All Episodes
Previous Next
June 15, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:44
June 15, 2015, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day, Rush Limbaugh and the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
And the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies telephone number if you want to be on the programs 800 282-2882 and the email address L Rushbow at EIB net.com.
George Orwell captured the whole notion of this mass delusion and propaganda.
The twisted logic of the politics of collective delusion.
And he put it this way, well, I'm paraphrasing, but his point was that if you believe something that differs from the social consensus, and and look at the social issues that are harping out there.
They're all rooted in this apparent crisis of inequality.
Somehow, the masses that we're talking about here, the propagandized, have been convinced that America is the land of inequality, the land of unfairness.
And so however it's happened, however the propaganda's happened, we all know how, I mean, it's various arms of media and education.
This Rachel Dolazal woman.
There's no doubt in my mind that this woman was at one time she may have been perfectly fine and well adjusted.
Somebody got hold of her, and becoming a victim looked attractive to her, or she became jealous of people who are victims, or she wanted to show how much she cares and sympathizes with other victims, so she wanted to become one.
But I guarantee you, the corruption of her mind occurred somewhere in this country in the educational system and maybe the media somewhere else.
I mean, she didn't she did not come out of the womb that screwed up.
That that had to be manipulated.
But this quest for equality trumping everything is a classic example.
You have you have this social consensus, no matter how illogical that consensus is.
If you happen to be the one to speak out against it, you or well pointed out, you are the one thought to be insane.
How about the consensus of scientists who all agree that global warming is man-made?
And what are the people who don't adopt and support and abide by the consensus?
Well, they're deniers or kooks or weirdo.
You know, Obama, you know the way he involves himself in this?
Obama uses rhetoric to destroy people.
He has these fake snowmen.
He'll use a technique along the lines of uh he'll make up a group of people who think something, but you don't know who the group is, and you don't know what they're you've never heard that he just tells you they exist.
This band of malcontents, whatever, conservatives usually.
And then he proceeds to rip them a new one, even though they don't exist.
They're straw men.
He has he has another technique, and this one's even better.
Have you ever heard Obama say, like this Supreme Court case coming up on Obamacare, have you heard him say he hopes the justices play it straight?
That's not an innocent statement.
That's that's not an innocent haphazard innocuous statement.
That is an accusation, a challenge, and a threat.
Because what it does, it establishes that the way Obama thinks about it is what's right, the way Obama's opinion of it is what's correct, and if you do not agree with Obama, you're somehow not playing it straight.
You're cheating, you're faking, but what your opposing view is not legitimate.
You take an opinion different from Obama's, and it's automatically illegitimate.
That's what I hope they play it straight means.
It's an attempt to impugn and insult and challenge the honesty and character and credibility of people who disagree with him.
It's a studied technique, it's a practice technique, and he uses it all the time, uses it constantly.
And it is a way that he's attempting to shame, in this case, justices on the court before they've reached their decision, and it's a way for him to delegitimize their decision if it goes against him.
Well, they obviously didn't play straight, obviously, found the crooked ways to get where they were going to go, and uh, so we'll deal with it.
And he sets it up as though he was right all along and still is right, but a bunch of corrupt creeps sabotaged him.
This is a famous technique used by a lot of community organizers and leftists because remember, they're all about conformity propaganda, they're not about reality and free speech.
Those are their enemies, reality free speech are their enemies.
The one person who doesn't go along with the consensus is the weirdo, is the kook is the insane one.
So if the consensus believes something that's absolutely insane and untrue, those who come along and point that out, they become the dangerous freaks who need to be dealt with.
Tim Hunt.
This is a story from the UK Guardian.
As jokes go, Sir Tim Hunt's brief stand-up routine about women in science last week has to rank as one of the worst acts of academic self-harm in history.
As he reveals to the observer, reaction to his remarks about the alleged tendencies of female researchers has virtually finished him off.
