All Episodes
Previous Next
June 16, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:34
June 16, 2015, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of The Rush 24 7 Podcast.
Well, well, well, well, Snerdley and I just spent the last half hour sitting here watching Donald Trump's announcement that he's going to run for president.
And we were laughing ourselves.
I mean, it was a howl session.
But at the same time, there's no doubt in my mind.
This is I'll tell you what this is shaping up to be.
For those of you who have a long-term memory and in this for the long game, think Perot.
Think Ross Perot remember the reaction people had to Ross Perot.
And I'm not comparing Trump's speech.
Perot Perot got going with a speech to the National Press Club that was on C-SPAN.
It was amazing, actually, because it was a noontime speech, but it was all about uh spending and debt spending and how the U.S. was second rate in every regard and how it was silly and how he could fix it.
And it was no intimation he's going to run for president that time.
It was just it was and that's what made the speech that Perot gave so made it so attractive and attracted so much attention to it.
Trump, the same kind of thing here with similar focus, except he made it official today.
He's running for president.
By the way, greetings and welcome back, Rush Limbaugh, the EIB network 800-282-2882.
But I mean, he was let me just give you a little summary.
We're still rolling tape here, uh assembling the audio sound bites.
He started out, well, I didn't, it's it's hard to say what he started with, because there's so much here, I don't remember where it all happened.
But for example, he said about Mexico, they're sending us their worst people.
They're sending us criminals, they're sending us the boy, they're sending they're just bad people.
Some of them may be good people, but they're just bad people.
And we don't need them.
And it resonated.
That's gonna resonate.
There's a whole bunch of people, just like Perot resonated.
And the drive-by media, by the way, they're already scoffing, they're already discounting it, they're already calling a circus act and uh and this kind of thing.
And it was, I mean, it was it was not at all what he passed.
He had a 10-minute speech that he gave out that was embargoed that was not what he did today.
Uh, you know, Trump's many things.
Serious businessman, he's performer, he's got a performer's ego that was on display today.
Uh, and and some days when you see him, he's dead serious about things.
Uh this was improv.
It was by no means on a teleprompter.
He said he said to the end of the speech, and I'm gonna build a wall.
We're gonna build a biggest, it's gonna be the best wall.
There's gonna be a better wall anywhere in the world.
We're gonna build a wall on the southern border, and we're gonna make Mexico pay for it.
And the place win months.
And then he said, leading up to announcing his uh his net worth, which he said is required when you run for president, you gotta submit the numbers, and he had this one piece of paper that he said his uh best accounting firm in the world had uh put together work.
It took months because he's so rich.
He said, I'm really rich.
I'm really rich.
I'm gonna show you in a minute here.
A really rich.
You know, it's things like that.
You just I'll tell you, tell you something happened.
I was riveted watching this for a whole host of reasons.
Um the phone rang, and I got mad because my hearing, the phone when there's a secondary noise in the room, I can't hear what I'm trying to hear.
I if if it like two people talking at the same time, I don't, I'm not able to comprehend either of them.
So I'm watching, I've got the sound up, which is very rare, and the phone started ringing, and nobody in the rest of the office here picked it up, and I yelled it, I just yelled at answer the blank blank phone.
Because I wanted to hear what Trump was saying.
And I stopped myself.
Wait a minute.
Look what just happened here.
There hasn't been a single other person give a political speech in years that if the phone rang and interrupted him, I'd have been mad.
Now, don't misunderstand that.
I'm I'm I've you know me, I'm not endorsing, haven't endorsed nowhere near any of that.
I'm not even jazzed yet, folks.
I've uh I have to tell you that this is all so premature, and it's all so early that whatever polling numbers there are just do not interest me.
Uh, because where we are right now is nowhere near where we're gonna end up.
And I have a there's a premonition, I've had a premonition uh after all we're talking about a presidential race with Hillary Clinton in it, the Last name's Clinton.
Oh, that's another thing.
He's talking about the prison escape, and he's he's attacking uh all the losers uh in the American government, losers here, losers there, that we're the dumbest people.
China's beating us, China's wiping us out.
But he loves China, building buildings all over China.
But he but the Chinese, we need smart people to beat the China.
We're losing everyone.
So we should have had the oil in Iraq.
Instead, if Iran's got it, we're just we're the losers.
