
No, I don't care, my parents love the guy.
I don't care, I don't care at all.
It doesn't matter to me.
I don't know where why that had nothing to do with this.
So we caught whoever it was, the publishers, and a little trick they were playing.
They were laying it off on her when it was them.
And because she said it publicly, she saved the theme song.
The EIB network.
Chrissy Hines, she's uh now 60, somehow, or close to it.
Anyway, greetings and welcome back.
It's great to have you here on the EIB Network.
Speaking of all this, I wasn't gonna bring this up today.
I just came across this during the break.
Sex bots.
Why women should panic.
This is a story in Breitbart.
Sex with robots will be the norm in fifty years, say experts.
Men are considering the prospect with curiosity and a sense of humor, but academics and feminists are terrified and calling for these sex bots to be banned.
Let me tell you why.
Milo Yanopoulos is the author of the story here.
Let me take a brief departure.
How many of you have heard of or maybe have seen a TV show called Humans.
It ran this summer.
And I think it was on AMC.
I happen to get it.
It's a British show, and I happen to see it from the British feed earlier in the summer.
And it is about synths, synthetic humans.
The nickname for them is synth, s-y-n-t-h-s synth.
And they are robots made to look and act exactly like human beings.
Now it's great future futuristic, obviously.
But they if it the only way you can tell that they are synths is their eyes.
They supposedly have no emotion.
They can't feel.
I mean, they're literally, you order them around, you do what have them whatever you want them to do, they do it, they drive, they take care of the kids, they don't talk back, they treat you with respect, whatever.
And of course, in the show, the drama was that their creator found a way that nobody knew to infuse them with emotion.
So about eight of these things in all of Europe, Great Britain, had emotion, had feelings, had consciousness.
And then they had their own civil rights group because then they began to realize they were just slaves to the human race, and they became unified.
Their objective was to take over the human race, get rid of human beings, replace all humans with synthetics.
Irrelevant.
The main reason I bring this up is because in one episode, the owner of one of these scents is having big problems with his wife.
And he ends up having sex with the robot.
And it was something nobody knew was possible.
But this particular robot that he's you go to Best Buy and you buy one, and he bought one, and it turned out to be one of these eight that had been infused with emotions.
But it had not been activated in her source code yet.
So, but he found a way.
Anyway, it's a convoluted series.
I don't know if it's going to be renewed or not, but when I saw this story, let me give you some of the pull quotes from this.
It's Breitbart, folks.
This is not some obscure off-the-wall site.
Sex with robots will be the norm in 50 years, say experts, when you introduce a low-cost alternative to women that comes without all a nagging, insecurity, and expense, frankly, men are gonna leap in headfirst.
Another reason men might be enthusiastic about female free sex is obvious.
The sociopathic man hating feminism we see so much of on TV and in our newspapers today is turning men off dealing with women altogether.
Constant whining about toxic masculinity, man spreading, mansplaining, the bogus gender pay gap, the absurd campus rape culture myth are pushing the sexes apart, fostering mistrust and fear.
Anyone want to deny that?
Another pull quote.
Feminists always hate when they accidentally get what they want.
They've been waging a war on sex on campuses and elsewhere for decades.
Now suddenly they will earn the fruits of their labor.
The whiny man babies, they've been bullying for so many years are going to be having sex with silicon-ribbed pleasure bots instead of groveling at their feet for a chance to smell the knickers.
Remember now it's a forecast 50 years out.
Now, I understand some people, how could you?
This is so beneath the standards of the EIB now.
Folks, I'm telling you, everything that happens in our culture is related to politics.
I have tried to illustrate that, point that out for as many years as I've been hosting the program as you know, I think the key, the long-term key to happiness and contentment is defeating liberalism.
Liberalism is the primary source of discontent and anger and animosity throughout our culture.
And it's going to take a profound awakening of people to understand it and accept it.
And right now, we're way behind the eight ball.
You tell people that liberals are responsible for that and responsible for this.
They don't want to hear you because it just sounds it's kind of like calling people communists 20 years ago.
People didn't listen, didn't take you seriously.
But it's true.
It is undeniable.
So you have stories like this.
Why does a story like this even happen?
You know, everything that happens has a reaction to it in physics.
Okay, and there are things happening in this all of this phony cultural rot taking place because of the advance of militant feminism on campus and everywhere else in the mainstream of culture is causing reactions like this.