He's a 72-year-old Nobel laureate, his career has been destroyed for making an observation.
Here is what he says.
He's been fired from his job, so was his wife.
Here's what he said.
Sir Tim reportedly described himself as a chauvinist pig at the World Conference of Science Journalists in Seoul, South Korea.
He argued in favor of single sex laboratories.
He said, Let me tell you about my trouble with girls.
Three things happen when they're in the lab.
You fall in love with them, or they fall in love with you, and when you criticize them, they cry.
That is it.
That is what he said.
And for saying that, he and his wife are now literally ruined.
Their career's over trying to have a little levity about a point that he believed.
Now he acknowledges, see, then this is classic too.
He acknowledges that what he said was wrong.
Why was it wrong?
He was telling him a freaking little joke here.
Yeah, I know, I know.
It was when you criticize them they cry and so forth.
But he's 72.
He comes from a different generation.
And even after admitting that he was wrong, which is the usual step someone takes, the price he and his wife have had to pay for his mistakes has been extreme and unfair.
He says, I've been hung out to dry.
His wife is Professor Mary Collins.
She's one of Britain's most senior immunologists, and she is similarly indignant.
She believes that University College London, where both of them had had jobs, has acted in an utterly unacceptable way in pressuring both of them and in failing to support them.
Now this guy, Tim Hunt, won the Nobel in 2001, psychology or physiology for his work on cell division.
And the speed of the dispatch from his various academic posts is startling.
And listen to this paragraph.
His treatment demonstrates the innate cruelty of social media and in particular the savage power of Twitter, which first revealed his transgression.
The tale also demonstrates how PR departments in trying to protect the reputation of institutions often do so at the expense of the people who work for or make up those bodies.
In other words, everybody caves.
Everybody just caves.
The guy goes out and makes a little joke.
The people wound too tight, literally go nuts, the sewer of Twitter comes alive.
The institution, the school, the university where this guy and his wife work are under siege, and they think the only way out is to get rid of the two.
Rather than stand up for them.
And nobody's standing up for any.
Nobody is telling these trolls to shut up and go away.
And as long as their bullying continues to work and everybody's going to act scared to death of them, they're only going to get more powerful.
And they're only going to get more.
What's the word?
They're going to have greater success in reducing and limiting people's freedom of expression.
It's just going to keep going.
I think, you know, that's the thing that has surprised me about all of this cultural rot, deterioration, the mass delusion propaganda we've been talking about.
The thing that surprises me is how fast powerful institutions are to cave.
Rather than stand up and oppose it and stop.
Everybody is caves.
Even if you give them the facts, even if you tell them that it's not tens of thousands of people on Twitter.
It's five or ten using algorithms to make themselves look like tens or thousands.
It it it's it's stunning to me.
I remember when I was growing up, uh, the adults of that generation did not put up with this crap.
But something's happened in Transformer.
We all know I mean it's just it's m the point is it's more than cultural evolution taking place here.
This is not a natural cultural evolution.
It's not natural change.
It is change, but I think it's brought about by artificial means, which is what propaganda is lies.
Delusion is delusion, and delusion is what it is.
Anyway, this ended up being discussed about me when I was out last week.
Give you some examples of that.
Uh last Monday CNN's Aaron Burnett out front of one week ago.
We have uh Jeff Zellany of the let's see.
Well, he used to be the New York Times.
Now he is the senior Washington correspondent for CNN.
He had a report about whether the Republican Party will accept having Caitlin Jenner as a member.
And I'm not even working that day.
The Republican Party's big tent is facing a new test of tolerance.
Rush Limbaugh and other conservative talk radio hosts have been scolding.
We should not be celebrating this.
We should not be lionizing this.
We should not be encouraging this.
Even Rick Santorum told reporters last week, if he says he's a woman, then he's a woman.
My responsibility as a human being is to love and accept everybody.
Republican strategists say if the party is going to expand its appeal, it must show a new face of acceptance.
