All Episodes
July 11, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
39:39
July 11, 2014, Friday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Greetings, my friends.
Great to have you with us, Rush Lindbaugh back at you in the final big broadcast day of the week.
Let's hit it.
Live from the Southern Command in Sunny, South Florida.
It's open live.
Open Friday.
This is where I, El Rushbow, take a back seat.
Well, I don't know that I'm constitutionally capable of taking back sea, but I try.
Meaning that when we go to the phones, whatever the callers wish to talk about, that's what we talk about.
No matter what I think of it.
It's a golden opportunity for callers to talk about what they want rather than have to talk about what interests me.
Now I know that my interests and yours are close.
They parallel and other.
But if there's something else out there that you want to chat about, feel free.
Telephone numbers 800-282-2882 and the email address El Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
I uh last night I um I must admit I and I sometimes worry about about this, but I don't watch cable news anymore much.
And there are a lot of reasons for it.
I remember I used to be uh habitually well, not addicted, but I I made appointments every Sunday to watch the Sunday morning shows.
And after a while, I stopped, I lost interest.
And the reason I lost interest is I stopped learning things.
And everybody on it didn't matter who the guests were, what they were going to say was predictable.
And so there was no anticipation for what might be said, what might happen, even if there was some scandal going on and some member of the regime was gonna show up, uh, or even a previous administration.
It just it just lost interest for me.
And over time, uh much of cable news has it is also formulaic and and predictive.
This is not a criticism of it.
I I don't please don't misunderstand.
That's not my point here.
I don't watch it, and I'm sometimes thinking maybe I should take the time as part of the job to watch it, because probably you do.
And so I ought to be watching some of what you watch, just for the purposes of being able to relate to it, be empathetic about it.
But I've been selfish, and I have been indulging myself in Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Greetings, my friends.
Great to have you with us, Rush Lindbaugh back at you in the final big broadcast day of the week.
Let's hit it.
Live from the Southern Command in Sunny, South Florida.
It's open live Friday!
This is where I, El Rushbo, take a back seat.
Well, I don't know that I'm constitutionally capable of taking back sea, but I try.
Meaning that when we go to the phones, whatever the callers wish to talk about, that's what we talk about.
No matter what I think of it.
It's a golden opportunity for callers to talk about what they want rather than have to talk about what interests me.
Now, I know that my interests and yours are close.
They parallel and and other.
But if there's something else out there that you want to chat about, feel free.
Telephone numbers 800-282-288-2 and the email address L Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
I last night, I um I must admit, uh I and I sometimes worry about about this, but I don't watch cable news anymore much.
And there are a lot of reasons for it.
I remember I used to be uh habitually, well, not addicted, but I I made appointments every Sunday to watch the Sunday morning shows.
And after a while, I stopped.
I lost interest.
And the reason I lost interest is I stopped learning things.
And everybody on didn't matter who the guests were, what they were going to say was predictable.
And so there was no anticipation for what might be said, what might happen, even if there was some scandal going on, and some member of the regime was going to show up, or even a previous administration.
It just lost interest for me.
And over time, much of cable news has it is also formulaic and predicting.
This is not a criticism of it.
Please don't misunderstand.
That's not my point here.
I don't watch it.
And I'm sometimes thinking maybe I should take the time as part of the job to watch it.
Because probably you do.
And so I ought to be watching some of what you watch, just for the purposes of being able to relate to it, be empathetic about it.
But I've been selfish, and I have been indulging myself in ways that I'm actually interested, things that I actually want to do.
But last night, I actually turned on cable news for the first time in a long time, and I happened to see, rather than just read about it, I happened to see, because it happened yesterday during the program.
I happened to see Obama's appearance at the uh at the at the Texas Theater in Austin.
His fundraising appearance where he was heckled ostensibly.
And I've heard a lot of people comment about it.
It happened during the program yesterday, and I had not really seen it.
I'd only heard things about it, as getting a little blurb reports here about it.
But I watched it, and it was this was the appearance where he was laughing at John Boehner.
He was laughing at the idea he might be impeached.
He was laughing at the idea that he might be sued.
And he was asking the audience to laugh along with him.
Now, since I saw it, I have seen and read a lot of commentary from people who also saw it and who think that it was really odd to have the president laughing about something that could be something very serious.
