All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 3, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:45
October 3, 2012, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host on this show make more sense than anything anybody else out there happens to be saying because the views expressed by the host on this show are the result of a daily relentless, unstoppable pursuit of the truth.
Great to have you here, folks.
As another hour of broadcast excellence is officially underway.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program is 800 28282 and the email address, Lrushbow at EIB net.com.
And we will get to your calls in uh in this hour.
So what's what how do we put all this together?
How do we synthesize this?
Well try this.
In the midst of the presidential campaign, Barack Obama is spending hundreds of millions of dollars on commercials trying to convince people that he is the man of the middle class.
He's Mr. Roads and Bridges.
You didn't build it.
People have built the roads and bridges.
They're the one who made your factory possible.
And here's the guy in the tape of 2007, saying I want to build any roads to the suburbs.
Mr. Rhodes and Bridges himself wants no roads in the suburbs anymore.
You don't like you people in the suburbs.
Not me saying it, he said it.
I don't like the fact you fled the cities.
You left a po behind.
The Poe behind.
And they got that dilapidated schools, and you've sought a better life than you left a Poe behind.
And you don't care.
So Obama does, though.
And his whole ad campaign, he's a man of everybody.
He's the man of 100% of the people.
He's post-partisan.
He's post-racial.
He's the Messiah.
He's spending all this money in his ad campaign trying to convince people that he is a man of the middle class.
That it is Mitt Romney who lives in a small cloistered world of the 1% who doesn't hug his garbage man.
He's got an ad Obama's running an ad from from Romney's garbage man.
See, Romney never hugged him.
And Romney didn't care about garbage people.
That's how cloistered Romney's world is.
Never mind the fact that Romney actually, when he was governor, did collect garbage for a day to find out what those people do.
I don't think Obama's ever collected garbage.
Has he?
That's the whole point.
Obama wants you, he's the man of the middle.
He's had the trials and tribulations.
He's experienced all the rot gut crap that this country presents to everybody.
And he's gonna make sure that everybody has to experience that crap.
That there isn't gonna be a one percent that doesn't have to experience it.
Not anymore.
We're gonna spread crap equally.
And we're gonna call it fair crap.
That's how you have a just society when everybody has to go through the same crap.
You're not gonna have people who don't have to experience the same crap.
We're gonna make sure everybody does.
And it's Romney, who is the cloistered elitist.
Writing off half the country, Mitt Romney.
Well, I'm sorry, but this 2007 video that Chatsworth Osborne Jr. released undercuts all of that.
It is Obama who is cloistered with his people.
It is Obama who is writing off half the country, and with resentment, I might add.
That's kind of interesting that Obama is trying to make people think that it's Romney who actually looks at the world as Obama really does.
Now we all knew this.
But he's saying it out of his mouth here.
Tacking the suburbs, Mr. Rhodes and Bridges.
He didn't want to build any bridges to the suburbs.
What is that sound bite?
Let's say it's number uh let's see.
Um what's the first sound bite I gave you, Mark?
Do you remember you having the number written down?
I've got these number number 11.
I just go back and play number 11 again.
This is this is Obama attacking the suburbs.
I just I want you to remember now this is Mr. Roads and Bridges.
The stimulus was to build roads and bridges.
And ever since, roads and bridges, And and if if you don't have a road and bridge in front of your property, it'll never amount to anything.
You've only succeeded because other people built roads and bridges.
For you to build your factory where you can exploit people, which is what Obama think businesses do.
So listen to Soundbite Number 11 here again.
This is in 2007, the Hamptons, Virginia tape.
And you keep in mind all the references you remember Obama making about wanting shovel-ready jobs, roads, and bridges.
We need additional federal public transportation dollars belonging to the highest need community.
We don't need to build more highways out in the suburbs if we have people in the cities right now who want to work but have no way to get into those jobs.
We've got to help connect them to the job that exists.
We should be investing in minority owned business in our neighborhood so people don't have to travel for miles away.
Yeah, we don't need any roads now.
We didn't need any roads in 2007.
This is roads and bridges business is phony as it's uh as it's always been.
There's uh another video that uh Paterico Pontifications, Patarico.com is uh uncovered.
They've released a video of State Senator Barack Obama, Illinois.
This is January 21st, 2002, in Chicago at the University of Chicago's Rockefeller Memorial Chapel.
This is during Martin Luther King Jr.
Day memorial services.