Their burden is doing so without alienating their base.
Right there, that little bite with 34 seconds encapsulates everything.
This email I got from a friend with the headline, Wall Street getting tired of funding socially conservative Republicans running for president.
The idea that it's the Republicans poisoning politics by in by insisting on talking about social issues.
And it's not.
It's the Democrats that inject social issues.
The Republicans used to stand up and defend the social targets that were under attack by the Democrat Party.
Stand up and defend them.
That's all Republicanism is anymore.
All conservatism is standing up and defending things the left is attacking.
We don't have time To go on offense on an agenda.
We're too busy defending because every day there's something new under assault.
And that defense now gets repositioned, recategorized as the Republicans refusing to get rid of the social issues.
So here we come, Jeff Zelony says, even Rick Santorum told reporters well, hey, if he says he's a woman, he's a woman.
That's not the Rick Santorma four years ago.
No comment other than that, but that's not the Rick Santorma four years ago.
It's exactly what I'm talking about here about how people came.
And the reason why what'd Zelani say next?
Republican strategists say if the party is going to expand its appeal, it must show a new face of acceptance.
Acceptance of what?
What must the party accept?
This deterioration?
This cultural rot.
Oh snerdling, I know what's gonna I know I'm gonna be all over TV tonight with this.
I know exactly what's gonna end.
Republicans are gonna be asked.
You agree with Rush Limbaugh, transgenderism is I know exactly.
But look, I'm not I'm just not cut out to conform with things like this that I find destructive.
But he nails it here in this Republican strategist say if the party is going to expand its appeal, it must show a new face of acceptance, which means you've got to stop opposing this, and you've got to accept it, and that's how you'll not be categorized as a new weirdo.
You can escape being characterized as the new kook and the new weirdo.
Because what used to be weird and what used to be off limits, what used to be kooky, that's the new norm.
And if you don't join it and accept it as a new norm, you're the new kook and weirdo.
And a bunch of Republicans, I don't want to be the weirdo.
I'm tired of being the weirdo.
So you fall in.
And acceptance is seen as growth.
Acceptance is seen as enlightenment.
And all it is is the Republicans accepting the Democrat Party agenda.
Take the issue, don't care, social issue, immigration.
You name it, that is the name of the game.
Zelony got time for one more after his report when he's talking here to um Aaron Burnett added this one little close.
The bigger picture here is what Republicans are trying to do to appeal to younger voters and women voters to be a more tolerant party, a more accepting party.
And a bigger test is coming up in the future here.
The Supreme Court is going to rule on gay marriage.
That gives the party an even bigger thing to wrestle here with.
Right.
So you see how this works.
It's painfully obvious how it works.
The consensus has formed.
The Republicans are the oddballs and kooks.
If they don't join the consensus, they're the new weirdo.
Gotta take a break here because I just saw the clock.
I know, I know, I know it.
Okay, back to the phones.
Wendy in Temperance, Michigan.
I really glad you waited, and welcome to the EIB network.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
Great honor to speak with you.
Um I've always had two anchors in my life the first is Jesus that doesn't change.
Then the second as a country.
I mean, I'm a Marine Corps veteran, and I listen to that transgender call, and I'm just it's just the sickness that's being accepted.
And like you said, everything you've set up to now is so true.
And of course, I mean, how do you I I I want to close my doors, my windows, and I just see everything going down the tubes and say, screw it, I've cared so much for so long.
I've been involved in politics and done all that, and it's like, just feel like, okay, I'm done.
I'm done.
You know, there people are stupid, they're too busy watching dancing with the stars.
They don't care.
They don't care.
I I just think I think we've passed the point.
And I'm I'm discouraged.
I'm mad.
Look, you you're discouraged because you don't see anybody on what you consider your side.
Mm-hmm.
To stand up to get shut down.
Stopping it, opposing it, fighting back, pushing back, so you feel leaderless.