Our airports are third world.
Hell, I come back from Qatar, I come back from anywhere in the world, I've just been to a great airport and I land at LAX or LaGuardia.
It's a third world airport.
America, third world airports.
Crowds cheering.
And I know a lot of people are gonna agree with that.
He starts talking about this prison escape up in New York.
And obviously it happened because we had stupidest people running our prisons.
We have a stupidest people in the police force chasing these guys.
He can't believe they're not caught yet.
In a responsible country, great leaders, these guys would have been caught.
But he turned that into a political comment on the Second Amendment.
He said, This is exactly why we need the Second Amendment.
We need a second, we need people with guns.
We need people able to defend themselves.
We got this prison breakup there, and our losers in charge of this can't even capture these guys yet.
A woman called me the other day, said Mr. Trump, I am joining you now in support of the Second Amendment.
I used to hate the Second Amendment, but you have convinced me, and so now my husband and I are on the same page because he already likes guns.
And Mr. Trump, I just want to tell you that we now have a gun in every room.
We're we're ready to start shooting.
We're ready to start.
That's when I lost it.
We're re Snerdley's watching this thing with his mouth half open for long stretches of time.
That's what we're working on the video here.
Uh rolling off the audio.
But remember Perot, that ended up being third party, and it gave us Bill Clinton, arguably.
Now, I know some people claim that even had Perot not run, that George H. W. Bush, they looked at the polling data in the in the post-election analytical data, and some people think that Bush would have lost anyway.
But you can see this setting up.
I mean, if Trump decides to go third party, if anybody goes third party, so if anybody goes third party, then you can say hello, Hillary.
And Hillary's an absolute disaster.
Can we just, I mean, this is something that I don't fight.
This is what bamboozles me.
If that's the best that Democrats can come of, they don't deserve to win any.
If that's the best they've got Mrs. Clinton is an absolute disaster.
I just the biggest thing she got going for her is there's a D by her name.
And that's why she's gonna get the majority of votes that she's gonna get.
Outside of that, uh, I just I I don't think I just same, I don't understand the fear.
I do not understand why people are so afraid of Hillary Clinton.
And I understand uh respect for all of the shenanigans that Clintons are able to pull off.
But I'm talking about just individually, I don't get the fear that I still find prevalent out there on the uh on the Republican side.
There's also other news out there that we're gonna get a Rachel Dolezal was on the Today Show today.
Wait till you hear the audio sound bites on this from the drive-by media.
Some of them are welcoming her to the black race.
Her poor parents won, I you know, this this when I see things like this, I'm of an age where I just assume how best to explain this.
I assume that the Vast majority of parents are responsible, smart together people, because they all were when I was a kid.
Now there were some bad actors, and I don't I don't want to give a false impression here.
I'm not suggesting that just because it was decades ago that things were better and less corrupt or any of that.
But parents, back when I was young enough, and everybody's a friend of mine had parents, and so they were they were you respected them.
And I look at some parents today of children and of people that happen to make news, and I listen to these parents.
I said, gee whiz, what what I mean it just bamboozles me.
What happened to them?
And then I have to stop and think, well, you know, they're they're baby boomers themselves or younger, and the change and corruption in our culture began long ago, actually.
But these poor parents of Rachel Dolazal trying to explain uh what happened and how it happened and how they feel about what she's done.
It's just it's painful to watch.
It's just painful to listen to these poor parents, and it's painful to listen to her.
And it's painful, well, funny to listen to the drive-by media analyzes.
Then there's been a leak of a papal incyclia.
And essentially, what this papal encyclia is suggesting is that every Catholic should vote for the Democrat Party.
Well, no, that's what how in the hell else do you interpret it when the Pope comes out and sounds like Al Gore on global warming and climate change?
Or when the Pope sounds like Clinton, or when the Pope sounds like any Democrat.
Meanwhile, we're in a 10-year cooling period.
There hasn't been any warming.
The whole thing is a hoax.
And we've got this leak of a papal encyclia on the fact that global warming is man-made, it's uh man-caused, and we have almost a religious uh commandment here to deal with it and do I mean it's just right out of the Democrat.
Anyway, we'll get into that in great detail.
Uh we've got we've got me in the audio sound bites here that again I didn't even know.