And it the Stepford wives were that that was those were real human beings that were drugged and prepared in other, you know, weird oddball ways.
I know it's something that that that captivates the imagination of men, generation after generation after generation.
But now we're getting technologically to the point where actually create a bunch of Stephen wives if possible.
I mean, we're closer to it.
And snurdly, ask yourself, just how much is it going to take to satisfy the average guy?
Now the the question Snerdley asked me during the show opened was do you think that Trump is once again going to be challenged to name all of these terrorist leaders and Middle Eastern leaders?
He was on the radio with Hugh Hewitt, who is one of the moderators tonight, and he couldn't name a lot of the names of terrorist leaders, presidents of Islamic countries, and Trump said, doesn't matter.
When I'm president, I'll find out who they are and I'll deal with them.
I'll get some people in there know how to deal with this.
Don't worry about it, it won't be a problem.
Reagan was hit with the same thing back in his day, and he said, doesn't matter.
I don't know who they are.
What matters is they better know who I am.
I fully expect something like that again.
I I I would I mean I have no idea, but I wouldn't be surprised if one of the moderators says, Mr. Trump, have you studied since three weeks ago?
Can you now name for us the leader of ISIS?
Can you name for us tonight the leader of Al-Qaeda?
Can you name for I wouldn't be surprised at all if that happens.
I'm not predicting anything.
I'm just telling you, I wouldn't be surprised if it happens.
I mean, you think you must think it might, you wouldn't have asked me otherwise.
You think they won't go gotcha because everybody's looking for gotcha?
You think they won't go gotcha now because everybody's looking for it, so they're going to try to come up with other ways to go at this to surprise them.
I mean, they know one way of doing things, though, when it Republicans are conservatives.
Remember now, it doesn't matter whether it's Trump or Ted Cruz or whoever else is on this state, don't forget for you know, don't allow the presence of Trump to make you forget what you already know about the media and Republicans.
Just because the number one objective is going to take Trump out, doesn't mean they want anybody else to look good.
This is the media after this CNN for crying out loud.
They don't want anybody looking good when this thing's over tonight.
I just was watching a little CNN during the break.
You know, they're in their four-hour 42-minute, 30-second countdown phase now.
And who was it?
It was Dana Bash.
He's talking to Wolf Blitzer.
And Dana Bash looked at Wolf Blitz and said, You know, you know, Wolf.
It really isn't about us tonight.
And Wolf just sat there and kind of stared at her blankly like he didn't get it.
No, no.
Wolf, it really isn't about us.
Um, it's about the candidates.
Um it's it's about what they say tonight, Wolf.
They think that's news.
That must be a an earth-shattering thing to say if you say it.
It's not about us tonight, Wolf.
Not about us.
Now others will say, BS, it's always about the media, and they'll do everything they can to make it about them.
And I kind of side with the latter of those.
Back with more after this.
Sit.
Your guiding light, Ill Rushball behind the golden EIB microphone.
Here is Dave in Des Moines, Iowa.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
You have a prediction, it says here.
Yes, uh, Hawkeye Cockai Ditto see your rush.
Thanks for taking my call.
It's an honor to speak for you.
Thank you very much, sir.
Appreciate that.
I have a prediction on tonight's debate would not only win the debate outright, but also clinch the election all in one move.
Trump announces that he and Ben Carson are now a team.
Trump, of course, on top.
And Dr. Carson is VP.
The top two in the polls are united as a team.
And you th are you actually predicting this tonight, or is it something that you think if it did happen it would it might be wishful thinking on my part, but if I, uh humble listener, can think of it, then that's Trump and Carson can certainly think of it too.
Well, that would for for that to uh for that to happen, you would have to somehow get to Ben Carson and tell him, Ben, the best you're gonna do is lose, and then run the risk that I don't choose you as VP.
So Ben we can do it this way.
You acknowledge tonight that I'm gonna win this thing, and you don't have a chance, and in exchange for that, you drop out and I will announce that you are my VP.
And then we own it after that.
Now, if Ben Carson would go for that, then you might have a point.
But I don't think Ben Carson is going to acknowledge here in uh September, before the new iPhones have even come out, that he is going to lose the nomination, which is what he would have to do.
Snerdley, you know, I know how call screeners work for folks.
I mean, Snerdley put this call up for a reason.
Snurdly thinks this guy's got a point that it could very well happen.
Either that or Snerdly just wants to hear what I think about it.
He thinks I'm gonna have some reaction.