And you don't think as an average citizen in temperance, Michigan, you can do anything about it by yourself.
And you see every you see everybody caving to it.
Uh, and I know it that aspect of it is uh is is quite dispiriting.
Uh-huh.
I don't think we've lost it.
I I I think this stuff all eventually reaches a point where it be it it it it will.
It's gonna get so absurd.
And it's got a long way to go before we get here, I admit, but it's gonna get so at some point, even the diluted are gonna put on the brakes at what they are because it's gonna end up affecting everybody.
Oh, it's got a long downward spiral ahead of it.
Um there's an aspect of this that I have not touched on that I probably should.
But there's the ear splitting tone.
Okay, looky.
I have another example.
But the one point that I failed to mention, I mean back to that.
There is a there's a clubby or a clickish aspect to this.
And that is that the members, for lack of a better word, of the politically correct crowd, the the the the delusional, the propagandized, they all are aware of the power they have.
They all that feels good to them.
They enjoy uh exacting this power over people from their positions of anonymity in the sewers of Twitter, and wherever else they slither around.
But they have a very superiorist attitude about themselves.
They think of themselves as perfect.
They never make these mistakes.
They never have a corrupt thought.
They never express a corrupt idea.
They never make a bad joke.
They never offend anybody.
They are just absolutely perfect, and they feel perfectly fine sitting in judgment of everybody else and deciding who works and who doesn't, who gets fired and who doesn't.
And just think, it wasn't very long ago, all of that used to be said about who?
All of that used to be said about the rich, the top 1%, conservatives, or what have you.
But look who the actual Stalinists, for lack of better term, are.
They're all a bunch of whether they know it or not, snivelling little leftists.
Here's another example.
It's Breitbart, five days ago.
Human beings urgently need to wipe themselves out to avoid ecological catastrophes, as the leader of the voluntary human extinction movement.
Now you read this, and the natural reaction is, what a bunch of kooks.
What a bunch of screaming oddballs.
What a bunch of looney tunes.
In an interview with Big Issue Magazine, the leader of the voluntary human extinction movement said that the extinction of humanity would be a good thing for the planet, and that humans need to reduce their numbers before they run out of resources.
The leader of the voluntary human extinction movement is a substitute teacher in Portland, Oregon, and he said that his main motivation for wanting to see the extinction of his own species was preservation of Earth's biosphere.
Meaning that which keeps human beings alive, he's trying to save by getting rid of human beings.
He says diversity is the strength of the biosphere, and the fewer species there are, the weaker it becomes.
We are pulling strands from the web of life and at the same time putting more pressure on it due to our increased consumption.
And he added that increased human population making it harder to feed the poor around the world.
He said, people are not doing too well.
Two billion people don't have potable water.
Almost a billion are experiencing food insecurity.
We used to call it hunger.
It's not a pretty world for half the people on the planet, and it won't be easy to improve their lot as long as progress is gobbled up by our increased numbers.
Now it's snerdly is those are such baloney.
Yes, yeah, but you r understand now where we are in our culture.
The average young people is not going to look at this as kooky.
The average young people is not going to look at this as kooky.
Yeah, look, my point is 25 years ago, 20 years ago we said laugh about it, we'd do funny bits, we'd produce skits about it and so forth, and and we'd think that everybody would think this is absolutely looty tunes, and these people are just a really small minority.
Today, these people these are the kind of people think making the rules, Snerdley.
These are the kind of people who are running Twitter and determining what you can and can't say and can and can't do.
Although in this case, I have to tell you, there's a new movie out.
Have you heard of it?
It's called Kingsman.
It's you you saw it.
It mocks this whole idea that human beings have to be wiped out to save the planet.
Samuel Snerdley, you've got a Samuel L. Jackson portrays Ruffle Themens.
