All Episodes
Previous Next
May 6, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:25
May 6, 2015, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
That's right.
I just went back and looked.
Piss Christ by Andre Serrano was funded by the NEA.
And nobody shot up the NEA.
Christians didn't run around shooting up.
But you have that racist organization called a Southern Poverty Law Center with that geek-looking guy, Mark Potok that runs it.
And he's one of the one of the loyal followers of his website went up to some business and shot it up because he named them.
The website named them as a hate bunch.
It wasn't Hobby Lobby, but it was some organization like.
It's the left that runs around doing all this violent stuff.
It's the left that runs around and is it claims to be tolerant and are not at all.
We've had to put up with Piss Christ, we've had to put up with Elephant Dung surrounding the Virgin Mary.
Other works of so-called art that I don't even remember, including this Finley Babe's performance art, nude covered in chocolate, all funded by taxpayer dollars.
And when all of it came up, we were supposed to sit there and be tolerant and understand the rage and learn from it and yada yada yada.
The point is that you know, this guy's why this guy calls me and says, You telling me you wouldn't mind if there was a piece of art with Jesus Christ being sodomized.
We've been through it, sir.
Then they're done that, and as last I looked, nobody ran around shooting the people that did it.
Yeah, they groused about it.
Yeah, they were upset by it.
They wondered why their own government was paying for it, but they didn't go on any protest march and they start shooting people.
Didn't start issuing edicts that people's First Amendment rights be denied.
Just questioned why in the world is our own government paying for this filth.
I.e.
their own tax dollars.
Anyway, it's great to have you back here, folks.
Uh as always, Rush Limboss serving humanity behind the golden EIB microphone, the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
I knew this was going to get to him.
I knew in the first or when I asked a very logical question.
Let me repeat the question, explains why the caller called in with his attempt to trip me up.
We are told that we have to respect militant Islam's right to shut down free expression.
Right?
If we're getting pictures drawn of the Prophet Muhammad, we can't do that because that offends Muslims, we can't offend them.
We've got to understand that.
But at the same time, we can flaunt gay marriage and gay rights and feminism in front of them all the time.
I mean, if you imagine militant Islamist turning on MSNBC that profoundly offended watching it, where do we draw the line?
If if we're going to respect their religious prohibitions against drawing pictures of the prophet, then why do we not respect their prohibitions against gay marriage and homosexuality and feminism?
Why do we throw that back in their face?
And I say, if you look at the Hobby Lobby case, here you have the federal government demanding that Christians who religiously oppose abortion nevertheless pay for it.
in employee benefits, or in other ways, a religious objection to abortion doesn't matter.
You have to pay for people who want them, or their abortifacients, or what have you.
Well, by that thinking, then doesn't it make sense that the militant Islamists who shot up the place in Garland, Texas, actually should have had to pay for the convention?
I mean, if you can tell one religion that it has to pay for people to engage in activity that it prohibits.
It's religion prohibits, i.e.
abortion.
Wouldn't it make sense that military Islamists would have to pay for Pamela Geller's convention for the cartoon contest?
It's the same line of thinking.
It's exact same thing, just different subject matter.
I imagine that a lot of leftists in the audience were just outraged at that.
So rather than call and debate that, try to trip me up, and it was a flailing and failed attempt.
Back to the audio sound bites, sticking now with uh with Baltimore and what is happening there.
I I've talked about this in the first hour, but I want you to hear the sound bites.
This is the mayor, Stephanie Rowling's Blake, press conference this morning talking about the new partnership she's very proud of between the City of Baltimore and the Department of Justice.
I'm requesting the Department of Justice conduct a federal pattern or practice investigation into the Baltimore City Police Department.
I'm asking the Department of Justice to investigate if our police department has engaged in a pattern or practice of stops, searches, or arrests that violate the Fourth Amendment.
I am asking that they investigate what systematic changes or systemic changes exist within our excuse me, challenges exist within our police department that can contribute to excessive force and discriminatory policing.
Now, can I ask a question?
Do you think she came up with this idea on her own?
If she did, she has to, as mayor, be sitting there thinking her own police department is a mess, that her own police department is screwed up, that her own police department is corrupt, and furthermore, she can't fix it.
So she has to call Big Brother.
She has to call Loretta Lynch.
She has to call the descendants of Eric Holder.
She got to call the D.O.J. to come in.
Why is she mayor?
Why did she want to be mayor if she thinks her own police department is so corrupt that she can't fix it?