And I don't I don't I don't know.
I I I don't I d this just seems too well, I think I understand why Ted Cruz is crossing at cozying up the snerdly.
What do you think about Ted Cruz coaching?
I'm I'm gonna.
Look, you had to ask me this, you had to ask me.
One of the things that surprises me is that Cruz is at seven percent.
I wanted Cruz to explode here in this process, and he may still yet.
But uh I didn't have any preference, as you know, I don't choose, I don't endorse during primaries, but I did expect uh Cruz to be doing better than one point better than Jeb.
Um so we'll see.
It's as I say, this debate's gonna be interesting for many reasons and in a lot of ways.
Well, I know Jeb's coming with both barrels tonight.
He's gonna show you what low energy really means.
That's what that's what Jeb said tonight.
He's gonna show everybody what low energy really looks like.
He's gonna come out with both barrels tonight.
Anyway, I appreciate the call, Dave.
Uh thanks.
Thanks much.
Here's uh here's Tim Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Great to have you with us.
Hello, sir.
Megadito's L. Rushbo, longtime listener, first-time caller.
Thank you very much.
Great to have you here.
Hey, I saw Trump's shout-out tweet yesterday.
He was tooling around Southern California surveying his wealth in his shiny black suburban and listening to your show.
And I'm actually hoping that he's listening today.
There was a Democrat that announced for president yesterday.
I think his name is Lysig.
And he'll be a good one.
Oh, yeah, this is some wacko professor at Harvard or something.
Yeah, yeah.
Lawrence Lessig or something.
Yeah, a single issue platform.
He said he'd reform campaign finance, the special interest and lobbyist access to power, then resign and let his VP run the country for the rest of his term.
Right.
And as crazy as that may sound, if Trump would put that ahead of his platforms on immigration and trade and military and tax reform, it really is the main issue for both parties.
Um he's he said that he's above it.
But he hasn't said that he'll fix it.
You know, say if Trump wins twice.
Where are we gonna find another self-funding billionaire to lead the country?
You know, he could deflect almost every attack and gotcha question at the debate tonight by refocusing on this one issue and highlighting where all the attacks are actually coming from, you know, and why they want him gone.
It it'd be a Herculean task.
It would take some in someone with enormous footspraw.
Well, you know, he might do that.
He does allude to this in the last two speeches and maybe in the ones prior, but the last two appearances, two rallies, he has made reference to the fact that he can't be bought and therefore can't be owned.
And he's made reference to the fact that all of this money, this lobbyist and special interest pack, but whatever he calls it, Uh is all aligned against him and and uh he's gone on to talk about another thing he said was and it was in the same uh spoken paragraph.
He was saying, you know, I come out here and I do an hour, fifteen minutes, an hour, whatever, and every speech I do is different.
And every one of those guys, they put it on the teleprompters, they have a stump speech.
Everybody's a stump speech, it's the same thing over and over again.
You never know what's gonna get with me.
And he related that to the fact that the donors who are putting money behind these people are riding them close to the vest to make sure they don't say anything too outrageous that might destroy their chances.
He says, I got nobody riding me.
I have nobody controlling me.
Yeah, he's above it, but he hasn't said that he's gonna fix it.
He hasn't come forward with a plan to take the bigger.
Well, hang on, I've got a break coming up.
I got hang on through the break here, if you will, uh, Tim, because I've got it coming right here, and I want to I want for you to define further what you're actually talking about.
You went fast through it.
Okay, back to Tim in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
What you're talking about, just to make sure I understand, you're talking about the special interest money and the pack money and the lobbyists and all that, the people who are funding all these candidates, that's what you want done away with.
You're quoting Lawrence Lessing, who claims he's got one agenda item, he's gonna elect the president, he'll he'll somehow outlaw all of that, reform the campaign finance system, and then quit.
And you think it's obvious that the Beltway elite is screwing us over for the benefit of big donors, and you and I both know some of that control is from other nations and other governments.
Look at the secret pan Asian trade deal that just went through in the dark.
Well, I know look, there's no there's no well, look at the first debate.
The donors sent the message out to take Trump out.
Right.
So there's no look at Obamacare.
The hospitals, medical and insurance donors are getting a big fat return on their longtime support on the Hill.
Right.
And in the Capitol.
Right.
So how do you do this, though?
I mean, money look at there's a story in the stack here, Jeff Imelt.
This is about the export import bank or import export bank.
And he's threatening if he doesn't get his money.