He's being sued.
He is being sued for acting outside the Constitution.
And he's not doing his job.
Sits up there and says, hey, you know what, they want to sue me for doing my job.
Well, they're not doing no.
Go ahead.
And while he said he was being sued and they wanted to impeach him, somebody in the audience started applauding.
So Obama stopped and said, Oh, really?
Really?
You you came in here, you want to join the impeachment.
And he started laughing about it.
And then the commentary since then has been how unseemly people thought it was for the president not to take this seriously.
I mean, here he is, the chief executive.
He's the president of the United States, and he is laughing about the things he's doing, the things he's being accused of doing, and the possibility of being sued slashed impeached over it.
And a lot of the commentary I saw was people think, well, you know, this is this is really disrespectful.
This is very serious stuff, and he laughing about it.
And I have a different take.
This is my this is the long lead up to this.
I don't think he's laughing at it.
I think he is livid and offended and outraged by it and is mocking the people who are critical.
I think he's that laughter is not laughing at the situation.
I I think he's mocking everybody.
I think he's, I think privately he's uh just ticked off about all of this.
Well, I don't think he's laughing about it in the sense that he doesn't take it seriously or that he thinks it's worthy of jokes.
A lot of people think that he's not taking it seriously, that it's just it's joking fun stuff.
I just not I don't read him that way.
Uh I I think privately this he tells you.
He will tell you what he thinks.
I'm doing my job.
And they want to assume me for doing my job.
That means something.
Um He thinks he's totally within his rights to be doing everything that he's doing.
And how dare, how dare anyone challenge him?
That he is with a bunch of friends, and I think he's just mocking, and that's what the yucks are all about.
I was also thinking about a couple of other things.
Do you remember, ladies and gentlemen, the fuss over the uh the sequester?
Real but very small budget cuts.
Not reductions in the rate of growth, but actual budget cuts.
I mean, they were infinitesimal.
And they outraged Obama.
It was his idea, and the Republicans called his bluff, and there was a sequester, and it ticked him off.
But do you remember?
During the sequester, Obama was able to close down the Washington Mall.
He was able to stop veterans' ceremonies.
He's able to shut down a Blue Ridge Parkway.
He was even able to shut down the Grand Canyon, visits to the Grand Canyon.
He's able to shut down visits at Jellystone National Park.
He was able, while the World War II memorial was shut down.
He allowed, I think it was an anti- or pro-immigration rally or some such thing to go on at that place when he was the when he was preventing World War II bets for making perhaps their once in a lifetime visit to the memorial, things they had saved money for, planned for.
And he used the sequester as the excuse for shutting things down, randomly selecting things to shut down.
Yet he tells us that he can't close the border.
And the Democrat Party tells us they can't close the border, but look at what they can randomly shut down whenever they want to.
They can shut down the mall.
They can shut down veterans' ceremonies at World War II memorials.
They can shut down the Grand Canyon.
You know the things they were shut.
But oh no, no, no way, can't shut down the border.
And then in addition to that, Obama's been able to keep congressmen and reporters out of all of these detention centers and military bases that are housing the latest illegal aliens.
But he can't keep little children from crossing the Rio Grande.
He can keep senators and members of the House out of these detention centers.
He can demand that they don't show up with cameras.
He can demand that they don't get to see in the media.
Everybody can't keep kids from crossing the border.
He can shut down any aspect of the government he wants, but he can't close the border.
He uses his powers very selectively, sort of like the um the way he selectively chooses which laws of the land that he's going to change and those that cannot be changed.
Yeah, he's got a phone and a pen, and whatever he wants to do, but he just can't close the border.
Damn it, and all these other things.
He can't close the border.
It just seems impossible to do.
You see, where the first lady of Guatemala went to visit the U.S. Mexico border.
Well, so she went to the Rio Grande River.
Uh that's where the U.S. border used to be.
She's not afraid of doing photo ops.
She's not afraid of doing theater.
She showed up.
Oh, speaking of that, we ended the program yesterday.
We had a uh uh a woman call and wanted to know how in the world all of these kids from El Salvador and Guatemala and Ecuador made it through the southern Mexico border with No problem whatsoever.
And of course, her theory was that there is an arrangement between the U.S. government and the government of Mexico to let this happen because both nations want this to happen.
