All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 20, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:38
February 20, 2015, Friday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Yes, yes, sir, Rebob.
Greetings, my friends.
Welcome.
Great to have you here.
It's Rush Limbaugh, the one and only EIB network, where we meet and surpass all audience expectations on a daily basis.
It is Friday, and that means live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
If you want to be on the program, and it's open line Friday.
And now we're going to extend the Brian Williams Bill O'Reilly option to you.
Make it up if you want to.
Lie about it.
Doesn't matter.
Have fun with it, folks.
You know, we've only had this is the third week in a row that I've offered this opportunity, and we've only had two people.
Unless you're not letting them through.
Are you screening?
Because I know that you sometimes disagree with the way I want to do this program.
Yes, I do.
And sometimes you screen calls out that I think I might like.
I know what goes on in there, but I don't care.
I totally trust your judgment.
But the could be lying to me right now about it, too.
I mean, look at I opened up this show.
You want to make it up?
Have their third open line Friday in a row, and I've had two people.
You tell me that Snerdley's passing them all through here, I don't buy it.
Snurdly's probably thinking, this is a dumb idea.
Rush really doesn't want to do this.
But he's not going to tell me that.
He's just going to tell me, I'm sorry, there aren't any liars calling.
And really, when you bought it, we've had one.
The guy said he was the dead body that was floating down the river, the street in the French quarter to Brian Williams saw.
That's that's that's about it.
I'm kidding about O'Reilly.
I told folks, I told you I'm a little surprised it's taken this long.
When the whole Brian Williams thing began, I said there are two things that are gonna happen here.
One of two things is gonna happen.
They're either gonna circle the wagons like they did around Dan Rather, which they didn't do, or they're gonna go out and try to find examples of other prominent television news people doing it too.
And that's what they've done.
All of a sudden, CBS somebody, I forget.
I've got it.
So New York Daily News has a story.
Brian Williams apparently isn't the only one under the microscope.
Fox News anchor Bill O'Reilly facing allegations.
Oh, yeah, it's Mother Jones, David Korn.
That ought to tell you right.
David Korn once wrote seems like a 5,000-word article on me, and how I was in copyright violation by playing my city was gone is the theme song.
A 5,000-word hit piece on how I was a major violator of law.
Copyright law by playing my theme song.
It was the most incredible.
It was it was uh, and it was hailed as a great intellectual piece.
It's the same guy, David Korn at Mother Jones, used to work at the nation.
You've seen him on TV, probably if you pay any attention the last 15 or 20 years.
David Korn uh claims that O'Reilly exaggerated his war stories when he covered the Falklands War 3 years ago.
33 years ago, we've got a story that they're trying to make stick, and this is exactly what I predicted that in order to save Brian Williams, they would try to find examples of other people doing it so that they could say, hey, everybody does it, like Clinton and Sex.
Everybody.
And they've only been able in all this time.
This is the best they can do to go out and claim that O'Reilly lied about things 33 years ago in covering the Falklands War.
What a stretch.
But it's classic, and it was eminently produced.
And O'Reilly is running around calling it BS.
And I'm sure it is.
It's just this is just transparent as it can be.
But there are a lot of drive-by media outlets that are trying to make it stick.
And I I just, I just want to remind you, I predicted that they would scour the world for examples of other news readers, other narrative readers making things up, so that they could say, hey, hey, no big deal, everybody does it.
But see, O'Reilly.
O'Reilly's a twofer.
Oh, yeah, it's O'Reilly, number one, and number two, he is at the dreaded, hated and despised fox.
But I don't even think I don't think people look at O'Reilly as an anchor.
The way they look at Brian Williams as an anchor, and I don't even think they look at O'Reilly as a narrative reader as they look at Brian Williams or any of the other network anchors.
But again, just to remind you, this charge was whipped up by David Korn at Mother Jones.
Korn is uh you may remember he's the buffoon who claimed that Valerie Plame was a covert CIA agent who was intentionally outed by the Bush administration to punish her idiot husband.
When in reality it was her idiot husband who had told everybody she worked at the CIA where she was not a covert agent.
And as we all know, it was Richard Armitage that originally leaked her identity to Robert Novak in the first place.
But David Korn got all this.
There's a little credibility problem with this, but it's just classic, just classic.
In the utter predictability of the drive-by media and how they attempt to go about this.
Poor poor immigrants, folks, it's just bad out there.
