All Episodes
Previous Next
March 6, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:52
March 6, 2015, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Okay, ready for this, Valerie Jarrett, who um actually, I think, on most days is the president.
Valerie Jarrett just said that well, she never received, never has received an email from Hillary, and she doesn't know anybody in the White House who has.
Which means there's no way we could have known that she wasn't using a State Department email domain because we never got any email from our Secretary of State.
Right.
Live from the Southern Command in Sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
These people, so what are you gonna do?
You're gonna call her a liar?
I mean, they're denying everything.
Why not?
We didn't get any email from Hillary.
I don't know anybody in the White House who did.
I mean, if I didn't get any email from Hillary, I know Barack didn't.
Valerie Garrett.
If you think, look, I'm not trying to.
You know me.
I'm I'm not obsessed with pessimism here.
I'm surrounded by it, as we all are, but I am I am not pessimistic.
But I just don't think anything's gonna happen to Hillary here.
Folks, the Republicans aren't saying a word.
Do you think the media is really gonna take her out of it?
One of the most attractive theories is the media wants Elizabeth Warren.
Elizabeth Warren says she's not gonna run if Hillary is in there.
So there's an abounding theory that the media is trying to take Hillary out.
They really don't like her.
They never have liked her.
Anybody better, they'll go for her, like they did Obama.
Uh but the Republicans are not saying a word.
I just not sure that I can envision the drive-by media taking out the Clintons.
I just can't see it down the road.
But we will see.
Open line Friday, 800-282-2882.
If you want to be on the program and the email address, L Rushball at EIBNet.com coming up, a gay community update.
We have had the first three-way same-sex marriage in Bangkok.
Well, I think it was Bangkok.
It's in Thailand, right?
And we got pictures and everything here.
So sit tight for that.
I'm going to go to phones.
Uh, we're gonna shake it up here.
Open line Friday.
I tried to get calls in in the first hour, and I failed.
I intended to, but Snerdley demanded to hear white my tease on the way the New York Times is handling the DOJ report on Ferguson.
Well, Snerdley says he's still astounded by it.
It no, see, this is the thing.
It ought to be totally ever since ever since uh what's his name, Tom Foley, said there's no evidence that George Bush ever went to Paris in an FSR-71 to talk the Iranians into holding the hostages.
But since this guy has written about it in a book, a seriousness of the charges, so we better look into it.
Well, if the New York Times wanted to be consistent, you know what they would do?
They would say, okay, there might not have been any weapons of mass destruction, but the seriousness of the charge demands that we look seriously at the allegation that he had weapons of mass destruction.
So it's a selective application.
There was no hands up, don't shoot.
It did not happen.
The Justice Department said so yesterday.
But the Justice Department also said we must examine why such a lie came to life.
What was it on the ground in Ferguson?
It's happening that's so bad that such a lie could be believed.
We better examine this.
And it's a way they perpetuate the lie.
It's a way they service the lie.
Hands up, don't shoot didn't happen, but we're gonna look into how it could have, which means it may as well have.
So as far as readers of the New York Times are concerned, it may as well have happened, or at least if it didn't, circumstances were were ripe enough that it was a believable lie, and there must be something seriously wrong with Ferguson, so we better investigate.
And well, it doesn't matter.
I know it led to riots and more than just Ferguson, but but you the details don't matter.
This is how liberalism perpetuates itself.
This is how liberalism continues to permeate and insinuate itself in the mainstream of American culture.
Even when it's discredited, even when liberalism is exposed as a total lie.
The liberals come back and say, but how did the lie start?
Circumstances must be so bad that the lie was believed by many people.
Why?
Therefore, they legitimize the lie, legitimize the people who make the lie, legitimize the action that came from the lie, the riots.
So at the end of the day, what Holder said about hand ups, hands up, don't shoot, not happening is forgotten.
At the end of the day, hands up, don't shoot could have.
A lot of people thought it did, and perception is reality, so it did happen.
We got to investigate Ferguson.
Maybe the cop didn't do anything, but Ferguson, seat of racism in Missouri, we got and that's how they do it.
That's how they got Clarence Thomas.
Or tried to.
There was no evidence.
Anita Hill had no evidence, but the seriousness of her charge about a potential Supreme Court justice, why, we must investigate.
And nobody on the Republican side has found a way to deal with it.
Nobody on the Republican side has found a way to stop this kind of thing that the left gets away with.
And the reason they haven't is because they're not ideological.
We're fighting an ideology with nothing.
And I'm talking about the Republican Party.