She wants these foreigners to come in from out of town and basically take over.
And you know what the DOJ guidelines, given the Obama administration's attitude toward police departments are going to be.
When they get through, this police department's going to be invisible.
You're not going to be able to find them.
Because the police department, according to Obama, is the reason crime takes place.
Yep.
The police department, the police department intimidates, the police department scares.
The police department discriminates.
Yes, right.
In a 60% black city, with people, African American running the police department, police commissioner, and all of this.
Still we got racial bias in the city of Baltimore is totally ill-equipped, incompetent to deal with it themselves.
Hello, big brother.
I don't even know that it happened that way.
But it doesn't matter how it happened.
It is happening.
And it's happened in 17 or 18 police departments, they're going to keep happening.
Remember now, the premise for all this reform in local police departments from the Obama standpoint is the police are responsible for the crime.
Lincoln Ferguson.
Hands up, don't shoot.
Didn't happen, but you'd never know that by listening to the media to this day and to activists in Ferguson to this day, you would never know what the grand jury results actually were.
So the police department, because of a pattern of abuse and discrimination and arresting and imprisoning the innocent, have caused all this unrest, have caused this misery.
So what do we have to do?
We have to restrain them.
We have to get them out of the way.
Now, you watch what happens.
You watch what happens in these police departments, or these cities, where the police departments have become next to...
I mean, and that not invisible, but from the standpoint, they're not going to be doing anything but reacting long after events take place.
The whole notion of prevention is going to be out of the window.
Because prevention, well, you can't prevent unless you discriminate.
You can't prevent unless you already know who the guilty are before they even do it.
That's the thinking.
That's the thinking.
How do you profile a city at 60%?
say that it is the way it is because of the remnants of slavery like Obama did yesterday.
Obama made clear that cities like Baltimore are the way they are, Communities like Baltimore are the way they are because of age-old discrimination dating to the founding of, like I've always said.
One of the many chips on his shoulder is the founding of this country was inherently unjust and immoral and racist.
We have made no progress Other than his election.
He acknowledged that that's progress, but that's not nearly enough on matters of race.
No, he hasn't gone to Baltimore, but at least he talked about it.
Okay, now here's Anthony Batts.
And I mentioned to you earlier that the police commissioner Baltimore didn't even know what the state attorney was going to do until 10 minutes before she did it.
I found out that the state attorney was going on on in what uh uh she was going to present probably about 10 minutes before she went on.
She uh gave me a phone call and told me what she was uh about to do and that she was gone on live.
She told me what the charges were.
I could say that I was probably surprised, you know, uh by the information that I heard.
Right.
Well, don't get the wrong idea here, folks.
Uh he's on her side.
He continued.
This is on Aaron Burnett's show on CNN.
He continued.
He's basically said the cops are part of the problem there.
There is a lack of trust within his community, period, bottom line.
And that's going to take healing.
That's going to take us uh acknowledging as a police department, not just here in Baltimore, but uh law enforcement as a whole, that we've been part of the problem.
There you go.
There you go.
So you even have the police commissioner in Baltimore now saying, oh, yeah, we're part of the problem.
What do you I?
You just made yourself part of the police commissioner.
You said we're part of the problem.
What have you been doing as commissioner to deal with the problem?
See, see here, the credit doesn't rely, doesn't lie in any action, remedial or otherwise.
You just, in order to keep all of the people that want to destroy you at bay, you just have to say the right thing.
And the right thing right now to say, if you are anywhere involved in city government, the police are the problem, and you'll be okay.
No matter what you've done, you could be the best police commissioner in the world, you can be the worst.
It doesn't matter.
As long as you say what Obama and his DOJ want to hear, the cops are the problem, you're good.
You're gold.
Exactly.
I do understand evidence.
All you have to do.
He could be the worst police commissioner, police chief, doesn't matter.
As long as you know what to say, you're gold.
You're safe.
Colonel Sanders could get a medal from Obama for being a leading critic of killing chickens if he said it was a bad thing to do.
And they'd leave his restaurants open.
Didn't matter.
He's killing them more than anybody else is.
When he acknowledges it, that's what everybody wants to hear that people killing chickens are the worst people alive, and Colonel Sanders, I agree with that, and we got a big problem, and we got to work on it, he'd got a gold star.
Well, that's just how it works.
