All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 8, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
38:21
November 8, 2011, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Welcome back, folks.
Rush Limbaugh and the EIB Network, the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, as we all witness a nation in decline.
All around us.
Happy to have you here, nevertheless.
Telephone number is 800-282-2882.
If you want to be on the program, the email address El Rushball.
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Welcome back, folks.
Rush Limbaugh and the EIB Network, the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, as we all witness a nation in decline.
All around us.
Happy to have you here, nevertheless.
Telephone number is 800-282-2882.
If you want to be on the program, the email address LRushball at EIBNet.com.
New York Times headline, Penn State, said to be planning Paterno's exit amid scandal.
Now, there are some crazy things about this story involving Jerry Sandusky abusing young boys at Penn State.
Paterno didn't.
The media, sports media, has been after Paterno to quit, resign for 10 years.
He's too old.
Life has passed him by.
Football has passed him by.
He's a funny duddy.
He's 84 years old.
He's got no business coaching football.
He's got no business being around college-age football players.
He can't relate to them.
What the hell does he know about them?
He's got to get out.
This has been a refrain in the sports media for years.
But Paterno hangs in there.
And Joe Paterno, up until now, has had something that very few people in this country die with, and that's an impeccable reputation.
But that's now gone, and the media is going to see to it.
And this is all part of a nation in decline.
Joe Paterno's tenure, coach of the Penn State football team, will soon be over, perhaps within days or weeks, in the wake of a sex abuse scandal that has implicated university officials, according to two people briefed on conversations among the university's top officials.
The Board of Trustees has yet to determine the precise timing of Paterno's exit, but it is clear that the man who has more victories than any other coach at college football's top level and who made Penn State a prestigious national brand will not survive to coach another season.
Discussions about how to manage his departure have begun, according to the two unnamed people.
Paterno was to have held a news conference today, but the university canceled it less than an hour before it was scheduled to start.
At age 84 and with 46 seasons as the Penn State head coach behind IPaterno's extraordinary run, one that produced tens of millions of dollars for the screw and two national championships and that established him as one of the nation's most revered leaders will end with a stunning and humiliating final chapter as the media smiles.
Jerry Sandusky, former defensive coordinator under Paterno, has been charged with sexually abusing eight boys over a 15-year period.
Paterno has been widely criticized for failing to involve the cops when he learned of an allegation of one assault of a young boy in 2002.
Additionally, two top university officials, Gary Schultz, the senior vice president for finance and business, and Tim Curley, the AD, were charged with perjury and failure to report to authorities what they knew of the allegations as required by state law.
Since Sandusky's arrest Saturday, Penn State, notably its president Graham Spenier and Paterno, have come under withering criticism for failure to act adequately after learning at different points over the years that Sandusky might have been abusing children.
Newspapers have called for their resignations.
Prosecutors have suggested their inaction led to more children being harmed by Sandusky.
Students and faculty at the university have expressed a mix of disgust and confusion and a hope that much of what prosecutors have charged isn't true.
On Monday, yesterday, law enforcement officials said that Joe Paterno had met his legal obligation in alerting his superiors at the university when he learned of the 2002 allegation against Sandusky, but they suggested that he might well have failed a moral test for what to do when confronted with such a disturbing allegation involving a child, not even in his teens.
No one at the university alerted the cops or pursued the matter to determine the well-being of the child involved.
The identity of the child remains unknown, according to the Attorney General of Pennsylvania.
Paterno has not been charged in the matter, but his failure to report to authorities what he knew about the 2002 incident, in which Sandusky allegedly sexually assaulted a young boy at Penn State's football complex has become a flashpoint, stirring anger among the board members and an outpouring of public criticism about his handling of the matter.
Now, what happened here?
A graduate assistant or assistant coach, student, whatever, witnessed Sandusky abusing, having sex with a young kid, don't know how old, in the Penn State locker room.
He went and told his dad.