That was uh Patty from Atworth, Georgia, who called, and we touched on this at the end of the show.
She wanted to know what Mexico was doing specifically to stop, if anything, the flood of illegal aliens.
Well, I took it upon myself to find out.
And this is what they are doing.
And this is not from some right wing outlet.
What I have here is a story from the examiner.com, but it's basically a rewrite of a Spanish language report from El Universal.
On Monday, Mexican president Enrique Peña Nieto and Guatemalan President Otto Perez Molina held a joint press conference in Playa de Cataja in Mexico to officially announce an agreement to make it easier for those making the illegal journey to the United States from Central America to cross into Mexico.
So there is your answer.
The Mexican president, the Guatemala president, had a joint press conference to announce an agreement that they came to make it easier for these illegal, alien, unaccompanied kids to make the journey to the U.S. from Central America— Make it easier to cross into Mexico, the Southern Border Program to improve passage.
That's the name of it.
SBPIP, Southern Border Program to Improve Passage, will provide for more border checkpoints along Mexico's border with Guatemalo.
It'll offer more protection and even emergency medical care to those making their way north.
Medical care, protection, not stopping them.
They're going to help them and have been helping them along the way.
The illegal aliens will receive a so-called regional visitors card, according to the Spanish language newspaper or network El Universal.
Officially, the program will grant the cards to only illegal aliens from Guatemala and Belize, the Caribbean superpower.
And these cards would allow him to remain in Mexico's southern states for 72 hours, which is more than enough time to reach the U.S. Mexico border by train.
So apparently this agreement is between Guatemala and Belize for now.
But who can tell where all of these undocumented people are from?
So anyway, that when I close the loop on that, she had a legitimate question.
What's the government of Mexico doing?
Keeping their southern border open so that this influx can pass through Mexico?
The basic answer is yes.
They're not just keeping their border open, they are facilitating passage.
All right, a brief timeout.
We will continue.
Open line Friday and the EIV Network back after this.
Have an audio soundbite here.
Actually, I want to get to a couple of them here.
And we're going to start.
This was Neil Cavuto yesterday afternoon on Fox News Channel.
And he spoke with Mike Brown, the former FEMA director, George W. Bush.
And in talking about the immigration crisis southern border.
Brown had a good point, by the way.
But I want to see if you pick something up in this bite.
Neil Cavuto said, there are a lot of differences.
But the one commonality, when you get to the scene of the incident, and President Bush was criticized for getting to Katrina too late.
This president for not getting to the border at all.
So Brownie, which is worse.
Bush getting to the scene too late, or Obama not even going.
During Katrina, you had a focal point.
You had the New Orleans Superdome, and that focal point allowed the media to really focus on what was going on in that natural disaster.
What you don't have in the border issue is the focal Point.
The media hasn't been able to get in, so there's no focal point for anybody to focus on.
So the American public doesn't get that this humanitarian crisis is as bad as the natural disaster in Katrina.
But the president's not going to go because this really fits the limball theorem that he uses the words that he's involved, he's paying attention, his staff is briefing him, but he's not going to go because he doesn't want a photo walk.
Did you catch that, folks?
Did you get former FEMA director Brownie referred to the limbaugh theorem to explain what Obama is doing vis-a-vis this humanitarian crisis?
And he's right on the money.
He understands the limbaugh theorem.
I'm so thrilled.
I'm so excited when somebody outside this universe understands.
And he gets it.
And you know, it's also a good point.
It in addition to, and I look, there's another point I want to make here, too, uh, because I think this is important.
Whenever there is a crisis involving children, the Democrat Party can't wait to show it to you.
They put the children all over television.
They they they give us all the details about their plight and their story, and there's none of that here.
And I was joking the other day about a telethon.
Where's the telethon?
Where's the hashtag?
And the truth of the matter is there will never be a telethon.
Because if you do a telethon, if you're going to do a Sally Struthers time, you've got to give the backstory.
You have to explain who these kids are, how they happen to get here, what in the world is going on.
And there's nobody on the left that wants to go there.
In fact, it's just the opposite.
They're doing everything they can to prevent the story from being told.
They don't want anybody to even take a picture of these kids and the others that are immigrating illegally.
They don't allow cameras in.
They're not allowing the media in.
