All Episodes
Previous Next
July 2, 2013 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:48
July 2, 2013, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Hiya folks, greetings to you.
Great to have you here.
All excited.
Another three hours of broadcast excellence.
Never boring, always intriguing, and the most imitated and the most duplicated and the most copied but never equaled radio talk show out there.
Mine.
Great to have you here.
Telephone number 800.
He just has to brag all the time.
That's right.
It's like Babe Root said it isn't bragging if you can do it.
Telephone numbers 800 282-2882, the email address, L Rushboard EIB net.com.
Folks, you know, I forgot to mention to you today, or mentioned to you yesterday that I was going to appear on the Fox News channel, Fox and Friends, this morning at 8 30.
I just forgot to mention it yesterday.
It was audio only.
The Fox people have uh have installed equipment that makes a telephone call sound like I'm live in the studio.
I don't want to get into the technical aspects.
It's called an ISDN line with the with the you know zephyr back and forth, but it makes all the difference in the world because their their phone system was such.
Doing phoners with them, it was it was very difficult for me to hear the questions I was being asked.
So I oftentimes just spoke and you know, if it was answering the question, so be it.
If it wasn't, it's just the way it worked.
So they put this thing in, and I I I uh agreed to do uh an appearance this morning.
It runs about ten minutes, and yet it's a gr it's it's a great summary of things that's happening out there.
Some of you might not have heard it or watched it, uh, even though highlights of it now appear all over the internet.
But I want to open the program.
It's about ten minutes to play the whole thing in its entirety here as a great way of setting up the rest of the program.
Rush Limbaugh joins us now on the one would argue.
Good morning to you, Rush.
Hey, it's been a long time since I've been with you guys.
How are you?
I know.
Thanks so much for joining us.
So much to talk about.
Pleasure.
Great to be here.
Well, thank you.
Let's talk a little bit about Egypt, because we've been watching these live pictures uh come into Fox and Friends this morning of these massive protests going on.
And and I'm interested in in knowing what your thoughts are.
The Egyptian military apparently giving President Morrissey twenty-four to forty-eight hours to basically not be president anymore in that country.
I'm totally confused by by Egypt.
I I thought this is what we wanted.
Um, when this all happened, when the Arab Spring was taking place a couple years ago, everybody was making it appear as though it was happening as a result of being inspired by Obama's own elections.
A hope and change was spreading to the Middle East, and we had all kinds of learned people, uh including some conservative media pundits talking about what a wonderful day it was in the Middle East, and this is exactly what uh what Obama's presidency means.
The world's gonna love us.
And and uh basically what we have is a bunch of people in Egypt defrauded by by an illegitimate lying campaign.
Reminds me of some others that I that I know I'm familiar with.
Rush, it's amazing too.
The Muslim Brotherhood had a chance to rule.
The people saw it, the oppressive way, and uh the way they dismiss women and rob them of their rights and their ability to succeed.
Well, and now they're riding the streets.
What did anybody think was gonna happen?
Well who are these people?
I mean, they're they're not exactly the founding fathers of this country.
Who w what do people think they are?
I mean, these are militant Islamists under the cover of a so-called moderate group called the Muslim Brotherhood.
Well, I don't understand why anybody's surprised by any of this.
I don't either, and that's been sort of my point this morning, Rush, is what they voted this person in.
They they had other candidates who were on the ballot.
Well, but they were defrauded, they were lied to.
The people of Egypt were lied to.
They were lied to about Mabarak, they were lied to about what they were getting with uh with Morrissey, who's just a front for a bunch of more militant uh people.
The fact that Obama can't even bring himself to condemn this ought to be eye-opening to anybody that's paying attention.
So, Russ, don't you think it's um it would have been wiser before we set start continue sending billions and billions of dollars of aid to Egypt and F-16s and any other sort of military help they want, anything they ask for, we say, Yeah, sure, go ahead.
We should have found out whether or not this Muslim Brotherhood influence is gonna be as Muslim brotherhoody as it is we th As we suspected or they thought.
I don't mean to be a cynic, but I don't think what's happening here is surprising to anybody in the regime, the Obama regime.
I don't think they're surprised by any of it.
They're going to keep sending the jets.
They're going to keep sending the money.
They're going to keep providing the foreign.
Nothing's going to change because of this.
This is this.
I don't even understand why people get so upset about this.
This is so predictable.