Uh immigrants in America now feeling stuck after the judge has blocked Obama's orders.
This is a tear-stained AP story.
Brenda Armandaris, her husband, and their two Mexico-born children were hoping to resolve their constant fears of being deported after President Barack Obama issued his latest executive orders on immigration, thanks to Obama's executive orders.
If none of the family members are convicted murderers or rapists, they have no need to worry about deportation, and they probably don't have any worries even if they are.
But you see, now that a federal judge in Texas has blocked Obama's efforts to protect four million more immigrants.
Her family is disillusioned and her children feel stuck as the president's offer of temporary legal status moves frustratingly beyond their reach.
My friends, I can barely continue for the tears.
Literally, my computer screen, my monitor was moistening up as I read this tale.
About a third of the immigrants now living in the U.S. illegally would be eligible for temporary protection if Obama's latest orders are upheld in court.
Either because they were brought into the U.S. as children or because their own children have legal status in the country.
But as Judge Hannon's injection or injunction correctly noted, there is nothing temporary about Obama's executive order.
There's nothing temporary about it at all because these work permits and social security cards will never be taken away, and it's going to lead to voting rights.
The point is, they're trying to drum up sympathy now, because all these illegals, they were ready to go, man.
They were primed, it was ready to happen.
Jorge Ramos had everybody revved up.
It was almost gonna happen.
And then this judge in Texas issues this injunction.
And the day the injunction was issued, everybody thought, well, it doesn't matter.
The regime will get in gear, they'll head over to the Fifth Circuit and they'll get this thing overturned inside of 12 hours.
And it's still in force.
Now the educated thinking is that the judge actually went at this in a brilliant way, and it sort of has the hands of the regime tied.
Because they totally ignored the mandated by law, as far as that matters to Obama, the mandated by law, public comment, period.
There must be public comment on matters like this, and Obama obviated it.
He just ignored it.
And this judge said, uh-uh, uh, you can't do that and issue to stay.
And the regime now they're kind of stuck on how to go about reversing this.
So now it's time for the stories of the pain and the suffering and the tears of the illegals who are primed to take advantage of Obama's unconstitutional executive action.
It's now time to whip up sympathy and uh sorrow for the victims of this crackpot judge in Texas who is a conservative Republican, Luis Gutierrez, who is a member of Congress from Illinois, predicts unprecedented militancy among immigrants after the amnesty injunction.
On Wednesday, Luis Gutierrez, Democrat of Illinois, predicted a federal judge's injunction against Obama's temporary and there's nothing temporary about Obama's amnesty program.
Can we just establish that off the top?
There is nothing temporary about it.
But Luis Gutierrez predicted that this will activate an unprecedented militancy in the immigrant community that will drive them to the polls against Republicans.
And they said to him, What do you mean by militancy?
Are you talking about civil unrest?
Are you talking about riots?
And he, oh no, no, no.
He began to walk it back immediately.
He said, no, no, no.
I mean, it may sound like a threat to you, but I, Luis Gutierrez, was not issuing a threat.
And I was not engaging in a mild form of terrorism.
We're just misunderstanding Gutierrez's nuance here when he says unprecedented militancy.
And he has been, you know, Luis Gutierrez has had this counted as done and in the bag ever since last November.
Luis Gutierrez has already convinced everybody that he talks to that it's a done deal, and he's run and running around making plans to assimilate.
No.
There is no assimilation.
He's been making plans to get them in, get them registered, get it all done, and I'm sure the voter registration is part of it, and it hasn't happened yet, and he's getting embarrassed.
And so now he's trying to make us think that the anger is building, and it's building, and it's going to explode at some point.
And when people said, What do you mean, militancy?
Are you threatening civil unrays?
No, no, no, no, no, no.
I'm just talking about they are really Hispanics are livid, and they're gonna really take it out on you the next election, is what he meant.
Now, and this Rudy Giuliani thing.
Um Rudy was on Fox last night, went out with Megan Kelly last night to get grilled.
And it was well, she demanded that Rudy clarify his position on his statement on the fact that he doesn't believe that Obama loves the country.
He walked it back a little bit, but uh I had to go to a cigar dinner last night, Marvin Shankin and a local cigar dinner down here in South Florida, and I was away from the TV, and I'm getting texts, and it's during the Megan Kelly show on Fox, and I'm getting texts and then praising Rudy to the to the rooftops.
