All Episodes
Previous Next
May 2, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:36
May 2, 2014, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Views expressed by the host in this program make more sense than anything anybody else out there is saying.
It's Friday, folks, so let's hit it.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open live Friday.
Darn right I was surprised.
I couldn't believe it happened, but they did it.
Well, because the Republicans are not stopping repr uh the Democrats.
There's there isn't any pushback, and yet they're gonna have this special select committee looking into Benghazi.
And furthermore, they're gonna put a real tiger as the chairman.
Trey Gowdy.
So Boehner has announced a special House Committee to investigate Benghazi.
This is something that is long overdue.
And to show that he is serious.
We just interviewed Trey Gowdy for the current issue.
Well, it's soon to be yeah, it's it's out now.
It's soon will be.
The digital version is out.
Trey Gowdy is the interview in the Limbaugh letter, and this guy's a former prosecutor in South Carolina, and and he is just takes no prisoners.
And he's gonna head up this special select committee, which means that it's not something just pro forma.
Selecting Gowdy is a great indicator.
You don't let me put it this way.
If you really didn't want this committee to do anything, if all you wanted was the news that you had appointed it, you wouldn't put Trey Gowdy in the chairmanship role, because he is gonna get to the bottom of this.
No matter what.
He is he's gonna not gonna leave one stone unturned here.
And Boehner has to know that.
Which tells me, of course, that Boehner's serious.
Well, I don't want to go that far.
But it has to meet it's good.
800-282-2882, if you want to be on the program, the email address, L Rushboard EIB net.com and openline Friday means that you get to talk about whatever you want.
Doesn't matter, doesn't have to be something I care about, doesn't have to be something that's in the news.
Even though I'm famous for not saying there isn't any news.
It's all how do we advance the Democrat agenda?
And let's stay focused on that for just a second.
I take you back to October 24th, 2012, on this program.
This is what I said.
What we're watching here today is the equivalent of Woodward and Bernstein helping Nixon cover up Watergate.
That is what is happening today with this story.
Mainstream media is Woodward and Bernstein.
Watergate is Benghazi, except this time Woodward and Bernstein are helping Nixon cover it up.
That's exactly what's going on.
Drive-by's not they're not interested in this at all.
They don't really think there is anything, and those of them who do know that there's something here want to cover it up.
Now the drive-by's are made up of a lot of stupid people, and the drive-by's are made up of a lot of uninformed people, and the drive-by's are made up a lot of people with a lot of prejudice.
And there are a lot of reporters who will discount Benghazi simply because of who is interested in it.
For example, if Fox is interested in it, it automatically is nothing.
If I'm interested in it, it doesn't rate any interest.
Because Fox and me, all we want is to get Obama.
That's all we did, and so wouldn't I get Obama because they don't want to get Obama.
So if if there's I mean, that's how prejudiced they are, sh and and short-minded.
You have some of the drive-bys who know full well what they're doing, and they're working with the regime to cover it up.
And then you have real activists in the uh in the drive-bys who know exactly what happened and who fear the truth coming out and are gonna do everything they can to protect Obama, including trying to lay the blame off on Republicans somehow.
Or the military or the video that nobody ever saw.
In fact, let's here's here's Dr. Knote Emma who was last night in the round table, the all-star panel.
Special report with Brett Beer, who said a few weeks ago, Dr. Kay, you said right here on this panel that Republicans should move on, that they should kind of leave Benghazi alone, that it was a dead end.
Have you changed your mind?
Yes, because of the appearance of this memo.
It's to me equivalent of what was discovered with the Nixon tapes.
And what's changed now, and we saw it in the briefing room, is that I think the other media are somewhat embarrassed by the fact that unlike Fox, they allowed themselves to be stoned and spun and rolled for a year and a half, and now the memo appears, and it's obvious that they missed the story.
Now two points here.
Dr. Krauthammer admits that two weeks ago he was in the Pelosi camp.
Benghazi, Benghazi, let's go, let it go.
There's nothing here there, nothing to see.
It's two years ago.
There's nothing to talk about, let's move on.
Then the memo came out.
The memo shows that there was a massive cover-up.
The memo shows the White House knew exactly what had happened and was trying to protect Obama from it, and the Susan Rice being briefed.
And now Dr. Crownhammer says that's the equivalent of the Nixon tapes being discovered.
You know, the Nixon tapes were big.