Everything that's happening here.
But there are those who said this is exactly what's going to happen, and not just in Egypt.
Go up to Turkey and go over to the Palestinian Israeli conflict.
This is the harbinger of what's coming.
And we supported this.
We helped install this.
I'm stunned that the Secretary of State is focusing on Israel and the Palestinians, which is Hamas.
Why is he there?
Even the New York Times is a side show.
It's John Kerry.
He doesn't know what he's doing.
Everything about this administration is image, sideshow, perception, photo op, optics.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been going on since the Bible was written.
John Kerry doesn't have the answer to it.
Nobody in this administration has the answer to the only way that conflict's ever going to be solved is like any other conflict is solved, and that is when there is an acknowledged loser who surrenders.
And until that happens, all of this just it it's it's it's it's meaningless.
It really is.
I be you know, I've been doing my radio show for 25 years, and topics now are starting to repeat, you guys.
And it nothing changes.
This is all just it's just it's all part and parcel of the of the pattern of events.
I mean, look at all the work Clinton and Arafat did.
Why?
Didn't matter a whit, did it?
Look at all the work Jimmy Carter did, but didn't matter a whit, did it?
Uh Arafat was given everything he asked for at one point.
He pulled out because he didn't want the conflict to end.
Just like uh certain leftists in this country don't want the conflicts they're involved in to end, because it that the if you've solved a problem, there's no reason for them to exist anymore.
So this is all of this to me is just is is just sadly, really sadly predictable.
And I'm not trying to be cynical about it, but I am.
But but at least with Mubarak, uh, although he was a dictator, he was helpful to the United States in trying to at least try and find a peace process there.
But let me ask you this if you were advising the president, what would you do about these growing crowds in Cairo today?
I would do what Obama always does, and I would try to shift this and make it look like they're protesting because they're inspired by him.
If I were Obama, I'd try to get myself into this story in such a way that it's all about me because that's what he does with everything else.
All right, Russ, here's something that we haven't talked about, and probably hasn't repeated itself because it's uh it's brand new.
Obamacare.
It turns out that they're having problems selling Obamacare.
In fact, they're having so much problem selling Obamacare, they're actually turning to school kids, they're turning to librarians, they're turning to the NFL, the NBA, etc.
What about it, Rush?
Uh can this thing survive?
Eric, it's gonna survive.
It's the law of the land.
Now, I don't think it'll survive, but I think it's gonna implode on itself.
It's just unworkable.
It is 2200 pages of a brand new bureaucracy that transfers one-sixth of the economy to the government, which doesn't know how to run anything properly, particularly this one.
The idea that why are they selling it?
Why are they it's the law of the land?
I'll tell you why they're selling it.
It's because the 2014 midterms.
Only 35 percent of the people approve or want Obamacare.
2010, the Democrats lost big.
I mean, all the way down the ballot, the dog catcher at the local level.
They lost big because of Obamacare.
They are salivating it winning 2014, and that is why they're out there running campaigns for a bill that is already the law of the land that nobody can do anything about.
They're trying to sell it.
They're counter the negatives about it for the 2014 midterms.
Right.
And so, Rush, what you're saying, uh essentially, is that it's unimplementable.
And if Republicans possibly were smart who are against it, the Republicans that are, and I believe everyone Republican is serving right now, they should back up and let someone try to work it because it's nobody's program.
It's a conglomeration of ideas.
I think it's well, you you're you're right.
I think it's I think it's a golden opportunity for the Republicans to get back in people's good graces and stand for something the American people actually stand for, and that is their dislike for this.
Look at what's happening to these exchanges, guys.
I mean, you you've been talking About it on your program this morning, the California Health Exchange.
I mean, most people think that's where you're gonna go to buy your health insurance if your employer doesn't provide it.
Turns out it's gonna be run by the SEIU, the S uh the AFL CIO, cover California, the NAACP, it's a Democrat voter registration group running the California Health Exchange.
You show up to get your health insurance, they're gonna register you as a Democrat, they're gonna get you to the polls to vote on Election Day as a Democrat.
They're using Obamacare and these exchanges to grow the Democrat Party, and the Republicans are sitting around twiddling their thumbs worried about immigration and whether the Hispanics like them or not, and they're being skunked on issue after issue after issue, like this is classic.
The 2014 midterms are really really important.
Democrats win the House, then there's no such thing as a lame duck last two years for Obama.