He's hanging in there, he's not backing down.
He is taking it to the middle.
Every Rudy was being praised on getting accolade texts all over the place about Rudy.
So when I got home, I had to figure out what had happened, and in fact, he had stood his ground and he had further evidence.
The point that I think needs to be made here about this is that I frankly know, I'm the guy who said on January 16th of 2009, this is before Obama was inaugurated.
I'm the guy who said I hope he fails.
I'm the guy who's been saying for six plus years now that it's apparent to me Obama does not like this country.
He's got chip on his shoulder about this country, and I've detailed the reasons why.
So what Rudy said to me is not a surprise.
It didn't shock me that Rudy would think this.
It kind of surprises me it's taken this long for people to have this kind of reaction, actually.
But you see, Rudy is an elected Republican.
He comes from the political class, per se.
He's not just a media guy.
And so that I guess constitutes uh groundbreaking behavior on the part of an elected Republican.
So they brought him in and put him under the microscope.
And he held up and he maintained exactly what he started out maintaining, didn't back off any of it all, and gave details, and was persuasive.
And it it's it's obvious to me, and it has been since the campaign, but certainly after the election in 2008.
I don't know, I mean, I I don't want to have to relive all of this because those of you who were here and been here a long time have heard me say all this on numerous occasions.
But it was it was obvious during the campaign.
When the biggest I mean here you have Brokaw and Charlie Rose, and it's a week before the election, and they're on Charlie Rose's show on PBS, and they're admitting they don't know the guy.
They don't know anything about it.
They're telling everybody they should vote for him, and he's unlike anything we've ever had before.
He's brilliant, he's this, he's that.
You got Brooks out there talking about he's really qualified because look at the crease in his slacks.
We've never seen anybody this meticulous.
This guy is just brilliant.
He's gonna make mincemeat of every critic.
And they were all just falling all over themselves, but here's Brokaw and Charlie Rose unable to tell anybody why they should like Obama.
They don't know what he believes about this, they don't know what his foreign policy is, they don't know who his influences are, they don't know what books he's read, and I'm pulling my hair out.
I do.
I know who's influenced him.
I know he sat in Reverend Wright's church for 20 years.
It matters.
I don't care.
He says he didn't hear anything, it matters.
I know that he was introduced to politics by Bill Ayers and his wife.
It matters.
They tried to sweep this stuff under the rug, but it matters.
Barack Obama has had as good friends, terrorists, and people who have tried to commit terrorist acts against this country.
It's not a mystery.
It's hard to accept.
I've always thought that it's people, even today, are going to have a tough time acknowledging who they voted for.
The presidency as an office is revered, no matter who occupies it.
And there's certain characteristics about it that people just will not be made to believe, particularly if they had a hand in making it happen, such as in voting for Obama.
But it did the evidence has been overwhelming.
This has been one of the most frustrating things, frankly, for me, about doing this program for the past six, seven years.
It's it's all out there in droves.
There's a treasure trove of information that makes it clear exactly who Obama is, who his mentors were, how he was educated, what he believes, what are his motivations, what are the things that inform him, what are the things that it's all there.
None of it is a secret.
The challenge is do you want to believe it or not?
And a lot of people didn't want to go there, didn't want to believe it.
Still don't.
I think Rudy, oh, just thought the clock.
Gotta take a break, folks.
Sit tight.
Back with more after this.
Okay back, open line Friday, Rush Limboy here on the cutting edge of societal evolution.
And now I'm watching CNN, and they're, and they they've you know what they wouldn't got Frank says no.
Frank says no hasn't worked at CNN on how long.
Frank says no is now it's some think tank that analyzes the news.
Some, I don't know what it, a new.
I'm not sure where it is, but it's it's one of these high-faluting intellectual outposts where the news and journalism are analyzed and reported on and judged and so forth.
And they're just doing this big deal on O'Reilly, and it's so transparent, it's David, all it takes.
It doesn't matter who.
I've just been waiting for just one left-wing drive-by reporter to make the assertion, and that's all these People need, and they are off to the races with it.
33 years ago.
Bill O'Reilly was working for CBS 33 years ago, the Falklands War.
I wonder how many people watching CNN even know where the Falkland Islands are and have any idea why they were in the news in 1982.
But Bill O'Reilly, he made it up.
He lied.
He made himself out to be heroic.
He was embedded.
He was on the front lines when he wasn't.
