All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 6, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:35
November 6, 2012, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Amber back.
Great to have you here, folks.
Rush Limbaugh, the Excellence and Broadcasting Network and Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, talent on loan, FumGod.
Meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program.
We're going to get your phone calls in this hour, probably in this half hour.
Telephone number is 800-282-2882, and the email address L. Rushbo at EIB EIBNet.com.
Just to catch up a little bit on the on the first hour of the program today, just some perhaps relevant data that I don't want anybody to miss.
Early voting stats out of Ohio in Obama carry counties.
Early voting in Ohio, turnout, early vote turnout.
This is not counting votes.
They don't do that.
They don't count the early votes until they count votes at the end of the day.
The early vote turnout in Ohio is up overall, 2.5% statewide.
However, the way this breaks down, it's down 4% in Obama carry counties.
It's up 14% in Bush McCain counties.
Now you have to figure people early voting in Obama carry counties or voting Obama.
Well, that's another thing I want to get to.
That's a something that nobody's talking about with these polls.
You got CNN yesterday with Democrat plus 11 sample.
Okay, cool, fine.
But have you noticed that every one of these polls is assuming that every Democrat's voting for Obama?
And again, my question to you.
Do you think more Republicans will vote for Romney than voted for McCain?
Without doubt.
Do you think that fewer Obama voters will vote this year than in 2008?
They do.
That's why Obama's doing nothing but shoring up the base.
It's Romney who's been, as they say, expanding the map.
It's Obama who's been showing up the base, shoring up the base.
But by the same token, if the 2010, this continues, you know, I could be proven tonight to be so wrong and so all wet that nobody should be listening to me.
But if the 2010 turnout is duplicated this year, and I don't know what's happened to lessen Republican enthusiasm to you.
If the 2010 turnout is duplicated, this is all academic.
When you add these things up, uh early voting turnout in Ohio down for Democrats, up big for Republicans.
This is turnout.
Uh Ohio Porton State.
The simple question, Obama, how many people voting for Obama in 08?
They're going to vote for him in 2012 Democrats.
It's going to be fewer.
I mean, even these pollsters, even the pollsters, eh, they don't really think there's going to be 11% more Democrats turn out than Republicans this year.
But that takes me to the next nugget.
It is from the same CNN poll we talked about yesterday, 4949, with a Democrat sample of plus 11, Romney winning independence 59 to 37.
The one thing not reported that's right here.
I mean, from the actual chart in the CNN poll.
99% of Republicans are voting Romney, 1% voting Obama.
93% of Democrats are voting for Obama.
Five percent of Democrats are voting for Romney, according to CNN, and nobody reported that yesterday.
It's tucked away here in a place that I doubt well I know nobody saw it.
I haven't heard anywhere.
Then and then of course you have the independent breakdown of 5937 for Romney.
So you had the CNN poll yesterday that everybody thinks is gospel.
There's one little nugget here, 5% of Democrats in that poll say they're going to vote for Romney.
It doesn't mean the Democrat plus a lamp and sample is wrong.
It doesn't wipe, it just means that a lot of those Democrats are voting for Romney.
And see, that's what none of these pol every every one of these polls is assuming and every Democrat votes Obama.
And that every Republican is voting for Romney.
That's more likely than it is every Democrat voting Obama.
Anyway, and then Gannett's Cincinnati.com inadvertently published results from Ohio early voting and showed Romney up 92,000.
And then they pulled it down.
And nobody knows why they pulled it down except it's not supposed to be released until tonight.
So it may be that Gannett, USA Today, they might have a line already established with the vote counters in Ohio.
I'm sure they do.
Every network does.
Every news agency does.
And maybe they just made a mistake publishing it.
So they've pulled it down.
So that's um.
And of course, Stephanie Cutter is telling Democrats, don't get depressed at the first wave of exit polls.
Our votes have already happened.
We've banked our votes in the early voting, and then it counted.
