All Episodes
Previous Next
June 16, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:30
June 16, 2015, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Okay, so I officially today announce that I identify as skinny.
And this day going forward, I am skinny.
Now in the old days, people's reaction to that would be to call me delusional and maybe think I needed some help.
Today I'm brave.
It's a courageous act to identify as skinny when one is not.
And I'm sure I will get accolades all across Twitter and accolades all across Facebook and accolades all across the drive-by media for positive thinking.
Now that I identify as skinny, and I'm fully expecting that weight watchers and others will identify with me and welcome me to the fold as a skinny since I now identify that way.
And the way I see myself is the way I am, not how you see me.
And if you don't see me that way, you're the bigot.
I'm brave.
Greetings and welcome back.
Great to have you.
Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network.
Okay, folks, a lot to do here.
We got four more soundbites of Trump.
Now, before I alluded to something here, one hour ago when this program began, I just, I asked you to keep something in mind, and that was Ross Perot.
Ross Perot burst on the scene as a result of one speech at the National Press Club.
It was a luncheon speech, if I remember right.
It ended up going to be replayed because it just, I mean, it just, it went viral back in those days.
I mean, there was this 1992, so going viral was ceaseman.
Stop and think of that, Snerdley.
Going viral was ceaseman.
Anyway, it did.
And all Trump did was talk about the irresponsibility of the current leadership.
He didn't rip into parties.
He didn't cast himself as a member of party.
He just said, we're doing everything wrong.
We're wasting money.
There's all kinds of things we could be doing smarter.
And he made himself out like to be the guy in charge of it.
And he was dragged into the presidential race.
And I remember from the get-go warning people to be careful about this because I told, and Snerdley, you might remember this.
My broadcast partners, I did not get on the Trump or on the Perot bandwagon.
And I constantly warned people not to do it and to beware.
I said, I don't think he really wants to win this.
He'll get out of this if it looks like he's going to win.
He doesn't want to be president.
There's something else going on, personal animus of George Bush.
Something going on here.
But this is not who you, and I remember my broadcast partner, syndication partner, took me a side.
Look, they thought I was blowing the show.
I was catching hell from some people, but they made a great miscalculation.
This is one of the, in fact, this turned out to be one of the first solid learning experiences for me about you in this audience.
Because back then, it would be safe to say that a majority of people listening to me thought that I should be the one championing Perot.
That I not only should be championing, I ought to be running with him or I ought to be part of his organization.
I ought to be the lead cheerleaders.
And I was the one cautioning everybody, don't do it.
Don't fall for it.
I even had my own little Perot impersonation, which ticked people off.
Anyway, syndication partner Ed McLaughlin brought me in.
Very worried.
Are you sure you're doing the right thing here on Perot?
I said, what do you mean?
I mean, your audience, we're worried here.
You're losing the audience.
I mean, the audience thinks that you are Perot.
The audience thinks that Perot is who he is because of you.
You need to get out.
And I said, I'm sorry.
But I can't do it.
I don't feel it.
Don't believe it, and so forth.
And I did catch a lot of flack from the audience.
But the audience hung in.
They didn't abandon the program, Snerdley.
Well, of course they, of course they threatened to.
I remember like it was yesterday.
And oh, they were calling.
I'm never going to listen to you again.
I thought you were somebody real, but you've just proven you're nothing more than a member of the establishment.
Here's your chance to really get on board with somebody who could really change this country.
What are you doing?
You're poo-pooing.
I remember all of it.
Oh, and I started the parodies of Perot.
Oh, you know, referring to him as a hand grenade with a bad haircut.
They're coming to take me away.
Ha ha.
Oh, it got even worse.
And my syndication party, oh, they were so worried that I was blowing everything.
They thought that I was losing every member of the audience that we had built after four years.
But I hung tough, and I turned out to be right.
Perot got out of the race when it looked like he was going to win.
And that just gave everything over to Bill Clinton.
He stated he hung in there for some presidential debates.
Anyway, I just asked people to remember that when Trump gets going here today, because what if Trump goes third party?
He's got enough money.
He doesn't have to.
He doesn't need consultants.
In fact, there's not a political consultant alive today that will have told Trump to say anything he said today.
There's not a single political consultant working in politics that would have advised Trump to say what he said today or would stand by and watch it said.
There's no political consultant on earth in this country that would want to be associated with what Trump did today.
So he's not going to get his pick, but if he does, I mean, his money talks, he might hire some away.
You never know.
But my point is that he can always decide to go third party with his money if it doesn't work in the Republican Party.