He was he's he's gonna clear sailing.
You think that's a possibility?
That the Democrats win the House 2014?
Is that yeah, because the Republicans are in the process of engaging in policies guaranteed to lose them elections.
Absolutely possible.
Speaking, you mean immigration?
Can I just point something out?
Rush, the reason why they're selling this to young people is because if young people don't sign up for Obamacare, the thing will implode up upon itself.
So the only thing that they are going to be pillars to it.
No, no, if they don't sign up, they're going to be faced, they're the IRS is going to find them and they're going to be fined.
Now, the the interesting number of the young people, people under 24, and I saw the other day that the average annual expense for health care is like 800 bucks.
The minimum premium is going to be 5500.
That I tell you, there's going to be another golden opportunity for the Republicans.
Yeah, if they get out in front of it, but they will pay the fine's going to be cheaper than that for a couple of years, but they will be found by the IRS, and they will have that fine deducted on their taxes if they have a job, which is another thing that fewer and fewer people have in this country.
Well, Rush, you have a big decision to make.
You're a huge baseball fan.
The All-Star Game is going to be in New York.
You know your way around this city.
Yeah.
Will you come up to New York City and possibly sit on our couch en route to going out to Citi Field for the All-Star Game?
No, that because...
Because well, I I don't go to New York during the work week because I get audited by the New York State.
I've been audited every year since I left New York in 1997.
And if I show up on a on a work day, then I get audited and they want it's a it's a hassle.
So no, I'm I'm sadly uh on the New York.
I'm gonna try to move the game to Sunday.
I think if you spend eight days in New York, you have to pay New York City taxes.
If I'm New York State taxes, you don't want to know.
But if they move the All-Star game to Saturday, I'd be there.
I'm gonna work on it.
Well, thank you so much for joining us on the phone, though.
So maybe we'll talk to you during that week as well.
Thanks much, Rush.
Have a great day.
Thank you guys very much.
That was this morning on Fox and Friends, and they covered a lot of stuff.
Ten minutes.
Brevity is the soul of wit.
Get in, get it, and get out.
And I I meant, and I knew yesterday I was gonna do this, and I just I I I forgot to mention it to you.
That's why I uh I played it in its entirety.
Um we gotta take a quick time out here.
We'll do that, come back and continue to set the table as we roll right on here on the EIB network.
Sit tight.
Speaking of Obamacare and California, the news today is the news today is that United Healthcare is the latest insurer to drop individual coverage in California because it's just too expensive, and it's too much trouble under Obamacare.
Now, folks, this this outfit, Healthcare United, Healthcare United, probably the biggest propagandists of all the insurance companies for Obamacare.
I mean, this is classic.
You remember when this thing was in its infancy, we had a number of hospitals or hospital groups and associations, and a number of insurance companies, which really perplexed me, all signed up to get on board this thing.
And I wasn't thinking about the the crony capitalist connections here.
But these industries were offered insider status and some sort of uh benefit or whatever, if they would help Obama get it passed.
Uh insurance companies were Asked, I think, to fund TV ads, and they did to an extent.
Hospital groups are asked to get involved in the in the same way by giving money.
By giving money to the Obama campaign to sell this thing.
And at the time, you know, I've I'm just sitting, I don't understand this.
These people, do they not understand?
It's like the Republican Party, do they not understand that Obama has planned for their demise?
What I don't but I guess the seductive allure of being close to power and of being officially tied to the administration as it's reforming health care might have made these people all think that they had an insurance policy themselves.
And if they were going to be intimately involved in it, that Obama would look out for them, take care of, I don't know.
But what I do know is that this was crony capitalism and it was it was made to happen.
It was it did happen because these people didn't have the slightest understanding or desire to look at Obama ideologically and find out that he doesn't believe in the free market.
Why would anybody in the free market help this guy when his objective is to wipe them out?
But they all did.
And so the news today is that Healthcare United, or United Healthcare, California, the latest insurer to drop individual coverage because it's just too expensive, and I'm gonna be able to sell anybody any policies.
And it's too much trouble.
Now, some people speculated that it was because they were they were going to get special sweetheart deals under Obamacare, and maybe they thought they were.
And maybe the insurance companies thought they were.
Maybe they thought they were going to be protected.
Whereas others in the private sector, where health care is concerned, would be destroyed, they thought maybe they will be protected.