Oh, but you notice the rich people are all for nonviolence.
They've done what they want.
They want to make sure they don't take their stuff.
But the Prince.
Kill it, kill it.
Oh, that God reverb you can't understand.
Let me read to you what he's saying.
I don't know if you've noticed, but rich people are all for nonviolence.
Well, why wouldn't they be?
They got what they want.
They want to make sure folks don't take their stuff.
But the principle of empathy recognizes that there are more subtle forms of violence to which we are answerable.
The spirit of empathy condemns not only the use of fire hoses and attack dogs to keep people down, but also accountants and tax loopholes to keep people down.
When a company town sees its plant closing because some distant executive made some decision despite the wage concessions, despite the tax breaks, they see their entire economy collapsing.
They feel violence.
He hasn't changed as the point, this is who he is.
The rich.
Of course they're all for nonviolent.
They don't want they don't like community organizers.
They don't like people raising hell in the streets.
They got their stuff.
They got what they want.
They just want to make sure that uh folks don't take their stuff.
And by the way, that's why Bill Gates and Warren Buffett run around and claim they're for tax increases, so that these rabble in the streets don't want to take their stuff.
That's why they do it.
Yeah, people ask me all the time, how can these rich liberals, because everybody assumes that a rich person has to be conservative.
Rich person has to be self-reliant.
A rich person has to believe in entrepreneurism and all the things that go along with acquiring wealth.
And when I hear these real super rich guys talking about raising taxes being in favor of it, scratch their heads, say why.
It's because what Obama's saying here.
Rich people are all for nonviolence.
Why wouldn't they be?
They've got what they want.
They want to make sure folks don't take their stuff.
Exactly right.
So rich people are for nonviolence.
They have all of they want.
This is anger, folks.
This is Barack Obama selling seething anger.
This is Barack Obama ginning up resentment of successful people.
And he's going to stand up on a stage tonight, debating a guy who stands for everything he hates.
Mitt Romney personifies everything Obama hates.
Romney is a rich guy.
He doesn't like violence.
He's why you want to be taking his stuff.
It's all of this is precisely who Obama is.
But on the other side of this, I want to take you to Bishop E. W. Jackson.
Bishop Jackson, the founder of the Chesapeake, Virginia-based Exodus Faith Ministries, and the chairman of Ministers Taking a Stand.
He released a video message to black Christians recently.
I have two sound bites of this.
Here's the first.
This is Reverend E. W. Jackson, and he's recounting all the lies that the Democrats tell black people, and he's just sick that black people believe it.
Gonna send you back to slavery.
Biden, you're all gonna be wearing chains.
They're gonna keep you from voting.
Voter ID.
Can't have that.
They're trying to make sure you don't get to vote anymore.
And they're gonna take away to Martin Luther King Jr. holiday.
Reverend Jackson's intelligence is insulted by the Democrat Party, and he is attempting to get other black people in this country to see it the same way.
The Democrat Party has created an unholy alliance between certain so-called civil rights leaders and Planned Parenthood, which has killed unborn black babies by the tens of millions.
The Democrat Party has equated homosexuality with being black, which is another outrageous lie.
We as Christians ought to know better.
Shame on us for allowing ourselves to be sold to the highest bidder.
Our ancestors were sold against their will centuries ago, but we're going to the slave market voluntarily today.
The time has come to take a stand.
Come out from among them.
Exodus now.
The Reverend E. W. Jackson in a video released to Black Christians recently.
Might have been yesterday or the day before.
We're gonna go to the uh another Prophet timeout.
We'll do that.
We'll come back with your phone calls here on the EIB network.
Don't go away.
Okay, to the phones we go, and we're gonna start Westchester County in New York.
Peter, I'm glad you called.
It's great to have you here with us.
Hey, Mr. Limbaugh, thanks for having me and sharing your audience with me.
I'm uh I'm a rush baby grow up listening to your show in the car with my father who's a courier in New York City.
Thank you, sir.
Very much appreciate that.
Thank you.
Um the reason I'm calling really is to talk about the debate tonight and really um illustrate how important it is.
You know, I think with the whole election, everyone's talking about getting an independence and some Democrats.
But tonight I think Mr. Romney has the ability to get everyone.
I think if he really just articulates conservative points like you're always saying, but also doesn't pander and really just is not passive about the issues, it's a really a golden moment to hold the president accountable, which no one has for four years.