This is one of the first uh Democrat party programs for the children where they do not and will not allow anybody to see a single photo.
The party that lives and dies by photo ops.
No photo.
Zilch Zero Nada.
And I uh it's the first time in in uh that I can recall where, and this is a political event.
Do not doubt that this is a an event being politicized by the Democrats.
Don't doubt that.
And yet they don't want any media.
They don't want any pictures, they don't want the backstory.
And and Brownie here has a really good point.
With Hurricane Katrina, there was a focal point.
It wasn't just the Superdome.
You could put Shepard Smith and uh what's it, Anderson Cooper side by side on a little bridge overlooking any part of New Orleans, and you had a focal point.
You could have uh a media person in a little rowboat stationed outside the House of Congressman William Jefferson, Democrat Louisiana, and you could hide and wait for him to show up after he had commandeered a rescue boat to go get $90,000 in cash that he had hidden in his freezer.
I mean, it was all happening right there.
But in this case, they won't let the media anywhere where they can get a picture, any picture of what's going on here.
And I guarantee you that does lessen the impact of this.
Be back.
Stay where you are.
He has made the announcement in an exclusive essay at Sports Illustrated.
He said that when he left Cleveland, he wanted to get a couple championships, and Miami was the best place to go.
So he went to Miami, he took his talents in South Beach, he won a couple championships, and he made great players out of his teammates and a great time doing it.
But Miami knows championships now.
He wants to go back to Cleveland and uh and help that roster there Develop and become the best they can be.
He wants kids in the Akron and Northeastern Ohio area to know it's a great place to grow up.
He wants to come back and he wants to bring championships.
He wants to have that roster.
He uh basically coming home.
And you remember Dan Gilbert is the owner of the Cleveland cavaliers.
Do you remember?
Do you remember what I don't remember you Snerdley said, you know, this disowner of the Cavaliers.
I mean, talked about LeBron.
I mean, like Donald Sterling talks about people when he left and went to uh went to Miami.
Why why would he want to go back?
I guarantee you they've they've put all that back together again.
That's no big deal.
That isn't any big deal.
That's uh I I'm sure LeBron got paid.
And he's uh he's uh coming back home.
This smooth all that stuff over.
That's just that was heat of the moment emotional stuff that came from the owner who didn't want to lose the guy.
And uh now LeBron's going back home.
Talent's leaving South Beach and heading back to.
Well, hey, you know, he's not the trailblazer here.
Uh the Republican Party is gonna do their convention in Cleveland.
LeBron's just following a trend here.
He's not setting one.
The GOP announced last week that they are going to Cleveland, and they did it first.
So there you have it.
Uh CNN hasn't done a thing.
I I think this story's made them break away from the missing airliner.
I got 15 or 20 people now giving expert analyst commentary on what this all means.
It's a slow news day out there for the unimaginative.
It is never a slow news day here at the EIB network.
Your host once again maligned and misrepresented.
And by the way, I n I I need to give you a heads up on something here, folks, before we head to the phones on open line Friday.
This so-called lawsuit that uh Boehner is threatening to file against Obama for behaving outside the Constitution, for basically breaking the law for doing things presidents are not constitutionally permitted to do.
I think you should know that certain news organizations are now associating my statement in January of 2009.
I hope he fails with the Boehner lawsuit.
There is an effort to conflate the two.
And in order to do that, you have to purposely misrepresent and misunderstand what I said and what I meant when I said I hope he fails.
Now I know you were tired of this.
You've heard this.
You knew exactly what I meant the moment I said it.
And furthermore, so did everybody else.
Everybody else knew exactly what I meant, but they pretended they didn't so that they could create a phony narrative that I actually wanted the country to fail because I couldn't stand a Democrat succeeding in making the country work.
So I wanted the country to that's what they were trying to make everybody believe I meant.
And of course it was just the exact opposite.
I wanted Obama to fail at what he has done.
I wanted him to fail at growing government.
I wanted him to fail with his economic policies.
Look what they've done.
I wanted every Obama policy to fail, and if that happened, the country would be spared.
I wanted to save the country.
I wanted to, I was I was offering a defense and a desire to protect the country by saying I hope Obama fails.
So let's go to C-SPAN, Washington Journal this morning.