The 18-minute gap, Rosemary Wood secretary, Nixon taping all the people in Haldeman, Ehrlichman.
It's what enabled Woodward and Bernstein to go.
I still like my comparison that the drive-bys of today are the equivalent of Woodward and Bernstein helping to cover it up.
When Dr. Crowdhammer says that the other media now somewhat embarrassed because they allowed themselves to be stoned and spun and rolled for a year and a half, and now the memo appears, it's obvious they missed the story.
You know, he knows some of those people, and I don't, so I'll have to acknowledge that he may have a point here.
I don't my instinct, though, is that the Obama media didn't have to be spun.
The Obama media on anything doesn't have to be spun and rolled.
There is, in fact, uh bear with me on this because I only read this once.
You may have seen it.
I, of course, did not.
I have to read about it.
Brent Bozell was on Fox one night this week on the Meghan Kelly show.
And he had a transcript of emails back and forth between somebody in the White House and a drive-by reporter.
And the drive-by reporter and the administration official in the White House were all both ragging on Fox.
They were watching Fox.
They were watching Brett Bear.
They were watching, no, it was O'Reilly.
They were watching the O'Reilly factor.
And they were emailing each other back and forth.
O'Reilly was going on about how Benghazi was a big thing and the media was missing it, and clearly the video had nothing to do with it.
And these two people, one a drive-by reporter, the other administration official, were both writing each other back and forth about what B.S. Fox was talking about.
And it was clear from these emails back and forth from the reporter.
I wish I could remember who it was.
I think it was I want to say the Hill.com, but I'm not sure.
That's right.
It was Victoria Newland.
Is she the regime official?
That's okay.
AP reporter Matt Lee and the regime official was Victoria Newland.
That's right.
State Department.
Exactly.
Okay, they're writing back and forth, emails to each other about what bunch of BS is on Fox, as O'Reilly is discounting the regime theory on the video, explaining why there were protests in Benghazi, and that's why the ambassadors did.
So the point is you have a State Department spokesman or official writing back and forth with a news media person.
What was the name?
Lee, first name Lee?
Dave Lee.
Matt Lee.
And if you read it, it's clear that Matt Lee from the Associated Press is offering his assistance to the regime.
Now, my only point bringing this up is the media didn't have to be spun.
The media didn't have to be rolled.
The me and I'm not I'm not criticizing Krauthammer.
Please don't misunderstand.
I'm just, I'm just I'm disagreeing with the role of the media here.
They are totally all ready in the Obama camp.
They are Obama Its first and journalists second.
They're liberal Democrats first and journalists second.
They're not even journalists anymore.
So you have Victoria Lula in the State Department and this Matt Lee guy, and they're watching O'Reilly, and O'Reilly's making all the sense in the world about the video, not being responsible for anything here.
And these two people writing back and forth about what a bunch of BS is on Fox.
Now the AP reporter, he doesn't know from anything.
He's not asking the State Department, babe, hey, is what I'm hearing on Fox right?
He's not asking the government official, hey, could O'Reilly have a point here?
Could maybe it video doesn't have anything to do.
No.
The AP reporter was already in bed with the State Department official, and they were already conspiring with each other on how to make sure nobody believed the Fox report or the Fox version of things.
They wanted to make sure that the Fox version of things remained marginalized and isolated.
So I don't think the media has to be spun.
And I don't think they're embarrassed now.
I don't think there's any regret that they missed this story.
The regret is they weren't able to successfully cover it up.
If anything, the drive-by media is gnashing its teeth over the fact that the original Fox and anti-standard media version of this, my version, everybody else, is the one that's real.
And that the regime has been lying.
They're mad that that has been learned.
And so now that now they got to cover it up.
So we're into the cover-up of a cover-up now.
The media is not interested in the truth of this story.
They never have been.
This has been a circle the wagons event from the get-go.
From the night of the Benghazi attack, this has been a circle the wagons moment.
Now they've got to do it again.
Here's Andy Henry.
Let's stick with the sound bites.
This morning on America's Newsroom, Bill Hammer.
He's talking to Ed Henry, is the chief White House correspondent for Fox.
Hemer said, Is it your sense that more reporters or in that briefing room or even your casual conversations, are they more dialed in on the story now or not?
Some of my colleagues will privately say, well, that's a Fox question if you're pursuing Benghazi.
And I don't care what you label it.
