All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 29, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:35
August 29, 2014, Friday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Somebody tell me what happened to we are the ones we've been waiting for.
Greetings, my friends.
Welcome to the Rush Limbaugh program on Friday.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida, it's Open Line Friday.
Open Line Friday.
No shortage of things to be interested in out there today, folks.
So let's hear from you.
Telephone number 800-282-2882 and the email address, lrushbo at EIBNet.com.
Open Line Friday is a career risk taken by me, shown to be worth it over 25 years.
One day a week, callers can discuss anything that they care about.
It doesn't have to be related to the news.
It doesn't have to be related to anything I care about.
It can be we draw the line at people complaining about the electric bill and that kind of stuff, sewage problems, but pretty much anything else.
Have at it.
Feel free.
Looking forward to talking to you.
Telephone numbers 800-282-2882 again.
Okay, we don't have a strategy yet to deal with ISIS.
And not only do we not have a strategy to deal with ISIS, the president of the United States told him that.
He told him that in a press conference yesterday.
Then he told Putin and the Russians that we're not going to do anything about whatever's going on in Ukraine.
And then he said that we'll never going to be able to vanquish ISIS.
I mean, we're never going to be able to get rid of them.
So you Iraqis, if you're worried about it, you better step up because we can't deal with them.
We can put them down here and there, but we can't get rid of them.
Imagine if that had been the attitude about Hitler and the Nazis.
Can you imagine if that had been the attitude about Imperial Japan back in World War II?
Can you imagine if that had been the attitude about Soviet Union and the Berlin Wall?
Can you imagine if that had been, hey, you know, we're never going to be able to get rid of these people.
We're going to find a way to compromise with them, have to find a way to live with them.
If you're directly affected by them, don't bother us.
You're on your own, like you're Iraqis.
Come on, you better step up.
If you can't deal with it, it's your problem.
I'm not going to help you anymore.
We'll get them out of here now.
We can't do anything about it.
Imagine if that attitude had been prevalent during World War I. Can you imagine if Barack Obama had been around during the Revolutionary War?
Hey, you know what?
You guys make a big mistake.
We can't get rid of British here.
What are you talking about?
Can you imagine Barack Obama as president during any period of time saying about the equivalent threat of that period, what he is saying about ISIS?
Meanwhile, David Cameron, you know, he says this while his own defense secretary says ISIS is unlike anything we've ever seen before.
While his idiotic Secretary of State also sounds the drums about how dangerous this bunch is.
And I'm telling you, people are trying to figure this out.
And I must tell you, I do get some pleasure.
Just a little pleasure.
It's very limited.
When I listened to all of the people who told us in the first three months of 2009, what a brilliant man this was.
And I'm not just talking about David Brooks and the comment he made about Obama's sharp crease in his slacks and what that portended for a great presidency.
There were all kinds of people who were bending over backwards and in a race with everybody else to try to come up with the perfect sycophantic description of this man's intelligence and his qualifications and his newness, his uniqueness.
And as you know, I was not among people.
I was not among those people that saw Obama that way.
And not only was I not, I was stunned that they could.
But boy, did they race with each other to try to be the first to the nearest camera or microphone to praise.
I'm talking about people on our side, folks.
I'm talking about learned media.
You know, I listened to Hillary Clinton today.
She's out speaking about Ferguson.
She's quoting Martin Luther King.
Do you realize how incompetent this woman is and always has been?
And yet, and you'll hear it when I get to the audio sound, but the woman is incompetent.
She's a total phony.
She's a total fake.
She's a fake and phony from Wellesley on, from Yale and all those days on.
Everything is a calculation and everything is an act.
There isn't one ounce of genuineness.
And she's not alone in that.
That has become our politics, sadly.
But this, it is so easy.
So many people think that so many other people are smarter than they are.
Or let's make it even more personal.
So many people, so many of you probably look around and, oh, man, they're smarter than I am.
I don't know that I could.
Steve Jobs once said, and it might have been in his commencement speech at Stanford.
He said, don't make the mistake of thinking just because you haven't done something, you can't do it.
And don't make the mistake of thinking that just because there's a whole bunch of people doing something, that they're the smartest ones doing it.
Don't fall prey to that.
Don't ever put down your own intelligence.
Don't ever slight your own ability.
But in this entire, I think all of Washington never gets out of high school.