His dad then told Paterno, and then Paterno told authorities at the university, which is what he was supposed to do.
The problem here is that the witness didn't stop it.
Everybody is up in arms over the witness didn't do anything to stop it in the process.
Saw it, ran out of there and started telling his dad.
His dad said, okay, we're going to tell Paterno, but nobody stopped Sandusky when he was in the act.
And that's got people a little worried.
And then that happened some time ago.
Sandusky was still allowed to use the football facilities after that when everybody knew.
That's the problem.
That is the those two events that Sandusky wasn't stopped and that people knew about and then Sandusky years later was still in the football facilities.
Well, everybody knew what he was doing.
That's, I don't know if you can put things in an order of worst here, but that certainly, if you did, would be at or near the top.
Now, Paterno didn't, didn't, what they're saying is that Paterno should have banished Sandusky, should have not allowed him anywhere near the place after learning what he learned, should have gone to the cops, should have done a whole bunch of stuff, should have turned Sandusky in, should have shot him, should have done something, whatever.
And they've been gunning for Joe Paterno for years, assorted alumni, media, and what have you, simply because of his age.
So it looks like Joe Paterno, who up until all of this had just an impeccable reputation, is going to be forced out, if this New York Times story is correct, is going to be forced out of Penn State with none of that intact, which, sad to say, there are several in our culture, several people love to just tear people down, just destroy them.
It's a fact of life in our culture because impeccable people or impeccable, impeccably reputed people make everybody else look bad.
So if we can make everybody look like a reprobate, it's not so bad to be a reprobate.
If everybody looks like a scumbag, then it's not so bad to be a scumbag.
And it's called, it's like Moynihan had a name for it, defining deviancy down.
That was in regards to pursuing crime.
Our culture finally over the years has decided at different levels of crime.
You know what?
We can't catch them all to hell with it.
We'll call it a misdemeanor to hell with it.
And so what used to be abhorrent criminal behavior is no misdemeanor.
Everybody does it.
That big a deal.
We got to move on to other things.
So we have ended up codifying scumbags and reprobates as the norm.
Then you go after institutions after that, after you destroy people.
And then after a while, there's nothing worth looking up to.
And there's nothing worth emulating because the left wants everybody to believe in all of those impeccable reputations and all those fine people never were.
They were scumbags like we all are.
They just phony reputations, PR campaigns made them look bigger and better in there, but they're not.
No, the model, now, people like Bill Clinton, that's the hero.
That's the star.
That's the kind of guy we all want to end up being like.
That's who the Democrat Party hoists up.
And if they don't hoist them up, they do their best to protect them.
As in John Edwards, Ted Kennedy, you know the drill.
I'm going to take a timeout here.
See, the left wants no standards for themselves.
They don't want to be judged.
They don't want it because they know full well they'll fail.
They know full well that they will come up short if measured against standards.
And so there can't be any standards.
It's just like people in poverty, the left, you're seeing it now.
They don't want to elevate people.
They're not interested in taking the 99% and getting them into the 1%.
They're not interested in taking the bottom 40 and putting them in the top 50.
Nope.
They want to go up to the top, pick everybody up there, and bring them down.
Cut everybody down to size, and they're doing it to the country.
And that's what Obama's mission is, is to take the country down a peg.
No American exceptionalism.
There never was.
That was all a lie.
That was all phony plastic PR.
This country's always been mean-spirited, extremist, bigoted, racist, and sexist.
And that's the truth of this country.
And we're going to make sure everybody understands that, not only in this country, but around the world too.
That's Obama's mission.
So we have a culture.
We have people.
We have a nation.
We have institutions in decline being managed as such purposefully.
All right, my friends, a brief time out.
When we come back, I'm going to give you all the details of the latest huge, humongous 2IF by T sweepstakes contest, whatever, coming up right after this.
Since we're talking about standards, ladies and gentlemen, on November 10th, the United States Marine Corps turns 236 years old.