We do it here every day, but we don't have any real power other than to shape public opinion.
But in terms of implementing it, that happens in Washington, and there isn't any conservatism there in the leadership.
Right.
No, those people that lied under oath to the grand jury, nothing's going to happen to those people because the Department of Justice has said they may have had a reason to lie.
Ferguson's racist.
That's another reason why the report is is written as it is.
You had people admittedly, this report documents the people that lied to that grand jury.
And how their lies were easily refuted.
And the report talks about how the liars intimidated the people telling the truth as witnesses.
And yet nothing is going to happen to the liars.
Because fur that's what they're trying to destroy is the respect for the justice system.
That's what the left is trying to destroy.
So there's not going to be any punishment, probably for the liars who went before and falsely testified that grand jury.
Because now it's been established that the climate was such that their lie, why it makes sense that they thought it happened.
Because Ferguson and the police department are so racist.
And so the justice system and everything else takes a big hit, while liberalism advances, cements itself, and inculcates us.
Anyway, let me get to the phones here because if I keep answering your questions on this, we'll never get to the phones.
And I'm going to break format.
Never take phones or very seldom in the opening monologue segment, but I'm going to do it.
We're going to start Springfield, Vermont.
This is Jeff, and it's great to have you, Jeff.
Welcome to the program.
Hi, Rush.
It's a pleasure to be here.
Thank you.
I've been wanting to thank you for quite a while.
I'm a retired uh human service worker, and I have now the time to call.
And I always viewed you as a coach.
And I'll tell you why.
Uh because many of the people I worked with, I tried to help get employment.
And you would be surprised.
Jeff, what kind of people?
You say you're a you're a uh a human service worker.
What kind of services?
I work for vocational rehabilitation, and our job was to get people employed.
Okay, so all right.
And one thing I found that the more programs that people are in, up here in the North, we have what's freezing rain, and all it's silent, but it works until a limb breaks when it gets so much weight, and I can't withstand that anymore.
And the thing with programs and the human spirit, human service programs, whatever, the bureaucracy.
People are exposed to more and more of those programs, and eventually their spirit breaks.
And it's a real tough job to get people back to work under these kind of conditions.
I used to listen to you as a for a motivational speaker because you always expected more out of people than they thought they had themselves.
And for that reason, I always called you a coach, And I had to listen to you.
One of the things that people don't realize is these programs, when I first started working for them, they worked for the people, and eventually they transition to living off the people.
And that's a big difference.
And I always found that you were inspi inspirational to listen to.
And I just had to clear the deck and get to you and tell you that.
Thanks a lot, Colby.
Well, no, I I um uh I appreciate that.
I you know what you're right.
I do have uh high expectations of people.
And it's one of the reasons I so often am disappointed, not with people in this audience, but I do have I have high expectations of people and in their ability to learn.
I have high expectations of people to see the truth.
I have high expectations of people being open to the truth and being able to be persuaded to it.
I have high expectations of people being able to accomplish more than they think they can.
And it has been, you're absolutely right.
It is one of the unstated attitudinal characteristics of me hosting the program, incumbent with the way I do it and the way I talk about things and the things I talk about, is the expectation that everybody's going to understand what I say, and with the high hope that everybody's going to believe it and act on it.
And it's because I have those high expectations of people.
I grew up with high expectations.
Um I had all kinds of pressure that way.
And I found out it's great motivation.
The soft bigotry of low expectation will kill you.
I mean, it will destroy people and the opportunity they have to maximize their potential, either as human beings or as employees or career workers or whatever it is.
If people don't expect much of you, you'll give them what you the what they expect.
Low expectations do not inspire, do not motivate.
So you've um you've actually identified something that is a constant ingredient, if you will, of the attitude I arrive to the golden EIB microphone with every day.
Now, I I know what you say too.
You've we we start out with these compassionate programs that people out of work, uh in many cases not their fault, and we don't want them to starve, and we don't we don't want people to suffer.
We have the most prosperous country on earth, and we just have this aversion to people suffering.
So we immediately embark on uh programs and plans designed to limit the suffering, ideally while they at the same time continue to get themselves out of the circumstances in which they find themselves.
But at some point, and we've reached it in many cases, the programs designed to help become more valuable in people's minds than work itself.
And now that's especially true with uh with Obamacare and what's happening to full-time versus part-time work, but I really appreciate your observation, Jeff, very much, because you're right on the money with it.
We'll take a brief time out and be back after this.
That's why I say meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day.
You know you have high expectations of me on this program.
You know you do.