I think they never get out of high.
It's clickish.
It's based on so much phoniness, formulaic phoniness, pedigree, where you went to school, who mommy and daddy were, this kind of stuff.
And that ends up being what is supposedly substantive about someone rather than who they really are.
Who Barack Obama is and the fact that he's not qualified and never has been qualified has not been a mystery.
It's been something you had to overlook.
His lack of qualifications, his lack of training, lack of ability is something that you've had to consciously overlook if you wanted to support the guy or even if you wanted to be fair.
This is just more of the same.
We don't have a strategy for that.
Okay, you don't have a strategy.
What it means is he doesn't care, folks.
He doesn't care.
He doesn't want to be bothered by it.
This is not why he became president.
This is an interruption.
It's interference.
This is getting the way of what he really wants to do and what his purpose is, which is the transformation of the country.
But he's got to do this stuff because it's part of the job.
But he really doesn't like it, and he's not interested in it.
If you're going to go out and say you don't have a strategy, don't say it.
Why say it?
And don't chalk that up to being just a blinder.
There are people inside the White House who are, if they're aware that's what he's going to say, because, you know, you really don't want to go out and say that.
It was intended, is my bottom line.
Now, Vladimir Putin's out today.
Don't mess with nuclear Russia, Putin says.
Vlad, you got nothing to worry about.
Obama's off.
He's already said so.
You can do whatever you want, Ukraine.
You're not going to stop.
He can't.
He doesn't care.
President Vladimir Putin said today on Russia's armed forces, backed by its nuclear arsenal.
Russia's, this is written important.
Vladimir Putin said Friday, comma, Russia's armed forces, backed by its nuclear arsenal, were ready to meet any aggression, declaring it a pro-Kremlin youth camp that foreign states should understand, quote, it's best not to mess with us.
Well, don't worry, because we don't have a strategy for that.
The Prime Minister of the UK, David Cameron, went out today.
I wonder if this is timed purposely to follow up Obama's embarrassingly inept, we don't have a strategy for that.
He went out and made a speech about how serious this really is, ISIS, and what we have to do about it.
Now, his and they have to be defeated, but his manner of defeat leaves something to be desired.
But still, he was defiant and he was not slinking away, and he was not acting afraid.
He was not acting indifferent.
And he properly characterized who these people are and why they have to be dealt with.
And it was bold and it was forceful and it was confidence-inspired until he got to his prescription.
But we'll cut him some slack on that.
You'll hear what I mean.
I'm just setting a table here, folks, because your phone calls are coming up.
It's open line Friday.
We've got audio sound bites and so forth.
I just, you know, watch the listen to the press court now.
These people that have been slavishly covering for this guy for six years that have been lying to this country about this or that, denying the truth of Obamacare, for example, to the people of this country, all to cover for Obama, all to make sure it all turns out for Obama.
And even they can't believe.
I watched Lynn Sweet, who was a Chicago newspaper columnist, on Fox this morning, and she was so flustered she couldn't put three words together in a row that made sense, trying to explain this while at the same time expressing her total bewilderment at all of this, the we don't have a strategy for that.
They're flummoxed.
They did everything they could to prop this guy.
They're the ones that told us how smart.
They're the ones who told us how qualified.
They're the ones that told us that Mitt Romney and George Bush are reprobates.
They're the ones that tell us when Mitt Romney travels the world and issues statements and defines our problems.
Romney's an idiot.
Romney's the fool.
Romney's dangerous.
Romney doesn't know what he's talking about.
Obama's the guy we have to go with.
Obama's the guy we have to listen to.
We don't have a strategy for that.
So those same people, to listen to them now try to explain this is, well, it's somewhat enjoyable in the limited scope that we have time to enjoy it because it's actually quite dangerous, folks.
It's actually quite frightening that this is the attitude at the highest levels of the United States government.
Anyway, let me take a brief timeout.
One quick soundbite before we go, and then we'll come back.
There's one media person we found, F. Chuck Todd, is attempting to explain what Obama really meant when he said we don't have a strategy for that.
Eddie Henry, Fox News, who was there, says he can't believe there were any follow-ups.
He wasn't called on.
He can't believe that none of the press corps followed up when Obama said there wasn't a strategy for dealing with ISIS.
And there's not a strategy for Syria, and there's not a strategy for Ukraine.