And if he does that, and this is the idle speculation at this point, if he does that, well, you know what that's going to mean.
It means Hillary or whoever the Democrat nominee is.
And along those lines, we got a lot of people want to talk about this.
If you're on haul, just hang in there.
We're coming to you.
I promise you, I guarantee it.
This is from the Daily Caller.
Looked it up here during the break.
Between 1989 and 2010, Donald Trump gave $314,000 to Democrat groups and candidates, $290,000 to Republicans, 1989 to 2010.
Trump actually donates more to Democrats than Republicans.
Now, what he'll say is, well, hell, that's who runs New York.
That's where I live.
I got no choice.
But still, Trump donated more than $4,100 to Hillary in 2002, 2005, 2006, and 2007.
His son gave Hillary $6,100 in 2006 and 2007.
He gave the Clinton Foundation at least $100,000 according to the Clinton Foundation website.
Now, again, what he'll say is, of course, I mean, these are the people running the shows.
What's wrong with politics?
I had to do it.
That's what he said.
I had to do it.
I got no choice.
I'm a Republican.
I live in New York.
If I didn't do this, I'd be a target.
That's what's wrong with politics, and that's why I'm running.
You think I like giving money to Democrats?
I hate giving money to Democrats, but that's what our politics is.
I know how that's that's how he would handle this.
Yeah, that's how I keep my money in my pocket.
I give to the people who otherwise would take my money away from me.
You don't think I got rich by being stupid, do you?
He's got any number of ways of explaining.
Okay, back to the Trump soundbites here.
We pick it up here with number 37.
This is classic, folks.
Through stupidity, in a very, very hardcore prison, interestingly named Clinton, two vicious murderers, two vicious people escaped, and nobody knows where they are.
And a woman was on television this morning and she said, You know, Mr. Trump, and she was telling other people, and I actually called her, but she said, You know, Mr. Trump, I always was against guns.
I didn't want guns.
And now, since this happened, it's up in the prison area.
My husband and I are finally in agreement because he wanted the guns.
We now have a gun on every table.
We're ready to start shooting.
I said, very interesting.
So protect the Second Amendment.
We're ready to start shooting, Mr. Trump.
I lost it.
We're ready to start shooting.
I just envisioned the actual conversation.
Here's Trump on the phone.
He got this anti-Second Amendment babe on the other end.
And because the two prisoners escaped from the stupid prison, they now have a gun on every table.
We're ready to start shooting.
Interesting.
So support the Second Amendment.
We're ready to start shooting.
Yeah, let's just keep it rolling here, folks.
They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us.
They're bringing drugs.
They're bringing crime.
They're rapists.
And some, I assume, are good people.
But I speak to border guards and they tell us what we're getting.
And it only makes common sense.
It only makes common sense.
They're sending us not the right people.
It's coming from more than Mexico.
It's coming from all over South and Latin America.
And it's coming probably, probably from the Middle East.
But we don't know because we have no protection and we have no competence.
We don't know what's happening.
This is Trump at his presidential announcement speech describing the kind of people coming here from Mexico.
They're sending people who have lots of problems.
They're bringing these problems with us.
They're bringing drugs.
They're bringing crimes.
They're rapists.
And some, I assume, are good people.
Some, I assume.
Most of them are reprobates.
And because we got stupid leadership, we don't even know who they are.
And now here's how he would deal with it.
I would build a great wall, and nobody builds walls better than me, believe me.
And I'll build them very inexpensively.
I will build a great, great wall on our southern border, and I will have Mexico pay for that wall.
Mark my words.
Nobody would be tougher on ISIS than Donald Trump.
Nobody.
I will find within our military, I will find the General Patton, or I will find General MacArthur.
I will find the right guy.
I will find the guy that's going to take that military and make it really work.
Yeah, and this is going to resonate.
All of this, all of this, I'm telling you, is going to resonate with people.
And here's something else to watch.
The more the media hates this and makes fun of it and laughs, the more support Trump's going to get.
There was another, we don't have tape on this.
It wasn't worth rowing off on tape, but he was talking about beating China, beating Japan, and how we don't have any skilled negotiators.
We've got dumb people.
We've got incompetent people.
We've got losers in every branch of government conducting a nation's business, and they don't know what they're doing.
He says, I have the smartest people.
I'll get the smartest people.
We will never, ever again lose a negotiation with Chinese or with a Japanese.
We're going to beat everybody.
We'll do very well, my friends.
We'll do very well.
I promise you.
And the final bite, this is his description of returning home to America after international travel.
