Rush Limbaugh Program - June 16, 2015, Tuesday, Hour #2

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 16, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program

37:30

June 16, 2015, Tuesday, Hour #2

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Okay, so I officially today announced that I identify as skinny.
	From this day going forward, I am skinny.
	Now, in the old days, people's reaction to that would be to call me delusional and maybe think I needed some help.
	Today I'm brave.
	It's a courageous act to identify as skinny when one is not.
	And I I'm sure I will get accolades all across Twitter and accolades all across Facebook and accolades all across the drive-by media for positive thinking.
	Now that I identify as skinny, and I'm I'm fully expecting that Weight Watchers and others will identify with me and welcome me to the fold as a skinny.
	Since I now identify that way.
	And what it's the way I see myself is the way I am, not how you see me.
	And if you don't see me that way, you're the bigot.
	I'm brave.
	Greetings and welcome back.
	Great to have you, Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network.
	Okay, uh, folks, a lot to do here.
	We got four more sound bites of Trump.
	Now, before I I alluded to something here.
	One hour ago when this program began.
	I just I asked you to keep something in mind, and that was Ross Perot.
	Ross Perot burst on the scene as a result of one speech at the National Press Club.
	It was a luncheon speech, if I remember right.
	It ended giving replayed uh because it it just I mean, it just it went viral back in those days.
	I mean, there was this 1992, so going viral was C-Span.
	Stop and thinking that, snurdly, going viral with C-Span.
	Anyway, it did.
	And all Trump did was talk about the irresponsibility of the current leadership.
	He didn't he didn't rip into parties, he didn't cast himself as a member of party, he just said we're doing everything wrong.
	We're wasting money.
	There's all kinds of things we could be doing smarter, and he made himself out like to be the guy in charge of it.
	And he was dragged into the presidential race.
	And I remember from the get-go warning people to be careful about this, because I told and uh Snerdley, you you might remember this.
	My broadcast partners, I would I did not get on the Trump or on the uh on the Perot bandwagon.
	And I constantly warn people not to do it, and to beware.
	I said, I don't think he really wants to win this.
	He'll get out of this if it looks like he's gonna win.
	He doesn't want to, he doesn't want to be president.
	There's something else going on, personal animus of George Bush, something going on here.
	But this is not who you and I remember my broadcast partner, syndication partner took me aside.
	Look, they thought I was blowing the show.
	They I was catching hell from some people, but they they made a great miscalculation.
	This is this is this is one of the in fact this turned out to be one of the first uh solid learning experiences for me about you in this audience.
	Because back then, it would be safe to say that a majority of people listening to me thought that I should be the one championing Perot.
	That I not only should be championing, I ought to be running with him, or I'd be part of his organization.
	I ought to be the lead cheerleaders, and I was the one cautioning everybody, don't do it, don't fall for it.
	Uh even had my own little perot impersonation, which ticked people off.
	Anyway, syndication partner Ed McLaughlin brought me in.
	Very worried.
	Are you sure you're doing the right thing here on Perot?
	I said, what do you mean?
	Well, I mean, your audience, uh, I'm we're worried here, you're losing the audience.
	I mean, the audience thinks that you are Perot.
	The audience thinks that Perot is who he is because of you.
	You need to get out.
	I said, I'm sorry.
	But I can't do I don't feel it, don't believe it, and so forth.
	Uh and I did catch a lot of flack from the audience.
	But the audience hung in.
	They didn't abandon the program, Snerdley.
	Well, of course they of course they threatened to, of course.
	I remember like it was yesterday.
	And oh, they were calling you.
	I'm never gonna listen to you again.
	I thought you were somebody real, but you've just proven you're nothing more than a member of the establishment.
	Here's your chance to really get on board with somebody who could really change this country.
	What are you doing?
	You're poo-pooing.
	I remember all of it.
	Oh, and I started the parodies of Perot.
	Oh, you know, referring to him as uh hand grenade with a bad haircut.
	They're coming to take me away, haha.
	Oh, it got even worse.
	And my syndication partner, oh, they were so worried that I was blowing everything.