And there's not a strategy for wherever.
He couldn't believe that the White House Press Corps didn't follow up.
Why would they?
Anyway, great moments in presidential history.
The only thing we have to say is fear itself.
Ask not what your country can do for you.
Ask what you can do for your country.
Mr. Gorbachev tear down this war.
I don't want to put the cart before the horse.
We don't have a strategy yet.
Yeah.
You didn't hear that?
The Fort Hood shooter, you know, that workplace violence at Fort Hood.
He has asked for citizenship from ISIS.
He sent ISIS a letter and is asking for citizenship in ISIS.
The Fort Hood shooter, an Army psychiatrist.
And it was just, it was workplace violence.
There's nothing to see there.
Greetings, folks.
Welcome back.
Great to have you, Rush Lynn Boy.
And Open Line Friday, ESPN may be in a tizzy right as we speak.
Maybe it, you know, there's a huge fallout over the shower report.
By the way, speaking of that, you know, Josina Anderson reported that Michael Sam was the last to use the showers after practice every day because he didn't want to make his teammates uncomfortable.
And everybody said, what's that about?
Well, the implied thing, you know, was, okay, guys in the shower.
Recruitment.
If anybody wanted to even deal with it, so he's going in there last.
Nobody actually said that, but that's what the undercurrent of the report was.
So everybody blew a gasket.
How dare they?
ESPN apologized.
They didn't suspend themselves, but they should have.
There are calls for the reporterte to be fired, the producer to be fired over this report.
Well, while they're trying to put themselves back together on this, the NFL network, which is owned by the league, there is a reporter there named Mike Silver, and he has just tweeted that he doesn't expect Michael Sam to make the Rams 53 man the final roster.
Now, ESPN's going to see this.
And another ESPN trick is to when somebody else breaks a story like this, ESPN runs a call that says, a crawl on the screen, ESPN confirms that Michael Sam will not be.
Or they try to make it look like they broke the story or they're right in there along with it.
Can you imagine NFL Network has reported, just a reporter there tweeted that Michael Sam won't make the final roster.
It's not official, just this guy's opinion.
But it's supposedly inside news, inside opinion, the league's own network.
A reporter there may have an end with the Rams.
The final cuts are due Saturday at 4 o'clock.
Final cuts, 4 o'clock tomorrow.
So that's when everybody will know.
ESPN now.
Oh, what do we do with this?
Oh, my God.
Does it having to do with our shower story?
I wonder if it has to do with our shower story.
Oh, gee.
Just love this stuff.
Audio soundbites.
Here's Barack Obama yesterday afternoon in Washington at his Don't Have a Strategy press conference.
I don't want to put the cart before the horse.
We don't have a strategy yet.
I think what I've seen in some of the news reports suggests that folks are getting a little further ahead of where we're at than we currently are.
And I think that's not just my assessment, but the assessment of our military as well.
We need to make sure that we've got clear plans so that we're developing them.
At that point, I will consult with Congress and make sure that their voices are heard.
Why?
Why are you going to consult with Congress?
I thought Congress was dysfunctional.
That's why you were going to have to do amnesty for 5 or 10, 20 million, or whatever it is illegals, because you can't work with Congress.
Why all of a sudden you're going to work with Congress on this?
If they're dysfunctional, they're dysfunctional.
Why don't you just go ahead and do what you're going to do on this one?
Why do you have to bring Congress in?
And then, did you note the whole tone of this?
You can barely hear the guy.
So soft-spoken, so deliberate.
I don't want to put the cart before the horse.
We don't have a strategy yet.
I think what I've seen in some of the news reports suggests that people are getting a little further ahead of where we are.
And that's just not my assessment.
That's the assessment our military is.
There's always a straw man.
There's always an invisible, unrepresented, you can't find them person that always agrees with Obama.
But that's not true.
His own Secretary of Defense, whatever he's worth, Chuck Hagel, has described ISIS as the absolute, uniquest, biggest threat we've faced.
Now, we don't know anything like these guys before.
Here's Obama.
And I think that's not just my assessment, of course, but the assessment of our military as well.
So again, he's informed by news reports.
I've got to make sure we get clear plans that we're developing.
And I will consult with Congress.
So he wants nothing to do with this.
He can't wait to consult a dysfunctional Congress.