We have to rebuild our infrastructure, our bridges, our roadways, our airports.
You come into LaGuardia Airport, it's like we're in a third world country.
You look at the patches in the 40-year-old floor, they throw down asphalt and they throw, you look at these airports.
We are like a third world country.
And I come in from China and I come in from Qatar and I come in from different places and they have the most incredible airports in the world.
You come back to this country and you have LAX, disaster.
You have all of these disastrous airports.
And we'll take a break and get going with your phone calls when we get back.
Rush Limbaugh, the EIB network, executing assigned host duties flawlessly.
And here's Bob in Youngstown as we got started on the phones.
Great to have you, Bob.
Hi.
Mr. Limbaugh, you're 100% on the money with Ross Perot.
I remember that conversation.
I remember your criticism at the time, and you were 100% correct.
And I was on your team at that point where I felt exactly the same way, that this was really much ado about nothing where Perot was concerned.
But the difference between Perot and this other gentleman is 180 degrees the opposite.
This guy's ego is so big, and he has considered himself to be so right for so long that I genuinely think he wants this, and I genuinely think that he is truly the establishment's worst nightmare.
He doesn't need anybody else's money.
I was watching Fox News this morning when one of their commentators was interviewing some political know-it-all and he said, oh, well, you know, he's getting into the game too late.
The people that know how to run a campaign are all taken up, the good ones.
And I'm thinking to myself, he doesn't want any of those people.
He has his own people.
He doesn't want the establishment.
This is a guy that knows how to promote himself and how to promote a campaign.
And I think the guy's for real this time only because he's got such a damn big ego that he's going to prove himself right and he's going to be in your face.
You know, I think you're very right about something you mentioned when you're talking heads on TV today.
Nah, there's no chance.
I mean, all the professional people have been hired already.
I mean, he's getting in this thing too late.
What Trump loves busting is conventional wisdom formulation.
And the idea that he can't run because all the best consultants are taken up.
That's exactly the kind of thing he thinks is paralyzing politics.
Exactly that kind of thinking that you've got to get in this, there, you hire the right consultants.
The way he looks at it and what you just said, he doesn't need an advisor.
He knows what he thinks.
He doesn't need somebody to help him do this or that.
He knows how he wants to talk.
He knows how he wants to come off.
He's comfortable in his own skin and he's willing to put it out there.
In other words, he doesn't, I don't think he wants to hire anybody.
Is going to tell him how to phony it up.
Exactly right.
He's got more money than God.
And plus, he's got the best of the best working for him.
He's got a brain trust that would rival any university.
And he's got people that know how to get the job done.
These are goal-oriented people that work for him.
And believe me, his ego is so big that he wants to just stand up there and say, I told you so.
I've been telling you for years.
The difference is Perot was really kind of a wallflower prior to him running.
You're 100% correct about that.
And he really, you were right.
He didn't want that job.
And he found every excuse.
I remember his daughter's wedding was kind of the opening to him finding a way out of running for the presidency.
Just the exact opposite.
This guy wants it, and he wants to say, I told you so.
I've been telling you, and I'm going to show you I'm right.
Wait a minute.
You are convinced after this speech today that he wants it.
Let me ask you a question.
I want you to think about this.
A lot of the drive-bys are saying, nah, nah, this is not about really running for president.
This is just about name recognition, name ideas.
Get his name out there.
For what purpose?
If he's not really doing this to run for president, why does he want to get his name out?
What could he possibly want to accomplish?
Is he hurting somewhere?
Is business hurting?
Is his reality TV show on Verger cancellation?
What would be the reason that he would do this for publicity only?
I truly believe, and I just have to go back to my original statement.
He's got an ego bigger than the sun.
And he's been telling the American people in Washington for years, you really don't know what you're talking about.
You really have no idea how to run this country.
You're destroying the economy.
You're destroying the money.
And I've had enough.
I'm going to show you I'm right.
And I'm going to get in there and I'm going to kick butt and take names later.
And I really think that that's what this is all about.
And I'll tell you something.
The establishment are probably the most worried people in Washington.
He doesn't need any lobbyists.
He's got more money than they need.
Wait, wait, wait a minute.
Wait a minute.
One thing.
They're not worried yet.
They're not taking this seriously yet.
They're laughing about this right now.
Do not doubt me.
They're laughing about it.
I mean, you might have a couple of them who take a moment.
Okay, what does this mean for me, XYZ, so forth, so on, in terms of just another name thrown in the hat here.
But right now, they're all laughing.