	They thought that I was losing every member of the audience that we had built after four years.
	But I hung tough, and I turned out to be right.
	Perot got out of the race when it looked like he was going to win.
	And that just gave everything over to Bill Clinton.
	He stated he hung in there for some presidential debates.
	Anyway, I just asked people to remember that when Trump gets going here today.
	Uh because what if Trump goes third party?
	He's got enough money.
	He doesn't have to.
	He doesn't need consultants.
	In fact, there's not a political consultant alive today that'll have told Trump to say anything he said today.
	There's not a single political consultant working in politics that would have advised Trump to say what he said today, or would stand by and watch it, said.
	There's no political consultant on earth in this country that would want to be associated with what Trump did today.
	So he's not going to get his pick.
	But if he does, I mean his money talks, he might hire some away.
	You never know.
	But he my point is that he can always decide to go third party with his money if it doesn't work in the Republican Party.
	And if he does that, and I this is the idle speculation at this point.
	If he does that, well, you know what that's gonna mean.
	It means Hillary.
	Or whoever the Democrat nominee is.
	And along those lines, we got a lot of people want to talk about this.
	If you're on hold, just hang in there.
	We're coming to you.
	I promise you, I guarantee it.
	This is from the Daily Caller.
	Looked it up here during the break.
	Between 1989 and 2010, Donald Trump gave $314,000 to Democrat groups and candidates, 290,000 to Republicans, 1989 to 2010.
	Trump actually donates more to Democrats and Republicans.
	Now, what he'll say is, well, hell, that's who runs New York, that's where I live.
	I got no choice.
	But still.
	Trump donated more than 4100 to Hillary in 2002, 2005, 2006, and 2007.
	His son gave Hillary $6100 in 2006 and 2007.
	He gave the Clinton Foundation at least a hundred thousand dollars, according to the Clinton Foundation website.
	Now, again, what he'll say is, of course, I mean, these are the people running the shorts.
	What's wrong with politics?
	I had to do it.
	That's what he I had to do it.
	I got no choice.
	I'm a Republican, I live in New York.
	If I didn't do this, I'd be a target.
	That's what's wrong with politics, and that's why I'm running.
	You think I like giving money to Democrats?
	I hate giving money to Democrats, but that's what our politics is.
	I know how that's that's how he would handle this.
	Uh yeah, that's how I keep my money in my pocket.
	I give to the people who otherwise would take my money away from me.
	You don't think I got rich by being stupid, do you?
	He's got any number of ways of explaining.
	Okay, back to the Trump sound bites here.
	Uh we pick it up here with number 37.
	This is classic, folks.
	Through stupidity in a very, very hardcore prison, interestingly named Clinton, two vicious murders, two vicious people escaped.
	And nobody knows where they are.
	And a woman was on television this morning.
	And she said, you know, Mr. Trump, and she was telling Other people, and I actually called her.
	But she said, you know, Mr. Trump, I always was against guns.
	I didn't want guns.
	And now, since this happened, it's up in the prison area.
	My husband and I are finally in agreement because he wanted the guns.
	We now have a gun on every table.
	We're ready to start shooting.
	I said, very interesting.
	So protect the second amendment.
	We're ready to start shooting, Mr. Trump.
	I lost it.
	We're ready to start shooting.
	I just envisioned the actual conversation.
	Here's Trump on the phone and get this anti-Second Amendment babe on the other end.
	And because the two prisoners escape from the stupid prison, they now have a gun on every time.
	We're ready to start shooting.
	Interesting.
	Very so support this.
	We're ready to start shooting.
	Yeah, let's just keep it rolling here, folks.
	They're sending people that have lots of problems.
	And they're bringing those problems with us.
	They're bringing drugs, they're bringing crime, they're rapists, and some I assume are good people.
	But I speak to border guards, and they tell us what we're getting.
	And it only makes common sense.
	It only makes common sense.
	They're sending us not the right people.
	It's coming from more than Mexico.
	It's coming from all over South and Latin America, and it's coming probably, probably from the Middle East.
	But we don't know, because we have no protection and we have no competence.
	We don't know what's happening.