And I think if he really gets, you know, nasty with the Fast and Furious, the debt, and Libya, um, I think he has an ability to break him, maybe kick kick him off balance, and possibly change the whole tone of this campaign.
Well, it is interesting to note.
I want you to stop and think of this, folks.
Here we are on October 3rd.
The presidential campaign has been underway in earnest for two years, starting with the Republican primaries.
And Obama has been running ads that long.
I know people are aware of this.
He's been running ads not nationally, not on cable networks, but in a local communities all this time.
Uh his presidency's been a never-ending campaign, and yet tonight is the first time.
Stop and think of this.
The first time the people who watch this debate will see Mitt Romney in anything longer than a 60-second commercial.
Exactly.
Yeah, exactly.
The first time.
And I I I put it in in that perspective as a means of illustrating campaign coverage the way it's been.
Obama can commandeer TV time anytime he wants it as president.
He uses it effectively.
He doesn't do press conferences, He doesn't take tough questions.
He just goes out and makes statements and then turns around and walks away.
But whatever amount of time he wants, he gets.
This is the first time in this entire campaign that American voters are going to see Mitt Romney in anything longer than either a Romney or Obama ad.
That to me is quite telling.
And it does represent an opportunity.
You're going to have people watching this thing tonight who have an opinion of Romney based solely on Obama ads.
And those Obama ads have painted Romney as this quiet, cloistered, elitist, uncaring, mean spirited guy who doesn't care about anybody.
No, I'm assuming that that not a whole lot of people watch the Republican can.
I think the the the audience for the debates is going to dwarf the conventions, is my point.
There are going to be a lot of people tonight seeing Romney for the first time.
Therefore, it is a golden opportunity for Romney.
Now the focus of this, you mentioned Libby, the focus of this debate tonight's domestic policy, the economy, and so forth.
And all Obama can do is lie.
However, however, I happen to catch a sneak peek of what Obama's going to say.
Because I saw Juan Williams on Fox.
And you know what Juan Williams was saying?
Do you realize the economy's coming back?
The job situation is robust now.
You're going to hear tonight that the economy has remounted and that we're growing.
And while you hear that, the fact of the matter is that we've got a gross domestic product.
We got GDP, our economic growth rate is slower than Cuba's, Mexico's, and China's.
We've got a growth rate of 1.3%.
But Juan Williams previewed what Obama's going to say tonight.
Because he's been told.
He's been told to go out and say it on TV today.
Job situation, housing starts, new home starts, whatever.
It's all magically better.
All Obama can do is lie.
And they're going to try to make it look like Romney's the guy that's lying.
They're going to make try to make it look like that when Romney tells the truth that he's just got sour grapes.
That's how they're going to try to position this tonight.
But it's Obama who's going to have to lie.
So, and if I if I were Romney, well, forget that.
If it were me debating tonight, I wouldn't care what questions are.
Jim Lara can ask whatever question he wants, and Jim Larry can do whatever he wants to make keep me on topic, but I'm launching.
I don't have many chances here if I'm Mitt Romney.
I've got this and two more.
And even these are not unfiltered.
There's still a moderator there who's going to try to enforce some sort of uh rules.
I mean, these really aren't debates.
They're expanded meet the press Sunday shows.
The moderator in questions and decorum and all that kind of thing.
And Lincoln Douglas, this isn't, but still it's an opportunity.
And you hear, here's here's Peter Westchester, golden opportunity for Romney, which it is precisely because he's got a chance to be seen in ways that counter how he's been presented by the Obama ad campaign.
Dan uh wait, sorry, no, JB.
JB in Charlotte, North Carolina.
You're next.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Hey, Rush.
Um, you know, I saw it in the McCain campaign strategy, and I'm seeing it play out again in the Romney campaign strategy.
And to me, you said it before.
The reason that they're not way ahead is because Republicans run their presidential campaigns like Obama runs his foreign uh policy.
Um they just don't they don't believe that they've actually got an enemy.
They don't believe they've got someone that doesn't matter what they say, they want to come back at them.
And that's, you know, it's their similarities are astonishing between the two.
Interesting.
You're saying the Republicans run their presidential campaigns like Obama runs foreign policy.
Explain that to me again.
Okay.
Well, I mean, the Republicans run their campaign presidential campaign through appeasement and apology.
They come out and they appease and they apologize for everything the same way Obama uh appeases and apologizes to the terrorists.
He doesn't realize that they want to attack him, and that's what they do constantly.