And none of the quote-unquote professionals are going to give Trump anywhere near even half a chance because he's so outside the formula that everybody says is necessary.
And I also, folks, I want to remind you of something else that happened.
And I'm not accusing here our old buddy Bob, but Bob seemed to know quite a bit about what Trump's motivation was, didn't he?
I don't know if Bob's ever met Trump, but when you listen to Bob talk, he knew exactly why Trump was doing what he was.
I found this phenomenon during the Perot era.
I had caller after caller after caller telling me why Perot was doing it, what Perot was going to do after he won, everything.
And they didn't know him.
Now, what it meant was that Perot was resonating so well that these people just automatically assumed Perot was going to do what they wanted done.
Hey, we're back.
El Rushboard here at the EIB Network, the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
This is Stacey in Fort Collins, Colorado.
Great to have you with us.
Hi.
Hi, Rash.
It's nice to be here.
I have to start out by saying that I was waiting tables in Fort Collins at Cooper Smith's Problem Brewing the day that you gave your speech for Dance Bake Sale, and I thought what a crazy bunch of people you are.
And now, 20 years later, I am a Rush fan.
Is that right?
You were working in Fort Collins the day of Dan's Bake Sale.
That was 1990, some odd.
I was.
I was standing on the parking garage at the top of the parking garage, and I watched your entire speech.
Well, it wasn't much of a speech, as I remember.
It was very short, yeah.
But there were like 75,000 people there.
It was unbelievable.
I'd never seen anything like it before.
And you're standing up there and say, what a bunch of kooks?
These people are crazy.
Yeah, now I'm one of them.
And now you are.
And I'm talking to you.
It's surreal.
It's great to have you.
I'm calling.
Sorry.
It's great to have you here.
Thank you.
I'm calling on a topic I never thought I would be calling about, not politics, but religion.
I am a Catholic, and I'm in so much pain today at the possibility that my Pope is spreading Marxist error.
I'll refrain from judging him until I've read the encyclical, and I'll hopefully give him the benefit of the doubt, and maybe this is all taken out of context.
But it will not shock me if it is true.
I think there is, you know, a lot of people are using this as a way and a vehicle to discredit the church.
But I want to point out that there is precedence for this in the Catholic Church.
All the way back from its inception, Judas was an apostle who chose politics and power over God, and he ended up betraying our Lord with a kiss.
And if the Pope chooses Marxism over the mystical body of Christ, you know, this is indeed a betrayal on a scale that we haven't seen before.
And it also is a realization of what the Blessed Mother warned us against at Fatima, which was that communism would spread her heirs.
So I am.
I'm absolutely distraught that I have to come out and defend my church against this.
But I hope that people don't use this just to discredit.
And it's kind of like the Constitution.
You know, we have the bedrock principles of our Constitution, and people pervert and try to use that for their own benefit all the time.
So I see the church whose documents have not changed.
The teaching of the church is still the same.
But people are using her to push their own agendas.
Well, here's the troubling thing.
Politics, by its very nature, is subject to change.
There's nothing, very few articles of faith in real terms in politics.
You've got a plethora of different political views.
You have elections where people win and lose.
Various different theories are implemented and people get to experience the results of those theories.
And it's, in many cases, it's hardcore fact.
Religion, at its root, is faith-based.
And a church is the exact opposite of politics in the sense that politics is designed to bend and shape to the will of public opinion.
At least in a democracy or a representative republic, it is.
Politics is designed to take the temperature of the American public and react accordingly, i.e., in elections.
And there's all kinds of things that get encompassed in politics.
The culture is part of politics.
But religion is what it is.
The Catholic Church is what it is.
It's not supposed to bend in shape to accommodate the failings of the flock.
It is not supposed to bend in shape so the flock can get away with committing sin.
It's not supposed to redefine sin.
It's not supposed, the church is supposed to, this is why the left hates it.
Correct.
The Pope is not speaking ex cathedra.
He is not speaking infallibly.
He's giving out an encyclical, which is just his teaching.
So it goes out to all the bishops, and they can, you know, this isn't, you don't have to believe this to be Catholic.
The bedrock principles that you have to believe as a Catholic are the same.
So people can try and pervert them all they want to, but they don't change, like birth control and gay marriage.
So people can try and, you know, politicize them all they want.
But if you really look at the documents and the teachings of the Catholic Church, they are exactly the same as they were going back to Peter.
For the most part, yeah.
I mean, you've had Vatican I and Vatican II.
Which is highly, you know, this has been such a wound to the faith.