If it's a fair question and there are lingering questions about what really happened that night, and then how the White House talked to the American people about what really happened.
Let the chips fall where they may.
You don't have to push anything politically.
Just ask fair and tough questions.
Yeah, well, but he's saying that most of his fellow correspondents.
It's a Fox story.
And they're not following the details.
They've moved on.
It's a non-story.
Their version of covering it up is to not report on it.
Their mechanism, their method of covering it up is not to report on it in the original stages.
And just leave it as a as a Fox or alternative media story.
That's what Hammer wanted to know.
Well, where are they now?
Okay, the memo's that everybody knows now.
The original version of this thing was B.S. So Hammer said, I'm not looking for gossip, Ed, but I mean, in your casual conversations, not what they're reporting, but if you just when you talk to these other reporters up there, are they dialed in on Benghazi or not?
There's a lot of issues out there that you and I cover and everyone else, health care and the economy that are also important.
So it's not like every reporter in the White House press corps has to be dialed in on every last detail.
But frankly, I'm not sure there are many who follow this that closely.
Some people have frankly just moved on.
Now you can tell Ed doesn't want to distance himself too much from these colleagues.
Well, you know, Bill, uh there's a lot of issues out there.
You and I cover everybody else, health care, the economy.
A lot of things that are very important, too.
So it's not like every reporter up there has to be dialed in on every last thing.
See, he had to pay his dues.
He had to acknowledge that he's got to stay their colleagues.
I mean, he works in the same room, don't want to be on size.
But the bottom line, he finally admitted they didn't follow this.
They didn't follow this closely.
And now they've moved on.
It is the cover-up of a cover-up now.
And now it's serious.
Got another election coming up, folks.
The drive by said I got a turn on Obama on this.
They're not going to turn on Obama on anything.
Here's John.
What I did, uh...
Thank you.
Thank you.
Wait a second now.
Oh, it is John.
Graph sound by number eight.
This is CNN's new day.
And uh correspondent uh John King talking with one of their reporters, Anna Palmer.
And King said, Look, the Republicans want to call John Carey up, testify about this.
They're saying if they can talk about the Senate, they would like to have a select committee look into it.
The Democrats are saying, especially with the White House taking a lead, this is old news.
It's all politics.
So who's right, Anna?
This is red meat for the Republicans, right?
When they're looking at the November elections, they want to turn out the base, and this is exactly what they do.
Democrats, they're trying to make a light of it almost.
And I don't know whether that's gonna probably almost inflame the right even more.
Risky.
Risky to make light of it.
An ambassador and three other Americans died in Benghazi.
Yeah, you it's just you hear this reporter, this infobe, Anna Palmer.
It's still political.
Four people dead, and it's still in her world all about vote turnout.
It's all about well, who can win the issue and turn it into advantage in the uh elections in November?
The substance of the issue is of no concern to her.
I'm frankly a little surprised.
John King said it's risky for the drive-by's to make light of this.
And Ambassador, three other Americans died in Benghazi.
Well, they are making light of it, and they're gonna keep trying to as long as they can.
Open line Friday, back to the phones that we go.
And this is Willie in Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello, Willie.
Oh, hello, and thank you for what you do.
I appreciate it.
You bet, sir.
Uh the the unemployment news that you were talking about, jobs created, all the numbers they throw out there seem real confusing.
The two numbers clarify everything that actually people gotta watch are from the White House uh numbers.
300,000 per week new unemployment applications for six years.
I know he's been in for seven years, but we'll give him the benefit of a doubt.
And only 100,000 new jobs per month on average.
Well, when you add those up, yeah, he's created 7,200,000 jobs.
Yeah, they say it's over nine, but just in jobs lost over the six years is 93,600,000.
So it doesn't matter what kind of numbers they come up with, they're in the tank.
Well, now wait, I don't think we've lost 93 million jobs because we didn't start the regime with uh labor force participation rate of 100%.
Now we've lost a lot of jobs.
Your point is that we've lost net more jobs than we've gained or produced.
And you're a lot more.
There's no question about that.
Yeah.
And then uh I thought a new thing on the Benghazi, too, when you were talking.
They've made up a lot of these stories.
They went out and arrested somebody and put him in prison under false pretenses.
They've done violated that man's civil rights.
How are they gonna get around that?
How are they gonna get around it?
The guy's scared to death and not saying anything about it.
The guy willfully went to jail.