He can't wait to bypass on immigration.
Now there you're talking.
There, now you got his time.
Now you got his attention.
Now you got his full commitment.
Now you're talking immigration and amnesty.
Now you've got action.
ISIS, I don't care.
I really don't.
Speaking of the National Football League, ladies and gentlemen, the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, the media just going, the media is in love.
The media can barely contain themselves because Goodell claimed he was wrong.
And there's nothing, nothing that makes media more orgasmic when a powerful figure admits he made a mistake.
Well, they don't get excited when Obama admits he made a mistake.
A, that doesn't happen.
B, they wouldn't want him to make that kind of admission.
Everybody else, it's big.
And what Goodell said, you know what, I heard.
I've been listening and I hear you.
And two-game suspension for Ray Rice, not nearly enough.
So I'll tell you what we're going to do.
New NFL policy is in the case of wife abuse, spouse abuse, six games.
The first time you were found guilty of it.
The second time, you're going to be suspended for a year with no guarantee you're going to be reinstated.
So two games was six games suspension for spousal abuse from now on.
And now the drive-bys in sports are asking, well, now will the Ravens do the right thing and suspend Rice for four more games for a total of six?
Because you know that would be the right thing to do.
Goodell suspended him for two games, but Goodell admitted to that.
That was a mistake.
And so the Ravens, are they going to be good NFL citizens?
Are the Ravens going to do the right thing?
And they're going to kick Ray Rice to the sidelines for six games?
That's what the media wants to know now.
And if the Ravens don't do it, will the commissioner do it?
Will Goodell call the Ravens and say, you know what?
Two games is not enough.
I was wrong.
It's six games now.
Ray Rice out for six.
The media is hoping one of those two things happens.
We have a call about this, in fact.
Julie in San Antonio, Texas.
I'm glad you called.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Hi.
Hey, Rush.
It's been a long, long time listener.
Never got, and I got through one other time, but it was too late to get on the air.
Well, I'm glad you made it through today early.
Yes, so I was talking to this nerdless.
Actually, I was talking to my husband last night about this domestic violence rule, these new rules, and I was really surprised about the lifetime ban for the second.
No, no, no, it's not lifetime.
I think it's one season.
Oh, I thought it was lifetime.
Well, either way, it's just pretty severe, the second offense.
Now, wait a minute.
Now that you mentioned, you know, now that you mentioned this, I think I've seen both.
I think I did see yesterday lifetime, and then today I read one year with no guarantee of reinstatement.
Well, either way, what I was telling my husband last night, and he said, you need to call Rush.
We always want to know what you think, especially on sports and NFL.
And we're really disappointed when that deal with the NFL didn't work out for you years ago because we love seeing you on there.
But my comment to my husband was, you know, if I'm a woman, and I'm a strong woman, I have a graduate degree.
I'm a professional, and I consider myself a pretty strong.
You know what?
You sound like a woman who can take care of herself.
You sound that way to me.
I think I am, but I still would think, and if I were in that position and my husband had already maybe, you know, we had a few drinks and he smacked me and got his first offense was done.
And now he's in the, you know, in this probationer area.
And something happens and he beats up on me again.
I'm going to be really hesitant to report it if he's going to have a lifetime ban.
And here I am living in this million-dollar mansion with all the stuff.
And I think it puts women in a really tough position and almost to where you're going to have these closet.
Do you realize, Julie, what you are saying here?
You are saying that some of these sports wives will do a comparison and they will decide in favor of the lifestyle over justice for an abusive husband and will suffer the abuse in order to maintain the lifestyle.
Yeah, I know your point.
You think the punishment for a second offense is way too severe.
It's never going to get reported.
I just think it puts the burden on the wife more than the guy.
I just think it puts a heavy burden on the and who did, I mean, Goodall made this decision after just, what, a day, he realized, oh, I made a big mistake.
Did he go and talk to, you know, professionals in this, you know, I don't want to say industry, but you know what I mean?
It is an industry In the whole, you know, did he go talk to the, you know, your best friends over at now or whoever the, you know, these feminazis and say, what should I do to these good, big, bad football players when they beat up on their wives?
Wait, are you, you were cutting out.
Were you asking me a question?
I just said, you know, who did he consult with to make this decision?
Oh, who did he?
Who did he consult?
Oh, well, I don't know, but it's clearly, Julie, it's reactive.