I'm a traditional Catholic.
I hate saying that word, but I go to the, you know, to the Tridentine Mass because I do see the modernism, you know, that has seeped into our church.
And it has caused a great deal of pain and suffering.
But, you know, the comfort that we have is that we do have these, you know, everything about the church is still there.
So if people want to, you know, love the church, they want to be Catholic.
The rules have ensure the rules.
But the teachings and guideposts of the church are the same.
They are exactly the same.
The articles are the same.
Despite how much people want to change them, they are the same.
And that's the point.
It is not supposed to bend and shape to popular opinion.
Absolutely.
And that's why it's valuable.
That's why terms like the rock are used.
But I know that the encyclical is not a religious article of faith, but the point is, and Catholics are not required to believe it.
It's not part of the actual teachings of the church.
But if this is true, if the Pope has come out and said that rich, it just sounds like another member nation of the U.N., the U.S. is guilty.
Western nations are rich and are polluting the world.
They're destroying the climate, and they've got a duty to stop and give more money to the poor and so forth.
If the left can get to a Pope and corrupt an encyclical, they're going to be inspired to keep going and try to corrupt the whole thing.
Correct.
But the church's official teaching on communism is that it was condemned.
So, like I said, this is absolutely one of the most painful phone calls that I've ever made to have to defend my church against something Marxist that our Pope has said is I can't even believe I'm living in a time like this.
Well, Marxism, in the sense I was making an economic analysis, obviously the Catholic Church has to stand against communism.
Communism doesn't believe in God.
Communists do not permit belief in God.
There's no such thing permitted or allowed.
The Catholic Church can never, ever become communist.
Correct.
But if the Pope is coming out and he's promoting an idea that says that we should annihilate all countries and have a world government, I mean, we are at a scary and spooky place.
And I think we have an obligation to speak out.
I understand how you're going to make a lot of people nervous because this is the kind of thing that the church has always been a safe haven from.
There are exceptions, of course.
But never forget, always remember, even the Washington Post story reporting on this encyclical alludes to the possibility that it's totally made up and is a leak designed to harm Il Papa.
And this has happened a lot.
The Pope is reported to have said something, whatever it is, that sounds way off the beaten path.
And people react to it.
And then later it is learned, the Vatican announces the Pope didn't say that.
It's taken out of context.
Here's what the Pope actually said.
This is the work of muckrakers trying to create problems.
The Pope never said it.
It's happened a lot, which is what has made me think they engage in the trial balloon aspect of politics.
Float something, see what the reaction is, and then decide later whether to legitimize it or say, no, no, no, no, that's a leak.
That's not true.
We'll just have to wait and see on this.
But this has been predicted, rumored, or what have you.
This encyclical, it still hasn't been released.
But even prior to today, there has been speculation that what it's reported to be today was exactly what it is and is coming.
Anyway, Stacey, so many years after Dan's bake sale at Fort Collins, great to know you're still there and part of us now.
We'll be right back.
High Point, North Carolina.
Scott wants to weigh in on the Trump announcement.
Greetings, sir.
Great to have you on the program.
Hi.
Hey, Rush.
Really, really awesome to talk to you.
I appreciate that, sir.
Thank you.
On the Trump announcement, I think personally, it was refreshing.
Not all the same rhetoric and consultant gobbledygook.
And, you know, it was pretty straight talk, a little bit all over the place sometimes, but I can certainly relate to his China talk, love, hate relationship with my situation.
But I think the smartest thing about the announcement was not really what he said, but what he did.
But what did he do?
He ended his announcement about five minutes before the Rush Limbaugh show.
Oh, yes, yes, yes.
That's exactly right.
Something that had escaped my mind.
You're exactly right.
He knew exactly when to wrap up.
I don't know when Bush exactly announced, but how much have you talked about Bush's announcement versus his?
Because he ended it at the right time.
Well, pretty much.
Bush announced after the program yesterday.
Right.
Which was a very considerate thing to do.
The Bushes are very polite people.
I acknowledge this.
And we're going to get to Jeb's announcement.
We get to all of them at some point.
I mean, there have been a bunch of them announced that we haven't talked about it.
Is it, what, 16 now or 20?
Well, I don't even know what the number is, but there's a lot of them in now.
Well, he definitely trumped the Bush announcement, I would say.
Yeah, I'd have to say that you're right.
So you didn't find him braggadocious.
That's not off-putting to you.
Like when Trump says, hey, I'm really rich, I'll show you here in a minute.
And I'm not ashamed to be.
It does me.