And if those expectations aren't met, I know what you're gonna start saying and maybe thinking.
So I gotta meet them.
I have to surpass them each and every day.
That's the way I approach you too, by the way.
I expect you people to get what I'm talking about, and I do not make any allowances for stupidity here.
I don't talk down to you.
I don't assume you don't or can't understand what I'm talking about.
And that's what that's a great way for that caller to put it.
Now, I've got another email from somebody that didn't quite understand my analogy of Eric Holder and the report as reported by the New York Times.
Let me try this one more time.
And maybe a little chronological order.
Let's set the table what happened.
We have the gentle giant robbing a store, leaving the store.
A white cop becomes aware that the suspect walking the middle of the street that he's trying to get back onto the sidewalk has just held up a liquor store or convenience store, or what have you.
Anyway, the cop approaches him and the gentle giant, as we now know, attempted to get the cops' gun, for followed the cop back into his car, the cop had no choice but them to shoot, and all of the witnesses at the grand jury here were telling the truth said they would have shot sooner.
The cop was totally justified.
The gentle giant did not put his hands up, did not offer to surrender.
It was the exact opposite.
He was aggressive, he tried to take the cop's gun away.
Witnesses, one after another confirmed this.
While this was going on, civil rights people were protesting left and right, claiming the cop was a racist and had targeted this kid simply because he was a black kid.
He shot him with no provocation.
He shot him for no reason other than he was black.
While those allegations are being made, Eric Holder and other civil rights activists are not poo-pooing it.
They are acknowledging it could be true.
So they are responsible.
Some of the highest officials in our government are responsible for the perpetuation of racial myth in Ferguson, Missouri.
That leads to even more protests.
It leads to out-of-towners coming in and protest.
It leads to the media joining the protest, and eventually the lie becomes reality.
Hands up, don't shoot is what everybody on the left and in the civil rights community thinks happened.
And partially, our own government is responsible for that because our own government wants this kind of chaos because it helps them advance their agenda.
But then the day of reckoning comes.
The grand jury.
The witnesses file in, they tell the story of what happened, and we find out that the truth is so solid and so irrefutable that the very Justice Department, which helped perpetuate the myth of hands up, don't shoot, has to report that it didn't happen.
But that puts them in a precarious position.
Because they have led people in Ferguson believe the cop is going to get it and the police department's going to get it.
They have led people to believe Eric Holder personally by going out there and interviewing people.
He led people to believe that he was going to make sure that cop got what was coming to him if the locals didn't take care of it.
Can we accept and agree on that?
Eric Holder himself, by going out there lent credence to the idea that the federal government, if nobody else in Ferguson did it, was going to come to the rescue and make sure that cop paid the price.
Now it's time to write the DOJ report after their investigation, and they find that the cop was as innocent and not guilty as anybody has ever been and could be.
But they have a problem because they, the Department of Justice, working with people like Al Sharpton and some of the out-of-towners, have helped the people of Ferguson believe that they're going to get the cop.
Amen.
So what do they do?
They can't just issue a clean report saying the cop acted properly, that the cop was totally innocent.
They can't issue a report that says the gentle giant was guilty.
They can't do that because they are responsible for half the attitudes there.
So they issue the report that's got two prongs, maybe more.
One prong is this guy, the cop, totally innocent.
We have the witness statements, and this is actually what happened.
Over here is this hands up, don't shoot thing.
And it caused a lot of strife in the community.
We better find out what happened there.
We better find out what is it about that community that could make all those people believe a lie.
So the Department of Justice had to include in their report that the community was justified in believing hands up, don't shoot it happened, even though it hadn't, because of some intrinsic generic institutional racism that existed there before all this happened.
When the truth of the matter is, I would venture to say that over half the reason the people out there believed it happened is because they thought Eric Holder, by going out there, was going to be the last resort.
If everybody locally failed to get that cop, the all-powerful DOJ was going to go out there and take care of business.
And the DOJ had to write that they too couldn't get the cop because the cop hadn't done anything wrong.
Cop was totally innocent.
The only guilty Party here, the gentle giant.
So what they did was issue a report, admitting that, but then saying that all of this stuff about hands up, don't shoot was legitimate too.
Because Ferguson is institutionally racist.
And it was it was a CYA move, pure and simple.
Um remember the excuse that Dan Rather gave after being exposed, having totally made up fake documents and all.
The story that George Bush had avoided a Vietnam war by going to the National Guard and skipped out on that duty.
The excuse was, yeah, yeah, the documents were fake.