He announces a two-game suspension.
Remember, at the time, the NFL didn't have a policy for spousal abuse.
They had a policy for suspensions for performance-enhancing drugs and for recreational drugs, substance abuse, and alcoholism, and any number of other things.
D-U-I.
But they didn't have one for spouse abuse.
So they said they were kind of flying blind.
There was no policy.
There was nothing.
So they had to just make it up.
So Goodell makes it up, two games, and there was an outcry from the media.
There was an outcry from the sports media.
And it was ongoing and relentless.
And I think the league is making a big push for female fans.
That's what Pink October is all about.
I've got a story here about how the NFL is promoting fantasy football for women.
It's hilarious.
They are asking women to play fantasy football and rate the players as husband quality, date quality, one night stand.
I'm not that they are using a relationship dynamic, an imaginary relationship with the players to entice women to play fantasy football.
It's all part of the push.
So clearly, I don't know who Goodell talked to, but it doesn't matter.
Whoever he's going to talk to about this is going to be talking to somebody on the left politically.
And it's all PR.
It's all reactive buzz and PR.
And so now it's six years.
Julie, I think you've got a good point.
If the second suspension is lifetime, a woman who likes the wife may not report it.
If it's a full year without pay, a wife may not report it.
You know, I mean, the amazing details about abusive relationships.
You know, we've had movies about women that put up with it for whatever psychological reasons.
Well, there's that side of it, too, that women who want to get revenge who would go ahead and turn the guy in and maybe make it up.
You know, by making it up, claiming that such and such a player abused me when it didn't happen to get revenge, ruin his career, and get out of the relationship, obviously.
Well, she'd have to have some evidence.
Or maybe not.
See, as reactive as the league is being, I don't know.
I told you, this is new, talking about this kind of stuff.
Here we are, basically, we're six days from the opening game of the NFL season.
We're talking about suspensions for spouse abuse and how the commissioner, a two-game suspension wasn't enough.
The media demanded more.
And now it's six games first defense.
And the big question in sports media today is, will the Ravens do the right thing and suspend Ray Rice for six games now instead of two?
No, it is.
That's the question in the media.
That's the question in the media is will the Ravens now do the right thing?
I kid you.
No, I'm not making that up.
Julie, thanks for the call.
I appreciate it.
Back to the Obama soundbites.
This is yesterday afternoon at the I don't have a strategy press conference.
He got a question from a reporter.
Do you regret not moving on ISIS earlier, Mr. President?
There's some report indicating out there that most of the weapons, U.S. weapons that they have, that they got it or they acquired it after the fall of Mosul.
The idea that the United States or any outside power would perpetually defeat ISIS, I think is unrealistic.
As I've said before, I think I said it in the previous press conference.
Our military is the best in the world.
We can rout ISIS on the ground and keep a lid on things temporarily, but then as soon as we leave, the same problems come back again.
So we've got to make sure that Iraqis understand in the end they're going to be responsible for their own security.
Folks, I want you to imagine FDR saying the idea that the United States and the Allied powers could perpetually defeat Hitler is unrealistic.
As I've said before, we got a great military and we can route the Nazis out of Paris or France, but it's going to be up to the French to take care of it.
We can't do everything.
Can you imagine if Ronald Reagan said, well, one thing we all have to realize, my fellow citizens, the Soviet Union is here to stay.
Worldwide, communism is here to stay.
We might be able to kick them out of Grenada.
We might be able to prevent them from establishing a beachhead in Nicaragua now and then.
And we might be able to upset them in Cuba, but they're always going to be there.
There's no way we can ever, ever, really perpetually defeat Soviet communism.
Can you imagine if FDR had said, remember last week when I told you that we would never, ever be able to perpetually defeat Hitler?
Well, it's the same thing with Imperial Japan.
The idea, I mean, they're way over the Pacific Ocean.
We're never going to be able to vanquish them.
It's not possible.
We can take them out on Midway and maybe Iwo Jima if we have to, but we're never going to be able to vanquish.
It's just not possible.
Can you imagine?
You imagine Churchill during the Blitz.
The Russians, the German V-2 rockets are hitting, and Hitler's saying, you know, there's nothing we can do to stop this.
I agree with President Roosevelt.
We're on our own.
The U.S. has the best military in the world.