But here, here from the article about this, the uh the nation's largest health insurer, United Health Group, Inc., is leaving California's individual health insurance market, the second major company to exit in advance of major changes under the Affordable Care Act.
Right.
It's mandates that they have to follow.
It's exactly they're getting out because they can't do the mandates.
They're mandated to do X, Y, and Z, sell policies at X price, they can't.
And stay in business.
What happens to their current clients?
What do you think happens?
If they're getting out of the business, what do you think happens to their current climate clients?
It would seem to me that they're off to talk to the SEIU and Covered California over at the exchanges.
I mean, if the come if you have a private health insurance policy with uh uh United Health, and they announce that they're getting out of that market at the point your policy expires, I think your policy lasts for as long as you bought when it expires, that's it.
You've got to go somewhere.
And there's a law now that says you have to have health insurance.
So if you're getting it, remember this United Healthcare is a private insurer, in individual health insurance.
This is not this is not through the uh employer, I don't believe.
United Health, this is in relation to current climate uh clients, I don't want to say current climates.
Regarding current clients, United Health said that it had notified state regulators it would leave the state's individual market at year end, forcing 8,000 customers to find new coverage with the end of the year.
So if you have a policy, a health insurance policy with United Health in California, the end of the year it ends, and you will be forced, according to the story, to find new coverage.
Now, back in March, United Healthcare proposed the 9% rate increase for about 2,000 California policyholders With student health insurance policies scheduled to take effect August 1st.
That filing with the State Insurance Department was later withdrawn, and the whole thing's gone now.
Now, you may remember that the president, Barack Obama, mm-hmm, said all during the run-up to the bill being signed by him into law.
Might remember him saying that if you like your current policy, nothing's gonna change for you, dude.
You get to keep it.
You like your doctor, you like your plan.
Nothing's gonna change.
Nobody's gonna force you to do anything.
You get to keep it.
Well, uh, if you're with this bunch in California, the end of the year, 8,000 of you, it's Sayonara.
And hello exchanges, and that means you're talking to the SEIU, the AFL CIO, the NAALCP and covered California.
Welcome back, folks.
Rushlin boy, half my brain tied behind my back, always.
To make it fair.
There's some confusing stuff out there on immigration today.
Well, at least on the surface, it appears to be confusing.
And that's what we do here is we take the confusing and the complex and we make it understandable.
Now, this first story regarding immigration is from Salon.com.
But before I get into this, let me just expand what one of the points that I was making with the people on Fox and Friends, even though Obamacare, and I want to explain this, even though Obamacare is the law of the land, they're running active campaigns to sell it to people because only 35% of the American people support Obamacare.
It is, it is it is grossly unpopular.
And the subject came up yesterday.
Here's a bill that is the law of the land.
It's been in the implementation process for over a year.
So why they run an ads for it?
Why are they raising money?
Why is Obama or anybody else in the regime running around doing campaign-style appearances to sell this when it's already the law of the land?
And the point that I made to the Fox people is what I said yesterday.
There is the 2014 midterm election up ahead, and that's what they have their eyes on, and they know it's a negative.
They want to win the House, the Democrats do.
They've got this giant negative called Obamacare.
If you go back to 2010, 2010 saw the birth of the Tea Party.
The Tea Party came to birth, came into existence because of Obamacare and the massive spending in debt.
Average ordinary Americans who had never organized politically before in their lives became affiliated with a bunch of different Tea Party groups, and they showed up to vote in massive numbers.
The Democrats lost hugely.
The scope of their defeat in 2010 still has not been accurately reported in the mainstream media.
It's...
When you say they lost 600 or almost 700 seats, that doesn't sound like a big number.
But you realize that some of those 600 were enough in the House to lose the majority.
They had control of the House.
And in 2010, they lost it.
So what'd they lose?
75, 80 seats, whatever it was.
There are 500, 600 other seats they lost in state legislatures, in mayoral offices, all the way down to city council, town council, county supervisor.
I mean, it was a nationwide, really deep down ballot shellacking.
Now the Democrats know if the same sentiment exists about Obama and any Obama issue, such as Obamacare, the likelihood for a similar turnout in 2014 to 2010 could happen.
The likelihood's very high.
That's why they're campaigning.
That's why they're trying to change everybody's opinion on Obamacare.
That's why Pelosi went out there and said on the 4th of July, we need to stop and give thanks for health independence.