This is the host, Peter Slan, I think is his name, and he uh he took a call from Mike in Memphis.
My solution is for the Congress, the lack of cooperation between the legislative government with the executive branches of Pauling, and it's killing us.
It's like they've adopted Rush Limbaugh.
I hope he fails, philosophy.
There's no cooperation.
Obama cannot do it by himself.
And it's gonna kill us.
This country is being destroyed from within.
Obama needs to call out the military to secure the border, the Tea Party right wing Republicans.
They're just sitting there and not offering any solutions to problem.
That means it's good to racism and prejudice of the black president.
Now, what do we do with this?
I mean, we're clearly are dealing with the quintessential low information voter here.
I mean, this is classic.
There's so many contradictions in what this guy said, so many factual inaccuracies.
Yet it's out there.
It's out there on C-SPAN.
And he says, see Daehner and the Republicans have adopted Rush Limbaugh, I hope he fails philosophy.
No, they haven't.
Here's the here's the thing.
Lack of cooperation is killing us?
No.
The only thing that is even giving us any hope is the gridlock.
If it weren't for the gridlock, if it weren't for the Republicans occasionally refusing to go along with what Obama wants, we'd be in worse shape than we're in now.
But this guy doesn't even understand.
He says there's no cooperation.
Obama can't do it by himself.
Obama's doing it by himself.
And he's bragging about doing it by himself.
And he's promising to do even more by himself.
If they won't do their job, well, I will.
I'm not going to sit around and wait for them to do nothing.
I'll go ahead and do it.
I'll do it.
And he's doing it.
That's why he's being sued.
He's doing more than the Constitution permits him to do.
He doesn't need any cooperation.
He wants fall guys.
He wants people to take the hit when the things that he does go wrong from our perspective.
They don't go wrong from his.
And then we get Obama needs to call out the military to secure the border.
Who made it insecure?
Who opened it?
Who's keeping it open?
Who's promoting it as open?
Who's down there welcoming everybody in?
Who's looking at it as a Democrat voter registration?
Call it the military to secure the border.
That's what the Tea Party wants to do.
And yet the Tea Party right wing.
They're just sitting there not offering any solutions.
That's all they are offering.
We and the Tea Party have a countless solutions to these problems.
They are the antithesis of Obama policy.
Now, for those of you, and I know you're there, except you don't.
Most low information voters don't know.
By definition, how could they?
They don't know enough to know they don't know anything.
So most low information voters don't know their low information.
That's the funny thing about this.
We can talk about all day long, and nobody's gonna think I'm talking about them.
Because there's not a low information voter out there who actually thinks he or she is low information.
They always think you're talking about somebody else.
But this January 16th, 2009, right here on this program, just for the sake of getting it out there again, because there is an effort being made to associate my I hope he fails with this Republican lawsuit.
I don't need 400 words.
I need four.
I hope he fails.
Well, what are you laughing at?
See, here's the point.
Everybody thinks it's outrageous to say.
Look at even my staff, oh, you can't do that.
Why not?
Why is it any different?
What's new?
What is unfair about my saying I hope liberalism fails.
Liberalism is our problem.
Liberalism is what's gotten us dangerously close to the precipice here.
Why do I want more of it?
I don't care what the drive-by story is.
I would be honored if the drive-by media headlined me all day long.
Limbaugh Colon, I hope Obama fails.
Somebody's got to say it.
And they did.
They headlined me.
I was all over.
I owned the media, and I don't even have a PR Firm.
And they just, and to this day, when they think it serves their purpose, they revive me saying, I hope Obama fails.
And they always attempt to convince people that what I really meant was that I wanted the country to fail.
I've actually heard some people explain it to others this way.
You know what Limbo really wanted?
We know he's really afraid of.
Limbo's afraid of a Democrat coming in and the economy booming and the country going great guns.
He just doesn't want that to happen when the Democrats are office because he knows it's the end of what he believes.
So that's why he wants Obama to He wants Obama to fail.
Meaning he wants the country to fail so that a Democrats don't need credit.
That's how they were trying to portray what I had said.
When they knew that's not what I meant.
I meant exactly what I said.
I have never supported liberalism.
I have, I know exactly who and what liberalism is and what it does.
And if everybody did, there's no way anybody would want more of it.
Well, not everybody.