And we here at the EIB network and, of course, at 2FBT.com are extremely proud of the men and women that serve this great nation in all branches of the military.
We hear stories every day of families that are separated for months at a time while their husbands, sons, daughters are worlds away defending our country.
That sacrifice that these families endure is immeasurable.
They don't complain.
And we are eternally grateful.
As you know, at 2fbit.com, our sponsor, we sponsor, the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
It's a great charity which provides college scholarships for the children of Marines killed in action.
So we decided that in honor of this important week, including Veterans Day, 2FBIT is hosting a very special sweepstakes.
What we're going to do is send four grand prize-winning couples to Honolulu, Hawaii.
That's right, my friends.
You heard correctly.
Four of you.
Four couples.
Grand Prize sweepstakes winners to Honolulu, Hawaii.
Each grand prize winner will receive a four-night, five-day trip.
This is not, you know, most people would send you out there.
It takes a day to get there, a day to get back, and then we'd give you two days and one overnight.
Not us.
Four-night, five-day trip to Honolulu, including airfare, accommodations, and beautiful Waikiki Tea and credit towards meals.
No, I meant to say it, Waikiki Tea, because it's Two of By Tea.
So you get five days, four nights, Honolulu, Waikiki Tea, airfare, accommodations, and credit towards meals.
Now, these winners will also be able to tour Pearl Harbor, the Pearl Harbor Memorial, the Arizona Memorial.
In addition to the grand prize winners, there'll be 10 second-place winners that will receive a Hawaiian gift basket and a brand new Apple iPod Touch.
And we're not finished because in honor of this week, we're also offering a special price for a limited time, only $19.99 per case, including shipping nationwide.
Normally it's $23.76.
$19.99 per case, includes shipping nationwide, if you use the offer code RUSH.
That's right, my friends.
I mean, you can't, we've outdone ourselves here.
$19.99, including shipping to your front door.
Simply enter Rush as the promo code at checkout.
Think of us, the modern day milkmen.
We deliver it straight to you.
No middleman, nobody else tampering with the product, nobody else messing it up, nobody else getting it away.
We maintain our direct contact with you, our beloved, loyal, and totally appreciative customers.
Now, as I said, 2FIT is a proud sponsor to Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
An incredible organization that gives thousands of dollars in scholarships to the children of fallen heroes that were lost serving our great country.
Folks, it's very simple to enter the sweepstakes, to be automatically entered, simply purchase tea between right now and 11.59 p.m. Pacific on Thursday.
It's a three-day deal here.
To be automatically entered, simply purchase tea between right now and 11.59 p.m. Pacific on Thursday, November 10th.
You can shop 24-7 at 2ifbytea.com or you can call the call center, 866-662-1776.
All the official rules are posted at 2fbit.com.
You go there, check it out.
There for one and all to see.
So just to review, November 10th, the Marine Corps birthday, 236 years old.
Veterans Day coming up as well.
Very, very important week for those of us who honor the U.S. military.
So we're hosting a very special sweepstakes.
Four grand prize-winning couples to Honolulu, Hawaii for five days and four nights.
Includes airfare accommodations in Waikiki tea and credit toward meals.
Also, a Pearl Harbor tour.
Just go to 2FBT.com.
$19.99 special price, including shipping, automatically enters you if you buy a case between now and 11.59 Pacific time on Thursday.
All right, here's Terry in Elkhart, Indiana.
Terry, welcome.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hey, Rush, thanks for letting me on here.
I appreciate your passion for the insanity of this country.
Here's the insanity of Biolex Soundbite this morning talking to her 13-year-old son.
What parent in their right mind sits down with their 13-year-old and fills their head with this stuff and then says, oh, yeah, you're my counselor and my guide.
I guess I better tell on this bad man.
That's insane.
That's insane, Rush.
That is an excellent question, and it further makes my point about the overall decline in this case.