And GE doesn't need any money.
GE is profiting famously.
Here it is.
Right up your alley here, Tim.
This is from Reuters.
GE to move U.S. jobs overseas and fight over export credits.
Flexing its muscles amid a bitter congressional fight over the U.S. export import bank, GE on Tuesday, revealed plans to shift up to five hundred U.S. manufacturing jobs to Europe and China because it can no longer access XM financing.
Meaning it can't get corporate welfare.
And you know, this was a this is a big battle in the U.S. Congress not long ago.
And once again, the Republican establishment was all in with big money on this.
And XM is not even needed anymore.
These corporations have plenty of money on their own.
They don't need free access to taxpayer money.
You can't just act like it's too big a problem to fix, though.
It's just like illegal immigration.
We're national laws.
You know, it'll you know, make it illegal uh to, you know, give large contributions to uh people that are on the hill and in the Capitol and enforce it, you know, inspect.
You know, you can't you have to start somewhere.
I don't know what the answer is.
I'm sure it's complex.
I mean, any time you have power and you have money, you've got a natural marriage.
But there there's got to be a way to inspect.
I mean, we can see you know, Hillary Clinton's, you know, emails now, and and the FBI is gonna come up with all of her, you know, private emails and find out if she was selling access, you know, with Bill Clinton's speeches all across the world.
Well, come on, we already know.
See, that's the thing about that.
We already know she was doing that, and nothing's gonna happen to her.
Nothing's gonna happen with this email thing.
It would have happened by now.
She'd have been indicted if she was going to be, it would have happened.
I think.
I agree with you.
They've got everything they need here.
Uh now now we're hearing uh, you know, in addition to the fact her server wasn't wiped, which means some of these things can be recovered.
That's not good news for her that the server wasn't wiped.
But we're also hearing that the um uh some inspectors generals have looked at this and uh they don't find anything really wrong uh with what Hillary's done.
Uh really nothing to see here.
Then the next day we hear something entirely different.
And it's it's hard to keep track of.
But one thing we know, she's been selling access to herself as future president for years.
That's what the Clinton Crime Family Foundation is all about.
Absolutely.
And you know, people are not loved.
I mean, they're not giving money to Hillary because she's beautiful, they're not giving money to Hillary because they want to go to cocktail parties with her.
That's not why this happens.
So you're saying here comes Trump that Trump's eighty percent of the congressmen leave Congress when they turn into a console uh they they go straight in and they start doing lobbying.
Right.
You know, they they lose the the election, but they still get millions of dollars to go spread the influence from all the big donors and probably governments around the world to buy the votes of all the people that are still on the hill, the people that do.
All of this is why ideas don't matter anymore.
And yet the American people, the American voter, thinks it's about ideas.
They want it to be about ideas.
They want the right ideas to triumph, bad ideas to lose.
They want the competition to be about ideas, and instead it isn't.
Now it's it's nothing new.
Tim, I'm sure you'll agree that money in politics is nothing new, but it seems to me that it's reached a level that I'm not familiar with it being.
It used to be that the big money donors were known.
They might have even had some respect.
But the big money donors were kept over there, they weren't talked about much.
They did get the private access, we didn't know about it.
I mean, they didn't publicize, they were having parties and confabs, and the parties at least went through the motions of making voters think it was about ideas.
Now that's even out the window.
Now you look at McConnell and Boehner, and they're making it clear that they are following the money, and doesn't matter what you think about it, that's what they're going to continue to do.
So it's gotten even more intense and more predominant.
It's always been a Jesse Unruth said back in the 60s that money is the mother's milk of politics.
But it seems you're right that now it's become oppressive.
So you have self-financing people like Trump, but you you raise a good point.
How many of those do we have that are going to want to put it at risk in a political campaign?
You see the huge insurgent from the outsiders in this election, you know, the the people that aren't in government, and I think that's why the the corruption in Washington is out of the closet.
You know, it's no longer the the secret uncle in the closet that nobody's paying attention to, you know, it's out in the open and everybody knows about it, and I think that's why the majority of the Republicans want somebody who's not involved.
Republican votes.
So you make that your primary issue, you double down on the thing that's already, you know, skyrocketed the uh insurgent candidates to plus 50 percent, you know, on the Republican side.
So just to close the loop, you think no matter what they throw at Trump tonight, if he somehow turned it all around and made this, the reason he's doing what he's doing, in addition to making America great again, he could just swat it away like a bunch of flies.