A guy willfully shut up, the guy's scared to death.
De Donald Sterling, the guy.
It's very simple.
He hadn't been heard from.
What whatever they want him to do, he's gonna say he's gonna agree.
He's scared to death.
The idea that this guy's responsible for riots and the death of an ambassador.
It's an absolute joke.
Look.
It was just week that old James Carville and Stan Greenberg put out another poll.
And the poll, there's that Vitor kid.
I can't.
I don't stay away from it, Rush.
Don't go there.
Do not.
I keep I. Anyway, they had a they had they had a poll out and they they had some advice for Democrats.
Do not use the word recovery as you're out there campaigning.
Don't do it.
Why not?
Because there isn't one.
Nobody believes there's a recovery.
So Greenberg and Carvel with their poll urging Democrats, whatever you do, don't go out and talk like Obama does.
Don't talk about a recovery.
Don't even use the word because people know there isn't a recovery.
And the reason that they know there's not a recovery is because they're living it.
They're living losing their health insurance.
They're living, losing their job.
They're living stagnating wages.
They are living it.
And they Greenberg and Carvel don't think that the regime can succeed in making people think that, well, it's okay for a lot of people, just not for you yet.
Because it's so bad for everybody.
Now, in the midst of Carville and Greenberg urging Democrats, don't use the word recovery.
Don't use the R word.
Because people know there isn't one.
Then can Obama actually pull this off?
Go out there to want a great job creation, roaring 50 months job creation recovery.
People aren't living it.
L. Rushbo.
Meeting and surpassing all audience.
Expectations every day.
Here's the Greenberg quote on the Democrats' use of the word recovery.
Democrats should bury any mention of the recovery.
That message was tested in the bipartisan poll we conducted for NPR, and it lost to the Republican message championed by Carl Rove.
The Democrat message missed how much trouble people are in.
It does not convince them that policymakers really understand or even focusing on the problems they continue to face.
So don't even talk about recovery.
In fact, folks, I'm just going to repeat this again.
And I'm going to repeat it as often as necessary.
There are two things the Democrats can do to give themselves a shot at having success in November.
Only two things, and it's turnout.
Single women and minorities.
That's it.
If they can't gin up turnout, those two groups, it's gonna be lights out, and it may be anyway.
But there's not a single issue.
They can't run on the unemployment rate.
Don't doubt me.
They can't do it, they're not gonna do it.
Greenberg won't let them.
You can't talk about recovery.
They can't run on Obamacare.
They can't run on Benghazi.
They can't run on Fox.
They can't run on me.
They can't run on any issue that they have enacted.
They can't run on anything.
All they can do is pray that somebody does something like Donald Sterling every two weeks.
And if it doesn't happen, go out and find it.
For example.
Right here, my formerly nicotine-stained fingers, A P story.
Democrat candidate for governor in Wisconsin, Brett Hulsey, plans to hand out white Ku Klux Klan style hoods to Republicans in Wisconsin as they gather for their annual convention today to highlight what he says are their racist policies.
Brett Hulsey, state representative from Madison, who is white, came into the State Capitol press room yesterday to show off a hood that he says he made with his daughter's sewing machine using curtain material that he bought for a buck.
It's a Wisconsin Republican Party hat, Halsey said, and people can interpret it any way they want.
So this guy is actually going to show up and pass out.
Or and by the way, there's no in this AP story, the byline is Scott Bauer.
There's not the slightest bit of outrage, anger, curiosity.
It just you read the story, and it's as it's as common an event as anything else they report.
Oh, yeah, Democrat's gonna show up and he's gonna give these Republicans their Klan hats.
Yeah, that's right.
Democrat knows how to make a Ku Klux Klan hood on his daughter's sewing machine at home.
He knows how to make one.
He went out and got the fabric, and he's gonna make a bunch of them at his home.
And then he's gonna take them to Republican convention and pass them out as though they're part of the Republican uniform.
Folks, this is why, this is exactly why the idea of doing history books for kids was so appealing to me.
This is blatant Democrat racism.
Here we have once again the total distortion of American history.
The idea that Abraham Lincoln and the Republicans were the original Klan.
The Democrats were the original Klan.
Better stated, the Ku Klux Klan was made up of Democrats.
Democrats were the segregationists.
Bull Connor, Democrat, J. William Fulbright, Democrat, Lester Maddox, all these people that denied blacks entry to universities, to cafes, to the front seats of the bus, Democrats.