A 13-year-old kid, and the woman gives the 13-year-old kid the details of what happened and then seeks the advice of the 13-year-old.
And the 13-year-old says, I think you should tell any mommy, which would make Obama ear perk up.
Oh, I'll tell you, the leftist brown shirts would love that.
Tattletales galore.
That 13-year-old wasn't even born yet when this incident supposedly happened.
And now all of a sudden she's going to this 13-year-old for the heart-to-heart decision of her life.
Right.
Well, don't forget.
That's crazy.
That's crazy.
Don't forget the fiancé, too.
I mean, the fiancé is all for it.
Isn't even the fiancé didn't know about it before, what, last week?
Fiancé is all for it.
Everybody's all for it.
Axelrod's all for it.
People at gym are all for it.
Everybody's all for it.
It's crazy.
It's crazy.
Thanks for your passion, Rush.
Appreciate it.
You bet.
Well, that actually is an excellent point.
A 13-year-old kid is the arbiter here.
You imagine the mother sits down.
You know, well, here's what that man, pointing to Herman Kane on TV, is what he did to me.
And yeah, what if the kid, mom?
I don't know if you should get involved in this, mom.
I don't know.
Well, but that didn't happen.
We could play if all day.
As Roger Whitaker once sang, I don't believe in if anymore.
Is it the end of it for Kane?
From the New York Times Magazine preview coming up this weekend.
Are you listening?
On the ropes with Herman Kane.
The end of the Kane campaign has been at hand for months, and yet the end doesn't arrive.
And the end isn't about to arrive now either.
Author T.A. Frank, upcoming New York Times magazine.
Snerdly, I know you're up there busy screening calls.
You're not listening.
Gallup is saying that the level of interest in this story is lower than anything they've seen in a long time.
And now with five women, I'm going to tell you what, rather than being the end of Kane, I think what most people are saying is this is getting absurd now.
This is becoming absolutely laughable.
Kane's sought a lot of public positions over his life, and in the last two weeks, all these, all the five women pop up.
I don't know what's going to happen.
I haven't the slightest idea what's going to happen or whether it means the end of things for Herman Kane or not.
Snerdley, I can tell you that it did not mean the end to Bill Clinton.
And it almost didn't mean the end for John Edwards.
If it hadn't been for the National Inquirer, there would still be, and it didn't mean the end for Ted Kennedy.
And it didn't really mean the end of Clarence Thomas, although that's a fine point that I need to be more specific about.
But he got to the court and he's still there.
And he's still laughing at him.
And we'll be back.
Okay, folks, media taking me to task the way I'm pronouncing the name of this poor victim of Herman Kane's lechery, Sharon Bialik.
For example, Karen Costello, my official CNN stalker, this morning on CNN's American Harassment.
I heard yesterday that you were ready for this media onslaught, and it has already begun.
Rush Limbaugh in his program yesterday said some not-so-nice things about you.
He mispronounced your name and he made this not very attractive sound with his mouth.
And I won't explain it to you because it's not really worth it.
But how is that sort of thing feeling to you now?
I expected it, and I still knew I had to come forward.
My biggest concern and my biggest fan is my son.
And actually, the night before that I was about to do this, I called him.
He was with his dad.
And I said, Nick, what do you think I should do?
He knew about this.
He had heard me speaking to Gloria and he said, what do you think I should do?
He's 13.
He said, Mom, you have to do the right thing.
I think you need to tell on him.
So that confirmed it for me.
So there you have everybody, a 13-year-old kid got all of these juicy details.
And by the way, I don't know anything bad about Bialik.
I didn't know anything about her.
All I did was pronounce her name the way Allred did.
And I was right.
Allred pronounced her name two different ways.
Here's soundbite number one.
I'm attorney Gloria Allred, and I'm here today with my client, Sharon Bialik.
Sharon Paws Bialik.
That's how I pronounced it first.