By the way, I did not make the news uh because of anything said on yesterday's program, and I was discussing this, Mr. Snerdley.
I came in today, said I make the news last night.
Was it was anything I said yesterday turned and face nope, nope, Jeb Bush, you forgot Jeb Bush is running and they're occupied with that.
And I put the stuff I said yesterday was ever green.
They can go back to that anytime they want and cream me.
So it's uh that in other words, evergreen, it's timeless.
It would be use it any time they want.
But nevertheless, um I am credited for creating words in a new dictionary now.
And it's not Feminazi.
It's one I don't even remember, but they are crediting me uh with it.
So look, let's take a uh a brief time out.
I'm gonna turn back to the printer and I see if any of these Trump soundbites have rolled in, because you missed this.
You really have to hear excerpts of it, or maybe the uh the whole thing, uh, there's the Dolezole parents.
I'm just what TV, they're just watching a video replay of those poor people and their interview today on on Fox.
Anyway, lots of stuff here today, folks, as there was yesterday, as there is every day, and this is the only place you get an intelligent, reasonable take on all of it.
Your guiding light, Rush Limbaugh, always having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Look, folks, you know, I I I I hate saying I told you so all the time.
But when it needs to be said, I do not shirk from it.
Did not I tell you that Pope Francis, after I've early on, remember this?
Early on, he started attacking capitalism using Democrat Party language, like Unfettered cap capitalism.
I said, this guy sounds like a Marxist.
And remember the ruckus that that caused?
And the Vatican, without naming me, of course, because I'm just a peon, started denying it left and right.
Hey, Pope is not a Marxist.
This is an extreme characterization of the pontiff's remarks.
There's no way.
But I stood by it at the time.
I caught a heck of a lot of grief from the drive-by media for pointing out early on that ill Papa sounded like a Marxist.
Well, this global warming in cyclical, that may be Latin for rant, seems to confirm.
I'm just kidding.
I'm just kidding.
I know that encyclical is not Latin for rant.
I just I just watch Trump.
But he doesn't even disguise it, folks, in this incyclic.
It doesn't even disguise every other word seems to be about how unfettered capitalism is destroying the world, and how the rich countries have to give more money to the poor countries to make amends.
I mean, that's call it what you want, Marxism, socialism, what have you.
But if this thing is real, then it leaves no doubt here what the political leanings or inclinations of the of the pontiff are.
It's in the Washington Post and the Washington Post a giddy reporting this.
Pope Francis blasts global warming deniers and leaked draft of encyclical.
Draft of a major environmental document by Pope Francis says the bulk of global warming is caused by human activity and calls on people, especially the world's rich, to take steps to mitigate the damage by reducing the consumption and reliance on fossil fuels.
Now I couldn't find, I know the Pope get this.
Pope Francis actually has a he got a degree as a chemical technician back in 1936.
See, I looked up this stuff.
Want to find out where does this come from?
So as a he got a degree as a chemical technician in 1936, which does make him gives him a leg up on Al Gore, who's got nothing.
And Al Gore doesn't have any scientific pedigree whatsoever.
But still there's no record of Iopapa having studied meteorology or climatology or any of the related sciences.
So we're supposed to take his assertions on faith.
Now, deniers uh does not uh show up in the in the text of the article, the Washington Post here uh has deniers in their headline.
Pope Francis blasts global warming deniers, but that that does not appear in the in the article.
Deniers.
See, there's a consensus that's formed, in this case, a consensus of scientists.
And the grand delusion is that the climate of the earth is abnormal caused by this current crop of human beings occupying the planet at this moment.
I've always found it interesting.
As old as the earth is, and I don't think there's an exact science to document it.
For as long as people have been around interesting that the vanity of humanity is the assumption that apparently 50, 60, 70 years ago, the earth was quote unquote normal.
Whatever was going on back, that was the norm.
Just so happens when we're alive.
That's the norm.
So anything that happens above or below that line from 70 years ago to the day, we are responsible for, according to these people.
But what is the norm?
Does anybody know?
Can there be scientific proof?
What is the norm of the climate of planet Earth?
There's Nobody that knows this.
So all of this is speculative.
It's all just politics.
But it has a grand delusion about it, fulfilling the requirement that propaganda be part of the delusion, and you got a consensus, and everybody goes along with a consensus because that's a path of least destruction, and anybody objects.