I'm sure it does to a lot of people.
But I mean, there are other people in the race that are kind of straight talk, not typical.
I mean, Carson is another one up there, not a political, you know, never held office, but, you know, speaks his mind and is very articulate as well.
You know, you remind me of something I heard before Trump made his announcement this morning.
I saw this on CNN.
Some info babe, I don't remember who, was lamenting Trump getting in the race as a clown.
And so the real problem with Trump getting in is he's going to make the Republican lower tier look good.
And she cited Ben Carson as an example and how unfortunate that is, that Ben Carson is going to end up looking presidential because Trump getting in is a clown.
And folks, let me tell you something.
This is exactly, It dovetails exactly with what I was talking about yesterday, and a point that I'm going to continue to try to make for as long as we've been doing this program.
Dr. Benjamin Carson is one of the finest, most accomplished human beings on this planet who has done more for people than most people in politics will ever do.
And he's done it personally, not with other people's money.
Dr. Ben Carson is a first-class human being and citizen.
He is exactly the kind of person that you could trust running any government institution.
You would trust him to babysit your kids.
He's just an admirable human being.
He has overcome great odds.
He's brilliant.
He's temperate.
There is everything in the world to recommend about the humanity of Dr. Benjamin Carson.
And here he is on CNN today, ripped, and said it's unfortunate that somebody like Ben Carson will be made to look serious when Trump gets in as the clown.
There is not a single person in the media today that could wear Dr. Benjamin Carson's uniform, whatever uniform he puts on it.
If it's a business suit, if it's surgical scrubs, there's not a single member of the media that could do anything close to what Ben Carson has done with his life.
But he gets, and he's not the only one, ripped to shreds, denigrated, destroyed.
And for what?
He holds to traditional values.
He believes in morality.
He is just a decent guy.
And he ends up a target for destruction.
And he's not the only one.
Same thing happened.
Romney, I mean, whatever you think of Romney and his politics.
As a human being, there's none better.
As a man of integrity, a man of character, there's none better.
These people get destroyed.
And nobody stands up to defend them.
Because then they get destroyed or attacked.
And it's exactly that's not, it's one of the many things that's just out of whack.
Compared to Hillary Clinton, you know, the other day, last hour, every government worker, every federal employee, every record about every federal employee has been hacked.
Does that include Hillary?
Has her private server been hacked?
We demand to know this.
We have every right to know whether her server's been had.
The Chikoms get her.
They got everybody else.
And why did the ChiComs want to hack every government?
It's not because they want their credit cards.
The TRICOMs don't need anybody's Amex account.
They want to be able to collect data on federal employees to either recruit them as spies or blackmail them or both.
And that would hold for Hillary Clinton if she becomes president.
You don't think the Clintons have things that they don't want people to know about?
Even the Clintons.
We think we know everything there is to know, but we don't.
Did Hillary's server get hacked?
Did the ChiComs know everything there is on that server that Hillary doesn't want anybody to know?
If they were able to hack every, get past every bit of security, supposedly protecting every federal employee.
Here's Mrs. Clinton's little server in Chappaqua or wherever the hell it was.
Maybe that's the reason why she's not releasing 30 some odd thousand emails.
These are serious questions.
But you compare Dr. Carson to the Clintons?
I mean, it's not even in talking character, accomplishment, intelligence, credibility, believability, every characteristic that matters, virtue, it's no contest.
The Clintons can't even get on the same stage.
And yet they're placed there by a fawning accomplice media that's doing the job of running around and destroying literally great, good, fine people.
And I think it's just, it's, it's unfortunate how easy it appears to be.
It's unfortunate how complete character assassination could end up being for somebody who just, why would you even want to destroy somebody like Ben Carson?
Why?
All he's done is save the lives of children.
I thought that's what mattered to people on the left and Democrats.
All he's done, and so much pro bono, brain surgery on young children, that was his specialty.
They even made a movie about him, a movie about his life.
It was so extraordinary.
It was so exemplary.
It was so inspiring.
Now you've got some no accomplishment twit on CNN claiming that the worst thing about Trump getting in is going to make Ben Carson look legitimate.
That's what's wrong.
No, no, I haven't forgotten.
It's just we're going to get to Rachel Dolezall.
I mean, you know everything there is to know there, but you've got to hear some of these soundbites.
That's the big deal.
Some of the media people commenting on that.
That's the fun of it.
So we'll get to all of that and still lots of other stuff, too.
We don't have enough time to get it all in, but we'll do everything we can.
▲
Export Selection