You know, I don't, I know, and this is probably uh because of the dynamic inside the beltway, but I think I speak for gazillions of you when I say, in fact, I know I am.
And One of the most irritating things about the Republican Party is they just don't see the Democrats the way we do.
We know the Democrats look at us as their number one enemy.
We are a greater threat to their political desires than Al Qaeda is or any other world power or any other world ideology.
We conservatives are their biggest enemy.
I don't think that the Republican Party has as has they d they don't appear to even understand who they're up against.
They're up against leftists, leftist radicals, not Democrats.
They're not up against just the the other party.
With a bunch of old cronies in there like like Bob Strauss or Tip O'Neill, the guys you supposedly had a beer with at the end of the legislative day.
Yeah, right.
They don't they don't see the Democrats the way the Democrats see us.
They don't see them as as um an enemy to the future of the country, and they don't approach it that way.
And you look at your kids' future and your grandkids' future, and you turn to Republican party, where's the leadership?
We're we're people who think like I do.
That's why you get calls like this.
Ah, I got McCain too.
We don't want to make them mad.
We don't want to offend them, we don't want to offend the independents, we don't want to come off as argumentative or mean or so it's defensive.
You know, we try to avoid being what these mythical things they accuse us of are.
And it does lead to a defensive strategy.
Well, let's wait and see what happens.
Hey, get this Stephanie Cutter, the uh the campaign babe for Obama demanding that Romney apologize.
The video.
The uh the Tucker Carlson video, the the Daily Caller video, she demanding that Romney should uh say it was wrong and and and apologize.
She said uh, I think allies to Mitt Romney responsible for that, and I think that the Romney campaign should stand up, do the right thing, say that it was irresponsible to do something like that, particularly on the eve of the debate.
The release of the video.
Stephanie Cutter thinks that Romney's uh uh this is the woman that called Romney a felon.
This is the woman behind the ad she denied the steel worker guy who called Romney a murderer of his wife.
So she's saying that Romney should apologize for this video that was released last night because it was wrong.
Romney campaign should apologize, say it was wrong, it was irresponsible to do something like that, particularly on the eve of the debate.
Now, why are they so bothered by this?
Why are they so bothered by this?
And maybe they're not, maybe just gonna use this as a um as as a as a distraction.
You think McCain would apologize for it if he had nothing to do with the relief.
You think he would apologize for it?
You think McCain.
I shudder to think.
Uh here's Dan in Hamden, Connecticut.
Dan, welcome to the EIB network and the Rush Limbaugh program.
Great to have you here.
Thank you very much.
And uh I'm appreciating you taking the call.
Um I have a question, and I thought I'd call the voice of reason, but it involves I was confused by the president's statement regarding roads, bridges, and the suburbs.
Yeah.
Uh in that he he spoke about people in the city unable to commute to the suburbs, you know, uh to go to work uh to to go to their jobs.
I thought it was kind of like the other way around where I mean, around here anyway, people commute from the suburbs in the room.
It's it's I think it's that way in most of the country.
People commute from the suburbs to the city to work.
Uh I mean they need the roads and bridges to get there, like in in New York.
If you live in New Jersey, Connecticut, you need Lots of roads and bridges to get into the city.
Right.
So I mean, am I guilty of faulty logic?
No, you're not guilty of faulty logic.
You are guilty of not understanding what Obama really means.
When he goes on this suburban tirade, he resents that people leave the city to live, that they don't stay there to live and work.
He's upset that these people have the ability to leave the financial means, resources to live in the suburbs, so they don't have to put up with the hellhole of the city as a as a residence.
But these other poor people, they can't get out because they don't have the money because they're discriminated against.
And so the suburbanites get to leave the hellhole of the city, and Obama's people don't get to leave it.
And then they come back, and that's what he's ticked off about.
So he doesn't want to build any more roads and bridges because he doesn't want any more people to be able to leave the cities.
He wants everybody riding mass transit.
When you get right down or driving a little vault for no further than 40 miles.
Ah.
I just thought perhaps we've been building one-way bridges.
We have been.
One way for the rich.
Yeah.
Big stop sign.
Turn around for the poor.
That's what he means.
He resents that people have left the cities.
He resents in in his in his worldview, the we're not really talking rich in the middle class.
Middle class leaves the city and they leave the stench and whatever is behind.
It's not fair they should be able to do that.
Like everybody else does.