Well, and he's good at that, too.
He's good at taking a question about you know something that he said and turning it into an attack on the person that he originally said it about.
I mean, he's he's great at stop, drop and roll.
I mean, the guy can pull it off for sure.
But if he says, I know why you asked me that question, you're trying to make me and uh say something or do something that's gonna, you know, finally, you know, harm my my uh you know enormous popularity.
And the reason is because I'm not controlled.
Uh you guys are controlled, you guys are controlled, look at the press, look at the other people on the stage.
I'm not controlled, and I know they want me gone.
I know every you know, all the big donors and everybody that's involved in the corruption and the entire system, they want me gone.
So I know why you're asking the question.
Well, you know here's what I'm gonna do.
Wouldn't you be perfect?
Just turn it right back around all.
Well, he's totally capable of it.
I know that.
You remind me of something that I I said before the first debate back in August on August 6th that I thought would happen, and it didn't.
And it now I'm thinking about it again, and it might.
Remember, you might remember my saying that I expected.
Let's go back to August 6.
What was happening?
Trump was in full bombast mode back then.
Everything he was was the greatest.
Everything he wasn't was a loser.
Everybody that he was not with him was a loser.
He was on that huge braggadocious funny as hell roll.
And I fully expected Trump staying in character.
Because we knew what they were going to do, try to take him out because he's not a serious candidate, waiting for the slip-up that they know he's gonna make that'll disqualify him and make people want to get rid of him and all that.
And I expected him to to in his own way mock the whole process as a setup and phony uh scenario.
What do you mean we get three minutes and thirty seconds?
Who the hell can say anything in thirty seconds besides me?
None of these people up here can tell you what they mean in 30 seconds.
I can do it, I'm better at it than anybody else.
They can't.
I fully expected him to sort of make fun of the whole thing, which is what his candidacy up to that point was doing.
And I still think that in one of these debates, depending on the frustration level, he might go that way.
Not I don't think it would be in a in a sense of disrespecting, but maybe relating to the American people.
These aren't even debates, he could say.
I'm not debating anybody but you.
And he can look at the moderator.
You're asking me a bunch of stupid questions that nobody watching this thing cares about.
And this is crazy.
This isn't advancing anybody's ideas and advancing anything.
What are we doing up here?
And I guarantee you, if he did that the right way, they'd get the same kind of applause for his campaign and approach that he's getting now.
Anyway, got to take a time out again here, folks.
Money to be made.
We do it.
We'll be back after this.
Here is the the details on the GE story, flexing its muscles amid a bitter congressional fight over the U.S. export import bank GE on Tuesday revealed plans to ship up to 500 U.S. manufacturing jobs to Europe and China because it can no longer access XM financing.
The largest U.S. industrial conglomerate said that it'll move production of some heavy-duty gas turbines and 400 jobs to Belfort, France in exchange for a credit line from France's co-face export agency.
The deal will support GE bids for international power projects.
U.S. plants in Greenville, South Carolina, Schenectady, New York, and Bangor Maine will lose out on those jobs if GE wins the power bids, a GE spokeswoman said.
So I'll tell you how this is going to end up.
Whatever else happens, the Republicans are going to end up being blamed for it.
Or at least they're thinking that they're going to get blamed for it.
And so to avoid being blamed for it, they will do everything they can to make sure GE the export import bank.
Uh this was, you know, Ted Cruz had a great speech in the floor in the Senate about this.
This was debate debate was back in uh August.
This was the one where he said that Mitch McConnell, and the leadership had lied to his face about this.
It's just another illustration of the powerful moneyed people directing and sidling up to government in this new phenomenon of cronyism that's no longer hidden.
It's just right out in the open, right in our faces.
And this is a you know, emelt is just tight with Obama.
Obama put him on the jobs council or some such thing.
They had a job summit and he put Imelt in charge of finding and creating domestic jobs.
And I don't know if if Imelt is still running that.
But if he is, here he is threatening to take GE jobs overseas, even if he isn't still running the Obama jobs commissioner.
What good was that anyway?
Here's uh here's Randall in Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
Randall, great that you called.
Great to have you on the program.
Hello.
Hi, Russ.
I wanted to explain to you why Donald Trump is doing so well with everybody.
Okay.
Yeah, I'd like to hear it, because I really don't have any idea.
So uh Well, Donald Trump is saying what we are seeing.
In other words, when Donald Trump says we're being overrun at the border, we see that.