	This is Trump at his presidential announcement speech describing the kind of people coming here from Mexico.
	They're sending people who have lots of problems.
	They're bringing these problems with us.
	They're bringing drugs, they're bringing crimes, they're rapists.
	And some I assume are good people.
	I assume.
	And because we got stupid leadership, we don't even know who they are.
	And now here's how he would deal with it.
	I would build a great wall, and nobody builds walls better than me, believe me.
	And I'll build them very inexpensively.
	I will build a great, great wall on our southern border, and I will have Mexico pay for that wall.
	Mark my words.
	Nobody would be tougher on ISIS than Donald Trump.
	Nobody.
	I will find the General Patton, or I will find General MacArthur.
	I will find the right guy.
	I will find the guy that's going to take that military and make it really work.
	Yeah, and this is going to resonate.
	All of this, all of this, I'm telling you, is going to resonate with people.
	And it's I tell you here's something else to watch.
	The more the media hates this and makes fun of it and laughs, the more support Trump's going to get.
	There was another, we don't have tape on this, it wasn't worth rolling off on tape, but he He was talking about beating China, you know, beating Japan, and how we don't have any skilled negotiators.
	We got dumb people, we've got incompetent people, we've got losers.
	Uh in every branch of government conducting a nation's business, and they don't know what they're doing.
	He says, I have the smartest people.
	I get the smartest people.
	We will never ever again lose a negotiation with Chinese or with the Japanese.
	We're going to beat everybody.
	We'll do very well, my friends.
	We'll do very well.
	I promise you.
	And the final bite, this is his description of returning home to America after international travel.
	We have to rebuild our infrastructure, our bridges, our roadways, our airports.
	You come into LaGuardia Airport, it's like we're in a third world country.
	You look at the patches in the 40-year-old floor, they throw down asphalt and they throw.
	You look at these airports.
	We are like a third world country.
	And I come in from China and I come in from Qatar and I come in from different places, and they have the most incredible airports in the world.
	You come back to this country, and you have LAX disaster.
	You have all of these disastrous airports.
	And we'll take a break and get going with your phone calls when we get back, said Rush Limbaugh, the EIB network executing a signed host duties flawlessly.
	And here's Bob in Youngstown as we got started on the phones.
	Great to have you, Bob High.
	Mr. Limbaugh, you're 100% on the money with Ross Perot.
	I remember that conversation.
	I remember your criticism at the time, and you were 100% correct.
	And I was on your team at that point where I felt exactly the same way that this was really much ado about nothing where Perot was concerned.
	But the difference between Perot and this other gentleman is 180 degrees the opposite.
	This guy's ego is so big, and he has considered himself to be so right for so long that I genuinely think he wants this, and I genuinely think that he is truly the establishment's worst nightmare.
	He doesn't need anybody else's money.
	I were was watching Fox News this morning when uh one of their commentators was interviewing some political know it all, and he said, Oh, well, you know, he's getting into the game too late.
	Uh the people that know how to run a campaign are all taken up, the good ones, and I'm thinking to myself, he doesn't want any of those people.
	He has his own people.
	He doesn't want the establishment.
	This is a guy that knows how to promote himself and how to promote a campaign, and I think the guy's for real this time, only because he's got such a damn big ego that he's gonna prove himself right and he's gonna be in your face.
	You know, you you you're I think you're very right about something you mentioned when you talking heads on TV today.
	There's no chance.
	I mean, all the professional people are been hired already.
	I mean, he's getting in this thing too late.
	What Trump loves busting is conventional wisdom formulation.
	And the idea that he can't run because all the best consultants are taken up that's that's exactly the kind of thing he thinks is paralyzing politics.
	Exactly the kind of that that kind of thinking that you've got to get in this there, you let hire the right consultants.
	The way he looks at it and what you just said, he doesn't need an advisor.
	He knows what he thinks.
	He doesn't need somebody to help him do this or that.
	He knows how he wants to talk, he knows how he wants to come off, he's comfortable in his own skin, and he's willing to put it out there.
	In other words, he doesn't I don't think he wants to hire anybody that's gonna tell him how to phony it up.