Denier.
Or weirdo, or cook, or worse.
And that is to discredit people who are not going along with the with the consensus.
But here's this Washington Post says in words likely to anger some of his conservative critics, the Pope backs the science of climate change, saying, quote, plenty of scientific studies point out that the last decades of global warming have been mostly caused by the great concentration of greenhouse gases, especially generated by human action.
Now, as we know, plenty of scientific studies say a lot of things turn out to be untrue.
Most scientific studies are bought and paid for.
Every scientific study on the dangers or benefits of various foods, from eggs to oats to red wine, is shown to have been wrong.
But I mean the empirical data here.
There hasn't been any warming, actually, in the last 18 years, and the latest data is at the last 10 years we are witnessing a cooling.
The papal encyclia reads, the poor in the earth are shouting.
The poor.
It's a tip-off.
The Pope is a product of liberation theology.
Gotta be back in a second.
Greetings, welcome back.
Great to have you, Rush Limboy here, the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
A telephone number if you want to be on the program.
800-282-2882.
Now, near the end of the Washington Post piece, there is an allusion, not illusion, allusion to the fact that this whole papal encyclical on global warming is a is an attempt to ruin the Pope.
The leak immediately fueled rumors about schemes to take down a Pope.
Many see as left-leaning on some issues.
So it can't really be that the Pope is a Marxist.
We've had a few calls that the Pope's degree in 1936 is impossible given his age.
Okay.
Well, find out what researcher fed me the information and just fire them then.
Anyway, uh the leak immediately fueled rumors about schemes to take down a Pope.
Many seem uh as see as left-leaning on some issues.
And there are people, I've this it's not just the Washington Post, there are a couple of other people who have uh raised this possibility.
And in fact, you know, there's a history of this with this Pope.
The Pope will be reported to have said something, or he will be reported to be writing something that is off the wall and hard to believe.
And then later somebody will come along from the Vatican and deny it and say that it was a trick or it was incorrect, and the Pope never said it, almost as like the Vatican sends out trial balloons.
So I guess it's possible this could be one of those things.
This is if if it is typical move by the left.
And it's by the way, entirely believable that the left would attempt to co-opt the Catholic Church, and the left does not like the Catholic Church at all, left doesn't like any religion, but the Catholic Church particularly is an institution that they despise,
fear uh all of that, because it stands as stark reminder in opposition to what the left believes and seeks.
And so anything that they've been the efforts to corrupt uh the Catholic Church and religion, period, by the left uh have been undertaken for years.
So I guess it's possible it could be uh a leak.
But I'll tell you what to get serious about this for this second.
I mean, here you have a papal encyclical about how the rich nations of the world are destroying the planet with global warming and need to give even more money to poor nations.
I mean, this right out of the Democrat Party playbook, right out of the leftist Olinski manual, any other leftist manual.
Meanwhile, Catholics and Christians are being wiped out all over the world by Muslims and other enemies.
Literally wiped out, Catholics and Christians are being targeted for mass murder all over the world.
And here we get a papal encyclical on climate change and global warming.
I don't know.
The two don't go together.
If we're going to have a papal encyclical, uh, you would think it'd be something opposing war or the real enemies of people.
Climate change, is climate change an enemy of the Catholic Church?
Is climate change an enemy of Catholics?
Is climate change, even if it is happening as they say, is climate change.
Something is it a matter of faith?
Is it is it something uh that the church believes is a weapon being used against the faithful.
It just doesn't, I don't know.
Folks, it doesn't, it doesn't wash here.
And that's why when I first heard the Pope start talking about economics, just like in this encyclical on global warming, it just sounded like pure, not even diluted.
Uh Marxism, here it is from the Daily Quarter today.
Data from America's most advanced climate monitoring system shows the U.S. has undergone a cooling trend over the last decade, despite recent claims by government scientists that warming is accelerated worldwide during that time.
The U.S. climate reference network was developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's NOAA to provide high quality climate data.
The network consists of 114 stations across the fruited plain in areas that NOAA expects no development for the next 50 to 100 years.
The climate stations use three independent measurements of temperature and precipitation to provide continuity of record and maintenance of well-calibrated and highly accurate observations.
So this is the most advanced climate station data shows that in a 10-year, U.S. is in a 10-year cooling trend, which, by the way, is also widely known and widely accepted by people outside the delusional consensus.