You're always going to have a few.
But we've not lost the country.
Now we don't we're I don't care what they say about the tipping point.
We have not got to the point where a majority of Americans just want to give up on their ambition, on their desires, on their families.
It hasn't happened.
Media would love you to believe that we've reached that point, but we haven't.
But for me, it was I don't want any more liberalism.
I've seen enough of it.
I know exactly what it does.
Worldwide, nationwide, I have seen what liberalism does.
And I was hoping Obama would fail in his attempt to transform this country into something it was not founded to be.
Ladies and gentlemen, stop and think of something for a second.
We are five and a half years into the Obama presidency.
Five and a half years.
And my statement and explanation on January 16th of 2009, this is two weeks before, maybe a week before Obama was even inaugurated.
My statement, I hope he fails, remains the most memorable and standing expression of opposition to Obama in five and a half years.
A guy on the radio, a guy on the radio a week before Obama's inauguration says, I hope he fails, and that, even after five and a half years, still stands as the strongest statement of opposition to Obama that there is.
That's where the media goes.
To illustrate opposition.
They don't go to anybody in the Republican Party and what they've said.
They go to a guy on the radio.
What does that say about the political opposition to Obama?
Means there hasn't been very much if my statement is still the go-to statement for the media.
After five and a half years, here I am still explaining this.
After five and a half years.
By the way, back to this caller on C-SPAN.
Mike from Memphis is what his name was.
Mike from Memphis.
Tries to say that the Tea Party is fighting, securing the border.
I mean, listen, he says there's no cooperation.
Obama can't do it by himself.
The country being destroyed.
Obama needs to call out the military, secure the border, the Tea Party right wing.
They're just sitting there not offering any the Tea Party is all for securing the border.
You know what I heard Rick Perry say this is something I didn't know.
Tell me if you knew this.
Rick Perry says that Obama has moved.
Border Patrol agents 45 miles inland.
They're not on the border.
Did you know that?
I didn't know that either.
Rick Perry says Obama has positioned the Border Patrol 45 miles inside the U.S. It isn't on the border.
And the reason for that is that Obama wants to have these illegals treated as already in the country.
Rather than be dealt with at the border at crossing, put the border patrol 45 miles, at least this is the case in Texas, that's what Perry would know.
So that way you treat these illegal aliens as already in the country.
Who therefore have to be given all the rights to hearings and appeals that every citizen would have to already hear 45 miles and not being interdicted.
At least in Texas.
Okay.
Open line Friday and to the phone, St. Petersburg, Florida, says Lawrence.
Thank you for calling, sir.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
It's a real thrill to speak with you.
Appreciate that.
Rush, it I believe it has never been more obvious that Democrats are putting party before country.
And this uh um border issue with the criminals uh uh breaking the law to become future Democrats, uh, union recruiting effort, uh, Democrats in waiting, Democrats in transit, maybe Democrats.
Uh that's what's going on there.
And it's about their party being more important than the rest of the country.
Do you not agree?
Yes.
However, I would add something to it, and this is key.
At one time, your statement alone would be shocking and would be new.
It would be revelatory.
My God, this party is putting itself ahead of the country.
The difference now, Lawrence, is that the Democrat Party is all in on transforming the country.
This is not so much putting the party above the country as remaking the country for the party.
Well, then, Rush, do you think that it has any parallel to uh beyond socialist?
Uh I'm looking at the definition of the Nazi Party and uh the former National Socialist German Workers' Party.
Do you think that there's any correlation or parallel?
I don't know.
But here's what when I hear you ask that question, my reaction is you sound like a reasonable human being.
You sound like a nice guy.
You don't sound like uh a tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist.
You sound to me like somebody scared to death.
And I have a lot of uh a lot of email from people who have these fears.
I don't know where this is going, but they're scared to death.
And I think your question is uh is a great illustration of uh uh where this could end up.
There's genuine fear.
This this it hasn't happened to this degree in our lifetimes.
And so where it ends up is obviously something that scares a lot of people.
But that's something I'm not prepared to predict now that we're headed to parallel the Nazi Party.
That entails too much.
It is the fastest three hours in media.
Can't believe first hours already in the can on the way over to Limbaugh Broadcast Museum, but we've got much more straight ahead, my friends, when we get back.
Export Selection