	Uh exactly right.
	He's got more money than God.
	And plus he's got the best of the best working for him.
	He's got a brain trust that would rival any university.
	And he's got people that know how to get the job done.
	These are goal-oriented people that work for him.
	And believe me, his ego is so big that he wants to just stand up there and say, I told you so.
	I've been telling you for years.
	The difference is Perot was really kind of a wallflower prior to him running.
	You're a hundred percent correct about that.
	And he really you were right.
	He didn't want that job.
	And he found every excuse I remember is his water his daughter's wedding was the was the was the kind of the the opening to him finding a way out of of running as uh for the presidency.
	Oh, yeah.
	The exact opposite.
	This guy wants it, and he wants to say, I told you so, I've been telling you, and I'm gonna show you I'm right.
	Wait a minute.
	A you negotiations go?
	You are convinced after this speech today that he wants it.
	Let me ask you a question.
	Yeah, sure.
	And what do you think about this?
	A lot of the drive-bys are say, nah, nah, this is not about really running for president.
	This is just about name recognition, name ideas, get his name out there.
	For what purpose?
	If he's not really doing this to run for president, why does he want to get his name out there?
	What could he possibly want to accomplish?
	What is he s is he is he hurting somewhere?
	Is it business hurting?
	Is it reality TV show on uh verge of cancellation?
	What would be the reason that he would do this for publicity only?
	I truly believe, and I I just have to to go back to my original statement.
	He's got an ego bigger than the sun, and he's gonna he's been telling the American people and Washington for years.
	You really don't know what you're talking about.
	You really have no idea how to run this country, you're destroying the economy, you're destroying the money, and I've had enough.
	I'm gonna show you I'm right, and I'm gonna get in there and I'm gonna kick butt and take names later.
	And I really think that that's what this is all about.
	Now and I'll tell you something.
	The establishment are probably the most worried people in Washington.
	The big money.
	He doesn't use any lobbyists.
	He's got more money than they do.
	Wait, wait a minute, wait a minute.
	One thing.
	They're not worried yet.
	They're not taking this seriously yet.
	They're laughing about this right now.
	Do not doubt me.
	They're laughing about it.
	I mean, you might have a couple of them who'll take a moment.
	Okay, what does this mean for me, XYZ, so forth, so on in terms of just another name thrown in the hat here.
	But right now they're all laughing.
	And none of the quote unquote professionals are going to give Trump anywhere near even half a chance because he's so outside the formula that everybody says is necessary.
	And I also, folks, I w I want to remind you of something else that happened.
	During I'm not accusing here our old buddy Bob, but Bob seemed to know quite a bit about what Trump's motivation was, didn't he?
	I don't know if Bob's ever met Trump, but when you listen to Bob talk, he knew exactly why Trump was doing I found this phenomenon during the Perot era.
	I had caller after caller after caller telling me why Perot was doing it, what Perot was going to do after he won.
	Everything, and they didn't know him.
	Now what it meant was that Perot was resonating so well that these people just automatically assumed Perot was going to do what they wanted done.
	Hey, we're back.
	El Rushmore here.
	The EIB Network, the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
	This is Stacey in Fort Collins, Colorado.
	Great to have you with us.
	Hi.
	Hi, Rash, it's nice to be here.
	I have to start out by saying that I was waiting tables in Fort Collins at uh Cooper Smith's Probe and Brewing the day that you gave your speech for dance bake sale, and I thought what a crazy bunch of people you are, and now twenty years later I am a Rush fan.
	Is that right?
	You were working in Fort Collins the day of Dan's big.
	That was nineteen ninety some odd.
	I mean, I was.
	I was standing on the parking garage at the top of the parking garage, and I watched your entire speech.
	Well, it wasn't much of a speech as I read.
	It was very short, yeah.
	But but there were like seventy-five thousand people there.
	It was unbelievable.
	I'd never seen anything like it before.
	And you're standing up there saying, What a bunch of kooks.
	These people are crazy.
	Yeah, now I'm one of them.
	And now you are.
	And I'm talking to you.
	It's I it's surreal.
	It's great to great to have you here.
	Sorry.