Michelle Obama, during a conversation with students in the UK, in the United Kingdom.
Yeah, that's right.
Pope Francis was born in 1936, so he couldn't have a degree in 1936.
That guy got the date got screwed up.
But he's got a degree in chemical technicians or whatever.
But the point is that in all the research to find out what kind of technical scientific background Pope Francis has, I just found one thing.
Which is more than what Al Gore has in the field.
But that is it.
I don't I can't know what the date of his actual chemical degree is.
Looks like it's sometime in the late 50s or early 60s before he took up religious studies.
So that 36 was the year he was born.
Anyway, Michelle Obama in the UK, during a conversation with students, told these women that men were useful for promoting the idea of more education for girls.
She said, we've got to change cultural norms too.
That's why work on the ground is so important.
We've got to send different messages about the importance of educating our girls.
And Ms. Obama suggested that while boys and men were important, it was crucial for them to talk about the lack of education for girls around the world.
And You know our sons are important.
We love men.
We all do.
They're good.
They're useful, she said.
I have one in my life.
Referring to her husband, President Obama.
I like him, she said.
But you know, we have to change the definition of what it means to invest in our young girls.
Young men, she said, were important to supporting the idea of education for girls, revealing that Prince Harry endorsed the idea of having male voices in the conversation.
The first lady added that it was essential for women to be involved on the ground with people and keep informed about the issues of the day.
Don't just be book smart.
Be smart about the world, know your community, understand your politics, read your papers, know what's happening in the world.
You have to know how your government works, and you have to vote and be actively engaged at all times.
That's part of an education.
That used to be understood.
That something like that makes news today?
A statement of education, what education ought to be makes news.
When it used to be standard operating program, used to not have to define what education was.
I love this line.
Men are useful.
I have one myself.
I have one in my life.
Of course, that's okay.
We're not supposed to take anything from that.
No, no, no.
That's not insulting, it's not discriminatory.
No, no, no, no, it's not.
You let some poor schlub in a university say he can't let girls in his science lab because if you disagree with them, they cry that all hell breaks loose, and the guy gets fired.
And his wife gets fired from her job as a professor at the university.
Okay, got us a quick time out.
We'll come back.
I think we got some Trump sound bites to go.
And uh Rachel Dolezolt.
I didn't get any sound bites for her yesterday, but today is different story.
A whole bunch of them.
And we'll get started with all the rest of it.
We get back.
Don't go away.
Okay, sorry folks for the goof up.
Here's the skinny on Pope Francis and his uh education in chemistry.
This, according to the National Catholic Reporter.
Pope Francis studied chemistry and worked as a chemist prior to entering seminary, before he began his life with God.
But the chemistry diploma is from a state-run technical secondary school.
This is the National Catholic Reporter, which is comparable to a community college certificate here.
And it's just the extent of the Pope's scientific education and knowledge.
So all the rest of this is politics.
All the rest of it is politics.
That entire papal, well, we haven't even seen it yet.
Whatever has been leaked, the leaked aspects of the papal encyclical are pure politics.
And they're right out of it.
Pick any Democrat Party candidate.
And it's what they're saying.
Any leftist, any socialist around the world, it's what they're all saying.
Okay, we got the Trump sound bites.
Let's get started here.
They're not any particular order here.
We just cherry picked.
Our country is in serious trouble.
We don't have victories anymore.
We used to have victories, but we don't have them.
When was the last time anybody saw us beating, let's say China in a trade deal?
They kill us.
I beat China all the time.
When did we beat Japan at anything?
They send their cars over by the millions.
And what do we do?
When was the last time you saw a Chevrolet in Tokyo?
It doesn't exist, folks.
They beat us all the time.
When do we beat Mexico at the border?
They're laughing at us at our stupidity.
I guarantee you.
And the drive-by is gonna poo-poo it, they're gonna Relegate it to the carnival characteristics of a campaign and so forth.
But it's gonna just like just like Perot did.
Make do not misunderstand this.
It is gonna resonate with a lot of us as you hear more of this.
Now, this bit about we're in serious trouble.
I mean, we when's the last time we beat China?
They kill us.
When's the last time we beat Japan at anything?
You know what a lot of people's reaction that's gonna be?
But why should we be beating anybody?