There's Elijah Cummings, former chairman, Congressional Black Caucasians, has represented Baltimore in uh office one or another for 34 years, state office, federal office, local office.
He was on CNN today with Chris Cuomo, who said we have two sound bites here.
He said uh the reports about the names being wrong, the innocent people uh were charged because the prosecutor got their names wrong and uh charging anyway.
Um he says, okay, they reports about the names being wrong and that maybe the knife did qualify as illegal.
Does that give you pause for concern here, Congressman?
I trust our prosecutor, and I trust uh what she's done, and I know that she's gonna give it her best.
And again, you know, if uh if the officers um are found not guilty, so be it.
But this is the process that we go through.
Uh people in my neighborhood go through this process every day.
What did I just say?
It doesn't matter what happens, all that matters is what you say.
And he said the right thing.
I trust our incompetent prosecutor, and I trust what our incompetent prosecutor has done.
And I know that despite the fact she doesn't know what she's doing, she's gonna give it her best.
And if the cops are found not guilty, so be it.
So be it.
You think that's gonna mollify the crowd?
Whenever this case goes to trial, and if the verdicts are not guilty, not guilty, not guilty, the crowds, so be it.
That's the process we go through.
What the process you go through is that the guilty get away with it.
Is that what you mean?
The guilty get away with it, or the innocent are charged all the time.
What which is it?
What is the process you go through?
Well, the officers are found not guilty, so be it.
What that means is it doesn't matter.
The trial doesn't matter.
We've scored already.
We charged them.
We got out there and we said we wanted to say to DOJ's taking over the police department mission accomplished.
Doesn't matter what happens to cops now.
That's what that means.
Am I right, Mr. Snerdley, or am I right?
And if the cops are found guilty, icing on the cake.
But if they're not, no sweat.
We have still made progress here.
We have furthered the notion that police departments are racist.
And we got it off the headlines.
And we made sure it didn't hurt Obama.
So Chris Cuomo.
Chris Cuomo said, well, now, Congressman Baltimore has been run by Democrats and recently African American Democrats for a really long time.
It's not really about Republicans, Congressman.
I mean the Democrats, you've had your people in there, Congressman Cummings.
You guys are as responsible for what has and hasn't been done as anybody else.
Isn't that f can you believe he asked that question?
Can you believe well I I'm stunned.
I know a lot of people are asking it, but not on MSNBC or CNN or the New York Times.
A lot of people are pointing out that the Democrats and African American Democrats run this city for 60 years, but you don't expect a former chairman of congressional black Caucasians to be asked about that on CNN by Chris Cuomo, son of Mario the Pious.
You just don't expect this.
Anyway, here is what Elijah Cummings said.
Chris, come on, Chris.
You know, it's not about personalities, it's about policy.
And you know and I know that a lot of the policies coming down from Washington are not necessarily kind uh to urban areas, but particularly yeah, lately.
I mean, you keep in mind that uh Freddie Gray uh had a serious problem with lead uh poisoning.
And we just found out that that that budget has been cut uh 33%.
Uh the the the news neighborhoods uh uh budget uh figure has been cut some 70 percent.
What what I can't believe this cracker asked me that.
What the hell am I gonna say?
Oh, well, Freddie Gray, lead part, come on, you know the federal government's response for what are you doing, Chris?
Come on, come on, quite Chris, do you know who buddies your brad brother?
What in the world are you asking me?
Uh uh, well, you know, a lot of the policies that come down from Washington, which last I look, you guys are also running that.
The official program observer, Mr. Snerdley, passionately telling me that he has seen evidence in the recent days that many Democrats are starting to realize that the question we've been asking is right.
How can this be happening in all of these places run by Democrats for all of these decades?
When the Democrats stand for euphoria, utopia, they stand for contentedness and happiness and justice.
Why is everything so missing?
He says more and more Democrats are starting to ask the question.
I haven't seen it, but he says he has.
Although, I have to grant you this, Juan Williams was on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace.
And he quoted Moynihan.
Daniel Patrick Moynihan wrote 50 years ago, The Negro Family, The Case for National Action.
And Juan Williams said that Moynihan, a Democrat, had it right about the breakdown of the black family and the government's role in it.
And people were taken aback, but Juan Williams, African American.
So Snerdley may have a point, and I've got this set aside to comment on it too, but we got to get to the phones because we've only had one in here in the first hour and a half.
We'll start in Los Angeles with Kyle.
Thank you, Kyle, for waiting.
You're next.