And so we're going to stop investing in any more roads and bridges suburbs.
I don't need that.
We need to put that money into the cities.
Invest in minority-owned businesses and so forth so that the people who stay in the city because they have no choice get a little fair treatment.
Because remember now, in Obama's world, if you're successful or if you've achieved, it's not because of you.
It's because of a stacked deck.
It's because of an unfair set of advantage that you've had, however he wants to define it, your family, your race, who you know, all kinds.
It's your your success is not legitimate.
And the proof of that is that there are still poor people.
And you're only successful because you've taken what were the what the poor were entitled to.
You've taken more than your share.
This is exactly who he is.
And when you've taken more than your share, and then you use that to flee the city, well then you are held in contempt.
And you have to be gotten even with.
So we're going to raise your taxes, or we're going to stop building bridges and roads for you to get easily back and forth, and we're going to take that money that uh that you're you're essentially stealing, and we're gonna and we're gonna keep it here in the city with these people.
And it maybe not the city, but but he's really talking about populations here, groups of people, the disadvantaged, the victims of capitalism.
It's it's not.
It's it's not the suburbs stole the wealth of the inner city.
That's the point.
The inner city is the inner city because suburbs stole it.
People fled, people left, they took the money with them.
And it wasn't theirs, and they have that that they've got more than their fair share.
Folks, I'm not making this up.
I'm simply telling you what he says.
I'm not speaking philosophically here.
I appreciate the call.
I love that's a great call.
That that that's an opportunity give me an opportunity to look even better than I otherwise do.
By by what?
By explaining things to people.
Well, I know.
I I know, I know.
Oh, the guy gets it.
I'm just that it's the others that don't.
I don't know.
You mean after the video comes out, will they?
That's the question I'm asking myself.
They didn't get it in 2008, they didn't care.
Why are they gonna care now?
You know, what are they gonna make them understand it now?
We'll see.
On late time, we'll tell on all this.
Rob in Long Island, it's great to have you with us, sir.
Hello.
Rush, good afternoon.
Rush, I've been polling people, rich and poor and, you know, different races and ages.
And it's really interesting that a lot of people think that gas prices when Barack Obama took office were like $250, $3, $350.
And I have a theory that when Katrina hit and gas prices went to $4.10, that people think the prices just stayed up there.
But they went down to $1.66 in December of 2008.
And I do think it's an interesting commentary about why did they go down, but why have they only gone up under Obama?
And I believe Avrami just had a real bullet message where people self-discovered through going to the Internet and just saying something like, you know, gas was $1.83 national average when Barack Obama took office.
Google it.
And that process of self-discovery would really hit home with those independents who were looking at these high gas prices.
and high food prices I I appre look at who by the way you you you said you've done a poll of all these different people where have you polled the rich for example well I mean middle class people I live in North Shore Long Island.
Uh so I talk to people in the neighborhood and I have some friends up in the Bronx I talk to folks you know in the South Shore and just different age groups I and I I go out of my way to talk to young people and I I ask them who are you voting for and why are you voting for them and and then I get into the gas prices and I try to explain that you know we use 20 million barrels of oil a day.
You don't start your coffee pot without gas.
And that gas, it's such a hurt on these middle-income folks at $4.15 a gallon.
And when I make them look at the computer, and they literally see it, wow, it was $1.66.
You can see the brain start to, you know, Twitter a little bit.
And they start putting it together.
And I think, actually, that's more of a visceral hit to people than Rami talking about high debt.
Because they don't feel that.
But they feel when they go to that gas pump, and they see $4.15, or they go to the supermarket, and they see, you know, food prices recently, they've really spiked up.
And I think that's an untapped method that Rami could really hit those independents with in Ohio and Virginia and Michigan and, you know, get people thinking about, you know, whether we like it or not.
We need 20 million barrels right now a day.
And Obama should not have, you know, forced this country to go so hard to a new energy sector right away.
but he should have focused on recovering the economy and recovering the jobs and keeping these gas prices down.
Okay.
Rob thanks much I appreciate it we got a brief timeout here my friends sit tight much more straight ahead your guiding light through times of trouble confusion murkiness tumult despair ill rush ball serving humanity simply by showing up here's uh here's Jeff Minneapolis great to have you on the program sir.
Hello.
Thank you, Rush.
Stay at home of seven dittles to you.
Question for you.
Which is the greater threat, do you think, liberalism or terrorism?