The exit polls don't count the early votes, so you're going to hear Republicans leading, but don't worry about stay calm.
Brad Thor, the thriller author in Chicago, claims that he's heard that the Obama campaign is going to claim victory mid to late afternoon today, before the polls close, in an effort to suppress Republican turnout.
So beware of that.
Britt Hume last night on special report with Brett Baer discussed the polls.
We are looking at a set of state polls in the battleground states that suggest that President Obama is leading, he's leading in most of these polls.
And most reporters would look at that and say, well, if that's the case, looks like President Obama's gonna win.
And that's what a lot of people have think.
That's kind of the conventional wisdom.
However, in a number of those polls, has a remarkably large number of Democrats in the sample.
More Democrats in some cases than turned out by percentage on election day four years ago, which was a very big year for the Democrats.
So those polls are troubling.
Now it would be unprecedented for this many polls reflecting a similar outcome to be wrong, uh, which is why I think people are reluctant to draw that conclusion.
But there's something wrong here.
Well, welcome to the the club.
Uh he's he's now seeing that the large Democrat sample in a lot of these polls is larger than the Democrat turnout in 2008.
And nobody, even the pollsters, nobody thinks that the Democrats are gonna turn, it was plus seven in 2008.
The Republicans were all depressed, they weren't excited about McCain.
It was fate-compli.
I mean, you we went into election day four years ago knowing it was over.
And a lot of voters did too.
It's entirely different this time around.
Uh but again, I just want to call everybody's attention to the fact that whatever the Democrat sample is, the assumption in all of these polls is that every Democrat's voting Obama.
And even without the CNN poll, I know that that's not true.
I know that Obama that the it stands to reason is gonna get fewer Democrat votes this year than he got in 2008.
You disagree with that, Snerdley.
I want to take you back, grab soundbite number two.
I want to take you back to October 30th of 2008.
This is one of my all-time favorite audio sound bites from our grooveyard of forgotten sound bites.
This is Charlie Rose and Tom Brokow.
And this is this is a couple of days, three or four days before the election.
And to put this in perspective, we've had a year to a year and a half of a campaign where the media has Ostensibly been telling us everything there is about Obama.
Of course, we know that they didn't vet him.
But despite whether they did or didn't, they have all been urging everybody to vote for Obama.
They were in the tank big time.
You know it, I know it, you all remember it.
And yet, just three or four days before the election, this conversation took place.
I don't know what Barack Obama's worldview is.
No, I don't know.
I don't know how he really sees where China is.
We don't know a lot about Barack Obama and the universe of his thinking about foreign policy.
I don't really know.
And do we know anything about the people who are advising them?
You know, it's an interesting question.
He is principally known through his autobiography and through very aspirational speeches.
I don't know what books he's read.
What do we know about the heroes of Barack Obama?
There's a lot about him we don't know.
It didn't matter.
Didn't matter.
We were all supposed to vote for the guys.
These guys are in the business of finding out who everybody is.
These guys are in the business of speaking truth to power, right?
These guys are in the business of exposing fraud, deceit, whatever it is in people of power.
That's what they claim their job is.
Here it is right before they're like, oh no, I have no idea who he is.
I can't wait to vote for him.
I don't know who he is.
I think you ought to vote for us.
So let's go to Charlie Rose last night.
Here are the guests.
Al Hunt, Matthew Dowd, John Harris of the Politico, Koki Roberts, uh Mark Halpern Time magazine, and John Heileman of New York magazine.
We have a montage of their discussion about the presidential race.
Albert Hunt.
Where are we?
Charlie, I think that the uh the fat lady is starting to sing.
It looks like things are are moving in a very, very slow but steady direction in Barack Obama's favor.
Breaking in the president's favor.
Yeah, this is not a dead even race.
It's ultimately gonna be a convincing victory by President Obama.
It will be close, but it will be convincing.
John Harris.
I agree with that.