	It's great to have you here.
	Thank you.
	I'm calling on a topic I never thought I would be calling about, not politics, but religion.
	Um I am a Catholic, and I'm in so much pain today at the possibility that my Pope is spreading Marxist error.
	I I'll refrain from judging him until I've read the encyclical, and I'll hopefully give him the benefit of the doubt, and maybe this is all taken out of context.
	But it will not shock me if it is true.
	Um I think there is, you know, for a lot of people are using this as a as a way and a um a vehicle to discredit the church.
	But I want to point out that there is precedence for this in the Catholic Church.
	All the way back from its inception, Judith was an apostle who chose politics and power over God, and he ended up betraying our logo with a kiss.
	And if the Pope chooses Marxism over the mystical body of Christ, um, you know, this is indeed a betrayal on a scale that we haven't seen before.
	Um, and it also is a realization of what the Blessed Mother warned us against at Fatima, which was that communism would spread her airs.
	Um, so I am.
	I'm I'm absolutely distraught that I have to come out and defend my church against this, but I hope that people don't use this just to discredit.
	And it's kind of like the Constitution, you know, we have the bedrock principles of our constitution.
	Um, and people pervert and try to use that for their own benefit all the time.
	So I see the church whose documents have not changed.
	The teaching of the church is still the same.
	Um, but people are using her to push their own agendas.
	Well, here's the troubling thing.
	Politics, by its very nature, is subject to change.
	There's nothing, very few articles of faith in real terms in politics.
	You've got a plethora of different political views.
	You have elections where people win and lose.
	Various different theories are implemented and people get to experience the results of those theories.
	And it's, in many cases, it's hard call fact.
	Religion, at its root, is faith-based.
	And a church is the exact opposite of politics in the sense that politics is designed to bend and shape to the will of public opinion.
	At least in a democracy or a representative republic, it is.
	Politics is designed to take the temperature of the American public and react accordingly, i.e., in elections.
	And there's all kinds of things that get encompassed in politics.
	The culture is part of politics.
	But religion is what it is.
	The Catholic Church is.
	what it is it's not supposed to bend in shape to accommodate the failings of the flock it is not supposed to bend in shape so the flock can get away with committing sin it's not supposed to redefine sin.
	It's not supposed the the church is supposed to this is why the left hates it correct but religions the Pope is not speaking ex cathedra he is not speaking um infallibly.
	He is he's giving out an encyclical which is just his teaching.
	So it goes out to all the bishops and he and they can you know this isn't you don't have to believe this to be Catholic.
	The the bedrock principles that you have to believe as a Catholic are the same.
	So people can try and pervert them all they want to but they don't change like birth control and gay marriage.
	So people can try and you know politicize them all they want but if you if you really look at the documents and the teachings of the Catholic Church, they are exactly the same as they were going back to Peter.
	For the most part yeah I mean you've had Vatican one and Vatican II this and which is it is highly you know this this has been such um a wound to the faith I'm a traditional Catholic I hate saying that word but I I go to the you know to the Tridentine Mass um because I do see the modernism you know that is seeped into our church and it's and it has caused a great deal of pain and suffering.
	But you know the comfort that we have is that we do have these you know everything about the church is still there.
	So if people want to you know love the church they want to be Catholic though rules haven't the rules but the the teachings and and guideposts of the church are the same.
	They are exactly the same.
	The articles despite how much people want to change them they are the same.
	And that's the point.
	It is not supposed to bend in shape to popular opinion.
	Absolutely that's that's why terms like the rock are are used.
	But I know that the encyclical is not uh a a religious article of faith but the point is yeah and and Catholics are not required to believe it.
	It's not it's not part of the actual teachings of the church.
	But what it represents if this is true if the Pope has come out and said that rich he just sounds like another member nation of the UN the U.S. is guilty Western nations are rich and they're polluting the world they're destroying the climate and they've got a duty to stop and give more money to the poor and so forth.
	If the if the left can get to a Pope and corrupt an encyclical they're going to be inspired to keep going and try to corrupt the whole thing.
	Correct but the church's official teaching on communism is that it was condemned.