It's great to have you here.
Hi.
Thanks, Rosh.
Appreciate it.
Appreciate it.
So going back to it, it's a popular culture war.
And CNN, or as I like to refer to them as the Communist Network, they're espousing the strategy of the enemy of my enemy as my ally, and they are attacking us.
The middle and the one percenters to defend each when one another.
And it's it's horrible.
But this change that uh the Obama agenda.
Yeah, they're deconstructing our constitution.
You know, and who better than a quote unquote constitutional scholar, Obama.
And morality is against our morality.
That's why that they do these things, such as the piss crucifix uh that you've rightly said National Down of the Arts has paid for.
You also have wealthy designers such as Tom Ford do a penis crucifix.
I mean, it's that's awful what's happening.
And I happen to be stuck on the left coast.
But I'm not gonna give up, and like you, I'm gonna battle and we'll win this country back.
But we have to be careful because the next thing the university will start teaching is moralityism.
And that's where morality is bad.
And we have to be very careful.
Because I see it in these young people, you know, I'm my early 40s.
I came out of university here in California and I fought it at that time, and I and they've just said one.
Well, that's now that's an excellent point.
I think they're already teaching it.
In fact, I had a story in the stack the last couple of days about some of the latest courses being taught mainstream American universities haven't had a chance to get to it.
Maybe I still have it on display here, try to find it.
But your notion that they're going to start teaching anti-morality isn't, they're already doing it.
The whole I without saying so, but the the whole thrust of the leftist educational agenda or anything else, the pop culture in movies, books, TV shows, is a direct attack on common morality as unjust and unfair and immoral, and who has the right to define it anyway?
There shouldn't be any.
Anyway, we'll be back.
Quick break.
And here's Todd in uh Eureka, California.
Greetings, sir, and welcome.
It's a delight to have you here.
Make it count.
Yeah, hi, Rush.
Um, I just had a question on uh I keep hearing freedom of speech all the time.
I wanted to know what your opinion was when freedom of speech actually becomes hate speech.
It seems to me like it's it's racial, as soon as you get into some racial thing or uh, you know, maybe the homosexuals, whichever.
I just want to know what your opinion was on that.
When does free speech become hate speech?
Whenever the left says it is.
That's what I'm thinking.
Um you don't know when it's hate speech until a liberal hears it and doesn't like it and accuses you of engaging in hate speech.
Same thing with a hate crime.
I mean, what is a hate crime?
I mean, hey, you commit a crime and they double your penalty or intensify you because you supposedly hated somebody while you're in the midst of committing it.
It's all arbitrary stuff, and it's it's it's rooted in the left trying to control speech.
And it's all about the left trying to prohibit speech they don't want to hear.
And it doesn't have to be about African Americans or or or gays or whatever, it can be truth that they don't want to hear.
And they simply say that the person who articulates was obviously rooted in hate for people he disagrees with or some such thing.
But these are the uh the speech codes that emanate from the left.
Political correctness is nothing more than censorship.
And the left enforces PC, practically gave it to us, uh, maintains it to this day, and defines it.
Now understand none of this could happen without willing accomplices in the media.
I mean, all these people squawking the offended, uh, if it were not for media amplifying what it is that agitates them and it wouldn't be a big deal.
So you can't you can't take the media out of it either.
But you know, hate speech is just what the left doesn't want anybody to say.
More m in fact, more properly, it's speech they don't want to hear.
And so hate speech is nothing more than a mechanism to get people to shut up.
It could be something very persuasive.
If you have a way of saying something about anything or anybody that is going to be persuasive to people and change their minds about it, then the left doesn't want to hear it and they don't want you getting away with it, come along trying to discredit you or whoever it is saying it by calling it hate speech, rooted in hate.
And I, you know, you look at the hate, I mean, just like an objective look, study our culture and society every day.
And I'll tell you the vast majority of the hate that I run into is on the left.
And the mass vast majority of intolerance I find is on the left.
Of course, while they claim to be the exemplars of both, they claim to be the most tolerant, the most understanding, and they are the least.
They pose a graze a grave threat, in my opinion, because they've succeeded.
A minority of people, don't care what the issue is, a minority of people succeed in silencing, frightening, cowing other people into shutting up.
It's gotten to the point like it was in the old Soviet Union, where people retreat to uh a room, like a bathroom, tell each other what they really think about things, because they're afraid somebody might overhear them and might not like what they hear or might tell somebody what they've heard.