They really think that they can win in 2014, the House.
And I do too, frankly.
I think they can.
But they know to do it, they're going to have to reduce the opposition to Obamacare.
And that's why they're out campaigning for it.
Because otherwise it makes no sense.
The bill's already law.
Why campaign?
It doesn't matter.
The votes are in.
But the public perception is killing them.
And they don't think, the Democrats don't think that that will lead to victory in winning the House back in 2014.
That's why they campaign on this.
And my my point to the Fox and Friends people that to me this represents a really golden opportunity for the Republic Republican Party.
Now I'm sitting here continually puzzled why the Republicans do not take the opportunity they have here, which is the greatest opportunity they've ever had in this regard, to contrast the differences between them and the Democrats.
Up until Obama, the contrast has basically been one of rhetoric and words and predictions, and attempting to explain who liberals are and what they will do if they get power.
Well, you no longer have to predict.
We're living it.
The Republicans don't have to come up with dire predictive consequences or any of that.
All they've got to do is point to the fact that nobody can get a job, health care costs skyrocketing.
They've got the best opportunity they have ever had in our lifetimes to contrast conservatism, and there's the rub, they're really not conservative at the Republican establishment.
But still, fake it.
It's all about winning elections.
Fake it.
If you're not conservative, fake it.
They've done it before.
Great opportunity to contrast themselves here.
With Obamacare, because the Democrats are outselling it.
The American people are already opposed to it.
The Republicans won't have to work hard to gin up opposition.
It already exists.
So all the Republicans would have to do is tap into it.
But the Republicans I guess, see what confuses me, I must be bluntly honest here.
Given what happened in 2010, the fact that the Republican Party did not embrace the Tea Party is something that, well, it doesn't confuse me because I understand it now, but at the time, I have to admit I was a little puzzled that even though I knew that the Republican Party establishment was not that fond of conservatives, they still like to win elections.
Had the Republican Party embraced the Tea Party, who knows might want to happen in 2012, instead of acting embarrassed by them.
Instead of joining the Democrats and making fun of them, instead of acting like they're just a bunch of rank amateurs that don't understand politics and we really don't want to get associated with them.
Had they embraced and brought the Tea Party in as a functioning powerful element of the Republican Party, and but they could do it again now.
It's the golden opportunity I was talking about.
Because the opposition to Obamacare is already there.
They don't have to create it.
They just have to tap into it.
And it is a sizable majority of the American people.
And it is a, to me, a golden opportunity for the Republican Party to demonstrate that they are indeed on the side of average Americans who oppose this.
But the Republicans want to do all that with immigration.
And only with Hispanics.
They're really motivated.
They're really hellbent here on showing Hispanics that they have what it takes on immigration.
But there are a lot because of the massive focus on that issue, there are other things that are sitting out by the wayside here being ignored, which I think are golden opportunities, such as Obamacare, particularly for holding the House and maybe even winning bigger elections down the road.
I mean, what is it the Republicans are facing?
The optics and the illusion that they don't like average people, that they're only for the rich and big business and they hate minorities and all that.
Well, it's made to order.
Maybe they think it's the law of the land, nothing we can do.
But it's a man, there's so many really great teachable moments that still exist here.
And that's the point that I was conveying to the um to the hosts of the Fox and Friends program this morning.
Now, the immigration news that we have today, as I, as I said, it's confusing.
The first story in my little stack on immigration today comes from Salon.com.
Now listen to this headline.
Hey, GOP, Mexican immigrants are not necessarily Democrats.
Here is the subheadline.
New research suggests that Mexican immigrants are all over the political spectrum, and that right winger Mexican immigrants are more likely to vote.
Now, hold on here.
The conventional wisdom holds that the vast majority of illegal immigrants, Hispanic, Mexico, wherever they're from, 70% vote Democrat.
The Hispanic population of the country today, the legal voting Hispanic population, votes 70% Democrat.
Actually, 73% Democrat.
I think Romney got 27%.
Okay, so the automatic conclusion is what are the Republicans doing here?
They're going to be legalizing 11, 12 million people, 70% of which are going to be automatic Democrat voters.
Now here comes Solon.com say, hold on, everything you think you know, you don't know.
Except I actually do.
Well explain after the break.
Once you get past all the posturing, opposition to immigration reform among congressional Republicans is at least partially based on self-preservation.