So says David Korn.
At Mother Jones, talk about relevant.
And now they're just because it's time to save the news.
It's time to save Brian Williams.
And it's it's so predictable.
The easiest way out of this for everybody and Brian Williams is to find examples of other prominent people doing.
Now we got a twofer.
O'Reilly and he's at Fox.
Oh, yeah, it's orgasm time.
Hi, how are you?
Welcome back, Rush Limbaugh, open line Friday, executing his sign host duties flawlessly, zero mistakes.
Here's another one.
This was utterly predictable.
It's been, it's been on the verge of becoming reality all this past week.
You remember earlier this week, we had a story, there were three Democrats.
There were two others.
I can't uh Baghdad Jim McDermott and one other, and they were just outraged.
You remember because so many of their constituents did not know the final enrollment date for Obamacare.
And because they had missed it, they were then going to be subject to fines for not having health insurance.
It's right there in the law, but these constituents of these Democrats didn't know it.
And neither did the Democrats.
The most amazing thing, the three Democrats of the many who voted for Obamacare, were out acting like they didn't know this either.
Like some aliens had snuck this provision in there.
And by golly, by gosh, they were going to get to the bottom of it.
And they were going to figure out how this happened.
Well, it happened because they voted for it.
It's always been the case in Obamacare that if you don't have health insurance by a date certain, then you're going to have to pay a fine.
The only two options in this country anymore, when it comes to health care, either you have a policy or you pay a fine for not having a policy.
And the fine works this way.
Very simply, 325 bucks or 2% of your adjusted gross income, whichever is the uh, I think it's the lesser, but it might even be the greater.
But then it escalates.
Now the 325 bucks, that's much cheaper than any policy anybody can get, other than the free one.
So it was assumed by many that a lot of people will pay the fine on purpose.
The young, the healthy, the uninformed, the idiots, the derelicts, the people paying no attention and don't even know about this.
What people were not told is the mechanism for paying the fine.
That's why we need 70,000 new, or 16,000, sorry, that's why we needed 16,000 new IRS agents, because it's right there in Obamacare.
If you don't buy insurance and therefore are subject to the fine, where are they going to get the money from you?
They're not going to send you a bill.
They're just going to take what you owe from your income tax refund every year.
Now, what if you don't get an income tax refund?
Then they will send you a bill.
Or they will charge your penalty against further refunds.
One way or the other, the federal government is going to get what you owe them if you don't have insurance.
Well, the story was about all of these Democrat voters who didn't know any of this.
They also didn't know that the enrollment period had expired.
They didn't know any of it.
And so these three Democrats, Sander Levin and uh Baghdad Jim McDermott, and I forget who the third one was, they went caterwalling to the AP talking about the unfairness and how this is this is just outrageous, and they were going to have to do something about this, like uh extend the enrollment period or or what have to do something about it.
But what was classically funny was they're the ones that made it happen.
They're the ones that voted for it.
Now we know that many people who voted for it never read the bill.
But once it just like we knew everything there is to know about Obama to be doubtful.
Folks, it was all there.
Everything about Obama.
You want to go through the list of things?
I'll do that in a minute.
But we knew everything we needed to know about Obama to seriously question who he was.
Well just like we knew that we knew what was in Obamacare.
We had taken the time to find out.
Many of us read it ourselves or we trusted others that we knew who had read it to be honest in telling us what was in it regardless.
We knew what was in it.
We knew the series of fines existed.
We knew the enrollment dates we knew the mandates we knew all of these things that were going to affect people and we spent years on this program telling you about them.
Therefore you, depending on your memory knew as well.
But the Democrat voters, the average Democrat voter didn't know and was shocked and outraged and the Democrat members of Congress that made it all happen were also acting ignorant and shocked and surprised and running around like the Limbaugh theorem blame somebody else for this.
This obviously some trick the Republican snuck in there except they couldn't they didn't vote for it.
The Republicans don't have a single fingerprint on Obamacare.
Well, this led to further stories earlier this week about the need to extend the enrollment period and maybe refine the fine-paying process and so forth.
And here's the latest on it today.
Bowing to intense pressure, the Obama regime said today that it will give uninsured Americans exposed to Obamacare's fine for lacking insurance another six-week delay.
grace period to enroll in coverage in other words to go out and get a policy and avoid heftier penalties next year even though they missed last weekend's deadline to sign up the special enrollment period will now last from March the 15th to April 30th.