The story was fake, but it was accurate.
Same thing here.
So that's really what has happened here, and it's outrageous that it has happened because the myth gets continued life.
Here is Valerie Jarrett this morning on Bloomberg Television Market Makers.
One of the hosts said to her, I would uh have to imagine that while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State that you got emails from her.
And that the president might have received emails from her from Clintonemail.com domain.
I mean, she's Secretary of State.
She's got to be communicating with you, right?
You got emails from her.
I actually did not.
No, I have not received an email from Secretary Clinton.
Did members of the administration receive emails from Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State?
That I don't know.
I do know that obviously the President has a very firm policy that emails should be kept on government systems.
He believes in transparency.
And I know that the State Department is currently working with the National Archives to make sure that all of Secretary Clinton's emails are captured.
I don't know.
It's folks, this is getting so difficult.
We're getting lied to so blazonly now, so blatantly, it's hard to take all this not take this as a personal insult.
She never got an email from the Secretary of State just like that.
I actually did not.
No, I have not received email from Secretary Clinton.
How can that possibly be?
Did members of the administration receive emails from Hillary while she was Secretary of State?
That I don't know.
I do know that the president has a very firm policy that emails should be kept on governments.
Well, if he does, then how the hell did she not do it?
He has a very firm policy that emails should be kept on government systems.
He believes in transparency.
I almost choked when she said that.
And I know that the State Department is currently working with the National Archives to make sure that all of her emails right.
You know what sickens me more is I just imagine all the low information voters out there sucking all this up, believing every syllable of it.
Now, one of the things about Mrs. Clinton, she threw a guy under the bus for having a non-state department email address and domain.
Former U.S. ambassador to Kenya, Scott, I don't know how you pronounce this name.
I would pronounce it Gratian, but I don't imagine that's the correct pronunciation.
G-R-A-T-I-O-N.
How would you pronounce that?
I would pronounce it Gratian, but it's probably Gration.
Who knows?
At any rate, he was criticized by the State Department for using a personal email domain while Secretary of State Hillary Clinton did the same thing.
And he was dismissed.
They got rid of this guy.
He's thrown under the bus for it.
Well, now he's publishing a book.
And I think this guy's book might outsell Hillary's book.
And I think if the guy did a book tour, people would actually show up to see him.
As opposed to people who didn't show up for Hillary's book tour.
But what he's saying here is that he has been falsely accused and booted out of the State Department because he was trying to beef up cyber and physical security.
He was trying to make emails more secure, and what that's what he claims he was engaged in, and that that's why they got rid of him.
It wasn't because he was in violation of policy.
He was independently trying to make his own domain more secure than what he had at the State Department when they found out about that, they booted him.
And you can't w whenever any of this stuff comes up, there's a word that always comes to the forefront of my mind, and that's Benghazi.
And I know that people on the left and pe some people on the right say, give up, Benghazi.
It's been too long.
Nothing's going to happen with Benghazi.
I know it's a shame.
Probably they're right.
I can't deny it, though.
When I hear about all this chicanery and all of this lying and all of this fudging and these domains here and these domains, now we've learned that Chelsea Clinton used a fake name on the Hillary email domain.
She used the name Diane Reynolds.
Why?
What what's the point if you have your own server for your own security and you and can you can be in control?
What what in the world should use a fake name for?
What was Chelsea doing?
It required a fake name being used.
Well, I know it's like lying to your diary, except that.
Hillary was not the one accused of doing that.
Some guy admitted he lied to his diary to save the Clinton's bacon on some story.
Anyway, we still have the whole Hillary stack to get to.
But I need to get back to the phones.
This is uh this is Fred in Jacksonville, Florida.
Hey Fred, great to have you on the program.
They did it was Rosh.
I'm commander Fred West of Jacksonville, Florida.
I was a pilot of the C-130 that flew uh Brian Williams and his crew from Bahrain to a Ford operating base southeast of Baghdad, where he uh boarded this infamous helicopter that he talked so much about.
You piloted the plane C 130, yes, sir.
Flew him from Bahrain to a forward operating base in the desert, southeast of Baghdad, where he was going to pick up his uh helicopter.
You flew Brian Williams.
Yes, sir.
We were coming in, it was So your plane, your plane came under fire.
Your plane was hit.
No, it wasn't.
Just like Brian Williams said, your plane was hit, you went down, somebody got hit, got a got a got a uh a purple purple heart injury right to the ear, right?
Well, we were flying downwind on runway 3-1, and we got to the downwind end and uh got to about 400 knots and had to do a half Cuban eight.