When Donald Trump says immigrant or illegal immigrants are killing and raping women, that is something that we see when Donald Trump says that we have idiots that are running our country.
If Mitch McConnell, Boehner, Pelosi, and uh Harry Reed and Barack Obama aren't the antiphysist of idiots, then I don't know what is.
When when Donald Trump says that a squirrel could have done a better job at delivering a better deal from the Iranians than Kerry, that is all things that we see.
These are all physical things that we see.
It's not like um it's not like somebody saying that, you know, these people are coming over here for love.
They're not coming over here for love.
They're coming over here for our stuff.
Plain and simple.
And Donald Trump is just plain putting it out there and saying, no, these people are overrunning us.
These people have killed and have raped and have hurt people.
Drunk drivers have crashed in the world.
Wait a second.
Wait just a minute.
Don't you understand?
The U.S. is responsible for this.
We conquered these people.
We mistreated.
We took their country.
We took their land.
We took their buffalo.
We took everything away from them.
We put them under Spanish rule.
Don't you think it's about time they got even?
Don't you think it's about time the U.S. was cut down to size?
This is the Democrat view of things, by the way.
That's the Democrat view.
But you know what really needs to happen?
We need to just take over Mexico.
Since they all want to come over here, why don't we just take them over?
I got, you know, i I think it's New Mexico and Old Mexico.
There'll be Texas and Tech Mex.
Now that's that's not going to happen out there, Randall.
It's not gonna happen.
But I mean, as as far as we're concerned, these people are just trying to invade us.
Okay, here's his point.
And it is folks, it's valid.
This is this is something that that I can I can uh use.
I think he's got a great point when he says everything Trump is criticizing is not theoretical.
It's real because we know it, we see it.
In other words, a lot of people will will try to gain your support by warning you what is going to happen.
And they'll try to persuade you that if you don't get up to speed real fast and understand what's happening, all kinds of things, A, B, C, D and E are gonna happen.
But Trump has come along and is simply acknowledging what is happening that everybody sees.
It's not a question of whether or not you trust or believe Trump.
You can't help it.
He's simply uttering the truth.
There's no question that what he's saying is true.
People have seen it.
People are experiencing it.
And so that that removes one of the huge barriers between the people and politicians, and that's trust.
It's not even a question of trusting Trump.
He's not lying to you.
He's simply voicing what everybody sees that nobody else in Washington will voice.
And in fact, when you do voice it, they try to tell you you're wrong.
You got it wrong.
You're a xenophobic, you're racist, you're databist.
Somehow it's your problem when you point it out.
And the problem is rooted in your racism, it's in your bigotry, or your xenophobia, or what have you.
And you pull your hair out because it's none of that.
You're just simply telling look at what's happening here, and you're not doing anything to stop it.
And it ought not be happening.
It's wrong.
They don't and shouldn't have the right to come here and do what they're doing.
The people in Washington to whom you lodge these complaints, you don't understand.
It's just a short, maybe precious few number of people.
The rest of these people, they're in the shadows, and we need to get them out.
They're coming here as acts of love.
And then you start choking with frustration and anger.
And so it's really boils down to there isn't any BS.
But I still maintain, in addition to that, the fact that whatever has happened in Washington, there aren't any Trump fingerprints on it.
This anti-Washington mentality is bigger than I have ever seen it in the number total number of years I've been hosting the program.
And we're now into our 28th.
Now it's always there.
There is always a segment of the population that is totally detached from Washington, distant and wants no part of it, and uh doesn't trust it.
It's bigger than I've ever seen it.
It's that they call it populism as a means of uh impugning it.
Uh populism means there's no rationality to it.
This is just runaway emotions, and we gotta stop this.
We have to get a check and handle on this, you people.
We can't allow you populists to run things because you're not thinking.
But we are.
You are.
It's not that you don't even have to think you know what's happening.
And the fact that they, the elites, the beltway, whatever, try to talk you out of what you know to be True, and then insult you by telling you it's only your rotten attitudes that make you see and think that.
The divide is wider than I've ever seen it.
And the thing is, again, the people in Wal they they're it's they're not confused here.
They're not disconnected.
They know full well they're just in denial.
They don't care.
What exciting, busy broadcast hour remains leading up to the second Republican presidential debate tonight?
Reagan Library.
We have the pre-debated six main attraction, eight o'clock.
We will be back in mere moments.
▲
Export Selection