	So um like I said this is absolutely one of the most painful phone calls that I've ever made to have to defend you know my church against something Marxist that our Pope has said is uh I I I can't even believe I'm living in in a time like this.
	Um Marxism in the sense I was making an economic analysis uh obviously the the Catholic church has to stand against community communism communism doesn't believe in God.
	Communists do not permit belief in God.
	There's no such thing permitted or allow the Catholic church can never ever become communist correct you know but the if the Pope is coming out and he's promoting an idea that says that you know we should you know annihilate all countries and have a world government.
	I mean we are at a a scary and spooky place um and I you know I think it is have an obligation to speak out of the I understand how you it's gonna make a Lot of people uh nervous because this is the kind of thing that the church has always been a safe haven from there are exceptions, of course.
	But uh never forget, always remember, even the Washington Post story reporting on this encyclical alludes to the possibility that it's totally made up and is a leak designed to harm Ill Papa.
	And this has happened a lot.
	The Pope is reported to have said something, whatever it is, that sounds way off the beaten path, and people react to it, and then later it is learned the Vatican announces the Pope didn't say that.
	It's taken out of context.
	Here's what the Pope actually said.
	This is a this is the work of muck rakers trying to create problems.
	The Pope never said it.
	It's happened a lot, which is what has made me think they tr they they engage in the trial balloon uh aspect of politics.
	Float something, see what the reaction is, and then decide later whether to legitimize it or say, no, no, no, no, that's a leak, that's not true.
	We'll just have to wait and see on this.
	But this has been this has been predicted, rumored or what have you.
	This encyclical, it still hasn't been released, but even prior to today, there has been speculation that that uh what it's reported to be today was exactly what it is, and uh is is coming.
	Anyway, Stacy, uh so many years after Dan's bake sale at Fort Collins, great to know you're still there and part of us now.
	We'll be right back.
	High Point, North Carolina, Scott wants to weigh in on the Trump announcement.
	Greetings, sir.
	Great to have you on the program.
	Hi.
	Hey, Rush.
	Really, really awesome to talk to you.
	I appreciate that, sir.
	Thank you.
	Um, the Trump uh announcement, I think personally it was refreshing, not all the same rhetoric and consultant gobbledygook.
	And you know, it was pretty straight talk, a little bit all over the place sometimes, but um I can certainly relate to his China talk love hate relationship with my situation, but um I think the smartest thing about the announcements was not really what he said, but what he did.
	Well, what did he do?
	He ended his announcement about five minutes before the Rush Limbaugh show.
	Oh, yes, yes, yes, you that's exactly right, something that had escaped my mind.
	You're exactly right.
	He knew exactly when to wrap up.
	I don't know when Bush exactly announced, but how much have you talked about Bush's announcement versus his because he ended it at the right time?
	Well, pretty much Bush announced after the program yesterday.
	Right.
	Which was a very considerate thing to do.
	The Bushes are very polite people.
	I acknowledge this.
	Um and we're we're gonna get we're gonna get to Jeb's announcement, and we get to all of them at some point.
	I mean, there have been a bunch of them announced that we haven't talked about.
	I don't even know what the number is, but there's a lot of them in now.
	Well, he he definitely trumped the Bush announcement, I would say.
	Yeah, I'd have to say that uh you're right.
	So you don't you didn't you didn't find him braggadocious that that's not off-putting to you, like when Trump says, hey, I'm really rich, I'll show you here in a minute.
	And I'm not ashamed to be a rich.
	I'm sure it does to a lot of people, but I mean, there are other people in the race that I that are kind of straight talk, not typical.
	I mean, Carson is another one up there, not a political, you know, never held office, but you know, speaks his mind and is very articulate as well.
	You know, you remind me of something I heard before Trump made his announcement this morning.
	I saw this on CNN.
	Some info babe, I don't remember who, was lamenting.
	Trump getting in the race is a clown.
	And so the real problem with Trump getting in is he's going to make the Republican lower tier look.
	And she cited Ben Carson as an example, and how unfortunate that is that Ben Carson is going to end up looking presidential because Trump getting in is a clown.