There's a widespread belief that Mexican immigrants who become citizens are overwhelmingly disposed to vote Democrat.
Newly published research suggests that's a complete misreading of the facts.
According to this analysis, politically engaged Mehicans who move to the United States fall all over the ideological spectrum, very much like Native born Americans.
And what's more, according to University of Nebraska political scientist Sergio Walls, those on the right are more inclined to vote.
They're more inclined to participate in the electoral process than leftist illegal immigrants from Mexico.
The notion that offering citizenship to undocumented uh immigrants will help Democrats has been widely discussed in recent months.
In April, the politico asserted that immigrant reform could produce an electoral bonanza for Democrats.
That and that analysis quickly refuted by Sean Trend of real clear politics.
But fear among Republicans has the debate just last week.
Longtime conservative activist Phyllis Schlafley insisted that Mexican immigrants don't have any Republican inclinations at all.
Now the political scientist University of Nebraska, Sergio Walls, uses data from two surveys of Meican immigrants living in the U.S., one conducted in 2003, the other in 2008.
Both groups, 1,023 people in one survey, 399 the other, were asked about their interest in politics and so forth, and from there it has been concluded that Mexican immigrants aren't necessarily Democrats.
Now, what do we make of this?
Let's take a brief time out, and we'll be back because my friends in the Daily Caller, another poll which shows Latinos strongly favored Democrats for 2016.
Two leading Democrat candidates, 2016 candidates for the White House, the two leading candidates among Latino voters.
Wait a minute, this that sentence is a fragment, that opening sentence doesn't just stick with the headline when we come back in the break.
Poll shows Latinos strongly favor Democrats for 2016.
That's a new poll reported here at the Daily Caller.
Then we got the salon thing that's wait a minute, you Republicans, you know what?
They're not all Democrats.
A lot of Republicans in this Mexican group.
What is happening here, folks?
Nice try, salon.com.
Story about Mexican immigrants aren't necessarily Democrats.
Newly published research suggests that uh immigrants voting Democrat is a complete misreading of the data.
According to this analysis, politically engaged Mexicans who move to the U.S. fall all over the ideological spectrum, very much like Native born Americans.
Now, we're not talking right now about Mexicans in Mexico.
We're talking about 11 million people who are already here, not future Mexican immigrants.
Now, the second thing is, what do we want to believe?
A poll from Salat.com or the state of California.
The state of California tells us everything we need to know about how illegal immigrants vote.
I don't care about the salon.com.
This salon.com poll is designed, I can I can imagine in Republican staff offices on Capitol Hill are running around waving this thing today, saying C, C. This is right, this is right.
We they're not all Democrats.
There are a lot of people, and in fact, the most conservative ones are the more likely to vote.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
But again, another story.
Poll shows Latinos strongly favored Democrats for 2016.
Neil Monroe, the Daily Caller, the two leading Democrat 2016 candidates for the White House, trounts, Republican candidates among Latino voters, including the two Republican politicians now prominently working to build Latino support.
The nation's second most prominent Democrat, Hillary Clinton scored 73%, somewhat or very favorable response from the 1,200 Latino voters.
Biden got 58%.
The Republicans, Jeb Bush, 27% of very or somewhat favorable support.
Marco Rubio, 31% favorable, 29% unfavorable.
Okay, so that's the politico.
Now the Hill.com.
Clinton tops, Bush, Rubio among Hispanic voters for 2016.
Now I told the people at Fox, I wanted to talk about this today.
That was three or four times, and they wouldn't do it.
They were not interested in bringing this subject up.
I wanted to talk about this in relationship to the current state of the Republican Party.
And they wouldn't they wouldn't do it.
I I I HR told them they asked me, what do you want to talk about?
I didn't tell them I wanted about Egypt.
I didn't want to talk about Egypt.
I said, first thing out of my mouth, I want to talk about immigration, the state of the Republican Party.
Wouldn't go there.
I had to bring it up myself to whatever extent that I did.
and that, by the way, is quite telling to me.
But I'm not through here.
The clock makes me have to shut down here for a second, but I'm not through on this.
So don't go away.
I think the Republicans ought to take it a step further.
I I I said I mentioned this the other day.
If if we're trying to make the Hispanics like us by going for immigration, then let's change our attitude on abortion.
And let's let's end this war on women and let's make the women vote for us too.
You know, I mean, where does this stop?
▲
Export Selection