Koki Roberts.
I agree that it's breaking in the president's favor.
Mark Alpern, do you concur?
I think the winner of Ohio will win.
And I think there's more reasons to think the president will win Ohio.
Let me get John in.
You agree with everything people have said?
I do, Charlie, I agree with everything that everybody said.
Well, that's a gate great guest list, isn't it?
Six people and they all think identically the same thing.
What a great guess roster, Charlie.
Not one person on Charlie's show that doesn't let's remember this.
Not one person on Charlie's show last night who disagreed.
Gloria Borger last night, CNN the situation room discussing the presidential race.
I think that voters don't really know who either of these guys are in the end.
What would a second Obama term look like?
And what would a first Romney term look like given the turning around we've seen of Matt Romney on the campaign?
I don't think we know who either of them are What an indictment of yourself.
It says another journalist.
We don't know who these guys are.
Such diversity.
I bet these guys don't even know anybody who voted for Romney.
I'll bet none of these people know anybody who here now air Gloria Borger to the Tom Brokar Charlie Rose list.
They don't know who these guys are.
It's your job.
It's no more complicated than it's your job to find out who these people are.
But notice given the turning around we've seen of Mitt Romney and the campaign, meaning Romney's flip-flopped.
He's lied.
He's distorted who he really is.
He's not.
But what an indictment of themselves this is.
Gloria Borger, you work at CNN, you've got a national cable network to tell everybody what you find out about these guys.
You don't know what a second term of Obama's gonna look like?
What's America look like now?
Now make it worse.
I can tell you what a second term of Obama's gonna look like.
And I can damn well tell you what Romney's gonna try to stop, and that's what's happening now.
Gory, do you do you realize that average Americans know more than you claim to know?
Everybody voting against Barack Obama today knows damn well what the future holds, and that's why they're voting against him, Gloria.
And everybody voting for Romney also knows what the next four years hold if Obama wins.
Not only are they voting against that, they're voting for very specific things Romney has said he wants to accomplish.
It isn't hard.
It really isn't hard to understand who these two people are.
One's a liberal.
That's all you need to know about Barack Obama.
Don't doubt me on this, folks.
And here's Stephanie Cutter.
This was uh last night on CNN Anderson Cooper 360.
He said, tell us what three things we should be looking for tomorrow night as a sense of which way it's going.
What are you gonna be looking for, Stephanie Cutter?
There has been so much early voting.
You know, some states half of the vote is in Colorado it'll probably be about eighty percent.
Um that the early exit polls are not going to accurately reflect where the the vote is.
So everybody should stay calm throughout the day.
Uh let the the day uh go on and get to those late uh exit polls and take a look at where we are there.
Yeah.
Exit polls don't uh don't don't be alarmed.
She's warning her troops not to be alarmed.
So Anderson Cooper says so or David Gergen said uh so the first exit polls, you shouldn't take it seriously as the latter exit polls.
No, we know how things work going from east to west.
Uh, you know, Virginia uh will be one of the early ones.
Ohio, you will have a sense of what's happening in Ohio uh early uh tomorrow evening.
So, you know, I would be looking at what's happening in those states.
Certainly if we win Virginia, then that's a very good sign moving west.
But you know, I think it's probably gonna be a late night.
And don't be alarmed at what you hear in the exit polls.
This is so rich because in 2004, you remember the exit polls were totally corrupt.
The first two waves, the two p.m. and the five p.m. exit polls, were as corrupt as as as they could have been.
And that they were signaled that John Kerry landslide.
And at five o'clock in the afternoon, Bob Schrum, who ran Kerry's campaign, walked into his office and said to Kerry, hey horse face, may I be the first to address you as Mr. President?
He said, Hey, horseface, can I be the first to address you as Mr. President?
They really and then and then the real vote started counting and tallied, and it showed it carried defeated soundly.
And all the libs thought that the exit polls were right and the real vote had been corrupted.