Runway three one, there wasn't any runway three one.
Runway three one in Bob this this happened in uh in in Iraq, he said.
Runway three, one where?
In a forward operating base just southeast of uh Baghdad.
Then we got to the upwind den and they changed the duty runway, so we did a split S and made a hard landing right on the numbers.
Struts went right through the wheel wells and uh all four propellers were ground to a halt on the on the runway.
And then uh And next thing you tell me is that Brian Williams suffered a catastrophic injury that he hadn't told anybody about yet because he doesn't want to make himself out to be a hero.
Well, what he did, uh you know, protocol for uh um uh airplanes is the plane commander gets is the last on and the first off.
Well, as soon as we landed, Brian Williams jumped out of the airplane and ran across the apron, and he was dodging left and right as if he was dodging sniper fire.
But there wasn't any fire, he just made it look like that.
He just made it look like that.
You should have seen him as like a like a track uh track man.
He was going left and right and jumping up and down and it was just a amazing.
Well, what did everybody think?
Because there's the other plane that he claimed he was on had landed an hour earlier and had taken all the fire.
Oh, no, no.
From the time you guys land, there's no fire, yet he's dodging fire that isn't happening.
Yeah, well, see, he was on a helicopter in that infamous thing.
We were the C-130 that flew him into Iraq from Bahrain.
So this was a whole different incident than the helicopter incident.
Wait a minute.
I thought Brian Williams said that the plane he was in got he was he was it was a helicopter that he was in that got hit?
Yes, yes.
So this is an entirely different Brian Williams, and you were the pilot.
Yes, I flew he and his crew into the into uh the desert south of uh Baghdad.
Did you find him to be a courageous guy?
Was he sitting in a number two seat with you?
He wasn't so courageous when he jumped off the airplane and ran to the uh the apron to try to find those helicopters.
You should have seen him dodging imaginary sniper fire.
Well was his crew following him and did anybody get this he had uh about three or four people a cameraman a sound guy probably a script guy I couldn't tell but uh they sort of followed it wait a second a script guy script guy how could you know there was a script guy well he had a he had a clipboard and uh uh grease pencil so I imagine he was writing the words for Brian to read Fred I'm gonna I'm gonna have to fr I know what Fred's doing.
Fred is is accepting an offer made weeks ago on this program on one open line Friday I offered anybody the opportunity to call here and lie and make it up see if they could sell it just as easily and as well as Brian Williams had sold all his lies and that's what Fred's doing here.
I knew this is a lie to begin with but when he told this script guy with a clipboard Brian Williams dodging nonexisting sniper fire way to go Fred I applaud you.
We'll take a brief break and be back this is great I got I have emails pouring in trying to help me understand what Fred was saying previous call.
No rush Fred flew the plane it was Brian Williams on a helicopter that flew to he was flying Brian folks the guy was lying he didn't fly Brian Williams anywhere.
He was taking advantage of my offer and he admitted this to snerdly knew this.
I didn't but snurdley knew it when he put the call up and it was an attempt to see just how far he could get me to go and into believing this and I don't know what it was just something triggered this might be made up from a week's old invitation to callers to call here and lie uh in honor of Brian Williams make it up and see how you can uh see how you can sell it how easily you can sell it.
Now this I Valerie Jarrett Hillary Clinton that we know of sent 55,000 emails from Clintonemail.com 55,000.
It's simply impossible to believe that she didn't send any emails to the White House.
It's not possible that Hillary Clinton as Secretary State did not send any emails to Obama or Valerie Jarrett or anybody else at the White House.
Now, I just got another email, and I don't know if somebody's pulling my chain or not.
It's not public email.
You know, I have my own private email account here, folks.
I do.
I always have had.
And a friend just sent me a note saying that Josh Earnest is out somewhere, and there's a pool reporter with Obama today, wherever.
And get this.
Now, Josh Earnest just told a pool reporter that Obama found out that Hillary was using a private email email domain when everybody else did when he read it in the news and I don't know anymore if if my friend's yanking my chain because I didn't see that it was somebody supposedly the pool reporters from McClanchy News.
So I'm gonna try to track this down.
I hope it's true I hope they're actually going back to that and once again Obama didn't know anything Hillary was doing till he found out about it in the news the same time everybody else found out about it.
Anyway, here's Hutch, Richmond, Texas.
Welcome to the EIB Network and Open Line Friday.
Hi.
Shocked and honored to be talking to you, Rush.
Thank you.
Appreciate it.