That's who he's that's that's that's who is uh uh wears the Yankee cap crooked, speak little lift, and he is an insane lunatic, high-tech billionaire who believes that the earth is sick, that global warming is the equivalent of a fever caused by a virus.
So the fever is the rising temperature.
The virus is humanity, and he comes up with a plan, because he owns every smartphone in the world.
He's the manufacturer, everybody's cell phone is one he made.
He's got a secret little plan on it that turns everybody into an aggressive killer when he turns it on.
They don't know what's happening, and everybody just starts killing everybody around them.
And he has kidnapped all of the one percent and all world leaders, he's holding them hostage in his massive compound to release them after he's wiped out humanity, so we can start again with the best, the brightest, and the richest in repopulating the earth with only smart, brilliant people.
And he's brought down and nuked to smithereens by the British Secret Service, a secret secret branch of the British Secret Service.
It's a comedy, but it totally mocks this idea of man-made global warming.
It and there are people, we've been chronicling them on this show for 25 years, who think that humanity is the problem with the earth, that we are not part of nature.
We are intruders on nature.
They exist.
The thing is, they are becoming more mainstream on the left.
They're not kooks anymore.
So there's a long way to go before this bottoms out.
Here is uh here's Robert in Donnelly, Idaho.
Has been a long time since we had anybody from Donnelly, Idaho on the program.
Great to have you here, Robert.
Hello.
Hi, thank you for taking my call.
You bet, sir.
Great to have you here.
The last Donley person was my wife, I believe.
Yeah.
May well be.
What's your name?
Dina.
Dina, yep.
Sounds rings a bell.
Dina White.
Anyway, my call was about uh fraud.
You know, there's so much fraud being perpetrated across this country for different reasons.
Uh why are we not going after these people for committing fraud?
Well, like who?
Who are you talking about?
Well, like uh Rochelle.
You know, she got a place in a black college.
So she took a position where an authentic black person didn't get.
Wait, you're you're you're talking about uh Rachel Dolazal?
Yeah.
The the fake African American that ran the NAALCP in Smokean.
That's correct.
And she also got to go to a black college.
That's true.
That's true.
She did.
No, I mean, I understand this line of thinking that she's uh engaged in fraud and she's signed fraudulent documents and all this kind of stuff.
You're wondering why she's not prosecuted?
That's correct.
Why do you think?
Why do you think not?
Uh, is it uh because we'd be called racist?
Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no.
I mean, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, but but it's it's it's it's deeper.
It's much deeper than that.
Okay, please explain.
Well, uh you know, I had something here.
I've got a whole bunch of pictures of frauds.
And I can't find what I did with it.
I and I set it aside just for this.
Oh well.
I'll have to find it at some point.
In the case of Rachel Dolazal, and and why she's being treated with kid gloves.
It's because sorry for her.
The soft bigotry of low expectations.
But the left is gonna have a real problem in punishing anybody who wants to be black.
I mean, that would be if you want to be black, that's an admirable thing.
Whether you pull it off or not, that's your problem.
But if you want to be black, oh, it would be far better if more people did that.
If more people wanted to be black, if more people identify as black, then that'd be a beautiful thing.
They don't, they're gonna find a very, very, very tough time.
You'll notice the NAA LCP has not gone on a tear for this woman.
The NAA LCP, the ones who ought to feel like they've been scammed, they're the ones say, hey, hey, hey, back off, back off, take it easy.
Because how in the world do you get mad at somebody for wanting to be black?
That's something for which you should get a gold star.
That makes you really sensitive.
That makes you a really quality person.
You aren't the antithesis of a racist.
If you're white and you want to be black and you go out and do everything you can to identify as black, how in the world can they condemn that?
That's not fraud, that's good intentions.
And as we know, as we've learned, we are supposed to examine the good intentions and not the nature of the evidence.
The nature of the evidence is that she's deranged and is a fraud.
But she was trying to do so much good.
Oh my God.
She wanted to be black.
Oh.
That's so admirable.