This is considered enough time to make sure that all uninformed and stupid Democrat voters can get hoovered up into this and figure out what they want to do.
Should be enough time to sweep them all up to swoop in there, get them signed up, whatever you're going to do and then take care of this special enrollment period now lasts from March 15th to April 30th and it will apply to federal exchange customers in 37 states who while filing their taxes learn for the first time they need to pay a fee.
See that's what's happened people are filing their taxes.
And if they go to HR block or if they try to do it themselves or they go to any tax preparer, that's when they learn that they have to pay a fine as you have health insurance checkbox yes or no.
And if you don't that's when your tax preparer tells you well you you you we're going to have to take away for your refund you're going to pay a fine and these people are blowing up they had no clue.
They had no idea.
And so mad Democrat voters, well, we can't put up with it.
No, no, no.
Mad Democrat voters, no, if that's going to happen, we're going to find a way to blame it on the Republicans, or we're going to find a way to fix it, because we can't have angry Democrat voters.
So everybody scrambled, and they've now extended the enrollment deadline.
And this is a wanton random change.
This is one of the many changes that Obama has randomly made to this law that he doesn't have the authority or the legal authority to do.
All of the different waivers, all the enrollment dates that have floated and moved, this law bears very little resemblance to what it was when it was originally voted on.
And it's becoming increasingly popular for people.
I think it's never been possible, actually, for even the most informed citizen to know exactly what's in this bill.
The people that wrote it.
There's so many people that wrote it that cut and pasted their own little pet peeve stories and stories.
proposals and ideas into it that it's a catch-all it's an absolute mess.
It's an absolute disaster.
I don't think there is anybody that knows exactly what's in it.
And besides that, all of the references in the law itself to, or as the secretary may determine, the Secretary of Health and Human Services is empowered to make this law whatever she or he wants, given any or this or other circumstance.
But it was it was just to me uproariously funny to watch these three Democrats act like they had no idea.
How did these fines get in there?
Who did this?
They did.
Their president did.
The Democrat Party owns Obamacare.
The mess, whatever it is only, are their fingerprints on this.
But now there's an addendum to the story.
Obamacare officials admit that 800,000 people got faulty tax advice information from the federal website.
The administration has estimated up to six million people to be subject to this individual mandate tax, this fine, for not having insurance last year.
Now it has not projected, the regime has not projected how many going to take advantage of the special enrollment extension or period.
The government will not offer relief from the 2014 penalty, which is the greater of $95 or 1% of household income.
That's the first year penalty.
The second year it's 325 and 2%.
Today's move was not unexpected as the regime had been openly mulling the relief period, and three state-run exchanges have already extended extra time to penalty payers.
But in a twist, the agency said that it is now scrambling to fix an error on crucial forms that went out to roughly one in five healthcare.gov customers, about 800,000 people, and could affect the calculation against 2014 income that determines whether they got too much or too little of a subsidy.
Do you realize what a mess this is?
800,000 people got faulty information at healthcare.gov.
So now the IRS and everybody's scrambling to send the correct information out to these people who have already filed their returns or on the verge of filing their returns.
They don't know what to pay penalty-wise.
They didn't know there was going to be a penalty.
They're agitated, they're irritated, and the Democrats are trying to make it look like they had nothing to do with this.
And the Obama administration, in pure limbaugh theorem form, is running around trying to act like they had nothing to do with this.
Somebody else screwed this up because when we finished it, I mean it was smooth salin boy, and it was ready to go.
But now it's exactly folks.
I look, I it's exactly the mess so many of us feared.
Nobody wants this for people.
This is not, this is not improving health care for people.
I saw it elsewhere in the stack here.
The number of uninsured who have been covered, which again was another one of the primary reasons for doing this, the number of uninsured that have been covered is so infinitesimally small, it's embarrassing.
I remember all during this, remember shouting at this microphone, none of this is about health care.
This is not about insuring you.
This is not about giving you good treatment.
This is about nothing other than the government getting bigger and swallowing whole one-sixth of the U.S. economy because it's health care, they are going to have more and more total dominion and control over how people live.
And lo and behold, coming up later on in the program, federal government, America should adopt a plant-based diet.
And a companion story, nation's top nutrition panel, the American diet is killing us.
And since they now are in charge of health care and therefore controlling its costs, they can determine what a healthy diet or unhealthy diet is, and they can demand that you adhere to it.