Yesterday in your discussion about the progressive drive-by media wanting Elizabeth Warren to be president, the thought occurred to me that that woman is either brilliant or incredibly lucky or manipulative.
I don't know which, but it seems to me that if, you know, she's made the declaration that she's not going to run against Hillary if Hillary runs, and now she gets the president.
to take out Hillary for her and then she can uh she can lay in the bushes and and uh take the high road and then get all of Hillary's votes in the primaries.
Let's say let's say lay in the tall grass instead of the bushes it just it might be less sorry about that confusing and suggestive.
Now remember this just a theory this is a theory that that has been developed to explain what's happening because so many people are really shocked that it looks like practically like ninety-five percent of the media has turned on Hillary.
It I mean it is shocking that the media is all over the media's treating her like a Republican would be treated.
And so people are why?
What why of all things this?
And one of the many theories that have been evolved out of whole cloth is well, what they really want is a progressive.
They really want Elizabeth Warren, but that she said she's not going to run if Hillary's in the race.
She's not going to give everybody girl on girl here.
She's going to wait her turn until after Hillary runs her course.
Now the media, the theory goes, wants Elizabeth Warren and is not crazy if Hillary never has been really.
They love Bill but not her.
And there's an opportunity to take Hillary out.
I I can't attest to the validity of that.
It sounds good, but how much truth in it, who knows.
Yeah, I've got another comment too, Rush.
Uh uh a Friday comment, kinda.
Uh I think you have what, about four hard breaks during during an hour.
I have uh let's see, let me count them.
Uh one no, actually just two.
Okay.
Well, hard or soft.
Uh it seems to me that uh the talent that you have to do what you do is uh is is in great part because you can uh construct your thoughts and deliver your thoughts, and it seems like every time you you end right on the second that you have to end.
I I don't know how you do that.
That's just amazing to me.
And it doesn't seem like you're you're embellishing too much or you know, just fill using filler words and all that.
I I just wanted to compliment you on that.
It makes the makes the show extremely entertaining.
Thank you.
So what you don't hear me vamping the fill time to get to the break.
Exactly.
Well.
But anyway, I wanted to compliment you on that.
I think it's a a real special gift.
Well, I appreciate I I I uh deeply appreciate that observation.
You um you're on to something.
I that's inside baseball stuff that you've picked up, and I I very much appreciate that you have uh noticed that.
I'll tell you what you you're he's what he's talking about here is timing.
Just it's just timing.
And that discipline was developed uh well, a number of things, but primarily the broadcasting aspect of that was developed as a DJ.
Most of the time when I was a DJ, the only time you could talk was over the musical post or the intro to a song.
And if you spoke anywhere outside that, you got called into the office of the program director and dressed down for being a loudmouth.
In fact, at one station I worked, the restriction was even greater.
Music over music.
I mean, if you had a song with a 25-second intro, you could use it all.
But you better be talking about music.
You better not be talking about the weather.
You better not be talking about something in the news.
You better be talking about music if you're gonna talk.
It was really restrictive.
And it was it was uh, you know, radio back when I did music formats were so rigid and timed down to the second playlists were put together, and so you had to meet these time requirements, and it just became a discipline that you learned over the course of doing it years and years and uh and years.
Anyway, so Hutch, I appreciate that very much.
I gotta take a quick time out here, my friend.
Sit tight, back with much more.
I think it's time.
I haven't I haven't gotten to the Hillary stack here because frankly, I probably shouldn't admit this to you.
But I'm already getting a little bored with it.
Because so much of this doesn't there's something about this that just isn't right.
The media jumping all over her here just is the this is not right.
And I think there's something else going on here, too, that has yet to be exposed.
And that is, like I just found out that the EPA administrator does the same thing.
The EPA administrator and that department is no friend to this country either right now.
That administrator has a private email account where who knows what is being sent to whom and what's coming back.
And I think this may be more widespread than just Hillary Clinton.
All throughout this government.
I think the secrecy.
That's why when Valerie Jarrett talks about Obama's full transparency, I want to puke.
It's another insult.
It's a minor correction.
Minor, minor correction.
The former EPA administrator, Lisa Jackson, who used a private email address.
By the way, she's now at Apple, running.
Oh, yeah, she's she's the environment, she's a vice president of environmental whatever at Apple.
She's doing their solar, and they just gave her some other responsibility.
It has nothing to do with that.
It's it's it sickened me when I found out.
I don't know.
I don't remember what it is.
I I forgot it because I didn't want to know.
▲
Export Selection