We're second, but there's not a thing we can do.
We're going to have to find a way.
Neville Chamberlain was right, my fellow citizens.
We're going to have to find a way to deal with Hitler.
We have to find a way, because we can tamp him down over here over there, but he's still going to prop back up.
Can you imagine?
This is, I don't know.
I run out of adjectives, folks.
Even if you think this, even if you're just, I don't know what, so corrupted that you even think this, why in the world go out and say it in a worldwide press conference?
Why go out and telegraph that we don't even expect to be able to stop you?
I don't know.
I just, I just wonder, all these people who told us six years ago that we'd never seen anything like this before.
Oh, no, we've never been in the company of such brilliants.
And don't question the man's qualifications.
He's fine.
He's like us.
He went to Harvard.
He's brilliant.
Harvard Law Review, don't you know?
Brilliant, brilliant.
Look at the crease of his slacks.
There's no reason to be suspicious.
And there's no reason to be concerned.
You hear the guy talk, talks just like us.
Smart as we are.
Maybe even smarter, if you can believe that.
Nothing to worry about here.
CNN right now has a discussion topic going, what is it that drives people to Islamic extremism?
If you don't understand ideology, you're never going to be able to answer that question.
Islam, militant Islam, is a political ideology.
It is an extremist, ideological, it is not a religious movement.
They have conned everybody into believing they're a religious movement so they have freedom to say and do whatever they want to do and be immune from criticism.
It is a militant, extremist political ideology, militant Islam, the ISIS guys.
But if you don't see the world as ideological, if you don't see liberalism as ideological, no, liberalism is just what's natural and good and decent.
Conservatism and the Tea Party.
Now, that's dangerous.
That's dangerous.
But they can't figure out what would drive, why do these American guys, like Daniel whatever this McCain guy, why they wanted this rapper?
Why do they want to join ISIS?
The answer is ideology.
It's right if you just got the courage to face it and admit it.
None of this is hard understanding it.
It's hard to admit, maybe, but understanding it's not hard.
Anyway, back to the phones.
Paige in Miami, great to have you.
Welcome to the EIB Network Open Line Friday.
Hello.
Hello.
How are you?
How are you doing, sir?
I'm great.
How are you doing?
I'm doing good, sir.
I have a question for you.
Okay.
I'd like to know why Mr. Obama, he's about to grant amnesty to all the immigrants that came over here illegally.
And I'm a black male from Miami.
And when the Cubans come here, they make it to land.
They get to stay.
And if the Haitian people come over, regardless if they make it to land or not, they get sent back.
Interesting question, Paige.
You want to know why the United States, in this case, Obama, eagerly wants illegal Hispanic immigrants and doesn't mind if the Cubans come ashore.
But when the Haitians try it, they get sent back.
That's right.
And when he ran, when he was candidate Obama, he promised to do something about that.
About what?
The Haitians?
About the policy, the immigration policy with the Haitians coming over here.
Well, let me ask you first.
I mean, you obviously have been thinking about this since you called to ask me.
And if I answer it, there's nothing left to be said.
So, what do you think is the answer to the question?
Why are they so eager for Hispanic illegals, but not Haitians?
Well, sir, I was thinking that because maybe the Spanish people will vote for him, but the Haitian people voted for him as well.
The majority of the Haitian people voted for him as well, but they go ignored.
Yeah, but he doesn't need any more of those.
But the Hispanic vote's always going to be up for grabs.
He's going to need more and more Hispanic groups.
And his donors want the Hispanic workers.
His donors want the illegal Hispanic or Hispanic immigrants.
And the poor Haitians.
The policy, the immigration policy with the Haitians coming over here.
Well, oh, is that what's going on?
Paige, you've got your radio up.
You're listening to the program on our delay to keep me from calling Sandra Fluck a name again.
Well, that's why it's there.
Snurdle is walking out of the room.
Paige.
Obama's got 93% of the Haitian African-American black vote.
The Hispanic vote, he doesn't.
It's all about votes.
He's got enough on the Haitian African-American side.
Another exciting excursion into Broadcast Hour.
Broadcast Excellent.
Another hour of it is in the can.
Fini, on the way over to the Limbaugh Broadcast Museum, which is in its virtual state now at rushlimbaugh.com.
We'll be back and continue on on Open Line Friday in just a moment.
▲
Export Selection