Then, later on, ladies and gentlemen, and about close to seven minutes into the presser, Allred pronounced it a different way.
And now it is my honor to present Sharon Bialik.
No, there you have it.
So she said it, Sharon Bialik, exactly as I was told she said it.
Why didn't Bialik correct Costello when Costello said that I mispronounced her name?
I pronounced her name the way she does, and yet Costello was allowed to besmirch me.
And why is Bialik not correcting the interviewers who are mispronouncing her name now right in front of her?
That was Allred actually pronounced it that way again at the end of the presser.
So she pronounced it by a lick twice.
It's a minor point, but when people start ripping me for getting things, I am in the communication business.
I am a highly trained broadcast specialist.
Pronouncing things right is what I do.
That's why when I don't know how something is pronounced, I go two or three different options because I sometimes haven't heard the way it is pronounced.
But Allred, in the third time, actually hits it very hard to buy a lick.
What sound did I make with my mouth?
I don't know.
We'll have to go back and listen.
I might have made a lick.
But that's just a holdover from Barney Frank theme song.
Who's next?
Kathy in Clarkston, Michigan.
You're next on the Rush Limbaugh program.
Hi.
Hey, Rush.
Thanks for taking my call.
Honor to talk to you.
You bet.
Yeah.
Hey, you know, I just wanted to, your commentary at the beginning of the program about the affluent and the rise in them eating out all the time and how they're spending so much money.
Right.
My take on that is this, Rush.
I have four children.
And from 2 o'clock in the afternoon until probably 9, sometimes later than that, I'm on the road.
And, you know, we are stopping.
We're stopping to eat.
We have to have options.
And I refuse the McDonald's and the Burger Kings and the Taco Bells.
So we're hitting Subway.
We're hitting Panera Bread.
We're hitting Starbucks.
We're hitting somewhere that I feel and that my family feels is better food sources.
Now, let me explain to the audience.
This is an hour and a half ago, what you're reacting to.
The beginning of the program, there were two things.
The New York Times has a story that despite soda pop bans in school, the students are still drinking all these sugary drinks that the band's not working.
And another report that says higher wage earners eat more fast food than the poor.
And that's why Kathy's calling here.
Yeah, that's right.
And, you know, we don't, we refrain from the pops and the soft drinks.
And, you know, I ask my kids get a bottle of water.
You know, typically I have a 24-pack of water in the back of my car or we grab some milk on the run.
So that's, and we're spending between $50 and $100 a week, probably in takeout food that I can, because we're busy.
I have four kids in travel club activities.
Right.
And you obviously call because you consider yourself affluent.
You fit the profile of the story.
Well, you know, we spend a great deal of money for our kids to play these sports.
And I guess if you want to call it that, you know, what's your definition of affluent?
Well, I have no definition of affluent.
I'm just saying you called to explain why the affluent might be eating more fast.
Because it's another one of these myths that the poor are so poor and so bedebled and so without that all they can eat is this rot, gut, poison, fast food, which is a scandal and which is a conspiracy to keep the poor a bunch of fat slobs.
And yet here comes the news that the affluent eat more fast food than the poor do.
And then that motivated you to call to explain why.
Yeah, absolutely.
And all of my four children all know what a carb, a protein, and a fat is.
They know how to read a food label and they know even if they're not with me and they have to stop somewhere with another family, they know the right choices to make.
No, that's good.
That's great.
Yeah.
Well, good for you.
That's my take, you know.
Well, your take is relevant.
Your take matters.
So do you, you who you are.
And I tell you, you don't like your kids drinking sodas like Coke and Pepsi and stuff?
Oh, no.
We don't drink much of it at all.
What about tea?
Don't you let them drink tea?
Yeah, they'll drink a tea occasionally.
But we don't, you know, that type of food, those things don't even come into our house.
If we want to go out for ice cream, we will go out to Dairy Queen or whatever.