So I mean, how many times now do people, when they tell you what they really think about something, whisper to you?
Or how many of them get really close so that they don't want to run the risk of being overheard.
You can tell the tale tale signs, and there's a lot of fear, which is exactly what the left wants.
Since I mentioned this Juan Williams piece, I don't want to leave this hanging, because it really touches on what we have been discussing today in terms of Baltimore and the mayor begging the DOJ to come in fix her police department.
And of course, the premise there is that her police department's all screwed up.
And there's all kinds of stuff wrong with her police department.
It's racist and it's biased and it's mean and it's brutal and it's unfair, and they can't fix it in Baltimore.
So you have to have the Department of Justice come in and do an investigation and a study, followed up by recommendations.
That's if this happened as we're told, meaning if the mayor actually is the one that got this started.
I wouldn't be surprised if we someday learned that her phone rang, and it was somebody at the regime saying, you need to make a call for the DOJ to come in.
And if you're a black mayor and the regime calls you, you're going to do whatever you think it takes to get in their good favor.
You everybody wants a promotion.
Everybody wants to be highly thought of by the boss.
But in the end, that doesn't matter.
What matters is the city of Baltimore is throwing up its hands and conceding that they can't run their own police department.
It's so out of control, they have to bring in the quote-unquote experts from DOJ.
Now, uh recent Sunday, Juan Williams appeared on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace.
And it was unique because you don't, and I didn't even know it happened.
I found this uh at Newsbusters, Brent Bosell's uh website and blog that chronicles much of what happens in the in the liberal media, but also, well, yeah, also some, you know, some of the great things that happen elsewhere in the media.
And uh, this is a story written up quite well by Jack Coleman.
Seldom does a liberal mention the prophetic document released 50 years ago known as the Moynihan Report.
Rarer still is a liberal who praises it.
It's officially titled The Negro Family, the Case for National Action.
The report was written largely by a bureaucrat in the Department of Labor, Daniel Patrick Moynihan.
He later became a senator, and he was a UN representative for Nixon.
Certain UN ambassador for Dixon.
So he was recognized a bipartisan kind of guy.
George Will's favorite all-time Washington person.
George Will idolized and loved Daniel Patrick Moynihan.
Thought he was the most brilliant, one of the most brilliant people in Washington in recent decades.
And in the course of his analysis of the tangle of pathology plaguing black families in large cities, Moynihan discovered a devastating truth.
And this is 50 years ago.
Well-intentioned federal programs for the poor, particularly welfare, created perverse incentives that drove black men from their families and created a generational cycle of dependency on government.
Now, today you think, well, this is standard operating procedure, everybody knows this.
Even today you will not find people that admit it.
Over the course of the 26 plus years that I have hosted this program.
Uh-oh, bulletin.
They finally finished the deflate gate investigation.
The Patriots, likely a deliberate act.
After all this time, we're told that it was maybe likely a deliberate act to deflate the footballs.
Ted Wells was the investigator for good.
In fact, I would, if I were one of the black, any of the defendants in Baltimore, I'd hire this guy as my lawyer, Ted Wells.
Just a solid reputation.
People have wondered why has this investigation, this last December, why has this investigation taken five months?
But anyway, it's been released, and that's just the only thing I know about it is that it was likely a deliberate act.
I don't know anymore.
We will find out momentarily as the details are released.
What I was going to say is of the 26 years of hosting this program, I've had numerous uh African Americans, primarily women, but some men call here and make the claim that Democrat Party welfare destroyed the black family because it made it unnecessary for fathers to stay home.
It made it unnecessary for fathers to be fathers.
Because the federal government took over.
The federal government provided for all of these single parent families, but not at any kind of decent level.
It was a subsistence warning, but it created a cycle of dependency.
And it the bottom line is it just busted up the families of all of these welfare beneficiaries, the majority of which in this country have been black.
And Moynihan wrote this report sympathetically.
This was not a, it was a criticism of government.
It was a criticism of the intentions, even, even though they were credited as good.
Because it created perverse incentives that drove black men from their families, created a generational cycle of dependency on government.
At the heart, this Moynihan writing, at the heart of the deterioration of the fabric of Negro society is the deterioration of the Negro family.
It is the fundamental source of the weakness of the Negro community at the present time.
That's 50 years ago, he wrote this.
And some would say it is still the fundamental source of the weakness of the black community.