Senate Majority Leader Robert Sheets Byrd was a grand Kleagel in the Ku Klux Klan.
The Democrats were actually had members of the Klan.
So this low-rent Brett Hulsey is going to show up and try to create a photo-op of Republicans touching or holding Klan hats.
I don't know if he's going to succeed or not, but he's obviously going to have media support.
This is all they've got, folks.
This kind of thing is all they've got.
No, he's not making the robes, just the white Klan hoods.
Thank you.
I mean, that would be expensive to make the whole Klan uniform.
He's just making the Klan hat.
No, burn crosses at Republicans' houses.
Nothing in there about burning crosses.
Just he's he's just gonna give out the caps.
He's just gonna, you know.
The KKK, folks, was formed to be the militant arm of the Democrat Party.
The KKK's purpose was to attack Republicans and keep blacks from voting for them.
That's what the KKK's original purpose was.
It was all Democrats.
But look at enough of that.
The point is, this is all they've got.
This kind of stunt, this kind of thing is the only thing they've got.
Liberalism is destroying this country.
The Democrat Party is ruining the United States of America.
We're coming up on the end of five years of this.
Is that right?
Or six, whatever it is, they're destroying this country.
They are the ruination.
And the evidence is everywhere.
Everything they've done has turned to excrement.
Everything they've done.
Or worse.
Charles Woods.
I just want to remind you of this.
I'm changing gears here rapidly, but I've got this on the top of my stack, so I wanted to get to us.
Charles Wood's son Tyrone died in the massacre at Benghazi.
He was on Fox Wednesday night.
He reminded people, he said this before.
He said, when I was approached by Hillary Clinton at the coming home ceremony, the bodies at Andrews Air Force Base and the caskets, flag-draped caskets, she said to me, we're going to go out and we're going to prosecute the person that made that video.
And Obama told the parents of the four dead Americans, we're going to find this guy that did the video, and we're going to really take it to this guy.
But now, Charles Woods said on Fox Wednesday night, I knew Hillary Clinton wasn't telling the truth.
And I think the whole world knows that now.
You know why this Benghazi cover-up isn't going to work, by the way?
Why I don't think it's going to cover up.
Succeed.
What do the Democrats need, I ask educationally, what do they need to pull off all this stuff they get away with?
We've talked about it before.
What is it that enables them to get away with destroying the health care system and not be held accountable?
What is it that allows them to destroy minority families in this country and not be held accountable for it?
It's good intentions.
They were trying to help the uninsured rest.
They were trying to get people covered with health insurance.
They were trying, at least they were trying, their intentions were good.
They always assign themselves good intentions.
We're never supposed to examine the results of their plans and their policies.
No, no, no, just their big hearts.
And of course they assigned to us evil intentions.
But you can't find the good intentions in Benghazi.
Where are the goods that there's there's no there's no evidence Obama was trying to do anything good in Benghazi.
That's going to make this really tough ultimately to cover up, especially by the time they turn Trey Gaudi loose on this at this House Select Committee.
The Democrats need this idea that there are good intentions behind what they do to inoculate them from any criticism or accountability.
But where are the good intentions here in Benghazi?
Well, Obama was he, you know, he really did like them, but can't make that case.
Well, you know, Obama really was trying to take it to terrorists.
Well, Obama, you know, he really, he really did care well.
Well, there aren't any good intentions to be found here.
So there's no excuse is the point.
And we will be right back.
You know, I don't like quoting the New York Times.
I don't I don't like telling you what's in the New York Times because, you know, big whoop.
But in this case, I'm gonna make an exception.
Because the New York Times is saying today that even if the Democrats succeed in ramping up their women and minority turnout, it won't save them.
No.
The New York Times writes pieces that are designed to help the Democrats.
They write pieces that it isn't give them tips, offer advice, uh, cover up for them, what have you.
So I don't know.
This this sounds like it's a warning piece.
And the headline is bursting the Democrats' midterm turnout bubble.
And from the article, it says, not even the most sophisticated and well-funded turnout effort can fix this problem.
Strong turnout operations can help Democrats at the margins, but their turnout problem is not marginal.
Now, the the New York Times is basically saying the Democrats will only win if they can change the mind of voters on the issues.
They are honestly reporting that.