We'll get the ice cream, and it doesn't even come into my house.
That's our treat.
Why?
Why do you have to?
Why do you think you have to?
Why do you have to tell everybody, and don't misunderstand, there's not any ice cream in my house.
What does it matter?
You know how much ice cream is in my house, and I don't eat it.
It's there for guests.
I know, but I got a whole freezer full of it.
I can't.
Sometimes I just don't want to eat it myself, so it's kind of a trigger for me.
Aha.
All right.
That makes sense.
Yeah.
Makes total sense.
Well, look, Kathy, I'm glad you called.
I appreciate it.
Thanks for doing your work.
Oh, by the Kathy, you know what I want to do?
I want to send you a case.
No.
You get four crumb crunchers.
I want to send you two cases of Tufby tea.
So I need you to hold on.
Mr. Snerdley will get your address, and we'll ship it out.
You'll get it.
And just, we've got four flavors, regular and raspberry diet and with sugar.
You pick out what you want.
Tell Snerdley what you want.
That's awesome.
Thank you.
That is awesome.
And do not be afraid to have it in the house.
It's out in the garage, Russ.
It's not in the house.
Wherever.
Wherever.
I mean, don't hide it someplace where you have to go get it so nobody will see it.
It's a treat.
All right.
Now, hang on.
Don't hang up.
Okay.
That's Kathy in Clarkston, Michigan.
Here's Jim in College Station, Texas.
Welcome.
Great to have you here.
How are you, my friend?
Very good.
Thank you.
Here's my point.
Followed Herman Kane since I first heard him on your show.
Really excited about his candidacy.
Now not so sure, and here's why.
Even if he's done nothing and all these allegations proved to be false, he has shown really poor judgment.
If you're a man who espouses Christian values, especially if you're a married man, biblical values, you don't allow yourself, Rush, to be in positions where you're alone with women.
You don't pick them up at the airport.
You don't take them to their hotel rooms.
You certainly don't have dinner with them solo.
It's just, and that's what's disappointing to me is it just really shows, at best, lack of judgment on his part or naivety or both.
Or at worst, he's looking for, you know, entertainment.
And I hope that's not the case because I really like Mr. Kane.
But I've got a press conference.
He's going to have to support Newt because it just really shows poor judgment on his part to be alone with women.
He's got a presser at 5 o'clock Eastern this afternoon.
He'll be in Phoenix, and maybe he'll have answers that are sufficient for you.
I hope so.
But I just need to know something.
Yeah.
In your view, as a Christian, is it wrong for a woman to be in a room with a man by herself?
Not a bedroom, not a hotel, just in a room.
Well, the word wrong is, I think, a poor choice of words.
No, that's not a moral issue just to be in a room.
But I was a former executive director of a Christian nonprofit.
Guess what?
All my staff were females, over 30-something volunteers, almost all females.
I travel quite a bit speaking, and I just felt like it was important to build safeguards into my life being married at the time.
Where I was not alone in my office, I didn't counsel young women by myself.
Yeah, why?
Let me ask you a question another day.
Jim!
I'm trying to come on the phone system here.
Jim, let me ask you a question about this.
Seriously, there's no wrong answer here.
I'm not trying to put you on the spot.
That's right.
Have you always been that way, or is that philosophy of yours recent, say, in the last 15 years?
I would think it would fall within the last 15 years.
Yeah, that's my life.
I got married.
I was married for 18 years.
Yeah.
Now, what I'm getting at here is that I'm wondering if just how much societal pressure has inadvertently flexed its muscles on you, as opposed to how you might have behaved before all of this feminazism hit the trail and said what's proper and what isn't proper and all that.
Men and women have been on the earth for a long time, and they've been in rooms together for a long, long, long time.
And only in the last 15 or 20 years has that automatically been wrong.
Just that, without regard for anything that might or might not happen, it's just not right.
Anyway, Jim, I'm glad you called.
I got to take a break here.