	And folks, that let me tell you something.
	This is exactly it dovetails exactly with what I was talking about yesterday, and a point that I'm going to continue to try to make for as long as I've been doing this program.
	Dr. Benjamin Carson is one of the finest, most accomplished human beings on this planet who has done more for people than most people in politics will ever do.
	And he's done it personally, not with other people's money.
	Dr. Ben Carson is a first class human being and citizen.
	He is exactly the kind of person that you could trust running any government institution.
	You would trust him to babysit your kids.
	He's just an admirable human being.
	He has overcome great odds.
	He's brilliant.
	He's temperate.
	There is everything in the world to recommend about the humanity of Dr. Benjamin Carson.
	And here he is on CNN today, ripped, and said it's unfortunate that somebody like Ben Carson will be made to look serious when Trump gets in as the clown.
	There is not a single person in the media today that could wear Dr. Benjamin Carson's uniform.
	Whatever uniform he puts on.
	If it's a business suit, if it's surgical scrubs, there's not a single member of the media that could do anything close to what Ben Carson has done with his life.
	But he gets and he's not the only one ripped to shreds, denigrated, destroyed.
	And for what?
	He holds to traditional values.
	He believes in morality.
	He is just a decent guy.
	And he ends up a target for destruction.
	And he's not the only one.
	Same thing happened.
	Romney, I mean, whatever you think of Romney and politics.
	As a human being, there's none better.
	As a man of integrity, a man of character, there's none better.
	These people get destroyed.
	And nobody stands up to defend them.
	Because then they get destroyed or attacked.
	And it's exactly that's not.
	It's one of the many things that's just out of whack.
	Compared to Hillary Clinton.
	You know, I was the other day, last hour.
	Every government worker, every federal employee, every record about every federal federal employees been hacked.
	Does that include Hillary?
	Has her private server been hacked?
	We demand to know this.
	We have every right to know whether her servers been hacked.
	The ChICOMs get her.
	They got everybody else.
	And why did the ChICOMs want to hack every governor?
	It's not because they want their credit cards.
	The ChICOMs don't need anybody's Amex account.
	They want to be able to collect data on federal employees to either recruit them as spies or blackmail them or both.
	And that would hold for Hillary Clinton if she becomes president.
	You don't think the Clintons have things that they don't want people to know about, even the Clintons.
	We think we know everything there is to know, but we don't.
	Did Hillary's did Hillary's server get hacked?
	Did GICON's know everything there is on that server that Hillary doesn't want anybody to know?
	If they were able to hack every get past every bit of security, supposedly protecting every federal employee.
	Here's Mrs. Clinton's little server in Chappaqua or wherever the hell it was.
	Maybe that's the reason why she's not releasing 30 some odds,000 emails.
	These are serious questions.
	But you compare Dr. Carson to the Clintons.
	I mean, it's not even talking character, accomplishment, intelligence, credibility, believability, every characteristic that matters.
	Virtue, it's no contest.
	The Clintons can't even get on the same stage.
	And yet they're placed there By a fawning accomplice media that's doing the job of running around and destroying literally great, good, fine people.
	And I think it's just it's it's unfortunate how easy it appears to be.
	It's unfortunate how complete character assassination can end up being for somebody who just why would you even want to destroy somebody like Ben Carson?
	Why?
	All he's done is save the lives of children.
	I thought that's what mattered to people on the left and Democrats.
	All he's done, and so much pro bono brain surgery on young children, that was his specialty.
	Even made a movie about him, a movie about his life.
	It was so extraordinary.
	It was so exemplary.
	It was so inspiring.
	I have got some no-accomplishment twit on CNN claiming that the worst thing about Trump getting in is going to make Ben Carson look legitimate.
	That's what's wrong.
	No, no, I haven't forgotten.
	It's just we're gonna get to Rachel Dolazal.
	I mean, you know everything there is to know there, but you gotta hear some of these sound bites.
	That's a big deal.
	Some of the media people commenting, and that's the fun of it.
	So we'll get to all of that, and still lots of other stuff, too.
	We don't have enough time to get it all in, but we'll do everything we can.

▲