The real vote didn't count.
There was fraud and the exit polls, they thought.
What a one eighty now.
Now he said, Horseface, can I be the first to address you as Mr. President?
Okay, to the phones we go as indicated and as promised.
This is Jim in Central Iowa.
You're up first today.
Great to have you with us.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
Thanks for taking my call.
You bet there.
Bigger.
More.
Hey, I've uh been listening to you this morning as I do many mornings, and uh I just got off duty as a poll watcher in Central Iowa.
And I just had to tell you my feelings and your feelings are pretty close together.
Let me ask you a question, Jim.
Jim, what w what is a poll watcher watch?
Uh well, we actually are primary duty other than making sure there's no skullduggery going on, and we can bring it the attention of the officials that are there recording votes, is to take the list of voters that have passed through the lines, cast their ballots, and we get a copy of that list, and we can check it off on our Republican side and see who is voted.
Okay, so you you can get an idea uh what the party turnout is.
Yeah, exactly.
Because of because the registr Yeah, same thing at my polling place.
I mean, they know.
I don't wait, no, no, wait, wait, wait a second now.
Wait a second.
Forgive my maybe totally naive.
Does the registration that you have in front of you that that indicates somebody shows up, yeah, that's who they are.
Does it say they're Republican or Democrat?
Uh no.
They they don't, but what's the thing?
Then how do you know Republican how do you know the Republican turnout is up where you are?
I go my I go to my list certified uh to me by our county Republican uh people that are registered Republicans and the state verifies it for us the Republican Party and uh we check against the list of people that have voted.
And we say, Oh, I've got that name, I check it off.
I don't have that or that oh, I've got that one.
And here's my tally from the first two hours of uh pretty good voting for this time of the morning.
It's seven in the morning, and it's kind of rainy and dreary it was anyway.
Uh I had recorded on the second precinct seventy-eight total voters coming through the line recording a vote.
I found 32 of those seventy-eight on that list were registered Republicans.
I could verify that much.
I don't know how they voted, of course.
That's less than 50 percent.
Well, a little bit less in 50%, but then if you sit and look at the person across from me who's doing it the same thing I'm doing for the Democratic Party, they had a mere handful.
I believe she said it was seven.
Well, wait a minute.
You got seventy-eight hold it a minute.
Seventy-eight people, thirty-eight Republicans and seven Democrats.
Who are the others?
Thirty-two registered Republicans went through the line out of that seventy-eight.
Right.
And seven or eight Democrats were identified by her sitting.
Okay, that's that's 45 people out of 78.
Right.
And you know who the other star?
Independents.
Okay, and you don't know how they're voting.
No, no, we certainly don't, but if we're doing our job right here in Central Iowa, we've contacted them and uh we've sent them information.
We followed up on the F ballot list and so in his little corner of the world, it's 38 to 7.
Republicans over Democrats, the rest independents.
Thanks, that we'll be back.
Don't go away.
You know what, folks, I'm gonna tell you another little theory that I have.
I can't prove it.
I can't document it.
But there's a whole bunch of independents out there now, right?
This last guy from Iowa in his poll so far, 78 people showed it's not a big number, but the breakdowns is interesting.
Thirty-eight Republicans out of seventy-eight voters, seven Democrats, and the rest are independents.
And in all of these polls, we got Romney up double digit in independence in many of them, and the high single digits in others.
My theory is that the independents of today are actually made up of a lot of Republicans, former Republicans, who for whatever reason, uh, signed off of Republican registration.
Could have been mad at something the party did, not raising money, not being conservative enough after they got elected.
It could be any number of things.
Could be to protect themselves with pollsters and everybody else.
And it's uh it's much safer as an independent and if as an independent, you are highly valued.
You know, independents make the world go round.
And uh, independents is opposed to moderates.
Moderates and independents are two different things.
A moderate's nothing more than a liberal without the guts to say so.
But I think a lot of these independents today are ex-Republicans.