Well, it's an interesting question.
Thank you.
What is the greater threat, liberalism or terrorism?
Yep.
See, both of them, both liberals and...
and terrorists have a lot in common the one thing that they hate the most is freedom the one thing that orients them toward their ideology is is is their opposition to freedom.
You look at his suburban business, you look at Obama and the suburbs, what really bugs him about it, as well as the financial aspect of it, is the freedom that people have to go back and forth, that the wealth that they have earned provides them.
A leftist and a terrorist, a leftist and a totalitarian are one and the same.
Anything that stands in the way of my freedom stands in the way of the American way of life.
of life so I I think when you ask me you're you're obviously bouncing off what I have said about the liberals looking at us as the the the greatest threat to their way of life.
And it's it's not inconsistent.
We stand for freedom.
That's their biggest bugaboo.
Freedom is what makes people different.
Freedom and liberty is what allows different outcomes from person to person to person.
It's freedom that allows exceptionalism, freedom that permits greatness, freedom that results in differences.
Well, if you look at you look at Sharia law in in uh in in Islam, they want everybody to live identically, the same rules, same way, same outcomes in life, so does the American liberal.
And so I don't know that the I don't know what you're trying to do with your question, But I look at conservatives as defending a country as founded, greatest ever, founded on liberty.
And I don't care where there is an enemy to that, it's got to be opposed and defeated.
So that the left, I don't hear, for example, anything I say repeated by Mahmoud Ahmedini Zad.
I don't hear anything I say repeated by Fidel Castro.
I don't hear anything I say repeated by Western European socialists or Vladimir Putin.
But I hear a lot of similarities.
When I listen to Mahmoud Ahmedini Zad criticize this country, could be Harry Reid.
Could be Barack Obama.
Well, I don't understand how in the world Americans could have as their arch enemies people who believe in freedom.
Us.
Conservatives.
Liberty, but it is the greatest threat.
There can't, there cannot be freedom as founded in this country and liberalism.
They cannot coincide.
Liberals are all about domination, control, power.
Look at the health care plan.
You're not going to have any choices.
You're not going to have any liberty in it once they finish implementing the whole thing.
Look at Obama if he gets his way on the suburban stuff.
If he gets his way on green energy, standard fossil fuel energy that permits freedom and liberty to drive and travel, whatever, it's going to be severely limited because the cost of that stuff is going to skyrocket, and there will not be plentiful green energy.
There isn't any.
So I don't care who they are, be they American Democrats or jihadists or militant Islamists, wherever there are leftists, we face an enemy.
Pure and simple.
If you believe in America as founded.
Well, if they don't like it, you know what they should do?
They should go get a book written by my buddy Andy McCarthy.
A book that documents chronicles the peaceful similar coexistence between militant Islamists and American liberals.
The commonalities, the things they have in uh in common, the things that they agree and are similar on.
Oh well, a leftist is a leftist wherever you find them, and what but uh uh totalitarianism, liberalism, but it's all a derivative of the same ideology.
I was thinking about this actually in this in this context, thinking back to the uh 1980s before the Berlin Wall fell, and the Soviet Union represented, as Reagan called it, the evil empire.
And in this country, the Democrat Party did not want to hear one word of Criticism of the Soviet Union.
If you were anti-communist, they made fun of you.
They mocked you.
Ah, communists are nothing to be afraid of.
They're communists don't exist anymore.
Soviet Union was.
I mean, they loved Mikhail Gorbachev and hated Ronald Reagan.
This isn't anything new.
They hated Reagan.
Gorbachev, they were groupies.
And before Gorbachev, Yuri Andropov, and then Berezhnev.
Didn't matter.
And then before that, Daniel Ortega.
And then in Nicaragua.
Look at how they salivate over Castro and Hugo Chavez.
Castro a terrorist?
So you got political prisons, put people in jail?
Shoot them on site, whatever.
Of course.
A Democrat Party here doesn't do that.
They don't shoot people on site, and they're not political prisons, but the same attitude, the same fear of freedom exists.
Liberty is something they've got to tamp down.
They can't coexist with free people.
It can't happen.
There can't be liberalism in that way.
There has to be an attempt to meld and force everybody into the same mold.
you Have to say, though, folks, terrorism is the greatest threat.
Because we can still defeat liberals without violence.
So terrorism still, of course, represents a greater threat than the Democrat Party.
We can handle them without violence.
▲
Export Selection