Why can't we cooperate?
Why can't we all just get along?
Why do we have to beat China today?
That's just gonna make China mad.
Why do we have to beat the Japanese?
Why we always do that before?
Wasn't that when we were a bad country?
We're always beating everybody.
Had to be winners and a losers.
Why do we have to do that?
That's the reaction a lot of people are gonna have.
Because that's the way they've been raised.
It's unfair to beat anybody.
It's unfair.
Competition unnecessary.
Conflict resolution.
That's what we need.
We need to compromise, get along, be bipartisan.
It's gonna scare a lot of people.
Beating the Chinese, beating the Japanese.
These are people that are ignorant, have no idea that what Trump says here is actually true.
Make no look, the Chinese just hacked every government employee.
Why do you think they did that?
You don't think the Chicoms consider us an enemy?
They sure as heck do.
You don't think Putin considers us an enemy?
He sure as heck does.
We're an enemy simply because we're the lone superpower anymore.
It's how you deal with that that distinguishes you.
And Trump's point is we don't have anybody.
We don't have any smart people at all in positions of authority and power, making decisions on anything that matter.
Which he made clear in his uh in his speech today.
Here's the next bite.
All of my life I've heard that a truly successful person, a really, really successful person, and even modestly successful, cannot run for public office.
Just can't happen.
And yet that's the kind of mindset that you need to make this country great again.
So, ladies and gentlemen, I am officially running for president of the United States.
And we are going to make our country great again.
Now, one thing, he does not make excuses for who he is.
He doesn't apologize for his wealth.
And he claims that people like him are the kind of people that need to be in political leadership positions, but they don't dare do it because of all the different possibilities that could happen to them.
He says, instead of instead of uh criticizing people like him, instead of targeting people like him, we need people like him in positions of authority and power making decisions because we need the smart people, the smartest people we've got running this country.
We don't have that now.
Here's the next bite.
I will be the greatest jobs president that God ever created.
I tell you that.
I don't need anybody's money.
I'm using my own money.
I'm not using the lobbyists, I'm not using donors, I don't care.
I'm really rich.
I'll show you that in a second.
And by the way, I'm not even saying that in a brag.
That's the kind of mindset, that's the kind of thinking you need for this country.
So, because we gotta make the country rich.
It sounds crass.
Somebody said, Oh, that's crass.
It's not crass.
It's not crass.
Now, can you say, can you can you hear Mitt Romney?
I'm rich.
I'm really rich.
I'll acknowledge it.
They're all calling me.
I'm really rich.
I'll show you here in a minute.
And I'm proud of it because I know Romney will go buy a station wagon, put the dog on the roof and go on vacation.
Trump's out there flying his Boeing 757 with his name on it in 14 karat gold on the fuselage.
He's out bragging about everything he's done because he's proud of it.
He's proud of his success, he's proud of his achievements, he wants people to know.
He says he's not bragging because he doesn't have to brag.
He's not ashamed of any of it, and he doesn't want to put on any airs and act like it was an accident or act like he doesn't deserve it because he does deserve it.
he told a story he grew up in Queens and Brooklyn.
His dad was a great negotiator.
And he learned a lot from his dad.
But his dad said, Donald, don't ever take our business into Manhattan.
It's a cesspool over there.
It's too big.
We're right where we need to be.
And Trump said he told his, but Dad, I gotta go to Manhattan.
I gotta go to Manhattan.
That's where the action is, Dad.
And I went to Manhattan and look what I own.
I own a Bank of America, own Trump Tower, rebuilding the greatest hotel of Washington, D.C. I'm doing all of this.
I'm very proud of this.
I make no excuses for any of it.
I am really rich.
I'll show you in a minute.
And I'm not bragging.
Take a break here.
We'll be back and continue after this.
Okay, we have four more sound bites.
Let's give you a little heads up here.
What's coming?
Four more sound bites from Trump.
And then we'll head into Rachel Dozal, who was on the Today Show today.
And her parents were over on Fox and various uh African American media types.
Some angry that she wants to be black or identifies as black, others saying it's perfectly fine and welcoming her to the race.
Um I think I think I'm gonna identify as skinny.
That way I will not have to ever go on a diet.
I'm just gonna identify as skinny.
Understand.
You think I'm not?
▲
Export Selection