And if you don't adhere to it, and they'll know by virtue of you getting fat or your blood pressure going up, or whatever mechanism they want to use, If they can find out you're not adhering to their mandatory diet, guess what?
You're gonna pay another fine.
Or worse, you're not gonna get treated.
That's how this is gonna work.
So therefore, they're gonna have more mechanisms to control every aspect of the way you live simply by having control of the purse strings to health care.
And that's what it was all about.
So all of these little machinations going on now, the enrollment not being met and the fines being a surprise to people.
They don't care.
It was not about this.
If these are just little bumps in the road, there's nothing you can do.
You're still gonna have to pay the fine or have a policy.
That isn't gonna change.
They may change the enrollment date and give you a couple more months to do it, but you're still gonna have to do all this.
You're still either gonna have to pay through the nose for a policy, or you're still gonna have to pay a fine, or you're gonna have to go around and hope they don't catch you and be in violation of the law.
Your payment is gonna come out of your tax refund every year, and then you're gonna have to adhere to the diet that they demand.
This is what's coming.
That's why they wanted socialized medicine.
That's why they wanted Obamacare.
That's it wasn't about altruistic things.
It wasn't about compassionate uh health care desires.
It wasn't about the fact that they care about your health and never want you to get sick, and if you do get sick, wanting you to get well as cheaply and as quickly as it's not about that.
They act like they care for you.
They act like they're the only ones that care for you.
And you're willing to entrust everything about yourself to them.
Their voters are.
And then it's sadly every time, no exception, people eventually learn they can't fulfill their promises.
Because they can't care enough.
They don't care enough, and it's not about caring about you in the first place.
And we've known since 2009, this is what this is gonna be.
Just like we've known since 2007, 2008, who Obama is.
None of it's a mystery.
Okay, it's Open Line Friday.
Always try to get started in the first hour with a call.
At least get one call in, since that's the focus of Open Line Friday.
We're gonna start with uh Mary in Warren, Ohio.
I'm glad you waited.
Great to have you on the program, and you are up first.
Hello.
Yes, good afternoon.
Uh very surprised that I got through.
Uh very small comment, a very quick one.
The I listen to a lot of Fox News where they keep trying to find out why the government is not calling them ex uh Islamic extremists rather than just terrorists or people of violence.
If it's not important to call that spade a spade, why is it important to call something a hate crime rather than just a murder?
I mean, you know, if it's just murder, why have to put a special name on it?
Uh okay, that's not what you called about, right?
Uh yes it was.
It was why okay, what why are they calling I'm sorry, I'm distracted here.
What what what we could you make your point again?
I I thought Well, the government kind of claims.
You said you've been watching what did you you said you've been watching Fox.
What's what's Fox doing that that you noticed?
Well, they're trying to they keep talking about the fact that Obama will not call people ex Islamist extremists.
Right.
That names don't matter.
If names don't matter, then why is it important to call something a hate crime when it's still a murder?
Right.
In that case, a name matters.
So, you know, it either matters or it doesn't.
Okay, so you oh I see.
So you're you're just you're you're giving us reasons why Obama's hypocritical.
Yes.
I see.
Well, the um we know that.
Yeah, he's obvious they they don't want to call it Islamic extremes.
Why do you think he doesn't want to call it that?
Uh that's what I'd like to know.
Oh, come on, you do know.
This is my point.
Everybody knows, they just don't want to say.
You know what it is.
Why didn't you want to call it?
He's afraid of doing it uh for fear of of offending Islamists.
I think they're pretty already upset as it is.
I mean, they're beheading people, they're burning people, and they're terrorizing people.
I mean, how much more angry can they get?
They can't get any more angry than they already are.
They are in control and they know it because too many people in government, especially ours, are not doing anything they're supposed to be doing.
Yeah, why is that?
Turning a blind eye.
Why is that?
Um, like they didn't know that we were killing all of the Jews during World War II.
Nobody knew about that.
Yeah, well, that's also the that that may be dubious as well.
But anyway, Mary, I appreciate the uh I appreciate the call.
Thanks much.
A brief time out here, my friends.
Sit tight, we'll be right back.
Don't go away.
Open line Friday, whatever you want to talk about.
You can even repeat things I've said, and I'll try to be patient with you.
800-282-2882.
Hang in there, folks.
▲
Export Selection