That the only chance they have in November of saving their position, of holding on to the Senate, preventing the Republicans winning the Senate and bigger advantage in the House, is to actually change people's minds.
Well, good luck with that.
That isn't gonna happen.
The only chance they've got is turnout.
The only chance they've got is to make just try to create the impression the whole Republican Party's Donald Sterling.
Which they do every election.
They try it every election.
And then the same thing with single women.
War on women meme and all of that.
But I'm just going to tell you the Democrat Party never wins when they have to resort to campaigning on the issues.
The Democrat Party never wins in the arena of ideas, folks.
They win for 2012, they lost because four Republicans, or they won because four Republicans, million Republicans stayed home.
We could have beaten Obama if four million Republicans that voted in 08 had shown up in 2012.
They don't win when they campaign on the issues.
Obama didn't campaign on.
He didn't win on issues.
He won on PR hype image.
Hatred of the Republicans.
Hatred of Bush.
Eight years of the media ripping the Republicans to shred.
That's why Obama won.
Plus the racial component.
We can't deny that.
Now they don't have that to rely on anymore.
So apparently the New York Times is worried, folks, this is it.
This is the last day.
You have got to shop 2ifyT.com by 11.59 p.m. Pacific tonight to be automatically registered to be one of three big grand prize sweepstakes winners that includes a day spent with us watching the program here at the EIB Network.
It's a three-day, two-night trip.
And I want to make a point about this.
We don't pick the date.
We'll pick a date range.
We want every winner, it's a total of six people here to be able to come on the same three-day period.
We will play around with it, but we do not give you a date range that you have to make it work.
We will work around the winner's ability to get here.
And it's first class all the way, it's state-of-the-art accommodations here at very luxurious compound here in South Florida.
It's a day here at the EIB network spent getting your photo taken behind the golden EIB microphone, walking around seeing the environments, watching the programs, sitting right behind Mr. Snerdley as he screens calls.
It's our annual kick off the summer kickoff tea season sweepstakes, 2FYT.com.
Proud sponsor of the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
Great organization.
They give financial aid, scholarships to the children of Marines killed in action.
And everything we do at 2ifyT.com is in honor of the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation and the military in general.
So you have again, from right now through 11.59 p.m. Pacific to be one of three incredibly out of this world, once-in-a-lifetime lucky winners.
This doesn't happen very often for.
We don't let people in here very often.
I mean, we are heavily fortified and bunkered, and we do our best to keep people out of here.
But here we welcome the winners aboard.
You have from now until 11.59 p.m. Pacific to simply go to twoifyt.com and shop.
Now, in honor of this, we have lowered the price of 2 if by tea.
Rush Revere is our icon right there on the bottle.
Best bottle in the business.
It's not one of these cheapy little crinkly bottles that practically crumbles to bits when you pick it up.
Sturdy bottle.
Great shape.
One of the best labels, one of the best icons, and it all enshrouds the best tasting iced tea you've ever had.
And I don't say that just because I have to.
Catherine and I personally choose by exhaustive testing.
The final recipes that make up each flavor.
And they're just so good, it's incredible.
So we've reduced the price.
The shipping is free.
All you have to do is shop by 11.59 p.m. Pacific tonight, and you could be one of three grand Prize winners that wins a trip here to the EIB Southern Command.
There are a hundred other prizes, too.
Nothing chintzy here.
We will personally call you if you are one of the winners.
You can go right now to twoifyt.com.
You should anyway, because you've got to go there to uh to shop and be that all that means is you're automatically registered.
You have to register and have to go to special form.
All you gotta do is shop, and that's it.
The rules are all right there.
And you can listen to a tape of previous winner being called to hear how thrilled, shouting, screaming, excited they are.
When they get the call, and it could be you telling that you that you are the latest winner.
So help us kick off the tea season.
Help us with our sponsorship of the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation, and take the chance.
Luckier than you could possibly imagine winners.
You can bring your spouse or a friend, or you don't have to bring anybody and come alone, or you can gift it to somebody.
But it's yours to do with what you want.
Three people here to watch a program whenever it works out for all three winners at the same time.
Twoifyt.com by 11 59 p.m. Pacific tonight.
As usual, at the two-hour appointment program, and sitting here and just barely scratched the surface with what's in here in a stack of stuff, plus uh more of your phone calls, given that it's open line Friday.
So sit tight, my friends, and hang in there and be tough.
We'll be back before you know it.
▲
Export Selection