Can't prove it.
Just one of these gut feelings that I've got.
Now, speaking of poll watchers, in Philadelphia, the Philadelphia Inquirer, two things.
What's happened in Philadelphia?
The new Black Panthers showed up again.
And they've got every right to be there and do what they did last election because Eric Holder dropped the investigation into them.
So they can they can they got Billy Clubs.
They can inde uh uh intimidate voters.
Eric Holder dropped the case from the 2008 election.
So the new Black Panthers have shown up in various parts of Philadelphia.
In addition to that, the Philadelphia Inquirer is reporting that Republican polling inspectors who are court-appointed election officials reportedly being thrown out by the head judges of elections who are elected Democrats in some areas around Philadelphia.
Now, Romney campaign is reporting that seventy-five Republican poll watchers have been barred from precinct polling places in Philadelphia.
In some cases, barred by Democrats, saying no Republicans will be allowed in the polling place.
Now, what's happened is that the GOP has gone to court.
They got a court order from the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas requiring the Republicans to be readmitted to the polls and seated per their legal authority.
Pennsylvania judge did issue an order to reinstate the Republican election officials across Philadelphia who were earlier today ejected or refused entry.
But who knows what shenanigans took place after they were thrown out.
It is Philadelphia.
That's why the Philadelphia suburbs, Bucks County et al.
are so important today, because the fix is in in Philadelphia, the city.
Whether Obama is in trouble or not, whether Pennsylvania's in play or not, Philadelphia is what it is.
This this would have happened probably regardless.
But it may not have happened with as much intensity or in such great numbers.
It may not have resulted in as many Republican inspectors being refused admittance.
But I mean, this is just machine power politics.
This is uh the same kind of stuff goes on in Chicago.
Just it's democracy.
It's democracy.
Now back to the audio sound bites.
One more Stephanie Cutter.
Anderson Cooper 360 last night.
He said to her, your team keeps saying that Governor Romney is in Pennsylvania now out of desperation.
But he's got no shot there.
If he's got no shot, why has your campaign been sending Clinton to Pennsylvania in the home stretch?
Why are you wasting time going in there if Romney has no shot?
If the state's not in play, couldn't that time that Clinton's spending in Pennsylvania be put to better use somewhere else?
We're not taking anything for granted, Anderson.
You know, Pennsylvania has tightened, absolutely.
Um, you know, if I were working on the Romney campaign, I'd probably be giving it a shot too.
I don't know whether to believe this woman or not.
That's my problem with this.
This woman's delusional.
This Stephanie Cutter babe.
She is delusional.
She said weird cockaminy things throughout this campaign, but here she says it has tightened.
Absolutely.
If I were working on the Romney campaign, I'd probably be giving it a shot too.
I have no idea if she's being truthful there.
No, I take that back.
I uh she probably is because I think it is tightening in Pennsylvania.
I think that is genuine.
And it is interesting.
Clinton is going in there.
Uh, and he's it's Clinton's got one stock line now.
Why would you want to elect a president knowing they lie to you?
Is that what you want?
Would you you you want it?
You want to elector presidents gonna lie to you all the time.
It's as delusional as Obama yesterday.
I still, that sounds like we had of Obama yesterday.
The deficit's down, job creation is up, we've lowered the deficit, we've lowered the national, it was delusional.
It was out of this world sick.
What Obama said about the economy in these past four years.
It it had no connection to reality whatsoever.
It was Stephanie Cutter, by the way, who first called Romney a felon.
And this is funny.
This is Bob Schrum.
I told you about him earlier.
Bob Schrum is the guy in 2004, about five o'clock in the afternoon, went into John Kerry's office at, hey, horseface, may I be the first to address you as Mr. President?
Because they all believe the exit polls in 2004.
They all thought the exit polls showed Kerry Landslide.
So this morning on CNN starting point, uh, he gets a question here from somebody named uh Hillary Rosen.