That all of this welfare, the war on poverty, the great society, the deterioration of the black family is the fundamental source of the weakness of the African American community.
He wrote that 50 years ago, and many would say it is still the case.
While white families in America had achieved a high degree of stability and remaining it, Moynihan continued, the family structure of lower class African Americans is highly unstable, and in many urban centers is approaching complete breakdown.
Citing census data from 1960, the Moynihan report stated that roughly one in four black children lived In a household where there was no father compared to 5% of white children.
Fifty years later, those rates have soared to 70% for black children living in homes without a father, nearly twice the percentage of out of wedlock children among whites.
And Juan Williams cited this on Fox News Sunday, talking about Baltimore and the brother things, and credited it.
He did not criticize it.
He endorsed it.
Anyway, I'm I gotta take a break.
I'm way warm but not through.
Sit tight, back in a moment.
Welcome back, Rushland boy.
Half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
While meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day.
Saying what I believe, loving, hearing myself say it.
Okay, here's some excerpts from the Ted Wells report that finds the New England Patriots probably deflated footballs in the AFC title game.
For the reasons described in this report, 283 pages, by the way, on deflated footballs.
283 pages.
They exonerate Belichick.
So he probably didn't know.
And uh and then team managing the owner didn't know.
For the reasons described in this report, and after a comprehensive investigation, we've concluded that in connection with the AFC championship game, it's more probable than not that New England patriot personnel participated in violations of the playing rules and were involved in deliberate effort to circumvent the rules.
In particular, we have concluded that it is more probable than not that Jim McNally, the official's locker room attendant for the Patriots, and John Jestremsky, an equipment assistant for the Patriots, participated in a deliberate effort to release air from Patriots game balls after the balls were examined by the Riff.
Based on the evidence, it is our view also that it is more probable than not that Tom Brady, the quarterback for the Patriots, was at least generally aware of the inappropriate activities of McNally and Jestrensky involving the release of air from Patriots game balls.
So Brady knew, based on the evidence, it's more probable than not that Brady knew was generally aware, but as I say, uh Belichick is exonerated.
He didn't know.
283 pages.
That's just the highlights.
I told you that we had just seen it released, and I wanted to get the thrust of it to you.
Il quico.
Back to the phones, Jeremiah, Minneapolis.
Welcome, sir.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
I just wanted to comment and say that I think uh, you know, us as conservative Christians, but I don't think that we really scream loud enough uh when we're offended about things.
And I think that's because of the fact that you know we believe in personal freedoms and expressions.
And uh, you know, there's an old saying that says the squeaky will gets to Greece.
And I think that we need to start squeaking a little more.
I mean, you talk about offensive, you know.
Uh how about cutting the heads off Christians and posting it on the web and whatnot?
I've seen some craziness, and it's just it's really starting to tick me off.
Wait a minute.
Cutting off the heads of Christians and posting it on the way.
You talk about ISIS?
Yeah, I was looking at I was looking at some stuff.
I was listening to some programs on the radio and uh went on the internet to look at some of this stuff, and it's just disgusting.
Well, there is that's there there is an all-out assault on Christianity all over the world, but particularly the Middle East.
I mean, one day 300 Christians will be killed, slaughtered, the group does it, claims credit.
Nobody says anything.
Uh, it's all rooted in um in a very perverse place that we find ourselves in this country, and I mean, maybe not just in this country, but around the world.
We've we've uh everything is cyclical.
Right now we're in a cycle where majorities, simply because they're majorities are guilty, and whatever pain they incur and suffer is legitimate.
Simply because they're majorities.
Ergo Christianity is perceived to be a majority religion because of the power.
I mean, Islam's big, but there is no Islamic Vatican.
But there is the Vatican.
There's all kinds, there are the trappings of Christianity are all over the place.
And as such, they're evil.
Simply because they're the majority.
The minority is a whatever minority it is, is uh almost angelic and permitted to do anything to overcome the tyrannical powers of the majority.
It's one of the things that motivates Obama, uh, in a in a sense.
And as as such, because we're considered the majority, we have been told that we are not to yell and squeak and squawk.
It's unbecoming.
We have to understand this.
But I I get your point on it.
We are tolerant as well, which is interesting because that's the last thing that is said about us.
Anyway, quick time out, folks.
Back after don't go away.
Oh my gosh, look at this.
I would barely have time here to say, hang on.
Our next exciting busy broadcast hour is just right around the corner.
▲
Export Selection