And that's why nothing is going to be done to her.
In fact, I suspect before this is over, uh, people will find a way for it to actually happen.
Uh back after.
Welcome back, Rushlin Boy.
Half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
McKinney, Texas.
You heard that town?
You heard of McKinney, Texas?
Very little nice little town.
Um police are called to a gated private swimming pool.
Seems that African American kids are sending out text messages to each other about where to go to uh to mob the swimming pool.
That is not theirs.
I mean, in all they don't have any right to be there.
I'm sorry to say that don't fire me, please.
They don't have any right to be there.
It's not their pool, it's somebody else's pool.
It's gated, but they found their way in, they're tweeting out, everybody come on join us.
They mob the area, they jump the fence, get aggressive, unruly, having sex all over the place, screaming curse words.
And they do this because there's no place for them to go swim.
So they feel discriminated against.
They don't have any swimming pools, they go out and find somebody else's, and they send out messages to be joined, and then people join them.
So there were mothers with their young children at the pool.
The people happen to be paying for the pool, by the way.
I'm sorry, that's I know insensitive to say.
These mothers call the cops.
And so the cops come.
Cops arrive.
Uh the African American kids act belligerent.
The cops try to get control situation.
And of course, cell phones are pulled out.
Video recording begins.
And there's video of a cop mistreating, mishandling, it looks like a perfectly peaceful young African American woman in a bikini on the ground.
Uh-oh.
Cop is fired and is now in hiding to protect himself.
In Florida.
A half screw principal mentions in a one-line tweet that he understands what the cop did in McKenney, Texas, and he has been fired.
And today we have a story in the Washington Post.
Are you ready for the headline?
How the rise of gated spaces like swimming pools can quietly perpetuate racial tension.
So you s so yes, Nerdley's laughing in there.
See, this is what you do.
You laugh.
But the fact of the matter is, we had a swimming pool privately owned behind a gated community.
It was invaded by people who have no right to be there.
They were not invited.
It's not their pool.
The cops show up and try to get control of the situation.
A cop gets fired, a principal who agrees with the cop in a one-line tweet gets fired, and now the Washington Post writes a story saying that such swimming pools are racist.
You want an example of massive propaganda delusion.
So the cops, what would you do if you're a cop the next time such a call happens?
Screw you, pal, you're on your own.
I'm not showing up.
If you're a school principal, you're not going to comment on the cops anymore, no matter what you think of what they do.
A one-line tweet from the principal saying he understood what the cop did, and he's fired.
The cop is running for his life now.
This is exactly the kind of situation and circumstance that I've been referring to all day.
Just like this silly story.
I saw it on Vox, which is its own, you know, social psychological curiosity.
You guys.
No, sexist.
You guys, and they're not supposed to say it anymore because it's not inclusive.
And women calling each other guys, that's not goal either, and they gotta stop doing it.
And we've got to stop saying it.
And people are seriously, honestly debating this.
As though it is profoundly offensive.
For a group of people to be referred to as you guys.
So now we gotta say, y'all, guys and girls, folks, you name it.
Whatever it is, it isn't free speech.
By the way, folks, I have to tell you with a smile on my face here, the Daily Beast.
Rush Limbaugh selling his children's books in Spanish now.
They are so ticked off.
And you know what they claim?
They claim I'm being a hypocrite.
They claim that I openly support immigrants assimilating.
So what am I doing publishing my book in Spanish?
And they also claim in the story that you, my fans, my listeners are angry at me.
You are livid at me for betraying our cause by publishing my book in Spanish.
You are mad at me because I have betrayed you and our cause.
A three-page story.
I mean, I haven't gotten one complaint, and I won't.
Well, I will get some fake complaints now, of course, but I haven't received any, period.
Folks, I told you there was going to be no way to get to everything that happened last week, and I wanted to talk about today.
So we're gonna be loaded for quite a while here.
▲
Export Selection