She's co-guest.
She said everybody remembers around lunchtime in 2004.
We got those awful exit polls saying essentially Kerry is going to be elected, and we had a couple of hours of euphoria until the actual votes started being counted.
Since that time, exit polling has actually changed, and the distribution of those polls has totally changed.
Tell your big picture perspective here, Bob, for a minute, on how you think the polls have affected expectations here.
Why is this different and why is it better now?
I anticipate that on Drudge, we'll see some early exit polls that favor Romney because that's what you see on Drudge.
Polling itself has now become a weapon in campaigns.
So you have all of these enterprises none of us ever heard of before this year, who are putting poll numbers out there, many of them outliers in these states, and they ought to simply be dismissed.
But I think it goes to the theory that Republicans have, especially that if you say you're doing well, you're gonna do well.
This this is from the guy who was out buying into the election polls, the exit polls in 2004.
This is delusional as well.
Not that it means anything, but here's a guy who couldn't wait to believe the exit polls, now saying that it's Republicans who say if you're doing well, you're gonna do well.
In other words, it's Republicans who will lie to you about how great things are going in order to make you think they're going well so that you'll vote that way.
Is it polling has now become a weapon?
The polling is the best friend Obama's got in this campaign.
Where would Obama be without this poll?
These polls.
Where would he be without these polls?
Stop and think of that.
If this were if if if Schrum's wish came true, and if the polls were outlawed, and if there weren't any, where do you think this election would be?
I I maintain to you that the only thing that's kept Obama in this is the polls.
That's the only thing that's given anybody any belief that he has a chance.
Because in the real world, this guy has been thrown out already.
It happened in 2010.
This guy already has been rejected.
The American people have already said no mas, no mas to this guy.
And yet the polling shows him winning, and so everybody has to accept it.
But without the polls, where would where would Obama be?
I'm not.
I'm not kidding about that.
I, in fact, this dovetails into a note that I got from a uh a good friend of mine.
This is a fascinating little think piece.
He lives in Kansas City, he's fed up with all the ads on TV.
He just fed up with it.
His Romney sign was defaced.
Uh cow manure was thrown all over it and underneath it on his yard.
He says, you know, I'm getting real tired of all the ads.
I can't wait till tomorrow, and I hope your prediction is right.
But here's my idea.
Let's just flip a coin.
If the Republicans win, they get to select the half of the country they want, and the Democrats get the other half.
They split this country right down the middle.
Republicans pick the side they want.
The Democrats get the other side.
We have Myth, they have Obama.
You can live wherever you want to live.
You choose which side you want to live in.
He said, the question is, how long would it be before Democrats are building tunnels to get underneath the wall, keeping them out of the Republican side.
Stop and think of this.
It's a great illustration.
You split the country right now, right down the Mississippi.
And let's just say the Republicans get the left half of the country and then build a wall.
Mississippi River is a river's not a moat, it's just you build a wall there.
And the Democrats get everything on the East and we get everything on the West.
Flip it doesn't matter.
We get our ways of life on our side, they get their ways of life.
How long will it be before all those Democrats are trying to get over to our side?
How long will it be?
We'd have to have checkpoints.
We have to shoot them on site if they're trying to get into our side of the country.
Just like in the old East and West Germany days.
Stop and think of that.
it would make a great book talking about one side comparing the two, it'd be it'd be great movie showing where certain companies chose to live, where certain people chose to live, how they chose to run their businesses, they they chose to manage their affairs.
On one half the country'd have a welfare state, and on the other half you'd have prosperity and good times and all that, where would people want to end up?
Now, do we already have who would pay for their welfare quickly?
The Democrat half of the country would cease to exist in two weeks.
There'd be nobody to pay for their way of life.
The Democrat half of the country would become barren and desert, and there would be no life, there'd be nothing there.
And they'd all be scrambling to get to our side of the country.
It's a great way, I think, to illustrate what the election's about.