We'll be back soon, my friends, before you know it.
All right, Eric Holder is in the news, ladies and gentlemen, Attorney General.
He was on Capitol Hill today during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Justice Department oversight.
And during the Q ⁇ A with Senator John Cornyn, a Republican from Texas, Cornyn said, have you apologized to the family Brian Terry?
That's the border agent who lost his life because of the Justice Department's Fast and Furious program, where we ran guns, Mexican drug cartels from Phoenix gun stores on purpose so as to drum up negative sentiment about guns so that the regime could create energy to wipe out the Second Amendment.
I have no doubt in my mind that's what Fast and Furious is all about.
And in the process of two, what, what?
200 people, 200 guns, whatever, this incredible amount of weaponry that ended up in Mexican drug cartels.
And it was used.
The weapons have been used.
A border agent died.
So Cornyn asked Holder if he had apologized to the family of the border agent.
I have not apologized to them, but I certainly regret what happened.
Have you even talked to them?
I have not.
Would you like to apologize today for this program that went so wrong that took the life of a United States law enforcement agent?
I certainly regret what happened to Agent Brian Terry.
It pains me whenever there is the death of a law enforcement official, especially under the circumstances that this occurred.
It is not fair, however, to assume that the mistakes that happened in Fast and Furious directly led to the death of Agent Terry.
It isn't.
The hell you say.
Well, we don't have to assume because we know at least 2,000 guns were sent from the U.S. to Mexico during Fast and Furious.
Anyway, here we are.
We are talking about Herman Cain and what he said to people in the 90s.
And meanwhile, we got this running the Justice Department.
And we got Eric Holder and Obama running guns to Mexico.
And speaking of Herman Kane, Herman Kane headed the Restaurant Association.
Restaurant, you know, where you go and order food at a table.
And so Herman Kane, who heads the Restaurant Association, shouldn't have adult beverages or dinner with a woman or women because he puts himself in an awkward position.
I don't think I could pass muster.
But you've got women all over male locker rooms in the world of sport.
You now have women trainers at the high school and college level under the guise of majoring in training or sports injuryitis or whatever.
But they're in the locker rooms.
They're teenage girls and they're running around in the locker rooms.
How about a female CEO or manager having drinks with a man or men?
Hmm.
I mean, I don't know.
Pick you name of a female CEO.
What comes to mind?
Does one, Carly Fiorina, Meg Whitman, think they ever had drinks with men, board of directors, what have you, while the husband's at home doing whatever the husband does at home, while a female CEO is CEOing?
I don't know.
I mean, just the questions I have here double-standard.
By the way, ladies and gentlemen, New York Times, we're going back here to September 13th, 1998.
New York Daily News, sorry, Helen Kennedy, New York Daily News staff writer.
President Clinton is revealed in the Star Report as a sexual glutton who rashly put the fate of his presidency in the hands of a 22-year-old star-struck intern with an admitted tendency to babble.
But he also comes across as a man struggling to avoid temptation, lavishing his young lover with attention and gifts.
And in the story, I've got short time here.
Let me just cut to the chase, the pull quote of the story.
They want a strategy, and all agree Clinton was the best.
With Lewinsky, Clinton said he would have never approached the White House job applicant Kathleen Willie because she had small breasts.
So Herman Kane, one of the, you could refute this.
The media wants a great strategy for you.
Just employ what Clinton did, your press conference.
He says, I never approached this Bialik or Bialik or whatever.
Breasts are too big.
I don't like big-breasted women.
I would have never done this.
And the press will exonerate you, just as they did Clinton.
Okay, we got another exciting big broadcast hour still to go, ladies and gentlemen, here on the EIB network and the Rush Limbaugh program, the fastest three hours in media.
And we'll be trying to squeeze as many of your phone calls in as we can in the next hour.
Good telephone number to make a note, 800-282-2882.
Sit tight.
▲
Export Selection