Anyway, I'll take a break.
Back after this.
Don't go away.
Back to the phone, so we go to Dave.
This is uh Albany, New York.
Great to have you on the program, Dave.
Hello.
Hello, uh Rush, absentee military ballot that uh dittoes to you.
Thank you, sir, very much.
I'm um calling because uh I'd love to bring up something that kind of came up last night as we're watching the news.
Uh my very young teenage daughter, myself and my wife were watching TV, and a clip of uh former President Clinton uh doing his closing argument for the campaign effort uh was put on.
And wasn't it interesting?
But it was one of those lighter moments when he had the crowd laughing and he said, You're laughing.
But who wants a president who will knowingly, repeatedly, tell you something he knows is not true?
And my daughter immediately said to me, Isn't he the man that was impeached for that?
And while while that was sinking in, I also immediately thought of well, we were told how many times that Benghazi was due to a video.
Well what an incredible moment in in political history.
I know it it's otherworldly.
I mean, I I'm a father of five.
And I look at the the the most important thing I'll ever hand off to my children, you know, my my my wife, by the way, is the bigotero of all, she homeschools them.
It's and it's amazing the job she does.
But the legacy of truth, of honor, of integrity.
I want to be able to point to all of my political leadership, and I know I won't be able to all the time, I get that.
When you look at something at this important, when my my teenage daughter can instantly, instantly see um that what he's talking about is just passing off as a lie for the purposes of political gain.
Well, but here's the thing about that.
I mean, uh as you point out here, Bill Clinton, who was uh he was convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice, he was disbarred, he lost his law license for a while.
Uh he suborned perjury as well, and now he's chaughty chiding Romney for lying, and what he's saying Romney's lying about says Romney lied in an ad, which is completely and totally accurate about Chrysler building jeeps in China.
Romney is not lying about, as you point out, the lying is coming from the regime from Obama.
And Clinton wrote the book on it.
Clinton lied so much in the 1990s the media was doing stories on how lying was good for everybody.
How lying was helpful.
It spared people hurt feelings.
Uh Dave, thanks for the call.
Here's the soundbite from Ohio.
But but Clinton's using it everywhere.
Virginia, Pennsylvania.
This is yesterday afternoon in Philadelphia.
It's an Obama campaign event, and this is the relevant portion of Clinton's remarks.
Who wants a president that will knowingly repeatedly tell you something that he knows is not true?
And when all this happened, they put it on television.
They ran a man.
And the more they were criticized, the more they up the ad box.
When I was a kid, if I got my hand caught in a cookie jar where it wasn't supposed to be, I turned red in the face and I took my hand out of the cookie jar.
That's not what I'm saying.
You gotta give it to Governor Romney.
When he gets his hand caught in the cookie jar, he just digs down for more cookies.
I take rid of Now that's that's that's inspiring.
You know it's gonna really make me vote for Obama.
When Bill Clinton, when his hand was caught in a cookie jar, he said to Juanita Broderick, you might want to put some ice on your lip.
The cookie jar.
Bill Clinton talking about the cookie jar.
Bill Clinton is the guy that took the cookie jar to the back of his L Camino that had AstroTurf in it.
For one reason.
But Romney is not lying in this ad about Chrysler making Jeeps over there in uh in China.
So all this time I've been thinking the war on women was about vaginas.
Obviously, it's about cookie jars.
I who knew.
You know, it's amazing.
Uh I hear Clinton's voice is very hoarse.
Do you notice that?
And Obama is uh his voice is hoarse and and very tired.
And Romney's is not.
And Romney's been out there every bit as much as these two guys are.
Uh it's it's it's it's I don't know, it doesn't mean anything, it's just uh just a contrast.
But regardless, folks, we're we're here in the midst of a a turnout election.
Really, it's a cliche to say it, but it's exactly where we are.
Turnout is going to uh determine this.
▲
Export Selection